Pricing
Pricing
Pricing
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265174923
CITATIONS READS
3 917
3 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Disaster Management for infrastructures like Metro Bus and Yellow Train View project
The Creativity and effectiveness of Interactive Digital Media on Advertising View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Rizwan Raheem Ahmed on 01 September 2014.
Keywords: Prescription Products; OTC Products; Pricing Strategies; R&D Cost; Cost-Plus Pricing;
Break-even Pricing; Value Based Pricing
1. Introduction
1.1 Background of the Research
Marketing is, as in other industries is the driving force in pharmaceutical industry. Most of the
people engaged in marketing activities in pharmaceutical industry are business graduates, with
majors in marketing. However, the biggest problem they face, and which in turn becomes a
challenge for human resource function of the company is the distinct character of
pharmaceutical marketing. What these business graduates learn at schools do not encompass
these unique characteristics and as a result, they find themselves inadequately equipped to
handle the dynamics of pharmaceutical marketing [1].
The controls maintained by regulatory bodies leaves very little room for maneuvering and
even lesser for making an error. Therefore, the Pharmaceutical Companies cannot manipulate
Pricing in any way; so, there was a need to develop a clear literature for the pricing issues in
Pharmaceutical Products [2]. This research review is an attempt to elaborate the pricing
strategies in Pharmaceutical Industry in Pakistan.
~ 13 ~
The Pharma Innovation Journal
~ 15 ~
The Pharma Innovation Journal
2.10 Why MNCs indulge into transfer pricing? In the example cited above, the company may decide to buy
As the first step, we need to understand a little about the the raw material from the parent company at the rate of US$
costing and pricing structure of the industry. The cost 10,000 instead of US$ 100. See how this will change the
structure in pharmaceutical industry goes somewhat as whole cost structure:
follows:
Cost of Active Raw Material (Drug itself)+Cost of 72.00 - Cost of Active Raw Material (Drug itself)+
excipients (Material used to give the medicine a particular 1.00 - Cost of excipients (Material used to give the
form like tablets, syrups etc.)+Applicable duties on import of medicine a particular form like tablets, syrups etc)
material (Approximately 20% all inclusive)+Cost of labor +
and other overheads+Packaging Material= In-Factory Cost 5.00 - Cost of labor and other overheads +
of Product [26]. 5.00 - Packaging Material =
In the whole of the above structure, all heads except for raw 83.00 - In-Factory Cost of Product
material are almost consistent for all products, and do not 32% - Gross Margin
allow much room for manipulation. Raw material, however
form the basic chunk of the cost structure, and this is where
there is much room for engineering. Now we come to what is The gross margin shown above can easily be consumed
transfer pricing [27]? We will explain this with the help of an through marketing and selling expenditure leaving nothing to
example: account for at the end of the year. The key to understand is
that the duty is 20%, whereas the corporate taxation comes
Example to 50%. This way, even after paying the duty, the company
Suppose the Retail Price of a product is Rs. 150 for a pack of saves around 30% of its profits and transfers the foreign
10 tablets, each containing 10 mg of active drug. The ex- exchange out of Pakistan and that too, officially [33].
factory price for the product will be calculated as per the
following formula: 2.11 What is the impact on the economy?
Informed sources claim, that the multinational
Retail Price (Less) 15% Retailers Margin (Less) 10% pharmaceutical companies cause a loss of a staggering 4-5
Distributors Margin billion per year to the national exchequer. The situation
In the above example, it will come to 150-15-13.5=121.50 appears graver when we realize that we are talking of just
one industry, whereas most of the industries operating in
This means that the manufacturer will get Rs. 121.50 for Pakistan import their raw material from abroad. The issue
each pack. This will be termed as the ex-factory price of the becomes further complicated when we consider the import of
product. Now assume that the cost of Raw material in the finished products by corporate giants like Unilevers and
international market is US$ 100/kg. If we take US$ 1= Pak P&G [34].
Rs. 60, the cost will come to Rs. 6,000 per kg. Add 10% duty Besides this, the amount we lose by tax evasion is also huge.
to it and the landed cost for each kilogram of raw material The prices at which MNCs sell their products will leave
will be Rs. 7,200. As we mentioned above, each tablet them with at least 20% net profit. Pharmaceutical industry in
contains 10 mg of raw material. The raw material consumer Pakistan has a total estimated value of Rs. 45 billion, out of
per pack will be 100 mg, the cost of which will be 0.72. If which 50% is MNCs share. In this scenario, we also lose
we now put this figure in the cost structure given above, and around Rs. 2.25 billion in taxes. Another disadvantage we
take approximate costs of the remaining items, we can arrive get is that MNCs get approval for a very high price based on
at the total cost of each pack [28, 29]. the cost structure they present with their applications. This
makes the cost of healthcare very high for the common men.
0.72 - Cost of Active Raw Material (Drug itself)+ Local companies also get a price which even being lower
1.00 - Cost of excipients (Material used to give the than MNCs, still give them extra-ordinary profits. In whole
medicine a particular form like tablets, syrups of this corporate hanky panky, consumer is the loser. Last
etc.) + but not the least, as a result of transfer pricing the country
5.00 - Cost of labor and other overheads + has to bear additional pressure in terms of balance of
5.00 - Packaging Material = payments [35].
11.72 - In-Factory Cost of Product
3. Conclusion
If we take the above costs against the ex-factory price of Rs. In view of the peculiar characteristics of pharmaceutical
121.50 as calculated above, the profit margin comes to 90% industry, the different approaches actually applicable and
[30]. practiced in the industry as Cost-Plus Pricing, Break-Even
The profit margin coming in the above example will make Pricing, Value Based Pricing, Competition Based Pricing, &
the firm liable to pay a handsome tax to the government, a Economy Pricing. The controls maintained by regulatory
reasonable dividend/return to the shareholders (in case of a bodies leaves very little room for maneuvering and even
public company), and finally bank charges to transfer the lesser for making an error. In view of the limited time and
retained earnings to their parent company. All of these are scope of this study, the focus will be the price and Pricing
the things, which MNCs do not want to incur. They want strategies for Pharmaceutical Products. This study covers the
their local profitability to be as less as possible, in fact Pricing consideration and approaches. This attempt made to
negative to make sure that they do not pay taxes. They also come up with possible pricing approaches and strategies for
want their profits to be transferred in advance as foreign pharmaceutical products. The amount of money charged for
exchange to their parent company. These objectives are a product or service, or the sum of the values that consumers
achieved through transfer pricing [31, 32]. exchange for the benefits of having or using the product or
~ 16 ~
The Pharma Innovation Journal
service. Internal factors affecting pricing include the 17. James C, Peabody J, Solon O, Quimbo S, Hanson K,
companys marketing objectives, marketing mix strategy, Eds. An Unhealthy Public-Private Tension: Pharmacy
costs, and organizational considerations. External factors that Ownership, Prescribing, and spending in the Philippines.
affect pricing decisions include the nature of the market and Health Affairs 2009; 28:1022-1033.
demand, competition, and other environmental elements. 18. Ahmed RR, Saeed A. Pharmaceutical Drug Promotion
Besides that, a company may amortize its R&D cost over a Practices in Pakistan: Issues in Ethical and Non-Ethical
period of time, which becomes an additional cost Practices. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary
component. Generally, a 60% and above gross margin is Research in Business 2014; 20(11):1630-1640.
considered to be reasonably good in pharmaceutical industry. 19. Kola I, Landis J. Can the Pharmaceutical Industry
However, in case of a new research molecule, the margin Reduce Attrition Rates? Nature Reviews Drug
may be as high as 500-1000%. Discovery 2004; 3:711-715.
20. Kuatbayeva AA. Modeling Situational Room for
4. References Healthcare. World Applied Sciences Journal 2013;
1. Ahmed M, Akhter N, Awan M, Murtaza G. Ethical 26(2):209-212.
Evaluation of Pharmaceutical marketing in Pakistan. 21. Landau R. Achilladelis B. Scriabine and Alexander.
Academic Journal 2011; 17(2):215. Pharmaceutical Innovation: Revolutionizing Human
2. Sattar I, Maqsood A. A Marketing Mix Health. Chemical Heritage Press 1999, 100-105.
Model for Pharmaceutical Industry - A Pakistani 22. Lexchin J. Pharmaceutical promotion in the third world.
Perspective. The Journal of Independent Studies and Journal of Drug Issues 1992; 22(2):417-422.
Research 2003; 1(2): 38-56. 23. Wolfe SM. Direct-to-consumer advertising Education
3. Ahmed RR, Parmar V, Ahmad N, Warraich UA, Khoso or emotion promotion? New England Journal of
I. Communication Mix in Pharmaceutical Marketing. Medicine 2002; 346(7):524-526.
The Pharma Innovation Journal 2014; 3(5):46-53. 24. Kotler P. Gary Armstrong. Principles of Marketing. Edn
4. Boltri JM, Elizabeh ER, Godon R, Voge R. Eds. Effect 9, Prentice-Hall International, New Jersey, 2002.
of Antihypertensive sample On Physican prescribing 25. Lundin D. Moral hazard in physician prescription
pattens 2002; 34:729-31. behavior. Journal of Health Economics 2000; 19(5):639-
5. Chew L, D MD, OYoung TS, Thomas K, Hazlet KA. 662.
Bradley, Charles Maynard, & Daniel S. Lessler, Eds. A 26. Pakistan Pharmaceutical Index-IMS (MAT Q2&Q3).
Physician Survey of the Effect of Drug Sample Pakistani Pharmaceutical Industry 2010.
Availability on Physicians Behavior. J Gen Intern Med 27. Ratner M. Public-private Model Pursues Precompetitive
2000; 15:478-483. R&D. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2004; 3:987.
6. Corckburn J, Pit, S. Prescribing behaviour in clinical 28. Uaq SH, Ahmed RR, Ahmad N, Khoso I, Parmar V.
practice: patients' expectations and doctors' perceptions Factors Influencing Prescription Behavior of Physicians.
of patients' 1997; 315:520-3. The Pharma Innovation Journal 2014; 3(5):30-35.
7. Ahmed RR, Saeed A. Ethical and non-ethical 29. Sagar DN, Kalaskar PB. Factors influencing
Pharmaceutical marketing practices: Case study of prescription behavior of physician: A stydy with
Karachi city. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary reference to Marathada Region. Indian Stream research
Research Business 2012; 3(11):456-475. Journal 2012; 2(4):1-4.
8. Duffy CM, Clark M. Who receives free sample 30. Pollack A. Despite Billions for Discoveries, Pipeline of
medications? Journal of General Internal Medicine Drugs is Far from Full. The New York Times 2002.
2003; 18:205. 31. Schreyoegg J, Busse R. Drug Budgets and Effects on
9. Filmore D, Thayer AM, Willis RC. Pipeline Challenges. Physicians' Prescription Behaviour: New Evidence from
Modern Drug Discovery 2004, 28-34. Germany. Journal of Pharmaceutical Finance 2005;
10. Ahmed RR, Sattar I, Khoso I, Parmar V. New Product 14:77-95.
development: Strategy and implementation mechanism 32. Theodorou M et al. Factors influencing prescribing
based on primary and secondary data Research in behaviour of physicians in Greece and Cyprus: results
Pharmaceutical Industry. International Journal of from a questionnaire based survey. BMC Health
Management, IT and Engineering 2014; 4(5):152-176. Services 2009; 9-150.
11. Gehlbach SW, Wilkison N, Clapp A, Finn W, Taylor 33. Wazana A. Physicians and the pharmaceutical industry:
MR. Improving Drug Prescribing in a Primary Care is a gift ever just a gift? JAMA 2000; 283(3):373-80.
Practice. Medical Care 1984; 22:193-201. 34. Ahmed RR, Vishnu P, Ahmed J. Factors that affect
12. Clark M, Gong M, Schork M, Evans D, Roloff D, attitude towards generic drugs perception: Comparison
Hurwitz M et al. Impact of Education for Physicians on of physicians & general practitioners of Karachi city.
Patient Outcomes. American Journal of Pediatrics 1998; International Journal of Managment, IT and Engineering
101:831. 2012; 2(11):151-178.
13. Gilbert J, Hanske P, Singh A. Rebuilding Big Pharmas 35. Westfall JM, McCabe HRA. Nicholas. Personal use of
Business Model. In Vivo 2003; 21:73-82. drug samples by physicians and office staff. JAMA
14. Gonul FF, Carter P, Elina K. Srinivasan. Promotion of 1997; 278:141-143.
Prescription Drugs and Its Impact on Physicians' Choice
Behavior. Journal of Marketing 2001; 65:79-90.
15. Greene J. (Ed.). Drug reps targeting non-physicians.
American medical News 2000, 27.
16. IMS PKPI (MAT Q2& Q3). Pakistani Pharmaceutical
Industry, December 31, 2008.
~ 17 ~