369 Full
369 Full
369 Full
Plastics
http://jep.sagepub.com/
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
Additional services and information for Journal of Elastomers and Plastics can be found at:
Subscriptions: http://jep.sagepub.com/subscriptions
Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
Citations: http://jep.sagepub.com/content/41/4/369.refs.html
A. M. MOHD YUSOF
Department of Polymer Technology, Malaysian Institute of
Chemical & Bio-Engineering Technology, Universiti Kuala
Lumpur, Lot 1988, Kawasan Perindustrian Bandar Vendor
Taboh Naning, 78000 Alor Gajah, Melaka, Malaysia
KEY WORDS: polylactic acid (PLA), rice starch, epoxidized natural rubber
(ENR), natural weathering, composites.
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL
Materials
PLA was supplied by Mitsui Chemicals Inc., Japan. Melt flow index
(MFI) and density of PLA were 64.8 g/10 min (at 1908C and 2.16 kg load)
and 1.23 g/cm3, respectively. Rice starch (RS) was obtained from TIGA
Gajah Cho Heng Sdn. Bhd., Malaysia. It was a fine white powder, which
is granular in form with particle size range from 2 to 8 mm and moisture
content of 11.5%. Two types of thermoplastic starch (TPS) were
prepared, i.e., rice starchglycerol mixture (SG) and rice starch
glycerolwater mixture (SGW). A standard mixture of rice starch and
glycerol (SG) (ratio 4/1) was prepared by using of a mechanical stirrer
(15 min, 100 rpm). The starch-glycerol mixture was left at room
temperature (25 38C) for 24 h to swell the RS granules. TPS was
Materials compositions
Materials designation PLA (wt%) RS (wt%) SG (wt%) SGW (wt%) ENR (phr)
PLA 100
PLA/RS20 80 20
PLA/RS20/ENR5 80 20 5
PLA/RS20/ENR10 80 20 10
PLA/SG20 80 20
PLA/SG20/E5 80 20 5
PLA/SG20/E10 80 20 10
PLA/SGW20 80 20
PLA/SGW20/E5 80 20 5
PLA/SGW20/E10 80 20 10
Sample Preparation
Natural Weathering
Mechanical Properties
Morphological Studies
Mechanical Properties
Exposure time
Tensile
Materials properties Control 2 weeks 4 weeks 6 weeks 8 weeks
PLA Tensile 3.3 3.1 (93.9) 3.0 (90.9) 2.8 (84.8) 2.6 (78.8)
modulus (GPa)
Tensile 57.8 46.5 (80.4) 43.3 (74.9) 39.6 (68.5) 33.1 (57.3)
strength (MPa)
Elongation 3.8 3.1 (81.6) 2.8 (73.7) 2.3 (60.5) 1.9 (50.0)
at break (%)
PLA/RS20 Tensile 3.8 3.0 (78.9) 2.9 (76.3) 2.8 (73.7) 2.5 (65.8)
modulus (GPa)
Tensile 44.0 34.9 (79.3) 32.4 (73.6) 29.5 (67.0) 25.0 (56.8)
strength (MPa)
Elongation 2.5 1.9 (76.0) 1.6 (64.0) 1.4 (56.0) 1.0 (40.0)
at break (%)
PLA/RS20/E5 Tensile 3.3 2.9 (87.8) 2.8 (84.8) 2.5 (75.7) 2.4 (72.7)
modulus (GPa)
Tensile 49.0 27.1 (55.3) 25.1 (51.2) 23.6 (48.2) 17.1 (34.9)
strength (MPa)
Elongation 3.4 2.1 (67.7) 1.8 (52.9) 1.6 (47.1) 0.9 (26.5)
at break (%)
PLA/RS20/E10 Tensile 2.8 2.5 (89.3) 2.4 (85.7) 2.2 (78.6) 2.1 (75.0)
modulus (GPa)
Tensile 37.2 16.7 (44.9) 14.6 (39.2) 12.8 (34.4) 12.0 (32.3)
strength (MPa)
Elongation 2.6 1.7 (65.4) 1.3 (50.0) 1.0 (38.5) 0.9 (34.6)
at break (%)
PLA/SG20 Tensile 3.7 2.5 (67.6) 2.3 (62.2) 2.1 (56.8) 2.0 (54.1)
modulus (GPa)
Tensile 37.0 15.8 (42.7) 13.9 (37.6) 10.4 (28.1) 8.8 (23.8)
strength (MPa)
Elongation 3.1 1.6 (51.6) 1.4 (45.2) 1.2 (38.7) 0.9 (29.0)
at break (%)
PLA/SG20/E5 Tensile 3.1 2.33 (75.2) 1.9 (61.3) 1.66 (53.5) 1.47 (47.4)
modulus (GPa)
Tensile 28.6 10.0 (34.9) 7.5 (26.2) 6.3 (22.0) 4.7 (16.4)
strength (MPa)
Elongation 3.5 1.3 (37.1) 1.2 (34.3) 1.1 (31.4) 0.8 (22.9)
at break (%)
PLA/SG20/E10 Tensile 3.0 2.0 (66.7) 1.7 (56.7) 1.5 (50.0) 1.3 (43.3)
modulus (GPa)
Tensile 23.4 8.0 (34.2) 6.3 (26.9) 4.6 (19.7) 4.1 (17.5)
strength (MPa)
Elongation 2.7 1.2 (44.4) 1.1 (40.7) 0.9 (33.3) 0.7 (25.9)
at break (%)
(Continued)
Table 2. Continued.
Exposure time
Tensile
Materials properties Control 2 weeks 4 weeks 6 weeks 8 weeks
PLA/SGW20 Tensile 3.6 2.8 (77.8) 2.4 (66.7) 1.7 (47.2) 1.3 (36.1)
modulus (GPa)
Tensile 34.9 16.4 (47.0) 14.3 (41.0) 14.0 (40.1) 13.5 (38.7)
strength (MPa)
Elongation 3.0 1.7 (56.7) 1.5 (50.0) 1.4 (46.7) 0.9 (30.0)
at break (%)
PLA/SGW20/E5 Tensile 3.1 2.5 (80.6) 1.9 (61.3) 1.8 (58.1) 1.7 (54.8)
modulus (GPa)
Tensile 29.1 13.7 (47.1) 12.4 (42.6) 10.9 (37.5) 9.0 (30.9)
strength (MPa)
Elongation 3.4 1.7 (50.0) 1.6 (47.1) 1.3 (38.2) 0.8 (23.5)
at break (%)
PLA/SGW20/E10 Tensile 2.8 2.0 (71.4) 1.8 (64.3) 1.6 (57.1) 1.5 (53.6)
modulus (GPa)
Tensile 25.3 11.5 (45.5) 9.5 (37.5) 8.5 (33.6) 7.5 (29.6)
strength (MPa)
Elongation 2.8 1.5 (53.6) 1.3 (46.4) 1.1 (39.3) 0.8 (28.6)
at break (%)
CO, NH, and SiO types of polymer bonds [11]. In this study, cleavage
of the CO bonds in PLA backbone chain may be attributed to the
UV radiation. Copinet et al. [9] reported that UV treatment (via UV light
with 315 nm) could catalyze the hydrolysis of ester linkage of PLA.
Several radical may be formed as a result from the cleavage at CO of the
main chain and the breaking of ester bonds as well as the radicals
produced from the cleavage at CC bonds of the main PLA macro-
molecular chains upon UV degradation [9].
Photo-degradation of polymers is basically initiated at some point
in the polymer where UV light is absorbed. The basic structure of
PLA containing chromophoric groups (CO) that could absorb solar UV
radiation. This may enhanced the susceptibility of PLA to premature
outdoor failure via photo-degradation. Carbonyl photo-cleavage reac-
tions may be the major cause of photodegradation in a wide range of
carbonyl-containing polymers as well as in the polymer that always
contain at least traces of carbonyl function as a result of oxidation
during processing (e.g., formation of carbonyl, hydroxyl, aldehyde,
ketone, carboxylic acid, and ester functional groups).
Recall that the chemical structure of PLA containing tertiary
hydrogen atoms (i.e., hydrogen atom in the branching CH3 groups
where adjacent to the chain backbone), thus it may be prone to the
oxidation degradation. Oxidative degradation of polymers causes them
to become embrittled and decreases their impact strength due to chain
scission and crosslinking reactions. As a result of oxidation, there is
also a decrease in both tensile strength and elongation at break of the
polymer [8].
The effects of RS and modified RS (SG and SGW) on the tensile
properties of PLA upon subjected to natural weathering were also
studied. Tensile strength and elongation at break of the exposed PLA/
RS20 composites generally decreased with the duration of natural
weathering. Recall that RS containing abundance of hydroxyl group,
which could prone to moisture absorption due to its hygroscopic nature.
The rainfall is relatively frequent during the natural weathering tests.
This may enhance the susceptibility of the RS to absorb rain water. It is
believed that the water molecules will be absorbed by the RS particles,
which were located in the outer surface, followed by the penetration of
the water molecules into the inner layer of the exposed PLA/RS20
specimens. In addition, some RS particles on the skin layer of weathered
PLA/RS20 samples were leached out due to the effects of rainfall.
Preechawong et al. [12] suggested that starch is prone to moisture and
water absorption due to its hygroscopic nature. Our previous study on
the water absorption of PLA/RS composites showed that the diffusion
bonds (double bond, CC) [14]. Poh and Lee [15] have investigated the
thermal oxidative aging of ENR and found that during thermal-
oxidative process, epoxide ring opening reaction takes place resulting
in the formation of free radicals. The radical will then form hydroper-
oxides which will subsequently react with ENR and generate further
by-products e.g., alcohol, carboxylic acid, and ketone groups. Thus it is
believed that the incorporation of ENR50 could further facilitate the
degradation of PLA/RS20 composites upon subjected to natural weath-
ering with a tropical climate condition.
Morphological Properties
Figure 1(a)(c) show the SEM micrographs taken from the tensile
fractured surface of un-weathered samples of PLA/RS20/E5, PLA/SG20/
E5, and PLA/SGW20/E5 (i.e., as control). Figure 2 (a)(c) show the SEM
micrographs taken from the tensile fractured surface of weathered
samples of PLA/RS20/E5, PLA/SG20/E5, and PLA/SGW20/E5 composites
for 8 weeks in natural environment. It can be seen that all weathered PLA
composites fractured in a brittle manner. Fibrillated structure and plastic
deformation was totally disappeared (c.f. Figure 2(a)(c)). Starch
detachment from the PLA matrix could be observed on the fractured
plane. In addition, inter-connected cracks were revealed on the fractured
50 m
1a
50 m 1b 50 m 1c
Figure 1. SEM micrographs taken from the tensile fractured surface of un-weathered
(a) PLA/RS20/E5, (b) PLA/SG20/E5, and (c) PLA/SGW20/E5.
Starch detachment
2a
Inter-connected cracks
Inter-connected cracks
2b 2c
Figure 2. SEM micrographs taken from the tensile fractured surface of weathered
(a) PLA/RS20/E5, (b) PLA/SG20/E5, and (c) PLA/SGW20/E5.
3a 3b
10m 10m
Figure 3. SEM micrographs taken from the samples surface of weathered (a) PLA/SG20
and (b) PLA/SG20/E5 composites.
CONCLUSIONS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES