MM Conclusion
MM Conclusion
MM Conclusion
The system seems to be equilibrium at velocity 50.8 m/s and -0.02702 radian with lift and drag
coefficient 1.48 kg/m and 0.04 kg/m respectively. The glider is assume to be stream lined so drag
coefficient is set to 0.04 kg/m. And considering L/D ratio of 37, lift coefficient is computed to be 1.48
kg/m.
Moreover, the trajectory of the flight has also been computed and found that the flight covers about
30,000 m in horizontal direction and drops by about 900 m height in 600 s time.
5.4 Validation
For the validation of the model, differential equations are solve analytically to compute angle and
velocity at equilibrium point. Different methods are considered to determine drag coefficient and lift
coefficient. And considering practical possibility, drag coefficient and lift coefficient are determined to
be 0.04 kg/m and 1.48 kg/m. And the corresponding angle and velocity at equilibrium point is computed
to be -0.02702 radian and 50.83 m/s respectively. These solution are indicated to in stable spiral points
as the solution has two Eigen value of imaginary number with negative real parts. The period of
oscillation are computed with the help of Eigen value to be 23.032 s.
Numerical simulation of mathematical model for 2000 s with stepsize 1/64 s as discussed early for initial
velocity 5 m/s, initial angle of flight -0.2 radian with drag coefficient and lift coefficient as determined
results in 50.83 m/s velocity and -0.02702 radian. These value are same as computed analytically at
equilibrium point. The period of oscillation from numerical simulation is figured to be 23.3 s which is
close to the period of oscillation computed analytically. Moreover, phase plane shows the converse
solution too.
Therefore, analytical solution and numerical simulation results are almost same which validate the
mathematical model that was studied. However, the trajectory of the flight shows high amplitude i.e.
fluctuation of height is so high that it is almost not acceptable practically. This is why, it is recommended
to modify the model. The detail recommendation will be discussed in consequent chapter.
6 Recommendation
The conclusion chapter recommended for the modification of the mathematical model. After
completing first cycle of mathematical model, the authors like to present following recommendation for
future modification of the model:
To incorporate the possibility of variance of drag coefficient and lift coefficient with angle of
glider.
To revise stepsize for obtaining even more precise results.
To incorporate additional parameters in the mathematical model.