Language Teaching Methodologies
Language Teaching Methodologies
Language Teaching Methodologies
Module: 1
Section: B
Question: 8
Throughout the history there has been lots of different approaches and methods in which
language has been taught. Each method has its own advantages and disadvantages. Changes have
been added to different methods to recognize the different kinds of learners and goals of
language study. Currently there are different types of teaching methods and all of the teaching
Formal Approach: In formal approach, the main focus is on teaching the rules of
the language and the presentation of the language, which is then reinforced with
the use of examples. This approach concentrates mainly on the writing and the
Active Approach: In active approach, the main focus is on learning the language
and how to communicate. Examples are provided and the students discover the
rules by themselves from the examples given, and the explanation is provided
later. This approach concentrates on the listening and speaking skills and the
teaching methodologies. There are lots of different teaching methods and approaches. To begin
with let us define approach, method and technique as they are used interchangeably.
Approach: Approach is the defined as the theory of what is taught, nature of the
language and how it is taught in the classroom. It is a set of ideas or rules that
Method: Method refers to the plan used for the presentation of the content in the
classroom. It is the kind of teaching aids, materials, activities that will be used in
the classroom.
material, no part of which contradicts, and all of which is based upon, the
classroom. (Ekawati)
In this essay we are going to discuss about the definition, merits and demerits of the
Direct Method, Communicative Approach and Situational Language Teaching Approach (Oral
approach).
Direct Method
With the short comings of the Grammar Translation Method, which concentrates only on
the writing and reading skills, the Direct Method became more popular and widely used
methodology.
The direct method was an answer to the dissatisfaction with the older grammar
translation method, which teaches students grammar and vocabulary through direct translations
Direct Method uses one basic rule that no L1 is used or no translation is allowed. In
Direct Method, language is primarily speech. Teachers use objects present in the classroom,
actions to demonstrate and help the students understand the meaning. The native language is not
used in the classroom. Student should start learning to think in the target language and
vocabulary is acquired through practice in the target language and by associating with the
objects.
The main purpose of the Direct Method is to use target language in communication. More
concentration is provided on the pronunciation. Grammar is taught only when needed. Lessons
include conversational activity to motivate the learners to speak. The principles of the Direct
Method are seen in the following guidelines as used in the Berlitz Schools, named after Charles
Berlitz, who was one of the person to popularize the use of Direct Method as follows:
Advantages: This is one of the method that introduced using realia in teaching
vocabulary. Understanding of the target language is easier because there is very less interference
from mother tongue. It provides better fluency in speech since language is taught through
which motivates the students to learn. This bridges the gap between theory and practice.
particular before general, concrete before abstract and practice before theory. (Rahmi)
native L2 speaker. It also requires large number of class hours as most of the work is done only
in the classroom. All the activities are limited to the classroom context, so the students do not
comprehend the meaning of using L2 in real life. This method gives very less emphasis on the
Communicative Approach:
communicate.
approach to language teaching that emphasizes interaction as both the means and the ultimate
goal of study. According to CLT, the goal of language education is the ability to communicate in
grammatical function. The features of the CLT Approach can be defined as:
4. The primary units of language are not merely its grammatical and structural features,
In this approach we develop the learners ability to use the target language in real life
situations like introductions, agreeing, disagreeing, apologizing, etc. Grammar is only taught to
language as well as performance. Such competence includes both the usage and use of the
language. Therefore, the approach does not deny the importance of mastering grammatical
forms, so long as they are taught as a means of carrying out meaningful communication. That is,
grammar is taught as a language tool rather than a language aim. (Teaching English as a
Foreign Language)
Language is selected based on relevance and learner needs. The student is an active
students. This helps the students to express themselves and removes any inhibitions of those who
feel intimidated by formal classroom activities. More student participation, makes the student
feel confident and motivates them to learn. It increases the oral and listening skills of the learner.
Disadvantages: CLT Approach best works on classes of smaller size. Larger classes can
be more challenging. More student interaction means noisier classroom. This is not the best
approach to use when the learner is not exposed to L2 outside of the classroom. CLT Approach
concentrates on the speaking and listening skills and tends to overlook the other skills (reading,
Situational Language Teaching Approach (SLT) also called as Oral Approach was
founded in Britain by applied linguists such as Harold Palmer and A.S. Hornsby and used during
the 1940s and to 1960s. The SLT relied on the structural view of the language. ST focuses on
the vocabulary and reading. In this approach, it is believed that mastery of a set of high
frequency words leads to good reading skills. It follows a behavioristic approach (habit
3. The use of the knowledge or material in actual practice until it becomes a personal skill.
(RHALMI)
Language is presented orally at first and then in written form. SLT focuses on all the
four basic skills. SLT concentrates on accurate pronunciation and use of grammar. It follows
a structural syllabus with increasing levels of complexity. Teaching involves language drills
structures or vocabulary). The teacher then proceeds to oral practice and drilling of the
elements presented. Finally, the lesson ends with reading activity or written exercises.
(RHALMI)
In SLT teacher occupies a more central role in teaching. The pupils are to imitate
what the teacher does to listen and repeat during the language drills. Active verbal interaction
Advantages: Though it has been replaced with many different new methods and
approaches, some teachers still find it useful due to its structural practice of language. This
method is the most suited when we are introducing them to the language. Provides good
command over vocabulary and pronunciation because of the language drills. When provided
with a good curriculum, this method makes teaching more effective rather than a burdensome
process.
grammar, since they give to bad language habits. The SLT approach, though follows some of
the Direct Method principles, it is mostly based on behaviorism rather than a natural
approach. Since the approach follows a structured curriculum, the learner has no control over
the content. And since teacher does most of the talking and the student take on a passive role,
the lessons can get boring. (The Oral Approach or The Situational Language Teaching)
Conclusion
The above mentioned approaches/methods are just a few out of many methods and
approaches present. Each approach has its own strengths and weakness. So teachers try to
overcome some of these weakness by using a feature from a different approach to suit their
needs. Since there is frequent changes in the methodologies, most of the teachers try to
combine the best element from different methodologies, and try to bring a best outcome for