CBK Power Co LTD Vs Cir
CBK Power Co LTD Vs Cir
CBK Power Co LTD Vs Cir
DOCTRINE DISCUSSED: Tax Refund; Tax Credit; Section 112(A) provides that after
the close of the taxable quarter when the sales were made, there is a two-year
prescriptive period within which a VAT-registered person whose sales are zero-rated or
effectively zero-rated may apply for the issuance of a tax credit certificate or refund of
creditable input tax
CTA 2ND DIVISION RULING: Accordingly, petitioner timely filed its administrative claims
for the three quarters of 2005. However, considering that the judicial claim was filed on
18 April 2007, the CTA Division denied the claim for the first quarter of 2005 for having
been filed out of time.
CTA EN BANC RULING: CTA En Banc ruled that petitioners judicial claim for the first,
second, and third quarters of 2005 were belatedly filed. The CTA Special Second
Division Decision and Resolution were reversed and set aside, and the Petition for
Review filed in CTA Case No. 7621 was dismissed. Petitioners Motion for
Reconsideration was likewise denied for lack of merit.
ISSUE: Whether or not CBK Power may claim for the issuance of tax credit certificates.
HELD: No. Section 112(A) provides that after the close of the taxable quarter when the
sales were made, there is a two-year prescriptive period within which a VAT-registered
person whose sales are zero-rated or effectively zero-rated may apply for the issuance
of a tax credit certificate or refund of creditable input tax.
Our VAT Law provides for a mechanism that would allow VAT-registered persons to
recover the excess input taxes over the output taxes they had paid in relation to their
sales. For the refund or credit of excess or unutilized input tax, Section 112 is the
governing law. Given the distinctive nature of creditable input tax, the law under Section
112 (A) provides for a different reckoning point for the two-year prescriptive period,
specifically for the refund or credit of that tax only.