Case - 1
Case - 1
Case - 1
The Causes
The high CAD was primarily was financed with short term borrowings .The BOT gave a
free hand to financial intermediaries in Thailand to borrow foreign currency at lower rates
and lend to native customers at high rates. As the Bhat was pegged to USD, there was
not much risk. However, the foreign inflows into Thailand were primarily used in non-
productive investments such as real estate .Real estate cannot be traded and hence
would not contribute to reduce the CAD. This also led to situation where prices of assets
such as land rose largely. In order to absorb the excess amount of Baht in the market,
BOT had to buy Baht by selling their foreign reserves. The foreign exchange reserves
gradually reduced to alarming levels in 1997 to be able to fix the Baht. Moreover, by 1997,
investors started pulling out their funds out of Thailand further depleting foreign reserves.
In the end, BOT had no option but to devalue the currency.
The Solution
1. Defend it
The BOT cannot afford to hold a fixed exchange regime due to the following reasons:
This seems the reasonable decision as it temporarily allows the currency to devalue
according to market forces, but prevents it from devaluing to an extent that is detrimental
to the countrys economy. The partial float will allow the Baht to reduce the disequilibrium
in CAD. At the same time, it wouldnt allow the Baht to devalue to a level that makes it
imports extremely costly.
Baht will initially depreciate due to the high CAD. A large current account deficit should
put downward pressure on Baht. If Thailand imports more than exports then this involves
selling Bahts to buy foreign currency to be able to buy the imports. A depreciating Baht
will make Thailand exports cheaper, imports more expensive and thus help to reduce
CAD and reduce the disequilibrium.
This is not a feasible solution as it enhances the chances of further speculative attacks.
Moreover, the short term borrowings of financial intermediaries will become costly and
may lead to a bank run.
4. Float it freely
This is again not a feasible solution as the short term borrowings of financial
intermediaries will become costly and may lead to a bank run.