Week 4
Week 4
Week 4
- Promulgation of Judgement
- Cross Examination
HIGHLIGHT: The most significant process that I witnessed was the Direct
Examination of a psychiatrist to prove moral damages because apparently,
the non-support of the husband caused anguish and despair to the wife.
The Defense was not able to Cross because he needed to research further
on the medical terms that the psychiatrist mentioned. In my opinion, the
Defense did not need further research to know what bipolar or
schizophrenia means. I would have presented the fact that the wifes
anguish and depression was not caused by the husbands non-support, but
because of the fact that she was bipolar, as what the psychiatrist attested
to; it was the wifes default demeanor. The moral damages wouldve
been removed.
- Arraignment
2. Criminal Case No. 48799-87 Falsification of Commercial
Documents
People v Generoso
- Arraignment
- Promulgation
- Promulgation
- Pre-Trial Conference
- Pre-Trial Conference
- Pre-Trial Conference
- Pre-Trial Conference
- Pre-Trial Conference
14. Criminal Case No. 09-7007-SPL Violation of Section 5(h) of RA
9262
People v Ananda Sirisena Karuna Singhe
- Pre-Trial Conference
- Pre-Trial Conference
- Pre-Trial Conference
- Pre-Trial Conference
- Pre-Trial Conference
- Pre-Trial Conference
- Pre-Trial Conference
- Pre-Trial Conference
4
7. Criminal Case No. 17-12027-SPL Violation of Section 5 of RA 9165
Criminal Case No. 17-12028-SPL Violation of Section 11 of RA 9165
People v Joselito Remerata y Remoquillo
- Pre-Trial Conference
- Initial Hearing
- Initial Hearing
- Initial Hearing
- Initial Hearing
- Initial Hearing
- Initial Hearing
Sub - Total 36