New Microsoft Word Document
New Microsoft Word Document
New Microsoft Word Document
Corporate governance is the set of processes, customs, policies, laws, and institutions affecting the way
a corporation is directed, administered or controlled. Corporate governance also includes the
relationships among the many stakeholders involved and the goals for which the corporation is
governed.
The principal stakeholders are the shareholders/members, management, and the board of directors.
Other stakeholders include labour (employees), customers, creditors (e.g., banks, bond holders),
suppliers, regulators, and the community at large. An important theme of corporate governance is to
ensure the accountability of certain individuals in an organization through mechanisms that try to
reduce or eliminate the principal-agent problem. It is a system of structuring, operating and controlling a
company with a view to achieve long term strategic goals to satisfy shareholders, creditors, employees,
customers and suppliers, and complying with the legal and regulatory requirements, apart from meeting
environmental and local community needs.
Report of SEBI committee on Corporate Governance defines corporate governance as the acceptance by
management of the inalienable rights of shareholders as the true owners of the corporation and of their
own role as trustees on behalf of the shareholders. It is about commitment to values, about ethical
business conduct and about making a distinction between personal & corporate funds in the
management of a company.
The independence of the entity's external auditors and the quality of their audits
Review of the compensation arrangements for the chief executive officer and other senior executives
To analyze corporate governance practice of BSE-30 companies for last five years with reference of
mandatory disclosure described by SEBI for Indian companies.
To find out importance of corporate governance in Indian companies from the view point of the
Company Secretary.
To find out the awareness of functioning of Corporate Governance amongst investors who are
fundamental analyst. To evaluate the importance of corporate governance as a parameter for investor
before investing.
Data Sources
Primary Data:
Secondary Data:
Business Articles
Business Magazines
Library Research
Internet Surfing
There are four broad theories to explain and elucidate corporate governance. These are:
Agency theory
Stewardship theory
Stakeholder theory
Sociological theory
Agency theory:
Recent thinking about strategic management and business policy has been influenced by agency cost
theory, though the roots of the theory can be traced back to Adam Smith who identified an agency
problem in the joint stock company. The fundamental theoretical basis of corporate governance is
agency costs. Shareholders are the owners of any joint stock, limited liability Company, and are the
principals of the same. By virtue of their ownership, the principals define the objectives of the company.
The management, directly or indirectly selected by the shareholders to pursue such objectives, are the
agents. While the principals generally assume that the agents would invariably carry out their objectives,
it is often not so. In many instances, the objectives of managers are at variance from those of the
shareholders. Such mismatch of objectives is called the agency problem; the cost inflicted by such
dissonance is the agency cost. The core of corporate governance is designing and putting in place
disclosures, monitoring, oversight and corrective systems that can align the objectives of the two sets of
players as closely as possible and hence minimize agency costs.
Stewardship theory:
The stewardship theory of corporate governance discounts the possible conflicts between corporate
management and owners and shows a preference for board of directors made u primarily of corporate
insiders. This theory assumes that managers are basically trustworthy and attach significant value to
their own personal reputations. The market for managers with strong personal reputations serves as the
primary mechanism to control behaviour, with more reputable managers being offered higher
compensation packages.
Stakeholder theory:
The stakeholder theory is grounded in many normative, theoretical perspectives including ethics of care,
the ethics of fiduciary relationships, social contract theory, theory of property rights, and so on. While it
is possible to develop stakeholder analysis from a variety of theoretical perspectives, in practice much of
stakeholder analysis does not firmly or explicitly root itself in a given theoretical tradition, but rather
operates at the level of individual principles and norms for which it provides little formal justification.
Stakeholder theory is often criticized, mainly because it is not applicable in practice by corporations
Sociological theory:
The sociological approach has focused mostly on board composition and implications for power and
wealth distribution in the society. Under this theory, board composition, financial reporting, and
disclosure and auditing are of utmost importance to realize the socio-economic objectives of
corporations.
This is also known as unitary board model, in which all directors participate in a single board comprising
both executive and non-executive directors in varying proportions. This approach to governance tends
to be shareholder oriented. It is also called the 'Anglo-Saxon' approach to corporate governance being
the basis of corporate governance in America, Britain, Canada, Australia and other Commonwealth law
countries including India.
Companies are typically run by professional managers who have negligible ownership stake. There is a
fairly clear separation of ownership and management.
Most institutional investors are reluctant activists. They view themselves as portfolio investors
interested in investing in a broadly diversified portfolio of liquid securities. If they are not satisfied with a
company's performance, they simply sell the securities in the market and quit.
The disclosure norms are comprehensive, the rules against insider trading tight, and the penalties for
price manipulations stiff, all of which provide adequate protection to the small investors and promote
general market liquidity. They also discourage large investors from taking an active role in corporate
governance. Reference :