02 Cañeda V Mechavez
02 Cañeda V Mechavez
02 Cañeda V Mechavez
Basil Maguigad
Caeda vs. Mechavez courtroom. This, the respondent judge failed to do. The
AM No. RTJ-06-2026, March 4, 2009 |Brion, J., severity of his violation is not tampered by his allegation that
the complainant himself contributed to the events that led to
FACTS the respondents show of temper.
Atty. Caneda (complainant) was the counsel of the In Juan dela Cruz (Concerned citizen of Legazpi City) v. Judge
defendants in a partition case being resolved under the Ruben B. Carretas, we had occasion to say:"Equanimity and
sala of RTC Judge Menchavez. judiciousness should be the constant marks of a dispenser of
justice. A judge should always keep his passion guarded. He can
Atty. Caneda wanted to move for settlement only in case that never allow it to run loose and overcome his reason x x x"
the opposing counsel shall withdraw its motion for
reconsideration pending in the Supreme Court. The opposing Similarly in Rowena v. Guanzon, et al. v. Judge Anastacio C.
counsel refused to such settlement. Now, Atty. Caneda wanted Rufon, the Court declared - "although respondent judge may
to resolve the issue thru mediation. A heated argument attribute his intemperate language to human frailty, his noble
between the two counsels of the partition case caused Judge position in the bench nevertheless demands from him
Menchavez to lose his temper. Judge Menchavez said: courteous speech in and out of court. Judges are demanded to
Nevermind mediation, its useless! be always temperate, patient and courteous both in conduct
and in language."
Then Atty. Caneda remarked that the case is being delayed
because no proper summons (by publication) was served to the WHEREFORE, premises considered, Judge ERIC F. MENCHAVEZ,
parties of the partition case. Again, Judge Menchavez lost his of the Regional Trial Court, Branch 21, Cebu City, is hereby
temper shouting I said no publication period!, while declared LIABLE for vulgar and unbecoming conduct as a judge.
banging his gavel. He banged it so hard that the head broke off Accordingly, a fine of P10,000.00 is imposed upon him with
and flew towards Atty. Caneda almost hitting him. The a WARNING that a repetition of the same or similar infraction
Judge then quickly returned to his chambers. After a few will be dealt with more severely. The complainant is given
minutes, he came out with a gun and smashed it on the the ADMONITION that in representing his clients, he should
table. He shouted at Atty. Caneda, What do you want? Devil! ever be mindful of the respect due to the court and avoid
Hardheaded! actions bordering on disrespect.
ISSUE(S)
RULING