Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 143 views

    Objection

    Uploaded by

    John Tyberious Smith
    1) The respondent is objecting to the petitioner's financial affidavit because it fails to disclose financial assistance received from family and from the Department of Child Safety. 2) The respondent provides details of the current childcare costs being paid mostly by the respondent due to the petitioner's late or insufficient payments in the past. 3) The respondent objects to incomplete text message transcripts submitted by the petitioner and discussions of irrelevant past events involving the respondent's father.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Objection

    Uploaded by

    John Tyberious Smith
    143 views5 pages
    1) The respondent is objecting to the petitioner's financial affidavit because it fails to disclose financial assistance received from family and from the Department of Child Safety. 2) The respondent provides details of the current childcare costs being paid mostly by the respondent due to the petitioner's late or insufficient payments in the past. 3) The respondent objects to incomplete text message transcripts submitted by the petitioner and discussions of irrelevant past events involving the respondent's father.

    Original Description:

    Objection to something

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1) The respondent is objecting to the petitioner's financial affidavit because it fails to disclose financial assistance received from family and from the Department of Child Safety. 2) The respondent provides details of the current childcare costs being paid mostly by the respondent due to the petitioner's late or insufficient payments in the past. 3) The respondent objects to incomplete text message transcripts submitted by the petitioner and discussions of irrelevant past events involving the respondent's father.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    143 views5 pages

    Objection

    Uploaded by

    John Tyberious Smith
    1) The respondent is objecting to the petitioner's financial affidavit because it fails to disclose financial assistance received from family and from the Department of Child Safety. 2) The respondent provides details of the current childcare costs being paid mostly by the respondent due to the petitioner's late or insufficient payments in the past. 3) The respondent objects to incomplete text message transcripts submitted by the petitioner and discussions of irrelevant past events involving the respondent's father.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 5

    ALEXANDER J NEIGHBORS

    1411 W Megan St
    Chandler, AZ 85224
    (480) 734-8649

    IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA


    AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA COUNTY
    In Re the Marriage of:
    Case No. FC2016-009166
    JORDAN NEIGHBORS , ) Case assigned to the Honorable Dewain Fox
    Petitioner, )
    ) OBJECTION TO FINANCIAL
    AFFIDAVIT
    And )
    )
    ALEXANDER J NEIGHBORS, )
    Respondent )

    The Respondent is Objecting to the financial affidavit.

    The Respondent does not know why the Petitioner submitted yet another false financial Affidavit
    to the court. The Petitioner has been receiving financial assistance as identified in previous
    objections filed by the respondent. She has also been receiving financial assistance from her
    family members and none of this is reflected on the Affidavit. Yet in earlier motions filed by
    Mr.Morton he claimed she has received extensive support from her parents.

    The Respondent also failed to identify on the financial affidavit that we currently receive
    assistance from DCS for child care due to the high number of Unfounded CPS Complaints filed
    by the petitioner and the petitioners mother against the Respondent. Currently we receive
    assistance from DCS, this support is set to end in Nov 2017. I have Attached the DCS care
    charges sheet that clearly shows what DCS is providing in assistance and in the bottom right is
    the actual amounts we are charged. The petitioner and respondent were originally splitting the
    amount but because the petitioner is consistently late with paying the school the Respondent has
    has provided his credit card details and is paying the child care costs to prevent an interruption of
    care for the children. The Respondent had to do this because the petitioner charges more than

    1
    just the child care costs to her card which she identified in the Financial affidavit as being only
    used for child care. If she provided the court with the statement from that card the court would
    see that she has charged over $2,000 for the purchase of her BMW to that card she has also
    charged over $4,000 in airline tickets for trips on that card as well as using that card for her own
    personal needs not just expenses for the children as she identified on the financial affidavit.

    The child care costs are currently the following:

    Oliver $540.12
    Jocelyn $526.47
    Ayvah $0.00
    Oliver & Jocelyn Enrichment program $930.00 every 3 months

    o
    Ayvahs Gymnastics class $85.00 a month

    The Petitioners attorney has submitted records of my fathers law suit of defamation against her,
    the two attorneys and the Petitioners mother. I had asked my father to not move forward with
    the law suite as I need her to get help and it was dropped. The Petitioner also submitted a 7 year
    old eval against my father but that should be stricken from the record as he does not live in

    2
    Arizona and it is just a distraction from the matter at hand. The petitioner also submitted screen
    shots of broken up conversations through text messages in which she intentionally left out parts
    of the conversation. The petitioner submitted Text messages between her and my father Guy
    Neighbors. These messages were sent to her after it was discovered that the petitioner and her
    mother were responsible for the un-founded CPS reports and my father was extremely upset
    when the petitioner had tried to stage a fraudulent domestic violence charge against the
    respondent. Guy Had sent those text messages her as he was afraid she was going to try and
    claim domestic violence against him. Due to her grabbing her own arm and making accusations
    the respondent had abused the petitioner, because he witnessed her do this to me and the
    Chandler police officer saw right through her stunt there was nothing that was going to prevent
    her from attempting the same thing against the respondents father.

    The petitioner also included conversations she had between Brandi a nanny we had hired to help
    us over 2 years ago who had quit because the petitioner on multiple occasions paid her with
    checks that bounced. The Respondent had solar at the time Brandi was working for us and
    Under SRP solar connect agreement the price rate changes. Normal power customers are charged
    $0.12 to $0.19 a kwh for energy used. As a solar customer under self generation are charged
    $0.04 a kwh but have an additional demand charge of $33.00 for every kw used beyond what
    the solar produced. Brandi would constantly use every high demand appliance in the house at the
    same time resulting in a 8+ kw demand charge for 1 day which would create a $264 power bill
    for that day. I tried to get her to understand that she needed to make sure when she worked she
    only used one of the items at a time: the dryer, stove or AC to prevent us from having a massive
    powerbill.

    ( Exhibit POWER Demand charges)


    https://www.srpnet.com/prices/home/residentialdemand.aspx

    (Exhibit Power Demand Charge price worksheet)

    https://www.srpnet.com/prices/pdfx/April2015/E-27p.pdf

    The petitioners reckless actions are having a devastating effect on the children, as well as herself.
    Due to the current custody arrangement I am only able to be there for the children when they
    return to my care. I do have them in counseling and it is helping greatly. The respondent also has

    3
    the children attend church so they have religious beliefs they can fall back on while there is
    turmoil in their home life.

    The Respondent Objects to Text message conversations between husband and wife being
    submitted in the case as they are covered under Federal civil procedures act which states
    communications between a husband and wife are held to the same protection as attorney client
    conversations, through submitting only parts of a conversation the court is not able to fully
    understand what was taking place.

    The Petitioner during the 4 month engagement with CPS, DCS and the Family preservation unit
    failed to complete any of the worksheets, program goals, and counseling sessions from CPS and
    the In home intervention services.

    The Respondent has attached his Parenting profile inventory which was completed with the CPS
    agent. (Exhibit 2) I also received a letter from the CPS Agent involved in my case commending
    me on my level of commitment to my children and family (including the petitioner) .

    The respondent is also very involved with the childrens school. He has on many occasions
    purchased supplies for the entire class and has even sponsored field trips for his childrens class.

    The Respondent is in a DivorceCare class and through that class the instructors identified that it
    is a lost cause to try and make your spouse be accountable or be honest. The respondent was not
    able to achieve this during the marriage there is no way to do it after she left. The more
    Respondent trys to control the situation the worse the situation is and that Respondent must rely
    on the court and allow the court and the judge to take control of an out of control situation.

    The Respondent needs the courts help in preventing \ detouring the Petitioner, Petitioners
    mother, and the Petitioners attorney from continuing to present incorrect-information to the
    court. The respondent does not know what to ask for legally to ensure this happens but hopes that
    the court can provide relief as it sees fit on the matter. I will also be requesting at the trial that
    the attorneys fees she agreed to pay in the settlement agreement are dismissed as the petitioner
    will need all the financial resources available to help cover the childrens expenses, and that it is
    unfair un-just for Mr.Morton to charge his client for submitting erroneous court documents.

    4
    Upon request from the court the Respondent can provide the details of DPS accident report. This
    report outlines the information on the head-on collision the respondent was in with a wrongway
    drunk driver (charged with Extreme DUI & endangerment) on the 101 freeway near the
    Broadway exit. In which the Respondent was on duty at the time and put himself in harms way
    to prevent a wrong way drunk driver from killing a civilian or other service members on the
    freeway at 5:30am on a Sunday.

    DATED this __11__ day _SEP____, 2017_.

    _________________________
    ALEXANDER J NEIGHBORS

    Certificate of Service

    A Copy of this document was mailed to the parties listed below.

    ____ ________________________ 11 SEP 2017

    Attorney Thomas Mortons email

    [email protected]

    Attachments:

    You might also like