(Dan M. Frangopol (Ed.), Richard Sause (Ed.), Chad PDF
(Dan M. Frangopol (Ed.), Richard Sause (Ed.), Chad PDF
(Dan M. Frangopol (Ed.), Richard Sause (Ed.), Chad PDF
Richard Sause
ATLSS Engineering Research Center, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
Chad S. Kusko
ATLSS Engineering Research Center, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
CRC Press/Balkema is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
All rights reserved. No part of this publication or the information contained herein may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, by
photocopying, recording or otherwise, without written prior permission from the publisher.
Although all care is taken to ensure integrity and the quality of this publication and the information herein,
no responsibility is assumed by the publishers nor the author for any damage to the property or
persons as a result of operation or use of this publication and/or the information contained herein.
ISBN: 978-0-415-87786-2
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Table of Contents
Preface XXXIII
Conference organization XXXV
Keynote Lectures
Mini-Symposia
MS1: Futuristic bridge maintenance technologies
Organizers: C.-B. Yun & B.F. Spencer Jr.
Passive sensors for monitoring corrosion in concrete bridges 81
A. Abu Yousef, S.L. Wood, P. Pasupathy & D.P. Neikirk
Coupled resonant coil sensors with increased interrogation distance 82
S. Bhadra, E. Thompson, B. Kordi, G.E. Bridges & D.J. Thomson
Concentration-dependent piezoelectricity and strain sensitivity of ZnO
nanoparticle-polymeric thin films 83
D. Chang & K.J. Loh
V
Prediction of displacement response of a suspension bridge using FBG strain sensors 84
S.J. Chang, N.S. Kim & H.K. Kim
Structural health monitoring of a cable-stayed bridge using acceleration data via
wireless smart sensor network 85
S. Cho, J. Park, H.-J. Jung, C.-B. Yun, S. Jang, H. Jo, B.F. Spencer Jr., T. Nagayama & J.W. Seo
Smart wireless tension force monitoring system for stay cables 86
S. Cho, C.-B. Yun & J.P. Lynch
An active sensor placement optimization strategy using data-driven Bayesian experimental design 87
E.B. Flynn & M.D. Todd
Investigation of the control performance of the smart passive system based on MR damper
using hybrid simulation 88
D.D. Jang, I.H. Kim, H.J. Jung & J.H. Koo
Autonomous structural health monitoring using wireless smart sensors on a cable-stayed bridge 89
S. Jang, H. Jo, K. Mechitov, S.-H. Sim, B.F. Spencer Jr., G. Agha, S. Cho,
H.-J. Jung, C.-B. Yun & J.A. Rice
Evaluation of ultimate performance of the reinforced concrete T-girder bridge
using optical fiber sensors 90
D.-S. Jung, C.-Y. Kim, S.-M. Cho, S.-A. Choi, B.-Y. Seo & K.-W. Lee
Statistical damage assessment based on the extreme value distribution using vibration responses 91
J. Kang & H.W. Park
Prestress-force monitoring using impedance-based smart sensor nodes in PSC girder bridges 92
J.-T. Kim, D.-S. Hong, S.-Y. Lee & J.-H. Park
Tension monitoring of a prestressing strand for concrete bridge using in-tendon FBG sensors 93
J.-M. Kim, H.-W. Kim, Y.-S. Kim & Y.-H. Park
Evaluation of the characteristics of local erosion of fine-grained soils in the west coast area of Korea 94
J. Lee, K. Kwak, J. Park & M. Chung
Impedance-based structural health monitoring using neural networks for autonomous
frequency range selection 95
J. Min, C.-B. Yun & S. Park
Output only modal identification and damage detection of bridge-structures using time
frequency and wavelet techniques 96
S. Nagarajaiah, B. Basu & V.S.M. Vemuru
Safety network system integration for bridge structures in Korea 97
K.T. Park, Y.J. Yoo, B.C. Joo, J. Lee & Y.K. Hwang
Damping properties identified from wind-induced vibration measurements of a suspension bridge 98
D.U. Park, N.S. Kim & H.K. Kim
Debonding condition monitoring of a CFRP laminated concrete beam using piezoelectric
impedance sensor nodes 99
S. Park, S.-K. Park, J.-W. Kim & H.-J. Chang
Development of a wireless power and data transmission system using laser and optoelectronic
devices for guided wave-based structural health monitoring 100
H.J. Park, H. Sohn, C.-B. Yun, J. Chung & I.B. Kwon
Development of structural health monitoring systems for railroad bridge testbeds 101
H.J. Park, C.-B. Yun, M.H. Shin, J.J. Lee & S.Y. Park
Development of a benchmark laboratory structure for finite-element model updating 102
S. Shang, G.J. Yun, S.G. Lee, J. Caicedo & S. Narasimhan
Variation of eigen-properties of a PSC bridge due to prestressing force 103
S. Shin, M.-S. Koo, H.-K. Lee & S.-J. Kwon
VI
Imaging ultrasonic waves in complex structures using a scanning laser Doppler vibrometer 104
H. Sohn, J.Y. Yang, D. Dutta, M.P. DeSimio, S.E. Olson & E.D. Swenson
Integrated wireless powering and data interrogation for civil infrastructure monitoring 105
S.G. Taylor, E.B. Flynn, D.L. Mascarenas, M.D. Todd, D. Dondi, T. Rosing, S. Kpotufe,
S. Dasgupta, K. Lin, R. Gupta, K.M. Farinholt, G. Park & C.R. Farrar
Multi-scale wireless sensor node for impedance-based SHM and long-term civil
infrastructure monitoring 106
S.G. Taylor, K.M. Farinholt, G. Park, C.R. Farrar & M.D. Todd
Energy harvesting and wireless energy transmission for powering SHM sensor nodes 107
S.G. Taylor, N.A. Miller, K.M. Farinholt, G. Park & C.R. Farrar
Feasibility investigation for identifying bridges fundamental frequencies from vehicle vibrations 108
T. Toshinami, M. Kawatani & C.W. Kim
Analysis and prediction for bridge maintenance costs based on life-cycle and Markov approach 109
Y.Q. Xiang, C. Zhou & D.M. Guo
Transmissibility-function-based structural damage detection with tetherless mobile sensors 110
X. Yi, D. Zhu, Y. Wang, J. Guo & K.-M. Lee
Long-term structural health monitoring for Tamar Suspension Bridge 111
K.Y. Koo, J.M.W. Brownjohn, P. Carden, D.I. List, R. Cole & T. Wood
International collaborative research and education on smart sensors and monitoring technologies 112
C.-B. Yun, H. Sohn, M.L. Wang, B.F. Spencer & Y. Fujino
Piezo paint-based smart tape sensor for bridge diagnosis 113
Y. Zhang, C. Zhou, Z. Li, C.C. Fu & C. Wang
VII
Output-only substructural identification for local damage detection 128
C.G. Koh & T.N. Thanh
Steel beam fatigue life prediction using acoustic emission amplitude histograms and
backpropagation neural networks 129
A. Korcak, J. Suleman, F.F. Barsoum & E.v.K. Hill
Health monitoring of concrete bridges: model simulations of pre-stressed beams under
static environmental loading based on experimental data 130
F. Lanata
Jointless bridge: Determination of fracture mechanical parameters values for nonlinear analysis 131
D. Lehk, Z. Kerner & D. Novk
Coupled field monitoring and structural analysis to assess scour conditions 132
J. McConnell & M. Cann
Proof load testing supported by acoustic emission. An example of application 133
P. Olaszek, G. Swit & J.R. Casas
Jointless bridge: Reliability assessment 134
J. Podrouek, D. Novk & A. Strauss
An innovative approach for dynamic damage detection in bridge girders 135
H.A. Rasheed & Sh. Nayyeri Amiri
Definition of structural parameters span structures of bridges by results of their
tests by mobile loading 136
V. Redchenko
Repair monitoring and experimental work associated with Ferrycarrig Bridge 137
P.C. Ryan, A.J. OConnor, L. Duffy, A. Daly & G. Jones
Analysis of in-service data collected during biennial inspections on typical bridges 138
H.W. Shenton III, K. Connor, M.J. Chajes, M. Rakowski & B. Brookes
Determination of concrete bridge ageing by structural health monitoring 139
S. Soyoz & M.Q. Feng
Monitoring based performance checking of the jointless Marktwasser Bridge S33.24 140
A. Strauss, R. Wendner, K. Bergmeister & D.M. Frangopol
Monitoring based verification of the soil structure interaction of the Markwasser Bridge S33.24 141
R. Wendner, A. Strauss & K. Bergmeister
Experimental trials on the detection of reinforcement breaks with the magnetic flux leakage method 142
T. Wolf & T. Vogel
Innovative structural health monitoring for Tamar Suspension Bridge by automated
total positioning system 143
K.Y. Koo, J.M.W. Brownjohn, D. List, R. Cole & T. Wood
VIII
Enhanced bridge management via integrated remote sensing 151
S. Chen, E. Hauser, K. Dai, W. Liu, B. Ribarsky, S. Lee, B. Tolone & C. Boyle
Full field mapping of bridge deformation using digital speckle photography 152
F.P. Chiang & J. Yu
Design for inspection one way towards durable infrastructures 153
M. Drissi-Habti
Non-homogeneous Markov Chain for bridge deterioration modeling 154
G. Fu & D. Devaraj
New tools for inspection and evaluation of steel truss bridge gusset plates 155
C. Higgins, Q.D. Nguyen & O.T. Turan
The computerized cables stay inspection of the Cooper River Bridge (Arthur Ravanel, Jr) 156
B. Kroely, G. Hovhanessian & J. Stieb
Load ratings of a concrete-encased steel 3-hinge arch bridge 157
L.-Y. Lai, W.-S. Chang & M. Majd
Rope access bridge inspections 158
B. Leshko
California bridge management 159
B. Newton
Post-earthquake bridge inspection guidelines for New York state 160
J.S. OConnor & S. Alampalli
A framework for evaluating the impact of structural health monitoring on bridge management 161
M. Pozzi, D. Zonta, W. Wang & G. Chen
Bridge management and inspection for the County of Baltimore, Maryland 162
J.K. Shaffer & M.C. Schellhase
Overview of remote structural health monitoring: Focus on end user demands 163
T. Spuler, G. Moor & R. Berger
Methods of quality control and quality assurance for highway bridge inspection in the United States 164
G.A. Washer
Studies on the use of KEEL software for intelligent analyzing of bridge load-bearing capacity 165
P. Wjtowicz & D. Krl
IX
Uncertainty and reliability analysis using monitoring data and artificial neural
network (ANN) calibration 175
T. Dumlupinar, H.B. Gokce, K.R. Mackie, F.N. Catbas & D.M. Frangopol
Effects of environmental changes on the dynamic characteristic of reinforced concrete beams 176
M.R. Esfahani & G. Behnam
Damage detection using a novel time series methodology: Application to the Z24 Bridge data 177
M. Gul & F.N. Catbas
Development of a bridge health monitoring approach using train-bridge interaction
analysis and GA optimization 178
X. He, T. Hayashikawa, T. Matsumoto, M. Kawatani & H. Furuta
Assessment of remaining fatigue life of aging orthotropic steel deck bridges 179
K. Kashefi, M. Zeinoddini & A.P. Zandi
Identifying bending stiffness change of a beam under a moving vehicle 180
C.W. Kim, M. Kawatani & T. Fujimoto
Low-cost wireless sensor node for vibration monitoring of infrastructures 181
C.W. Kim, M. Kawatani, R. Ozaki, N. Makihata & M. Kano
Bridge retrofit design optimization for fatigue based on monitoring and FE analysis 182
K. Kwon & D.M. Frangopol
Updating the finite element model of bridge structures by an improved Taguchi updating method 183
Y. Liu, H. Li, Z. Duan & Y. Yao
High-order local vibration properties of RC Viaduct under the passing high speed train 184
K. Matsuoka, K. Kaito, T. Watanabe & M. Sogabe
Condition assessment of bridge deck truss using in-service monitoring data of strain 185
Y.Q. Ni, H.W. Xia, J.M. Ko & K.Y. Wong
Simultaneous monitoring of the coupled vibration between a bridge and moving trains 186
Y. Oshima, K. Yamamoto, K. Sugiura, A. Tanaka & M. Hori
Challenges and uncertainty mitigation in structural identification of long span bridges 187
J.B. Prader, J. Zhang, F.L. Moon & A.E. Aktan
Bridge instrumentation for long term structural health monitoring 188
M. Sanayei, J.D. Sipple, J.E. Phelps, E. Santini-Bell, P.J. Lefebvre & B.R. Brenner
Modeling and instrumentation of the Tobin Memorial Bridge 189
M. Sanayei, E.J. Pheifer, B.R. Brenner, E. Santini-Bell & W.L. Durack
Instrumentation for reinforced concrete durability monitoring of Qingdao Bay Bridge 190
X.P. Shao, B.L. Guo & Y.Q. Ni
Structural monitoring of Lezria Bridge since its construction 191
H. Sousa, J. Figueiras & J. Bento
Reliability assessment oriented monitoring system design for Shanghai Yangtze River Bridge 192
Z. Sun, H.-S. Wu, Q.-M. Wang, Y.-C. Lu & Z.-F. Zhou
Bridge Sensor Mart: A flexible and scalable data storage and analysis framework for
structural health monitoring 193
N.C. Tas, C. Raileanu, M. Dejori & C. Neubauer
Full-scale measurements on buffeting response of Sutong Bridge under typhoon Fung-Wong 194
H. Wang, A.Q. Li, T.Y. Zhu & R.M. Hu
Structural health monitoring for damage detection based on integration of computer imaging
and sensor data 195
R. Zaurin & F.N. Catbas
X
MS5: New procedures for bridge rehabilitation
Organizer: V. Popa
Sustainable and cost effective solutions to life extension of bridges 199
C.P. Atkins, P. Lambert, R. Brueckner, R. Merola & A.R. Foster
Electrochemical chloride extraction and electrochemical re-alkalization Foreva
Regebeton PA process 200
R.A. Bedn & D. Deschamps
Bridge crossings raised to provide more overhead clearance 201
R.A. Daniel, B. van Sinten & H.T. van Manen
Choosing the appropriate sustainable polymer concrete material for bridge
preservation and maintenance 202
A.M. Dinitz & M.S. Stenko
Shear resistances and strengthening of aged prestressed concrete bridges considering
deterioration and fatigue effects 203
P. Mark, M. Bender, M. Strack, Ch. Fust & V. Birtel
Fatigue strength and repair methods of corroded bridge wires 204
S. Nakamura & K. Suzumura
XI
A framework for comprehensive estimation of user costs for bridge management: A synopsis
of existing practices and discussion of new considerations 222
Q. Bai, S. Labi, G.P. Ong, A. Bhargava, K.C. Sinha & P.D. Thompson
Bridge management technique: Implementation of a deterioration model to different
highway networks 223
P. Crespi, D. Oggionni & G. Pasqualato
Structural monitoring with wireless sensor networks: Lessons learned from field deployments 224
G. Feltrin, R. Bischoff, J. Meyer & O. Saukh
An improved model for predicting NBI condition ratings 225
M.J. Fraher, S. Hwang & J. Fu
Bridge maintenance and practical bridge management systems in Japan 226
H. Furuta & E. Watanabe
Contribution of non-destructive defect detection to bridge management 227
R. Helmerich & B. Milmann
Bridge inspections: Are we getting it right? 228
B. Kamya
Maximizing return on investment utilizing a bridge depreciation model 229
H.S. Kleywegt
Trends in development of bridge management systems 230
J.S. Kong, J.H. Kim, B.T. Adey & L. Klatter
The bridge management system of the NYCDOT 231
B. Kroely, K. McAnulty & J. Daza
Integrated bridge inspection and management software for New Jersey Turnpike Authority 232
J.H. Laird, J.A. Paul & J.K. Shaffer
Integration of bridge management systems (BMS) and pavement management systems (PMS) 233
R.M. Ellis, A. Cheetham, K. Hong & P.D. Thompson
Development of a bridge network life cycle cost model 234
T. Reale, A. OConnor, L. Duffy & A. Daly
Implementation of a multi-period bridge investment optimization approach utilizing Pontis
results and additional constraints in three agencies 235
W. Robert, D. Gurenich & R. Thompson
BrIM based bridge operations and management 236
A.M. Shirole, S.S. Chen, Q. Gao & H. Hu
Updating bridge deterioration models with irregular inspection intervals 237
P.D. Thompson, R.M. Ellis & K. Hong
Estimation of enhanced Pontis deterioration models in Florida 238
P.D. Thompson & J.O. Sobanjo
Advanced dynamic testing and bridge management system 239
J. Zwolski, J. Bien & P. Rawa
XII
Uncertainty in bridge fragility curves and its effect on the seismic risk evaluation of
a highway transportation network 245
S. Banerjee & M. Shinozuka
Sequential bridge fragility updating using long-term monitoring data 246
M. Shinozuka, M. Torbol & S. Banerjee
XIII
Bridging the data gaps for effective management, session 3: performance LTBP data
infrastructure and data integration 270
M. Dejori, R. Ciprian & C. Neubauer
LTBP pilot study methodology and preliminary results 271
A.J. Foden & V.R. Sibley
Enhancing bridge performance defining/measuring/improving bridge performance 272
H. Ghasemi & J.M. Hooks
NDE condition assessment of reinforced concrete bridge decks within the LTBP program 273
N. Gucunski, F. Romero, H. Parvardeh, F.A. Fetrat, S. Kruschwitz & R. Feldmann
Performance indicators for highway bridges and their integration in bridge management 274
N.M. Okasha & D.M. Frangopol
Parameter identification of a reinforced concrete T-beam bridge 275
Y. Zhou, J. Weidner, J. Prader, N. Dubbs, F. Moon & E. Aktan
XIV
An analysis of long time deflection of long span prestressed concrete bridges 295
L. Vrablik & V. Kristek
Reliability-based assessment of RC bridges in a marine environment considering spatial
and temporal variability of deterioration processes 296
J.S. Zhu & D.M. Frangopol
XV
MS15: European approach on integrated infrastructure risk management (IRIS)
Organizer: H. Wenzel
Health monitoring of a smart base isolated benchmark cable-stayed bridge using
symptom approach 321
G.P. Cimellaro, A. De Stefano, M. Domaneschi & L. Martinelli
Reliability of SHM procedures and decision support in infrastructure management 322
A. Del Grosso
Crystal clear data fusion in subspace system identification and damage detection 323
M. Dhler, B.X. Lam & L. Mevel
Experiments for damage detection by subspace identification on a tied arch bridge 324
C. Ebert & A. Lenzen
Web based monitoring and assessment of bridges and structures 325
M. Fritz, M. Stger & R. Berger
Practical implementation of SHM with a special focus on the end users needs 326
P. Furtner & H. Wenzel
Recording and simulating environmental effects upon Tamar Suspension Bridge 327
R.J. Westgate, K. Koo & J.M.W. Brownjohn
A statistical method for masonry arch bridges damage detection 328
G. Ruocci & A. De Stefano
Proposal of a workers and scaffolds monitoring and risk mitigation system for building sites 329
A. Sassi, L. Gioanola & P. Civera
Observed dynamic characteristics of an overpass bridge during destructive testing 330
D.M. Siringoringo, T. Nagayama, Y. Fujino, D. Su & C. Tandian
Case based reasoning systems for comparative assessment 331
R. Stumptner, B. Freudenthaler, J. Kng & M. Aburahma
European approach on integrated infrastructure risk management 332
H. Wenzel & H. Allmer
XVI
When major bridges need to carry more and heavier loads 344
K.F. Kirkwood & P.G. Buckland
Structural health monitoring for Bosphorus Bridge 345
D. Mackenzie, N. McFadyen & S. de Neumann
Bridge hanger deterioration 346
D. Mackenzie, N. Adamson & M. Bloomstine
Bridge barriers and parapets 347
D. MacKenzie, J. Tarrell & O. Srensen
Surfacing for orthotropic bridge decks 348
N. McFadyen & J. Blumensen
Bridge bearings and joints 349
O. Srensen, D. MacKenzie & E. Lauersen
Replacement of suspension bridge suspenders and main cables 350
O. Srensen, M.L. Bloomstine & P.G. Buckland
XVII
Redundancy analysis for a cable-stayed bridge using fibre model 366
K. Sugioka, H. Kanaji, S. Matsumoto, K. Magoshi & M. Nagai
Analytical study on detection of structural damages of a long-span suspension bridge by
wind-induced response 367
N.D. Thang, H. Katsuchi, H. Yamada & E. Sasaki
New high performance steels for long-span bridges 368
T.-Y. Yoon, J.-K. Lee, K.-S. Kim & J.-Y. Cho
Special Sessions
SS1: Use of health monitoring for life-cycle cost analysis & optimization
Organizers: D.M. Frangopol & A. Orcesi
Optimization of the amount of structural health monitoring via probabilistic system assessment 371
C. Albrecht, D. Hosser, C. Klinzmann & R. Schnetgke
The potential link between bridge management systems, structural health monitoring and bridge
weigh-in-motion progress and challenges 372
R.M. Ellis & P.D. Thompson
Probabilistic optimal bridge monitoring planning 373
S. Kim & D.M. Frangopol
Optimization of bridge maintenance actions considering combination of sources of information:
Inspections and expert judgment 374
L.C. Neves & D.M. Frangopol
Structural health monitoring: from data acquisition to optimum life-cycle management
under uncertainty 375
A.D. Orcesi & D.M. Frangopol
The role of structural identification in asset management 376
J. Weidner, J. Prader, N. Dubbs, F. Moon & E. Aktan
SS2: Safety monitoring & maintenance strategy for long span bridges
Organizer: A. Chen
Safety monitoring of the cable stayed bridge in the Commercial Harbor of Venice, Italy 379
B. Briseghella, E. Siviero, C. Lan, E. Mazzarolo & T. Zordan
Iterative buckling analysis for steel cable-stayed bridges 380
D.H. Choi, H.S. Na, S.G. Gwon, D.H. Yoo & H. Yoo
Rehabilitation planning and stay cable replacement design for the Hale Boggs Bridge in
Luling, Louisiana 381
A.T. Ciolko, S.T. Wyatt & C.A. Ligozio
Reliability assessment of Yonghe Bridge based on structural health monitoring 382
S. Li, H. Li & J. Ou
Risk management of newly-built bridge vibration effects on surrounding buildings 383
X. Shi, S. Geng, X. Ruan, Z. Wang & Z. Qu
Bridge safety assessment based on field test data with SORM method 384
X.M. Wang, X.F. Shi, X. Ruan & T.Y. Ying
XVIII
Time-dependent reliability of PSC bridge box-girders exposed to aggressive environments 389
T. Guo, R. Sause, D.M. Frangopol & A.Q. Li
Condition improvement of deteriorating bridges by using high performance ceramic materials 390
H. Nakajima, T. Yamagami, S. Tsukamoto, H. Sugiyama, T. Ura & H. Koide
Rehabilitation of Haynes Avenue Bridge 391
A.P. Ranasinghe & V. Ganji
Influence of corrosion on prestressed concrete beams: An experimental survey 392
Z. Rinaldi, S. Imperatore, C. Valente & L. Pardi
Development of a compound inspection method to detect fatigue damages on orthotropic steel deck 393
H. Sugiyama, A. Tabata, H. Nakajima, T. Yamagami, S. Tsukamoto, M. Uchima, M. Okuno & Y. Kohno
Application of Bayesian Network for concrete bridge deck condition rating 394
A. Tarighat & A. Miyamoto
Vulnerability analysis of a reinforced concrete structure by visual inspection 395
M.V. Piras, L. Deias & F. Mistretta
Remaining lifetime and resistance of corrosion attacked bridge deck 396
J. Vican & M. Skora
The condition assessment and strengthening for the deteriorating prestressed concrete
trussed combination arch bridge 397
G.W. Yao & S. Bai
Development of a bridge condition assessment system by using city bus 398
A. Yabe & A. Miyamoto
XIX
Optimal design of bridge SHM systems based on risk and opportunity analysis 414
D. Inaudi
Smart textiles and their application in bridge engineering 415
T.B. Messervey, D. Zangani & J.L. Withiam
Conical couplers for non-pigtailed, free-space optical coupling to fiber optic sensors for
bridge monitoring 416
L. Qiu, K. Goossen, D. Heider, D.J. OBrien & E.D. Wetzel
XX
SS11: ARCHES: Assessment & rehabilitation of Central European highway structures
Organizers: T. Wierzbicki & J.R. Casas
Smart cathodic protection systems 443
R.B. Polder, J. Leggedoor, G. Schuten, S. Sajna & A. Kranjc
Assessment and monitoring of existing bridges to avoid unnecessary
strengthening or replacement 444
J.R. Casas
Composite UHPFRC-concrete construction for rehabilitation most recent advances
and applications 445
A. ajna, J.S. uput, E. Denari, E. Brhwiler, G. Habert, P. Rossi,
L. Recic & T. Wierzbicki
Corrosion resistant steels as reinforcement in concrete 447
I. Stipanovic Oslakovic, D. Bjegovic, M. Serdar, A. Legat, A. ajna,
T. Kosec, V. Kuhar & N. Gartner
SS14: Using technology to manage, preserve, & renew landmark signature bridges
Organizers: D.S. Lowdermilk & F.L. Moon
Load capacity estimation for the Burlington Bristol Bridge 461
N. Dubbs, F. Moon & A.E. Aktan
Design and implementation of load cell bearings to measure dead and live load effects
in an aged long span bridge 462
N. Dubbs, F. Moon & A.E. Aktan
Structural health monitoring of signature bridges: An engineers perspective 463
D. Lowdermilk, L. Egan & J. Prader
Health monitoring of the Tacony-Palmyra bridge bascule span 464
J. Weidner
XXI
Probabilistic seismic response and retrofit assessment of aging bridges 468
J. Ghosh & J.E. Padgett
Seismic response of repaired bridges by pseudodynamic tests 469
D. Lavorato & C. Nuti
Response of curved steel bridges to seismic loading 470
D.G. Linzell, J. Seo & V.P. Nadakuditi
The design of r.c. bridge deck subjected to horizontal actions by strut-and-tie models 471
M. Mezzina, F. Palmisano & D. Raffaele
Hybrid seismic isolation design of Sakarya-II Viaduct in the proximity of the North Anatolian Fault 472
C. Ozkaya, N. Celebi, F. Tulumtas & M. Dicleli
Seismic abutment-deck interaction of a four-span R/C bridge model 473
M. Saiidi, A. Ebrahimpour & N.B. Johnson
Influence of shear key modelling on the performance of bridges under simulated seismic loads 474
P.F. Silva & T.L.T. Nguyen
A case study of analysis techniques for precast segmental bridges subjected to vertical
seismic excitation 475
M.J. Veletzos & J.I. Restrepo
Compressive stress-strain model for high-strength concrete confined with spirals 476
J.C. West & R.A. Hindi
XXII
Time varying risk modeling of deteriorating bridge infrastructure for sustainable
infrastructure design 491
A.S. Rao, M.D. Lepech, A.S. Kiremidjian & X.Y. Sun
Development of on-board image measurement system for actual running and application
to wall surface surveys of structures 498
H. Kurashige, S. Nishimura, K. Hara, J. Kato, T. Omae & H. Yamasaki
Strain analysis method using multi-rosette analysis by digital image correlation method 501
M. Uchino, T. Okamoto, K. Hida, Y. Ito, P. Sumitoro & H. Matsuda
Risk based inspection strategy considering structural redundancy of long span bridges 507
N. Mashima, K. Sugioka, H. Kobayashi, H. Kanaji, H. Oishi & K. Kaito
Approach for bridge management using BMS in West Nippon Expressway Company Limited 508
T. Matsui, Y. Wada, S. Sakai & T. Yasuzato
Risk evaluation and financial analysis for road maintenance on urban expressway
based on H-BMS 510
Y. Sakai, M. Jido, H. Furuta & K. Kobayashi
Study for bridge renewal and repair by Osaka municipal government 511
E. Watanabe, H. Furuta, T. Yokota, Y. Komatsu & S. Nagahashi
XXIII
SS20: Challenges for enhancing bridge security
Organizer: S.R. Duwadi
Recognizing and reducing vulnerabilities of transportation infrastructure 515
S.R. Duwadi
Bridge design relevance and efficiency of protective measures for bridge structures
under severe loading 516
M. Noeldgen, W. Caspari & J. Krieger
Structural health monitoring of Stonecutters Bridge under the construction stage 522
K.Y. Wong, D.M.S. Yau & M.C.H. Hui
SHMS-based bridge rating method for long span cable-supported bridges 524
Y.L. Xu, Y. Zheng, Z.W. Chen, Y. Xia, Q. Li, A.X. Guo & K.Y. Wong
A method for stress concentration factor determination of welded steel bridge T-joints
under moving load 525
X.W. Ye, Y.Q. Ni, J.M. Ko & K.Y. Wong
A study on vibration performance estimation of footbridge using human body model 530
S.-H. Kim, K.-I. Cho & M.-S. Choi
I-girder with discrete torsional bracings: Lateral-torsional buckling and torsional vibration 531
C.T. Nguyen & H.E. Lee
Reliability based design optimization of steel box girder bridge under corrosion attack 533
N.V. Son, M.C. Jeong, S.H. Kim & J.S. Kong
XXIV
Strengthening design for two-span steel-concrete composite bridges strengthened by
external tendons 538
D.H. Choi, H.S. Na & S.G. Gwon
Assessment and corrosion performance enhancement of weathering steel highway structures 539
N. Damgaard, S. Walbridge, C. Hansson & J. Yeung
Analytical study of fatigue repair of coped beams using carbon fibre reinforced polymers 540
T.A. Holden, J.J.R. Cheng, C.C. Lam & M.C.H. Yam
CFRP repair of fatigue cracks and bonding behavior subjected to cyclic load during curing 541
F. Lin, H. Nakamura, K. Maeda, H. Suzuki & T. Irube
An analytical study on the fatigue cracking of the top flange in steel railway through
truss stringers 542
K. Matsumoto, Y. Niwa, T. Nakayama & M. Sakano
A study of longer service life of a multispan simple steel railway bridge 543
Y. Niwa, T. Nakayama, K. Matsumoto, M. Sakano & A. Koshiba
Development of XFEM analysis code for simulation of fatigue crack propagation in
steel structure 544
K. Shibanuma, H. Aoi, T. Utsunomiya, M. Sakano & Y. Natsuaki
Development of health monitoring indicators for steel bridges and its implementation
to sensing systems 545
K. Sugisaki, Mas. Abe, Mak. Abe & M. Shimamura
Retrofit and advanced investigation on fatigue cracks penetrating orthotropic steel deck plates 546
H. Sugiyama, K. Sugioka, A. Tabata, S. Tsukamoto & K. Utsunomiya
Study on improvement of fatigue strength of out-of-plane gusset welded joints
by attaching GFRP 547
H. Suzuki, N. Inaba, Y. Tomita & K. Shito
Study on improvement of the fatigue durability by filling of mortar in U-shaped rib of
orthotropic steel deck 548
A. Tabata, Y. Aoki, Y. Takada, H. Onishi & S. Matsui
Study of fatigue assessment of orthotropic steel decks in consideration of variations in
locus distribution of wheels 549
Y. Takada, A. Tabata & T. Yamaguchi
Experimental study on the root fatigue life improvement for the reasonable design of steel
pier seismic reinforcement 550
T. Tominaga, K. Matsuoka, C. Miki & Y. Hirabayashi
Effect of reinforcing method against fatigue cracking of orthotropic steel deck with bulb ribs 551
D. Yamaoka, M. Sakano, Y. Natsuaki, S. Nonaka, Y. Nakagawa & K. Nakamura
XXV
Effect of tension stiffening in composite bridges in the light of Eurocodes 559
G. agoda, W. Radomski & M. agoda
XXVI
SS30: Chinese bridges
Organizer: M.-C. Tang
Major steel bridges for high speed railway in China 591
Z. Gao
Major bridges in Shanghai 592
Y.-P. Lin
Bridges in Chongqing the bridge capital of China 593
D. Yin, W. Xu & X. Duan
Cross-river bridges in Jiangsu 594
Q. You, L. Ji & X. Dong
General Sessions
Organizers: F. Biondini & S. Pakzad
Experimental study on repair welding under static and cyclic loads 597
Y. Agano, S. Fujihira, S.H. Lee & Y.C. Kim
Long-term performance prediction of RC bridge slabs in a marine environment 598
M. Akiyama, D.M. Frangopol & I. Yoshida
Arrigoni Bridge inspection and testing program 599
B. Bantimba & A. Siddiqui
On the applicability of random field theory to transportation network analysis 600
P. Bocchini & D.M. Frangopol
Design check of bridge over Tejo River in Carregado, Portugal 601
P. Cachim & P. Fidalgo
Using microsimulation to estimate highway bridge traffic load 602
C.C. Caprani
Pseudodynamic and cyclic tests on reduced-scale pier-deck sub-systems 603
D. Cardone, G. Perrone, S. Sofia, M. Dolce & L. Pardi
The case study and application of the substructure replacement technique for bridges
having serious scouring of foundation 604
D.-W. Chang, J.-L. Wang, C.-P. Chang & M.-Y. Yu
Bridge maintenance prioritization through visual inspection results 605
M.H. Chen, H.C. Tsai, C.Y. Wang & M.C. Chen
Time-dependent reliability analysis of systems with repairable or non-repairable components 606
T. Cheng & M.D. Pandey
An empirical life-cycle assessment of the relative cost-effectiveness of alternative
materials for reinforcing bridge decks 607
A. Cope, S. Labi & C. Fang
A procedure to derive probabilistic fatigue strength data for riveted joints 608
J.A.F.O. Correia, A.M.P. de Jesus, A.L.L. da Silva & J.F.N. da Silva
Uncertainty evaluation of reinforced concrete structures behavior 609
P.J.S. Cruz, I. Valente, J.C. Matos & J. Batista
Toward a more rational serviceability considerations for high performance steel bridges 610
S. Darjani, M.A. Saadeghvaziri, S. Saigal, N. Aboobaker & A. Khan
Refined load rating analysis of in-service bridges in North Carolina, USA 611
S. Das
Designing the rehabilitation of the Henley Street Bridge in Knoxville, Tennessee, USA 612
S. Das
XXVII
Stress intensity factors evaluation for riveted beams applying FEA with VCCT 613
A.M.P. de Jesus & J.A.F.O. Correia
Deterioration and maintenance of RC bridge decks under uncertainty: Condition and
reliability indicators 614
A. Dec & D.M. Frangopol
Multi directional hysteretic damper with adaptive post-elastic stiffness for seismic
protection of bridges in near fault zones 615
M. Dicleli & A. Salem-Milani
Distribution of live load effects in integral bridge abutments and piles 616
M. Dicleli & S. Erhan
Static and dynamic model validation and damage detection using wireless sensor network 617
S. Dorvash, S. Pakzad, R. Yao & K. Okaly
Modern permanent and portable restraint systems for bridges 618
T. Edl & A. Barnas
Effect of soil bridge interaction on the distribution of live load effects among integral
bridge components 619
S. Erhan & M. Dicleli
Live load distribution in integral bridge girders 620
S. Erhan & M. Dicleli
Comparison of fatigue behavior under concentrated loads of orthotropic decks and crane runways 621
M. Euler & U. Kuhlmann
The strain development in concrete under cyclic loading 622
M. Foglar
Cracking of reinforced concrete deck on skewed bridges 623
G. Fu, J. Feng, J. Dimaria & Y. Zhuang
The Filetto Bridge on the Santerno River near Bologna (Italy): Seismic retrofit and
reinforcement design 624
G. Gasparini, S. Silvestri, T. Trombetti & C. Ceccoli
Masonry arch bridges towards a hierarchical assessment framework 625
N. Gibbons & P.J. Fanning
Target proof load factors for highway bridge assessment in Central and Eastern
European Countries (CEEC) 626
J.D. Gmez & J.R. Casas
Synthetic fiber ropes to replace steel wire in pedestrian suspension bridges 627
S. Gupte, R. Betti & T. Zoli
Seismic evaluation of Sogutlucesme Viaduct 628
A.F. Gurdil, A. Yagcioglu & A.G. Ozcebe
Sustainable design for steel-concrete bridges 629
G. Hauf, P. Maier & U. Kuhlmann
Estimating natural frequencies, damping ratios and FEM models of suspension bridges
from wind response measurement 630
A.L. Hong, R. Betti & F. Ubertini
Using orthogonal pairs of rollers on concave beds (OPRCB) in seismic design and retrofit
of highway bridges 631
M. Hosseini, A. Soroor & S. Khavari
Two cable-stayed bridges designed for easy access and low maintenance 632
R. Hsu
Development of a cooperative management framework for bridge maintenance using IFC data model 633
M.G. Huang, H.-J. Kim, K.-H. Kim & S.-H. Lee
XXVIII
Development of live load model using weigh-in-motion data 634
E.-S. Hwang
A review of metallic bridge failure statistics 635
B.M. Imam & M.K. Chryssanthopoulos
Shear transfer mechanism in slab-on-girder bridges 636
A. Jamali & M.A. Saadeghvaziri
Estimation of optimum isolator parameters for effective mitigation of seismic risk for bridges 637
M. Karalar & M. Dicleli
Development of a new cycle counting method for cyclic thermal strains in integral bridge piles 638
M. Karalar & M. Dicleli
Properties of self-consolidating light-weight concrete in massive structures 639
M. Kaszynska
Seismic vulnerability assessment and comparing various retrofit designs for an
existing highway bridge 640
S.R. Khavari & M. Hosseini
Experimental evaluation of spliced PSC-steel-PSC hybrid girder connected with advanced
joints consisting of perfobond ribs 641
S.-H. Kim, J.-H. Yoon, S.-J. Park, J.-H. Won, C.G. Lee & S.-J. Kim
Construction of the hybrid cable-stayed bridge 642
D.G. Kim, H.C. Kwon & K.J. Lee
Low cycle fatigue strength of cruciform welded joints considering plate thickness 643
K. Kinoshita & K. Ueda
An analysis on the torsion of hybrid bridges with corrugated steel webs considering tensile
strength of concrete 644
H.J. Ko, H.E. Lee & J. Moon
Application of a new metal spraying system for steel bridges. Part 5. Analysis of the
corrosion prevention mechanism of the system 645
T. Kondo, S. Okuno, H. Matsuno & M. Ohshiba
Assessment of existing steel structures Recommendations for estimation of the remaining
fatigue life 646
B. Khn
Computational methodologies for the blast vulnerability assessment of steel bridge girders 647
L.D. Leininger & A.M. Coughlin
Design live load for long span bridges 648
M. Lutomirska & A.S. Nowak
Management of interstate 95 in Pennsylvania 649
T.P. Macioce, H.M. Berman & D. Constable
Monitoring of the Manhattan Bridge and interferometric radar systems 650
L. Mayer, B. Yanev, L.D. Olson & A. Smyth
A rational partial composite bridge beam transition 651
P.S. McCarten
Structural health monitoring for bridge management 652
P.S. McCarten
Destructive test of a steel slab-on-girder bridge 653
J. McConnell, M. Chajes, H. Shenton III, K. Michaud, C. Russo & J. Ross
Bridge inspection and repair technologies on the expressways in Japan 654
H. Miyauchi
XXIX
Improving transparency of bridge condition for decision-making and analysis in
bridge management 655
J.T. Newlin, W.L. Meyers, G.P. Patil & S.W. Joshi
Countermeasures for rain- and wind-induced vibrations on the Meiko Nishi Bridge 656
A. Noguchi & H. Miyauchi
Proposal for modification of load and resistance factors in the AASHTO LRFD bridge design code 657
A.S. Nowak & P. Paczkowski
Recommendations for dynamic allowance in bridge assessment 658
E.J. OBrien, A. Gonzlez & A. nidaric
Influence of steel reinforcement corrosion on the stiffness of simply supported concrete beams 659
F.J. OFlaherty, P.S. Mangat, P. Lambert & E.H. Browne
Influence of shear reinforcement corrosion on the performance of under-reinforced concrete beams 660
F.J. OFlaherty, P.S. Mangat, P. Lambert & E.H. Browne
Fatigue evaluation of steel finger type expansion joints for highway bridges 661
S. Ono, S. Sakai & T. Imamura
Design of elastic foundation layers for buildings new design and calculation
methods design examples 662
M. sterreicher & W. Unterberger
An attempt of rationalization for maintenance of railway structures using management
supporting system 663
M. Oyado, M. Miyashita, S. Ueda & A. Sakairi
Sensitivity of bridge reliability to parameter variation in systems susceptible to spatially
distributed soil liquefaction 664
J.E. Padgett, J. Ghosh & L. Dueas-Osorio
An enhanced XML Schema matching technique for checking of the missing items in
construction document delivery 665
S.I. Park, B.-G. Kim, H.J. An & S.-H. Lee
Structural analysis and fatigue life assessment of the Paderno Arch Bridge 666
A. Pipinato
New high endurance sliding material for bridge bearings 667
V. Quaglini, C. Tavecchio, P. Dubini, D. Cuminetti & D. Ferroni
What is bridge durability official regulations and reality 668
W. Radomski
Effective management of concrete assets concrete durability: Achievement and enhancement 669
P.C. Robery
Condition inspection, analysis and maintenance of three prominent railroad bridges 670
C. Rolwood & R. Drew
Full scale laboratory testing of replacement orthotropic deck for Verrazano Narrows Bridge 671
S. Roy, J.W. Fisher & R.S.D. Alapati
Structural hardening for cable elements of cable supported bridges 672
N.D. Sauer
Peformance assessment of bridges under progressive damage and abnormal actions 673
D. Saydam & D.M. Frangopol
Detection of fatigue crack of steel deck plate by ultrasonic nondestructive testing 674
H. Shirahata, K. Akasaka & T. Iizuka
Fiber-reinforced polymer composites: An effective solution to our nations crumbling infrastructure 675
M. Stafford
XXX
Seismic assessment on the existing highway bridges in Taiwan 676
Y.-C. Sung, K.-C. Chang, D.-W. Chang, C.-L. Chen, H.-M. Wu & K.-Y. Liu
Prediction of restrained shrinkage stresses and premature deck cracking in composite bridges 677
A. Szwed & M.M. Szerszen
Evaluation of corrosion deterioration of weathering steel bridge under the
environmental corrosiveness 678
Y. Tamaki, T. Shimozato, Y. Arizumi, T. Yabuki & S. Ono
Study on the cause of brittle fracture during earthquakes in steel bridge bent
focusing on stress triaxiality 679
H. Tamura, E. Sasaki, H. Yamada & H. Katsuchi
A simplified approach to calculate the secondary moments of continuous prestressed
concrete bridges 680
V. Tiruchirapalli & R.A. Hindi
Fatigue testing of stay cables at resonant frequency 681
W. Traeger & J. Kollegger
Durable connections between precast bridge components: Fundamental approach 682
A.E. Ulku, U.B. Attanayake & H.M. Aktan
Bridge strengthening by structural change: from continuous beam to network arch 683
M. Valenzuela & J.R. Casas
Innovations in fabrication of the self-anchored suspension span of the
San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge 684
M. Wahbeh, P. Siegenthaler, T. Nilsson, M. Nader & A. Cavendish-Tribe
Fatigue life evaluation of existing highway reinforced concrete bridges 685
C. Wang, G. Li, X. Dong, L. Hao & J. Wang
Durability rehabilitation of a reinforced concrete bridge damaged by corrosion and overload 686
H.L. Wang, X.Y. Sun & Z.J. Zheng
Where are the sustainable bridges in the United States? 687
D. Whittemore
A heuristic approach for optimizing bridge inspection route 688
C.-I. Yen, H.-K. Liao, J.-J. Chai & N.-J. Yau
Assessment of the operation level of a bridge network in postearthquake scenarios 689
Y.C. Yue, D. Zonta, F. Bortot & R. Zandonini
A distributed application for infrastructure risk prevention 690
M.H. Zaharia, F. Leon, G.M. Atanasiu, G. Pagu & E. Czeran
The relevance of whole life costs for infrastructure buildings 691
T. Zinke & T. Ummenhofer
XXXI
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Preface
The number of deteriorating bridges is increasing worldwide. Costs of maintenance, repair and rehabilitation of
these bridges far exceed available budgets. Maintaining the safety and serviceability of existing bridges by making
better use of available resources is a major concern for bridge management. Internationally, the bridge engineering
profession continues to take positive steps towards developing more comprehensive bridge management systems.
Consequently, it continues to be appropriate to bring together all of the very best work that has been done in the
field of bridge maintenance, safety, management and life-cycle optimization at the Fifth International Conference
on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management (IABMAS2010), held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA,
from July 11 through 15, 2010. The First (IABMAS02), Second (IABMAS04), Third (IABMAS06), and
Fourth (IABMAS08) International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management were held in
Barcelona, Spain, July 1417, 2002, Kyoto, Japan, October 1822, 2004, Porto, Portugal, July 1619, 2006, and
Seoul, Korea, July 1317, 2008, respectively.
The International Association for Bridge Maintenance and Safety (IABMAS, www.iabmas.org), which serves
as the organizing association of IABMAS2010 in conjunction with Lehigh Universitys Advanced Technology for
Large Structural Systems (ATLSS) Engineering Research Center, encompasses all aspects of bridge maintenance,
safety and management. Specifically, it deals with: health monitoring and inspection of bridges; bridge repair
and rehabilitation issues; bridge management systems; needs of bridge owners, financial planning, whole life
costing and investment for the future; bridge related safety and risk issues and economic and other implications.
The objective of IABMAS is to promote international cooperation in the fields of bridge maintenance, safety,
management, life-cycle performance and cost for the purpose of enhancing the welfare of society. The interest
of the international bridge community in all these fields has been confirmed by the high response to the call
for papers. In fact, 835 abstracts were received by the Conference Secretariat. Approximately 70% of them
were selected for final publication as full-papers and presentation at the Conference within mini-symposia,
special sessions, and general sessions. Compared to IABMAS08 the total of number of papers scheduled for
presentation has increased from 465 to 511.
IABMAS2010 covers all major aspects of bridge maintenance, safety, management and life-cycle optimization
including advanced materials, ageing of bridges, assessment and evaluation, bridge codes, bridge diagnostics,
bridge management systems, bridge security, composites, design for durability, deterioration modeling, emerging
technologies, fatigue, field testing, financial planning, health monitoring, high performance materials, innova-
tions, inspection, life-cycle performance, load capacity assessment, loads, maintenance strategies, new technical
and material concepts, non-destructive testing, optimization strategies, prediction of future traffic demands,
rehabilitation, reliability and risk management, repair, replacement, residual service life, safety and service-
ability, service life prediction, strengthening, sustainable materials for bridges, sustainable bridges, informatics,
whole-life costing, and multi-criteria optimization, among others.
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization contains the lectures and papers pre-
sented at IABMAS2010. It consists of a book of abstracts and a CD-ROM containing the full texts of the lectures
and papers presented at IABMAS2010, including the T.Y. Lin Lecture, nine Keynote Lectures and 501 technical
papers from 35 countries. This set provides both and up-to-date overview of the field of bridge engineering
and significant contributions to the process of making more rational decisions in bridge maintenance, safety,
management, life-cycle performance, and cost for the purpose of enhancing the welfare of society.
On behalf of IABMAS and Lehigh Universitys ATLSS Engineering Research Center, the chairs of the
Conference would like to take this opportunity to express their sincere thanks to the authors, organizers of
special sessions and mini-symposia, and participants for their contributions; to the Conference Honorary Chair,
Professor John W. Fisher; to the members of the Conference Scientific and Organizing Committees for their
dedicated work; and to the members of the Local Organizing Committee for the time and effort they have
devoted to making IABMAS2010 a successful event. Finally, we would like to register our sincere thanks to all
the sponsors of IABMAS2010.
Dan M. Frangopol and Richard Sause
Chairs, IABMAS2010
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA, April 2010
XXXIII
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Conference organization
ORGANIZING ASSOCIATION
The International Association for Bridge Maintenance and Safety (IABMAS) (http://www.iabmas.org/)
CONFERENCE CHAIRS
HOST ASSOCIATION
Advanced Technology for Large Structural Systems (ATLSS) Engineering Research Center, Lehigh University,
Bethlehem, PA, USA (http://www.atlss.lehigh.edu)
XXXV
Hyo-Nam Cho Hanyang University, Ansan, Korea
Marios Chryssanthopoulos University of Surrey, Guilford, Surrey, UK
Young Soo Chung Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea
Marcello Ciampoli University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
Joel Conte University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
Ross Corotis University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
Christian Cremona LCPC, Paris, France
Paulo Cruz University of Minho, Guimaraes, Portugal
Andrea Del Grosso University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
George Deodatis Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
Sophia Diniz Federal University of Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Sheila Duwadi Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA, USA
Lennart Elfgren Lule University of Technology, Lule, Sweden
Bruce Ellingwood Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
Ib Enevoldsen RAMBLL, Copenhagen, Denmark
Allen Estes California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, USA
Glauco Feltrin Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing & Research, Dbendorf,
Switzerland
Joo Almeida Fernandes National Civil Engineering Laboratory, Lisbon, Portugal
Joaquim Figuerias University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
John W. Fisher Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
Michael Forde University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
Dan M. Frangopol Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
Karl Frank University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA
Ian M. Friedland Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA, USA
Gongkang Fu Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
Yozo Fujino University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Hitoshi Furuta Kansai University, Osaka, Japan
James H. Garrett Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA USA
Yaojun Ge Tongji University, Shanghai, China
Hamid Ghasemi Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA, USA
Michel Ghosn City University of New York, New York, NY, USA
Paul Grundy Monash University, Victoria, Australia
Rade Hajdin Infrastructure Management Consultants GmgH, Zrich, Switzerland
Geir Horrigmoe Norut Technology, Narvik, Norway
Michael C.H. Hui Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative, Hong, Kong, P.R.C.
Naeem Hussain ARUP, Hong Kong, P.R.C.
Daniele Inaudi SMARTEC SA, Manno, Switzerland
Jens Sandager Jensen COWI A/S, Lyngby, Denmark
Maarten-Jan Kallen HKV Consultants, Lelystad, The Netherlands
Ahsan Kareem University of Notre Dame, South Bend, IN, USA
Maria Kaszynska Szczecin Technical University, Szczecin, Poland
Malcolm Kerley Virginia Department of Transportation, Richmond, VA, USA
Sang-Hyo Kim Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
Sungkon Kim Seoul National University of Technology, Seoul, Korea
Risto Kiviluoma WSP Finland Ltd., Helsinki, Finland
F. Wayne Klaiber Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA
Leo Klatter Public Works & Water Management, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Jan-Ming Ko The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, P.R.C.
C. G. Koh National University of Singapore, Singapore
Hyun-Moo Koh Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
Jung Sik Kong Korea University, Seoul, Korea
Ulrike Kuhlmann University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
John Lane Railway Safety and Standards Board, London, UK
Jrn Lauridsen Danish Road Directorate, Copenhagen, Denmark
Kincho Law Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Hakeun Lee Korea University, Seoul, Korea
Jeeho Lee Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea
Chin-Hsiung Loh National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Jerome Lynch University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Pier Giorgio Malerba Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
XXXVI
Ayaz Malik Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, USA
Lance Manuel University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
Ren Maquoi University of Lige, Lige, Belgium
Antonio Mari Universitat Politcnica de Catalunya
Barney Martin Modjeski & Masters, Poughkeepsie, NY, USA
Sami Masri University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Thomas Messervey DAppolonia S.p.A, Genoa, Italy
Ayaho Miyamoto Yamaguchi University, Ube, Japan
Aftab Mufti ISIS Canada Research Network, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Hani Nassif Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
Jinping Ou Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China
Livia Pardi Autostrade per lItalia, Rome, Italy
Udo Peil Technical University of Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
Stephen Pessiki Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
Victor Popa Search Corporation, Bucharest, Romania
Mark Reno Quincy Engineering Inc., Sacramento, CA, USA
James Ricles Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
Xin Ruan Tongji University, Shanghai, China
Salvatore Russo University of Iuav of Venice, Venice, Italy
Mehdi Saiidi University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA
Richard Sause Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
Richard Shepard City of Elk Grove, Public Works, Elk Grove, CA, USA
Masanobu Shinozuka University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
Dong-Ku Shin Myongji University, Gyeonggido, Korea
Soobong Shin Inha University, Incheon, Korea
Arunprakash M. Shirole Arora and Associates, P.C., MN, USA
Jongsung Sim Hanyang University, Ansan, Korea
Marja-Kaarina Sderqvist Finnish Road Administration, Helsinki, Finland
Mark Stewart University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
Luc Taerwe University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
Man-Chung Tang T.Y. Lin International, San Francisco, CA, USA
Palle Thoft-Christensen Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
Paul Thompson Castle Rock, CO, USA
Tomoaki Utsunomiya Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
Pedro Vellasco State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Thomas Vogel ETH Zrich, Zrich, Switzerland
Eiichi Watanabe Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
You-Lin Xu Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, P.R.C.
Zhishen Wu Ibaraki University, Hitachi, Japan
Bojidar Yanev New York City DOT, New York, NY, USA
Riccardo Zandonini University of Trento, Trento, Italy
Yunfeng Zhang University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
Ex-Officio Members:
Dan M. Frangopol Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
Chad Kusko Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
Richard Sause Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
Members:
Eugene Bruehwiler EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
Joan R. Casas Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
Airong Chen Tongji University, Shanghai, China
Sheng-Jin Chen National Taiwan University of Science & Technology, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Christian Cremona LCPC, Paris, France
XXXVII
Paulo Cruz University of Minho, Guimaraes, Portugal
Yozo Fujino University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Hitoshi Furuta Kansai University, Osaka, Japan
Rudolph Kotze New Zealand Transport Agency, Hamilton, New Zealand
Pier Giorgio Malerba Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
Chitoshi Miki Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
Aftab Mufti ISIS Canada, Research Network, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Young Suk Park Myongji University, Gyeonggido, Korea
Robert Sweeney Modjeski & Masters, Montreal, Canada
Man Chung Tang T.Y.Lin International, San Francisco, CA, USA
Jin-Guang Teng Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, P.R.C.
Eiichi Watanabe Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
Chung-Bang Yun Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejon, Korea
Ex-Officio Members:
Dan M. Frangopol Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
Chad Kusko Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
Richard Sause Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
Members:
Sreenivas Alampalli NY State DOT, Albany, NY, USA
Raimondo Betti Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
Harry Capers Arora & Associates, P.C., Lawrenceville, NJ, USA
F. Necati Catbas University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
Michael Chajes University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
Steven Chase University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
Karl Frank University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA
Ian M Friedland Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, USA
Gongkang Fu Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
James H. Garrett Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Hamid Ghasemi Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, USA
Michel Ghosn City University of New York, New York, NY, USA
Martin Kendall Edwards & Kelcey, Inc., New York, NY, USA
Myint Lwin Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA, USA
Tom Macioce Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Harrisburg, PA, USA
Ali Maher Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
Barney Martin Modjeski & Masters, Poughkeepsie, NY, USA
Dennis Mertz University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
Andrzej Nowak University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA
Mary Lou Ralls Ralls Newman, LLC., Austin, TX, USA
Mark Reno Quincy Engineering, Inc., Sacramento, CA, USA
Bala Sivakumar HNTB Corporation, New York, NY, USA
Bill Spencer Jr. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA
Richard Walther Wiss, Janney, Elstner Assoc., Inc., Northbrook, IL, USA
Bojidar Yanev New York City DOT, New York, NY, USA
XXXVIII
Peter A. Mazzeo HNTB, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Ronnie Medlock High Steel Structures, Inc., Lancaster, PA, USA
Bill Michaleyra Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
Franklin Moon Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Clay Naito Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
Shamim Pakzad Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
Alan W. Pense Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
Stephen P. Pessiki Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
James M. Ricles Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
Matt Sanfilippo Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Richard Sause Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
Harry W. Shenton III University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
Wagdy Wassef Modjeski & Masters, Inc., Mechanicsburg, PA, USA
Ben T. Yen Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
Yunfeng Zhang University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
IABMAS2010 MINI-SYMPOSIA
MS1: Futuristic bridge maintenance technologies, organized by C.-B. Yun & B.F. Spencer Jr.
MS2: Monitoring & assessment of bridges using novel techniques, organized by A. Strauss & D.M. Frangopol
MS3: Present & future of bridge inspection & evaluation, organized by S. Alampalli, A.K. Agrawal &
M. Ettouney
MS4: Research & applications in bridge health monitoring, organized by F.N. Catbas, J.R. Casas,
H. Furuta & D.M. Frangopol
MS5: New procedures for bridge rehabilitation, organized by V. Popa
MS6: Measurement systems for bridge weigh-in-motion (B-WIM), organized by B. Bakht, A. Znidaric &
D.K. McNeill
MS7: Bridge management tools & research, organized by L. Klatter
MS8: Uncertainty in bridge damageability modelling, organized by M. Shinozuka
MS9: Performance-based asset & risk management of the highway infrastructure system, organized by
A.E. Aktan
MS10: Bridging the data gaps for effective management, organized by H. Ghasemi
MS12: Computational prediction & in field validation of bridge performance, organized by F. Biondini,
F. Bontempi & P.G. Malerba
MS13: Management & maintenance of long span bridges, organized by A. Chen & D.M. Frangopol
MS14: SmartEN Marie Curie ITN Smart management for sustainable human environment,
organized by T. Onoufriou & R. Helmerich
MS15: European approach on integrated infrastructure risk management (IRIS), organized by H. Wenzel
MS16: Safety & management of bridges in Mexico, organized by D. De Leon
MS17: COWI Group mini-symposium Cable supported bridges, organized by J.S. Jensen
MS18: Lifetime design of super long span bridges, organized by H.-M. Koh
SS1: Use of health monitoring for life-cycle cost analysis & optimization, organized by
D.M. Frangopol & A. Orcesi
SS2: Safety monitoring & maintenance strategy for long span bridges, organized by A. Chen
SS3: Bridge condition assessment, organized by A. Miyamoto & F. Tondolo
SS4: Bridges for high speed railways, organized by R. Calcada
SS5: Industrial smart material applications for civil infrastructure (ISMA), organized by T.B. Messervey
SS6: Advances in structural robustness: dependability framework, organized by F. Bontempi
SS7: Bridge adaptation to the environmental & climate changes, organized by V. Popa
SS8: Nondeterministic schemes for structural safety & reliability of bridges, organized by S. Arangio
SS10: Life cycle bridge engineering in Korea, organized by H.-N. Cho & J.-S. Kong
SS11: ARCHES: Assessment & rehabilitation of Central European highway structures, organized by
T. Wierzbicki & J. R. Casas
SS13: Current advancements in bridge technology, organized by A.H. Malik
SS14: Using technology to manage, preserve, & renew landmark signature bridges, organized by
D.S. Lowdermilk & F.L. Moon
SS15: Modeling of bridge seismic response, organized by M. Fischinger
SS16: Recent challenging bridge structures, organized by I.S. Darwish
XXXIX
SS17: Life-cycle design of structural systems, organized by F. Biondini & D.M. Frangopol
SS18: Optical monitoring techniques for bridge maintenance & safety, organized by S. Sumitro & H. Matsuda
SS19: Implementation of bridge management administration in Japan, organized by H. Furuta & E. Watanabe
SS20: Challenges for enhancing bridge security, organized by S.R. Duwadi
SS21: Structural monitoring of bridges: Hong Kongs experience, organized by Y.-L. Xu & M.C.H. Hui
SS23: Performance-based design for steel structures, organized by S.-H. Kim & J.-S. Kong
SS24: Steel bridge rehabilitation, organized by M. Sakano
SS25: New developments in bridge design codes, organized by A.S. Nowak
SS26: WIM-based live loads for bridges, organized by A.S. Nowak
SS27: High performance concrete lessons of past decades, organized by M.L. Ralls
SS28: Construction, architecture & testing of soil-steel bridges, organized by Z. Manko & D. Beben
SS29: Lessons learned from instrumented bridges, organized by M. Feng
SS30: Chinese bridges, organized by M.-C. Tang
FINANCIAL SPONSORS
XL
NON-FINANCIAL SPONSORS
XLI
XLII
TECHNICAL EXHIBITORS
XLIII
T.Y. Lin Lecture
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
C. Seim
Consulting Bridge Engineer, El Cerrito, California, USA
3
Most importantly, if the bridge were to be taken out of padding a header above a sub-standard height opening
service, the highway system would lose an important or posting signs warning of low clearances.
investment of public money.
In emergency situations, maintenance engineers
must act quickly, decisively, and wisely to protect the 4 THE CHANGING MAINTENANCE SCENE
safety of the traveling public. Usually there is no time
to look at textbooks, and, if there were time, there From time to time new materials are introduced to
are few textbooks on the subject that will solve the improve the maintenance of bridges. About 1975,
immediate problem. some states and communities started to impose volatil-
A good example of this occurred during the Septem- ity limits on paint and solvents used in bridge
ber 2009 repair of a fractured eyebar on the San maintenance; sandblasting was curtailed, and full
Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. The installation was containment of removed material was required to
not actually a repair, but was a partial-strengthening avoid sweeping it into bays or rivers. The limit on
of the cracked eyebar: the strengthening failed seven paint volatility was an opportunity which resulted in
weeks after its installation. The bridge was closed for improved paints for structural steel. Todays paint sys-
six days to all traffic while a second temporary, but tems have three times the life that they had when I
improved, strengthening system was again installed. started in maintenance with the traditional red lead
The permanent repair was then installed in December paint system.
2009 over eight days by working at night with partial High-Performance Steel and Concrete require less
deck closures. material for construction, should last longer, reducing
the cost of maintenance. Protective coatings for steel
reinforcing bars in concrete decks and in splash-zone
of concrete piers also extend the service lives of these
3 MAINTENANCE AND SAFETY areas.
Todays bridge codes are recognizing the need for
Safety is always paramount in the maintenance oper- designs that use durable materials that are long-lasting
ations of a bridge. Good maintenance includes the and that can reduce maintenance demands. A new buzz
safe management of facilities such as traffic, roadway, word, Sustainable-Design is being used to denote the
aviation, and navigation lighting; keeping deck drains use of these improved materials.
open; repair of expansion joints that spring loose; as Bridge Diagnostic-Systems are being developed
well hundreds of other items. Safety also covers the that make detection of bridge elements with structural
safe management of accesses for maintenance person- problems easier to find, record, and maintain. Bridge
nel such as ladders, cat walks, and their personal gear Management Systems are also being developed that
such as coveralls, gloves, respirators, body harnesses make routine and special maintenance easier to track.
and lanyards. Bridge Security is a new, developing technology
Today there are a number of personnel hoists for for protecting important bridges that will require trial
above-deck and below-deck access that aid in the installations on bridges to determine how they may
safe placement of maintenance workers at the point affect bridge-maintenance functions.
of work. However, these facilities come at the price These few examples show that Bridge Maintenance
of one or two lane closures and the redirecting of can indeed be a changing, exciting profession!
traffic.
These personnel hoists are also used in the impor-
tant function of inspecting all elements of the bridge 5 THE ROLES OF THE BRIDGE OWNER
for close-up inspection. These hoists do have their
limitations, and sometimes inspectors need to climb All bridges that have been built and all the bridges to be
steel, install temporary rigging, or use mountain- built in the future will have owners. What should be
climbing equipment to get to all the inspection points. the role of the owners of bridges in regard to main-
Whichever methods are used, Safety First is the tenance and safety operations? Perhaps, for a new
primary mandate for inspecting a bridge. bridge, their role would be to conceive of a beautiful
Additionally, OHSA compliance for the health and bridge, thoughtfully designed, well constructed, and
safety of maintenance personnel was one of the most safely maintained. For existing bridges, the owners are
important directives for health and safety ever passed limited to safely maintaining their bridges to obtain the
by Congress. OHSA has saved many lives and pre- built-in service life.
vented many injuries over time. Although OHSA rules The design and construction of a bridge requires
may be costly to implement and to self-enforce, and money up front, whereas good maintenance func-
thus have drawn some criticism; this is money well tions require money after the bridge has been built;
spent. All maintenance operations performed on a sometimes that money, unfortunately, can be slow in
bridge must conform to the requirements of OSHA, coming, or worse yet, be cut-off. The owner must
wherever possible. Sometimes, on existing bridges, appreciate that good maintenance will prolong the life
OHSA rules cannot be fully implemented; in such of the bridge, will provide safe passage for the pub-
cases the maintenance engineer must do whatever lic, and will require reserves of money that must be
measures he/she can to increase worker safety, such as appropriated as needed.
4
6 THE ROLES OF THE BRIDGE DESIGNER Fortunately, this Association sponsors conferences,
such as this one, that promotes and advances the art,
Good maintenance starts with good design. If the practice, and development of Bridge Maintenance and
bridge designer does a worthy job of designing the Safety.
structure and a thorough job of selecting proper materi-
als; providing maintenance access when possible; and
providing enough clear space for inspecting, cleaning, 8 WHAT IS GOOD MAINTENANCE?
painting, and replacing good maintenance should
follow. I think that politicians do not always understand why
A bridge designer has many difficult roles to fill: money must be spent on Maintenance. They may think:
he/she needs to satisfy a large number of requirements, You built the bridge, it is carrying traffic, and now you
such as those contained in a four-inch thick design want to fix it. Didnt you do your work right the first
code: choosing the proper structural type, span lengths, time? When money is short, maintenance is usually
and foundation types; selecting the materials, bearings, the first item cut; politicians refer to this process by
and expansion joints; and writing specifications and the euphemism deferred maintenance.
estimating costs.Thus a designer may become too busy Although it is fair for the politicians to ask: Is
to think about the future maintenance of the bridge. our money being well spent or, can this money be
However, I believe the appropriate time to think spent more effectively? It is up to bridge owners to
about installing facilities for maintenance operations provide, and to maintenance engineers to ensure, that
is during the design phase. These facilities will lower maintenance money is effectively utilized for good and
the life-cycle cost of the bridge; but only if the bridge necessary maintenance.
designer is motivated to provide maintenance access Since the advent of the LRFD bridge design spec-
and space on the bridge plans, and if the bridge owner ifications, we have seen the probabilistic basis of this
will provide a little bit more money now to save more new approach to bridge design from publications dis-
money in the future. playing two bell-shaped curves, superimposed on a
diagram, with the curve on the left representing the
loads L (dead, truck, wind, others), and with the curve
7 ROLES OF THE MAINTENANCE ENGINEER on the right representing the resistances R (of the
bridge elements). A simplified interpretation of this
The roles of the maintenance engineer are too numer- diagram is that the distance between the peaks of
ous to mention here; suffice to say that the major the two curves is a measure of safety called Relia-
roles of the maintenance engineer are: maintaining bility Index. The acceptable value of the Reliability
the safety of personnel, the safety of the travelling Index used for the design of bridges, is set by a
public, and the safety of the structures. These roles specification-writing committee and is based upon
demand, among many other requirements, knowledge their judgment and experience, and by comparison to
of structures and materials; some knowledge of con- the performances of existing bridges.
struction practice, repair methods, and of arresting In the practical world, Politicians control L by their
corrosion; familiarity with OHSA, safety devices and votes on legal-load weights for highways, hopefully
access equipment; ability to communicate with and guided by the advice of bridge engineers. However,
to motivating personnel; and the ability to talk pleas- politicians are constantly being lobbied to increase
antly to people who are heatedly complaining about legal-load weights, which they often vote to do.
pot holes in the bridge deck. The resistance, R, of each of the myriad of bridge
Where can bridge owners find good maintenance elements that make up a bridge, is controlled by the
engineers? They usually are made the hard way from bridge designer, using the current, thick bridge design
working on the maintenance of bridges, and if lucky, specifications and his/her knowledge and experience.
under the mentorship of a seasoned maintenance engi- After the bridge is constructed and opened to service,
neer. We never see advertising: Enroll now, get your the resistance, R, is partially controlled in one way
degree in bridge maintenance engineering, and make of looking at it by the bridge maintenance engineer,
a fortune! ensuring that the service life designed into the structure
In my case, I was appointed, kicking and screaming, will be obtained through good maintenance.
into the maintenance engineering function. Luckily I The measure of good maintenance (and good
inherited a good staff that were well trained and knew design) is that the bridge will safely serve society,
what they were doing before I came; they educated me without reduction in load capacity, to the end of its
very quickly as to what I was to do and how I could design life.
best help them to do their job!
However, other maintenance engineers may not be
so lucky, and they may have to start almost from scratch 9 SERVICE LIFE OF A BRIDGE
in educating themselves and in training their own per-
sonnel; or worst, they have small staffs, little or no What is the lifetime of a bridge, or better yet, what is
maintenance money, and must keep their bridges open the service life of a bridge? Service life is the bet-
with bailing wire and sheer determination. ter description because it implies that the bridge will
5
safely carry the loads, without reduction, for which it Maintenance engineers had to stand by helplessly
was designed, over its specified lifetime. An old bridge because these failures were beyond their control to
can live on after its service life has passed but it may manage or prevent; all they could do was watch, patch,
require rehabilitation or extensive reconstruction. and repair. However, there are now several installa-
At the beginning of my career, most bridges were tions of orthotropic decks and wearing surfaces that
designed for a life time of 50 years. We used slide-rules are nearing, or have achieved, a 30 to 40 year service
and the now-obsolete allowable stress design(ASD); life. These successful installations are typified by the
the bridge design specifications were only about use of engineered and laboratory-tested materials, as
inches thick, and life was much simpler! That 50- all of our materials should be, before being used on
year service life was increased, a couple of decades bridges.
ago, to 75 years when the LFD method of design was
developed. I have recently worked on oversight of the
design and the construction of the Cooper River cable- 10 PRIMARY, SECONDARY, AND TERTIARY
stayed bridge which has a specified service life of 100 EFFECTS
years. I am presently working in the same capacity on
the bridge from Hong Kong to Macau, which has a One of the jobs of the bridge designer is to determine
specified life of 125 years. the effects of the primary stresses generated by loads
There is certainly a trend toward increasing the and structural action, and to use appropriate materi-
design service-life of our bridges in the United States: als in the proper amount, to provide the necessary
a hundred year life has been suggested. At what point resistance to meet the load demands. There are now
does a longer specified service life of the bridge trigger programs that have the ability to analyze secondary
an increase in the Reliability Index or load factors, or stresses, non-linear and inelastic structural actions,
in a reduction in fatigue stress? Do we know enough and even dynamic load-time-histories applications.
about the tertiary effects of aging on our materials? However, we still lack the ability to analyze for ter-
More importantly, what effects will longer service tiary effects of time, loading, and the environment on
lives have on the maintenance and safety functions material used in our bridges. For example, the break-
of our bridges? down of paint films under the aging effects of weather,
Rivets have been around for about two centuries; oxygen, and moisture; the migration of chloride ions
though not used very often now; reinforced concrete through concrete, that, when reaching the level of
began to be used in bridges a little over a century the steel reinforcing bars, starts corrosion; and the
ago; prestressed concrete and welded steel girders have fatigue-effects of out-of-plane bending of steel plates.
been used for a little over a half-century. Elastomeric To be sure, specialists can do these things, but usu-
and pot bearings and modular expansion joints have ally not typical bridge designers. We try to cover these
less than a half-century of use in bridges; high perfor- adverse effects whenever they are discovered by code
mance concrete and steel have an even shorter history requirements that are based upon experience. How-
of bridge-use about a decade; yet even shorter is ever, tertiary effects are the very effects that the bridge
the use of advanced composites, which utilize plastic maintenance engineer must inspect, monitor, and con-
resins and fiber reinforcement. trol, so as to provide a long service life for the bridge.
If the century, or the century and a quarter of bridge Although, at the time of this writing, no testing
service life is successfully to be achieved, perhaps results have been published on the eyebars of the San
we need a comprehensive test program for traditional Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge, I believe the cause of
materials being used for longer-life applications as the crack in the troubled eyebar will be found to be a
well as for the new materials being used for longer tertiary effect that could not be calculated nor found
life in traditional applications. by inspecting at the time that the bridge was designed,
A disastrous example of not performing sufficient nor could the cause be found with todays technology.
development and testing of new materials and new These tertiary effects showed up very vividly in
structural forms was the introduction of orthotropic my experience on the Golden Gate Bridge, back in
steel decks to the United States, about forty years ago. the 1970s. The Golden Gate Bridge, Highway, and
The first-draft design specifications for orthotropic Transportation District (The District) is a completely
steel decks were based on strength-design, rather than separate organization from the California Department
on serviceability-design. In some of the early installa- of Transportation, (Caltrans), for whom I worked at
tions of this deck-type the steel began to fatigue-crack that time.
in high stress areas and had to be repaired in the field. The District had employed a consultant to evalu-
An even worse example was the choice of wearing ate the concrete deck; the consultant reported that the
surface material placed on the steel deck to provide deck reinforcing bars were fatiguing under wheel loads
skid resistance, a smooth ride, and to protect the steel and would begin fatigue-fracturing within a few years.
deck from corroding. Asphalt, or modified asphalt was The concrete deck could not be replaced under traf-
used with very little laboratory testing to prove its dura- fic. Therefore a new lower deck in the plane of the
bility. All of the original asphalt-based materials failed lower truss chords would need to be constructed, traf-
in just a few years and now need to be replaced every fic diverted to the new lower deck, the upper concrete
decade or so. deck removed, and a new deck cast in place, all under
6
full traffic. Obviously this would be a tremendously But this will never happen again on the Golden
expensive and traffic-disrupting plan. The District Gate Bridge. The corroded rivets were replaced with
asked Caltrans for a second opinion and I drew the high strength bolts and new lacing bars were installed.
assignment. About 1970, and over a twenty-year period, the
I read the report stating that corrosion had occurred maintenance crews blasted off the old red lead paint,
between and on the top flanges of the longitudinal steel applied an inorganic zinc primer, and protected the
stringers, lifting the concrete slab free of its support primer with an overcoat of durable paint. The Bridge
from the flanges of the stringers. The deck was now has not lost steel section since. It is now a model bridge
spanning over one or two longitudinal stringers, and for showing what good maintenance should be.
the extra-long spans were producing higher fatigue
stresses under truck wheel loading. 11 THE BRIDGE WILL SHOW YOU
I noted that the report used a beam analogy instead
of a plate or arch analogy. I requested that the Cal- The most important function for the maintenance and
trans Transportation Laboratory in Sacramento place safety operations of a bridge is inspection, either by
strain gauges on a few of the reinforcing bars and mon- eye or by instruments. If you look, the bridge will show
itor stresses during the morning commute. The strain you where it needs maintenance help.
gauge showed that the maximum stress recording was During the most famous bridge collapse of all-time,
about 2000 psi. Even with an impact factor of 100 per- the Qubec Bridge, under construction in 1906, was
cent, this low stress would not be significant in terms deflecting abnormally and some of the iron work-
of fatiguing the rebars. ers walked off the job. The now infamous I 35W
However, our inspection did find that reinforcing truss bridge had bucked gusset plates before it col-
bars near the soffit of the deck appeared to be cor- lapsed in 2007. Several of the lifting cables of the
roding. We then performed half-cell readings on the old Dumbarton Bridge lift-span in San Francisco Bay
deck and took two-inch diameter cores through the were vibrating excessively and had to be replaced in
6 1/2 inch thick deck, sliced the cores, and analyzed 1975. The cable stays of the Luling Bridge, near New
the slices for Chloride ions. The analysis showed quite Orleans, were galloping abnormally and developing
clearly that the chloride content in the lower third of cracks in the plastic tubing and in the cement grout;
concrete in the deck was above the threshold content the stays are now being replaced. And so on, as there
that sustains steel reinforcing bar corrosion. The deck are literally thousands of examples; however the most
was corroding, not fatiguing. important observation is what your bridge is telling
The chloride was being deposited on the soffit of you, if you look.
the deck from the salt laden fogs that continually roll Of course there are distress items that are hidden
through the Golden Gate. The Golden Gate Bridge from view. The flaw in the eyebar of the Silver Bridge
needed a new steel deck that could be constructed across the Ohio River that failed and precipitated the
under traffic. The new steel orthotropic deck was total collapse of the suspension bridge in 1969 was a
opened in 1985 and is still performing well but that tertiary effect hidden from view.
is another story. But there are now ongoing efforts to develop detec-
Both the corrosion of the top flange of the stringers tion instrumentation, data acquisition recorders, and
and the intrusion of the Chloride ions were all tertiary transmission methods to find hidden distressed areas
effects that could not be calculated or predicted by the the tertiary effects but these effects are still what the
designers at that time. We can do this today, but with bridge is telling you, but looking in a different and
the exception of the cable-stayed Cooper River Bridge, more effective way.
we just dont do it. The conditions on the Golden Gate We all can look forward to the development of new
Bridge were made worse by the chief engineer stip- technologies, and to the improvements of the ongo-
ulating that sandblasting was not to be used to clean ing technologies, which will assist us with inspection,
the steel for paint application, as each blasting cycle maintenance, and safety work on our bridges.
removes some steel, and during the multi-century life
of the structure, would remove too much of the steel
sections. 12 SUMMING UP
The irony of this requirement is that the bridge has
lost more steel section from corrosion than it ever I have had a wonderful career in bridge engineering;
would have from sandblasting. I remember many years but my stint in bridge maintenance stands out as the
ago talking to the paint superintendent of the San high-light. I use that experience all the time in my
Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge, who was very criti- current bridge consulting work, when I ask myself,
cal of the maintenance of the Golden Gate Bridge. He How can THAT be maintained? I mentor younger
told me sandblasting was not allowed on that bridge, engineers to acquaint them with, and to think about the
and as a result many rivets have lost their heads from maintenance functions of a bridge: Remember, if you
corrosion, and that the lacing bars are sharp enough to cant access THAT for inspection and maintenance,
shave by. I thought he was exaggerating, but when I THAT will not last as long as it should!
was inspecting the deck, I did see rivets without heads, I have not listed any references, as these are my
and lacing bars sharp as a razor. thoughts alone, based on my own experiences.
7
Keynote Lectures
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
P.G. Buckland
Buckland & Taylor Ltd., North Vancouver, BC, Canada
ABSTRACT: The argument is made that when retrofitting a suspension bridge, the greatest value is obtained
when the engineer considers the fundamentals of engineering, rather than simply following the code. By fun-
damentals two aspects are considered. One is a thorough understanding of not only structural behavior, but also
how loads, resistances, and safety factors are derived. The other aspect covers the fundamentals of good design
(as opposed to good analysis), in preparing designs that can be constructed during short occupancies and are
tolerant of problems that might arise during the short construction period between deadlines. The design aspect
includes looking for opportunities to reduce maintenance and improve inspection access, and produce such other
benefits as may be desired.
11
The best balance between Cost Items 1 and 2 can be
found by careful and creative design, and this theme
will be examined later in the paper.
It can also be seen that Cost Items 3 and 4 are
related, in the sense that either cost will be over the opti-
mum unless the narrow band is found between too safe
and not safe enough. In other words: how safe is safe
enough? That is the starting point for this presentation.
3 SAFETY
12
Table 1. Multi-lane reduction factors, recent study.
13
Figure 6. Distribution of load effects.
14
A measure of safety (as opposed to concentrating on
the probability of failure) is often represented by , the
safety index. is the number of standard deviations
that the mean of the distribution is from zero. The
greater is, the greater the safety and the lower the
probability of failure.
From this approach, once the target probability of
failure has been set (or the factor established) the
required separation between the nominal (design) load
and the nominal resistance can be defined. The sepa-
ration is the combination of the load factor and the
resistance factor, in general: the safety factor.
5.2 Variable safety Figure 9. Shims between new floor beam and existing
girder.
The issue of safety has been discussed in some detail
so that we can introduce the concept of varying the The consequences of having short and/or restricted
load factors for different members. occupancies for construction are:
Risk (perhaps the opposite of safety) can be 1. Any retrofit must be designed to be constructed dur-
defined as: ing the short occupancies permitted, and shall be
Risk = (Probability of an event occurring) (Con- safe for the public between construction periods;
sequences of such an event) 2. The design must be tolerant of problems that may
Therefore to have consistent risk (or safety), the be found during the construction occupancy. Gen-
greater the consequences of an event, the lower the erally these will be unexpected, or they would have
probability we should accept of the event occur- been planned for, and they can include finding that
ring. Conversely, if the consequences are reduced, the the structure is not as was expected, breakdown of
acceptable probability can be greater. the contractors equipment, errors in design or con-
Consider the tower of a suspension bridge. If it struction, and non-delivery to site of components
fails, the entire bridge collapses. Then consider a steel or consumables, such as weld rod.
stringer that supports a steel or concrete deck. It will 3. The designers responsibility is to provide a design
probably fail in bending, and the load will be shed to that is as tolerant of unexpected problems as pos-
adjacent stringers, with the result that there is a tem- sible. A simple example is providing shims in a
porary dip in the roadway until it is fixed. The two connection so that if the existing steel is misaligned,
consequences are completely different, and it is clearly the new steel can be leveled to the correct eleva-
desirable to have less probability of tower failure than tions, as shown in Figure 9. Here, the new transverse
of stringer failure. In other words, the safety (load floor beam (framing in from the left) was to sit
factors) for the two members should not be the same. on the old longitudinal girder. Instead of trying to
Properly considering these differing requirements make the connection directly, a gap was provided,
can result in large cost savings during a retrofit. The to be filled by steel shims. Thus if the elevations or
subject is well covered in Section 14 of the Cana- alignments were not as expected, the shims could
dian Highway Bridge Design Code (2006) and its be adjusted accordingly.
Commentary. 4. The contractors responsibility is to provide a higher
level of management than for a typical project. If
work is only to proceed at night, the contractor has
6 PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS two deadlines per day one to be ready to start work
at a certain time, and the other to have the bridge
The discussion so far has been rather theoretical, ready for traffic on time. This requires considerably
although I maintain that a thorough understanding of more attention to scheduling than the conventional
safety is fundamental to safe and economical retrofit project that must simply meet the one deadline of
of any major bridge. substantial completion.
There are also, however, a number of practical 5. An aspect that is too often overlooked is that most
matters to be considered. bridge failures occur during construction by a fac-
tor of about a hundred compared to finished bridges.
In the case of bridge retrofit, the public is using
6.1 Bridge occupancy and traffic disruption
the bridge during the reconstruction process, which
There have been a few cases of suspension bridges means that the public is placed at a much greater
being closed to traffic for months on end while ren- risk during reconstruction than it would normally
ovations are made. These are rare, however, and it is be. The answer to this is not to increase the safety
much more likely that construction operations will be factors; it is to increase the quality and quantity of
limited to only one or two lanes at a time, or only independent checking of the proposed construction
at night or weekends, or some combination of these. activities, to a higher level than normal.
15
Figure 12. Port Mann Bridge, BC, Canada.
16
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M. Feng
Ministry of Communications, Beijing, China
ABSTRACT
17
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J. Sandager Jensen
COWI A/S, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
ABSTRACT: This paper presents experience collected by engineers from COWI during involvement in design,
maintenance, rehabilitation and management of several major cable supported bridges all over the world. First,
the major problems encountered during the exploitation of major existing cable supported bridges are discussed.
Then, several aspects of maintenance and management of such bridges are presented. Finally, the main issues
related to the proper design and rehabilitation of major cable supported bridges are analyzed. At the end of the
paper several case studies related to the maintenance, management, rehabilitation and design of major cable
supported bridges are shown.
18
Figure 1. Details of corroded strands.
newer bridges the problem can be even more seri- bridges loss of coating and corrosion is still a major
ous, as the design safety factor for the main cables cost problem.
has been progressively reduced over the years. It has
been demonstrated by many examples that a tradi- 2.3 Deterioration of bridge deck surfacing
tional system can slow down corrosion, but it can not
Modern cable supported bridges being part of road and
prevent it.
railway infrastructure are to a large extent designed
All these factors have led to the development of
using the orthotropic steel decks.
a new corrosion protection system for main cables,
In the case of cable supported railway bridges with
which is based on dehumidification (Bloomstine et al.
orthotropic steel decks the track support details are
2006). In contrast to a traditional system, a dehumidi-
typically consisting of a slab track solution or a direct
fication system eliminates the source of the corrosion
fastening system. Both solutions allow a controlled
problem water/moisture in the cables. Hence, a
load transfer to take place to the bridge superstructure
properly designed dehumidification system provides
with minimum fatigue problems. The main challenge
complete corrosion protection of the main cables, as
is to accommodate secondary loadings (non rail)
they are enclosed in an atmosphere with a sufficiently
and to ensure an efficient waterproofing at the inter-
low relative humidity, such that corrosion can not
face between the direct fastening/track slab and the
occur.
remaining part of the orthotropic bridge steel deck.
The roadway surfacing on modern orthotropic
2.2 Loss of paint and deterioration of the
bridge steel decks are generally composed of asphaltic
bridge deck
layers with a total thickness between 40 and 60 mm.
All steel elements exposed to the normal environmen- On the Great Belt East Bridge in Denmark the surfac-
tal conditions suffer from corrosion due to presence of ing under the traffic lanes consists of (from bottom to
oxygen and humidity. Steel elements of major bridges top):
are usually exposed to much more harsh conditions
4 mm mastic
of marine environments, where the presence of chlo-
25 mm intermediate layer of mastic asphalt
rides accelerates the corrosion process.Therefore, they
30 mm wearing layer of mastic asphalt
have to be well maintained and repainted every time
the coating losses its protective capabilities. This type of asphalt surfacing has been used on
Service life of coating in aggressive environments orthotropic steel bridge decks in Denmark since 1970
is often limited to about 25 years. This is a short period and has proven to be very durable (see Wegan and
compared with the service life of a major bridge, which Bloomstine 2004).
usually is designed for 120, 150 or even 200 years Road surfacing on movable bridges with orthotropic
of service life. Is it possible to improve this in order steel bridge decks with special requirements to weight
to avoid the costly repainting works which often also has been carried out using polymeric resin surfacing.
cause some traffic disturbances? The reduction in weight is a must from a functional
The problem of deterioration of steel elements point of view and it is expected to be the next step
has been partially solved in modern cable supported into optimization the design of orthotropic bridge
bridges with box girders, where dehumidification sys- steel decks for long span cable supported bridges.
tems for the interior of the box girder are installed. Some of the challenges to be overcome are fabrication
These mechanical systems keep humidity level inside tolerances and fatigue of steel.
the girder at such a level that corrosion of the steel does As regards practical experience of both mastic
not propagate. Also, in some modern bridges robots asphalt and epoxy asphalt roadway surfacing the five
for performing repainting works of the outside sur- U.K. bridges built during the 1960s and 1970s with
faces of the decks have been installed, which speed up orthotropic steel bridge decks provide valuable lessons
and simplifies the process. However, in many existing learned. (see McFadyen & Blumensen 2010).
19
Table 1. Expansion joint movements.
2.4 Wear and malfunction of bearings, expansion 2.5 Vibrations of cable stays and hangers
joints and other movement devices
Vibrations of stay cables and hangers under the com-
Many years of experience of design and maintenance bination of rain, wind and frost are observed at many
of bridges show that bridge elements allowing for major cable supported bridges (Laursen et al. 2006).
movements, such as bearings, expansion joints, etc., This phenomenon is not yet well understood and due
are among the more expensive as far as maintenance to this fact it is quite difficult to control. Although it
costs are concerned. These mechanical devices require is rather impossible to eliminate completely the cable
regular maintenance and partial or full replacement vibrations, it is important to minimize their magnitude
several time during the bridge service life. Movement to such extend that the structural integrity is main-
elements generally represent a minor portion of the tained, and failure due to e.g. fatigue will not occur.
total budget for construction of a new bridge. During Sudden rupture of cable might put in risk safety of the
the service life this ratio is generally quite different whole structure and will cause disturbances to the traf-
and the cost for maintenance, repair and replacement fic when the replacement work will have to be carried
of movement elements is most often a major expense out. Consequently, the large vibrations of stay cables
seen in relation to other maintenance costs (Srensen and hangers have to be avoided.
et al. 2007). Several vibration mitigation alternatives may be
The movements of a major cable supported bridge used, from the most simple as the cable separators,
are naturally larger than on beam bridges with spiral ropes, wind ropes, to the more elaborated damp-
traditional spans. Suspension bridges in particular ing systems with hydraulic dampers or tuned liquid
may experience major longitudinal displacements and dampers. Although previous experience is helpful in
specifically a very large accumulated movement which choosing the appropriate vibration mitigation devices,
makes specific demands on durability. To illustrate in some situations trial and error application supported
this, the annual accumulated movement of an expan- by long term monitoring or frequent observation will
sion joint on different bridge types is presented in be necessary.
Table 1.
In Table 1 the maximum movement and yearly accu-
mulated movement at joint, for the case of the Great
3 OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND
Belt Suspension Bridge are presented for the struc-
MANAGEMENT OF MAJOR CABLE
tural system with and without hydraulic buffers. The
SUPPORTED BRIDGES
buffers reduce bridge fast movements caused by traffic
or wind allowing in the same time for slow move-
3.1 General
ments due to temperature and static loads. Wear of
expansion joints is determined not only by accumu- Major cable supported bridges are normally planned
lated movements but also by other phenomena such as to be maintained for a very long period of time: 75, 100
frost, rain, traffic intensity, dynamic interaction, etc. or 120 years. Some bridges have been even assumed to
However, the above relative comparison indicates that be in service for more than 200 years. During all this
expansion joints and bearings for major cable sup- period, due to limited possibility of traffic diversion (or
ported bridges are more prone to wear and damages even lack of any), the traffic on major bridges has to be
than those applied in standard bridges. provided with the minimum possible interruption. Due
During several years of experience in mainte- to all above mentioned considerations and having in
nance of major cable supported bridges COWI had mind the fact that the rehabilitation or replacement of
to deal several times with rehabilitation and replace- such structures is extremely difficult and costly, special
ment of bearings and expansion joints, sometimes attention has to be paid to their operation, maintenance
only few years after bridge completion. The lesson and management.
learned from it is that bridges should be arranged Generally, the entire service life of a bridge con-
with as few movement elements as possible. Further- tains of two different subsequent stages (see Fig. 2).
more, all of them have to be maintained regularly The first stage is the normal stage of operation, where
and inspected much more often than other bridge just regular inspections are undertaken, some regular
elements. testing and monitoring is performed (if necessary) and
20
information regarding bridge condition, safety, func-
tionality, etc. All this information can be obtained
due to inspections, condition assessment, performance
assessment and testing and monitoring of bridges.
Some of the mentioned activities are carried out regu-
larly while others are performed just once or few times
along the whole life of the structure.
All the above mentioned activities (i.e. inspections,
condition assessment, performance assessment, test-
ing and monitoring) have very important economical
and functional impact on the operation, maintenance
and management of existing bridges due to the fact
that they may postpone the costly repair, retrofitting or
replacement of the structure and thus also reduce the
traffic interruption. COWI was recently involved in the
development of several Guidelines covering all these
issues for railway bridges (SB-ICA, 2007; SB-LRA,
2007; SB-MON, 2007; SB-STR, 2007).
3.2 Inspections
Effective maintenance management of major bridges
has to be based on their actual condition. Appropri-
ate scheme of carefully performed bridge inspections
allows to identify damages, malfunctions and wear of
several bridge elements and ancillary items (as has
been discussed in section 2) before any risk may arise
to the bridge users or to the structure itself.
Figure 2. Stages and activities during entire life of bridges. The inspections scheme for major bridges is usually
similar to the general scheme used for the inspection
of all bridges in the country and most often consist of
some minor maintenance actions are undertaken (e.g. three (eventually four) levels of inspections:
painting, lubricating bearings, etc.).
The second stage is a special stage which starts 1. Routine inspections every half/one year
when some concern regarding the safety or the func- 2. General inspection every 56 years
tionality of the bridge arises and the assessment of 3. Special inspections whenever required
the bridge have to be performed and/or some more During inspections of major bridges, much more
costly maintenance action have to be undertaken, as attention has to be paid to the ancillary items as
for example repair, rehabilitation or strengthening. In bearings, buffers, expansion joints, etc. than it is in
order to extend the service life of a bridge into the the case of ordinary structures. This is due to fact that
maximum, considering the functional and economi- their malfunction may cause major problems. Further-
cal constraints, several maintenance actions have to more, great attention has to be paid to the corrosion
take place within its lifetime. Depending of the type protection and vibration mitigation of main cables and
of maintenance action, they might: slow down the hangers.
rate of deterioration (routine maintenance), eliminate
the source of deterioration and/or restore capacity
3.3 Testing and monitoring
loss (repair or rehabilitation), upgrade the capacity
or the functionality of the bridge (strengthening or Several testing and monitoring techniques, developed
retrofitting). in last decades, have found application in broadly
The decision regarding what kind of maintenance meant operation and maintenance of some major
action to undertake and when to do it in order to mini- cable supported bridges. Testing and monitoring are
mize the maintenance costs and maximize the bridge very suitable to supplement visual inspections with
performance should be taken according to the main- some more subjective data. Moreover, continuous
tenance strategy established for the group of bridges monitoring techniques enable, to some extent, reduce
(e.g. along the whole railway line) or for the specific scope or the intervals between the visual inspections.
bridge (e.g. for some substandard bridges). Very important feature of the monitoring is also the
Bridge Management Systems (BMS) support the ability of the immediate warning whenever some min-
bridge owners and operators in their choice of opti- imum required conditions are not fulfilled and the
mum maintenance strategy that are consistent with the safety of the users or the bridge itself is in hazard.
owners policies, long-term objectives and financial Due to above mentioned, monitoring systems should
constraints. Obviously, any BMS, in order to sug- become the standard equipment of modern major
gest optimal decisions, requires adequate and reliable cable supported bridges, however selected testing
21
Figure 3. Basic elements of DANBRO + Bridge Management System (BMS) (Bjerrum et al. 2006).
methods should be used for the bridge inspections on age of the computers, a basic equipment of major
a routine basis. bridges. The systematic maintenance of major bridges
involves an extensive list of technical, traffic and
administrative activities. Therefore, an IT Bridge Man-
3.4 Maintenance activities agement System (BMS) has to be able to cover a
Major cable supported bridges require clear mainte- number of different disciplines such as maintenance,
nance strategy based on the: organization management, surveillance, inspections,
rehabilitation, traffic control, priority ranking, budget
1. Actual bridge/element condition identified based and quality control. The purpose of the manage-
on inspections combined with non-destructive test- ment system is to optimize and support the daily
ing and optional monitoring administration of bridges including systematization
2. Forecast of deterioration based on the previous and quality assurance of the management of the struc-
records, experience and theoretical models tures carried out by various engineers and technicians.
3. Identification of the importance (e.g bridge ele- A long cooperation of COWI with Danish Road
ment or ancillary item) to the global safety and Directorate during the development and application of
operability BMS in the maintenance management of large bridges
Maintenance and repair work in major bridges in has lead to the following conclusion. The effective
general should be carried out before deterioration BMS for major bridges has to be user friendly, pre-
develops to a major extent. Such a preventive mainte- senting data in an effective way, updating data and
nance policy reduces the risk of large scale repair work documents in an easy way and having all informa-
and herby minimizes the user inconveniences. From tion located in a single place. This is required due to
the experience of COWI in the maintenance manage- the number of disciplines, people and organizations
ment of several large bridges it can be concluded that involved. The system has to be capable of supporting
the rehabilitation of such structures is extremely costly several activities as presented in Fig. 3.
and that preventive maintenance policy is the most
appropriate. This of course does not have to be the
case for small bridges of low importance. 3.6 Managing heavy transports
In recent years heavy (overweight) transports have
increased significantly and thereby the need for effi-
3.5 Bridge management systems
cient overweight permit systems is more important
An effective management system that allows for an than ever to prevent bridges from overloading. In
easy access to updated information for bridge opera- Denmark the increase is first of all a result of the
tors, consultants and contractors is nowadays, in the quick-growing wind power industry.
22
Figure 4. Principles for application of heavy transport permission (Ravn et al. 2006).
The management of heavy transport on standard and restricted classes are taken into consideration as
bridges with spans up to 50 m is made usually by use well as vehicle classes on critical span lengths (see
of simple rating system, where all bridges and vehi- Fig. 4).
cles are rated according to the maximum capacity and Major cable supported bridges require refined rating
weight respectively (Ravn et al. 2006). The vehicle principles but the heavy transport management system
rating estimates the load effects which the transport can be similar as it is for the standard bridges. The
exposes to the bridge while the bridge rating esti- method used in Denmark for major bridges applies
mates the load capacity of the bridge. In Denmark the actual overweight vehicle for rating of critical
the standard rating classes are from 10 to 200 tones. structural elements. As the heavy transport is used
The classification of the bridge is determined by the directly in the evaluation for the particular bridge,
heaviest standard truck that crosses the bridge under the uncertainties introduced as consequence of the
specified conditions i.e.: vehicle rating are eliminated and the results are more
accurate.
1. Normal class Heavy transport and normal traffic,
The Danish approach for administrating overweight
whole bridge area may be used, no restrictions;
vehicles was developed keeping in mind that the rat-
2. Normal class: Heavy transport and normal traffic,
ing systems are used numerous times every day and
whole bridge area may be used, no restrictions;
hence shall be cost effective and at the same time
3. Restricted class 1 As normal class but only the
assure the best utilization of the load bearing capacity
roadway may be used;
of the bridges on the Danish road network. Practi-
4. Restricted class 2 As restricted class 1, but the
cal experience has proved that both goals have been
speed must not exceed 10 km/h;
achieved.
5. Restricted class 3 The heavy transport is the only
transport on the bridge, low speed of max. 10 km/h
and driving in the least critical position. 4 DESIGN, ASSESSMENT AND
REHABILITATION
The normal classes are visualized on maps on
the Internet, called the Heavy Load Grid. The road
4.1 Design of new bridges
stretches in the grid are given a classification equal to
the lowest Normal Class bridge present on the actual The design life requirement for new major bridges is
stretch. The maps are for daily use by police and road constantly increasing. It is often more than 100 years
administrators. Restricted classes are only used by and in some cases as high as 200 years, e.g. the Messina
bridge/road administrators, in cases where the vehi- Bridge. The design traffic load is also increasing with
cle class is higher than the bridge classes shown on regards to intensity and weight. Therefore it is neces-
the map. sary to especially focus on the durability of the bridge
The vehicle class is calculated for simply sup- elements that are directly affected by traffic.
ported bridge spans from 2200 m. The vehicle class Requirements concerning the operation period of
is determined by reference to predefined standard the bridge are also becoming more common as bridge
trucks labeled by their overall weight. The vehicle class owners are starting to realize that a low tender price
equals the standard truck that produce the same load does not usually give a low lifetime cost. Therefore,
effects as the actual heavy transport on the particular Life Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis must be incorpo-
simply supported span. rated in the design to ensure a durable design with
Application for transport permission shall be for- the correct lifetime and the lowest possible Life Cycle
warded to the police and the police may issue per- Cost. The optimal solution with the lowest LCC must
mission if the maximum vehicle class for all spans is be determined for each bridge element, resulting in
lower than or equal to the bridge classes on the current the lowest LCC for the entire bridge. There is also
route. If not, bridge/road administrators are involved increasing focus on availability of the passageway,
23
Figure 5. Step-level procedure for reassessment of bridges (SB-LRA, 2007).
meaning that traffic disruptions are not allowed. The state of knowledge. Also, in the same manner, the re-
design must therefore allow inspection, maintenance qualification actions (strengthening and repairs) may
and repair without disturbing the traffic. Furthermore be evaluated, compared and selected. It should, how-
access facilities for all structures should be incorpo- ever, be noticed that economical considerations alone,
rated in the initial design, as this allows fulfillment may not be sufficient for re-qualification purposes as
of the aforementioned requirements with regards to explicit requirements to the safety of the bridge are
traffic and LCC. often dictated by legislation.
Key areas for future bridge design are therefore Fig. 5 shows the step-level procedure recommended
durability/low LCC, accessibility and availability. in the SB-LRA (2007) Guideline to be used in the pro-
cess of assessment of existing bridges. Considering
4.2 Assessment of existing bridges the above discussed topics, in the presented proce-
dure, the knowledge about the bridge is established
Assessment of an existing bridge with the purpose of
and refined in an adaptive manner according to the
re-qualifying the bridge for increased loading and/or
actual needs.
for prolonging the service life may be seen as an
As it can be seen in Fig. 5, an assessment of existing
adaptive, step-level process of refining the state of
bridges in the proposed procedure is divided into three
knowledge regarding the present and the future state of
levels, which in terms of refinement and detailing can
the bridge and its behavior. An assessment may involve
be characterized as follows:
a review of project documentation, inspection of the
structure, testing of materials, testing of structural per- 1. Purely heuristic experience or code based state-
formance, refined numerical analysis and planning of ments (initial assessment);
future inspections. 2. Application of deterministic and semi-probabilistic
The decision on whether or not to collect more safety formats (intermediate assessment);
information is always based on the existing informa- 3. Instrumentation, testing and/or probabilistic analy-
tion (prior information) and the expected reduction ses (enhanced assessment).
of the life cycle cost obtained on the basis of the
additional information. Depending on the actually Generally, an assessment can be carried out within
achieved knowledge (posterior information) it may or the framework of these three phases. However, the
may not turn out to be feasible to refine further the level of detail within each phase may vary. In this
24
way it is possible to tailor a reassessment for differ- variability in modeling loads and resistance proper-
ent purposes. The level of detail of the assessment is ties, and taking into account bridge redundancy and
recommended to be chosen considering the detailed system behavior.
assessment objectives for the particular bridge and its The sensitivity analysis, performed during the
characteristics. assessment, may help to identify where the refinement
According to the presented step-level procedure, the of the knowledge about the bridge may be the most
capacity of the bridge in cause is initially assessed beneficial for the assessment of the bridge in cause.
on the basis of simple calculation checks and readily As already discussed, such refinements may be based
accessible data (drawings, design calculations, earlier on detailing of the analysis methods and/or further
assessment calculations, inspection records, etc.). On collection of data.
this basis, the extent to which the bridge fails to comply
with the given requirements is evaluated.
4.3 Rehabilitation
In the intermediate level of assessment, the capacity
of the bridge (which fails the initial assessment) is eval- Rehabilitation of bridges should generally take into
uated using more advanced analysis (e.g. elastic but account the same requirements as mentioned above
giving better idealization, plastic, etc.) and more accu- for new bridges. Furthermore, before starting rehabili-
rate data (obtained from inspection an simple tests) tation design it is essential to carry out inspections
on the material properties, the loads, the current state and investigations to determine the cause of the dam-
and the behavior of the bridge (e.g. material properties ages/degradation, such that the rehabilitation design
obtained from simple measurement, loads defined by can prevent similar problems in the future. New and
measurements, etc.). durable details should be developed to replace the
Finally, in the enhanced level of assessment, the original design.
capacity of the bridge, which fails the intermediate During rehabilitation it is essential to focus on pre-
assessment and where repair or strengthening costs vention of traffic disruptions. Many bridge owners
are significant, can be evaluated using most advanced have begun requiring this to be a part of the LCC
assessment methods (e.g. reliability-based assessment Analysis by setting a price on traffic delays.
methods, system level assessment, etc.) and tools Many older bridges do not have safe and/or suf-
available (e.g. non-linear analysis, probabilistic anal- ficient access facilities. A rehabilitation project is
ysis, testing, monitoring, etc). Testing and monitoring an ideal opportunity to upgrade these facilities and
may provide relevant data regarding actual bridge an upgrade will decrease future maintenance costs.
loads, actual properties of material, and actual behav- Access facilities should therefore always be considered
ior of the bridge. However, probabilistic analysis and in connection with rehabilitation.
non-linear analysis allow for considering the actual
25
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
S.C. Kang
Steel Structure Research Laboratory, Research Institute of Industrial Science & Technology, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
J.F. Choo
Department of Civil Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea
ABSTRACT
However, design codes are not specifying explicitly
the concept of lifetime design.
The main issue when deciding upon a specific ser-
The AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications
vice life is to clarify the event, which will identify the
define service life as the period of time that the bridge
end of the service life. However, the lack of speci-
is expected to be in operation. The design life is defined
fication provisions related to the length of service life
as the period of time on which the statistical derivation
in the codes constitutes an obstacle to the realiza-
of transient loads is based. Though the specifications
tion of extended service life for bridges. This situation
prescribe transient loads based on a design life of 75
becomes more acute in the case of super-long-span
years, they are not giving any basis or explanation on
bridges because of their nature. In view of the cur-
the extent of the expected service life. In other words,
rent practice, service life of 100 to 150 years seems
the 75-year prescribed design life is an indicator of the
to be achievable and has already been implemented in
structural safety and reliability, while the service life
recent major bridges owing to special specifications by
is an indicator of the durability. However, the speci-
the owners of the bridge projects. This paper reviews
fications do not prescribe the expected duration for
current practices for service life design with some
service life nor give direct correlation between design
recent examples in Korea and addresses issues that
and service life (Bartholomew 2007, 2009).
will be faced in the lifetime design for cable-supported
It is noteworthy that lifetime design is a recent con-
super-long-span bridges. Limitations of the current
cept of which definition has not been clearly defined
practice are highlighted and, additional requirements
to date. The Roman builders did certainly not have
and research directions that will help designers in
imagined that many of their bridges would still remain
achieving extended lifetime of 200 years or more for
operational 2000 years after their construction. Roe-
the super-long-span bridges are suggested. Dedicated
bling, the designer of Brooklyn Bridge, also did not
research programs currently implemented in Korea are
apply the concept of design lifetime for his bridge,
also presented.
which is still one of the most important arterial road
linking New York and the district of Brooklyn even
after 126 years of service, while most of its con-
1 INTRODUCTION temporaries have collapsed or have been replaced
meanwhile.
1.1 Lifetime design, a definition On the other hand, recent literature sets a target
The purpose of lifetime design is to predict and opti- design lifetime for long-span bridges since the end
mize the lifetime quality of the designed structure. of 1990s. For example, the Great Belt East Bridge
Lifetime quality means the capability of the struc- (1994) in Denmark and the Confederation Bridge
ture to fulfill the requirements of its users, owners (1997) in Canada have been designed for a 100-year
and society over its entire planning and design life life expectancy, as well as the more recent Incheon
(Sarja 2010). Bridge (2009, Figure 1) and the Busan-Geoje Fixed
This sentence involves two major concepts that are Link actually under construction in Korea (Figure 2).
performance and design life of the structure, which are A useful project life of the Millau Viaduct (2004)
indeed closely related. In the case of bridge structures, crossing the Tarn Valley in France is 120 years. The
the required performances are given in the relevant Humber Bridge, the worlds longest single span sus-
design codes. These performances are currently spec- pension bridge has a design life of 120 years. And
ified in terms of allowable strength or limit-states. a record of 150 years design lifetime was set for the
26
longer than 1,000 m for cable-stayed bridges and
longer than 1,990 m for suspension bridges.
Differently from common bridges, long-span
bridges represent the unique access to remote places.
As a matter of fact, any disruption of such bridge for
repair or replacement will have tremendous effects on
the local economy and obstruct completely communi-
cations for relatively long period. In the case of such
super-long-span bridges, these effects will grow expo-
nentially since super-long-span bridges not only by
their length but also by their role as inter-continental
route will affect a wider area and a larger community.
In addition, the costs required for the construction and
maintenance of super-long-span bridges will also grow
Figure 1. View of Incheon Bridge linking Youngjong Island exponentially. Therefore, the lifetime design of super-
and the mainland (total length: 12.3 km, central span: 800 m, long-span bridges addresses issues of which feasibility
design service life: 100 years). and practicability should be discussed thoroughly.
The ability of the bridge to fulfill its intended func-
tions along its service life can be compromised due to
degradation. The ideal bridge any designer is dream-
ing of is a bridge that will stand for an infinite service
life with minimum maintenance or maintenance free.
However, such a bridge is not possible in practice as all
materials deteriorate gradually when exposed to envi-
ronment and traffic. Even though bridges are made
of different materials, have different structures, are
located in different locations and have different ages,
their common feature is their degradation with time.
Major causes of degradation are high transient loads
and severe environmental conditions.
A fatigue life of 200 years may be feasible through
Figure 2. View of one of the two cable-stayed bridges careful technical considerations involving high initial
(Geoga Bridge) of the Busan-Geoje fixed link under con- quality and adequate maintenance activities. Assum-
struction (total length: 8.2 km, central span: 470 m, design ing a fatigue life of the bridge of 200 years, the
service life: 100 years). probable range of the bridge life can be thought of in
the order of 100 to 400 years (Frangopol et al. 2000).
Akashi Bridge (1999) in Japan and the Oakland Bay Improving the design methods of bridge components
Bridge in San Francisco. is the basic step to achieve this target. Proper struc-
The question that arises now is the basis on which tural design addresses the effects of transient loads
such design lifetimes have been selected or computed. through adequate proportioning of the members and
A review of the relevant literature shows that the design details. In addition, well-coordinated design,
assessment of the design lifetime of these bridges relies construction and maintenance are essential to sustain
essentially on the lifespan of the involved materials. bridge structure with an extended service life. As men-
That is, if the durable life of concrete reaches 100 years tioned above, an important issue having determining
so does the structure. However, could we simply state influence on the service life is the material durability.
that durable lifespan of the materials is guaranteeing However, the design lifespan of the material consti-
equivalent lifespan of the whole structure? tutes a necessary but not sufficient condition in the
How can designers suggest reasonable service life extension of the service life of the structure.
for a bridge structure considering that the target or A typical example is the first Jindo Bridge, which is
expected service life relies on the owners desires or the first cable-stayed bridge in Korea and was also the
societal needs whereas the actual service life depends longest cable-stay span outside Europe at its comple-
on the quality of materials, design and construction, tion in 1984 (Figure 3). This bridge was designed with
the environmental conditions to which the structure is respect to a design live load DB-18, equivalent to the
exposed, and on the maintenance strategy? design load HS-18 in USA. In 1996, the close inspec-
tion of the bridge including loading and vibration tests
resulted in the closure of the bridge to heavy trucks
since the structure showed signs of fatigue and accel-
1.2 Lifetime design, the issues
erated degradation due to the increasing crossing of
In this paper, super long-span bridge refers to a bridge truck loads exceeding the design load. Thereafter, the
exhibiting span length equivalent or superior to the governmental authorities decided to improve the load
longest span lengths realized to date. That is span carrying capacity of the existing bridge while erecting
27
Accordingly, this paper reviews current practices
for service life design through recent examples in
Korea and addresses issues that will be faced in
the lifetime design for cable-supported super-long-
span bridges. Limitations of the current practice are
highlighted and, additional requirements and research
directions that are being discussed among Korean
experts to help designers in achieving extended life-
time of the structures are presented.
28
Table 1. Design life in national codes. spalling of concrete. The end of the service life of
the structure occurs when the accumulated damage
Code Definition of design life in the bridge materials exceeds the tolerance limit.
However, the service life is typically extended by per-
ISO and Design working life (DWL): Assumed period for forming periodic repairs to restore the serviceability
Eurocode which a structure is to be used for its intended
of the structure.
purpose with anticipated maintenance but
without major repair being necessary. Accordingly, the durability design process for
achieving extended lifetime requires the analysis of
DWL Indicative the environmental conditions in which the structure
category DWL (years) Examples will be exposed, the adequate selection of the range of
1 10 Temporary structures materials involved and the understanding and identifi-
2 10 to 30 Replaceable structural cation of their rate of deterioration. The probabilistic
parts approach adopted by the DuraCrete method can be
3 15 to 25 Agricultural and similar cited as the best example achieving such durability
structures
design process for concrete structures.
4 50 Building structures and
other common structures
not listed elsewhere in 3.1 Durability design, current practice
this table Long-span bridges are expected to exhibit longer ser-
5 120 Monumental building
vice life than common bridges, but are exposed to more
structures, highway and
railway bridges, and severe conditions such as chloride ingress or wind load
other civil engineering due to their location in marine environment. There-
structures fore improved and specified design methods have been
adopted to achieve the expected design life.
BS 5400 Design life: Period of time on which the During the last several years, models have been
structure behaves safely without need of repair
developed to predict the service life of concrete bridges
and within acceptable probability (service life
design of 120 years since 1988) exposed to chlorides. Several service life prediction
models assume diffusion to be the most dominant
AASHTO Design life: Period of time on which the mode of transport for chloride ions. The time taken
statistical derivation of transient loads is based by chlorides to reach reinforcing steel and accumulate
(75 years for these Specifications) to a level exceeding the corrosion threshold is known
Service life: The period of time that the bridge
as time to initiation of corrosion (TIC). TIC depends
is expected to be in operation
on many factors like the diffusivity of concrete, con-
crete cover, temperature, and the degree of exposure.
The propagation time, from initiation of corrosion to
3 MATERIAL DURABILITY intolerable accumulation of damage, also depends on
many factors including environmental conditions and
As seen above, the current practice in assessing the corrosion protection strategies.
design lifetime of bridge structures relies essentially Therefore, design codes provide qualitative method
on the lifespan of the involved materials. to achieve the expected design life such as con-
Concrete and steel have been and are still the most crete quality, type of cement, unit cement content,
popular construction materials. Sarja (2010) reported water-cement ratio, concrete cover depth and cur-
several features identifying the end of the service life ing methods. However all these recommendations are
of bridge structures as follows. Degradation is the deem-to-satisfy requirements, which have no ratio-
dominant reason for maintenance and minor repair nal relationship to the service life and the service life
of concrete structures and represents 26% (steel) and as such is not defined in an operational manner.
27% (concrete) of the causes for bridge demolition; The following present several current practice
obsolescence load is responsible of 74% of the causes examples of measures taken to protect materials from
for bridge demolition. environmental ingress.
Environmental conditions that cause degradation
include carbonation, sulfate attack, alkali-silica reac- 3.1.1 Corrosion protections for reinforced concrete
tion, freeze-thaw cycles, and ingress of chlorides structures
and other harmful chemicals. Adverse environmen- Durability life of concrete constitutes the most essen-
tal conditions, if not properly addressed, typically tial factor in achieving the design life of long-span
cause chemicals to invade the concretes pore structure bridges in many cases. Deterioration of concrete is
and initiate physical and chemical reactions causing usually affected by salt damage, neutralization, free-
expansive by-products. The service life of the bridge thaw, alkali-aggregate reaction and sulfate attack.
structure in terms of materials depends on the deteri- In particular, main damage to RC structure is the
oration of concrete, corrosion of steel and interaction corrosion of the reinforcements caused by chloride
between these reactions. The most damaging conse- attack and carbonation process which interacts with
quence of these reactions is depassivation and eventual deterioration of concrete. These degradation mecha-
corrosion of reinforcing steel causing cracking and nisms are currently dealt with by two methods.
29
Figure 4. View of the 3-pylon cable-stayed bridge con-
struction site of Busan-Geoje Fixed Link.
30
to the low W/C ratio of the material as well as the
homogeneity of the cement matrix.
This project having been successfully completed in
2006, Super Bridge 200 has been launched in 2007 as
a succeeding project involved in the top-brand projects
of the Ministry of Sciences and Technology. Super
Bridge 200 targets the development of bridge sus-
tainable for 200 years by exploiting the so-developed
ultra-high strength concrete to cable-stayed bridge
structures. The expected outcomes are reduction of
the maintenance costs by 20% and extension of the
lifespan of the bridges by 200%.
Figure 6. Key technologies of HIPER-CONMAT.
31
corrosion-resistance coating system. Zinc-aluminum
alloy coated cables are expected to have enhanced
corrosion resistance more than 2 times compared to
former zinc coated cables. Techniques and design stan-
dards for high-durability ceramic/heavy duty painting
method are also developed to ease maintenance even
in harsh conditions like near the sea water area. The
painting systems are purposed to have B10 life longer
than 20 years with 80% reliability. Cable dehumidifi-
cation system expected to reach the global standards
is also going to be developed through this project.
Researches and experiments on durability of cables,
anchorages and cable systems using FRP to improve
corrosion resistance and fatigue performance are also
under progress. These researches may contribute not Figure 7. Design life of concrete structures: a two-phase
only to the steel durability but also to the guarantee of modeling of deterioration (Tuuttis Model 1982).
the 200-year design life.
32
Figure 8. Example of target service life vs. failure
probability.
Figure 9. S-N fatigue curve.
severe environment conditions. Coefficients of con-
crete properties are acquired by experiment and not be established and verified to assess the design life.
by theoretical basis to enhance the accuracy. The long history of concrete allowed the development
This approach is used for Busan-Geoje Fixed Link. of model with a relatively high degree of reliability.
The environmental conditions of the bridges and But steel members need more verifications and exper-
immersed tunnel are classified into 3 zones that are iments. The establishment of a reliable deterioration
splash zone, submerged zone, and atmospheric zone, model for steel would enable to suggest quantitative
and limit states are defined as the time when chloride design life using reliability-based design.
ions reach the reinforcement. Accordingly, the cover Protection methods such as CP or painting sys-
depths and chloride diffusion coefficients are deter- tem need also to be quantified. Those methods are not
mined so that the probability of those limit states to be expected to last for 200 years without additional main-
violated (i.e. failure event) remain less than 10% for tenance. Periodic monitoring system and maintenance
100-year life (Daewoo E&C 2005). are essential. Currently, the expected life of these pro-
However, these methods present some lack for tections is not suggested quantitatively but implicitly.
being applied to super-long-span bridges such as For reasonable maintenance planning, durability and
model imperfections of deterioration model due to reliability of each protection system should be verified.
complexity of deterioration mechanisms. According
to Luping (2007), even DuraCrete method which uses 3.2.2 Fatigue load problem
simplified deterioration model for RC can overesti- The Korea Bridge Design Code (KBDC 2008) sug-
mate the actual life of structure. This imperfection gests 2 million cycles for fatigue life of reinforcement
error can be neglected for bridges with relatively short assuming a 50-year life. If the fatigue life is extended
design life but may become significant for prolonged to 200 years, the number of cycles to be considered will
design life and increased importance of super-long- increase which leads to decrease of allowable fatigue
span bridges. This error can be lessened by using stress as shown in the following S-N fatigue curve.
improved deterioration models which are more sophis- This result can be verified using the following equa-
ticated even though the analyzed lifetimes from those tions. For load-induced fatigue considerations, each
models also show some differences with actual exper- detail shall satisfy:
imental results. There are some researches to provide
a correct model based on the actual physical or elec-
trochemical processes considering distance from the
surface, time, the interactions between chloride and
where = load factor for fatigue limit state; (f ) =
cement hydrate, the influence of moisture transport in
live load stress range due to the passage of fatigue load;
parallel with diffusion within the concrete, etc. (Nils-
(F)n = nominal fatigue resistance (MPa).
son 2009). Although these types of model would be
Nominal fatigue resistance:
better than those based on simple Ficks 2nd Law, these
methods usually require finite lamina time stepped
calculation to solve the sophisticated mathematical
equations that are hard to apply field application
directly. Accordingly, research should be implemented
to provide more reliable and practical models. where N = (365)(t)n(ADTT )SL ; t = design life (year);
On the other hand, the development of assessment A = detail category constant taken from Table 2
methods usually focused on the deterioration of con- (MPa3 ); n = number of stress range cycles per
crete and reinforcement steel and, not on steel element. truck passage; (ADTT )SL = single-lane ADTT (Aver-
Even if RC member is important in pylon or pier of age Daily Truck Traffic); and (F)TH = constant-
super-long-span bridges, the importance of steel mem- amplitude fatigue threshold in Table 2 (MPa).
ber such as the non-replaceable girder is more crucial In Equation 2, the nominal fatigue resistance
due to the increased span length. It means that deterio- decreases as the total number of fatigue load passage
ration model for steel members according to time must N increases. Since N is proportional to design life t,
33
Table 2. Detail category constant, A, and constant-
amplitude fatigue threshold (F)TH .
A 82.0 165.0
B 39.3 110.0
B 20.0 82.7
C 14.4 69.0
C 14.4 82.7
D 7.21 48.3
E 3.61 31.0
E 1.28
34
Figure 11. The new live load model in Korea (Hwang 2009).
35
Korea, therefore a rational live load model should be
developed based upon the collected data in the future.
5 EXTREME EVENTS
36
Table 3. Return period and risk rate of earthquake.
5 48.0 0.40
10 95.4 0.57
20 190.3 0.73
50 475.1 1.00
100 949.6 1.40
200 1898.7 1.89
37
Figure 19. Rendering of Gwangyang Bridge with main span
of 1545 m in Korea.
38
all the AFs computed for each class of vessels cor- limited historical ship collision data of US waterways.
responds to the annual frequency of collapse of this Geometric condition, effects of current and traffic vol-
specific structural element (PIANIC 2001). ume are considered in the calculation of PA. However,
the human error factor, which represents the most
important factor in ship aberrancy, is not reflected
sufficiently in the current assessment methodology
where AF = annual frequency of bridge element col- of ship aberrancy probability. Geometric probability
lapse due to vessel collision; N = annual number of (PG) which is concerned with the model of the loca-
vessels classified by type, size, and loading conditions tion of an aberrant vessel and the collision velocity also
which can strike the bridge element: PA = probability need to be improved. Based on historical bridge col-
of vessel aberrancy; PG = geometric probability of a lision data of USA, a normal distribution is assumed
collision between an aberrant vessel and a bridge pier to model the location of an aberrant vessel which can-
or span; PC = probability of bridge collapse due to a not represent actual aberrant ships path with accuracy.
collision with an aberrant vessel. The same observation can be done for the ship collision
According to this formula, the annual frequency of velocity. Calculated ship collision risk of super-long-
bridge collapse depends on the predictions of the future span bridges may differ from actual value because
annual number of vessels (N ) and vessel size. More- of the lack of available statistics and may result in
over, if design is performed assuming a higher level erroneous designs of the bridges.
of risk for extended lifespan of the bridge, a smaller Another limitation of the current practice concern-
target AF should be adopted in the design. Since the ing ship collision is the formula adopted to estimate
values of PA and PG cannot be controlled or adjusted the ship collision force. The impact force formula pro-
by the designer, the value of PC must be reduced posed inAASHTO LRFD is based on studies dedicated
to strengthen the resistance capacity of the bridge to the collisions between ships (AASHTO 1991). In
elements to satisfy the current design specifications. case of ship-ship collision, the absorption of kinetic
Supplying additional protection facilities like dol- energy due to large deformations of each ship is the
phins constitutes another way for reducing the collapse main mechanism. However ship-bridge collision cases
probability. The type and size of the ship collision pro- are ship-to-rigid-body collision, which results in the
tection facilities depend on the impact loads of design underestimation of the impact force by the formula of
vessel. AASHTO (Petersen et al. 1993; Svensson 2006).
Both options have naturally direct influence on the The prediction or estimation of extreme events that
construction costs. Therefore, for more economical may occur in the future is very difficult and involves
design against vessel collisions the pre-estimation of a wide range of variables. Even though a probabilis-
future vessel type, size and quantity should be carefully tic approach is adopted, the corresponding prediction
considered. is likely to lose its accuracy as much as the consid-
ered design lifetime lengthens. In current practice,
simple extrapolation will increase extreme load and
5.3 Limitations of the current practice in
make it a governing load in the structural design.
super-long-span bridges
Therefore, change of the design paradigm should
As mentioned earlier, if the design loads are extrapo- give priority to the economy and sustainable design
lated for 200-year lifetime using the current practice, against extreme events. Under extreme loads the con-
the resulting structures are likely to be excessively sequence of damages are more important than other
overdesigned. Especially, the three types of extreme criteria related to the deflection or serviceability. As a
events considered above have been seen to influence result, when extreme events are considered in design,
different parts of bridge. That is, earthquake loads the design paradigm should shift toward risk-based
govern the design of the substructure, wind loads design or consequence-based design to minimize the
determine the design of the superstructure and vessel consequences and damages.
collision influence the design of the piers or require Innovations are needed to transcend the current
additional protections. Besides, if more stringent cri- practice and to devise reasonable approaches in cop-
teria are applied in the design of the structural parts, ing with extreme events. In case of natural disasters
the feasibility of the construction project can be ruined such as earthquakes and typhoons, the probabilities of
due to the loss of economical efficiency brought by extreme events are site-dependent. Careful site investi-
larger sections and stronger structural elements. gation should thus be conducted to assess realistically
Since ship collision assessment requires proba- and reasonably the probability of the uncertainties
bilistic approach because of its rareness, previous related to these events. In the case of Honshu-Shikoku
design specifications such as AASHTO LRFD sug- Bridge Authority, the special windproof design stan-
gest methodologies based on a probabilistic approach. dard forAkashi Kaikyo bridge was established in 1990.
However, the lack of statistical data impedes direct Design specifications should prescribe the application
application of these methodologies to the design of of improved structures such as airfoil shaped sec-
super-long-span bridges for the following reasons. tions and multi-box girders used in Messina Bridge
The AASHTO LRFD suggests base rate of proba- or Gwangyang Bridge so as to cope efficiently with
bility of ship aberrancy (PA) as simple values based on extreme events. Solutions like seismic control devices
39
against strong earthquakes and gales should also be Cho (2009) suggested a probabilistic analysis method-
developed to be applicable for super-long span bridges. ology using 3D ship maneuvering simulation data to
In addition, in case of manmade disasters like improve the accuracy of the results. The simulation
ship collisions, cooperation with other industrial fields data for the given ship and bridge location reflect
should also be accounted. As an example, recent navi- more accurately the effects of various weather/current
gation technology of ship has experienced tremendous conditions and even human factors on ship collision
evolution. GPS and laser range finder can reduce accidents. However, the time and cost required to per-
drastically the occurrence of ship-bridge collision. In form such simulations constitute also an obstacle in
Korea, the volume of vessel has recognized an increase gathering a sufficient number of simulations to estab-
of 800% within two decades. But the annual ship col- lish reliable probabilistic model of aberrant path and
lision frequency has just increased less than two times collision velocity. For that reason, random vector gen-
(KMI 2003). This proves that manmade disasters can eration method from multivariate normal distribution
be reduced relatively easily by technical tools. is applied to the limited simulation data in order to
generate and acquire sufficient and meaningful data.
This methodology makes it possible to calculate ship
6 SUPER LONG SPAN BRIDGE R&BD collision risk more accurately over the long service
PROJECT life. Besides more convenient to use and more reli-
able methodology have been developed using fast-time
The Ministry of Land, Transportation and Maritime simulation with advanced auto-pilot function. The col-
Affairs (MLTM) of Korea has set up the VC-10 lapse mechanism of ship-to-pier according to various
(Value Creator-10) Program for Construction Tech- types of bridges and ships will also be investigated.
nology Innovation. Technology Road Map for each In addition, a ship collision risk assessment program
program was established by experts from academia, including dolphin protections will be developed. An
research institutes and various fields of construction expected outcome of the program will be the optimal
industry. One of the programs is Super Long Span design and placement of dolphin protections.
bridge R&BD project, launched in 2009 under the These results from the researches about extreme
supervision of Korea Expressway Corporation, which events will also be applied to prepare for the design
defines four major programs: (1) development of key specifications for super long span bridges together
technologies for planning and design of long-span with the development of aerodynamic cross-section of
bridges, (2) development of high-performance cable cable-supported bridges. Disaster management system
systems and high-performance materials for long-span will be developed for a series of disaster scenar-
bridges; (3) development of highly efficient and inno- ios. Based on those scenarios, disaster factors will
vative cable erection equipments and methods, and be monitored in real time, and the damages will be
cost effective construction methods for offshore mega analyzed accurately by probabilistic risk assessment
foundations; and (4) development of IT-based disaster technique. The so-gathered disaster information will
mitigation and maintenance technologies. be exploited for bridge users safety as well as for the
Lifetime design is one of the most important themes implementation of immediate actions.
of the project. To that goal, research is actively con- Other important topic of the R&BD project is the
ducted in diversified fields involving materials, live durability improvement of materials and bridge sys-
loads and extreme events as discussed in the previ- tems. HSB800W steel featured not only high strength
ous chapters. The detailed researches of each program and improved fatigue performance but also improved
related to the features discussed above are as follows. weathering performance is under development. Devel-
Live load models will be developed to be suitable for opments of zinc-aluminum alloy coating method,
super-long-span bridges. For that purpose, measured dehumidification system and high-durability paint-
truck data of domestic bridges have been collected and ing method have also been performed to enhance
analyzed. System reliability assessment methodology corrosion resistance of high strength steel cable for
and reliability based load combination method using super-long-span bridges. Increase of cable material
the developed model will also be developed through durability itself is also supposed to be attained by
this project. The final outcome of this topic is the devel- using FRP cable. Developed FRP cable and anchorage
opment of reliability-based design specifications for systems will show improved fatigue performance and
super long span bridges. durability. These researches will contribute to increase
Related to the extreme events, the extreme loads material durability and eventually to secure 200-
caused by earthquakes, typhoons or ship collisions will year design life of super-long-span bridges. Details
be defined more specifically and reasonable design of the assignments can be found in the website
solutions will be suggested. As mentioned in sec- (www.longspanbridge.org).
tion 5.3, the current probabilistic approach adopted
for the assessment of ship collision presents several
limitations due to the lack of statistical data. Accord- 7 CONCLUSIONS
ingly, improved methodology for the assessment of
ship aberrancy probability and geometric probability This paper reviewed current practices for service life
has been studied using ship maneuvering simulation. design and addressed issues that will be faced in the
40
lifetime design for cable-supported super-long-span gratitude for Dr. Y.J. Kim at the Korea Institute of
bridges. Research directions that will help designers Construction Technology and Prof. D.H. Ha at Konkuk
in achieving extended lifetime of 200 years or more University for their contribution.
for the super-long-span bridges have been derived.
The main issue when deciding upon a specific ser-
vice life is to clarify the event and feature, which will REFERENCES
identify the end of the service life. In view of the cur-
AASHTO 1991. Guide Specification and Commentary for
rent practice, service life of 100 to 150 years seems Vessel Collision Design of Highway Bridges. Washington,
to be achievable and has already been implemented in D.C.
recent major bridges owing to special specifications AASHTO 2004.AASHTO LRFD bridge specifications. Wash-
by the owners of the bridge projects. ington, D.C.
The lack of specification provisions prescribing ACI Committee 365. 2000. Service-Life-Prediction State-of-
explicitly the length of the service life is an obvious the-Art Report, ACI 365.1R-00. Farmington Hills.
obstacle to the implementation of extended service life Aitcin, P.C. 2003. The durability characteristics of high
for major bridges. Even though each long-span bridge performance concrete: a review. Cement and Concrete
is unique, the development of relevant specifications Composites 25(45): 409420.
Bartholomew, M. 2007. How long will your bridge last?
providing sufficient margins should be implemented The need to predict service life of bridge components.
for the designers to guarantee the service life of their Western Bridge Engineers Seminar, Boise, Idaho, 2326
structures. September 2007.
This paper addressed three major topics for which Bartholomew, M. 2009. Design for service life, bridge birth
limitations of the current practice are likely to hap- certificate and concrete structures management concepts.
pen for the design of super-long-span bridges in the AASHTO Bridge Sub-Committee Meeting, T-9 Technical
future. These topics are material durability, live load Committee for Bridge Preservation, New Orleans, LA, 6
model and extreme events. Currently, design prac- July 2009.
tice assumes that securing material durability for Chen, W.F. & Duan, L. (ed.) 1999. Bridge engineering
handbook. Florida: CRC press LLC.
200 years will guarantee equivalent or longer life- Cho, H. H. 2009. Probability Analysis of Ship-Bridge Colli-
time of the bridge. However, one cannot assume the sion Using Ship Maneuvering Simulation (Ph. D. Thesis).
reliability of such approach considering the harsher Seoul National University. Korea.
conditions in which super-long span bridges will be Daewoo E&C 2005. Busan-Geoje Fixed Link-Concrete Dura-
exposed. Accordingly, the application of high perfor- bility. Internal Report.
mance materials together with appropriate protection DuraCrete Report 2000. DuraCrete Final Technical Report,
alternatives should be seriously conceived and dedi- Document No. BE95-1347/R17. Gouda: CUR.
cated research should promoted. In the case of load Frangopol, D.M. & Furuta, H. (ed.) 2000. Life-cycle cost
models including live loads and extreme events, the analysis and design of civil infrastructure systems. Proc.
US-Japan Workshop on Life-Cycle Cost Analysis and
need for probabilistic approach has been highlighted. Design of Civil Infrastructure Systems, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Should the designer assume higher risks or maximize Gehlen, Ch. & Schiessl, P. 1999. Probability-based dura-
safety with more conservative design? Although fur- bility design for the Western Scheldt Tunnel. Structural
ther study should be conducted, the authors estimate Concrete 2: 17.
that the cost-effectiveness of the structure is a design Gluver, H. & Olsen, D. 1998. Ship Collision Analysis.
priority. This means that, from a lifetime perspective, a Roterdam: Balkema.
certain level of risks should be accepted within a prob- Gucma, L. 2009. Method of Ship-Bridge Collision Safety
abilistic framework so as to ensure both reliability and Evaluation. Reliability & Risk Analysis: Theory & Appli-
cost-effectiveness. cations 2(2): 5063.
Hwang, E.S. 2009. Development of Vehicular Load Model
Consequently, extending the service life for bridge using Heavy Truck Weight Distribution (I) Data Col-
structures and especially super-long-span bridges lection and Estimation of Single Truck Weight. KSCE
requires a paradigm shift in the current design practice. Journal 29(3A): 189197.
Rather than focusing unilaterally on material dura- Hwang, E.S. 2009. Development of Vehicular Load Model
bility, the extension of service life should rely on using Heavy Truck Weight Distribution (II) Multiple
more systematic lifetime design procedures involving Truck Effects and Model Development. KSCE Journal
probabilistic approach, consequence-based design and 29(3A): 199207.
some marginal increase of costs. Imai, K. & Frangopol, D.M. 2001. Reliability-based assess-
ment of suspension bridges: application to the Innoshima
bridge. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering 6(6):
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 398411.
Incheon Bridge Corporation 2004. Concessionaire Supple-
This work is a part of a research project, performed at mentary Requirements Internal report.
Korea Bridge Design & Engineering Research Center International Navigation Association(PIANIC) 2001. Ship
Collisions due to the Presence of Bridges. Brussels,
of Seoul National University and supported by Korea Report of WG19
Ministry of Land, Transportation Maritime Affairs KICT 2009. DurabilityAssessment of ultra-high performance
(MLTM) as a Core Research Project 1 of Super Long concretes Internal report.
Span Bridge R&BD Center. The authors acknowledge Kline, E. 2009. Durable Bridge Coatings. Modern Steel
the financial support. The authors also express their Construction 11: 4650.
41
Koh, H.M., Lee, H.S., Kim, S. & Choo, J.F. 2008. Monitoring OHBDC 1983. Ontario Highway Bridge Design Code.
of Bridges in Korea. In Encyclopedia of Structural health Ontario Ministry of Transportation Communication.
Monitoring. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Park, C.M. & Park, J.C. 2003. Evaluation of structural
Korea Road and Transportation Association 2008. Korea behavior using full scale measurements on the Seohae
Bridge Design Code. KRTA. (in Korean) cable-stayed bridge. Proceedings of annual conference of
Korea Maritime Institute 2003. Korean Shipping statistical the Korean Society of Civil Engineers (KSCE), Korea,
handbook. KMI. (in Korean) 2003: 571576.
Kwon, S.-D. 2008. Aerodynamic Design of Long-Span Pedeferri, P. 1996. Cathodic protection and cathodic pre-
Bridges in Korea. Proceeding of the 4th International con- vention. Dipartimento di Chimica Fisica Applicata
ference on Advances in Wind and Structures(AWAS08), Politecnico di Milano, 6 February 1995.
Jeju, 2008. Petersen, P.T., Valsgaard, S., Olsen, D. & Spangenberg, S.
Kwon, S-.D. 2008. Wind resistance design of Kwangyang 1993. Ship impacts: Bow Collisions. International Jour-
Bridge. Proceeding of the 4th International Conference nal of Impact Engineering 13(2): 163187.
on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management (IAB- Raupach, M. & Dauberschmidt, C. 2003. Durability of
MAS08), Seoul, 1317 July 2008. marine structures made of high-performance concrete.
Lafarge 2007. Concretes for the 21st century. The Press In Ying-shu Yuan (ed.), Advances in Concrete and
Theme Book of Lafarge. Structures; Proc. International Conference ICACS 2003,
Luping, T. & Gulikers, J. 2007. On the mathematics of Xuzhou, 1719 September 2003. Bagneux: RILEM.
time-dependent apparent chloride diffusion coefficient in Rostam, S. 2005. Service life design of concrete structures
concrete. Cement and Concrete Research 37(4): 589595. A challenge to designers as well as to owners. Asian Jour-
Mahmoud, K.M. (ed.) 2006. Advances in Cable-Supported nal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) 6(5):
Bridges: Selected Papers. 5th International Cable- 423445.
Supported Bridge Operators Conference, New York City, Sarja, A. & Vesikari, E. (eds.) 1996. RILEM Report 14
2829 August 2006. London: Taylor & Francis. Durability design of concrete structures. London: E&FN
Nagai, M. 2004. Feasibility of a 1,400 m spa steel cable- SPON.
stayed bridge. Journal of bridge engineering: 444452. Sarja, A. 2010. Reliability principles, methodology and
Nilsson, L.O. 2009. Models for chloride ingress into con- methods for lifetime design. Materials and Structures 43
crete from Collepardi to today. International Journal of (DOI 10.1617/s11527-009-9486-y): 261271.
Modeling, Identification and Control 7(2): 129134. Stahl, F.L. & Gagnon, C.P. 1996. Cable Corrosion in Bridges
Nowak, A.S. 1993. Live load model for highway bridges. and Other Structures: Causes and Solutions. New York:
Structural safety 13: 5366. ASCE Press.
Nyman, W.E. & Moses, F. 1985. Calibration of bridge fatigue Svensson, H. 2006. Protection of Bridge Piers against Ship
design model. Journal of Structural Engineering 111(6): Collision. Keynote Lecture, Proceeding of International
12511266. Conference on Bridge Engineering, Hong Kong, 2006.
42
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
P.G. Malerba
Department of Structural Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
43
Table 1. Characteristics of the main bridges examined (see Figure 1.a).
Total Length
Year of length over the Piers in Piers in
River Place construction [m] river [m] flood-plains riverbed Pier and foundation types
and stone arch bridges involved limited spans resting General visual inspection.
on a high number of piers, having basements in an Geometrical survey, with dimensional cross-checks
insidious and wandering riverbed. with the original drawings. Detailed description of
The first long span bridges appeared at the begin- local damage states.
ning of the twentieth century with the diffusion of the Survey of the overall attitude of the bridge, with
steel-truss girders. Many of these road and rail bridges, respect to horizontal and vertical references. Verti-
although after some reconstruction work, are still oper- cality checks of the piers. Levelling of the roadway.
ating. After WWII, many new bridges were built, with Bathymetric survey, in order to draw the geometry
a wide use of prestressed reinforced concrete. The of the riverbed, to detect possible scouring signals
main challenge during the design and erection phases near the piers.
was not represented by the spans (usually 5070 m Underwater surveys, aimed to detect cracks or
on average), but by the interaction with severe fluvial clefts in the submerged parts, as well as traces of
hydraulics, characterized by cyclic floods, which often erosions or scour holes at the piers basis.
overtopped the embankments, invaded the floodplains Vertical boreholes in the piers aimed to measure
and sometimes upset countries and villages at the two their buried depth. Echo-soundings, used to check
sides of the river. the actual depth of the piers above the piles.
We have a fairly complete knowledge of the his- Geognostic boreholes, with the performance of
torical floods of the Po river since a remote age. The SPT and CPT tests and with collection of disturbed
main floods of the last hundred years occurred in 1926, and undisturbed soil samples.
1951, 1994 and 2000.
The relative cost of each survey activity is shown
in Figure 1c. The mean cost of the surveys versus the
2.2 A wide surveying campaign overall length of the bridges is shown in Figure 1d.
After the 2000 flood, the Compartment for the Lom-
bardia region of the Italian Agency for Roads (ANAS) 2.4 Laboratory and office activities
promoted a campaign aimed to survey the state of
the piers, of the basements and of the foundations of The results of the laboratory tests carried out on the soil
the main bridges crossing the Po. Such a campaign samples were used to define the load carrying capacity
was meant to provide a first evaluation of the bridges of the original foundation systems, as well as to design
state and to detect possible critical conditions of the the strengthening works on the insufficient ones.
piers and foundations, paying particular attention to The office activities concerned in hydraulic engi-
hydraulics causes of instability, like erosion and scour. neering and structural assessments.
The bridge main characteristics are listed in Table 1. For each bridge a comprehensive report was com-
Their locations are shown in Fig. 1a. piled. These reports gave a final assessment of the
actual state of the bridge and highlighted its possi-
ble critical faults. When the safety of the structure
2.3 Surveying and monitoring was at stake, suitable suggestions for urgent inter-
ventions were provided. Each bridge was classified
Surveying and monitoring consisted in the following
and given a priority level which implied recommenda-
activities:
tion for ordinary or extraordinary maintenance activ-
Preliminary exam of each bridge on the basis of the ities, or, in the worst cases, for radical strengthening
documents available in the archives. works.
44
Figure 1. (a) Position of the main bridges listed in Table 1; (b) maximum hydrometric at the Piacenza gauging station in the
last two centuries; (c) cost distribution for different types of test; (d) mean cost of the surveys per meter vs overall length of
the bridges.
2.5 Main results drawn from the bridge inspection As regards to the body of the piers, it was not
Floods are a common experience for people who live at found in a bad situation. Some masonry piers pre-
the Po riversides. Now, comparing the recent surveys sented losses of mortar among the masonry courses.
with the historical data, it is possible to observe a rising Both masonry and reinforced piles presented traces of
trend of the maximum flood levels and, in recent years, collision with the small boats and ships which sail the
a higher frequency of the flood events. middle and final reaches of the river.
According to the experts of environmental For the main bridges, the position and the ori-
hydraulics, such a phenomenon is mainly due to entation of the piers with respect to the main flow
anthropic factors, like a progressive waterproofing of was judged correct. In some minor bridge, spanning
the basins, due to urban and infrastructural grow- over tributary rivers, some cases of wrong foundation
ing, the removal of expansion zones and the increase basement were found (Figs 2c, d).
of river reaches confined by embankments. Climate Another general consideration regards the sound-
changes may also have contributed to these effects. ness of our probabilistic design procedures, tuned to
Figure 1b shows the maximum hydrometric levels values of return periods (100, 200 years). The surveys
recorded by the Piacenza measuring station during last of the most recent bridges, for which it was possible
two centuries and confirm these remarks. to compare the present riverbed profile with that of
Another element which was confirmed is the depth thirty/forty years ago, showed cases of strong riverbed
of the scour in the rapid transient phase as determined changes, with the movement of the main current from
according to the recent Po Basin Authority specifica- one alignment to another and also with the growth of
tions, which agrees with the most widely recognized temporary islands downstream the old main current.
formulations (Hamill 1999). These values of scour The underwater surveys reported that, even after
depth appeared quite higher than those assumed in the a long time from the end of the flood event, a sys-
past (Figs 2a, b) and strongly condition the load car- tematic encumbrance of debris remained at the basis
rying capacity computation of the foundations and of and along the body of the piers. This is a problem of
the piles. ordinary maintenance. But, who is in charge of the
45
Figure 2. Scour effects and debris action on piers in the riverbed: (a),(b) collapses caused by the scouring action in bridges
crossing river Pos tributaries; (c),(d) effects of the position, of the orientation with respect to the water flow, and of the depth
of the foundations in a small river; (e),(f) Multi-columns piers acting as grids in the formation of debris rafts.
debris removal? Is it the river Authority or the bridge the foundation systems;
Authority? More simply: who has to pay? the main structures of the bridges;
their complementary or special devices.
46
which lead to higher depths of the estimated scour step by step, caring not to cut the reinforcing bars.
holes and higher values of the acting forces. The demolition was accompanied by the contempo-
The strengthening interventions are usually based rary reconstruction of reaches of the new, wider crown.
on two contributions. The first one consists in protect- Twenty horizontal threaded bars having a diameter of
ing the area surrounding the piers by means of big bags 32 mm, passing across the pile body and placed at two
containing massive stones. Such a work stabilizes the different levels (Figs 3b, d, e), strongly connect the
riverbed and leads to less severe expected scour depths. two opposite sides of the crown. Figure 3f shows an
The second intervention consists in strengthening the intermediate phase of the works. Before and during the
pier basement. works, the attitude of the bridge was topographically
Usually the strengthening is carried out in one of surveyed.
these two ways:
when the body of the pier is sufficiently compact
and massive, like in the case of masonry piers, new 5 MAIN STRUCTURES OF THE BRIDGES
piles are driven across the body itself;
when this is not possible or when previous repairing The interventions needed on the main structures of a
interventions occurred in the volume of the pier, bridge may be summarized as follows:
new piles are driven around the perimeter. Strengthening of the carrying structure due to some
A common problem of both these type of inter- lacks in their load bearing capacity, caused, for
vention is the accomplishment of a robust connection instance, by settlement effects, or by corrosion of
between new and old structures. the reinforcing bars or of the prestressing steel in
An example of strengthening is presented in the critical sections;
following. Refurbishment and adjustment of the structure to
new codes prescriptions, involving, for instance,
heavier load conditions;
4.1 An example of strengthening of the foundations Changes in geometry, due to the need of widening
of a bridge of the nineteenth century the road platform.
The Lodi masonry bridge cross theAdda River and was In the following, the case of refurbishment regard-
built in the years 1863-64, by the Milanese Architect ing an old arch bridge is examined.
Gualini. It is made of nine shallow arches spanning
18.90 m each, for a total length of 175 m (Fig. 3a).
In 197071, the deck of the Lodi Bridge was refur- 5.1 The railway bridge across the Gaggione River
bished in order to comply with the new traffic loads 5.1.1 The structure
(Figure 3b), and a weir was built 200 m downstream in The railway bridge across the Gaggione River was built
order to protect the basement of the bridge. In the fol- in 1885 and connects the city of Milan to Varese, 60 km
lowing years, the weir caused some floods involving away.
the town riverside. This brought, after new hydraulic The bridge, shown in Figure 4a, has a total length
assessments carried out in 2006, to the decision of low- of 130 m and is made of a sequence of seven stone
ering the weir. This lowering, which is scheduled for barrel arches, which rest on six stone piers. The barrel
the summer of 2010, will increase the flow velocity arches have internal radius of 5.82 m and their centers
and therefore expose the foundations to more severe are 14.00 m apart. The piers are slightly tapered. The
service conditions. After soil samplings and labora- longest one is 32.60 m high. The free height of the piers
tory tests, a subsequent geotechnical and structural is interrupted by an intermediate service deck made of
assessment showed that the foundation system was not five shallow arches.
safe even before a worsening of the conditions caused In 198586, the bridge was strengthened in order to
by the lowering of the weir would occur, and needed carry new, heavier train loads. The main interventions
strengthening works. regarded the basements of the central piers, the node
This choice was confirmed also by the presence of at the intersection between the piers and the interme-
some foundation settlements already observed in the diate deck, and the strengthening of the intrados and
past. In fact, some works had already been performed spandrels of the arches.
in 1947, when each foundation was strengthened and The intrados and spandrels were enveloped in a layer
its basement was protected against erosion and scour. of shot concrete, 180 mm thick, and reinforced with
The new intervention substantially recalls the old 14 mm bars arranged so as to form a mesh with a
one. Twenty new micropiles, having a diameter of pitch of 200 mm both ways. After a strong hydrosand
0.20 m and 24.70 m long, were drilled alternatively at a blasting in order to improve the chemicalmechani-
5 angle along the sides of the basement (Figs 3b, c). cal adherence, the added layers were linked to the
The micropiles were reinforced by valved steel tubes stone surfaces through a uniform curtain of pins and
having a diameter of 127 and a thickness of 10 mm confined against the original walls through 22 mm
(Fig. 3c). threaded bars, piercing the body of the arches. Other
Their position was defined so as not to interfere with works regarded the river bed stabilization, obtained
the old piles. The old concrete crown was demolished with the introduction of embankments and weirs.
47
48
Figure 3. Lodi Bridge (186364). (a) front view of the bridge; (b) transversal section showing the new deck, made of precast prestressed beams, the position of the new piles and that of the
threaded connecting bars; (c) arrangement of the micropiles at the two sides of a pier; (d), (e) details of the R.C. hooping crown; (g) photograph of an intermediate phase of the works.
Figure 4. Gaggione Bridge (1885): (a) front view of the bridge; (b) transversal section after strengthening, layout of the
relative displacement transducers and distribution of the strains in the depth of section during the loading tests; (c) comparison
between theoretical and experimental vertical displacements.
5.1.2 The problem actual static scheme and how old and new structures
It is quite obvious that, considering this type of mas- contribute to the overall bridge robustness.
sive bridges, any intervention which confines tightly Usually the arch is considered the main bearing
the masonry, and, at the same time, does not add exces- structure, while the superstructures (the walls and the
sive loads to the original structure, leads to an increase filling up, made of light non cohesive material), are
in the safety level. It is less immediate to define the considered as dead loads. Then, why it is so common
49
to see clefts around the arches keystones and even, in The bearing supports can also be considered as crit-
some cases, the loss of central bricks? ical parts in a bridge: their substitution in old bridges
is frequently not easy.
5.1.3 The bridge behavior According to the actual concepts of maintenance,
In December 1986, at the end of the strengthening the stays are considered as special devices that can be
works, severe loads test were carried out. Several substituted when necessary. But when the number of
load positions were examined and the vertical dis- stays is very limited, it is difficult not to involve the
placements were measured. At the intrados and at the entire structure.
lateral walls of the central section, eight electrome- In the following, the refurbishment of the ties of
chanical gauges (relative displacement transducers) one of the three A shaped frames which characterize
were placed as shown in Figure 4b. Figure 4c shows the Polcevera Bridge is presented.
the displacements obtained with the train in the cen-
tral position. The maximum vertical displacement was
v = 0.71 mm. Figure 4b shows the vertical distribution 6.1 The strengthening of the ties of one of the first
of the horizontal strains compared to the stratigraphy tied bridges. The case of the Polcevera Bridge
of the section: the added reinforcement layer and the 6.1.1 The structure
arch rib are in tension; the spandrels above the arch top The Polcevera Bridge was designed by Riccardo
and the infill material are compressed. A fairly good Morandi, built in the years 1960-1964 and put in ser-
matching between numerical and experimental data vice in September 1967. It flies over a large railway
was reached. parking lot and connects the A7 Genoa-Serravalle
Hence, during the service life and for the applied highway to the A10 Genoa-Ventimiglia highway. A
loads, the crown of the bearing arch works in tens- general layout of the bridge is shown in Figure 5. The
ion and the superstructure in compression. Analo- bridge is 1121.4 m long and 18.00 m wide. Its main
gous behavior was found through a FEA for the part is composed by three A shaped frames 90.2 m
effects of self weight. The theoretical final results high, supporting decks 171.9, 171.9 and 145.7 long,
of the analysis gave, for the most compressed fiber, connected by 36.0 m long suspended girders. At a dis-
= 0.28 N/mm2 , a relatively small value which can tance of ten meters from their ends, the long decks
be sustained also by a moderately compacted soil. are suspended to a couple of ties, made of prestressed
These assessments, which trust to the cooperation concrete.
with materials that cannot be defined as structural in This scheme repeats concepts already adopted by
the strict sense of the word (i.e. the filling of the span- Morandi for the Maracaibo Bridge, the Rio Magdalena
drels), cannot be used for safety evaluations. Safety Bridge and the Wadi Kuff Bridge (Morandi 1969).
derives from the certainty that the evolution from the
service to the ultimate state would involve the crushing 6.1.2 The concept of stay according to Morandi
of the filling material, while the line of the thrust lowers This type of ties is probably the most characteristic
until it reaches the extrados of the bearing arch, which elements of the Morandi system. The tie sections are
finally works according to the usual interpretation of shown in Figure 5b. Their construction sequence was
its behavior. no doubt complicated, but had a clear aim: to create ties
From this experience, many suggestions were that behave as an homogenous system made of tendons
drawn for similar interventions carried out in the working in tension and of a prestressed concrete case,
following years. working in decompression, but not in tension, under
the added and traffic loads. In this way, the fatigue
effects in the strands were limited thanks to the reduc-
6 AUXILIARY AND SPECIAL DEVICES tion of stress variations due to variable loads and, at
the same, the strands were protected against corrosion.
The service life of a bridge is strongly influenced by
the regular functioning of all its different components. 6.1.3 Needed repair interventions
A special mention must be made to the water After about 25 years of service, many parts of the
drainage system. It has a relatively modest cost if bridge presented severe damage states. On the ties
compared to other parts of the bridge, but it may of frame No. 11, at the Genoa side, clear corrosion
cause severe damages. Leakages through any points of traces in the strands of the tendons appeared. Minor
weakness in the waterproofing system or in the expan- damages were detected on the tendons at the top of
sion joints may lead to significant reductions of the the antenna of the nearby frame (No. 10) and in other
structural safety. parts of the bridge. In 199294, a recovery program
Other vulnerable systems are the expansion joints was carried out under the guide of Francesco Pisani,
which may exhibit worn rubber covering, torn up who was one of Prof. Morandis aides at the time of the
anchorage bolts and permanent deformations. A cause bridge design and planned the repairing intervention
of these drawbacks can be found in the dynamic effects phases (Martinez y Cabrera 1994). The main interven-
due to road platform discontinuities in correspondence tion concerned the four ties of frame No. 11. The basic
of the joints and to poor attention paid to the details concept of the intervention was to flank each original
during the construction works. tie with a set of 12 additional modern cables, in order
50
Figure 5. Polcevera Bridge (196064). (a) anchorage plates at the top of the antenna; (b) collar fastening the original stays;
(c) lower end ribbed plate; (d) anchorage of the tie to the abutment; (e) anchorage of the stay to deck transverse; (f), g), (h)
phases of demolition and of reconstruction of the end zones of the ties.
to transfer the suspension action from the ties to the is important in order to maintain the original design
stays. behavior of the bridge and to avoid any change in
Through specially designed devices (collars and the deflection and flexural behavior of the deck, with
new anchorage systems) and following the recovery consequences also on the elements of the main frame.
sequence (progressive tensioning phases) shown in Another aim of the progressive tension transfer from
Figure 5c, the new composed stay system, result- the old ties to the new composed stays, was to reduce
ing from the coupling of the old ties to the new cables, the structural risk of excessive compression stresses
maintains its original shape, while the stiffness char- in the concrete ties, avoiding potential bursting effects
acteristics remain very close to the original ones. This when the old cables were being cut.
51
At the end of this process, the compressive stress in of the type of concrete, a correct curing process,
the concrete ties was about 10 N/mm2 , as the original adequate cover and detailing of the reinforcing bars
design assumed. may considerably lengthen the service life and reduce
The repair works concerned also the other two maintenance costs.
frames. On frame No. 10 a local repair, aimed to Particular attention must be paid to the drainage
strengthen the upper end of the ties was carried out. On system. The lack of efficiency of the drainage system
frame No. 9, whose cables appeared less damaged with is one the main causes of damages and corrosion both
respect to the previous ones, no particular interven- in steel and concrete structures.
tions were adopted. Surface protection interventions Any effort to eliminate joints or, at least, to reduce
were carried out on all three frames. their dynamic effects, must be done.
It must be pointed out that the interventions were
carried out without traffic interruptions. Only some
traffic limitations were needed during the demolition ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
and tensioning phases.
My first acknowledgments are for the members of my
6.1.4 Some final considerations on the Polcevera design team: Emanuele Barbera, Paolo Galli, Chiara
Bridge Malerba, Marco di Domizio, Giacomo Comaita and
The Polcevera Bridge and other Morandi tied bridges Giovanni Mineo.
represent an exceptional reference from the concep- Many of the works presented were carried out by the
tual, aesthetic and technical point of view, which is Author in cooperation with the late Prof. Francesco
even more relevant if related to the times in which these Martinez y Cabrera, to whom my memory and my
structures were built. Nowadays, however, similar gratitude go.
static schemes, though brilliant, cannot be proposed. The hydraulic studies were carried by the ETATEC
According to the modern criteria of durability, Company. Supervisor: Prof. Alessandro Paoletti
the prestressed concrete tie does not appear as a (Politecnico di Milano).
safe solution for elements in tension. Moreover, the All Italian Authorities who promoted special inves-
suspension action entrusted to a limited number of ele- tigations and demanding repairing works are grate-
ments, makes the whole structure little robust and the fully acknowledged. Among these: the ANAS (Italian
maintenance actions quite difficult. Agency for Roads) Compartment for the Lombardia
Modern bridge configurations, characterized by a region, Milan; the Lodi Municipality, Lodi; the Tech-
relative great number of stays (a curtain of stays), are nical Office of the Lecco Province, Lecco; FNM SpA
designed so that, should the failure of one of more stays (North Milan Railways), Milan; SSIF Spa (Swiss
occur, the subsequent loss of suspension action would Italian Railway Company), Domodossola.
be made up for by other suspension elements, making
the cables maintenance and/or substitution easier.
REFERENCES
52
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
James C. Ray
US Army Engineer Research and Development Center
ABSTRACT
53
their stiffness and strength. Thus, a pool fire from
such as a ruptured tanker truck on the deck of a bridge,
adjacent to key components or in the water adjacent to
piers or towers is of concern.
The science for mitigation of these threats is dis-
cussed in terms of the following sub-areas: mitigation
prioritization; vulnerability assessments; and threat
mitigation. Detailed discussions of these items are pro-
vided in the paper, but a brief overview is provided
below.
Mitigation Prioritization: Since 911, most bridge
owners have completed the prioritization of their
infrastructure between individual nodes (i.e. bridges,
tunnels, etc.) and have begun or are ready to begin mit-
igation efforts on their highest priority nodes. At this
point, the question once again arises: Where do we
start? Based upon the myriad of terrorist threats that Figure 3. Explosively damaged girders.
could be brought to bare as well as the large number of
vulnerable structural components on any given bridge,
there are almost unlimited mitigation measures that The paper provides an overview of the vulnerability
can be deployed on a given bridge.Yet, there are always assessment process for terrorist threats and discusses
limited resources. A rational and consistent means is various analytical tools that are available for this
required to assess and compare individual structural purpose.
component criticality and the effectiveness of varied Threat Mitigation: Physical security of any asset
mitigation measures throughout an individual bridge. must essentially comprise a layered and fully inte-
Thus, once again a prioritization is required, this time grated combination of four basic mitigation measures,
at the individual structure level. referred to herein as the Four Ds: Deter, Detect,
Instead of prioritizing among a group of structures, Delay, and Defend. These measures cannot be applied
the owner must now prioritize among the individual independently and must be employed as part of an
components on a given structure to determine which interdependent systematic approach to a layered secu-
are at highest risk and most in need of mitigation rity perimeter around the protected asset, in this case
efforts. The need in this case is to compare individual the bridge component or a specific critical bridge com-
bridge components based on their specific importance ponent. The paper provides discussion on each of
and vulnerabilities. Since most of the high-priority the Four Ds, but emphasis is placed on the Defense
bridges are major structures with potentially massive aspect (better known as hardening), which addresses
replacement costs and economic effects if lost, impor- the scenario where the attacker overcomes the denial
tance should be primarily based on a components methods and carries out the attack before a capable
contribution to overall structural stability; i.e. if the response occurs. Or, with the case of a vehicular-borne
component is sufficiently damaged, the bridge will device (i.e. vehicle bomb), the attack can be carried
totally collapse. However, other factors such as com- out so quickly and with such force that detection and
ponent replacement or repair costs can also factor in. denial methods are essentially of no use. Hardening is
Component vulnerability will be a function of the spe- the only viable defense for this threat.
cific threat type and size used against the component, The type of structural defense employed will of
the likelihood of such a threat, and the components course be threat dependent. Hand-emplaced explo-
resistance to the threat. There are many risk assessment sive threats, non-explosive cutting threats, fire, etc. all
methodologies that can be used for this purpose. This require radically different defensive measures. Signif-
paper provides an overview of a component level risk icant advances have been made since 911 for protec-
assessment methodology developed by Ray (2007) tion of vulnerable components from hand-emplaced
specifically for this purpose. explosive- and non-explosive cutting threats. How-
Vulnerability Assessment: In order to prioritize miti- ever, most of these technologies are proprietary and/or
gation measures on a given structure, the vulnera- Classified and thus cannot be discussed in the paper.
bilities of important structural components to each And while there is always room for improvement, fire
threat must be understood. Since damage from ter- and vehicular impact mitigation technologies are well-
rorist threats is generally very localized (Fig. 3), evolved and require no additional discussion. Thus, the
vulnerability assessments must be accomplished at the major focus of the paper is on hardening against vehi-
individual component level. cle bomb blast, which is a predominant threat against
Total bridge collapse will only occur if the locally which hardening is required.
affected structural components (i.e. column, truss In sifting through the myriad of potential solutions
member, tower wall, cable, etc.) are sufficiently dam- to structural hardening, the most important thing to
aged and structurally important enough to induce a remember is that no matter how exotic or high-tech
progressive collapse of the entire structural system. a proposed mitigation scheme may appear, it must
54
ultimately affect at least one of the three variables of
Newtons Second Law as given in equation (1).
55
concepts have been proposed and explored for this explosive energy does not go away and must be defused
purpose as it is clear that all materials demonstrate in some manner. Essentially, any concept only serves
various phase changes (an energy absorbing process) to re-distribute the energy; either through inertial
as a function of shock pressure. In addition, all mate- resistance, strain energy, or momentum transfer (frag-
rials absorb energy to varying degrees as they undergo mentation). Mitigation designers are encouraged to
gross irrecoverable volumetric strains (i.e. crushing). consider all of the strengths and weaknesses of each of
Beyond energy absorption, are there ways to the concepts and develop a layered hardening approach
completely- or partially shield the component of con- that capitalizes upon the strengths of each. An exam-
cern from the explosive energy? This can conceivably ple of a layered hardening approach for a cellular steel
be accomplished through blast barriers that can be bro- column is provided.
ken into two basic categories: structural barriers and Multi-Hazard Considerations: Terrorist threat miti-
sacrificial barriers. gation cannot be considered alone. In addition to
A structural barrier is essentially a wall in front of terrorism, there are many other hazards that threaten
the protected component that has sufficient strength to a bridge, including earthquakes, wind, water, fire,
stay in place throughout the blast event, collecting and weathering, etc. and a risk-based approach must be
dissipating all of the explosive energy and completely utilized to determine the relative degree of importance
shielding the protected structure. A sacrificial barrier of each threat to a given bridge. And, as funding is
provides shock wave reflection and inertial resistance always limited, the mitigation efforts must be priori-
just like structural barriers, but has minimal structural tized according to the level of risk. The paper discusses
resistance and breaks apart under the blast loading, mitigation measures that can address multiple hazards,
thus minimizing support reaction forces. The exper- such as wrapping of reinforced concrete columns to
imental testing of various materials for blast energy increase both seismic and blast resistance. In addition
absorption and shielding is discussed in detail in to the beneficial multi-hazard overlaps, discussion is
the paper. Materials considered included: elastomers, also given to detrimental overlaps of mitigation mea-
dilatants, porous aggregates, concretes, and water. sures. One example is: Local hardening of a structural
It is ultimately shown that energy absorption or component to increase its blast resistance may add
shielding is not effective for bridge components where detrimental mass and stiffness within the structural
bomb standoffs and shield thicknesses are minimal. system, affecting its seismic resistance.
Certainly the theory is sound, but unfortunately there
is just not enough space to place a sufficiently thick
shield with enough material to significantly affect the REFERENCES
extremely high blast pressures from a near-contact
detonation. American Association of State Highway and Transportation
Officials (AASHTO). 2003. Recommendations for Bridge
Load Path Redundancy: Complete mitigation of
and Tunnel Security, prepared by the Blue Ribbon Panel
damage from very large explosive threats may not be on Bridge and Tunnel Security, Washington, DC.
economically or logistically possible. In many cases, it Ray, J. 2007. Risk Based Prioritization of Terrorist Threat
makes more sense to just limit the extent of damage to Mitigation Measures on Bridges. ASCE Journal of Bridge
the most exposed components and ensure that there Engineering. March/April 2007: pp. 140146.
is enough redundant/residual capacity in other less US Army, Air Force, Navy, & the Defense Special Weapons
exposed members to insure that the structural system Agency. 2002. DAHS-CWE-UFC 3-340-01, Design and
as a whole can continue to function and not undergo a Analysis of Hardened Structures to Conventional Weapons
progressive collapse. Effects, Washington, DC.
Williamson, E., Williams, D., Holland, C., Bayrak, O.,
Layered Hardening Approach: A wide variety of
Marchand, K. (in press). Blast-Resistant Highway
hardening concepts are discussed and each has at Bridges: Design and Detailing Guidelines, Final Report
least some validity and usefulness for specific sce- to the National Cooperative Highway Research Program,
narios. There are also no concepts that just allevi- Project 1272.
ate the extreme loadings without consequences. The
56
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
R.A.P. Sweeney
Modjeski & Masters, USA
57
Table 2. Compare 1964 to today. Sweeney (2006).
1964 Today
58
bridge plant that is expected to be needed for quite
some time to come was totally irresponsible even if
he intended to retire in 9 years. Fortunately, his staff
politely ignored his order.
Suppose it had been possible to run the structures
into the ground where and how would it be possible
to earn enough money to completely re-build? As all
managers know the first duty is to maintain share-
holder value and preserve the enterprise. Substitute the
word the peoples for shareholder if the enterprise is
Government owned.
59
These people need to be given clear actionable effec- Table 3. Maintenance Levels.
tive choices that will accomplish the desired results.
They need to be respectfully led to do the right thing. Level Functional Safety of Preservation
Performance Persons and of the asset
Quality and Property in and the
reliability all aspects amenities
3 MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT
Minimum Nil (Not All legal All legal
Applicable) Requirements Requirements
Maintenance management can be divided into 5 main To be met To be met
possible action levels:
Preservation Nil (Not Fully safe Prevention of
1. A minimum level to comply with legal, statuary and Applicable) in all deterioration
contractual requirements. respects for of asset and
2. A slightly better level designed to preserve the asset. reintroduction amenities
to service
3. A normal level of economical good practice.
on 7 days
4. A higher level (for facilities that are operationally notice
vital, structurally hazardous,
Normal Availability Fully safe Meets
5. An even higher level for assets of prestige value,
Factor at in all specified
etc.) full specified respects for condition of
Note that in level 1 it may not be possible to restore performance regular use facilities and
the facility to adequate operational condition with- not less amenities
than 0.85
out considerable expenditure since only the minimum
legal and similar requirements are met. Operationally Availability Fully safe Meets
At level 2 it would seem that reintroduction to Vital Factor at in all specified
full specified respects for condition
service in a week would be a reasonable expectation.
performance regular use of facilities
At level 3, the asset should be available for service not less under specified and amenities
85% of the time at a minimum. than 0.98 overload and
At levels 4 and 5, the asset should be available 98% abnormal
of the time under specified overload and abnormal con- conditions
ditions. The difference with level 5 is that the facility Prestige Availability As above To be in first
should also be in impeccable condition. Factor at class order
In deciding what to do and how much to do the full specified and
answers to the following questions need to be quan- performance impeccable
titively assessed as each comes with a rising level of not less condition
cost: than 0.98
60
6 REDUCING THE STRESS STATE
OF THE RAILROAD
61
providing guidance on what is critical for long term
maintenance.
At the US Department of Transportations FAST
facility in Colorado that is managed by the Transporta-
tion Technology Center Inc. (TTCI) of the Association
ofAmerican Railroads there are three pre-stressed con-
crete bridge spans and a steel bridge with two spans.
A train of 315 000 lb. (1.4 MN) cars circles a track
loop at 40 mph (64 kph), reversing directions daily, and
can accumulate the same traffic in a month that a very
heavily travelled mainline railroad would see in a year,
Sweeney (2007).
62
8 FUTURE TO DO LIST 9 CONCLUSIONS
Issues that need further research to increase mainte- Preserving the asset for its intended use involves work
nance effectiveness. undertaken in order to keep or restore every part of a
facility to an acceptable standard. This paper expanded
We need a methodology to use anecdotal data. There
on that concept and how to achieve it.
are thousands of structures in service that can tell
us a lot.
We need a methodology to use the research test data REFERENCES
that did not lead to failure. A lot of tests get stopped
before failure occurs, yet we have no agreed way of Drucker, Peter F., The Effective Executive Harper & Row,
making use of this information. NY, 1985.
We need a much better understanding of the real FRA Track Safety Standards, Federal Railway Administra-
load environment. tion, Office of Safety, Washington, DC, 2005.
The gap between design and prudent limits of use Fry, G.T., Borchers, C.R., Otter, D.E.et all, Fatigue Testing
needs further investigation. of Full Scale Solid Sawn and Glued Laminated Railroad
Bridge Stringers, R-969, AAR-TTCI, Pueblo, CO., 2004.
The effect of infrequent loads on fatigue:-does one
Jones, Byron. W., Inflation in Engineering Analysis, John
car in 1000 or 10,000 really effect the life? Wiley, NY., 1982.
What light vehicles can be ignored in fatigue life Madsen, Borg, Sweeney, Robert A.P., Shear Strength of
evaluations? Douglas FirTimber BridgeTies.Transportation Research
How do we avoid legal or political concerns from Board, Washington, DC 1999.
preventing the dissemination of valuable research? Robertson, J.A. The Planned Maintenance of Buildings and
Capacity problems will force higher loads and more Structures Paper 7184S. ICE, London, UK, Oct. 1969.
frequent loads on our bridges. What can we do to Sculley, P.J. Fry, G.T. et all, Static Tests of Timber Bridge
affordably accommodate these? Piles Draft Report R04-02sa, TTCI, Pueblo, CO., 2004
Sweeney Robert A.P., The Art of Railway Bridge Engi-
Deflection criteria. As capacity problems get worse, neering Today Keynote Address, 7th International Con-
the pressure for higher speeds on railways will grow. ference on Short and Medium Span Bridges, CSCE,
Current design deflection limits on steel and timber Montreal, Canada, 2006. Sweeney, Robert A.P., Otter,
in North America are quite liberal and in fact as Duane, A Review of North American Railway Bridge
speeds increase the deflection of the span will absorb Research IABSE Symposium Weimar, IABSE Zurich,
most of the tolerance now allowed for rail., FRA Switzerland, 2007.
(2005) Sweeney, Robert A.P., Unsworth, John F., North American
Educators and engineering supervisors need to Railway Bridge Inspection Practice Paper submitted and
remember to teach is so far as possible that Engi- accepted by J of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, Washington,
DC, 2010.
neering is an Art that uses Science and not just
Waddell, J.A.L., Bridge Engineering Vol. 1 and 2,
applied science. J. Willey & Sons, New York, NY 1916.
Engineers need to develop simple intuitive tools to
ensure their conclusions are in the right ballpark.
Particularly in this computer age.
It is very important that older engineers tell their
stories so that mistakes are not continually repeated.
Continuous relevant learning and improvement are
a must.
63
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
E. Watanabe
Kyoto University, Chairperson of Board of Directors of Regional Planning Institute
H. Furuta
Professor of Informatics of Kansai University, Takatsuki, Osaka
T. Yamaguchi
Professor of Osaka City University, Osaka
M. Kano
JIP Techno-Science Co., Osaka, Japan
64
(2) The investment for the renewal is predicted to 2.3 Function and performance
increase, specifically, from 0.3 trillion JPY to 3.7
Performance refers to the structural capacity based
trillion JPY.
on the field inspection data and the structural health
(3) The investment for the newly-built is predicted to
assessment taking into account the deterioration of
decrease, specifically, from 15.9 trillion JPY to 9
infrastructure. On the other hand, the function implies
trillion JPY.
updated capacities meeting the current standard of the
(4) The stock of the infrastructure will be vastly
wheel loadings, natural forces such as wind and earth-
accumulated.
quake excitations, river flow, design traffic flow and so
forth.
2 LIFETIME OF BRIDGES It is a general practice to decide the maintenance
plan based on the field inspection data and the struc-
2.1 Definition of lifetime tural health assessment of bridges taking into account
their deterioration rate. However, the old bridges built
It is quite confusing to know that the definition of the
in the past were based on different old codes from
lifetime varies considerably from places to places. In
now with respect to loads, earthquake-resistant design
this paper, the lifetime may be defined as the period
and river conditions and so forth, thus their func-
of time since structures have started to be in service
tion does not correspond to the present design codes.
until they cease to be used for some reasons or the final
Thus, the judgment on the bridge replacement solely
stage when they are possibly in service any further
on the basis of the bridge health assessment alone
(JSSC 1991).
may lead to wrong decisions. From this standpoint,
the final decision requires the functionality in addi-
2.2 Definition of expected lifetime tion to the health assessment as explained in the
following. In this paper, the countermeasure such as
The expected lifetime may be defined as the period
earthquake-resistance retrofitting is not considered for
of time in which structures are expected to satisfy
mere convenience. However, base-isolation will be
the demand performance, to possess the physical
regarded as a method to improve the performance in
load-carrying capacity and to fulfill the serviceability.
this paper.
65
(2) Functional lifetime inspection, system, timing, judgment, measure and
It refers to the lifetime of an existing bridge budget to prolong the lifetime beyond the expected
which may have to be renewed by a new bridge lifetime.
when the widening of roadway width or the up- The keywords for the longevity may be summa-
grading of the traffic loads are legally demanded rized as:
but deemed difficult to meet these demands by
(1) Increase of bridge stocks
only reforming the present bridge. As shown in
(2) In view of the limitation for budgetary appropria-
Figure 1(b), it represents the period from the ini-
tion, the scenario of renewal of every bridge does
tial state of a bridge to the time when its demand
not exist any more.
performance is changed beyond the present per-
(3) The national and local governmental principle for
formance.
the preventive management is supported by the
(3) Economic lifetime
authorized experts.
It refers to the lifetime of an existing bridge
(4) The concept of longevity for those newly-built and
which may have to be renewed by a new bridge
already existing are different.
when the up-grading the existing bridge is judged
(5) The performance-based specification is encour-
much more expensive than building a new bridge.
aged for the longevity by adopting innovative and
In Figure 1(c), it represents the period from the
development technologies.
initial state of a bridge to the time when its cost
for the repair and retrofitting become greater than Figure 3 shows the ratio of the bridges with the
that for the replacement. lifetime over the age of 50 to those under 50 (MLIT
Table 2 shows several examples of physical, func-
tional and economic lifetimes.
66
Table 3. Chronological characteristics of replacement of
steel bridges (NILIM 2004).
2008). It may be apparent that after the year of 2030, The National Institute for Land and Infrastructure
the ratio of bridges over the age of 50 becomes more Management, NILIM, showed the statistics of the
significant. number of replaced bridge plotted against the year of
replacement.
The statistical distribution is assumed to follow the
Normal distribution and the parameters are so deter-
2.7 Target lifetime mined as to minimize the errors between the achieved
record and the prediction. Table 3 shows the average
The target lifetime is not defined by the structures but
lifetime and standard deviation of bridges built from
by the manager.
1920 to 2000 (NILIM 2004).
(1) It is the matter of consciousness of the managers For those bridges built during the period of so-called
and the public opinion. rapid economic progress from the year 1961 to 1980
(2) The limit performance for management varies the statistics show that the average lifetime is 70 years
depending on the demand performance of the with the standard deviation of 20 years. Thus, if the
time. normal distribution is assumed and 95% fractile of
(3) Theoretically, steel structures are considered to be non-exceedance is assumed, this fractile corresponds
ever-lasting structures. to 1.65, the longevity of prolonged lifetime of 35
(4) The target lifetime may be considered to be 1.5 more years can be expected (20 1.65 = 35) as shown
time of the lifetime of existing structures as shown in Figure 5. While those bridges built in recent years
in Figure 4 (Abe 2008). from 1981 to 2000, the average lifetime is 100 years
(5) Even at the end of the target lifetime, the structures with the standard deviation of 30 years. By the similar
may not have to be renewed if they posses the token, the longevity of 50 more years may be expected
sufficient structural health. (30 1.65 = 50).
67
Table 4. Expected average lifetime of bridges for different
probabilities of non-exceedance.
68
Figure 8. Dry air dehumidifier inside a bridge deck.
69
4.2 Several problems to be solved The methodology of investigation is as follows:
There are many problems remain yet to be solved. (1) to collect the information of related books, reports
These may be summarized below: including committee reports, and seminars that are
published in Japan
(1) Difference of management level (demand perfor- (2) to collect references on typical international con-
mance) ferences on the structural health monitoring
Not only the natural environment but also socio- (3) to understand the present trend of technologies
economic environment are to be considered for for structural health monitoring and evaluation of
the determination of lifetime and maintenance performance
management. (4) to classify the existing technologies by summariz-
(2) Limitation of budget (evaluation of LCC) ing the target of application and methodology in
Balancing of cost for maintenance management the form of matrix
by essential management and that by preventive (5) to summarize the prospect of application of struc-
maintenance must be established. tural health monitoring technologies after review-
(3) Effective use of data (data sharing) ing references
This is effective when combined with manage-
ment system and good for accountability.
(4) Succession of technology 6.1.2 Target references of investigation
The education of young engineers and out The references reviewed are shown in Table 5.
sourcing are important.
(5) Effective inspection method (frequency and
methodology) 6.2 Reference survey
Priority in inspection, remote inspection and 6.2.1 Summary of references
structural health monitoring technology are Totally 136 references were reviewed and summarized
expected to be established. by Tables 10 and 11. Although a great number of fig-
ures and tables were contained. They are not shown in
this paper because of the restriction of page numbers.
5 NEEDS FOR STRUCTURAL HEALTH
MONITORING AND REQUIRED
PERFORMANCE Table 5. List of references surveyed.
70
REFERENCES
Abe, M., 2008. Activity of bridge maintenance toward the
age of longevity of bridges. Report of Seminar. EXTEC,
84, 6162 (in Japanese).
BMSG., 2004. Guide to management for road bridges. Bridge
Management Study Group, Japan Bridge Engineering
Center, JBEC (in Japanese).
Habel, W.R. et al., 2007. Fiber Optic Sensors For Long-Term
SHM in Civil Engineering Applications, Proc Interna-
tional Conference on Structural Health Monitoring of
Intelligent Infrastructure.
Ishida, Sato, Fujikawa, Sekiguchi and Hashimoto., 2006.
Concept of corrosion protection of steel for D-runway
For reduction of LCC-. 2nd Seminar on report of construc-
tion of D-runway ofTokyo InternationalAirport (Haneda).
8.18.8 (in Japanese).
Figure 11. Number of references with respect to measured JAPH, 1999. Technological Standard and Commentary of
physical quantities and output. Port and Harbor Facilities, Japanese Association of Port
and Harbor, 1 & 2, (in Japanese).
JSSC, 1991. Study on lifetime of steel structures. Report of
Task Committee on Lifetime of Steel Structures, 2930 (in
Japanese).
JTS. Titanium World In pursuit of its unlimited potentiali-
ties and realization of dreams-, 2000. The Japan Titanium
Society, http://www.titan-japan.com, 7, (in Japanese).
Kaneko, Mizoue and Naito,1999. Corrosion protection inside
a box girder by dry air intake New Onomichi Bridge-,
Bridge and Foundation, 33(5), 3134 (in Japanese).
Kato, M., 1983. Recent topics in maintenance. Journal of
JSCE. 68(11): 25 (in Japanese).
Kitagawa, Furuya, Nakamura and Suzumura., 2001. Study on
corrosion protection performance by dry air intake system
for main cables for suspension bridge cables. Proc. JSCE
672(VI50), 145154 (in Japanese).
MLIT, 2002. White paper of the Government of Japan.
MLIT, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport
Figure 12. Number of references in the matrix form with
and Tourism (http://www.mlit.go.jp/hakusyo/mlit/h14/
respect to measured physical quantities and types of damage.
H14/index.html) (in Japanese)
MLIT, 2008. Suggestions for preventive maintenance of
6.2.2 Representation of matrix roadway bridges. Report of Meeting by experts toward
The result of the survey on sensing technologies and Preventive Maintenance of Roadway Bridges, MLIT, Min-
istry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport and Tourism (in
assessment methods is conveniently represented by a Japanese).
matrix method as shown in Figures 11 and 12. NILIM, 2004. Study on estimation of the lifetime of road
The following observations may be made: bridges, National Institute for Land and Infrastructure
(1) Status of developments of sensing technologies Management, NILIM Report, 223 (in Japanese).
Nippon Steel, 2000. Titanium Clad, Cat. No. TC026, (in
a. Majority of measured physical quantities are Japanese).
strains and accelerations. However, the number PWRI Bridge Laboratory., 1997. Study on replacement of
of instances of stresses, reaction forces, ph and bridges (III), PWRI Report 3512 (in Japanese).
temperature is quite few. Sumitro, S. et.al., 2007. Removable Actual-Stress Sensor,
Proc International Conference on Structural Health Mon-
b. Local deformations and vibrations constitute the itoring of Intelligent Infrastructure.
majority of the diagnosed damages. The number
of instances of direct measurements is quite few
for material deterioration and decrement of rigidity
target damage.
71
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
B.F. Spencer
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
T. Nagayama
University of Tokyo, Japan, USA
72
speed in horizontal and vertical wind directions are
measured through analog input interface connectors
on the SHM-W board. The wind data can be acquired
precisely synchronized with the bridge acceleration
data from the SHM-A board. The IBB2400CA battery
board powers the Imote2 using three 1.5-volt batter-
ies. To investigate the feasibility of sustainable energy
harvesting, solar panels and rechargeable batteries
have been adapted on several sensor nodes installed
at the locations hardly reachable.
73
Figure 3. Locations of sensor nodes deployed on the 2nd Jindo Bridge.
Figure 4. Various types of wireless sensor nodes installed on the 2nd Jindo Bridge.
74
3 WIRELESS VIBRATION SENSOR NETWORK
FOR BRIDGE MONITORING
75
Figure 9. Temperature-compensated CC indices for multi-
Figure 7. Experimental setup for impedance-based SHM ple damage detection on a bridge.
on Ramp-G bridge.
noted that the condition of hand-tightened Bolt #1 is
Table 2. Damage scenarios for detecting multiple damages not same with original condition (baseline). Then, the
on a bridge girder. CC value decreases as the damage severity increases
due to loosened bolts and artificial notches. Here, the
Damage Damage CC metric for Cases 5 and 6 have similar values,
Case Description Case Description which might be because Bolt #2, which got loosened
in Case 6, is located fairly far from the sensor. Through
1 No damages 5 Additionally loosened
in-field test, it is expected that the actual damages can
Bolt #1 (2 Turns)
2 Loosened Bolt #1 6 Additionally loosened be effectively identified by the developed sensor node
(2 Turns) Bolt #1 (2 Turns) and on-board processed damage indices.
3 Hand-retightened 7 Additionally Notch #2
Bolt #1
4 Notch #1
4 WIRELESS ACTUATION AND SENSING
FOR GUIDED WAVES BASED SHM
76
Figure 12. An overall experimental setup of the proposed
Figure 10. An overall schematic for optics based wireless
wireless guided wave excitation system.
guided wave generation and sensing.
77
REFERENCES
Celebi, M. (2002) Seismic instrumentation of buildings
(with emphasis of federal buildings), Technical report
No. 0-7460-68170.
Crossbow, Inc. (2007). Imote2 Hardware Reference Manual.
Revision A, PN: 7430-0409-01, http://www.xbow.com.
Giurgiutiu, V. (2008) Structural Health Monitoring with
Piezoelectric WaferActive Sensors, Elsevier Inc., London.
Grisso B.L. & Inman D.J. (2005) Developing an autonomous
on-orbit impedance-based SHM system for thermal pro-
tection systems, Proceedings of 5th Intl Workshop on
Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford, CA, September.
Lee, H.S., Park, H.J., Sohn, H. & Kwon, I.B. (2009) A
Hybrid PZT/FBG guided wave generation and sensing
system using a single laser source, International con-
ference on computational design in engineering, Seoul,
Korea, November.
Lynch, J.P. & Loh, K.J. (2006a) A summary review of wireless
sensors and sensor networks for structural health moni-
toring, The Shock and Vibration Digest, Vol. 38(2), pp.
91128.
Mascarenas D.L., Todd M.D., Park G. & Farrar C.R. (2007)
Development of an impedance-based wireless sensor node
for structural health monitoring, Smart Materials and
Structures, Vol. 16, pp. 21372145.
Figure 13. Experimental results. Mascarenas, D.L., Park, G., Farinholt, K., Todd, M.D. &
Farrar, C.R. (2009)A Low-Power Wireless Sensing Device
for Remote Inspection of Bolted Joints, Journal of
sensing, temperature/power monitoring, structural Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 223, pp. 565575.
damage detection using embedded algorithms, and Mechitov, K. Kim, W., Agha, G., & Nagayama, T. (2004)
energy scavenging. Lately, an innovative wireless sys- High-frequency distributed sensing for structure moni-
tem is proposed for guided wave excitation and sensing toring, Proceedings of 1st Int. Workshop on Networked
based on laser and optoelectronic technologies. The Sensing Systems.
Nagayama, T. & Spencer Jr., B.F. (2007) Structural Health
feasibility has been experimentally demonstrated.
Monitoring using Smart Sensors, NSEL Report Series 1,
The wireless sensor and sensing technology is the UIUC. USA. (http://hdl.handle.net/2142/3521).
enabler of realization of cost-effective monitoring Overly, T.G., Park, G., Farrar, C.R. & Allemang, R.J. (2007)
system. The system-on-chip data acquisition system Compact hardware development for structural health
without tethering work lowers the cost of sensors monitoring and sensor diagnostics using admittance mea-
themselves as well as of installation, maintenance, and surements, Proceedings of IMAC-XXV, USA.
replacement. The wireless data transmission removes Park, H.J., Sohn, H., Yun, C.B. & Chung, J. (2010) Develop-
the cost related to the cables, and therefore, pro- ment of a wireless power transmission system for guided
motes the free clustering of sensor networks. The wave generation and sensing via a laser, SPIE vol. 7647
Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil,
on-board computation enables the quick and easy
Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems, USA, submitted.
on-line monitoring without concerns on data inun- Raghavan, A. & Cesnik, E.S. (2007) Review of Guided-wave
dation. However, there still remain some limitations Structural Health Monitoring, The Shock and Vibration
in wireless communication and energy supply for Digest, Vol. 39(2), pp. 91114.
wireless sensor networks. Wireless communication Rice, J.A., Mechitov, K.A., Spencer Jr., B.F., & Agha, G.
inevitably requires quick and reliable data communi- (2008) A Service-Oriented Architecture for Structural
cation protocol, recovery of missing data, and time Health Monitoring using Smart Sensors. Proc. 14th World
synchronization among sensors. To overcome current Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.
capacity of battery technology, which may not be Straser, E.G. & Kiremidjian, A.S. (1998) A modular, wireless
damage monitoring system for structures Report No. 128,
enough to operate wireless sensor networks in mid-
John A, Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford
or long-term, power management as well as power Univ., CA.
harvesting from ambient vibration, wind, and temper- Yeatman, E.M. (2009) Energy harvesting-small scale energy
ature, are now actively under development. Multidis- production from ambient source, SPIE vol. 7288 Active
ciplinary researches as well as education can facilitate and Passive Smart Structures and Integrated Systems,
the rapid development as well as application. USA.
78
Mini-Symposia
MS1: Futuristic bridge maintenance technologies
Organizers: C.-B. Yun & B.F. Spencer Jr.
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
81
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
82
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
D. Chang
Department of Chemical Engineering & Materials Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
K.J. Loh
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
ABSTRACT
83
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
H.K. Kim
Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
ABSTRACT 80
Displacement (mm)
Fromdisplace mentsensor
In thisstudy
40 From GPS
Predictions of displacement as an important factor in
evaluating the robustness of large structures become 0
the basis to determine the decrease of structural per-
40
formance and the degree of aging in general. It is
however well known that it is not easy to measure the 80
0 20 40 60 80
displace response of large structure like suspension Time(sec)
bridges due to the absence of measurement tech-
niques despite the importance of measurements in Figure 1. Comparison of estimated displacement response
the displacement response. In this study, a method and measured displacement response.
estimating displacement responses is proposed using
a mode decomposition technique. This is a method
Table 1. Comparison of estimated maximum displacement
estimating the total displacement response combined and measured maximum displacement
with the each displacement response about the major
mode of the structure and the quasi-static displacement From displacement
responses. In this study From GPS sensor
Figure 1 shows that the estimated displacement
response and the displacement response measured are LC1 35.6 mm 37 mm 31.98 mm
identical. The outcome of comparison of the biggest LC2 32.5 mm 50 mm 34.03 mm
amount of deflection of the inferred displacement LC3 60.6 mm 63 mm 60.68 mm
response and the displacement response measured is
seen in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, it was identified
100
that the inferred displacement response by means of
50
mode decomposition technique and the displacement
Displacement (mm)
0
response measured is similar. As shown in the Fig- 50
100
ure 2 was estimated that there is a similarity between 150
Using 16 FBG sensors
Using 8 FBG sensors
measured displacement response and that with the use 200 Using 6 FBG sensors
Using 4 FBG sensors
of 6 sensors. But when 4 sensors was used, it was 250
From displacement sensor
300
observed that there is a big error. Thus when estimat- 0 20 40 60 80
ing the displacement response of simple span girder, it Time(sec)
is expected that the reliable inference of displacement
response can be made with the use of 6 censors. Figure 2. Comparison of estimated displacement responses.
When using mode decomposition technique, it is
possible to infer the displacement response while using REFERENCE
strain signals at a smaller number of points and to infer
the displacement response at all of points. In addition Chang, S.J. & Kim, N.S. 2008. Estimation of Displacement
to this, reliable measurement of strain signal in the Response from the Measured Dynamic Strain Signals
large structures such as suspension bridge can be made Using Mode Decomposition Technique, Journal of the
with the use of FBG sensor with which multiple mea- Korean Society of Civil Engineers. 28(4-A):507-515.
surement is possible, generating little electric noise.
84
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
T. Nagayama
University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
J.W. Seo
Hyundai Institute of Construction Technology, Yongin, Korea
ABSTRACT
85
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J.P. Lynch
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
86
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
87
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J.H. Koo
Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA
ABSTRACT
REFERENCES
Cho, S.W., Jung, H.J. & Lee, I.W. 2005. Smart passive system
based on magnetorheological damper. Smart Materials
and Structures. 14: 707714.
Dyke, S.J., Spencer, B.F., Jr., Sain, M.K. & Carlson, J.D. 1996.
Modeling and control of magnetorheological dampers
for seismic response reduction. Smart Materials and
Structures. 5: 565575.
Nakashima, M., Kato, H. and Takaokas, E. 1992. Develop-
ment of real-time pseudo dynamic testing. Earthquake
Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 21: 7992.
88
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
S. Jang, H. Jo, K. Mechitov, S.-H. Sim, B.F. Spencer, Jr. & G. Agha
University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, USA
J.A. Rice
Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA
ABSTRACT
89
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
D.-S. Jung
Hybrid Structural Testing Center, Myongji University, Yongin, Republic of Korea
K.-W. Lee
Maintra Co. Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea
90
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J. Kang
University of California Irvine, Irvine, USA
H.W. Park
Dong-A University, Busan, South Korea
ABSTRACT
REFERENCES
Kang, J. & Park, H.W. 2009. Understanding the asymptotic
convergence of domain of attraction in extreme value dis-
tribution for establishing baseline distribution in statistical
assessment of a structure. Journal of the Korea Institute
for Structural Maintenance Inspection 13(2): 231242
(in Korean).
Park, H.W. & Sohn, H. 2006. Parameter estimation of the gen-
eralized extreme value distribution for structural health
monitoring. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 21(4):
366376.
Sohn, H., Allen, D.W., Worden, K., & Farrar, C.R. 2005.
Structural damage classification using extreme value
Figure 1. Quantification of discrepancy between the theo-
statistics. ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measure-
retical CDF of the Pareto distribution and the estimated GEV
ment, and Control 127(1): 125132.
with respect to the sample size.
91
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
92
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Y.-H. Park
Expressway & Transportation Research Institute, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea
ABSTRACT
93
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
94
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
S. Park
Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea
ABSTRACT
95
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
S. Nagarajaiah
Department of Civil & Environmental Eng. and Dept. of Mechanical Eng. & Material Sc., Rice University,
Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
B. Basu
Department of Civil, Structural, & Environmental Eng., Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
V.S.M. Vemuru
Department of Civil & Environmental Eng., Rice University, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
96
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
K.T. Park, Y.J. Yoo, B.C. Joo, J. Lee & Y.K. Hwang
Korea Institute of Construction Technology, Goyang, South Korea
ABSTRACT
97
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
H.K. Kim
Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
ABSTRACT
98
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
99
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J. Chung
CyTroniq Co., Ltd, Asan, Korea
I.B. Kwon
Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science, Deajeon, Korea
ABSTRACT
1 Wired
excitation aspect of the overall system. The proposed 0.5
Wired
0.5
wirelessly transmitted to a photodiode connected to
a PZT. Then, the photodiode converts the transmitted 0
0.5
light into an electric signal and excites the PZT to gen-
1
erate guided waves on the structure where the PZT is 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45
100
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M.H. Shin
Korea Railroad Research Institute, Uiwang, Korea
J.J. Lee
Sejong University, Seoul, Korea
S.Y. Park
Korea Maintenance Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea
101
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J. Caicedo
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
S. Narasimhan
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
ABSTRACT
102
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
H.-K. Lee
Dong-Bu Eng. Co., Seoul, Korea
S.-J. Kwon
Korail Research Institute, Daejeon, Korea
ABSTRACT 1.30
1.15
a comparison of the analytical results with those
obtained from the results of laboratory experiments 1.10
available in the literature, which shows significant
variation in the natural frequencies due to the pre- 1.05 Rect. Cross Section
stressing force. The proposed algorithm has been also T Cross Section
I Cross Section
applied to the analysis of actual PSC girder bridges 1.00
with prestressing. 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55
To compute the first natural frequency in terms of P/Pcr
the prestress directly, a normalized equation of Equa-
tion 1 can be obtained. In the equation, we can observe Figure 1. Variation of fp /f0 with P/Pcr from the proposed
that the variation of the first natural frequency due to model.
the prestress is a function of the relative ratio of the
Table 1. Natural frequencies by Eq. 1 and proposed model.
prestress P and Eulers critical load Pcr of a simply
supported column. Section A-20 A-23 A-25 B-25
Figure 1 shows the variation of the normalized ratio frequency is attributed to the amount of the prestress-
(fp /f0 ) of the first natural frequency with the increase ing force being negligibly small relative to the critical
of the non-dimensional axial force indicator (P/Pcr ). axial load of a typical PSC girder. Therefore, it can
To investigate the effects of presterssing force on be concluded that it may not be necessary to con-
PSC railway girder bridges, the proposed model has sider the effects of the prestressing force on the natural
been applied. frequencies of actual PSC girder bridges.
Table 1 summarizes the computed critical axial
load for each girder type and the natural frequencies
computed from the proposed finite element model. REFERENCES
The effect of prestressing force on the first natural
DallAsta, A, & Leoni, G. 1999. Vibration of beams pre-
frequency is within 1.5% for all girder types when
stressed by internal frictionless cables. J. of Sound and
Equation 1 is applied. Vibration 222(1): 118.
When the method was applied to actual PSC girder Nabil, F.G. & Ross, B. 1996. Dynamic characteristics of
bridges, the increase of the first natural frequency due post-tensioned girders with web openings. J. of Structural
to the prestressing force was less than 1.5% among Engineering 122: 643650.
the tested cases. This slight increase in the natural
103
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
D. Dutta
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA
E.D. Swenson
United States Air force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson AFB, USA
ABSTRACT
S.G. Taylor, E.B. Flynn, D.L. Mascarenas, M.D. Todd, D. Dondi, T. Rosing, S. Kpotufe,
S. Dasgupta, K. Lin & R. Gupta
University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA USA
105
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M.D. Todd
University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA USA
106
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
S.G. Taylor, N.A. Miller, K.M. Farinholt, G. Park & C.R. Farrar
The Engineering Institute, Los Alamos National Laboratory, USA
ABSTRACT
107
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
C.W. Kim
Department of Civil and Earth Resource Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
ABSTRACT
108
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Analysis and prediction for bridge maintenance costs based on life-cycle and
Markov approach
109
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
110
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
P. Carden
Lloyd Register, UK
T. Wood
Cornwall Country Council, UK
ABSTRACT
REFERENCES
Fish R., Gill J., Tamar suspension Bridge strengthening and
capacity enhancement. In Bridge Modification 2: Stronger
and Safer Bridges Thomas Telford, London, 1997, ed B
Pritchard.
Brownjohn, J.M.W. and Carden EP, Real-time Operational
Modal analysis of Tamar Bridge. IMACXXVI, Orlando,
USA, 47 Feb 2008.
Brownjohn, J.M.W., Pavic A., Carden P., Middleton, C.,
Modal Testing of Tamar Suspension Bridge, IMAC XXV,
Figure 1. Tamar suspension Bridge, Plymouth, UK. Orlando, USA, 1922 Februray 2007.
111
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M.L. Wang
Department of Civil & Material Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, USA
B.F. Spencer
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, USA
Y. Fujino
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
112
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
C. Wang
Key Laboratory for Bridge and Tunnel Engineering of Shaanxi Province, Highway College, Changan University,
Xian, Shaanxi Province, China
ABSTRACT
113
MS2: Monitoring & assessment of bridges using novel techniques
Organizers: A. Strauss & D.M. Frangopol
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
117
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
118
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
119
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
120
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J. Ciesla
Road and Bridge Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland
ABSTRACT
121
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
L. Della Sala
Universit della Basilicata, Potenza, Italy
R. Cerone
Studio di Ingegneria, Melfi (PZ), Italy
M. Franzese
A.N.A.S. S.p.A., Potenza, Italy
ABSTRACT
122
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J.D. Fasl, T.A. Helwig, S.L. Wood, V.A. Samaras, A.A. Yousef & K.H. Frank
University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
D.L. Potter
National Instruments Corporation, Austin, TX, USA
R.E. Lindenberg
Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc., Northbrook, IL, USA
123
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
124
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
R. Geier
Schimetta Consult ZT GmbH, Vienna, Austria
ABSTRACT
125
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
B. Gliic
Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
ABSTRACT
126
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
R. Arndt
Federal Highway Administration, Office of Infrastructure R&D, McLean, VA, USA
ABSTRACT
127
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
128
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
1.1 Acoustic methodology Suleman, Jamil, Andrej Korcak, Fady F. Barsoum, and Eric
V.K Hill. Acoustic Emission Monitoring and Neural Net-
Acoustic emissions function on the basis that sounds work Fatigue Analysis of Steel Bridges. Proc. of FCAAP
can be transmitted throughout a material. Where AE Annual Technical Symposium, Orlando, 2009.
129
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
F. Lanata
Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Genoa, Italy
Institute de recherche en Gnie Civil et Mcanique (GeM), Universit de Nantes, France
130
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
131
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J. McConnell
University of Delaware
M. Cann
Gannett Fleming, Inc.
ABSTRACT
132
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
P. Olaszek
Road and Bridge Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland
G. Swit
The Kielce University of Technology, Kielce, Poland
J.R. Casas
Universitat Politcnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
ABSTRACT
133
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
A. Strauss
BOKU University, Vienna, Austria
ABSTRACT
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Figure 1. Half-symmetrical topology with constraints and
continuous load (ATENA FEM model). This outcome has been achieved with the financial sup-
port of the project No. MSM0021630519 from the
Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic and the
research project Eurostars E!4351 RLACS.
REFERENCES
Lehk, D., Kerner, Z. & Novk, D. 2010. Jointless Bridge:
Determination of Fracture Mechanical Parameters Values
for Nonlinear Analysis. IABMASS, Philadelphia, USA.
Novk, D., Vorechovsk, M. & Rusina, R. 2009. FReET
Feasible Reliability Engineering Efficient Tool, Users and
Theory guides. Version 1.5, Brno/Cervenka Consulting,
Czech Republic, http://www.freet.cz.
Strauss, A., Wender, R. & Bergmeister, K. 2010. Monitor-
ing based analysis of time dependent processes. IABMAS,
Figure 2. Probability of failure for the ultimate limit state. Philadelphia, USA.
134
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
135
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
V. Redchenko
DerzdorNDI, Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine
ABSTRACT
136
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
G. Jones
Structural Healthcare Limited, Manchester, United Kingdom
137
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M. Rakowski
Pennoni Associates, Wilmington, Delaware, USA
B. Brookes
Formerly, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA
ABSTRACT
138
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
S. Soyoz
Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey
M.Q. Feng
University of California, Irvine, CA, US
ABSTRACT
139
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
D.M. Frangopol
Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania,USA
ABSTRACT
140
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
141
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Figure 1. Permanent magnet besides a reinforcing bar. Figure 2. 3-axis sensor module besides a reinforcing bar.
142
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
T. Wood
Cornwall Country Council, UK
ABSTRACT
REFERENCES
Fish R., Gill J., Tamar suspension Bridge strengthening and
capacity enhancement. In Bridge Modification 2: Stronger
and Safer Bridges Thomas Telford, London, 1997, ed B
Pritchard.
Brownjohn, J.M.W. and Carden EP, Real-time Operational
Modal analysis of Tamar Bridge. IMACXXVI, Orlando,
USA, 47 Feb 2008.
Brownjohn, J.M.W., Pavic A., Carden P., Middleton, C.,
Modal Testing of Tamar Suspension Bridge, IMAC XXV,
Figure 2. Easting deflections. Orlando, USA, 1922 Februray 2007.
143
MS3: Present & future of bridge inspection & evaluation
Organizers: S. Alampalli, A.K. Agrawal & M. Ettouney
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
A.K. Agrawal
City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
S. Alampalli
New York State Department of Transportation, Albany, NY, USA
147
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
148
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
B. Bien
SPIN s.c., Research & Development, Poland
ABSTRACT
149
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
B. Bien
SPIN s.c., Research & Development, Poland
ABSTRACT
150
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
C. Boyle
Boyle Consulting Inc., Charlotte, NC, USA
151
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
152
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M. Drissi-Habti
Laboratoire Central des Ponts & Chausses, France
153
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
G. Fu
Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, US; Tongji University, Shanghai, China
D. Devaraj
Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, US
ABSTRACT model the entire life span of the bridge elements dete-
rioration process. Given inspection data of condition
Bridge components or elements deteriorate with time. state evolution, a fitting scheme is also suggested here
Deterioration modeling is an important step in bridge to estimate the non-homogeneous transition probabil-
management operation. In the popular bridge manage- ities depending on age. In addition, a new screening
ment system Pontis, a Markov Chain model is used to scheme is proposed in this paper for initial data screen-
describe bridge element deterioration. The core part of ing to filter inconsistent raw data. Application of the
this model is its transition probability matrix, which proposed model to Michigan bridge inspection data
describes the deterioration process using a probability shows improved modeling results. This approach was
measurement for the likelihood that the element dete- also applied to the bridge condition rating data in
riorates (transits) from a condition state to another. the National Bridge Inventory format and thereby
Namely, those elements that deteriorate faster are produced more realistic predictions.
assigned higher transition probabilities from a bet-
ter condition state to a worse one. It is interesting
though to point out that this approach does not take REFERENCES
into account the age of the element. In other word, an
AASHTO Pontis Technical Manual, Release 4.4, 2004
older bridge element is assigned the same transition Fu, G. Modeling of Lifetime Structural System Reliabi-
probabilities from better conditions to worse ones as lity, Ph.D. Dissertation, Report No. 87-9, Department
a much younger one. This model is thus referred to of Civil Engineering, Case Western Reserve University,
as a homogeneous Markov Chain. In addition, due to Cleveland, OH, May 1987.
typically long life span of bridge elements in decades, Fu, G., and Devaraj, D. Methodology of Homogeneous and
small inaccuracy in transition probability matrix esti- Non-homogeneous Markov Chains for Modeling Bridge
mation for short time intervals (a few years) can cause Element Deterioration, Final Report to Michigan Depart-
large errors in the final result of service life prediction. ment of Transportation, Center for Advanced Bridge Engi-
This paper proposes a new model of non- neering, Department of Civil and Environmental Engi-
neering, Wayne State University, August 2008, MDOT
homogeneous Markov Chain to take into account the Research Report 1520.
elements age, with detailed elaboration on the issues Fu, G. and Moses, F. Application of Lifetime System Reli-
discussed above. Namely, the transition probability ability, Preprint No. 52-1, American Society of Civil
matrix is now age-dependent not constant for all ages. Engineers Structures Congress86, New Orleans, LA,
Therefore, multiple such matrices will be needed to Sept. 1518, 1986, p. 281.
154
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
New tools for inspection and evaluation of steel truss bridge gusset plates
ABSTRACT
155
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J. Stieb
Freyssinet Inc., Sterling, VA, USA
156
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
157
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
B. Leshko
HDR Engineering, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Bridge Inspection has received the spotlight since the Client Bridges
tragic collapse of the I-35W Bridge in Minneapolis,
MN. Proper bridge inspection is dependent upon ade- AKDOT&PF 12 Fracture Critical Highway Bridges
throughout Alaska (statewide)
quate access to the structure. Since you cannot inspect
AKDOT&PF 36 Fracture Critical Transfer Bridges
what you cannot see, visual inspections rely upon the throughout Alaska (statewide)
inspector having the requisite access to all components Mn/DOT 5 Truss Bridges throughout Central
of a bridge structure. This paper focuses on the vari- Minnesota
ous rope access methods currently available to bridge NHDOT Memorial Bridge over the Piscataqua
inspectors to supplement conventional means. River in Portsmouth, NH
HDR Engineering, Inc. (HDR) has developed rope NHDOT Sarah Long Bridge over the Piscataqua
access techniques for evaluating structures in remote River in Portsmouth, NH
locations as well as urban settings. Engineers are chal- ODOT Steel Bridge over the Willamette River in
Portland, OR
lenged to evaluate structural components within arms
reach on designated fracture critical member bridges.
Rope access is the application of specialized rope tech-
niques to place inspectors in hard-to-reach locations
in the vertical environment, especially when conven- an independent certification program. HDRs speciali-
tional man-lift, bucket truck or under bridge inspection zed bridge inspectors have received Rope Access I
vehicle access is prohibited due to insufficient deck training and annual refresher training from Skala,
width (functionally obsolete), desire not to impede Inc. (Skala), and have hundreds of hours of logged
normal travel lanes, or load posting of the structure time on ropes, exclusively performing bridge inspec-
(structurally deficient). Rope access is a work system tions for numerous owners and maintainers. All rope
using ropes and specialized hardware as the primary access inspections are performed under the supervi-
means of supporting inspectors. Rope access inspec- sion of a qualified SPRAT-certified Level III, Safety
tors descend, ascend and traverse ropes to access the Supervisor, with the training, skills, experience and
structure to perform a hands-on inspection. The sup- qualifications necessary to assume responsibility for
port of the rope completely eliminates the likelihood the entire rope access work site to include the design,
of a fall. Rope access inspectors use a back-up fall pro- analysis, evaluation and implementation of the rope
tection system in the unlikely failure of their primary access system. HDRs teaming partner, Skala, has pro-
means of support. This redundant system is achieved vided safety supervision for all rope access bridge
by using two ropes, a working line and a safety line. inspections completed to date.
HDRs rope access bridge inspectors are certified to This paper describes the planning, coordination,
Level I, Worker, by the Society of Professional Rope logistics and overall process of conducting successful
Access Technicians (SPRAT), a member-based orga- rope access field inspection of fracture critical mem-
nization that serves the rope-access industry by devel- ber bridges for representative owners and maintainers
oping and maintaining standards and administering located throughout the United States (see Table 1).
158
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
B. Newton
California Department of Transportation, Structure Maintenance & Investigations
159
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J.S. OConnor
University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, U.S.A.
S. Alampalli
New York State Department of Transportation, Albany, NY, U.S.A.
ABSTRACT
160
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
W. Wang
Weidlinger Associates Inc., Broadway, Cambridge, MA, USA
G. Chen
Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Missouri University of Science and
Technology, Rolla, MO, USA
161
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
REFERENCES
Federal Highway Administration., 1995. Recording and Cod-
ing Guide for Structure Inventory and Appraisal of the
Nations Bridges, December 1995, FHWA-PD-96-001,
and Errata Sheet, March 2004, Washington, D.C.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Bridge Inspec-
tors Reference Manual, December 2006, Washington,
D.C.
Maryland Bridge Inspection Coding Manual and Inspection
Figure 1. Software components by functions (Montgomery Forms: Maryland SHA Office of Bridge Development:
Implementation). Baltimore, MD 2004.
162
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
REFERENCES
Wenzel H. 2009, Health Monitoring of Bridges: Wiley, a John
Wiley and Sons, Ltd, Publication.
Wenzel H., Pichler 2005, Ambient Vibrations Monitoring:
Wiley, a John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, Publication.
163
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
G.A. Washer
University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, U.S.A.
164
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
P. Wjtowicz
Faculty of Computer Science and Management, Wrocaw University of Technology, Poland
D. Krl
Institute of Informatics, Wrocaw University of Technology, Poland
165
MS4: Research & applications in bridge health monitoring
Organizers: F.N. Catbas, J.R. Casas, H. Furuta & D.M. Frangopol
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Design and implementation of load cell bearings to measure dead and live
load effects in an aged long span bridge
169
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
F.N. Catbas, H.B. Gokce, T. Dumlupinar, R. Zaurin, M. Gul, T. Terrell & D. Harper
University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, United States
D.M. Frangopol
Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States
170
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
1
Also affiliated with the Universidad de Concepcin, Con-
cepcin, Chile.
171
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
A. Cury
Paris-Est University, Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chausses, Paris, France
C. Cremona
Direction for Research and Innovation, MEEDDM, La Dfense, France
ABSTRACT
172
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
S. Limin
State Key Laboratory for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
ABSTRACT
173
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
D. Posenato
Smartec S.A., Manno, Switzerland
A. Mercalli
Autostrade per lItalia, Romagnano Sesia, Italy
ABSTRACT
174
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
D.M. Frangopol
Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
ABSTRACT
Figure 1. DHF and reliability block diagram. Figure 4. Test setup and data acquisition.
175
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
176
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
177
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M. Kawatani
Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
H. Furuta
Kansai University, Osaka, Japan
178
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
179
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
C.W. Kim
Department of Civil and Earth Resource Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
M. Kawatani
Department of Civil Engineering, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
T. Fujimoto
Kajima Corporation, Tokyo, Japan
ABSTRACT
180
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
C.W. Kim
Department of Civil & Earth Resource Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
ABSTRACT
181
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
182
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Y. Liu
School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China
183
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
184
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
K.Y. Wong
Bridges & Structures Division, Highways Department of HKSAR Government, Hong Kong
ABSTRACT
185
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
A. Tanaka
Chuo Fukken Consatants Co., Ltd Osaka Japan
M. Hori
Traffic Service Ltd., Osaka, Japan
Figure 1. Picture of the monitored bridge and the train. Figure 3. Cross spectrum of train and bridge.
186
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
187
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
B.R. Brenner
Fay, Spofford, & Thorndike, LLC, Burlington, MA, USA; Tufts University, USA
188
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
B.R. Brenner
Fay, Spofford, & Thorndike, LLC, Burlington, MA, USA; Tufts University, USA
189
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Y.Q. Ni
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
(1)
Figure 1. Qingdao Bay Bridge under construction. pier column; (2) cushion cap; (3) bridge tower.
190
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J. Bento
BRISA Auto-Estradas de Portugal S.A., Lisboa, Portugal
ABSTRACT
191
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Z.-F. Zhou
Shanghai Juyee Technology Development Ltd. Company, Shanghai, China
Figure 1. Sensor placement for Shanghai Yangtze River Main-navigation Channel Bridge.
192
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Bridge Sensor Mart: A flexible and scalable data storage and analysis
framework for structural health monitoring
193
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
REFERENCES
Xu,Y.L. and Zhu, L.D, 2005. Buffeting response of long-span
cable-supported bridges under skew winds: case study.
Journal of Sound and Vibration, 281, 675687.
Brownjohn, J.M.W., Bocciolone M., Curami A., et al. 1994.
Humber bridge full-scale measurement campaigns 1990
1991. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aero-
dynamics, 52, 185218.
Miyata T., Yamada H., Katsuchi H., and Kitagawa M., 2002.
Full-scale measruments of Akashi-Kaikyo Bridge dur-
ing typhoon. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial
Aerodynamics, 90, 15171527.
Figure 1. Acceleration spectra of upstream cables.
194
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
195
MS5: New procedures for bridge rehabilitation
Organizer: V. Popa
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
199
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
200
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
R.A. Daniel
Ministry of transport Public Works and Water Management, Civil Engineering Division, Utrecht, The Netherlands
B. van Sinten
Heijmans Infra B.V., Roosmalen, The Netherlands
ABSTRACT
201
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
202
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
V. Birtel
Materialprfungsanstalt Universitt Stuttgart, Germany
ABSTRACT
203
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
S. Nakamura
Tokai University, Hiratsuka, Japan
K. Suzumura
Nippon Steel Engineering, Futtsu, Japan
204
MS6: Measurement systems for bridge weigh-in-motion (B-WIM)
Organizers: B. Bakht, A. Znidaric & D.K. McNeill
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
207
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M. Ghosn
The City College of New York/CUNY, New York, New York, U.S.A.
B. Sivakumar
HNTB, New York, New York, U.S.A.
ABSTRACT that best fits the tail end of the distribution. The mean
of the Normal that best fits the tail end of the distri-
This paper recommends a procedure to estimate the bution is obtained from event = n/m. The standard
maximum expected load effect on a highway bridge. deviation of the best fit Normal is event = 1/m. Given
The procedure describes how site-specific truck weight a total number of events in the return period of inter-
and traffic data collected using Weigh-In-Motion est, N, the most probable value, u, and the dispersion
(WIM) systems can be used to obtain estimates of the coefficient for the Gumbel distribution that models the
maximum live load for the design life of a bridge, spec- maximum value Lmax are:
ified to be 75 years as per the AASHTO LRFD code,
or the two-year return period that may be used for the
load capacity evaluation of existing bridges.
The model requires as input the WIM data col-
lected at a site after being scrubbed and processed
as described by Sivakumar et al (2008). The process
begins by assembling the measured load effects his-
tograms for single lane events and two-lane events. The
cumulative distribution function for each load effect is The mean value of the maximum load effect, Lmax ,
used to obtain the standard deviate of the cumulative and the standard deviation are obtained from:
function. A plot is made of the upper 5% of the val-
ues of the normal deviate versus the load effect X as
illustrated in Fig. 1.
The slope m and intercept n of the best fit regression
line provide the statistics for the normal distribution in which is the Euler number = 0.577216. The
standard deviation is:
REFERENCES
Sivakumar, B., Ghosn, M. & Moses, F. (2008) Protocols for
Collecting and Using Traffic Data in Bridge Design, Web
Figure 1. Linear fit of tail end of load effect histogram on Report NCHRP Project 1276, Transportation Research
Normal probability paper. Board, National Academy Press, Washington DC.
208
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
209
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
B. Bakht
JMBT Structures Research, Toronto, Canada
210
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
E.J. OBrien
University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
B. Enright
Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin, Ireland
T. Dempsey
Roughan ODonovan Innovative Solutions, Dublin, Ireland
ABSTRACT
REFERENCES
Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R. (1993), An Introduction to the
Bootstrap Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Scott, D. W. (1992), Multivariate density estimation: theory,
Figure 1. Inter-lane GVW correlation, the Netherlands. practice, and visualization, New York: Wiley.
211
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
REFERENCES
Moses, F. (1979). Weigh-in-motion system using instru-
mented bridges. ASCE Journal of Transportation Engi-
neering, 105(3), 233249.
OBrien, E.J., Quilligan, M. and Karoumi, R. (2006). Cal-
culating an Influence Line from Direct Measurements.
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Bridge
Figure 1. (Ideal) Influence Line. Engineering, 159(BEI), 3134.
212
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M. Petschacher
PEC Consulting, Am Huegel, Feldkirchen/Kaernten, Austria
ABSTRACT
213
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
214
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Vehicle loading and effect on the Tsing Ma Bridge using WIM data
K.Y. Wong
Highways Department, Hong Kong, China
215
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
216
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
217
MS7: Bridge management tools & research
Organizer: L. Klatter
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
B.T. Adey
Infrastructure Management Group, Institute for Construction Engineering and Management,
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland
J.D. Birdsall
Parsons Transportation Group, Washington D.C., United States of America
(formerly Infrastructure Management Consultants, Zurich, Switzerland)
R. Hajdin
Infrastructure Management Consultants, Zurich, Switzerland
ABSTRACT
221
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
P.D. Thompson
Paul D. Thompson, Castle Rock. CO. USA
ABSTRACT certain bridges, the user may detour for more than one
reason, and not accounting for this situation may lead
Bridge agencies strive to incorporate stakeholder per- to double counting of user costs. This issue of double
spectives in their decision-making processes. One way counting has not been explicitly considered in the liter-
of doing this is to include user costs as a key per- ature. By using principle of set theory, the paper shows
formance criterion in investment evaluation. While how the estimation of user costs of detouring could
agencies seek to manage their bridges to meet user be carried out in a manner that avoids double count-
expectations of performance, they are often stymied ing. In addition, the paper improves the methodology
by lack of a comprehensive and consistent framework for calculating bridge delay user cost by updating the
for assessing the several different user cost types and speed-volume function.
components. This paper tries to establish a framework The applicability of the framework is then demon-
for comprehensively estimating user costs for bridge strated using a case study that calculated a broad array
management. of bridge user cost categories for a steel bridge.
The paper first identifies the factors of bridge user The results show that when the double counting
cost incurrence and the various categories of user cost issue is not taken into account, the calculated user
(Table 1). This is done on the basis of a synthesis of the cost is higher. Specific results for this case study sug-
existing state of practice and some new considerations. gest that the calculated workzone user cost (whether
For purposes of this presentation, the bridge user the double counting issue is addressed or otherwise)
cost is categorized into detour cost, delay cost and can be extremely high when the bridge is closed for
accident cost. Also, it is recognized that the bridge rehabilitation and that the user cost of delay reduces
life-cycle user cost consists of the cost incurred dur- drastically after the bridge widening intervention.
ing the period of normal operations of the bridge and Summing up, the case study results suggest that it is
those incurred during the work zone period. The lit- prudent to appreciate the problem of double counting
erature review showed that relatively few studies had and to address this issue duly. The results also suggest
addressed the latter category of user cost. The paper that work zone user cost is a critical and dominant com-
provides a refined and detailed procedure to calculate ponent of bridge user costs and needs to be considered
bridge detour cost and delay user cost. In address- in any bridge investment evaluation problem.
ing key considerations, the paper recognizes that for
REFERENCES
Table 1. User cost factors and possible user costs.
Johnston, D.W., Chen, C., and Abed-Al-Rahim, I. 1994.
Detour Delay Accident Developing user costs for bridge management systems.
Traffic Causes Cost Cost cost Transportation Research Circular 423: 139149.
Son, Y. & Sinha, K.C. 1997. Methodology to Estimate User
On Load Capacity Limit Yes Costs in Indiana Bridge Management System. Trans-
bridge Vertical clearance limit over bridge Yes Yes portation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation
Horiz. clearance limit over bridge Yes Yes Research Board 1597: 4351.
Poor alignment Yes Yes Thompson, P.D., Najafi, F.T., Soares, R., and Kerr, R. 2000.
Low capacity Yes Development of Pontis User Cost Models for Florida.
Work zone Yes Yes Yes Transportation Research Circular 498: D-1/1D-1/15.
Under Vert. Clearance limit under bridge Yes Yes Thompson, P. D., Soares, R. H., Choung, J., Najafi , F. T., and
bridge Horiz. clearance limit under bridge Yes Yes Kerr, R. 2000. User Cost Model for Bridge Management
Work zone Yes Yes Yes Systems. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the
Transportation Research Board 1697: 613.
222
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
P. Crespi
Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
223
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
224
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J. Fu
Hawaii Department of Transportation, Kapolei, Hawaii, USA
225
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
H. Furuta
Department of Informatics, Kansai University, Takatsuki, Japan
E. Watanabe
Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
226
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
227
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
B. Kamya
Kamya Consulting Ltd, United Kingdom
228
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
H.S. Kleywegt
Keystone Bridge Management Corp., Kingston, ON, Canada
229
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
B.T. Adey
Infrastructure Management Consultants GmbH
L. Klatter
Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, Center for Public Works
230
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
B. Kroely
Advitam, Sterling, VA, USA
K. McAnulty
NYCDOT Bridge Department, New York, NY, USA
J. Daza
AECOM-Earthtech, New York, NY, USA
231
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J.H. Laird
New Jersey Turnpike Authority, Woodbridge, NJ
J.A. Paul
LS Engineering Associates Corporation, Montville, NJ
J.K. Shaffer
InspectTech, Pittsburgh, PA
ABSTRACT
232
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
R.M. Ellis
Stantec Consulting Inc., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
P.D. Thompson
Consultant, Castle Rock, Colorado, USA
233
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
234
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
R. Thompson
Virginia Department of Transportation Richmond, Virginia, USA
235
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
A.M. Shirole
S & A Shirole, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
236
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
P.D. Thompson
Consultant, Castle Rock, Colorado, USA
R.M. Ellis
Stantec Consulting Inc., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
K. Hong
Stantec Consulting Inc., Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
237
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
P.D. Thompson
Consultant, Castle Rock, Colorado, USA
J.O. Sobanjo
Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA
ABSTRACT
238
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
239
MS8: Uncertainty in bridge damageability modelling
Organizer: M. Shinozuka
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
243
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
244
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
S. Banerjee
Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
M. Shinozuka
University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
245
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
S. Banerjee
The Pennsylvania State University, USA
ABSTRACT
REFERENCES
Hossein Tahghighi, Kazuo Konagai, Numerical analysis of
nonlinear soil-pile group interaction under lateral loads,
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 27 (2007).
Shinozuka, M., Banerjee, S., Kim, S.-H. (2007 Statistical
and mechanistic fragility analysis of concrete bridges,
MCEER, State University of New York at Buffalo.
Soyoz, S., Feng, M.Q. (2008) Long-Term Monitoring
and Identification of Bridge Structural Parameters,
Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering,
Figure 1. Flow chart of the study. 24(2009), 8289.
246
MS9: Performance-based asset & risk management of the
highway infrastructure system
Organizer: A.E. Aktan
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
249
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
A.G. Ardrey
Halcrow Inc., New York, USA
B. Stanforth
A-One Plus, England, UK
250
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
D.L. Blake
Floridas Turnpike Enterprise PBS&J, Ocoee, FL, USA
251
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT link damage state and how a link damage state can
influence its functionality, has been created a set of
In this study bridges fragility is evaluated considering damaged networks. In this set of damaged networks
the effect caused to the transportation network and to has been assigned the transportation demand and the
the economy of the region affected by the earthquake. fluxes have been calculated. The total network time
This is a multi-disciplinary approach since the pro- has been calculated in order to evaluate the network
cedure is composed by several modules: geological, delay that the damage causes. At the end of the pro-
structural, transportation, economic. The procedure is cess the network risk curve (probability of the seismic
based on a stock of bridges included in a database action vs. total delay) is derived. Some possible appli-
and starts from a set of possible seismic scenarios. cations of the procedure are the evaluation of the order
By using fragility curves of bridges the damage state of bridge retrofitting and the analysis of the emergency
of the network links, in which bridges are included, response. The procedure developed in general terms
can be obtained. By making a series of hypothesis has been applied to a test network near Treviso in the
on how a bridge damage state is correlated with a north-eastern part of Italy.
252
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
B. Kroely
Advitam Inc, Sterling, VA
The Road Administration of Bulgaria and Advitam set Software and trained teams to periodically inspect
up jointly, in 2003, a national scale solution to all these the bridges condition. The correct following of the
questions. Rehabilitation is not a matter of deciding inspection calendar defined in the Bulgarian norms
how much money to deploy, but shall/can fit to avail- is now facilitated.
able budgets. The project mainly stands on three steps: Software to help the decision about actions of main-
tenance. The systematic link between defects and
A global audit including regulations in effect as
respective actions to undertake can now be done
well as the infrastructure network. Practical meth-
automatically.
ods and techniques allowing it within limited time
Preliminary repair projects for 15 critical bridges.
and controlled budget from the beginning
These projects will serve as basis to launch repair
A global infrastructure network evaluation, using
works and can be used as reference in terms
objective indicators through synthesis tools
of actions and costs for future similar projects,
The setting and application of a progressive director
including:
scheme, from partial rehabilitation projects towards
Defect total quantities from detailed inspections,
a global preventive maintenance management.
which allowed to state directly on the necessary
To support this project, Advitam was in charge light repair budget for the 15 bridges
of developing a Bridge Management System (BMS) Recommendations for heavy repairs (replace-
based on its software suite: ScanPrint. From mid of ment of equipments as bearings or expansion
October to mid of December 2003, inspectors trav- joints, structural reinforcement, etc. . .)
eled around the country and gathered information and Recommendations for further investigations
pictures about the 1312 bridges. Advitam provided (durability tests, monitoring, etc. . .)
technical assistance in the various regions to finalize A global maintenance master plan on the 1312
the training. Bridges, stating when to re-inspect the bridges,
By the end of the project, the REA has been according to their technical and final condition rat-
provided with the following information system: ing, and to the criteria selection. A global decision
tree has been worked out with the REA in order to
Standard procedures for bridge inventory and
step towards a global preventive maintenance man-
inspection
agement plan of all bridges over 20 m in 10 years.
Database with information about all bridges. This
information may be accessed by many means and
be easily transmitted to local administrations:
ScanPrint interface
Excel tables resuming information
Web interface containing inspection results
253
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
254
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
255
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J.M. Jansen
Danish Road Directorate, Operation & Maintenance Division
256
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
257
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
258
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
259
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
260
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
A.R. Pradhan, P.L. Gurian, F.A. Montalto, F. Moon & A.E. Aktan
Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
261
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
262
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
G. Vacheyroux
cole des Ingnieurs de la Ville de Paris, France
R.B. Corotis
University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA
263
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
264
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
265
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M. Yamawaki
Graduate school of Engineering, University of Kagawa, Japan
Y. Kawakami
Hanshin Expressway Company, Osaka, Japan
K. Yasuda
NEWJEC Inc., Osaka, Japan
266
MS10: Bridging the data gaps for effective management
Organizer: H. Ghasemi
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Defining and implementing data collection goals for the Long Term
Bridge Performance program
M.C. Brown
Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, VA, USA
269
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
270
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
271
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
H. Ghasemi
Federal Highway Administration, McLean, Virginia, USA
J.M. Hooks
Highway R&D Services, Cape Coral, FL, USA
272
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
273
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
274
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
275
MS12: Computational prediction & in field validation
of bridge performance
Organizers: F. Biondini, F. Bontempi & P.G. Malerba
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
F. Akgl
Department of Engineering Sciences, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey
279
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
280
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
D.M. Frangopol
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, ATLSS Center, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
ABSTRACT
281
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
F. Biondini
Department of Structural Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
D.M. Frangopol
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, ATLSS Center, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
282
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
REFERENCES
Camossi G. 2009 (in italian). Analisi di strutture in regime
elastoviscoso in presenza di incertezze. Graduated thesis.
Politecnico di Milano.
Ghali, A., Favre, R. & Eldbadry, M. 2002. Cocrete Structures,
Figure 1. Effects of uncertainties in the initial pretension- Stresses and Deformation, London and NewYork: E & FN
ing of the stays. Tension variation in a stay over time. Spon.
(1) self-weight only; (2) pretensioning only; (3) = (1) + (2): Martinez y Cabrera, F., Malerba, P.G., Bontempi, F. & Bion-
mean value (thick line) and standard deviation from the dini, F. 1997. Creep Effects on Prestressed Cable Stayed
mean (thin lines). Bridges. Proceedings of the ICCCBE-VII. Seoul, Korea.
283
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
F.F. Geng
Chengxian College, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
284
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
S. Manenti
Department of Hydraulics, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
ABSTRACT
285
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
C. Cremona
Direction for research and innovation, MEEDDM, La Dfense, France
L. Elfgren
Lulea Technical university, Lulea, Sweden
ABSTRACT
286
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Field test and analysis of the dynamic factors for bridge in urban railway
transportation system
X.H. He & P. Li
School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Central South University, Changsha, China
A. Scanlon
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, USA
ABSTRACT
287
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
K.C. Chang
Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taiwan
ABSTRACT
288
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
T. Kaminski
Wrocaw University of Technology, Wrocaw, Poland
ABSTRACT
289
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
290
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
P.G. Malerba
Department of Structural Engineering, Polytechnic of Milan, Milan, Italy
ABSTRACT
291
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
292
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
REFERENCES
Khalil, M.S., Dilger, W.H., and Ghali, A. 1983. Time-
dependent analysis of PC cable-stayed bridges. Journal
of structural Eng. 109(8): 19801996.
Spacone, E., Filippou, F.C., andTaucer, F.F. 1996. Fiber beam-
column model for non-linear analysis of R/C frames : Part
1. Formulation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural
Figure 2. Moment of deck at final construction phase. Dynamics, 25: 771725.
293
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
T. Vogel
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
294
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
295
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J.S. Zhu
Tianjin University, Tianjin, P.R. China
D.M. Frangopol
Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
296
MS13: Management & maintenance of long span bridges
Organizers: A. Chen & D.M. Frangopol
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Z. Junhui
Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials, P.R. China
ABSTRACT
REFERENCES
Tatsuya et al. 1999. Development of Corrosion protection
Methods Using S-shaped Wire Wrapping System. Nippon
Steel Technical Report. No.82 November 1999. 814.
John Sun P.E. et al. 2004. Suspension Cable Design of
the New San Francisco- Oakland Bay Bridge. Journal
of Bridge Engineering. (ASCE/JANUARY/FEBRUARY).
Figure 1. The Shantou Bay Bridge. 101106.
299
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
300
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
301
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
V. Stathopoulos
Gefyra, Greece
G. Hovhanessian
Advitam, France
B. Kroely
Advitam Inc, Sterling, VA, USA
302
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J. Wu
Tongke College, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
ABSTRACT
303
MS14: SmartEN Marie Curie ITN Smart management for
sustainable human environment
Organizers: T. Onoufriou & R. Helmerich
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Th. Demetriou
Structural Engineer, Cyprus
A. Stassis
Higher Technical Institute, Cyprus
ABSTRACT
REFERENCES
Chrysostomou, C. Z., Stassis, A, Demetriou, Th. and Ham-
daoui, K.. 2008. Application of shape memory alloy pre-
stressing devices on an ancient aqueduct, Smart Structures
and Systems, v. 4, No. 2: 261278.
Croci, G. 2000. General methodology for the structural
restoration of historic buildings: the cases of the Tower
of Pisa and the Basilica of Assisi, Journal of Cultural
Figure 1. Larnaca aqueduct. Heritage, 1, 718.
307
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
REFERENCE
Feltrin, G., Meyer, J., Bischoff, R., & Motavalli, M. 2009.
Wireless sensor networks for long term monitoring of civil
Figure 1. a) Stork Bridge in Winterthur, Switzerland. structures. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering: DOI:
b) Locations of the network nodes. 10.1080/15732470903068573.
308
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
309
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
H. Furuta
Kansai University, Osaka, Japan
Y. Nomura
Ritsumeikan University, Shiga, Japan
ABSTRACT
REFERENCES
Nichols, J.M., Todd, M.D., Seaver, M. & Virgin., L.N. 2003a.
Use of chaotic excitation and attractor property analy-
sis in structural health monitoring, Physical Review E,
67:016207 18.
Nichols, J.M.,Virgin, L.N.,Todd, M.D. & Nichols, J.D. 2003b.
On the use of attractor dimension as a feature in struc-
tural health monitoring, Mechanical System and Signal
Figure 1. Structural model. Processing, 17(6):13051320.
Nichols, J.M., Todd, M.D., Seaver, M., Trickey, S.T., Pecora,
Table 1. Structural property L.N. & Moniz. L. 2003c. Controlling system dimension:
A class of real systems that obey the Kaplan-Yorke con-
jecture, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Moment of inertia Iy,z 0.0108 m4
of the United States of America (PNAS), 100(26):15299
Youngs modulus E 210 Gpa
15303.
Weight/m 27.68 kN/m
Nichols, J.M., Trickey, S.T., Todd, M.D. & Virgin, L.N.
Poissons ratio 0.25
2003d. Structural Health Monitoring Through Chaotic
Damping ratio for the 1st and 2nd mode 0.01
Interrogation, Meccanica, 38:239250.
310
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M. Imran Rafiq
University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK
REFERENCE
Rafiq, M.I. 2005. Health monitoring in proactive reliabi-
lity management of deteriorating concrete bridges. PhD
Thesis. School of Engineering. University of Surrey. UK.
Figure 1. Interaction between information in space and time
(Inspection vs SHM).
311
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
A. Kounoudes
SignalGeneriX Ltd, Lemesos, Cyprus
A. Kalis
Research and Education Laboratory in Information, Athens, Greece
Centre Tecnologic de Telecomunicacions de Catalunya (CTTC), Barcelona, Spain
T. Onoufriou
Cyprus University of Technology, Lemesos, Cyprus
A.G. Constantinides
Imperial College, London United Kingdom
312
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
313
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
R.E. Melchers
The University of Newcastle, Australia
C.Q. Li
The University of Greenwich, England
ABSTRACT
314
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
A. Kounoudes
SignalGenerix Ltd, Lemesos, Cyprus
A.G. Constantinides
Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
A. Kalis
Research and Education Laboratory in Information, Athens, Greece
315
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
T. Onoufriou
Cyprus University of Technology, Lemesos, Cyprus
A.G. Constantinides
Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
A. Kounoudes
SignalGenerix Ltd, Lemesos, Cyprus
316
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
A.D. Orcesi
Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chausses, Paris, France
D.M. Frangopol
Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
ABSTRACT
317
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
318
MS15: European approach on integrated
infrastructure risk management (IRIS)
Organizer: H. Wenzel
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
321
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
A. Del Grosso
Department of Civil Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Genoa, Italy
322
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT excitation factor to all the setups, then merges the data
and does the system identification in the final step.
Subspace-based linear system identification methods A new strategy called crystal clear is used to clean
have been proven efficient for the identification of the the resulting stabilization diagrams from unstable and
eigenstructure of a linear multivariable system in many noise modes in the identification step.
applications. Moreover, damage detection using null Furthermore, the uncertainty of the obtained modal
space based stochastic subspace detection techniques parameters is evaluated. For this, an existing algorithm
has also been proved to be useful in structural health is adapted to the covariance- and data-driven SSI used
monitoring during the last decade. Our main motiva- in this paper.
tion in this paper is output-only structural identifica- Finally we derive a version of the null space based
tion and damage detection in vibration mechanics. statistical damage detection algorithm that is adapted
The problem consists in identifying the modal to multi-setup measurements.
parameters (natural frequencies, damping ratios and All the presented algorithms are applied to the Z24
mode shapes) of a structure subject to ambient unmea- bridge, being a benchmark of the COST F3 Euro-
sured vibrations, by using accelerometer measure- pean network. The system identification results show
ments or strain gauges. This is output-only system high quality, confidence intervals are computed on the
identification, as the excitation input is unknown and obtained frequencies and damping ratios, and damage
not measured. Examples are, amongst others, offshore is successfully detected when comparing multi-setup
structures subject to swell, bridges subject to wind and measurements of two damage scenarios of the Z24
traffic, etc. bridge.
We analyze how the Stochastic Subspace Identifica-
tion (SSI) can be adapted when several successive data
sets are recorded, with sensors at different locations in REFERENCES
the structure. For doing this, some of the sensors, called
the reference sensors, are kept fixed, while the others Basseville, M., Abdelghani, M. & Benveniste, A. 2000.
Subspace-based fault detection algorithms for vibration
are moved for a so-called multi-setup measurement.
monitoring. Automatica, 36(1):101109.
Like this, we mimic a situation in which lots of sen- Mevel, L., Basseville, M., Benveniste,A. & Goursat, M. 2002.
sors are available, while in fact only a few are at hand. Merging sensor data from multiple measurement setups
However, there is one unpleasant feature of structural for nonstationary subspace-based modal analysis. Journal
identification of structures subject to ambient exci- of Sound and Vibration, 249(4):719741.
tation, namely that excitation is typically turbulent Overschee, P.V. & Moor, B.D. 1996, Subspace Identification
in nature and nonstationary. Like this, the excitation for Linear Systems:Theory, Implementation,Applications,
factor can change from setup to setup and has to be Kluwer.
normalized for the data fusion. Peeters, B. & De Roeck, G. 1999. Reference-based stochas-
tic subspace identification for output-only modal analy-
We describe a new merging algorithm for multi-
sis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 13(6):
setup measurements that is common for both 855878.
covariance-driven SSI and the data-driven SSI using Reynders, E., Pintelon, R. & De Roeck, G. 2008. Uncertainty
the Unweighted Principal Component (UPC) algo- bounds on modal parameters obtained from stochastic
rithm. This merging approach called PreGER (Pre subspace identification. Mechanical Systems and Signal
Global Estimation Re-scaling) introduces the same Processing, 22(4):948969.
323
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
C. Ebert
Wlfel Beratende Ingenieure GmbH & Co. KG, Hchberg, Germany
A. Lenzen
University of applied sciences Leipzig, Germany
324
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
R. Berger
mageba SA, Blach, Switzerland
325
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
326
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
REFERENCES
Brownjohn, J. M. W. & Carden, P., Real-time operation
modal analysis of Tamar Bridge, 26th International Modal
Analysis Conference (IMAC XXVI), Orlando, 2008.
Cornwell, P., Farrar, C. R., Doebling, D. W. & Sohn, H., Envi-
ronmental variability of modal properties, Experimental
Techniques, Vol. 23, No. 6, 4548, 1999.
Liu, C. & Wolf, J. T. D., Effect of temperature on modal
variability of a curved concrete bridge under ambient
Figure 1. Modal frequencies of the Tamar Bridge through- loads, Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 133, No.
out a week in March. 12, 17421751, 2007.
327
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
328
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
329
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
BRIDGE DESCRIPTION AND DAMAGE 2. Damage also alters the mode shapes locally. Modal
SCENARIOS displacements at the pier-girder node for damage
cases increase significantly suggesting immediate
Vibration measurement and analysis of dynamic char- effect of constraint-losing at the boundary condi-
acteristics of an overpass bridge during a full-scale tion. The changes are evident from bending and
destructive testing are described. The tested bridge torsional low-order modes and are well predicted
is the S101 Overpass Bridge located in Reibersdorf, by FEM. Effects of damage on mode shapes are
UpperAustria, west side of Vienna,Austria. The bridge more obvious in torsional modes than in bending
crossed over the national highway A1 Westautobahn modes as indicated by larger changes in modal dis-
Austria. It is a post-tensioned concrete bridge with the placement of pier-girder node of torsional modes
main span of 32 m, side spans of 12 m, and the width than that of bending modes.
of 6.6 m (VCE 2009). Measurement system consists 3. In general damping increases as the damage level
of six triaxial accelerometers. During two days mea- increases. Estimations from system identification
surement, ambient vibration of bridge was measured (Juang and Pappa 1985) indicate that damping
using six sensor configurations. in damage stages increase up to 2.53% from
Damage was introduced to the structure by cut- previously 1.5% in undamaged stage.
ting the pier column just above the pier footing. A 4. Multivariate outlier analysis (Worden et al 2000) is
hydraulic jack was placed on bottom of the steel col- used to detect the presence of damage. The results
umn to provide a temporary support. Immediately show that using Mahalanobis distance of auto-
after the cutting process was completed, the tempo- spectra the presence of damage at the earliest stage
rary steel column was lowered gradually by releasing can be detected with reasonable accuracy. When
the pressure in hydraulic jack. This caused the ver- damage has significantly changed the characteris-
tical settlement of the bridge at the location of pier tics of structure such as the case, all detection points
column. are unambiguously detected as outliers indicating
the clear presence of damage. Also the distance
between threshold line and damage points in outlier
detection are increasing as damage becomes larger.
RESULTS OF VIBRATION ANALYSIS This distance can be used further as indicator of
damage severity.
Through systematic data analysis using spectrogram,
output-only modal analysis, and multivariate outlier
analysis, important results of the study are summarized REFERENCES
as follow:
Juang JN, Pappa RS,1985.An Eigensystem RealizationAlgo-
1. A non-uniform pier settlement simulated as rithm For Modal Parameter Identification And Model
damage in this study, affects global stiffness of Reduction, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics,
structure significantly. This is evident by the signif- Vol. 8(5): 620627
VCE 2009. Progressive damage test S101 Flyover Reibes-
icant change in frequency of low-order modes. The
dorf,Vienna Consulting Engineers (VCE) Internal Report,
effects are more obvious in torsional modes than in Report Nr.08/2308, Vienna Austria, May 2009
bending modes, as indicated by larger changes in Worden K., Manson G., and Fieller N.R.J. 2000. Damage
frequencies of torsional modes than that of bending Detection Using Outlier Analysis, Journal Sound and
modes. Vibration. Vol. 229(3): 647667
330
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M. Aburahma
Computer Science Department, Faculty of Media Engineering and Technology, German University of Cairo, Egypt
331
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
332
MS16: Safety & management of bridges in Mexico
Organizer: D. De Leon
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
D. De Leon
Autonomous University of Mexico State, Toluca, Mexico State, Mexico
ABSTRACT
335
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
H. Hernandez
Engineering School, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolas de Hidalgo, Michoacan State, Mexico
D. De Leon
Engineering School, Universidad Autnoma del Estado de Mexico, Mexico State, Mexico
336
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
A.A. Torres-Acosta
Instituto Mexicano del Transporte, Pedro Escobedo, Quertaro, Mxico
P. Castro-Borges
Centro de Investigacin y Estudios Avanzados del IPN, Mrida, Yucatn, Mxico
M. Len-Irola
Administracin Portuaria Integral de Progreso, Progreso, Yucatn, Mxico
ABSTRACT
337
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
REFERENCES
Torres-Acosta, A.A. & Martnez-Madrid, M. 2003. Residual
life of corroding reinforced concrete structures in marine
environment. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering.
Vol. 15 (4): 344353.
Torres, A., Martnez, M., del Valle A. y Prez, J. 2004. El uso
de nuevas tecnologas en el mantenimiento, conservacin
en la infraestructura de puentes en Mxico que presenta
daos por corrosin. Revista Ingeniera de Construccin.
Vol. 19 (2): 6572.
Red DURAR. 1997. Manual de inspeccin, evaluacin y
diagnstico de corrosin en estructuras de hormign
armado. Maracaibo: CYTED.
338
MS17: COWI Group mini-symposium Cable supported bridges
Organizer: J.S. Jensen
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
341
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
342
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
343
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
344
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
345
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
D. Mackenzie
Flint & Neill Limited, London, United Kingdom
N. Adamson
Flint & Neill Limited, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom
M. Bloomstine
COWI A/S, Lyngby, Denmark
346
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
O. Srensen
COWI A/S, Lyngby, Denmark
347
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
N. McFadyen
Flint & Neill Limited, Stone, Gloucestershire,GL13 9LB, UK
J. Blumensen
COWI A/S, Parallelvej 2, DK-2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
348
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
O. Srensen
COWI A/S, Lyngby, Denmark
D. MacKenzie
Flint & Neill, London, Great Britain
E. Lauersen
A/S Storebltsforbindelsen, Denmark
349
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
P.G. Buckland
Buckland & Taylor Ltd, Vancouver, Canada
350
MS18: Lifetime design of super long span bridges
Organizer: H.-M. Koh
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J.V. Thomsen
Danish Road Directorate, Copenhagen, Denmark
353
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
S.-W. Cha
Department of Civil and Environmental Engr., University of Ulsan, Korea
K.-H. Kim
Research Institute of Energy and Resources, Seoul National University, Korea
J.-Y. Cho
Department of Civil and Environmental Engr., Seoul National University, Korea
354
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Analysis and comparison of recent bridge failures in China and the rest
of the world
355
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
356
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
357
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
REFERENCES
DAEWOO E&C, Institute of Construction Technol-ogy
(DICT) (2005). Internal report on Concrete Mixing
Design Results for the Busan-Geoje Fixed Link (private
document).
DuraCrete Final Technical Report. (2000). Proba-bilistic
Performance Based Durability Design of Concrete
Structures. Document BE95-1347/R17, European Brite-
EuRam Programme. Published by CUR, The Netherlands.
EuroCode-2 Concrete Structures, Section 4.4.2.4 Calculation
of Crack Width [ENV 1992-1-1:Dec 1991].
Nordtest method NT Build 492 (1999). Concrete, mortar
Figure 1. Chloride diffusivity coefficient of core taken from and cement-based repair materials: Chlo-ride migration
actual structure. coefficient from non-steady migra-tion experiments.
358
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
N.-S. Kim
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea
359
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
S. Kite
Arup, London, UK
The Forth Replacement Crossing will be built across The main maintenance access entry to the bridge is at
the Firth of Forth in Scotland to maintain and enhance a the south abutment. A secondary entrance is available
vital transport link in the country.The wide estuary will via the north abutment.
be crossed by a 3-tower cable stayed bridge support- The full length of the deck including the approach
ing a pair of navigational main spans each 650 m, and viaduct and cable stayed bridge is accessible by a pair
an approach viaduct. The scheme design of the cross- of internal deck shuttles. Openings are provided in the
ing, completed by the Jacobs Arup JV, aims to provide top of the cable stayed bridge deck at regular inter-
a fitting 21st century icon, standing alongside exist- vals to gain access to the central zone between the
ing 19th and 20th century Grade A listed bridges. The carriageways.
specifications for the Design and Build contract to be The towers are accessible from the deck and an inter-
let by the client, Transport Scotland, include enhanced nal rack and pinion lift in each tower is the primary
measures to ensure durability and a full suite of access means to gain access above deck level with a stairway
facilities to allow safe maintenance and management provided both below and above deck level to give inter-
of the bridge. nal access over the full height of each tower. Similarly
the piers are accessible from within the deck and inter-
nal ladders / stairs provide access through the height
DESIGN FOR DURABILITY of the pier shafts. Abseiling is envisaged to reach the
external faces of the towers and piers. Suitable struc-
Durability is not an absolute property of a material tural inserts will be provided in the external faces to
but can be affected by both design and construction aid abseiling.
factors. To achieve a satisfactory working design life Permanent moveable access gantries are provided
regular maintenance and some repair work will be below the deck to provide access to the deck sof-
required. Both the required protection (by durability fit. Because of the configuration of the piers, some
design) and mitigation (by maintenance) have been areas of the soffit will not be fully accessible from the
assessed in order to ensure that the design life of 120 gantries, so here the soffit will be accessed by lorry
years can be achieved with a good degree of confi- mounted underbridge inspection vehicles. It is also
dence. For the certain elements, where replacement recommended that a stay cable inspection gantry is
is feasible and cost effective, a shorter service life as provided.
appropriate has been adopted in the design.
360
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
Table 1. Super Long Span Bridge R&BD Program.
The need for sea-crossing long-span bridges in Korea
has been recently revitalized by the ambitious plan of Center Korea Expressway Corporation
the government to link some of the 3,000 islands of the Programs 1. Engineering Technology
peninsula to the mainland. For example, the invest- (institute) (Seoul Natl University)
ment of ongoing projects intend to link some major 2. High Performance Material & Application
islands of the southwestern coast with the mainland Technology (Research Institute of
reaches approximately $10 billion until 2010 for the Industrial Science & Technology)
3. High Efficiency Construction Technology
Province of Jeollanamdo. Additional investments for (Korea Institute of Construction Technology)
the construction of bridges are also foreseen until 2025 4. Test Bed & Operating Technology (Korea
to promote economical and social balanced regional Expressway Corporation)
development all over the peninsula. Sponsors Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime
Thanks to this unprecedented bridge construction Affairs Korea Institute of Construction &
projects, remarkable technological accomplishments Transportation Technology Evaluation and
for long-span cable supported bridges have been Planning (KICTEP)
achieved in Korea. In order to support such enterprise Duration 7 years (2008.122015.12) 3 stages (V3):
and sustain the next generation of bridges to be con- Verification Validation Value Creation
structed in the peninsula, the Korean R&D community Budget 94.6 billion KRW (about 80 million USD)
agreed with the necessity to develop and construct Government (MLTM): 63.6 billion KRW,
a new generation of high performance facilities by Private: 31 billion KRW
means of enhanced materials, advanced structural sys-
tems and technologies as well as upgraded or improved
specifications or standards in a lifetime perspective.
Accordingly, the Korea Ministry of Land, Trans- lifetime design technology (Table 1). Other important
port and Maritime Affairs (MLTM), formally the R&D programs are also presented.
Korea Ministry of Construction and Transportation
(MOCT), launched the Program for 5 Years Plan for
Construction Technology Innovation (20032007) to REFERENCES
strengthen and systematize R&D programs as well as
improve R&D management system. Koh, H.M. 2006. Recent research and development of bridge
This paper introduces recent research and business technology in Korea, Proceedings of International Sym-
development programs for super long span bridges in posium on Sea-Crossing Long-Span Bridges, Invited Lec-
ture, Mokpo, Korea , 1517 February: Korean Group of
Korea. Among the currently ongoing programs, Super
IABSE, 81101.
Long Span Bridge center, a 7 year national R&BD pro- Koh, H.M. and Choo, J.F. 2004. Preparing for the future:
gram launched in 2009, is the largest single program National research programs for the next generation of
dedicated to the development of cable-supported long bridge design and maintenance in Korea, Second Intern.
span bridge technology. Overview and some details Conf. on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management,
of the program are summarized with the emphasis on IABMAS 04, Kyoto, Japan, October 1822.
361
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
D.-S. Kim
Korea Railroad Research Institute, Uiwang, Kyeonggi-Do, Korea
S.-Y. Ok
Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
Figure 1. Three failure modes identified in the Figure 2. Hierarchical structure of the multi-scale MSR
two-dimensional standard normal space. method.
362
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Cross-section
In order to realize strait crossing bridge projects of the
next generation, the development of new materials and Single box Two-box + grating
new structural systems for super long span bridges, as
well as economical, durable, rational design and con- Non initial imperfection, 1770 MPa 2.106 2.210
struction method are required. From this background, Initial imperfection, 1770 MPa 2.041 2.157
the consecutive continuous structural system of a Initial imperfection, 2000 MPa 2.090 2.195
3-span suspension bridge was considered first based
on previous experience. However, this form requires
the installation of an intermediate anchorage, and the Table 1 shows the load factor at the ultimate state
number of tower foundations also increases, so this is of loading condition LC2 which gives lowest ultimate
not economical. Hence a multi-span suspension bridge strength based on the analysis results.
is focused as an economical alternative. Since the dead load can be reduced by employing
At present, a wide range of studies has been two-box and grating section, it is clear that the load
reported as part of the planning for the straits cross- factor at the ultimate state increases by 45% com-
ing project, focusing on the structural characteristics, pared to that of the single box section model. The load
the economics, the methods on applying the live factor at the ultimate state of the high strength cable
loads, the buckling characteristics of the central towers model increased by around 2% compared to that of the
(O.Yoshida and T.Moriya 1997), etc., for 4- and 5-span conventional cable model.
suspension bridges. In four super long-span suspension bridge exam-
In the research and development work as summa- ined in this study, an application of the stiffening girder
rized above, there has been no studies investigating having the cross-section with two-box and grating and
the elastic-plastic behavior or ultimate strength of the high strength cable are effective to improve the
the overall structure of multi-span suspension bridges load carrying capacity of the whole bridge system and
(K.Nogami and M.Nagai 2002). Hence, in this study, can maintain the value more than 2.0 in conventional
analytical study was carried out to make clear the required load factor at the ultimate state. Hence, four
elastic-plastic behavior and ultimate strength of the super long-span suspension bridge is able to secure
overall structure of a 4-span suspension bridge having enough safety.
a central span length of 3000 m (K.Nogami A.Someya
and T.Yamasawa 2006). This bridge employed a con- REFERENCES
ventional single box section and a new structural type
consisting of two boxes and the grating as the stiffening O.Yoshida and T.Moriya 1997. Structural characteristics and
girder and of using 1770 MPa and new high-strength feasibility of four suspension bridge, Journal of structural
2000 MPa cables. engineering, Vol. 43A (in Japanese).
The numerical calculation takes into account K.Nogami and M.Nagai 2002. Effect of initial imperfections
both geometric and material non-linearity. The of towers on safety factors of main cables, hangers and
towers in a super long-span suspension bridge, Journal of
materialstress-strain relationship used the incremen- JSCE, No. 717/I-61: 161166 (in Japanese).
tal method in accordance with incremental plasticity K.Nogami A.Someya and T.Yamasawa 2006. Elasto-plastic
theory. Also, the numerical analysis is adopted the behaviors of four long-span suspension bridges and prac-
Newton-Raphson method in combination with the tical rigidity of towers, Journal of structural engineering,
incremental displacement method. Vol. 52A: 901912 (in Japanese).
363
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
364
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
365
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
K. Sugioka
Osaka Business and Maintenance Department, Hanshin Expressway Company Limited, Osaka, Japan
H. Kanaji
Construction Management Headquarters, Hanshin Expressway Company Limited, Osaka, Japan
S. Matsumoto
Planning Division, Hanshin Expressway Management Technology Center, Osaka, Japan
K. Magoshi
Seismic Analysis Research Inc., Nagoya, Japan
M. Nagai
Nagaoka University of Technology, Niigata, Japan
ABSTRACT
366
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
367
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J.-Y. Cho
POSCO Technical Research Laboratories, Pohang, Korea
368
Special Sessions
SS1: Use of health monitoring for life-cycle
cost analysis & optimization
Organizers: D.M. Frangopol & A. Orcesi
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
371
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
R.M. Ellis
Stantec Consulting Inc., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
P.D. Thompson
Consultant, Castle Rock, Colorado, USA
372
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
373
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
L.C. Neves
UNL/FCT Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
D.M. Frangopol
Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
374
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
A.D. Orcesi
Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chausses, Paris, France
D.M. Frangopol
Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
ABSTRACT
375
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
376
SS2: Safety monitoring & maintenance
strategy for long span bridges
Organizer: A. Chen
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
B. Briseghella
College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, China
T. Zordan
College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
ABSTRACT
379
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
D.H. Yoo
ENVICO Consultants Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea
H. Yoo
Hyundai Institute of Construction Technology, Yongin, Korea
ABSTRACT
380
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Rehabilitation planning and stay cable replacement design for the Hale
Boggs Bridge in Luling, Louisiana
C.A. Ligozio
CTL Engineers & Construction Technology Consultants, PC, Rochester, New York, USA
381
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
S. Li
School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, China
H. Li
School of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China
J. Ou
School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China
REFERENCES
Neves, A.C. & Frangopol, D.M. 2006. Probabilistic life-time
oriented multi-objective optimization of bridge mainte-
nance: combination of maintenance types. Journal of
Structural Engineering 132(11): 18211834.
Enright, M.P. & Frangopol, D.M. 1999. Condition prediction
of deteriorating concrete bridge using Bayesian updating.
Journal of Structural Engineering 125(10): 11181125.
Estes, A.C. & Frangopol, D.M. 1999. Repair optimization
of highway bridges using system reliability approach.
Figure 1. PDF comparison between measured and simu- Journal of Structural Engineering 125(7):766775.
lated vehicle load moment at closure segment.
382
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
REFERENCES
Xin Ruan & Airong Chen & Xuefei Shi, 2008. Risk assess-
ment of bridge engineering. Beijing: China Communica-
tions Press.
Guohao Li,1996. Stability and vibration of bridge structures
(Revised Edition). Beijing: China Railway Publishing
Figure 1. Surrounding buildings 3D location of real House.
research topic in Wenzhou.
383
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Bridge safety assessment based on field test data with SORM method
T.Y. Ying
Architectural Design & Research Institute of Tongji University (Group) Co., Ltd. Shanghai, China
384
SS3: Bridge condition assessment
Organizers: A. Miyamoto & F. Tondolo
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
387
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
A.Q. Li
College of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
388
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
T. Guo
College of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, P.R.China
A.Q. Li
College of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, P.R.China
ABSTRACT
389
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
H. Sugiyama
Hanshin Expressway Company Limited, Osaka, Japan
390
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
391
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
C. Valente
University G. dAnnunzio of Chieti-Pescara, Italy
L. Pardi
Autostrade S.p.A., Rome, Italy
392
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Steel road bridges having orthotropic decks, due to Because they require contact with the steel
its lightness and short construction time, have been orthotropic deck, proper equipment and scaffolding
widely applied in the coastal area of urban highways. In works are necessary.
recent years, with the increase in the traffic amount and In high viaducts or water crossing, they require
the constant occurrence of overloaded vehicles, fatigue large-scale overall scaffolding works.
damages on orthotropic decks have been reported. Because of the above mentioned requirements, the
Fatigue damages on orthotropic decks can be clas- efficiency or the whole inspection is not good.
sified into 4 groups. Comparing the inspection costs, the costs of the
facilities are high, having budget restraints.
Cracks occurring in along the weld between the
Although the cycle of the inspections are not yet
deck and U-shaped rib
defined, periodic inspections are necessary.
Cracks occurring in the weld between the U-shaped
rib and transverse beams. Thus, the authors have developed a rational and
Cracks occurring in the butt weld between U- economic method, which combined infrared inspec-
shaped rib and transverse beams tion, eddy-current inspection and phased array
Cracks occurring in the weld between the deck plate ultrasonic inspection.
and the vertical stiffeners Through the study, it was found that a rational
In particular, type cracks originated in the root of and economic inspection can be achieved when the
the weld between the U-shaped rib and the deck can 3 inspection methods are applied orderly by starting
be classified into 3 types, as shown in the figure below. from a general and wide-range method, and deepening
and narrowing to a more directed method, that is,
Infrared inspection through thermal images
obtained by an infrared camera mounted on a
vehicle moving in high speed. (Screening)
A simplified method of evaluation applying eddy
current inspection to the points that were selected
during screening.
Detailed investigation through phased array at
Among crack types to , cracks of type -3 points in which cracks perforating the deck were
develop from the weld root in the direction of the found by the simplified evaluation method.
deck upper surface. These cracks not only cannot be
visually detected from the lower surface of the deck, In case shortening of inspection intervals becomes
but also, cannot be found by visual inspection from necessary, the present compound method, that made
the upper surface of the deck without the removal screening possible, can be applied without great
the pavement. Thus, ultrasound inspection carried out increase in the inspection costs.
from the bottom surface of the deck plate was applied. In order to improve the detection limits and preci-
However, ultrasound inspections have the following sion of the present method, the authors shall continue
disadvantages. to collect inspection data for further studies.
393
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
A. Tarighat
Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran
A. Miyamoto
Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan
394
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
The article outlines a new, reliable and robust approach Type of Linguistic Safety
for estimating the vulnerability of reinforced concrete degradation judgment goal
sructures, developing a survey methodology based Ei Gij Wijk
only on visual inspection.
E1 Small G11 Medium W114
The results of visual inspection are subjective Shear stress Medium G12 Large W126
assessments of the structural safety yet easy to obtain Large G13 Very Large W137
employing unskilled operators. Aim of our work is
E2 Small G21 Slightly Small W213
to obtain an objective assessment of the safety level Longit. stress Medium G22 Medium W224
by manipulating the linguistic judgments using fuzzy Large G23 Large W236
logic (Zadeh 1965), chosen for its ability to quantita-
E3 Small G31 Very Small W311
tively treat the uncertainty of reality and inaccuracy Gravel nests Medium G32 Small W322
of natural language. The goal of our method is to Large G33 Medium W334
manipulate through fuzzy logic the subjective linguis-
tic judgments, expressed by an unskilled inspecting
staff, on the visual signs of degradation, in order to
assess the current safety level of the construction. Dur-
ing visual inspection, assessment cards will be filled in
by the inspecting staff, who will also be making photos
and videos of the construction.
In the card for each structural element we have three
columns. In the first column for each structural ele-
ment are shown the degradation expression that are
more relevant to the structural element itself. There
can be one or more expressions, depending on the
element under consideration. In the second column Figure 1. Weight Wijk membership functions.
the inspection staff will subjectively chose the assess-
ments of gravity attributed to the different types of
degradation. The third column shows the weights that environment. The results are within the values of fail-
each judgment will have on the current safety assess- ure probability that we expected (Zhao & Chen 2001).
ments. To each linguistic variable, and both for the Moreover the robustness of the method is proved when
judgments Gij and weights Wijk , we associate a mem- two different operators give slightly different linguis-
bership function (x) whose domain is [0, 1]. The tic judgments and derives directly from the ability of
triangular membership functions are shown in Fig. 1. fuzzy logic to deal with uncertainty.
It is important to stress out that the card is con-
structed and the relations between judgment and
weight on the safety previously stated according to REFERENCES
the expertise of a technically skilled team, while the Zadeh, L.A. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and control 8,
second column is filled in during visual inspection by 338353.
unskilled staff. The reliability of the method is shown Zhao, Z. & Chen, C. 2001. Concrete bridge deterioration
by analyzing an existing reinforced concrete structure, diagnosis using fuzzy inference system. Advances in
a bridge 3 km long, located in an aggressive seawater Engineering software 32, 317325.
395
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Bridges are the most significant components of the The paper presents results of the research activi-
transport infrastructure from the viewpoint of safety, ties supported by the Slovak Grant Agency, grant
durability and serviceability and also from economic No. 1/0311/09 and the results of the project
point of view. Therefore, it is necessary to paid implementation: Centre of Excellence in Transport
enhanced attention to their design and exploitation Engineering (ITMS: 26220120027) supported by the
to fulfil required function during the bridge working Research & Development Operational Programme
life. Present standard methods of the reliability theory funded by the ERDF.
are based on verification of the structural reliability
from the viewpoint of limit states caused by the per-
manent, variable and accidental actions. Nevertheless REFERENCES
the actual member resistance can be changed by var-
ious factors as for example degradation of materials Akgul, F. & Frangopol, D. M. 2004. Lifetime performance
analysis of existing steel girder bridge superstructures.
due to aggressive environment, which are taking into
Journal of Structural Engineering v. 130, No. 12.
account indirectly or neither in bridge member design. Bucher, Ch. & Hintze, D. & Ross, D. 2000. Advanced anal-
The investigation of actual reliability and determining ysis of structural reliability using commercial FE-codes.
actual remaining lifetime of structure are the impor- ECCOMAS 2000, Barcelona, Spain, 11. 14. September.
tant characteristics for evaluation of existing bridge Kmiecik, M. & Guedes Soares, C. 2002. Response-surface
structures. approach to the probability distribution of the strength of
The purpose of this paper is to analyze uncertain- compressed plates. Marine Structures. Elsevier.
ties of orthotropic steel plate deck in order to evaluate Qin, S. & Cui, W. 2003. Effect of corrosion models on
its random variable resistance using the finite element the time-dependent reliability of steel plated elements.
Marine Structures. Elsevier.
simulations and to get the time variant stress-state
Rackwitz, R. 2001. Reliability analysis a review and some
influenced by corrosion effects. The effort was focused perspectives. Structural Safety. Elsevier.
on the determination of stress state of compression Reh, S. & Beley, D.J. & Mukherjee, S. & Eng Hui, K.
orthotropic decks creating the upper flanges of bridges 2006. Probabilistic finite element analysis using ANSYS.
with ballast beds. It is consisting of thin-walled sheets Structural Safety, Elsevier.
stiffened by the system of longitudinal and transver- Skora, M. & Vican, J. 2009: Numerical and experimental
sal stiffeners. All of the above mentioned factors are analysis of steel orthotropic plate deck stress state. XVIII.
stochastic in their nature, so the probabilistic approach Russian-Slovak-Polish seminar, Theoretical foundation
to the structural reliability assessment is necessary of civil engineering. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza
Politechniki Warszawskiej.
to use. There was developed the probabilistic model
ertler, H. & Vican, J. 1995. The real behaviour of steel
in ANSYS software environment using software sup- railway bridges. ilina: ES VDS (in Czech).
port module PDS. Random variables were described Tepl, B. & Novk, D. 1999. Reliability analysis of civil
by means of parameters of probability density distri- engineering structures. Brno: Academic press CERM.
bution according to data determined experimentally. Vican, J. & Kurck, F. 2006. Probabilistic approach to the
The model also comprised the geometrical and mate- ultimate strength of compression chords of railway bridges
rial nonlinearities of the structure. Nevertheless the considering corrosion. 6th International Symposium Steel
actual member resistance can be changed by vari- Bridges. Prague.
ous factors as for example degradation of materials
due to aggressive environment. The time variant loss
of member resistance was computed based on some
corrosion models.
396
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
G.W. Yao
Key Laboratory of Bridge-Structure Engineering Ministry of Transport, School of Civil Engineering
and Architecture, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing, PR China
S. Bai
School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing, PR China
397
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
A. Yabe
KOZO KEIKAKU Engineering Inc. Tokyo, Japan
A. Miyamoto
Yamaguchi University Yamaguchi, Japan
398
SS4: Bridges for high speed railways
Organizer: R. Calcada
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
REFERENCES
Albuquerque, C. 2008. Dynamic behavior of high speed
railway bridges with orthotropic deck; MSc. Thesis (in
Portuguese). Porto: Faculty of Engineering of the Univer-
sity of Porto.
Carnerero Ruiz, A. 2007. Dynamic behavior of high speed
railway bridges with transverse structural elements; PhD.
Thesis (in Spanish). Madrid: Escuela Tcnica Superior de
Ingenieros de Caminos, Caneles y Puertos. Universidad
Politcnica de Madrid.
Comit Europen de Normalisation 2003. EN1991-2
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures Part 2: Traffic loads
on bridges. Brussels.
Comit Europen de Normalisation 2005. EN1990-A2: Basis
of Structural Design Annex A2: Applications for bridges.
Figure 1. Prester Bridge. Brussels.
401
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
402
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
403
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
404
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
S.I. Kim
Korea Railroad Research Institute, Uiwang, South Korea
ABSTRACT
405
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Bridges E-2 and E-3 in the new railway to the Northwest of Spain
C. Jurado
Polytechnic University of Madrid, Spain; Ingecal Ingenieros, S. L. Madrid, Spain
ABSTRACT
406
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
New bridge in pergola for the new railway of high speed trains to the
Northwest of Spain
C. Jurado
Polytechnic University of Madrid, Spain; Ingecal Ingenieros, S. L. Madrid, Spain
ABSTRACT
407
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
408
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
A.A. Pvoas
AP Bridge Construction Systems Portugal, Ltd
ABSTRACT
409
SS5: Industrial smart material applications
for civil infrastructure (ISMA)
Organizer: T.B. Messervey
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
413
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
D. Inaudi
SMARTEC SA, Manno, Switzerland
414
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J.L. Withiam
DAppolonia, Monroeville, PA, USA
ABSTRACT
415
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
D. Heider
University of Delaware, Center for Composite Materials, Newark, DE, USA
ABSTRACT
416
SS6: Advances in structural robustness:
dependability framework
Organizer: F. Bontempi
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
REFERENCES
NASA, 2007. NASA Systems Engineering Handbook, Revi-
sion 1, NASA/SP-2007-6105.
419
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
F. Brando
Structural Engineer, New York, United States
R.B. Testa
Columbia University in the City of New York, New York, United States
F. Bontempi
Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
420
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J.R. Casas
Technical University of Catalunya, Civil Engineering Department, Barcelona Spain
A.H. Huespe
International Center for Computational Methods in Engineering (CIMEC), Santa Fe, Argentina
ABSTRACT
421
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
C. Crosti
University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
D. Duthinh
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
422
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M. Wolff
Grassl Engineering Consultans, Hamburg, Germany
U. Starossek
Structural Analysis and Steel Structures Institute, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany
ABSTRACT
423
SS8: Nondeterministic schemes for structural
safety & reliability of bridges
Organizer: S. Arangio
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
427
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
S. Arangio
School of Engineering, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
M. Ghosn
City College of New York, NY, USA
428
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Basic aspects for the uncertainty in the design and analysis of bridges
ABSTRACT
REFERENCES
Handling Exceptions in Structural Engineering 2008, Rome,
DOI:10.3267/HE2008.
Figure 1. Evolutive/Innovative designs in the Starossek, U., (2009) Progressive collapse of structures,
(performance parameter) space. Thomas Telford.
429
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
C. Crosti
University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
D. Duthinh
National Institute of Standard and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
ABSTRACT since Atn < 0.58 Avn , failure is by block shear. The ulti-
mate load is 2088 kN at a displacement of 14 mm, and
Following the catastrophic failure of the I-35W bridge thus the LRFR value provides a factor of safety of 2.14.
in Minnesota in 2007, the Federal Highway Adminis- Plate 4 has tension length Lt of 0.150 m and shear
tration issued guidelines for the load rating of bolted length Lv of 0.273 m. In this case, Atn > 0.58 Avn and
and riveted gusset plates in truss bridges (FHWA, failure is by tension. The ultimate load is 2190 kN at a
2009). This paper develops finite-element models displacement of 7.8 mm, and the LRFR value provides
capable of predicting the behavior of gusset plates in a factor of safety of 2.38.
tension, resulting in possible failure by block shear, Thus, Plates 2 and 3, which failed by block shear,
for comparison with the guidelines. Block shear fail- even though they had rather different hole arrange-
ure is a limit state that combines tension failure on one ment, behaved very similarly. Plate 4, which failed by
plane and shear failure on a perpendicular plane. The tension, had a slightly higher factor of safety but less
analysis accounts for the nonlinearity of the material ductility than Plates 2 and 3. In all cases, the FHWA
and large displacements. For validation, Plate 1 simu- values are safe and adequate.
lates a physical test by the University of Alberta (UA). Compared to Plate 2, Plate 5 has a third row of
The material is bilinear elasto-plastic, with Youngs bolts. The ultimate load is 3468 kN at a displacement
modulus of 215 GPa, yield strength of 410 MPa and of 47.3 mm, and the LRFR value provides a factor
tangent modulus of 2.15 GPa. The analysis uses true of safety of 2.73. Results show the beneficial effect
stress and true strain and the tension load is applied of adding internal bolts, which increase the strength
by three point loads on the upper half of each bolt and ductility of the gusset plate. A simplified analy-
hole. Results from the present two STRAND meshes sis that only accounts for the perimeter bolts would
agree well with the ABAQUS model used by UA. All underestimate the strength and ductility of the gusset
three finite-element results slightly underestimate the plate.
test results, especially at the onset of yielding. The Finally we analyze one of the example plates from
Load Resistance Factor Rating (LRFR) value falls on the guidance document. Its ultimate load is 10750 kN
the limit of the elastic range, whereas the unfactored at a displacement of 43.2 mm, and thus the LRFR value
FHWA value produces a small amount of yielding. provides a factor of safety of 2.28.
Plate 2 has a tension length Lt of 0.139 m, a shear In conclusion, nonlinear finite-element analysis val-
length Lv of 0.358 m and 16 bolt holes arranged in two idated by experimental data confirms the safety and
rows. Since net tension area Atn < 0.58 Avn net shear validity of the FHWA load rating formulas for the
area, failure is by block shear. Assuming as failure block shear strength of riveted and bolted gusset plates.
criterion a maximum strain of 100%, results show an For a variety of geometries, the Load and Resistance
ultimate load of 2720 kN at a displacement of 14 mm, Factor Rating (LRFR) value produces factors of safety
and thus the LRFR value provides a factor of safety of between 2.1 and 2.7. This study also provides guid-
ultimate load/LRFR value of 2.15. ance on the mesh density required around the holes,
The bolts in Plate 3 are distributed over a narrower the application of bolt loads, and the approximation
width. This gusset plate has a tension length Lt of involved in modeling the perimeter holes only.
0.0462 m and a shear length Lv of 0.358 m. Again,
430
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
431
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
E. Tubaldi
Dipartimento di Architettura Costruzione e Strutture, Universit Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona
M. Barbato
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
A. DallAsta
ProCAM, Dipartimento di Progettazione e Costruzione dellAmbiente, University of Camerino, Viale della
Rimembranza, Ascoli Piceno (AP), Italy
ABSTRACT
432
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J.S. Zhu
Tianjin University, Tianjin, P.R. China
D.M. Frangopol
Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
433
SS10: Life cycle bridge engineering in Korea
Organizers: H.-N. Cho & J.-S. Kong
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
C. Park
Department of Civil Engineering, Kangwon National University, Samcheok, Korea
M.-J. Lee
Department of Civil Engineering, Choongnam National University, Daejeon, Korea
Recently, researchers in the field of bridge mainte- Customer value LOS (Level of Service)
nance and management have tried to enhance the
satisfaction of both users and agencies of social infras- Sustainability Provide sustainable services without
adverse function to the environment
tructures by applying the asset management concept.
Approachability* Allow users to approach bridges
Asset management of bridges is clearly a national mat- without restrictions
ter that must be set up in preparation for a possible Validity of costs** Efficiently manage bridges
sharp increase in maintenance costs in the near future. Quality* Validate bridge performance of
Nevertheless, the asset management has still remained basic functions
incomplete, given the lack of relevant government sup- Health & safety* Let users safely use bridges
ports or policy in Korea. Therefore, it is urgent to carry Reliability and Provide predictable and continuous
out in-depth studies to build a bridge management sys- responsiveness** services
tem at the asset management level by establishing a Minimize impact by promptly
counteracting emergencies
support system for making decisions such as the for-
Customer service** Kindly respond to service demand
mulation of bridge maintenance strategies and the log- Minimize civil complaint
ical budget allocation. In Korea, diverse efforts have
recently been performed to build an asset management
system for the entire infrastructure facilities. functions of the suggested processes are defined con-
This study is to develop more efficient asset man- sidering the domestic circumstances in Korea. This
agement framework for bridge management. The basic study also defines a diversity of LOS (level of service)
concept of a bridge asset management is defined and of bridges with respect to the accomplishment of the
the core technologies to establish systems are pro- local communities and customer values, and clarifies
posed by analyzing the current status and functions performance measures for quantitative assessment of
of the existing bridge and asset management systems the LOS. By dividing asset management of bridges
both in and out of Korea. In addition, the bridge into the establishment of strategies and that of plans,
asset management process is suggested and major various decision-making subjects are outlined.
REFERENCES
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration) 1999. Asset man-
agement Primer, Office of Asset Management, US DOT.
INGENIUM and IPWEA 2006. International Infrastructure
Management Manual -Version 3.0, ISBN 0-473-10685-X.
Kobayashi Kiyoshi 2008. Efficient Budgeting for Sustainable
Management, Bridges and Foundations, No.8, 109111.
Korea Institute of Construction Technology (KICT) 2006.
Development of life-cycle cost analysis method and sys-
tem for the life-cycle cost optimum design and the
life-time management of steel bridges, Research Report,
Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs
(MLTM) and Korea Institute of Construction and Trans-
portation Technology Evaluation and Planning (KICT-
Figure 1. Bridge asset management process. TEP) (in Korean).
437
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
H. Park
IAM corporation, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
K.-H. Park
Korea Institute of Construction Technology, Ilsan, Korea
S.-Y. Oh
Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affair, Gwacheon, Korea
438
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J.-S. Kong
Civil, Environment and Architecture Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
H.-Yong
ITS & Road Environment Division, Office of Transport Policy, Ministry of Land, Transportation and Maritime
Affairs, Korea
ABSTRACT
R.B. Polder
TNO Built Environment and Geosciences, Structures and Safety, Delft, The Netherlands
Delft University of Technology, Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft, The Netherlands
443
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J.R. Casas
Civil Engineering Department. Universitat Politcnica de Catalunya. Barcelona, Spain
444
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
L. Recic
Salonit Anhovo, Deskle, Slovenia
T. Wierzbicki
IBDIM, Warsaw, Poland
ABSTRACT
445
Denari et al. 2009a, Recommendations for the tailoring of Habert, G., ajna, A., Rossi, P., Denari, E., 2009, Environ-
UHPFRC recipes for rehabilitation, deliverable ARCHES mental evaluation of a bridge rehabilitation system with
D06, http://arches.fehrl.org/. a new local material based UHPFRC, Journal paper in
Denari et al. 2009b, Recommendations for the use of preparation.
UHPFRC in composite structural members rehabili-
tation Log ezsoki bridge, deliverable ARCHES D14,
http://arches.fehrl.org/.
446
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M. Serdar
Faculty of Civil Engineering University of Zagreb, Croatia
447
SS13: Current advancements in bridge technology
Organizer: A.H. Malik
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
451
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
C.C. Fu
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
Figure 2. 12-minute raw data was extracted from Tyding Bridge gauge number 3.
452
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
A.H. Malik
Delaware Department of Transportation, Delaware, USA
453
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
454
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Z. Pan
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA;
Department of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
C.C. Fu
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
Z. L
Department of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
ABSTRACT
455
box girder bridge in Palau. 8th International Conference long-span continuous rigid-frame bridges. Journal of
on Creep and Shrinkage of Concrete, preliminary report: China & Foreign Highway 25(1): 5658. (in Chinese).
120. Ise-Shima, Japan. L Zhitao & Pan Zuanfeng 2010. Several problems of design-
Zhan Jianhui & Chen Hui 2005. Analysis of causes of ing long-span prestressed concrete box girder bridges.
excessive deflections and cracking of box girder in China Civil Engineering Journal 43(1): 17. (in Chinese).
456
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J.J. Shim, S.N. Hong, J.M. Park, J.W. Choi & S.K. Park
Sungkyunkwan Univ., Suwon, Korea(south)
K.B. Han
Expressway & Transportation Research Institute, Hwaseong, Korea(south)
457
SS14: Using technology to manage, preserve, &
renew landmark signature bridges
Organizers: D.S. Lowdermilk & F.L. Moon
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
461
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
462
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
463
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J. Weidner
Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
ABSTRACT
464
SS15: Modeling of bridge seismic response
Organizer: M. Fischinger
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
L. Pardi
Autostrade per lItalia S.p.A., Rome, Italy
467
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
468
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
REFERENCES
Albanesi, T. & Lavorato, D. & Nuti, C. 2006. Prove sper-
imentali monotone e cicliche su barre di acciaio inox.
Proceedings of National Conference Sperimentazione su
materiali e strutture: 357366. Venezia. Italy.
469
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
V.P. Nadakuditi
Stress Offshore, Inc., Houston, TX, USA
INRODUCTION
470
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
471
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M. Dicleli
Engineering Sciences Department, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey
ABSTRACT
472
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M. Saiidi
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, USA
A. Ebrahimpour
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho, USA
N.B. Johnson
Nevada Department of Transportation, Carson City, Nevada, USA
ABSTRACT
473
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
474
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M.J. Veletzos
Merrimack College, North Andover, MA, USA
J.I. Restrepo
University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
475
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
476
SS16: Recent challenging bridge structures
Organizer: I.S. Darwish
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
479
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
T. Cakebread
LUSAS Vice President North America
480
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
481
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
S. Russo
Iuav University of Venice, Italy
A. Adilardi
Engineer of Pratos Municipality, Italy
ABSTRACT
482
SS17: Life-cycle design of structural systems
Organizers: F. Biondini & D.M. Frangopol
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
S. Alampalli
New York State Department of Transportation, Albany, NY, USA
M. Ettouney
Weidlinger Associates, Inc., New York, NY, USA
ABSTRACT
485
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
A. Palermo
University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
486
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
F. Biondini
Department of Structural Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
D.M. Frangopol
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, ATLSS Center, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
487
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
G. Flintsch
Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, USA
ABSTRACT
488
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
D.R. Mertz
University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA
Recently, a second fatigue limit state was included limit-state load live-load load
in the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifica- combination factor
tions (AASHTO, 2010). This limit state, termed the
Fatigue I 1.50
Fatigue I limit state, was added to explicitly dif-
Fatigue II 0.75
ferentiate infinite-life fatigue design from finite-life
fatigue design. The original fatigue limit state is now
termed the Fatigue II limit state and provides finite-life
designs. The live-load load factors of the two fatigue- The Fatigue II live-load load factor of 0.75, from
and-fracture limit-state load combinations excerpted Table 1, times the fatigue load yields an effective
from LRFD Table 3.4.1-1 are given in Table1 below. truck which replicates fatigue damage of the entire
The load factors of the fatigue-and-fracture limit- distribution of truck traffic.
state load combinations represent multipliers which The additional fatigue limit state has no impact
transform the fatigue load of LRFD Article 3.6.1.4, on the design of steel and concrete highway bridges.
the HL-93 design truck with a fixed rear-axle spac- The original fatigue resistance equation with its lower
ing of 30 feet, into nominal fatigue loads for use in bound has been replaced with two separate fatigue
the two fatigue-and-fracture limit-state load combina- resistances equations. The real impact is on the percep-
tions. They do not represent uncertainty of the nominal tion of bridge designers. Now when they are providing
fatigue loads. an infinite-life design, they explicitly know it.
The Fatigue I load factor of 1.50, from Table 1, when
multiplied by the stress range due to the passage of
the LRFD fatigue truck produces the maximum stress REFERENCES
range considered for fatigue design. This maximum
stress range for fatigue design has been characterized AASHTO, LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Fifth Edi-
as the stress range with a 1 in 10,000 probability of tion, American Association of State Highway and Trans-
being exceeded. portation Officials, Washington, DC, 2010.
489
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
C.M. Paliga
Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil
M.V. Real
Federal University of Rio Grande, Rio Grande, Brazil
A. Campos Filho
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
S.M.C. Diniz
Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
490
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
X.Y. Sun
Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P.R. China
Visiting Scholar 20092011, Stanford University, Stanford, California USA
ABSTRACT
491
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J.R. Casas
Universitat Politcnica da Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
ABSTRACT
492
SS18: Optical monitoring techniques for
bridge maintenance & safety
Organizers: S. Sumitro & H. Matsuda
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
K. Chandler
Chandler Monitoring Systems Inc., Lawrenceville, Georgia USA
T.W. Graver
Micron Optics Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, USA
A. Mndez
MCH Engineering LLC, Alameda, CA, USA
495
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M. Uchino
Fukuoka Industrial Technology Center, Kitakyushu, Japan
K. Yamaguchi
Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
H. Matsuda
Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
ABSTRACT
REFERENCES
Uchino, M., 2001. Two-directional simultaneous measure-
ment system of the surface deformation using speckle
interferometry method. Proceedings of the APCFS &
ATEM01. 863839.
Uchino, M., 2006. Discussion of StrainAnalysis using Digital
Image Correlation Method. JSEM collaborated workshop.
Picture 1. Specimen and camera. No.6-1. 3639.
496
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
K. Hida
K&T Consultant Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan
Y. Ito
Saga University, Saga, Japan
M. Uchino
Fukuoka Industrial Technology Center, Fukuoka, Japan
T. Okamoto
Keisoku Research Consultant Co. Ltd, Hiroshima, Japan
P. Sumitoro
Smart Structures, Illinois, United States
H. Matsuda
Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
1 INTRODUCTION
497
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Table 1.
Manufacturing Can be controlled to constant Almost constant Can be controlled at a Single camera
line conditions constant speed
Infrastructure Change between day and night, Distance changes depending Travel speed changes. More than one camera is used. Vibration-
survey and depending on places on cross sections. proof and small-size cameras are desirable.
498
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
T. Miyashita
Nagaoka University of Technology, Japan
Y. Fujno
University of Tokyo, Japan
499
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
K. Ichimiya
Civil Engineering, Oita National College of Technology, Japan
ABSTRACT
500
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M. Uchino
Fukuoka Industrial Technology Center, Fukuoka, Japan
T. Okamoto
Keisoku Research Consultant Co, Hiroshima, Japan
K. Hida
K&T Consultant Co, Tokyo, Japan
Y. Ito
Saga University, Saga, Japan
P. Sumitoro
Smart Structures, Rantoul, United State
H. Matsuda
Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
ABSTRACT
REFERENCE
Uchino, M., Okamoto, T., Hida, K., Ito, Y., and Mastuda, H.,
2009. Investigation of Strain Analysis Method around a
Hole in a Plate Using Multi-Rosette Analysis by Digital
Image Correlation Method (in Japanese), Journal of the
Japanese Society for Experimental Mechanics (JJSEM),
Figure 1. Definition of deformation state at the border of
9(2): 96102.
the through hole.
501
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Y. Fujino
The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
502
SS19: Implementation of bridge management
administration in Japan
Organizers: H. Furuta & E. Watanabe
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
H. Furuta
Department of Informatics, Kansai university, Takatsuki, Japan
1 INTRODUCTION 4 CONCLUSIONS
The Osaka Prefectural Government has been build- In 1999, around 900 bridges with more than 15 m
ing an asset management system for bridge structures. span length had been inspected in Osaka prefecture.
This system attempts to maintain existing bridges in Using the inspection data, the integrity level of each
good conditions and extend the remaining lives by bridge was calculated, which was used to make the
introducing the concept of Life-Cycle Cost (LCC). It ordering of repair actions. In the determination of the
is, then, necessary to achieve a rational plan of resource repair order, the importance of bridges was taken into
allocation through the normalization of annual budget. account as well as the damage states. The importance
In this paper, the asset management system developed was given by the significance level of the road involv-
by the Osaka Prefectural Government is described. ing the bridge. The importance level was classified into
three categories.
LCC calculation presents 3.5 million US dollars/
2 PRESENT STATE OF BRIDGES IN OSAKA year necessary for maintenance. Because of the present
PREFECTURE financial difficulty of Osaka prefecture, it is difficult
to secure the budget for the maintenance. Thus, the
There are 811 bridges (more than 15 m span) in Osaka necessary resource may be partly appropriated from
prefecture. The age of most bridges is 40 years, and other budget of repair works such as pavement, paint-
it will become 60 years after 20 years. The ratio of ing or other repair actions or may be managed to be
bridges with more than 50 years will become 56% secured through the more efficient utilization of road
from 9%. Then, it is necessary to equalize the annual infrastructures.
budget and change from the essentail maintenance to The improvement of painting has started to extend
the preventive maintenance in order to establish a ratio- the interval of repainting. Various actions have been
nal maintenance program under the limited amount of performed to obtain the understanding of tax payers for
budget. the importanece of maintence works throught the site
explanation meetings. The repair strategy and meth-
ods have been integrated and standardized to realize a
3 BRIDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN rational allocation of financial and human resources.
OSAKA PREFECTURE The movement of asset management of bridge
structures has spread all over Japan. Many local gov-
This system attempts to maintain existing bridges in ermnents established a forum of asset management
good conditions and extend the remaining lives by engineers, in which active discussions and experience
introducing the concept of Life-Cycle Cost (LCC). It and knowledge have been exchanged. The appeal for
is, then, necessary to achieve a rational plan of resource the necessity of preventive maintenance has started
allocation through the normalization of annual budget. and the movement has grown up.
505
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
H. Kawaragi
Aomori Prefectural Government, Aomori, Japan
M. Kaneuji
Kajima Corporation, Tokyo, Japan
E. Watanabe
Osaka Regional Planning Institute, Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan
ABSTRACT
506
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
H. Oishi
Planning Division, Hanshin Expressway Management Technology Center, Osaka, Japan
K. Kaito
Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
ABSTRACT
507
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
T. Yasuzato
West Nippon Expressway Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan
ABSTRACT
508
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
509
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Y. Sakai
Hanshin Expressway Company Limited, Osaka, Japan
M. Jido
Chuo Fukken Consultants Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan
H. Furuta
Department of Informatics of Kansai University, Osaka, Japan
K. Kobayashi
Graduate School of Management, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
510
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
E. Watanabe
Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
H. Furuta
Kansai University, Takatsuki, Japan
511
SS20: Challenges for enhancing bridge security
Organizer: S.R. Duwadi
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
S.R. Duwadi
Federal Highway Administration, McLean, Virginia, USA
REFERENCES
FHWA 2006 Conditions and Performance Report, Status
of the Nations Highways, Bridges, and Transit, Federal
Highway Administration, Department of Transportation,
2006 http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/2006cpr/index.htm.
515
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J. Krieger
Federal Highway Research Institute, Bergisch-Gladbach, Germany
516
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
517
SS21: Structural monitoring of bridges:
Hong Kongs experience
Organizers: Y.-L. Xu & M.C.H. Hui
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
K.Y. Wong
Bridges & Structures Division, Highways Department, The Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
521
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
K.Y. Wong
Bridges and Structures Division, Highways Department, The Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative
Region
522
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
523
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Q. Li
Department of Bridge Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
A.X. Guo
School of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China
K.Y. Wong
Bridges & Structures Division, Highways Department, Hong Kong
524
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
K.Y. Wong
Bridges & Structures Division, Highways Department, Hong Kong
525
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
526
SS23: Performance-based design for steel structures
Organizers: S.-H. Kim & J.-S. Kong
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
H. Furuta
Department of Informatics, Kansai University, Takatsuki, Japan
N. Sato
Department of Civil Engineering, Chuo University, Tokyo, Japan
M. Kawatani
Department of Civil Engineering, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
529
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
530
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
531
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
S.Yabe
Ryusho Industrial Co., Kagawa, Japan
M. Dogaki
Kansai University, Osaka, Japan
532
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
Table 1. Results of optimum design variables. Czarnecki, A. A., Nowak, A. S. 2008. Time-variant reliability
profiles for steel girder bridges. Journal of Strutural safety,
Design 30 (2008), 4964.
variables L = 40 m L = 50 m L = 60 m L = 70 m Kwang-Min Lee, Hyo-Nam Cho and Cheol-Jun Cha. 2006
Life-cycle cost effective optimum design of steel bridge
X1 18.10 18.23 18.40 18.68 considering environmental stressors, Engineering Struc-
X2 25.15 28.28 31.26 34.14 ture Journal, 12521265.
X3 18.24 18.35 18.52 18.77
X4 1704.3 2113.5 2537.7 2976.5
Total cost 390.96 436.7 483.22 530.6
533
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
E. Yamaguchi
Kyushu Institute of Technology, Kitakyushu, Japan
534
SS24: Steel bridge rehabilitation
Organizer: M. Sakano
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
W.J. Castle
W.J. Castle, P.E. & Associates, P.C.
ABSTRACT
537
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
538
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
REFERENCES
Canadian Standards Association (CSA). 2006. CAN/CSA-
S6-06: Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code.
Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE). 2002. SAE J2334:
Figure 1. Weathering steel corrosion test results. Cosmetic Corrosion Lab Test SAE Handbook.
539
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
C.C. Lam
University of Macau, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
M.C.H. Yam
Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Department of Building and Real Estate
540
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
H. Suzuki
Meisei University, Tokyo, Japan
T. Irube
TTK Corporation, Tokyo, Japan
ABSTRACT
541
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
K. Matsumoto
Railtech Co., Osaka, Japan
M. Sakano
Kansai University, Osaka, Japan
INTRODUCTION
REFERENCES
R. Daito, K. Matsumoto, Y. Niwa, M. Sakano.2008. Out-
of-plane bending behavior of the top flange under sleep-
ers in steel railway though truss stringer. Journal of
Photo 1. Fatigue crack. Constructional Steel in Japanese 16: 703710.
542
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
K. Matsumoto
Railtec, Osaka, Japan
M. Sakano
Kansai University, Osaka, Japan
A. Koshiba
BMC, Chiba, Japan
543
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M. Sakano
Kansai University, Osaka, Japan
Y. Natsuaki
Japan Bridge Association, Osaka, Japan
ABSTRACT
REFERENCES
Belytschko, T. & Black, T. 1999. Elastic crack growth in finite
elements with minimal remeshing, International Journal
for Numerical Methods in Engineering 45: 602620.
Shibanuma, K. & Utsunomiya, T. 2009. Reformulation of
XFEM based on PUFEM for solving problem caused
by blending elements, Finite Elements in Analysis and
Figure 1. Modeling of crack in the PU-XFEM. Design, 45(11): 806816.
544
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M. Shimamura
Research and Development Center of JR East Group, Kita-Ku, Saitama, Japan
ABSTRACT
545
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
546
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
H. Suzuki
Meisei University, Hino, Tokyo, Japan
N. Inaba
Central Nippon Expressway, Numadu, Shizuoka, Japan
Y. Tomita
East Nippon Expressway, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan
K. Shito
East Nippon Expressway, Misato, Saitama, Japan
ABSTRACT
Figure 1. Specimens.
547
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Figure 2. Location of stress measurement. Figure 4. One example for change of stress.
548
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
549
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Experimental study on the root fatigue life improvement for the reasonable
design of steel pier seismic reinforcement
C. Miki
Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro, Japan
Y. Hirabayashi
Metropolitan Expressway Corporation, Chiyoda, Japan
ABSTRACT
550
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Y. Natsuaki
Japan Bridge Association, Osaka, Japan
ABSTRACT
REFERENCE
Tabata, S., Yamamura, K., Hamada, N., Sakota, H., Sakai,
Y. and Sakano, M. 2007. Experimental study on rein-
forcing method against fatigue damage at welded joint
between bulb rib and lateral rib in orthotropic steel deck,
Figure 1. Fatigue cracks in welded joint between bulb rib Proceedings of 62th Annual Meeting of JSCE, I-003 (in
and lateral rib in the Hanshin Expressway. Japanese).
551
SS25: New developments in bridge design codes
Organizer: A.S. Nowak
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
E.-S. Hwang
Kyung Hee University, Yongin, Korea
I.R. Paik
Kyung Won University, Seongnam, Korea
H.-M. Koh
Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
Figure 1. Evolution of design code for bridges. Figure 2. Comparison between proposed and current .
555
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
B.H. Choi
Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Hanbat National University, South Korea
ABSTRACT
556
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J.M. Kulicki
Modjeski and Masters, Inc.
557
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Approach for developing calibrated service limit states for the AASHTO
LRFD bridge design specifications: A progress report
A.S. Nowak
University of Nebraska
D.R. Mertz
University of Delaware
558
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M. agoda
Lublin University of Technology, Lublin, Poland
Road & Bridge Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland
REFERENCES
CEN. En 1994-2, 2005: Design of composite steel and
concrete structures. Part 2: Composite bridges.
Gomes Nawarro M., Lebet J.P. 2001 Concrete cracking in
composite bridges: tests, models and design proposals.
Structural Engineering International, 11 (3), 184190.
559
SS26: WIM-based live loads for bridges
Organizer: A.S. Nowak
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
G. Fu
Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, US; Tongji University, Shanghai, China
J. You
Tongji University, Shanghai, China
563
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
B.A. Jacob
Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chausses (LCPC), Paris, France
M. Bereni
Service dEtude sur les Transports, les Routes et leurs Amnagements (SETRA), Bagneux, France
M. Ghosn
City College of New-York, New York, United States
B. Sivakumar
HNTB, One Penn Plaza, New York, New York, United States
T. Kearney
Federal Highway Administration, New York, United States
564
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
565
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
B. Sivakumar
HNTB Corp., New York, New York, U.S.A
ABSTRACT occurred if the gap between two trucks, that is the dis-
tance between the last axle of the leading truck and
An important parameter that controls the maximum the first axle of the trailing truck, is less than the span
load imposed on the structure is related to the number length. Five WIM sites (ten directional sites) with free-
of simultaneous vehicles on the bridge, which is deter- flowing traffic in New York State were studied by the
mined through data on truck headways under operating NCHRP 1276 Research Team in order to determine
conditions. Accurate headway information should be the maximum multiple presence probabilities for vari-
collected through WIM systems. Simultaneous data on ous truck traffic volumes. Daily truck traffic volume
headways and weights is necessary to determine pos- was classified as light (less than 1000 trucks per day),
sible correlations between truck positions or the lanes average (more than 1000 trucks but less than 2500
they occupy and their weights or other characteristics trucks per day), heavy (more than 2500 trucks but less
such as truck type, size and numbers of axles. Fortu- than 5000 trucks per day), and very heavy (more than
nately, the data needed for multiple presence estimates 5000 trucks per day). Multiple presence probabilities
is presently available and already contained in the raw were compiled for headway separations up to 300 feet,
data files captured by many WIM data loggers. Field in 20-foot increments. Maximum multiple presence
measurements of truck arrival data to a 0.01 second probabilities were obtained for each headway separa-
resolution is necessary to establish multiple presence tion interval. These statistics can be used to simulate
probabilities for a span. multiple-presence events for sites where accurate time
Multiple presence is influenced by traffic volume stamps are not available. The paper will describe the
and span length. When considering multiple trucks on findings of this study. Mr Sivakumar was the Principal
a given span, a multiple presence event is said to have Investigator for NCHRP 1276.
566
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
B. Costa
LABEST, Faculty of Engineering, University of Beira Interior, Covilh, Portugal
ABSTRACT
567
SS27: High performance concrete lessons of past decades
Organizer: M.L. Ralls
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J. Kapur
Washington State Department of Transportation
571
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
S.N. Lane
Portland Cement Association, Washington, DC, USA
572
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
C. Ozyildirim
Principal Research Scientist, Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, Virginia, U.S.A.
573
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
K.R. Pruski
Texas Department of Transportation, Bridge Division, Texas, USA
574
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
D.L. Scott
New Hampshire Department of Transportation, Bureau of Bridge Design, Concord, NH, USA
Institute, Gouda, The Netherlands
575
SS28: Construction, architecture & testing of soil-steel bridges
Organizers: Z. Manko & D. Beben
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
D. Beben
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Opole University of Technology, Opole, Poland
Z. Zee Manko
Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wroclaw, Poland
ABSTRACT
579
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Figure 3. Measured moments at the crown centreline for different locomotive speeds.
580
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J. Kurzynski
Commercial-Service Bridge Company ZBYSZKO, Klodzko, Poland
Z. Zee Manko
Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wroclaw, Poland
D. Beben
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Opole University of Technology, Opole, Poland
ABSTRACT
581
SS29: Lessons learned from instrumented bridges
Organizer: M.Q. Feng
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
P.J. Fanning
School of Architecture Landscape & Civil Engineering, University College Dublin, Ireland
ABSTRACT
585
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M.Q. Feng
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
L.-H. Sheng
California Department of Transportation, California, USA
ABSTRACT
586
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
H.F. Zhou
Structural Health Monitoring Division, PolyU Technology & Consultancy Company Limited, Hong Kong
587
SS30: Chinese bridges
Organizer: M.-C. Tang
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Z. Gao
China Railway Major Bridge Reconnaissance & Design Institute Co., Ltd. Wuhan, China
Major steel bridges for high speed railway in China Zhengzhou Jinan
are recently developed. Some of these bridges, located Tianxing Dashen Yellow Yellow
Beijng-Shanghai and Beijing-Guangzhou High Speed Project zhou guan River River
Railways, across Yangtze River and Yellow River,
Objective Design 200 300 350 350
are under construction, include: Tianxingzhou Bridge, Speeds (km/h)
Dashenguan Bridge (Fig. 1), Zhengzhou Yellow River
Bridge, and Jinan Yellow River Bridge. All these
major bridges are multy railway lines or rail-cum-road
bridges, with heavy loading capacity and high railway Yangtze River Bridge, Nanjing Dashenguan Yangtze
operation speeds, therefore, the steel truss structure River Bridge, Zhengzhou Yellow River Rail-Cum-
are adopted for all of them. Some new materials, Road Bridge, and Jinan Yellow River Bridge of
new structures and new workmanships are applied Beijing-Shanghai High Speed Railway. For all the
accordingly. above mentioned bridges, steel truss has been used
Bridges are important structure to high speed rail- with its good rigidity. Some new materials, new
way and railway passenger special line, have main strutures and new workmanships have been applied.
impact on stability of high speed train operation, Objective design speeds for both Beijing-Shanghai
as well as comfort and safety of passengers. Cur- High Speed Railway and Beijing-Guangzhou Railway
rently, Beijing-Shanghai and Beijing-Guagzhou High Passenger Special Line are 350km/h. According to the
Speed Railways are under construction. They have traffic conditions at the bridge location, and the struc-
total 4 major bridges across Yangtze River or Huanghe ture features, the objective design speeds of 4 bridges
River, namely Wuhan Tianxingzhou Rail-Cum-Road above mentioned refer to Table 1:
These bridges have heavy self-weight load, and most
of them are taking several railway lines or carriage-
ways, so the live loads are considerable great also.
Tianxingzhou Bridge undertake 4 railway linesand 6
carriageways, Dashenguan Bridge 4 railway lines plus
2 metro lines, both of them are the bridges with the
largest design loads in the world. Please refer to Table 2
for these bridges span length and design live loads.
According to thelarge span, high Speed and heavy
load features, some new techniques are adopted in the
bridge design.
Figure 1. Dashenguan Bridge.
Zhengzhou Jinan
Tianxingzhou Dashenguan Yellow Yellow
Bridge Bridge Bridge River Bridge River Bridge
591
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Y.-P. Lin
Shanghai Municipal Engineering Design General Institute, Shanghai, China
ABSTRACT
592
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
D. Yin
T. Y. Lin International China, Chongqing, China
W. Xu & X. Duan
China Zhongtie Major Bridge Reconnaissance & Design Institute Co., Ltd. Wuhan, China
ABSTRACT
593
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Q. You
Jiangsu Provincial Communications Dept, Nanjing, China
L. Ji
Jiangsu Taizhou Bridge CCD, Taizhou, China
X. Dong
Jiangsu Sutong Bridge CCD, Nanjing, China
Jiangsu Province is located in Yangtze River Delta, the Bridge Name Built Year Span (m) Bridge Type
mostly developed area in China. It is also theT-junction
intersection of coastal areas and the Yangtze River Jiangyin 1999 1385 Suspension
Runyang 2005 1490 Suspension
adjacent to Shanghai, Zhejiang, Shandong and other
Taizhou(Fig.2) Under Constr 1080 2 Suspension
provinces with busy land and water traffic. However, Nanjing 4th Under Constr 1418 Suspension
the separation caused by the Yangtze River obstructed Nanjing 2nd 2001 628 Cable-Stayed
the cross-coast exchange and development. Therefore, Nanjing 3rd 2005 648 Cable-Stayed
bridges constructed over the Yangtze River had been Sutong(Fig.1) 2008 1088 Cable-Stayed
the dream of people living on both banks of the river. Nanjing Yangtze 1968 160 Steel Truss
Since Jiangsu Province is located in the middle and River Girder
lower reaches of Yangtze River, the huge water width Dashengguan 2010 336 Steel Truss Arch
and depth as well as the geological complexity make Chongqi Under Constr 185 Concrete Girder
it extremely difficult to construct cross-river bridges
over there. Until 1968, Nanjing Yangtze River Bridge,
the first cross-river bridge along the water section of
450 kilometers in Jiangsu Province, was opened to traf-
fic. In 1980s, with the development of social economy
and the improvement of technology, Jiangsu started to
conduct researches and planning for the construction
of cross-river channels overYangtze River. Therein, 12
positions were selected for the construction of bridges
or tunnels (Fig. 1). Figure 2. Taizhou Bridge.
This article briefly introduces the construction of
cross-river bridges in Jiangsu Province(Tab. 1).
In 2009, the State approved the general plan of
Jiangsu coastal development. To help northern Jiangsu
preferably blend into the Yangtze River Delta and
join the Metropolitan Area of Shanghai, more cross-
river bridges are needed. Recently, Jiangsu Province
has further adjusted planning of cross-river passages,
Figure 3. Sutong Bridge.
confirming that there are 24 cross-river passages in
Jiangsu Province, 11 of which are integral parts of
cross-river passages of Jiangsu Highway. Compared
to first planned location, the geological, hydrologi-
cal and navigation conditions of newly-planned bridge
location are more complicated and the project con-
struction is more difficult. We will make use of our
own and domestic and overseas advanced experience,
go on with the path of development and innovation,
and make contribution to the development of bridges
Figure 1. Cross-river Channels Plan for Express Ways in in our country.
Jiangsu Province.
594
General Session
Organizers: F. Biondini & S. Pakzad
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
597
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M. Akiyama
Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
D.M. Frangopol
Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
I. Yoshida
Tokyo City University, Tokyo, Japan
598
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
REFERENCES
AASHTO Guide for Commonly Recognized (CoRe) Struc-
tural Elements
AASHTO Manual For Bridge Evaluation, 2008
AASHTO PONTIS Users Manual
Connecticut DOT Bridge Inspection Manual, 2.1
FHWA Bridge Inspectors Reference Manual FHWA-NHI-
03-001
FHWA Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MUTCD)
FHWA Recording and Coding Guide for the Structure
Inventory of the Nations Bridges, FHWA PD-96-001
US DOT Publication No. FHWA-HRT-04-042
Figure 1. Arrigoni Bridge, Middletown, CT.
599
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
600
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
P. Cachim
DECivil & LABEST, University of Aveiro, Portugal
P. Fidalgo
HDP Lda, Portugal
ABSTRACT
601
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
C.C. Caprani
Department of Civil & Structural Engineering, Dublin Institute of Technology, Ireland
ABSTRACT
602
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M. Dolce
Italian Dept. of Civil Protection, Rome, Italy
L. Pardi
Autostrade per lItalia S.p.A., Rome, Italy
603
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
604
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M.H. Chen
China Engineering Consultants, Inc., Taiwan
M.C. Chen
Ching-Yun University, Taiwan
ABSTRACT
Grade 0 1 2 3 4
605
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
606
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
C. Fang
Applied Research Associates, Inc., Champaign, Illinois, USA
607
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
608
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
REFERENCE
Matos, J.C., Valente, I. e Cruz, P. 2010. Avaliao de
incertezas no comportamento at rotura de vigas de beto
armado, ASCP09 1o Congresso de Segurana e Con-
servao de Pontes, ISBN 978-989-20-1559-0, Lisboa,
Figure 2. Mixed supported beam. pp. 512.
609
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
N. Aboobaker
New Jersey Department of Transportation, Trenton, New Jersey, USA
A. Khan
Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc., Trenton, New Jersey, USA
610
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
S. Das
URS Corporation, Morrisville, North Carolina, USA
611
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
S. Das
URS Corporation, Morrisville, North Carolina, USA
612
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
REFERENCES
Moreno, J., Valiente, A. 2004. Stress intensity factors in
riveted steel beams. Engineering Failure Analysis 11:
777787.
Krueger, R. 2004. Virtual crack closure technique: History,
approach, and applications. Applied Mechanics Reviews
57(2): 109143.
613
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
614
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
615
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT and piles different than that calculated using the live
load distribution equations developed for the girders of
Structural analysis of highway bridges using compli- jointed bridges. Therefore, using AASHTO live load
cated 3-D finite element models (FEMs) to determine distribution equations may results in either conserva-
live load effects in bridge components is possible due tive or unconservative estimates of the live load effects
to the readily available computational tools in design in the piles and abutments of integral bridges. Thus, in
offices. However, throughout the design process, using this study, live load distribution equations for integral
such complicated methods is tedious, time consuming bridge substructures are developed. For this purpose,
and expensive. Therefore, most design engineers pre- numerous 3-D and corresponding 2-D structural mod-
fer using simplified 2-D structural models of bridges els of typical integral bridges are built and analyzed
and live load distribution equations available in cur- under AASHTO live load. In the analyses, the effect
rent bridge design codes such as AASHTO (American of various superstructure and substructure properties
Association of State Highway Transportation Offi- such as span length, girder spacing, girder stiffness,
cials) LRFD (Load and Resistance Factor Design) abutment height, pile size, pile spacing and foundation
Bridge Design Specifications (2007) to determine live soil stiffness are considered. The results from the 2-D
load effects in bridge components. In AASHTO LRFD and 3-D analyses are then used to calculate the live
Bridge Design Specifications, live load distribution load distribution factors for the abutments and piles
equations are available only for the girders of jointed of integral bridges as a function of the above men-
bridges. AASHTO does not have any provisions for the tioned properties. live load distribution equations are
calculation of live load effects in integral bridge com- then developed to estimate the live load moments and
ponents including the girders, abutments and piles. shear in the abutments and piles of integral bridges
Consequently, these live load distribution equations using these live load distribution factors and nonlinear
are also used for designing the girders of integral regression analysis methods to address the above men-
bridges. In addition, most design engineers generally tioned uncertainties and to provide useful tools to the
calculate the live load effects in the abutments and piles bridge engineering community at large for the design
of integral bridges by using the AASHTO live load dis- of integral bridge abutments and piles under live load
tribution equations developed for the girders of jointed effects. It is observed that the developed live load dis-
bridges. This approach is based on the assumption that tribution equations yield a reasonably good estimate
the same rotations about a transverse axis perpendicu- of live load moment and shear in the abutments and
lar to the longitudinal direction of the bridge occur both piles of integral bridges.
in the abutments and the girders under live load due
to the monolithic construction of the superstructure-
abutment joint in integral bridges. However, it is REFERENCE
anticipated that the concentrated rigidity of a particular
girder combined with those of the adjacent girders con- AASHTO 2007. LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 4th
Edition. Washington, D. C., USA.
nected to the abutment having a smeared rigidity, may
produce a live load distribution within the abutment
616
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
617
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
REFERENCES
EN 1317-1, Road restraint systems Part 1: Terminology and
general criteria for test methods, April 1998
EN 1317-2, Road restraint systems Part 2: Performance
classes, impact test acceptance criteria and test methods
for safety barriers, April 1998.
Hellmich K., Stella J., Stangl E., Piringer S., Heimel H.,
Plomer J. 2002, Restraint systems on bridges acceptance
tests with force measurements, Final report of the research
contract of theAustrian Ministry of Traffic, Innovation and
Technology, Road research contract Nr. 3554.
RVS 15.47, 2005: Brckenausrstung, Rckhaltesysteme auf
Brcken
ENV 1991-2, 2004, Eurocode 1 Actions on structures, Part
2: General actions Traffic loads on bridges.
618
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
619
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
620
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
621
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M. Foglar
Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
ABSTRACT
622
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
G. Fu
Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, US; Tongji University, Shanghai, China
J. Feng
New Institute, Gouda, The Netherlands
623
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
The Filetto Bridge on the Santerno River near Bologna (Italy): Seismic
retrofit and reinforcement design
ABSTRACT
624
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
625
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Span-length (m)
values obtained for the specific bridge for a Reliability
R/Rn 10 15 20 25 30 35 index = 2.3.
The values presented in tables 3 and 4 were obtained
1.0 0,18 0,38 0,49
0,9 0,61 0,70 0,84 1,07 1,16 1,22
for the considered countries. In the cases that docu-
0,8 0,86 0,98 1,14 1,26 1,31 1,35 mentation is not available,
0,7 1,04 1,12 1,26 1,33 1,37 1,41
0,6 1,11 1,18 1,28 1,37 1,41 1,44
0,5 1,14 1,20 1,30 1,39 1,44 1,46 REFERENCES
ARCHES-D16 2009. Recommendations on the use of soft,
Table 2. Proof load factors for NMS and = 2.3. diagnostic and proof load testing. Deliverable D16.
ARCHES Project. VI EU Framework Program. Brussels
Span-length (m) (available on line at http://arches.fehrl.org)
Gmez, J.D. & Casas, J.R. 2008. Assessment of bridge
R/Rn 10 15 20 25 30 35 capacity through proof load testing. Proceedings of 4th
International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety
1.0 0.31 and Management, IABMAS08. Seoul, Korea. Rotterdam:
0.9 0.15 0.28 0.45 0.55 0.59 0.61 Balkema
0.8 0.51 0.58 0.69 0.78 0.82 0.84 Casas, J.R &. Gmez, J.D. 2010. Bridge capacity assessment
0.7 0.63 0.69 0.82 0.94 0.96 0.98 by combined proof-loading and WIM data. Proceedings
0.6 0.72 0.78 0.92 1.00 1.04 1.05 of 5th International Conference on Bridge Maintenance,
0.5 0.78 0.84 0.96 1.04 1.07 1.09 Safety and Management, IABMAS 10. Philadelphia ,
USA. Rotterdam: Balkema
626
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
T. Zoli
HNTB Corporation, New York, United States of America
ABSTRACT
627
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
628
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
629
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
F. Ubertini
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
ABSTRACT
630
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M. Hosseini
Structural Engineering Research Center, International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES),
Tehran, Iran
A. Soroor
Earthquake Engineering Department, School of Engineering, Science and Research Branch of the Islamic Azad
University (IAU), Tehran, Iran
S. Khavari
Civil Engineering Department, Sama Organization (Affiliated to the Islamic Azad University Roudehen Branch),
Roudehen, Iran
ABSTRACT
631
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Two cable-stayed bridges designed for easy access and low maintenance
R. Hsu
Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc.
632
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
633
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
E.-S. Hwang
Kyung Hee Universisty, Yongin, Korea
634
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
635
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
REFERENCE
Badie S.S. et al. 2002. Large Shear Studs for Compos-
ite Action in Steel Bridge Girders. Journal of Bridge
Engineering 7(3): 195203.
636
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
637
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
638
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M. Kaszynska
West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Poland
ABSTRACT
639
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
S.R. Khavari
Civil Engineering Department, Sama Organization (Affiliated to the Islamic Azad University Roudehen Branch),
Roudehen, Iran
M. Hosseini
Structural Engineering Research Center, International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES),
Tehran, Iran
ABSTRACT
REFERENCE
Hosseini, M., Banaeizadeh, Y., and Khavari, S. R. 2008. Vul-
nerability Assessment of an Existing Highway Bridge by
Push-Over and 3-D Nonlinear Time History Analyses for
its Seismic Retrofit Design, The 6th US National Seismic
Conference on Bridges and Highways, Charleston, SC,
Figure 1. The three proposed retrofit designs. USA.
640
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
S.-J. Kim
Sampyo Engineering & Construction, Seoul, Korea
ABSTRACT
641
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
642
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
643
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J. Moon
Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, State of Washington, USA
644
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
645
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
B. Khn
Leader Department for Bridge Construction, Verheyen-Ingenieure GmbH & Co. KG, Bad Kreuznach, Germany
646
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
647
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
648
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
T.P. Macioce
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States of America
H.M. Berman
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
D. Constable
Federal Highway Administration, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States of America
649
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
L. Mayer
IDS Ingegneria Dei Sistemi S.p.A., Pisa, Italy
B. Yanev
New York City DOT, New York, NY
L.D. Olson
Olson Engineering, Inc., Wheat Ridge, Colorado
A. Smyth
Columbia University, New York, NY
ABSTRACT
650
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
P.S. McCarten
Opus International Consultants Limited, Napier, New Zealand
ABSTRACT
651
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
P.S. McCarten
Opus International Consultants Limited, Napier, New Zealand
652
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J. Ross
Larson Design Group
ABSTRACT
653
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
H. Miyauchi
Central Nippon Expressway Co., Ltd
1 INSPECTION
3 CONCLUSION
The most commonly employed method for concrete
structure inspection is visual inspection from the road The aging structures are increasing and as it turned
surface. If any defect is detected by this survey, then, out more and more expense for inspection and main-
close range visual inspection and hammering test are tenance is needed in near future. Therefore, we must
conducted by engineers. This method, however, is carry out effective inspection and maintenance under
costly, takes a long period of time, and requires traffic the appropriate evaluation. Then, development of
regulations. Furthermore, the inspection results could inspection and repair technologies is indispensable,
vary depending on the engineer, so there has been and upbringing and improving the skill of the engineer
a strong demand to develop an effective inspection is very important, too.
method. This paper represents several methods being
developed at NEXCO-Central by utilizing ICT tech-
nologies: one is the infrared concrete defects detection REFERENCES
method which can be easily used on sight by engi-
neers, and the others are the digital crack measurement [1] NEXCO-Central, March, 2008 Annual report 2008
method, and inspection method for PC grouting. [2] NEXCO-Central, April, 2006 Manual for maintenance
On the other hand, there are several types of dete- and inspection
rioration of steel structures, mainly fatigue and cor- [3] JSCE, Dec 2007, Standard Specifications for Concrete
rosion. This paper introduces Paint View method Structures 2007, Maintenance
654
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
J.T. Newlin
Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA USA
W.L. Myers
Penn State Institutes of Energy and Environment, University Park, PA USA
G.P. Patil
Center for Statistical Ecology and Environmental Statistics, Penn State University, University Park, PA USA
S.W. Joshi
Department of Computer Science, Slippery Rock University, Slippery Rock, PA USA
655
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
A. Noguchi
Planning and Design Team, Nagoya Branch, Central Nippon Expressway Company Limited
H. Miyauchi
Engineering Inspection Department, Central Nippon Expressway Company Limited
656
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
where Qi is the load effect, Rn is the nominal resistance, and the corresponding reduced resistance factors are:
i is load modification factor, i and are respectively 0.9 for prestressed concrete girders in flexure,
load and resistance factors. 0.8 for reinforced concrete girders in flexure,
Theoretically the load and resistance factors can 0.9 for composite and non-composite steel girders
take any value.The structural performance can be mea- in flexure,
sured in terms of the reliability index, . Therefore, the
selection criterion for design requirements is close- The reliability analyses were performed and it was
ness to the target , or acceptable risk of failure. The shown that new load and resistance factors will result
load factors are expected to be larger than 1, and the in slightly higher reliability indices. The proposed
resistance factors are expected to be smaller than 1. changes will allow for future rational modifications
AASHTO LRFD (2007) load and resistance factors of resistance factors reflecting the improved quality of
were determined in the calibration process (Nowak materials and fabrication.
1999). The statistical parameters of load and resistance
were determined using the data available in 1980s
REFERENCES
(Ellingwood et al. 1980 and Nowak 1999). Live load
was based on the truck survey in Ontario performed AASHTO, Bridge Design Specifications, American Asso-
in 1975. Mechanical properties of materials such as ciation of State Highway and Transportation Officials,
concrete and steel were obtained from literature. Washington, D.C., 2007.
Over the last two decades there were significant Ellingwood, B., Galambos, J.V., MacGregor, J.G., and
improvements in numerical and analytical methods Cornell, C.A., (1980). Development of a Probability
resulting in enhanced accuracy in prediction of the Based Load Criterion for American National Standard
actual resistance. In addition, it was observed that the A58. NBS Special Publication 577, Washington, DC,
National Bureau of Standards.
quality of materials improved over the years (Nowak Nowak, A.S., Calibration of LRFD Bridge Design Code,
and Szerszen 2000). Therefore, resistance factors can NCHRP Report 368, Transportation Research Council,
be increased. However, in cases when the resistance Washington, D.C., 1999.
factors are already set to 1, such an increase could Nowak, A.S. and Szerszen, M.M., Calibration of Design
result in factors that are larger than 1 which can be Code for Buildings (ACI 318) Part 1&2: Statistical Models
philosophically unacceptable. for Resistance, ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 100, No. 3,
This study presents a proposal for modification of 2003, pp. 377382 & pp. 383391.
the load and resistance factors in the AASHTO LRFD
(2007). The current Strength I load combination is:
657
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
A. nidaric
Slovenian National Building and Civil Engineering Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia
658
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
E.H. Browne
Halcrow Group Limited, Birmingham, UK
659
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
E.H. Browne
Halcrow Group Limited, Birmingham, B16 8PE, UK
ABSTRACT
660
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Fatigue evaluation of steel finger type expansion joints for highway bridges
S. Ono
Japan Construction Method and Machinery Research Institute, Fuji-shi, Shizuoka-ken, Japan
ABSTRACT
661
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M. sterreicher
iC-group, Department for Dynamics and Acoustics, Vienna, Austria
W. Unterberger
iC-group, Head of Department for Dynamics and Acoustics, Vienna, Austria
Due to increasing requirements on developed sites the elastic layer can not be achieved with the classical
with good infrastructure, the buildings move more SDOF System calculation.
often near to existing traffic infrastructure. Addition- An other important point of interest represents the
ally capital spending in revitalization or renewal of material used for elastic foundation layers. Generally
existing traffic nodes (i.e. urban railway stations) leads all of the existing materials come with non-linear mate-
to new developed sites near existing traffic infrastruc- rial properties. The bedding modulus strongly depends
ture. On the other hand the requirements concerning on the load (pressure) on the material. In case of
immission levels (vibrations and re-radiated noise) are the classical approach a single bedding modulus is
increasing rapidly. This leads to the fact that, in order assumed for the elastic layer. For buildings where
to fulfil these increased requirements, elastic founda- the loads on the foundation varies considerable the
tion layers for buildings are the only way to achieve classical approach leads to a wrong estimation of the
these requirements. bedding modulus and therefore to a wrong estimation
Therefore new innovative solutions on designing of the system natural frequency. The system natural
are required to fulfil on the one hand the technical frequency is however one of the key values for the
demands and on the other hand the economical require- immissions expected inside the buidling
ments for such projects. Traditionally the design of Thus to meet the immission requirements together
elastic foundation layers is based on the theory of the with economical requirements new approaches com-
SDOF (Single degree of freedom) system. For this the posed of improved FE-calculation considering the
building itself is assumed as a rigid complex. This is non-linear material properties are necessary. Addi-
generally more or less valid for classical stiff buildings tionally special solutions like expansion joints piping
buildings of conrete but leads to an overestimate of the are crossing the elastic foundation layers must be
loads applied to the elastic foundation layer for mod- considered.
ern buildings with columns bearing the load instead The present work shows this new calculation and
of walls. As a consequence the use of the classical design approach theoretically and on an example. The
SDOF System for such design calculations leads to used example comes from a building site on a new
wrong estimations for the loads (pressure) on the elas- developed area, near a railway tunnel in the city of
tic layer. Thus the demand for an economical design of vienna.
662
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
S. Ueda
Hankyu Corporation, Osaka, Japan
A. Sakairi
Odakyu Electric Railway Corporation, Tokyo, Japan
ABSTRACT
663
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
664
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
665
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Structural analysis and fatigue life assessment of the Paderno Arch Bridge
A. Pipinato
Department of Construction and Transportation, University of Padova, Italy
666
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
667
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
W. Radomski
Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland
668
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
P.C. Robery
Halcrow Group Limited
669
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
C. Rolwood
Hardesty & Hanover, LLP, Bear Tavern Road, West Trenton, New Jersey
R. Drew
Hardesty & Hanover, LLP, Broadway, New York
ABSTRACT
670
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
671
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
N.D. Sauer
VSL, Dallas, TX, USA
672
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
673
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
674
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M. Stafford
R.J. Watson, Inc., East Amherst, NY, USA
675
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Y.-C. Sung
National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan
K.-C. Chang
National Taiwan University, National Center for Research of Earthquake Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan
D.-W. Chang, C.-L. Chen & H.-M. Wu
Taiwan CECI Consultant Inc., Taipei, Taiwan
K.-Y. Liu
National Center for Research of Earthquake Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan
ABSTRACT
676
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
A. Szwed
Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland
M.M. Szerszen
University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA
ABSTRACT
677
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
S. Ono
Japan Construction Method and Machinery Research Institute, Japan Construction Mechanization
Association, Shizuoka, Japan
Figure 1. Corrosion situation (the end of the girder). Figure 3. Corrosion of the center part and the end.
678
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
where max is the maximum principal stress. Figure 2. Maximum principal stress distributions.
T1 and T2 are indexes which have a similar tendency can be found the remarkable difference.This is because
for estimating the triaxiality of multiaxial stress state the effect of the triaxiality which is strongly affected by
(Tamura et al. 2009). the weld bead shape. It implies one of the main causes
In this study, FEM analyses considering geometri- of brittle fracture in the real bent was possibly the tri-
cal and material nonlinearities were conducted using axiality generated by a small radius toe (approximately
the analysis program Abaqus 6.7. In the analyses, a 1 mm) of unequal leg bead.
zooming method was applied to obtain the local stress Similarly, the effects of unequal leg bead and crack-
state of fracture origin during earthquakes. ing were also investigated. As a result, it was indicated
As one of the result of this study, the dependency that there is a possibility that fracture occurs due to
of triaxiality on the weld bead radius is shown in these weld bead shape effect.
Figure 1. The horizontal axis of the figure is the depth
from the weld toe in which the fracture of real bent
started. From the figure, the difference of triaxiality REFERENCES
distributions among four kinds of bead shape (the toe
Schafer, B. W., Ojdrovic, R. P. & Zarghamee, M. S. 2000.
radii are 0.5 mm, 1.0 mm, 2.0 mm, and 5.0 mm) can be
Triaxiality and Fracture of steel moment connections.
confirmed. The degree of triaxiality increase with the Journal of Structural Engineering, pp.11311139.
depth depends strongly on the toe radius. Tamura, H., Sasaki, E., Yamada, H. & Katsuchi, H. 2009.
The triaxiality increases the risk of brittle fracture, Involvements of stress triaxiality in the brittle fracture
because it increases the local normal stress of there. during earthquakes in steel bridge bents. International
Figure 2 shows the effects of triaxiality on the max- Journal of Steel Structures, Vol. 9, No. 3, September,
imum principal distributions at the fracture origin. It pp. 241252.
679
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
680
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
681
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
A.E. Ulku
Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, USA
682
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
683
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
M. Wahbeh
Consultant to California Department of Transportation, Shanghai, China
P. Siegenthaler
California Department of Transportation, Oakland, CA, USA
T. Nilsson
American Bridge & Fluor Enterprise, Shanghai, China
M. Nader
T.Y. Lin International, San Francisco, CA, USA
A. Cavendish-Tribe
Hatch Mott MacDonald Limited, Consultant to Bay Area Toll Authority, Birmingham, UK
684
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Generally, fatigue has not been considered as a key The writers gratefully acknowledge the financial
problem in the design of reinforced concrete bridges. support provided by the Shaanxi Province Trans-
Until the 1960s, reinforcement was mild steel and portation Technology Research Project (Grant No.
the stresses permitted in the steel bar and the con- 07-04k) and Chinese West Transportation Develop-
crete were such that fatigue and fracture failure was ment Research Projects (Grant No. 200831849404,
believed to be impossible. With the developments of 200631822302-07).
reinforced concrete structures, higher working stresses
were permitted and, in particular, high yield reinforc-
ing bars were introduced. In recent years, some studies
showed that fatigue could occur in reinforced concrete REFERENCES
structures in combination with other causes of deteri-
ACI Committee 215., 1974. Consideration for design of con-
oration. In the past ten years, considerable increases
crete structure subjected to fatigue loading. ACI Journal,
in traffic volume and wheel loads have caused obvi- 71(3): 97121.
ously fatigue damage in existing highway reinforced BSI., 2007. Guide on Methods for Assessing the Acceptabil-
concrete bridges in China. Some highway reinforced ity of Flaws in Metallic Structures, BS7910:1999. British
concrete bridges were damaged seriously, leading to Standards Institution, London.
the whole bridge collapse sometimes because of over- ECCS., 1985. Recommendations for the Fatigue Design of
loading and oversize trucks. So how to evaluate the Steel Structures. European Convention for Constructional
fatigue safety of existing reinforced concrete bridges Steelwork, Brussels.
is an urgent problem in China. In the current paper, Helgason, T. and Hanson, J.M., 1976. Fatigue Strength of
High-Yield Reinforcing Bars. National Cooperative High-
the assessment models of existing reinforced con-
way Research Program Report 164, National Research
crete bridges based on S-N curve and linear elastic Council, Washington. D.C.
fracture mechanics (LEFM) were proposed. The two Herwig, A., 2008. Reinforced Concrete Bridges under
methods were applied to the case study bridge, and Increased Railway Traffic Loads. Ph.D. Thesis of cole
the fatigue life of the bridge was estimated using the Polytechnique Fdrale de Lausanne, Lausanne.
monitoring strain data and considering traffic volume Hordijk, D.A., 1991. Local Approach to Fatigue of Concrete.
increase rate. In short, the following conclusions could Ph.D. Thesis of Technische Universiteit Delft, Delft.
be gained: (1) The S-N curve and LEFM approaches Schlfli, M. and Brhwiler, E., 1998. Fatigue of existing rein-
could be effectively applied to evaluate the fatigue forced concrete bridge deck slabs. Engineering Structures.
20(11): 991998.
safety of actual RC bridges. (2) Combined with other
Walker, E.F. Harrison, I.M. and Morley, J., 1975. Fatigue and
factors of deterioration such as corrosion, corrosion Corrosion Fatigue of Reinforcement Bars. Department
fatigue could cause the remarkable reduction of fatigue of Civil and Structural Engineering Report, University
life for reinforced concrete bridges. (3) Furthermore, College, Cardiff, UK.
the effect of overloading and oversize trucks should be Zhao, G.F., 1999. The Advanced Reinforced Concrete Struc-
investigated in-depth. tures. China Electric Publish Press, Beijing.
685
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
Z.J. Zheng
Hangzhou Urban Construction Design and Research Institute Co. Ltd., Hangzhou, PR China
ABSTRACT
686
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
D. Whittemore
AI Engineers, Inc., Middletown, CT
REFERENCES
Table 1. LEED Design Goals vs. Sustainable Bridges.
Brundtland Commission. 1987. Our Common Future, Report
Equivalent Bridge by the Brundtland Commission. Oxford University Press
LEED Design Goals Design Goal U.S. Green Building Council. 2006. New Construction &
Major Renovation Version 2.2 Reference Guide. Washing-
Sustainable Sites Sustainable Sites ton, D.C.:U.S. Green Building Council.
Water Efficiency Water Efficiency Center for Environmental Excellence by AASHTO. 2009.
Energy and Atmosphere Energy and Transportation Sustainability. Web. http://environment.transportation.org/
Materials and Resources Materials and Resources environmental_issues/sustainability/
Indoor Environmental Quality N/A
Innovation in Design Innovation in Design
687
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
C.-I. Yen
Department of Research & Development, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taiwan
H.-K. Liao
Department of Civil Engineering, National Central University, Taiwan
REFERENCE
Marco Dorigo & Luca Maria Gambardella 1997. Ant
Where Y = bridge regular inspection time (minute); Colonies for The Travelling Salesman Problem, BioSys-
X1 = slab area (m2 ); X2 = number of deteriorated tems 43: 7381.
688
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
689
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
G.M. Atanasiu
Structural Mechanics dept., Technical University Gheorghe Asachi of Iasi, Romania
690
Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimization Frangopol, Sause & Kusko (eds)
2010 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-87786-2
ABSTRACT
691