Disini vs. Sandiganbayan and People

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Disini vs.

Sandiganbayan and People


GR 169823 September 11, 2013
DOCTRINE
President Marcos, in causing the award of the contracts to Burns & Roe and
Westinghouse by taking advantage of his position and in committing said act in relation to
his office, was placed under circumstances that would make him liable for direct bribery.
The second element of corruption of public officers simply required the public officer
to be placed under circumstances, not absolute certainty, that would make him liable
for direct or indirect bribery.
FACTS
Petitioner Disini was charged and convicted in Sandiganbayan for corruption of public
officials and violation of section 4 of Anti-graft and corrupt practices act.
During the period from 1974 to February 1986 Disini unlawfully conspired with
President Marcos by promising gifts by way of stock in a mining corporation in consideration
of contracts for engineering and architectural services which Disini subsequently received.
In another criminal case this time for violation of sec 4 of Anti-graft and corrupt
practices act it was alleged that President Marcos was a golf partner and a close personal
friend of Disini and that Disinis wife Paciencia Disini was actually the first cousin of the first
Lady Imelda Marcos.
In the said complaint it was alleged that Disini took advantage of such close personal
relation to gain projects for the National Power Corporation (NPC) at Morong, Bataan wherein
Disini managed to obtained projects for the said corporation and others through the direct
intervention of then President Marcos.
ISSUES
WON there is sufficiency of information to hold Disini guilty of said crime.
Held
The information were sufficient in form and substance. For the corruption of public
officer complaint: The information stated that: (1) Disini made an offer and promise, and
gave gifts to President Marcos, a public officer; and (2) in consideration of the offers,
promises and gifts, President Marcos, in caused the award of the contracts in favor of Disini
by taking advantage of his position and in committing said act in relation to his office, was
placed under circumstances that would make him liable for direct bribery. The second
element of corruption of public officers simply required the public officer to be placed under
circumstances, not absolute certainty, that would make him liable for director indirect
bribery. Thus, even without alleging that President Marcos received or accepted Disini's
offers, promises and gifts an essential element in direct bribery the allegation that
President Marcos caused the award of the contracts to Burns & Roe and Westinghouse
sufficed to place him under circumstances of being liable for direct bribery.
For the complaint regarding the violation of Sec 4 of R.A 3019 the information
contained if hypothetically admitted, would establish the elements of the offense,
considering that: (1) Disini, being the husband of Paciencia Escolin-Disini, the first cousin of
First Lady Imelda Romualdez-Marcos, and at the same time the family physician of the
Marcoses, had close personal relations and intimacy with and free access to President
Marcos, a public official; (2) Disini, taking advantage of such family and close personal
relations, requested and received $1,000,000.00 from Burns & Roe and $17,000,000.00 from
Westinghouse, the entities then having business, transaction, and application with the
Government in connection with the PNPPP; (3) President Marcos, the public officer with
whom Disini had family or close personal relations, intervened to secure and obtain for
Burns & Roe the engineering and architectural contract, and for Westinghouse the
construction of the PNPPP.

You might also like