GUIDELINES ON PROTECTION FROM

EXPOSURE TO TOBACCO SMOKE

PURPOSE, OBJECTIVES AND KEY CONSIDERATIONS

Purpose of the guidelines

1. Consistent with other provisions of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control
and the intentions of the Conference of the Parties, these guidelines are intended to assist Parties
in meeting their obligations under Article 8 of the Convention. They draw on the best available
evidence and the experience of Parties that have successfully implemented effective measures to
reduce exposure to tobacco smoke.

2. The guidelines contain agreed upon statements of principles and definitions of relevant
terms, as well as agreed upon recommendations for the steps required to satisfy the obligations of
the Convention. In addition, the guidelines identify the measures necessary to achieve effective
protection from the hazards of second-hand tobacco smoke. Parties are encouraged to use these
guidelines not only to fulfil their legal duties under the Convention, but also to follow best
practices in protecting public health.

Objectives of the guidelines

3. These guidelines have two related objectives. The first is to assist Parties in meeting their
obligations under Article 8 of the WHO Framework Convention, in a manner consistent with the
scientific evidence regarding exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke and the best practice
worldwide in the implementation of smoke free measures, in order to establish a high standard of
accountability for treaty compliance and to assist the Parties in promoting the highest attainable
standard of health. The second objective is to identify the key elements of legislation necessary to
effectively protect people from exposure to tobacco smoke, as required by Article 8.

Underlying considerations

4. The development of these guidelines has been influenced by the following fundamental
considerations.

(a) The duty to protect from tobacco smoke, embodied in the text of Article 8, is
grounded in fundamental human rights and freedoms. Given the dangers of breathing
second-hand tobacco smoke, the duty to protect from tobacco smoke is implicit in, inter
alia, the right to life and the right to the highest attainable standard of health, as recognized
in many international legal instruments (including the Constitution of the World Health
Organization, the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the Convention on the
Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women and the Covenant on Economic,
Social and Cultural Rights), as formally incorporated into the preamble of the WHO
Framework Convention and as recognized in the constitutions of many nations.

(b) The duty to protect individuals from tobacco smoke corresponds to an obligation
by governments to enact legislation to protect individuals against threats to their
fundamental rights and freedoms. This obligation extends to all persons, and not merely to
certain populations.

1
 (c) Several authoritative scientific bodies have determined that second-hand tobacco
smoke is a carcinogen. Some Parties to the WHO Framework Convention (for example,
Finland and Germany) have classified second-hand tobacco smoke as a carcinogen and
included the prevention of exposure to it at work in their health and safety legislation. In
addition to the requirements of Article 8, therefore, Parties may be obligated to address the
hazard of exposure to tobacco smoke in accordance with their existing workplace laws or
other laws governing exposure to harmful substances, including carcinogens.

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES AND RELEVANT DEFINITIONS

UNDERLYING PROTECTION FROM EXPOSURE TO TOBACCO SMOKE

Principles

5. As noted in Article 4 of the WHO Framework Convention, strong political commitment is

necessary to take measures to protect all persons from exposure to tobacco smoke. The following
agreed upon principles should guide the implementation of Article 8 of the Convention.

Principle 1

6. Effective measures to provide protection from exposure to tobacco smoke, as envisioned

by Article 8 of the WHO Framework Convention, require the total elimination of smoking and
tobacco smoke in a particular space or environment in order to create a 100% smoke free
environment. There is no safe level of exposure to tobacco smoke, and notions such as a threshold
value for toxicity from second-hand smoke should be rejected, as they are contradicted by
scientific evidence. Approaches other than 100% smoke free environments, including ventilation,
air filtration and the use of designated smoking areas (whether with separate ventilation systems
or not), have repeatedly been shown to be ineffective and there is conclusive evidence, scientific
and otherwise, that engineering approaches do not protect against exposure to tobacco smoke.

Principle 2

7. All people should be protected from exposure to tobacco smoke. All indoor workplaces
and indoor public places should be smoke free.

Principle 3

8. Legislation is necessary to protect people from exposure to tobacco smoke. Voluntary

smoke free policies have repeatedly been shown to be ineffective and do not provide adequate
protection. In order to be effective, legislation should be simple, clear and enforceable.

Principle 4

9. Good planning and adequate resources are essential for successful implementation and
enforcement of smoke free legislation.

2
 Principle 5

10. Civil society has a central role in building support for and ensuring compliance with smoke
free measures, and should be included as an active partner in the process of developing,
implementing and enforcing legislation.

Principle 6

11. The implementation of smoke free legislation, its enforcement and its impact should all be
monitored and evaluated. This should include monitoring and responding to tobacco industry
activities that undermine the implementation and enforcement of the legislation, as specified in
Article 20.4 of the WHO Framework Convention.

Principle 7

12. The protection of people from exposure to tobacco smoke should be strengthened and
expanded, if necessary; such action may include new or amended legislation, improved
enforcement and other measures to reflect new scientific evidence and case-study experiences.

Definitions

13. In developing legislation, it is important to use care in defining key terms. Several
recommendations as to appropriate definitions, based on experiences in many countries, are set
out here. The definitions in this section supplement those already included in the WHO
Framework Convention.

Second-hand tobacco smoke or environmental tobacco smoke

14. Several alternative terms are commonly used to describe the type of smoke addressed by
Article 8 of the WHO Framework Convention. These include second-hand smoke,
environmental tobacco smoke, and other peoples smoke. Terms such as passive smoking
and involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke should be avoided, as experience in France and
elsewhere suggests that the tobacco industry may use these terms to support a position that
voluntary exposure is acceptable. Second-hand tobacco smoke, sometimes abbreviated as
SHS, and environmental tobacco smoke, sometimes abbreviated ETS, are the preferable
terms; these guidelines use second-hand tobacco smoke.

15. Second-hand tobacco smoke can be defined as the smoke emitted from the burning end of
a cigarette or from other tobacco products usually in combination with the smoke exhaled by the
smoker.

16. Smoke free air is air that is 100% smoke free. This definition includes, but is not limited
to, air in which tobacco smoke cannot be seen, smelled, sensed or measured.1

1
It is possible that constituent elements of tobacco smoke may exist in air in amounts too small to be measured.
Attention should be given to the possibility that the tobacco industry or the hospitality sector may attempt to exploit the
limitations of this definition.

3
 Smoking

17. This term should be defined to include being in possession or control of a lit tobacco
product regardless of whether the smoke is being actively inhaled or exhaled.

Public places

18. While the precise definition of public places will vary between jurisdictions, it is
important that legislation define this term as broadly as possible. The definition used should cover
all places accessible to the general public or places for collective use, regardless of ownership or
right to access.

Indoor or enclosed

19. Article 8 requires protection from tobacco smoke in indoor workplaces and public places.
Because there are potential pitfalls in defining indoor areas, the experiences of various
countries in defining this term should be specifically examined. The definition should be as
inclusive and as clear as possible, and care should be taken in the definition to avoid creating lists
that may be interpreted as excluding potentially relevant indoor areas. It is recommended that
indoor (or enclosed) areas be defined to include any space covered by a roof or enclosed by
one or more walls or sides, regardless of the type of material used for the roof, wall or sides, and
regardless of whether the structure is permanent or temporary.

Workplace

20. A workplace should be defined broadly as any place used by people during their
employment or work. This should include not only work done for compensation, but also
voluntary work, if it is of the type for which compensation is normally paid. In addition,
workplaces include not only those places at which work is performed, but also all attached or
associated places commonly used by the workers in the course of their employment, including,
for example, corridors, lifts, stairwells, lobbies, joint facilities, cafeterias, toilets, lounges,
lunchrooms and also outbuildings such as sheds and huts. Vehicles used in the course of work are
workplaces and should be specifically identified as such.

21. Careful consideration should be given to workplaces that are also individuals homes or
dwelling places, for example, prisons, mental health institutions or nursing homes. These places
also constitute workplaces for others, who should be protected from exposure to tobacco smoke.

Public transport

22. Public transport should be defined to include any vehicle used for the carriage of members
of the public, usually for reward or commercial gain. This would include taxis.

THE SCOPE OF EFFECTIVE LEGISLATION

23. Article 8 requires the adoption of effective measures to protect people from exposure to
tobacco smoke in (1) indoor workplaces, (2) indoor public places, (3) public transport, and (4) as
appropriate in other public places.

4
24. This creates an obligation to provide universal protection by ensuring that all indoor public
places, all indoor workplaces, all public transport and possibly other (outdoor or quasi-outdoor)
public places are free from exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke. No exemptions are justified
on the basis of health or law arguments. If exemptions must be considered on the basis of other
arguments, these should be minimal. In addition, if a Party is unable to achieve universal
coverage immediately, Article 8 creates a continuing obligation to move as quickly as possible to
remove any exemptions and make the protection universal. Each Party should strive to provide
universal protection within five years of the WHO Framework Conventions entry into force for
that Party.

25. No safe levels of exposure to second-hand smoke exist, and, as previously acknowledged
by the Conference of the Parties in decision FCTC/COP1(15), engineering approaches, such as
ventilation, air exchange and the use of designated smoking areas, do not protect against exposure
to tobacco smoke.

26. Protection should be provided in all indoor or enclosed workplaces, including motor
vehicles used as places of work (for example, taxis, ambulances or delivery vehicles).

27. The language of the treaty requires protective measures not only in all indoor public
places, but also in those other (that is, outdoor or quasi-outdoor) public places where
appropriate. In identifying those outdoor and quasi-outdoor public places where legislation is
appropriate, Parties should consider the evidence as to the possible health hazards in various
settings and should act to adopt the most effective protection against exposure wherever the
evidence shows that a hazard exists.

INFORM, CONSULT AND INVOLVE THE PUBLIC TO ENSURE SUPPORT

AND SMOOTH IMPLEMENTATION

28. Raising awareness among the public and opinion leaders about the risks of second-hand
tobacco smoke exposure through ongoing information campaigns is an important role for
government agencies, in partnership with civil society, to ensure that the public understands and
supports legislative action. Key stakeholders include businesses, restaurant and hospitality
associations, employer groups, trade unions, the media, health professionals, organizations
representing children and young people, institutions of learning or faith, the research community
and the general public. Awareness-raising efforts should include consultation with affected
businesses and other organizations and institutions in the course of developing the legislation.

29. Key messages should focus on the harm caused by second-hand tobacco smoke exposure,
the fact that elimination of smoke indoors is the only science-based solution to ensure complete
protection from exposure, the right of all workers to be equally protected by law and the fact that
there is no trade-off between health and economics, because experience in an increasing number
of jurisdictions shows that smoke free environments benefit both. Public education campaigns
should also target settings for which legislation may not be feasible or appropriate, such as private
homes.

30. Broad consultation with stakeholders is also essential to educate and mobilize the
community and to facilitate support for legislation after its enactment. Once legislation is adopted,
there should be an education campaign leading up to implementation of the law, the provision of
information for business owners and building managers outlining the law and their
responsibilities and the production of resources, such as signage. These measures will increase

5
the likelihood of smooth implementation and high levels of voluntary compliance. Messages to
empower non-smokers and to thank smokers for complying with the law will promote public
involvement in enforcement and smooth implementation.

ENFORCEMENT

Duty of compliance

31. Effective legislation should impose legal responsibilities for compliance on both affected
business establishments and individual smokers, and should provide penalties for violations,
which should apply to businesses and, possibly, smokers. Enforcement should ordinarily focus on
business establishments. The legislation should place the responsibility for compliance on the
owner, manager or other person in charge of the premises, and should clearly identify the actions
he or she is required to take. These duties should include:

(a) a duty to post clear signs at entrances and other appropriate locations indicating
that smoking is not permitted. The format and content of these signs should be determined
by health authorities or other agencies of the government and may identify a telephone
number or other mechanisms for the public to report violations and the name of the person
within the premises to whom complaints should be directed;

(b) a duty to remove any ashtrays from the premises;

(c) a duty to supervise the observance of rules;

(d) a duty to take reasonable specified steps to discourage individuals from smoking
on the premises. These steps could include asking the person not to smoke, discontinuing
service, asking the person to leave the premises and contacting a law enforcement agency
or other authority.

Penalties

32. The legislation should specify fines or other monetary penalties for violations. While the
size of these penalties will necessarily reflect the specific practices and customs of each country,
several principles should guide the decision. Most importantly, penalties should be sufficiently
large to deter violations or else they may be ignored by violators or treated as mere costs of doing
business. Larger penalties are required to deter business violators than to deter violations by
individual smokers, who usually have fewer resources. Penalties should increase for repeated
violations and should be consistent with a countrys treatment of other, equally serious offences.

33. In addition to monetary penalties, the legislation may also allow for administrative
sanctions, such as the suspension of business licences, consistent with the countrys practice and
legal system. These sanctions of last resort are rarely used, but are very important for enforcing
the law against any businesses that choose to defy the law repeatedly.

34. Criminal penalties for violations may be considered for inclusion, if appropriate within a
countrys legal and cultural context.

6
Enforcement infrastructure

35. Legislation should identify the authority or authorities responsible for enforcement, and
should include a system both for monitoring compliance and for prosecuting violators.

36. Monitoring should include a process for inspection of businesses for compliance. It is
seldom necessary to create a new inspection system for enforcement of smoke free legislation.
Instead, compliance can ordinarily be monitored using one or more of the mechanisms already in
place for inspecting business premises and workplaces. A variety of options usually exists for this
purpose. In many countries, compliance inspections may be integrated into business licensing
inspections, health and sanitation inspections, inspections for workplace health and safety, fire
safety inspections or similar programmes. It may be valuable to use several such sources of
information gathering simultaneously.

37. Where possible, the use of inspectors or enforcement agents at the local level is
recommended; this is likely to increase the enforcement resources available and the level of
compliance. This approach requires the establishment of a national coordinating mechanism to
ensure a consistent approach nationwide.

38. Regardless of the mechanism used, monitoring should be based on an overall enforcement
plan, and should include a process for effective training of inspectors. Effective monitoring may
combine regular inspections with unscheduled, surprise inspections, as well as visits made in
response to complaints. Such visits may well be educative in the early period after the law takes
effect, as most breaches are likely to be inadvertent. The legislation should authorize inspectors to
enter premises subject to the law and to collect samples and gather evidence, if these powers are
not already established by existing law. Similarly, the legislation should prohibit businesses from
obstructing the inspectors in their work.

39. The cost of effective monitoring is not excessive. It is not necessary to hire large numbers
of inspectors, because inspections can be accomplished using existing programmes and personnel,
and because experience shows that smoke free legislation quickly becomes self-enforcing (that is,
predominantly enforced by the public). Only a few prosecutions may be necessary if the
legislation is implemented carefully and active efforts are made to educate businesses and the
public.

40. Although these programmes are not expensive, resources are needed to educate businesses,
train inspectors, coordinate the inspection process and compensate personnel for inspections of
businesses outside of normal working hours. A funding mechanism should be identified for this
purpose. Effective monitoring programmes have used a variety of funding sources, including
dedicated tax revenues, business licensing fees and dedicated revenues from fines paid by
violators.

Enforcement strategies

41. Strategic approaches to enforcement can maximize compliance, simplify the

implementation of legislation and reduce the level of enforcement resources needed.

42. In particular, enforcement activities in the period immediately following the laws entrance
into force are critical to the laws success and to the success of future monitoring and
enforcement. Many jurisdictions recommend an initial period of soft enforcement, during which

7
violators are cautioned but not penalized. This approach should be combined with an active
campaign to educate business owners about their responsibilities under the law, and businesses
should understand that the initial grace period or phase-in period will be followed by more
rigorous enforcement.

43. When active enforcement begins, many jurisdictions recommend the use of high-profile
prosecutions to enhance deterrence. By identifying prominent violators who have actively defied
the law or who are well known in the community, by taking firm and swift action and by seeking
maximum public awareness of these activities, authorities are able to demonstrate their resolve
and the seriousness of the law. This increases voluntary compliance and reduces the resources
needed for future monitoring and enforcement.

44. While smoke free laws quickly become self-enforcing, it is nevertheless essential that
authorities be prepared to respond swiftly and decisively to any isolated instances of outright
defiance. Particularly when a law first comes into force, there may be an occasional violator who
makes a public display of contempt for the law. Strong responses in these cases set an expectation
of compliance that will ease future efforts, while indecisiveness can rapidly lead to widespread
violations.

Mobilize and involve the community

45. The effectiveness of a monitoring-and-enforcement programme is enhanced by involving

the community in the programme. Engaging the support of the community and encouraging
members of the community to monitor compliance and report violations greatly extends the reach
of enforcement agencies and reduces the resources needed to achieve compliance. In fact, in
many jurisdictions, community complaints are the primary means of ensuring compliance. For
this reason, smoke free legislation should specify that members of the public may initiate
complaints and should authorize any person or nongovernmental organization to initiate action to
compel compliance with measures regulating exposure to second-hand smoke. The enforcement
programme should include a toll-free telephone complaint hotline or a similar system to
encourage the public to report violations.

MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF MEASURES

46. Monitoring and evaluation of measures to reduce exposure to tobacco smoke are important
for several reasons, for example:

(a) to increase political and public support for strengthening and extending
legislative provisions;

(b) to document successes that will inform and assist the efforts of other countries;

(c) to identify and publicize the efforts made by the tobacco industry to undermine
the implementation measures.

47. The extent and complexity of monitoring and evaluation will vary among jurisdictions,
depending on available expertise and resources. However, it is important to evaluate the outcome
of the measures implemented, in particular, on the key indicator of exposure to second-hand
smoke in workplaces and public places. There may be cost-effective ways to achieve this, for

8
example through the use of data or information collected through routine activities such as
workplace inspections.

48. There are eight key process and outcome indicators that should be considered:2

Processes

(a) knowledge, attitudes and support for smoke free policies among the general
population and possibly specific groups, for example, bar workers;

(b) enforcement of and compliance with smoke free policies;

Outcomes

(c) reduction in exposure of employees to second-hand tobacco smoke in workplaces

and public places;

(d) reduction in content of second-hand tobacco smoke in the air in workplaces

(particularly in restaurants) and public places;

(e) reduction in mortality and morbidity from exposure to second-hand tobacco

smoke;

(f) reduction in exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke in private homes;

(g) changes in smoking prevalence and smoking-related behaviours;

(h) economic impacts.

2
The publication WHO policy recommendations: protection from exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke
(Geneva, World Health Organization, 2007) provides references and links to monitoring studies conducted elsewhere
on all of these indicators.