Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 129 views

    Clemente Guillen Lopez

    Uploaded by

    masondesudcalifornia
    The document is an order of detention pending trial for Clemente Guillen-Lopez. The judge found by a preponderance of evidence that Guillen-Lopez is a serious flight risk and ordered his detention. Specifically, the judge found that Guillen-Lopez is not a US citizen, is in the US illegally, and faces removal proceedings if released, placing him beyond the court's jurisdiction. The judge also noted Guillen-Lopez has no significant contacts in the US or Arizona.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Clemente Guillen Lopez

    Uploaded by

    masondesudcalifornia
    129 views1 page
    The document is an order of detention pending trial for Clemente Guillen-Lopez. The judge found by a preponderance of evidence that Guillen-Lopez is a serious flight risk and ordered his detention. Specifically, the judge found that Guillen-Lopez is not a US citizen, is in the US illegally, and faces removal proceedings if released, placing him beyond the court's jurisdiction. The judge also noted Guillen-Lopez has no significant contacts in the US or Arizona.

    Original Description:

    Clemente Guillen-Lopez

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document is an order of detention pending trial for Clemente Guillen-Lopez. The judge found by a preponderance of evidence that Guillen-Lopez is a serious flight risk and ordered his detention. Specifically, the judge found that Guillen-Lopez is not a US citizen, is in the US illegally, and faces removal proceedings if released, placing him beyond the court's jurisdiction. The judge also noted Guillen-Lopez has no significant contacts in the US or Arizona.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    129 views1 page

    Clemente Guillen Lopez

    Uploaded by

    masondesudcalifornia
    The document is an order of detention pending trial for Clemente Guillen-Lopez. The judge found by a preponderance of evidence that Guillen-Lopez is a serious flight risk and ordered his detention. Specifically, the judge found that Guillen-Lopez is not a US citizen, is in the US illegally, and faces removal proceedings if released, placing him beyond the court's jurisdiction. The judge also noted Guillen-Lopez has no significant contacts in the US or Arizona.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    Case 2:14-mj-01751-JFM Document 3 Filed 07/22/14 Page 1 of 1

    WO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


    DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
    United States of America ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING TRIAL
    v.
    Clemente Guillen-Lopez Case Number: 14-01751M-001
    In accordance with the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. 3142(f), a detention hearing has been submitted. Defendant was present
    and was represented by counsel. I conclude by a preponderance of the evidence the defendant is a serious flight risk and order
    the detention of the defendant pending trial in this case.
    FINDINGS OF FACT
    I find by a preponderance of the evidence that:
    : The defendant is not a citizen of the United States or lawfully admitted for permanent residence.
    : The defendant, at the time of the charged offense, was in the United States illegally.
    : If released herein, the defendant faces removal proceedings by the Bureau of Immigration and Customs
    Enforcement, placing him/her beyond the jurisdiction of this Court and the defendant has previously been
    deported or otherwise removed.
    9 The defendant has no significant contacts in the United States or in the District of Arizona.
    9 The defendant has no resources in the United States from which he/she might make a bond reasonably
    calculated to assure his/her future appearance.
    : The defendant has a prior criminal history.
    9 The defendant lives/works in Mexico.
    9 The defendant is an amnesty applicant but has no substantial ties in Arizona or in the United States and has
    substantial family ties to Mexico.
    9 There is a record of prior failure to appear in court as ordered.
    9 The defendant attempted to evade law enforcement contact by fleeing from law enforcement.
    9 The defendant is facing a maximum of years imprisonment.
    9
    The Court incorporates by reference the material findings of the Pretrial Services Agency which were reviewed by the
    Court at the time of the hearing in this matter, except as noted in the record.
    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
    1. There is a serious risk that the defendant will flee.
    2. No condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required.
    DIRECTIONS REGARDING DETENTION
    The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General or his/her designated representative for confinement
    in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody
    pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. On
    order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, the person in charge of the corrections
    facility shall deliver the defendant to the United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court
    proceeding. APPEALS AND THIRD PARTY RELEASE
    IT IS ORDERED that should an appeal of this detention order be filed with the District Court, it is counsel's responsibility
    to deliver a copy of the motion for review/reconsideration to Pretrial Services at least one day prior to the hearing set before the
    District Court. Pursuant to Rule 59(a), FED.R.CRIM.P., effective December 1, 2009, Defendant shall have fourteen (14) days
    from the date of service of a copy of this order or after the oral order is stated on the record within which to file specific written
    objections with the district court. Failure to timely file objections in accordance with Rule 59(a) may waive the right to review.
    59(a), FED.R.CRIM.P.
    IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if a release to a third party is to be considered, it is counsel's responsibility to notify
    Pretrial Services sufficiently in advance of the hearing before the District Court to allow Pretrial Services an opportunity to
    interview and investigate the potential third party custodian.
    DATE: July 21, 2014
    JOHN A. BUTTRICK
    United States Magistrate Judge

    Page 1 of 1

    You might also like