Blue Book PDF
Blue Book PDF
Blue Book PDF
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
10th Edition, Revised January 2007
www.med.umich.edu/obgyn/gynonc
Gyn Oncology.......................................................................734-764-9106
Cancer Center Answer Line ...............................................800-865-1125
Contents
Gyn Tumors Page
Breast Cancer ......................................................................... 1
Cervical Cancer 6
Endometrial Cancer................................................. 17
Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia 24
Ovarian Cancer ....................................................... 29
Sarcomas 44
Vaginal Cancer ........................................................ 47
Vulvar Cancer 49
Appendix
GOG Toxicity Criteria ............................................ 119
Performance Status............................................... 123
Special thanks to William Burke, MD, for his update of the Perioperative Management
chapter and to Catherine Christen, PharmD, for her careful proof reading
Favorite Quotes
"Statistics are no substitute for judgment."
Henry Clay
"A leading authority is anyone who has guessed right more than once."
Frank A. Clark
"To err is human; to repeat the error is sometimes cause for concern."
"Good surgery is like a ballet!"
George W. Morley, MD
I. Incidence: Most common cancer of women in US. 212,000 new cases in 2006, with 40,970
deaths (Jemal). Incidence increasing 1-2% annually. Average lifetime risk of developing
breast cancer is 10%.
II. Epidemiology
A. Risk factors
1. Cumulative Likelihood of Developing Breast Cancer, By Age And Risk Factors
Relative Risk Coefficient Risk Factors
Age 1 2 5 1 Menarche 14y, no breast biopsies, first
20-40 0.5% 1.0% 2.5% birth 20y, no first degree relatives with
20-50 1.7% 3.4% 8.3% breast cancer
30-50 1.7% 3.3% 8.1% 2 One first degree relative with breast cancer
30-60 3.2% 6.3% 14.9% first birth 30y, menarche <12y, one prior
40-60 2.8% 5.5% 13.1% breast biopsy
40-70 4.4% 8.6% 20.0% 5 Two first degree relatives with breast
50-70 3.2% 6.4% 15.1% cancer, one relative with breast cancer
50-80 4.4% 8.5% 19.9% and one prior breast biopsy
60-80 3.0% 5.9% 14.0% Assumes well screened population
2. Risk of positive family history, between ages 30-70
Mother or Sister's Lesion Risk
Premenopausal, unilateral 7%
Postmenopausal, unilateral 18%
Premenopausal, bilateral 51%
Postmenopausal, bilateral 25%
3. Other risk factors: endometrial/ovarian cancer, prior radiation exposure, atypical
benign breast disease (ductal or lobular hyperplasia), obesity, low parity, early
menarche, high socioeconomic status
B. Etiology. Estrogen, progesterone, prolactin implicated. Two temporal sets of etiologies:
1. Premenopausal cancers influenced by genetic linkage, and ovarian-pituitary
dysfunction. Several pedigrees exist: site specific, breast-ovary, and Lynch II family
cancer syndrome. Genes BRCA-1 and BRCA-2 implicated in many familial cases
2. Postmenopausal cancers influenced by obesity, dietary fat intake, and hormones.
III. Pathology
A. Benign lesions
1. Nipple discharge. Present in 75% of women. Discharge associated with: duct ectasia
(green); benign intraductal papilloma and cancer (serous or bloody). Likelihood of
cancer: serous discharge (6%), bloody discharge (13-20%). Evaluate suspicious
discharge with ductogram and excision. Cytology rarely helpful.
2. Fibrocystic change. Present in up to 75% of women. No longer considered an
accurate diagnostic term.
3. Cysts. Common during reproductive years. Probably develop due to estrogen.
Evaluate palpable mass by FNA. If clear fluid obtained without residual mass, then
repeat exam in 1 month. If bloody fluid obtained, or if mass persists, submit cytology
specimen, order mammogram, and perform biopsy.
4. Fibroadenoma. Most common benign tumor of breast. Peak incidence age 20-30.
Usually firm, well circumscribed, and solitary. FNA often diagnostic. Phylloides
tumors can mimic fibroadenoma. Lobular CIS reported in these tumors occasionally.
Biopsy appropriate.
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 2
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
2. Papilloma, intraductal. Associated with bloody discharge. Palpable subareolar
lesions in 30%. Evaluate with ductogram and excision. B. Premalignant lesions. May
be either precursors or marker lesions.
B. In-Situ Lesions
1. Ductal carcinoma in situ. Average age 55y. Represents 10-20% of new breast
cancers. Often multifocal: up to 60% have residual DCIS after biopsy, 12%
associated with cancer in contralateral breast , and 21-30% associated with cancer
in ipsilateral breast. Lifetime breast cancer risk increased 10x. Treatment
controversial. Options include excision +/- radiation, or mastectomy.
2. Lobular carcinoma in situ. Average age 45y. Usually an incidental finding (not
detected on clinical or mammogram exam) in premenopausal women. Multifocal: 60-
90% have residual LCIS after biopsy, 30-50% associated with LCIS in contralateral
breast, and 25% associated with cancer in either breast (usually ductal). Treatment
controversial. Options include bilateral mastectomy, or excision with close followup.
C. Malignant lesions
1. Ductal carcinoma
a. Infiltrating ductal carcinoma: 80% of breast cancers (53% pure, 28% mixed
ductal patterns). Arise in myoepithelial cells around duct. Marked desmoplastic
response can cause skin dimple or nipple retraction. In inflammatory carcinoma,
a poor-prognosis subtype, dermal lymphatics contain tumor.
b. Comedocarcinoma: 5% of breast cancers. Predominantly intraductal tumor.
c. Medullary carcinoma: 6% of breast cancers. Arise in ductal epithelium. Tumors
bulky, soft, often necrotic. Less likely to spread than infiltrating ductal tumors.
Prognosis good (85-90% 5y survival).
d. Papillary carcinoma: < 1% of breast cancers. Commonly involves multiple ducts.
e. Colloid carcinoma: < 1% of breast cancers. Bulky, gelatinous, mucin-containing
tumors with relatively good prognosis.
2. Lobular carcinoma: 5% of breast cancers. Arise in acinar cells and terminal ducts.
Usually multicentric.
3. Paget's disease: 2% of breast cancers. Arises from mammary ducts. Clinical
appearance of eczematoid nipple.
4. Sarcoma: < 1% of breast cancers. Cystosarcoma phylloides has benign and
malignant types, and is most common sarcoma of breast. Metastases rare.
Treatment usually simple mastectomy.
IV. Diagnosis
A. Evaluation of a palpable mass
Palpable mass
Pathologic (pN) based on axillary dissection. If sentinel nodes done, denote with (sn)
postscript
pNx Regional nodes cannot be assessed (previously removed or not removed)
pN0 No regional lymph node metastases, no additional exam for isolated tumor cells
(ITC)
ITC defined as individual tumor cells or clusters 0.2 mm detected by
immunohistochemistry (IHC), molecular methods or histologic verification. Usually
no evidence of proliferation or stromal reaction
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 4
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
pN0(i - ) No regional lymph node metastases, negative IHC
pN0(i + ) No histologic evidence of regional lymph node metastases, positive IHC, no
IHC clusters > 0.2 mm
pN0(mol - ) No regional lymph node metastases, negative molecular findings with reverse
transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
pN(mol + ) No regional lymph node metastases, positive molecular findings with reverse
transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
pN1 Metastases in 1-3 axillary nodes, and/or internal mammary nodes with
microscopic disease detected by sentinel node dissection without clinically
apparent disease on exam or imaging
mi Micrometastasis > 0.2 mm and 2 mm
a Micrometastases in 1-3 axillary nodes
b Metastases in internal mammary nodes with microscopic disease detected by sentinel
node dissection but not clinically apparent
c Metastases in axillary and internal mammary nodes with microscopic disease detected
by sentinel node dissection but not clinically apparent
pN2 Metastases in 4-9 axillary nodes or in clinically apparent internal mammary
nodes in the absence of axillary node metastases
a Metastases in 4-9 axillary nodes with at least one tumor deposit of > 2 mm
b Metastases clinically apparent internal mammary nodes in the absence of
axillary node metastases
pN3 Metastases in 10 axillary nodes, or in infraclavicular nodes, or in clinically
apparent internal mammary nodes in the presence of 1 axillary node
metastases; or in > 3 axillary nodes with internal mammary node
micrometastases; or supraclavicular node metastasis
a Metastases in 10 axillary nodes with at least one tumor deposit of > 2 mm,
or in infraclavicular nodes
b Metastases in clinically apparent internal mammary nodes in the presence of
1 axillary node metastases; or in > 3 axillary nodes with internal mammary
micrometastases that are clinically inapparent
c Metastases in ipsilateral supraclavicular nodes
I. Incidence: Second most common cancer of women, worldwide. 12th most common cancer of
women and 3rd most common gyn malignancy in USA. 9,710 cases, and 3700 deaths in
2006 in USA (Jemal)
II. Epidemiology:
A. Falling incidence 1940 to1986. Rising since 1986 for Caucasian women
B. Table of Relative Risks (Morrow, Wright in Hoskins) RR
Age at coitarche (years) <16 vs>19 16
16-19 vs>19 3
Menarche-coitarche interval (years) <1 vs>10 26
1-5 vs>10 7
6-10 vs>10 3
Sexual partners (# before age 20) >4 vs 0-1 4
Genital Warts 3
Smoker > .25 PPD, >20 years vs < 1 yr 4
HPV detectable on exam Varies by HPV type 4-40
OCP, long term use 1.5-2
Unsatisfactory Satisfactory
FIGO Stage IA-2, IB, IIA FIGO Stage IIB FIGO Stage III, IVA
XX. Prevention
A. Immunization (Blumenthal, Mao, Stanley)
1. Gardasil (Merck): FDA approved in 2006, quadrivalent for HPV 6, 11, 16, 18. Phase
III randomized trial (n=12,150) with injection on day 1, month 2 and month 6 showed
100% prevention of CIN 2-3 at 17 months followup if no HPV infection occurred and
97% efficacy if HPV infection occurred after immunization with 24 months followup
(Villa). May be commercially available by late 2006
2. Cervarix (Glaxo Smith Kline): FDA approval anticipated in 2007-08. Bivalent for HPV
16 and 18.
B. Sex education to alter high-risk behavior and age of first intercourse (Howard)
References
ACOG Committee Opinion: Committee on Gynecologic Practice. Routine cancer screening. Int
J Gynecol Obstet 1993; 43: 344-348Berek JS, Hacker NF. Practical Gynecologic Oncology.
Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1989.
Apgar BS, Brotzman GL, Spitzer M (eds).Colposcopy Principles and Practice: An integrated
textbook and atlas. Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders, 2002
Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance / low-grade squamous intra-epithelial
lesions triage study (ALTS) group. Human papillomavirus testing for triage of women with
cytologic evidence of low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;
92: 397-402
Benedet JL, Selke PA, Nickerson KG. Colposcopic evaluation of abnormal Papanicolaou
smears in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 157:932-7.
Blumenthal PD, Gaffikin L. Cervical cancer prevention: making programs more appropriate and
pragmatic. J Am Med Assoc 2005; 294: 2225-2228
Dargent D. Radical vaginal hysterectomy. In: Smith JR, Del Priore G, Curtin J, Monaghan JM
(Eds.). An Atlas of gynecologic oncology. London: Martin Dunitz, 2001.
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 15
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
Diakomanolis E, Haidopoulos D, Stefanidis K. Treatment of high-grade vaginal intraepithelial
neoplasia with imiquimod cream. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 374
Gershenson DM, DeCherney AH, Curry SL. Operative Gynecology, 2nd edition. Philadelphia:
W. B. Saunders, 2001.
Hartmann KE, Hall SA, Nanda K, et al.: Screening for Cervical Cancer. Rockville, MD: Agency
for Health Research and Quality, 2002 available at
www.nci.nih.gov/cancertopics/pdq/screening/cervical/HealthProfessional/page6
Hatch KD. Handbook of Colposcopy. Boston: Little Brown, 1989.
Hellberg D, Axelsson O, Gad A, Nilsson S. Conservative management of the abnormal smear
during pregnancy. A long-term follow-up. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1987; 66:195-9.
Hckel M. Pelvic side-wall recurrence of cervical cancer: the LEER / CORT procedure. In:
Smith JR, Del Priore G, Curtin J, Monaghan JM (Eds.). An Atlas of gynecologic oncology.
London: Martin Dunitz, 2001.
Howard M, McCabe JB. Helping teenagers postpone sexual involvement. Family Planning
Perspectives 1990; 22: 21-26.
Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Smigal C, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2006. CA
Cancer J Clin 2006; 56: 106-30
Keys HM, Bundy BN, Stehman FB, et al. A comparison of weekly cisplatin during radiation
therapy versus irradiation alone each followed by adjuvant hysterectomy in bulky stage IB
cervical carcinoma: a randomized trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. New Engl J
Med 1999; 340: 1154-1161
Krebs HB. Treatment of vaginal condyloma acuminata by weekly topical application of 5-
fluorouracil. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 70: 68-71.
Kurman RJ. Blaustein's Pathology of the Female Genital Tract, 4th Edition., New York:
Springer-Verlag, 1994.
LaPolla JP, O'Neill C, Wetrich D. Colposcopic management of abnormal cervical cytology in
pregnancy. J Reprod Med 1988; 33:301-6.
Mao C, Koutsky LA, Ault K, et al. Efficacy of human papillomavirus-16 vaccine to prevent
cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107:
18-27
Maruyama Y, van Nagell JR, Yoneda J, Donaldson E, Gallion HH, Higgins R, Powell D,
Kryscio R, Berner B. Dose-response and failure pattern for bulky or barrel-shaped stage IB
cervical cancer treated by combined photon irradiation and extrafascial hysterectomy.
Cancer. 1989; 63: 70-6
Morrow CP, Curtin JP, Townsend DE. Synopsis of Gynecologic Oncology, Fourth Ed., New
York: Churchill Livingstone, 1993.
Morrow CP, Masterson JG, Shingleton HM, Morley GW, et al. Is pelvic radiation beneficial in
the postoperative management of stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix with
pelvic node metastases treated by radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy?
Gynecol Oncol 1980; 10: 105-10.
Paley PJ, Goff BA, Minudri R, Greer BE, Tamimi HK, Koh WJ. The prognostic significance of
radiation dose and residual tumor in the treatment of barrel-shaped endophytic cervical
carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2000; 76: 373-9
Perez CA, Hall EJ, Purdy JA, Williamson JF. Biologic and physical aspects of radiation
oncology. In: Hoskins WJ, Perez CA, Young RC (Eds.). Principles and Practice of
Gynecologic Oncology, 3rd edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2000.
Peters WA 3rd, Liu PY, Barrett RJ 2nd, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation
therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical
surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 2000; 18: 1606-13
Plante M, Roy M. Radical vaginal trachelectomy. In: Smith JR, Del Priore G, Curtin J,
Monaghan JM (Eds.). An Atlas of gynecologic oncology. London: Martin Dunitz, 2001.
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 16
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
Reid R, Stanhope CR, Herschman BR, Crum CP, Agronow SJ. Genital warts and cervical
cancer. IV. A colposcopic index for differentiating subclinical papillomaviral infection from
cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984; 149: 815-23
Reynolds RK, Burke WM. The evolving role of laparoscopic surgery for treatment of
gynecologic masses and cancers. Female Patient 2004; 29: 25-32
Rose PG, Bundy BN, Watkins EB, et al. Concurrent cisplatin-based chemoradiation improves
progression-free and overall survival in advanced cervical cancer: results of a randomized
Gynecologic Oncology Group study. New Engl J Med 1999; 340: 1144
Saslow D Runowicz C, Solomon D, et al. American Cancer Society guideline for the early
detection of cervical neoplasia and cancer. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2002; 52:
342-76,
Schiffman M, Solomon D. Findings to date from the ASCUS-LSIL triage study (ALTS). Arch
Pathol Lab Med 2003; 127: 946-9
Schorge JO, Knowles LM, Lea JS. Adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Curr Treat Options Oncol.
2004; 5: 119-27
Shingleton HM, Fowler WC Jr, Koch GG. Pretreatment evaluation in cervical cancer. Am J
Obstet Gynecol 1971; 110: 385-9
Shy K, Chu J, Mandelson M, Greer B, Figge D. Papanicolaou smear screening interval and
risk of cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 74: 838-43
Stanley M. HPV vaccines. Best Practice and Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology
2006; 20 (2): 279-93
Stehman FB, Perez CA, Kurman RJ, Thigpen JT. Uterine cervix. In: Hoskins WJ, Perez CA,
Young RC (Eds.). Principles and Practice of Gynecologic Oncology, 3rd edition.
Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2000.
Takushi M, Moromizato H, Sakumoto K, Kanazawa K. Management of invasive carcinoma of
the uterine cervix associated with pregnancy: outcome of intentional delay in treatment.
Gynecol Oncol. 2002; 87: 185-9
Tannock IF, Hill RP. The Basic Science of Oncology. New York: Pergamon, 1987.
Verreault R, Chu J, Mandelson M, Shy K. A case-control study of diet and invasive cervical
cancer. Int J Cancer. 1989; 43: 1050-4
Villa LL, Costa RL, Petta CA, et al. Prophylactic quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6,
11, 16, and 18) L1 virus-like particle vaccine in young women: a randomized double-blind
placebo-controlled multicentre phase II efficacy trial. Lancet Oncol 2005; 6: 271-78
Wright TC Jr, Cox JT, Massad LS, Carlson J, Twiggs LB, Wilkinson EJ; American Society for
Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology. 2001 consensus guidelines for the management of
women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189: 295-304
Wright TC, Gagnon S, Richart RM, Ferenczy A. Treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
using the loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79: 173-8.
Wright TC. Pathogenesis and diagnosis of preinvasive lesions of the lower genital tract. In:
Hoskins WJ, Perez CA, Young RC (Eds.). Principles and Practice of Gynecologic
Oncology, 3rd edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2000.
Wright VC, Lickrish GM. Basic and Advanced Colposcopy. Houston, Biomedical
Communications: 1989.
12/2006
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 17
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
Endometrial Carcinoma
I. Incidence: most common gyn tumor in U.S. Fourth most common cancer of women in U.S. In
2006, 41,200 new cases per year, resulting in 7,350 deaths (Jemal). Average age at onset
is 58 years.
II. Epidemiology
A. Represents progression from normal to hyperplastic to atypical then invasive
endometrial cells.
B. Risk factors RR
Overweight (age 50-59) by 20-50 pounds 3
by > 50 pounds 10
GO vs G> 5 5
Menopause after age 52 2
Diabetes 3
Unopposed estrogen replacement (Includes tamoxifen) 6
Combination OCP 0.5
C. Etiology
1. Prolonged or non-cyclic estrogen stimulation (endogenous or exogenous) for Type I
cancers
2. Risk of progression to cancer of endometrial hyperplasia without atypia (1-3%), with
atypia (29%) (Kurman)
3. 5% of endometrial cancers arise as hereditary cancers in HNPCC families
associated with mismatch repair genes MLH, MSH, PMS1, and PMS2 (Boyd)
III. Screening
No test or procedure has been identified as a cost-effective method to screen for
endometrial cancer. ACOG does not recommend screening
IV. Diagnosis
A. Symptoms: 90% present with postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) or abnormal discharge
1. Common etiologies of PMB: hormone replacement therapy (27%),endometrial
carcinoma (13-16%), cervical carcinoma (1-4%), atrophy (10%), polyps (7-23%),
cervicitis (6-14%). No pathology (20-23%).
2. Likelihood that PMB is associated with endometrial cancer is a function of age:
70
60
50
Percent
40
30
20
10
0
<50 50-59 60-69 70-79 >80
Age
B. Pap test very low sensitivity, but necessary to rule out cervical cancer as a cause of
postmenopausal bleeding
C. Endometrial biopsy 90-97.5% sensitive (Stovall)
D. Fractional curettage hysteroscopy is diagnostic gold standard
E. Vaginal U/S for endometrial thickness. Cancer rare if stripe <4 mm (Varner)
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 18
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
F. Preoperative CXR
G. Preop CA-125: accurate predictor of extra-uterine disease and survival (Sood)
V. Pathology
Endometrioid 75-85%
Squamous differentiation common
Papillary (Villoglandular) rare
Secretory rare
Uterine Papillary Serous Tumor (UPST) 5-7%
Clear Cell Carcinoma 4%
Mucinous Rare
Squamous Rare
Type I refers to well differentiated tumors arising from estrogen stimulation
Type II refers to poorly differentiated or non-endometrioid histology and is associated
with poorer prognosis (Boyd)
1. Adverse risk factors (*) defined as age >60, lymph vascular space involvement
(LVSI), tumor size, lower uterine segment involvement
2. Randomized trials (**) show reduced pelvic recurrences with pelvic radiotherapy but
no improvement in overall survival (Keys: GOG 99, Creutzberg: PORTEC-1).
B. Stage II
1. Stage IIA grade 1-2: observe or vaginal brachytherapy
2. Stage IIA grade 3 or all stage IIB: vaginal brachytherapy +/- pelvic RT
3. If initial Tx was radical hysterectomy without extrauterine spread, then no RT
C. Stage III:
1. Stage IIIA
a. Positive washings with no other evidence of metastatic disease. Prognostic
significance debated with some studies showing no impact on survival
(Grimshaw, Kasamatsu) and some showing poor outcome (Creasman)
b. Adnexal or uterine serosal involvement: treated with chemotherapy +/- tumor
directed RT (NCCN)
2. Stage IIIB: tumor directed RT +/- chemotherapy
3. Stage IIIC: chemotherapy better (50% vs. 38% disease free survival at 5 years)
based on randomized trial comparing whole abdominal RT vs. cisplatin and
doxorubicin chemotherapy (Randall)
4. Treatment individualized. May include surgery, and/or tumor directed RT
D. Stage IV: Treatment individualized.
1. Chemotherapy
a. Cisplatin 50 mg/m2 day 1, doxorubicin 45 mg/m2 day 1 and paclitaxel 165 mg/m2
day 2 with cytokine support days 3-12 repeated every 3 weeks. Regimen has
highest response rates 57% vs. 34% for cisplatin 50 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 60
mg/m2. Average progression free survival is 5 to 8 months (Fleming)
b. Doxorubicin (Adriamycin), 60-75 mg/m2 IV q3weeks (maximum cumulative dose
450 mg/m2), is the most active single-agent drug. Response rate is 37%
2. Tumor directed RT may be useful to palliate bleeding or pain.
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 21
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
3. For estrogen-progesterone receptor positive tumors, or metastatic grade 1-2 tumors,
hormonal therapy with megestrol acetate, 80 mg po bid and / or tamoxifen 10-20 mg
po bid, sometimes useful
E. There is no demonstrated benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy or hormonal therapy
(Morrow)
F. Uterine papillary serous tumors (UPST)
1. Clinical stage underestimates extent of disease in 50%.
2. Patients with surgical stage I recur in 50-60%. Recur in upper abdomen 67%.
Natural history resembles ovarian tumors.
3. Adjuvant therapy using combination chemotherapy with or without pelvic RT favored
in phase II trials. No sizable phase III studies available. Best regimens reported
include carboplatin and paclitaxel alone (Dietrich) or in combination with RT
(Bancher-Todesca, Kelly, Turner)
G. Incompletely staged disease. If uterine disease is myoinvasive or grade is 2-3, then
either complete staging surgically or image and base adjuvant therapy on best
assessment of disease extent.
X. Survival
A. Endometrioid Histology
5 Yr Survival
Stage I Grade 1 94%
Grade 2 87%
Grade 3 75%
Stage II 57%
Stage III 36%
Stage IV 9%
B. Uterine Papillary Serous Histology
5 Yr Survival
Stage I-II 45%
Stage III-IV 11%
XI. References
ACOG Committee Opinion: Committee on Gynecologic Practice. Routine cancer screening.
Int J Gynecol Obstet 1993; 43: 344-348
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin, Clinical
Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-gynecologists, Number 65, August 2005:
Management of Endometrial Cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 413-25
Bancher-Todesca D, Neunteufel W, Williams, et al. Influence of postoperative treatment on
survival in patients with uterine papillary serous carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 1998; 71:
344-47
Ben-Shachar I, Pavelka J, Cohn DE, Copeland LJ, Ramirez N, Manolitsas T, Fowler JM.
Surgical staging for patients presenting with Grade 1 endometrial carcinoma. Obstet
Gynecol 2005; 105:487-93
Berek JS, Hacker NF. Practical Gynecologic Oncology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins,
1989.
Boyd J, Berchuck A. Oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes. In: Hoskins WJ, Perez CA,
Young RC, Barakat R, Markman M, Randall M, Eds. Principles and practice of
gynecologic oncology. 4th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005.
Bristow RE, Zahurak ML, Alexander CJ, Zellars RC, Montz FJ. FIGO stage IIIC endometrial
carcinoma: resection of macroscopic nodal disease and other determinants of survival.
Int J Gynecol Cancer 2003; 13:664-72
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 22
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
Ceccaroni M, Savelli L, Bovicelli A, Alboni C, Ceccarini M, Farina A, Bovicelli L. Prognostic
value of pelvic lymphadenectomy in surgical treatment of apparent stage I endometrial
cancer. Anticancer Res 2004; 24:2073-8
Chan J, Cheung MK, Husain A, et al. The therapeutic benefit of extensive lymph node
dissection in endometrioid uterine cancer: a study of 12,333 women. Abstract #46, 37th
Annual Meeting of the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists, March, 2006. Gynecol Oncol
2006; 101S: S22
Cragun JM, Havrilesky LJ, Calingaert B, et al. Retrospective analysis of selective
lymphadenectomy in apparent early-stage endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 1-
8
Creasman WT, DiSaia PJ, Blessing J, Wilkinson RH, Johnston W, Weed JC. Prognostic
significance of peritoneal cytology in patients with endometrial cancer and preliminary
data concerning therapy with intraperitoneal radiopharmaceuticals. Am J Obstet
Gynecol 1981; 141:921-7
Creutzberg CL, van Putten WL, Koper PC, et al. Survival after relapse in patients with
endometrial cancer: results from a randomized trial. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 89: 201-9
Dietrich CS, Modesitt SC, DePriest PD, et al. The efficacy of adjuvant platinum-based
chemotherapy in stage I uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC). Gynecol Oncol
2005; 99: 557-63
Farhi DC, Nosanchuk J, Silverberg SG. Endometrial adenocarcinoma in women under 25
years of age. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68:741-5.
Fleming GF, Brunetto VL, Cella D, et al. Phase III trial of doxorubicin plus cisplatin with or
without paclitaxel plus filgrastim in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic
Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 2159-66
Frumovitz M, Slomovitz BM, Singh DK, Broaddus RR, et al. Frozen section analyses as
predictors of lymphatic spread in patients with early-stage uterine cancer. J Am Coll
Surg 2004; 199: 388-93Gershenson DM, DeCherney AH, Curry SL. Operative
Gynecology. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1993.
Grimshaw RN, Tubber C, Fraser RC, Tompkins MG, Jeffrey JF. Prognostic value of
peritoneal cytology in endometrial carcinoma. Gyn Oncol 1990; 36:97-100
Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Smigal C, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2006.
CA Cancer J Clin 2006; 56: 106-30
Kadar N, Malfetano JH, Homesley HD. Determinants of survival of surgically staged
patients with endometrial carcinoma histologically confined to the uterus: implications
for therapy. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80:655-9
Kasamatsu T, Onda T, Katsumata N, Sawada M, Yamada T, Tsunematsu R, Ohmi K,
Sasajima Y, Matsuno Y. Prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology in
endometrial carcinoma confined to the uterus. Br J of Cancer 2003; 88: 245-50
Kelly MG, OMalley D, Hui P, McAlpine J, Dziura J, Rutherford TJ, Azodi M, Chambers SK,
Schwartz PE. Patients with uterine papillary serous cancers may benefit from adjuvant
platinum-based chemoradiation. Gyn Oncol 2004; 95: 469-73
Keys HM, Roberts JA, Brunetto VL, et al. A phase III trial of surgery with or without
adjunctive external pelvic radiation therapy in intermediate risk endometrial carcinoma:
a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 92: 744-751
Kitchener H, Redman CW, Swart AM, et al. A study in the treatment of endometrial cancer:
a randomized trial of lymphadenectomy in the treatment of endometrial cancer. Abstract
#45, 37th Annual Meeting of the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists, March, 2006
Gynecol Oncol 2006; 101S: S21-22
Kilgore LC, Partridge EE, Alvarez RD, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: Survival
comparisons of patients with and without pelvic node sampling. Gynecol Oncol 1995;
56: 29-33
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 23
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
Kueck AS, Gossner G, Burke WM, Reynolds RK. Laparoscopic technology for the
treatment of endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2006, in press
Kurman RJ. Blaustein's Pathology of the Female Genital Tract, Fourth Ed., New York:
Springer-Verlag, 1994.
Mariani A, Webb MJ, Galli L, et al. Potential therapeutic role of para-aortic
lymphadenectomy in node positive endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2000; 76: 348-
56
Morrow CP, Bundy BN, Homesley HD, et al. Doxorubicin as an adjuvant following surgery
and radiation therapy in patients with high risk endometrial carcinoma, stage I and
occult stage II: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 1990; 36: 166-71
Morrow CP, Curtin JP, Townsend DE. Synopsis of Gynecologic Oncology, Fourth Ed., New
York: Churchill Livingstone, 1993.
Randall ME, Filiaci VL, Muss H, et al. Randomized phase III trial of whole-abdominal
irradiation versus doxorubicin and cisplatin chemotherapy in advanced endometrial
carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 36-44
Sood AK, Buller RE, Burger RA, Dawson JD, Sorosky JI, Berman M. Value of preoperative
CA 125 level in the management of uterine cancer and prediction of clinical outcome.
Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90:441-7.
Stovall TG, Photopulos GJ, Poston WM, Ling FW, Sandles LG. Pipelle endometrial
sampling in patients with known endometrial carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77:954-6
Tannock IF, Hill RP. The Basic Science of Oncology. New York: Pergamon, 1987.
Trimble EL, Kosary C, Park RC. Lymph node sampling and survival in endometrial cancer.
Gynecol Oncol 1998; 71: 340-3
Trope CG, Alektiar KM, Sabbatini PJ, Zaino RJ. Corpus: Epithelial tumors. In: Hoskins WJ,
Perez CA, Young RC, Barakat R, Markman M, Randall M, Eds. Principles and practice
of gynecologic oncology. 4th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005.
Turner BC, Knisely JPS, Kacinski BM, Haffty BG, Gumbs AA, Roberts KB, Frank AH,
Peschel RE, Rutherford TJ, Edraki B, Kohorn EI, Chambers SK, Schwartz PE, Wilson
LD. Effective treatment of Stage I uterine papillary serous carcinoma with high dose-rate
vaginal apex radiation (192Ir) and chemotherapy. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys
1998; 40:77-84
Varner RE, Sparks JM, Cameron CD, et al. Transvaginal sonography of the endometrium
in postmenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78:195-200.
Varner RE, Sparks JM, Cameron CD, Roberts LL, Soong S. Transvaginal sonography of
the endometrium in postmenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78:195-99.
Vergote I, Kjrstad K, Abeler V, Kolstad P. A randomized trial of adjuvant progestagen in
early endometrial cancer. Cancer 1989; 64:1011-6
Vizza E, Galati GM, Corrado G, Sbiroli C. Role of pelvic lymphadenectomy in the
management of stage I endometrial cancer: our experience. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol
2003; 24:126-8
Yenen MC, Dilek S, Dede M, Goktolga U, Deveci MS, Aydogu T. Pelvic-paraaortic
lymphadenectomy in clinical Stage I endometrial adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study.
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2003; 24:327-9
12/2006
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 24
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia
I. Trophoblastic neoplasms are essentially tumors of the placenta. The disease can be divided
into a non-invasive group of tumors consisting of complete and partial moles, and an
invasive group of tumors including invasive mole, choriocarcinoma and placental site
trophoblastic tumor.
II. Incidence of hydatidiform molar pregnancies (Non-invasive disease)
A. Population based studies 1:522 (Japan) to 1:1560 (Sweden)
B. Hospital based studies 1:85 (Indonesia) to 1:1724 (USA)
C. In elective abortions in US 1:600 and 1:1500 pregnancies in US
III. Epidemiology of hydatidiform moles
Table of Relative Risks RR
Prior Molar Pregnancy 10-40
Maternal age <20 1.5
Maternal age >40 5.2
Prior Spontaneous Abortion 1.9-3.3
Vitamin A, above median 0.6
Parity >1 0.4
IV. Pathology of hydatidiform moles
A. Complete: Arise from fertilization of an empty oocyte with 1 sperm that is then
duplicated (more common) or 2 sperm (less common)
B. Partial: Arises from fertilization of an apparently normal oocyte with 2 sperm
Characteristic Complete Mole Partial Mole
Karyotype 46XX (90%) Triploid (90%)
46XY (10%) 69XXX or 69XXY
All paternal Diploid (10%)
chromosomes 46 paternal
chromosomes
Fetus Absent Often present
Villous edema Prominent and diffuse Focal if at all
Fetal RBC None Usually present
Proliferation of trophoblast Prominent Mild to moderate
Likelihood of local invasion 15% 3.5%
Likelihood of metastasis 4% 0.6%
V. Clinical Features
A. Presenting Symptoms of Moles Complete Partial
Vaginal Bleeding 97% 73%
Excessive Uterine Size 51% 8%
Theca Lutein Cysts (>6 cm) 50% 0%
Preeclampsia 27% 3%
Hyperemesis 26% 0%
Hyperthyroidism 7% 0%
Trophoblastic Emboli (over all) 2% 0%
If size of uterus is > 16 weeks 27%
B. Diagnosis of hydatidiform moles
1. Usually diagnosed in first trimester. Workup often initiated because of symptoms
(Section V.A.)
2. Ultrasound:
a. Complete mole: vesicular pattern, snowstorm pattern
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 25
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
b. Partial mole: focal cystic change in placenta and ratio of transverse to AP
dimension of gestational sac of > 1.5. A small for dates fetus with multiple
anomalies may be present
3. -hCG elevated, especially in complete moles. 46% of complete moles have -hCG
> 100,000 mU/mL. Only 6% of partial moles have -hCG > 100,000 mU/mL. Partial
moles may have higher percentage of -hCG.
VI. Treatment of hydatidiform moles
A. Pre-treatment workup: CBC and platelet count; clotting function studies; -hCG; liver,
renal and thyroid function tests; blood type with Rh and antibody screen; chest X-ray
B. Curettage, suction and sharp, using oxytocin. Do not begin oxytocin until uterus
evacuated to minimize intra-uterine tone and trophoblastic emboli. Hysterectomy
acceptable, if fertility no longer desired
C. Post-treatment follow-up: Follow -hCG every week until normal for 3 weeks, then
monthly for 6 months. Contraception to prevent confusion over interpretation of -hCG
values is important. OCPs do not increase the likelihood of persistent disease.
D. If -hCG levels plateau x3 weeks or rise x2 weeks, then metastatic workup and
chemotherapy is initiated. Repeat curettage occasionally useful.
E. Management Flow Diagram
Suction curettage,
weekly -hCG
Observation x 6
months with Metastatic workup
contraception
References
ACOG Practice Bulletin. Diagnosis and treatment of gestational trophoblastic disease. Obstet
Gynecol 2004; 103: 1365-1377
Berkowitz RS, Goldstein DP. Gestational trophoblastic diseases. In: Hoskins WJ, Perez CA,
Young RC, Barakat R, Markman M, Randall M (Eds.). Principles and Practice of
Gynecologic Oncology, 4th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2005.
Rubin SC. Chemotherapy of gynecologic cancers, Second edition. Philadelphia, Lippincott
Williams and Wilkins, 2004
Rev. 3/2005
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 29
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
Ovarian Cancer
I. Incidence:
A. Second most common gyn malignancy in U.S. Largest number of gyn cancer deaths. In
2006, incidence 20,180 cases with 15,310 deaths (Jemal)
B. Incidence rises with age, peak incidence age 54-64
C. Individual lifetime risk of any ovarian neoplasm 5-7%. Individual lifetime risk of ovarian
cancer 1.8%. Risk that adnexal mass is malignant 7-13% (premenopause), and 30-45%
(postmenopause) (Koonings)
D. Differential diagnosis for adnexal masses
1. Ovary
a. functional cysts
b. endometriosis
c. benign neoplasm: epithelial, germ cell, stromal
d. malignant neoplasm: epithelial invasive, epithelial low malignant potential, germ
cell, stromal
2. Uterus (e.g. pedunculated fibroid, sarcoma, etc.)
3. Fallopian tube (e.g. hydrosalpinx, paratubal cyst, Fallopian tube carcinoma, etc.)
4. GI tract (e.g. diverticulosis, appendiceal abscess or tumor, rectal carcinoma, etc.)
5. Urinary tract (e.g. neurogenic bladder, bladder carcinoma, etc.)
6. Other: (e.g. aneurysm or A-V malformation, pelvic fracture, etc.)
II. Epidemiology
A. Incidence increased 200% between 1930-2004
B. Risk Factors, Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma RR
Positive Family History 29
History breast cancer 2
Nulliparity (vs. P >5) 4-5
Age at 1st pregnancy (>25 vs < 20) 3
Talc (rare cause of cancer because exposure is low) 3
Obesity 2
OCP use 0.5
C. Risk factors, germ cell: 50% risk of dysgerminoma in patients with dysgenetic gonads
D. Proposed etiologies, epithelial carcinomas
1. "Incessant ovulation". Probably accounts for the majority of ovarian cancers.
a. Prolonged stimulation by pituitary gonadotropins
b. Repetitive surface trauma / healing due to ovulation or inflammation
2. Genetic: autosomal dominant gene with variable penetrance. Three known
pedigrees for Familial Breast / Ovarian Cancer (FBOC): site specific, breast-ovary,
"cancer family syndrome" (Lynch II). FBOC accounts for 5-10% of ovarian cancers
a. BRCA-1. Chromosome 17q21. Tumor suppressor gene. Over 500 mutations
reported. Accounts for 70-80% of FBOC. Founder mutations in Ashkenazi Jews:
185delAG, 5382insC.
b. BRCA-2. Chromosome 13q12. Tumor suppressor gene. Over 300 mutations
reported. Accounts for 10-30% of HBOC. Associated with male breast cancer.
Founder mutation in Ashkenazi Jews: 6174delT.
c. Criteria to determine high risk individual for BRCA1 or BRCA2 testing:
i. Personal history of breast cancer < age 40, bilateral breast cancer, or breast
and ovarian cancer.
ii. Family history predictive of >10% chance of mutation: breast cancer in 2
relatives at age < 50, or 1 breast cancer at age < 50 and any ovarian cancer,
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 30
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
or 2 ovarian cancers, or any male relative with breast cancer, or any
Ashkenazi Jewish family with breast or ovarian cancer
iii. If individual is high risk, then:
a. Genetic counseling should be recommended and gene testing offered.
b. High risk individuals may benefit from chemoprevention with OCP
(literature with conflicting studies)
c. For BRCA mutation carriers, prophylactic oophorectomy results in 85-96%
ovarian cancer risk reduction and 53-68% breast cancer risk reduction
(Lalley: Kauff, Reebeck)
d. HNPCC (Lynch II). Mismatch repair genes: MLH1, MSH2, PMS1, PMS2. Identify
high risk individual for HNPCC testing using Amsterdam criteria for risk
assessment: (1) 3 or more relatives with colon cancer across 2 generations, (2)
at least 1 colon cancer < 50 years of age, (3) exclude FAP, (4) any colon with
either endometrial cancer < 50 years of age or ovarian cancer at any age.
e. Risk of cancer depends on specific mutation and age of patient and may be
modified by environmental issues (e.g. chemoprevention).
Site BRCA1 BRCA2 HNPCC
Female breast cancer 60-85% 60-85% N/C
Ovarian cancer 20-40% 10-20% 12%
Endometrial cancer N/C N/C 42-60%
Colon cancer Possible N/C 70-82%
Stomach / GI N/C Possible 19%
Male breast cancer N/C 6% N/A
Prostate 25% 5-7.5% N/C
E. Presenting symptoms: Abd discomfort (50%), GI (20%), urinary (15%), vaginal bleeding
(15%), weight loss (15%). Symptoms may mimic pregnancy. Germ cell tumors may
present with acute pain. Precocious pseudopuberty and virilization seen with some
germ cell and sex cord/stromal tumors
III. Diagnosis and Screening for Ovarian Mass
A. Obtain family history and initiate genetic counseling and gene testing for high risk
individual. (See Section II.D.2.a-e.)
B. Regular pelvic exams per ACOG recommendation.
C. Ultrasound for screening controversial due to cost and sensitivity/specificity (DePriest).
When used to triage a known mass 75-100% sensitive, 83-95% specific (Sassone,
Kawai, Kurjak)
D. Tumor Markers. Sensitivity and specificity too low for screening. CA-125 has 55% false
negative rate for stage I epithelial ovarian cancer. See Pathology Section (VII.A-D.) for
markers associated with each tumor type. New markers such as Ovacheck (proteomics-
based chip) and LPA are in development.
E. Prospective, randomized trial does not show benefit to screening for ovarian cancer with
combined CA-125 and ultrasound (Jacobs)
IV. Preoperative Testing and Preparation (Guidozzi, Ozols)
A. Tumor marker(s) appropriate for patient's age
B. Ultrasound helpful for triage of clinically palpable cystic masses
C. Chest X-ray abnormal in 9% of new cases, to rule out metastases or effusions
D. Liver function tests, important if ascites present to rule out primary liver disease
E. Barium enema or colonoscopy abnormal in 39% of new cases with large or fixed
masses. Order if > 45 years old or if GI symptoms present
F. Abdominal and pelvic CT scan useful for some new cases with large or fixed masses.
Not necessary for all new cases
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 31
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
G. Intravenous pyelogram abnormal in 45% of new cases. CT scan more useful particularly
if large or fixed mass present
H. Head CT or abd/pelvic MRI; liver, spleen, and bone scans NOT routinely indicated
I. Patients with suspicious adnexal masses should be prepared for definitive staging
procedure
1. Preoperative consultation with or referral to gynecologic oncologist
2. Consent for primary staging and cytoreductive surgery
3. Mechanical bowel preparation
4. Pre-operative antibiotics
5. Thromboembolic prophylaxis with SCDs and / or heparin or fractionated heparin
6. Appropriate positioning of the patient
a. Low lithotomy for patients with cul de sac masses
b. Supine for all others
7. Appropriate incision
a. Vertical incision preferred if malignancy is likely
b. Maylard incision is acceptable alternative
c. Pfannenstiel incision not desirable for high risk cases. Can be converted to
Cherney incision for improved upper abdominal exposure
d. Laparoscopic approach requires careful triage (Reynolds)
J. Adnexal mass decision tree:
Palpable Adnexal
Mass
Exclude Non-Gyn
Problem
Premenopausal Postmenopausal
Frozen
Malignant section
No Further Treatment
Fertility desired Fertility not desired
Oophorectomy TAH-BSO,
PLND/PAND PLND/PAND,
Omentectomy Omentectomy,
Cytoreduction Cytoreduction
80
IA
IB
60
Percent
IC
IIA
40
IIB-C
III
20
IV
0
0 1 2 3 4 5
Years
Morrow, 1998
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 39
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
B. Germ Cell and Stromal Tumors
Histology Stage Therapy Survival
DG Ia Surgery, VAC or RT if recurs 95%
All others Surgery plus VAC 85%
IT Ia1 Surgery 90-95%
All others Surgery plus BEP 85%
EST All stages Surgery plus BEP or PVB 75-95%
Granulosa All stages Surgery chemotherapy (VAC, 95%, 68%
Cell BEP, PVB, RT or hormone tx.) 5y,10y
Sertoli- All stages Surgery VAC or BEP or PVB 70-90%
Leydig
X. Fertility
A. If anatomic structures are preserved, fertility excellent
B. Alkylating chemotherapy drugs cause ovarian failure as function of age and dose. If
amenorrhea occurs, < 10% chance of resumed ovarian function
C. Radiation therapy causes ovarian failure as function of age and dose. All women
receiving > 800 cGy to pelvis develop ovarian failure
XI. NIH consensus recommendations regarding management of ovarian cancer
A. Women with masses having a significant risk of malignancy should be given the
opportunity to have surgery performed by a gynecologic oncologist
B. Aggressive cytoreductive surgery as primary management of ovarian cancer will
improve chances for long term survival
C. Fully staged FIGO IA-1 and IB-1 ovarian cancers do not require postoperative adjuvant
therapy
D. Second look laparotomy should only be done for patients enrolled in clinical trials or for
those patients in whom surgery will affect clinical decision making
E. Platinum-based (carboplatin or cisplatin) and paclitaxel (Taxol) are optimal first line
chemotherapy drugs following primary debulking surgery
F. There is no evidence to support screening of women with or without affected first
degree relatives
G. Recommendations for prophylactic oophorectomy include
1. Confirmed pedigree
2. Annual U/S and CA-125 until 35y or completed childbearing
3. Oophorectomy after 35y or completed childbearing
References:
Abu-Rustum NR, Sonoda Y, Chi D, et al. The effects of CO2 pneumoperitoneum on the
survival of women with persistent metastatic ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2003, 90: 431-
4
Advincula AP, Binno S, Song AH, Wechter ME. Prevention of perioperative neuropathies.
Female Patient, 2003; 28: 23-35
Agostini A, Robin F, Jais JP, et al. Peritoneal closure reduces port site metastases: results of
an experiment in a rat ovarian cancer model. Surg Endosc 2002, 16: 289-291
Armstrong DK, Bundy B, Wenzel L, et al. Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian
cancer. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 34-43
Benifla JL, Hauuy JP, Guglielmina JN, et al. Kystectomie percoelioscopique: decouverte
histologique fortuite dun carcinoma ovarien. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 1992, 21: 45-49
Berchuck A, Alvarez AA. Management of hereditary ovarian cancer. Postgraduate Obstet
Gynecol 1999; 19 (16): 1-6
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 40
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
Berek JS, Bertelsen K, du Bois A, Brady MF, et al. Advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: 1998
consensus statements. Ann Oncol 1999; 10: S87-S92
Bridges J, Oram D. Epithelial ovarian cancer. In: Smith JR, Del Priore G, Curtin J, Monaghan
JM, Eds. An atlas of gynecologic oncology investigation and surgery. London, Martin
Dunitz, Ltd., 2001
Buchsbaum HJ, Brady MF, Miller A, et al. Surgical staging of carcinoma of the ovaries. Surg
Gynecol Obstet 1989; 169:226-232.
Burghardt E, Girardi F, Lahousen M, et al. Patterns of pelvic and paraaortic lymph node
involvement in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1991; 40: 103-106.
Burrell MO, Childers JM, Adelson MD, et al. Complications of laparoscopic surgery in
gynecology and gynecologic oncology. In: Querleu D, Childers JM, Dargent D, Eds.
Laparoscopic surgery in gynaecological oncology. London: Blackwell Science, 1999.
Canis M, Mage G, Pomel C, et al. Laparoscopic diagnosis of adnexal tumors. In: Querleu D,
Childers JM, Dargent D, Eds. Laparoscopic surgery in gynaecological oncology. London:
Blackwell Science, 1999.
Carney ME, Lancaster JM, Ford C, Tsodikov A, Wiggins CL. A population-based study of
patterns of care for ovarian cancer: who is seen by a gynecologic oncologist and who is
not? Gynecol Oncol. 2002; 84: 36-42
Carney ME. The adnexal mass and ovarian cancer in pregnancy. Postgraduate Obstet
Gynecol 1999; 19 (14): 1-7
Childers JM, Aqua KA, Surwit EA. Abdominal-wall tumor implantation after laparoscopy for
malignant conditions. Obstet Gynecol 1994, 84:765-9
Childers JM, Lang J, Surwit EA, et al. Laparoscopic staging of ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol
1995, 59: 25-33
Conway C, Zalud I, Dilena M, Maulik D, Schulman H, Haley J, Simonelli K. Simple cyst in the
postmenopausal patient: detection and management. J Ultrasound Med. 1998; 17: 369-72
Covens AL. A critique of surgical cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol
2000; 78: 269-274
Creasman WT, Soper JT. Assessment of the contemporary management of germ cell
malignancies of the ovary. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1985; 153:828-834.
Delgado G, Oram DM, Petrilli ES. Stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: The role of maximal
surgical reduction. Gynecol Oncol 1984; 18: 293-298.
Dembo AJ, Bush RS, Beale FA, et al. The Princess Margaret Hospital study of ovarian cancer:
Stages I, II, and asymptomatic III presentations. Cancer Treat Rep 1979; 63: 249-254.
Dembo AJ, Davy M, Stenwig AE, et al. Prognostic factors in patients with stage I epithelial
ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75: 263-273.
DePriest PD, DeSimone CP. Ultrasound screening for the early detection of ovarian cancer. J
Clin Oncol 2003, 21: 194-9
Disaia PJ. Fertility-sparing treatment of patients with ovarian cancer. Comp Therapy 1990; 16:
35-42.
Eisenhauer EA, Vermorken JB, van Glabbeke M. Pridectors of response to subsequent
chemotherapy in platinum pretreated ovarian cancer: a multivariate analysis of 704
patients. Ann Oncol 1997; 8: 963-8
Eisenkop S, Spirtos N, Montag T. The impact of subspecialty training in the management of
advanced ovarian cancer. Abstract #24, Society of Gynecologic Oncologists, 21st Annual
Meeting, February, 1990.
Eisenkop SM, Friedman RL, Wang HJ. Complete cytoreductive surgery is feasible and
maximizes survival in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A prospective study.
Gynecol Oncol 1998; 69: 103-108
Eisenkop SM, Spirtos NM. Procedures required to accomplish complete cytoreduction of
ovarian cancer: Is there a correlation with biological aggressiveness and survival? Gynecol
Oncol 2001; 82: 435-441
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 41
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
Eisenkop SM, Spirtos NM. The clinical significance of occult macroscopically positive
retroperitoneal nodes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 82:
143-149
Eisenkop SM, Spirtos NM. What are the current surgical objectives, strategies, and technical
capabilities of gynecologic oncologists treating advanced epithelial ovarian cancer?
Gynecol Oncol 2001; 82: 489-497
Elit L, Bondy SJ, Paszat L, Przybysz R, Levine M. Outcomes in surgery for ovarian cancer.
Gynecol Oncol. 2002; 87: 260-7
Eltabbakh GH. Laparoscopic management of ovarian cysts. Contemporary Ob/Gyn 2003,
August 2003, 37-50
Gershenson DM, DeCherney AH, Curry SL. Operative Gynecology. 2nd edition. Philadelphia:
W. B. Saunders, 2001.
Gershenson DM, Hartmann LC, Young RH. Ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors. In: Hoskins WJ,
Perez CA, Young RC, Barakat R, Markman M, Randall M, Eds. Principles and practice of
gynecologic oncology. 4th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005.
Gershenson DM, Morris M, Cangir A, et al. Treatment of malignant germ cell tumors of the
ovary with bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin. J Clin Oncol, 1990; 8: 715-720.
Gershenson DM. Why American women are not receiving state-of-the-art gynecologic cancer
care. Cancer J. 2001; 7: 450-7
Guidozzi F, Sonnendecker EWW. Evaluation of preoperative investigations in patients
admitted for ovarian primary cytoreductive surgery. Gynecol Oncol 1991; 40: 244-247
Hoskins WJ, Perez CA, Young RC, Barakat R, Markam M, Randall M, Eds. Principles and
Practice of Gynecologic Oncology. 4th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,
2005.
Hoskins WJ, Rubin SC, Dulaney E, et al. Influence of secondary cytoreduction at the time of
second look laparotomy on the survival of patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma.
Gynecol Oncol 1989; 34: 365-71
ICON 2: randomised trial of single-agent carboplatin against three-drug combination of CAP
(cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) in women with ovarian cancer. ICON
Collaborators. International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm Study. Lancet. 1998; 352:
1571-6.
ICON 3. Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus standard chemotherapy with either single-agent
carboplatin or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in women with ovarian cancer:
the ICON3 randomised trial. International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm Group. Lancet.
2002; 360: 505-15.
ICON 4. Paclitaxel plus platinum-based chemotherapy versus conventional platinum-based
chemotherapy in women with relapsed ovarian cancer: The ICON 4 trial. Lancet 2003; 361:
2099-2106
Jacobs IJ, Skates SJ, MacDonald N, et al. Screening for ovarian cancer: a pilot randomised
controlled trial. Lancet. 1999, 353:1207-10
Jakobsen A, Bertelsen K, Andersen JE, et al. Dose-effect study of carboplatin in ovarian
cancer: a Danish Ovarian Cancer Group study. J Clin Oncol. 1997; 15: 193-8
Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Smigal C, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2006. CA
Cancer J Clin 2006; 56: 106-30
Kawai M, Kano T, Kikkawa F, et al. Transvaginal Doppler ultrasound with color flow imaging in
the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 79: 163-7
Kerlikowske K, Brown JS, Grady DG. Should women with familial ovarian cancer undergo
prophylactic oophorectomy? Obstet Gynecol, 1992; 80:700-707.
Koonings PP, Campbell K, Mishell DR, Grimes DA. Relative frequency of primary ovarian
neoplasms: A 10-year review. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74: 921-926.
Kramer BS, Gohagan J, Prorok P. NIH Consensus 1994: Screening. Gynecol Oncol 1994; 55:
S20-S21.
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 42
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
Krebs H-B, Goplerud DR. Surgical management of bowel obstruction in advanced ovarian
carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 61: 327-330
Kurjak A, Schulman H, Sosic A, et al. Transvaginal ultrasound, color flow, and Doppler
waveform of the postmenopausal adnexal mass. Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 80: 917-21
Kurman RJ. Blaustein's Pathology of the Female Genital Tract, Fourth Ed., New York:
Springer-Verlag, 1994.
Lehner R, Wenzl R, Heinzl H, Hussein P, Sevelda P. Influence of delayed staging laparotomy
after laparoscopic removal of ovarian masses later found malignant. Obstet Gynecol 1998;
92: 967-71
Maiman M, Seltzer V, Boyce J. Laparoscopic excision of ovarian neoplasms subsequently
found to be malignant. Obstet Gynecol 1991, 77: 563-565
Maiman M. Mismanagement of ovarian cancer by laparoscopy and laparotomy. In: Querleu D,
Childers JM, Dargent D, Eds. Laparoscopic surgery in gynaecological oncology. London:
Blackwell Science, 1999.
Marana R, Caruana P, MuziiL, et al. Operative laparoscopy for ovarian cysts: excision versus
aspiration. J Reprod Med 1996, 41: 435-438
Markman M, Walker J. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy of ovarian cancer: A review, with focus
on practical aspects of treatment. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 1-7
Matei DE, Russell, AH, Horowitz CJ, Gershenson DM, Young RH. Ovarian germ-cell tumors.
In: Hoskins WJ, Perez CA, Young RC, Barakat R, Markman M, Randall M, Eds. Principles
and practice of gynecologic oncology. 4th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &
Wilkins, 2005.
McGowan L, Lesher LP, Norris HJ, Barnett M. Misstaging of ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol
1985; 65: 568-572.
McGuire WP, Hoskins WJ, Brady MF, et al. Gynecologic Oncology Group. Cyclophosphamide
and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV
ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334: 1-6.
Messing MJ. Surgery for advanced ovarian cancer. In Gallup DG, Talledo OE, Eds. Surgical
atlas of gynecologic oncology. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1994
Mettler L, Jacobs V, Brandenburg K, et al. Laparoscopic management of 641 adnexal tumors
in Kiel, Germany. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2001, 8: 74-82
Morrow CP, Curtin JP, Townsend DE. Synopsis of Gynecologic Oncology, Fourth Ed., New
York: Churchill Livingstone, 1993.
Morrow CP, Curtin JP. Surgery for ovarian neoplasia. In: Gynecologic cancer surgery. New
York: Churchill Livingstone, 1996
National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement. Ovarian cancer:
Screening, Treatment, and Follow-up. Gynecol Oncol 1994; 55: S4-S14
Ozols RF, Bundy BN, Greer BE, et al. Phase III trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel compared
with cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with optimally resected stage III ovarian cancer: a
Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21: 3194-3200
Ozols RF, Rubin SC, Thomas GM, Robboy SJ. Epithelial ovarian cancer. In: Hoskins WJ,
Perez CA, Young RC, Barakat R, Markman M, Randall M, Eds. Principles and practice of
gynecologic oncology. 4th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005.
Ozols RF. Update of the NCCN ovarian cancer practice guidelines. Oncology 1997; 11: 95-105
Parker WH, Berek JS. Management of selected cystic adnexal masses in postmenopausal
women by operative laparoscopy: a pilot study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990, 163: 1574-7.
Querleu D, Papageorgiou T, Lambaudie E, et al. Laparoscopic restaging of borderline ovarian
tumors: results of 30 cases initially presumed as stage IA borderline tumors. BJOG 2003,
110: 201-204
Reynolds RK, Burke WM. The evolving role of laparoscopic surgery for treatment of
gynecologic masses and cancers. Female Patient 2004; 29: 25-32
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 43
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
Rubin SC, Hoskins WJ, Benjamin I, Lewis JL Jr. Palliative surgery for intestinal obstruction in
advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1989; 34: 16-19
Sassone AM, Timor-Tritsch IE, Artner A, et al. Transvaginal sonographic characterization of
ovarian disease: evaluation of a new scoring system to predict ovarian malignancy. Obstet
Gynecol 1991,78:70-6
Sevelda P, Dittrich C. Salzer H. Prognostic value of the rupture of the capsule in stage I
epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 1989; 35: 321-322
Sjoval K, Nilsson B, Einhorn N. Different types of rupture of the tumor capsule and impact on
survival in early ovarian carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 1994, 4: 333-336
Soper JT, Johnson P, Johnson V, Berchuck A, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comprehensive restaging
laparotomy in women with apparent early ovarian carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80:
949-953
Surwit EA, Childers JM. Cancer of the ovary. In: Querleu D, Childers JM, Dargent D, Eds.
Laparoscopic surgery in gynaecological oncology. London: Blackwell Science, 1999.
Tannock IF, Hill RP. The Basic Science of Oncology. New York: Pergamon, 1987.
Trimbos JB, Haville NF. The case against aspirating ovarian cysts. Cancer 1993, 72: 828-831
Van der Burg MEL, van Lent M, Buyse M, et al. The effect of debulking surgery after induction
chemotherapy on the prognosis in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 1995;
332: 629-34
Vergote IB, de Wever I, Decloedt J, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary
debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer. Semin Oncol 2000; 27: 31-36
Wang PH, Lee WL, Yuan CC, et al. Major complications of operative and diagnostic
laparoscopy for gynecologic disease. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2001; 8: 8-9.
Rev. 12/2006
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 44
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
Uterine Sarcomas
V. Staging
By convention, uterine sarcomas are staged using FIGO endometrial cancer rules. Stage
subdivisions are usually ignored (e.g. IIIaIII).
FIGO Staging for Uterine Sarcoma
I Tumor confined to uterine corpus
II Tumor involves cervix
III Tumor confined to true pelvis
IV Distant metastases
VI. Survival
Stage LMS ESM ESS MMMT
I 48% 89% 78% 36%
II 67% 75% 0% 22%
III 0% 67% 14% 10%
IV 0% 0% 6%
Berchuck A, Rubin SC, Hoskins WJ, Saigo PE, Pierce VK, Lewis JL. Treatment of endometrial
stromal tumors. Gynecol Oncol 1990; 36: 60-65
Berchuck A, Rubin SC, Hoskins WJ, Saigo PE, Pierce VK, Lewis JL. Treatment of uterine
leiomyosarcoma. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71: 845-850
Rose PG, Boutselis JG, Sachs L. Adjuvant therapy for stage I uterine sarcoma. Am J Obstet
Gynecol 1987; 156: 660-662
Salazar OM, Bonfiglio TA, Patten SF, et al. Uterine sarcomas: natural history, treatment and
prognosis. Cancer 1978; 42: 1152-1160
Schwartz SM, Thomas DB. A case-control study of risk factors for sarcomas of the uterus.
Cancer 1989; 64: 2487-2492
Sutton GP, Stehman FB, Michael H, Young PC, Ehrlich CE. Estrogen and progesterone
receptors in uterine sarcomas. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68: 709-714
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 47
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
Vaginal Cancer
II. Epidemiology and Natural History: Etiology and cell types stratified by patient age
A. Childhood tumors
1. Sarcoma botryoides: embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. 90% occur before 5y of age.
Appearance of red-tan grape clusters protruding from vagina. Frequent lymphatic
mets to groin and pelvis. Hematogenous mets occur as well.
2. Endodermal sinus tumor: germ cell origin (see ovary chapter). Occurs in infants. Can
be mistaken for sarcoma botryoides.
B. Tumors of adolescence and young adulthood: Clear cell carcinoma (CCC) associated
with in-utero diethylstilbestrol (DES) exposure.
1. Features of in-utero DES exposure: Risk of CCC (Vagina >> cervix) is 1:1000.
History of in-utero DES exposure present in 67% of vaginal CCC, 33% of cervical
CCC. Mean age of DES associated CCC 19y (range 7-42). Three histologic
subtypes: tubulocystic, papillary, solid. Tubulocystic has better prognosis (88% vs
73% 5y survival) and usually occurs after age 19. Adenosis present in 33%.
Squamous metaplasia in adenosis makes colposcopic evaluation of dysplasia
difficult, but causes eventual regression of adenosis. Lifetime risk of vaginal
dysplasia increased. Probably no significant increased risk of breast cancer
(controversial). DES associated uterine anomalies (80%) and infertility widely
reported.
2. Recommended routine DES exam: Initial colposcopy, pap smear, and palpation of
vagina. Take separate pap from vagina and cervix. If adenosis present, re-examine
q6 months with colposcopy at least every 4th visit.
C. Tumors of adults
1. Squamous carcinoma: Mean age 60-65y. Most common in upper 1/3 of vagina, and
on posterior wall. Lymphatic drainage mimics cervix for upper vaginal lesions, and
vulva for lower vaginal lesions. Frequently associated with HPV (usually HPV 16,
see cervix chapter).
2. Malignant melanoma: Average age 55y (range 22-83). Usually in lower 1/3 of
vagina, and on anterior wall. Pigmented in 95%, amelanotic in 5%.
3. Rarely, tumors develop in Gartner's duct cysts (Wolffian system) and Mllerian duct
cysts. They tend to be located anterolaterally, and anteriorly, respectively.
Lymphoma and sarcoma (adult type) also occur rarely.
D. Presenting symptoms: vaginal bleeding and foul discharge in 50-70%
III. Pathology
Squamous Carcinoma 80%
Adenocarcinoma 14%
Melanoma/Sarcoma 6%
Germ Cell Tumors Rare
IV. Diagnosis
A. Biopsy and pelvic exam. Must rule out cervical, vulvar, and rectal lesions. By
convention, tumor extension to cervix or vulva reclassifies tumor as cervical or vulvar.
B. Cystoscopy for anterior lesions
C. Sigmoidoscopy for posterior lesions
D. CXR and IVP, or CT of abdomen and pelvis
E. Consider tumor markers: SCC (TA-4) and CEA for squamous lesions; CA-125 for
adenocarcinoma
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 48
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
V. Staging
VI. Treatment
A. Carcinoma
1. Radiation therapy. Four field pelvic port (40-50 Gy) followed by interstitial implant
(25-40 Gy to tumor volume). If lower 1/3 of vagina involved, inguinal nodes also
treated. Patients with large or high stage lesions may benefit from addition of
radiation sensitizers (cisplatin and/or 5-fluorouracil). Small stage I lesions can be
treated with brachytherapy alone.
2. Surgery. Upper vaginal lesions treated with radical hysterectomy and vaginectomy.
Better suited for superficial, posterior fornix lesions, or for patients who cannot be
radiated. Recurrent tumors (after radiation) may be treatable by pelvic exenteration.
3. DES-associated CCC in young women. Treatment customized to include resection
+/- radiation therapy. Possible to preserve fertility in some cases.
B. Melanoma. No standard therapy. Treatment includes excision +/- radiation therapy,
radical surgery, and radiation therapy alone. Local excisions recur locally 80%. Radical
excision impacts little on survival.
C. Sarcoma botryoides. Treatment individualized. Vincristine, dactinomycin (Actinomycin-
D), cyclophosphamide (VAC) chemotherapy is crucial. Surgical resection radiation is
suggested for the tumor site and positive margins, respectively. Local control with
chemotherapy alone is 15%.
VII. Survival
A. Carcinoma
Stage Percent in Stage 5y Survival
I 17 77%
II 25 45%
III 40 31%
IV 18 18%
B. Melanoma, all stages 15-20% at 5y
C. Sarcoma botryoides, all stages 75% at 5y
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 49
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
Vulvar Cancer
I. Incidence: 4.4% of all gyn malignancies, 0.5% of all malignancies in women. 3740 new
cases and 880 deaths in the USA in 2006 (Jemal). Mean age 65
II. Epidemiology:
A. Bimodal age distribution. In young women HPV linked to development of cancer. In
older women, lichen sclerosis more common.
B. HPV types associated with gynecologic neoplasia (Hoskins). Underlined lesions are
predominant.
Lesion HPV Association
Condyloma 6, 11, 16, 30, 40, 41,
42, 44, 45, 54, 55, 61
VIN, VAIN 6, 11, 16, 18, 30, 31, 33, 35, 39, 40, 42,
45, 51, 52, 55, 59, 61, 62, 64, 66-70
Cervical Cancer 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 54, 55,
56, 58, 59, 66, 68
C. VIN and vulvar cancer etiology. N=235 with VIN and CA, from 24 N.Y. hospitals, case
control study, 30 months duration (Trimble).
HPV Positive Mean Age
VIN, n=54 88.9% 49
Basaloid / Warty CA, n=21 85.7% 61
Keratinizing SCC, n=48 6.3% 65
D. Association of vulvar cancer with prior vulvar dystrophy and VIN. (Trimble).
LS&A Hyperplastic VIN
KSCC, n=48 19% 33% 4%
B-W, n=21 5% 19% 81%
KSCC=keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma
B-W=basaloid-warty carcinoma
E. Comparison of relative risk for HPV and Non-HPV associated vulvar cancer (Trimble)
Overall B-W KSC
Sex Partners, 2 (vs 1) 2.9 8.1 2.2
Coitarche, <20y 1.5 7.4 2.5
Abnl Pap 2.3 4.7 NC
Condyloma 5.9 10 NC
Smoker, ever 4.9 12.3 NC
F. Progression of untreated VIN to cancer
1. Age of women with VIN 3 fell from 52.7y to 35.8y between 1961 and 1992 (Jones)
2. Incidence of VIN rose exponentially between 1961 and 1992 (Jones)
3. Untreated VIN more likely to progress to cancer. (Jones)
Status Cancer
Treated VIN (n=105) 3.8%
Untreated VIN, 8 years (n=8) 87.5%
G. Relative Risks in Non-HPV Associated Vulvar Cancer RR
Coffee (>2 cups/day vs. none) 2.8
Occupation (laundry, dry cleaning) 3.8
Hx vulvitis (granulomatous STD) 8.5
Hx leukoplakia 13.0
H. Association with cervical malignancy in 15% of all vulvar cancers.
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 50
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
III. Pathology: (Dunton)
Squamous carcinoma 85-90%
Melanoma 5-10%
Bartholin's Adenocarcinoma 4%
Basal Cell carcinoma <2%
Sarcoma <2%
Paget's Disease <1%
A. Melanoma occurs most often in 6th and 7th decades in Caucasian. One third occur in
women younger than 50 (Wilkinson). Incidence 360 per year in USA in 2001 (Greenlee)
B. Melanoma Types
1. Superficial Spreading Melanoma. Accounts for 4% of vulvar lesions (Ragnarsson).
Radial spread 4 or more rete lateral to the vertical or infiltrative growth (Wilkinson)
2. Nodular Melanoma. Accounts for 22% of vulvar lesions. Vertical growth pattern.
(Ragnarsson).
3. Lentiginous types account for 57% of vulvar lesions (Ragnarsson).
a. Acral Lentiginous Melanoma, more common subtype on vulva.
b. Lentigo Maligna Melanoma
4. Amelanotic melanoma, containing no melanin, occurs in up to 27% of vulvar lesions
(Ragnarsson)
IV. Natural History
A. Symptoms
1. Mass (45%)
2. Pruritus (45%). More commonly associated with LS&A and dysplasia.
3. Pain (23%)
4. Ulcer (13%)
B. Spread
1. Indolent local invasion, followed by
2. Lymphatic spread: superficial inguinal to femoral to pelvic nodes. Spread is usually
ipsilateral, but 0.4% positive contralateral nodes with ipsilateral negative nodes
reported
V. Diagnosis
A. Differential Diagnosis
1. Benign solid neoplasms including leiomyoma, lipoma, syringoma, trichoepithelioma,
granular cell tumor, neurofibroma, schwannoma
2. Glandular neoplasms including papillary hidradenoma, nodular hidradenoma, ectopic
breast or nipple, endometriosis
3. Cysts including Bartholins cyst, epithelial inclusion cyst (sebaceous cyst), Wolfian
cyst (mesonephric cyst), cyst of canal of Nuck (mesothelial cyst)
4. Vascular lesions including angiokeratoma, capillary hemangioma, cavernous
hemangioma, cherry angioma, varicose veins
5. Nevi and pigmented lesions including vitiligo, fibroepithelial polyp (skin tag,
acrochordon), seborrheic keratosis, vulvar melanosis, nevus, dysplastic nevus
6. Infectious diseases including HPV, HSV, condyloma lata, molluscum, chancroid,
lymphogranuloma venereum, granuloma inguinale
7. Vulvar dystrophy
B. Biopsy indicated for obtaining diagnosis. Complete excision not required.
C. Punch biopsy technique: use Keys punch or Kevorkian forceps with local anesthetic. No
suture required. Apply silver nitrate or Monsels solution for hemostasis (Reid). Excision
of small lesion: make elliptical incision following lines of tension in skin. Incise,
undermine and remove lesion with minimal margin, if benign in appearance. Undermine
surrounding skin to mobilize for closure. Use mattress or subcuticular stitch with fine
absorbable suture (Jenison, Karlen).
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 51
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
D. Shave biopsy technique contraindicated for possible melanoma lesions
E. Colposcopy of the Vulva
1. Indications
a. Persistent condyloma or visible lesion
b. Chronic pruritus or pain
2. Colposcopy technique
a. Soak vulva with gauze moistened with acetic acid. Let soak for several minutes
b. Inspect methodically
c. Lesions may appear white, red, or pigmented. Mosaic and punctation uncommon
d. Biopsy anything which does not appear normal
VI. Treatment of Pre-Invasive Disease
A. Condyloma
1. TCA (85%): apply topically 1-3x per week. Safe during pregnancy
2. Laser (CO2): requires anesthesia. See technique below.
3. LEEP: requires local anesthetic. Best method for debulking large condylomata.
4. Imiquimod (Aldara): apply to skin 3 times per week for up to 16 weeks. Apply at h.s.
and leave on 6-10 hours, then wash off
5. Podofilox 0.5% topical gel (Condylox): apply b.i.d. for 3 days x 4 weeks. No more
than 10 cm2 area.
6. -Interferon: 1,000,000 units s.c. 3x per week for 4-6 weeks
7. Efudex cream (5 FU, 5%): massage small amount into skin 2 nights per week for 10
weeks. Cleanse skin next AM. Alert patient to expected symptoms (burning).
Contraindicated in pregnancy
B. Ablative techniques indicated for condyloma and vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia
1. Laser (CO2) or ultrasonic surgical aspiration: best cosmetic result on mucosal
surfaces
2. Wide local excision: best results on hair-bearing surfaces (Wright VC)
C. Laser ablation
1. Clinical utility depends on use of appropriate wavelength. The CO2 laser is most
applicable to ablation of condyloma, dysplasia, and carcinoma-in-situ. The 10,600
nM wavelength is absorbed by water, resulting in tissue vaporization. Absorption
occurs at the surface. Thermal damage to underlying tissue is minimized
2. Power density must be adequate to prevent char
a. PD (Watts/cm2)=(Watts x 100)/r2, r = spot radius (not diameter).
b. Use of a motorized handpiece (Silk Touch) will result in a smoother and more
uniform depth of ablation
c. A colposcope may be used to guide the laser. Low power Helium Neon laser (red
beam) is used for aiming. Eye protection mandatory
3. Depth of laser ablation must be below the basement membrane for dysplasia
treatment
a. Ablate to a depth of 1-2 or 2.5 mm in non-hairbearing skin and hairbearing skin,
respectively (Morrow, Baggish)
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 52
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
b. Surgical Planes defined by Reid use visual landmarks to determine depth
Plane Tissue vaporized Healing Landmark Technique
1 Proliferating epithelium No scar "Opalescent Single brush, wipe with
Condy debris" moist gauze
2 Superficial papillary No scar "Chamois" Plane1, then rapid
dermis brush
3 Superficial reticular Mild "Water-logged Plane 1, then slow
VIN dermis scar cotton" brush
4 Deep reticular dermis Scar "Sand grains" Plane 3, then slow
brush
4. Operative Technique
a. Requires anesthesia
b. Ice vulvar skin and drape surrounding area with wet towels
c. Stain epithelium with 5% acetic acid and mark lesions
d. Set power density to 600-750 W/cm2; 15-20 W with spot size of 2 mm
e. Frequently wipe char from area during ablation
5. Post Operative Care
a. Sitz bath b.i.d. until re-epithelialized
b. Blow dry on low setting, then apply neomycin-bacitracin ointment
c. Separate labia b.i.d. to prevent coaptation. Foley if periurethral tissues ablated
d. For discomfort, moist tea bag compresses b.i.d. after sitz baths
e. Follow weekly until re-epithelialization complete
6. Treatment Results
a. Condyloma and VIN: 70-90% success at 2 years
D. Ultrasonic Surgical Aspiration (Rader)
1. Uses mechanical vibration to cavitate tissue allowing aspiration of the disease
2. Unlike laser, specimen can be submitted for histology
3. Operative Technique
a. Stain epithelium with 5% acetic acid and mark lesions
b. Set power to 5-6 on CUSA and ablate to a depth of 2-2.5 mm
4. Post Operative Care as for laser ablation, although pain less severe
5. Treatment Results: Condyloma and VIN 78% success at 50 weeks
E. General Principles of Electrosurgery
1. Radio frequency current (350 KHz-3.3 MHz) results in kinetic energy transfer to
intracellular ions which vaporizes intracellular water. Avoid Faradic Effect (50 Hz-200
KHz), which stimulates muscle and nerve causing pain by using proper equipment
2. Cutting: sine-wave RF current; coagulation: pulsed ("spark gap") RF current
F. Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure
1. Technique
a. Lesion outlined using acetic acid and colposcope
b. Anesthetize with 1% Lidocaine with epinephrine
c. Choose loop to excise lesion
d. Excise tissue in single pass, using 34 - 40 W, blend mode
e. Cauterize base with ball electrode at 50 W, coagulation mode
f. Apply Monsel's solution
2. Advantages
a. Diagnostic and therapeutic intervention, potentially with one clinic visit
b. Histologic specimen improves diagnostic accuracy
c. Equipment less costly than laser
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 53
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
VII. Staging of Invasive Disease.
A. Vulvar cancer staging is surgical. AJCC and FIGO staging systems are identical. This
system applies for all tumor types other than melanoma
B. Staging assessment may require cystoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, and chest X-ray for
locally advanced lesions.
TNM system (FIGO, Revised 1995)
T1: Tumor confined to vulva, 2 cm in largest diameter.
T1a Tumor invades 1mm
T1b Tumor invades > 1mm
T2: Tumor confined to vulva, >2 cm in largest diameter.
T3: Tumor of any size with spread to urethra, vagina, or anus.
T4: Tumor of any size infiltrating bladder or rectal mucosa, and/or
fixed to bone.
N0: No lymph node metastases.
N1: Unilateral regional node metastases.
N2: Bilateral regional node metastases.
M0: No clinical metastases.
M1: Spread to pelvic nodes or distant metastases.
Stage Grouping
Stage I: T1a-b N0 MO
Stage II: T2 N0 MO
Stage III: T3-2-1 N0-1 MO
Stage IVa: T3-2-1 N2 MO; T4 N(any) M0
Stage IVb: T(any) N(any) M1
3. Microinvasion: T1aN0M0. Defined by International Society for the Study of Vulvar
Diseases (ISSVD) in 1984, and adopted by FIGO in 1995. Incidence of inguinal
node metastases is < 1%. Conservative surgical therapy without inguinal-femoral
lymphadenectomy indicated.
C. Melanoma staging is separate from the above and is based primarily on lesion
thickness.
1. Microstaging systems for melanoma (Breslow, Chung, Clark)
Stage Breslow Chung Clark
I <0.76 mm Intraepithelial Intraepithelial
II 0.76-1.5 mm 1 mm Into papillary dermis
III 1.51-2.25 mm 1-2 mm Filling dermal papillae
IV 2.26-3.0 mm > 2 mm Into reticular dermis
V > 3 mm Into subcutaneous fat Into subcutaneous fat
2. American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) TNM system for melanoma, 2001
Primary Tumor
Tis Melanoma in situ
T1a Tumor < 1.0 mm in thickness, without ulceration and level II/III
T1b Tumor < 1.0 mm in thickness, with ulceration or level IV/V
T2a Tumor 1.01-2.0 mm in thickness without ulceration
T2b Tumor 1.01-2.0 mm in thickness with ulceration
T3a Tumor 2.01-4.0 mm in thickness without ulceration
T3b Tumor 2.01-4.0 mm in thickness with ulceration
T4a Tumor > 4.0 mm in thickness without ulceration
T4b Tumor > 4.0 mm in thickness with ulceration
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 54
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
Stage Grouping
Clinical Surgical
Stage 0 Tis N0 M0 Tis N0 M0
Stage IA T1a N0 M0 T1a N0 M0
Stage IB T(1b or 2a) N0 M0 T(1b or 2a) N0 M0
References
Albertini JJ, Cruse CW, Rapaport D, Wells K, Ross M, DeConti R, et al. Intraoperative
radiolymphoscintigraphy improves sentinel node identification for patients with melanoma.
Ann Surg 1996; 223: 217
Baggish MS, Sze EHM, Adelson MD, et al. Quantitative evaluation of the skin and accessory
appendages in vulvar carcinoma in situ. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74: 169
Balch CM. The role of elective node dissection in melanoma: rationale, results, and
controversies. J Clin Oncol 1988; 6: 162
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 59
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
Berek JS, Lagasse LD, Hacker NF, Leuchter RS. Levator ani transposition for anal
incompetence secondary to sphincter damage. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 59: 108
Brand E, Fu YS, Lagasse LD, Berek JS. Vulvovaginal melanoma: report of seven cases and
literature review. Gynecol Oncol 1989; 33: 54
Breslow A. Thickness, cross-sectional area and depth of invasion in the prognosis of
cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg 1970; 172: 902
Burrell MO, Franklin EW III, Campion MJ, et al. The modified radical vulvectomy with groin
dissection: an eight year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 715
Calabro A, Singletary SE, Balch CM. Patterns of relapse in 1001 consecutive patients with
melanoma nodal metastases. Arch Surg 1989; 124: 1051
Chung AF, Woodruff JM, Lewis JL Jr. Malignant melanoma of the vulva: a report of 44 cases.
Obstet Gynecol 1975; 45: 638
Clark WH, From L, Bernardino EA, Mihm MC. The histogenesis and biologic behavior of
primary human malignant melanomas of the skin. Cancer Res 1969; 29: 705
Cohn DE, Peters WA. Surgical management of vulvar cancer. Operative Techniques in
Gynecologic Surgery. 1998; 3: 253
Copeland LJ. Reconstructive surgery in gynecologic oncology. In: Gershenson DM,
DeCherney AH, Curry SL. Operative gynecology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1993, page
607
Creagan ET, Dalton RJ, Ahmann DL, et al. Randomized, surgical adjuvant clinical trial of
recombinant interferon alfa-2a in selected patients with malignant melanoma. J Clin Oncol
1995; 13: 2776
Dunton CJ, Kautzky M, Hanau C. Malignant melanoma of the vulva: a review. Obstet Gynecol
Surv 1995; 50: 739
Emami B, Perez CA. Combination of surgery, irradiation, and hyperthermia in treatment of
recurrences of malignant tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1987; 13: 611
Fiorica J, Grendys E, Hoffman M. Intraoperative radiolocalization of the sentinel node in
patients with vulvar cancer. Operative Techniques in Gynecologic Surgery 2001; 6: 27
Fitzpatrick TB, Johnson RA, Wolff K, Suurmond D. Color atlas and synopsis of clinical
dermatology, 4th Edition. New York: McGraw Hill, 2001
Gallup DG, Talledo OE. Gracilis myocutaneous flap. In Gallup DG, Talledo OE, Eds. Surgical
atlas of gynecologic oncology. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1994
Gallup DLC. The use of locally mobilized skin (Z-plasty and rhomboid flaps) for large defects.
In Gallup DG, Talledo OE, Eds. Surgical atlas of gynecologic oncology. Philadelphia:
Saunders, 1994
Hacker NF. Surgery for malignant tumors of the vulva. In: Gershenson DM, DeCherney AH,
Curry SL. Operative gynecology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1993
Heaps JM, Fu YS, Montz FJ, et al. Surgical-pathologic variables predictive of local recurrence
in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. Gynecol Oncol 1990; 38: 309
Herod JJO, Shafi MI, Rollason TP, Jordan JA, Luesley DM. Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: a
long term follow up of treated and untreated women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 446-
452.
Ho VC, Milton GW, Sober AJ. Biopsy of melanoma. In: Balch CM, Houghton AN, Milton GW, et
al, Eds. Cutaneous melanoma. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1992
Hoffman MS, LaPolla JP, Roberts WS, Fiorica JV, Cavanagh D. Use of local flaps for primary
anal reconstruction following perianal resection for neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol 1990; 36: 348
Iverson T, Aas M. Lymph drainage from the vulva. Gynecol Oncol 1983; 16: 179
Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Smigal C, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2006. CA
Cancer J Clin 2006; 56: 106-30
Jenison EL. Surgery for benign and indolent growths of the vulva. Operative Techniques in
Gynecologic Surgery. 1998; 3: 241
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 60
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
Jiveskog S, Ragnarsson-Olding B, Platz A, Ringborg U. N-ras mutations are common in
melanomas from sun exposed skin of humans but rare in mucosal membranes or
unexposed skin. J Invest Dermatol 1998; 111: 757
Johnson TM, Headington JT, Baker SR, Lowe L. Usefulness of the staged excision of lentigo
maligna and lentigo maligna melanoma: The square procedure. J Am Acad Dermatol
1997; 37: 758-64
Johnson TM, Smith JW, Nelson BR, Chang AE. Current therapy for cutaneous melanoma. J
Am Acad Dermatol 1995; 32: 689-707
Johnson TM, Yahanda AM, Chang AE, Fader DJ, Sondak VK. Advances in melanoma
therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998; 38: 731-741
Jones RW, Rowan DM. Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia III: A clinical study of the outcome in
113 cases with relation to the later development of invasive vulvar carcinoma. Obstet
Gynecol 1994; 84: 741-745.
Karlen JR. Benign and premalignant lesions of the vulva. Operative Techniques in Gynecologic
Surgery. 1998; 3: 236
King LA. Alternate reconstructive techniques for repair of large vulvar and vaginal defects. In
Gallup DG, Talledo OE, Eds. Surgical atlas of gynecologic oncology. Philadelphia:
Saunders, 1994
King LA. The tensor fascia lata flap. In Gallup DG, Talledo OE, Eds. Surgical atlas of
gynecologic oncology. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1994
Kirkwood JM, Strawderman MH, Ernstoff MS, et al. Interferon alfa-2b adjuvant therapy of high
risk resected cutaneous melanoma: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial. J Clin
Oncol 1996; 14: 7
Knapstein PG, Friedberg V. Reconstructive operations of the vulva and vagina. In Knapstein
PG, Friedberg V, Sevin BU, Eds. Reconstructive surgery in gynecology. New York: Thieme,
1990
Levenback C, Burke TW, Gershenson DM, et al. Intraoperative lymphatic mapping for vulvar
cancer. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84: 163
Look KY, Roth LM, Sutton GP. Vulvar melanoma reconsidered. Cancer 1993; 72: 143-6
Mayer AR, Rodriguez RL. Vulvar reconstruction using a pedicle flap based on the superficial
external pudendal artery. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 964
Messing MJ, Gallup DG. Carcinoma of the vulva in young women. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 86:
51-54.
Moore DH, Koh WJ, McGuire WP, Wilkinson EJ. Vulva. In: Hoskins WJ, Perez CA, Young RC,
Barakat R, Markman M, Randall M, Eds. Principles and practice of gynecologic oncology.
4th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005
Morrow CP, Curtin JP. Surgery for vulvar neoplasia. In: Gynecologic cancer surgery. New
York: Churchill Livingstone, 1996
Morrow CP, Curtin JP. Surgical anatomy. In: Gynecologic cancer surgery. New York: Churchill
Livingstone, 1996
Nadji M, Ganjei P. The application of immunoperoxidase techniques in the evaluation of vulvar
and vaginal disease. In: Wilkinson EJ, Ed. Contemporary issues in surgical pathology.
Pathology of the vulva and vagina, Volume 9. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1987
NIH Consensus Development Panel on early melanoma. Diagnosis and treatment. JAMA
1992; 268: 1314
North JH, Spellman JE. Role of sentinel node biopsy in the management of malignant
melanoma. Oncology 1996; 10: 1237
Perry MD, Gore M, Seigle HF, et al. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of metastatic melanoma: a
morphological analysis of 174 cases. Acta Cytol 1986; 30: 385
Piura B, Rabinovich A, Dgani R. Malignant melanoma of the vulva: report of six cases and
review of the literature. Eur J Gynaec Oncol 1999; 20: 182-186
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 61
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
Rader JS, Leake JF, Dillon MB, et al. Ultrasonic surgical aspiration in the treatment of vulvar
disease. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 573
Ragnarsson-Olding, BK, Kanter-Lewensohn LR, Lagerlof B, Nilsson BR, Ringborg UK.
Malignant melanoma of the vulva in a nationwide, 25 year study of 219 Swedish females.
Cancer 1999; 86: 1273-84
Reid GC. Surgical aspects of vulvar melanoma. Operative Techniques in Gynecologic Surgery.
1998; 3: 262
Reid R, Elfont EA, Zirkin RM, Fuller TA. Superficial laser vulvectomy II. The anatomic and
biophysical principles permitting accurate control over the depth of dermal destruction with
the carbon dioxide laser. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 152: 261
Reid R. Local and distant skin flaps in the reconstruction of vulvar deformities. Am J Obstet
Gynecol 1997; 177: 1372
Reid R. Superficial laser vulvectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 152: 504
Reynolds RK. Pelvic exenteration for treatment of locally advanced primary or recurrent vulvar
carcinoma. Operative Techniques in Gynecologic Surgery. 1998; 3: 268
Rose PG, Piver MS, Tsukada Y, Lau T. Conservative therapy for melanoma of the vulva. Am J
Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 52-5
Ross MI. Surgical management of stage I and II melanoma patients: approach to the regional
lymph node basin. Semin Surg Oncol 1996; 12: 394
Sim FH, Taylor WF, Pritchard DJ, et al. Lymphadenectomy in the management of stage I
malignant melanoma, a prospective randomized study. Mayo Clin Proc 1986; 61: 697
Singhal RM, Narayana A. Malignant melanoma of the vulva: response to radiation. Br J Radiol
1991; 64: 846
Snyder MK, Hopkins MP. Complications of vulvar surgery and vulvar hematoma. Operative
Techniques in Gynecologic Surgery. 1998; 3: 249
Sondak VK, Wolf JA. Adjuvant therapy of melanoma. Curr Opin Oncol 1997; 9: 189
Trimble CL, Hildesheim A, Brinton LA, Shah KV, Kurman RJ. Heterogeneous etiology of
squamous carcinoma of the vulva. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87: 59-64.
Veronesi U, Adams J, Bandiera DC, et al. Delayed regional lymph node dissection in stage I
malignant melanoma of the skin of the lower extremities. Cancer 1982; 49: 2420
Webb MJ. Plastic surgical procedures. In Webb MJ, ed. Mayo Clinic manual of pelvic surgery,
2nd edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2000
Wilkinson EJ. Premalignant and malignant tumors of the vulva. In: Kurman RJ, Ed. Blausteins
pathology of the female genital tract. 4th edition. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1994
Wright VC, Davies E. Laser surgery for vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: principles and results.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156: 374
Rev. 12/2006
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 62
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
Nutrition, Fluids and Electrolytes
I. Types of Malnutrition
Protein Stores Adipose Stores
Kwashiorkor Loss Stable
Marasmus Stable Loss
Cachexia Loss Loss
II. Risk Factors for Malnutrition
A. Body weight 20% below ideal
(Ideal =100 lbs for 60" height + 5 lbs for each additional inch)
B. Recent weight loss 10% of usual weight
C. Alcohol abuse
D. Chronic diseases or cancer
E. NPO for 7 days with only IV hydration
F. Increased nutritional needs: burns, trauma, surgery, fever, sepsis, wounds, pregnancy
G. Nutritional losses: malabsorption, short bowel syndrome, dialysis, effusions, chronic
bleeding or diarrhea
H. Catabolic drugs: steroids, immunosuppressants, chemotherapy agents
I. Protracted emesis
III. Nutritional Assessment
A. Anthropomorphic Measurement. e.g. triceps skin fold thickness.
B. Protein Store Assessment
Normal Mild Moderate Severe
Weight loss, 1 month, % - 3-4 5 >5
3 months, % - 6-7 7.5 > 7.5
6 months, % - 8 - 9.5 10 > 10
Transferrin, mg/dL 200 - 350 180 - 200 160 - 180 < 160
Albumin, mg/dL 3.5 3 - 3.5 2.5 - 3 < 2.5
Pre-albumin, mg/dL > 13 10 - 13 6.5 - 10 < 6.5
Tot Lymphocyte Count > 1800 1500 - 1800 900 - 1500 < 900
Skin test antigens, mm > 15 10 - 15 5 - 10 <5
Half-life of: albumin (20 days), transferrin (8-10 days), Pre-albumin (2 days).
Lymphocyte count is inaccurate for patients undergoing RT or chemotherapy.
C. Nitrogen Balance Estimate. Not accurate with fistulas, diarrhea, burns, dialysis
N Bal = [(P I / 6.25) - (UUN + 3)]
Where UUN=24 hour urine urea nitrogen in grams, PI=24 hour protein intake in grams
IV. Estimation of Nutritional Requirements
A. Caloric Intake
1. Harris-Benedict Basal Energy Expenditure (BEE) equation:
BEE(kcal) = 655 + 9.6(wt, kg) + 1.7(ht, cm) - 4.7(age, yr)
Coefficient of Adjustment
Bed rest 1.2x(BEE)
Ambulatory 1.3x(BEE)
Sepsis 1.3x(BEE)
Anabolic/Burns 1.5x(BEE)
Increase BEE 12% for each degree of fever >37 C.
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 63
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
H. Trace Elements
1. Replace if deficient or on parenteral alimentation
2. Metabolic function
Zinc Metabolism of protein, carbohydrates, lipids, nucleic acids
Copper Cofactor for oxidative enzymes, collagen synthesis, iron interactions
Manganese Muccopolysaccharide metabolism, oxidative phosphorylation
Chromium Potentiation of insulin effects via glucose tolerance factor
Selenium Cofactor for glutathione peroxidase
Also: Iron, Molybdenum, Iodine, Fluoride
Patients with high output fistulas are usually deficient in zinc and copper.
I. Nutrient deficiency syndromes
B1 Beriberi (Wernicke's encephalophathy), paresthesia, cardiac failure,
cerebellar signs, anorexia, weakness
B2 Sore lips and tongue, stomatitis, desquamation, anemia
B6 Seborrhea facies, cheilosis, glossitis, anemia, peripheral neuritis
B12 Weakness, fatigue, sore tongue, paresthesia, anorexia, diarrhea,
alopecia, depression, pernicious anemia
Biotin Alopecia, dermatitis
Folic acid Fatigue, sore tongue, anemia, stomatitis, nausea
Niacin Dermatitis, painful tongue, stomatitis, diarrhea, headache, pellagra
(neuropsychiatric symptoms)
Dexpanthenol Fatigue, paresthesia, weakness, burning feet
C Weakness, irritability, gingivitis, joint pain, loose teeth, easy
bleeding, scurvy, heart failure, poor wound healing
A Night blindness
D Tetany, muscle weakness, rickets, osteopenia
E Areflexia, gait disturbance, paresis of gaze, hemolytic anemia
K Bruising or bleeding
Iron Anemia, stomatitis
Manganese Ataxia, retarded skeletal growth, decreased reproductive function
Chromium Neuropathy, free fatty acids, insulin resistant glucose intolerance
Copper Neutropenia, anemia, diarrhea, scurvy symptoms
Zinc Facial and extremity rash, skin ulcers, alopecia, confusion, apathy,
hypogonadism, night blindness
Selenium Muscle weakness, cardiac failure
Fatty acids Scaling dermatitis, coarse hair, alopecia, diarrhea, numbness,
paresthesia, weakness, blurred vision, poor wound healing
J. Sites of nutrient absorption
1. Stomach: intrinsic factor secretion
2. Duodenum: vitamins A & B, iron, calcium, glycerol and fatty acids, monoglycerides,
amino acids, mono and disaccharides
3. Jejunum:
a. Entire: glucose, galactose, vitamin C, amino acids, glycerol and fatty acids,
monoglycerides, folic acid, biotin, copper, zinc, potassium, pantothenic acid
b. Proximal: vitamins A &B, folic acid, iron, lactose
c. Distal: isomaltase, maltose, trehalose, sucrose
4. Jejunum and ileum: vitamins D, E, K, B1, B2, B3, B6, iodine, calcium, magnesium,
phosphorus
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 65
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
5. Ileum:
a. Entire: chloride, sodium
b. Proximal: isomaltase, maltose, trehalose, sucrose
c. Distal: B12 and intrinsic factor
6. Colon: water, synthesis of biotin
V. Hyperalimentation
A. Parenteral
1. Indications: pre-op and post-op support where malnutrition exists, or patient
anticipated to be NPO>5-7 days, or patient with protracted emesis. Enteral feeding
preferred if GI tract is functional
2. Access: must be infused through a large caliber, high flow vein
3. Formulations (in most hospitals): standard, peripheral, and custom ordered.
University of Michigan Standard Formulation:
Amino Acids (5%) 50 g Total Volume 1050 mL
Dextrose (20%) 200 g
Ca2+ 4.5 mEq Osmolarity Hi mOsm/L
Mg 2+ 5 mEq
K+ 40 mEq Total Calories 880 kcal
Na+ 45 mEq
Acetate 41 mEq
Cl- 45 mEq
PO4 2- 15 mM
Heparin 1000 Units
Multivitamins Daily
Trace Elements Daily
Vitamin K Daily
4. Lipids: Liposyn 20%, contains soybean and safflower oil, egg phospholipids, and
glycerin in 500 mL bottles. Must not pass through IV line filter. Provides 2 Kcal/mL at
260 mOsm/L. Minimum essential fatty acid requirements met with two 300 mL
bottles of Liposyn weekly.
5. Initiation of Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN). Begin infusion at 40 mL/hour and taper
up to calculated full infusion rate. Tapering of TPN must be done in a similar fashion
to prevent hypoglycemia. Rule out hypoglycemia 1 hour after stopping
6. Recommended lab monitoring for TPN
Test Initial During Taper-Up Stable TPN
Glucose, finger stick x q6h 2x weekly
CBC, Plts, Diff x weekly
Electrolytes x daily 2x weekly
BUN, Creatinine x 2x weekly
2+
Ca ,PO4 2- x daily 2x weekly
Liver enzymes x 2x weekly
Bilirubin x weekly
Triglycerides x prn
Mg2+ x daily weekly
PT, PTT x prn
Albumin, Prealbumin x weekly
7. TPN can be cycled in home administration setting to improve quality of
life.
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 66
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
8. Complications of TPN
a. IV access: pneumothorax, hemothorax, infection, nerve injury, air embolism
b. Metabolic
i. Hyperglycemia/hypoglycemia, affected by infusion rates, stress, infection
ii. Hypophosphatemia: "Refeeding Syndrome" results in respiratory failure,
cardiomyopathy. Requires slow advancement of TPN, careful monitoring of
PO42-, Mg2+, and K+
iii. Hypertriglyceridemia, associated with lipid and carbohydrate infusion
iv. Vitamin/Trace Element deficiencies
v. Hypercapnea: CO2 production associated with carbohydrate infusion in
excess of patient needs
c. Hepatobiliary complications
i. Cholestasis: most common hepatotoxicity. Associated with long term TPN,
lack of gut stimulation, recurrent sepsis, short bowel syndrome,
ii. Overfeeding
d. Electrolyte disturbances
B. Enteral
1. Indications: nutrition for patients with functional GI tract
2. Access: Dobhoff feeding tubes are more suitable than Salem sump NG tubes.
Metoclopramide and/or fluoroscopy aids in tube placement
3. Formulations
a. Nutritionally complete, lactose free, 1 kcal/mL. Standard protein (<20% kcal as
protein): (This list is not comprehensive and formulations change frequently.)
Oral: Boost, Carnation Instant Breakfast, Ensure
Tube Feeding: Isocal, Osmolite HN, Vivonex.
Fiber containing: Jevity, Enrich
Low fat, oligomeric: Criticare HN
High Protein (>20% kcal as protein): Isotein HN
b. Specialized formulas: Travasorb Renal, Amin-Aid, Pulmocare
4. Initiation
a. Start with half strength formula at 40-60 mL/h. Advance rate by 60-100 mL/h
every 12-24 hours. When planned infusion rate reached, advance concentration
to 3/4 strength formula for 24 hours, then to full strength
b. If gastric residual is >100 mL, hold feeding for 2 hours, then remeasure
c. Dobhoff tubes should be irrigated after each bolus feeding, or q6h if on
continuous infusion
d. Head should be elevated 30 during feeding to prevent aspiration
5. Monitoring
Weights daily
Accurate I&O's q8h
Confirmation of correct tube placement every feeding
Glucose, finger stick q8h, 2x weekly when stable
Electrolytes, hepatic enzymes, BUN, creatinine prn
6. Complications: diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, constipation, dehydration, aspiration,
electrolyte disturbance, lactose intolerance
References
Khalidi N, Btaiche IF, Kovacevich DS. Parenteral and enteral nutrition. Ann Arbor:
University of Michigan, 2003
12/18/2006
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 67
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
Radiation Therapy
I. Ionizing radiation: >10 eV, the binding energy of electrons. UV light does not ionize.
II. Energy, E=h; where h=Planck's constant, =frequency. Energy attenuates proportional to
the inverse square of the distance from the source.
III. Absorption=energy loss.
A. Types of energy absorption
1. Photoelectric Effect: energy absorbed by inner shell electrons. Absorption
proportional to cube of atomic number, a useful property for diagnostic X-rays.
Energy range: 10-100 keV
2. Compton Effect: portion of energy absorbed by outer shell electron. Residual energy
transmitted. Energy range: 100 keV-3 MeV
3. Pair Production: photon (E > 1.02 MeV) interacts with nucleus to produce electron +
positron pair
B. Linear Energy Transfer (LET): energy absorption over distance, a function of particle
charge squared, particle velocity squared, and electron density of the target.
-dE/dX=2/2, where x=distance, =charge, =electron density, =velocity
C. Absorbed Dose. Current unit: Gray = (Joules/kg); Old unit: rad = (100 ergs/g); 1 Gy =
100 rads.
D. Isodose Curves
References
Dembo AJ. Epithelial ovarian cancer: the role of radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.
1992; 22: 835-45
Reynolds RK. Gynecologic malignancies and complications of their management. In:
Emergency care of the woman. Pearlman MD, Tintinalli JE, Eds. Ney York: McGraw-
Hill, 1998
Tannock IF, Hill RP. The Basic Science of Oncology. New York: Pergamon, 1987.
Perez CA, Purdy JA, Li Z, Hall EJ. Biolog and physical aspects of radiation oncology. In:
Hoskins WJ, Perez CA, Young RC, Barakat R, Markman M, Randall M, Eds. Principles
and practice of gynecologic oncology. 4th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &
Wilkins, 2005.
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 71
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
Chemotherapy
D. Calvert Formula for Carboplatin Dosing: Use the Creatinine Clearance estimated from
either the Cockcroft-Gault or Jelliffe methods:
Carboplatin dose = [Creatinine clearance + 25] x AUC
AUC = area under the curve, a chosen value between 4.5 and 7, that determines the
dose intensity based on the chosen regimen
XI. Multidrug Regimens used for Gynecologic Tumors Preprinted orders on file at
https://ummcpharmweb.med.umich.edu/chemotherapy/
BEP: Bleomycin / Etoposide / Cisplatin: (GOG 5-day regimen) for ovarian germ cell and
stromal tumors).
Bleomycin 20 U/m2 IV (maximum 30 U) weekly
Etoposide 100 mg/m2 IV daily x 5 days, repeat every 3 weeks
Cisplatin 20 mg/m2 IV daily x 5 days, repeat every 3 weeks
Total of 3-4 cycles depending on adequacy of resection and tumor markers (if any)
BEP: Bleomycin / Etoposide / Cisplatin: (3-day regimen) for ovarian germ cell and
stromal tumors). Ref: J Clin Oncol 1990; 8: 715-20
Bleomycin 10 Units / dayover 18 hours each day x 3 days
Etoposide 100 mg/m2 IV daily x 3 days, repeat every 3 weeks
Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 IV, repeat every 3 weeks
Total of 3-4 cycles depending on adequacy of resection and tumor markers (if any)
Cb-T: Carboplatin / Paclitaxel: standard regimen for ovarian epithelial carcinoma
Taxol 175 mg/m2 IV as 3 hour infusion, followed by
Carboplatin Calvert AUC 4.5 - 7 (usually 5 6) IV
Repeated every 21 days for 6 cycles
DoG: Gemcitabine / Docetaxel: for leiomyosarcoma (Hensley)
Gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8
Docetaxel 100 mg/m2 IV on day 8
Filgrastim 300 mcg SC on days 9 15
Cycle repeats every 21 days
Patients with prior pelvic radiation are dose reduced 25% for both chemo drugs
EMA-CO: Etoposide / Methotrexate / Atinomycin D / Cyclophosphamide / Vincristine:
for high risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasms
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 87
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
Etoposide 100 mg / m2 IV on days 1, 2.
Methotrexate 100 mg/ m2 IV push followed by 200 mg/ m2 IV over 12 hours on day 1. If
brain mets present, Methotrexate dose is changed to 1000 mg/m2 as 24 hour
infusion. Urine must be alkalinized. If brain mets present, intrathecal methotrexate
may be needed, although radiation therapy is an alternative. See GTN Chapter for
details
Actinomycin-D 0.5 mg IV push on days 1, 2
Leucovorin 15 mg IV, IM or PO q 12 hours x 4 doses beginning 24 hours after
methotrexate infusion complete. If high dose methotrexate used, then 9 doses
Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/ m2 IV on day 8
Vincristine 1 mg / m2 IV push on day 8
Cycle repeats every 2 weeks. Filgrastim support required.
EMA-EP: Etoposide / Methotrexate / Atinomycin D / Etoposide / Cisplatin: for
refractory, high risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasms
Etoposide 100 mg / m2 IV on days 1, 2.
Methotrexate 1000 mg/ m2 IV over 24 hours on day 1
Actinomycin-D 0.5 mg IV push on days 1, 2
Leucovorin 15 mg IV, IM or PO q 12 hours x 9 doses beginning 24 hours after
methotrexate infusion complete
Etoposide 100 mg / m2 IV on day 8
Cisplatin 80 mg / m2 IV on day 8
Cycle repeats every 2 weeks. Filgrastim support required.
Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian cancer
See ovarian cancer chapter, section IX.A.4.e.
MAI: Mesna, Adriamycin and Ifosfamide: for uterine sarcomas. (Adapted from Antman)
Ifosfamide 1500 mg / m2 / day as 1 hour infusion on days 1 - 3
Mesna 20% of IFX dose IV 15 minutes prior to each IFX dose in addition to 4 and 8
hours after each IFX dose
Doxorubicin 20 mg / m2 / day as 24 hour infusion for days 1 - 3
RT sensitization
Platinum Regimen (Cervix)
Cisplatin 40 mg/m2 IV as 2 hour infusion with 25 g mannitol and 1 g magnesium
sulfate. Cap dose at 70 mg / m2 / week
Administer weekly throughout radiation treatment
5 Fluorouracil Regimen (Vulva)
5 Fluorouracil 1000 mg / m2 / day as 24 hour infusion on days 1-4.
Repeat every 4 weeks during radiation treatment
TAC: Paclitaxel / Doxorubicin / Carboplatin: GOG regimen for endometrial carcinoma
(Duska)
Doxorubicin 45 mg/m2 IV slow push on day 1
Paclitaxel 160 mg/m2 IV as 3 hour infusion on day 1
Carboplatin AUC 5 IV as 1 hour infusion on day 1
Neulasta 6 mg SC on day 2
Cycle repeats every 3 weeks for 6 cycles
TAP: Paclitaxel / Doxorubicin / Cisplatin: GOG regimen for endometrial carcinoma
(Fleming)
Doxorubicin 45 mg/m2 IV on day 1
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 88
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
Cisplatin 50 mg/m2 IV as 2 hour infusion with 25 g mannitol and 1 g magnesium sulfate
on day 1
Paclitaxel 160 mg/m2 IV as 3 hour infusion on day 2, > 24 hours after doxorubicin
Neulasta 6 mg SC on day 3
Cycle repeats every 3 weeks for 6 cycles
VAC: Vincristine / Actinomycin-D / Cyclophosphamide: GOG regimen for ovarian germ
cell tumors)
Vincristine 1.5 mg/m2 IV (maximum 2 mg), repeat every 2 weeks
Actinomycin-D 350 mcg/m2 IV daily x 5 days, repeat every 4 weeks
Cyclophosphamide 150 mg/m2 IV daily x 5 days, repeat every 4 weeks
Total of 4-6 cycles depending on adequacy of resection and tumor markers (if any)
Other Regimens
AC: Adriamycin + cisplatin: for endometrial cancer
CI: Cisplatin + ifosfamide: for cervical carcinoma
CP: Cisplatin + paclitaxel for cervical cancer
CT: Cisplatin + topotecan for cervical cancer
VCPBAE: Vincristine, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, bleomycin, doxorubicin, etoposide
for small cell neuroendocrine ovarian cancer
VAC-EI: Vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, ifosfamide for pPNET
tumors
References:
Alberts DS, Hess LM, Von Hoff DD, Dorr RT. Pharmacology and therapeutics in
gynecologic cancer. In: Hoskins WJ, Perez CA, Young RC, Barakat R, Markman M,
Randall M, Eds. Principles and practice of gynecologic oncology, 4th edition.
Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005.
Antiemesis Clinical Practice Guideline www.nccn.org
Antman K, Crowley J, Balcerzak SP. An intergroup phase III randomized study of
doxorubicin and dacarbazine with or without ifosfamide and mesna in advanced soft
tissue and bone sarcomas, J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 1276-85
Bookman MA. Principles of chemotherapy in gynecologic cancer. In: Hoskins WJ, Perez
CA, Young RC, Barakat R, Markman M, Randall M, Eds. Principles and practice of
gynecologic oncology, 4th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005.
Duska LR, Berkowitz R, Matulonis U, et al. A pilot trial of TAC chemotherapy with filgrastim
support followed by radiotherapy in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer. Gynecol
Oncol 2005; 96: 198-203
Fever and Neutropenia Practice Guideline www.NCCN.org
Fischer DS, Knobf MT, Durivage HJ. The cancer chemotherapy handbook, 4th edition. St.
Louis: Mosby, 1993.
Fleming GF, Brunetto VL, Cella D, et al. Phase III trial of doxorubicin plus cisplatin with or
without paclitaxel plus filgrastim in advanced endometrial carcinoma: A Gynecologic
Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 2159-2166
Hensley ML, Maki R, Venketraman, et al. Gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with
unresectable leiomyosarcoma: Results of a phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 2824-
2831
Hesketh PJ, Kris MG, Grunberg SM, et al. Proposal for classifying the acute emetogenecity
of cancer chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 103-109
Rubin S. Chemotherapy of Gynecologic Cancers, 2nd Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott
Williams and Wilkins, 2004
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 89
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
Saghir NE, Otrock Z, Mufarrij A, Mourad YA, Salem Z, Shamseddine A, Abbas J.
Dexrozoxane for anthracycline extravasation and GM-CSF for skin ulceration and
wound healing. Lancet Oncol 2004; 5: 320-321
www.epocrates.com
Revised 12/25/2006
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 90
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
Perioperative Management
Fluid challenge
Treat underlying cause
Swan-Ganz
J. Pressors
1. Dopamine. Increases renal, cerebral, and mesenteric flow at low doses (<5
mcg/kg/min). CO increases without changing BP. At doses >10 mcg/kg/min,
receptor stimulation causes vasoconstriction, increased BP and pulmonary edema.
Adverse effects: arrhythmia, ischemia, tissue necrosis (antidote: phentolamine 10
mg in 15 mL saline), nausea, MAO inhibitor (vasospasm) and phenytoin
(hypotension) interactions. Premix: 400 or 800 mg in 250 mL D5W. Dose: 2-20
mcg/kg/min
2. Dobutamine. Stimulates cardiac and -1 receptors and peripheral -2 receptors,
resulting in increased CO and decreased SVR. CO increases and PAWP decreases
without changing BP. Adverse effects: arrhythmia, ischemia, nausea. Premix: 1000
mg in 250 mL D5W. Dose: 2.5-20 mcg/kg/min
* Dopamine and Dobutamine are complimentary when used concurrently
3. Norepinephrine. Stimulates cardiac -1 receptors and peripheral receptors,
resulting in inotropic and vasopressor effects. Adverse effects: arrhythmia, ischemia,
tissue necrosis (antidote: phentolamine 10 mg in 15 mL saline). Prepare: 4 mg in
250 mL D5W. Dose: 2-12 g/min
4. Amrinone. Phosphodiesterase inhibitor that has both positive inotropic and
vasodilator actions. Combined effects produce an increase in cardiac stroke output
without an increase in cardiac stroke work. Indicated as single agent therapy for low
output states caused by systolic heart failure. Initial loading dose 0.75 mg/kg,
followed by continuous infusion ranging from 5 to 10 mcg/kg/min.
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 94
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
K. Vasodilators
1. Nitroprusside. Arterial and venous vasodilation. Adverse effects: ischemia,
thiocyanate toxicity. Premix: 50 mg in 250 mL D5W with 500 mg sodium thiosulfate.
Dose: 0.5-8 g/kg/min
2. Nitroglycerine. Increases venous capacitance and dilates coronary arteries. Adverse
effects: headache, hypotension. Premix: 100 mg in 250 mL D5W. Dose: 50-200
g/min. Sublingual dose: 0.3-0.4 mg SL q5 min up to 3 doses
L. Anti hypertensive Medications
1. Esmolol. Ultra-short-acting, cardioselective, -adrenergic blocking agent. Onset of
action within 1 minute, with duration of 1020 min. Metabolized via rapid hydrolysis
of ester linkages by red blood cell esterases independent of renal or hepatic
function. Available for IV use both as a bolus and as an infusion. Particularly useful
in severe postop hypertension. It is a suitable agent in situations in which the cardiac
output, heart rate, and blood pressure are increased. Typically given as a 0.51 mg /
kg loading dose over 1 min, followed by an infusion starting at 50 mcg/kg-min and
increasing up to 300 mcg/kg-min.
2. Fenoldopam. Dopamine DA1 agonist, short acting and has advantage of increasing
renal blood flow and sodium excretion. Structure is similar to that of dopamine, but is
highly specific for DA1 receptors and is 10 times more potent than dopamine as a
renal vasodilator. Rapidly metabolized by conjugation in the liver, without
cytochrome P450 enzymes. Onset of action is within 5 min, and maximal achieved
by 15 min. Duration of action is 30 - 60 min, with the pressure gradually returning to
pretreatment values without rebound once infusion stopped. No adverse effects
reported. Starting dose is 0.1 mcg / kg-min. Causes a consistent dose-related
decrease in blood pressure in the dose range 0.030.3 mcg / kg-min. Improves
creatinine clearance, urine flow rates, and sodium excretion in severely hypertensive
patients with both normal and impaired renal function. Is drug of choice in severely
hypertensive patients with impaired renal function
3. Labetalol. A selective 1- and nonselective -adrenergic receptor blocker with an /
blocking ratio of 1 / 7. Metabolized by liver to form inactive glucuronide conjugate.
Hypotensive effect begins within 2 5 min after IV dosing, reaching a peak at 5 15
min and lasting for about 2 4 hours. Because of -blocking effects, heart rate is
maintained or slightly reduced. Unlike pure -adrenergic blocking agents that
decrease cardiac output, maintains cardiac output. Reduces systemic vascular
resistance without reducing total peripheral blood flow. Cerebral, renal, and coronary
blood flow is maintained. Used in pregnancy - induced hypertensive crises because
little placental transfer occurs, mainly due to the drug's negligible lipid solubility.
Labetalol may be given as a loading dose of 20 mg, followed by repeated
incremental doses of 20 80 mg given at 10 - min intervals until the desired blood
pressure is achieved. Alternatively, after the loading dose, an infusion starting at 12
mg / min is titrated until the desired effect is achieved. Bolus injections of 12 mg/kg
produce precipitous fall in blood pressure and should be avoided.
4. Nicardipine. A second generation dihydropyridine derivative calcium channel blocker
with high vascular selectivity and strong cerebral and coronary vasodilator. 100
times more water soluble than is nifedipine, and therefore can be administered IV.
Onset of action of is 5 - 15 min with duration of 4 6 hours. Crosses the blood
brain barrier and reaches CNS, where it binds to L-type calcium channels primarily
in the hippocampus. IV nicardipine reduces cardiac and cerebral ischemia.
Appropriate dosage is independent of weight, with an initial infusion rate of 5 mg /
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 95
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
hour, increasing by 2.5 mg / hour every 5 min to a maximum of 30 mg / hour.
5. Hydralazine. A direct acting vasodilator. Following IM or IV administration, initial
latency period of 5 15 min is followed by a progressive and often precipitous fall in
blood pressure that can last up to 12 hours. Although circulating half - life is about 3
hours, the half - life of effect on blood pressure is100 hours. Because of prolonged
and unpredictable antihypertensive effects and the inability to titrate the drug's
hypotensive effect effectively, hydralazine is best avoided in the management of
hypertensive crises.
6. Clonidine. 2-adrenergic receptor agonist. Dose: 0.1 mg sublingual for postop HTN.
7. CAUTION: Hold ACE inhibitors in the immediate post-op period due to risk of
pronounced hypotension that is not correctable with IV fluid bolus.
O2 , prn Supplemental O2
Follow ABG Follow ABG's and A-a
Follow A-a gradient gradient
Consider intubation
Progressive hypoxia
Progressive hypercarbia
Interstitial
nephritis
Ultrasound: Pre-Renal
rule out obstruction
References
Annane D, Fan E, Herridge. Review: Pro-Con Debate: Steroid use in ACTH non-responsive
septic shock patients with high baseline cortisol levels. Critical Care. 2006; 10: 1186.
Bartlett RH. A Critical Carol. Being an Essay on Anemia, Suffocation, Starvation, and Other
Forms of Intensive Care, After the Manner of Dickens. Chest, 1984; 85:687-693
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 103
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
Boersma E, Kertai MD, Schouten O, Bax JJ, Noordzij P et al. Perioperative cardiovascular
mortality in noncardiac surgery: Validation of the Lee cardiac index. The American Journal
of Medicine, 2005; 118: 1134-1141.
Doyle RL. Assessing and modifying the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Chest,
1999; 115: 77S-81S.
Eagle KA et al. ACC/AHA Guideline update for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for
noncardiac surgery-Executive summary: A report of the American College of
Cardiology/American Heart Association Taks Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation;
2002: 1257-1267.
Ferguson MK. Preoperative assessment of pulmonary risk. Chest. 1999; 115: 58S-63S
Geerts WH, Heit JA, Clagett GP, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism. Chest. 2001;
119: 132S-175S.
Jacober SJ, Sowers JR. An update on perioperative management of diabetes. Arch Intern
Med. 1999; 159: 2405-2411.
Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM, Thomas EJ, Polanczyk CA, Cook F, Sugarbaker MD,
Dondaldson MC, Poss R, Ho KL, Ludwig LE, Pedan A, Goldman L. Derivation and
prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac
surgery. Circulation. 1999; 100: 1043-1049.
Lyerly HK. The Handbook of Surgical Intensive Care: Practices of the surgery residents at the
Duke University Medical Center. Chicago: Yearbook Medical Publishers, 1989.
Mangano DT, Goldman L. Preoperative assessment of patients with known or suspected
coronary disease. NEJM. 1995; 333 (26): 1750-1756.
Medical Clinics of North America. Preoperative Consultation. 1987; 71(3)
Qaseem A, Snow V, Fitterman N, Hornbake R, Lawerence VA, Smetana GW, Weiss K, Owens
DK. Risk assessment for and strategies to reduce perioperative pulmonary complications
for patients undergoing noncardiac-thoracic surgery: A guideline from the American College
of Physicians. Ann of Intern Med. 2006; 144: 575-580.
Schenemann HJ, Munger H, ODonnell M, Cook D, Guyatt G. Methodology for guideline
development for the seventh American College of Chest Physicians Conference on
antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic
and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest. 2004; 126: 174S-178S.
Smetana GW. Preoperative pulmonary evaluation. NEJM. 1999; 340: 937-944.
Van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, Verwast C, Bruyninckx F, Schetz M, Vlasselarers
D, Ferdinande P, Lauweres P, Bouillon R. Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients.
NEJM. 2001; 345: 1359-1367.
Stone forceps
Allis
Ring forceps
Babcock
Kocher
Heaney
Straight
III. Retractors
A. Self retaining
1. Balfour. Self-retaining design with or without c-arm. Does not retract deep structures.
2. Bookwalter. Complex but very flexible self-retaining design. Able to retract deep
structures. Post clamps to OR table
3. Denis Browne. Lightweight self-retaining ring for small incisions. Does not retract
deep structures.
4. Gelpi. Single tooth with locking handle. Good for perineal exposure.
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 107
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
5. Lone Star. Self-retaining ring for perineal exposure.
6. OConnor OSullivan. Self-retaining design for small incisions. Does not retract deep
structures.
7. Weitlaner. For inguinal node dissection. Sharp or blunt tooth designs.
Self-Retaining Retractors
IV. Scissors
Bandage. For cutting dressings. Not for tissue.
Iris. Fine scissors with pointed blades.
Jorgenson. Heavy right angle design for vaginal cuff.
Mayo. Heavy short scissors. Straight or curved. Straight used for suture cutting, curved for
fascia or dense tissue
Metzenbaum. Delicate, long or short, curved. For dissecting soft tissue.
Nelson. Long heavy scissors, curved or straight. For firm or rubbery tissues, e.g.
uterosacral ligament.
Potts-Smith. Delicate angled scissors with pointed tips. For urinary conduits or other fine
cutting.
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 109
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
V. Scalpels
Blades are numbered. #10 used for most skin incisions. #15 used for small incisions or
peritoneal entry. #11 used for laparoscopic incisions and cone biopsies.
VI. Curettes. For scraping tissue. In gyn this is usually for endometrium.
Heaney. Small, serrated tip. Good for polyp removal. Good tactile feedback.
Novak. Hollow with serrated tip for office or OR biopsy. Some tactile feedback.
Sharp. Many sizes and lengths.
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 110
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
X. Needles
Cutting. For skin only.
Keith. Straight needle with cutting tip.
Taper. Many sizes and degrees of
curvature. RB (very small for delicate
tissue), SH (fine needle for soft Cutting
tissue), CT (general closure), UR Taper
(urology needle with more circular arc)
Swaged. Needle must be cut from suture.
Do not try to pull off. Needle can fly.
Controlled Release (Pop-Off). Important
to pull off at correct angle.
XI. Knots
Granny. Bad because it slips
Square. Good because it does not slip
Surgeons. Good for fascia because first throw holds tight even when tissue on tension but
not easily tensioned on vascular pedicles or soft tissue.
Best knot for monofilament mass closure on fascia is surgeons + surgeons + square knot.
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 112
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
Monopolar
Bipolar
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 115
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
7. Complications of Electrosurgery
a. Injury to adjacent structures by arcing or heating tissue
Poor technique
Instrument failure
b. Consequence of injury may be delayed (e.g. bowel perforation or ureteral
stricture)
c. Capacitance: Occurs when energy is transferred to adjacent metal structure
through an insulator. Can cause injury remote from instrument tip
Capacitance is produced by the Capacitance injury can occur out of the
conductor within the insulated shaft visual field (rectangle) if an organ is near
of laparoscopic instruments to the instrument shaft
Site of burn
XIII. Staplers
A. Bowel
1. Gastrointestinal anastamosis (GIA). Staples and divides. Use 3.8mm staples on
small bowel. Use 4.8mm staples on colon or inflamed bowel. Available in different
lengths and for both laparotomy and laparoscopy procedures. Used for dividing and
anastamosis of bowel. Can be used for broad ligament and IP ligament (expensive)
2. Thoracoabdominal (TA). Staples without dividing. Available in different lengths and
with roticulating tip for placement deep in pelvis. Used for bowel division and
anastamosis.
3. End-to-end anastamosis (EEA). Staples and divides with concentric ring design.
Available in different diameters. Use largest diameter that bowel will accept.
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 117
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
EEA stapler in use for low rectal anastamosis after supralevator pelvic exenteration.
B. Skin
C. Others
1. Ligate-divide-staple (LDS). Gas powered stapler for dividing soft tissues such as
omentum.
2. Fascial staples. For hernia repairs.
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 119
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
Pulmonary
Pulmonary Asymptomatic, Abnormal Dyspnea on significant Dyspnea at normal activity Dyspnea at rest
P.F.T exertion
Neurologic
Sensory Mild paresthesia, loss of Mild-moderate objective Severe objective sensory -
D.T.R. sensory loss, moderate loss; paresthesia that
paresthesia interferes with function
Motor Subjective weakness; no Mild objective weakness; Objective weakness, with Paralysis
objective findings no significant impairment impairment
Cortical Mild somnolence or Moderate somnolence or Severe somnolence or Coma, seizure, toxic
agitation agitation agitation, confusion, psychosis
hallucination
Cerebellar Slight incoordination, Intention tremor, Locomotor ataxia Cerebellar necrosis
dysdiadokinesis dysmetria, nystagmus,
slurred speech
Mood Mild anxiety or depression Moderate anxiety or Severe anxiety or Suicidal ideation
depression depression
Headache Mild Moderate or severe but Unrelenting and severe -
transient
Hearing Asymptomatic loss, noted Tinnitus Functional hearing loss, Deafness, not correctable
on audiometry only correctable
Vision - - Symptomatic subtotal loss Blindness
of vision
Skin / Allergy
Skin Scattered, asymptomatic Scattered maculo-papular General, symptomatic Exfoliative or ulcerative
maculo-papular eruption eruption, with pruritus or maculo-papular or dermatitis
or erythema other symptoms vesicular eruption
Wound Cellulitis; incisional Superficial infection; Abscess; fascial defect Necrotizing fasciitis; fascial
separation incisional hernia without evisceration defect with evisceration
Local Injury Pain Pain, and swelling, with Ulceration Plastic surgery indicated
inflammation; or phlebitis
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 122
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
Alopecia Mild hair loss Pronounced or total hair - -
loss
Allergy Transient rash, Urticaria, mild broncho- Serum sickness or Anaphylaxis
drug fever <100.4F spasm, bronchospasm requiring
drug fever 100.4F treatment
Lymphedema Mild Moderate, requiring Severe, limiting function; Severe, limiting function,
compression; or or lymphocyst requiring with ulceration
lymphocyst surgery
Infection
Infection Mild Moderate Severe Life threatening
Fever 37.1-38C 38.1-40C >40C or 104F >40C or 104F for >24
98.7-100.4F 100.5-104F for <24 hours hours, or hypotension
Metabolic
Weight gain or loss 5 - 9.9% 10 - 19.9% > 20% -
Hyperglycemia 116 - 160 161 - 250 251 - 500 > 500, or ketoacidosis
Hypoglycemia 55 - 64 40 - 54 30 - 39 < 30
Amylase < 1.5 x N 1.5 - 2 x N 2.1 - 5 x N >5xN
Hypercalcemia 10.6 - 11.5 11.6 - 12.5 12.6 - 13.5 > 13.5
Hypocalcemia 7.8 - 8.4 7 - 7.7 6.1 - 6.9 < 6.1
Hypomagnesemia 1.2 - 1.4 0.9 - 1.1 0.6 - 0.8 < 0.6
Coagulation
Fibrinogen 0.75 - 0.99 x N 0.5 0.74 x N 0.25 0.49 x N < 0.25 x N
PT 1.01 1.25 x N 1.26 1.5 x N 1.51 2 x N >2xN
PTT 1.01 1.66 x N 1.67 2.33 x N 2.34 x 3 x N >3xN
Gyn Onc Overview, Page 123
R. Kevin Reynolds, MD
Performance Status
84BJR03