Delay Tactics Release June 29 2017

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Delay Tactics Benefit Payday Lenders and Cost

Ohioans More Than $200,000 Per Day


STATEMENT OVERVIEW: Last week, yet another closed-door meeting was held at the
Ohio Statehouse regarding the payday lending reform bill. This meeting was reportedly
convened to offer an opportunity for the lenders themselves to provide input. But
payday lenders were a no-show. Reform advocates are expressing deep
disappointment for inaction on a bill that would protect Ohio consumers and
families: These delays are troubling and play into the hands of the multi-billion dollar
payday lending industry.

The following is a statement by members of Ohioans for


Payday Loan Reform regarding failure to move House Bill
123 forward

Columbus June 29, 2017 A June 21st meeting at the Statehouse to


discuss payday lending reform resulted in no progress because payday
lending company officials failed to show up at the session. The meeting was
set up to discuss constructive solutions to Ohios troublesome payday
landscape, as called for in bi-partisan HB 123. The bill would end Ohios
embarrassing distinction of having the highest payday loan interest rates in
the nation. Those rates average 591%.

The meeting, called by Rep. William Seitz (R-Cincinnati), included advocates


of payday lending reform and was also supposed to include members of the
payday loan industry but they failed to attend, sending an army of well-
heeled lobbyists instead.

We have been beyond patient and respectful of the legislative process, as we


have responded to every request for information made by leadership and
members of the General Assembly, but its becoming abundantly clear that
the payday lenders will use whatever means they can to stall this important
discussion, and stop a public hearing from happening.

HB 123, which seeks to establish a maximum interest rate on such loans of


28% plus a maximum monthly fee of $20, was introduced March 8 by Rep.
Kyle Koehler (R-Springfield) and Rep. Michael Ashford (D-Toledo).

Since then, our coalition has met directly with Speaker Cliff Rosenberger,
Chairman Louis Blessing, Majority Floor Leader Seitz, and a majority of the
Members of the Government Accountability & Oversight Committee. Yet, no
hearing on the bill has been scheduled. While we are happy to participate in
productive meetings, this legislation and the Ohioans stuck in this predatory
lending cycle deserves a public forum.

We have provided legislators with extensive documentation articulating the


need for reform and Ohios dubious distinction as the most expensive state in
the nation for borrowers of payday loans. Borrowers themselves have come to
the statehouse to meet with legislators and appeal for reform.

Enough is enough. These tactics to draw out the legislative process should be
an affront to every Ohio taxpayer who supports public discussions of issues of
such importance. The fact that this bill has not been given a hearing as the
legislature breaks for summer is troubling and plays into the hands of the
multi-billion dollar payday lending industry.

HB 123 would preserve access to small loans while ensuring fair terms and
lower costs, saving Ohioans $75 million annually. Every day this bill stalls, it
costs Ohioans $205,479adding up to more than $20 million since HB 123
was introduced in March. Its astonishing that any leader would allow this to
continue when a reasonable solution - HB123 - is so clear.

Ohio can achieve fair small-dollar lending with our legislators help. Recent
polling shows that 80% of likely voters support this reform, and history shows
that they will vote to corrector eliminatethe payday loan problem if our
representatives fail to act.

####

You might also like