Forensic Science International: Antioco Franco Sedda, Gabriele Rossi
Forensic Science International: Antioco Franco Sedda, Gabriele Rossi
Forensic Science International: Antioco Franco Sedda, Gabriele Rossi
Case report
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Article history: Bullets found in crime scenes are usually compared by examination of the riing impressions produced
Received 9 November 2009 in the barrel of the questioned rearm. When, however, a bullet is fragmented or highly deformed, the
Received in revised form 29 May 2010 comparison of riing micro striations cannot be performed, and the only way two compare two or more
Accepted 3 June 2010
bullets is by a match of their chemical analysis. In spite of the limits of the chemical analysis methods,
Available online 1 July 2010
due to the frequent compositional lead variability of ammunition boxes, the technique still keeps its full
value, both as trial element, and as an aid in the investigations. A case is reported in the present paper, in
Keywords:
which some crushed and deformed bullets, recovered from a murder victim body, have been analyzed by
Bullet analysis
INAA
Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis. The analysis allowed the assignation of the bullets to one of
Lead analysis the ammunitions lots owned by one of the murder suspect.
0.22 Ammunition 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
0379-0738/$ see front matter 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.06.003
e6 [(Fig._1)TD$IG]
A.F. Sedda, G. Rossi / Forensic Science International 206 (2011) e5e7
From each seized ammunition group (brand and type), ve bullets have been
chosen. This number was chosen as a reasonable compromise between the need of
obtaining a reasonable statistical signicance in analytical procedure, and the need
to keep intact some of the bullet samples for ballistic expert witness tests. Most of
the seized bullets were unpacked and loose, and the samples for the analytical
determinations have been randomly chosen.
From each of the recovered samples, and from each bullet of seized
ammunitions, a lead fragment was cut. The fragments were sampled by cutting
them with a new scalpel blade from the inner of the lead shot, by operating under a
laminar ux fume hood. Each of the fragment, weighting from 12 to 18 mg, was put Fig. 1. Plot of Principal Component 1 vs. Principal Components 2 for the
into an high purity plastic sealed vial, and irradiated for about 15 min into the fast ammunitions under investigation, and for the bullet fragments extracted from
pneumatic transfer line (rabbit) of the 1 MW TRIGA reactor of ENEA-Casaccia the body of the victim.
Center, under a thermal neutron ux of 1.25 1013 neutrons/cm2/s. Primary and
secondary analytical standards (lead BCR CRM 288) were simultaneously irradiated,
Table 2
and used for gamma energy spectra calibration. After irradiation, the vials have
Coefcients of linear combination of each element in the rst three Principal
been opened, and the samples transferred to the counting system, for gamma
Components.
spectra recording. Data collection for measurements of the net area of gamma peaks
was performed using an ORTEC high-purity germanium detector, coupled with a PRIN 1 PRIN 2 PRIN 3
CANBERRA pulse height/multichannel analyzer system. The obtained spectra have
been normalized and the isotopes identied by the software CANBERRA Genie-2K. Ag 0.32 0.94 0.13
The statistical analysis of the data has been performed by the software package SAS- As 0.57 0.17 0.40
Statistics 6.12. Sb 0.58 0.10 0.38
Cd 0.49 0.28 0.82
4. Results
The activation analysis allowed the determination of the due to the fact that the variance of the group possess most of the
elements Ag, Sb, Cd, Cu, As, Na, Nb, and Pb (see Table 1) in all informative discrimination power, rather than the absolute value
the bullet samples. In order to identify the chemical elements with of the elements; only an high precision analytical technique is
the maximum informative power for the discrimination of the therefore required, without the need of an high accuracy. In Fig. 1
samples, a general screening was preliminary performed, by using the plot of Principal Component 1 vs. Principal Component 2 is
the Principal Component Analysis statistical method. Briey, showed, which describes the distribution of the entire group of
Principal Components Analysis is a mathematical procedure that ammunition seized in the house of the suspect, and the fragments
can transform a number of possible variables into a smaller extracted from the body of the victim. It should be noted in the
number of uncorrelated variables, called Principal Components. gure that different brands, and also different lots, have generally
The rst Principal Component accounts for as much as variability slight different composition and different variance (Table 1).
as possible, each successive Principal Component accounts as In order to quantitatively evaluate the group attribution, a
much of the remaining variability as possible, and so on Canonical Discriminant Analysis was performed on the analytical
successively [5]. data, by dening six groups (one containing the murder recovered
The elements that in the present case accounted for the most of fragments, and the others corresponding to the ve bullets
the variability were Ag, As, Sb and Cd. A Principal Components brands). If some groups of observations are dened, each with
Analysis has been performed by using only these four elements. several quantitative variables, the Canonical Discriminant Analysis
Table 2 reports the coefcients of the linear combination of these can transform the variables into a linear combination of the same
elements in the three Principal Components; the greater the variables that has the highest possible multiple correlation with
absolute value in the table, the higher the weight and importance the groups. This maximal multiple correlation is called the rst
of the element in the discrimination analysis. It must be outlined canonical discriminant. The second canonical correlation is the
that in the present case the rst two Principal Components linear combination, uncorrelated with the rst canonical variable,
accounted for more than 90% of the variability, and the rst three that has the highest possible correlation with the groups, and so on.
Principal Components for 99%. In such a way the entire data set of Basically, the canonical variable summarizes the between-class
analytical data can be reduced and summarized into a simple plot variation, while Principal Components Analysis summarize total
of Principal Component 1 vs. Principal Component 2, still keeping variation. The probability of a point belonging to a certain non-
the 90% of explained variance, i.e. of informative discrimination spherical group can be expressed in terms of its Mahalanobis
power. More than this, an high accuracy in the analytical distance, i.e. the distance of a point from a group center of mass,
measurements of the elements concentrations is not necessary, divided by the width of the ellipsoid in the direction of that point.
Table 1
Mean element concentration in the bullets under investigation.
Sb(%) 0.46 0.02 0.48 0.02 0.44 0.62 0.03 0.29 0.02 0.47 0.02
Ag 284 25 253 28 210 19 72 15 77 22 257 31
Na 480 12 507 24 412 18 498 24 278 26 515 33
As 32 0.7 35 0.9 29 0.9 4 0.3 19 0.8 33 1.2
Nb 0.7 0.01 0.6 0.01 0.4 0.01 <0.02 0.7 0.01 0.6 0.01
Cd 3.8 0.5 3.7 0.6 4 0.6 3 0.4 0.6 0.1 3.9 0.5
Cu 226 32 167 28 573 67 21 4 950 75 97 34
RWS/hp = RSW long rie hollow point; RWS/pf1 = RSW high velocity long rie, lot 1: RWS/pf2 = RSW high velocity long rie, lot 2; W/H = Winchester H; W/sX = Winchester
super X.
A.F. Sedda, G. Rossi / Forensic Science International 206 (2011) e5e7 e7
The greater this distance, the lower is the associated probability of of interpretation of the results of bullet lead examinations. The
belonging to the same group. The associated probabilities were main argument was that neither scientist nor bullet manufacturers
found all <0.0001, except for the one corresponding to the distance were able to denitely attest the signicance of an association
RWS/fp1-RWS/fp2, with a value of <0.006, and RW/fp2-Victim between bullets during a bullet examination, given the above
Fragments, with a value of 0.32. mentioned lack of bullets homogeneity in a single ammunition
The evidence of a statistically highly signicant similarity box.
between the fragments extracted from the body of the victim and For these reasons, while the FBI Laboratory still rmly supports
the composition of the ammunition RWS full point (lot 2) found in the scientic foundation of bullet lead analysis, given the costs of
the house of the suspect, was evident. These results led the maintaining the equipment and the resources necessary to do the
investigators to look for further probation elements in the places examination, and its relative probative value, this institution has
frequented by the suspect. A thorough search revealed the decided that it will no longer conduct this exam. Notwithstanding
presence of traces of the blood of the victim in an agricultural this decision, FBI afrmed that chemical lead bullet analysis will
greenhouse owned by the father of the suspect; clear evidence of still be useful in linking individuals to a crime as well as to exclude
bullet ricochets were also found on the walls of the site, and a third, others. These conclusions have raised a large debate among
deformed bullet was found on the site, whose analysis revealed the expert witnesses, about the real affordability and potential risks of
same composition of the fragments extracted from the body of the comparative bullet lead analysis [811].
victim. After this sum of evidence, the suspect confessed that he In spite of the criticism raised on this technique, we afrm that
had shot the victim using the seized rie, during a quarrel in strictly selected cases in which an heuristic approach can be
regarding an illicit drug supply, and had tried to dispose the body of applied, the analysis of lead bullet can still furnish fundamental
the victim, by throwing it far from the homicide site. information in criminal investigations, both as a trial and as an
investigation support.
5. Discussion In the present paper, an example of a crime case is reported, in
which the compositional lead bullet comparison technique
The principle of compositional bullet lead comparison is based practically demonstrated its full validity in the orientation and
on the assumption that each batch of molten lead has its own information power during the investigations; the fact that precise
characteristic elemental composition. Lead used in the bullet- analytical determinations and a direct comparison with bullets
manufacturing process is generally obtained from secondary lead under investigation were possible, has also been considered as a
smelters, where the raw material is made primarily of recycled valid probation element in court.
automobile batteries, and from other sources, and is melted in Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis is a powerful, rapid,
kettles with capacities of 75100 tons [6]. Each bullet lot is multielemental analytical technique, particularly useful in many
obtained from ingots, each from 30 kg to 1 ton, depending from forensic applications. In the determination of bullet chemical
brand and production process and plant. In this phase, antimony composition, this technique is particularly appreciable, due to the
may be added to harden the alloy; hardened lead is generally used lack of interference from the lead matrix, to its high sensitivity, and
in non-jacketed bullets, whereas soft lead, where antimony has a to the possibility of carrying out non-destructive assays. Unfortu-
low concentration, is generally used in jacketed bullets, or in some nately the availability of a nuclear reactor strongly limits its
bullets, like 0.22 ammunitions. Other elements are present in trace widespread application. In these cases also the most commonly
amounts and can greatly vary in concentration; generally, the available analytical techniques (atomic absorption, mass spec-
bullets produced from a single ingot or billet are analytically trometry, polarography or UVvis spectrophotometry), can furnish
indistinguishable. useful data for discrimination, by using a judicious choice of the
The chemical composition of bullet lead has been widely used most discriminating chemical elements, and should be considered
in the past, in the attempt to match a brand or a production lot with a complement to traditional ballistic studies. The use of advanced
the bullet of a crime scene, by starting from the assumption that statistical analysis in data treatment is also highly recommended,
bullets with the same chemical composition were considered to due to its power in extracting and summarizing the discrimination
come from the same molten batch. Of course, the same concept has informative power in an easy and affordable way [12,13].
been used to exclude suspects from further investigations, or as a
court discharge proof. References
Unfortunately, during the processes of cutting, swaging,
[1] A.F. Sedda, G. Capannesi, J. Forensic Sci. 37 (2) (1992) 657662.
nishing, and jacketing bullets, assembling cartridges and [2] S.S. Krishnan, Can. Soc. Forensic Sci. 6 (1973) 5577.
packaging boxes, the bullets from various melts are sometimes [3] M.A. Haney, J.F. Allagher, J. Forensic Sci. 20 (1975) 484500.
intermingled, so that more than one compositional group can be [4] R.O. Keto, J. Forensic Sci. 44 (5) (1999) 10201026.
[5] .E.R. Malinowski, Factor Analysis in Chemistry, 3rd edition, Wiley, New York, 2002
present in the same box, and the assumption of an in-the-box [6] E. Randich, W. Duerfeldt, W. McLendon, W. Tobin, Forensic Sci. Int. 127 (2002)
bullets homogeneity of composition cannot be always considered 174191.
valid [7]. [7] R.D. Koons, D.M. Grant, J. Forensic Sci. 47 (5) (2002) 950958.
[8] C.H. Spiegelman, K. Kafadar, Chance 19 (2) (2006) 1725.
Due to this fact, in 2002 the FBI asked the National Research
[9] M.O. Finkelstein, B. Levin, J. Law Pol. 13 (2005) 119142.
Council of the National Academy of Sciences to have an [10] R.D. Koons, J. Buscaglia, J. Forensic Sci. 50 (2005) 111.
independent evaluation of the scientic bases of comparative [11] W.C. Thompson, Jurimetrics 46 (2005) 6589.
bullet lead analysis. While the NRC found that the analytical [12] P. Gareth, G.P. Campbell, M. James, J.M. Curran, M. Gordon, G.M. Miskelly, S. Sally
Coulson, M. Gregory, G.M. Yaxley, C. Eric, E. Grunsky, C. Simon, C. Cox, Forensic Sci.
instrumentation and the elements selected for the analysis were Int. 188 (13) (2009) 8190.
appropriated, some doubts have been raised on the general validity [13] S.A. Cole, Law Probab. Risk 8 (3) (2009) 233255.