Consti VIII Judiciary
Consti VIII Judiciary
Consti VIII Judiciary
(property or
personal rights) involved which are legally demandable and enforceable. It is one which is proper to be examined or decided in
courts of justice because its determination would not involve an encroachment upon the legislative or executive power.
A POLITICAL QUESTION is one which under the Constitution is to be decided by the people in their sovereign capacity, or in regard
to which full discretionary authority has been delegated to the legislative or executive branch of the government. It is concerned
with issues dependent upon the wisdom, not the validity or legality, of a particular measure or a contested act.
1. Judicial power is the authority to settle justiciable controversies or disputes involving rights that are enforceable and demandable
before the courts of justice or the redress of wrongs for violations of such rights.
2. Vested in the Supreme Court and such lower courts as may be established by law.
3. Since the courts are given judicial power and nothing more, courts may neither attempt to assume or be compelled to perform
non-judicial functions. They may not be charged with administrative functions except when reasonably incidental to the fulfillment
of their duties.
4. In order that courts may exercise this power, there must exist the following:
5. Judicial power cannot be exercised in vacuum. Without any laws from which rights arise and which are violated, there can be no
recourse to the courts.
1. The duty of the courts to settle actual controversies involving rights which are legally demandable and enforceable; and
1. To determine whether or not there has been a grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction on the
part of any branch or instrumentality of the government.
Political Questions:
1. A political question is one the resolution of which has been vested by the Constitution exclusively in either the people, in the
exercise of their sovereign capacity, or in which full discretionary authority has been delegated to a co-equal branch of the
Government.
2. Thus, while courts can determine questions of legality with respect to governmental action, they cannot review government
policy and the wisdom thereof, for these questions have been vested by the Constitution in the Executive and Legislative
Departments.
1. Defining enforceable and demandable rights and prescribing remedies for violations of such rights; and
2. Determining the court with jurisdiction to hear and decide controversies or disputes arising from legal rights.
3. Thus, Congress has the power to define, prescribe and apportion the jurisdiction of various courts.
1. BUT, Congress cannot deprive the Supreme Court of its jurisdiction over cases provided for in the Constitution.
2. Creation and abolition of courts:
1. The power to create courts implies the power to abolish and even re-organize courts.
2. BUT this power cannot be exercised in a manner which would undermine the security of tenure of the judiciary.
3. If the abolition/re-organization is done in good faith and not for political or personal reasons, then it is VALID. (same
rule applies for civil servants)
Sec. 3. FISCAL AUTONOMY
1. The entire judiciary shall enjoy fiscal autonomy.
2. Annual appropriations for the judiciary cannot be reduced below the amount appropriated for the previous year.
3. Once approved, appropriations shall be automatically and regularly released.
Secs. 4-7; 12 JUDICIARY
Composition of the Supreme Court:
1. Chief Justice and
2. 14 Associate Justices
Note: Members of the Supreme Court and of other courts established by law shall not be designated to any agency performing
quasi-judicial or administrative functions.
1. The Judicial and Bar Council is under the supervision of the SC.
3. Members of the Judiciary are NOT exempt from payment of income tax.
1. Members of the SC and judges of the lower courts hold office during good behavior until
a. Only the SC en banc has jurisdiction to discipline or dismiss judges of lower courts.
b. Disciplinary action/dismissal: Majority vote of SC Justices who took part in the deliberations and voted therein.
3. Removal of SC Justices:
a. Only by IMPEACHMENT.
a. Treaty
c. Law.
a. Presidential decrees
b. Proclamations
c. Orders
d. Instructions
e. Ordinances; and
f. Other regulations.
5. Cases where SC modifies or reverses a doctrine or principle of law laid down by the SC en banc or by a division.
1. Must be decided with the concurrence of a majority of the members who took part in the deliberations and voted thereon.
Powers of the SC
b. Petitions for certiorari, prohibiton, mandamus, quo warranto, and habeas corpus.
2. SC has APPELLATE jurisdiction over final judgments and orders in the following:
1. treaty
2. international or executive agreement
3. law
4. presidential decree
5. proclamation
6. order
7. instruction
8. ordinance, or
9. regulation;
1. tax
2. impost
3. assessment or
4. toll or
5. any penalty imposed in relation thereto;
d. Criminal cases where the penalty imposed is reclusion perpetua or higher; and
Note: Temporary assignment shall not exceed 6 months without the consent of the judge concerned.
a. It should provide a simplified and inexpensive procedure for the speedy disposition of cases.
6. Appoint ALL officials and employees of the Judiciary, in accordance with Civil Service Law.
7. Exercise administrative supervision over ALL courts and the personnel thereof.
1. Reached in consultation before being assigned to a member for the writing of the opinion.
2. A certification to this effect must be signed by the Chief Justice and attached to the record of the case and served upon the
parties.
3. Members of the SC who took no part, or who dissented or abstained must state the reasons therefore.
Note: This procedure shall also be observed by all lower collegiate courts (CA, CTA, and the Sandiganbayan).
JUDICIAL REVIEW
Definition
1. Judicial Review is the power of the SC to declare a law, treaty, ordinance etc. unconstitutional.
2. Lower courts may also exercise the power of judicial review, subject to the appellate jurisdiction of the SC.
3. Only SC decisions are precedent, and thus, only SC decisions are binding on all.
Requisites Code: [A R S Co R]
1. An ACTUAL CASE calling for the exercise of judicial power
2. The question involved must be RIPE FOR ADJUDICATION, i.e. the government act must have had an adverse effect on the person
challenging it.
3. The person challenging the governmental act must have STANDING, i.e. a personal and substantial interest in the case such that
he has sustained, or will sustain, direct injury as a result of its enforcement.
4. The question of Constitutionality must be raised in the first instance, or at the earliest opportunity.
5. Resolution of the issue of constitutionality is unavoidable or is the very lis mota.
Effect of a declaration of unconstitutionality:
1. Prior to the declaration that a particular law is unconstitutional, it is considered as an operative fact which at that time had to be
complied with.
2. Thus, vested rights may have been acquired under such law before it was declared unconstitutional.
3. These rights are not prejudiced by the subsequent declaration that the law is unconstitutional.
1. Decisions MUST state clearly and distinctly the facts and the law on which it is based.
2. Refusal to give due course to petitions for review and motions for reconsideration must state the legal basis for such refusal.
3. Memorandum decisions, where the appellate court adopts the findings of fact and law of the lower court, are allowed as long as
the decision adopted by reference is attached to the Memorandum for easy reference.
4. These rules only apply to courts. They do not apply to quasi-judicial or administrative bodies nor to military tribunals.