Ant Diversity Lab Report

Ant Diversity Lab Report
Seokhyun Jeon
Lab Partners: Lauren Vidal, Trinity Millian, Marian Famularcano, Sofia Cruz
Date: 13 September 16
Purpose: The purpose of this experiment is to see if increasing amount of human impact
decreases ant biodiversity over a given area. Biodiversity is the variety of life in a ecosystem. A
healthy ecosystem tend to have biodiversity. The reason a healthy ecosystem usually have
biodiversity is because it boosts ecosystem productivity as it provides more resources for life.
One of the formulas used to measure diversity is known as the Simpson index. The index takes
into account the richness as well as the evenness of a specie to calculate the biodiversity.
Simpsons index is Diversity=the number of individuals for each species(the number of
individuals for each species - 1)/total number of organisms in the survey(total number of
organisms in the survey-1). The maximum diversity will be reached if the answer of the equation
is zero and minimum diversity will be reached if the answer is one. To make this experiment
work ants were trapped in three different areas. A place with low human impact, meaning 9
meters from any concrete, sustainable water source, no bug exterminator, and grassy areas.
Another in a place with medium human impact area which will be like a basic front/backyard,
basic roads, access to some kind of water supply, and no bug exterminator. The last trap was
placed in high human impact areas meaning, buildings, a lot of concrete, high traffic area, and 3
meters away from plants. The bait used were oil from a tuna can and syrup. The data shows that
most of the traps did not have any result. Just through this, it is safe to conclude that most places
has been affected by humans in a negative way in all kinds of ecosystems. Even the traps that
had ants did not go below the diversity of .5. Which further suggests that humans have had
negative impact on the diversity of ants.
Materials:
Syrup diluted 1:1 with water
Erlenmeyer flasks, 250ml
Disposable dropper type pipettes
Tuna in oil
Petri Dishes
Markers
Forceps
Dissecting needles
Hand lenses
Masking tape
Wire cutters
Zip Lock bags
Test tubes with lids
Freezer
Procedure: The trap was made by making a hole in the center of the side of a petri dish with
wire cutters, while making the rectangular opening about 1 cm wide and 1 cm tall. Then the lid
was put on and taped along the sides while leaving the cut hole open. These steps were repeated
1 more times to create 2 traps. The bait was placed in a test tube with lids. One having a half
water, half syrup combination. The other drained tuna oil from the tuna cans. Each person then
took their 2 traps and test tubes home to put their traps in a low, medium, or high impact areas.
Using the disposable droppers, 1.5 ml of syrup was poured into one trap, while 1.5 ml of tuna oil
was poured into the other trap. The trap was then placed in a low, medium, or high impact area
and was placed there for 4 to 5 hours in the afternoon. After labeling the petri dish with the bait
used and the plastic bag with the location and the bait, place the trap into the plastic bag and
freeze them overnight in a freezer. The frozen ants were then brought to class. There petri dishes
were opened and ants were counted by moving them over onto a strip of masking tape with
forceps. Ants that looked the same were placed in groups on the masking tape. Each individual
person used the Simpsons Index (ni(ni-1)/N(n-1) where N - Total number of organisms in
survey, Ni - Total number of each species, D - Diversity) to calculate the ant diversity of their
area and recorded the result in the data chart below.
Data:
Human Impact
Name Level N Ni D
222 sweet loving
Alyssa R. Medium 223 1 oil loving 0.99

20 sweet loving 0.55
Alexis Low 29 9 oil loving

Peggy High 0 0 0
Seokhyun Medium 0 0 Undefined
77 oil loving
Sofia Cruz Low 232 155 sweet loving 0.55
Aliza Aquino Medium 0 0 undefined

70 sweet loving
Marian F. Medium 431 361 oil loving 0.728

Marie Medium 0 0 undefined
Ben Gorham Low 0 0 undefined
234 sweet loving
170 oil loving
Tyler Gulley Medium 404 (S+O=Tiny Ant) 0.511

Lauren Vidal Low 0 0 Undefined
550 sweet loving
Anna Valcarcel Medium 635 85 oil loving .77

Trinity Medium 0 0 Undefined
89 Oil Loving
0 Sweet Loving 1
Alyssa Souza High 89 0 Tiny Ants

Mikayla Canales High 0 0 0
Alex Mello Medium 0 0 0
Riley T. High 0 0 0
Rita Zughbaba Medium 0 0 0
Nicole Khoury Medium 0 0 0
115 sweet loving
3 oil loving
1 huge momma
Kiera Cullen Medium 119 ant 0.934

Inayah Morris Low 0 0 0
Joey Hammond medium 0 0 0
Juliana Galvan low 0 0 0
Calculations: ni(ni-1)/N(n-1) = undefined
Ni = 0
N=0
Discussion: The objective of this experiment was to find out if increasing amount of human
impact decreases ant biodiversity over a given area. 5 people who placed their traps in an area
with medium human impact had a diversity that was closer to 1 than zero (around .77), the other
8 people that placed in medium human impact area did not have any result. 2 people placed their
traps in a location with low human impact had a diversity of .55 while the other 4 people who did
the same produced no results. 1 person placed traps in a location with high human impact had a
biodiversity of 1 while the other 3 people who placed their traps in high impact areas produced
no results. The results we got was predictable however the results we didnt get was surprising.
Majority of the people who did this lab was unable to produce any results, most likely due to bug
sprays without the persons knowledge. This shows that humans have had a negative impact on
the diversity of ants by just killing all of them. On the other hand people who got the results,
which was 8/23 people had the results we expected. In places with medium human impact the
diversity was quite low as expected. In places with high human impact the diversity was non-
existent. On the other hand, places with low human impact had the largest biodiversity compared
to the other places, as expected.
Conclusion: From this experiment it is safe to conclude that human beings have had a negative
impact on the diversity of ants in general. It is also possible to conclude that increasing the
human impact in an area decreases the diversity of ants.

Ant Diversity Lab Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ant Diversity Lab Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ant Diversity Lab Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ant Diversity Lab Report

Simpsons index is Diversity=the number of individuals for each species(the number of

negative impact on the diversity of ants.

Syrup diluted 1:1 with water

Erlenmeyer flasks, 250ml

Disposable dropper type pipettes

Zip Lock bags

Test tubes with lids

area and recorded the result in the data chart below.

222 sweet loving

Alyssa R. Medium 223 1 oil loving 0.99

Alexis Low 29 9 oil loving

Sofia Cruz Low 232 155 sweet loving 0.55

Aliza Aquino Medium 0 0 undefined

Marian F. Medium 431 361 oil loving 0.728

170 oil loving

Tyler Gulley Medium 404 (S+O=Tiny Ant) 0.511

Anna Valcarcel Medium 635 85 oil loving .77

Alyssa Souza High 89 0 Tiny Ants

Kiera Cullen Medium 119 ant 0.934

Juliana Galvan low 0 0 0

Calculations: ni(ni-1)/N(n-1) = undefined

to the other places, as expected.

human impact in an area decreases the diversity of ants.

You might also like