0% found this document useful (0 votes)
181 views8 pages

Case Study

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 8

Running Head: Case Study Treatment Plan Project 1

Case Study Treatment Plan Project


Erin Alexander, Marlee Cohen, Danielle Da Cunha, Christine Von Cappeln
Dr. Welling
Seton Hall University
Fall 2016
CASE STUDY TREATMENT PLAN PROJECT 2

Case Study Treatment Plan Project

1. Background history information:


Please refer to attached case history document (1.1)

2. Diagnosis:
Allan's primary condition is a bilateral chronic and fluctuating conductive hearing loss
with secondary conditions including impaired expressive and receptive language, an
articulation disorder, and suspected vision impairment. Due to frequent middle ear infections
as a young child, Allan received PE tubes to relieve the pressure and fluid that had
accumulated in his middle ears. The opening where the myringotomy tubes were placed
never healed properly which led to perforations of his ear drums and resulted in a bilateral
conductive hearing loss. The comorbid diagnoses to Allan's hearing loss are an expressive
and receptive language disorder and articulation disorder. Allan's teacher has also expressed
concerns regarding a vision impairment, all which have led to Allan's difficulties with
academics and social interactions.

3. Description of diagnoses/disorders:
Figure 3.1: Un-Aided Audiogram

Figure 3.2: Aided Audiogram


CASE STUDY TREATMENT PLAN PROJECT 3

Figure 3.3: Tympanogram

An OAE would not be an appropriate test to perform on Allan. See further detail below.

Unaided
The audiogram shows a binaural moderate conductive hearing loss. Allan's speech
detection threshold is 55dB, pure tone average is 48dB, speech reception threshold is 45dB, and his word
detection threshold is 80dB. There is a moderate impairment in his air conduction while bone conduction
is within normal limits resulting an air bone gap. The air bone gap distinguished the hearing loss as
conductive.

Tympanogram
Due to Allan having binaural perforated ear drums his tympanogram in both ears is Type
B (flat). This is because the perforations do not allow any compliance or any pressure to take
place; thus, the air goes straight through the canal to the middle ear with no resistance.
OAE
CASE STUDY TREATMENT PLAN PROJECT 4

The otoacoustics emission results do not show any response because the signal is unable
to reach the hairs of the cochlea because of the conductive hearing loss. This is not to say that the
inner ear is not functioning, but that this test would not be able to properly assess the inner ear
because the path the signal needs to take is damaged.
Do these findings corroborate the rest of the audiometric result?
These findings do corroborate the findings within the audiograms. The audiogram shows
that there is a conductive hearing loss and the results from the tympanogram confirm the
malfunction of the ear drum being that it is type B. There would be no results from the OAE, not
from a malfunction of the inner ear, but because the signal would not able to properly pass
through and reach the inner ear. The un-aided audiograms bone conduction showed that the inner
ear is properly functioning showing that it is in fact a conductive hearing loss.
Aided
An aided audiogram was used to show if there would be an improvement in Allan's
audiological results with the trial use of the BAHA. Results from the audiogram proved that the
BAHA was an effective intervention. Allan's speech detection threshold is 30dB, pure tone average is
23dB, speech reception threshold is 20dB, and his word detection threshold is 55dB. The use of the
BAHA closed the air bone gap on the audiogram putting Allan's hearing in the normal to mild range.
What is/are the medical diagnoses
Allan's medical diagnosis is a fluctuating conductive hearing loss due to bilateral
perforations of his ear drums from PE tubes that were surgically inserted to alleviate the effects
of chronic otitis media. The area that the tubes were inserted never healed causing the chronic
perforations.
Characterize the speech-language impairment.
Allan's speech-language impairments include impaired expressive and receptive language
skills, problems with articulation, and he is experiencing academic difficulty.

4. What are the audiological treatments/remediation's/interventions?


Before audiological intervention takes place, a referral to an ENT would be necessary to
ensure that routine checkups and medical management are occurring. Once intervention begins,
an open line of communication with the ENT should be established. A trial period with a BAHA
on a band would be implemented for six months while keeping consistent communication with
Allan's audiologist. A classroom assessment would be performed and the proper FM system
would need to be used in each class that he attends. If Allan has success with the use of a BAHA
on a band, he may then be considered as a candidate for the surgery.
As a follow-up plan, Allan's hearing will be re-checked biyearly by an audiologist. Allan will
also visit an ENT quarterly to ensure no infection or other medical issues arise.
The SLP will ensure that FM systems in Allan's classrooms are operating and his teachers are
well trained on the function of these systems. The SLP will also notify all school employees of
what a BAHA system is and what it looks like incase the device is misplaced.
The use of a BAHA should increase Allan's hearing threshold from 50dB to 20-25dB. In
addition, the FM system will help to further amplify the auditory information he is receiving in
the classroom where distractions or disturbances may occur. The increase in Allan's hearing
abilities should allow him to be more stimulable for speech therapy services relating to his
articulation issue.

5. Impact of hearing loss on communication:


CASE STUDY TREATMENT PLAN PROJECT 5

Two additional scales that were considered in order to assess Allan's overall difficulties
included a classroom checklist filled out by his teacher, and a vision history questionnaire, which
was filled out by his parents. (Refer to attached forms; 5.1 and 5.2) His teacher emphasized a
concern for his hearing and vision. It was stated that Alan consistently needs directions repeated
and clarification during classroom activities. Per his case history form he also tends to repeat
certain words and phrases excessively. A concern for his vision arose when his teacher noticed
him rubbing his eyes often and squinting his eyes when trying to read what was on the board. A
referral to an optometrist was made to ensure that he was not straining his eyes and effecting his
vision.
The classroom communication and learning checklist showed that Allan's hearing loss is
effecting many elements in his educational environment. One in particular is social activities.
This includes his timid demeanor when socializing with his peers. He has difficulty initiating
play with others and typically avoids any social interactions. His academics are also affected
because of his difficulties following directions and focusing on what is happening in class. The
case history reiterated this by stating that Allan expresses frustration often due to his
communication restrictions which also occur at home.
He's lacking the appropriate comprehension skills, which overall effects his lexicon and
writing efficiency. Allan's primary mode of communication is spoken. His hearing impairment
has not affected his speech to the extent that sign language or any alternative forms of
communication are necessary.

6. Additional Aspects to Considerations


Visual impairment concerns have been raised by Allan's teacher. A referral to an optometrist
has been made and test results are pending. This will be done to ensure that his vision is not
impacting his performance in school. Being that Allan's hearing loss is fluctuating, it is
imperative to be continuously monitoring the status of Allan's ear. Consent from the ENT to
allow open and continual communication on any information or medical status that would help in
Allan's case.

7. How does the (entire) audiologic/auditory status impact your role as an SLP with this
particular client?
When assessing a client with hearing loss an SLP must collaborate with the audiologist to
gain a complete understanding of how this affects his or her communication. In Allan's case, his
hearing loss has contributed to difficulties in articulation and expressive and receptive language.
To accommodate Allan's impairments, assessment in a sound treated environment would be
necessary. Since Allan will have a BAHA, it is important that the SLP ensures the device is
functioning properly each time that they meet. Keeping up with interprofessional
communication, the SLP should contact the audiologist on the case if there are any problems
with the device. To continuously provide an optimal environment the SLP should make certain
that they are consistently speaking within the child's hearing range and at the same eye-level as
the child.
The modifications that are being implemented in the assessment environment should be
carried over into the treatment setting. Intervention targets would focus on strengthening Allan's
expressive and receptive language, overall enhancing his social skills. Activities that involve the
sequencing and re-telling of a narrative could be a focus point. Simple conversational skills can
be improved by beginning every session asking Allan how his day went. Because of noted
CASE STUDY TREATMENT PLAN PROJECT 6

difficulties with vision, the SLP would have to ensure that all materials are within his visual
field. If visual difficulties persist and begin to affect treatment progress, an optometrist should be
contacted by the SLP to disregard any extraneous factors that could be affecting his speech and
language abilities.

8. What additional resources will you provide to the client and/or family?
1. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Parental Rights in Special
Education (PRISE), and American's with Disabilities Act (ADA) all apply to Allan and
his family. IDEA ensures that Allan has access to the general education curriculum and
any assistive technology he may require while being in the classroom (i.e. FM system).
PRISE gives Allan's parents the right disagree with services or programs recommended
by the school to ensure that they are in control and comfortable with the services Allan
will receive. ADA protects Allan from being excluded from participating in federally
funded program or activities.
Additionally, information regarding the BAHA surgery after the 6-month trial
period has been completed would be beneficial for the family to be able to review. If
Allan shows improvement in the various areas that had previously shown concern,
moving forward with the surgery could be extremely beneficial for him. Relevant
literature and resources, like cochlear.com, would be an efficient way for the family to
educate and familiarize themselves on the procedure.

2. After the initial use of a BAHA and speech therapy services, if social issues are still
present, a referral to the school psychologist would be necessary. Counseling along with
speech therapy would potentially help Allan with any social issues he continues to exhibit
with his peers.

Final Note: If improvement after the 6-month trial period is substantial then a consultation
with Allan's Teacher, ENT, Audiologist, SLP, and Parents to see if a more permanent BAHA
through surgery would be beneficial.

Resources:
Baha bone conduction implants. (n.d.). Retrieved November 30, 2016, from
http://www.cochlear.com/wps/wcm/connect/intl/home/discover/baha-bone-conduction-implants
CASE STUDY TREATMENT PLAN PROJECT 7

Child Vision History Questionnaire for Parent/Caregiver [PDF]. (2016, January). St. Paul:
Minnesota Department of Health.
Classroom communication and learning checklist [PDF]. (n.d.). Wiig & Secord.
Speech-language Hearing Case History Form [PDF]. (2004). Greenville: Super Duper.
Welling, D. R., & Ukstins, C. A. (2015). Fundamentals of Audiology for the speech-language
pathologist. Burlington, VA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Appendix
1.1 Parent Questionnaire
CASE STUDY TREATMENT PLAN PROJECT 8

3.1 Unaided Audiogram


3.2 Aided Audiogram
3.3 Tympanogram
5.1 Classroom Checklist- Teacher
5.1 Vison History Questionnaire- Parents

You might also like