Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 108 views

    IP Readings

    Uploaded by

    Chow Momville Estimo
    This document provides an overview and summary of key intellectual property law concepts and cases in the Philippines. It begins with a brief introduction of reference materials on IP law in the Philippines. The bulk of the document then lists and summarizes illustrative court cases related to different aspects of copyright, trademark, patent and other IP rights based on Philippine statutes and jurisprudence. It concludes with references to provisions in the IP Code and rules relating to enforcement of IP rights.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    IP Readings

    Uploaded by

    Chow Momville Estimo
    108 views3 pages
    This document provides an overview and summary of key intellectual property law concepts and cases in the Philippines. It begins with a brief introduction of reference materials on IP law in the Philippines. The bulk of the document then lists and summarizes illustrative court cases related to different aspects of copyright, trademark, patent and other IP rights based on Philippine statutes and jurisprudence. It concludes with references to provisions in the IP Code and rules relating to enforcement of IP rights.

    Original Description:

    Law

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides an overview and summary of key intellectual property law concepts and cases in the Philippines. It begins with a brief introduction of reference materials on IP law in the Philippines. The bulk of the document then lists and summarizes illustrative court cases related to different aspects of copyright, trademark, patent and other IP rights based on Philippine statutes and jurisprudence. It concludes with references to provisions in the IP Code and rules relating to enforcement of IP rights.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    108 views3 pages

    IP Readings

    Uploaded by

    Chow Momville Estimo
    This document provides an overview and summary of key intellectual property law concepts and cases in the Philippines. It begins with a brief introduction of reference materials on IP law in the Philippines. The bulk of the document then lists and summarizes illustrative court cases related to different aspects of copyright, trademark, patent and other IP rights based on Philippine statutes and jurisprudence. It concludes with references to provisions in the IP Code and rules relating to enforcement of IP rights.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    Reference Book - Essentials of Intellectual Property Law

    by Ernesto C. Salao (A guidebook on RA 8293 and other Related Laws


    Republic Act 8293 or the IP Code of the Philippines (3rd edition) 2016
    Reference websites : www.wipo.int ; www.ipophil.gov.ph
    KISS Guide in Intellectual Property

    Illustrative Cases re different kinds of IP


    (no unfair competition in copyright)
    1. Pearl & Dean vs. Shoemart Inc, GR No. 148222, Aug 15, 2003
    2. Kho vs. CA, GR No. 115758, Mar. 19, 2002
    3. Air Philippines Corporation v.Pennswell, Inc.
    G.R. No. 172835, December 13, 2007
    > Constitution Secs XII and XIV
    ASSIGNMENT
    > Sec. 2 of IP Code Pages 273-344 of Salao's Book
    Copyright being a statutory right
    IP Code Sections 2,3 and 4 Secs. 171-229 of the IP Code (Cases for 5.1 to 5.4)
    pages 1-56 5. Joaquin v. Drilon G.R No. 108946, 28 Jan 1999)
    6. Ching v. Salinas, GRN. 161295, June 29, 2005
    See WIPO website and ipophil.gov.ph 7. United Feature Syndicate Inc., vs. Munsingwear Manufacturing
    Company, G.R. No. 76193 November 9, 1989

    Cases Assigned for 5.1 to 5.4


    Functions and Jurisdiction of IPO 8. Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone 499 US 340 (1991)
    9. Manly Sportwear Manufacturing vs. Dadodette
    4. Pest Management Association of the Philippines vs. GR.N. 165306, September 20, 2005
    Fertilizer and Pesticides Authority, Secretary of DA, 10. Ong Ching Kian Chuan vs. CA, Lorenzo Tan,G.R. No. 130360
    G.R. NO. 156041 , February 21, 2007
    August 15, 2001 Columbia Pictures Inc. vs. CA, GR No. 110318, Aug 28, 1996
    11. Santos vs.McCullough PrintingG.R. No. L-19439,October 31, 1964
    12. Brandir Int'l Inc., vs. Cascade Pacific Lumber Company, Cases for 5.15
    844 F 2D. 1142, U.S CA Second Circuit, Dec. 2, 1987 Pearl & Dean vs. Shoemart Inc, GR No. 148222, Aug 15, 2003
    Cases for 5.5 to 5.12 Kho vs. CA, GR No. 115758, Mar. 19, 2002
    13. Lotus v. Borland US Court of Appeals No. 93-2214 Secs. 121-170 of the IP Code
    14. Triad Systems vs.Southeastern Express Co USC, 8th Circuit Pages 123-221 of Salao's book
    August 31, 1995 Section 21, RA 8239 or the IP Code
    15. Los Angeles News Service vs. Frank Tullo, 973F. 2D 791 Cases for 6.2 - 6.7
    16. Campbell vs. Acuff-Rose Music, - US Court of Appeals for Ang Tibay v. Teodoro (74 Phil 50)
    the 6th Circuit, March 7, 1994 Philip Morris, Inc. v. CA (224 SCRA 624, Dissenting Opinion
    17. Bayanihan Music vs. BMG, Jose Mari Chan,
    Mirpuri vs. CA
    GR No. 166337, March 7, 2005
    Victorias Milling Co. vs. Ong Su (79 SCRA 207)
    18. Filscap v. Tan ( 148 SCRA 461, 16 March 1987)
    Unno Commercial vs. Gen Milling Corp, 205 Phils.707
    19. ABS CBN Corp vs. Gozon, Duavit, et.al, G.R. No. 195956

    March 11, 2015
    Philip Morris, Inc. v. CA (274 SCRA 576)
    20. Habana vs. Robles,GRN 131522, July 19, 1999
    Shangrila Hotels vs. DGCI, GR No. 159938, March 31, 2006

    Asia Brewery vs. CA, GR No. 103543, 5 July 1993


    Cases for 6.8-6.9
    Sterling Products vs. Faber Farbenfabriken AG 27 SCRA 1214

    Asia Brewery v. CA (ibid, dissenting opinion)


    ASSIGNMENT
    Cases for 6.11 a)
    Cases for 5.13 -5.14 Pag-asa Industrial Corp. vs. CA, 118 SCRA 526
    NBI-Microsoft Corp. vs. Hwang GR No. 147043, June 21, 2005 Mc Donald's Corp. vs. LC Big Mak Burger, GR No. 243993,
    Microsoft Corp.vs. Maxicorp Inc.,GR No. 140946, Sept. 3, 2004 August 18, 2004
    20th Century Fox Film Corp v. CA , L-76649-51, Aug 19, 1988
    Columbia Pictures Inc. vs. CA, 237 SCRA 367 (1994)
    ASSIGNMENT
    Cases for 6.11a
    Mc Donald's Corp. vs. MacJoy Fastfood Corp,GR No 16615
    February 2, 2007
    Cases for 6.11b)
    Ang v. Teodoro (74 Phil 50) ASSIGNMENT
    Sta. Ana vs. Maliwat ([G.R. No. L-23023. August 31, 1968.] Ses. 21 -84 of the IP Code
    Phil. Refining Co. vs. Ng Sam[G.R.No. L-26676.July 30, 1982.]
    Mighty Corp. vs. E.J Gallo Winery [G.R. No. 154342
    July 14, 2004
    Cases for item VII
    Manzano vs. CA G.R.No.113388.Sept 5, 1997
    Cases for 6.10c
    Aguas vs. de Leon, 111 SCRA 238 ,1982
    Ang v. Teodoro, ibid
    Maguan vs. CA, 146 SCRA 107 , 1986
    Puma Sportschufabriken v. CA (G.R. No.75067, 26 Feb 1998)
    Godines vs. CA, GR No. 97343, Sept. 13, 1993
    Schuartz vs. CA, GR No. 113407, July 12, 2000
    Cases for 6.11
    Creser Precision System vs.CA, GR No. 118708,Feb. 2, 1998
    La Chemise Lacoste vs. Hernandez, [G.R. Nos. L-63796-97.
    G. Sell v. Yap Jue, 12 Phil 519, 1909
    May 21, 1984
    Smith Kline v. CA, 409 SCRA 33 (2003)
    Kabushi Kaisha Isetan v. IAC, [G.R. No. 75420. Nov 15, 1991.]

    Esso Standard v. CA [G.R. No. L-29971. August 31, 1982.] Pages 286-312 of the IP Code
    A.M No. 02-1-06-SC Rule on Search and Seizure in Civil Actions for
    Cases for 6.17 to 6.20 Infringement of IPR (took effect on Feb. 15, 2002)
    1. Mighty Corp. vs. E.J Gallo Winery [G.R. No. 154342 July 14, 2004]
    People et.al vs. Choi, GR No. 152950, Aug. 3, 2006
    2 Mc Donald cases
    Solid Triangle Sales Corp.vs. Sheriff, 422 Phils. 72,83, 2001
    Societe Des Produits Nestles v. CA, 356 SCRA 207, 2001)
    Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. vs. Bright Tech
    Levi Strauss vs. Clinton Aparelle,GR No. 138900,Sept 20,2005
    G.R. No. 169156, February 15, 2007
    Samson vs. Daway, GR Nos. 160054-55, 21 July 2004

    You might also like