Ces PDF
Ces PDF
Ces PDF
Ruhl
Constant elasticity of substitution preferences will show up often in international trade; they are a
simple way to aggregate over many goods. Consider the case with a continuum of goods.
Z 1 1/
max U (c) = b(i)c(i) di (1)
0
Z 1
s.t. p(i)c(i)di = I
0
Using this definition, and the budget constraint, we can write (3) as
C1 = I, (5)
where 1 = P has the natural interpretation as being the price of one unit of utility. To solve for
P , return to (2) and solve for c(0 ) and multiply by b
Z 1
0 /(1) 0 /(1) 0 /(1)
c( ) = b( ) p( ) b(i)c(i) di (6)
0
Z 1
b(0 )c(0 ) = /(1) b(0 )1/(1) p(0 )/(1) b(i)c(i) di (7)
0
to get
Z 1 1
1
1 0 0 0
P = = b( ) 1 p( ) 1 d (9)
0
Properties
Elasticity of Substitution
From (2) we have
1 1
c(j) b(j) 1 p(j) 1
= (10)
c(i) b(i) p(i)
Taking the log of this equation and differentiating with respect to p(j)/p(i) shows that the elasticity
of substitution between goods is = 1/(1 ).
where = 1/(1 ) is the own price elasticity of good i. Note that this is only the case when good
i is so small it has a negligible impact on P . This is true when there are a continuum of goods, and
is also typically assumed even when the number of goods is finite. A typical assumption is that
the number of goods is large enough that no single good can influence the aggregate price level.
1 p(i) 1
p(i)c(i) = b(i) 1 P C. (12)
P
Limiting Cases
As 0 this is Cobb-Douglas. As 1 perfect substitutes, as Leontief.
products into an economy with other goods and specify the consumers problem as
Z 1 1/ !
max U c0 , b(i)c(i) di (13)
0
Z 1
s.t. p0 c0 + p(i)c(i)di = I
0
Using the derivations above, we can rewrite this as a two stage budgeting problem, where the
first stage is
which determines the expenditure on the nummeraire good and the differentiated goods. Once
we know P C we can solve the problem specified in (1) replacing I with P C.
CES Production
You will also find papers in which the i-goods are considered to be intermediate goods and the CES
aggregator is meant to be a production function (e.g. Ethier 1982). For example, a model might
have a feasibility constraint like
Z 1 1/
Ct + It b(i)y(i) di = Yt , (15)
0
where C is consumption of the final good and I is the amount of final good used for investment.
In a model like this, you might be tempted to think that P is the GDP price deflator. It is not.
The GDP deflators in the United States and Canada are chain-weighted Fisher indices. Other
countries follow different procedures (some use chained Laspeyres indices) but, in any case, none
of the countries use a price index that looks like (9).