Case+Studies Der
Case+Studies Der
Case+Studies Der
Chester Midway, CFA, is a portfolio manager for Pacific Capital, a hedge fund which invests in debt,
equity and related derivatives securities. Midway is reviewing several investment recommendations
from his research staff with respect to Yorktown Carrier Corporation.
Midway believes that Yorktowns stock price will increase over the next six months, but he does not
want to purchase the stock today. In order to protect against the stock price rising over the next six
months, Midway is considering a forward purchase. Yorktowns common stock currently trades at $100
per share and is expected to pay quarterly dividends of $0.75 per share with the next dividend payment
expected 90 days from today. To evaluate this transaction, Midway uses the data provided in Exhibit 1.
Exhibit 1
Risk Free Interest Rates
Maturity Rate
3 months 0.50%
6 months 0.50%
1 year 1.00%
Michael Edwards, an equity analyst at Pacific, believes that call options are an alternative approach to
establishing a long position in Yorktown stock. The current market price of a six month put option with a
strike price of $100.00 is $5.35.
Midway asks Edwards if there are ways to measure the risk of option positions. Edwards responds by
stating that numerical risk measures such as delta and gamma are used by investors to monitor the price
relationship between a call option and the underlying stock. Edwards makes the following statements:
Midway has analyzed Yorktowns recent price history and estimates that historical volatility is 30%. He
uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to observe that the volatility implied by the market prices of
Yorktown options is 20%. Midways forecast is that Yorktowns price volatility will remain at 30%.
Midway recommends buying put options and selling call options in order to profit from his view on the
volatility for Yorktowns stock relative to the market consensus.
Jim Frank is Pacifics fixed income analyst. He has analyzed Yorktowns balance sheet, and is meeting
with the companys treasurer. He asks the treasurer if Yorktowns stock price may be adversely affected
by rising interest rates given the high level of floating rate debt within its capital structure. Frank,
however, believes that interest rates will not rise. The treasurer tells him that Yorktown could consider
interest rate swaptions which hedge against a rise in rates but which simultaneously provides the
flexibility to not engage in the swap should rates not rise.
Frank has evaluated Yorktowns senior debt and its credit default swaps (CDS). Frank has a positive
outlook regarding Yorktowns credit condition over the next two years but is concerned about
Yorktowns longer term (5 years) credit outlook based on secular trends within Yorktowns industry.
7. The six month forward price on Yorktown stock that Midway should expect to pay is closest to:
A. $98.50.
B. $98.75.
C. $99.00.
8. Based on Exhibit 1 and put-call parity, the price of a 6-month call option with a strike price of
$100.00 on Yorktown stock is closest to:
A. $5.10.
B. $5.60.
C. $5.85.
A. Statement 1.
B. Statement 2.
C. Statement 3.
10. Holding all of the other components of the Black-Scholes model constant, Midways put and call
strategy to exploit volatility is most likely incorrect because:
11. Which interest rate hedge instrument is most suitable for Yorktown given Franks assessment of
Yorktowns interest rate exposure and his view on interest rates:
A. Payer Swaption
B. Receiver Swaption
C. Plain Vanilla Swap
12. Given Franks credit evaluation of Yorktown, which CDS strategy is most appropriate for Pacific?
Chester Midway, CFA, is a portfolio manager for Pacific Capital, a hedge fund which invests in debt,
equity and related derivatives securities. Midway is reviewing several investment recommendations
from his research staff with respect to Yorktown Carrier Corporation.
Midway believes that Yorktowns stock price will increase over the next six months, but he does not
want to purchase the stock today. In order to protect against the stock price rising over the next six
months, Midway is considering a forward purchase. Yorktowns common stock currently trades at $100
per share and is expected to pay quarterly dividends of $0.75 per share with the next dividend payment
expected 90 days from today. To evaluate this transaction, Midway uses the data provided in Exhibit 1.
Exhibit 1
Risk Free Interest Rates
Maturity Rate
3 months 0.50%
6 months 0.50%
1 year 1.00%
Michael Edwards, an equity analyst at Pacific, believes that call options are an alternative approach to
establishing a long position in Yorktown stock. The current market price of a six month put option with a
strike price of $100.00 is $5.35.
Midway asks Edwards if there are ways to measure the risk of option positions. Edwards responds by
stating that numerical risk measures such as delta and gamma are used by investors to monitor the price
relationship between a call option and the underlying stock. Edwards makes the following statements:
Midway has analyzed Yorktowns recent price history and estimates that historical volatility is 30%. He
uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to observe that the volatility implied by the market prices of
Yorktown options is 20%. Midways forecast is that Yorktowns price volatility will remain at 30%.
Midway recommends buying put options and selling call options in order to profit from his view on the
volatility for Yorktowns stock relative to the market consensus.
Jim Frank is Pacifics fixed income analyst. He has analyzed Yorktowns balance sheet, and is meeting
with the companys treasurer. He asks the treasurer if Yorktowns stock price may be adversely affected
by rising interest rates given the high level of floating rate debt within its capital structure. Frank,
however, believes that interest rates will not rise. The treasurer tells him that Yorktown could consider
interest rate swaptions which hedge against a rise in rates but which simultaneously provides the
flexibility to not engage in the swap should rates not rise.
Frank has evaluated Yorktowns senior debt and its credit default swaps (CDS). Frank has a positive
outlook regarding Yorktowns credit condition over the next two years but is concerned about
Yorktowns longer term (5 years) credit outlook based on secular trends within Yorktowns industry.
7. The six month forward price on Yorktown stock that Midway should expect to pay is closest to:
A. $98.50.
B. $98.75.
C. $99.00.
Answer = B
B is correct because
Forward Price = (Stock Price Present value of dividends over life of contract) X (1+r)T
98.75 = (100 - .7491 - .7481) (1.005) (180/360)
Where:
PV D1 = (.75) / (1+.005)90/360 = .7491
PV D2 = (.75) / (1+.005)180/360 = .7481
8. Based on Exhibit 1 and put-call parity, the price of a 6-month call option with a strike price of
$100.00 on Yorktown stock is closest to:
A. $5.10.
B. $5.60.
C. $5.85.
Answer = B
B is correct:
Call value = Short Bond + Put + Stock
= -$100/(1.005) (180/360) + $5.35 + $100.00 = $5.60
9. Which of Edwards statements to Midway regarding options is mostly likely correct:
A. Statement 1.
B. Statement 2.
C. Statement 3.
Answer = C
C is correct because Gamma is larger when there is more uncertainty about whether the option
will expire in- or out-of-the-money.
10. Holding all of the other components of the Black-Scholes model constant, Midways put and call
strategy to exploit volatility is most likely incorrect because:
Answer = A
A is correct because Pacific will want to purchase Call Options and Put Options, since both will
increase in value should Implied Volatility rise to match the level of historical volatility.
11. Which interest rate hedge instrument is most suitable for Yorktown given Franks assessment of
Yorktowns interest rate exposure and his view on interest rates:
A. Payer Swaption
B. Receiver Swaption
C. Plain Vanilla Swap
Answer = A
Derivative Markets and Instruments, Don M. Chance
2011 Modular Level II, Vol. 6 p. 283
Study Session 17-63-f
Explain and interpret the characteristics and uses of swaptions, including the difference
between payer and receiver swaptions.
A is correct because entering into a Payer Swaption provides a simultaneous benefit - Yorktown
owns the option to enter into a pay fixed swap should rates increase but it may choose not to
enter into the pay fixed swap should rates not increase.
12. Given Franks credit evaluation of Yorktown, which CDS strategy is most appropriate for Pacific?
Answer = B
B is correct because Pacific will collect CDS income over the first three years (when
creditworthiness is projected to be OK) but will benefit from owning credit protection via the
CDS between year 3 and 5. This strategy is known as a steepener.
Meredith Whitney Case Scenario
Meredith Whitney is a senior consultant in the Swaps Advisory Group of DCM Capital, an independent
advisory firm. Whitney will be meeting with three clients who need advice on structuring and
implementing swap programs to manage their interest rate exposures.
For her meetings, Whitney plans to use the data presented in Exhibit 1 below.
Exhibit 1
Current Term Structure of Rates (%)
Days LIBOR EURIBOR HIBOR
90 1.42 1.86 1.22
180 1.84 2.11 1.53
270 2.12 2.24 1.70
360 3.42 2.34 1.87
Note: LIBOR is the London Interbank Offer rate. EURIBOR is Euro Interbank Offer Rate. HIBOR is
the Hong Kong Interbank Offer rate. All rates shown are annualized.
Whitneys first meeting is with Novatel, a U.S. based company that currently has an outstanding loan of
$250,000,000 that carries a 5.15% fixed interest rate. Novatels managers feel that the current interest
rate on the loan is high and they also believe that interest rates are poised to decline. Whitney advises
Novatel to enter into a one-year pay floating LIBOR receive fixed interest rate swap with quarterly
payments. The notional principal on the swap will be $250,000,000.
Novatel has asked Whitney to provide recommendations on how it can terminate the swap. Whitney
outlines three options:
Option 1: A cash settlement with the counterparty.
Option 2: Enter into a payer swaption
Option 3: Enter into a receiver swaption.
Next, Whitney meets with Grand Manufacturing. This client is based in Hong Kong but requires a
25,000,000 one-year bridge loan to fund operations in Germany. Grand manufacturing is currently
able to borrow Euros at an interest rate of 3.75%, but wonders if there is a less expensive alternative.
Whitney advises Grand to borrow in HK$ and enter into a one-year foreign currency swap with quarterly
payments to pay Euros at a fixed rate of 2.32% and receive HK$ at a fixed rate of 1.84%. The current
exchange rate is HK$11.42 per 1.
The final meeting is with KPS Financial Services, a U.S. based asset manager. KPS wants to increase the
equity exposure to the U.S. market in one of its portfolios by $100,000,000. Whitney advises KPS to
enter into a one-year equity swap with quarterly payments to receive the return on a U.S stock index
and pay a floating LIBOR interest rate. The current value of the U.S. stock index is 925.
Each client follows Whitneys advice and immediately implements the recommended position.
Forty five days have passed since Whitneys initial meetings and in the interim a worldwide financial
crisis has caused interest rates to rise dramatically. Whitneys clients have asked to meet with her to
review their positions.
In order to prepare for the meeting Whitney has obtained updated interest rate data that is presented
in Exhibit 2. In addition, she notes that the exchange rate for the Hong Kong dollar is HK$9.96 per 1 and
the U.S. stock index is at 905.
Exhibit 2
Term Structure of Rates 45 Days Later (%)
Days LIBOR EURIBOR HIBOR
90 2.21 2.94 1.95
180 2.62 3.03 2.45
270 3.73 3.08 2.70
360 4.92 4.15 3.85
Note: LIBOR is the London Interbank Offer rate. EURIBOR is Euro Interbank Offer Rate. HIBOR is
the Hong Kong Interbank Offer rate. All rates shown are annualized.
7. Using data in Exhibit 1, the annualized fixed rate of the swap recommended by Whitney for
Novatel is closest to:
A. 2.22%
B. 3.36%
C. 5.15%
8. Using data in Exhibit 2, the market value of Novatels swap after 45 days is closest to:
A. -$2,875,000
B. -$2,250,000
C. -$718,750
9. With regard to the recommendations for the termination of Novatels swap position, Whitney is
least likely correct with respect to:
A. option 1.
B. option 2.
C. option 3.
10. Using data in Exhibit 2, the market value of Grand Manufacturings swap after 45 days is closest
to:
A. HK$1,313,300
B. HK$35,402,000
C. HK$36,500,000
11. Using data in Exhibit 2, the market value of KPS Financial Services swap after 45 days is closest
to:
A. -$4,372,000
B. -$2,232,000
C. -$2,162,000
12. At what point in the swaps life is the credit risk with respect to KPS Financial Services swap
position most likely the highest?
A. End
B. Middle
C. Beginning
Meredith Whitney Case Scenario
Meredith Whitney is a senior consultant in the Swaps Advisory Group of DCM Capital, an independent
advisory firm. Whitney will be meeting with three clients who need advice on structuring and
implementing swap programs to manage their interest rate exposures.
For her meetings, Whitney plans to use the data presented in Exhibit 1 below.
Exhibit 1
Current Term Structure of Rates (%)
Days LIBOR EURIBOR HIBOR
90 1.42 1.86 1.22
180 1.84 2.11 1.53
270 2.12 2.24 1.70
360 3.42 2.34 1.87
Note: LIBOR is the London Interbank Offer rate. EURIBOR is Euro Interbank Offer Rate. HIBOR is
the Hong Kong Interbank Offer rate. All rates shown are annualized.
Whitneys first meeting is with Novatel, a U.S. based company that currently has an outstanding loan of
$250,000,000 that carries a 5.15% fixed interest rate. Novatels managers feel that the current interest
rate on the loan is high and they also believe that interest rates are poised to decline. Whitney advises
Novatel to enter into a one-year pay floating LIBOR receive fixed interest rate swap with quarterly
payments. The notional principal on the swap will be $250,000,000.
Novatel has asked Whitney to provide recommendations on how it can terminate the swap. Whitney
outlines three options:
Option 1: A cash settlement with the counterparty.
Option 2: Enter into a payer swaption
Option 3: Enter into a receiver swaption.
Next, Whitney meets with Grand Manufacturing. This client is based in Hong Kong but requires a
25,000,000 one-year bridge loan to fund operations in Germany. Grand manufacturing is currently
able to borrow Euros at an interest rate of 3.75%, but wonders if there is a less expensive alternative.
Whitney advises Grand to borrow in HK$ and enter into a one-year foreign currency swap with quarterly
payments to pay Euros at a fixed rate of 2.32% and receive HK$ at a fixed rate of 1.84%. The current
exchange rate is HK$11.42 per 1.
The final meeting is with KPS Financial Services, a U.S. based asset manager. KPS wants to increase the
equity exposure to the U.S. market in one of its portfolios by $100,000,000. Whitney advises KPS to
enter into a one-year equity swap with quarterly payments to receive the return on a U.S stock index
and pay a floating LIBOR interest rate. The current value of the U.S. stock index is 925.
Each client follows Whitneys advice and immediately implements the recommended position.
Forty five days have passed since Whitneys initial meetings and in the interim a worldwide financial
crisis has caused interest rates to rise dramatically. Whitneys clients have asked to meet with her to
review their positions.
In order to prepare for the meeting Whitney has obtained updated interest rate data that is presented
in Exhibit 2. In addition, she notes that the exchange rate for the Hong Kong dollar is HK$9.96 per 1 and
the U.S. stock index is at 905.
Exhibit 2
Term Structure of Rates 45 Days Later (%)
Days LIBOR EURIBOR HIBOR
90 2.21 2.94 1.95
180 2.62 3.03 2.45
270 3.73 3.08 2.70
360 4.92 4.15 3.85
Note: LIBOR is the London Interbank Offer rate. EURIBOR is Euro Interbank Offer Rate. HIBOR is
the Hong Kong Interbank Offer rate. All rates shown are annualized.
7. Using data in Exhibit 1, the annualized fixed rate of the swap recommended by Whitney for
Novatel is closest to:
A. 2.22%
B. 3.36%
C. 5.15%
Answer = B
8. Using data in Exhibit 2, the market value of Novatels swap after 45 days is closest to:
A. -$2,875,000
B. -$2,250,000
C. -$718,750
Answer = B
B is correct. Per $1 of notional principal the present value of the fixed payments
= (0.0084) (0.9972 + 0.9903 + 0.9772 + 0.9587) + (1 0.9587) = 0.9917. Note that the
payments now occur in 45, 135, 225 and 315 days.
Per $1 the present value of the floating payments = present value of first floating payment + the
present value of future floating payments
= ((.0142 90/360) + 1) (0.9972) = 1.0007
The market value of the pay floating receive fixed rate swap = $250,000,000 (0.9917 1.0007)
= -$2,250,000
9. With regard to the recommendations for the termination of Novatels swap position, Whitney is
least likely correct with respect to:
A. option 1.
B. option 2.
C. option 3.
Answer = C
C is correct. A receiver swaption cannot be used to terminate a pay floating receive fixed swap.
10. Using data in Exhibit 2, the market value of Grand Manufacturings swap after 45 days is closest
to:
A. HK$1,313,300
B. HK$35,402,000
C. HK$36,500,000
Answer = B
B is correct. Initially, Grand receives 25,000,000 and pays HK$285,500,000 based on the
current exchange rate of HK$11.42 per euro. We are told that Grand will pay an interest rate of
2.32% on the euro and receive 1.84% on the Hong Kong dollar.
Forty five days into the swap:
Per HK$1 of notional principal the present value of the fixed payments received on the Hong
dollar
= (0.0046) (0.9976 + 0.9909 + 0.9834 + 0.9674) + (1 0.9674) = 0.9855
Per 1 of notional principal the present value of the fixed payments paid on the euro
= (0.0058) (0.9963 + 0.9888 + 0.9811 + 0.9650) + (1 0.9650) = 0.9878
Note that based on the exchange rate of HK$11.42 the actual notional principal = 111.42 =
0.08757
The present value of euro fixed payments = 0.9878 0.08757 = 0.08649
The present value of euro fixed payments in HK$ = 0.08649 9.96 = 0.8615
The market value of the swap = 285,500,000 (0.9855 0.8615) = HK$35,402,000
11. Using data in Exhibit 2, the market value of KPS Financial Services swap after 45 days is closest
to:
A. -$4,372,000
B. -$2,232,000
C. -$2,162,000
Answer = B
B is correct. The market value of the swap per $ notional principal = value of $1 investment in
equity - present value of floating payment.
Value of $1 investment in equity = 905 925 = 0.97838
Per $1 the present value of the floating payments = present value of first floating payment + the
present value of future floating payments
= ((.0142 90/360) + 1) (0.9972) = 1.0007
Market value of swap = (0.97838 1.0007) $100,000,000 = -$2,232,000
12. At what point in the swaps life is the credit risk with respect to KPS Financial Services swap
position most likely the highest?
A. End
B. Middle
C. Beginning
Answer = B
2011 Modular Level II, Vol. 6, p. 288
Study Session 17-63-i
Evaluate swap credit risk for each party and during the life of the swap, distinguish between
current credit risk and potential credit risk, and illustrate how swap credit risk is reduced by
both netting and marking to market.
B is correct. Interest rate and equity swaps do not involve an exchange of principal. Therefore,
credit risk is greater during the middle of the life of these swaps. KPS Financial has entered into
an equity swap, so the credit risk is higher during the middle of its life.
Questions 49 through 54 relate to Derivative Investments.
Ravi Baloo is a portfolio manager with Springtree Investments, a U.S.-based asset management
firm. Baloo is considering using derivatives to enhance returns and manage risk. He asks his
junior analyst, Thomas Monk, to help him.
In Exhibit 1, Monk summarizes the relationship between an increase in the value of each of the
listed inputs and the value of a European-style call option, holding all else constant.
Exhibit 1
Effect of Increasing Input Values on European Call Option Values
Effect on
Input
Call Option Value
Exercise price Decrease
Risk-free rate Decrease
Time to expiration Increase
Volatility of the underlying Increase
Monk wonders about the delta and gamma of a long call option position. Monk makes the
following statements:
Transaction 1: Arbitrage Strategy on Acuriva Ltd. (ACT) Equity. Exhibit 2 provides current
market prices and data of selected instruments related to ACT equity.
Exhibit 2
Current Market Prices and Data
Security Price
European call option on ACT equity $2.25
European put option on ACT equity $3.40
ACT equity price $33.66
Time to expiration of options 3 months
Exercise price of options $35.00
Annualized risk-free rate 6.00%
Monk determines that the value of a synthetic call option expiring in 3 months with an exercise
price of $35.00 is $2.58.
Transaction 2: Purchase of a European put option on Tekvonix (TVX) equity. Monk uses a one-
period binomial model to calculate the value of a one-year put option on TVX equity. Details of
the put option are given in Exhibit 3.
Exhibit 3
European Put Option on TVX Equity
Time to expiration 1 year
TVX equity price $52
Exercise price $45
Model predicted up move 15%
Model predicted down move 20%
Annualized risk-free rate 6.00%
Transaction 3: Equity swap to gain exposure to the Russell 2000 index. Springtree enters into a
two-year equity swap in which it will receive the rate of return on the Russell 2000 Index and
will pay a fixed interest rate equal to 4.99 percent. The swap has annual payments. The Russell
2000 Index is at 757.09 at the beginning of the swap and the notional principal of the swap is
$100 million.
Transaction 4: Baloo expects to enter a pay-fixed position in a 4-year interest rate swap in six
months. He asks Monk to explain how a swaption can be used to protect Springtree from an
adverse change in interest rates. Monk makes the following statements:
Monk considers a scenario in which the Russell 2000 Index falls to 723.86 in 100 days and the
term structure of interest rates is as presented in Exhibit 4.
Exhibit 4
Term Structure of LIBOR Interest Rates 100 Days Later
Days (T) (T) (T)
260 0.0442 0.9691
620 0.0499 0.9209
Note: Calculations are on a 360-day basis. T = Time to expiration;
(T) = LIBOR rate to time T; (T) = Discount factor of $1 from time
T to the present.
Monk states, The value of this equity swap is the amount of money that is exchanged on the
annual payment date.
A. Volatility
B. Risk-free rate
C. Exercise price
50. Which of Baloos statements regarding the delta and gamma of a call option is correct?
A. Statement 1
B. Statement 2
C. Statement 3
A. selling the put option in the market and buying the equity.
B. selling the put option in the market and shorting the equity.
C. buying the put option in the market and shorting the equity.
52. The value of the one-year put option in Transaction 2 is closest to:
A. $0.83.
B. $1.70.
C. $2.38.
53. Given Monks scenario, the market value of Transaction 3 is closest to:
A. $5,910,000.
B. $3,070,000.
C. -$1,070,000.
54. Which of the statements Monk makes with respect to Transaction 4 is incorrect?
A. Statement 4
B. Statement 5
C. Statement 6
Questions 49 through 54 relate to Derivative Investments.
Ravi Baloo is a portfolio manager with Springtree Investments, a U.S.-based asset management
firm. Baloo is considering using derivatives to enhance returns and manage risk. He asks his
junior analyst, Thomas Monk, to help him.
In Exhibit 1, Monk summarizes the relationship between an increase in the value of each of the
listed inputs and the value of a European-style call option, holding all else constant.
Exhibit 1
Effect of Increasing Input Values on European Call Option Values
Effect on
Input
Call Option Value
Exercise price Decrease
Risk-free rate Decrease
Time to expiration Increase
Volatility of the underlying Increase
Monk wonders about the delta and gamma of a long call option position. Monk makes the
following statements:
Transaction 1: Arbitrage Strategy on Acuriva Ltd. (ACT) Equity. Exhibit 2 provides current
market prices and data of selected instruments related to ACT equity.
Exhibit 2
Current Market Prices and Data
Security Price
European call option on ACT equity $2.25
European put option on ACT equity $3.40
ACT equity price $33.66
Time to expiration of options 3 months
Exercise price of options $35.00
Annualized risk-free rate 6.00%
Monk determines that the value of a synthetic call option expiring in 3 months with an exercise
price of $35.00 is $2.58.
Transaction 2: Purchase of a European put option on Tekvonix (TVX) equity. Monk uses a one-
period binomial model to calculate the value of a one-year put option on TVX equity. Details of
the put option are given in Exhibit 3.
Exhibit 3
European Put Option on TVX Equity
Time to expiration 1 year
TVX equity price $52
Exercise price $45
Model predicted up move 15%
Model predicted down move 20%
Annualized risk-free rate 6.00%
Transaction 3: Equity swap to gain exposure to the Russell 2000 index. Springtree enters into a
two-year equity swap in which it will receive the rate of return on the Russell 2000 Index and
will pay a fixed interest rate equal to 4.99 percent. The swap has annual payments. The Russell
2000 Index is at 757.09 at the beginning of the swap and the notional principal of the swap is
$100 million.
Transaction 4: Baloo expects to enter a pay-fixed position in a 4-year interest rate swap in six
months. He asks Monk to explain how a swaption can be used to protect Springtree from an
adverse change in interest rates. Monk makes the following statements:
Monk considers a scenario in which the Russell 2000 Index falls to 723.86 in 100 days and the
term structure of interest rates is as presented in Exhibit 4.
Exhibit 4
Term Structure of LIBOR Interest Rates 100 Days Later
Days (T) L0(T) B0(T)
260 0.0442 0.9691
620 0.0499 0.9209
Note: Calculations are on a 360-day basis. T = Time to expiration;
L0(T) = LIBOR rate to time T; B0(T) = Discount factor of $1 from
time T to the present.
Monk states, The value of this equity swap is the amount of money that is exchanged on the
annual payment date.
A. Volatility
B. Risk-free rate
C. Exercise price
Answer: B
50. Which of Baloos statements regarding the delta and gamma of a call option is correct?
A. Statement 1
B. Statement 2
C. Statement 3
Answer: A
A. selling the put option in the market and buying the equity.
B. selling the put option in the market and shorting the equity.
C. buying the put option in the market and shorting the equity.
Answer: B
The synthetic call (long put, long underlying and short bond) is more expensive than the
market price thus the call is under priced in the market. Using put-call parity, Baloo should
buy the call in the market and sell the synthetic call. Thus the correct arbitrage transaction
(see put-call parity formula below) is to buy the call and sell the put, short the equity, and
buy the bond.
Put-call parity: co + X/(1 + r)T = po + So
co current price of call option with exercise price X, expiring in T years
X exercise price
r risk-free rate
po current price of put option with exercise price X, expiring in T years
So current equity price
52. The value of the one-year put option in Transaction 2 is closest to:
A. $0.83.
B. $1.70.
C. $2.38.
Answer: A
53. Given Monks scenario, the market value of Transaction 3 is closest to:
A. $5,910,000.
B. $3,070,000.
C. -$1,070,000.
Answer: A
=((723.86/757.09)-0.9209-0.0499*(0.9691+0.9209))*100,000,000= -$5,910,000
54. Which of the statements Monk makes with respect to Transaction 4 is incorrect?
A. Statement 4
B. Statement 5
C. Statement 6
Answer: B
The exercise rate on a payer swaption is the fixed rate at which the holder can enter a pay-
fixed position in a swap, if it chooses.
Robyn Lawrence Case Scenario
Robyn Lawrence is a senior quantitative analyst in the Global Derivatives Group of Ridgeview Capital, an
investment management firm based in New York City. Lawrence is conducting a training session for two
recently hired analysts, Wilma Kaplan and Anita Mehra. At the meeting, Kaplan and Mehra are asked
questions about the Berkeley Corporation and are provided with the information in Exhibit 1.
Exhibit 1
Stock and Options Data for Berkeley Corporation
and Risk-Free Interest Rate
Current Call Price $2.30
Current Put Price $4.70
Exercise Price $130.00
Days to Expiration* 60
Current Stock Price $128.55
Up Move on Stock 15%
Down Move on Stock 10%
Risk-Free Interest Rate 3%
*Note: Assume a 365-day year.
Statement 1:
You have both been asked to use the information provided in Exhibit 1 to perform certain calculations.
One of your tasks was to calculate the synthetic values of call and put options for Berkeley Corporation.
Can one of you tell me why it is useful to construct and value synthetic calls and puts?
Kaplan responds, Deriving synthetic values enables us to determine whether it is possible to earn
arbitrage profits. For example, if we find that the current call price is greater than the synthetic call price
then we could earn an arbitrage profit by carrying out the following transactions: selling the call,
purchasing the put, and taking short positions in the stock and the bond.
The discussion then moves on to the BlackScholesMerton option pricing model. Lawrence states: The
BlackScholesMerton option pricing model is based on a number of assumptions, including: underlying
prices follow a lognormal probability distribution, the risk-free rate is known and constant, there are no
cash flows on the underlying, and the options being priced are European options. What are the other
assumptions of this model? Kaplan responds:
The other assumptions of the model are:
Lawrence continues the discussion: In the BlackScholesMerton model, option prices for European
calls and puts are impacted by a number of variables, including time to expiration, volatility, and the
risk-free rate. Can one of you explain the effect of changes in these variables on the prices of European
call and put options?
Mehra responds: Call and put prices are higher when volatility is higher, and call and put prices are
lower for higher risk-free rates. However, while call options are higher for longer time to expiration, put
option prices can be higher or lower the longer the time to expiration.
Statement 2:
An important option Greek that you should be familiar with is the option delta, because traders can use
this to construct hedges to offset the risks of their option positions. You should note that for in-the-
money call and put options, delta approaches 1 as the option moves toward expiration.
7. Based on the information provided for the Berkeley Corporation in Exhibit 1, the price of a
synthetic 60-day call option with a $130.00 strike price is closest to:
A. $3.25
B. $3.88
C. $5.52
A. correct.
B. incorrect with regard to purchasing the put.
C. incorrect with regard to taking a short position in the stock.
9. Based on the information in Exhibit 1 and using a one-period binomial model, the value of a 60-
day Berkeley Corporation call option with a strike of $130.00, is closest to:
A. $6.67.
B. $8.31.
10. Kaplans response to Lawrence regarding the assumptions of the BlackScholesMerton model
is least likely correct with respect to:
A. Assumption 1.
B. Assumption 2.
C. Assumption 3.
11. Mehras response to Lawrence is least likely correct with respect to the impact on call and put
prices of:
A. volatility.
B. the risk-free rate.
C. time to expiration.
A. Yes.
B. No, she is incorrect with respect to calls.
C. No, she is incorrect with respect to puts.
Robyn Lawrence Case Scenario
Robyn Lawrence is a senior quantitative analyst in the Global Derivatives Group of Ridgeview Capital, an
investment management firm based in New York City. Lawrence is conducting a training session for two
recently hired analysts, Wilma Kaplan and Anita Mehra. At the meeting, Kaplan and Mehra are asked
questions about the Berkeley Corporation and are provided with the information in Exhibit 1.
Exhibit 1
Stock and Options Data for Berkeley Corporation
and Risk-Free Interest Rate
Current Call Price $2.30
Current Put Price $4.70
Exercise Price $130.00
Days to Expiration* 60
Current Stock Price $128.55
Up Move on Stock 15%
Down Move on Stock 10%
Risk-Free Interest Rate 3%
*Note: Assume a 365-day year.
Statement 1:
One of your tasks was to calculate the synthetic values of call and put options for Berkeley Corporation.
Can one of you tell me why it is
arbitrage profits. For example, if we find that the current call price is greater than the synthetic call price
then we could earn an arbitrage profit by carrying out the following transactions: selling the call,
Lawrence continues the discussion: Scholes Merton model, option prices for European
calls and puts are impacted by a number of variables, including time to expiration, volatility, and the
risk-free rate. Can one of you explain the effect of changes in these variables on the prices of European
Mehra responds: gher when volatility is higher, and call and put prices are
lower for higher risk-free rates. However, while call options are higher for longer time to expiration, put
Statement 2:
this to construct hedges to offset the risks of their option positions. You should note that for in-the-
7. Based on the information provided for the Berkeley Corporation in Exhibit 1, the price of a
synthetic 60-day call option with a $130.00 strike price is closest to:
A. $3.25
B. $3.88
C. $5.52
Answer = B
B is correct. The synthetic call option is constructed by going long the put and the stock and
short the bond.
Synthetic call =
= = $3.88.
8. most likely:
A. correct.
B. incorrect with regard to purchasing the put.
C. incorrect with regard to taking a short position in the stock.
Answer = C
C is correct. Kaplan is correct about the reason for calculating synthetic option values; it allows
one to determine if it is possible to earn arbitrage profits. However, Kaplan is incorrect about
the set of transactions that can be used to earn an arbitrage profit if the current price of the call
option is greater than the synthetic value. The correct strategy is to sell the call option and then
take long positions in the put and the stock and a short position in the bond (purchase the
synthetic call). He incorrectly states that a short position should be taken in the stock.
9. Based on the information in Exhibit 1 and using a one-period binomial model, the value of a 60-
day Berkeley Corporation call option with a strike of $130.00, is closest to:
A. $6.67.
B. $8.31.
C. $9.00.
Answer = C
A. Assumption 1.
B. Assumption 2.
C. Assumption 3.
Answer = B
B is correct. Kaplan is incorrect. The Black Scholes Merton model assumes that the volatility of
the underlying asset is known and is constant.
11. least likely correct with respect to the impact on call and put
prices of:
A. volatility.
B. the risk-free rate.
C. time to expiration.
Answer = B
Study Session 17-56-d
Explain how an option price, as represented by the Black Scholes Merton model, is affected by
a change in the value each of the inputs.
B is correct. Mehra incorrectly states the relationship between the risk-free rate and the prices
of call and put options. The price of a call option rises as the risk-free rate goes up. The price of a
put option, however, declines as the risk-free rate rises.
A. Yes.
B. No, she is incorrect with respect to calls.
C. No, she is incorrect with respect to puts.
Answer = C
C is correct. For in-the-money put options, delta approaches 1, not 1, as the option moves
toward expiration.
Questions 49 through 54 relate to Derivative Investments.
Tarja Stahlberg, the company treasurer for the Finnish-based Borealis Group Oyj, is planning to
repatriate million from its British subsidiary. She intends to convert the British pounds to
euros (the home currency for Borealis) in 90 days.
Nicholas Howell is advising Stahlberg on these transactions. Stahlberg has told Howell that she
wants to protect Borealis against the possibility that the British pound depreciates against the
euro before the funds are repatriated.
Howell suggests that Stahlberg consider the use of foreign currency options. In particular, a
European call option on euros will allow Borealis to hedge its foreign currency risk. Howell
makes the following statements:
Statement 1: The call option price will decrease as the time to expiration decreases or the
exercise price decreases; and is very sensitive to the risk-free rate.
Statement 2: You can use 90-day call options on the euro with a strike price of
current 90-day forward exchange rate is uropean call option on the euro
can be created by combining a long put position on the euro, a short position in a forward
contract on the euro, and a short position in a zero-coupon bond.
Stahlberg mentions that Borealis will have ongoing U.S. dollar borrowing needs, and that she
wants to use the Eurodollar market to meet these. She prefers to use floating rate debt, and is
considering issuing a U.S. dollar denominated floating rate note (FRN). Stahlberg is concerned
that an increase in U.S. yields before the FRN issuance date will increase her future borrowing
costs (measured in U.S. dollars).
Howell explains how swaps and swaptions can be used to address Stahlbergs concerns, stating:
Statement 3: Similar to a forward contract, a plain vanilla interest rate swap can fix borrowing
costs. For example, if you issued a US$100 million FRN today that has a 180-day term and
coupon payments that reset every 90 days at the 90-day LIBOR, a plain vanilla interest rate swap
could convert it to a fixed rate obligation.
Statement 4: A newly entered plain vanilla interest rate swap has no current credit risk, but has
potential credit risk that will increase steadily over the life of the swap.
Statement 5: A receiver swaption permits the holder to enter into a pay floating position and is
equivalent to a put option.
Statement 6: Suppose that you planned to issue a US$100 million FRN in 90 days time that has
a 180-day term and coupon payments that reset every 90 days at the 90-day LIBOR. You would
want a European swaption with a notional principal amount of US$100 million and a 90-day
expiry at the time of FRN issuance. The data for this example is presented in Exhibit 1.
Exhibit 1
U.S. dollar LIBOR and Fixed Rates
LIBOR, Swap, and Swaption
Today In 90 days
Rates are Annualized
90-day U.S. LIBOR 3.50% 4.00%
180-day U.S. LIBOR 3.85% 4.35%
Fixed rate on swaption 3.90% n/a
Fixed rate on swap n/a 4.32%
90-day discount factor 0.9913 0.9901
180-day discount factor 0.9811 0.9787
A. exercise price.
B. time to expiration.
C. risk-free interest rate.
A. put option
B. forward contract
C. zero-coupon bond
51. Given the information in Statement 3 and Exhibit 1, the annualized fixed rate on the plain
vanilla interest rate swap would be closest to:
A. 1.76%.
B. 3.84%.
C. 4.32%.
52. Statement 4 can be best characterized as:
54. Based on Statement 6 and Exhibit 1, the market value of the swaption at expiration would
be closest to:
A. $206,725.
B. $207,764.
C. $208,961.
Questions 49 through 54 relate to Derivative Investments.
Tarja Stahlberg, the company treasurer for the Finnish-based Borealis Group Oyj, is planning to
repatriate million from its British subsidiary. She intends to convert the British pounds to
euros (the home currency for Borealis) in 90 days.
Nicholas Howell is advising Stahlberg on these transactions. Stahlberg has told Howell that she
wants to protect Borealis against the possibility that the British pound depreciates against the
euro before the funds are repatriated.
Howell suggests that Stahlberg consider the use of foreign currency options. In particular, a
European call option on euros will allow Borealis to hedge its foreign currency risk. Howell
makes the following statements:
Statement 1: The call option price will decrease as the time to expiration decreases or the
exercise price decreases; and is very sensitive to the risk-free rate.
Statement 2: You can use 90-day call options on the euro with a strike price of
current 90-day forward exchange rate is uropean call option on the euro
can be created by combining a long put position on the euro, a short position in a forward
contract on the euro, and a short position in a zero-coupon bond.
Stahlberg mentions that Borealis will have ongoing U.S. dollar borrowing needs, and that she
wants to use the Eurodollar market to meet these. She prefers to use floating rate debt, and is
considering issuing a U.S. dollar denominated floating rate note (FRN). Stahlberg is concerned
that an increase in U.S. yields before the FRN issuance date will increase her future borrowing
costs (measured in U.S. dollars).
Howell explains how swaps and swaptions can be used to address Stahlbergs concerns, stating:
Statement 3: Similar to a forward contract, a plain vanilla interest rate swap can fix borrowing
costs. For example, if you issued a US$100 million FRN today that has a 180-day term and
coupon payments that reset every 90 days at the 90-day LIBOR, a plain vanilla interest rate swap
could convert it to a fixed rate obligation.
Statement 4: A newly entered plain vanilla interest rate swap has no current credit risk, but has
potential credit risk that will increase steadily over the life of the swap.
Statement 5: A receiver swaption permits the holder to enter into a pay floating position and is
equivalent to a put option.
Statement 6: Suppose that you planned to issue a US$100 million FRN in 90 days time that has
a 180-day term and coupon payments that reset every 90 days at the 90-day LIBOR. You would
want a European swaption with a notional principal amount of US$100 million and a 90-day
expiry at the time of FRN issuance. The data for this example is presented in Exhibit 1.
Exhibit 1
U.S. dollar LIBOR and Fixed Rates
LIBOR, Swap, and Swaption
Today In 90 days
Rates are Annualized
90-day U.S. LIBOR 3.50% 4.00%
180-day U.S. LIBOR 3.85% 4.35%
Fixed rate on swaption 3.90% n/a
Fixed rate on swap n/a 4.32%
90-day discount factor 0.9913 0.9901
180-day discount factor 0.9811 0.9787
A. exercise price.
B. time to expiration.
C. risk-free interest rate.
Answer: B
As expiration approaches, the price of the option moves toward the payoff value of the
option at expiration, a process known as time value decay.
A. put option
B. forward contract
C. zero-coupon bond
Answer: B
2009 Modular Level II, Volume 6, pp. 202-205
Study Session17-62-i
Illustrate how put-call parity for options on forwards (or futures) is established.
A synthetic call option is constructed by being long a forward, long the put option, and
long or short a zero-coupon bond. Since Howell stated that F(0,T) > X, then this would
be a short position in the zero-coupon bond.
That is you take a long position in the put, a short bond position and a long forward
position.
51. Given the information in Statement 3 and Exhibit 1, the annualized fixed rate on the plain
vanilla interest rate swap would be closest to:
A. 1.76%.
B. 3.84%.
C. 4.32%.
Answer: B
Answer: A
While there is no credit risk at contract initiation, the potential credit risk of an interest
rate swap is greatest at the middle of its life; it does not increase throughout the life of the
swap.
Answer: B
A. $206,725.
B. $207,764.
C. $208,961.
Answer: A
The payoff of a payer swap in which the exercise price is x and the market rate on the
underlying swap is FS(0,n,m) is:
Max[0, FS(0,n,m) x] * j (hj)
Using the information in Exhibit 1 and Howells sixth statement:
[4.32% - 3.90%) * (90/360)]= $105,000
( ) = 1 / ( 1 + 0.0400*90/360) = 0.9901
( ) = 1 / ( 1 + 0.0435*180/360) = 0.9787
($105,000 * 0.9901) + ($105,000 * 0.9787) = $206,725
Tyra Merinar Case Scenario
Tyra Merinar is a portfolio manager at Ridge Row Capital Advisors (RRCA), a hedge fund based in
Charlottesville, Virginia. Merinar is meeting with two assistant portfolio managers, Vinay Jani
and Zhong Geng, to review the performance of investments made by RRCA and to evaluate
potential new investments. At this meeting they will discuss two recent investments, an equity
swap and a swaption, as well as two potential new investments.
RRCA entered into a one-year equity swap 30 days ago. Under the terms of the swap, the fund
would receive the return on the S&P/ASX 300 Metals & Mining Index and pay a fixed annual
interest rate of 4.8% on notional principal of $75,000,000. The swap calls for quarterly
payments. At the time the swap was initiated, 30 days ago, the S&P/ASX 300 index was 3,250.
The value of the S&P/ASX 300 index today is 3,738. Merinar wishes to determine the market
value of the equity swap today using the current term structure of interest rates presented in
Exhibit 1.
Exhibit 1
Term Structure of Interest Rates (%)
Days LIBOR
60 1.42
150 1.84
240 2.12
330 3.42
Three months ago, RRCA purchased a European receiver swaption that is exercisable into a two-
year swap with semiannual payments. The swaption has a semiannual exercise rate of 2.75%
and a notional principal of $25,000,000. The swaption has just expired, and Merinar asks Jani to
determine its cash settlement using the term structure presented below in Exhibit 2.
Exhibit 2
Term Structure of Interest Rates (%)
Days LIBOR
180 1.95
360 3.68
540 4.11
720 4.65
Merinar explains the investment strategy to be implemented if the stock index futures contract
e calculation, the appropriate
Merinar closes the meeting by asking if Geng and Jani can explain the relation between futures
s prices are an accurate estimate of
43. Using the information provided in Exhibit 1, the market value of the equity swap is
closest to:
A. $7,717,500.
B. $7,665,000.
C. $9,997,500.
44. Using the information in Exhibit 2, the market value of the receiver swaption is closest
to:
A. $106,250.
B. $495,508.
C. $687,500.
A. Yes.
B. No, the appropriate strategy would be to sell 2-year CDS and buy 5-year CDS for
Onex Corporation.
C. No, the appropriate strategy would be to buy 2-year CDS and sell 5-year CDS for
Onex Corporation.
46. Assuming a 365-day year, the S&P 400 Mid Cap stock index futures price is closest to:
A. 836.85.
B. 848.11.
C. 854.71.
47. most likely correct?
A. Yes.
B. No, the correct strategy would be to only purchase stock index futures.
C. No, the correct strategy would be to purchase the stock index and sell stock index
futures.
48. Who correctly states the relationship between futures prices and expected spot prices?
A. Jani
B. Geng
C. Merinar
Tyra Merinar Case Scenario
Tyra Merinar is a portfolio manager at Ridge Row Capital Advisors (RRCA), a hedge fund based in
Charlottesville, Virginia. Merinar is meeting with two assistant portfolio managers, Vinay Jani
and Zhong Geng, to review the performance of investments made by RRCA and to evaluate
potential new investments. At this meeting they will discuss two recent investments, an equity
swap and a swaption, as well as two potential new investments.
RRCA entered into a one-year equity swap 30 days ago. Under the terms of the swap, the fund
would receive the return on the S&P/ASX 300 Metals & Mining Index and pay a fixed annual
interest rate of 4.8% on notional principal of $75,000,000. The swap calls for quarterly
payments. At the time the swap was initiated, 30 days ago, the S&P/ASX 300 index was 3,250.
The value of the S&P/ASX 300 index today is 3,738. Merinar wishes to determine the market
value of the equity swap today using the current term structure of interest rates presented in
Exhibit 1.
Exhibit 1
Term Structure of Interest Rates (%)
Days LIBOR
60 1.42
150 1.84
240 2.12
330 3.42
Three months ago, RRCA purchased a European receiver swaption that is exercisable into a two-
year swap with semiannual payments. The swaption has a semiannual exercise rate of 2.75%
and a notional principal of $25,000,000. The swaption has just expired, and Merinar asks Jani to
determine its cash settlement using the term structure presented below in Exhibit 2.
Exhibit 2
Term Structure of Interest Rates (%)
Days LIBOR
180 1.95
360 3.68
540 4.11
720 4.65
Merinar explains the investment strategy to be implemented if the stock index futures contract
alculation, the appropriate
Merinar closes the meeting by asking if Geng and Jani can explain the relation between futures
rices are an accurate estimate of
43. Using the information provided in Exhibit 1, the market value of the equity swap is
closest to:
A. $7,717,500.
B. $7,665,000.
C. $9,997,500.
Answer = C
C is correct. Per $1 of notional principal, the market value of the equity swap is
calculated as follows:
A. $106,250.
B. $495,508.
C. $687,500.
Answer = B
Don M. Chance
2012 Modular Level II, Vol. 6, pp. 268 269, 286 287
Study Session 17-57-h
Calculate and interpret the value of an interest rate swaption at expiration.
A. Yes.
B. No, the appropriate strategy would be to sell 2-year CDS and buy 5-year CDS for
Onex Corporation.
C. No, the appropriate strategy would be to buy 2-year CDS and sell 5-year CDS for
Onex Corporation.
Answer = C
rge Spentzos
2012 Modular Level II, Vol. 6, pp. 361 362
Study Session 17-59-d
Describe credit derivatives trading strategies, and explain how they are used by hedge
funds and other managers.
C is correct. Since Geng expects credit ratings for Onex Corporation bonds to weaken
over the near term up to two years, and then strengthen over the longer term (five
years), the appropriate strategy is to buy 2-year CDS and sell 5-year CDS. The 2-year CDS
would provide a hedge against short-term volatility, and the sale of the 5-year CDS
would partially fund the purchase of 2-year CDS. This is a flattener curve trade.
46. Assuming a 365-day year, the S&P 400 Mid Cap stock index futures price is closest to:
A. 836.85.
B. 848.11.
C. 854.71.
Answer = B
A. Yes.
B. No, the correct strategy would be to only purchase stock index futures.
C. No, the correct strategy would be to purchase the stock index and sell stock index
futures.
Answer = A
A is correct. Merinar is correct. If stock index futures are underpriced, the correct
arbitrage strategy would be to short the stock index and purchase stock index futures.
This strategy will effectively ensure that Merinar has borrowed money at the risk-free
rate and repaid at a rate less than the risk-free rate.
48. Who correctly states the relationship between futures prices and expected spot prices?
A. Jani
B. Geng
C. Merinar
Answer = A
ts
2012 Modular Level II, Vol. 6, pp. 99 100
Study Session 16-55-f
Explain the relation between futures prices and expected spot prices.
A is correct. Jani is correct. The futures price is equal to the expected spot price minus a
risk premium. Alternatively, the expected spot price equals the futures price plus a risk
premium.