PROJECT REPORT

On

MULTYSTOREY PARKING STRUCTURE

FOR KANNUR RAILWAY STATION

Project Team
AMAL SUNNY
SANOJ JOSE
SREENADH HARIDAS
ALINTA FRANCIS
REKHA P V
SANISHA A

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING

VIMAL JYOTHI ENGINEERING COLLEGE

CHEMPERI, KANNUR
2014-2015
 PROJECT REPORT
On
MULTYSTOREY PARKING STRUCTURE FOR KANNUR
RAILWAY STATION

Submitted by

AMAL SUNNY
SANOJ JOSE
SREENADH HARIDAS
`ALINTA FRANCIS
REKHA P V
SANISHA A

Guided by
Ms.Shimna Paulose
(Assistant Professor)

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING

VIMAL JYOTHI ENGINEERING COLLEGE
CHEMPERI, KANNUR
2014-2015
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

First and foremost we express our whole hearted gratitude to Almighty God for
His grace and blessings which gave us the strength to complete this project.

We express our heartfelt gratitude to our guide Ms. Shimna Paulose, for her
valuable suggestions, constant support and encouragement throughout this project.

We are also thankful to the entire Civil Engineering Department of Vimal

Jyothi Engineering College for their stimulating support.

We express our gratitude to Mr. Shylendran, Station Master, Kannur Railway

Station and Mr. Saji, Section Engineer, Kannur Railway Station for their
encouragement and support.

Our colleagues from the Civil Engineering Department supported us in our

project work. We want to thank them for all their help, support, interest and valuable
hints. We would also like to give our special thanks to our parents whose patient love
enabled us to complete this work.

During the period of mini project, We relied on the assistances, resources and
support of many people. We acknowledge with gratitude the help, guidance and
encouragement given by many individuals in the completion of this mini project.

i
 ABSTRACT

In urban areas, there is a heavy rush of vehicles and pedestrians during peak
hours of the day and it results in traffic congestion. The demand for parking spaces by
automobile users is one of the major problems faced. When vehicles park on road sides
even for a short while, there is a restriction to other vehicles passing by, resulting in
congestion and accidents. Modern techniques and methods have to be found out to
make the movement of vehicles smooth and easier.

The traffic in Kannur city is increasing at a tremendous rate and it is mainly

concentrated near the railway station. During peak hours of traffic the vehicles
approaching to the station contribute a major part to the traffic congestion. Also the
parking facilities currently provided in the railway station is not able to meet the current
requirements of parking. This project mainly intents to divert the traffic flow and to
create more space in and around the railway station and thus solve the existing parking
problems. One of the solutions to decongest roads and solve parking problems may be
a multilevel car parking system to maximize car parking capacity by utilizing vertical
space, rather than expanding horizontally.

In this project planning of a Multistoried Car Parking structure for Kannur

Railway Station is carried out based on the feasibility studies involving questionnaire
survey and parking studies. The parking survey has been carried out by license plate
method and the parking load is found. The capacity of multistory parking structure is
determined based on this survey.

A suitable location was selected and surveyed using total station and the site
plan was made. Based on the required capacity of the parking structure suitable layout
and plan for the structure has been prepared and drawn using Auto CAD as per the
National Building Code and Kerala Building Rules. The modelling and analysis are
done and a rough estimate is calculated using SR USSOR.

Keywords: Multistory car park, parking studies, modelling, analysis

ii
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title: page no:

Acknowledgement i

Abstract ii

Table of Contents iii

List of Tables v

List of Figures vi

Glossary vii

CHAPTER1: INTRODUCTION

1.1.GENERAL 1

1.2.PROBLEM STATEMENT 1

1.3.OBJECTIVE 2

CHAPTER2: LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1. PARKING STUDIES 3

2.2. PARKING SURVEYS 3

2.3. SITE REQUIREMENTS 4

2.4. DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 4

2.4.1. Layout Details 4

2.4.2. Parking Space Provision 6

2.4.3. Details of Stair 6

2.4.3.1. Fire escape staircase 6

2.4.4. Details of Ramp 7

2.4.5. Height Considerations 7

2.4.6. Maneuvering on Aisles 7

iii
 2.5. SMART PARKING SYSTEM 8

CHAPTER3: METHODOLOGY

3.1. QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY 9

3.2. RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY 10

3.2.1. Site Study 10

3.3. SITE SURVEY 11

3.3.1. Total Station Survey 11

3.3.2. Survey Sketch Preparation 11

3.4. PARKING SURVEY 12

3.5. PREPARATION OF PLAN, SECTION AND 13

ELEVATION

3.5.1. Preparation of Layout 14

3.5.2. Preparation of Plan Using AutoCAD 14

3.6. MODELLING AND ANALYSIS 15

3.6.1. Design Information Sheet 15

3.6.2. Structural Summary Sheet 16

3.7. ESTIMATION 17

Conclusion

Reference

Annexure

iv
 LIST OF TABLES

Table Description Page No

No

1. Summary of parking survey data for first day Annexure A

2. Summary of parking survey data for second day Annexure A

3. Summary of parking survey data for third day Annexure A

4. Summary of curb parking data Annexure A

v
 LIST OF FIGURES

Figure No. Description Page No

2.1 Parallel parking 4

2.2 90degree parking 5

2.3 45degree parking 5

2.4 Head room 7

2.5 Vehicle Turning Path 8

A.3.1 Accumulation curve graph-1 annexure A

A.3.2 Accumulation curve graph-2 annexure A

A.3.3 Accumulation curve graph-3 annexure A

C.1 Location of the site annexure C

D.1 Layout of the structure annexure D

D.2 Survey sketch annexure D

D.3 Site plan annexure D

D.4 Plan annexure D

D.5 Elevation annexure D

D.6 Section annexure D

vi
 GLOSSARY

Access way: Carriageway not adjoining bays and used solely for the
movement of vehicles.

Aisle: An access way serving adjoining bays.

Bay: The parking area, exclusive of aisle or other adjoining area,

allocated to one car.

Deck: A slab at any level of the car park.

Ramp: An access way or aisle connecting parking areas at different

levels. More usually, the term is applied to access ways only.

Clearway ramp: A ramp system that does not include an aisle in its circulation
and which provides unencumbered access between the parking
floors and an entrance or exit.

Parking angle: The angle between the longitudinal centerline of a bay and the
aisle from which it is served.

Static capacity: The total number of bays in a car park.

vii
 CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION

1.1. GENERAL
Parking demand often grows quickly, significantly and unexpectedly in urban areas
where there is a heavy rush of vehicles and pedestrians during peak hours of the day
resulting in traffic congestion. When vehicles park on road sides even for a short while, it
can result in congestion and accidents. Also surface parking consuming too much of the
precious land area is not always feasible. One of the solutions is multilevel car parking
system by utilizing vertical space rather than expanding horizontally.

A multi-storey car park is a building designed for car parking and where there are
a number of floors or levels on which parking takes place.These structures often have low
ceiling clearances, which restrict access by full size vans and other large vehicles.

1.2. PROBLEM STATEMENT

The increasing traffic in Kannur town has resulted in serious parking problems.
This problem is further increased by poor parking facilities available in the area. The
congestion in this region is increasing day by day and no measures have been found
effective in solving these issues. The vehicular traffic flowing towards the Kannur Railway
Station causes serious traffic problem in the areas surrounding the railway station. The poor
road facility provided in the front side of railway station aid this problem.

The current parking facilities provided in the premises of railway station proves
ineffective during peak times of a day. Many vehicle users have experienced difficulties in
parking and started complaining about this problem. Also Curb parking and unauthorized
parking pose great parking problem.
1.3. OBJECTIVE
The main objective of this project is to solve the parking problems in Kannur
railway station by constructing a multi-storey car park. The study involves preparation of
a detailed plan for the multi-storey car park (MCP). Prior to the functional planning of the
MCP the feasibility of the project is found out by conducting questionnaire survey and
parking survey. Then the modelling and analysis of the structure is carried out using
ETABS and a rough estimate of the project is made using the SRUSSOR.

2
 CHAPTER-2
LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 PARKING STUDIES

The demands by automobile users for parking spaces are one of the major problems
increasing day to day. Parking studies are done to evaluate the parking facilities available.
Parking facilities are broadly divided into two:

On street parking (kerb parking)

Off street parking.
In case of On Street Parking, the vehicle is allowed to park on the kerb and it may either
be restricted or unrestricted kerb parking. Police or parking meters control the former,
while there is no such control in the latter. On street parking reduces the effective width of
road and if not properly designed, leads to traffic congestion.

In case of Off Street Parking the vehicles are parked in a separate place away from the
kerb. This facility avoids undue traffic congestion. The various methods of off-street
parking are basement floor and open spaces around the buildings, construction of central
parking stations in the form of multi storied buildings with open walls, developing parking
lots with parking fee, etc.

2.2 PARKING SURVEYS

Parking is one of the serious problems that confront the urban planner and the traffic
engineers. Before any measures for the betterment of the conditions can be formulated
basic data pertaining to the availability of parking space, extend of its usage and parking
demand is essential. If it is proposed to implement a system of parking charges it will also
be necessary to know how much to charge and what will be the effect of the pricing policy
on parking. Parking surveys are intended to supply all this kind of information.
2.3 SITE REQUIREMENTS

Large and rectangular shaped sites are ideal for parking structures. The overall
width of the structure should be determined based upon multiples of the chosen parking
bay width. Longer sites provide the opportunity to park along the end bays, which provides
more parking spaces, improves efficiency, and lowers the cost per space.

A longer site also allows for shallower ramps which provide improved user comfort.
Generally, parking bays should be oriented parallel to the longer dimension of the site and
preferably in the predominate direction of pedestrian travel.

2.4 DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

Many design consideration are adopted while designing a parking structure. The
design considerations involve design layouts, details of ramp and stair, height
considerations, maneuvering over aisles, parking space provisions etc.

2.4.1 Layout Details

Parking layout details may be as follows:

Parallel Parking
This type of parking requires less pavement area. Works well in extremely narrow and
linear spacing.
Standard Dimensions (min): 7.5m long, 2.75m wide.

Fig.2.1 Parallel Parking

4
 90 degree angle parking
This type of parking accommodates most vehicles per linear area. Effective in long
term parking.
Standard dimensions: Parking space width- 2.75m, Parking space length- 6m

Fig. 2.2 - 90 degree parking

45 degree angle parking

Reduce the width required for parking. Easy maneuvering in and out of parking spaces.
Provide good visibility to rear.
Standard Dimensions: Parking space width- 2.75m, parking space length- 6.2m.

Fig. 2.3 - 45 degree parking

5
2.4.2. Parking Space Provision

According to National Building Code (NBC) clause 10.3 each off-street parking
space provided for vehicles shall be:

a. For car the minimum parking space to be 3m x 6m when individual parking space
is required and 2.75 m * 5 m when common parking space is required.
b. Space for scooter/two wheeler and bicycle to be not less than 1.25 sq.m and 1 sq.m
respectively.
c. For Disabled Persons:
According to NBC D-2.3.3 Parking space for individuals with physical disabilities
should be 3.6 m to3.8 m wide and the length of the aisle should 7.3 m, 6.1 m and
6.5 m for head-on 60degree and 90degree parking respectively.

2.4.3. Details Of Stair

According to NBC

(4.9.7)The minimum width of tread shall be 300mm for commercial buildings.

(4.9.8)The height of riser should be 150mm and the number shall be limited to
15per flight.
(4.9.9)The handrail should be provided at a height of 1000mm to be measured from
the base of the middle of the treads to the top of the hand rails.

2.4.3.1.Fire escape staircase

According to KPBR

(47.1:a) Fire staircase shall be provided for every building other than residencies
exceeding two storey above ground level.
(47.2) Width of fire escape stair shall not be less than 0.75 m, width of tread shall
not be less than 15 cm, height of fire escape stair riser shall not be less than 19 cm,
and number of risers shall not exceed 16 per stair.
(47.3) Height of hand rail shall not be less than 1 m.
(47.5) Fire escape stair shall have a straight flight.

6
2.4.4. Details Of Ramp

According to NBC (4.14.2), the slope of ramp should not exceed 1 in 10.
According to KPBR (104.3),The maximum gradient of any ramp which
approaching to a building shall not exceed 1 in 12. Height of hand rail shall be 80
cm .

2.4.5 Height Considerations

Most cars have a height of less than 1.5m and the height never exceed 1.95 m. So a
height greater than 2 m is adopted for parking structures housing only light weight 4 wheel
vehicles. (Jim Hill, 2005)

Fig. 2.4 - Head Room

2.4.6. Maneuvering On Aisles

Recommended minimum aisle widths (2.4m wide stalls):

90 degree with 2 way flow 7.00 m

90 degree with 1 way flow 6.00 m

60 degree 4.20 m

45 degree 3.60 m

( Jim Hill,2005)

7
 Fig 2.5 - Turning path

2.5 SMART PARKING SYSTEM

With increase in vehicle production more parking systems and facilities are
required. So large multistory parking structures are erected to meet the demands of parking.
Many problems like difficulty to find parking spaces, improper parking, parking fee
payment etc. has been observed in these structures. SPS solves these problems by using
ultrasonic sensors to detect either car parking occupancy or improper parking actions
( Amin Kianpisheh, July 2012).

8
 CHAPTER 3
METHODOLOGY

3.1. QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY

Questionnaire surveys consist of series of questions and other prompts for

the purpose of gathering information from respondents. They are designed for statistical
analysis of resources. The questions are direct and could be easily understood by the
respondents. The number of questions are reduced and made short keeping in mind about
the comfort of respondents.

A questionnaire has been prepared with above factors in mind. The questionnaire
is mainly intended for understanding the feasibility of the project. A questionnaire survey
was carried out by interviewing passengers approaching and departing from the railway
station. Some passengers were interviewed right in the parking lot. This type of
questionnaire is quick method but the results may not be accurate, it may include bias.The
bias can take two forms. Drivers will sometimes overestimate their parking needs in order
to encourage the surveyors to recommend additional parking. Or, they may file false reports
so that their opinion feel are more socially acceptable.

The following data has been inferred from the questionnaire survey:

About 95% of people have experienced traffic congestion problems near railway
station.

90% of people are dissatisfied with the current parking provisions.

More than 80% of people invited the idea of multi-storeyed car parking for Kannur
railway station.

The format of questionnaire survey is shown in Annex B.

3.2. RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY

Reconnaissance surveys represent a type of field survey that is often used

to gather initial information regarding the topography and suitability of the selected plot
for the project. Reconnaissance surveys generally include field visits and collection of
relevant data by enquiry. The reconnaissance surveys are also carried out for understanding
the site features like topography, location, availability of resources, etc.

The following was observed during reconnaissance survey of our site:

The site is located at Railway station, Kannur. The location of the site is shown in
Annex C.1.
The site is located near congested town area.
A better parking facility is not available in nearby area.
The site is uniformly levelled.
The traffic congestion near the site is heavy.
Labour and building materials are easily available.
An old building is situated in the site so demolishing works need to be carried out.

3.2.1. Site Study

While planning and designing a building, the first thought is about the
general scope or the purpose of the proposed building. Site is the main factor which has
large effect on the layout and design of the proposed building. The relation of the site with
its environment and the topographical features of the site are to be taken into consideration
while planning and designing a building. Parking buildings are unique when compared to
other types of buildings. It should be located in such a way that it could be easily located
and identified by vehicle users.

The following points was considered before the site selection:

Large and rectangular shaped sites are ideal for parking structures.
Longer sites provide the opportunity to park along the end bays, which provides
more parking spaces, improves efficiency, and lowers the cost per space.
The site should be easily accessible and roads connecting these sites should have
sufficient width to avoid congestion.

10
3.3. SITE SURVEY

The detailed survey has been done to determine the boundaries of the
required areas of the site with the help of total station. This kind of survey are usually
confined to the boundaries of the parcel of land. The survey will often include data such as
the elevation of the land, that is, how high the land is above an arbitrary datum (level). A
commonly used arbitrary level is the mean sea level which is taken as zero meters high.
The Easting and Northing coordinates of the land may have to be taken too.

3.3.1. Total Station Survey

The total station survey was conducted for establishing the boundary
regions and to produce the site plan based on the survey details. The following details may
be noted:

As the site was level contour map was not prepared.

The boundaries of the plot were determined using total station from two station
points.
The positions of nearby road, electric post, drainage and existing buildings are
surveyed.
After completing the field recordings, the data from total station are transferred
to the computer using LEICA GEOSYSTEM software.
The data were imported to AutoCAD and survey sketch was prepared.

3.3.2. Survey Sketch Preparation

The survey sketch was prepared using AutoCAD. The data collected from the field
using total station can be retrained by connecting the total station to the computer. By using
softwares the data has been exported and converted to the required file type. The files are
imported into AutoCAD. Then the points are connected using lines of different colours.
Each colour may represent different object which are recognized from the field. The
dimensions are marked using dimension options and the locations are properly labelled.
The survey sketch of the plot is shown in Annex .C.

11
3.4. PARKING SURVEY

Parking is one of the serious problems that confront the urban planner and the traffic
engineer. Before taking any measures for the betterment of the conditions, the basic data
pertaining to the availability of parking space, extent of its usage and parking demand are
essential. Parking surveys are intended to supply all this kind of information. Studies are
conducted to collect the required information about the capacity, use of existing parking
facilities, and information about the demand for parking. Information are collected on the
current condition of parking facilities.

The efficiency of current parking provisions and the capacity of parking structure
has to be determined based on the parking survey .The type of parking survey adopted for
this project is duration and turnover survey. For conducting the duration and turnover
surveys license plate method has been adopted. In this method of survey, every parking
stall is monitored at a continuous interval of 15 minutes or so and the license plate number
is noted down. This will give the data regarding the duration for which a particular vehicle
was using the parking bay.

The data from the survey is tabulated and based on the data parking accumulation
is calculated. Parking accumulation is the number of vehicles parked at a given instant of
time. The number of bays occupied is expressed in percentage of total number of bays. The
parking accumulation for each hour is tabulated as shown in Annex A.1. The parking
accumulation curve is plotted. Accumulation curve is the graph obtained by plotting the
number of bays occupied with respect to time. The accumulation curves can be seen in
Annex A.2

The parking load can be calculated from the accumulation curve. Parking load gives
the area under the accumulation curve. It can also be obtained by simply multiplying the
number of vehicles occupying the parking area at each time interval with the time interval.
Parking index or efficiency can be then found out. Parking index is the ratio of number of
bays occupied in a time duration to the total space available. The parking index can be
found out by using the formulae:

12
 The parking index gives an aggregate measure of how effectively the parking space
is utilized. The capacity of the new parking provision to be adopted can be determined
using the parking accumulation values. In this project the maximum accumulated value is
chosen along with the considerations for curb parking. The curb parking and unauthorized
parking are also surveyed which are tabulated and shown in annex A.1.

The parking turnover is found out which gives the overall use of the parking provision.
Parking turnover is the ratio of number of vehicles parked in a duration to the number of
parking bays available. It is given by:

In order to find the turn over, parking volume has to be determined. Parking volume is the
total number of vehicles parked at a given duration of time. This does not account for
repetition of vehicles. The actual volume of vehicles entered in the area is recorded. Parking
volume is found by calculating the total vehicles obtained during the survey, without
considering repetitions. This may be done using MS Excel.

The calculations for parking index and turnover for this project have been shown under
Annex A.4.

Based on parking surveys the static capacity is taken as: 350 vehicles

3.5. PREPARATION OF PLAN, SECTION AND ELEVATION

The plan of the parking structure has been prepared based on the details of the site
plan. The plan has been drawn as per the Kerala Panchayat Building Rules (Annex D). As
per KPBR the plan was drawn to a scale of not less than 1:100.

For drawing the plan of the parking structure a suitable layout should be adopted.
The layout should allow the vehicles to park and manoeuver easily through the structure.
Precautions are taken so that there will not be any clash or conflicts between vehicles in
the structure.

13
 The parking structure is provided with following facilities for the users:

Token counter
Ramps
Lifts and staircases
Toilets for gents and ladies
Electrical room and lighting facilities
Emergency escapes
Special Provisions for disabled people

The facilities provided in the structure meets the requirements as per the KPBR and NBC.
The lighting, ventilation and aesthetics aspects has been considered while preparing the
plan of the parking structure.

3.5.1. Preparation Of Layout

A layout is the rough sketch of the building which shows the entrance and exit
ways, position and direction of maneuvering regions, parking spaces etc. The layout has
been prepared based on the design parking capacity, which is obtained from the parking
studies. About 60 to 70 vehicles are accommodated in each floor. Each parking slot is
effectively allotted such that the users can easily park their vehicle as well as can exit the
structure with least delay. This was made possible by providing one way manoeuvers and
separate entry and exit ramps. Different layouts for parking slots have been selected such
as parallel parking, 90 degree parking, and 45 degree parking. The size of each slot for 2
wheel and 4 wheel vehicles are adopted keeping in mind the code specifications for off-
street parking.

3.5.2. Preparation Of Plan Using AutoCAD

Based on the selected layout the plan of the multistory can park was drawn using
AutoCAD. The column locations was marked in the plan, the size of the columns are taken
as 400x400 mm. The parking slots are distributed within the structure in such a way that
the columns does not interfere in the parking. The stairs, lifts and ramps are drawn by
meeting the requirements as per the codes. Six storey has been provided so as to meet the
parking requirement.

14
3.6. MODELLING AND ANALYSIS

In this project modelling and analysis of multi-storied car parking is done by using
a very popular designing software ETABS. We have chosen ETABS because of its
following advantages: - easy to use interface, conformation with the Indian Standard
Codes, versatile nature of solving any type of problem, accuracy of the solution.

Figure 3.1 3D Model of Structure

The initially provided sections were columns of size 400x400 mm and beams of
size 300x400 mm but these showed failure due to greater span between the columns in this
particular structure. So the section properties are revised and analysed. Beams of size
400x500 mm and staircase beams of size 300x400 mm are adopted. The columns provided
at the edges/ near to the half walls has a size of 500x500 mm and columns at the interior
has size 700x700 mm. Estimation has been done based on the revised structural details and
reinforcement details obtained from design software.

3.6.1 Design Information Sheet

IS 456-2002

Design Codes National Building Code-2005

Kerala Building Code-2011

15
 Intended Use Car Park

Subsoil Conditions Laterite

Subgrade Modulus 20,000 KN/m3

Exposure Conditions Moderate

Foundation Type Mat Foundation

Material data Concrete Grade 30, fck=30 N/mm2

Steel, Fe 415

Self Weight of Concrete 25KN/m3

3.6.2. Structural Summary Sheet

Main Beams 400x500 mm

Staircase Beams 300x400 mm

Slab 200 mm Thick

Columns 300x300 mm, 500x500 mm, 700x700 mm

RC Foundations Mat Foundation 1.5 m thick

Cover 30 mm cover

Ramp 20 mm thick ramp with 1 in 10 slope

16
3.7. ESTIMATION

For all the engineering works it is required to know beforehand the probable cost
of the construction known as the estimated cost. If the estimated cost is greater than the
money available, then attempts are made to reduce the cost. An approximate estimation is
done by using centre line method. UNIFIED STANDARD SCHEDULE OF RATES
(USSOR) is the software used for determining rates of different material in the project for
estimation.

The quantity estimate and approximate cost estimate using SRUSSOR is

provided in Annexure E.

17
 CONCLUSION

Increase in urban growth has increased the number of vehicle users. This has led to
rising traffic problems. Raise in traffic has in-turn raised the problem relating to parking of
vehicle. Apart from this, inadequacy of space required for parking and poor regulation of
the existing parking space has contributed in their own way to enhance the problem. A
solution to this rising problem is by utilizing vertical space rather than expanding
horizontally. This solution can be achieved by constructing multi-storey parking structures.

The multi-storey car parks provides a great advantage to the traffic system in urban
areas by regulating the parking system in the region. This project helps to compromise
majority of the parking problems faced in the railway station, Kannur city. Furthermore
this project act as traffic regulator because of the peculiar location of the project. It diverts
the traffic to the railway station away from the main entrance and towards multi-storey
parking structure.

18
 REFERENCE

1. Car Park Designers Handbook Jim Hill, 2005

2. Traffic Engineering and Transport Planning Dr. L R Kadiyali, 8th edition, 2013

3. National Building Code ,2005

4. Kerala Panchayat Building Rule, 2011.

5. Design Recommendations for multi-storey and underground car parks (3rd

Edition) , June 2002 published by ,The Institution of Structural Engineers.

19
 ANNEXURE-A

PARKING SURVEY DETAILS

A.1. SUMMARY OF LICENSE PLATE METHOD PARKING SURVEY

The above tables are summarized to following results which are tabulated
below:

Table 10 Vehicle details for parking lot 1 and 2 , on first day

Parking Analysis Area: Parking lot 1,2

Table-10 Date:25-7-2014
Area Capacity 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00
No Of
Area

1 200 No of 163 200 182 153 121 134 162 146 123 183
Vehicles
% 81.5 100 91 76.5 60.5 67 81 73 61.5 91.5
2 50 No of 23 48 40 31 33 20 37 22 28 46
Vehicles
% 46 96 80 62 66 40 74 44 56 92
Total No of 186 248 222 184 154 141 199 168 151 229
Vehicles
% 74.4 99.2 88.8 73.6 61.6 56.4 79.6 67.2 60.4 91.6

Table 11 Vehicle details for parking lot 1 and 2 , on second day

Parking Analysis Area: Parking lot 1,2

Table-11 Date:2-8-2014
Area Capacity 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00
No Of
Area
1 200 No of 150 192 186 161 134 126 154 149 176 189
Vehicles
% 75 96 93 80.5 64 63 77 74.5 88 94.5
2 50 No of 37 46 39 30 21 24 19 19 34 42
Vehicles
% 74 92 78 60 42 48 38 38 68 84
Total No of 187 238 225 191 155 150 173 168 210 231
Vehicles
% 74.8 95.2 90 76.4 62 60 69.2 67.2 84 92.4
 Table 12. Vehicle details for parking lot 1 and 2 , on third day

Parking Analysis Area: Parking lot1,2

Table-12 Date:7-8-2014
Area Capacity 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00
No Of
Area
1 200 No of 176 200 191 162 130 112 154 134 183 192
Vehicles
% 73 100 95.5 81 65 56 77 67 91.5 96
2 50 No of 32 48 44 33 27 28 39 36 41 44
Vehicles
% 64 96 88 66 54 56 78 72 82 88
Total No of 208 248 235 195 157 140 193 170 224 236
Vehicles
% 83.2 99.2 94 78 62.8 56 77.2 68 89.6 94.4

Table 13 Total curb parking for the 3 days of survey:

Curb parking 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00

25-07-2014 12 14 10 4 2 3 0 0 5 8
02-08-2014 11 12 7 1 1 0 0 0 5 9
07-08-2014 8 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 7
A.2. PARKING ACCUMULATION CURVES

Parking Accumulation Curve

300
248
250 222 229
199
186 184
No Of Vehicles

200 168
154 151
141
150

100

50

0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time(hrs)

Fig. A.3.1-Parking Accumulation curve 1

Fig 1: The accumulation curve based on the results obtained from Table-10

Parking Accumulation Curve

238 231
250 225
210
187 191
200 173 168
155
No Of Vehicles

150
150

100

50

0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time(hrs)

Fig. A.3.2-Parking Accumulation curve 2

Fig2: The accumulation curve based on the results obtained from Table-11
 Parking Accumulation Curve
300
248
235 236
250 224
208
195 193
No Of Vehicles

200 170
157
140
150

100

50

0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time (hrs)

Fig. A.3.3-Parking Accumulation Curve 3

Fig 3: The accumulation curve based on the results obtained from Table-12

A.3. CALCULATIONS

A.3.1. Parking volume

Total Parking volume obtained on 25-7-2014 = 365+149 = 514 vehicles

Total Parking volume obtained on 02-08-2014 = 365+141 =506 vehicles
Total Parking volume obtained on 07-08-2014 =314+130 =444 vehicles

A.3.2.Parking load

The parking load on 25-7-2014 obtained from Table10 =

{(163+200+182+153+121+134+162+146+123+183)+(23+48+40+31+33+20+
37+22+28+46) }*1/10= 188.2 veh hr
The parking load on 02-08-2014 obtained from table-11 =
{(150+192+186+161+134+126+154+149+176+189)+(31+46+39+30+21+24+
19+19+34+42)}*1/10 = 192.8 veh hr
The parking load on 07-08-2014 obtained from table-12 =
{(176+200+191+162+130+112+154+134+183+192)+(32+48+44+33+27+28+
39+36+41+44)}*1/10 = 200.6 veh hr

A.3.3. Average parking duration

 Average Parking Duration on 25-07-2014 = Parking load/Parking Volume =
1882/514 = 3.66 hrs
Average Parking Duration on 02-08-2014 = 1928/506 = 3.81 hrs
Average Parking Duration on 25-07-2014 = 2006/444 = 4.52 hrs

A.3.4. Parking turnover

Parking turn over on 25-07-2014 = Parking volume/no. of bays available =

514/250 = 2.056 veh/hr/bay
Parking turn over on 2-08-2014 = 506/250 = 2.024 veh/hr/bay
Parking turn over on 07-08-2014 = 444/250 = 1.776 veh/hr/bay

A.3.5. Parking index

Parking index (for 25-07-2014) = (188.2/250)*100 = 75.28%

Parking index (for 2-08-2014) = (192.8/250)*100= 77.12%
Parking index (for 7-08-2014) = (200.6/250)*100 = 80.24%

A.4. RESULTS

The parking problems arises during peak periods. So the parking load during
peak period has to be calculated. The value of curb parking is also considered in the
calculation.

The total traffic/load during peak periods:

Parking load on 25-07-2014 = 262

Parking load on 02-08-2014 = 250

Parking load on 07-08-2014 = 256

For Design considerations we take the maximum load which is 262 veh hr.

The design capacity of the parking structure will be then = (262*100) /75 =
349.33~= 350 veh.
The average parking duration value will be required while calculating the
amount for toll which is beyond the scope of the project.
 ANNEX B

QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY
(A copy of the questionnaire survey is attached)

NAME :
GENDER :
DATE OF BIRTH :
NUMBER OF DEPENDENTS :
ADDRESS :
We the students of Department of Civil Engineering of Vimal Jyothi
Engineering College, chemperi, civil department are presently doing a project on
Planning of multistory parking structure. We request you to kindly fill the
questionnaire below .It is assured that the data provided will be kept confidential.

Do you own a vehicle?

YES NO
Do you ever had difficulty to park at the Railway station?

YES NO
Are you satisfied with the existing pay and park facility available in the station?

YES NO
Have you ever experienced difficulties due to lack of proper traffic arrangement
in railway station?

YES NO
Do you wish better pay and park facility in railway station?

YES NO
How much parking time you require usually?

Name and sign of the surveyed Name and sign of the surveyor
 ANNEX C

C.1. LOCATION OF THE PROJECT

Shows the proposed site for multi-storey parking structure

 ANNEX D

DRAWINGS

D.1. SURVEY SKETCH

D.2 SITE PLAN

D.3.PLAN

D.4.ELEVATION

D.5.SECTIONAL VIEW
 ANNEXURE E.1

QUANTITY ESTIMATE OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE

ITEM
PARTICULARS NO L B H QUANTITY
NO

1 Earth work in excavation 1 100 32.4 2 6480

2 RCC Works in superstructure:

2.a RCC work for columns

column1 292 0.5 0.5 2.7 197.1

column2 5 0.3 0.3 2.7 1.215

column3 12 0.5 0.5 2 6

column4 28 0.5 0.5 1.2 8.4

column5 110 0.7 0.7 2.7 145.53

Total 358.245

2.b RCC work for beams

beam1 310 0.4 0.5 8.3 514.6

beam2 20 0.4 0.5 10 40

beam3 65 0.4 0.5 12 156

beam4 42 0.4 0.5 4.7 39.48

beam5 28 0.4 0.5 3.2 17.92

beam6 28 0.4 0.5 5.1 28.56

beam7 70 0.4 0.5 3 42

beam8 90 0.4 0.5 7 126

beam9 12 0.4 0.3 3.2 4.608

 beam10 5 0.4 0.3 1.85 1.11

beam11 20 0.4 0.5 5.3 21.2

brace(ramp) 20 0.4 0.5 25.04 100.16

Total 1092.994

2.c RCC work for slabs

a) base slab 1 100 32.4 0.2 648

deductions:

lift well 2 5.1 4.7 0.2 9.588

Total 638.412

b) first floor, third floor: 1 100 32.4 0.2 648

deductions:

stair 2 3.2 4.7 0.2 6.016

lift well 2 5.1 4.7 0.2 9.588

ramp 2 24.9 3 0.2 29.88

Total 602.516

c) second floor,fourth floor: 1 100 32.4 0.2 648

deductions:

stair 2 3.2 4.7 0.2 6.016

lift well 2 5.1 4.7 0.2 9.588

ramp 2 24.9 3 0.2 29.88

Total 602.516

d) fifth floor: 1 100 32.4 0.2 648

deductions:

stair 2 3.2 4.7 0.2 6.016

lift well 2 5.1 4.7 0.2 9.588

 ramp 2 24.9 3 0.2 29.88

total: 602.516

e) slab2 4 8.3 4.7 0.12 18.7248

grand total 2445.96

2.d RCCwork for ramps 10 25.04 3 0.2 150.24

2.e RCC work for stairs

main stair

waist slab 24 3.01 1.5 0.15 16.254

landing slab 24 1 3.2 0.15 11.52

Total 27.774

emergency staircase

waist slab 10 3.01 0.9 0.15 4.0635

landing slab 11 1 1.85 0.15 3.0525

Total 7.116

2.f sunshade concrete 5 264 0.6 0.2 158.4

2.g lintel concrete 1 45.2 0.2 0.15 1.356

3 RCC Work in Foundation 1 100 32.4 1.5

4 Masonry Work
 a) ground floor 1 301.6 2.7 0.2 162.864

deductions:

window 6 1.5 1.2 0.2 2.16

door 2 1.1 2.1 0.2 0.924

column 40 0.5 2.7 0.2 10.8

openings(half wall) 1 91 1.7 0.2 30.94

openings(entrance) 2 4 2.7 0.2 4.32

opening(emergency) 1 1.5 2.7 0.2 0.81

Total 112.91

b) 1,2,3,4,floors 5 293 2.7 0.2 791.1

deductions:

Column 200 0.5 2.7 0.2 54

openings(half wall) 5 201.4 1.7 0.2 342.38

opening(emergency) 1 1.5 2.7 0.2 0.81

Total 393.91

c) fifth floor: 1 293 2.7 0.2 158.22

deductions:

column 40 0.5 2.7 0.2 10.8

openings(half wall) 1 248.2 1.7 0.2 84.388

opening(emergency) 1 1.5 2.7 0.2 0.81

Total 62.222

d) sixth floor 1 44.8 2 0.2 17.92

grand total 586.962

5 Plastering with cement mortar 1:4, 12mm thick .

a) ground floor
 wall 2 301.6 2.7 0.12 195.4368

column1 224 0.5 2.7 0.12 36.288

column2 88 0.7 2.7 0.12 19.9584

column3 4 0.3 2.7 0.12 0.3888

deductions:

window 12 1.5 1.2 0.12 2.592

door 4 1.1 2.1 0.12 1.1088

column 80 0.5 2.7 0.12 12.96

openings(half wall) 2 91 1.7 0.12 37.128

openings(entrance) 4 4 2.7 0.12 5.184

opening(emergency) 2 1.5 2.7 0.12 0.972

Total 192.1272

b) 1,2,3,4,floors

Wall 10 293 2.7 0.012 94.932

column1 224 0.5 2.7 0.12 36.288

column2 88 0.7 2.7 0.12 19.9584

column3 4 0.3 2.7 0.12 0.3888

deductions:

column 400 0.5 2.7 0.012 6.48

openings(half wall) 10 201.4 1.7 0.012 41.0856

opening(emergency) 10 1 2.7 0.012 0.324

Total 103.6776

c) fifth floor:

wall 2 293 2.7 0.012 18.9864

column1 48 0.5 2.7 0.012 0.7776

 column2 68 0.5 1.2 0.012 0.4896

deductions:

openings(half wall) 2 248.2 1.7 0.012 10.12656

opening(emergency) 2 1.5 2.7 0.012 0.0972

Total 10.02984

d) sixth floor

wall 2 44.8 2 0.012 2.1504

grand total 307.985

6 Plastering with cement mortar

1:3, 9mm thick for ceiling

a) ground floor, second floor 2 100 32.4 0.009 58.32

deductions:

column1 112 0.5 0.5 0.009 0.252

column2 44 0.7 0.7 0.009 0.19404

stair 4 3.2 4.7 0.009 0.54144

lift well 4 5.1 4.7 0.009 0.86292

Ramp 4 24.9 3 0.009 2.6892

Total 53.7804

b) first floor, third floor 2 100 32.4 0.009 58.32

deductions:

column1 112 0.5 0.5 0.009 0.252

column2 44 0.7 0.7 0.009 0.19404

stair 4 3.2 4.7 0.009 0.54144

lift well 4 5.1 4.7 0.009 0.86292

Ramp 4 24.9 3 0.009 2.6892

 Total 53.7804

c) fourth floor 1 100 32.4 0.009 29.16

deductions:

column1 56 0.5 0.5 0.009 0.126

column2 22 0.7 0.7 0.009 0.09702

stair 2 3.2 4.7 0.009 0.27072

lift well 2 5.1 4.7 0.009 0.43146

ramp 2 24.9 3 0.009 1.3446

Total 26.8902

d) fifth floor, sixth floor 4 4.7 8.3 0.009 1.40436

deductions:

stair 4 3.2 4.7 0.009 0.54144

Total 0.86292

grand total 135.3139

Flooring with c.c 1:4:8, 75mm thick using 40mm nominal size aggregate +surface
7 treatment

a) ground floor 1 100 32.4 0.75 2430

deductions:

lift well 2 5.1 4.7 0.75 35.955

Total 2394.045

b) first floor, third floor 2 100 32.4 0.75 4860

deductions:

column1 112 0.5 0.5 0.75 21

column2 44 0.7 0.7 0.75 16.17

stair 4 3.2 4.7 0.75 45.12

 lift well 4 5.1 4.7 0.75 71.91

Ramp 4 24.9 3 0.75 224.1

Total 4497.87

c) second floor, fourth floor: 2 100 32.4 0.75 4860

deductions:

column1 112 0.5 0.5 0.75 21

column2 44 0.7 0.7 0.75 16.17

stair 4 3.2 4.7 0.75 45.12

lift well 4 5.1 4.7 0.75 71.91

Ramp 4 24.9 3 0.75 224.1

Total 4497.87

d) fifth floor 1 100 32.4 0.75 2430

deductions:

column1 48 0.5 2.7 0.75 48.6

column2 68 0.5 1.2 0.75 30.6

stair 2 3.2 4.7 0.75 22.56

lift well 2 5.1 4.7 0.75 35.955

Ramp 2 24.9 3 0.75 112.05

Total 2210.835

e) sixth floor 2 4.7 8.3 0.75 58.515

deductions:

Stair 2 3.2 4.7 0.75 22.56

Total 35.955

grand total 13636.58

 White washing for new plastered walls, including cost and conveyance of all
8 materials and labor charges etc. complete

cost per item no 6 307.985

cost per item no 7 135.3139

Total 443.299

9 Wood Works

9.a window frame

wooden frame 6 1.5 1.2 0.1 1.08

deductions(openings) 24 0.4 1.1 0.1 1.056

Total 2.136

9.b window shutter

wooden shutter 24 0.4 1.1 0.02 0.2112

deductions(glazed) 24 0.3 1 0.02 0.144

Total 0.0672

9.c door shutter

door1 4 1.1 2.1 0.05 0.462

9.d door1 frame 4 1.1 2.1 0.1 0.924

Deductions 4 1 2.05 0.1 0.82

Total 0.104
 ANNEXURE E.2
Approximate Estimation Using SRUSSOR
nIh /SOUTHERN RAILWAY <./E.1119
.<. 239(vi)c/ C.E.(Revised)Large
Ij n E +iMi E +n/ WORK ORDER UNDER ZONE CONTRACT
Ij-n E +iMi E +n ./Work Order No. nxE/dated

E /Agreement No.

|vE/Authority xvx/Allocation

nE() E Binu
>{ i M Ij-n E E +iMi xxJi xh E { Ex E +n n Vi --
The
Contractor(s) is/are
hereby ordered to carry out the following works under Zone-Contract Agreement herein before referred to :-
Ij -n
E
Mx
U{ n +xS
i
E
G +xS E MM n/Rate in
n {h E E n E h/Desciption of x]/ Schedule E/Amount
Sl. /Item Approx. item of work Unit annexed
No No. of Quantity to the
printed Zone
Basic Contract
Schedule Agreement
of Rates ./Rs. ./Rs.
Schedule . 'A'
1 011011 6480.00 Earthwork in excavation for all 1 cum 103.32 669513.60
kinds of soils
2 021010 293.48 Loading/Unloading F.P.S. / 1000 Nos. 455.38 133644.92
Modular bricks including
manual lead upto 50m and
stacking properly into/from
trucks, trailers or wagons
3 041012 3167.80 Reinforcement concrete- All 1 cum 3690.00 11689182.00
works in buildings above plinth
level.
4 042014 6593.05 Formwork- Lintels, beams, 1 Sqm 206.61 1362190.06
plinth beams, bed blocks,
girders, bressumers and
cantilevers
5 042015 2421.00 Formwork- Columns, 1 Sqm 326.50 790456.50
pillars,
posts and struts
6 042016 108.36 Formwork- Stairs 1 Sqm 502.20 54418.39
(excluding
landings) except spiral-
staircases
7 042024 1.80 Formwork- Small lintels not 1 Sqm 106.51 191.72
exceeding 1.5m clear span,
moulding as in cornices, window
sills, string courses, bands,
copings, bed plates, anchor
blocks and items of similar
shape and size
8 042029 792.00 Formwork- Weather 1 Sqm 618.61 489939.12
shade,
Chajjas, corbels etc. including
edges
9 045014 96765.1 Reinforcement- High 1 Kg 53.05 16838710.84
yield
strength deformed bars
10 046010 3167.80 Additional concrete- Extra for 1 cum 357.32 1131918.30
RCC work in superstructure
above floor two level for every
floor or part thereof
11 048070 15960.3 Vacuum dewatering of all 1 Sqm 7.83 124969.15
0 types & grades concrete by
mechanical means including
draining out the sucked excess
water from concrete & then
finishing the surface smooth
with mechanical trowelling with
suitable equipment etc.
complete. The methodology to
be adopted will be as per user
manual of dewatering &
trawling machine and as directed
by
Engineer.
12 063020 234.78 Laterite masonry- 1 cum 237.70 55807.21
Extra for
Laterite Masonry in
superstructure above plinth level
upto floor two level
13 063030 352.18 Laterite masonry- 1 cum 241.70 85121.91
Extra for
Laterite Masonry in
superstructure above floor two
level for every floor or part
thereof
14 071014 2.24 Woodwork(frames)-Kail, 1 cudm 76.47 171.29
venteak, pillamarudhu or locally
available comparable species of
good country wood (to be listed
by respective railway)
15 072015 12.60 Woodwork(shutters)-Kail, 1 Sqm 2573.45 32425.47
venteak, pillamarudhu or locally
available comparable species of
good country wood (to be listed
by respective railway) - 35mm
thick
16 072023 18.76 Woodwork(panelling)-Kail, 1 Sqm 1629.71 30573.36
venteak, pillamarudhu or locally
available comparable species of
good country wood (to be listed
by respective railway) - 15mm
thick
17 081423 1000.00 Handrail- G.I. pipes 1 Kg 87.85 87850.00
40mm
nominal bore (class B)
18 092011 18182.1 Plastering- 25mm thick with 1 Sqm 123.51 2245672.41
1
12.5mm nominal size stone
aggregate

19 072037 7.20 Window(panels)- Glazing with 1 Sqm 455.73 3281.26

float glass panes 4mm thick
(10kg/sqm)
20 072050 7.20 Deduction for providing frosted 1 Sqm -150.03 -1080.22
glass panes 10 kg/sqm (4mm
thick) instead of ordinary glass
panes 10 kg/sqm (4mm thick) in
doors, windows and clerestory
window shutters. (area of
opening for glass panes
excluding portion inside rebate
shall be measured)
21 046020 15990.3 Flooring- Extra for rendering 1 Sqm 62.20 994601.64
8
smooth the top of suspended
floors, landings and staircases
(treads and risers) with cement
mortar 1:2 (1 cement : 2 coarse
sand) including a floating coat of
neat cement and protecting the
surface with a layer of 7.5cm of
earth laid over
22 042013 12369.0 Flooring- Suspended floors, 1 Sqm 244.27 3021395.17
8
roofs, landings, balconies, FOB
slabs, walkway slabs and access
platform
23 109050 18182.1 Roofing- Water proofing of 1 Sqm 225.50 4100065.81
1 roofs and exposed concrete
surfaces by cleaning and
preparing the surfaces by acid
etching; treating it with a two-
layer plaster; the first layer 5mm
thick with cement (OPC or slag),
admixed with an octadecanoic
acid based cementitious
waterproofing compound in the
weight ratio of
50:3 for cement and
waterproofing compound;
finally providing a 12mm thick
cement sand (1:4) plaster,
enriched with polyester fiber,
and curing the plastered surface;
the treatment shall be
impermeable under a water head
of 20m (polyester triangular
fiber and removal of existing
damaged waterproofing system,
PCC, Lime Terracing etc., if any
to be paid extra under separate
item)
24 111011 25190.2 Cement plaster- 1:4 (1 cement : 1 Sqm 96.19 2423046.30
1
4 fine sand)
25 111012 15049.1 Cement plaster- 1:6 (1 cement : 1 Sqm 96.19 1447580.62
8
6 fine sand)
26 115011 40239.3 White washing and 1 Sqm 9.24 371811.96
colour
 9 washing- New work (three or
more coats)
27 121051 200.00 White washing and colour 1 Sqm 49.59 9918.00
washing- Two or more coats on
new work
28 141021 250.00 Pipe and fittings- 100mm dia. 1 metre 191.03 47757.50
S.W. pipe
29 131013 200.00 Pipe and fittings- 2025 (25mm 1 metre 241.74 48348.00
OD) pipe
30 151011 4.00 Sanitary works- White 1 Each 3550.36 14201.44
Vitreous China Orissa pattern
W.C. pan of size
580mmx440mm with integral
type foot rests
31 151021 2.00 Sanitary works- W.C. pan with 1 Each 2701.30 5402.60
ISI marked white solid plastic
seat and lid
32 151073 4.00 Sanitary works- White vitreous 1 Each 1725.01 6900.04
china wash basin size 550mmx
400mm with a pair of 15mm
C.P. brass pillar taps
33 181010 250.00 Demolishing- Demolishing lime 1 cum 183.73 45932.50
concrete and disposal of material
within 50m lead
34 182013 300.00 Demolishing- In cement mortar 1 cum 444.52 133356.00
35 185020 30.00 Demolishing- Taking out doors, 1 Each 41.48 1244.40
windows, clerestory window,
cupboard shutters only (steel or
wood) including stacking within
50m lead
36 124031 35.00 Polishing- New work (two or 1 Sqm 51.46 1801.10
more coats)
37 011040 3240.00 Earthwork- Extra for manual 1 cum 15.23 49345.20
compaction of earthwork, where
permitted, with rammers
38 021100 3303.3 Transport- Loading/Unloading 1 MT 38.43 126945.819
cement in bags, coal-tar, asphalt,
paint etc. including lead upto
50m and stacking properly
into/from trucks, trailors or
wagons
39 021510 48.00 Materials-Hiring of JCB 1 Hour 857.91 41179.68
Machine (in good working
condition) for leveling and
dressing ground / dismantling
structures including disposal of
debris through dumpers etc. with
contractors labour, JCB
machine, machine operator, fuel
etc. The contractor shall arrange
road permit for vehicle for all the
States of operation, as per
instructions of engineer in-
charge and vehicle shall not be
more than three years old.
Payment shall be made for actual
working hours at site.
40 041011 4860.00 Foundation concrete -All work 1 cum 3426.21 16651380.60
upto plinth level including raft
foundation of washable aprons,
HS tank, pile cap, footings of
FOB and Platform shelter etc.
41 042011 3637.20 Shuttering in foundation- 1 Sqm 144.80 526666.56
Foundations, footings, bases of
columns, raft foundation of
washable aprons, Pile caps,
Footings of FOB etc.
42 252040 3303.30 Ordinary Portland Cement 1 MT 5290.00 17474442.19
Grade43

Total 83368280.41
Add 10% for mid section 10 % 8336828.41
91705108.45
f/P]/Enhanced/Diminished % 0.00
by
E E MM E /Total 91705108.45
Approximate value of work