An Investigation of Cash Management Practices and Their Effects On The Demand For Money
An Investigation of Cash Management Practices and Their Effects On The Demand For Money
An Investigation of Cash Management Practices and Their Effects On The Demand For Money
3
The use of Kleins rate involves some empirical issues
that make interpreting its effect difficult (see Carlson and
F r e w [ 6 ] ) . However, to the extent that one believes
that corporations earn a competitive rate on their de-
posits, omission of RD leads to specification bias. (For
more detail see Dotsey [9], especially footnotes 6 and 7.)
4
Since the emphasis of this article is to illustrate the
effects of cash management practices on the demand for
demand deposits, equation 2 is not discussed in detail.
For a full discussion see Dotsey [S].
5
Descriptions of these test statistics are quite technical
and are therefore omitted. The interested reader can
find a more detailed discussion in Dotsey [8] or can read
the referenced articles. An excellent summary can also
be found in Boughton [4]. Demand Deposits
Table II
I II III IV
costs in adopting new technology, it would be natural THE LOGARITHM OF ONE PERIOD AHEAD
to use both variables simultaneously. This was FORECAST ERRORS
attempted, but only LNP retained its significance,
perhaps because these variables only reflect general None T RATCHET LNP EFT
trends and are therefore only picking up an overall
tendency toward increasing cash management so- 1966 - .19 .04 - .15 .00 .05
phistication. Finally a regression including LNP, 1967 - .24 .04 - .13 .00 .11
RATCHET, and EFT was run with only EFT
retaining its significance. 1968 - .16 .16 .08 .18 .18
Second, all of the proxies decrease the instability 1969 - .15 .14 .16 .17 .23
of the regressions in the sense that the cusum of
1970 - .18 .15 .19 .17 .21
square statistic is lowered. However, only by using
EFT could a lack of stability be rejected using the 1971 - .14 .10 .06 .12 .17
Brown-Durbin-Evans test. Also, one could not reject
1972 - .25 .05 - .12 - .03 .07
stability of the regression with EFT under the pro-
cedure developed by Cooley and Prescott. However, 1973 - .17 .07 - .04 .10 .32
when the sample was divided in 1949, stability was
1974 - .26 - .02 - .08 .03 .20
rejected using a standard F-test. Given that EFT
only includes the number of wire transfers over the 1975 - .71 - .04 - .47 - .38 - .28
Federal Reserve wire system, and is therefore an
1976 - .94 - .62 - .72 - .53 - .26
imperfect measure of total wire transfers, the net
result of the stability tests is encouraging. 1977 - .63 - .48 - .70 - .36 .02
Third, an examination of one step ahead out of 1978 - .73 - .48 - .80 - .33 .05
sample forecast errors is depicted in Table III.
Again, all the proxies generally improve the forecasts, 1979 - .69 - .30 - .60 - .40 .41
with EFT performing the best. Using EFT resulted Avg.
in a reduction of the average absolute error of the Error - .38 - .12 - .24 - .07 .11
forecast by 52 percent and a reduction in the root
RMSE .29 .28 .35 .24 .19
mean square error by 34 percent.
1. Barger, H. Outlay and Income in the United States 12. Kimball, R. C. Wire Transfer and the Demand
1921-1938. New York: National Bureau of Eco- for Money. New England Economic Review,
nomic Research, 1942. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (March/April
1980), pp. 5-22.
2. Baumol, W. J. The Transactions Demand for
Cash-An Inventory-Theoretic Approach. Quar- 13. Klein, B. The Payment of Interest on Commercial
terly Journal of Economics 66 (1952), 645-56. Bank Deposits and the Price of Money: A Study
of the Demand for Money. Unpublished Ph.D.
3. Beehler, Paul J. Contemporary Cash Management. dissertation. University of Chicago, 1970.
New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1978.
14. . Competitive Interest Payments on
4. Boughton, J. M. Recent Instability of the Demand Bank Deposits and the Long-Run Demand for
for Money : An International Perspective. South- Money. American Economic Review 64 (1971),
ern Economic Journal 48 (1981), 579-97. 931-49.
5. Brown, R. L.; J. Durbin; and J. M. Evans. Tech- 15. Kuznets, S. National Income and its Composition.
niques for Testing the Constancy of Regression New York: National Bureau of Economic Re-
Relationships Over Time. Journal of the Royal search, 1941.
Statistical Society, Series B 37 (1975), 149-63.
16. Lieberman, D. The Transactions Demand for
6. Carlson, J. A., and J. R. Frew. Money Demand Money and Technological Change. Review of
Responsiveness to the Rate of Return on Money: Economics and Statistics 59 (1977), 307-17.
A Methodological Critique. Journal of Political
Economy 88 (1980), 598-607. 17. McKee, M. J. "Computer Prices in the National
Accounts: Are Our Economic Problems a Com-
7. Cooley, T. F., and E. C. Prescott. Systematic puter Error. Council of Economic Advisors, 1981.
(nonrandom) Variation Models Varying Parame- (Processed.)
ter Regression : A Theory and Some Applications.
Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 2 18. Porter, R. D., and E. Mauskopf. Cash Manage-
(1973), 463-73. ment and the Recent Shift in the Demand for
Demand Deposits. Board of Governors of the
8. Dotsey, Michael. The Effects of Cash Management Federal Reserve System, 1978. (Processed.)
Practices on the Demand for Demand Deposits.
Working Paper 83-2. Federal Reserve Bank of 19. ; T. D. Simpson; and E. Mauskopf.
Richmond, 1983. Financial Innovation and the Monetary Aggre-
gates. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity
9. The Effects of Cash Management (1: 1979)) 213-29.
Practices on the Demand for Demand Deposits.
1984. (Processed.) 20. Simpson, T. D., and R. D. Porter. Some Issues
Involving the Definition of and Interpretation of
10. ; S. Englander; and J. Partlan. Money the Monetary Aggregates in Controlling the Mone-
Market Mutual Funds and Monetary Control. tary Aggregates III. Federal Reserve Bank of
Quarterly Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New Boston Conference Series no. 23 (1980), pp. 161-
York 6 (1982), 9-17. 234.
11. Karni. E. The Value of Time and the Demand for 21. Tobin. J. The Interest Elasticity of Transactions
Money. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 6 Demand for Cash. Review of Economics and Sta-
(1974), 45-64. tistics 38 (1953), 241-47.