An Online App Platform Enhances Collaborative Medical Student Group Learning and Classroom Management
An Online App Platform Enhances Collaborative Medical Student Group Learning and Classroom Management
An Online App Platform Enhances Collaborative Medical Student Group Learning and Classroom Management
Abstract
Purpose: The authors presented their results in effectively using a free and widely-accessible online app platform to manage and
teach a first-year pathology course at Mayo Medical School.
Methods used: The authors utilized the Google Blogger, Forms, Flubaroo, Sheets, Docs, and Slides apps to
Med Teach Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by University of Calgary on 03/24/15
effectively build a collaborative classroom teaching and management system. Students were surveyed on the use of the app
platform in the classroom, and 44 (94%) students responded.
Results: Thirty-two (73%) of the students reported that Blogger was an effective place for online discussion of pathology topics
and questions. 43 (98%) of the students reported that the Forms/Flubaroo grade-reporting system was helpful. 40 (91%) of the
students used the remote, collaborative features of Slides to create team-based learning presentations, and 39 (89%) of the
students found those collaborative features helpful. Docs helped teaching assistants to collaboratively create study guides or
grading rubrics. Overall, 41 (93%) of the students found that the app platform was helpful in establishing a collaborative, online
classroom environment.
Conclusions: The online app platform allowed faculty to build an efficient and effective classroom teaching and management
system. The ease of accessibility and opportunity for collaboration allowed for collaborative learning, grading, and teaching.
For personal use only.
Correspondence: Justin G. Peacock, Department of Graduate Medical Education, San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium,
3551 Roger Brook Dr., Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA. Tel: (507) 398-4304; E-mail: [email protected]
ISSN 0142-159X print/ISSN 1466-187X online/15/0000017 2015 Informa UK Ltd. 1
DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1020290
J. G. Peacock & J. P. Grande
be used in the educational environment (Barlow & Lane 2007; Google Drive is useful for storing and
Oishi 2007; Adams 2008; Herrick 2009; Khmelevsky & organizing class materials
Voytenko 2010; Schneckenberg et al. 2011; Tan & Kim 2011;
Google Drive was used as the repository for class material,
Railean 2012). The advantages of online app platforms, such as
including lecture powerpoints and videos, pathology slides,
Google Apps, for classroom management and CGL are that
video resources, CGL presentations, the course syllabus,
they are mobile and free, can be used on many different types
assessments and grades. We created a secured faculty/
of devices, allow for remote team collaboration on projects,
teaching assistant folder that was only accessible by email
can be secured, and can be configured to perform all required
invitation from the course director, and we created a separate,
classroom functions (Oishi 2007; Adams 2008; Tan & Kim
student folder with secure access for students, faculty, and
2011; Railean 2012).
teaching assistants. The benefits of Google Drive were that it
We wanted to explore the use of the Google-based online
was universally accessible via the internet on a wide range of
app platform in a first-year pathology course at Mayo Medical
devices, but it was secure and access to certain folders was
School. We wanted to establish the entire classroom manage-
regulated by invitation to specific individuals. The universal
ment system, including announcements, presentations, assess-
access also meant that faculty or teaching assistants could
ments, and collaborative CGL activities on the app platform.
ensure that lecture materials were up-to-date, even at the last
We present the methods for how we utilized the app platform
minute. Eighty-seven percent of students responded positively
in the course and the results of a student survey regarding the
Med Teach Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by University of Calgary on 03/24/15
Figure 1. Class announcements and discussion using Blogger. (A) Example of Blogger used to for class announcements. (B)
Example of blog used for question and answers with the professor. (C) Example of blog used for discussion following a group
presentation.
and disease process. They then would teach the rest of the Google Docs can be used to create living,
class about the disease from the presentation that they had collaborative written documents
created. The benefit of Google Slides over conventional
presentation programs was that it allowed for a team-based We used Google Docs throughout the course, including for
collaborative effort. Pathology case assignment descriptions, for the syllabus, for
Google Slides allowed multiple students to work on the teaching assistant study guides, and for creating collaborative
same presentation remotely simultaneously or at different TA grading rubrics. Like Google Slides, Google Docs allowed
times. Previous edits were saved and could be viewed in the for multiple users to collaborate on a common document.
revision history. Revision history not only let the students see Again, revision history recorded changes to the documents,
the changes that were made, but it allowed faculty to see who including who made the changes. Teaching assistants would
was making revisions. From the revision history, faculty were collaboratively design a study guide after each small group
able to see if all the students were contributing equally to the session for the students to study from (Figure 3). Teaching
presentation. The survey revealed that the majority (91%) assistants also used Google Docs to create a collaborative
worked remotely on the presentation at different times (Table grading rubric for assignments throughout the course. On the
1). Eighty-nine percent of students found the collaborative grading rubric, as teaching assistants came across answers that
capabilities of Google Slides helpful or very helpful in creating they felt did or did not deserve credit, they could post those
their CGL presentation, and 73% indicated that creating answers and their grading rationale for other teaching assist-
presentations in Google Slides was easy or very easy (Table 1). ants to comment on. Through this process, they were able to
3
J. G. Peacock & J. P. Grande
How often did you use the course blog during the block?
Daily 23 Times per week Once per week Once per class Never
39% 52% 9% 0% 0%
Did you ever leave a comment on the course blog?
Yes No
61% 39%
How did you find the course blog as a place for posting course announcements or assignments?
Very useful Useful Neutral Unuseful Very unuseful
27% 61% 5% 2% 5%
How did you find the course blog as a place for discussions regarding questions from small group or lecture?
Very useful Useful Neutral Unuseful Very unuseful
25% 48% 20% 5% 2%
How did you find the Google Drive as a repository for up-to-date class lecture materials?
Very useful Useful Neutral Unuseful Very unuseful
55% 32% 5% 2% 7%
How did you find the Google-based platform for taking assessments?
Very easy to use Easy to use Neutral Difficult to use Very difficult to use
75% 25% 0% 0% 0%
Med Teach Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by University of Calgary on 03/24/15
How did you find the personally emailed grade results from the assessments?
Very helpful Helpful Neutral Unhelpful Very unhelpful
75% 23% 2% 0% 0%
Did your group formulate the case presentation altogether at one time or did you use the editing features to contribute to the presentation at different times?
Altogether (1 time) Separately (Different times)
9% 91%
How did your group find the collaborative capabilities of using Google Slides software to create a joint presentation?
Very helpful Helpful Neutral Unhelpful Very unhelpful
39% 50% 9% 2% 0%
How easy or challenging was it to create a presentation using Google Slides?
Very easy Easy Neutral Difficult Very difficult
For personal use only.
come up with a uniform and consistent grading methodology technology-driven, and team-based approaches to medical
(Figure 4). education. While Google Apps have been used in other
educational institutions, this is the first published instance, to
Google Apps can be used to facilitate CGL our knowledge, of Google Apps being used in a medical
and help manage a medical student course school course (Oishi 2007; Barlow & Lane 2007; Adams 2008;
Herrick 2009; Nevin 2009; Railean 2012).
As an overall assessment of the online app platform, students
Overall, the student survey revealed that students had
were asked about how helpful they found the app platform for
favorable opinions of the online app platform. They particu-
course management, assessment and collaboration (Table 1).
larly appeared to appreciate the ease of assessments and the
Fifty percent found the platform very helpful and 43% found
ability to receive immediate email results (Table 1). Students
the platform helpful, for a total positive response of 93%
did seem to indicate that while the blog was helpful for
(Table 1). When asked about using the app platform in other
announcements and class discussion, there could be improve-
pre-clinical courses, 73% said they would like to see it in other
ments with regards to the discussion aspects (Table 1).
courses, with 25% saying maybe they would like to see it in
Another online app that we did not use was Google Groups
other courses (Table 1).
(groups.google.com), which allows for group discussions and
may allow for more participation and better discussion.
In the future, we could employ Wiki pages, such as Google
Discussion
Wiki pages (sites.google.com), for the CGL projects. The Wiki
In this paper, we have shown how we were able to pages would allow students to create not just presentations,
successfully use a free, widely-accessible online app platform, but also web pages to teach the information. We would also
Google Apps, to encourage collaborative CGL and effectively like to incorporate the ability for students, including those not
manage a first-year pathology course at Mayo Medical School. presenting, to comment on and even revise the CGL presen-
The online apps provide an excellent platform for medical tations, for possible future course use. We would also like to
education, given the increasing demand for mobile, study the impact of the online app learning platform on
4
App platform enhances medical education
Med Teach Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by University of Calgary on 03/24/15
For personal use only.
Figure 2. Google Forms used for assignments and assessments. (A) Example of a Google Form for a differential diagnosis
assignment. (B) Example of a daily quiz question created using Google Forms. (C) Post-quiz sample output for (B) that can be used
as an audience response system to show what answers were given in class.
Figure 3. Google Docs used to create teaching assistant study guides. Example of how Google Docs was used to create a
collaborative teaching assistant study guide for the medical students to use.
5
J. G. Peacock & J. P. Grande
Med Teach Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by University of Calgary on 03/24/15
For personal use only.
Figure 4. Google Docs used to create collaborative grading rubrics for assignments. (A) Example of a differential case
assignment given to the students. (B) Example of a section of the grading rubric for (A). In the cases, students were asked to come
up with differential diagnoses for the case presented to them using the broad VITAMIN CDE diagnoses categories. Teaching
assistants were able to collaboratively come up with the best way to uniformly grade the assignments. Comments could be left in
different text colors by the different teaching assistants.
outcomes not assessed in the current study, including The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do
academic and clinical proficiency and teamwork. not reflect the official policy or position of Brooke Army
Medical Center, the U.S. Army Medical Department, the U.S.
Army Office of the Surgeon General, the Department of the
Conclusion Army, the Department of the Air Force and Department of
We have presented the use of a free, online app platform to Defense or the U.S. Government. The appearance of name-
effectively manage and improve collaborative CGL in a first- brand products, like Google, in this article does not constitute
year pathology course. Students surveyed after the course endorsement by Brooke Army Medical Center, the U.S. Army
overwhelmingly felt positively about the online app platform Medical Department, the U.S. Army Office of the Surgeon
for the course and would like to see it used in other medical General, the Department of the Army, the Department of the
school courses. Air Force and Department of Defense or the U.S. Government
of the information, products, or services contained therein.
Notes on contributors
Dr. JUSTIN G. PEACOCK, MD, PhD, is a Transitional Intern at San Antonio
Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium (SAUSHEC) entering a
References
Radiology residency program at SAUSHEC. Adams DC. 2008. Gaga for Google in the twenty-first century advanced
Dr. JOSEPH P. GRANDE, MD, PhD, is a Professor of Laboratory Medicine placement language classroom. Clearing House 82(2):96100.
and Pathology at the Mayo Clinic College of Medicine. Barlow K, Lane J. 2007. Like technology from an advanced alien culture.
Proceedings of the 35th annual ACM SIGUCCS conference on User
services SIGUCCS 07. New York: ACM Press. pp 810.
Burdette SD, Herchline, TE, Oehler R. 2008. Surfing the web: practicing
Declaration of interest: Authors do not have conflicts of medicine in a technological age: using smartphones in clinical practice.
interest to disclose. Clin Infect Dis 47(1):117122.
6
App platform enhances medical education
Cain J, Fox BI. 2009. Web 2.0 and pharmacy education. Am J Pharma Educ Kingdom (UK): A regional survey. BMC Med Inform Decision Making
73(7):120. 12:121.
Herrick DR. 2009. Google this! Proceedings of the ACM SIGUCCS fall Railean E. 2012. Google Apps for education A powerful solution
conference on User services conference SIGUCCS 09. New York, for global scientific classrooms with learner centred environment.
USA: ACM Press. p 55. Int J Comp Sci Res Appl 2(2):1927.
Hrynchak P, Batty H. 2012. The educational theory basis of team-based Sampognaro PJ, Mitchell SL, Weeks SR, Khalifian S, Markman TM, Uebel
learning. Med Teach 34(10):796801. LW, Dattilo JR. 2013. Medical student appraisal: Electronic resources for
John NW. 2007. The impact of Web3D technologies on medical education inpatient pre-rounding. Appl Clin Inform 4(3):403418.
and training. Comput Educ 49(1):1931. Schneckenberg D, Ehlers U, Adelsberger H. 2011. Web 2.0 and compe-
Khmelevsky Y, Voytenko V. 2010. Cloud computing infrastructure proto- tence-oriented design of learning-potentials and implications for higher
type for university education and research. Proceedings of the 15th education. Br J Educ Technol 42(5):747762.
Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education WCCCE 10. Sisk RJ. 2011. Team-based learning: Systematic research review. J Nurs
New York: ACM Press. p 1. Educ 50(12):665669.
Nevin R. 2009. Supporting 21st century learning through Google Apps. Tan X, Kim Y. 2011. Cloud computing for education: A case of
Teach Librarian 37(2):3538. using Google Docs in MBA Group Projects. 2011 International
Nieder GL, Parmelee DX, Stolfi A, Hudes PD. 2005. Team-based learning in Conference on Business Computing and Global Informatization. IEEE,
a medical gross anatomy and embryology course. Clin Anat (NY) pp. 641644. [Accessed 3 September 2014] Available from http://
18(1):5663. ieeexplore.ieee.org/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber6003981.
Oishi L. 2007. Working together: Google Apps goes to school. Technol Wallace S, Clark M, White J. 2012. Its on my iPhone: Attitudes to the use
Learn 27(9):46. of mobile computing devices in medical education, a mixed-methods
Parmelee DX, DeStephen D, Borges NJ. 2009. Medical students attitudes study. BMJ Open 2(4):e001099.
Med Teach Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by University of Calgary on 03/24/15
about team-based learning in a pre-clinical curriculum. Med Educ Wiecha J, Heyden R, Sternthal E, Merialdi M. 2010. Learning in a
Online 14, p. 1. [Accessed 3 September 2014] Available from http:// virtual world: Experience with using second life for medical
www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid2779620&tool education. J Med Internet Res 12(1):e1.
pmcentrez&rendertypeabstract. Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Russell J, Boynton P, Toon P. 2003. Putting your
Payne KFB, Wharrad H, Watts K. 2012. Smartphone and medical related course on the web: Lessons from a case study and systematic literature
App use among medical students and junior doctors in the United review. Med Educ 37(11):10201023.
For personal use only.