Awwa C304 07 PDF
Awwa C304 07 PDF
Awwa C304 07 PDF
AWWA Standard
Design of Prestressed
Concrete Cylinder Pipe
SM
CAUTION NOTICE: The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) approval date on the front cover of this standard
indicates completion of the ANSI approval process. This American National Standard may be revised or withdrawn at
any time. ANSI procedures require that action be taken to reaffirm, revise, or withdraw this standard no later than five
years from the date of publication. Purchasers of American National Standards may receive current information on all
standards by calling or writing the American National Standards Institute, 25 West 43rd Street, Fourth Floor, New York,
NY 10036; (212) 642-4900.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic
or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information or retrieval system, except in the form of brief
excerpts or quotations for review purposes, without the written permission of the publisher.
ii
Copyright 2007 American Water Works Association. All Rights Reserved.
Committee Personnel
The AWWA standards subcommittee that revised this standard had the following personnel
at the time of approval:
Producer Members
S.A. Arnaout, Hanson Pipe & Products Inc., Dallas, Texas (AWWA)
H.H. Bardakjian, Ameron International, Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. (AWWA)
G. Bizien, Hyprescon Inc., St. Eustache, Que. (AWWA)
A.W. Tremblay, Price Brothers Company, Dayton, Ohio (AWWA)
The AWWA Standards Committee on Concrete Pressure Pipe, which reviewed and
approved this standard, had the following personnel at the time of approval:
iii
Copyright 2007 American Water Works Association. All Rights Reserved.
P.J. Olson,* Standards Engineer Liaison, AWWA, Denver, Colo. (AWWA)
J.J. Roller, CTL Group, Skokie, Ill. (AWWA)
A.E. Romer, Boyle Engineering Corporation, Newport Beach, Calif. (AWWA)
C.C. Sundberg, CH2M Hill, Issaquah, Wash. (AWWA)
M.S. Zarghamee, Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc., Waltham, Mass. (AWWA)
Producer Members
J.O. Alayon, Atlantic Pipe Corporation, San Juan, Puerto Rico (AWWA)
S.A. Arnaout, Hanson Pipe & Products Inc., Dallas, Texas (AWWA)
H.H. Bardakjian, Ameron International, Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. (AWWA)
G. Bizien, Hyprescon Inc., St. Eustache, Que. (AWWA)
D. Dechant, Northwest Pipe Company, Denver, Colo. (AWWA)
S.R. Malcolm, Vianini Pipe Inc., Somerville, N.J. (AWWA)
D.P. Prosser, American Concrete Pressure Pipe Association, Reston, Va. (ACPPA)
A.W. Tremblay, Price Brothers Company, Dayton, Ohio (AWWA)
User Members
*Liaison, nonvoting
iv
Copyright 2007 American Water Works Association. All Rights Reserved.
Contents
All AWWA standards follow the general format indicated subsequently. Some variations from this format
may be found in a particular standard.
SEC. PAGE SEC. PAGE
Foreword 3 Load and Internal-Pressure
I Introduction ................................... xi Combinations
I.A Background .................................... xi 3.1 Notation.......................................... 8
I.B History .......................................... xv 3.2 Load Factors for Limit-States
I.C Acceptance..................................... xv Design............................................. 9
II Special Issues ................................ xvi 3.3 Minimum Combined Design Loads
III Use of This Standard................... xvii and Pressures................................... 9
III.A Purchaser Options and 3.4 Working Loads and Internal
Alternatives ................................. xvii Pressures ......................................... 9
III.B Modification to Standard ........... xviii 3.5 Working Plus Transient Loads
IV Major Revisions.......................... xviii and Internal Pressures ..................... 9
V Comments.................................. xviii 3.6 Working Loads and Internal
Field-Test Pressures ...................... 10
Standard 3.7 Load and Pressure Factors ............. 10
1 General 4 Moments and Thrusts
1.1 Scope .................................................1 4.1 Notation........................................ 12
1.2 References........................................ 1 4.2 Distribution of Loads .................... 13
1.3 Applications..................................... 3 4.3 Moments and Thrusts ................... 13
1.4 Pipe Structure.................................. 3
1.5 Tolerances ....................................... 4 5 Design Material Properties
1.6 Definitions ...................................... 4 5.1 Notation........................................ 15
1.7 Metric (SI) Equivalents ................... 5 5.2 Materials and Manufacturing
Standard........................................ 16
2 Loads and Internal Pressures 5.3 Properties of Core Concrete .......... 16
2.1 Notation.......................................... 5 5.4 Properties of Coating Mortar ........ 21
2.2 Design Loads and Internal 5.5 Properties of Steel Cylinder........... 22
Pressures.......................................... 6 5.6 Properties of Prestressing Wire ...... 23
2.3 Loads ............................................... 6
6 Stresses From Prestressing
2.4 Internal Pressures............................. 7
6.1 Notation........................................ 25
6.2 Prestress Losses .............................. 27
v
Copyright 2007 American Water Works Association. All Rights Reserved.
SEC. PAGE SEC. PAGE
vi
Copyright 2007 American Water Works Association. All Rights Reserved.
SEC. PAGE SEC. PAGE
vii
Copyright 2007 American Water Works Association. All Rights Reserved.
SEC. PAGE SEC. PAGE
viii
Copyright 2007 American Water Works Association. All Rights Reserved.
SEC. PAGE SEC. PAGE
ix
Copyright 2007 American Water Works Association. All Rights Reserved.
This page intentionally blank
I. Introduction.
I.A. Background. This standard establishes the mandatory minimum require-
ments for the structural design of prestressed concrete cylinder pipe (PCCP) and
provides procedures that will ensure that the design requirements are satisfied.
There are two types of PCCP: (1) lined-cylinder pipe (LCP), with a core composed
of a steel cylinder lined with concrete, which is subsequently prestressed with
high-tensile wire wrapped directly around the steel cylinder; and (2) embedded-cylinder
pipe (ECP), with a core composed of a steel cylinder encased in concrete, which is
subsequently prestressed with high-tensile wire wrapped around the exterior concrete
surface. The cores of both types of pipe are coated with portland-cement mortar.
Before the procedures and requirements contained in this document were
developed, the design of PCCP was determined by two distinct procedures. These were
designated methods A and B described in appendixes A and B of ANSI*/AWWA
C301-84, Prestressed Concrete Pressure Pipe, Steel-Cylinder Type, for Water and Other
Liquids.
Method A used a semiempirical approach based on (1) Wo , which is nine-tenths
of the three-edge bearing test load that causes incipient cracking; and (2) the
theoretical hydrostatic pressure, Po , which relieves the calculated residual compression
in the concrete core as a result of prestressing. The allowable combinations of
three-edge bearing load and internal pressure were determined by a cubic parabola,
passing through Wo and Po , which defined the limits of these combinations. The
three-edge bearing loads used in method A were converted to earth loads and
transient external loads using bedding factors provided in AWWA Manual M9,
Concrete Pressure Pipe (1979) and in the ACPAConcrete Pipe Design Manual (1988).
Method B was based on a procedure that limited the maximum combined net
tensile stress in pipe under static external load and internal pressure to a value equal
to 7.5 f c , where fc = the 28-day compressive strength of core concrete in psi
( 0.62 f c , where fc = the 28-day compressive strength of core concrete in MPa).
*American National Standards Institute, 25 West 43rd Street, Fourth Floor, New York, NY 10036.
American Concrete Pipe Association, 1303 West Walnut Hill Lane, Suite 305, Irving, TX 75038.
xi
Copyright 2007 American Water Works Association. All Rights Reserved.
Both design methods limited the working pressure to Po for ECP and to 0.8Po for
LCP, where Po was the internal pressure required to overcome all compression in the
core concrete excluding external load. Under transient conditions, such as those
produced by surge pressures and live loads, both methods permitted increased
internal pressure and external load.
Although the two methods of design produced similarly conservative results that
served PCCP users well for nearly half a century, a unified method of design,
described in this standard, was developed to replace methods A and B.
The following objectives for the unified design procedure were established:
1. It should replace both existing methods, the semiempirical method A and
the working stress method B, described in ANSI/AWWA C301-84.
2. It should be based on state-of-the-art procedures for the design and analysis
of concrete and prestressed concrete structures.
3. It should account for the state of prestress in the pipe, as well as the com-
bined effects of external loads, pipe and fluid weights, and internal pressures.
4. It should agree with the results of 40 years of experimental data gathered by
the American concrete pressure-pipe industry.
5. It should preclude the onset of visible cracking under working plus transient
conditions.
6. It should provide adequate safety factors based on elastic and strength limit
states.
The method of calculating residual stresses in the concrete core, the steel cylinder,
and the prestressing wire was updated to separately account for the effects of elastic
deformation, creep, and shrinkage of concrete, and the relaxation of the prestressing
wire (Zarghamee, Heger, and Dana 1988a; see appendix B). Intrinsic wire relaxation,
creep factors, and shrinkage strains obtained from procedures recommended by ACI*
Committee 209 (1982) (ACI 1982; see appendix B) were used in a step-by-step
integration procedure (Zarghamee 1990; see appendix B) to evaluate the time-related
variations of stress in the pipe elements. The results of the step-by-step integration
procedure, applied to pipe in a buried environment, were used to develop simplified
equations for practical design use.
Calculations of the design creep factor and shrinkage strain for buried pipe are
based on the procedures recommended by ACI Committee 209. Creep and shrinkage
are computed as functions of time, relative humidity, volume-to-surface ratio, age at
*American Concrete Institute, 38800 Country Club Drive, Farmington Hills, MI 48331.
xii
Copyright 2007 American Water Works Association. All Rights Reserved.
loading, curing duration, concrete composition, and method of placement. Design
values for creep factor and shrinkage strain are based on a 50-year exposure of pipe
to the environment to which typical pipe will be exposed. The default environment
is given in the following scenario:
1. The pipe is initially stored outdoors for 270 days.
2. The pipe is buried and kept empty for 90 days.
3. The pipe is filled with water for the duration of its design life.
The periods of time given in items 1 and 2 above may be extended at the
purchasers discretion.
The design wire-relaxation factor was obtained by measuring the intrinsic loss of
prestressing wire, manufactured in accordance with ASTM* A648, Specification for
Steel Wire, Hard Drawn for Prestressing Concrete Pipe, under constant strain and
accounting for the reduction in relaxation loss caused by creep and shrinkage.
The simplified procedure, which separately accounts for concrete creep and
shrinkage and wire relaxation, complies with test results (Zarghamee, Fok, and
Sikiotis 1990; see appendix B) and with prior design practice (Zarghamee, Heger,
and Dana 1988b; see appendix B).
The method adopted for determining allowable combinations of internal
pressure, external loads, and pipe and fluid weights is based on satisfying certain
limit-states design criteria (Heger, Zarghamee, and Dana 1990; see appendix B). The
purpose of using limit-states design is to ensure the serviceability of pipe that is
subject to working plus transient design loads and pressures. Limit-states design also
ensures that the prestress and safety margins for pipe strength will be maintained
even if the pipe is subjected to abnormal conditions that may cause visible cracking.
The limit-states design procedure is based on limiting circumferential thrust and
bending moment resulting from internal pressure, external loads, and pipe and fluid
weights. The procedure specifies that certain limit-states-design criteria are not
exceeded when the pipe is subjected to working loads and pressures and to working
plus transient loads and pressures.
In the design procedure, three sets of limit-states criteria are used: serviceability,
elastic, and strength. To satisfy the three sets of limit-states criteria, combined loads
and pressures corresponding to each of these limit states must be calculated. As a
result, the combined moments and thrusts in the pipe wall corresponding to the limit
states must be calculated, and both uncracked and cracked cross sections must be
xiii
Copyright 2007 American Water Works Association. All Rights Reserved.
considered. For accurate calculation of these combined moments and thrusts, the
constitutive properties of concrete and mortar in tension must be expressed correctly.
A trilinear model for stressstrain relationships of concrete and mortar was adopted
for use in the limit-states design of PCCP.
Serviceability limit-states criteria are intended to preclude microcracking in the core
and to control microcracking in the coating under working loads and pressures. These
criteria are also intended to preclude visible cracking in the core and the coating under
working plus transient loads and pressures. Criteria are provided for the following:
1. Core-crack control.
2. Radial-tension control.
3. Coating-crack control.
4. Core-compression control.
5. Maximum pressure.
Elastic limit states are defined to limit combined working plus transient loads and
pressures so that if cracks develop in a prestressed pipe under the transient condition,
the pipe will have an elastic response, preventing damage or loss of prestress. Criteria
are provided for the following states:
1. Wire-stress control.
2. Steel-cylinder-stress control.
Strength limit states are defined to protect the pipe against yielding of the
prestressing wire, crushing of the concrete core under external load, and tensile failure
of the wire under internal pressure. Safety factors are applied to loads and pressures
that produce the strength limit states. The following criteria are provided:
1. Wire yield-strength control.
2. Core compressive-strength control.
3. Burst-pressure control.
4. Coating bond-strength control.
The limit-states design procedure for PCCP subjected to the combined effects of
internal pressure, external loads, and pipe and fluid weights
1. Is a rational procedure based on state-of-the-art structural engineering prac-
tice for concrete structures.
2. Uses parameters resulting from many tests of prestressed concrete pipe and
its constitutive materials.
3. Is substantiated by the results of combined-load and three-edge bearing veri-
fication tests of LCP and ECP.
xiv
Copyright 2007 American Water Works Association. All Rights Reserved.
The standard includes tables of standard designs for prestressed concrete LCP and
a design example for ECP.
I.B. History. The AWWA Standards Committee on Concrete Pressure Pipe
supported a recommendation that a design standard be developed for PCCP to be
manufactured in accordance with ANSI/AWWA C301, Prestressed Concrete Pressure
Pipe, Steel-Cylinder Type. On June 20, 1989, the C301 Design Subcommittee first
met for the purpose of developing the design standard. At its October 1989 meeting,
the AWWA Standards Council authorized a separate design standard for PCCP. The
first edition of this standard, ANSI/AWWA C304, Design of Prestressed Concrete
Cylinder Pipe, was approved by the Board of Directors on June 18, 1992. The second
edition was approved on Jan. 24, 1999. This edition was approved on Jan. 21, 2007.
I.C. Acceptance. In May 1985, the US Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) entered into a cooperative agreement with a consortium led by NSF
International (NSF) to develop voluntary third-party consensus standards and a
certification program for all direct and indirect drinking water additives. Other
members of the original consortium included the American Water Works Association
Research Foundation (AwwaRF) and the Conference of State Health and Environ-
mental Managers (COSHEM). AWWA and the Association of State Drinking Water
Administrators (ASDWA) joined later.
In the United States, authority to regulate products for use in, or in contact with,
drinking water rests with individual states.* Local agencies may choose to impose
requirements more stringent than those required by the state. To evaluate the health
effects of products and drinking water additives from such products, state and local
agencies may use various references, including
1. An advisory program formerly administered by USEPA, Office of Drinking
Water, discontinued on Apr. 7, 1990.
2. Specific policies of the state or local agency.
3. Two standards developed according to NSF, NSF/ANSI 60, Drinking
Water Treatment ChemicalsHealth Effects, and NSF/ANSI 61, Drinking Water
System ComponentsHealth Effects.
*Persons outside the United States should contact the appropriate authority having jurisdiction.
NSF International, 789 N. Dixboro Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48113.
American National Standards Institute, 25 West 43rd Street, Fourth Floor, New York, NY 10036.
xv
Copyright 2007 American Water Works Association. All Rights Reserved.
4. Other references including AWWA standards, Food Chemicals Codex, Water
Chemicals Codex,* and other standards considered appropriate by the state or local
agency.
Various certification organizations may be involved in certifying products in
accordance with NSF/ANSI 61. Individual states or local agencies have authority to
accept or accredit certification organizations within their jurisdiction. Accreditation
of certification organizations may vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.
Annex A, Toxicology Review and Evaluation Procedures, to NSF/ANSI 61
does not stipulate a maximum allowable level (MAL) of a contaminant for substances
not regulated by a USEPA final maximum contaminant level (MCL). The MALs of
an unspecified list of unregulated contaminants are based on toxicity testing
guidelines (noncarcinogens) and risk characterization methodology (carcinogens).
Use of Annex A procedures may not always be identical, depending on the certifier.
ANSI/AWWA C304 does not address additive requirements. Thus, users of this
standard should consult the appropriate state or local agency having jurisdiction in
order to
1. Determine additive requirements, including applicable standards.
2. Determine the status of certifications by all parties offering to certify prod-
ucts for contact with, or treatment of, drinking water.
3. Determine current information on product certification.
II. Special Issues. The information needed for selection of designs from the
tables of standard designs includes:
1. Inside diameter of pipe (in. [mm]).
2. Internal working pressure (psi [kPa]).
3. Type of standard bedding.
4. Height of earth cover over the pipe (ft [m]).
The standard criteria used in the design selection tables are summarized in Sec. 9.4
preceding the design selection tables. If different design criteria are required by the
purchaser, they should be specified by the purchaser, stated in the contract documents,
and accounted for in the design of the pipe.
*Both publications available from National Academy of Sciences, 500 Fifth Street, N.W.,
Washington, DC 20001.
xvi
Copyright 2007 American Water Works Association. All Rights Reserved.
III. Use of This Standard. It is the responsibility of the user of an AWWA
standard to determine that the products described in that standard are suitable for use
in the particular application being considered.
III.A. Purchaser Options and Alternatives. For LCP designs not included in
the standard design tables and for all ECP designs, the design procedures specified in
the standard must be implemented. For this purpose, the following information is to
be provided by the purchaser:
1. Inside diameter of pipe (in. [mm]).
2. Fluid unit weight (lb/ft3 [kg/m3]) if a fluid other than fresh water is
required.
3. Height of earth cover over the pipe (ft [m]) or external dead load (lb/ft
[kg/m]).
4. External surcharge load (lb/ft [kg/m]).
5. External transient load (lb/ft [kg/m]) if loading other than AASHTO* HS20
loading is required.
6. Internal working pressure (psi [kPa]).
7. Internal transient pressure (psi [kPa]).
8. Internal field-test pressure (psi [kPa]).
9. Installation requirements.
10. Time period of exposure to outdoor environment (days) if more than 270 days.
11. Relative humidity of the outdoor environment.
12. Time exposure of pipe to burial environment before water filling (days) if
more than 90 days.
III.A.1. Information to be Provided by the Pipe Manufacturer. In addition to the
information listed above (Sec. III.A), the following information is to be provided by
the pipe manufacturer:
1. Outside diameter of the steel cylinder (in. [mm]).
2. Thickness of the steel cylinder (in. [mm]).
3. Diameter of prestressing wire (in. [mm]).
4. Class of prestressing wire (II or III).
5. Number of layers of prestressing wire (one, two, or three).
6. Coating thickness over the prestressing wire (in. [mm]).
*American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 444 North Capitol St.,
N.W., Washington, DC 20001.
xvii
Copyright 2007 American Water Works Association. All Rights Reserved.
7. Coating thickness between layers of prestressing wire (in. [mm]).
8. Concrete 28-day compressive strength (psi [MPa]).
9. Concrete modulus of elasticity multiplier, if less than 0.9.
10. Concrete creep factor multiplier, if greater than 1.1.
11. Concrete shrinkage strain multiplier, if greater than 1.1.
12. Prestressing wire intrinsic relaxation multiplier, if greater than 1.1.
III.B. Modification to Standard. Any modifications to the provisions, defini-
tions, or terminology in this standard must be provided by the purchaser.
IV. Major Revisions. The major revisions made to the standard in this
edition include the following:
1. Editorial changes have been made throughout the standard to correct errors
and to update the standard to AWWA standard style.
V. Comments. If you have any comments or questions about this standard,
please call the AWWA Volunteer and Technical Support Group at 303.794.7711,
FAX at 303.795.7603, write to the group at 6666 West Quincy Avenue, Denver, CO
80235-3098, or e-mail at [email protected].
xviii
Copyright 2007 American Water Works Association. All Rights Reserved.
ANSI/AWWA C304-07
(Revision of ANSI/AWWA C304-99)
AWWA Standard
SECTION 1: GENERAL
*American National Standards Institute, 25 West 43rd Street, Fourth Floor, New York, NY 10036.
1
Copyright 2007 American Water Works Association. All Rights Reserved.
2 AWWA C304-07
for installation of the pipe are described in AWWA Manual M9, Concrete Pressure
Pipe.
This standard references the following documents. In their current editions,
they form a part of this standard to the extent specified in this standard. In any case
of conflict, the requirements of this standard shall prevail.
AASHTO* HB-15Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges.
ACI 209R-92Prediction of Creep, Shrinkage, and Temperature Effects in
Concrete Structures.
ANSI/AWWA C301Prestressed Concrete Pressure Pipe, Steel-Cylinder Type.
ASTM A648Standard Specification for Steel Wire, Hard Drawn for
Pre-stressing Concrete Pipe.
ASTM C33Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates.
ASTM C39Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical
Concrete Specimens.
ASTM C192/C192MStandard Practice for Making and Curing Concrete
Test Specimens in the Laboratory.
ASTM C469Standard Test for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poissons
Ratio of Concrete in Compression.
ASTM C512Standard Test Method for Creep of Concrete in Compression.
Concrete Pipe Design Manual. American Concrete Pipe Association.
Concrete Pressure Pipe. AWWA Manual M9. AWWA, Denver, Colo. (1995).
FAA** AC150/5320-6CAirport Pavement Design and Evaluation.
FAA AC150/5325-5CAircraft Data.
Manual for Railway Engineering. American Railway Engineering and Mainte-
nance-of-Way Association.
*American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 444 N. Capitol St. NW, Ste.
429, Washington, DC 20001.
American Concrete Institute, 38800 Country Club Drive, Farmington Hills, MI 48331.
ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428.
American Concrete Pipe Association, 1303 West Walnut Hill Lane, Ste. 305, Irving, TX 75038.
**Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20591.
American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association, 10003 Derekwood Lane, Ste.
210, Lanham, MD 20706.
Figure 1 Schematic pipe-wall cross sections for lined- and embedded-cylinder pipe
2.3.1.2 Fluid weight, Wf , computed using 62.4 lb/ft3 (1,000 kg/m3) as the
unit weight of fresh water. If fluids other than fresh water are to be transported by the
pipe, then the actual unit weight of those fluids shall be used.
2.3.1.3 External dead load, We , computed as the sum of earth load and
surcharge load, if any.
Earth load is computed in accordance with AWWA Manual M9; ACPAs
Concrete Pipe Design Manual; or AASHTO HB-15, division I, section 17.4; or
recognized and documented analytical procedures based on soilpipe interaction.
Surcharge load, resulting from the dead load of structures or other surface loads
that are not transient loads as defined in Sec. 2.3.2, is computed in accordance with
ACPAs Concrete Pipe Design Manual.
2.3.2 Transient loads. Transient load, Wt , for which the pipe shall be
designed, includes the following vertical surface loads of short duration, whenever
applicable.
2.3.2.1 Highway live load, computed in accordance with AASHTO HB-15,
AWWA Manual M9, and ACPAs Concrete Pipe Design Manual. HS20 loading shall
be used unless other loading is specified by the purchaser.
2.3.2.2 Railroad live load shall be computed in accordance with AREMAs
Manual for Railway Engineering and ACPAs Concrete Pipe Design Manual. Cooper E-72
loading shall be used unless other loading is specified by the purchaser.
2.3.2.3 Aircraft live load shall be computed using appropriate aircraft wheel
loads (see FAA AC150/5325-5C, Aircraft Data), in accordance with FAA AC150/
5320-6C, Airport Pavement Design and Evaluation, and ACPAs Concrete Pipe Design
Manual.
2.3.2.4 Construction live load, if specified by the purchaser, shall be
computed using the specified load and earth cover in accordance with ACPAs
Concrete Pipe Design Manual procedure for highway live load.
2.3.3 Impact factor. Computation of Wt shall include the application of an
appropriate impact factor, If , in accordance with the applicable live load standard or
ACPAs Concrete Pipe Design Manual.
Where:
2 = 1.3 for ECP and 1.4 for LCP
Where:
1 = 1.1 for ECP and 1.2 for LCP
Where:
Po = the decompression pressure that relieves the final prestress in the core,
as defined in Sec. 6.3.3. Dy is in in., and Po is in psi. The metric
equivalent of Eq 4-1, with Dy in mm and Po in kPa, is
No = 1/2Dy Po
4.3.2 Moments and thrusts from combined loads.* The moments and thrusts
resulting from pressure, external loads (earth, surcharge, transient, and construction
loads), and weights of pipe and fluid, for a pipe with uniform wall, are
Where:
Di + hc + hm
R = ------------------------------ (Eq 4-6)
2
When Dy is in mm and P is in kPa, substitute 1/2Dy for 6Dy in Eq 4-4 and 4-5.
The moment and thrust coefficients are obtained from the assumed distribution
of earth pressure selected for the design installation.
4.3.3 Moment redistribution.* When the moment, M1, given by Eq 4-2 is
greater than the moment capacity at the invert, M1cap, the moments at the invert and
springline, M1 and M2, obtained using Eq 4-2 and 4-3, shall be redistributed as
described in this section. M1cap for ECP is the M1-moment limit at the invert
corresponding to the steel-cylinder stress reaching a limiting value and is computed
according to the procedure in Sec. 7.4.2 and 8.9.1. M1cap for LCP is the M1-moment
limit at the invert corresponding to the coating strain reaching the compressive
strain limit after cracking of the core and is computed according to the procedure
in Sec. 8.9.4. For loads exceeding the limiting load that produces M1cap at the invert,
the redistributed moment at the springline M2r is
Where:
M1 and M2 are given by Eq 4-2 and 4-3
but not less than 1.8 times the initial prestress in the core (that is, the initial prestress
in the core shall not exceed 0.55fci ).
5.3.3 Tensile strength of concrete.* The design tensile strength of the core
concrete is
f t = 7 f c (Eq 5-1)
Where:
fc = design 28-day compressive strength of core concrete in psi
f t = 0.58 f c
Where:
fc = design 28-day compressive strength of core concrete in MPa
Where:
c = 145 lb/ft3
fc = design 28-day compressive strength of concrete in psi
1.51 0.3
E c = 0.074 c ( fc )
Where:
c = 2,323 kg/m3
fc = design 28-day compressive strength of concrete in MPa
specimens shall be computed. The design 28-day compressive strength of the test
concrete shall be
For purposes of these tests, fct shall range from 4,500 to 6,500 psi (31.0 to
44.8 MPa).
The modulus of elasticity multiplier is
E ct
C E = -----------------------------------------
- (Eq 5-4)
1.51 0.3
158 c ( f ct )
Where:
Ect (psi) = the average of the five or more modulus of elasticity test results
c = 145 lb/ft3
E ct
C E = ----------------------------------------------
1.51 0.3
0.074 c ( fc t )
Where:
Ect (MPa) = the average of the five or more modulus of elasticity test results
c = 2,323 kg/m3
If CE is less than 0.9 for all pipe manufactured using the aggregates and cement
used in the test, the design modulus of elasticity shall be reduced by multiplying the
result of Eq 5-2 by CE, and the modular ratios given in Sec. 6 and 8 shall be
increased by dividing them by CE.
The quality-assurance test to determine modulus of elasticity shall be made
annually or whenever the sources of aggregate or cement are changed.
5.3.5 Stressstrain relationship of concrete.* The design stressstrain relation-
ship of the core concrete is shown in Figure 2A.
5.3.6 Creep and shrinkage properties of concrete. Each factory that manufac-
tures PCCP shall perform a quality-assurance test of concrete creep and shrinkage on
a mix with the aggregates and cement to be used in the manufacture of pipe (without
additives or admixtures). If either the measured concrete creep factor or shrinkage
strain is more than the value computed in accordance with ACI 209R-82, the design
ft Onset of Microcracking
7 fc
Tensile Stress
Ec Ec /10
1
1
Onset of
Visible Cracking
Compressive
Stress
ft
7 fm
Tensile Stress
Em Em /7
1
1
Onset of
Visible Cracking
Figure 2 Stressstrain relationships for concrete and mortar in tension and compression
creep factor and shrinkage strain shall be modified for all pipe manufactured using
these aggregates and cement.
The creep and shrinkage-strain properties of concrete produced at the factory
shall be determined from tests of at least one set of molded cylindrical test specimens
of concrete meeting the requirements of ANSI/AWWA C301. The test specimens
shall be molded in accordance with ASTM C192. Each set of test specimens shall
include 5 specimens for creep tests, 5 specimens for shrinkage tests, 5 specimens for
modulus-of-elasticity tests, and 10 specimens for compressive-strength tests. Each of
the specimens shall be cured and stored in accordance with the requirements for
Standard Curing in Section 6.1 of ASTM C512. Creep specimens shall be tested in
accordance with ASTM C512. Compressive strength and modulus of elasticity shall
be determined in accordance with ASTM C39 and C469, respectively.
Immediately before loading the creep specimens, the compressive strength of
concrete shall be determined by testing five of the strength specimens in accordance
with ASTM C39.
Creep-test specimens shall be loaded at 7 days to a compressive stress level
ranging from 30 to 40 percent of the compressive strength of the concrete at loading
age.
Strain readings of loaded specimens shall be taken immediately before and after
loading, 7 days after loading, and 28 days after loading. Shrinkage strains shall be
measured at the same times as strain readings of loaded specimens. Additional strain
readings may be taken at other times.
The 28-day compressive strength of concrete shall be determined by testing the
remaining five strength specimens in accordance with ASTM C39 and averaging
their results. The 28-day modulus of elasticity of concrete shall be determined by
testing five test specimens in accordance with ASTM C469 and averaging their
results.
In addition to the items required by ASTM C512 to be included in the report,
the following items shall be reported:
1. Shrinkage strains at designated ages (in./in. [mm/mm]).
2. Compressive strength at 28 days of age (psi [MPa]).
3. Modulus of elasticity at 28 days of age (psi [MPa]).
4. Cement content of the concrete (lb/yd3 [kg/m3]).
5. Watercement ratio.
The average of five specific creep strains plus the initial elastic strains measured
up to 28 days after loading shall be extrapolated using the BPKX model of drying
creep (Bazant, Kim, and Panula [1991, 1992]) or the ACI 209R-92 model of drying
creep to compute the specific creep plus instantaneous strain at 50 years. A procedure
for the extrapolation is discussed in Ojdrovic and Zarghamee (1996). The resulting
creep factor at 50 years is computed by dividing the specific creep strain at 50 years,
(18,250), by the specific initial strain.
The concrete creep factor multiplier, C , is the ratio of the creep factor at 50
years to the computed value of the creep factor using ACI 209R-92:
( 18,250 )
C = ------------------------
2.0
If C is greater than 1.1, for all pipe to be manufactured using the aggregates
and cement used in the test, the design creep factor shall be increased by multiplying
the creep factor given in Eq 6-16 by C .
The average of five shrinkage strains measured at 28 days after loading of the
creep specimens shall be extrapolated using the BPKX model of shrinkage (Bazant,
Kim, and Panula [1991, 1992]) or the ACI 209R-92 model of shrinkage to compute
the shrinkage strain at 50 years, s (18,250). A procedure for the extrapolation is
discussed in Ojdrovic and Zarghamee (1996). The concrete shrinkage strain
multiplier, Cs , is the ratio of the shrinkage strain at 50 years to the computed value
of the shrinkage strain using ACI 209R-92:
s ( 18,250 )
C s = -------------------------
700
If Cs is greater than 1.1, for all pipe to be manufactured using the aggregates and
cement used in the test, the design shrinkage strain shall be increased by multiplying
the shrinkage strain s given in Eq 6-17 by Cs.
Creep and shrinkage measurements shall be made whenever the sources of
aggregate or cement are changed.
Where:
fm = design 28-day compressive strength of coating mortar in psi
f tm = 0.58 f m
Where:
fm = design 28-day compressive strength of coating mortar in MPa
Where:
m = 140 lb/ft3
fm = 5,500 psi
1.51 0.3
E m = 0.074 m ( fm )
Where:
m = 2,242 kg/m3
fm = 37.9 MPa
If the specified minimum yield strength of the cylinder steel is greater than
45,000 psi [310 MPa], the larger value may be used for f *yy .
fy
fyy
Constant
Linear
Ey
Compression
fs g = 0.75fs u
Figure 4 Stressstrain relationship for 6-gauge prestressing wire in tension after wrapping at fs g
5.6.2 Yield strength of wire. The design yield strength of wire, fs y , is 85 percent
of the specified minimum tensile strength of the wire:
This stress level corresponds to the 0.2 percent strain offset in a wire before
prestressing.
5.6.3 Modulus of elasticity of wire. The design modulus of elasticity of wire,
after wrapping at fs g , for stress levels below fs g , shall be
f ic ( A c + nr A s + n r A y ) ( As E s + A y E y )s A s Rf sg
f cr = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (Eq 6-4)
A c + ( n r A s + n r A y ) ( 1 + )
A c ( f ic n r + E y s ) RA s f sg n r ( 1 + )
f yr = f iy + ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Eq 6-5)
A + ( n A + n A ) ( 1 + )
c r s r y
A c ( f ic n r + E s s ) RA s f sg n r( 1 + )
f sr = f is + Rf sg + ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Eq 6-6)
A + ( n A + n A ) ( 1 + )
c r s r y
wire diameter. For designs with greater radial distance between prestressing layers,
special designs are required.
6.4.2 Initial prestress. The initial prestress in concrete for a pipe with
multiple layers of prestressing is the sum of the initial prestress caused by each layer
of prestressing:
Where:
A s1 f sg
f ic1 = -------------------------------------------
- (Eq 6-9)
A c + n i A s1 + n i A y
A s2 f sg
f ic2 = --------------------------------------------------------------
- (Eq 6-10)
A c + ni ( A s1 + A s2 ) + n i A y
A s3 f sg
f ic3 = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- (Eq 6-11)
A c + n i ( A s1 + A s2 + A s3 ) + n i A y
3
A c ( f ic n r + E s s ) R k A sk f sg n r( 1 + )
k = 1
f srj = f isj + R j f sg + ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Eq 6-15)
A c + ( n r A s + n r A y ) ( 1 + )
Sec. 6.6 Design Creep Factor and Design Shrinkage Strain for Buried Pipe*
For a buried pipe, the creep factor, , and shrinkage strain, s, are
( h co + h m ) com h m m + h ci ci
= ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Eq 6-16)
h ci + h co
( h co + h m )s com h m s m + h ci s ci
s = ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (Eq 6-17)
h ci + h co
where ci, com , m , sci , scom, and sm are creep factors and shrinkage strains for the
inner core, the outer core plus the coating, and for the coating, respectively.
Based on the quality-assurance tests of concrete creep and shrinkage discussed in
Sec. 5.3.6, if the design creep factor and shrinkage strain need to be increased, the
values of and s computed in Eq 6-16 and 6-17 shall be multiplied by C and Cs ,
respectively.
The volume-to-surface ratio of a cylinder with only one exposed surface is
equal to its thickness. Creep factors and shrinkage strains are expressed in terms of
volume-to-surface ratios as follows:
and
Where:
and are volume-to-surface correction factors for creep and shrinkage.
1, s1, 2, and s2 are the creep factors and shrinkage strains for inner core
concrete and outer core concrete for the special case of = = 1.0. The functions
(h) and (h) of the volume-to-surface ratio h are:
0.54h
(h) = 2/3 [ 1 + 1.13e ] (Eq 6-24)
0.12h
(h) = 1.2e (Eq 6-25)
Values of 1, 2, s1, and s2 are determined on the basis of the following design
scenario for exposure of buried pipe:
1. The inner and outer surfaces of the pipe are exposed to an outdoor
environment with a specific relative humidity, RH, for t1 days.
2. The inner and outer surfaces of the pipe are exposed to a burial
environment with 92.5 percent RH for an additional t2 days.
3. The inner surface of the pipe is exposed for the remainder of the pipes
service life to a 100 percent RH environment (water-filled condition), while the
outer surface continues to be exposed to the burial environment.
The minimum values of t1 and t2 for which the pipe shall be designed are
t1 = 270 days (9 months)
t2 = 90 days (3 months).
relative humidity less than 40 percent, the constants 1, 2, s1, and s2 shall be those
given in the table for RH = 40 percent.
Values of 1, 2, s1, and s2 for cast core concrete when t1 270 days or t2
90 days may be calculated from the following expressions:
0.65 0.05
1 = 2.35 ------------------------------ + ---------------------------------------------- + 0.6 (Eq 6-26)
0.6 0.6
1 + 10 t 1 1 + 10 ( t 1 + t 2 )
0.65
2 = 2.35 ------------------------------ + 0.65 (Eq 6-27)
0.6
1 + 10 t 1
6 ( 0.225 )t 0.225 ( t 1 + t 2 )
s 1 = 312 10 -----------------------------------1- + --------------------------------- (Eq 6-28)
t 1 + 55 t 1 + t 2 + 55
6 ( 0.4 0.09 )t
s 2 = 780 10 ----------------------------------------1- + 0.225 (Eq 6-29)
t 1 + 55
Where:
= 0.8 and = 0.7 for RH = 70 percent
= = 1.0 for RH = 40 percent
Values of 1, 2, s1, and s2 for spun core concrete are 60 percent of the values
calculated for cast concrete.
A s Asf A sf
Rf = 0.127 5.0 0.17 ----- ------ + 0.83 ------ for cast concrete (Eq 6-33)
A c Ac Ac
A s1 A A s1
R1 = 0.101 2.5 0.65 ------- + 0.35 -----s ------- for spun concrete (Eq 6-34)
Ac Ac Ac
A s A sf A sf
Rf = 0.127 2.5 0.06 ----- ------ + 0.94 ------ for spun concrete (Eq 6-35)
Ac Ac Ac
Where:
R1 = the relaxation factor for the first layer of prestressing
Rf = the relaxation factor for the final layer of prestressing
The relaxation factors for the other layers of prestressing are obtained by linear
interpolation.
6.7.3 Each factory where ASTM A648 wire is made for PCCP shall perform
a quality-assurance test of wire relaxation. The normal intrinsic relaxation of wire for
an initial stress of 0.7fsu at 1,000 h, determined in accordance with the requirements
of ASTM A648, is denoted by I. For normal intrinsic relaxation, I = 6.8 percent of
the initial stress. The wire intrinsic relaxation multiplier, CR = I/6.8, is the ratio of
the intrinsic relaxation of wire to normal intrinsic relaxation. If CR > 1.1, the
wire-relaxation factors shall be calculated based on the provisions of Sec. 6.7.4
and 6.7.5.
6.7.4 The wire-relaxation factors for pipe with a single layer of prestressing,
using ASTM A648 wire with higher than normal intrinsic relaxation and
prestretched to fs g = 0.75fs u , are as follows:
R = 0.035 + 0.146CR (0.95 + 2.55CR)(As /Ac ) for cast concrete (Eq 6-36)
R = 0.004 + 0.128CR (2.01 + 1.09CR)(As /Ac ) for spun concrete (Eq 6-37)
6.7.5 The wire-relaxation factors for multiple layers of prestressing, using wire
with higher than normal intrinsic relaxation and prestretched to fs g = 0.75fs u , are as
follows:
A s1 A A s1
R1 = 0.044 + 0.069C R 5.8 0.64 ------- + 0.36 -----s ------- for cast concrete (Eq 6-38)
Ac Ac Ac
A s A sf A sf
Rf = 0.050 + 0.077C R 5.0 0.17 ----- ------ + 0.83 ------ for cast concrete (Eq 6-39)
Ac Ac Ac
A s1 A A s1
R1 = 0.032 + 0.069C R 2.5 0.65 ------- + 0.35 -----s ------- for spun concrete (Eq 6-40)
Ac Ac Ac
A s A sf A sf
Rf = 0.050 + 0.077C R 2.5 0.06 ----- ------ + 0.94 ------ for spun concrete (Eq 6-41)
Ac Ac Ac
7.3.1 Core crack control. The tensile strain at the inside surface of the core
shall be limited to the following:
7.3.2 Radial tension control. The calculated radial tensile stress at the inter-
face between the inner core and cylinder of ECP shall be a maximum of 12 psi under
working-load combination FW1 and under working plus transient load combination
WT3.
7.3.3 Coating crack control. The tensile strain at the outside of the coating
shall be limited to the following:
The tensile strain at the outside surface of the concrete core shall be limited to
the following:
load and pressure combination W1: w = 1.5t
load and pressure combinations FT1, WT1, and WT2: k = 11t
7.3.4 Core compression control. The maximum compressive stress at the
inside surface of the core shall be limited to the following:
load combination W2: 0.55fc
load combination WT3: 0.65fc
7.3.5 Maximum pressures. The maximum internal pressure shall be limited
to the following:
ECP
load and pressure combination W1: Po
load and pressure combination WT1: min. (1.4Po , Pk)
LCP
load and pressure combination W1: 0.8Po
load and pressure combination WT1: min. (1.2Po , Pk)
Where:
Pk = the internal pressure that, acting alone, produces (1) strain in the
coating of 0.5km , or (2) axial tensile stress in the core of 5 f c ,
7.5.3 Burst pressure. The stress in the prestressing wire shall remain below
the specified minimum tensile strength of the wire when the pipe is subjected to the
factored pressure combination FWT6.
7.5.4 Coating bond-strength control. To ensure satisfactory mortar-coating
bond strength, the minimum design spacing of prestressing wires in the same layer
shall be d/ds 2 for ECP and d/ds 2.75 for LCP. The maximum center-to-center
design spacing of prestressing wires in the same layer shall be 1.5 in. (38 mm), except
that for LCP with wire 1/4 in. (6.35 mm) in diameter and larger, the maximum
design spacing of prestressing wires shall be 1 in. (25 mm).
7.5.5 Pipe manufacture and storage in adverse environments.* Pipe manufac-
tured and stored in hot and/or dry environmental conditions should be protected
against excessive heat and drying effects. Adverse environments for pipe manufacture
and storage exist when (1) the normal maximum daily temperature exceeds 90F
(32C) during the two-month period after pipe manufacture, referred to as a hot
environment, or (2) the mean relative humidity is less than 40 percent during the
two-month period after pipe manufacture, referred to as an arid environment.
Protection of pipe in adverse environments shall be provided by the treatments
indicated in the following matrix and list.
Pipe Treatments
Environmental Condition Not Arid Arid
Not Hot None 1,2
Hot 1,3 1,4
Pipe treatments:
1. Mortar coating shall have a minimum moisture content of 7.5 percent of
the total dry weight of the mix.
2. A curing membrane shall be applied to the exterior of the pipe to retard
moisture loss from the mortar coating.
3. Whitewash, paint, or other material shall be applied to the exterior of the
pipe to reflect solar radiation.
4. A curing membrane shall be applied to the exterior of the pipe to retard
moisture loss from the mortar coating. The curing membrane shall be light in color.
Whitewash, paint, or other material shall be applied over the curing membrane to
reflect solar radiation.
m = hm /2hc
s = ds / 2hc
sj = [( j 1/2)ds + ( j 1)dw ]/hc
y = dy /hc
= k/t 1 = 10
2 = co /t 1 or ci /t 1
m = km/tm 1 = 7
r = radial tension between inner core and cylinder of ECP (psi [MPa])
0.5 km 5 f c
P k = P o min. -------------------, 1 + ------------
- (Eq 8-1)
cr f cr
0.5 km 0.41 f c
P k = Po min. -------------------, 1 + --------------------
-
cr f cr
Table 3 Design load combinations and calculation references for embedded-cylinder pipe criteria
Table 4 Design load combinations and calculation references for lined-cylinder pipe criteria
Serviceability at To preclude onset of core Inside core tensile strain limit: W1 Sec. 8.9.1
Invert/Crown microcracking ci 1.5t
To preclude onset of core visible Inside core tensile strain limit: WT1, WT2, F T1 Sec. 8.9.1
cracking ci k = 11t
Serviceability at To preclude onset of core Outer core tensile strain limit: W1 Sec. 8.9.2
Springline microcracking and to control co 1.5t
microcracking of coating
Outer coating tensile strain limit:
mo 0.8km = 6.4tm
To preclude coating visible Outer core tensile strain limit: WT1, WT2, F T1 Sec. 8.9.2
cracking co 11t
Outer coating tensile strain limit:
mo km = 8tm
To control core compression Inner core compression limit: W2 Sec. 8.9.2
fci 0.55 fc
Inner core compression limit: WT3 Sec. 8.9.2
fci 0.65 fc
Elastic Limit at To preclude exceeding wire fsg wire stress limit plus core FWT1, FWT2, Sec. 8.9.2
Springline limit stress, fsg, and core compression limit: F T2
compression stress of 0.75 fc fsr + nfcr + fs fsg
fci 0.75 fc
Strength at To preclude wire yielding fsy wire stress limit: FWT3, FWT4 Sec. 8.9.2
Springline fsr + nfcr + fs fsy
To preclude core crushing Ultimate moment: M Mult FWT5 Sec. 8.9.3
Burst Pressure To prevent burst failure P Pb FWT6 (Eq 8-4)
*See Sec. 8.
See Sec. 4.
For LCP
0.5 k m 3 f c
P k = Po min. -------------------, 1 + ------------
- (Eq 8-2)
cr f cr
Where fc and fcr are in psi.
0.5 k m 0.25 f c
P k = Po min. -------------------, 1 + --------------------
-
cr f cr
N k = 6D y P k (Eq 8-3)
Where Ay and As are in in.2/ft, f *yy and fs u are in psi, and Dy is in in.
A y f yy + A s f su
P b = 2 --------------------------------------
Dy
Where Ay and As are in mm2/m, f *yy and fs u are in MPa, and Dy is in mm.
Where:
2 = (ci /t 1) and ranges from 1 to 10.
The value of k is computed by the procedure described in Sec. 8.9 for
computation of stresses and strains in the pipe wall subjected to moments and
thrusts.
Sec. 8.7 Combined Loads and Internal Pressures at Design Limit States
The maximum loads that may be combined with any specified internal pressure
and the maximum internal pressures that may be combined with any specified
external load for each of the design limit states defined in Sec. 7 shall be determined
using the combined moment-thrust design limits described in Sec. 8.2, together with
the relationships among internal pressure, external loads, pipe and fluid weights, and
moments and thrusts given in Sec. 3 and 4.
Where:
n = E s /Ec
n = E y /Ec for both cast and spun concrete
Em
-------
for mm tm
Ec
m= E m tm (Eq 8-8a)
<
for tm
mm < km
- 8 ------------- 1
-------
7E c mm
0 for mm km
In Eq 8-8a, mm refers to the strain in the mortar coating resulting solely from
the thrust Ni and is calculated from the following equation:
Ni
mm = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i = 1,2 (Eq 8-8b)
E c [ bh c + ( n m ) A s + ( n 1 ) A y + mbh m ]
3. Compute the stress resultants in the constituent materials and set up the
equation for the equilibrium of internal stress resultants and applied thrusts. If the
equilibrium of forces is not achieved, change the strain gradient assumed in step 1
and repeat the calculations.
4. Compute the moment from the equilibrium equation for moments
considering the internal stress resultants and the applied thrusts. Change the strain in
step 1 and repeat the calculations until the maximum moment is found. Set the
moment limit equal to the maximum moment.
The computation of the moment limits for the ultimate compressive strength of
the pipe wall shall follow Sec. 8.9.3 at the springline and Sec. 8.9.4 at the invert and
crown. The computation procedure shall be based on an assumed compressive-strain
limit of 0.003 for the extreme fiber of the core or coating and a rectangular
(Whitney) compressive-stress block and shall follow the procedure for moment limits
corresponding to the strain limit criteria described in this section. The moment limit
calculated by the procedure in Sec. 8.9.4 is used in the moment distribution
procedure described in Sec. 4.3.3.
8.9.1 Strains, stresses, thrusts, and moments at invert and crown. The strain
equations stated below express the strains at the critical points of the pipe wall using
the assumed value of strain at the inside surface of the core as expressed by the
nondimensional factor 2 and the assumed strain gradient expressed by the
nondimensional factor k (see Figure 5). The stress equations stated below are based
on the stressstrain relationships of Sec. 5 and the strains at the critical points of the
pipe wall.
y y
y= ci 1 ----- fy = nft(1 + 2) 1 -----
k k
y
fcy = ft(1 + 2) 1 ----- for 2 0 and all or
k for all and 1
2
tt
tx
ci fci fci
ft
ts
y
dy
Fci
Fy
ts
fcy
tt
khc fcy
eo
e
tt
ft
tt
No
hc
N1 1
M1 tt = khc
1 + 2
tt = 2tt
Fco
ds /2
tx = (2 )tt
co fco fco dy
fms Fs =
fms ts
hm
mm fmm Fm
mo fmo fmo
s
2 < 2 >
Figure 5 Schematic of strain and stress distributions in pipe-wall cross section at invert and crown
2
= ft 1 ----- ( 1 ) for 0 < 2 and < 1 or
<<1
for 2 > and 1 -----
2
=0 for 2 > and 1 -----
2
+ s- 1
s= ci 1------------- + s- 1
fs = nft(1 + 2) 1-------------
k k
1 + s
fms = m f t ( 1 + 2 ) -------------- 1 f cr
k
1 + m 1 + m
mm= ci ---------------
- 1 cr fmm = m f t ( 1 + 2 ) ---------------
- 1 f cr
k k
1 + 2 m 1 + 2 m
mo= ci ------------------- 1 cr fmo = m f t ( 1 + 2 ) ------------------- 1 f cr
k k
F = 0 implies
Where:
Fy = Ay (fy fcy)
bh c
Fco = ------- (1 k)fco
2
Fs = As (fs fms )
Fm = Fm + Fm
M 1 N 0 [ ( 1 + s )h c e o ] + N 1 [ ( 1 + s )h c e ] = M ci + M y + M co + M m (Eq 8-10)
Where
eo and e are given by Eq 8-6 and 8-7, respectively, and
1 2
= Fci ( 1 + s )h c t t 2 + ------------ Fci ( 1 + s )h c + t t --------------
3 3
for 0 < 2
1
= Fci ( 1 + s )h c t t 2 + ------------ for 2 >
3
My = Fy hc (1 + s y )
2 m
--------- 4
Mm = Fm hc - s + Fmhc m
- s
---------
3 3
For a pipe with multiple layers of prestressing wire ( f = 2 or 3), the expressions
for s , fs , fsr , Fs , and As defined earlier in this section refer to the outer layer of
prestressing wire, and
( 2j 1 )d s + 2 ( j 1 )d w
sj = ------------------------------------------------------- for j = 1, , f
2h c
Where:
dw = the total clear mortar thickness between wire layers.
For the j-th layer of prestressing wire, the strain in the wire, s j , is
f srj nf cr
sj = sj ---------------------
E s
Where:
sf sj
sj = s 1 ---------------------
+ k sf
linear interpolation between the calculated M1-moment limit at Nk and the zero
moment corresponding to the axial thrust Nyy that causes yielding of the steel
cylinder in the absence of external load.
f
N yy = A c f c ( cr + yy ) + A y f yy + Asj fsj ( srj + yy )
j=1
Where:
fc(cr + yy) = the stress in softened concrete calculated for strain at the onset
of cylinder yielding, where cr = fcr /Ec.
yy = the circumferential strain increment that produces cylinder yielding.
f yr + f yy
yy = -----------------
Ey
The term fs j (srj + yy ) is the stress in the j-th prestressing wire layer, calculated
using Eq 5-7, for strain srj + yy , where srj = fsrj /E s.
8.9.2 Strains, stresses, thrusts, and moments at springline. The strain equations
below express the strains at the critical points of the pipe wall using the assumed
value of strain at the outer surface of the core as expressed by the nondimensional
factor 2 and the assumed strain gradient expressed by the nondimensional factor k
(see Figure 6). The stress equations below are based on the stressstrain relationships
of Sec. 5 and the strains at the critical points of the pipe wall.
1 y 1 y
y = co -------------- 1 fy = n (1 + 2)ft -------------- 1
k k
1 y
fcy = (1 + 2)ft -------------- 1 for 2 0 and all or
k
for all 2 and 1
2
= ----- ( 1 ) 1 ft for 0 < 2 and < 1 or
<1
for 2 > and 1 -----
2
Figure 6 Schematic of strain and stress distributions in pipe-wall cross section at springline
= 0
for 2 > and < 1 -----
2
f sg + f sr nf cr
s = co 1 + ----s fs = n(1 + 2)ft 1 + ----s for s -------------------------------
k k Es
f sg + f sr nf cr
fs = fs(s) + fsr nfcr for s > -------------------------------
Es
f sr nf cr
s = s -------------------
Es
2 m
mo = co 1 + ---------
- + cr
k
Note that fs (s ) denotes the stress in the prestressing wire calculated for a wire
strain of s from the wire stressstrain function (Eq 5-7).
F = 0 implies
N o N 2 = F ci + F y + F co + F s (Eq 8-11)
Where:
Fci = 1/2(1 k)bhc fci
Fy = Ay(fy fcy)
Fco = 1/2bkhc (1 + 2)ft for 2 0
= (Fc o Fc o)
where Fc o = 1/2btt (1 + )ft and
where Fc o = 1/2btt ( + 2)fco for 0 < 2
= 1/2btt (1 + )ft for 2 >
Fs = As fs
M about wire = 0 implies
M 2 + N o [ ( 1 + s )h c e o ] N 2 [ ( 1 + s )h c e ] = M ci + M y + M co (Eq 8-12)
Where:
eo and e are given by Eq 8-6 and 8-7, respectively, and
( 1 k ) h
Mci = Fci ( 1 + s )h c ------------------------c
3
My = Fy hc (1 + s y)
For a pipe with multiple layers of prestressing ( f = 2 or 3), the expressions for
s , fs , fsr , Fs , and As defined earlier in this section refer to the outer layer of
prestressing wire, and
( 2 j 1 )d s + 2 ( j 1 )d w
sj = ------------------------------------------------------- j = 1, ..., f
2h c
Where:
dw = the total clear mortar thickness between wire layers.
For the j-th layer of prestressing wire, the strain in the wire sj is
f srj nf cr
sj = sj -----------------------
E s
Where:
sf sj
sj = s 1 ---------------------
sf + k
limit at Nk and the zero moment corresponding to the axial thrust Nsg that causes
elastic limit stress in the outer layer of prestressing wire without external load.
f
N sg = A c f c ( cr + sg ) + A y f y ( yr + sg ) + Asj fsj ( srj + sg )
j=1
Where:
fc (cr + s g), fy (yr + s g ), and fs j (srj + s g ) are the stresses in the
concrete core, steel cylinder, and the j-th layer of prestressing wire, respectively,
calculated from the stressstrain relationships of Sec. 5.3.5, 5.5.4, and 5.6.4,
respectively; yr = fyr /Ey ; srj = fs rj /E s is the wire tensile strain corresponding to
the final prestress in the j-th layer; and s g = sg srf is the circumferential
strain increment.
For N2 > Nk, M2 shall not exceed the M2-moment limit corresponding to the
yield strength fs y of the outer layer of prestressing wire ( f = 1, 2, or 3). This will
ensure that the limit criterion specified in Tables 3 and 4 is met. The M2-moment
limit at N2 is computed by linear interpolation between the calculated M2-moment
limit at Nk and the zero moment at the axial thrust Ns y that causes yielding of the
outer layer of prestressing wire without external load.
f
N sy = A c f c ( cr + sy ) + A y f y ( yr + sy ) + Asj fsj ( srj + sy )
j=1
Where:
fc (cr + s y ), fy (yr + s y ), and fs j (srj + s y ) are the stresses in the
concrete core, steel cylinder, and the j-th layer of prestressing wire, respectively,
calculated from the stressstrain relationships of Sec. 5.3.5, 5.5.4, and 5.6.4,
respectively; yr = fyr /Ey ; srj = fs rj /E s is the wire tensile strain corresponding to
the final prestress in the j-th layer; and s y = sy srf is the circumferential
strain increment.
8.9.3 M2-moment limit for ultimate compressive strength of core concrete. T h e
strain equations below express the strains at the critical points of the pipe wall using
the ultimate strain of 0.003 at the inner surface of the core and the assumed strain
gradient expressed by the nondimensional factor k (see Figure 7). The stress
equations below are based on a rectangular (Whitney) stress block for core concrete
in compression, the stressstrain relationships of Sec. 5, and the strains at the critical
points of the pipe wall.
Figure 7 Schematic of strain and stress distributions for computation of M2-moment limit for
ultimate compressive strength of core concrete
s = ci -------------
1 k
fs = fs(s ) + fsr nfcr
k
Where:
Fci = bkd(0.85fc)
Fy = Ay(fy fcy)
Fs = fs As
Note that if s s u = (1.63fs u + fs r nfcr)/E s, then set fs = fs u + fs r nfcr
and s = s u. Furthermore, if
f sg 163f su s E s 2.25
----- < s < --------------- , then set f s = f su 1 1 0.6133 --------- + f sr nf cr
Es Es f su
k
ci = -------------- s
1 k
and
y
k --------------
1 + s
y = s -------------------------
1 k
M 2 + ( N o N 2 ) [ ( 1 + s )h c e o ] = M ci + M y (Eq 8-14)
Where:
eo is given by Eq 8-6, and
k
Mci = F ci d 1 --------
2
My = Fy(d dy )
For a pipe with multiple layers of prestressing wire ( f = 2 or 3), the expressions
for s , fs, fs r , Fs , and As defined earlier in this section refer to the outer layer of
prestressing wire, and
( 2j 1 )d s + 2 ( j 1 )d w
sj = ------------------------------------------------------- for j = 1, ..., f
2h c
Where:
dw = the total clear mortar thickness between wire layers.
For the j-th layer of prestressing wire, the strain in the wire sj is
f srj nf cr
sj = sj ---------------------
E s
Where:
sr sj
sj = s 1 -------------------
+ k sf
and s is the strain in the outer layer of prestressing wire.
The stress in the j-th layer of prestressing wire fs j is calculated from the stress
strain function (Eq 5-7), substituting sj for s .
In Eq 8-13
f
Fs = Fsj
j=1
Where:
Fsj = As j fs j
and fs j is expressed by fs with s , fs , and fsr replaced by sj , fs j, and fs rj,
respectively.
M is calculated about the center of the outer layer of prestressing wire by
adding
f1
Ms = Fsj hc ( sf sj )
j=1
to the right-hand side of Eq 8-14.
8.9.4 M1-moment limit for compressive strength of coating. The M1-moment
limit for LCP computed in accordance with the procedures of this section is used in
the moment-redistribution procedure described in Sec. 4.3.3.
The strain equations below express the strains at the critical points of the pipe
wall using the ultimate strain of 0.003 at the outer surface of the coating and the
assumed strain gradient expressed by the nondimensional factor k1 (see Figure 8).
The stress equations below are based on a rectangular (Whitney) stress block for
coating mortar in compression, the stressstrain relationships of Sec. 5, and the
strains at the critical points of the pipe wall.
Figure 8 Schematic of strain and stress distributions for computation of M1-moment limit for
ultimate compressive strength of coating
f yy + f yr nf cr
fcy = fco
mo + cr E c mo + f cr
co = ------------------------ k 1 d 1 fco = -------------------------- k 1 d 1 for k1d1 > 0
k1 d1 + hm k1 d1 + hm
=0 otherwise
mo + cr E c mo + f cr
s = ------------------------ ( k 1 d 1 + h c s ) fs = n -------------------------- ( k 1 d 1 + h c s )
k1 d1 + hm k1 d1 + hm
fms = 0.85fm for hm hcs < mhm
=0 otherwise
mo = 0.003 fmo = 0.85fm for k1d1 > hm
=0 otherwise
N 0 N 1 = F ci + F y + F co + F s + F m (Eq 8-15)
Where:
Fci = 0
Fy = Ay(fy fcy)
Fco = 1/2bk
1d1 fco
Fs = As (fs fm s )
Fm = bmhm( fmo )
M about cylinder = 0 implies
M 1 + N o ( e o d y ) N 1 ( e d y ) = M co + M s + M m (Eq 8-16)
Where:
eo and e are given by Eq 8-6 and 8-7, respectively, and
k
Mco = F co d 1 1 ----1-
3
Ms = Fs (d1 + hc s)
Mm = Fm(d1 + hm 1/2mhm)
For LCP, the cylinder and the first layer of prestressing wire are lumped into an
equivalent steel area. Analysis is performed using the following modifications:
1. Set Ay , dy = 0
2. Replace n by n* where
A y ( n 1 )
n* = n 1 + ----- ------------------- for k 1 0
As n
A y n
n* = n 1 + ----- ----- for k 1 < 0
As n
For a pipe with multiple layers of prestressing ( f = 2 or 3), the expression for
s , fs , Fs , and As defined earlier in this section refer to the outer layer of
prestressing wire, and
( 2j 1 )d s + 2 ( j 1 )d w
sj = ------------------------------------------------------- for j = 1, ..., f
2h c
Where:
dw = the total clear mortar thickness between wire layers.
In Eq 8-15
f
Fs = Fsj
j=1
Where:
Fsj = As (fs j fmsj )
and fs j and fmsj are given by the expressions for fs and fm s with s replaced by sj.
M is calculated about the center of the outer layer of prestressing wire by
replacing Ms in Eq 8-16 by
f1
Ms = Fsj ( d1 + hc sj )
j=1
All of the design conditions fall within the criteria given in Sec. 9.4. Using the
design selection table for 24-in. (610-mm) LCP with type R-1 bedding, an earth
cover of 12 ft (3.65 m), and a system working pressure of 175 psi (1,206 kPa), the
required As is 0.32 in.2/lin ft (677 mm2/m).
The specified transient pressure of 50 psi (345 kPa) is less than the transient
pressure used in the selection tables (0.4 150 psi = 60 psi [0.4 1,034 kPa = 414 kPa]),
and the specified field-test pressure of 165 psi (1,138 kPa) is less than the field-test
pressure used in the selection tables (1.2 150 psi = 180 psi [1.2 1,034 kPa =
1,241 kPa]); therefore, the selection tables can be used. From the table for 36-in.
(915-mm) LCP with type R-2 bedding, an earth cover of 8 ft (2.44 m), and a working
pressure of 150 psi (1,034 kPa), the required As is 0.37 in.2/lin ft (783 mm2/m).
The dash () in the Required As column for R-1 bedding indicates that a
special design is required. This could include a second layer of prestressing wire, a
larger-diameter prestressing wire, a higher concrete strength, a thicker steel cylinder,
a thicker concrete core, or some combination of these items.
The two plus signs (++) next to the As value under R-2 bedding indicate that a
28-day compressive strength of 7,000 psi (48.3 MPa) is required. The single plus sign
(+) next to the As values under R-3 and R-4 beddings indicates that a 28-day
compressive strength of 6,500 psi (44.8 MPa) is required. Standard 28-day compressive
strength of 6,000 psi (41.4 MPa) is sufficient for the design under R-5 bedding.
Embankment condition indicates trench width at top of pipe exceeds transition width.
For bedding types R1 and R2, trench bottom shall be over excavated and bedding material shall extend to depth b
below bottom of pipe if subgrade is rock or other unyielding material.
Figure 9 Bedding details for prestressed concrete cylinder pipe embankment condition
combinations commonly used. These designs are based on the criteria specified in
this standard and the following:
1. Concrete-core thickness = pipe diameter 16.
2. Mortar-coating thickness = 3/4 in. (19 mm) over the wire.
3. Transient pressure (Pt) = 0.4Pw or 40 psi (276 kPa), whichever is greater.
4. Field-test pressure (Pft) = 1.2Pw .
5. Transient external load = AASHTO HS20 truck loading (two trucks
passing) on unpaved road.
*American Concrete Pressure Pipe Association, 11800 Sunrise Valley Dr., Ste. 309, Reston, VA 20191.
77
Copyright 2007 American Water Works Association. All Rights Reserved.
78 AWWA C304-07
*American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 444 N. Capitol St., N.W.,
Washington, DC 20001.
American Society of Civil Engineers, 1801 Alexander Bell Dr., Reston, VA 20191.
*American Concrete Institute, 38800 Country Club Dr., Farmington Hills, MI 48331.
When concrete and mortar are stressed in tension, their stressstrain behaviors
may be approximated by the trilinear diagrams presented in Figure 2, which depicts
the following three distinct states:
1. The virgin state, in which the concrete or mortar is uncracked.
2. The strain-softened state, in which microcracking of the concrete or
mortar occurs.
3. The cracked state.
Microcracks are minute, short, unconnected cracks, visible only with the aid of
a microscope, usually occurring at the aggregate/cementmortar interface. Micro-
cracks occur in a random pattern and are unaligned with the tensile stress field. The
phrase Onset of microcracking in Figure 2 indicates the boundary between the
virgin state and the strain-softened state. The phrase Onset of visible cracking in
Figure 2 refers to the tensile strain at which point no additional stress is transferred
across the fracture process zone delineating the boundary between the strain-softened
state and the cracked state. Near this point, microcracks coalesce and become aligned
with the stress field to form surface fissures, or macrocracks, which become visible to
the unaided eye as strain increases.
In the literature on testing of prestressed concrete, Kennison (1960) discusses an
incipient crack as follows: This microscopic crack is not readily visible to the
naked eye and is defined as a crack, 0.001 in. in width and 12 in. long. Kennison
continues, The first visible crack is defined as a crack 0.002 in. in width and 12 in.
long and can usually be observed with normal eyesight if a meticulous examination
of the surface is made.
Figure A.1 Mean annual number of days maximum temperature of 90F (32C) and above, except 70F (21C) and above in Alaska
(1990). These references state that the standards assumptions and simplifications are
consistent with test results. One of the assumptions of Sec. 8.9 is that applied thrusts
act on a circular reference axis. Zarghamee and Fok state, Although the location of
the reference axis...is arbitrary, it is recommended that it be at the centroid of the
coated pipe cross section calculated for the pressured pipe in absence of any bending
moments from external loads and pipe and fluid weights.
As shown in Figure 5 of Sec. 8.9.1 and Figure 6 of Sec. 8.9.2, the reference line
of action of the computed thrust is at the centroid of the transformed coated pipe
cross section calculated for the total thrust. The total thrust comprises the thrusts
applied by external loads, pipe self-weight, contained fluid weight, and internal
pressure. An exception to this selection of the line of action of the computed thrust
is in the computation for serviceability criteria at the springline, in which a
simplifying approximation of neglecting the coating while setting e = eo was
compared with actual test results and was determined to be valid (Zarghamee, Fok,
and Sikiotis 1990).
Computations of moments and thrusts from the combined loads are based on
elastic theory for a circular ring of constant thickness and radius R to the geometric
centroid of the cross section. Although R does not coincide with the radius to the
center of the cross section used in Figure 5 and Figure 6, the resulting difference is
negligibly small. The use of R for the computation of applied moments and the use
of the transformed centroid as the location for the application of thrust to the cross
section is consistent with accepted engineering practices for the design of statically
indeterminate structures.
ACI. 1982. Prediction of Creep, Shrinkage, and Smith, W.W. 1978. Stresses in Rigid Pipe. Transpor-
Temperature Effects in Concrete Structures. tation Engineering Journal, ASCE, 104:TE3:
Report No. ACI 209R-82, Pub. SP76-10, ACI, 387392.
pp. 193300. Zarghamee, M.S. 1990. Evaluation of Combined
Bazant, Z.P., J.K. Kim, and L. Panula. 1991, 1992. Load Tests of Prestressed Concrete Cylinder
Improved Prediction Model for Time-Depen- Pipe. In Pipeline Design and Installation, K.K.
dent Deformations of Concrete. Materiaux et Kienow, ed., ASCE, pp. 572585.
Constructions, Part 1, V. 24, No. 143, pp. Zarghamee, M.S., and W.R. Dana. 1991. A
327345; Part 2, V. 24, No. 144, pp. 407 Step-by-Step Integration Procedure for Com-
421; Part 3, V. 25, No. 145, pp. 2128; Part puting State of Stress in Prestressed Concrete
4, V. 25, No. 146, pp. 95101; Part 5, V. 25, Pipe. In Computer Analysis of the Effects of
No. 147, pp. 163169. Creep, Shrinkage, and Temperature Changes on
Heger, F.J., M.S. Zarghamee, and W.R. Dana. 1990. Concrete Structures, Pub. SP-129, ACI, pp.
Limit States Design of Prestressed Concrete 155170.
Cylinder Pipe. I: Criteria. Journal of Structural Zarghamee, M.S., and K.L. Fok. 1990. Analysis of
Engineering, 116:8:20832104. Prestressed Concrete Pipe Under Combined
Kennison, H.F. 1960. Tests on Prestressed Concrete Loads. Journal of Structural Engineering,
Embedded Cylinder Pipe. Journal of the 116:7: 20222039.
Hydraulics Division, ASCE, November, pp. Zarghamee, M.S., K.L. Fok, and E.S. Sikiotis. 1990.
7798. Limit States Design of Prestressed Concrete
Ojdrovic, R.P., and M.S. Zarghamee. 1996. Con- Cylinder Pipe. Part II: Procedure. Journal of
crete Creep and Shrinkage Prediction From Structural Engineering, 116:8:21052126.
Short-Term Tests. ACI Materials Journal, ACI, Zarghamee, M.S., F.J. Heger, and W.R. Dana.
93:2:169177. 1988a. Experimental Evaluation of Design
Olander, H.C. 1950. Stress Analysis of Concrete Methods for Prestressed Concrete Pipe. Jour-
Pipe. Engineering Monograph, No. 6, October. nal of Transportation Engineering, 114:6:126.
US Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, Colo. Zarghamee, M.S., F.J. Heger, and W.R. Dana.
Paris, J.M. 1921. Stress Coefficients for Large 1988b. Predicting Prestress Losses in Pre-
Horizontal Pipes. Engineering News-Record, stressed Concrete Pressure Pipe. Concrete Intl.:
87:19:768771. Design & Construction, ACI, 10:10:5964.
Pauw, A. 1960. Static Modulus of Elasticity of Zarghamee, M.S., F.J. Heger, and W.R. Dana. 1990.
Concrete as Affected by Density, ACI Journal Concrete Creep and Shrinkage and Wire
Proceedings, 57:6:679688. Relaxation in Buried Prestressed Concrete
Raphael, J.M. 1984. Tensile Strength of Concrete. Pipe. ACI Structural Journal, 87:5:512522.
ACI Journal Proceedings, 81:2:158165.
89
Copyright 2007 American Water Works Association. All Rights Reserved.
This page intentionally blank
The internal pressures, moments, strains, and stresses in the pipe wall are
compared with the internal-pressure capacities, moment capacities, and strain and
stress limits specified in Table 3 for ECP and Table 4 for LCP.
The design procedure is iterative. An initial wire area is assumed and, using this
area, all design criteria are checked. If any of the criteria are violated, a new larger
wire area must be assumed. If none of the criteria is violated, the initial wire area
must be decreased. If an estimate of the final wire area is not available, the following
systematic procedure may be used:
91
Copyright 2007 American Water Works Association. All Rights Reserved.
92 AWWA C304-07
References*
1. Compute the minimum and maximum allowable wire ANSI/AWWA C301,
areas for the pipe from the ANSI/AWWA C301 wire- Sec. 3.2.2
spacing requirements.
2. Compute the wire area required by the burst pressure Eq 8-4
criterion.
3. Compute the wire area required from the maximum Eq 8-1, Eq 8-2
pressure criterion.
4. Check all other criteria using the minimum wire area Sec. 8.2
that satisfies the maximum wire spacing, the burst
pressure, and maximum pressure requirements.
5. If any criterion is violated, a design using the maximum
wire area that satisfies the minimum wire spacing
requirement may be checked to determine if a feasible
design exists.
6. If a feasible design exists, the smallest acceptable wire
area may be determined by trial and error. If no feasible
design exists, other design parameters such as wire
diameter, number of layers of prestressing wire, concrete
strength, and core thickness must be modified.
In this example, representative calculations are presented to illustrate the design
procedure. It is assumed that the final design wire area for the example pipe has
already been determined; the calculations presented are for checking the design.
References*
Pipe: 72-150 ECP with cast core
Core: Di = 72 in., Dy = 75.5 in., hc = 5.5 in.
Pressures: Pw = 150 psi, Pt = 60 psi, Pft = 180 psi
Earth load and fluid weight:
We = 6,000 lb/ft, Wt = 0
2
Di f 72
2
62.4- = 1,764 lb/ft
Wf = ------------------ = ----------------------------------
4 144 4 144
References*
Wire: 6 gauge, ds = 0.192 in., Class III, fsg = 189,000 psi,
fsu = 252,000 psi, Es = 28 106 psi
fsy = 0.85fsu = 0.85 252,000 = 214,200 psi Sec. 5.6.2
ds 0.192 = 0.0175
s = -------
- = ---------------- Sec. 8.1
2h c 2 5.5
f sg
sg = ----- = 189 , 000- = 6, 750 10 6
-------------------- Sec. 8.1
Es 28 10
6
f sy
sy 214, 200- = 7, 650 10 6
= ----- = -------------------- Sec. 8.1
Es 28 10
6
References*
E 6
28 10 - = 7.29
n = -----s = ------------------------ Sec. 8.1
Ec 6
3.84 10
Ey 6
30 10 - = 7.81
n = ----- = ------------------------ Sec. 8.1
Ec 6
3.84 10
ft = 7 f c = 7 5, 500 = 519 psi Eq 5-1
f 519 - = 135 10 6
t = ----t- = ------------------------ Figure 2
Ec 6
3.84 10
k = 11t = 11 135 106 = 1,487 106 Figure 2
Mortar: fm = 5,500 psi
Em = 158 1401.51 5,5000.3 = 3.64 106 psi Eq 5-6
Em 6
3.64 10
m = ------- = ------------------------- = 0.948 before softening Sec. 8.8
Ec 6
3.84 10
Sec. C.3.2 Minimum Allowable Prestressing-Wire Area Based on Maximum Wire Spacing
References*
The maximum allowable center-to-center spacing of wire is 1.5 in.; ANSI/AWWA
therefore, C301,
2 Sec. 3.2.2
d s 12 3.14 0.192
2
12
As, min = ---------- ------- = --------------------------------- ------- = 0.232 in.2/ft
4 1.5 4 1.5
0.54 1.69
= 2/3 1 + 1.13e = 0.969
0.54 ( h co + h m )
(hco + hm) = 2/3 1 + 1.13e Eq 6-24
0.54 h m
(hm) = 2/3 1 + 1.13e Eq 6-24
0.54 0.942
= 2/3 1 + 1.13e
= 1.120
References*
m = 2(hm) = 1.79 1.12 = 2.005 Eq 6-20
( h co + h m ) com h m m + h ci ci
= ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eq 6-16
h ci + h co
= (----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.75 + 0.942 )1.3 0.942 2.005 + 1.69 1.705- = 1.304
1.69 + 3.75
Sec. C.4.2.3 Shrinkage factor References*
0.12h ci 0.12 1.69
(hci) = 1.2e = 1.2e = 0.980 Eq 6-25
References*
For RH = 70%, s1 = 184 106 and s2 = 299 106 Sec. 6.6
sci = s1(hci) = 184 106 0.980 = 180.3 106 Eq 6-21
scom = s2(hco + hm) = 299 106 0.683 = 204.2 106 Eq 6-22
sm = s2(hm) = 299 106 1.072 = 320.5 106 Eq 6-23
( h co + h m )s com h m s m + h ci s ci
s = ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eq 6-17
( h ci + h co )
( 3.75 + 0.942 )204.2 0.942 320.5 + 1.69 180.3 6
= ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10
( 1.69 + 3.75 )
= 177 106
Sec. C.4.2.4 Wire relaxation References*
As
R = 0.111 3.5 ------- = 0.111 3.5 ------------- = 0.0832
0.519
Eq 6-30
c
A 65.28
0.519 189,000
= ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- = 1,293 psi
65.28 + 8.23 0.519 + 8.83 0.7176
fiy = nific = 8.83 1,293 = 11,417 psi Eq 6-2
fis = fsg + nific = 189,000 + 8.23 1,293 = 178,359 psi Eq 6-3
References*
A c ( f icn r + E ss ) RA s f sg n r ( 1 + )
fsr = fis + Rfsg --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eq 6-6
A c + ( n r A s + n rA y ) ( 1 + )
= 178,359 + 0.0832 189,000
6 6
65.28 ( 1,293 1.304 7.02 + 28 10 177 10 )
+ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
65.28 + ( 7.02 0.519 + 7.47 0.7176 ) ( 1 + 1.304 )
0.0832 0.519 189,000 7.02 ( 1 + 1.304 )
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- = 151,426 psi
65.28 + ( 7.02 0.519 + 7.47 0.7176 ) ( 1 + 1.304 )
0.5 km 5 f
= min P o -------------------, P o 1 + ------------c-
cr f cr
References*
Because
5 f
P o 1 + ------------c- = 155.3 1 + 5--------------------
5,500- = 216.1 psi
f cr 947
and
0.5 k m 0.5 1,144 10 6
P o ------------------- = 155.3 --------------------------------------------- = 359.6 psi
cr 247 10
6
Pk = min [216.1, 359.6] = 216.1 psi
and
min (Pk, 1.4Po) = min (216.1, 1.4 155.3) = 216.1 psi
Therefore,
Pw + Pt = 150 + 60 = 210 psi < 216.1 psi
and loading condition WT1 is satisfied.
References*
f yr 24,918 - = 831 10 6
yr = ----- = --------------------
Ey 30 10
6
f sr 150,192 6
sr = ----- = --------------------- = 5,364 10
Es 6
28 10
Po = 169.36 psi
No = 6Dy Po = 6 75.5 169.36 = 76,720 lb/ft Eq 4-1
Using the above prestress values, Pk' can be computed as shown earlier.
Pk = 230.44 psi
Nk = 6Dy Pk = 6 75.5 230.44 = 104,389 lb/ft Eq 8-3
Pipe weight can now be computed for As = 0.565 in.2/ft.
Wp = --------- ( D i + h c )h c c + ( D i + 2h c + h m )h m m ---
144
As
+ ( D y t y )t y ( s c ) + ( D i + 2h c + d s ) ------ ( s m )
12
= --------- ( 72 + 5.5 )5.5 145 + ( 72 + 2 5.5 + 0.942 )0.942 140 ---
144
+ (75.5 0.0598) 0.0598 (489 145)
( 72 + 2 5.5 + 0.192 )0.565 ( 489 140 )
+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- = 1,654 lb/ft
12
Furthermore, the location of the neutral axis for prestress thrust is
0.5bh c + nA s ( 1 + s ) + ( n 1 )A y y
eo = h c --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eq 8-6
bh + nA + ( n 1 ) A
c s y
0.5 12 5.5 + 7.29 0.565 ( 1 + 0.0175 )
= 5.5 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12 5.5 + 7.29 0.565 + ( 7.81 1 )0.7176
( 7.81 1 )0.7176 0.313
+ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- = 2.839 in.
12 5.5 + 7.29 0.565 + ( 7.81 1 )0.7176
In other words, the prestressing-wire area must satisfy for loading combination W1:
Pw Po
Pw = 150 psi < Po = 169.36 psi
and for loading combination WT1:
Pw + Pt min (Pk, 1.4 Po)
because
min (Pk, 1.4Po) = min (230.44, 1.4 169.36) = 230.44 psi,
Pw + Pt = 150 + 60 = 210 psi 230.44 psi
Therefore, both requirements are satisfied.
Calculation procedures for all of the criteria and load combinations are similar.
The detailed calculations for the inside core visible cracking criterion under the load
combination WT1 are shown below; the results for other criteria are summarized at
the end of the section.
Applied moment and thrust at invert for load combination WT1:
References*
The procedure for determining the strain and the stress distribution in the cross
section caused by applied loads is iterative and requires satisfying the force and
moment equilibrium equations. An iteration cycle is demonstrated below for trial
values of
2 = 1.696
k = 0.704
References*
0.5 12 5.5 + ( 7.29 0.365 )0.565 ( 1 + 0.0175 )
= 5.5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12 5.5 + ( 7.29 0.365 )0.565 + ( 7.81 1 )0.7176 + 0.365 12 0.942
( 7.81 1 )0.7176 0.313 + 0.365 12 0.942 ( 1 + 0.0856 )
+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12 5.5 + ( 7.29 0.365 )0.565 + ( 7.81 1 )0.7176 + 0.365 12 0.942
= 2.996 in.
Where:
m = 0.365 is calculated by trial and error for tensile softened coating when
the pipe is subjected to a tensile thrust of N1 alone.
References*
The tensile strain in the coating is
N1
mm = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eq 8-8b
E c [ bh c + ( n m )A s + ( n 1 )A y + mbh m ]
Em t m
m = -------- 8 ------------
-1 Eq 8-8a
7E c mm
References*
1+
s = ci --------------s 1 = 364 10 1-------------------------
6 + 0.0175 1 = 162 10 6 Sec. 8.9.1
k 0.704
1 + m
mm = ci ---------------
- 1 cr = 364 10 1-------------------------
6 + 0.0856 1 268 10 6 Sec. 8.9.1
k 0.704
= 71 106
1 + 2 m + 2 0.0856- 1 268 10 6
mo = ci ------------------- 1 cr = 364 10 1----------------------------------
6
Sec. 8.9.1
k 0.704
= 26 106
1+
fs = nf t ( 1 + 2 ) --------------s 1 = 7.29 519 ( 1 + 1.696 ) ------------------------- 1
1 + 0.0175 Sec. 8.9.1
k 0.704
= 4,542 psi
1+
fms = m f t ( 1 + 2 ) --------------s 1 f cr Sec. 8.9.1
k
References*
1 + m
fmm = m f t ( 1 + 2 ) ---------------
- 1 f cr
k
1 + 2 m
fmo = m f t ( 1 + 2 ) ------------------- 1 f cr Sec. 8.9.1
k
1 + 2 0.0856
= 0.948 519 ( 1 + 1.696 ) ----------------------------------- 1 1,028 = 94 psi
0.704
Where:
m = 0.948 corresponds to the condition of no tensile softening of mortar, because
the tensile strain in the coating is
Mco = F co h c 1----------
k- + = 5,744 5.5 1---------------------
0.704- + 0.0175 Sec. 8.9.1
3 s 3
= 3,670 lb-in./ft
2 m + F h 4
Mm = F m h c ---------
- m
- s
m c --------- Sec. 8.9.1
3 s 3
0.0856 0.0175
= 2,358 5.5 2-------------------------
3
4 0.0856
531 5.5 ------------------------- 0.0175 = 795 lb-in./ft
3
Sec. C.8.7 Sum of Moments
References*
M = M1 No [(1 + s)hc eo] + N1[(1 + s)hc e] Mci
My Mco Mm Eq 8-10
= 51,694 76,720[(1 + 0.0175)5.5 2.839]
+ 93,484[(1 + 0.0175)5.5 2.996]
72,248 15,503 + 3,670 + 795 = 46 0
Therefore, equations for equilibrium of forces and moments at the invert are satisfied.
Inside core W1 66,304 51,685 0.199 0.368 108 106 1,203 106 Yes
tensile strain
(ci 1.5 t)
Inside core WT1 93,484 51,685 1.684 0.704 363 106 1,487 106 Yes
tensile strain
(ci k) WT2 66,304 51,685 0.199 0.368 108 106 1,487 106 Yes
FT1 87,883 56,853 1.210 0.641 299 106 1,487 106 Yes
Note that ci = 364 106 < k = 1,487 106 and, therefore, the strain limit
corresponding to the visible crack control inside the core is satisfied.
References*
To check the radial tension when there is no fluid pressure, repeat the Sec. 8.6
same calculations iteratively until 2 and k values that satisfy both
equations of equilibrium are determined. Because the strain in the
inner fiber of the core for both loading conditions FW1 and WT3 is
not tensile, radial tension does not develop.
The results for the final iteration cycle for all serviceability limit states at invert/
crown obtained using a computer program are summarized in Table C.1. Note that
small differences with hand calculations are caused by roundoff.
References*
Coating microcracking W1 Table 3
Outer core visible cracking WT1, WT2, FT1 Table 3
Coating visible cracking WT1, WT2, FT1 Table 3
Inner core compression W2, WT3 Table 3
Calculation procedures for all of the criteria and load combinations are similar.
The detailed calculations for outer core visible cracking and coating visible cracking
under load combination WT1 are shown below. The results for other criteria are
summarized at the end of the section.
Applied moment and thrust at springline for load combination WT1:
References*
M2 = R [ C m2e ( W e + W t ) + C m2p W p + C m2f Wf ] Eq 4-3
= 39.22[0.0885(6,000 + 0) + 0.1016 1,654 + 0.0878 1,764]
= 33,491 lb-in./ft
N2 = 6D y P [ C n2e ( W e + W t ) + C n2p W p + Cn2f Wf ] Eq 4-5
= 6 75.5(150 + 60) [0.5386(6,000 + 0) + 0.3026
1,654 0.0617 1,764] = 91,507 lb/ft
The procedure for determining the strain and the stress distribution in the pipe
cross section at springline caused by the applied loads is iterative and requires
satisfying the force and moment equilibrium equations. An iteration cycle is
demonstrated below for the trial values of
2 = 0.296
k = 0.702
Sec. C.9.1 Constants
References*
1 1
tt = --------------- kh c = ---------------------- 0.702 5.5 = 2.979 in. Sec. 8.9.2
1 + 2 1 + 0.296
ts = 2 tt = 0.296 2.979 = 0.882 in. Sec. 8.9.2
hc dy
- = 5.5 1.72- = 4.286
= -------------- ----------------------- Sec. 8.9.2
ts 0.882
1 y Sec. 8.9.2
y = co -------------- 1 = 175 10 1---------------------
6 0.313- 1 = 4 10 6
k 0.702
Sec. 8.9.2
s = co 1 + -----s = 175 10 1 + ---------------- = 179 10
6 0.0175 6
k 0.702
f sr nf cr 6 150,192 7.29 1,028
s = s ------------------- = 179 10 -----------------------------------------------------------
-
Es 6
28 10
= 5,811 10 6 Sec. 8.9.2
2 m 0.0856 + 268 106
mo = co 1 + ---------
- + cr = 175 10 1 + 2-------------------------
6
Sec. 8.9.2
k 0.702
= 486 106
1 y
fy = n ( 1 + 2 )f t -------------- 1 = 7.81 ( 1 + 0.296 )519 1---------------------
0.313- 1
k 0.702
References*
fs = n( 1 + 2 ) f t 1 + -----s = 7.29 ( 1 + 0.296 )519 1 + 0.0175
----------------
k 0.702
= 5,026 psi Sec. 8.9.2
References*
- + F h t
Mco = F co h c s + t t 2 + 1----------- -------------s Sec. 8.9.2
3 c o c s t 3
= 21,795 lb-in./ft
Outer core tensile W1 64,327 33,482 0.478 0.300 70 106 ,203 106 Yes
strain
(co 1.5t)
Outer coating tensile W1 64,327 33,482 0.478 0.300 378 106 912 106 Yes
strain
(mo 0.8km)
Outer core tensile WT1 91,507 33,482 0.296 0.702 175 106 1,487 106 Yes
strain
(co k ) WT2 64,327 33,482 0.478 0.300 70 106 1,487 106 Yes
FT1 85,708 36,830 0.183 0.606 160 106 1,487 106 Yes
Outer coating tensile WT1 91,507 33,482 0.296 0.702 486 106 1,144 106 Yes
strain
(mo km) WT2 64,327 33,482 0.478 0.300 378 106 1,144 106 Yes
FT1 85,708 36,830 0.183 0.606 473 106 1,144 106 Yes
( fci 0.55fc ) W2 3,623 33,482 2.223 0.705 1,536 psi 3,025 psi Yes
( fci 0.65fc ) WT3 3,623 33,482 2.223 0.705 1,536 psi 3,575 psi Yes
Calculation procedures for all of the criteria and load combinations are similar.
For the load combination WT1, stresses and strains in the pipe invert satisfying the
Yielding of cylinder WT1 93,485 51,685 1.684 0.704 10,840 +33,000 Yes
fyr + nfcr + fy fyy
WT2 66,304 51,685 0.199 0.368 16,400 +33,000 Yes
Onset of tension in cylinder WT3 1,646 51,685 1.917 0.491 22,973 0 Yes
fyr + n fcr + fy 0
equations of equilibrium of forces and moments have already been calculated. Using
fy already calculated for WT1, yielding of the cylinder does not occur, because
fy = fyr + nfcr + fy
= 24,918 + 7.81 1,028 + 6,069 = 10,820 psi fyy = 33,000 psi
The steel cylinder is in compression and, therefore, cannot yield in tension. The
results for the final iteration cycle for all elastic limit states at invert/crown obtained
using a computer program are summarized in Table C.3.
The calculation procedure for the wire elastic and yield limits and core
compression limit of 0.75fc is similar to the previously shown procedure for
serviceability limits. The calculation for the wire-yield criterion is demonstrated
below, because that criterion controls the design. The calculation procedure is shown
for N2 > Nk. Under this condition, the criterion check is performed by comparing
the moment at springline with the moment capacity at springline. The moment at
springline is computed accounting for the moment redistribution, because the
moment capacity at invert is exceeded, and moment is redistributed from invert to
springline. The computation of critical thrust at invert at cylinder yield is presented
in Sec. C.11.2. This is required for calculating the moment capacity at invert and
moment at springline after redistribution, stated in Sec. C.11.3.
= 1,633 10 6
References*
Because c > k = 1,487 106, fc (cr + yy) = 0.
The strain in the prestressing wire at cylinder yield is
33,000 + 24,918
6 6
s = sr + yy = 5,364 10 + --------------------------------------- = 7,295 10 Sec. 8.9.1
6
30 10
Because wire strain s is greater than the strain at the elastic limit of the wire fsg /Es =
189,000/28 106 = 6,750 106, the stress in the wire must be computed from the nonlinear
stressstrain relationship of the wire. Therefore, the critical thrust at cylinder yield is
E s 2.25
fs = f su 1 1 0.6133 s ----- Eq 5-7
f su
6 2.25
28 10
fs = 252,000 1 1 0.6133 7,295 10
6
---------------------- = 198,333 psi
252,000
Nyy = Ac fc + Ay fyy + As fs = 65.28 0 + 0.7176 33,000
+ 0.565 198,333 = 135,739 lb/ft Sec. 8.9.1
The calculation procedure for computing the moment capacity for a given thrust
is iterative and similar to the procedure described before for elastic limit at the invert.
For each selected trial value of k and 2, the stresses and strains are computed and the
equilibria of forces and moments are checked. The only difference is that the new
values of 2 are determined from the condition in which the stress in the cylinder
reaches yield rather than from the equilibrium of moments equation. In this example,
in the final iteration cycle 2 = 17.771 and k = 0.908. Stress in the cylinder is
References*
y
fy = n f t ( 1 + 2 ) 1 ----- Sec. 8.9.1
k
where the location of the line of action of thrust, e = 2.973 in., and the moments on
the right-hand side of the equation are calculated following the procedure in Sec. C.8.
The moment capacity at the onset of tension in the cylinder is calculated
similarly at pressure equal to zero with
References*
N1 = [Cn1e (We + Wt) + Cn1p Wp + Cn1f Wf ] Eq 4-4
= [0.3255(6,000 + 0) + 0.1029 1,654 0.2703 1,764]
= 1,646 lb/ft
In the last iteration, when the cylinder stress reaches the onset of tension, 2 =
8.247 and k = 0.569. Stress in the cylinder is
References*
Moment capacity, based on onset of tension in the cylinder at Nk, denoted here
as Myo(Nk), is calculated following the above procedure for moment capacity at
cylinder yield. The result is shown below.
M1yo(Nk) = 76,720[(1 + 0.0175)5.5 2.839] + Eq 8-10
1,646[(1 + 0.0175)5.5 3.216] + 42,424 +
45,982 45,814 + 14,602 = 272,648 lb-in./ft
References*
Because c > k = 1,487 106, fc (cr + sy ) = 0 Figure 2
y = yr + sy = yr + sy sr Sec. 8.9.2
= 831 106 + 8,359 106 5,364 106
= 12,892 106 Sec. 8.9.2
f yy 33,000 6
Since y > yy = ----- = --------------------- = 1,100 10 , f y = f yy
Ey 6
30 10
= 33,000 psi Figure 3
Nsy = Ac fc + Ay fy + As fsy = 65.28 0 + 0.7176 33,000
+ 0.565 214,200 = 144,704 lb/ft Sec. 8.9.2
Table C.4 Summary of calculations for elastic limits and wire-yield limit at springline
Limit-State Load N2 M2 or M2r Applied Stress Limiting Criterion
Criterion Combination (lb/ft) (lb-in./ft) 2 k or Moment Value Satisfied
Wire elastic limit, FWT1 100,657 36,830 3.103 0.754 173,574 189,000 Yes
fs fsg
FWT2 70,759 36,830 0.197 0.431 162,403 189,000 Yes
Core compression limit, FWT1 100,657 36,830 3.103 0.754 694 4,125 Yes
fc 0.75fc
where the location of the line of thrust, e = 2.973 in., and the moments on the
right-hand side of the equation are calculated following the procedure in Sec. C.8.
The moment capacity at N2, denoted here as M2sy(N2), is calculated by linear
interpolation:
N sy N 2 144,704 (118,959)
M2sy(N2) = ----------------------- M 2sy ( N k ) = ------------------------------------------------ 106,488
N sy N k 144,704 (104,380)
= 68,003 lb-in./ft Sec. 8.9.2
Following the procedure given in Sec. C.11, it is shown that M1 < M1cap, and
there is no moment redistribution from invert to springline.
The location of the neutral axis is calculated by trial and error until force
equilibrium is satisfied. In the last iteration, k' = 0.4597.
References*
1 k 1 0.4597 6
s = ci -------------- = 0.003 ------------------------- = 3,526 10 Sec. 8.9.3
k 0.4597
= 514,393 lb-in./ft
My = Fy (d dy) = 8,206(5.596 1.72) = 31,806 lb-in./ft Sec. 8.9.3
Moment limit for ultimate compressive strength of core M2ult is:
M2ult = (No N2) [(1 + ls) hc eo] + Mci + My Eq 8-14
= (76,720 + 5,797) [(1 + 0.0175)5.5 2.839]
+ 514,393 + 31,806 = 318,679 lb-in./ft
Because M2 = 53,586 lb-in./ft < M2ult = 318,679 lb-in./ft, the core crushing criterion
for the load combination FWT5 is satisfied.