7/5/17 Shakopee City Council Meeting Agenda

Shakopee City Council
July 5, 2017
7:00 PM
City Hall 129 Holmes St.
Shakopee Mission Statement

The Mission of the City of Shakopee is to provide the opportunity to live, work and play in a community
with a proud past, promising future, and small town atmosphere within a metropolitan setting.
A. Keep Shakopee a safe and healthy community where residents can pursue active and quality lifestyles.
B. Positively manage the challenges and opportunities presented by growth, development and change.
C. Maintain the City's strong financial health.
D. Maintain, improve and create strong partnerships with other public and private sector entities.
E. Deliver effective and efficient public services by a staff of well-trained, caring and professional employees.
F. Housekeeping item.
Mayor Bill Mars presiding

1. Roll Call
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Approval of Agenda
4. Consent Business - (All items listed in this section are anticipated to be routine. After
a discussion by the Mayor there will be an opportunity for members of the Council to
remove any items from the consent agenda for individual discussion. Those items
removed will be considered following the Public hearing portion of the agenda. Items
remaining on the Consent Agenda will not be discussed and will be approved in one
motion.)
A. Police and Fire
*4. A.1. *Declare Surplus Property
B. Public Works and Engineering
*4. B.1. *Assessment Policy Revision
*4. B.2. *Extended Construction Hours - Ridge Creek 1st Addition
C. Parks and Recreation
*4. C.1. *Donations to Fun For All Playground
D. General Administration
*4. D.1. *City Council Minutes
*4. D.2. *Mobile Communications Policy
*4. D.3. *Massage Business and Massage Therapist License
*4. D.4. *On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses for MCMC LLC dba Muddy Cow
Page 1 of 334
*4. D.5. *Gambling Premise Permit for Shako Valley Amateur Hockey Association
E. Planning and Development
*4. E.1. *Blue Cross Funding for Comprehensive Plan Community Engagement
Activities
5. RECOGNITION OF INVOLVED CITIZENS BY CITY COUNCIL - Provides an
opportunity for the public to address the Council on items which are not on the agenda.
Comments should not be more than five minutes in length. The Mayor may adjust that
time limit based upon the number of persons seeking to comment. This comment
period may not be used to make personal attacks, to air personality grievances, to
make political endorsements or for political campaign purposes. Council Members will
not enter into a dialogue with citizens, and questions from Council will be for
clarification only. This period will not be used to problem solve issues or to react to
the comments made, but rather for informational purposes only.
6. Business removed from consent will be discussed at this time
7. General Business
A. Parks and Recreation
7. A.1. Park Dedication Fees
B. General Administration
7. B.1. 2016 Annual Financial Report, Audit Presentation and Review by Staff
from BerganKDV
C. Planning and Development
7. C.1. Text Amendment to Allow Residential Use in Major Rec Zone
7. C.2. Orderly Annexation Agreement with Jackson Township
7. C.3. Set Public Hearing for Canterbury Tax Increment Financing District
7. C.4. Request for Extended Construction Hours by School District Contractor
7. C.5. Update on City Owned Property at 69/169
7. C.6. Vierling Drive Improvements Contract
8. Reports
8.A. Liaison and Administrator
8.B. City Bill List
9. Other Business
10. Adjournment to July 18, 2017 at 7:00 p.m.
Page 2 of 334
*4.A.1.

July 5, 2017
FROM: Chris Dellwo, Captain

TO: Mayor and Council Members
Subject:
Declare Seven Forfeited Vehicles as Surplus Property
Policy/Action Requested:
Declare seven forfeited vehicles as surplus property and authorize their disposal.
Recommendation:
Approve the policy/action as requested.
Discussion:
The following vehicles were obtained through successful forfeiture proceedings:
1. 1999 GMC Yukon, VIN: 1GKEK13R9XJ769864

2. 2001 Subaru Forester, VIN: JF1SF65681H744817
3. 2001 Cadillac Deville, VIN: 1G6KE57Y01U254436
4. 2003 Buick Regal, VIN: 2G4WB52K431289212
5. 2004 Volvo S40, VIN: YV1VS27594F034559
6. 2007 Chevrolet Trailblazer, VIN: 1GNDT13S972278218
7. 2008 Dodge Ram, VIN: 1D7HU182X8S533739
After being declared surplus, the vehicles will be sold at auction and the proceeds, if any, will
be disbursed according to Minnesota State Statute.
Budget Impact:
None
Page 3 of 334
*4.B.1.

July 5, 2017
FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director

Subject:
*Amend the Special Assessment Policy for Alleys.
Approve Resolution 7908, which amends the Special Assessment Policy in regard to alleys in
the Central Business District (CBD).
Recommendation:
Approve Policy/Action requested
Discussion:
Previously the assessment percentage for alleys in the downtown central business district has
been 25%. For instance, the alley associated with the Lewis Street Parking Lot was proposed
at 25% assessed.
Council has indicated a desire to have the assessment policy for alley reconstruction be
consistent with street reconstruction which is 30%. The attached resolution amends the
special assessment policy for alleys in the central business district.
Further analysis and research is needed to recommend any changes to the assessment policy
for alleys outside the central business district.
Budget Impact:
This amendment to the special assessment policy would decrease the amount the City would
pay.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution 7908
Assessment Policy
Page 4 of 334
RESOLUTION 7908
A Resolution Amending the Special Assessment Policy
WHEREAS, on January 19, 1992, the City Council of Shakopee adopted the Special
Assessment Policy by Resolution No. 3735; and,
WHEREAS, the Special Assessment Policy was recently amended by Resolution 7025 on
August 17, 2010; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the Special Assessment Policy.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, The Special Assessment Policy is hereby amended as follows:
1. In Section X, Paragraph A.6. Alleys the last sentence is changed to read: For CBD
alleys, the City Council will assess 30% of the alley improvement.
These policy changes shall become effective on July 5, 2017.
Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota, held this 5th day of July , 2017.
Mayor of the City of Shakopee

ATTEST:
City Clerk
ENGR/2017-PROJECTS/COUNCIL/RES7908-Amendspecialassessmentpolicy
Page 5 of 334
Page 6 of 334
Page 7 of 334
*4.B.2.

July 5, 2017
FROM: Ryan Halverson, Assistant City Engineer

Subject:
Request for Extended Construction Hours for Lennar and Ridge Creek 1st Addition
development contractors.
Approve suspension of City Code Sec. 130.45, Noise Elimination and Noise Prevention,
Subd. C, Hourly Restrictions on Certain Operations, 4, allowing Lennar and their contractors
to perform work from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. on weekdays and 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Saturdays
through the end of October 2017 subject to the conditions recommended by staff, and direct
publication of notice of the suspension terms.
Recommendation:
Approve Policy/Action requested subject to the following conditions:
1. Approval is contingent upon minimizing noise exposure adjacent to residents
2. If the property owner complaints are received by the City, the suspension can be
revoked at the discretion of the City Engineer.
Discussion:
The above named section of the City Code restricts the hours of construction operation from
7 a.m. to 10 p.m. on weekdays, and 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. on weekends and holidays.
Attached is a letter from Lennar requesting extended work hours on Saturday to start at 8
a.m. until the Ridge Creek 1st Addition project is completed by the end of the construction
season.
This request is being made to help expedite the work and meet the schedule for this project to
be completed prior to the end of the construction season.
If Council approves the suspension, a public notice to meet the City Code requirements and
notice such as a news release would be placed in the Shakopee Valley News.
Page 8 of 334
Budget Impact:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
Lennar Letter - Extended Work Hours
Page 9 of 334
Dear Mr. Halverson,
Lennar is asking on behalf of Enebak Construction for permission to start 1 hour earlier on Saturdays at
8:00 am instead of 9:00 am on our Ridge Creek project.
Thank you for your consideration,
Mark Bode
Lennar Homes
Page 10 of 334
*4.C.1.

July 5, 2017
FROM: Jamie Polley

TO: Mayor and City Council
Subject:
Fun For All Inclusive Playground Donation, Res. No. 7910
Offer Resolution No. 7910, A Resolution of the City of Shakopee, MN Accepting A
Donation of $1000 and a Bench for the Shakopee Fun For All Playground.
Recommendation:
Recommend accepting the donations for the Fun For All Inclusive Playground.
Discussion:
On March 2, 2016 the City Council approved the concept of an inclusive playground at
Lions Park and authorized the fundraising efforts of the Fun For All Task Force. Task Force
members have applied for grants as well as met with local business owners, corporations and
various organizations seeking donations.
Many generous donators have come forward in many ways and the park was mostly
completed in October of 2016. The donor wall is currently under construction however
donors can also be recognized on a bench or piece of equipment.
Per city requirements for donations, any monetary donation of $1000 or more needs to be
accepted by two-thirds vote of the City Council. The City has received a donation of $1000
from Joe Theis in honor of his grandparents, Gene and Esther Brown and his uncle Tim
Ratigan. The Shakopee Valley Lions would also like to donate an additional bench to the
perimeter of the playground.
Budget Impact:
The donations will assist the city to complete the donor wall and add benches to the
playground.
ATTACHMENTS:
Page 11 of 334
Resolution No 7910
Page 12 of 334
RESOLUTION NO. 7910
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA

ACCEPTING A DONATION OF $1,000.00 AND A BENCH FOR THE
SHAKOPEE FUN FOR ALL PLAYGROUND.
WHEREAS, on November 6, 2002, the City Council adopted Resolution

No. 5794, which established procedure relating to the receipt of gifts and
donations by the City; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 5794 specifies that donations or gifts shall be

accepted by resolution of the City Council, and shall require a two-thirds majority
of the Council for acceptance; and
WHEREAS, avid supporters of the City of Shakopee have generously

donated $1,000 and a bench to the Shakopee Fun For All Inclusive Playground;
and
WHEREAS, the $1000 donator is Joe Theis in honor of his grandparents

and uncle and the bench donator is the Shakopee Valley Lions; and
WHEREAS, donations will assist in funding a unique playground that will

provide a positive playing experience for all community members, young to old
and of all abilities.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, that the donations are gratefully
accepted; and
FURTHER, the City staff is directed to send a letter to the donors,

acknowledging receipt of the gift and expressing the appreciation of the City
Council.
Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,

Minnesota held this 5th day of July, 2017.
______________________________
William Mars
ATTEST:
___________________________________
City Clerk
Page 13 of 334
*4.D.1.

July 5, 2017
FROM: Lori J. Hensen, City Clerk

Subject:
City Council Minutes from June 20, 2017
Approve the minutes of June 20, 2017 as presented.
Recommendation:
Approve the above motion.
Discussion:
Budget Impact:
ATTACHMENTS:
June 20, 2017
Page 14 of 334
Shakopee City Council Minutes
June 20, 2017
7:00 PM
City Hall 129 Holmes St.
Mayor Bill Mars presiding

1. Roll Call -At the June 20, 2017 Shakopee City Council meeting one member will be
participating via interactive television. The regular meeting location; Council Chambers,
129 Homes St. S, Shakopee, MN, is the primary meeting location and will be open to the
public as usual. The secondary meeting location; Council Member Matt Lehman's hotel
room, Flamingo Inn, 2011 South Atlantic Avenue, Daytona Beach, FL 32118, is also open
to the public. For further details about attending the June 20, 107 Shakopee City Council
meeting from the secondary meeting location, contact City Hall at 952-233-9300.
Present: Mayor William Mars, Councilmember Mike Luce, Councilmember Matt Lehman,
Councilmember Jay Whiting, Councilmember Kathi Mocol
Staff Present: Administrator Bill Reynolds, Assistant Administrator Nate Burkett, City
Attorney Jim Thomson, Fiance Director Darin Nelson, Assistant City Engineer Ryan
Halverson, Planning and Development Director Michael Kerski, Senior Planner Mark
Noble, Senior Planner Kyle Sobota, Park and Recreation Director Jamie Polley, City
Clerk Lori Hensen
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Special Presentation
3.A. MRPA Award of Excellence
4. Approval of Agenda
Councilmember Jay Whiting made a motion to approve the agenda as presented, seconded
by Councilmember Kathi Mocol and the motion passed.
5-0
5. *Consent Business - (All items listed in this section are anticipated to be routine. After
a discussion by the Mayor there will be an opportunity for members of the Council to
remove any items from the consent agenda for individual discussion. Those items
removed will be considered following the Public hearing portion of the agenda. Items
remaining on the Consent Agenda will not be discussed and will be approved in one
motion.)
Page 15
1 ofof6334
Councilmember Jay Whiting made a motion to approve consent agenda, seconded by
Councilmember Kathi Mocol and the motion passed.
5-0
A. Planning and Development
*5. A.1. *Vacation of Public Right-of-Way and Drainage & Utility Easements
Approve Resolution No. 7896, a resolution setting the public hearing date to consider
the vacation of a public right-of-way (Shenandoah Drive) and public drainage &
utility easements for property located north of Eagle Creek Blvd., East of
Shenandoah Drive extended at Eastway Avenue, South of 4th Avenue East and West
of Vierling Drive at 12th Avenue East. (Motion was carried under consent agenda.)
B. Public Works and Engineering
*5. B.1. *Parking Control Change on Garden Lane
Approve the parking control change on Garden Lane as outlined in the memo and the
attached drawing. (Motion was carried under consent agenda.)
*5. B.2. *Extended Construction Hours
Approve a suspension of City Code Sec. 130.45, Noise Elimination and Noise
Prevention, Subd. C, Hourly Restrictions on Certain Operations, 4, allowing D.R.
Horton and their contractors to perform work from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. on weekdays and
8 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Saturdays through the end of October or earlier if worked is
completed and directing staff to publish notice of the suspension terms with conditions
as recommended by staff. (Motion was carried under consent agenda.)
C. Parks and Recreation
*5. C.1. *Lease Agreement with Xcel Energy
Approve a lease agreement with Xcel Energy for use of 30 acres of land south of
Quarry Lake Park for soft surface trails. (Motion was carried under consent agenda.)
D. General Administration
*5. D.1. *City Council Minutes
Approve the minutes from June 6, 2017. (Motion was carried under consent agenda.)
*5. D.2. *Reorganization of IT Division
Approve reclassification of one IT Assistant to the position of IT Specialist -
Applications. (Motion was carried under consent agenda.)
*5. D.3. *Temporary Liquor License - Saint Joachim & Anne
Page 16
2 ofof6334
Approve the temporary liquor license for Saint Joachim & Anne's annual Julifest
event being held July 28 through July 30, 2017. (Motion was carried under consent
agenda.)
*5. D.4. *Badger Hill request to allow alcohol to be consumed in Parking Lot
Approve the suspension of city code 114.11 Consumption and possession of
alcoholic beverages on street, public property, private parking lots to which the public
has access, and other private property, allowing Badger Hill Brewery to hold their 5th
Beerthday Party Event held on June 24, 2017. (Motion was carried under consent
agenda.)
*5. D.5. *Performance Measurement Program
Adopt Resolution No. 7906 Which Adopts the State of Minnesota Performance
Measurement Program. (Motion was carried under consent agenda.)
6. RECOGNITION OF INVOLVED CITIZENS BY CITY COUNCIL - Provides an
opportunity for the public to address the Council on items which are not on the agenda.
Comments should not be more than five minutes in length. The Mayor may adjust that
time limit based upon the number of persons seeking to comment. This comment
period may not be used to make personal attacks, to air personality grievances, to
make political endorsements or for political campaign purposes. Council Members will
not enter into a dialogue with citizens, and questions from Council will be for
clarification only. This period will not be used to problem solve issues or to react to
the comments made, but rather for informational purposes only.
7. Business removed from consent will be discussed at this time
8. Public Hearings
8.A. Vacation of Public Drainage & Utility Easement - SPUC
Councilmember Jay Whiting made a motion to open the public hearing, seconded by
5-0
Councilmember Mike Luce made a motion to close public hearing, seconded by

Councilmember Jay Whiting and the motion passed.
5-0
Councilmember Jay Whiting made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 7898, a

Resolution approving a vacation of Public Drainage and Utility Easements at 2168-
2188 Kelly Circle, seconded by Councilmember Mike Luce and the motion passed.
5-0
Page 17
3 ofof6334
8.B. (SPUC) Shakopee Avenue Electric Underground Project 2017-9
Councilmember Kathi Mocol made a motion to open the public hearing, seconded by
Councilmember Mike Luce and the motion passed.
5-0
Councilmember Jay Whiting made a motion to close the public hearing, seconded by
5-0
Councilmember Jay Whiting made a motion to approve Resolution 7900, a resolution

ordering an improvement and preparation of plans and specifications for the (SPUC)
Shakopee Avenue Electric Underground, Project No. 2017-9, seconded by
5-0
9. Recess for Economic Development Authority Meeting
10. Reconvene
11. General Business
A. Planning and Development
11. A.1. Vacation of Easement at 2400 Jennifer Lane
Councilmember Jay Whiting made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 7782,

approving a vacation of a public drainage & utility easement adjacent to 2400
Jennifer Lane, seconded by Councilmember Kathi Mocol and the motion passed.
5-0
11. A.2. Purchase Agreement with Booyaah Properties
Councilmember Jay Whiting made a motion to approve Resolution Number 7901 to

acquire 339 1 Ave W 100. PID 270010810, seconded by Councilmember Kathi
Mocol and the motion passed.
3-1
Nays: Lehman
Abstain: Luce
11. A.3. Approval for Redevelopment of City Hall and First Avenue Properties
Councilmember Kathi Mocol made a motion to approve Resolution 7903 and enter
Page 18
4 ofof6334
into an agreement with CPM or its affiliates to redevelop sites for housing (City Hall)
and Hotel (First Ave), seconded by Councilmember Jay Whiting and the
motion passed.
3-1
Nays: Lehman
Abstain: Luce
11. A.4. West Vierling Acres Apartments
Councilmember Jay Whiting made a motion to adopt Ordinance No. 965, which
rezones the property from R-3 Multiple Family Residential to R-4, High Density
Residential, seconded by Councilmember Kathi Mocol and the motion passed.
3-2
Nays: Lehman, Luce
Councilmember Jay Whiting made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 7905, which
approves the Final Plat of West Vierling Acres Third Addition, a conditional use
permit for an over-height structure, and a Planned Unit Development (PUD)
Amendment to allow development of no more than a 133-unit apartment building,
seconded by Councilmember Kathi Mocol and the motion passed.
3-2
Nays: Lehman, Luce
11. A.5. Purchase Agreement with Booyaah Properties II
Councilmember Kathi Mocol made a motion to approve Resolution Number 7902 to

acquire to parcels, 321 1 Ave W, PID Numbers 270010820 and 270010830,
seconded by Councilmember Jay Whiting and the motion passed.
3-2
Nays: Lehman, Luce
11. A.6. Property Acquisition for Nonpayment of Taxes
Councilmember Jay Whiting made a motion to adopt Resolution 7904 to acquire the
two parcels to protect the rail spurs for the industrial park, seconded by
5-0
B. General Administration
11. B.1. Monthly Financial Review
11. B.2. Updated Liaisons List
Page 19
5 ofof6334
Councilmember Jay Whiting made a motion to approve updated liaisons list as
presented, seconded by Councilmember Kathi Mocol and the motion passed.
5-0
11. B.3. Capital Bonding Request
Councilmember Kathi Mocol made a motion to adopt Resolution 7899, the City of
Shakopee's application to the State of Minnesota's 2018 capital budget, seconded by
Councilmember Jay Whiting and the motion passed.
5-0
12. Reports
12.A.Liaison and Administration
12.B.City Bill List
13. Other Business
14. Adjournment to Wednesday July 5, 2017 at 7:00 p.m.
Councilmember Kathi Mocol made a motion to adjourn to July 5, 2017 at 7:00 p.m.,
seconded by Councilmember Matt Lehman and the motion passed.
5-0
Page 20
6 ofof6334
*4.D.2.

July 5, 2017
FROM: Nate Burkett, Assistant City Administrator

Subject:
Mobile Communications Policy, establishing standards for mobile device usage and a stipend
for authorized employees to use personal mobile devices.
Approve the mobile communications policy as proposed, establishing standards for employee
mobile device usage in the conduct of city business, and authorizing a stipend for eligible
employees using a personally owned mobile device for city business.
Recommendation:
Approve the policy/action requested.
Discussion:
Mobile technology has become an important tool for many city employees. The City
currently provides and pays for service for over 100 devices (both cell phones and mobile
data terminals).
This policy establishes a policy that clarifies those circumstances where it is appropriate for
the city to provide wireless service to an employee for the performance of their duties and
gives options as to how that service will be provided.
The biggest change in this policy from the existing practice is that the city will offer eligible
employees a $25.00/month stipend for use of their personal device.
The biggest concern with this policy is data practices. Employees opting to use their personal
device for city business must be aware that in the event there is a data practices request,
employees must report certain data in accordance with the law. This will include work
related (not personal) text messages and phone records. Personal information on personally
owned devices is not available through public data requests. Emails on personally owned
devices will be retained through the city's server and are not of concern.
Page 21 of 334
Data security is also of concern. This policy allows for the IT division to create rules related
to password protection and mobile device management to ensure data security when data is
stored on a personally owned device.
The $25/per month stipend is set at that level to ensure that each device transitioned from
city-paid to a stipend will result in a cost savings for the city.
Budget Impact:
This policy will not increase the city's expense. Depending on how many employees choose
to use their personally owned device - adoption of this policy may save up to approximately
$10,000 per year.
ATTACHMENTS:
Mobile Communications Policy
Page 22 of 334
Mobile Device Policy
(Chapter, Section, Code Added by Administration)
Adopted:
Amended:
POLICY CONTENTS
A. Scope ................................................................................................................................................................. 1
B. Purpose ............................................................................................................................................................ 1
C. Business Need Required ............................................................................................................................ 1
D. Mobile Communication Device and Service Options ...................................................................... 2
E. City Issued Mobile Devices and Service ............................................................................................... 2
F. Personal Mobile Devices and Service with city Stipend ................................................................ 3
G. Personal Mobile Devices and Service without city Stipend ......................................................... 3
H. Mobile Device Usage, Generally .............................................................................................................. 4
A. SCOPE
This policy applies to all city of Shakopee employees.
B. PURPOSE
This purpose of this policy is to ensure that city employees can use mobile communication
devices in the course of their duties to promote efficiency, ensure effective communication
and improve customer service in a cost-effective manner. This policy defines acceptable
use of mobile communication devices, the circumstances under which the city will provide
for a mobile communication device and/or service, and how the city will provide for mobile
communication devices and/or service. Employees who abuse and/or misuse mobile
communication devices under this policy may be subject to disciplinary action.
C. BUSINESS NEED REQUIRED

Department heads (or their designees) shall determine if there is a business need based on
the employees job duties. An initial determination of business need does not guarantee an
employee will be provided with mobile communications, or that the determination may not
change. Business needs that justify provision of a mobile communication device include:
The employees safety or the safety of others is dependent on mobile communications.
The employees job duties frequently require the employee to be out of the office and it
is required that the employee be available to respond to immediate inquiries or
requests for information from other employees or the public.
The employee is frequently required to be available to receive communication outside
of normal working hours.
Page 23 of 334
The employees position is such that providing for mobile communications will improve
the employees efficiency.
Other justification as approved by the city administrator.
D. MOBILE COMMUNICATION DEVICE AND SERVICE OPTIONS

If the department head has determined that there is a business need for an employee to
have access to mobile communications in the course of their duties the employee may
choose from the following options:
The city will issue a mobile communications device and provide service at the citys
expense subject to the requirements of this policy; or
The city will provide a monthly stipend to the employee, and the employee will provide
a mobile communications device and service subject to the requirements of this policy;
or
The employee may use their personal device and service subject to the requirements of
this policy.
E. CITY ISSUED MOBILE DEVICES AND SERVICE

The Information Technology Division will provide standard hardware and service to
employees who choose this option. The device remains the property of the city and must
be returned upon request by the city, or upon termination.
City issued devices will have a Mobile Device Management (MDM) software enforcing
policy requirements regarding security, applications, and data.
City issued devices must have appropriate security technology and password protection
as determined by the Information Technology Division.
Information Technology supports standard services including Outlook and Skype. The
Information Technology may support other mobile applications with a demonstrated
business need. No applications may be downloaded to city owned devices without
approval of the Information Technology Division.
Incidental personal use is allowed provided such use does not interfere with city
business, does not increase the citys costs and such use complies with the citys
Acceptable Use Policy. Under no circumstances should an employee use a city provided
mobile device as their primary personal mobile communications device.
Replacement of devices will be based on business needs and is not guaranteed.
The cellular phone number will be listed in the internal city staff directory and on
business cards and email signature lines as appropriate.
Managers and supervisors are responsible for periodically monitoring and reviewing
cellular phone billings of their staff to ensure proper employee usage and billing
accuracy.
All data maintained on city owned devices is subject to data practices laws and policies.
Page 2 of 4
Page 24 of 334
F. PERSONAL MOBILE DEVICES AND SERVICE WITH CITY STIPEND
If the department head has determined that there is a business need and the employee
desires to use their personal mobile device for city business, the city may offer a stipend of
$25.00 per month for reasonable use of the employees personal mobile device and service.
The approved stipend is agreed upon as full and complete compensation by the city to
the employee for the use of their personal mobile device for business purposes. The
stipend is inclusive of minutes, data, text messaging, access and all other charges. The
city shall not reimburse the employee for overages of minutes, data or texts or other
expenses beyond the approved stipend.
Employees accepting the stipend under this section are responsible to ensure that their
service is active. Employees who allow their service to lapse may be required to
reimburse the city all or part of the stipend if service lapses.
The cellular phone number will be listed in the city Staff Directory and on business
cards and email signature lines as appropriate.
Personal mobile devices used for business purposes must have appropriate security
technology and password protection as determined by the Information Technology
Division.
As determined by the Information Technology Division, mobile devices under this
section may have mobile device management software in place to enforce security
protocols.
An employee separating employment with the city who has used their personal device
for city business must delete all business-related data from their device, to be verified
by the Information Technology Division.
The Information Technology Division will not support the device or applications on the
device.
Loss or damage of the device during city or personal use will not be reimbursed by the
city.
Employees who use their personal mobile device for business purposes under this
section acknowledge and agree to comply with data practices laws and policies. Data on
personal mobile devices under this section may be subject to data practices laws and
policies including but not limited to:
o Emails, documents, texts, and any other data created or maintained on the device for
business use
o Phone records, including numbers called, times, and durations of calls made for
business purposes.
G. PERSONAL MOBILE DEVICES AND SERVICE WITHOUT CITY STIPEND

Employees may choose to use their personal device for business purposes and not receive a
stipend.
Page 3 of 4
Page 25 of 334
The city shall not reimburse employees for overages or use of overages of minutes, data
or texts or other expenses related to personal mobile device usage for business
purposes.
The employee shall not have official city email or records on their personal mobile
device unless the Information Technology Department approves.
An employee separating employment with the city who has used their personal device
for city business must delete all business-related data from their device, to be verified
by the Information Technology Division.
The Information Technology Division will not support the device or applications on the
device.
Loss or damage of the device during city or personal use will not be reimbursed by the
city.
Employees who use their personal mobile device for business purposes under this
section acknowledge and agree to comply with data practices laws and policies. Data on
personal mobile devices under this section may be subject to data practices laws and
policies including but not limited to:
o Emails, documents, texts, and any other data created or maintained on the device for
business use
o Phone records, including numbers called, times, and durations of calls made for
business purposes.
H. MOBILE DEVICE USAGE, GENERALLY

Employees using mobile devices for city business or during working hours are subject to
the following provisions.
When driving a vehicle for city business, employees shall be aware that driving is their
primary responsibility. Use of a mobile device in a vehicle must comply with state laws.
Managers and supervisors are expected to ensure compliance with the Fair Labor
Standards Act, other federal and state laws, and city policy with regard to working
hours. Generally, the city shall not expect non-exempt employees to monitor the device
outside of scheduled work hours unless terms and agreements for on-call, emergency
and other business needs are required.
Page 4 of 4
Page 26 of 334
*4.D.3.

July 5, 2017

Subject:
Massage Business License and Massage Therapist License for Andrea Zitzloff
Approve a massage therapy business license and a massage therapist license to Andrea
Zitzloff.
Recommendation:
Discussion:
Andrea Zitzloff has applied for a massage therapy business license and massage therapist
license at 1850 Sarazin Street. She will be providing massages to staff and resident's at St.
Gertrude's Health & Rehab Center.
The Police Department has conducted the customary background investigation and has
advised that it identified nothing that would prohibit the issuance of the licenses.
Budget Impact:
None.
Page 27 of 334
*4.D.4.

July 5, 2017

Subject:
On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses for MCMC LLC dba Muddy Cow.
Approve the On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses for MCMC LLC. dba Muddy Cow on
condition that final inspections are performed and passed.
Recommendation:
Discussion:
Patrick Conroy is opening a restaurant located at 1244 Canterbury Road, Shakopee and has
applied for an on-sale and a Sunday on-sale liquor license. The applications and required
evidence of insurance are in order.
The Police Department has conducted the customary background investigation and has
advised that it identified nothing that would prohibit the issuance of the licenses. Inspections
by the Building Department and Fire Department are still needed and will be completed
before final issuance of the licenses.
Budget Impact:
None.
Page 28 of 334
*4.D.5.

July 5, 2017

Subject:
Gambling Premise Permit for the Shako Valley Amateur Hockey Association
Approve Resolution 7907, a resolution of the City of Shakopee approving a premises permit
for Shako Valley Amateur Hockey Association located at Muddy Cow 1244 Canterbury
Road .
Recommendation:
Discussion:
The Shako Valley Amateur Hockey Association is applying for a premises permit for
gambling activities at the Muddy Cow located at 1244 Canterbury Road. The permit will
ultimately be issued by the State Gambling Control Board. When application is made, the
board requires that the local unit of government pass a resolution specifically approving or
denying the application.
Budget Impact:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution 7907
Page 29 of 334
RESOLUTION 7904
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APPROVING

PREMISES PERMIT FOR SHAKO VALLEY AMATEUR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION
_____________________________________________________________________________________
WHEREAS, the 1990 legislature adopted a law which requires municipal approval in order for
Gambling Control Board to issue or renew premises permits; and
WHEREAS, the Shako Valley Amateur Hockey Association is seeking a Premises Permit for the
site at the Muddy Cow, 1244 Canterbury Road, Shakopee, Minnesota.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE,

MINNESOTA AS FOLLOWS:
That the Premises Permit for the Shako Valley Amateur Hockey Association at Muddy Cow, 1244
Canterbury Road, Shakopee, Minnesota, be approved.
Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, held this 5th
day of July, 2017.
____________________________________
ATTEST:
______________________________
City Clerk
Page 30 of 334
*4.E.1.

July 5, 2017
FROM: Michael Kerski, Director of Planning and Development

Subject:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota funding for comprehensive plan community
engagement activities as part of the Center for Prevention's "Active Place Demonstration
Project" initiative.
Approve an agreement with Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota for funding to support the
city's community engagement efforts related to the 2040 comprehensive planning process for
$12,500 and direct the appropriate city representative to execute the agreement, subject to
review by the City Attorney.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the agreement.
Discussion:
In March, the council authorized staff to submit an application to the Center for Prevention's
"Active Place Demonstration Project" funding initiative. The Center for Prevention is a
department within Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota focused on improving community
health.
The city's application included a request for funds to support increased community
engagement activities supporting Envision Shakopee, the city's 2040 comprehensive planning
process. The application was successful and the city was awarded $12,500 in funding. Blue
Cross offers the funding via a funding agreement.
The application included six small subcontracts to six community-based organizations to

assist with community engagement, marketing and outreach. Staff will bring forth these
subcontracts at a later date.
Budget Impact:
Page 31 of 334
The city's request was fully funded at $12,500. This includes $6,500 to fund additional
printed materials, food, and workshop and engagement supplies and $6,000 in community-
based organization subcontracts.
ATTACHMENTS:
Active Places Demonstration Projects Agreement
Page 32 of 334
ACTIVE PLACES DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS AGREEMENT
This Active Places Demonstration Projects Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into as of June 13, 2017, (the
"Effective Date") by and between City of Shakopee, Minnesota (Shakopee), with its address at 129 Holmes St South,
Shakopee, Minnesota 55379, and BCBSM, Inc., dba Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota (Blue Cross) located
at 3535 Blue Cross Road, Eagan, Minnesota 55122.
WHEREAS, Blue Cross is committed to initiatives that increase walking and bicycling for both transportation and recreation
as a means of improving the health of Minnesotans through active living. An Active Places Demonstration Project
supports Blue Crosss goals of increasing walking and biking rates by creating community destinations and improving
walking and biking routes. An Active Places Demonstration Project will transform previously abandoned or avoided places
into areas where people want to be physically active. An Active Places Demonstration Project aims to build support for
wider community changes over time. An Active Places Demonstration Project address the well-researched principal that
people are more likely to walk or bike if the route and the routes surroundings are pleasant, if there are destinations along
the route, and if they can reach those destination on foot or bike.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
1. Description of the Project. Shakopee desires to participate in an Active Places Demonstration Project throughout the
city to engage the growing number of people of color in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan which sets the tone for future
planning, making it the communitys greatest opportunity to influence policy future infrastructure projects, and contribute
to the future of the city. Activities include:
A. Conducting a "hands-on" workshop using maps and craft supplies. The workshop will be conducted throughout the
community with small, targeted focus groups. People will be able to share their specific ideas while doing art-based
activities.
B. Engaging students of all cultures using photovoice which is a visual engagement technique. The city, Shakopee
High School, and District 288 will partner and use photovoice to use imagery to promote engagement among
students.
C. Establishing city presence at community events, festivals, and gatherings. The city will bring a pop-up engagement
booth to community gatherings, for example a five-week summer concert series in which the city will be present.
D. Creating and providing "Meeting in a Box" materials which allows organizations, residents, and businesses the
opportunity to host vision meetings without city staff being present. Materials will be created to help facilitate
discussions and gather feedback.
The first phase of the community engagement, focused on the vision of the community, will take place April through
November 2017. Creative workshops will take place intermittently throughout the city during this time period. A summer
concert series will take place in downtown Shakopee for five weeks in July and August. Student engagement at the
Shakopee High School will take place in the fall. Collectively, these activities constitute the Project.
2. Fees. Blue Cross shall make a $12,5000 financial contribution to Shakopee to support the Project, subject to the terms
and conditions of this Agreement. Shakopee shall refund Blue Cross financial contribution if it is unable to execute the
terms and conditions of this Agreement within 30 days.
3. Term and Termination. This Agreement will be effective as of the last date of signature below. This Agreement may be
terminated by either party by providing the other with at least 30 days written notice. In the event of termination by
Shakopee prior to Project completion, Shakopee shall refund any unused funds.
4. Shakopee shall provide Blue Cross with (a) proofs for review and approval prior to publication (including paper or
electronic publishing, and creation of audio/video documentation) of any Project-related materials containing Blue
Crosss name, logo, or references to Blue Crosss funding; and (b) the opportunity to approve or reject the placement,
color or size of Blue Crosss name or logo on all Project-related materials. Blue Cross retains all right, title, and interest
in its corporate name, logo, and taglines, and nothing in this Agreement will be construed to constitute a waiver of any
other right or remedy Blue Cross may have relative to the use of its corporate name or logo by Shakopee.
Page 1 of 9
city of shakopee, minnesota apdp 19jun2017.docx
Page 33 of 334
5. Shakopee shall acknowledge Blue Cross in all promotional materials related to the Project including but not limited to
fliers, posters, brochures, programs, website, signage, banners, T-shirts, advertisements (both print and electronic),
event signage, onsite messages related to community health, promotional literature, brochures, publications, press
releases, advertisements and digital/multi-media content. Shakopee will provide Blue Cross the opportunity to include
promo item(s) in giveaway bags, if applicable, and/or to distribute promo items onsite. Shakopee shall use the following
language:
Preferred copy:
Funding for this project is provided by the Center for Prevention at Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, as
part of Blue Cross long-term commitment to tackling the leading causes of preventable disease: tobacco use, lack
of physical activity and unhealthy eating.
Abbreviated copy (for times when you have space constraints):

Funding for this project is provided by the Center for Prevention at Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota.
Copy for use when Blue Cross is not the primary funder:
Funding for this project is provided in part by the Center for Prevention at Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota.
6. Shakopee will work with Blue Cross on public relations efforts related to the Project. Shakopee shall not make any
media statements on behalf of Blue Cross under any circumstance. However, Shakopee may publicize that Blue Cross
has funded the Project and advise media to contact Blue Cross directly for more information. In addition, if any media
outlet contacts Shakopee requesting comment on behalf of Blue Cross, Shakopee shall contact Blue Crosss
communications staff immediately. Any proactive outreach to media regarding the Project shall be coordinated with
Blue Crosss communications staff in advance.
7. Grant of license. Shakopee hereby grants to Blue Cross and its affiliates a worldwide, transferable, sublicensable,
perpetual, non-exclusive, royalty free, fully paid, license to use, reproduce, display, and/or create derivative works
(including to adapt or excerpt for Blue Crosss use, including for commercial purposes) from any written reports,
promotional materials, toolkits, educational materials, audio, video and/or other works created by or on behalf of
Shakopee in connection with the use, display, operation, modification, distribution and/or commercial exploitation of the
Project. Further, Shakopee hereby grants to Blue Cross and its affiliates a non-transferable, non-sublicensable, non-
exclusive, royalty free, fully paid, license to use, reproduce and display such representations of the Project (including
its name and logo) as are reasonably necessary for Blue Cross to fulfill the purposes of this Agreement.
8. Deliverables:
A. Within 12 months after the Project closes, Shakopees project manager will participate in a one-hour key information
interview with Blue Cross, or with Blue Crosss contracted vendor, to provide feedback on progress towards
Projects long term goals and learnings.
B. Within one month of the completion of the Project, or by December 31, 2017, whichever occurs first, Shakopee
shall submit to Blue Cross a written report that includes (i) a description of the process through which the Project
was implemented; (ii) the Projects budget; (iii) how the Project advanced Shakopees long term visions, as
described in Projects application for funding; and (iv) an evaluation of the Project, which shall include an
assessment of the Projects successes, weaknesses, and community responses to the Project.
9. Shakopee acknowledges and agrees that it will comply with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations in executing the
work under this Schedule including compliance with any tax withholdings, filings, or other reporting obligations.
10. The parties acknowledge that execution of this Agreement does not constitute an association for the purpose of
establishing a partnership or a joint venture, nor create any trustee or agency relationship between the parties.
11. Each party hereby represents that it has full power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to perform its
obligations; it has obtained all permits, licenses, and other governmental authorizations and approvals required for its
performance under this Agreement; and to the best of its knowledge and belief, the services to be rendered and the
materials provided by each party under this Agreement neither infringe nor violate any patent, copyright, trade secret,
trademark, or other proprietary right of any third party.
Page 2 of 9
Page 34 of 334
12. Indemnification. Shakopee shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Blue Cross, its trustees, officers, employees and
affiliates from and against all claims, damages, actions, expenses and costs (including reasonable attorneys' fees)
which result or arise from the Project, from this Agreement or a breach of this Agreement.
13. Governing Law. This Agreement will be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
14. Assignment. Neither party shall sell, transfer or assign this Agreement, or delegate its obligations hereunder, without
the prior written consent of the other party, except that Blue Cross may assign this Agreement in whole or in part to any
affiliate of Blue Cross upon notice to Shakopee.
15. Shakopee shall not solicit, and shall not engage as a sponsor, any other health insurance plan or third party claim
administrator, or any entity owned or controlled by, or under common ownership or control with, any other health
insurance plan or third party claim administrator with respect to funding, promotion or engagement in the Project.
16. Shakopee warrants that it has not performed services funded by or to the benefit of the tobacco industry within the past
five (5) years. Furthermore, Shakopee will not pursue or accept a contract, including sponsorship or participation, with
a tobacco company during the term of this Agreement. Shakopee will make every reasonable effort to ensure that any
sponsors or corporate participants in the Project have not been involved with other projects funded directly or indirectly
by the tobacco industry, or any other projects that could reasonably be considered counter to tobacco reduction or
cessation efforts. In addition, Shakopee will make every reasonable effort to ensure that any subcontractors performing
Services under this Agreement have not been involved in projects funded directly or indirectly by the tobacco industry,
or any projects that would be considered counter to Blue Crosss initiatives on tobacco use reduction or cessation.
17. Shakopee represents and warrants that it has not had any relationship with a representative of, nor entity involved in,
the tobacco industry within the past 5 years.
18. Audit. During the term of this Agreement, and for a period of one year after its termination or expiration date, Blue Cross
may utilize its internal auditors or engage a third-party auditor reasonably acceptable to Shakopee to perform a
confidential audit of Shakopees compliance with its obligations under this Agreement. In addition, Shakopee shall
reasonably participate in any audits initiated by a customer or regulator of Blue Cross, to the extent that Shakopee's
performance of the Project is within the scope of such audit. Blue Crosss reasonable cooperation with audits is part of
the Project, and will be provided at no additional cost to Blue Cross.
If any audits of Shakopee result in an adverse or qualified opinion, (a) Shakopee shall provide Blue Cross a detailed
remediation plan (including dates), and use reasonable efforts to remediate (at its own expense) the condition(s) giving
rise to such opinion, and (b) Blue Cross may utilize its internal auditors or engage a third party to specifically re-test
activities related to such opinion, to verify closure, or identify potential impact to Blue Cross.
This Agreement represents the entire agreement between the parties with respect to its subject matter, and supersedes all
prior agreements relating to its subject matter.
Page 3 of 9
Page 35 of 334
This Agreement has been duly executed by the parties hereto as of the dates set forth below.
BCBSM, INC., dba Blue Cross and Blue Shield City of Shakopee, Minnesota
of Minnesota
By: By:
Signature Signature
Janelle Waldock
Vice President, Community Health & Health Equity
Print Name Print Name
Date Date
Page 4 of 9
Page 36 of 334
EXHIBIT A
TO THE
ACTIVE PLACES DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS AGREEMENT
Page 5 of 9
Page 37 of 334
7.A.1.

July 5, 2017
FROM: Jamie Polley

Subject:
Park Dedication Fee Revisions and Ordinance Updates
Approve revisions to the park dedication fees required for single family, multi-family and
commercial/industrial development as recommended by the Parks and Recreation Advisory
Board (PRAB).
Adopt Ordinance No. 962, Amending the City's Adopted 2017 Fee Schedule.
Adopt Ordinance No. 963, Amending Shakopee City Code Section 150.65, Parks
and Dedications.
Recommendation:
Approve the actions requested.
Discussion:
Park Dedication Fees
Development is increasing within the city and many of the city fees are under review. The
current park dedication fees have not been revised since 2005. Revisions to the fees have
been recommended over the last 10 years however the fees remain unchanged. There is
a potential for a number of higher density housing projects which have encouraged the city to
review the park dedication fees. In many studies the city's park dedication rate is higher then
average for both single family ($5,340/unit) and multi-family ($4,450/unit) residential
housing development and below average for commercial/industrial ($6,930/acre)
development.
The park dedication fees collected are used to construct new parks within the city for the
residents of Shakopee to enjoy. The city also wants to encourage development or
redevelopment that offers the residents nice places to live and work. To find the balance
Page 38 of 334
between the fees needed to construct the park system and encouraging development, data
was collected from a number of metropolitan cities including 10 cities that have been
designated as comparable cities to Shakopee.
After reviewing the data collected staff and the PRAB is recommending that the fees for
single family ($5,340/unit) and townhouses ($4,450/unit) remain unchanged and the fee for
commercial/industrial development increase from $6,930/acre to $11,000/acre. The increase
to the commercial/industrial fee is calculated utilizing a formula that the city has used in the
past to determine this fee. The formula averages current land sale prices divided by a
dwelling per unit amount of 2.5 multiplied by 10%. The cost per dwelling unit is then
multiplied by 2.5/acre to get the per acre price. ($110,000/acre/2.5 DUA *10% = $4,400*2.5
DUA = $11,000/acre).
The recommended changes to the multi-family fees are based on the kind of units being
proposed:
Market Rate units with less than 60% 1BR and studios $4,450/unit (unchanged)
Market Rate units with more than 60% 1BR and studios $2,225/unit
Projects in redevelopment areas will be discussed as part of the Redevelopment TIF.
The reduced rate for projects that have more then 60% 1BR and studios is based on the fact
that typically 1-2 people are living in each smaller unit, versus 2-6 people living in 2 or 3
bedroom units. Projects in redevelopment areas are unique to the City of Shakopee and
relate only to the downtown district or possible Canterbury Park area. These area have a
number of challenges and higher costs of development due to reduced space and existing
facilities and infrastructure. The City Council has the ability to negotiate the park dedication
fees for Redevelopment TIF projects.
City Code Revision

Minor revisions to City Code Section 150.65, Parks and Dedications are recommended to
clarify the expectations of the developer pertaining to trail development and the calculation
of park dedication fees. As part of any development it has been required that the developer
construct all public trails. The developers have complied with this requirement in the past. To
make it clear to developers moving forward the requirement has been added to the City
Code.
Page 39 of 334
In addition, in calculating park dedication fees or land to be dedicated all wetland, ponding
and city accepted drainageways and utility easements were deducted. The ordinance states in
item B.10 that "Buildable" park land must be dedicated. Wetlands and ponding are not
considered buildable park land and are therefore are still removed from the calculation
however land that has a drainageway and/or utility easement through it is still buildable
parkland. Drainageways and utility easements have therefore been removed as a deduction to
the park dedication calculation.
Budget Impact:
Revising the park dedication fees is anticipated to have a positive impact on development
within the city resulting in increased park dedication revenue. Attached is an example of the
results of the proposed fees.
ATTACHMENTS:
Ordinance No. 962

Ordinance No. 963
Results of proposed fees
Park Dedication Fee Proposal
Page 40 of 334
ORDINANCE NO. 962, FOURTH SERIES
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA,

AMENDING THE CITYS ADOPTED 2017 FEE SCHEDULE
_____________________________________________________________________________
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 954, the City Council established a fee schedule effective
January 1, 2017; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is desirable to modify the portion of
the 2017 Fee Schedule pertaining to Park Dedication Fees for Multi-Family Apartments and
Commercial/Industrial property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Shakopee

that Section III. B. in the Land Use Administration Fees portion of the Adopted 2017 City Fee
Schedule is amended to read as follows:
B. Park Dedication Fees (City Code 150.65. These are set by City Council in
consultation with Park and Recreation Advisory Board)
Cash in lieu of land dedication fees:
1. Residential/Single-family/Duplex (per unit) $5,340/unit
2. Multi-family Apartment
less than 60% 1BR or Studio (per unit) $4,450/unit
Multi-family Apartment
60% or more 1BR or Studio (per unit) $2,225/unit
3. Commercial/Industrial (per acre) $6,930 $11,000/acre
Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this 5th
day of July, 2017.
__________________________________
ATTEST:
________________________
Acting City Clerk
Published in the Shakopee Valley News on _________________________________.
502292v2 JJT SH155-23
Page 41 of 334
ORDINANCE NO. 963
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE,MINNESOTA AMENDING

SHAKOPEE CITY CODE SECTION 150.65, PARKS AND DEDICATIONS

Section 1. Section 150.65, Paragraph (B) of the Shakopee City Code is amended to read as follows:
(B) Standards for accepting dedication of land for public purposes. It should be the policy of
the city that the following standards and guidelines for the dedication of land for park, playground,
and open space purposes (or cash contribution in lieu of such dedications) in the subdividing and
developing of land within the city, shall be directly related to density and intensity of each
subdivision and development.
(1) As a prerequisite to subdivision approval, subdividers shall dedicate land for parks,
playgrounds, public open spaces, and trails and/or shall make a cash contribution to the Citys Park
Fund and Trail Fund as provided by this section.
(2) Land to be dedicated shall be reasonably suitable for its intended use and shall be at a
location convenient to the people to be served. Factors used in evaluating the adequacy of the
proposed park and recreation areas shall include size, shape, topography, geology, hydrology, tree
cover, access, and location.
(3) The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board shall recommend to the Planning
Commission and City Council the land dedication and cash contribution requirements for proposed
subdivisions.
(4) Changes to the density of plats shall be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation
Advisory Board for reconsideration of park dedication and cash contribution requirements.
(5) When a proposed park, playground, recreational area, school site, or other public
ground has been indicated in the citys official map or comprehensive plan and is located in whole
or in part within a proposed plat, it shall be designated as such on the plat and shall be dedicated
to the appropriate governmental unit. If the subdivider elects not to dedicate an area in excess of
the land required hereunder for such proposed site, the city may consider acquiring the site through
purchase or condemnation.
(6) Land conveyed or dedicated to the city shall not be used in calculating density
requirements of the city zoning ordinance, and shall be in addition to and not in lieu of open space
requirements for planned unit developments.
(7) In establishing the amount of land to be dedicated or preserved or the amount of the
cash contribution, the city will give due consideration to the open space, recreational, or common
areas and facilities proposed by the applicant to be open to the public.
Page 42 of 334
(8) The city, upon consideration of the particular type of development, may require larger
or lesser parcels of land to be dedicated if the city determines that present or future residents would
require greater or lesser land for park and playground purposes.
(9) In residential plats, the city shall have a standard of 1 acre of park land for every 75
people. Thus, 1 acre of land shall be conveyed to the city as an outlot warranty for every 75 people
the platted land could house based on the following population calculations.
Apartments, townhouses, condominiums, other multiple-

1 person per bedroom
family dwelling units
Duplex-twin homes 3.0 persons per dwelling unit
Single-family detached dwelling lots 3.0 persons per lot
(10) In plats other than residential, the city hereby finds that, as a general rule, it requires
that an amount of land equal to 10% of the buildable land proposed to be subdivided be dedicated
or reserved to the public for public use for parks, playgrounds, trails, wetlands, or open space.
Buildable land is determined by calculating the gross acreage of all land in the proposed
subdivision in its pre-subdivided condition excluding wetlands as defined in 151.002. Should
the land to be dedicated have greater fair market value than the average fair market value in the
plat, the city shall only be authorized to require dedication of an amount of land equal to 10% of
the fair market value of all the property being platted.
(11) In lieu of park land dedication, the city may require an equivalent cash dedication
based upon the average fair market value of undeveloped land that is, or under the citys adopted
comprehensive plan, may be served by municipal sanitary sewer and water service. The cash
dedication requirement shall be established annually by the City Council.
(12) The subdivider will be required to construct all public trails within the development
or adjacent at the time of development.
(123) In lieu of trail donation, trail construction, or trail easement dedication, the city may
require a cash donation for the trail system. The cash dedication requirement shall be established
annually by the City Council. Dedication for trails in the form of cash shall apply only to residential
plats.
(134) The city may elect to receive a combination of land and cash for park use. The city
shall determine the amount of land dedication it requires, and the cash contribution shall be
calculated based on the percentage of unmet land dedication.
(145) Planned unit developments with mixed land uses shall make cash and/or land
contributions in accordance with this section based upon the percentage of land devoted to the
various uses.
(156) Park and trail cash contributions are to be calculated based on the fees in place at
the time of the final plat approval.
Page 43 of 334
(167) The cash contributions for parks and trails shall be deposited in either the citys
Park Reserve Development Fund or Multi-Purpose Pedestrian Fund and shall be used only for
acquisition, improvement, development, or redevelopment of parks and trails.
(178) If a subdivider is unwilling or unable to make a commitment to the city as to the

type of building that will be constructed on lots in the proposed plat, the land and cash contribution
will be a reasonable amount determined by the City Council.
(189) Wetland and ponding areas, drainageways and utility easements accepted by the
city shall not be considered in the park land and/or cash contribution to the city.
(1920) When a proposed trail has been indicated in the citys official comprehensive plan
map, and it is located in whole or in part within the proposed plat, it should be designated on the
plat and should be dedicated to the city. If the subdivider elects not to dedicate an area in excess
of the land required for a trail, the city may consider acquiring it through condemnation.
(2021) Required land dedication and/or payment of fees in lieu of land dedication shall
be required at the time of recording the final plat.
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage and
publication.
Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota held this 5th
day of July, 2017.
___________________________________
Attest:
_________________________,
City Clerk
Published in the Shakopee Valley News on the ______ day of _____________, 2017.
Page 44 of 334
Current Projects Proposed Fees
Acres/lots/units
Shakopee Crossing Limited Marcus Theater $ 57,670.77 8.32 $ 91,540.90
Canterbury Park Existing $ 153,580.04 $ 153,580.04
Opus Development Warehouse $ 42,240.22 6.10 $ 67,047.97
Menden Addition SF Subdivision $ 64,080.00 12.00 $ 64,080.00
Ivy Properties (Henderson) Elderly Apartments $ 226,950.00 51.00 $ 226,950.00
HY-VEE Grocery Store $ 92,723.40 13.38 $ 147,180.00
Praire Meadow SF Subdivision $ 25,824.24 12.00 land + cash $ 25,824.24
Duke Realty My Pillow $ 116,077.50 16.75 $ 184,250.00
$ 779,146.17 $ 960,453.15
Possible new developments 2017-2018
Vierling Apartments - HyVee Small unit apartments 133.00 $ 299,250.00

South Ridge Apartments Market rate 300.00 $ 1,335,000.00
City Hall site Redevelopment 70.00 $ 56,000.00
Canterbury Apartments. Redevelopment 600.00 $ 480,000.00
Downtown site Redevelopment 1.00 $ 11,000.00
Southridge restaurants Pad 3.00 $ 33,000.00
DR Horton Commercial Pad 11.00 $ 121,000.00
$ 2,214,250.00
Page 45 of 334
Park Dedication Fees Single Family Townhouses Apartments Commercial Industrial
Shakopee $ 5,340 $ 4,450 $ 4,450 $ 6,930/acre $ 6,930/acre

Maplewood $ 3,540 9% of FMV 9% of FMV
Coon Rapids $ 2,000 $ 1,360 $ 1,360 $ 5,000/acre $ 4,000/acre
Lakeville $ 3,895 $ 2,650 $ 2,032 $ 7,963/acre $ 4,558/acre
Roseville $ 3,500 7% of FMV 10% of FMV
Blaine $ 3,744 $ 8,704/acre $ 6,093/acre
St. Louis Park* $ 1,950 5% of FMV
Golden Valley 4% of FMV 4% of FMV 4% of FMV
Inver Grove Heights $ 2,850 $ 7,000/acre $ 5,000/acre
Burnsville $ 2,717 $ 17,500/acre $ 8,750/acre
Savage $ 3,842 $ 3,842 $ 3,842 $ 8,937/acre $ 8,937/acre
Proposed 2017 Fees

$ 5,340 $ 4,450 $ 4,450 $ 11,000 $ 11,000
Market rate units with more than 60% 1 BR and studios $ 2,225
Projects that are in Redevelopment Areas Fees are negotiated as part of the Redevelopment TIF
Easement areas included in fee calculation area. PD calculated on gross land area.
All developments will be required to construct any public trails in development or adjacent.
Page 46 of 334
7.B.1.

July 5, 2017
FROM: Darin Nelson, Finance Director

Subject:
2016 Annual Financial Report, Audit Presentation and Review by Staff from BerganKDV
Accept the 2016 Audit and accompanying reports, as presented by the audit staff from
BerganKDV
Recommendation:
Approve the 2016 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) as presented.
Discussion:
Annually the City of Shakopee's finance staff and BerganKDV audit staff undertake an
extensive audit process, beginning in December and continuing into April. The audit results,
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), and accompanying data will be presented
and discussed at the July 5, 2017 meeting by Steve Wischmann, Government Audit Partner
with BerganKDV.
Budget Impact:
No budget impact
ATTACHMENTS:
2016 CAFR
2016 Compliance Report
2016 Communication Letter
Page 47 of 334
Comprehensive
ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016
2016 Show Off Shakopee Photo Contest Submissions

Shakopee
Page 48 of 334
City of Shakopee | 129 Holmes St. S., Shakopee MN 55379 | 952 233-9300 | www.ShakopeeMN.gov Minnesota
CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA
Scott County
COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT
For the Year Ended

December 31, 2016
Department of Finance
Darin Nelson, Director of Finance

Melissa Schlingman, Accounting Manager
129 Holmes Street South

Shakopee, MN 55379
Page 49 of 334
(THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY)
Page 50 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION I
Page
INTRODUCTORY SECTION
Elected Officials and Administration................................................................................ 1
Organization Chart ............................................................................................................ 2
Letter of Transmittal ......................................................................................................... 3
Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting .................................. 9
SECTION II
FINANCIAL SECTION
Independent Auditors Report........................................................................................... 11
Managements Discussion and Analysis (Unaudited) ...................................................... 15
Basic Financial Statements:
Government-Wide Financial Statements:
Statement of Net Position ..................................................................................... 28
Statement of Activities .......................................................................................... 29
Fund Financial Statements:
Balance Sheet Governmental Funds .................................................................. 30
Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet to the Statement of Net Position
Governmental Funds ........................................................................................... 31
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances
Governmental Funds ........................................................................................... 32
Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in
Fund Balances to the Statement of Activities Governmental Funds ............... 33
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances
Budget and Actual General Fund ..................................................................... 35
Statement of Net Position Proprietary Funds..................................................... 36
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Fund Net Position
Proprietary Funds ................................................................................................ 37
Statement of Cash Flows Proprietary Funds ...................................................... 38
Combined Statement of Fiduciary Net Position ................................................... 41
Statement of Net Position Component Unit....................................................... 42
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Fund Net Position
Component Unit ................................................................................................. 43
Notes to the Financial Statements ............................................................................... 45
Required Supplementary Information:
Schedule of Funding Progress Other Post Employment Benefits ........................... 96
Schedule of City's Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability General
Employees Retirement Fund .............................................................................. 97
Schedule of City's Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability Public
Employees Police and Fire Retirement Fund..................................................... 98
Schedule of Component Units' Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability
General Employees Retirement Fund ................................................................ 99
Schedule of City Contributions General Employees Retirement Fund ..................... 100
Schedule of City Contributions Public Employees Police and Fire Retirement
Fund .................................................................................................................. 101
Schedule of Component Unit Contributions General Employees Retirement Fund . 102
Schedule of Changes in the Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios
Fire Relief Association ...................................................................................... 103
Page 51 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION II (Continued)
FINANCIAL SECTION
Required Supplementary Information: (Continued)
Schedule of City Contributions and Non Employer Contributing Entities
Fire Relief Association ...................................................................................... 104
Notes to Required Supplementary Information .......................................................... 105
Supplementary Information:
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance
Budget and Actual General Fund ........................................................................... 108
Combining and Individual Fund Financial Statements and Schedules:
Combining Balance Sheet Nonmajor Governmental Funds .............................. 110
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances Nonmajor Governmental Funds ....................................................... 116
Combining Statement of Fund Net Position Internal Service Funds ................. 122
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Fund Net
Position Internal Service Funds ....................................................................... 123
Combining Statement of Cash Flows Internal Service Funds ........................... 124
Combined Statement of Fiduciary Net Position ................................................... 125
Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities Agency Fund ........................... 126
SECTION III
STATISTICAL SECTION
Net Position by Component .............................................................................................. 1 132
Changes in Net Position .................................................................................................... 2 134
Fund Balances Governmental Funds ............................................................................. 3 136
Changes in Fund Balances Governmental Funds .......................................................... 4 138
Tax Capacity and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property ...................................... 5 140
Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Rates ..................................................................... 6 141
Principal Taxpayers .......................................................................................................... 7 142
Property Tax Levies and Collections ................................................................................ 8 143
Ratio of Outstanding Debt by Type .................................................................................. 9 144
Ratio of General Bonded Outstanding .............................................................................. 10 145
Direct and Overlapping Governmental Activities Debt.................................................... 11 147
Legal Debt Margin Information ........................................................................................ 12 148
Pledged Revenue Coverage .............................................................................................. 13 150
Demographic and Economic Statistics ............................................................................. 14 151
Principal Employers .......................................................................................................... 15 153
Full-Time Equivalent City Government Employees by Function/Program ..................... 16 154
Operating Indicators by Function/Program ...................................................................... 17 156
Capital Asset Statistics by Function/Program................................................................... 18 158
Page 52 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
ELECTED OFFICIALS AND ADMINISTRATION

DECEMBER 31, 2016
Elected Officials Position Term Expires

William Mars Mayor December 31, 2018
Matthew Lehman Council Member December 31, 2020
Jay Whiting Council Member December 31, 2020
Michael Luce Council Member December 31, 2018
Kathleen Mocol Council Member December 31, 2018
Administration
Bill Reynolds City Administrator
Assistant City
Nathan Burkett Administrator
Darin Nelson Finance Director
Jennifer Gabbard HR Manager
Andy Hutson IT Director
Lori Hensen City Clerk
Director of Planning &
Michael Kerski Development
Dave Kriesel Building Official
Jeff Tate Police Chief
Rick Coleman Fire Chief
Public Works
Bruce Loney Director/Engineer
Jamie Polley Park and Recreation Director
1
Page 53 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
ORGANIZATION CHART
DECEMBER 31, 2016
Electorate
City Council
Planning Commission & Board of Park and Recreation Advisory

Adjustment & Appeals Board
Shakopee Public Utilities

Police Civil Service Commission
Commission
Environmental Advisory Economic Development Advisory

Committee Committee
City
Administrator
Police Fire Finance Department of Engineering & Department of Parks &

Department Department Department Administration Public Works Planning & Recreation
Department Development Department
HR Division
Planning
Division
IT Division
Building
City Clerk Inspection
Division
Facility Maintenance Division Economic

Development
2
Page 54 of 334
May 18, 2017
To the Honorable Mayor, Members of the City Council, and Citizens of the City of Shakopee:
The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2016, is submitted herewith:
Management assumes full responsibility for the completeness and reliability of the information contained
in this report, based upon a comprehensive framework of internal control that it has established for this
purpose. The costs of internal control should not exceed anticipated benefits and therefore the object is
to provide reasonable rather than absolute assurance that the financial statements are free from material
misstatement.
The City of Shakopees financial statements have been audited by BerganKDV, Ltd., a firm of licensed
certified public accountants. The goal of the independent audit was to provide reasonable assurance that
the financial statements of the city for the year ended December 31, 2016, are fairly presented in
conformity with GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles). Based on the audit, the independent
auditor concluded that there was reasonable basis for rendering an unmodified (clean) opinion on the
citys financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016. The independent audit involved
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements;
assessing the accounting principles used; significant estimates made by management; as well as
evaluation of the overall financial statement presentation. The independent auditors report is presented
as the first component of the financial section of this report.
Management Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) immediately follows the independent auditors report
and provides a narrative introduction, overview, and analysis to accompany the basic financial
statements. This letter of transmittal is designed to complement the MD&A and should be read in
conjunction with it.
Profile of the City
The City of Shakopee was incorporated for the second time in 1870 and is located approximately 25
miles southwest of Minneapolis. Bound by the Minnesota River on the north, Shakopee is in the
northern part of Scott County and is the county seat. In recent years, the city has been one of the most
rapidly growing communities in the state. The 2000 population of the city was 20,568 and the land area
covered is approximately 30 square miles. The 2010 census confirmed that the population had increased
to 37,076 and has been continuing to experience growth into the current year, with an estimated
population of 40,254, in 2016. The city comprises a unique blend of residential, commercial and
industrial properties, which provides a wide range of opportunities that are the result of the strong
economic health of the community and region. More than 80% of the community is developed, with
approximately 35% of the developed land as residential. The city levies a property tax on both real and
personal property located within its boundaries except for land owned or controlled by the Shakopee
Mdewakanton Sioux Community (SMSC), a federally recognized Native American Tribe. The city may
COMMUNITY PRIDE SINCE 1857

129 Holmes Street South Shakopee, Minnesota 55379-1351 952-233-9300 FAX 952-233-3801 www.ShakopeeMN.gov 3
Page 55 of 334
also by state statute, extend its corporate limits by annexation, which historically has occurred
periodically.
Shakopee is organized in Minnesota under Plan A, which includes a City Administrator, but the City
Council retains primary decision making authority such as policy setting, adopting ordinances and
budget and staffing. The City Council has four members who serve staggered terms of four years plus
the Mayor who serves a two-year term. All council positions are non-partisan, part-time and members
are elected at large. In 2019, the Mayors term will also become a four-year term.
The city provides typical municipal services such as police and fire protection, street and infrastructure
construction, public works maintenance, parks, recreation, planning and zoning. Also provided are
utilities such as sewer and storm drainage utilities, organized refuse collection, and recycling. Electric
and water utilities are operated by Shakopee Public Utilities Commission which is appointed by the
City Council but operates independently of the City of Shakopee.
Economic development and redevelopment are controlled by the Shakopee Economic Development
Authority (the Authority). The Authority is comprised of the Mayor and City Council members and is
included as an integral part of the citys report. The economic development activities of both staff and
Council continue to increase from past years, as the strong economic climate in the region has
provided the city with the benefit of planned commercial and industrial growth as well as expansion of
several existing businesses and commercial sites. 2016 activity has already confirmed that the
continuation of the growth trend will carry into the current year as the valuation of building permits for
the first quarter of 2017 was $35 million compared to a similar amount of $36 million for the same
timeframe in 2016.
The annual budget is the basis for the citys financial planning and control. The budget is prepared by
fund (e.g., General), function (e.g., Public Works) and division (e.g., Engineering). Major budget
requests or initiatives are submitted in July by Department Heads. The City Administrator reviews the
submittals with the Finance Director and Department Heads, to determine the prioritization of specific
budget requests. The City Council is presented with a proposed budget and a maximum tax levy in
September of each year. This information succinctly details changes in the upcoming year budget, such
as changes in personnel and position structure. It also includes funding requests that are unique to the
specific budget year, the basis for the request, as well as requests for transfers and internal funding needs,
such as internal service fund reviews. City Council is required to adopt a maximum tax levy by
September 30. The final tax levy and budget are adopted in December after a public meeting, which
provides the City Council and community impact information relating to both the budget decisions and
property tax levies. Final levy information is submitted to the County for inclusion in the development
of the upcoming year property tax statements. Budgeting control is provided by an annual budget
resolution passed by City Council. Formal control is at the division level and Council action is necessary
to change budgeted amounts between divisions and/or funds. The Finance Director or City
Administrator may make changes within divisions.
Along with the operating budget, the city annually prepares a five-year capital improvement plan (CIP)
that is the basis for the long term goal of providing and maintaining a functional public facility program,
that provides the residents and businesses with infrastructure necessary for the on-going growth and
development. The capital plans have historically provided details on the infrastructure projects that are
4
Page 56 of 334
funded through property tax levy, special assessments, utility funds and other intergovernmental revenue
sources. These projects primarily allow for the upgrades, expansion and coordination of transportation
based needs, as well as trails, signals and other infrastructure improvements. The City Council also
reviews and discusses the park planned improvements that are funded through the Park Reserve fund,
which provides for the use of park and community facilities that have historically been funded through
the collection of Park Dedication fees. The capital plans are reviewed with the Council and city staff,
and the funding sources and priorities developed for the annual and future budget practices.
A five-year major equipment list is also annually prepared and presented to Council. The funding for
this program is through the Internal Service fund rate charges, which are determined by departmental
use, replacement plans and determination of the remaining life. Internal Service funds are utilized for the
definition and application of other charges, including governmental buildings, park assets facilities, and
information technology. These charges are integrated into the individual budgets of the General fund and
departments that are benefitted by the activities of the programs. The Internal Service funds continue to
be reviewed and updated as the community needs and council directives are considered during each
budget cycle.
Local Economy
Shakopee is the county seat of Scott County, and it abuts the largest county in the region, Hennepin
County. Shakopee continues to benefit from its strategic location within the metropolitan region, as
well as its direct access to TH 169, which connects the city to other major regional roadways, the MSP
International Airport, and major employment centers. The city is also at the heart of regional
attractions which includes Valleyfair, Canterbury Park horse racing track, Mystic Lake and Little Six
casinos, and the Minnesota Renaissance Festival. These and other factors have propelled the city
through a period of strong and consistent growth that is likely to continue for years to come.
In 2016 and 2017, permits were issued for the construction of the following:
Marcus Theatres constructed a 54,000-square foot, ten screen movie theatre which opened in
April 2017.
Minnesota Municipal Power Agency (MMPA) constructed a 46-megawatt (MW) natural gas
powered electric plant. The plant went online in March of 2017.
Hy-Vee is constructing a 96,000-square foot grocery store along with an additional
convenience store and attached car wash. The grocery store is expected to open in the fall of
2017.
Apple Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram constructed a new dealership building that opened in the
spring of 2017
The Shakopee School District is undertaking a major the expansion of the high school which
includes an additional 335,000-square feet of learning space. Completion is expected prior to
the beginning of the 2018-19 school year.
These projects are in addition to major projects that were issued building permits in 2015 and
completed construction in 2016. These major projects included:
Rahr Malting expansion
Amazon fulfillment center construction
Amerisource Bergan pharmaceutical distribution facility construction
5
Page 57 of 334
St. Francis Regional Medical Center expansion
Construction of a 55-unit senior assisted living facility near downtown
In addition, two major residential developments are in the works to break ground in the spring of 2017.
The first development is in the Ridge Creek addition, which will include 104 single family homes.
The second is the Windermere addition. This development is planned to be a mix of 197 residential
lots, seven commercial lots and multifamily housing.
Major Initiatives
The recent commercial, industrial and residential growth has required the city to maintain a commitment
to infrastructure plans, and integration with other local and regional projects. The City Council
committed funding in 2013 for a dedicated transfer of the property tax levy to fund a portion of the
planned capital improvements. The initial $500,000 commitment allows for street reconstruction and
overlays, and miscellaneous other construction projects. The 2014, 2015 and 2016 budgets provided
$750,000, $1.0 million and $1.2 million, respectively for continued and expanded capital improvement
funding. The 2017 budget continues with the commitment, dedicating $1,135,000 million towards
capital improvement funding through a combination of property and franchise taxes. This will provide
for a consistent funding source needed to address recently deferred infrastructure programs. The city
also continues to work with Scott County, the State of Minnesota (MnDOT), as well as private
developers, to allow for a strong coordination of project planning and benefits to the regions
transportation system and business climate.
Supporting retail opportunities, such as restaurants and small retail sites, are investigating locating in
Shakopee due to increased employee counts from the commercial ventures that have recently been built
in the community.
Scott County has historically dealt with a daily out-migration of workers who work in neighboring
counties. This issue is being addressed by decision makers, who want to utilize the skilled and educated
work force as an attraction to businesses. The commercial and industrial growth that the city has recently
and will continue to experience will eliminate some of the loss of daily work force from the area. By
seeking a solution to both transportation and employment issues, the residents of the Shakopee area will
be able to benefit by living and working close to home.
The citys community center and ice rink renovation broke ground April 1, 2016. This $30.4 million
project includes the construction of a new two-sheet arena, addition of an aquatic facility, and the
expansion of fitness, senior lounge, indoor playground, and child care areas. This project is being funded
through the issuance of tax abatement bonds. Project completion is scheduled for the summer of 2017.
The city is also constructing a 25,000-square foot City Hall that will be adjacent to the police station.
The City Hall addition will create a centralized city campus. Completion is anticipated to be in July
2017. The project cost is $8.5 million with financing from a mix of internal transfers and an interfund
loan.
6
Page 58 of 334
Long-Term Financial Planning
Historically, the city has issued only limited debt, in the form of bonds and internal funding for
planned infrastructure projects, expansion specific to streets, underground utilities, trails and sidewalk
expansion. A portion of the long term debt is funded by special assessments against benefited
properties. The city applies special assessments against benefitted properties at a rate of 30% of the
assessable project costs. This limited amount of special assessment revenue does require the city to
clearly define the other recognized components of the payment of project costs. The city does not
assess for overlays, which then requires funding from the tax levy or other regional revenues sources.
The City Council has recently allowed for the use of inter-fund transfers, use of existing fund balance
position, as well as review of charges and fees that may be applicable to the projects, and currently not
tapped for future funding sources.
In addition, the City Council passed an ordinance effective January 1, 2017 assessing the private gas
and electric utilities a franchise tax based on three percent of energy sales. This franchise tax is
estimated to generate $750,000 in 2017, with revenue dedicated to the Capital Improvement Fund.
City equipment needs are currently identified and funded in a manner that will not place an undue burden
or single year expense fluctuation on the taxpayers. The planned equipment replacement program clearly
identifies the equipment needs for current projects as well as future use. This is based on known and
anticipated programs and mandates, such as environmental program adjustments and possible
community expansion and growth. The capital and equipment needs of the city require constant
appraisal for replacement cost, life span and the assurance that the insurance coverage is providing for
the most comprehensive, yet affordable, coverage.
A self-insurance internal service fund was created in 2016 to aid in controlling insurance costs by
monitoring the premiums against deductible expenses. The long-term goal of the fund is to eventually
self-insure for non-catastrophic type of losses.
Relevant Financial Policies
The citys target General Fund balance is to maintain an unassigned level between 40% and 45% of
expenditures. This level is to provide working capital for cash flow, expected declines in revenues,
and for unforeseen expenditures such as natural disasters, or for unforeseen but urgent requests.
Replenishing the fund balance when it falls below the target level shall be accomplished by inter-fund
transfers, or adjusting of expenditures or revenues, over a period not to exceed three years.
The city historically receives no local government aid (LGA). Annual legislative actions may impact
the financial position of those cities that are currently reliant on these and other government derived
revenue sources, which leaves them vulnerable to the economies of the State as a whole. As of this
writing, it was not anticipated that actions by the Minnesota Legislature would negatively impact the
city and its operations and planning. The standard budget process, which provides for the presentation
and approval of the property tax levies for the General fund (including Economic Development), debt
service and referendum debt, will be consistent with prior year actions.
7
Page 59 of 334
The accounting, auditing and financial reporting policies are designed to maintain a system of financial
monitoring, control and reporting for all operations and funds to provide effective means of ensuring
that overall city goals and objectives will be met and to assure the citys residents and investors that the
city is well managed and fiscally sound.
The investment policy provides for conservative investing, preserving capital and maintaining adequate
liquidity for forecasted cash needs. A third party investment manager handles the majority of the
portfolio and all investments are held in a trust account.
The debt policy ensures that the city's debt; 1) does not weaken the city's financial structure; and 2)
provides limits on debt to avoid problems in servicing debt. This policy is critical for maintaining the
best possible credit rating.
Capital policies include having expenditures forecasted ahead for five to ten years and are updated
annually. Internal Service Funds for major equipment, major buildings and facilities, park asset
replacement and information technology costs stabilize the annual impact of those items to the General
fund.
Awards and Acknowledgements
The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a
Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City of Shakopee for its
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. This
was the 31st consecutive year that the city has received this award. In order to be awarded a Certificate
of Achievement, a government must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized CAFR. This
report satisfied both GAAP and applicable legal requirements.
A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. We believe our current CAFR
continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement Programs requirements and we are submitting it to
the GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate.
The preparation of this report would not have been possible without the efficient and dedicated
services of the Finance Department, Accounting Manager Melissa Schlingman, and the entire city
staff. We express appreciation to those staff members who assisted and contributed to the preparation
of this report. Credit also must be given to the Mayor and City Councilors for their support in
maintaining the highest standards of professionalism in the management of the City of Shakopees
finances.
Respectfully submitted,
William H. Reynolds Darin Nelson

City Administrator Finance Director
8
Page 60 of 334
(D
Government Finance Officers Association
Certificate of
Achievement
for Excellence
in Financial
Reporting
Presented to
City of Shakopee
Minnesota
For its Comprehensive Annual

Financial Report
for the Fiscal Year Ended
December 3L,20Ls
&/trZfu-
Executive Director/CEO
9
Page 61 of 334
10
Page 62 of 334
Independent Auditors Report
Honorable Mayor and Members

of the City Council
City of Shakopee
Shakopee, Minnesota
Report on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the
business-type activities, the aggregate discretely presented component units, each major
fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, as
of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, and the related notes to financial statements,
which collectively comprise the Citys basic financial statements as listed in the Table of
Contents.
Managements Responsibility for the Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial
statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control
relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditors Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the
United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in
Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's
judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial
statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor
considers internal control relevant to the City's preparation and fair presentation of the
financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
City's internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of
significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of the financial statements. BerganKDV, Ltd.
bergankdv.com
11
Page 63 of 334
Auditors Responsibility (Continued)
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to
provide a basis for our audit opinions.
Opinions
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to in first paragraph present fairly, in all
material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the
business-type activities, the aggregate discretely presented component units, each major
fund and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, as
of December 31, 2016, and the respective changes in financial position and, where
applicable, cash flows thereof and the budgetary comparison for the General Fund for the
year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.
Other Matters
Required Supplementary Information
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the
Managements Discussion and Analysis, which follows this letter, and Required
Supplementary Information, as listed in the Table of Contents, be presented to supplement
the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial
statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB), who
considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial
statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied
certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with
auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of
inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the
information for consistency with managements responses to our inquiries, the basic
financial statements and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial
statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information
because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an
opinion or provide any assurance.
Other Information
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements
that collectively comprise the City of Shakopees basic financial statements. The
introductory section, supplementary information and statistical section, are presented for
purposes of additional analysis, and are not a required part of the basic financial statements.
12
Page 64 of 334
Other Matters (Continued)
Other Information (Continued)
The supplementary information is the responsibility of management and was derived from
and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic
financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied
in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including
comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other
records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements
themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the supplementary information is
fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole.
The introductory and statistical sections have not been subjected to the auditing procedures
applied in the audit of the basic financial statements, and accordingly, we do not express an
opinion or provide any assurance on it.
Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated
May 18, 2017, on our consideration of the City of Shakopees internal control over financial
reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations,
contracts and grant agreements, and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe
the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and
results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on internal control over financial
reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in
accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City of Shakopees
internal control over financial reporting and compliance.
St. Cloud, Minnesota

May 18, 2017
13
Page 65 of 334
14
Page 66 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

December 31, 2016
As management of the City of Shakopee (the City), we offer readers of the Citys financial statements
this narrative overview and analysis of the financial activities of the City for the year ended
December 31, 2016. We encourage readers to consider the information presented here in conjunction
with additional information that we have furnished in our Letter of Transmittal, which can be found on
pages 3 to 8 of this report.
Financial Highlights
The assets of the City exceeded its liabilities at the close of the most recent year by $ 245.3
million (net position). Of this amount, $ 40.0 million (unrestricted net position) may be used to
meet the Citys ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors.
The Citys total net position decreased $ 1,988,045.
As of the close of the current year, the Citys governmental funds reported combined ending
fund balances of $ 30,666,344, increasing from the prior year. Approximately 34.9% of this total
amount, $ 10.7 million is available for spending at the Citys discretion (unassigned fund
balance).
At the end of the current year, unassigned fund balance for the General Fund was $ 10.7 million,
or 49.0 %, of total General Fund 2016 expenditures and 44.3% of the 2017 budgeted
expenditures.
The Citys total bonded debt increased $ 27.8 million.
Overview of the Financial Statements
This discussion and analysis are intended to serve as an introduction to the Citys basic financial
statements. The Citys basic financial statements comprise three components: 1) government-wide
financial statements, 2) fund financial statements, and 3) Notes to the Financial Statements. This report
also contains other supplementary information in addition to the basic financial statements themselves.
Government-Wide Financial Statements
The government-wide financial statements are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the
Citys finances, in a manner similar to private-sector business.
The Statement of Net Position presents information on all of the Citys assets and deferred outflows of
resources and liabilities and deferred inflows of resources, with the difference between them reported as
net position. Over time, increases or decreases in net position may serve as a useful indicator of whether
the financial position of the City is improving or deteriorating.
The Statement of Activities presents information showing how the Citys net position changed during
the most recent year. All changes in net position are reported as soon as the underlying event giving rise
to the change occurs, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Thus, revenues and expenses are
reported in this statement for some items that will only result in cash flows in future fiscal periods (e.g.,
uncollected taxes and earned but unused employee leaves).
Both of the government-wide financial statements distinguish functions of the City that are principally
supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues (governmental activities) from other functions that
are intended to recover all or a significant portion of their costs through user fees and charges (business-
type activities). The governmental activities of the City include general government, public safety,
15
Page 67 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

December 31, 2016
highways and streets, economic development and recreation. The business-type activities of the City
include sewer, storm drainage utilities and refuse.
The government-wide financial statements include not only the City itself (known as the primary
government), but also two legally separate entities for which the City is financially accountable. The
component units are Shakopee Public Utilities Commission (SPUC) and the Economic Development
Authority (EDA). SPUCs financial information is reported separately from the financial information
presented for the primary government as a discretely presented component unit. The EDA, which
functions like a department of the City although it is a legally separate entity, is presented within the
Citys government-wide financial statements. The City Council is the EDA Board.
The government-wide financial statements can be found on pages 28 and 29 of this report.
Fund Financial Statements
A fund is a grouping of related accounts that is used to maintain control over resources that have been
segregated for specific activities or objectives. The City, like other state and local governments, uses
fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance-related legal requirements. All of
the funds of the City can be divided into three categories: governmental funds, proprietary funds and
fiduciary funds.
Government Funds
Government funds are used to account for essentially the same functions reported as governmental
activities in the government-wide financial statements. However, unlike the government-wide financial
statements, governmental fund financial statements focus on near-term inflows and outflows of
spendable resources, as well as on balances of spendable resources available at the end of the year. Such
information may be useful in evaluating a Citys near-term financings requirements.
Because the focus of governmental funds is narrower than that of the government-wide financial
statements, it is useful to compare the information presented for governmental funds with similar
information presented for governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements. By
doing so, readers may better understand the long-term impact of the Citys near-term financing
decisions. The governmental funds Balance Sheet and the governmental funds Statement of Revenues,
Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances provide a reconciliation to facilitate this comparison
between governmental funds and governmental activities.
The City maintains 29 individual governmental funds. Information is presented separately in the
governmental funds Balance Sheet and in the governmental funds Statement of Revenues, Expenditures
and Changes in Fund Balances for the General Fund, the Capital Improvements and Community Center
and Ice Arena Capital Project Funds. Those are considered to be major funds. Data from the other
governmental funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation. Individual fund data for each
of these non-major governmental funds is provided in the form of combining statements elsewhere in
this report.
The City adopts an annual appropriated budget for its General Fund. A budgetary comparison statement
has been prepared for the fund to demonstrate compliance with the budget.
The basic governmental funds financial statements can be found on pages 30 to 35 of this report.
16
Page 68 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

December 31, 2016
Proprietary Funds
The City maintains two different types of proprietary funds. Enterprise funds are used to report the
same functions presented as business-type activities in the government-wide financial statements. The
City uses enterprise funds to account for its sewer, storm drainage and refuse operations. Internal
service funds are an accounting device used to accumulate and allocate costs internally among the Citys
various functions. The City uses internal service funds to account for its fleet of vehicles and mobile
equipment, its major buildings, the replacement of park assets, information technology items, insurance
funding and for employee compensated absences. All of these services predominantly benefit
governmental rather than business-type functions.
Proprietary funds provide the same type of information as the government-wide financial statements.
The proprietary fund financial statements provide separate information for the sewer, storm drainage and
refuse operations, all of which are considered to be major funds of the City. Conversely, all internal
service funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation in the proprietary fund financial
statements. Individual fund data for the internal service funds is provided in the form of combining
statements elsewhere in this report.
The basic proprietary fund financial statements can be found on pages 36 to 39 of this report.
Component Units
Component units are legally separate organizations for which the City is financially accountable. The
government-wide financial statements present information for the component units in a single column
on the Statement of Net Position. Also, some information on the Statement of Changes in Net Position
is aggregated for component units. The component units Statements of Net Position and Statement of
Changes in Net Position provide detail for each major component unit.
Fiduciary Funds
Fiduciary funds are used to account for resources held for the benefit of parties outside the government.
Fiduciary funds are not reflected in the government-wide financial statement because the resources of
those funds are not available to support the Citys own programs.
The basic fiduciary fund financial statements can be found on page 41 of this report.
Notes to the Financial Statements
The notes provide additional information that is essential to a full understanding of the data provided in
the government-wide and fund financial statements. The Notes to the Financial Statements can be found
on pages 45 to 94 of this report.
Other Information
In addition to the basic financial statements and accompanying notes, this report also presents certain
required supplementary information concerning the Citys progress in funding its obligation to provide
pension benefits to its employees.
17
Page 69 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

December 31, 2016
The combining statements referred to earlier in connection with non-major governmental funds, internal
service funds and fiduciary funds are presented immediately following the required supplementary
information on pensions. Combining and individual fund statements and schedules can be found on
pages 110 to 127 of this report.
GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
As noted earlier, net position may serve over time as a useful indicator of a Citys financial position.
For the City, assets exceeded liabilities by $ 245.3 million at the close of the most recent year.
By far the largest portion of the Citys net position (81.0%) reflects its investment in capital assets (e.g.,
land, buildings and equipment); less any related debt used to acquire those assets that is still outstanding.
The City used these capital assets to provide services to citizens; consequently, these assets are not
available for future spending. Although the Citys investment in its capital assets is reported net of
related debt, it should be noted that the resources needed to repay this debt must be provided from other
sources, since the capital assets themselves cannot be used to liquidate these liabilities.
Net Position
(Expressed in Thousands)
Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Total
2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015
Current and Other Assets $ 56,638 $ 46,317 $ 23,992 $ 27,526 $ 80,630 $ 73,843
Capital Assets 155,754 129,046 70,099 68,986 225,853 198,032
Total Assets $ 212,392 $ 175,363 $ 94,091 $ 96,512 $ 306,483 $ 271,875
Deferred Outflows of Resources $ 17,410 $ 2,352 $ 199 $ 44 $ 17,609 $ 2,396
Long-Term Liabilities
Outstanding $ 65,120 $ 18,776 $ 589 $ 419 $ 65,709 $ 19,195
Other Liabilities 9,795 5,224 268 1,132 10,063 6,356
Total Liabilities $ 74,915 $ 24,000 $ 857 $ 1,551 $ 75,772 $ 25,551
Deferred Inflows of Resources $ 2,970 $ 1,398 $ 52 $ 37 $ 3,022 $ 1,435
NET POSITION:
Net Investment in Capital Assets $ 128,560 $ 120,831 $ 70,099 $ 68,986 $ 198,659 $ 189,817
Restricted 6,637 7,547 - - 6,637 7,547
Unrestricted 16,720 23,939 23,282 25,982 40,002 49,921
Total Net Position $ 151,917 $ 152,317 $ 93,381 $ 94,968 $ 245,298 $ 247,285
An additional portion of the Citys net position (2.7%) represents resources that are subject to external
restrictions on how they may be used. The remaining balance of unrestricted net position ($ 40.0
million) may be used to meet the Citys ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors.
At the end of the current year, the City was able to report positive balances in all three categories of net
position, both for the government as a whole, as well as for its separate governmental and business-type
activities. The same situation held true for the prior year.
18
Page 70 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

December 31, 2016
During the current year, the Citys net position decreased $ 2.0 million. Governmental activities
decreased as a result of additional bituminous overlay projects during 2016. The business-type activities
decreased as a result of expenses exceeding revenues during the year. Expenses also increased due to
increased fees from Met Council and increased storm costs related to cost sharing agreements.
Increased utility rates are still not covering operational expenses. In addition, the business type
activities transferred funds to governmental fund for operations and construction resulting in an overall
decrease in net position.
Changes in Net Position

(Expressed in Thousands)

2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015
REVENUES:
Program Revenues:
Charges for Services $ 8,366 $ 7,920 $ 5,030 $ 4,699 $ 13,396 $ 12,619
Operating Grants and
Contributions 2,778 2,510 - - 2,778 2,510
Capital Grants and
Contributions 2,187 1,735 183 66 2,370 1,801
General Revenues:
Property Taxes 18,016 16,807 - - 18,016 16,807
Other Taxes 465 407 - - 465 407
Other 546 540 291 367 837 907
Total Revenues 32,358 29,919 5,504 5,132 37,862 35,051
EXPENSES:
General Government 4,206 4,238 - - 4,206 4,238
Public Safety 13,281 10,582 - - 13,281 10,582
Public Works 8,594 8,552 - - 8,594 8,552
Culture and Recreation 4,653 4,355 - - 4,653 4,355
Economic Development 2,105 2,604 - - 2,105 2,604
Interest on Long-Term Debt 1,191 275 - - 1,191 275
Sewer - - 3,843 3,824 3,843 3,824
Storm - - 1,849 1,726 1,849 1,726
Refuse - - 127 128 127 128
Total Expenses 34,030 30,606 5,819 5,678 39,849 36,284
Increase (Decrease in Net

Position before Transfers (1,672) (687) (315) (546) (1,987) (1,233)
Transfers 1,272 496 (1,272) (496) - -

Special Items - (634) - - - (634)
Change in Net Position (400) (825) (1,587) (1,042) (1,987) (1,867)
NET POSTION:
January 1 152,317 160,386 94,968 96,317 247,285 256,703
Change in Accounting Principles - (7,244) - (307) - (7,551)
January 1 As Restated* 152,317 153,142 94,968 96,010 247,285 249,152
December 31 $ 151,917 $ 152,317 $ 93,381 $ 94,968 $ 245,298 $ 247,285
*GASB Statement No. 68 was implemented for the year ended December 31, 2015 and required a
$ 7,244,500 and $ 306,917 restatement of beginning net position for governmental activities and
business type activities, respectively.
19
Page 71 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

December 31, 2016
Governmental Activities
Governmental activities decreased the Citys net position by $ 400,905. The major decrease was due to
additional bituminous overlay projects during 2016. These projects are considered maintenance and are
not capitalized.
Expenses and Program Revenues Governmental Activities
$14,000,000
$12,000,000
$10,000,000
$8,000,000 Program Revenues
$6,000,000 Expenses
$4,000,000
$2,000,000
$-
Public works
Government
Public Safety
Recreation
Development
Interest on Long
Economic
General
Term Debt
Revenues by Source Governmental Activities

Other Revenues Operating Grants
2% and
Charges for Contributions
Services 8%
26%
Capital Grants
and
Contributions
Other Taxes 7%
1%
Property Taxes
56%
20
Page 72 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

December 31, 2016
Business-Type Activities
Business-type activities decreased the Citys net position by $ 1,587,140. Revenues and expenses both
increased between the current and prior year however overall expenses exceeded revenues as the
revenue collected for sewer services does not cover the payments made to suppliers. Additionally,
Business type activities transferred $1,271,853 to the governmental funds for operational and
construction expenses. The sewer and storm water activities will continue to experience a higher degree
of expense, as the deferral of maintenance and increasing mandates will continue to put pressure on the
funds, to meet the demands of on-going and future development needs.
Expenses and Program Revenues Business-Type Activities

$4,000,000
$3,500,000
$3,000,000
$2,500,000
Program
$2,000,000 Revenues
Expenses
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
$-
Sewer Storm Refuse
Revenues by Source Business-Type Activities
Capital Grants
and
Contributions
3%
Investment
Earnings
5% Charges for
Services
92%
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE CITYS FUNDS
As noted earlier, the City uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance-
related legal requirements.
21
Page 73 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

December 31, 2016
Governmental Funds
The focus of the Citys governmental funds is to provide information on near-term inflows, outflows and
balances of spendable resources. Such information is useful in assessing the Citys financing
requirements. In particular, assigned and unassigned fund balance may serve as a useful measure of a
Citys net resources available for spending at the end of the year.
As of the end of the current year, the Citys governmental funds reported combined ending fund
balances of $30,666,344, an increase of $9,164,952 in comparison with the prior year. Approximately
34.9%, ($10,699,250), of the total amount constitutes unassigned fund balance, which is available for
spending at the Citys discretion. Approximately 23.0%, ($7,059,661), of the total amount constitutes
assigned fund balance, which is assigned for designated purposes. The remainder of fund balance,
($12,907,433), is not available for new spending because it has already been restricted or is
non-spendable.
The General Fund is the chief operating fund of the City. At the end of the current year, fund balance of
the General Fund was $ 10,761,366. As a measure of the General Funds liquidity, it may be useful to
compare fund balance (unassigned) to total fund expenditures. Unassigned fund balance represents
49.0% of total General Fund expenditures.
Fund balance of the Citys General Fund increased by $ 921,256 during the current year. Key factors in
this increase consist of the following:
Before transfers, the fund balance of the General Fund showed a $ 4,010,877 increase. After the
net transfer out of $ 3,098,755, fund balance increased $ 921,256. Transfers provided the
necessary funding for several significant capital infrastructure programs and projects, payment of
some debt service funds, economic development operations as well as funding insurance.
Overall revenues increased approximately $ 1,596,205 as a result of increased property taxes.
Licenses and permits increased due to increased growth and development during the year.
Charges for services increased due to additional contracted services being performed in 2016 as
well as increased community center usage. Miscellaneous revenue decreased as a result of
insurance moving to a new internal service fund. The City typically receives property and
liability insurance dividends each year, which is now being redirected toward the new self-
insurance internal service fund to match revenues with expenses.
Overall expenditures increased approximately $ 852,000 due to cost of living increases and new
positions added in 2016 as well as filling many open positions that were open at the end of 2015.
Fund balance of the Capital Improvements fund decreased $ 1,385,919. The decrease was attributed to
projects being completed that were funded with special assessment and tax increment which will be
received in future years. The City paid for the following projects in 2016 from this fund:
Street Reconstruction Projects
Bituminous Overlay
4th Avenue Reconstruction
Bituminous Reclaimation
Fund balance of the Community Center and Ice Arena fund increased $ 8,223,533. This project began
in 2015 with design work only. In 2016 bond proceeds of approximately $28 million were received to
fund this project. As of December 31, 2016, approximately $22 million has been completed. The
remodel of the community center and the creation of the new indoor pool is still under construction.
22
Page 74 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

December 31, 2016
Fund balance of the Non-major Governmental Funds increased $ 1,406,082. Major changes are as
follows:
Economic Development special revenue fund increased $829,007 due to the downtown
redevelopment project not being completed in 2016 as well as revaluing the land held for resale
back to cost.
Debt service funds increased $ 627,427 due to regular bond payments offset by bond proceeds,
tax levies and assessment revenue related to the bonds. Bond proceeds were received on the
2016A Tax Abatement Bond to pay the first 2 interest payments.
Park Reserve decreased $789,587. Quarry Lake Park project that took place during the year
along with the completion of Southbridge Community Park and Taphah West baseball fields.
City Hall increased $732,502 as a result of transfers from the General fund, Building internal
service fund and Sewer and Storm Drainage fund to fund the construction of a new city hall.
Proprietary funds
The Citys proprietary funds provide the same type of information found in the government-wide
financial statements, but in more detail.
Unrestricted net position of the enterprise funds (expressed in thousands):
Storm
Sewer Drainage Refuse
Beginning of Year $ 12,061 $ 14,741 $ (1,008)

Change During Year (1,737) (1,193) 95
End of Year $ 10,324 $ 13,548 $ (913)
The City has undertaken several new development projects and continues to review fees charged to make
sure costs are covering operations of the funds. The capital assets of the projects will increase the capital
assets of these funds, as well as the offsetting future year depreciation charges. A portion of these projects
are funded through special assessments, but a significant portion of this is funded through the anticipated
future revenues collected for services. The Refuse fund was created during 2014 with the Citys purchase
of garbage carts. The negative net position is anticipated to be reduced each year as service charges
continue to be collected from customers.
GENERAL FUND BUDGETARY HIGHLIGHTS
Budget amendments of $902,710 between original and final amended budget were approved during
2016. Following are the main components of the amendments:
Revenues were increased $1,032,777 as a result of increased licenses and permits, increased
contracted services in public safety and additional state grants for maintenance and pension.
Expenditures were reduced $1,114,333. Wages and benefits were reduced approximately
$426,000 due to unfilled positions during 2016. Additionally, budgets were reduced for
pavement preservation, motor fuel and contracted services for reductions in spending in 2016.
Transfers out were increased $1,245,000 to help fund insurance, make future debt service
payments and partially fund the city hall construction.
23
Page 75 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

December 31, 2016
Actual expenditures of $21,916,614 were $203,924 over budget. The variances are noted below:
General government was under budget as a result of not spending contingency funds. Various
staff members wage distributions were not adjusted to reflect actual distribution resulting in
administration being over budget. Finance was over budget due to lodging tax coming in over
budget. Lodging tax is a budget neutral expenditure since we disburse what the city receives so
the variance is also noted in revenues. Compensated absences are not budgeted, actual was
approximately $53,000.
Public safety was over budget due to the implementation of an electronic review system, Project
Docs, resulting in approximately $95,000 in expenditures. Compensated absences are not
budgeted, actual was approximately $110,300.
Public works was over budget due to street light change outs on Southbridge Parkway of
approximately $53,000 was added when sealcoating was completed. Fleet implemented a new
management system for tracking vehicles for approximately $26,000. Compensated absences are
not budgeted, actual was approximately $39,700.
Park and recreation actual was consistent with the budget. Compensated absences are not
budgeted, actual was approximately $28,300.
Actual revenues of $25,927,491 were $666,691 over budget. The variances are noted below:
Property taxes came in under budget as a result of tax abatements paid to 3 companies during
2016. Tax abatements are a reduction in the property taxes received by the city. Also, lodging
tax come in over budget as noted above.
Licenses and permits came in over budget as a result of an increases in development and building
and conservative budgeting.
Intergovernmental revenue came in over budget due to additional police aid and PERA aid
related to pensions.
Charges for services come in over budget due to increased community center admissions and
memberships as well as additional contracted police services during 2016. Additionally,
engineering and grading fees were over budget because of the increased development.
CAPITAL ASSET AND DEBT ADMINISTRATION
Capital Assets
The Citys investment in capital assets for its governmental and business type activities as of
December 31, 2016, amounts to $225,853,229 (net of accumulated depreciation). This investment in
capital assets includes land, buildings and systems, improvement, machinery and equipment, park
facilities, roads, highways and bridges.
Major capital assets events during the current year included the following:
Purchase of 2 zambonies
New two sheet ice arena and community center remodel as well as furnishings in both buildings
Quarry Lake Park phase I construction and a new pedestrian bridge on quarry lake trail
Reconstruction of streets, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water mains and bituminous
reclaimation projects on 4th Avenue, Hilldale Drive, 3rd Avenue, Market Street, Marcia Lane,
Eagle Creek, Mckenna Road, County Highway 16, 7th Street, Shumway Street, St Marks Street,
Minnesota Street, Shumway Street, and Shenandoah Drive.
Vehicle replacements in police, fire, streets and parks
24
Page 76 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

December 31, 2016
Additional information on the Citys capital assets can be found in Note 6 on pages 64 to 66 of this
report.
CAPITAL ASSETS
(Net of Depreciation)
Expressed in Thousands

2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015
Land $ 21,005 $ 20,907 $ 3,797 $ 3,797 $ 24,802 $ 24,704

ROW 254 254 508 447 762 701
Construction in Progress 29,933 4,136 58 212 29,991 4,348
Line Rights - - 792 817 792 817
Infrastructure 69,308 69,489 63,014 61,499 132,322 130,988
Buildings 24,665 25,631 - - 24,665 25,631
Machinery and Equipment 10,589 8,629 1,930 2,214 12,519 10,843
Total $ 155,754 $ 129,046 $ 70,099 $ 68,986 $ 225,853 $ 198,032
In 2016, several projects that were in progress were continued and completed, as these projects often
involved the coordination with County, State and Federal entities. The status of these projects is highly
dependent on weather and the funding and staffing of cooperating entities, and will often impact the
ability of the City to complete these projects in the anticipated year.
Long-Term Debt
At the end of the current year, the City had total bonded debt outstanding of $ 36,030,000. Of this
amount, $ 33,935,000 comprises debt backed by the full faith and credit of the government and
$ 2,095,000 is special assessment debt for which the government is liable in the event of default by the
property owners subject to the assessment.
Outstanding Debt
G.O. and Revenue Bonds
Expressed in Thousands
2016 2015
G.O. Bonds $ 33,935 $ 5,100

Special Assessment Debt with
Governmental Commitment 2,095 3,115
Total $ 36,030 $ 8,215
25
Page 77 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

December 31, 2016
The Citys total bonded debt increased by $ 27,815,000 during the current year. The 2016A Tax
Abatement bond was issued in 2016 for $29,500,000 to fund the community center remodel and ice
arena construction. Additionally, another year of payments were made on all outstanding bonds totaling
$1,685,000.
Minnesota Statutes limit the amount of general obligation (G.O.) debt a government entity may issue to
a net figure of 3% of the taxable market value. The current legal debt margin for the City is $83 million,
which is significantly in excess of the Citys outstanding G.O. debt.
Additional information on the Citys long-term debt can be found in Note 7 on pages 66 to 69 of this
report.
ECONOMIC FACTORS AND NEXT YEARS BUDGETS AND RATES
The City is currently experiencing the construction and development of several new commercial
business sites. These companies such as Marcus Theatres, Minnesota Municipal Power Agency, Hy-
Vee and Apple Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram are expanding and enhancing the economic tax base as well as
the employment options in the community. These business ventures will bring not only a strong base of
varied jobs to the area but enhanced tax base for the recently developed commercial and industrial sites.
The City is also experiencing growth in residential developments with the addition of two developments
in 2017.
During the current year, the unassigned fund balance in the General Fund was $10,739,178. This can be
similarly compared to the unassigned fund balance of 2015 of $9,818,537. The City continues to
maintain a strong financial position as the economic climate and the economic diversification of the
region and the state continue to improve.
The general tax levy for 2017 is increased to $18,926,341, in comparison to the prior year amount of
$16,825,900. This levy was increase to provide needed funding for city positions, infrastructure needs
through the capital improvement fund and debt service levies. Historically only 30% of some of the
project costs are funded through special assessments which will require a firm commitment of the
Council to provide needed resources for maintenance, improvements and additions to the existing
infrastructure.
City staff continues to refine and coordinate multi-department development related activities. This is
done through review of fees, charges, consistent practices and detailed discussions specific to each
development review. As staff continues to refine these practices the achieved outcome will be to
provide a higher level of positive customer and development satisfaction.
REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION
This financial report is designed to provide a general view of the Citys finances for all those with an
interest in the Citys finances. Questions concerning any of the information provided in this report or
requests for additional information should be addressed to the Finance Director, 129 Holmes St. S.,
Shakopee, Minnesota, 55379.
26
Page 78 of 334
BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
27
Page 79 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
STATEMENT OF NET POSITION

December 31, 2016
Governmental Business-Type
Activities Activities Total Component Unit
ASSETS AND DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES
Assets
Cash and Investments (Including Cash Equivalents) $ 48,102,133 $ 23,095,073 $ 71,197,206 $ 36,630,116
Restricted Cash and Investments - - - 13,403,450
Property Tax Receivable 76,631 - 76,631 -
Accounts Receivable (Net of Allowance for
Uncollectible Accounts) 501,242 22,000 523,242 4,114,344
Interest Receivable 191,437 106,042 297,479 46,511
Due From Other Governments 593,611 500,462 1,094,073 121,604
Special Assessments Receivable 4,826,856 268,188 5,095,044 -
Inventories - - - 1,173,161
Prepaid Expenses 205,804 - 205,804 52,000
Land Held for Resale 1,023,612 - 1,023,612 -
Net Pension Asset 1,117,106 - 1,117,106 -
Capital Assets, Net of Accumulated
Depreciation (Where Applicable):
Land and Land Improvements 21,004,655 3,796,803 24,801,458 5,097,532
Right of Way 253,904 507,746 761,650 -
Construction in Progress 29,933,034 58,296 29,991,330 8,268,479
Line Rights - 792,008 792,008 -
Infrastructure 69,308,222 63,014,542 132,322,764 -
Plant in Service - - - 71,712,938
Buildings 24,665,239 - 24,665,239 -
Machinery and Equipment 10,588,887 1,929,893 12,518,780 -
Total Assets 212,392,373 94,091,053 306,483,426 140,620,135
Deferred Outflows of Resources

Deferral on Refunding - - - 225,899
Deferred Outflows of Resources Related to Pensions 17,410,230 199,023 17,609,253 2,139,453
Total Deferred Outflows of Resources 17,410,230 199,023 17,609,253 2,365,352
Total Assets and Deferred Outflows of Resources $ 229,802,603 $ 94,290,076 $ 324,092,679 $ 142,985,487
LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES AND NET POSITION

Liabilities
Accounts and Contracts Payable $ 6,128,960 $ 140,857 $ 6,269,817 $ 4,960,728
Other Current Liabilities - - - 364,607
Due to Other Governments 212,072 99,791 311,863 467,394
Salaries and Benefits Payable 292,498 - 292,498 -
Deposits Payable - - - 2,243,180
Interest Payable 519,065 - 519,065 144,346
Unearned Revenue 1,765 - 1,765 1,661,410
Customer Advances - - - 310,312
Bond Principal Payable, Net:
Payable Within One Year 1,685,000 - 1,685,000 425,000
Payable After One Year 36,480,590 - 36,480,590 7,581,402
Compensated Absences Payable:
Payable Within One Year 956,190 27,639 983,829 -
Payable After One Year 1,168,676 33,781 1,202,457 -
Net Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) Obligation 1,591,366 77,308 1,668,674 -
Net Pension Liability 25,879,138 478,013 26,357,151 5,042,212
Total Liabilities 74,915,320 857,389 75,772,709 23,200,591
Deferred Inflows of Resources

Deferred Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions 2,970,605 51,916 3,022,521 531,951
Total Deferred Inflows of Resources 2,970,605 51,916 3,022,521 531,951
Total Liabilities and Deferred Inflows of Resources $ 77,885,925 $ 909,305 $ 78,795,230 $ 23,732,542
Net Position
Net Investment in Capital Assets 128,559,527 70,099,288 198,658,815 77,072,547
Restricted for:
Economic Development 1,503,917 - 1,503,917 -
Cable PEG Fees 70,795 - 70,795 -
Forfeiture 186,965 - 186,965 -
Debt Service 4,875,714 - 4,875,714 -
Component Units - - - 10,915,924
Unrestricted 16,719,760 23,281,483 40,001,243 31,264,474
Total Net Position 151,916,678 93,380,771 245,297,449 119,252,945
Total Liabilities and Net Position $ 229,802,603 $ 94,290,076 $ 324,092,679 $ 142,985,487
The Notes to the Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement. 28
Page 80 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Net (Expense) Revenues

Program Revenues and Changes in Net Position
Operating Capital Grants
Charges for Grants and and Governmental Business-Type Component
Functions/Programs Expenses Services Contributions Contributions Activities Activities Total Units
General Government $ 4,205,975 $ 2,858,344 $ 89,931 $ - $ (1,257,700) $ - $ (1,257,700) $ -
Public Safety 13,281,715 2,744,824 701,497 - (9,835,394) - (9,835,394) -
Public Works 8,593,885 746,086 609,061 2,150,904 (5,087,834) - (5,087,834) -
Culture and Recreation 4,653,362 1,760,925 343,525 36,135 (2,512,777) - (2,512,777) -
Economic Development 2,104,584 256,312 1,033,968 - (814,304) - (814,304) -
Interest on Long-Term Debt 1,190,824 - - - (1,190,824) - (1,190,824) -
Total Governmental Activities 34,030,345 8,366,491 2,777,982 2,187,039 (20,698,833) - (20,698,833)
Sewer 3,843,232 3,292,166 - 183,142 - (367,924) (367,924) -
Storm Drainage 1,848,768 1,632,218 - - - (216,550) (216,550) -
Refuse 127,034 105,309 - - - (21,725) (21,725) -
Page 81 of 334
Total Business-Type Activities 5,819,034 5,029,693 - 183,142 - (606,199) (606,199) -
Total Primary Government $ 39,849,379 $ 13,396,184 $ 2,777,982 $ 2,370,181 (20,698,833) (606,199) (21,305,032) -
Component Unit - SPUC

Electric $ 41,528,759 $ 46,609,850 $ - $ 430,031 - - - 5,511,122
Water 4,678,000 4,766,202 - 2,446,393 - - - 2,534,595
Total Component Unit $ 46,206,759 $ 51,376,052 $ - $ 2,876,424 - - - 8,045,717
General Revenues
Property Taxes 18,015,507 - 18,015,507 -
Tax Increments 464,632 - 464,632 -
Unrestricted Investment Earnings 495,804 289,001 784,805 205,682
Gain on Sale of Asset 50,132 1,911 52,043 4,886
Transfers 1,271,853 (1,271,853) - -
Total General Revenues, Transfers and Special Items 20,297,928 (980,941) 19,316,987 210,568
Change in Net Position (400,905) (1,587,140) (1,988,045) 8,256,285
Net Position - Beginning 152,317,583 94,967,911 247,285,494 110,996,660
Net Position - Ending $ 151,916,678 $ 93,380,771 $ 245,297,449 $ 119,252,945
The Notes to the Financial Statements are an integral part of this statement.
29
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
BALANCE SHEET - GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS

December 31, 2016
Capital Projects
Community Other Total

Capital Center & Ice Governmental Governmental
General Fund Improvements Arena Funds Funds
ASSETS
Cash and Investments $ 10,962,029 $ 4,923,524 $ 10,409,129 $ 9,855,981 $ 36,150,663
Delinquent Taxes Receivable 76,491 - - 140 76,631
Special Assessments Receivable:
Delinquent 4,364 - - 29,840 34,204
Deferred 19,369 3,121,051 - 1,652,232 4,792,652
Accounts Receivable 321,322 - 16,463 157,328 495,113
Interest Receivable 56,647 22,666 16,777 38,672 134,762
Due from Other Funds - 7,802 - - 7,802
Due From Other Governments 355,857 13,569 192,645 31,540 593,611
Prepaid Items 22,188 - - - 22,188
Land Held for Resale - - - 1,023,612 1,023,612
Total Assets $ 11,818,267 $ 8,088,612 $ 10,635,014 $ 12,789,345 $ 43,331,238
LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS OF

RESOURCES AND FUND BALANCES
Liabilities
Accounts Payable $ 450,767 $ 157,598 $ 3,055,187 $ 896,801 $ 4,560,353
Contracts Payable - 65,287 1,032,370 247,866 1,345,523
Due to Other Funds - - - 7,802 7,802
Due to Other Governments 211,647 401 - 24 212,072
Salaries and Benefits Payable 292,498 - - - 292,498
Advance from Other Funds - - - 1,341,394 1,341,394
Unearned Revenue 1,765 - - - 1,765
Total Liabilities 956,677 223,286 4,087,557 2,493,887 7,761,407

Unavailable Revenue - Property Taxes 76,491 - - 140 76,631
Unavailable Revenue - Special Assessments 23,733 3,121,051 - 1,682,072 4,826,856
Total Deferred Inflows of Resources 100,224 3,121,051 - 1,682,212 4,903,487
Fund Balances
Nonspendable 22,188 - - - 22,188
Restricted - - 6,547,457 6,337,788 12,885,245
Assigned - 4,744,275 - 2,315,386 7,059,661
Unassigned 10,739,178 - - (39,928) 10,699,250
Total Fund Balances 10,761,366 4,744,275 6,547,457 8,613,246 30,666,344
Total Liabilities, Deferred Inflows

of Resources and Fund Balances $ 11,818,267 $ 8,088,612 $ 10,635,014 $ 12,789,345 $ 43,331,238
30
Page 82 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
RECONCILIATION OF THE BALANCE SHEET TO

THE STATEMENT OF NET POSITION - GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
December 31, 2016
Total Fund Balances - Governmental Funds $ 30,666,344
Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Net Position

are different because:
Capital assets used in governmental activities are not current financial

resources and, therefore, are not reported as assets in governmental funds.
Cost of Capital Assets 202,910,031
Less Accumulated Depreciation (80,247,087)
Long-term assets from pensions reported in governmental activities are not financial resources
and therefore are not reported as assets in the funds. 1,117,106
Long-term liabilities, including bonds payable, are not due and payable in the current period and,
therefore, are not reported as liabilities in the funds.
Long-term liabilities at year-end consist of:
Bond Principal Payable (36,030,000)
Unamortized Bond Premium (2,135,590)
Net OPEB Obligation (1,591,366)
Net Pension Liability (25,879,138)
Delinquent property taxes and assessments receivable will be collected this year, but are
not available soon enough to pay for the current period's expenditures and, therefore,
are reported as unavailable revenue in the funds.
Property Taxes 76,631
Special Assessments 34,204
Deferred special assessments receivable are not available to pay for current expenditures and,
therefore, are reported as unavailable revenue in the funds.
Deferred Special Assessments 4,792,652
Governmental funds do not report a liability for accrued interest due and payable. (519,065)
Deferred Outflows of Resources and Deferred Inflows of Resources are created as a

result of various differences related to pensions that are not recognized in the governmental
funds.
Deferred Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions (2,970,605)
Deferred Outflows of Resources Related to Pensions 17,410,230
Internal service funds are used by management to charge the costs of

equipment, buildings, park assets and employee benefits to individual funds.
A portion of the assets and liabilities of those funds are included in
governmental activities in the Statement of Net Position. 44,282,331
Total Net Position - Governmental Activities $ 151,916,678
Page 83 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND

CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
Capital Projects
Community Other Total
Capital Center & Ice Governmental Governmental
General Fund Improvements Arena Funds Funds
REVENUES
Property Taxes $ 17,022,204 $ - $ - 1,062,630 $ 18,084,834
Tax Increment - - - 464,634 464,634
Special Assessments 15,818 830,701 - 768,642 1,615,161
Licenses and Permits 2,564,729 - - 582,089 3,146,818
Intergovernmental 1,344,279 1,039,329 192,645 1,043,557 3,619,810
Charges for Services 4,750,514 - - 8,730 4,759,244
Fines and Forfeitures 11,213 46,300 - 47,430 104,943
Miscellaneous 218,734 62,076 139,620 456,678 877,108
Total Revenues 25,927,491 1,978,406 332,265 4,434,390 32,672,552
EXPENDITURES
Current
General Government 3,999,953 - - 16,918 4,016,871
Public Safety 10,585,899 - - 57,443 10,643,342
Public Works 3,061,172 - - - 3,061,172
Culture and Recreation 4,232,167 - - 37,044 4,269,211
Economic Development - - - 2,092,337 2,092,337
Debt Service
Principal - - - 1,685,000 1,685,000
Interest and Other Charges - - 86,433 778,061 864,494
Capital Outlay 37,423 4,564,325 22,639,151 4,918,513 32,159,412
Total Expenditures 21,916,614 4,564,325 22,725,584 9,585,316 58,791,839
Excess of Revenues Over

(Under) Expenditures 4,010,877 (2,585,919) (22,393,319) (5,150,926) (26,119,287)
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES

(USES)
Proceeds from Sale of Capital Asset 9,134 - - - 9,134
Bonds Issued - - 28,379,125 1,120,875 29,500,000
Premium on Bonds Issued - - 2,237,727 - 2,237,727
Transfers In 250,000 1,200,000 - 5,466,355 6,916,355
Transfers Out (3,348,755) - - (30,222) (3,378,977)
Total Other Financing
Sources (Uses) (3,089,621) 1,200,000 30,616,852 6,557,008 35,284,239
Net Change in Fund

Balances 921,256 (1,385,919) 8,223,533 1,406,082 9,164,952
FUND BALANCES
Beginning of Year 9,840,110 6,130,194 (1,676,076) 7,207,164 21,501,392
End of Year $ 10,761,366 $ 4,744,275 $ 6,547,457 $ 8,613,246 $ 30,666,344
32
Page 84 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
RECONCILIATION OF THE STATEMENT OF REVENUES,

EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES TO
THE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES - GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
Net Change in Fund Balances - Governmental Funds $ 9,164,952
Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Activities are
Capital outlays are reported in governmental funds as expenditures. However, in the

Statement of Activities, the cost of those assets is allocated over the estimated useful
lives as depreciation expense.
Capital Outlays 31,081,158
Depreciation Expense (4,769,425)
Loss on Disposal of Fixed Assets (9,594)
Contributed Assets 36,135
Principal payments on long-term debt are recognized as expenditures in the

governmental funds but as an increase in the net position in the Statement of Activities. 1,685,000
Interest on long-term debt in the Statement of Activities differs from the amount
reported in the governmental funds because interest is recognized as an expenditure
in the funds when it is due and thus requires use of current financial resources.
In the Statement of Activities, however, interest expense is recognized as
the interest accrues, regardless of when it is due. (428,467)
Governmental funds report the effects of bond premiums when debt is first issued, whereas these amounts
are deferred and amortized in the Statement of Activities 102,137
Proceeds from long-term debt are recognized as an other financing source in the
governmental funds but as a decrease in net assets in the Statement of Activities.
Bonds Payable (29,500,000)
Unamortized Bond Premium (2,237,727)
Certain revenues in the Statement of Activities that do not provide current financial
resources are not reported as revenues in the funds.
Special Assessments Delinquent 5,862
Special Assessments Deferred (493,348)
OPEB obligations are recognized when paid in the government funds but recognized
when incurred in the Statement of Activities (246,342)
Delinquent receivables will be collected this year, but are not available soon enough
to pay for the current period's expenditures and, therefore, are not revenues in the funds. (69,327)
Capital assets transferred from proprietary funds to governmental funds 68,840
Governmental funds recognized pension contributions as expenditures at the time of payment

whereas the statement of activities factors in items related to pensions on a full accrual
perspective.
Pension Expense (2,934,439)
Internal service funds are used by management to charge the costs of certain
activities such as buildings, equipment, park assets and employee benefits to
individual funds. (See Note 2.B.) (1,856,320)
Change in Net Position - Governmental Activities $ (400,905)
Page 85 of 334
34
Page 86 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND

CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES -
BUDGET AND ACTUAL - GENERAL FUND
Budget Variance with

Actual Final Budget -
Original Final Amounts Over (Under)
REVENUES
Property Taxes $ 17,150,900 $ 17,150,900 $ 17,022,204 $ (128,696)
Special Assessments 11,500 11,500 15,818 4,318
Licenses and Permits 1,504,100 2,269,100 2,564,729 295,629
Intergovernmental 1,108,500 1,251,900 1,344,279 92,379
Charges for Services 4,226,275 4,368,150 4,750,514 382,364
Fines and Forfeitures 1,500 1,500 11,213 9,713
Miscellaneous Revenues:
Investment Income 145,000 125,000 118,764 (6,236)
Contributions and Donations 4,800 6,800 7,266 466
Rents 9,500 9,500 9,460 (40)
Other 65,948 66,450 83,244 16,794
Total Revenues 24,228,023 25,260,800 25,927,491 666,691
EXPENDITURES
Current
General Government 4,686,001 4,096,290 3,999,953 (96,337)
Public Safety 10,374,766 10,357,100 10,585,899 228,799
Public Works 3,393,889 2,965,440 3,061,172 95,732
Parks and Recreation 4,370,867 4,233,860 4,232,167 (1,693)
Capital Outlay
Public Safety - 60,000 37,423 (22,577)
Park and Recreation 1,500 - - -
Total Expenditures 22,827,023 21,712,690 21,916,614 203,924

(Under) Expenditures 1,401,000 3,548,110 4,010,877 462,767
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)

Proceeds from Sale of Capital Asset - 600 9,134 8,534
Transfers In 250,000 250,000 250,000 -
Transfers Out (2,100,000) (3,345,000) (3,348,755) (3,755)
Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) (1,850,000) (3,094,400) (3,089,621) 4,779
Net Change in Fund Balances $ (449,000) $ 453,710 921,256 $ 467,546
FUND BALANCES
Beginning of Year 9,840,110
End of Year $ 10,761,366
Page 87 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
STATEMENT OF NET POSITION - PROPRIETARY FUNDS

December 31, 2016
Business-Type Activities - Enterprise Funds

Governmental
Activities -
Storm Internal
Sewer Drainage Refuse Total Service Funds
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and Investments, Including Cash Equivalents $ 9,176,744 $ 13,595,766 $ - $ 22,772,510 $ 12,274,033
Accounts Receivable - 22,000 - 22,000 6,129
Interest Receivable 42,912 63,406 (276) 106,042 56,675
Special Assessment Receivable:
Deferred 267,330 858 - 268,188 -
Due from Other Funds 59,355 - - 59,355 -
Due from Other Governments 350,068 150,394 - 500,462 -
Prepaid Expenses - - - - 183,616
Total Current Assets 9,896,409 13,832,424 (276) 23,728,557 12,520,453
Noncurrent Assets
Advances to Other Funds, Noncurrent 853,627 - - 853,627 1,341,394
Capital Assets:
Land 4,500 3,792,303 - 3,796,803 221,876
Right of Way - 507,746 - 507,746 -
Construction in Progress 35,990 22,306 - 58,296 401,288
Line Rights 1,368,569 - - 1,368,569 -
Infrastructure 43,791,973 43,514,667 - 87,306,640 3,617,493
Buildings - - - - 34,592,888
Machinery and Equipment 1,894,016 1,024,239 1,172,068 4,090,323 15,324,414
Total Cost 47,095,048 48,861,261 1,172,068 97,128,377 54,157,959
Less Accumulated Depreciation (13,697,024) (13,097,523) (234,542) (27,029,089) (21,066,962)
Net Capital Assets 33,398,024 35,763,738 937,526 70,099,288 33,090,997
Total Noncurrent Assets 34,251,651 35,763,738 937,526 70,952,915 34,432,391
Total Assets 44,148,060 49,596,162 937,250 94,681,472 46,952,844

Deferred Outflows of Resources Related to Pensions 96,356 102,667 - 199,023 -
Total Assets and Deferred Outflows of Resources $ 44,244,416 $ 49,698,829 $ 937,250 $ 94,880,495 $ 46,952,844
LIABILITIES AND NET POSITION

Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable $ 28,036 $ 23,402 $ - $ 51,438 223,084
Contracts Payable 89,419 - - 89,419 -
Due to Other Funds - - 59,355 59,355 -
Due to Other Governments 79,695 20,096 - 99,791 -
Current Compensated Absences 13,459 14,180 - 27,639 956,190
Total Current Liabilities 210,609 57,678 59,355 327,642 1,179,274
Noncurrent Liabilities
Advances from Other Funds - - 853,627 853,627 -
Compensated Absences 16,449 17,332 - 33,781 1,168,676
Net OPEB Obligation 38,654 38,654 - 77,308 -
Net Pension Liability 231,428 246,585 - 478,013 -
Total Noncurrent Liabilities 286,531 302,571 853,627 1,442,729 1,168,676
Total Liabilities 497,140 360,249 912,982 1,770,371 2,347,950

Deferred Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions 25,135 26,781 - 51,916 -
Net Position
Investment in Capital Assets 33,398,024 35,763,738 937,526 70,099,288 33,090,997
Unrestricted 10,324,117 13,548,061 (913,258) 22,958,920 11,513,897
Total Net Position 43,722,141 49,311,799 24,268 93,058,208 44,604,894
Total Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources and

Net Position $ 44,244,416 $ 49,698,829 $ 937,250 $ 46,952,844
Adjustment to Reflect the Consolidation of Internal Service

Fund Activity Related to Enterprise Funds (See Note 2c) 322,563
Total Business-Type Activities Net Position $ 93,380,771
Page 88 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES

IN FUND NET POSITION - PROPRIETARY FUNDS

Governmental
Activities -
Internal Service
Sewer Storm Drainage Refuse Total Funds
OPERATING REVENUES
Charges for Services $ 3,085,500 $ 1,202,004 $ 105,309 $ 4,392,813 $ -
Rental Charges - - - - 2,364,368
Other Charges 9,943 - - 9,943 -
Special Assessments 4,578 249 - 4,827 -
Total Operating Revenues 3,100,021 1,202,253 105,309 4,407,583 2,364,368
OPERATING EXPENSES
Salaries and Benefits 302,773 524,343 - 827,116 38,214
Depreciation 812,027 803,609 117,431 1,733,067 1,847,874
Professional Services 115,733 204,323 - 320,056 1,358
Sewer Disposal Charges 2,443,356 - - 2,443,356 -
Repairs and Maintenance 44,160 249,068 - 293,228 59,124
Materials and Supplies 35,784 53,041 - 88,825 379,138
Rent 38,530 40,179 - 78,709 -
Insurance 67,060 12,360 - 79,420 134,014
Utilities 79,297 1,916 - 81,213 -
Total Operating Expenses 3,938,720 1,888,839 117,431 5,944,990 2,459,722
Operating Income (Loss) (838,699) (686,586) (12,122) (1,537,407) (95,354)
NONOPERATING REVENUES
(EXPENSES)
Investment Income 122,703 167,402 (1,104) 289,001 155,581
Donations - - - - 366,622
Insurance Dividends - - - - 145,757
Interest Expense - - (9,603) (9,603) -
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Asset - 1,911 - 1,911 40,998
Capital Asset Transfer (7,966) (7,967) - (15,933) (52,907)
Trunk Charges 192,145 431,271 - 623,416 -
Total Nonoperating Revenues

(Expenses) 306,882 592,617 (10,707) 888,792 656,051
Income before Capital

Contributions and Transfers (531,817) (93,969) (22,829) (648,615) 560,697
Capital Contributions from Special Assessments 183,142 (1,306) - 181,836 -

Transfers In - - - - 105,222
Transfers Out (630,920) (625,000) - (1,255,920) (2,386,680)
Change in Net Position (979,595) (720,275) (22,829) (1,722,699) (1,720,761)
NET POSITION
Beginning of Year 44,701,736 50,032,074 47,097 94,780,907 46,325,655
End of Year $ 43,722,141 $ 49,311,799 $ 24,268 $ 93,058,208 $ 44,604,894
Adjustment to Reflect the Consolidation of Internal Service

Fund Activity Related to Enterprise Funds (See Note 2d) 135,559
Change in Net Position - Business-Type Activities $ (1,587,140)
Page 89 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS - PROPRIETARY FUNDS


Governmental
Activities -
Storm Internal
CASH FLOWS - OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Receipts from Customers and Users $ 3,026,147 $ 1,163,649 $ 105,309 $ 4,295,105 $ 2,358,736
Receipts from Interfund Services - - 12,023 12,023 1,091,174
Payments to Suppliers (3,118,865) (1,133,211) - (4,252,076) (826,383)
Payments to Employees (295,209) (498,763) - (793,972) -
Payments for Interfund Services (12,023) - - (12,023) -
Net Cash Flows - Operating
Activities (399,950) (468,325) 117,332 (750,943) 2,623,527
CASH FLOWS - NONCAPITAL

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Payment Received on Interfund Loan 106,703 - (106,703) - 50,000
Interest Expense on Interfund Loan Repayment - - (9,603) (9,603) -
Insurance Dividends - - - - 145,757
Transfer from Other Funds - - - - 105,222
Transfer to Other Funds (630,920) (625,000) - (1,255,920) (2,386,680)
Net Cash Flows - Noncapital
Financing Activities (524,217) (625,000) (116,306) (1,265,523) (2,085,701)
CASH FLOWS - CAPITAL AND RELATED

Trunk Charges 192,145 431,271 - 623,416 -
Capital Related Special Assessments 190,964 - - 190,964 -
Donations - - - - 366,622
Proceeds (Loss) from Disposal of Capital Assets - 62,183 - 62,183 409,903
Acquisition of Capital Assets (1,577,369) (1,344,822) - (2,922,191) (2,437,853)
Net Cash Flows - Capital and
Related Financing Activities (1,194,260) (851,368) - (2,045,628) (1,661,328)
CASH FLOWS - INVESTING ACTIVITIES

Interest Received 127,455 168,488 (1,026) 294,917 158,215
Net Cash Flows - Investing
Activities 127,455 168,488 (1,026) 294,917 158,215
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents (1,990,972) (1,776,205) - (3,767,177) (965,287)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

Beginning of Year 11,167,716 15,371,971 - 26,539,687 13,239,320
End of Year $ 9,176,744 $ 13,595,766 $ - $ 22,772,510 $ 12,274,033
Page 90 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS - PROPRIETARY FUNDS

(Continued)

Governmental
Activities -
Storm Internal
RECONCILIATION OF OPERATING
INCOME (LOSS) TO NET CASH
FLOWS - OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Operating Income (Loss) $ (838,699) $ (686,586) $ (12,122) $ (1,537,407) $ (95,354)
Adjustments to Reconcile Operating
Income (Loss) to Net Cash
Flows - Operating Activities:
Depreciation Expense 812,027 803,609 117,431 1,733,067 1,847,874
Pension Expense (686) 16,156 - 15,470 -
Changes in:
Accounts Receivable - (22,000) - (22,000) (6,129)
Due from Other Funds (12,023) - - (12,023) 897,344
Due from Other Governments (13,773) (14,675) - (28,448) 497
Special Assessments (60,101) (1,929) - (62,030) -
Due to Other Governments (293,674) (268,946) - (562,620) -
Accounts and Contracts Payable (1,271) (303,378) - (304,649) (69,133)
Prepaid Expenses - - - - (183,616)
Due to Other Funds - - 12,023 12,023 -
Compensated Absences Payable 2,904 4,078 - 6,982 232,044
Net OPEB Obligation 5,346 5,346 - 10,692 -
Total Adjustments 438,749 218,261 129,454 786,464 2,718,881
Activities $ (399,950) $ (468,325) $ 117,332 $ (750,943) $ 2,623,527
NONCASH INVESTING, CAPITAL AND

Transfer of Capital Assets $ (7,966) $ (7,967) $ - $ (15,933) $ (52,907)
Page 91 of 334
40
Page 92 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
COMBINED STATEMENT OF FIDUCIARY NET POSITION

December 31, 2016
Total Agency
Funds
ASSETS
Current
Cash and Investments $ 3,156,064
Due from Other Governments 91,644
Prepaids 9,152
Total Assets $ 3,256,860
LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable $ 378,410
Deposits Payable 2,839,140
Due to Other Governments 39,310
Total Liabilities $ 3,256,860
41
Page 93 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
STATEMENT OF NET POSITION - COMPONENT UNIT - SPUC

December 31, 2016
Electric Water Total

ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and Investments $ 30,515,896 $ 6,114,220 $ 36,630,116
Restricted Assets:
Sinking Account 533,930 - 533,930
Accrued Interest Receivable 37,587 8,924 46,511
Customer Accounts Receivable 3,601,559 264,166 3,865,725
Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts (31,510) (9,742) (41,252)
Other Accounts Receivable 107,200 182,671 289,871
Due from City of Shakopee 102,319 19,285 121,604
Inventory 1,136,281 36,880 1,173,161
Prepaid Expenses 39,000 13,000 52,000
Total Current Assets 36,042,262 6,629,404 42,671,666
Noncurrent Assets
Restricted Assets:
Customer Deposits Account 2,210,076 33,104 2,243,180
Connection Account - 10,526,340 10,526,340
Emergency Repairs Account 100,000 - 100,000
Capital Assets:
Plant in Service 62,220,987 53,985,582 116,206,569
Accumulated Depreciation (22,415,902) (16,980,197) (39,396,099)
Construction in Progress 6,586,352 1,682,127 8,268,479
Total Noncurrent Assets 48,701,513 49,246,956 97,948,469
Total Assets 84,743,775 55,876,360 140,620,135

Deferred Outflows of Resources Related to Pensions 1,604,590 534,863 2,139,453
Unamortized loss on refunding 225,899 - 225,899
Total Deferred Outflows of Resources 1,830,489 534,863 2,365,352
Total Assets and Deferred Outflows of Resources $ 86,574,264 $ 56,411,223 $ 142,985,487
LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS

Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable $ 4,846,190 $ 114,538 $ 4,960,728
Due to City of Shakopee 415,529 51,865 467,394
Other Current Liabilities 245,474 119,133 364,607
Total Current Liabilities 5,507,193 285,536 5,792,729
Liabilities Payable from Restricted Assets

Current Portion of Revenue Bonds 425,000 - 425,000
Accrued Interest Payable 144,346 - 144,346
Customer Deposits 2,210,076 33,104 2,243,180
Total Liabilities Payable from Restricted Assets 2,779,422 33,104 2,812,526
Revenue Bonds 7,590,000 - 7,590,000
Unamortized Bond Discount (8,598) - (8,598)
Unearned Revenues 1,661,410 - 1,661,410
Customer Advances 259,511 50,801 310,312
Net Pension Liability 3,781,660 1,260,552 5,042,212
Total Noncurrent Liabilities 13,283,983 1,311,353 14,595,336
Total Liabilities 21,570,598 1,629,993 23,200,591
Deferred Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions 398,962 132,989 531,951
Total Liabilities and Deferred Inflows of Resources $ 21,969,560 $ 1,762,982 $ 23,732,542
Net Position
Investment in Capital Assets 38,385,035 38,687,512 77,072,547
Restricted for Debt Service 389,584 - 389,584
Restricted for Connections & Reconstruction - 10,526,340 10,526,340
Unrestricted 25,830,085 5,434,389 31,264,474
Total Net Position 64,604,704 54,648,241 119,252,945
Total Liabilities and Net Position $ 86,574,264 $ 56,411,223 $ 142,985,487
42
Page 94 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES

IN FUND NET POSITION - COMPONENT UNIT - SPUC
Electric Water Total
Operating Revenues $ 46,202,101 $ 4,568,096 $ 50,770,197
Operating Expenses 41,152,902 4,677,855 45,830,757
Operating Income 5,049,199 (109,759) 4,939,440
NONOPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES)

Rentals and Miscellaneous 317,749 212,328 530,077
Interdepartmental Rent from Water 90,000 - 90,000
Investment Income 164,029 41,653 205,682
Interest Expense (358,055) (145) (358,200)
Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs and
Loss on Refunding (17,802) - (17,802)
Gain(Loss) on Disposition of Property 4,886 (14,222) (9,336)
Total Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses) 200,807 239,614 440,421
Income Before Contributions and Transfers 5,250,006 129,855 5,379,861
Capital Contributions 430,031 2,446,393 2,876,424
Change in Net Position 5,680,037 2,576,248 8,256,285
NET POSITION
Beginning of Year 58,924,667 52,071,993 110,996,660
End of Year $ 64,604,704 $ 54,648,241 $ 119,252,945
43
Page 95 of 334
44
Page 96 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016
NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A. Reporting Entity
The City of Shakopee is a statutory city governed by an elected mayor and four council members. The
accompanying financial statements present the government entities for which the government is
considered to be financially accountable.
The financial statements present the City and its component units. The City includes all funds,
organizations, institutions, agencies, departments and offices that are not legally separate from such.
Component units are legally separate organizations for which the elected officials of the City are
financially accountable and are included within the financial statements of the City because of the
significance of their operational or financial relationships with the City.
The City is considered financially accountable for a component unit if it appoints a voting majority of
the organizations governing body and it is able to impose its will on the organization by significantly
influencing the programs, projects, activities or level of services performed or provided by the
organization or there is a potential for the organization to provide specific financial benefits to or impose
specific financial burdens on, the City.
As a result of applying the component unit definition criteria above, certain organizations have been
defined and are presented in this report as follows:
Blended Component Unit Reported as if they were part of the City.
Discretely Presented Component Unit Entails reporting the component unit financial data in
statements separate from the financial date of the City.
Joint Ventures and Jointly Governed Organizations The relationship of the City with the entity is
disclosed.
For each of the categories above, the specific entities are identified as follows:
1. Blended Component Unit
The Shakopee Economic Development Authority (EDA) was organized to promote development,
improve housing and reduce blighted areas in the City. It is included by reason of the City Council
having final approval for Shakopee EDA actions and the Shakopee EDA Board being comprised
entirely of City Council Members. City staff handles Shakopee EDA activity including Shakopee
EDA funds and the City approves Shakopee EDA tax levies and bonding activity. Therefore, the
City has financial oversight for Shakopee EDA activities. The City also has operational
responsibility of the EDA.
The activity of the Shakopee EDA is shown in the Shakopee EDA Special Revenue Fund in the
Citys financial statements. No separate financial statements for the Shakopee EDA are issued. For
any information desired beyond what is presented in this report, contact the Finance Director for the
City of Shakopee at 129 Holmes Street South, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379-1351.
45
Page 97 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
A. Reporting Entity (Continued)
2. Discretely Presented Component Unit

The electric and water utilities of the Shakopee Public Utilities Commission (SPUC) are self-
supporting entities and collectively comprise separate enterprise funds of the City of Shakopee (the
City). The utility provides electric and water operations to properties within the City as well as
electric distribution to certain other areas outside of the City. The utility accounts for the costs of
electric and water operations on a continuing basis and is managed by the SPUC. The SPUC Board
consists of five members who serve three year consecutive terms. SPUC is presented as a discretely
presented component unit because of the nature and significance of its relationship with the primary
government. Separate financial statements are included in this report for the SPUC Funds to
emphasize that it is legally separate from the City. Based on its relationship with the City, it would
be misleading to exclude SPUC as a component unit. It is this criterion that results in SPUC being
reported as a discretely presented component unit. The complete financial statements can be
obtained from the Shakopee Public Utility Commission, 225 Sarazin Street, Shakopee, Minnesota
55379.
3. Joint Ventures and Jointly Governed Organizations
Local Government Information Systems
Local Government Information Systems (LOGIS) is a joint venture of approximately 44

governmental entities that provides computerized data processing and support services to its
members. Legally separate, the City does not appoint a voting majority of the Board and LOGIS is
fiscally independent of the City. During 2016, the City paid $ 163,777 to LOGIS for services
provided which is included in expenditures of the General Fund. Financial statements are available
by contacting LOGIS, 5750 Duluth Street, Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422-4036.
4. Other Organizations
Shakopee Volunteer Fire Department Relief Association
The Shakopee Volunteer Fire Department Relief Association (the Association) is organized as a
nonprofit organization, legally separate from the City, by its members to provide pensions and other
benefits to such members in accordance with Minnesota Statutes. It is not a component unit of the City
because the Board of Directors is appointed by the membership of the Association and not by the City
Council. The financial oversight of the City is limited to approval authority for amending the
Association bylaws when the change results in an increase in the pension benefit level requiring an
increased City contribution. The Association has the authority to levy its own taxes for pensions and
deficits and would continue to exist for its members if the City was dissolved. Because the Association
is fiscally independent of the City, the financial statements of the Association have not been included
within the Citys reporting entity.
46
Page 98 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
B. Government-Wide and Fund Financial Statements
The government-wide financial statements (i.e., the Statement of Net Position and the Statement of
Activities) report information on all of the nonfiduciary activities of the City. The fiduciary funds are
only reported in the Statement of Fiduciary Net Position at the fund financial statement level.
Governmental activities, which normally are supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues, are
reported separately from business-type activities, which rely to a significant extent on fees and charges
for support.
The Statement of Activities demonstrates the degree to which the direct expenses of a given function or
segment is offset by program revenues. Direct expenses are those that are clearly identifiable with a
specific function or segment. Interest on general long-term debt is considered an indirect expense and
is reported separately in the Statement of Activities. Program revenues include 1) charges to customers
or applicants who purchase, use or directly benefit from goods, services or privileges provided by a
given function or segment and 2) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the operational
or capital requirements of a particular function or segment. Taxes and other items not properly
included among program revenues are reported instead as general revenues. Internally dedicated
revenues are reported as general revenues rather than program revenues.
Separate financial statements are provided for governmental funds and proprietary funds. Major
individual governmental funds and major individual enterprise funds are reported as separate columns in
the fund financial statements.
The Escrow Agency Fund is presented in the fiduciary fund financial statements. Since, by definition,
these assets are being held for the benefit of a third party (other local governments, private parties, etc.)
and cannot be used to address activities or obligations of the City, this Fund is not incorporated into the
government-wide statements.
C. Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting and Financial Statement Presentation

The government-wide financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus
and the accrual basis of accounting, as are the proprietary fund financial statements. Revenues are
recorded when earned and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of
related cash flows. Property taxes are recognized as revenues in the year for which they are levied.
Grants and similar items are recognized as revenue as soon as all eligibility requirements imposed by the
provider have been met.
The Agency Funds report only assets and liabilities and have no measurement focus, but do use the
accrual basis of accounting to recognize receivables and payables.
Governmental fund financial statements are reported using the current financial resources measurement
focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized as soon as they are both
measurable and available. Revenues are considered to be available when they are collectible within the
current period or soon enough thereafter to pay liabilities of the current period. For this purpose, the
City considers revenues to be available if they are collected within 60 days of the end of the current
period. Expenditures generally are recorded when a liability is incurred, as under accrual accounting.
47
Page 99 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016

C. Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting and Financial Statement Presentation (Continued)
However, debt service expenditures, as well as expenditures related to compensated absences and claims
and judgments, are recorded only when payment is due.
Property taxes, franchise taxes, licenses and interest associated with the current period are all
considered to be susceptible to accrual and so have been recognized as revenues of the current period.
Only the portion of special assessments receivable due within the current period is considered to be
susceptible to accrual as revenue of the current period. All other revenue items are considered to be
measurable and available only when cash is received by the City.
Description of Funds:
Major Governmental Funds:
General Fund This Fund is the Citys primary operating fund. It accounts for all financial resources
of the general City, except those required to be accounted for in another fund.
Capital Improvements Capital Project Fund This Fund accounts for the capital projects of the City
not accounted for in separate capital funds.
Community Center & Ice Arena Capital Project Fund This Fund accounts for the construction
costs associated with the construction of the community center and ice arena.
Proprietary Funds:
Sewer Fund This Fund accounts for operations of the Citys sewer utility.
Storm Drainage Fund This Fund accounts for the activities of the Citys storm drainage utility.
Refuse Fund This Fund accounts for operations associated with the Citys garbage carts and
recycling operations.
48
Page 100 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
Description of Funds: (Continued)
Internal Service Funds:
Equipment Fund This Fund accounts for the Citys acquisition of larger pieces of equipment.
Buildings Fund This Fund accounts for the Citys funds accumulated for construction,
improvement or major repairs of major public buildings.
Park Assets Fund This Fund accounts for the Citys funds accumulated for the replacement of park
assets.
Employee Benefits Fund This Fund accounts for the Citys funds accumulated for compensated
absences and OPEB.
Information and Technology Fund This Fund accounts for the Citys funds accumulated for
information technology resources.
Self Insurance Fund This Fund is used to account for all revenues and expenses associated with
premiums, deductibles and claims for general liability and workers compensation policy through
LMCIT.
The Citys internal service funds are allocated between governmental and business-type activities and
are combined, as allocated in Note 2, with the respective governmental activities and business-type
activities in the government-wide financial statements.
Fiduciary Funds:
Escrow Agency Fund This Fund accounts for the monies held for specific purposes for individuals,
private organizations, other government units and other funds. Escrows are held on behalf of
builders and developers, for security deposits and police evidence deposits.
Holiday Lighting Agency Fund This Fund accounts for the monies held for holiday lighting.
Southwest Metro Drug Task Force Agency Fund This Fund accounts for the activity related to the
task force held by the City in a strictly custodial capacity.
Component Unit Funds:
Electric Fund This Fund accounts for the operations of the SPUCs electric utility.
Water Fund This Fund accounts for the operations of the SPUCs water utility.
49
Page 101 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
As a general rule, the effect of interfund activity has been eliminated from the government-wide
financial statements. Exceptions to this general rule are payments, where the amounts are reasonably
equivalent in value to the interfund services provided and other charges between the Citys utility
function and various other functions of the City. Elimination of these charges would distort the direct
costs and program revenues reported for the various functions concerned.
Proprietary funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from nonoperating items. Operating
revenues and expenses generally result from providing services and producing and delivering goods in
connection with a proprietary funds principal ongoing operations. The principal operating revenues of
the enterprise funds are charges to customers for sales and services. Operating expenses for enterprise
funds include the cost of sales and services, administrative expenses and depreciation on capital assets.
All revenues and expenses not meeting this definition are reported as nonoperating revenues and
expenses.
When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the Citys policy to use
restricted resources first, then unrestricted resources as they are needed.
D. Assets, Liabilities and Net Position or Equity
1. Deposits and Investments
Cash and investments include balances from all funds that are combined and invested to the extent
available in various securities as authorized by state law. Earnings from the pooled investments are
allocated to the individual funds based on the average of month-end cash and investment balances.
All funds of the City are included in the pooled investments with the exclusion of the 2016A bond
proceeds which is included in the non-pooled investments.
The Citys cash and cash equivalents are considered to be cash on hand, demand deposits and highly
liquid debt instruments purchased with original maturities of three months or less from the date of
acquisition.
Certain investments for the City and Component Unit are reported at fair value as disclosed in Note
4. The City and Component Unit categorizes its fair value measurements within the fair value
hierarchy established by generally accepted accounting principles. The Hierarchy is based on the
valuation inputs used to measure the fair value of the asset. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active
markets for identical assets; Level 2 inputs are significant other observable inputs; Level 3 inputs are
significant unobservable inputs.
50
Page 102 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
D. Assets, Liabilities and Net Position or Equity (Continued)
1. Deposits and Investments (Continued)
Minnesota Statutes authorizes the City to invest in obligations of the U.S. Treasury, agencies and
instrumentalities, shares of investment companies whose only investments are in the aforementioned
securities, obligations of the State of Minnesota or its municipalities, bankers acceptances, future
contracts, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements and commercial paper of the highest
quality with a maturity of no longer than 270 days and in the Minnesota Municipal Money Market
Fund.
In accordance with GASB Statement No. 79, the Minnesota Municipal Investment Pool securities
are valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. There are no restrictions or limitations
on withdrawals from the 4M Liquid Asset Fund. Investments in the 4M Plus must be deposited for a
minimum of 14 calendar days. Withdrawals prior to the 14-day restriction period will be subject to a
penalty equal to seven days interest on the amount withdrawn. Seven days' notice of redemption is
required for withdrawals of investments in the 4M Term Series withdrawn prior to the maturity date
of that series. A penalty could be assessed as necessary to recoup the Series for any charges, losses,
and other costs attributable to the early redemption.
2. Receivables and Payables
Activity between funds that are representative of lending/borrowing arrangements outstanding at the
end of the year are referred to as advances to/from other funds. All other outstanding balances
between funds are reported as due to/from other funds. Any residual balances outstanding
between the governmental activities and business-type activities are reported in the government-
wide financial statements as interfund balances.
All trade and property tax receivables are shown at a gross amount since both are assessable to the
property taxes and are collectible upon the sale of the property.
The City levies its property tax for the subsequent year during the month of December. December
28 is the last day the City can certify a tax levy to the County Auditor for collection the following
year. Such taxes become a lien on January 1 and are recorded as receivables by the City at that date.
The property tax is recorded as revenue when it becomes measurable and available. Scott County is
the collecting agency for the levy and remits the collections to the City three times a year. The tax
levy notice is mailed in March with the first half of the payment due on May 15 and the second half
due on October 15. Taxes not collected as of December 31 each year are shown as delinquent taxes
receivable.
The County Auditor prepares the tax list for all taxable property in the City, applying the applicable
tax rate to the tax capacity of individual properties, to arrive at the actual tax for each property. The
County Auditor also collects all special assessments, except for certain prepayments paid directly to
the City.
The County Auditor submits the list of taxes and special assessments to be collected on each parcel
of property to the County Treasurer in January of each year.
51
Page 103 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016

3. Inventory, Prepaid Items and Other Assets
Certain payments to vendors reflect costs applicable to future accounting periods and are recorded as
prepaid items in both government-wide and fund financial statements. Prepaid expenditures of
governmental funds are reported using the consumption method and recorded as
expenditures/expenses at the time of consumption.
Inventories of enterprise funds are valued at average cost using the first in, first out (FIFO) method.
Inventory in the governmental funds are recorded as an expenditure when consumed rather than
when purchased.
Other assets include unamortized debt issuance costs, the Emergency Repairs Account and the asset
and related amortization relating to the Electric Plant Acquisition.
4. Land Held for Resale
Land is acquired by the City for subsequent resale for redevelopment purposes. Land held for resale
is reported as an asset at the lower of cost or estimated realized value in the fund that acquired it.
5. Restricted Assets
Certain cash and investments in the component units are classified as restricted. The Electric Fund
has monies restricted for customer deposits and debt service. The Water Fund has monies restricted
for water production and trunk distribution facility acquisition, based on trunk and connection fees
collected from users, construction projects and debt service.
6. Capital Assets
Capital assets, which include property, plant, equipment and infrastructure assets (e.g., roads,
sidewalks and similar items), are reported in the applicable governmental or business-type activities
columns in the government-wide financial statements. Capital assets are defined by the City,
excluding the component unit, as assets with an initial, individual cost of more than $ 10,000 and an
estimated useful life in excess of two years. Capital assets for the component unit are defined as
assets with an initial, individual cost of more than $ 1,000 and an estimated useful life in excess of
one year. Such assets are recorded at historical cost or estimated historical cost if purchased or
constructed. Donated capital assets are recorded at acquisition value at the date of donation.
The costs of normal maintenance and repairs that do not add to the value of the asset or materially
extend assets lives are not capitalized.
52
Page 104 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
6. Capital Assets (Continued)
Property, plant and equipment of the City are depreciated using the straight-line method over the
following estimated useful lives.
Assets Years
Buildings 30-50
Park Buildings 30
Building Improvements 25
Light Vehicles 4-10
Machinery and Equipment 4-20
Utility Distribution System 50-75
Infrastructure 30-50
Fire Trucks 20-25
7. Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources
In addition to assets, the statement of financial position will sometimes report a separate section for
deferred outflows of resources. This separate financial statement element represents a consumption
of net position that applies to a future period(s) and so will not be recognized as an outflow of
resources (expense/expenditure) until that time. The City has one item that qualifies for reporting in
this category. The City and Component Unit present deferred outflows of resources on the Statement
of Net Position for the deferred charge related to pensions. The Component Unit also has one item
that qualifies for reporting in this category. It is the deferred charge on refunding reported in the
statement of net position- component unit - SPUC. A deferred charge on refunding results from the
difference in the carrying value of refunded debt and its reacquisition price. This amount is deferred
and amortized over the shorter of the life of the refunded or refunding debt. The City presents
deferred outflows of resources on the Statements of Net Position for deferred outflows of resources
related to pensions. Deferred outflows of resources related to pensions results from the net effect of
the change in proportionate share, the difference between projected and actual investments earnings
and employer contributions paid to PERA and the firefighters relief association subsequent to the
measurement date.
In addition to liabilities, the statement of financial position and fund financial statements will
sometimes report a separate section for deferred inflows of resources. This separate financial
statement element, deferred inflows of resources, represents an acquisition of net position that
applies to a future period(s) and so will not be recognized as an inflow of resources (revenue) until
that time. The City only has one type of item, which arises only under the modified accrual basis of
accounting that qualifies for reporting in this category. Accordingly, the item is reported only in the
governmental funds balance sheet as unavailable revenue.
53
Page 105 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016

7. Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources (Continued)
The governmental funds report unavailable revenues from two sources: property taxes and special
assessments. These amounts are deferred and recognized as an inflow of resources in the period
that the amounts become available.
The City presents deferred inflows of resources on the Statements of Net Position for deferred
inflows of resources related to pensions. Deferred inflows of resources related to pensions results
from the net difference between projected and actual earnings on plan investments, changes in
proportionate share and the differences between expected and actual economic experience.
8. Compensated Absences
Vacation and sick leave benefits are recorded as expenditures in the Employee Benefits Internal
Service Fund and governmental funds when the obligations have matured and are expected to be
liquidated with expendable financial resources. City employees earn vacation time based on years
of City service. Employees who have 0 to 15 years of employment may accumulate no more than
240 hours. Employees who have 16 or more years of service may accumulate no more than 360
hours of vacation leave. Upon termination, employees will receive compensation for all unused
vacation. Employees earn sick leave and may accumulate to a maximum of 960 hours. The City
compensates employees who leave municipal service at the rate of 45% up to 15 years of service.
After 15 years of service, employees who leave are compensated at the rate of 55% plus 2% for
each year of service beyond 15 years up to 75% of unused sick leave.
9. Long-Term Obligations
In the government-wide financial statements and proprietary fund types in the fund financial
statements, long-term debt and other long-term obligations are reported as liabilities in the applicable
governmental activities, business-type activities or proprietary fund type Statement of Net Position.
Enterprise fund bond premiums and discounts, are deferred and amortized over the life of the bonds
using the effective interest method. Bonds payable are reported net of the applicable bond premium
or discount.
In the fund financial statements, governmental fund types recognize bond premiums and discounts,
as well as bond issuance costs, during the current period. The face amount of debt issued is reported
as other financing sources. Premiums received on debt issuances are reported as other financing
sources while discounts on debt issuances are reported as other financing uses. Issuance costs,
whether or not withheld from the actual debt proceeds received, are reported as expenditures.
54
Page 106 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016

10. Pensions
For purposes of measuring the net pension liability, deferred outflows/inflows of resources, and
pension expense, information about the fiduciary net position of the Public Employees Retirement
Association (PERA) and the relief association and additions to/deductions from PERA's and the
relief association's fiduciary net position have been determined on the same basis as they are
reported by PERA and the relief association except that PERA's fiscal year end is June 30. For this
purpose, plan contributions are recognized as of employer payroll paid dates and benefit payments
and refunds are recognized when due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms. Investments
are reported at fair value.
11. Fund Equity
a. Classification
In the fund financial statements, governmental funds report fund classifications that comprise a
hierarchy based primarily on the extent to which the City is bound to honor constraints on the
specific purpose for which amounts in those funds can be spent. Non-spendable fund balances
include amounts that cannot be spent because they are not in spendable form. Amounts that are
restricted to specific purposes either by a) constraints placed on the use of resources by creditors,
grantors, contributors, or laws or regulations of other governments or b) imposed by law through
enabling legislation are classified as restricted fund balances. Amounts that can only be used for
specific purposes pursuant to constraints imposed by the City Council (highest level of decision
making authority) through resolution are classified as committed fund balances. Amounts that
are constrained by the Citys intent to be used for specific purposes but are neither restricted nor
committed are classified as assigned fund balances. Assignments are made by the Citys Finance
Director based on the City Councils direction. Unassigned fund balance represents fund balance
that has not been assigned to other funds and that has not been restricted, committed or assigned
to a specific purpose in the General Fund. The Citys policy is to consider unrestricted fund
balance to be spent by City Council action, appropriations or emergency situations.
The City applies restricted resources first when expenditures are incurred for purposes for which
either restricted or unrestricted (committed, assigned and unassigned) are available. Similarly,
within unrestricted fund balance, committed amounts are reduced first followed by assigned and
then unassigned amounts when expenditures are incurred for purposes for which amounts in any
of the unrestricted fund balance classifications could be used.
a. Minimum Fund Balance
The Citys target General Fund balance is to maintain an unassigned level between 40%
(minimum) and 45% of budgeted expenditures. This level is to provide working capital for cash
flow, expected decline in revenues and unforeseen expenditures such as natural disasters.
Replenishing fund balance when it falls below the target level shall be accomplished by interfund
transfers or budgeting for expenditures and other uses to be less than revenues or other sources
over a period not to exceed three years.
55
Page 107 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016

12. Net Position
Net position represents the difference between assets and deferred outflows and liabilities and
deferred inflows in the government-wide financial statements. Net investment in capital assets
consists of capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation, reduced by the outstanding balance of any
long-term debt used to build or acquire the capital assets. Net position is reported as restricted in the
government-wide financial statement when there are limitations on their use through external
restrictions imposed by creditors, grantors or laws or regulations of other governments.
13. Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements. Estimates also affect the reported amounts of revenue and
expenditures/expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
NOTE 2 RECONCILIATION OF GOVERNMENT-WIDE AND FUND FINANCIAL

STATEMENTS
A. Explanation of Certain Differences between the Governmental Fund Balance Sheet and the
Government-Wide Statement of Net Position
The governmental fund Balance Sheet includes reconciliation between fund balance total
governmental funds and net position governmental activities as reported in the government-wide
Statement of Net Position. One element of that reconciliation explains that Internal Service Funds are
used by management to charge the costs of providing certain services for the City.
Net Position of the Internal Service Funds $ 44,604,894
Less Portion Loss Related to Business-Type Activities (322,563)
Net Adjusmtent to Increase Fund Balance- Total Governmental

Funds to Arrive at Net Position- Governmental Activities $ 44,282,331
56
Page 108 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
NOTE 2 RECONCILIATION OF GOVERNMENT-WIDE AND FUND FINANCIAL

STATEMENTS
B. Explanation of Certain Differences between the Governmental Fund Statements of

Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances and the Government-Wide
Statement of Activities
Another element of that reconciliation states that Internal Service Funds are used by management to
charge the costs of providing various services for the City. The details of this difference are as follows:
Change in Net Position of the Internal Service Fund $ (1,720,761)
Less the Net of Indirect Revenues and Expense (135,559)
Net Adjustment to Decrease Net Change in Fund Balances - Total

Government Funds to Arrive at Changes in Net position of
Government Activities $ (1,856,320)
C. Explanation of Certain Differences between the Proprietary Fund Statements of Net

Position and the Government-Wide Statement of Net Position
The proprietary fund Statement of Net Position includes reconciliation between net position total
enterprise funds and net position of business-type activities as reported in the government-wide
Statement of Net Position. The description of the sole reconciliation is adjustment to reflect the
consolidation of internal service fund activities related to enterprise funds. The details are as follows:
Internal Payable Representing Costs less than Charges to

Business- Type Activities- Current Year $ 322,563
D. Explanation of Certain Differences between the Proprietary Fund Statements of

Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Position and the Government-Wide
Statement of Activities
Another element of that reconciliation states that Internal Service Funds are used by management to
charge the costs of providing various services for the City. The details of this difference are as follows:
Net adjustment to Increase Net Change in Fund Balances- Total

Enterprise Funds to Arrive at Changes in Net Position of
Business- Type Activities $ 135,559
57
Page 109 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
NOTE 3 STEWARDSHIP, COMPLIANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY
A. Budgetary Information
Budgets are adopted on a basis consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. Annually appropriated budgets are adopted for the General Fund.
Budgeted amounts present the originally adopted budget and final amended budget approved by the City
Council. The City does not use encumbrances. Budgeted expenditure appropriations lapse at year-end.
1. In August of each year, City staff submits to the City Council, a proposed operating budget for
the year commencing the following January 1. The operating budget includes proposed
expenditures and the means of financing them for the upcoming year.
2. Public hearings are conducted to obtain taxpayer comments.
3. The budget is legally enacted through passage of a resolution after obtaining taxpayer comments.
4. Expenditures may not legally exceed budgeted appropriations at the division level. The division
level expenditures are presented in the schedule of revenues, expenditures and changes in fund
balances budget and actual general fund. No funds budget can be increased without City
Council approval. The City Council may authorize transfer of budgeted amounts between
divisions within any fund. Management may amend budgets within a division level, so long as
the total division budget is not changed.
5. An annual budget is adopted for the General Fund. Annual appropriated budgets are not adopted
for Debt Service Funds because effective budgetary control is alternatively achieved through
bond indenture provisions. Budgetary control for Capital Projects Funds is accomplished
through the use of project controls and budgets are not adopted.
6. Budgeted amounts are as originally adopted and as amended by the City Council. Individual
amendments were not material in relation to the original amounts budgeted. Budgeted
expenditure appropriations lapse at year-end
NOTE 4 DEPOSITS AND INVESTMENTS
A. Deposits
In accordance with applicable Minnesota Statutes, the City and the Component Unit maintains deposits
at depository banks authorized by the City Council and the Commissioners.
58
Page 110 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016

A. Deposits (Continued)
Custodial Credit Risk: This is the risk that an issuer or other counterparty to an investment will not
fulfill its obligation to the holder of the investment. Minnesota Statutes 118A.04 and 188A.05 limit
investments that are in the top two ratings issued by nationally recognized statistical rating
organizations. The Citys investment policy references Minnesota Statutes and further limits the types
of investments that the City is allowed to invest in. The Commission has a deposit policy that requires
the Commissions deposits to be collateralized as required by Minnesota Statues 118.03 for an amount
exceeding FDIC, SAIF, BIF, FCUA, or other federal deposit coverage. As of December 31, 2016, the
City and Commissions bank balances were not exposed to custodial credit risk because they were
insured through Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and properly collateralized with
securities held by the pledging financial institutions trust departments or agents in the Citys name.
As of December 31, 2016, the City had the following deposits:

City Deposits $ 289,709
Component Unit Deposits 9,183,823
Total Deposits $ 9,473,532
B. Investments
As of December 31, 2016, the City held the following investments:
Years to Maturity
Less than Moody's
Fair Value One Year 1-5 Years 5-10 Years 10-15 Years Concentration Rating
Pooled Investments:
Certificate of Deposit $ 5,493,668 $ 3,739,223 $ 1,754,445 $ - $ - 8.70% NR
Money Market Fund 103,326 103,326 - - - 0.16% NR
Mortgage
FFCB 1,202,772 1,202,772 - - - 1.91% AAA
FHLB 9,408,563 7,655,383 1,753,180 - - 14.91% AAA
FHLMC 4,634,419 501,981 2,202,998 272,740 1,656,700 7.35% AAA
FNMA 3,830,112 6,908 164,131 - 3,659,073 6.07% NR
Municipal Bond 13,279,434 1,957,720 9,383,789 1,937,925 - 21.05% AAA-AA3
US Treasury Notes 25,143,262 300,171 24,843,091 - - 39.85% AAA
Non-Pooled Investments:
Money Market Fund 2,636,185 2,636,185 - - - 24.05% NR
Mortgage
FHLB 681,020 681,020 - - - 6.21% AAA
FHLMC 5,892,460 5,892,460 - - - 53.75% AAA
FNMA 1,752,642 1,752,642 - - - 15.99% NR
Total Investments $ 74,057,863 $ 26,429,791 $ 40,101,634 $ 2,210,665 $ 5,315,773
59
Page 111 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016

B. Investments (Continued)
As of December 31, 2016, the component units had the following investments:
Years to Maturity
Less than
Fair Value One Year 1-5 Years Concentration Rating
US Agencies $ 6,514,828 $ 4,488,742 $ 2,026,086 15.95% AAA

U.S. Treasuries 11,877,365 4,078,618 7,798,747 29.09% AAA
4M Fund 22,440,673 22,440,673 - 54.92% N/A
Money Market Fund 15,177 15,177 - 0.04% N/A
Total $ 40,848,043 $ 31,023,210 $ 9,824,833 100.00%
The Citys investment policy, which covers all funds except the component units, addresses the
following risks. The Citys component units also have a formal policy to address the following risks.
Credit Risk: This is the risk that an issuer or other counterparty to an investment will not fulfill its
obligation to the holder of the investment. Minnesota Statutes 118A.04 and 188A.05 limit investments
that are in the top two ratings issued by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations. The Citys
investment policy references Minnesota Statutes and further limits the types of investments that the City
is allowed to invest in. The Commissions policy states to ensure safety, it is the policy of the Shakopee
Public Utilities Commission that when Considering an investment, all depositories under consideration
be cross-checked against existing investments to make certain that funds in excess of insurance limits
are not made in the same institution unless collateralized as outlined below. Furthermore, the Shakopee
Public Utilities Commission will approve all financial institutions, brokers, and advisers with which the
Shakopee Public Utilities Commission will do business.
Custodial Credit Risk Investments: For an investment, this is the risk that in the event of the failure of
the counterparty, the City will not be able to recover the value of its investments or collateral securities
that are in the possession of an outside party. The Citys investment policy states all securities
purchased, including appropriate collateral, shall be placed with an independent third party for custodial
safekeeping. The Commissions policy states they will minimize risk by only purchasing investments
that are held in safekeeping with a Federal Reserve bank, United States Bank with corporate trust
powers, a primary reporting dealer to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or a broker dealer having
its principal executive office in Minnesota and that designated brokers have insurance through the SIPC
(Securities Investor Protection Corporation). As of December 31, 2016, all investments of the City and
the component units were insured, registered and held by the City or its agent and in the Citys name, or
by the SPUC and in the SPUCs name.
Interest Rate Risk: This is the risk that changes in market interest rates will adversely affect the fair
value of an investment. The Citys policy states the investment portfolio shall be designed with the
objective of attaining a market rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking into
account the investment risk constraints and liquidity needs. To the extent possible, the City shall
attempt to match its investments in short-term operating funds with anticipated cash flow requirements.
60
Page 112 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016

Unless matched to a specific cash flow, the City will not directly invest in securities maturing more than
ten years from the date of purchase. Long-term funds shall not be invested in securities exceeding 10
years in modified duration, at time of purchase. The Commissions policy states that will minimize
interest rate risk by structuring the investment portfolio so that securities mature to meet cash
requirements for ongoing operation, thereby avoiding the need to sell securities on the open market prior
to maturity.
Concentration of Credit Risk: This is the risk of loss attributed to the magnitude of an investment in a
single issuer. According to the Citys investment policy, the aggregate investment portfolio shall be
diversified by:
Limiting investments to avoid over concentration in securities from a specific issuer or business
sector.
Limiting investments in securities that have higher credit risks.
Investing in securities with varying maturities.
Continuously investing a portion of the portfolio in readily available funds, such as Local
Government Investment Pools (LGIP), money market funds or repurchase agreements to ensure
appropriate liquidity is maintained in order to meet ongoing obligations.
Having all investments, other than those in direct obligations or agencies of the United States,
secured by collateral or repurchase agreements, shall not exceed 50% of the aggregate
investment portfolio. Mortgage backed securities shall not exceed 35% of the aggregate
investment portfolio, at the time of investment (i.e., commercial paper or bankers acceptance).
Limiting investments in any one corporation to 5% of the aggregate investment portfolio.
The Commissions policy states they will minimize risk by only purchasing investments that are held in
safekeeping with the Federal Reserve bank, United States Bank with corporate trust powers, a primary
reporting dealer to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or a broker dealer having its principal
executive office in Minnesota and that designated brokers have insurance through a SIPC (Securities
Investor Protection Corporation). As of December 31, 2016, the City held investments that exceeded 5%
of its total investments for all funds as noted in the table on the previous page. The component units
investments noted in the table above exceeded 5% of its total investments as of December 31, 2016.
61
Page 113 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016

The City has the following recurring fair value measurements as of December 31, 2016:
Fair Value Measurement Using

Fair Value Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Investments at Fair Value:
Certificate of Deposit $ 5,493,668 $ - $ 5,493,668 $ -
Mortgage
FFCB 1,202,772 - 1,202,772 -
FHLB 10,089,583 - 10,089,583 -
FHLMC 10,526,879 - 10,526,879 -
FNMA 5,582,754 - 5,582,754 -
Municipal Bond 13,279,434 - 13,279,434 -
US Treasury Notes 25,143,262 25,143,262 - -
Total/Subtotal 71,318,352 $ 25,143,262 $ 46,175,090 $ -
Investments at Amortized Cost:

Money Market Fund 2,739,511
Total $ 74,057,863
All of the Component Units investments at December 31, 2016 are valued using quoted market prices
(Level 1 inputs).
The following is a summary of total deposits and investments as of December 31, 2016:
Deposits (Note 3.A.) $ 9,473,532

City Investments 74,057,863
Component Unit Investments 40,848,043
City Petty Cash 5,698
Component Unit Petty Cash 1,700
Total Deposits and Investments $ 124,386,836
62
Page 114 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016

Deposits and investments are presented in the December 31, 2016 basic financial statements as follows:
City Component
Funds Units Total
Statement of Net Position:
Cash and Investments $ 71,197,206 $ 36,630,116 $ 107,827,322
Restricted Assets - 13,403,450 13,403,450
Statement of Fiduciary Net Position:
Cash and Investments 3,156,064 - 3,156,064
Total $ 74,353,270 $ 50,033,566 $ 124,386,836
NOTE 5 RECEIVABLES/UNAVAILABLE REVENUE

A. Taxes and Assessments
Governmental funds report unavailable revenue in connection with receivables for revenues that are not
considered to be available to liquidate liabilities of the current period. Governmental funds also defer
revenue recognition in connection with resources that have been received, but not yet earned. At the end
of the current year, the various components of unavailable revenue reported in the governmental funds
were as follows:
Delinquent Delinquent Deferred
Property Special Special
Taxes Assessments Assessments Total
General Fund $ 76,491 $ 4,364 $ 19,369 $ 100,224

Capital Improvements - - 3,121,051 3,121,051
Nonmajor Funds 140 29,840 1,652,232 1,682,212
Total $ 76,631 $ 34,204 $ 4,792,652 $ 4,903,487
63
Page 115 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
NOTE 6 CAPITAL ASSETS

Governmental capital asset activity for the year ended December 31, 2016 was as follows:
Beginning Ending
Balance Increases Decreases Balance
Governmental Activities:
Capital Assets not being
Depreciated:
Land $ 20,907,105 $ 97,550 $ - $ 21,004,655
Right-Of-Way 253,904 - - 253,904
Construction in Progress 4,136,075 27,675,690 1,878,731 29,933,034
Total Capital Assets
not being Depreciated 25,297,084 27,773,240 1,878,731 51,191,593
Capital Assets being

Depreciated:
Buildings 38,314,495 - 125,080 38,189,415
Infrastructure 144,552,591 4,511,522 - 149,064,113
Machinery and Equipment 16,434,014 3,297,679 1,108,824 18,622,869
being Depreciated 199,301,100 7,809,201 1,233,904 205,876,397
Less Accumulated
Depreciation for:
Buildings 12,683,403 891,372 50,599 13,524,176
Infrastructure 75,063,491 4,692,400 - 79,755,891
Machinery and Equipment 7,805,261 1,033,527 804,806 8,033,982
Total Accumulated
Depreciation 95,552,155 6,617,299 855,405 101,314,049
Total Capital Assets being

Depreciated, Net 103,748,945 1,191,902 378,499 104,562,348
Governmental Activities Capital

Assets, Net $129,046,029 $ 28,965,142 $ 2,257,230 $155,753,941
Depreciation expense was charged to functions/programs of the City as follows:

General Government $ 147,812
Public Safety 692,943
Public Works 4,878,142
Parks and Recreation 898,402
Total Depreciation Expense - Governmental Activities $ 6,617,299
64
Page 116 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
Business-type capital asset activity for the year ended December 31, 2016 was as follows:
Beginning Ending
Business-Type Activities:
Capital Assets not being
Depreciated:
Land $ 3,796,803 $ - $ - $ 3,796,803
Right-Of-Way 447,746 60,000 - 507,746
Construction in Progress 211,774 58,296 211,774 58,296
not being Depreciated 4,456,323 118,296 211,774 4,362,845
Capital Assets being Depreciated:

Line Rights 1,368,569 - - 1,368,569
Plant in Service 84,410,270 2,896,370 - 87,306,640
Machinery and Equipment 4,053,941 103,366 66,984 4,090,323
being Depreciated 89,832,780 2,999,736 66,984 92,765,532
Less Accumulated
Depreciation for:
Line Rights 551,760 24,801 - 576,561
Plant in Service 22,911,452 1,380,646 - 24,292,098
Machinery and Equipment 1,839,522 327,620 6,712 2,160,430
Total Accumulated
Depreciation 25,302,734 1,733,067 6,712 27,029,089

Depreciated, Net 64,530,046 1,266,669 60,272 65,736,443
Business-Type Activities Capital

Assets, Net $ 68,986,369 $ 1,384,965 $ 272,046 $ 70,099,288
Depreciation expense was charged to functions/programs of the City as follows:
Sanitary Sewer $ 812,027
Storm Drainage 803,609
Refuse 117,431
Total Depreciation Expense - Business-Type Activities $ 1,733,067
65
Page 117 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
Component unit capital asset activity for the year ended December 31, 2016 was as follows:
Beginning Ending
Component Unit Capital Assets
not being Depreciated:
Land and Land Rights $ 5,097,532 $ - $ - $ 5,097,532
Construction in Progress 8,274,803 7,843,214 7,849,538 8,268,479
not being Depreciated 13,372,335 7,843,214 7,849,538 13,366,011
Capital Assets being Depreciated:

Distribution 87,302,196 9,575,444 182,898 96,694,742
General 14,093,273 347,595 26,573 14,414,295
being Depreciated 101,395,469 9,923,039 209,471 111,109,037
Less Accumulated Depreciation 36,443,485 3,041,315 88,701 39,396,099

Depreciated, Net 64,951,984 6,881,724 120,770 71,712,938
Component Unit Capital Assets, Net $ 78,324,319 $ 14,724,938 $ 7,970,308 $85,078,949
Depreciation expense was charged to functions/programs of the component units as follows:
Component Units:
Electric $ 1,841,744
Water 1,199,571
Total Depreciation Expense - Component Units $ 3,041,315
NOTE 7 LONG-TERM DEBT
A. General Obligation Bonds
The City issues general obligation (G.O.) bonds to provide for financing tax increment projects, street
improvements and construction of government buildings. Debt service is covered respectively by tax
increments and special assessments against benefited properties with any shortfalls being paid from
general taxes.
G.O. bonds are direct obligations and pledge the full faith and credit of the City. These bonds generally
are issued as serial bonds with equal debt service payments each year. G.O. bonds currently outstanding
are shown on the following page.
66
Page 118 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
B. Revenue Bonds
The Commission issues Revenue Bonds for electric and water activity. Debt service is covered through
the revenue producing activities of these funds.
C. Components of Long-Term Liabilities

Issue Interest Original Final Principal Due Within
Date Rates Issue Maturity Outstanding One Year
G.O. Bonds:
G.O. Improvement Bonds:
2006A 07/01/06 4.00% 3,440,000 02/01/17 $ 360,000 $ 360,000
2007A 02/01/07 4.00% 1,370,000 02/01/17 150,000 150,000
2007B 09/01/07 4.00% 1,445,000 02/01/18 310,000 155,000
2008A 09/01/08 3.50%-4.00% 2,170,000 02/01/19 635,000 210,000
2010A 08/01/10 0.50%-2.90% 1,555,000 02/01/21 640,000 135,000
G.O. Building Refunding Bonds 2004B 05/01/04 2.25%-4.00% 2,275,000 02/01/17 225,000 225,000
G.O. Building Refunding Bonds 2012A 06/14/12 1.50%-2.125% 4,865,000 02/01/25 4,210,000 450,000
G.O. Tax Abatement Bonds 2016A 01/21/16 3.00%-5.00% 29,500,000 02/01/36 29,500,000 -
Total G.O. Bonds 36,030,000 1,685,000
Unamortized Premiums 2,135,590 -
Compensated Absences 2,124,866 956,190
Total Governmental
Activities $ 40,290,456 $ 2,641,190
Compensated Absences $ 61,420 $ 27,639
Component Unit Long-Term Liabilities:

Utility Revenue Bonds:
Series 2006A Crossover Refunding Bonds 11/21/06 4.125%-4.375% 10,570,000 02/01/30 $ 8,015,000 $ 425,000
Unamortized Discounts (8,598) -
Total Component Unit Long-Term Liabilities $ 8,006,402 $ 425,000
Long-term bonded indebtedness listed above were issued to finance acquisition and construction of
capital facilities or to refinance (refund) previous bond issues. For the most part, the General Fund and
the Employee Benefits Internal Service Fund are typically used to liquidate governmental compensated
absences payable. The Sewer and Storm Drainage funds are typically used to liquidate business type
compensated absences payable.
67
Page 119 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
D. Changes in Long-Term Liabilities

Long-term liability information for the year ended December 31, 2016 was as follows.
Beginning Ending Due Within
Balance Additions Reductions Balance One Year
Bonds Payable $ 8,215,000 $ 29,500,000 $ 1,685,000 $ 36,030,000 $ 1,685,000
Unamortized Premiums - 2,237,727 102,137 2,135,590 -
Compensated Absences 1,892,822 1,214,891 982,847 2,124,866 956,190
Total Governmental Activities $ 10,107,822 $ 32,952,618 $ 2,769,984 $ 40,290,456 $ 2,641,190
Compensated Absences $ 54,438 $ 40,671 $ 33,689 $ 61,420 $ 27,639
Component Unit Activites:

G.O. Utility Revenue Bonds $ 8,425,000 $ - $ 410,000 $ 8,015,000 $ 425,000
Unamortized Discounts (9,218) - (620) (8,598) -
Total Component Unit Activites $ 8,415,782 $ - $ 409,380 $ 8,006,402 $ 425,000
E. Governmental Activity G.O. Bonds
Debt service to maturity for outstanding G.O. bonds is as follows:

Year Ending Governmental Bonds
December 31, Principal Interest Total
2017 $ 1,685,000 $ 1,229,781 $ 2,914,781

2018 1,995,000 1,163,474 3,158,474
2019 1,910,000 1,086,058 2,996,058
2020 1,750,000 1,012,644 2,762,644
2021 1,760,000 941,161 2,701,161
2022-2026 8,790,000 3,717,956 12,507,956
2027-2031 8,395,000 2,128,031 10,523,031
2032-2036 9,745,000 759,741 10,504,741
Total $36,030,000 $12,038,846 $ 48,068,846
68
Page 120 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
F. Component Unit Revenue Bonds
Debt service to maturity for outstanding revenue bonds is as follows:
Year Ending Utility Revenue Bonds

December 31, Principal Interest Total
2017 $ 425,000 $ 337,400 $ 762,400

2018 445,000 318,912 763,912
2019 460,000 299,681 759,681
2020 480,000 279,706 759,706
2021 500,000 258,881 758,881
2022-2026 2,870,000 944,081 3,814,081
2027-2031 2,835,000 256,047 3,091,047
Total $ 8,015,000 $ 2,694,708 $ 10,709,708
NOTE 8 CONDUIT DEBT OBLIGATIONS
Conduit debt obligations are certain limited obligation revenue bonds or similar debt instruments issued
for the express purpose of providing capital financing for a specific third party. The City has issued
various revenue bonds to provide funding to private-sector entities for projects deemed to be in the
public interest. Although these bonds bear the name of the City, the City has no obligation for such debt
beyond the resources provided by related leases or loans. Accordingly, the bonds are not reported as
liabilities in the financial statements of the City.
69
Page 121 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
NOTE 8 CONDUIT DEBT OBLIGATIONS
As of December 31, 2016, the following conduit debt was outstanding:
Date of Original Amount Balance

Project Issue of Issue Outstanding
Scott County CDA Housing Development 07/15/06 $ 905,000 $ 215,000

2006D Refunding- River City Center Project
Scott County CDA Housing Development 04/26/12 5,885,000 5,170,000
2012A Refunding- North Ridge Court Redevelopment
2013A Refunding- River City Center Project
2013E Refunding- River City Center Project
Benedictine Health System Obligated Group 12/01/13 9,485,000 7,762,869
Health Care and Housing Facilities Revenue Refunding
Note Series 2013A
Benedictine Health System Obligated Group 12/01/13 9,575,000 8,511,032
Health Care and Housing Facilities Revenue Refunding
Note Series 2013B
St. Francis Regional Medical Center 06/18/14 41,865,000 39,630,000
Health Care Facilities Revenue Refunding Bond Series
2014
Total $ 64,463,901
70
Page 122 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
NOTE 9 INTERFUND ASSETS/LIABILITIES
The composition of interfund balances as of December 31, 2016 is as follows:
Receivable Fund Payable Fund Amount
Capital Improvement Fund Nonmajor Governmental Funds $ 7,802

Sewer Fund Refuse Fund 59,355
Total $ 67,157
The due from/due to other funds balance represents borrowing to eliminate a cash deficit. This will be
repaid as funds are available.
NOTE 10 ADVANCE FROM/TO OTHER FUNDS
The composition of advance from/to other funds as of December 31, 2016 is as follows:
Receivable Fund Payable Fund Amount
Sewer Fund Refuse Fund $ 853,627

Internal Service Fund Nonmajor Governmental Funds 1,341,394
Total $ 2,195,021
The advance between the Sewer Fund and Refuse Fund represents a long term interfund loan which was
used to purchase garbage carts. This will be repaid over 10 years with revenue collected for cart usage
at rate of 1% interest. The advance between the Internal Service fund and Nonmajor Governmental
Fund represents a long term interfund loan which was used to recreate a Property Acquisition Fund.
This will be repaid over 10 years with proceeds from the sale of land or tax levy at rate of 0% interest.
The advance between the Internal Service fund and Economic Development Authority Fund represents a
long term interfund loan which was used to purchase land which will be resold. This will be repaid once
the parcels are sold or developed at rate of 0% interest.
71
Page 123 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
NOTE 11 INTERFUND TRANSFERS
Transfer In Transfer O ut
Governmental F unds:
General F und (1) (2) (3) (4) (6) (8) (9) $ 250,000 $ 3,348,755
C apital Improvements (3) 1,200,000 -
O ther Governmental F unds (2) (4) (5) (6) (7) (9) 5,466,355 30,222
Total Governmental F unds 6,916,355 3,378,977
P roprietary F unds:
S ewer F und (1) (5) (6) - 630,920
S torm Drainage F und (1) (6) - 625,000
Total P roprietary F unds - 1,255,920
Internal S ervice F unds:

Buildings (4) (6) - 2,386,680
P ark Asset (7) 30,222 -
S elf Insurance (8) 75,000 -
Total Internal S ervice F unds 105,222 2,386,680
Total $ 7,021,577 $ 7,021,577
(1) Annual transfer to finance General F und

(2) Annual transfer to fund operations and improvement loan program
(3) Annual transfer to fund infrastructure projects
(4) Annual transfer for bond payment
(5) Transfer S AC C redit funds to EDA as business subsidies
(6) Transfer to C ity Hall F und for city hall construction
(7) Transfer related to F un for all P layground from the Lions C lub
(8) Transfer to provide workers compensation funding.
(9) Transfer to close Dare F und to General F und
72
Page 124 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
NOTE 12 PENSION PLANS
The city participates in various pension plans. Total pension expense for the year ended December 31,
2016 was $4,481,742. The components of pension expense are noted in the following plan summaries.
Public Employees' Retirement Association
A. Plan Description
The City participates in the following cost-sharing multiple-employer defined benefit pension plans
administered by PERA. PERA's defined benefit pension plans are established and administered in
accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 353 ad 356. PERA's defined benefit pension plans are tax
qualified plans under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.
General Employees Retirement Plan (General Employees Plan (accounted for in the General Employees
Fund))
All full-time and certain part-time employees of the City are covered by the General Employees Plan.
General Employees Plan members belong to either the Coordinated Plan or the Basic Plan. Coordinated
Plan members are covered by Social Security and Basic Plan members are not. The Basic Plan was
closed to new members in 1967. All new members must participate in the Coordinated Plan.
Public Employees Police and Fire Plan (Police and Fire Plan (accounted for in the Police and Fire
Fund))
The Police and Fire Plan, originally established for police officers and firefighters not covered by a local
relief association, now covers all police officers and firefighters hired since 1980. Effective July 1, 1999,
the Police and Fire Plan also covers police officers and firefighters belonging to a local relief association
that elected to merge with and transfer assets and administration to PERA.
B. Benefits Provided
PERA provides retirement, disability, and death benefits. Benefit provisions are established by state
statute and can only be modified by the state legislature.
Benefit increases are provided to benefit recipients each January. Increases are related to the funding
ratio of the plan. Members in plans that are at least 90% funded for two consecutive years are given
2.5% increases. Members in plans that have not exceeded 90% funded, or have fallen below 80%, are
given 1% increases.
The benefit provisions stated in the following paragraphs of this section are current provisions and apply
to active plan participants. Vested, terminated employees who are entitled to benefits but are not
receiving them yet are bound by the provisions in effect at the time they last terminated their public
service.
73
Page 125 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
Public Employees' Retirement Association (Continued)
B. Benefits Provided (Continued)
General Employees Plan Benefits
General Employees Plan benefits are based on a member's highest average salary for any five successive
years of allowable service, age and years of credit at termination of service. Two methods are used to
compute benefits for PERA's Coordinated and Basic Plan members. The retiring member receives the
higher of a step-rate benefit accrual formula (Method 1) or a level accrual formula (Method 2). Under
Method 1, the annuity accrual rate for a Basic Plan member is 2.2% of average salary for each of the
first ten years of service and 2.7% for each remaining year. The annuity accrual rate for a Coordinated
Plan member is 1.2% of average salary for each of the first ten years and 1.7% for each remaining year.
Under Method 2, the annuity accrual rate is 2.7% of average salary for Basic Plan members and 1.7%
for Coordinated Plan members for each year of service. For members hired prior to July 1, 1989, a full
annuity is available when age plus years of service equal 90 and normal retirement age is 65. For
members hired on or after July 1, 1989, normal retirement age is the age for unreduced Social Security
benefits capped at 66.
Police and Fire Plan Benefits
Benefits for the Police and Fire Plan members first hired after June 30, 2010, but before July 1, 2014,
vest on a prorated basis from 50% after five years up to 100% after ten years of credited service.
Benefits for Police and Fire Plan members first hired after June 30, 2014, vest on a prorated basis from
50% after ten years up to 100% after twenty years of credited service. The annuity accrual rate is 3% of
average salary for each year of service. For Police and Fire Plan who were first hired prior to July 1,
1989, a full annuity is available when age plus years of service equal at least 90.
C. Contributions
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 353 sets the rates for employer and employee contributions. Contribution
rates can only be modified by the state legislature.
74
Page 126 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
C. Contributions (Continued)
General Employees Fund Contributions
Basic Plan members and Coordinated Plan members were required to contribute 9.1% and 6.50%,
respectively, of their annual covered salary in calendar year 2016. The City was required to contribute
11.78% of pay for Basic Plan members and 7.50% for Coordinated Plan members in calendar year 2016.
The City's contributions to the General Employees Fund for the year ended December 31, 2016, was
$459,555. The City's contributions were equal to the required contributions as set by state statute. The
Commission's contributions to the General Employees Fund for the year ended December 31, 2016, was
$299,473. The Commission's contributions were equal to the required contributions as set by state
statute.
Police and Fire Fund Contributions
Plan members were required to contribute 10.8% of their annual covered salary in calendar year 2016.
The City was required to contribute 16.20% of pay for Police and Fire Fund members in calendar year
2016. The City's contributions to the Police and Fire Fund for the year ended December 31, 2016, were
$ 761,951. The City's contributions were equal to the required contributions as set by state statute.
D. Pension Costs
General Employees Fund Pension Costs
At December 31, 2016, the City reported a liability of $ 7,575,497 for its proportionate share of the
General Employees Fund's net pension liability. The City's net pension liability reflected a reduction due
to the State of Minnesota's contribution of $6 million to the fund in 2016. The State of Minnesota is
considered a non-employer contributing entity and the State's contribution meets the definition of a
special funding situation. The State of Minnesota's proportionate share of the net pension liability
associated with the City totaled $ 98,919. The net pension liability was measured as of June 30, 2016,
and the total pension liability used to calculate the net pension liability was determined by an actuarial
valuation as of that date. The City's proportion of the net pension liability was based on the City's
contributions received by PERA during the measurement period for employer payroll paid dates from
July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016, relative to the total employer contributions received from all of
PERA's participating employers. At June 30, 2016, the City's proportion share was 0.0933%, which was
an increase of 0.0003% from its proportion measured as of June 30, 2015.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the City recognized pension expense of $ 1,002,782 for its
proportionate share of General Employees Fund's pension expense. In addition, the City recognized an
additional $ 29,495 as pension expense (and grant revenue) for its proportionate share of the State of
Minnesota's contribution of $6 million to the General Employees Fund.
75
Page 127 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
D. Pension Costs (Continued)
At December 31, 2016, the City reported its proportionate share of the General Employees Plan's
deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources, and its contributions subsequent to the
measurement date, related to pensions from the sources as follows.
Deferred Deferred
Outflows of Inflows of
Resources Resources
Differences between expected and actual economic experience $ - $ 615,395

Changes in actuarial assumptions 1,483,289 -
Difference between projected and actual investment earnings 1,437,860 -
Changes in proportion 11,895 207,356
Contributions paid to PERA subsequent to the measurement date 221,054 -
Total $ 3,154,098 $ 822,751
$ 221,054 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to pensions resulting from City
contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a reduction of the net pension
liability in the year ended December 31, 2017. Other amounts reported as deferred outflows and
deferred inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized in pension expense as follows:
Year Ending Pension Expense

December 31, Amount
2017 $ 550,574
2018 550,572
2019 735,511
2020 273,636
Total $ 2,110,293
76
Page 128 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
Police and Fire Fund Pension Costs
At December 31, 2016, the City reported a liability of $ 18,781,654 for its proportionate share of the
Police and Fire Fund's net pension liability. The net pension liability was measured as of June 30, 2016,
and the total pension liability used to calculate the net pension liability was determined by an actuarial
valuation as of that date. The City's proportion of the net pension liability was based on the City's
contributions received by PERA during the measurement period for employer payroll paid dates from
July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016, relative to the total employer contributions received from all of
PERA's participating employers. At June 30, 2016, the City's proportion share was 0.4680 % which was
a decrease of 0.0040% from its proportion measured as of June 30, 2015.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the City recognized pension expense of $ 3,269,763 for its
proportionate share of the Police and Fire Fund's pension expense. The City also recognized $ 42,120
for the year ended December 31, 2016, as pension expense (and grant revenue) for its proportionate
share of the State of Minnesota's on-behalf contributions to the Police and Fire Fund. Legislation passed
in 2013 required the State of Minnesota to begin contributing $9 million to the Police and Fire Fund
each year, starting in fiscal year 2014.
At December 31, 2016, the City reported its proportionate share of the Police and Fire Fund's deferred
outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions from the following sources:
Deferred Deferred
Resources Resources
Differences between expected and actual economic experience $ - $ 2,154,609

Changes in actuarial assumptions 10,336,366 -
Difference between projected and actual investment earnings 2,866,217 -
Contributions paid to PEPFF subsequent to the measurement date 369,101 -
Total $ 13,743,026 $ 2,190,501

$ 369,101 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to pensions resulting from City
liability in the year ended December 31, 2017. Other amounts reported as deferred outflows and inflows
of resources related to pensions will be recognized in pension expense on the following page.
77
Page 129 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016

December 31, Amount
2017 $ 2,411,970
2018 2,411,970
2019 2,411,984
2020 2,180,345
2021 1,767,155
Total $ 11,183,424
Component Units General Employees Fund Pension Costs
At December 31, 2016, the Commission reported a liability of $ 5,042,212 for its proportionate share of
the General Employees Fund's net pension liability. The Commission's net pension liability reflected a
reduction due to the State of Minnesota's contribution of $6 million to the fund in 2016. The State of
Minnesota is considered a non-employer contributing entity and the State's contribution meets the
definition of a special funding situation. The State of Minnesota's proportionate share of the net pension
liability associated with the Commission totaled $ 65,842. The net pension liability was measured as of
June 30, 2016, and the total pension liability used to calculate the net pension liability was determined
by an actuarial valuation as of that date. The Commission's proportion of the net pension liability was
based on the Commission's contributions received by PERA during the measurement period for
employer payroll paid dates from July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016, relative to the total employer
contributions received from all of PERA's participating employers. At June 30, 2016, the Commission's
proportion share was 0.0621%, which was an increase of 0.0013% from its proportion measured as of
June 30, 2015.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Commission recognized pension expense of $ 681,569 for
its proportionate share of General Employees Fund's pension expense. In addition, the Commission
recognized an additional $ 19,632 as pension expense (and grant revenue) for its proportionate share of
the State of Minnesota's contribution of $6 million to the General Employees Fund.
At December 31, 2016, the Commission reported its proportionate share of General Employees Fund's
deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources, and its contributions subsequent to the
measurement date, from the following sources on the subsequent page.
78
Page 130 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
Deferred Deferred
Resources Resources
Differences between expected and actual economic experience $ - $ 409,605

Changes in actuarial assumptions 987,271 -
Difference between projected and actual investment earnings 957,033 -
Contributions paid to PERA subsequent to the measurement date 149,737 -
Total $ 2,139,453 $ 531,951
$ 149,737 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to pensions resulting from Commission
liability in the year ended December 31, 2017. Other amounts reported as deferred outflows and inflows
of resources related to pensions will be recognized in pension expense on the following page.

December 31, Amount
2017 $ 386,792
2018 386,792
2019 502,051
2020 182,130
Total $ 1,457,765
E. Actuarial Assumptions
The total pension liability in the June 30, 2016, actuarial valuation was determined using the entry age
normal actuarial cost method and the following actuarial assumptions:
Inflation 2.50 % Per Year

Active member payroll growth 3.25 % Per Year
Investment rate of return 7.50 %
79
Page 131 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
E. Actuarial Assumptions (Continued)
Salary increases were based on a service-related table. Mortality rates for active members, retirees,
survivors, and disabilitants were based on RP-2014 tables for the General Employees Plan and RP-2000
tables for the Police and Fire Plan for males or females, as appropriate, with slight adjustments. Cost of
living benefit increases for retirees are assumed to be 1% for all future years for the General Employees
Plan and Police and Fire Plan.
Actuarial assumptions used in the June 30, 2016, valuation were based on the results of actuarial
experience studies. The most recent four-year experience study in the General Employees Plan was
completed in 2015. The experience study for Police and Fire Plan was for the period July 1, 2004
through June 30, 2009.
The following changes in actuarial assumptions occurred in 2016:
General Employees Fund

The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.0% per year through 2035
and 2.5% per year thereafter to 1.0% per year for all future years.
The assumed investment return was changed from 7.9% to 7.5%. The single discount rate was
changed from 7.9% to 7.5%.
Other assumptions were changed pursuant to the experience study dated June 30, 2015. The
assumed future salary increases, payroll growth, and inflation were decreased by 0.25% to 3.25%
for payroll growth and 2.50% for inflation.
Police and Fire Fund

and 2.5% thereafter to 1.0% per year for all future years.
The assumed investment return was changed from 7.9% to 7.5%. The single discount rate
The assumed future salary increases, payroll growth, and inflation were decreased by 0.25% to
3.25% for payroll growth and 2.50% for inflation.
The State Board of Investment, which manages the investments of PERA, prepares an analysis of the
reasonableness of the long-term expected rate of return on a regular basis using a building-block method
in which best-estimate ranges of expected future rates of return are developed for each major asset class.
These ranges are combined to produce an expected long-term rate of return by weighting the expected
future rates of return by the target asset allocation percentages. The target allocation and best estimates
of geometric real rates of return for each major asset class are summarized in the table on the following
page.
80
Page 132 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
E. Actuarial Assumptions (Continued)
Long-Term
Expected Real
Asset Class Target Allocation Rate of Return
Domestic stocks 45% 5.50 %

International stock 15% 6.00
Bonds 18% 1.45
Alternative assets 20% 6.40
Cash 2% 0.50
Total 100%
F. Discount Rate
The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability in 2016 was 7.5%, a reduction from the
7.9% used in 2015. The projection of cash flows used to determine the discount rate assumed that
contributions from Plan members and employers will be made at rates set in Minnesota Statutes. Based
on those assumptions, the fiduciary net position of the General Employees Fund was projected to be
available to make all projected future benefit payments of current Plan members. Therefore, the long-
term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was applied to all periods of projected benefit
payments to determine the total pension liability.
In the Police and Fire Fund, the fiduciary net position was projected to be available to make all projected
future benefit payments of current plan members through June 30, 2056. Beginning in fiscal years ended
June 30, 2057 for the Police and Fire Fund, when projected benefit payments exceed the funds
projected fiduciary net position, benefit payments were discounted at the municipal bond rate of 2.85%
based on an index of 20-year general obligation bonds with an average AA credit rating at the
measurement date. An equivalent single discount rate of 5.60% for the Police and Fire Fund was
determined that produced approximately the same present value of projected benefits when applied to all
years of projected benefits as the present value of projected benefits using 7.50% applied to all years of
projected benefits through the point of asset depletion and 2.85% after.
81
Page 133 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
G. Pension Liability Sensitivity
The following table presents the City's proportionate share of the net pension liability for all plans it
participates in, calculated using the discount rate disclosed in the preceding paragraph, as well as what
the City's proportionate share of the net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount
rate 1 percentage point lower or 1 percentage point higher than the current discount rate:
1% Decrease in 1% Increase in
Discount Rate Discount Rate Discount Rate
(6.5%) (7.5%) (8.5%)
City's proportionate share of the General
Employees Fund net pension liability $ 10,759,451 $ 7,575,497 $ 4,952,786
Commission's proportionate share of the
General Employees Fund net pension liability $ 7,161,435 $ 5,042,212 $ 3,296,549
1% Decrease in 1% Increase in
(4.6%) (5.6%) (6.6%)
City's proportionate share of the Police
and Fire Fund net pension liability $ 26,291,823 $ 18,781,654 $ 12,645,276
H. Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Position
Detailed information about each pension plan's fiduciary net position is available in a separately-issued
PERA financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary information. That
report may be obtained on the Internet at www.mnpera.org.
Public Employees Defined Contribution Plan (Defined Contribution Plan)
Four Council Members of the City are covered the Defined Contribution Plan, a multiple-employer
deferred compensation plan administered by PERA. The Defined Contribution Plan is a tax qualified
plan under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code and all contributions by or on behalf of
employees are tax deferred until time of withdrawal.
82
Page 134 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
H. Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Position (Continued)
The defined contribution plan consists of individual accounts paying a lump-sum benefit, plan benefits
depend solely on amounts contributed to the plan plus investment earnings, less administrative expenses,
therefore, there is no future liability to the employer. Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 353D.03, specifies
plan provisions, including the employee and employer contribution rates for those qualified personnel
who elect to participate. An eligible elected official who decides to participate contributes 5% of salary
which is matched by the elected official's employer. For ambulance service personnel, employer
contributions are determined by the employer, and for salaried employees must be a fixed percentage of
salary. Employer contributions for volunteer personnel may be a unit value for each call or period of
alert duty. Employees who are paid for their services may elect to make member contributions in an
amount not to exceed the employer share. Employer and employee contributions are combined and used
to purchase shares in one or more of the seven accounts of the Minnesota Supplemental Investment
Fund. For administering the plan, PERA receives 2% of employer contributions and twenty-five
hundredths of 1% (.0025) of the assets in each member's account annually.
Pension expense for the year is equal to contributions made. Total contributions made by the City during
fiscal year 2016 were:
Contribution Amount Percentage of Covered Payroll

Employee Employer Employee Employer Required Rate
$ 2,503 $ 2,503 5% 5% 5%
Defined Benefit Pension Plan Volunteer Fire Fighter's Relief Association
A. Plan Description
The Shakopee Firefighter's Relief Association is the administrator of a single employer defined benefit
pension plan established to provide benefits for members of the Shakopee Fire Department per
Minnesota State Statutes.
The Association issues a publicly available financial report that includes financial statements and
required supplementary information. That report may be obtained by writing to Shakopee Fire Relief
Association, 129 Holmes Street South, Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 or by calling 952-233-9570.
83
Page 135 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
Defined Benefit Pension Plan Volunteer Fire Fighter's Relief Association (Continued)
B. Benefits Provided
Volunteer firefighters of the City are members of the Shakopee Fire Fighter's Relief Association. Full
retirement benefits are payable to members who have reached age 50 and have completed 20 years of
service for lump sum service pension. Partial benefits are payable to members who have reached 50 and
have completed 5 years of service. Disability benefits and widow and children's survivor benefits are
also payable to members or their beneficiaries based upon requirements set forth in the bylaws.
These benefit provisions and all other requirements are consistent with enabling state statutes.
C. Employees Covered by Benefit Terms
At December 31, 2015, the following employees were covered by the benefit terms:
Inactive employees or beneficiaries currently receiving benefits 0

Inactive employees entitled to but not yet receiving benefits 14
Active Employees 44
Total 58
D. Contributions.
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 424A.092 specifies minimum support rates required on an annual basis. The
minimum support rates from the municipality and from State aids are determined as the amount required
to meet the normal cost plus amortizing any existing prior service costs over a ten year period. The
City's obligation is the financial requirement for the year less state aids. Any additional payments by the
City shall be used to amortize the unfunded liability of the relief association. The Association is
comprised of volunteers: therefore, there are no payroll expenditures (i.e. there are no covered payroll
percentage calculations). During the year, the City recognized as revenue and as an expenditure an on
behalf payment of $ 246,910 made by the State of Minnesota for the Relief Association.
E. Net Pension Liability
The City's net pension liability was measured as of December 31, 2015, and the total pension liability
used to calculate the net pension liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of that date.
84
Page 136 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
E. Net Pension Liability (Continued)
Actuarial assumptions.
The total pension liability in the December 31, 2015, actuarial valuation was determined using the
following actuarial assumptions, applied to all periods included in the measurement:
Inflation 2.75 %
Salary increase 0.00 %, average, including inflation
Investment rate of return 6.00 %, net of pensions plan investment expense:
including inflation
The Association is comprised of volunteers; therefore, there are no salary increases.
The value of death benefits is similar to the value of the retirement pension. Because of low retirement
ages, the plan assumes no pre-retirement mortality. Post-retirement mortality does not apply as the
benefit structure and form of payment do not reflect lifetime benefits.
The long-term return on assets has been set based on the plan's target investment allocation along with
long-term return expectations by asset class. When there is sufficient historical evidence of market
outperformance, historical average returns may be considered. Best estimates of arithmetic real rates of
return for each major asset class included in the pension plan's target asset allocation as of the
measurement date are summarized in the table below.
Target Long-Term Expected

Asset Class Allocation Real Rate of Return
Domestic Equity 39.82% 5.58%

International Equity 14.50% 5.71%
Fixed Income 25.81% 2.27%
Real Estate and Alternatives 2.02% 4.44%
Cash and Equivalents 17.85% 0.84%
Total 100.00%
Discount rate.
The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability was 6.00 %. Assets were projected using
expected benefit payments and expected asset returns. Expected benefit payments by year were
discounted using the expected asset return assumption for years in which the assets were sufficient to
pay all benefit payments. Any remaining benefit payments after the trust fund is exhausted are
discounted at the municipal bond rate. The equivalent single rate is the discount rate.
85
Page 137 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
F. Changes in the Net Pension Liability
Increase (Decrease)
Total Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Pension

Liability Net Position Liability
(a) (b) (a) - (b)
Balances at January 1, 2015 $ 3,664,402 $ 5,182,390 $ (1,517,988)
Changes for the year

Service Cost 139,447 - 139,447
Interest 228,231 - 228,231
Contributions- Employer - 244,626 (244,626)
Net Investment Income - (268,069) 268,069
Administrative Expense - (9,761) 9,761
Net Changes $ 367,678 $ (33,204) $ 400,882
Balances at December 31, 2015 $ 4,032,080 $ 5,149,186 $ (1,117,106)
Sensitivity of the net pension liability to changes in the discount rate. The following presents the net
pension liability of the City, calculated using the discount rate disclosed on the proceeding page, as well
as what the City's net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is 1-
percentage point lower or 1 percentage point higher than the current discount rate:
1% Decrease in Current 1% Increase in

(5%) (6%) (7%)
City's proportionate share of
the Relief net pension asset $ 1,011,040 $ 1,117,106 $ 1,217,826
86
Page 138 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
F. Changes in the Net Pension Liability (Continued)
Pension plan fiduciary net position. Detailed information about the pension plan's fiduciary net position
is available in the separately issued relief association financial report.
G. Pension Expense and Deferred Outflows of Resources and Deferred Inflows of Resources
Related to Pensions
For the year ended December 31, 2015, the City recognized pension expense of $ 177,199. At December
31, 2015, the City reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to
pensions from the following sources:
Deferred Deferred
Resources Resources
Contributions paid subsequent to the measurement date $ 246,910 $ -

Net Difference Between Projected and Actual Earnings on
Pension Plan Investments 465,219 9,269
Total $ 712,129 $ 9,269
$246,910 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to pensions resulting from State contributions
subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a reduction of the net pension liability in the year
ended December 31, 2016. Amounts reported as deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of
resources related to pensions will be recognized in pension expense as follows:

December 31, Amount
2017 $ 113,215
2018 113,215
2019 113,216
2020 116,304
Total $ 455,950
H. Payable to the Pension Plan
At December 31, 2016, the City reported a payable of $ 0 for the outstanding amount of contributions to
the pension plan required for the year ended December 31, 2016.
87
Page 139 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
NOTE 13 POST EMPLOYMENT HEALTH BENEFITS PLAN
A. Plan Description
The City provides a single-employer defined benefit health care plan to eligible retirees and their
spouses. The plan offers medical coverage administered by Medica. It is the Citys policy to
periodically review its medical coverage and to obtain requests for proposals in order to provide the
most favorable benefits and premiums for City employees and retirees.
B. Funding Policy
Retirees and their spouses contribute to the health care plan at the same rate as City employees. This
results in the retirees receiving an implicit rate subsidy. Contribution requirements are established by
the City, based on the contract terms with Medica. The required contributions are based on projected
pay-as-you-go financing requirements. For the year 2016, the City contributed $ 53,193 to the plan. As
of January 1, 2016, there were six retirees and two disabled officers receiving health benefits from the
Citys health plan. For the most part, the General Fund and the Employee Benefits Internal Service
Fund are typically used to liquidate net other post employment benefit obligations.
C. Annual OPEB Cost and Net OPEB Obligation
The Citys annual OPEB cost (expense) is calculated based on the annual required contribution (ARC)
of the City, an amount actuarially determined in accordance with the parameters of GASB Statement
No. 45. The ARC represents a level of funding that, if paid on an ongoing basis, is projected to cover
normal cost each year and amortize any unfunded actuarial liabilities (or funding excess) over a period
not to exceed 30 years. The following table shows the components of the Citys annual OPEB cost of
the year, the amount actually contributed to the plan, and changes in the Citys net OPEB obligation to
the plan.
ARC $ 337,572
Interest on Net OPEB Obligation 49,407
Adjustment to ARC (76,752)
Annual OPEB Cost (Expense) 310,227
Contribution Made (53,193)
Increase in Net OPEB Obligation 257,034
Net OPEB Obligation - Beginning of Year 1,411,640
Net OPEB Obligation - End of Year $ 1,668,674
The Citys annual OPEB cost, the percentage of annual OPEB cost contributed to the plan and the net
OPEB obligation for 2016 was as follows:
Percentage of
Fiscal Year Annual OPEB Employer Annual OPEB Net OPEB
End Cost Contribution Cost Contributed Obligation
12/31/16 $ 310,227 $ 53,193 17% $ 1,668,674

12/31/15 237,322 69,166 29% 1,411,640
12/31/14 231,421 55,738 24% 1,243,484
88
Page 140 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
NOTE 13 POST EMPLOYMENT HEALTH BENEFITS PLAN
D. Funded Status and Funding Progress
As of January 1, 2016, the most recent actuarial valuation date, the City had no assets deposited to fund
the plan. The actuarial accrued liability for benefits was $ 2,629,107 and the actuarial value of assets was
$ 0, resulting in an unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) of $ 2,629,107. The covered payroll
(annual payroll of active employees covered by the plan) was 12,403,330 and the ratio of the UAAL to
the covered payroll was 21.2%.
Actuarial valuations involve estimates of the value of reported amounts and assumptions about the
probability of occurrence of events far into the future. Examples include assumptions about future
employment, mortality and the health care cost trend. Amounts determined regarding the funded status
of the plan and the ARC of the employer are subject to continual revision as actual results are compared
with past expectations and new estimates are made about the future.
The Schedule of Funding Progress Other Post Employment Benefits, presented as required
supplementary information following the Notes to the Financial Statements, presents multi-year trend
information about whether the actuarial value of plan assets is increasing or decreasing over time
relative to the actuarial accrued liabilities for benefits.
E. Actuarial Methods and Assumptions
Projections of benefits for financial reporting purposes are based on the substantive plan (the plan as
understood by the employer and the plan members) and include the types of benefits provided at the
time of each valuation and the historical pattern of sharing of benefit costs between the employer and
plan members to that point. The actuarial methods and assumptions used include techniques that are
designed to reduce the effects of short-term volatility in actuarial accrued liabilities, consistent with the
long-term perspective of the calculations.
In the January 1, 2016 actuarial valuation, the projected unit credit actuarial cost method was used. The
actuarial assumptions included a 3.5 % discount rate, which is based on the investment yield expected to
finance benefits depending on whether the plan is funded in a separate trust (about 7.0% to 8.5%, long-
term, similar to a pension plan) or unfunded (3.5% to 5.0%, shorter-term, based on Citys general
assets). The City currently does not fund this benefit. At the actuarial valuation date, the annual health
care cost trend rate was calculated to be 3.2% initially, increased incrementally to an ultimate rate of
5.3% after five years. Both rates included a 2.75% inflation assumption. The UAAL is being amortized
as a level percentage of payroll on an open basis. The remaining amortization period at December 31,
2016 was 30 years.
NOTE 14 SEGMENT INFORMATION
The City maintains three enterprise funds that account for the sewer, storm drainage and refuse utilities.
The City considers each of its enterprise funds to be a segment. Since the required segment information
is already included in the Citys proprietary funds Balance Sheet and Statement of Revenues, Expenses
and Changes in Fund Net Position balances, this information has not been repeated in the Notes to the
Financial Statements.
89
Page 141 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
NOTE 15 FUND BALANCE DETAIL
Fund equity balances are classified as follows to reflect the limitations and restrictions of the respective
funds.
Community Other
General Capital Center/ Ice Governmental
Fund Improvements Arena Funds Total
Nonspendable:
Prepaid Items $ 22,188 $ - $ - $ - $ 22,188
Restricted:
Forfeitures - - - 186,965 186,965
SCDP Grant - - - 4,734 4,734
Revolving Loans - - - 263,787 263,787
Economic Development - - - 1,503,917 1,503,917
Debt Service - - - 3,712,584 3,712,584
Capital Improvements - - 6,547,457 665,801 7,213,258
Total Restricted - - 6,547,457 6,337,788 12,885,245
Assigned:
Telecommunications - - - 70,795 70,795
Capital Improvements - 4,744,275 - 2,244,591 6,988,866
Total Assigned - 4,744,275 - 2,315,386 7,059,661
Unassigned: 10,739,178 - - (39,928) 10,699,250
Total Fund Balance $ 10,761,366 $ 4,744,275 $ 6,547,457 $ 8,613,246 $ 30,666,344
NOTE 16 COMMITTMENTS
Project Work 12/31/2016
Authorization Completed Commitment
2016 Sanitary Sewer Lateral Pipe Rehabilitation $ 524,980 $ 397,682 $ 127,298

2015 Sanitary Sewer Lateral Pipe Rehabilitation 606,316 534,886 71,430
2016 Street Lighting Project 104,311 - 104,311
4th Avenue Reconstruction 2,119,047 2,002,216 116,831
Community Center Improvements 23,440 17,580 5,860
City Hall 8,556,398 3,368,052 5,188,347
Ice Arena/Community Center Improvements 29,344,881 23,033,939 6,310,943
Quarry Lake Park Phase I 1,189,635 1,169,851 19,783
Shakopee Ice Arena 93,673 64,759 28,915
90
Page 142 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
NOTE 17 RISK MANAGEMENT
The City purchases commercial insurance coverage through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance
Trust (LMCIT) with other cities in the state which is a public entity risk pool currently operating as a
common risk management and insurance program. The City pays an annual premium to the LMCIT for
its insurance coverage. The LMCIT is self-sustaining through member premiums and reinsures through
commercial companies for excess claims. The City is covered through the pool for any claims incurred
but unreported, however, retains risk for the deductible portion of its insurance policies. The amount of
these deductibles ranges from $ 500 to $ 50,000 and is considered immaterial to the financial statements.
There were no significant reductions in insurance from the previous year or settlements in excess of
insurance coverage for any of the past three years.
Through the pool, the City is subject to reassessment but due to reserves and reinsurance contracts, the
likelihood is very low. The policy limits through the pool included $ 2,000,000 aggregate for liability,
$ 1,500,000 for automobile coverage, $ 1,000,000 faithful performance employee bonding and
$ 1,000,000 for universal umbrella coverage. Property coverage is at approximately $ 134,300,000.
NOTE 18 CONTINGENCY
The City has been named as a defendant in the cleanup of the Burnsville landfill. The case is pending
further information and the outcome of liability to the City is unknown at the present time.
NOTE 19 TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT
The City has entered into three Tax Abatement Financing agreements which meet the criteria for
disclosure under Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 77 Tax Abatement
Disclosures. The City's authority to enter into these agreements comes from Minnesota Statute 469. The
City entered into these agreements for the purpose of economic development.
Under each agreement, the City and developer agree on an amount of development costs to be
reimbursed to the developer by the City though tax revenues from the additional taxable value of the
property generated by the development (tax abatement).
The tax abatement agreements are as follows:
Datacard Abatement was established in 2013. Entrust Datacard is the worlds largest issuer of
protected, personalized ID cards, credentials, and credit cards. The City of Shakopee awarded an
eleven-year economic development property tax abatement, ending in 2024, which required the
creation of 100 new full time jobs in Shakopee. The first year of disbursement occurred in 2014.
The total city abatement awarded was $ 334,869 with an annual maximum award of $ 36,195.
The total county abatement awarded was $ 324,324 with an annual maximum award of $ 35,055.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the total disbursed was $ 69,778 with $35,920 from
Scott County and $33,858 from the City.
91
Page 143 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
NOTE 19 TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT
Emerson Abatement was established in 2013. Rosemount Emerson Process Management is a

leading supplier of process management products and solutions, including control valves,
regulators, transmitters, analyzers, and automation systems. The City of Shakopee awarded a
nine-year economic development property tax abatement, ending in 2023, which required the
creation of 154 new full time jobs in Shakopee. The first year of disbursement occurred in 2015.
The total city abatement awarded was $ 590,496. The total county abatement awarded was $
570,608 with an annual maximum award of $ 64,401. During the year ended December 31, 2016,
the total disbursed was $ 102,349 with $49,981 from Scott County and $52,368 from the City.
Shutterfly Abatement was established in 2014. Shutterfly, Inc. is an Internet-based social

expression and personal publishing service that was founded in December of 1999. The City of
Shakopee awarded a nine-year economic development property tax abatement, ending in 2024,
which required the creation of 258 new jobs in Shakopee. The first year of disbursement
occurred in 2016. The total city abatement awarded was $758,771 with an annual maximum
award of $89,431. The total county abatement awarded was $734,898 with an annual maximum
award of $86,615. The 2016 disbursement amount was reduced by 11% due to Shutterfly not
meeting their job creation goal of 258 new jobs. They created 230 which left them 28 jobs short
or 11% short of their goal, therefor the annual award was reduced to reflect the shortage. The
abatement was awarded from the City and Scott County. During the year ended December 31,
2016, the total disbursed was $106,202 with $54,339 from Scott County and $51,863 from the
City.
NOTE 20 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
The City has entered into three Tax Increment Financing agreements which meet the criteria for
disclosure under Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 77 Tax Abatement
Disclosures. The City's authority to enter into these agreements comes from Minnesota Statute 469. The
City entered into these agreements for the purpose of economic development.
Under each agreement, the City and developer agree on an amount of development costs to be
reimbursed to the developer by the City though tax revenues from the additional taxable value of the
property generated by the development (tax increment). A "pay-as-you-go" is established for this
amount, on which the City makes payments for a fixed period of time with available tax increment
revenue after deducting for certain administrative costs.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the City generated $464,634 in tax increment revenue and
made $422,329 in payments to developers.
92
Page 144 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
NOTE 20 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
TIF District No. 10 was established in 1996 for the purpose of establishing multifamily rental
housing. River City Centre is 52-units of multifamily rental housing owned and operated by the
Scott County Community Development Authority (CDA). Under this agreement, up to
$2,750,000 in development costs would be reimbursed over twenty-five years with the final year
being 2024. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the City generated $41,585 of tax
increment revenue and made payments of $41,585. The available balance at year end was
$2,191,642.
TIF District No. 14 was established in 2014 as an economic development TIF. J&J
Minneapolis/SanMar is a wholesale apparel and accessories distribution company. This TIF
required the creation of 150 new full time jobs in Shakopee. The first year of disbursement
occurred in 2015 and the final year will be in 2024. Under this agreement, up to $2,000,000 of
development costs will be reimbursed through tax increment over a 9 year period. During the
year ended December 31, 2016, the City generated $280,739 of tax increment revenue and made
payments on the pay-as-you-go note of $ 252,665. The available balance at year end was
$1,494,277.
TIF District No. 15 was established in 2014 for the purpose of establishing a housing unit.
Trident/All Saints Senior Living is an 80-unit senior community providing assisted living,
memory care, and care suites with 20% of the units being affordable to persons of low and
moderate income. Under the agreement, up to $1,000,000 of development costs will be
reimbursed through tax increment over a 25 year period. During the year ended
December 31, 2016, the City generated $142,310 of tax increment revenue and made payments
of $128,079. The available balance at year end was $766,848.
NOTE 21 NEW STANDARDS ISSUED BUT NOT YET IMPLEMENTED
GASB has issued GASB Statement 74 relating to postemployment benefit plans other than pension
plans administered through trusts that meet certain criteria and includes requirements for OPEB plans
not administered through trusts. This new statement requires additional note disclosures and additional
required supplementary information. This statement is effective for financial statements for fiscal years
beginning after June 15, 2016. We are recommending that a review of your actuarial study be completed
with your actuarial firm to ensure compliance with the new standard.
GASB has issued GASB statement 75 relating to accounting and financial reporting for postemployment
benefits other than pensions. The new statement requires governments in all types of OPEB plans to
present more extensive note disclosures and required supplementary information (RSI) about OPEB
liabilities. This statement is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after June 15,
2017.
93
Page 145 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

DECEMBER 31, 2016
NOTE 21 NEW STANDARDS ISSUED BUT NOT YET IMPLEMENTED
GASB has issued GASB statement 80 relating to blending requirements for certain component units.
The new statement amends the blending requirements for financial statement presentation of component
units. The additional criterion requires blending of a component unit incorporated as a not-for-profit
corporation in which the primary government is the sole corporate member. This statement is effective
for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2016.
94
Page 146 of 334
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
95
Page 147 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
SCHEDULE OF FUNDING PROGRESS - OTHER POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS

December 31, 2016
Actuarial UAAL as a
Actuarial Accrued Liability Unfunded Percentage of
Actuarial Value of (AAL) - AAL Funded Covered Covered
Valuation Assets Entry Age (UAAL) Ratio Payroll Payroll
Date (a) (b) (b-a) (a/b) (c ) ((b-a)/c)
01/01/08 $ - $ 1,887,961 $ 1,887,961 0.0% $ 6,652,669 28.4%

01/01/09 * - 1,887,961 1,887,961 0.0% 6,652,669 28.4%
01/01/10 - 1,483,810 1,483,810 0.0% 7,154,161 20.7%
01/01/11 * - 1,483,810 1,483,810 0.0% 7,154,161 20.7%
01/01/12 * - 1,483,810 1,483,810 0.0% 7,154,161 20.7%
01/01/13 - 1,938,082 1,938,082 0.0% 8,738,120 22.2%
01/01/14 * - 1,938,082 1,938,082 0.0% 8,738,120 22.2%
01/01/15 * - 1,938,082 1,938,082 0.0% 8,738,120 22.2%
01/01/16 - 2,629,107 2,629,107 0.0% 12,403,330 21.2%
* Because an actuarial valuation is being performed once every three years, the amounts for
the 01/01/08 and 01/01/09, and the 01/01/10, 01/01/11 and 01/01/12,and the 01/01/13, 01/01/14
and 01/01/15 valuation are the same.
96
Page 148 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
SCHEDULE OF CITY'S PROPORTIONATE SHARE OF NET PENSION LIABILITY

LAST 10 YEARS GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND
City's Proportionate City's Plan

State's Share of the Net Proportionate Fiduciary
Proportionate Pension Liability Share of the Net Position
City's City's Share of the and the State's Net Pension as a
Proportion Proportionate Net Pension Proportionate Share City's Liability as a Percentage
of the Net Share of the Liability of the Net Pension Covered- Percentage of of the Total
For the Fiscal Pension Net Pension Associated Liability Associated Employee its Covered Pension
Year Ended Liability Liability with the City with the City Payroll Payroll Liability
June 30, 2016 0.0933% $ 7,575,497 $ 98,919 $ 7,674,416 $ 5,790,920 130.82% 68.91%
June 30, 2015 0.0930% 4,819,743 - 4,819,743 5,373,627 89.69% 78.19%
* Schedule is to be provided prospectively beginning with the City's fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, or after.
97
Page 149 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
SCHEDULE OF CITY'S PROPORTIONATE SHARE OF NET PENSION LIABILITY

LAST 10 YEARS PUBLIC EMPLOYEES POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT FUND
City's City's City's Proportionate Plan Fiduciary

Proportion Proportionate City's Share of the Net Net Position as a
of the Net Share of the Covered- Pension Liability as Percentage of the
For the Fiscal Pension Net Pension Employee a Percentage of its Total Pension
Year Ended Liability Liability Payroll Covered Payroll Liability
June 30, 2016 0.4680% $ 18,781,654 $ 4,511,556 416.30% 63.88%
June 30, 2015 0.4720% 5,363,024 4,199,481 127.71% 86.61%
98
Page 150 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
SCHEDULE OF COMPONENT UNIT'S PROPORTIONATE SHARE OF NET PENSION LIABILITY

City's Proportionate City's Plan

State's Share of the Net Proportionate Fiduciary
Proportionate Pension Liability Share of the Net Position
City's City's Share of the and the State's Net Pension as a
Proportion Proportionate Net Pension Proportionate Share City's Liability as a Percentage
of the Net Share of the Liability of the Net Pension Covered- Percentage of of the Total
For the Fiscal Pension Net Pension Associated Liability Associated Employee its Covered Pension
Year Ended Liability Liability with the City with the City Payroll Payroll Liability
June 30, 2016 0.0621% $ 5,042,212 $ 65,842 $ 5,108,054 $ 3,854,427 130.82% 68.91%
June 30, 2015 0.0608% 3,150,972 - 3,150,972 3,516,627 89.60% 78.19%
99
Page 151 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
SCHEDULE OF CITY CONTRIBUTIONS

Contributions Contributions
Statutorily in Relation to Contribution City's Covered- as a Percentage
For the Fiscal Required the Statutorily Deficiency Employee of Covered
Year Ended Contribution Required (Excess) Payroll Employee
December 31, 2016 $ 459,555 $ 459,555 $ - $ 6,127,400 7.50%
December 31, 2015 416,647 416,647 - 5,555,293 7.50%
100
Page 152 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
SCHEDULE OF CITY CONTRIBUTIONS

LAST 10 YEARS PUBLIC EMPLOYEES POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT FUND
in Relation to as a Percentage
Statutorily the Statutorily Contribution City's Covered- of Covered
For the Fiscal Required Required Deficiency Employee Employee
Year Ended Contribution Contributions (Excess) Payroll Payroll
December 31, 2016 $ 761,951 $ 761,951 $ - $ 4,703,401 16.20%
December 31, 2015 720,513 720,513 - 4,447,611 16.20%
101
Page 153 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
SCHEDULE OF COMPONENT UNIT CONTRIBUTIONS

Statutorily in Relation to Contribution City's Covered- as a Percentage
For the Fiscal Required the Statutorily Deficiency Employee of Covered
Year Ended Contribution Required (Excess) Payroll Employee
December 31, 2016 $ 299,473 $ 299,473 $ - $ 3,992,973 7.50%
December 31, 2015 273,227 273,227 - 3,643,027 7.50%
102
Page 154 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN NET PENSION LIABILITY

AND RELATED RATIOS - FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATION
2014 2015
Total Pension Liability (TPL)
Service cost $ 135,715 $ 139,447
Interest 224,377 228,231
Differenced between expected and actual experience - -
Changes of assumptions - -
Changes of benefit terms - -
Benefit payments, including refunds or member contributions (599,181) -
Net change in total pension liability (239,089) 367,678
Beginning of year $ 3,903,491 $ 3,664,402
End of year $ 3,664,402 $ 4,032,080
Plan Fiduciary Net Pension (FNP)

Contributions - employer $ 341,036 $ 244,626
Contributions - employee - -
Net investment income 315,532 (268,069)
Benefit payments, including refunds of member contributions (599,181) -
Administrative expense (10,897) (9,761)
Other - -
Net change in plan fiduciary net position 46,490 (33,204)
Beginning of year 5,135,900 5,182,390
End of year $ 5,182,390 $ 5,149,186
Net Pension Liability (NPL) $ (1,517,988) $ (1,117,106)
Plan fiduciary net position as a percentage of the total pension liability 141.4% 127.7%
Covered employee payroll n/a n/a
Net pension liability as a percentage of covered payroll n/a n/a
The City implemented the Provisions of Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 68
for the year ended December 31, 2015. The schedules within the Required Supplementary Information
section required a ten-year presentation, but does not require retroactive reporting. Information prior to
2014 is not available. Additional years will be reported as they become available.
103
Page 155 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
SCHEDULE OF CITY CONTRIBUTIONS AND NON-EMPLOYER

CONTRIBUTING ENTITIES - FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATION
Contributions
as a Percentage
Actuarial Actual Contribution Covered of Covered
For the Fiscal Year Determined Contributions Deficiency 2% State Employee Employee
Ended Contribution Paid (Excess) Aid Payroll Payroll
December 31, 2015 $ - $ - $ - $ 244,626 n/a n/a
December 31, 2014 113,868 113,868 - 227,168 n/a n/a
The Association implemented the Provisions of Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 68 for the year ended
December 31, 2015. The schedules within the Required Supplementary Information section required a ten-year presentation, but does
not require retroactive reporting. Information prior to 2014 is not available. Additional years will be reported as they become
available.
104
Page 156 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
NOTES TO REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
GENERAL EMPLOYEES FUND
2016 Changes
Changes in Actuarial Assumptions
The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.0% per year through
2035 and 2.5% per year thereafter to 1.0% per year for all future years.
was changed from 7.9% to 7.5%.
Other assumptions were changed pursuant to the experience study dated June 30, 2015. The
assumed future salary increases, payroll growth, the inflation were decreased by 0.25% to
2015 Changes
Changes in Plan Provisions
On January 1, 2015, the Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund was merged into the General
Employees Fund, which increased the total pension liability by $1.1 billion and increased the
fiduciary plan net position by $892 million. Upon consolidation, state and employer
contributions were revised.

and 2.5% per year thereafter to 1.0% per year through 2035 and 2.5% per year thereafter.
POLICE AND FIRE FUND
2016 Changes
and 2.5% thereafter to 1.0% per year for all future years.
The assumed future salary increases, payroll growth, and inflation were decreased by 0.25% to
2015 Changes
Changes in Plan Provisions
The post-retirement benefit increase to be paid after attainment of the 90% funding threshold was
changed, from inflation up to 2.5%, to a fixed rate of 2.5%.

and 2.5% per year thereafter to 1.0% per year through 2037 and 2.5% per year thereafter.
105
Page 157 of 334
106
Page 158 of 334
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
107
Page 159 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND

Variance with
Budget Actual Final Budget -
REVENUES
Property Taxes
General Property Taxes $ 14,955,400 $ 14,955,400 $ 14,814,140 $ (141,260)
Fiscal Disparities 1,857,500 1,857,500 1,807,792 (49,708)
Lodging Tax 325,000 325,000 388,372 63,372
Aggregate Tax 13,000 13,000 11,900 (1,100)
Total Property Taxes 17,150,900 17,150,900 17,022,204 (128,696)
Special Assessments 11,500 11,500 15,818 4,318
Licenses and Permits 1,504,100 2,269,100 2,564,729 295,629
Intergovernmental Revenues
Federal Grants 18,000 18,000 30,174 12,174
PERA Aid 18,000 18,000 18,170 170
Police Aid 343,000 343,000 390,012 47,012
Fire Aid 224,000 241,600 246,910 5,310
State Grants 504,500 630,300 657,513 27,213
Other Grants and Aids 1,000 1,000 1,500 500
Total Intergovernmental Revenues 1,108,500 1,251,900 1,344,279 92,379
Charges for Services

General Government 2,044,825 2,045,500 2,171,067 125,567
Public Safety 594,250 757,250 817,719 60,469
Public Works 522,500 473,900 581,032 107,132
Parks and Recreation 1,064,700 1,091,500 1,180,696 89,196
Total Charges for Services 4,226,275 4,368,150 4,750,514 382,364
Fines and Forfeitures 1,500 1,500 11,213 9,713
Miscellaneous Revenues
Investment Income 145,000 125,000 118,764 (6,236)
Contributions and Donations 4,800 6,800 7,266 466
Rents 9,500 9,500 9,460 (40)
Other 65,948 66,450 83,244 16,794
Total Miscellaneous Revenues 225,248 207,750 218,734 10,984
Total Revenues 24,228,023 25,260,800 25,927,491 666,691
EXPENDITURES
General Government
Current:
Mayor and Council $ 185,260 $ 176,990 $ 171,877 $ (5,113)
Administration 1,555,530 1,355,860 1,430,285 74,425
City Clerk 399,170 326,030 327,235 1,205
Finance 1,243,700 1,154,300 1,194,485 40,185
Planning 674,905 501,720 470,494 (31,226)
Government Buildings 408,986 363,810 370,741 6,931
Unallocated 218,450 217,580 34,836 (182,744)
Total General Government 4,686,001 4,096,290 3,999,953 (96,337)
108
Page 160 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND

Variance with
Budget Actual Final Budget -
EXPENDITURES (Continued)
Public Safety
Current:
Police 7,625,014 7,690,810 7,758,048 67,238
Fire 2,079,785 2,059,380 2,112,184 52,804
Building Inspection 669,967 606,910 715,667 108,757
Capital Outlay - 60,000 37,423 (22,577)
Total Public Safety 10,374,766 10,417,100 10,623,322 206,222
Public Works
Current:
Engineering 739,178 627,340 607,934 (19,406)
Streets 2,225,116 1,934,790 2,004,914 70,124
Shop 429,595 403,310 448,324 45,014
Total Public Works 3,393,889 2,965,440 3,061,172 95,732
Parks and Recreation

Current:
Park Maintenance 1,643,096 1,570,640 1,601,390 30,750
Natural Resources 198,092 200,410 178,269 (22,141)
Recreation 2,529,679 2,462,810 2,452,508 (10,302)
Capital Outlay 1,500 - - -
Total Parks and Recreation 4,372,367 4,233,860 4,232,167 (1,693)
Total Expenditures 22,827,023 21,712,690 21,916,614 203,924
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 1,401,000 3,548,110 4,010,877 462,767

Proceeds from Sale of Capital Asset - 600 9,134 8,534
Transfers In 250,000 250,000 250,000 -
Transfers Out (2,100,000) (3,345,000) (3,348,755) (3,755)
Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) (1,850,000) (3,094,400) (3,089,621) 4,779
Net Change in Fund Balances $ (449,000) $ 453,710 921,256 $ 467,546
FUND BALANCES
Beginning of Year 9,840,110
End of Year $ 10,761,366
109
Page 161 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
COMBINING BALANCE SHEET -

NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
December 31, 2016
Special Revenue
Forfeitures Telecommunication SCDP Grant

ASSETS
Cash and Investments $ 189,697 $ 62,082 $ 4,713
Delinquent Taxes Receivable - - -
Delinquent - - -
Deferred - - -
Accounts Receivable - 8,424 -
Interest Receivable 881 289 21
Due From Other Governments - - -
Land Held for Resale - - -
Total Assets $ 190,578 $ 70,795 $ 4,734

Liabilities
Accounts Payable $ 3,613 $ - $ -
Contracts Payable - - -
Due to Other Funds - - -
Due to Other Governments - - -
Advance from Other Funds - - -
Total Liabilities 3,613 - -

Unavailable Revenue - Property Taxes - - -
Unavailable Revenue - Special Assessments - - -
Total Deferred Inflows of Resources - - -
Fund Balances
Restricted for:
Special Revenue 186,965 - 4,734
Debt Service - - -
Capital Projects - - -
Assigned - 70,795 -
Unassigned - - -
Total Fund Balances 186,965 70,795 4,734

of Resources and Fund Balances $ 190,578 $ 70,795 $ 4,734
110
Page 162 of 334
Special Revenue Debt Service
Economic 2004B 2006A 2007A
Development Refunding Improvement Improvement
Revolving Loan Authority Total Bonds Bonds Bonds
$ 262,567 $ 1,511,913 $ 2,030,972 $ 225,264 $ 381,347 $ 156,950

- 17 17 123 - -
- - - - - 29,550
- - - - - 280,438
- - 8,424 - - -
1,220 7,026 9,437 1,047 1,772 730
- 29,811 29,811 - - -
- 923,612 923,612 - - -
$ 263,787 $ 2,472,379 $ 3,002,273 $ 226,434 $ 383,119 $ 467,668
$ - $ 27,051 $ 30,664 $ 255 $ 255 $ 255

- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- 941,394 941,394 - - -
- 968,445 972,058 255 255 255
- 17 17 123 - -
- - - - - 309,988
- 17 17 123 - 309,988
263,787 1,503,917 1,959,403 - - -

- - - 226,056 382,864 157,425
- - - - - -
- - 70,795 - - -
- - - - - -
263,787 1,503,917 2,030,198 226,056 382,864 157,425
$ 263,787 $ 2,472,379 $ 3,002,273 $ 226,434 $ 383,119 $ 467,668
111
Page 163 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

(Continued)
December 31, 2016
Debt Service
2007B 2008A 2010A
Improvement Improvement Improvement
Bonds Bonds Bonds
ASSETS
Delinquent 290 - -
Deferred 8,348 101,043 68,079
Accounts Receivable - - -
Interest Receivable 699 1,082 809
Due From Other Governments 28 - -
Total Assets $ 239,896 $ 384,769 $ 283,044

Liabilities
Accounts Payable $ 255 $ 255 $ 255
Total Liabilities 255 255 255

Unavailable Revenue - Special Assessments 8,638 101,043 68,079
Total Deferred Inflows of Resources 8,638 101,043 68,079
Fund Balances
Restricted for:
Special Revenue - - -
Debt Service 231,003 283,471 214,710
Capital Projects - - -
Assigned - - -
Unassigned - - -

112
Page 164 of 334
Debt Service Capital Projects
2012A
Refunding 2016A Tax TIF District No. TIF District No.
Bonds Abatement Bond Total Park Reserve 10 14
$ 1,663,219 $ 544,041 $ 3,698,152 $ 744,555 $ - $ 54,225

- - 123 - - -
- - 29,840 - - -
1,194,324 - 1,652,232 - - -
- - - 2,619 - -
7,727 877 14,743 3,459 (36) 252
1,701 - 1,729 - - -
- - - - - -
$ 2,866,971 $ 544,918 $ 5,396,819 $ 750,633 $ (36) $ 54,477
$ 255 $ 255 $ 2,040 $ 101,036 $ 764 $ -

- - - 58,493 - -
- - - - 7,802 -
- - - 24 - -
- - - - - -
255 255 2,040 159,553 8,566 -
- - 123 - - -
1,194,324 - 1,682,072 - - -
1,194,324 - 1,682,195 - - -
- - - - - -
1,672,392 544,663 3,712,584 - - -
- - - 591,080 - 54,477
- - - - - -
- - - - (8,602) -
1,672,392 544,663 3,712,584 591,080 (8,602) 54,477
$ 2,866,971 $ 544,918 $ 5,396,819 $ 750,633 $ (36) $ 54,477
113
Page 165 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

(Continued)
December 31, 2016
Capital Projects
Road
TIF District No. Expansion Tree
15 Dedication Replacement
ASSETS
Delinquent - - -
Deferred - - -
Accounts Receivable - - -
Interest Receivable 94 438 849
Due From Other Governments - - -
Total Assets $ 20,244 $ 94,591 $ 183,545

Liabilities
Accounts Payable $ - $ - $ -
Total Liabilities - - -

Unavailable Revenue - Special Assessments - - -
Total Deferred Inflows of Resources - - -
Fund Balances
Restricted for:
Special Revenue - - -
Debt Service - - -
Capital Projects 20,244 - -
Assigned - 94,591 183,545
Unassigned - - -

114
Page 166 of 334
Capital Projects
Property Total
Acquisition Governmental
Sealcoat Fund City Hall Total Funds
$ 72,504 $ 267,432 $ 2,691,142 $ 4,126,857 $ 9,855,981

- - - - 140
- - - - 29,840
- - - - 1,652,232
- - 146,285 148,904 157,328
338 1,242 7,856 14,492 38,672
- - - - 31,540
- 100,000 - 100,000 1,023,612
$ 72,842 $ 368,674 $ 2,845,283 $ 4,390,253 $ 12,789,345
$ - - 762,297 $ 864,097 $ 896,801

- - 189,373 247,866 247,866
- - - 7,802 7,802
- - - 24 24
- 400,000 - 400,000 1,341,394
- 400,000 951,670 1,519,789 2,493,887
- - - - 140
- - - - 1,682,072
- - - - 1,682,212
- - - - 1,959,403
- - - - 3,712,584
- - - 665,801 665,801
72,842 - 1,893,613 2,244,591 2,315,386
- (31,326) - (39,928) (39,928)
72,842 (31,326) 1,893,613 2,870,464 8,613,246
$ 72,842 $ 368,674 $ 2,845,283 $ 4,390,253 $ 12,789,345
115
Page 167 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES

IN FUND BALANCE - NON MAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
Special Revenue
Revolving
Forfeitures Telecommunication SCDP Grant Loan
REVENUES
Property Taxes $ - $ - $ - $ -
Tax Increment - - - -
Special Assessments - - - -
Licenses and Permits - 32,495 - -
Intergovernmental - - - -
Charges for Services - - - -
Fines and Forfeitures 47,430 - - -
Miscellaneous 10,652 - - -
Investment Income 2,016 1,131 51 2,922
Total Revenues 60,098 33,626 51 2,922
EXPENDITURES
Current
General Government - 16,918 - -
Public Safety 57,443 - - -
Culture and Recreation - - - -
Economic Development - - - -
Debt Service
Principal - - - -
Interest and Other Charges - - - -
Capital Outlay - 54,540 - -
Total Expenditures 57,443 71,458 - -

(Under) Expenditures 2,655 (37,832) 51 2,922

Bonds Issued - - - -
Transfers In 3,755 - - -
Transfers Out - - - -
Sources (Uses) 3,755 - - -
Net Change in Fund Balances 6,410 (37,832) 51 2,922
FUND BALANCES
Beginning of Year 180,555 108,627 4,683 260,865
End of Year $ 186,965 $ 70,795 $ 4,734 $ 263,787
116
Page 168 of 334
Special Revenue Debt Service
Economic 2004B 2006A 2007A 2007B
Development Refunding Improvement Improvement Improvement
Authority Total Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds
$ 6 $ 6 $ 238,027 $ 315,390 $ - $ 94,992

- - - - - -
- - - 16,699 22,375 9,315
- 32,495 - - - -
1,029,810 1,029,810 - - - -
6,000 6,000 - - - -
- 47,430 - - - -
250,312 260,964 - - - -
14,701 20,821 336 1,241 1,599 756
1,300,829 1,397,526 238,363 333,330 23,974 105,063
- 16,918 - - - -
- 57,443 - - - -
- - - - - -
1,377,742 1,377,742 - - - -
- - 220,000 380,000 155,000 150,000

- - 14,330 25,805 9,805 16,005
- 54,540 - - - -
1,377,742 1,506,643 234,330 405,805 164,805 166,005
(76,913) (109,117) 4,033 (72,475) (140,831) (60,942)
- - - - - -
905,920 909,675 - - - 80,000
- - - - - -
905,920 909,675 - - - 80,000
829,007 800,558 4,033 (72,475) (140,831) 19,058
674,910 1,229,640 222,023 455,339 298,256 211,945
$ 1,503,917 $ 2,030,198 $ 226,056 $ 382,864 $ 157,425 $ 231,003
117
Page 169 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

(Continued)
Debt Service
2008A 2010A 2012A 2016A Tax
Improvement Improvement Refunding Abatement
Bonds Bonds Bonds Bond
REVENUES
Property Taxes $ - $ 88,500 $ 47,386 $ -
Special Assessments 60,391 31,232 628,630 -
Licenses and Permits - - - -
Fines and Forfeitures - - - -
Miscellaneous - - - -
Investment Income 2,158 906 11,809 427
Total Revenues 62,549 120,638 687,825 427
EXPENDITURES
Current
General Government - - - -
Public Safety - - - -
Economic Development - - - -
Debt Service
Principal 200,000 135,000 445,000 -
Interest and Other Charges 30,105 18,016 86,592 576,639
Capital Outlay - - - -
Total Expenditures 230,105 153,016 531,592 576,639

(Under) Expenditures (167,556) (32,378) 156,233 (576,212)

Bonds Issued - - - 1,120,875
Transfers In 50,000 40,000 226,680 -
Transfers Out - - - -
Sources (Uses) 50,000 40,000 226,680 1,120,875
Net Change in Fund Balances (117,556) 7,622 382,913 544,663
FUND BALANCES
Beginning of Year 401,027 207,088 1,289,479 -
End of Year $ 283,471 $ 214,710 $ 1,672,392 $ 544,663
118
Page 170 of 334
Debt Service Capital Projects
TIF District TIF District No. TIF District No. Emerson

Total Park Reserve No. 10 14 15 Abatement
$ 784,295 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 102,349
- - 41,585 280,739 142,310 -
768,642 - - - - -
- 549,594 - - - -
- - - - - -
- 2,730 - - - -
- - - - - -
- 90,000 - - - -
19,232 15,674 (12) 555 206 -
1,572,169 657,998 41,573 281,294 142,516 102,349
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - 41,621 253,451 128,847 102,349
1,685,000 - - - - -
777,297 - 764 - - -
- 1,427,324 - - - -
2,462,297 1,427,324 42,385 253,451 128,847 102,349
(890,128) (769,326) (812) 27,843 13,669 -
1,120,875 - - - - -
396,680 - - - - -
- (20,261) - - - -
1,517,555 (20,261) - - - -
627,427 (789,587) (812) 27,843 13,669 -
3,085,157 1,380,667 (7,790) 26,634 6,575 -
$ 3,712,584 $ 591,080 $ (8,602) $ 54,477 $ 20,244 $ -
119
Page 171 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE

(Continued)
Capital Projects
Road
Shutterfly Datacard Expansion
Abatement Abatement Dedication Lions Park
REVENUES
Property Taxes $ 106,202 $ 69,778 $ - $ -
Special Assessments - - - -
Licenses and Permits - - - -
Fines and Forfeitures - - - -
Miscellaneous - - - -
Investment Income - (111) 1,049 33
Total Revenues 106,202 69,667 1,049 33
EXPENDITURES
Current
General Government - - - -
Public Safety - - - -
Economic Development 106,202 81,589 - -
Debt Service
Principal - - - -
Interest and Other Charges - - - -
Capital Outlay - - - -
Total Expenditures 106,202 81,589 - -

(Under) Expenditures - (11,922) 1,049 33

Bonds Issued - - - -
Transfers In - - - -
Transfers Out - - - (9,961)
Sources (Uses) - - - (9,961)
Net Change in Fund Balances - (11,922) 1,049 (9,928)
FUND BALANCES
Beginning of Year - 11,922 93,542 9,928
End of Year $ - $ - $ 94,591 $ -
120
Page 172 of 334
Capital Projects
Property Total Other
Tree Acquisition Governmental
Replacement Sealcoat Fund City Hall Total Funds
$ - $ - $ - $ - $ 278,329 $ 1,062,630
- - - - 464,634 464,634
- - - - - 768,642
- - - - 549,594 582,089
9,589 - 4,158 - 13,747 1,043,557
- - - - 2,730 8,730
- - - - - 47,430
1,313 38,936 - - 130,249 391,213
2,233 346 2,914 2,525 25,412 65,465
13,135 39,282 7,072 2,525 1,464,695 4,434,390
- - - - - 16,918
- - - - - 57,443
37,044 - - - 37,044 37,044
- - 536 - 714,595 2,092,337
- - - - - 1,685,000
- - - - 764 778,061
- - 6,626 3,430,023 4,863,973 4,918,513
37,044 - 7,162 3,430,023 5,616,376 9,585,316
(23,909) 39,282 (90) (3,427,498) (4,151,681) (5,150,926)
- - - - - 1,120,875
- - - 4,160,000 4,160,000 5,466,355
- - - - (30,222) (30,222)
- - - 4,160,000 4,129,778 6,557,008
(23,909) 39,282 (90) 732,502 (21,903) 1,406,082
207,454 33,560 (31,236) 1,161,111 2,892,367 7,207,164
$ 183,545 $ 72,842 $ (31,326) $ 1,893,613 $ 2,870,464 $ 8,613,246
121
Page 173 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
COMBINING STATEMENT OF FUND NET POSITION -

INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
December 31, 2016
Information
Employee and
Equipment Buildings Park Asset Benefits Technology Self Insurnace Total
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and Investments, Including
Cash Equivalents $ 4,510,751 $ 3,865,428 $ 1,813,152 $ 1,042,051 $ 679,861 $ 362,790 $ 12,274,033
Accounts Receivable - - - - - 6,129 6,129
Interest Receivable 20,956 17,958 8,424 4,840 3,159 1,338 56,675
Prepaid Expenses - - - - - 183,616 183,616
Total Current Assets 4,531,707 3,883,386 1,821,576 1,046,891 683,020 553,873 12,520,453
Noncurrent Assets
Advances to Other Funds, Noncurrent 941,394 400,000 - - - - 1,341,394
Capital Assets:
Land - - 221,876 - - - 221,876
Construction in Progress - - 401,288 - - - 401,288
Infrastructure - 79,820 3,537,673 - - - 3,617,493
Buildings - 31,296,794 3,296,094 - - - 34,592,888
Machinery and Equipment 10,945,650 189,539 3,951,903 - 237,322 - 15,324,414
Total Cost 10,945,650 31,566,153 11,408,834 - 237,322 - 54,157,959
Less Accumulated Depreciation (4,725,030) (11,877,384) (4,276,368) - (188,180) - (21,066,962)
Net Capital Assets 6,220,620 19,688,769 7,132,466 - 49,142 - 33,090,997
Total Noncurrent Assets 7,162,014 20,088,769 7,132,466 - 49,142 - 34,432,391
Total Assets $ 11,693,721 $ 23,972,155 $ 8,954,042 $ 1,046,891 $ 732,162 $ 553,873 $ 46,952,844
LIABILITIES AND NET POSITION

Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable $ 143,165 $ - $ 43,365 $ - $ 30,933 $ 5,621 $ 223,084
Current Compensated Absences - - - 956,190 - - 956,190
Total Current Liabilities 143,165 - 43,365 956,190 30,933 5,621 1,179,274
Compensated Absences - - - 1,168,676 - - 1,168,676
Total Noncurrent Liabilities - - - 1,168,676 - - 1,168,676
Total Liabilities 143,165 - 43,365 2,124,866 30,933 5,621 2,347,950
Net Position
Investment in Capital Assets 6,220,620 19,688,769 7,132,466 - 49,142 - 33,090,997
Unrestricted 5,329,936 4,283,386 1,778,211 (1,077,975) 652,087 548,252 11,513,897
Total Net Position 11,550,556 23,972,155 8,910,677 (1,077,975) 701,229 548,252 44,604,894
Total Liabilities and

Net Position $ 11,693,721 $ 23,972,155 $ 8,954,042 $ 1,046,891 $ 732,162 $ 553,873 $ 46,952,844
122
Page 174 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES

AND CHANGES IN FUND NET ASSETS -
Information
Employee and Self
Equipment Buildings Park Asset Benefits Technology Insurance Total
OPERATING REVENUES
Rental Charges $ 612,868 $ 533,450 $ 385,900 $ - $ 365,200 $ 466,950 $ 2,364,368
Other Charges - - - - - - -
Total Operating Revenues 612,868 533,450 385,900 - 365,200 466,950 2,364,368
OPERATING EXPENSES
Salaries and Benefits - - - 38,214 - - 38,214
Depreciation 741,766 714,862 373,512 - 17,734 - 1,847,874
Professional Services - - - - 1,358 - 1,358
Repairs and Maintenance - 6,600 20,869 - 26,034 5,621 59,124
Materials and Supplies 6,426 80,959 1,557 - 290,196 - 379,138
Insurance - - - - - 134,014 134,014
Total Operating Expenses 748,192 802,421 395,938 38,214 335,322 139,635 2,459,722
Operating Income (Loss) (135,324) (268,971) (10,038) (38,214) 29,878 327,315 (95,354)
NONOPERATING REVENUES
(EXPENSES)
Investment Income 51,194 63,764 24,580 8,969 6,894 180 155,581
Donations - - 366,622 - - - 366,622
Insurance Dividends - - - - - 145,757 145,757
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Asset 114,978 (61,942) (12,038) - - - 40,998
Capital Asset Transfer 15,933 - (68,840) - - - (52,907)
Total Nonoperating Revenues

(Expenses) 182,105 1,822 310,324 8,969 6,894 145,937 656,051
Income (Loss) before Capital

Contributions and Transfers 46,781 (267,149) 300,286 (29,245) 36,772 473,252 560,697
Transfers In - - 30,222 - - 75,000 105,222

Transfers Out - (2,386,680) - - - - (2,386,680)
Change in Net Position 46,781 (2,653,829) 330,508 (29,245) 36,772 548,252 (1,720,761)
NET POSITION
Beginning of Year 11,503,775 26,625,984 8,580,169 (1,048,730) 664,457 - 46,325,655
End of Year $ 11,550,556 $ 23,972,155 $ 8,910,677 $ (1,077,975) $ 701,229 $ 548,252 $ 44,604,894
123
Page 175 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS -

Information
Employee and
Equipment Buildings Park Asset Benefits Technology Self Insurance Total
CASH FLOWS - OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Receipts from Customers and Users $ 612,868 $ 533,450 $ 386,397 $ - $ 365,200 $ 460,821 $ 2,358,736
Receipts from Interfund Services - 897,344 - 193,830 - - 1,091,174
Payments to Suppliers (17,074) (92,918) (84,934) - (313,827) (317,630) (826,383)
Activities 595,794 1,337,876 301,463 193,830 51,373 143,191 2,623,527
CASH FLOWS - NONCAPITAL

Payment Received on Interfund Loan - 50,000 - - - - 50,000
Insurance Dividends - - - - - 145,757 145,757
Transfer from Other Funds - - 30,222 - - 75,000 105,222
Transfer to Other Funds - (2,386,680) - - - - (2,386,680)
Net Cash Flows - Noncapital
Financing Activities - (2,336,680) 30,222 - - 220,757 (2,085,701)
CASH FLOWS - CAPITAL AND RELATED

Donations - - 366,622 - - - 366,622
Proceeds (Loss) from Disposal of Capital Assets 409,402 501 - - - - 409,903
Acquisition of Capital Assets (1,446,070) - (991,783) - - - (2,437,853)
Net Cash Flows - Capital and
Related Financing Activities (1,036,668) 501 (625,161) - - - (1,661,328)
CASH FLOWS - INVESTING ACTIVITIES

Interest Received 50,798 69,685 24,890 7,655 6,345 (1,158) 158,215
Net Cash Flows - Investing
Activities 50,798 69,685 24,890 7,655 6,345 (1,158) 158,215
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents (390,076) (928,618) (268,586) 201,485 57,718 362,790 (965,287)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

Beginning of Year 4,900,827 4,794,046 2,081,738 840,566 622,143 - 13,239,320
End of Year $ 4,510,751 $ 3,865,428 $ 1,813,152 $ 1,042,051 $ 679,861 $ 362,790 $ 12,274,033
RECONCILIATION OF OPERATING
INCOME (LOSS) TO NET CASH
FLOWS - OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Operating Income (Loss) $ (135,324) $ (268,971) $ (10,038) $ (38,214) $ 29,878 $ 327,315 $ (95,354)
Adjustments to Reconcile Operating
Income (Loss) to Net Cash
Flows - Operating Activities:
Depreciation Expense 741,766 714,862 373,512 - 17,734 - 1,847,874
Changes in:
Accounts Receivable - - - - - (6,129) (6,129)
Due from Other Funds - 897,344 - - - - 897,344
Due from Other Governments - - 497 - - - 497
Accounts and Contracts Payable (10,648) (5,359) (62,508) - 3,761 5,621 (69,133)
Prepaid Expenses - - - - - (183,616) (183,616)
Compensated Absences Payable - - - 232,044 - - 232,044
Total Adjustments 731,118 1,606,847 311,501 232,044 21,495 (184,124) 2,718,881
Activities $ 595,794 $ 1,337,876 $ 301,463 $ 193,830 $ 51,373 $ 143,191 $ 2,623,527
NONCASH INVESTING, CAPITAL AND

Contributions of Capital Assets from the
Transfer of Capital Assets $ 15,933 $ - $ (68,840) $ - $ - $ - $ (52,907)
124
Page 176 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
COMBINED STATEMENT OF FIDUCIARY NET POSITION

December 31, 2016
Southwest
Holiday Metro Drug
Escrow Lighting Task Force Total Agency
Agency Fund Agency Fund Agency Fund Funds
ASSETS
Current
Cash and Investments $ 2,779,900 $ 36 $ 376,128 $ 3,156,064
Due from Other Governments - - 91,644 91,644
Prepaids - - 9,152 9,152
Total Assets $ 2,779,900 $ 36 $ 476,924 $ 3,256,860
LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable $ - $ - $ 378,410 $ 378,410
Deposits Payable 2,779,900 36 59,204 2,839,140
Due to Other Governments - - 39,310 39,310
Total Liabilities $ 2,779,900 $ 36 $ 476,924 $ 3,256,860
125
Page 177 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES -

AGENCY FUNDS
December 31, 2016
Escrow Agency Fund

Balance at Balance at
December 31, December 31,
2015 Additions Deductions 2016
ASSETS
Current
Cash and Investments $ 2,293,485 $ 2,017,295 $ 1,530,880 $ 2,779,900
LIABILITIES
Deposits Payable $ 2,293,485 $ 2,017,295 $ 1,530,880 $ 2,779,900
Holiday Lighting Agency Fund

ASSETS
Current
Cash and Investments $ - $ 3,860 $ 3,824 $ 36
LIABILITIES
Deposits Payable $ - $ 3,860 $ 3,824 $ 36
Southwest Metro Drug Task Force Agency Fund

ASSETS
Current
Cash and Investments $ 555,344 $ 250,056 $ 429,272 $ 376,128
Interest Receivable 2,321 - 2,321 -
Due from Other Governments 22,000 69,644 91,644
Prepaids - 9,152 - 9,152
Total Assets $ 579,665 $ 328,852 $ 431,593 $ 476,924
LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable $ 413,426 $ 256,366 $ 291,382 378,410
Deposits Payable 139,883 59,037 139,716 59,204
Due to Other Governments 26,356 13,449 495 39,310
Total Liabilities $ 579,665 $ 328,852 $ 431,593 $ 476,924

126
Page 178 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES -

AGENCY FUNDS
December 31, 2016
Total Agency Funds

ASSETS
Current
Cash and Investments $ 2,848,829 $ 2,271,211 $ 1,963,976 $ 3,156,064
Interest Receivable 2,321 - 2,321 -
Due from Other Governments 22,000 69,644 - 91,644
Prepaids - 9,152 - 9,152
Total Assets $ 2,873,150 $ 2,350,007 $ 1,966,297 $ 3,256,860
LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable $ 413,426 $ 256,366 $ 291,382 $ 378,410
Deposits Payable 2,433,368 2,080,192 1,674,420 2,839,140
Due to Other Governments 26,356 13,449 495 39,310
Total Liabilities $ 2,873,150 $ 2,350,007 $ 1,966,297 $ 3,256,860
127
Page 179 of 334
128
Page 180 of 334
STATISTICAL SECTION
129
Page 181 of 334
130
Page 182 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
STATISTICAL SECTION
December 31, 2016
This part of the Citys Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) presents detailed information
for placing in context and understanding what the information shown in the financial statements, note
disclosures and required supplementary information reveals about the Citys overall financial health.
CONTENTS Page
Financial Trends 132
These schedules show trend information to help the reader understand how the Citys
financial performance and well being have changed over time.
Revenue Capacity 140
Portrayed is information to help the reader assess the Citys most important local revenue
source, the property tax.
Debt Capacity 144
These schedules present information to help the reader assess the affordability of the Citys
current levels of outstanding debt and the Citys ability to issue additional debt in the future.
Demographic and Economic Information 151
Shown are demographic and economic indicators to help the reader understand the
environment within which the Citys financial activities take place.
Operating Information 154
These schedules shown service and infrastructure data to help the reader understand how
the information in the Citys financial report relates to the services the City provides and the
Source: Unless noted otherwise, the information in these schedules is from the CAFR for the relevant
year.
131
Page 183 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
NET POSITION BY COMPONENT

Years 2007 Through 2016
2007 2008 2009 2010

Net Investment in Capital Assets $ 113,534,056 $ 112,909,793 $ 112,097,148 $ 111,905,152
Restricted 13,081,337 21,915,945 16,518,865 1,844,129
Unrestricted 28,316,931 22,086,771 28,832,576 43,910,102
Total Governmental
Activities Net Position $ 154,932,324 $ 156,912,509 $ 157,448,589 $ 157,659,383
Restricted 1,026,351 1,756,369 3,574,612 4,889,050
Unrestricted 46,169,289 49,366,581 55,595,594 59,014,070
Total Business-Type
Activities Net Position $ 161,741,858 $ 166,247,188 $ 173,501,422 $ 178,968,088
Primary Government:
Restricted 14,107,688 23,672,314 20,093,477 6,733,179
Unrestricted 74,486,220 71,453,352 84,428,170 102,924,172
Total Primary
Government Net Position $ 316,674,182 $ 323,159,697 $ 330,950,011 $ 336,627,471
From 2007-2010, the SPUC Funds, Water and Electric Enterprise Funds, were reported as a
blended component unit of the City. In 2011, SPUC funds have been presented as discretely
presented component units as it no longer met the criteria for blending.
The City implemented GASB Statemetn No. 68 and GASB Statement No. 71 in 2015. Years
prior to 2015 have not been restated.
132
Page 184 of 334
Table 1
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
$ 114,981,955 $ 115,191,768 $ 118,166,525 $ 117,980,552 $ 120,831,029 $ 128,559,527

10,914,439 9,912,551 10,454,238 7,103,581 7,547,490 6,637,391
32,771,327 34,823,712 30,642,443 35,302,035 23,939,064 16,719,760
$ 158,667,721 $ 159,928,031 $ 159,263,206 $ 160,386,168 $ 152,317,583 $ 151,916,678
$ 65,080,070 $ 64,124,590 $ 65,181,465 $ 67,831,099 $ 68,986,369 $ 70,099,288

- - - - - -
31,927,930 33,354,521 31,183,904 28,485,814 25,981,542 23,281,483
$ 97,008,000 $ 97,479,111 $ 96,365,369 $ 96,316,913 $ 94,967,911 $ 93,380,771
$ 180,062,025 $ 179,316,358 $ 183,347,990 $ 185,811,651 $ 189,817,398 $ 198,658,815

10,914,439 9,912,551 10,454,238 7,103,581 7,547,490 6,637,391
64,699,257 68,178,233 61,826,347 63,787,849 49,920,606 40,001,243
$ 255,675,721 $ 257,407,142 $ 255,628,575 $ 256,703,081 $ 247,285,494 $ 245,297,449
133
Page 185 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
CHANGES IN NET POSITION

Years 2007 Through 2016
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

EXPENSES:
General Government $ 3,543,980 $ 3,514,573 $ 3,388,268 $ 3,042,918 $ 4,252,887 $ 4,603,027
Public Safety 8,301,075 8,346,104 8,528,413 9,123,316 9,236,767 9,430,785
Public Works 15,264,606 8,099,384 7,860,080 8,397,874 7,094,047 7,083,299
Culture and Recreation 5,323,087 3,637,527 3,859,670 3,765,660 3,866,307 3,817,677
Economic Development 363,805 522,074 316,566 427,169 244,361 152,541
Other 1,042,133 1,033,999 1,040,044 784,824 619,099 587,384
Total Governmental Activities Expenses 33,838,686 25,153,661 24,993,041 25,541,761 25,313,468 25,674,713
Electric 34,710,974 36,186,676 30,140,842 32,700,410 - -
Water 3,332,132 3,461,261 3,316,102 3,293,079 - -
Sewer 2,938,955 3,308,759 3,398,117 3,685,417 3,807,322 3,926,541
Storm 1,352,078 1,435,376 1,264,261 1,792,749 1,382,391 1,445,633
Refuse - - - - - -
Total Business-Type Activities Expenses 42,334,139 44,392,072 38,119,322 41,471,655 5,189,713 5,372,174
Total Primary Government Expenses $ 76,172,825 $ 69,545,733 $ 63,112,363 $ 67,013,416 $ 30,503,181 $ 31,046,887
PROGRAM REVENUES:
Charges for Services:
General Government $ 583,247 $ 606,259 $ 680,681 $ 652,686 $ 721,180 $ 3,356,772
Public Safety 1,650,235 1,506,680 1,677,772 1,716,573 1,503,188 1,524,158
Public Works 2,615,402 2,354,276 1,342,173 941,224 478,788 454,145
Culture and Recreation 1,086,750 1,295,772 1,013,044 1,039,820 1,071,482 2,222,430
Economic Development - - - - 7,100 16,500
Operating Grants and Contributions 1,943,805 1,660,191 1,485,124 2,943,857 3,606,089 2,106,559
Capital Grants and Contributions 2,463,129 1,825,124 1,241,884 952,450 3,152,881 1,479,343
Total Governmental Activities
Program Revenues 10,342,568 9,248,302 7,440,678 8,246,610 10,540,708 11,159,907
Charges for Services:
Electric 37,407,565 38,732,701 34,272,099 36,872,008 - -
Water 3,525,140 3,390,309 3,605,498 4,417,498 - -
Sewer 2,806,371 2,556,299 3,485,882 3,508,947 2,941,753 3,728,189
Storm 1,505,247 1,379,821 1,405,560 1,281,986 1,083,878 1,442,394
Refuse - - - - - -
Operating Grants and Contributions - - - 6,415 - -
Capital Grants and Contributions 4,138,977 1,007,519 1,879,530 1,661,001 93,810 348,756
Total Business-Type Activities
Program Revenues 49,383,300 47,066,649 44,648,569 47,747,855 4,119,441 5,519,339
Total Primary Government
Program Revenues $ 59,725,868 $ 56,314,951 $ 52,089,247 $ 55,994,465 $ 14,660,149 $ 16,679,246
Net (Expense) Revenue:

Governmental Activities $ (23,496,118) $ (15,905,359) $ (17,552,363) $ (17,295,151) $ (14,772,760) $ (14,514,806)
Business-Type Activities 7,049,161 2,674,577 6,529,247 6,276,200 (1,070,272) 147,165
Total Primary Government Net Expense $ (16,446,957) $ (13,230,782) $ (11,023,116) $ (11,018,951) $ (15,843,032) $ (14,367,641)
GENERAL REVENUES AND OTHER

CHANGES IN NET POSITION:
Taxes:
Property Taxes $ 12,767,354 $ 14,200,833 $ 14,676,518 $ 14,229,111 $ 14,487,805 $ 15,002,764
Other Taxes 369,240 388,935 151,956 147,561 160,884 113,902
Unrestricted Investment Earnings 2,232,717 1,941,335 1,323,230 1,039,867 1,032,409 546,681
Gain on Disposal of Assets 22,628 56,453 37,162 - - 11,769
Special Item - - - - - -
Transfers 1,111,046 1,297,988 1,899,577 2,089,406 100,000 100,000
Total Governmental Activities 16,502,985 17,885,544 18,088,443 17,505,945 15,781,098 15,775,116
Investment Earnings 3,185,863 3,128,741 1,336,979 1,279,872 758,182 423,946
Gain on Disposal of Assets - - - - - -
Transfers (1,111,046) (1,297,988) (1,899,577) (2,089,406) (100,000) (100,000)
Total Business-Type Activities 2,074,817 1,830,753 (562,598) (809,534) 658,182 323,946
Total Primary Government $ 18,577,802 $ 19,716,297 $ 17,525,845 $ 16,696,411 $ 16,439,280 $ 16,099,062
Change in Net Position:

Government Activities $ (6,993,133) $ 1,980,185 $ 536,080 $ 210,794 $ 1,008,338 $ 1,260,310
Business-Type Activities 9,123,978 4,505,330 5,966,649 5,466,666 (412,090) 471,111
Total Primary Government $ 2,130,845 $ 6,485,515 $ 6,502,729 $ 5,677,460 $ 596,248 $ 1,731,421
From 2007-2010, the SPUC funds, Water and Electric Enterprise Funds, were reported as a blended component unit of the City. In 2011, SPUC Funds have been presented as
discretely presented component units as it no longer met the criteria for blending.
The City implemented GASB Statement No. 68 and GASB Statement No. 71 in 2015. Years prior to 2015 have not been restated.
134
Page 186 of 334
Table 2
2013 2014 2015 2016
$ 4,704,956 $ 5,514,412 $ 4,237,647 $ 4,205,975

9,868,702 10,543,861 10,582,354 13,281,715
7,578,493 10,667,275 8,552,096 8,593,885
4,020,974 4,250,557 4,355,453 4,653,362
338,907 1,593,968 2,603,741 2,104,584
573,949 453,696 274,960 1,190,824
27,085,981 33,023,769 30,606,251 34,030,345
- - - -
- - - -
4,096,504 3,777,866 3,824,026 3,843,232
1,641,438 1,924,853 1,726,149 1,848,768
- - 127,781 127,034
5,737,942 5,702,719 5,677,956 5,819,034
$ 32,823,923 $ 38,726,488 $ 36,284,207 $ 39,849,379
$ 3,047,447 $ 3,155,648 $ 2,904,587 $ 2,858,344

1,701,875 1,879,209 2,146,840 2,744,824
688,286 693,647 704,687 746,086
2,012,436 1,827,046 2,140,071 1,760,925
18,000 18,000 24,000 256,312
1,894,436 2,880,493 2,509,986 2,777,982
689,424 6,668,531 1,735,543 2,187,039
10,051,904 17,122,574 12,165,714 13,331,512
- - - -
- - - -
3,004,826 2,916,192 2,829,981 3,292,166
1,720,653 1,211,793 1,765,679 1,632,218
- 72,167 103,637 105,309
- - - -
7,780 496,655 65,844 183,142
4,733,259 4,696,807 4,765,141 5,212,835
$ 14,785,163 $ 21,819,381 $ 16,930,855 $ 18,544,347
$ (17,034,077) $ (15,901,195) $ (18,440,537) $ (20,698,833)

(1,004,683) (1,005,912) (912,815) (606,199)
$ (18,038,760) $ (16,907,107) $ (19,353,352) $ (21,305,032)
$ 15,795,777 $ 16,446,631 $ 16,807,367 $ 18,015,507

113,796 216,441 406,571 464,632
40,589 727,619 452,281 495,804
256,600 52,674 87,819 50,132
- - 496,484 -
162,490 (419,208) (634,070) 1,271,853
16,369,252 17,024,157 17,616,452 20,297,928
53,431 538,248 349,776 289,001

- - 17,438 1,911
(162,490) 419,208 (496,484) (1,271,853)
(109,059) 957,456 (129,270) (980,941)
$ 16,260,193 $ 17,981,613 $ 17,487,182 $ 19,316,987
$ (664,825) $ 1,122,962 $ (824,085) $ (400,905)

(1,113,742) (48,456) (1,042,085) (1,587,140)
$ (1,778,567) $ 1,074,506 $ (1,866,170) $ (1,988,045)
135
Page 187 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
FUND BALANCES - GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS

Last Ten Fiscal Years
2007 2008 2009 2010

General Fund:
Nonspendable:
Prepaids $ - $ - $ - $ 149,940
Reserved 1,810,650 1,126,074 799,276 -
Restricted for:
BATC Litigation - - - 218,032
Committed to:
Working Capital - - - 345,820
Unreserved 7,896,883 8,733,528 10,703,004 -
Unassigned - - - 8,323,938
Total General Fund $ 9,707,533 $ 9,859,602 $ 11,502,280 $ 9,037,730
All Other Governmental Funds

Reserved:
Special Revenue Funds $ 2,489,775 $ 2,738,909 $ 2,677,290 $ -
Debt Service Funds - - - -
Capital Projects Funds 3,849,703 4,873,440 4,185,059 -
Restricted for:
Forfeitures - - - 189,112
Transit - - - 1,158,355
SCDP Grant - - - 55,743
Revolving Loans - - - 143,023
Economic Development - - - 447,319
Debt Service - - - 5,127,697
Capital Improvements - - - 2,203,238
Committed to:
Working Capital - - - 345,820
Transit - - - 463,470
Revolving Loans - - - 100,000
Economic Development - - - 20,930
Park Projects - - - 1,785,164
Capital Improvements - - - 3,616,689
2008 Projects - - - 190,431
2009 Projects - - - 14,876
2010 Projects - - - 131,398
Fire Station 2 - - - 2,476,886
Assigned to:
Telecomminication - - - 49,192
Capital Improvements - - - -
Capital Projects Funds - - - -
Unreserved
Special Revenue Funds 993,555 1,130,452 - -
Debt Service Funds 7,941,439 7,658,289 7,504,770 -
Capital Projects Funds 1,673,762 1,994,812 2,453,383 -
Unassigned - - - (116,803)
Governmental Funds $ 16,948,234 $ 18,395,902 $ 16,820,502 $ 18,402,540
Note: GASB Statement No. 54 was implemented in 2010.
Only 2010-2016 are reported in compliance with GASB Statement No. 54. 2007-2009 are reported as previously stated.
136
Page 188 of 334
Table 3
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
$ 131,447 $ 19,189 $ 16,440 $ 13,949 $ 21,573 $ 22,188

- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
9,172,747 9,503,652 9,076,549 9,824,097 9,818,537 10,739,178
$ 9,304,194 $ 9,522,841 $ 9,092,989 $ 9,838,046 $ 9,840,110 $ 10,761,366
$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
208,518 195,823 180,696 174,580 180,555 186,965

1,237,762 1,045,340 941,469 635,247 - -
22,462 22,447 4,546 4,627 4,683 4,734
249,147 252,639 253,065 257,601 260,865 263,787
497,775 562,959 685,671 361,569 674,910 1,503,917
4,625,946 9,574,198 8,678,680 7,053,086 3,085,157 3,712,584
958,195 1,815,339 1,882,231 1,634,954 1,425,798 7,213,258
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
45,681 66,989 54,499 76,342 108,627 70,795

6,964,247 8,681,475 5,753,669 5,630,178 6,130,194 4,744,275
413,228 394,666 176,398 228,059 1,505,595 2,244,591
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
(484,089) (384,965) (1,716) (7,316) (1,715,102) (39,928)
$ 14,738,872 $ 22,226,910 $ 18,609,208 $ 16,048,927 $ 11,661,282 $ 19,904,978
137
Page 189 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS

2007 2008 2009 2010

REVENUES:
Taxes $ 13,084,595 $ 14,437,766 $ 14,992,051 $ 14,385,788
Special Assessments 2,301,560 1,879,974 1,810,511 1,404,088
Licenses and Permits 1,378,570 1,221,939 1,492,746 1,338,111
Intergovernmental 2,540,584 2,702,993 1,811,668 2,924,161
Charges for Service 2,089,375 2,209,269 1,808,865 2,202,524
Fines and Forfeits 501,228 442,626 428,662 549,543
Miscellaneous 2,322,755 2,028,529 1,503,722 1,255,038
Total Revenues 24,218,667 24,923,096 23,848,225 24,059,253
EXPENDITURES:
General Government 3,479,925 3,517,957 3,331,193 2,960,233
Police 8,342,017 8,462,288 8,604,704 9,012,567
Public Works 3,769,491 3,628,954 3,591,049 3,902,622
Culture and Recreation 3,651,539 4,101,175 3,898,844 4,075,919
Economic Development - 522,074 316,566 270,915
Debt Service:
Principal 3,110,000 3,280,000 2,660,000 3,800,000
Interest and Other Charges 1,025,868 1,077,711 1,077,325 833,245
Capital Outlay 7,288,033 3,300,942 1,797,299 2,812,488
Total Expenditures 30,666,873 27,891,101 25,276,980 27,667,989
Excess of Revenues
Under Expenditures (6,448,206) (2,968,005) (1,428,755) (3,608,736)
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES

(USES):
Bonds Issued 2,815,000 2,170,000 - 1,555,000
Sale of Assets 17,700 - - 6,000
Premium on Bonds Issued 9,956 16,741 - -
Transfers In 4,411,281 4,605,693 4,958,133 13,199,807
Transfers Out (2,188,333) (2,224,692) (3,462,100) (12,380,403)
Special Items - - - -
Total Other Financing Sources
(Uses) 5,065,604 4,567,742 1,496,033 2,380,404
Net Change in Fund Balance $ (1,382,602) $ 1,599,737 $ 67,278 $ (1,228,332)
Debt Service as a Percentage of

Noncapital Expenditures 16% 17% 16% 18%
138
Page 190 of 334
Table 4
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
$ 14,699,066 $ 15,141,903 $ 15,851,560 $ 16,798,542 $ 17,225,535 $ 18,549,468

1,475,324 1,499,810 930,331 2,673,132 1,157,405 1,615,161
1,281,150 2,441,246 2,349,945 2,318,447 2,989,038 3,146,818
3,941,830 2,548,692 1,857,803 4,743,014 3,427,130 3,619,810
3,958,237 4,449,003 4,583,551 4,683,722 4,479,845 4,759,244
411,211 418,474 381,470 429,021 171,856 104,943
705,969 836,868 189,717 675,643 604,816 877,108
26,472,787 27,335,996 26,144,377 32,321,521 30,055,625 32,672,552
4,004,684 4,396,219 4,495,662 5,225,483 3,864,337 4,016,871

9,460,824 9,483,999 9,731,407 10,193,496 10,209,739 10,643,342
2,602,104 2,349,042 2,631,154 2,829,846 3,036,284 3,061,172
3,902,386 3,799,723 3,771,068 3,981,999 3,891,542 4,269,211
247,591 155,692 340,904 1,595,628 2,352,621 2,092,337
2,565,000 1,950,000 2,070,000 3,160,000 5,615,000 1,685,000

658,265 634,063 618,695 504,460 365,898 864,494
6,301,406 2,164,053 6,883,191 7,245,157 5,461,607 32,159,412
29,742,260 24,932,791 30,542,081 34,736,069 34,797,028 58,791,839
(3,269,473) 2,403,205 (4,397,704) (2,414,548) (4,741,403) (26,119,287)
- 4,865,000 - - - 29,500,000
- - 150 314 - 9,134
- 73,480 - - - 2,237,727
2,968,919 3,367,400 4,890,809 3,531,038 6,135,344 6,916,355
(2,750,830) (3,002,400) (4,540,809) (2,932,028) (5,145,452) (3,378,977)
- - - - (634,070) -
218,089 5,303,480 350,150 599,324 355,822 35,284,239
$ (3,051,384) $ 7,706,685 $ (4,047,554) $ (1,815,224) $ (4,385,581) $ 9,164,952
14% 11% 11% 12% 20% 9%
139
Page 191 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Table 5
TAX CAPACITY AND ESTIMATED ACTUAL VALUE OF TAXABLE PROPERTY
Taxable Tax
Estimated Capacity as a
Commercial Less: Less Net Net Taxable Total Taxable Percentage of
Fiscal Residential Industrial Other Tax Increment Fiscal Tax Direct Market Estimated
Year Property Property Property Property Disparities Capacity Tax Rate Value Market Value
2007 26,817,616 14,013,644 675,479 378,593 1,963,379 39,164,767 0.31939 3,419,040,600 1.15%
2008 29,942,078 15,426,355 741,679 411,490 1,846,919 43,851,703 0.31925 3,800,795,500 1.15%
2009 29,805,971 16,088,685 1,319,935 156,799 1,862,715 45,195,077 0.32630 3,850,591,200 1.17%
2010 27,805,069 16,459,872 1,279,807 151,914 1,584,552 43,808,282 0.33710 3,710,814,056 1.18%
2011 24,652,932 18,351,835 1,304,688 161,430 1,630,522 42,517,503 0.34731 3,570,069,500 1.19%
2012 23,180,073 17,956,273 852,512 155,002 1,740,447 40,093,409 0.36655 3,347,179,800 1.20%
2013 22,824,263 17,577,547 576,049 107,928 1,707,617 39,162,314 0.41996 3,064,695,700 1.28%
2014 22,782,372 17,580,049 589,717 214,592 1,961,307 38,776,239 0.41437 3,206,518,700 1.21%
2015 26,419,959 18,769,230 625,872 408,172 1,918,874 43,488,015 0.37862 3,629,757,200 1.20%
2016 27,838,939 20,111,657 670,839 384,578 1,857,605 46,379,252 0.37902 3,844,106,800 1.21%
Source: Scott County Auditor
140
Page 192 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Table 6
DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING PROPERTY TAX RATES
City Direct Rate General

Obligation
Shakopee Debt Service
Fiscal Operating Debt Service Total Direct School Scott Other Market Value
Year Rate Rate Rate District County Jurisdictions Rate
2007 0.29822 0.02117 0.31939 0.27132 0.33140 0.04434 0.00728
2008 0.29874 0.02051 0.31925 0.26103 0.32646 0.04642 0.00537
2009 0.30401 0.02229 0.32630 0.27274 0.32684 0.04960 0.00651
2010 0.32152 0.01558 0.33710 0.29050 0.33240 0.04980 0.00651
2011 0.32996 0.01735 0.34731 0.31182 0.35541 0.05020 0.00342
2012 0.34005 0.02650 0.36655 0.35512 0.38802 0.05610 0.00345
2013 0.41996 - 0.41996 0.39715 0.40674 0.05701 0.00467
2014 0.39305 0.02131 0.41437 0.36963 0.39720 0.05569 0.00524
2015 0.35235 0.02626 0.37862 0.35578 0.36638 0.05169 0.00536
2016 0.34757 0.03145 0.37902 0.53478 0.36175 0.05129 0.00605
Sources: Scott County Auditor and League of Minnesota Cities Reports
141
Page 193 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Table 7
PRINCIPAL TAXPAYERS
Current Year and Nine Years Ago
2016 2007
Percentage Percentage
2015/16 of Total 2006/07 of Total
Tax Cap. Tax Cap. Tax Cap. Tax Cap.
Taxpayer Type of Business Value Rank Value Value Rank Value
Excel Energy Electrical Generation $ 631,975 1 1.45% $ 565,320 1 1.57%
J & J Minneapolis LLC Manufacturing 449,000 2 1.03%
Rahr Malting Grain Processing 443,141 3 1.02% 411,700 3 1.14%
Liberty Properties LP Distribution 432,750 4 1.00%
Seagate Manufacturing/Research 419,250 5 0.96% 399,250 4 1.11%
Rosemount Inc Manufacturing 399,470 6 0.92%
Lothenbach Properties Warehouse/Manufacturing 399,250 7 0.92%
Kin LLC Warehouse/Manufacturing 399,250 7 0.92%
St. Francis RMC Health Care 374,500 9 0.86%
Certainteed Manufacturing 365,250 10 0.84% 344,552 7 0.95%
Shakopee Crossing LTD Retail 424,789 2 1.18%
Walmart Retail 373,630 5 1.04%
Shakopee Valley Market Retail 349,682 6 0.97%
Valleyfair Amusement Park 319,819 8 0.89%
First Industrial LP Warehouse 305,462 9 0.85%
Ryan Companies Property Management 292,170 10 0.81%
$ 4,313,836 9.92% $ 3,786,374 10.51%

142
Page 194 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Table 8
PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS
Ratio of
Accumulated
Percentage Delinquent
Collections Percentage Collections of Total Accumulated Taxes to
Year Tax of Current of Levy of Prior Total Collections Delinquent Current
Collected Levy Years Taxes Collected Years Taxes Collections To Tax Levy Taxes Years Taxes
2007 $ 12,745,449 $ 12,418,768 97% $ 91,200 $ 12,509,968 98% $ 331,315 2.60%
2008 14,222,007 13,661,366 96% 208,470 13,869,836 98% 483,317 3.40%
2009 14,983,677 14,457,378 96% 157,920 14,615,298 98% 319,740 2.13%
2010 14,918,665 13,971,356 94% 55,020 14,026,376 94% 310,624 2.08%
2011 14,837,438 14,019,831 94% 278,981 14,298,812 96% 260,248 1.75%
2012 14,837,438 14,553,417 98% 188,750 14,742,167 99% 235,011 1.58%
2013 15,483,223 15,109,599 98% 279,485 15,389,084 99% 293,025 1.89%
2014 16,312,179 16,177,463 99% - 16,177,463 99% 157,555 0.97%
2015 16,773,267 16,351,700 97% - 16,351,700 97% 145,958 0.87%
2016 17,610,195 17,316,074 98% 41,140 17,357,214 99% 76,631 0.44%
1. The above data does not include tax increment districts.

2. The State of Minnesota cancelled $ 243,439 in 2008, $ 511,956 in 2009, $ 558,860 in 2010 and $ 595,572 in 2011 of
annual aid payments to the City that were part of the tax levy.
143
Page 195 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Table 9
RATIO OF OUTSTANDING DEBT BY TYPE
Business-type
Special Activities Total Percentage
Fiscal G.O. Assessment Revenue Primary of Personal Per
Year Bonds Bonds Bonds Government Income Capita
2007 $ 7,560,000 $ 17,165,000 $ 33,895,000 $ 58,620,000 4.5% 1,752
2008 7,165,000 16,450,000 33,225,000 56,840,000 4.1% 1,689
2009 6,755,000 14,200,000 22,235,000 43,190,000 4.1% 1,276
2010 6,340,000 12,370,000 21,470,000 40,180,000 3.4% 1,084
2011 5,905,000 10,240,000 - 16,145,000 1.3% 428
2012 10,325,000 8,735,000 - 19,060,000 1.6% 504
2013 9,865,000 7,125,000 - 16,990,000 1.4% 446
2014 9,390,000 4,440,000 - 13,830,000 1.1% 353
2015 5,100,000 3,115,000 - 8,215,000 0.7% 208
2016 33,935,000 2,095,000 - 36,030,000 2.7% 895
Sources: See Table 14 for income and population data.
Note: From 2007-2010, the SPUC Funds, Water and Electric Enterprise Funds, were reported as a blended
component unit of the City. In 2011, SPUC Funds have been presented as discretely presented component
units as it no longer met the criteria for blending.
144
Page 196 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Table 10
RATIOS OF GENERAL BONDED OUTSTANDING
Percentage of Percentage of
Actual Taxable Total
Fiscal G.O. Value of Per Personal
Year Bonds Property Capita Income
2007 $ 7,560,000 0.22% 226 0.61%
2008 7,165,000 0.19% 213 0.52%
2009 6,755,000 0.18% 199 0.65%
2010 6,340,000 0.17% 171 0.54%
2011 5,905,000 0.17% 157 0.49%
2012 10,325,000 0.31% 273 0.86%
2013 9,865,000 0.32% 259 0.81%
2014 9,390,000 0.29% 240 0.75%
2015 5,100,000 0.14% 129 0.40%
2016 33,935,000 0.88% 843 2.58%
Sources:
1. Metropolitan Council estimated for population.
2007-2009 populations are the City's estimate.
2. Scott County Auditor
145
Page 197 of 334
146
Page 198 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Table 11
DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES DEBT
December 31, 2016
Percentage Amount
Applicable Applicable
G.O. To City of To City of
Debt Shakopee (1) Shakopee
Direct Debt:
City of Shakopee $ 36,030,000 100.0% $ 36,030,000
Overlapping Debt:
Independent School District No. 720 210,545,000 85.4% 179,856,678
Independent School District No. 191 207,630,000 2.3% 4,801,655
Scott County 74,730,000 27.3% 20,395,033
Metropolitan Council (2) 189,226,614 1.3% 2,386,869
Total Overlapping Debt: 682,131,614 207,440,235
Total Direct and Overlapping Debt $ 718,161,614 $ 243,470,235
Source:
Scott County Taxation Department
Metropolitan Council
Note: Overlapping governments are those that coincide, at least in part, with geographic boundaries of
the City. This schedule estimates the portion of the outstanding debt of those overlapping governments
that is borne by the residents and businesses of the City. This process recognizes that, when
considering the City's ability to issue and repay long-term debt, the entire debt burden borne by the
residents and businesses should be taken into account. However, this does not imply that every
taxpayer is a resident, and therefore responsible for repaying the debt of each government.
(1) The percentage of overlapping debt is estimated using net tax capacity. Applicable percentages
were estimated by determining the portion of net tax capacity that is within the City's boundaries and
dividing it by total net tax capacity for each entity.
(2) Excludes general obligation debt supported by wastewater revenues and housing rental payments.
Includes certificates of participation.
147
Page 199 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
LEGAL DEBT MARGIN INFORMATION

2007 2008 2009 2010
Market Value (Taxable) $ 3,419,040,600 $ 3,800,795,500 $ 3,850,591,200 $ 3,710,814,056
Debt Limit - Percent of

Market Value (Note A) 68,380,812 114,023,865 115,517,736 107,102,085
Amount of Debt Applicable

to Debt Limit:
G.O. Bonds 7,560,000 7,165,000 6,755,000 6,340,000
Available in Debt Service Funds (834,155) (847,608) (837,100) (786,306)
Total Debt Applicable
to Debt Limit 6,725,845 6,317,392 5,917,900 5,553,694
Legal Debt Margin $ 61,654,967 $ 107,706,473 $ 109,599,836 $ 101,548,391
NOTE (A):
M.S.A. Section 475.53 (Limit on Net Debt)
Subdivision 1. Generally, except of otherwise provided in Sections 475.51 to 475.75, no municipality, except a
school district or a city of the first class, shall incur or be subject to a net debt in excess of 2%
(3% starting 2008) of the market value of taxable property in the municipality."
NOTE (B):
M.S.A. Section 475.51 Definitions: Subdivision 4. "Net debt" means the amount remaining after deduction
from its gross debt the aggregate of the principal of the following:
(1) Obligations issued for improvements which are payable wholly or partly from the proceeds of special
assessments levied upon property specially benefited thereby, including those which are general obligations
of the municipality issuing them, if the municipality is entitled to reimbursement in whole or in part from
the proceeds of the special assessments.
(2) Warrants or orders having no definite or fixed maturity.
(3) Obligations payable wholly from the income of revenue-producing conveniences.
(4) Obligations issued to create or maintain a permanent improvement revolving fund.
(5) Obligation issued for the acquisition, and betterment of public waterworks systems, and public lighting,
heating or power systems and on any combination thereof or for any other public convenience from
which a revenue is or may be derived.
(6) Amount of all money and the face value of all securities held as a sinking fund for the extinguishment
of obligations other than those deductible under this subdivision.
M.S.A. Section 469.178, subdivision 1. (tax increment bonds) "... The bonds are not included for purposes
of computing the net debt of any municipality."
148
Page 200 of 334
Table 12
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
$ 3,570,069,500 $ 3,347,179,800 $ 3,064,695,700 $ 3,206,518,700 $ 3,629,757,200 $ 3,844,106,800
107,102,085 100,415,394 91,940,871 96,195,561 108,892,716 115,323,204
5,905,000 10,325,000 9,865,000 9,390,000 5,100,000 33,935,000

(826,957) (4,974,768) (4,836,597) (4,833,096) (1,511,502) (2,443,111)
5,078,043 5,350,232 5,028,403 4,556,904 3,588,498 31,491,889
$ 102,024,042 $ 95,065,162 $ 86,912,468 $ 91,638,657 $ 105,304,218 $ 83,831,315
149
Page 201 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Table 13
PLEDGED REVENUE COVERAGE
Utility Bonds
Utility Less: Net
Fiscal Service Operating Available Debt Service
Year Charges Expense Revenue Principal Interest Coverage
2007 $ 44,692,049 $ 36,644,414 $ 8,047,635 $ 640,000 $ 1,574,925 3.63
2008 45,499,791 38,689,351 6,810,440 670,000 1,523,198 3.11
2009 42,437,910 33,009,500 9,428,410 710,000 1,012,874 5.47
2010 45,586,795 36,375,440 9,211,355 765,000 939,426 5.40
2011 - - - - - -
2012 - - - - - -
2013 - - - - - -
2014 - - - - - -
2015 - - - - - -
2016 - - - - - -
1. Operating expense excludes depreciation and amortization.
Note: From 2007-2010, the SPUC Funds, Water and Electric Enterprise Funds,were reported
as a blended component unit of the City. In 2011, SPUC Funds have been presented as
discretely presented component units as it no longer met the criteria for blending.
150
Page 202 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Table 14
DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC STATISTICS
Last Ten Calendar Years
Fiscal School Unemployment Total Per Capita Personal

Year Population (1) Enrollment (2) Rate (3) Employment Income (3) Income (4)
2007 33,460 6,905 4.6% 19,020 $ 39,042 $ 1,306,345,320
2008 33,660 7,163 6.3% 18,967 31,900 1,375,044,660
2009 33,860 7,465 7.4% 18,728 30,900 1,046,274,000
2010 37,076 7,814 6.5% 19,933 31,700 1,175,309,200
2011 37,721 8,115 5.2% 20,449 32,017 1,207,713,257
2012 37,841 8,392 4.6% 20,926 31,628 1,196,835,148
2013 38,120 8,452 3.8% 21,233 31,829 1,213,321,480
2014 39,144 8,698 3.6% 21,439 32,174 1,259,419,056
2015 39,523 8,939 3.0% 21,877 31,965 1,263,352,695
2016 40,254 8,927 3.2% 21,571 32,704 1,316,466,816
Source: 1. 2010 is the official census figure. 2007-2009, 2011-2016 are the City's estimate.
2. Shakopee School District, SACS, Bloomington Lutheran
3. Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development
4. Per capita income times population
151
Page 203 of 334
152
Page 204 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Table 15
PRINCIPAL EMPLOYERS
Current Year and Nine Years Ago
2016 2007
Total Total
City City
Taxpayer Type of Business Employees Rank Employment Employees Rank Employment
Amazon Distribution 2,000 1 9.27%
Valley Fair Amusement Park 1,600 2 7.42% 1,600 1 8.78%
School District No. 720 Education 1,055 3 4.89% 785 5 4.31%
Canterbury Park Horse Racing 877 4 4.07% 1,000 3 5.49%
St. Francis RMC Health Care 875 5 4.06% 800 4 4.39%
Imagine Print Solutions Printing 823 6 3.82%
Entrust Datacard Manufacturing 820 7 3.80%
Seagate Manufacturing/Research 775 8 3.59% 1,500 2 8.23%
Scott County Government 638 9 2.96% 675 6 3.70%
Emerson Manufacturing 504 10 2.34%
Northstar Auto Auction Auto Auction 313 7 1.72%
TORO Manufacturing 280 8 1.54%
CertainTeed Manufacturing 275 9 1.51%
American Color - SVP Printing 273 10 1.50%
9,967 46.22% 7,501 41.17%
Total Employment 21,571 19,020
Source: Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development and Shakopee Chamber of Commerce.
153
Page 205 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT CITY GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES

BY FUNCTION/PROGRAM
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

General Government:
Administration 5 5 5 5 5
City Clerk 4 4 4 4 4
Finance 3 3 3 3 3
Planning 5 5 5 5 5
Facilities Maintenance 6 7 6 6 6
Information Technology 2 2 2 2 2
Public Safety:
Police:
Licensed 46 47 47 47 50
Other 7 6 6 6 6
Fire:
Full time 1 2 3 3 3
Paid On Call 48 48 44 44 42
Building Inspection 7 6 5 5 5
Public Works:
Engineering 7 7 7 7 7
Street 12 13 13 13 13
Shop 3 3 3 3 4
Park and Recreation:

Park Maintenance 8 8 8 8 8
Natural Resources - - - - -
Recreation 10 7 7 7 7
Economic Development:
EDA - - - - -
Total 174 173 168 168 170
Source: City departments
154
Page 206 of 334
Table 16
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
6 7 8 6 8
3 3 3 3 3
4 4 4 4 4
5 5 5 5 5
4 4 4 3 3
2 2 2 4 5
49 47 47 48 48
7 10 10 11 11
3 7 7 7 7
44 44 43 43 43
5 5 5 4 5
7 7 8 8 8
13 13 14 14 14
3 3 4 4 4
8 8 9 9 9
- 1 2 2 1
7 7 7 9 12
- 1 1 1 1
170 178 183 185 191
155
Page 207 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
OPERATING INDICATORS BY FUNCTION/PROGRAM

2007 2008 2009 2010

General Government
Planning
Number of Case Files 67 68 35 33
Number of Plats Filed 3 2 2 1
Number of Acres Platted 38 50 34 6
Public Safety
Police
Arrests 2,199 1,881 1,913 1,962
Citations 6,073 4,058 6,127 5,528
Calls for Service 19,606 19,057 17,909 17,831
Fire
Calls for Service 609 538 517 557
Building Inspection
Building Permits Issued 1,194 1,019 1,102 1,083
Number of Inspections 8,174 5,946 9,726 8,048
Single Family Homes Permitted 138 94 314 160
Public Works
Street
Miles of Roadway 154 154 154 154
Park and Recreation

Park Maintenance
Acres Maintained 930 933 933 933
Recreation
Program Participants 10,847 11,410 10,377 13,001
Community Center Members 597 613 823 2,534
Community Center Admissions 100,044 100,397 109,257 117,336
Source: City departments
156
Page 208 of 334
Table 17
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
24 47 49 45 75 50
2 5 8 7 9 7
68 89 99 68 335 79
1,666 1,798 1,387 1,524 2,121 1,543

5,647 5,636 5,656 4,934 5,510 4,396
17,852 18,349 17,822 17,846 19,357 21,117
600 617 584 730 745 792
1,881 1,413 1,066 1,519 1,054 1,030

8,004 8,191 7,408 7,854 6,835 6,659
118 97 66 61 50 45
154 154 154 156 156 156
933 933 933 1,015 1,402 1,402
13,157 13,104 15,854 18,540 29,446 10,926

3,682 4,009 5,025 2,610 2,028 2,329
120,667 128,929 140,778 124,124 112,000 96,236
157
Page 209 of 334
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
CAPITAL ASSET STATISTICS BY FUNCTION/PROGRAM

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Police:
Stations 1 1 1 1 1
Patrol Zones 4 4 4 4 4
Patrol Units 15 15 15 15 15
Fire Stations 2 2 2 2 2
Street:
Miles of Roadway 154 154 154 154 154
Traffic Signals 25 26 27 27 27
Parks:
Acres 1,015 1,019 1,024 1,024 1,024
Ball Fields 47 49 49 52 54
Playgrounds 22 24 24 24 26
Source: City Departments
158
Page 210 of 334
Table 18
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
1 1 1 1 1
4 4 4 4 4
15 15 15 15 15
2 2 2 2 2
154 154 156 156 156

29 29 30 30 30
1,048 1,048 1,055 1,055 1,055

56 56 56 56 56
26 26 26 26 26
159
Page 211 of 334
160
Page 212 of 334
City of Shakopee
Scott County, Minnesota
Reports on Compliance with

Government Auditing Standards,
and Minnesota Legal Compliance
December 31, 2016
Page 213 of 334

City of Shakopee
Table of Contents
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an
Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance
with Government Auditing Standards 1
Report on Legal Compliance 3
Page 214 of 334

Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an
Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance
with Government Auditing Standards
Independent Auditor's Report

of the City Council
City of Shakopee
Shakopee, Minnesota
We have audited, in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United
States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government
Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial
statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, the aggregate
discretely presented component unit, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund
information of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota as of and for the year ended December 31,
2016, and the related notes to financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's
basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated May 18, 2017.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the City's
internal control over financial reporting (internal control) to determine the audit procedures
that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the
financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the City's internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of
the City's internal control.
A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not
allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned
functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material
weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control such that there
is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the City's financial statements will
not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a
deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a
material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with
governance.
BerganKDV, Ltd.
bergankdv.com
1
Page 215 of 334
Internal Control over Financial Reporting (Continued)
Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first
paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control
that might be material weaknesses, or significant deficiencies. Given these limitations,
during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control that we consider to
be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been
identified.
Compliance and Other Matters

As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City's financial statements are
free from material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain
provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which
could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts.
However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of
our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests
disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported
under Government Auditing Standards.
Purpose of this Report

The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control
and compliance and the result of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the
effectiveness of the City's internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of
an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the
City's internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for
any other purpose.

May 18, 2017
2
Page 216 of 334
Report on Legal Compliance
Independent Auditor's Report

of the City Council
City of Shakopee
Shakopee, Minnesota
We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United
States of America, and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government
Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial
statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, the discretely
presented component unit, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information
of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, and
the related notes to financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic
financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated May 18, 2017.
The Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities, promulgated by the State Auditor
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 6.65, contains seven categories of compliance to be tested:
contracting and bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of interest, public indebtedness,
claims and disbursements, miscellaneous provisions and tax increment financing. Our audit
considered all of the listed categories.
In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the
City of Shakopee failed to comply with the provisions of the Minnesota Legal Compliance
Audit Guide for Cities. However, our audit was not directed primarily toward obtaining
knowledge of such noncompliance. Accordingly, had we performed additional procedures,
other matters may have come to our attention regarding the City's noncompliance with the
above referenced provisions.
The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of compliance and
the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on compliance. Accordingly, this
communication is not suitable for any other purpose.
St. Cloud, Minnesota BerganKDV, Ltd.

bergankdv.com
May 18, 2017
3
Page 217 of 334
City of Shakopee
Communications Letter
December 31, 2016
Page 218 of 334

City of Shakopee
Table of Contents
Report on Matters Identified as a Result of

the Audit of the Financial Statements 1
Required Communication 3
Financial Analysis 7
Emerging Issues 16
Page 219 of 334

Report on Matters Identified as a Result of
the Audit of the Financial Statements
Honorable Mayor, Members

of the City Council and Management
City of Shakopee
Shakopee, Minnesota
In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of the governmental
activities, business-type activities, the aggregate discretely presented component unit, each
major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Shakopee,
Minnesota, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, in accordance with auditing
standards generally accepted in the United States of America, we considered the City's
internal control over financial reporting (internal control) as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our
opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
effectiveness of the City's internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the
effectiveness of the City's internal control.
Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the preceding
paragraph and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be
material weaknesses or significant deficiencies and, therefore, material weaknesses or
significant deficiencies may exist that were not identified. In addition, because of inherent
limitations in internal control, including the possibility of management override of controls,
misstatements due to error, or fraud may occur and not be detected by such controls.
However, as discussed below, we identified a certain deficiency in internal control that we
consider to be a significant deficiency.
A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not
allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned
functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material
weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies in internal control, such that there
is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the City's financial statements will
not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. We did not identify any
deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses.
A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control

that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those
charged with governance.
BerganKDV, Ltd.
bergankdv.com
1
Page 220 of 334
The accompanying memorandum also includes financial analysis provided as a basis for
discussion. The matters discussed herein were considered by us during our audit and they do
not modify the opinion expressed in our Independent Auditors Report dated May 18, 2017,
on such statements.
This communication is intended solely for the information and use of the City Council,
management, others within the City and state oversight agencies and is not intended to be,
and should not be, used by anyone other than these specified parties.

May 18, 2017
2
Page 221 of 334
City of Shakopee
Required Communication
We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, business-type activities, the
aggregate discretely presented component unit, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund
information of the City as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016. Professional standards require
that we provide you with the following information related to our audit.
OUR RESPONSIBILITY UNDER AUDITING STANDARDS GENERALLY ACCEPTED IN

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
As stated in our engagement letter, our responsibility, as described by professional standards, is to

express opinions about whether the financial statements prepared by management with your oversight
are fairly presented, in all material respects, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America. Our audit of the financial statements does not relieve you or
management of your responsibilities.
As part of our audit, we considered the internal control of the City. Such considerations were solely for
the purpose of determining our audit procedures and not to provide any assurance concerning such
internal control.
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement, we performed tests of the City's compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations,
contracts, and grants. However, the objective of our tests was not to provide an opinion on compliance
with such provisions.
Generally accepted accounting principles provide for certain required supplementary information (RSI)
to supplement the basic financial statements. Our responsibility with respect to the RSI, which
supplement(s) the basic audit financial statements, is to apply certain limited procedures in accordance
with generally accepted auditing standards. However, the RSI was not audited and, because the limited
procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance,
we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the RSI.
Our responsibility for the supplementary information accompanying the financial statements, as
described by professional standards, is to evaluate the presentation of the supplementary information in
relation to the financial statements as a whole and to report on whether the supplementary information is
fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the financial statements as a whole.
PLANNED SCOPE AND TIMING OF THE AUDIT
An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements; therefore, our audit involved judgment about the number of transactions to be
examined and the areas to be tested.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of the City and its environment, including internal
control, sufficient to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and to design
the nature, timing, and extent of further audit procedures. Material misstatements may result from
(1) errors, (2) fraudulent financial reporting, (3) misappropriation of assets, or (4) violations of laws or
governmental regulations that are attributable to the City, or to acts by management or employees acting
on behalf of the City.
3
Page 222 of 334
City of Shakopee
QUALITATIVE ASPECTS OF ACCOUNTING PRACTICES
Management is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. The significant
accounting policies used by the City are described in the notes to financial statements. No new
accounting policies were adopted and the application of existing policies was not changed during the
year ended December 31, 2016. We noted no transactions entered into by the City during the year for
which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus. All significant transactions have been
recognized in the financial statements in the proper period.
Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are
based on managements knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about
future events. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the
financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ
significantly from those expected. The most sensitive estimates affecting the financial statements were:
Depreciation The City is currently depreciating its capital assets over their estimated useful lives,
as determined by management, using the straight-line method.
Expense/Expenditure Allocation The City is currently allocating certain costs among the programs
and supporting services benefited. The costs are allocated based on managements estimates.
Net Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) Obligation This liability is based on an actuarial
study using estimates of future obligations of the City for post-employment benefits.
Net Pension Liability, Deferred Outflows of Resources Relating to Pension Activity, and Deferred
Inflows of Resources relating to Pension Activity These balances are based on an allocation by the
pension plans using estimates based on contributions.
We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop the accounting estimates in determining
that they are reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.
The financial statement disclosures are neutral, consistent, and clear.
DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED IN PERFORMING THE AUDIT
We encountered no significant difficulties in dealing with management in performing and completing

our audit.
CORRECTED AND UNCORRECTED MISSTATEMENTS
Professional standards require us to accumulate all known and likely misstatements identified during the
audit, other than those that are clearly trivial, and communicate them to the appropriate level of
management. We identified the following uncorrected misstatement(s) of the financial statements.
Management has determined its effect is immaterial, both individually and in the aggregate, to the
financial statements taken as a whole:
Government-Wide State Aid for PEPFF Contribution

4
Page 223 of 334
City of Shakopee
CORRECTED AND UNCORRECTED MISSTATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
In addition, none of the misstatements detected as a result of audit procedures and corrected by
management were material, either individually or in the aggregate, to the financial statements taken as a
whole.
DISAGREEMENTS WITH MANAGEMENT
For purposes of this letter, a disagreement with management is a financial accounting, reporting, or
auditing matter, whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, that could be significant to the financial
statements or the auditor's report. We are pleased to report that no such disagreements arose during the
course of our audit.
MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATIONS
We requested certain representations from management that are included in the management
representation letter.
MANAGEMENT CONSULTATIONS WITH OTHER ACCOUNTANTS
In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting
matters, similar to obtaining a "second opinion" on certain situations. If a consultation involves
application of an accounting principle to the City's financial statements or a determination of the type of
auditor's opinion that may be expressed on those statements, our professional standards require the
consulting accountant to check with us to determine that the consultant has all the relevant facts. To our
knowledge, there were no such consultations with other accountants.
OTHER AUDIT FINDINGS OR ISSUES
We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and
auditing standards, with management each year prior to retention as the City's auditors. However, these
discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship and our responses were not a
condition to our retention.
OTHER MATTERS
We applied certain limited procedures to the RSI that supplements the basic financial statements. Our
procedures consisted of inquiries of management regarding the methods of preparing the information
and comparing the information for consistency with management's responses to our inquiries, the basic
financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements.
We did not audit the RSI and do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the RSI.
5
Page 224 of 334
City of Shakopee
OTHER MATTERS (CONTINUED)
With respect to the supplementary information accompanying the financial statements, we made certain
inquiries of management and evaluated the form, content, and methods of preparing the information to
determine that the information complies with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America, the method of preparing it has not changed from the prior period, and the information
is appropriate and complete in relation to our audit of the financial statements. We compared and
reconciled the supplementary information to the underlying accounting records used to prepare the
financial statements or to the financial statements themselves.
6
Page 225 of 334
City of Shakopee
Financial Analysis
The following pages provide graphic representation of select data pertaining to the financial position and
operations of the City for the past five years. Our analysis of each graph is presented to provide a basis
for discussion of past performance.
GENERAL FUND OPERATIONS OF THE CITY
For the year ended December 31, 2016, revenues and transfers in exceeded expenditures and transfers
out. Total fund balance in the General Fund increased $921,256, or 9.4%, in 2016 to $10,761,366.
General Fund
$29,000,000
$25,000,000
$21,000,000
$17,000,000
$13,000,000
$9,000,000
$5,000,000
$1,000,000
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Revenues $21,770,348 $22,869,399 $23,794,189 $24,331,286 $25,927,491
Expenditures 18,694,101 19,539,401 20,506,749 21,063,756 21,916,614
Fund Balance 9,522,841 9,092,989 9,838,046 9,840,110 10,761,366
General Fund Revenues/Expenditures

Per Capita
$700
$644
$600 $608 $616
$600 $575
$544
$524 $533
$513
$494
$500
$400
$300
$200
$100
$-
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Revenues Expenditures
7
Page 226 of 334
City of Shakopee
Financial Analysis
GENERAL FUND OPERATIONS OF THE CITY (CONTINUED)
Unassigned Fund Balance as a Percent of Expenditures

70%
60%
50%
51%
49%
48% 47%
46%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
The Citys target General Fund balance is an unassigned level between 40% (minimum) and 45% of
expenditures. This level is to provide working capital for cash flow, expected decline in revenues and
unforeseen expenditures such as natural disasters. Replenishing the Fund balance when it falls below the
target level shall be accomplished by interfund transfers or budgeting for expenditures and other uses to
be less than revenues or other sources over a period not to exceed three years. For the year ended
December 31, 2016, the City maintained an unassigned fund balance of 49% of current year
expenditures. The City also evaluates the unassigned fund balance as a percentage of the next years
budgeted expenditures. Based on the 2017 budget the City has an unassigned fund balance of 44.3%.
8
Page 227 of 334
City of Shakopee
Financial Analysis
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
The Citys revenue in the General Fund has increased each of the last five years. During 2016, revenue
in the General Fund exceeded the prior year revenue by $1,596,205, increasing from $24,331,286 to
$25,927,491. Property taxes increased due to an increase in the General Fund levy of approximately
$688,000, as well as increased delinquency collections, and a number of tax petitions in 2015 which had
reduced revenue. Licenses and permits increased $541,000 due to increased development within the
City. Charges for services increased $298,000 with increased police contracted services and new arena
advertising and increased memberships. All other revenues were consistent with the prior year.
During 2016, property taxes represented 66% of the total General Fund revenues. Charges for services
represented the second largest component at 18%.
General Fund Revenues

$28,000,000
$25,000,000
$22,000,000
$19,000,000
$16,000,000
$13,000,000
$10,000,000
$7,000,000
$4,000,000
$1,000,000
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Miscellaneous $359,323 $132,202 $333,177 $319,491 $218,734
Charges for Services 4,035,921 4,304,786 4,294,637 4,452,415 4,750,514
Fines and Forfeitures 368,167 348,262 391,500 7,093 11,213
Licenses and Permits 1,229,184 1,443,885 1,534,165 2,023,436 2,564,729
Intergovernmental 991,445 1,042,127 1,191,127 1,356,733 1,344,279
Taxes and Assessments 14,786,308 15,598,137 16,049,583 16,172,118 17,038,022
9
Page 228 of 334
City of Shakopee
Financial Analysis
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
In 2016, total General Fund expenditures increased $852,858, or 4.0%, from $21,063,756 in 2015 to
$21,916,614 in 2016. Public safety increased $396,031 as a result of salary and benefit increases, and
additional employees. Recreation increased $315,098 due to changes in staffing levels, pay increases,
and increased electric costs with the new arena. General government and public works were consistent
with prior year amounts.
2016 General Fund Expenditures
Parks and Recreation

19.31% General Government
18.25%
Public Works
13.97%
Public Safety
48.47%
2015 General Fund Expenditures
Parks and Recreation General Government

18.46% 18.44%
Public Works
14.55%
Public Safety
48.55%
10
Page 229 of 334
City of Shakopee
Financial Analysis
GENERAL FUND OPERATIONS OF THE CITY
For the 2016 operating year, the City Council provided a revised budget that would increase the General
Fund balance by $453,710. Revenues and expenditures exceeded expectations, resulting in both being
over budget. At year-end, revenues and transfers in exceeded expenditures and transfers out by
$921,256.
Budget Actual Variance

Revenues
Taxes and assessments $ 17,162,400 $ 17,038,022 $ (124,378)
Licenses and permits 2,269,100 2,564,729 295,629
Intergovernmental 1,251,900 1,344,279 92,379
Charges for services 4,368,150 4,750,514 382,364
Fines and forfeitures 1,500 11,213 9,713
Miscellaneous revenues 207,750 218,734 10,984
Total revenues $ 25,260,800 $ 25,927,491 $ 666,691
Expenditures
General government $ 4,096,290 $ 3,999,953 $ (96,337)
Public safety 10,417,100 10,623,322 206,222
Public works 2,965,440 3,061,172 95,732
Parks and recreation 4,233,860 4,232,167 (1,693)
Total expenditures $ 21,712,690 $ 21,916,614 $ 203,924
Proceeds from sale of capital asset $ 600 $ 9,134 $ 8,534

Transfers in 250,000 250,000 -
Transfers out (3,345,000) (3,348,755) (3,755)
Total other financing
Sources (uses) (3,094,400) (3,089,621) 4,779
Change in fund balance $ 453,710 $ 921,256 $ 467,546
During 2016, revenue in the General Fund exceeded the budget by $666,691, or 2.6%. Significant
revenue budget variances are a result of conservative budgeting for revenues that can fluctuate during
the year, such as licenses, permits and engineering fees. Charges for services were over the revised
budget due to increased contracts for police services and engineering fees for developments that
exceeded the amounts anticipated at the time the budget was revised.
Expenditures exceeded budgeted amounts by $203,924, or 0.9%. Public safety was over budget due to
increased compensated absences that were not included in the budget, as well as the purchase of new
software for building inspections that was not budgeted. All other functions were consistent with
budgeted amounts.
11
Page 230 of 334
City of Shakopee
Financial Analysis
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
The City has three enterprise funds. The following charts compare the segment information and net
position of the Sewer and Storm Drainage enterprise funds for the last five years.
Sewer Fund
$5,000,000
$4,000,000
$3,000,000
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
$-
$(1,000,000)
$(2,000,000)
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Operating Revenues $3,730,226 $2,973,474 $2,872,662 $2,845,439 $3,100,021
Operating Expenses 3,953,269 4,122,406 3,734,691 3,846,338 3,938,720
Operating Loss (223,043) (1,148,932) (862,029) (1,000,899) (838,699)
Change in Net Position (14,003) (1,162,542) (201,729) (1,425,120) (979,595)
Storm Drainage Fund

$2,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
$-
$(500,000)
$(1,000,000)
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Service Charges $1,037,427 $1,047,160 $1,066,118 $1,102,728 $1,202,253
Operating Expenses 1,472,361 1,604,937 1,935,464 1,748,461 1,888,839
Operating Loss (434,934) (557,777) (869,346) (645,733) (686,586)
Change in Net Position 431,658 (3,004) 101,746 363,481 (720,275)
During 2016, the Sewer and Storm Drainage Funds both had operating losses. The Funds have reported
an operating loss for the past five years. This is primarily due to the depreciation expense in both Funds.
12
Page 231 of 334
City of Shakopee
Financial Analysis
TAX LEVY, CAPACITY, AND RATES
The 2014 through 2016 levies include the General Fund and debt service levies. The tax levy is then
reduced by fiscal disparity credit that is received in the form of state aid. Disparity aid is reported as tax
revenue and reduces the amount of property tax revenue levied upon the City.
Taxable Tax Capacity and Certified Levy

$45,000,000
$40,000,000
$35,000,000
$30,000,000
$25,000,000
$20,000,000
$15,000,000
$10,000,000
$5,000,000
$-
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Taxable Tax Capacity $35,402,744 $32,445,035 $34,210,957 $38,705,002 $40,933,710
Certified Levy 14,717,435 15,333,211 16,137,178 16,573,266 17,372,168
* Tax capacity values and levy obtained from the League of Minnesota Cities.
13
Page 232 of 334
City of Shakopee
Financial Analysis
TAX LEVY, CAPACITY, AND RATES (CONTINUED)
Tax Capacity Rate

55
48.79 48.75
50 46.26 46.89 46.52
45
46.14 46.01
43.45 43.37 42.95
40 42.00 41.44
35 37.86 37.90
36.66
30
25
20
15
10
0
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
City Rate State Average Metro City Average
* Tax rates obtained from the League of Minnesota Cities.
14
Page 233 of 334
City of Shakopee
Financial Analysis
DEBT SERVICE
The following charts illustrate debt service requirements, including principal and interest through 2036
and bonded debt for the last five years.
Debt Service Schedule
$3,500,000
$3,000,000
$2,500,000
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
$-
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036
Bonded General Obligation Debt

$40,000,000
$35,000,000
$3,712,584
$30,000,000
$36,030,000
$25,000,000
$20,000,000
$32,317,416
$19,060,000
$15,000,000 $16,990,000
$9,574,198
$13,830,000
$10,000,000 $8,678,680 $8,215,000
$6,620,389
$3,085,157
$5,000,000 $9,485,802
$8,311,320
$7,209,611
$5,129,843
$-
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Gross Bonded Debt Debt Service Fund Balance Net Bonded Debt
15
Page 234 of 334
City of Shakopee
Emerging Issues
Executive Summary
The following is an executive summary of financial and business related updates to assist you in staying
current on emerging issues in accounting and finance. This summary will give you a preview of the new
standards that have been recently issued and what is on the horizon for the near future. The most recent
and significant updates include:
Accounting Standard Update Accounting and Financial Reporting for Postemployment

Benefits Other Than Pensions Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) has issued
GASB statement 75 relating to accounting and financial reporting for postemployment benefits other
than pensions. The new statement requires governments in all types of OPEB plans to present more
extensive note disclosures and required supplementary information (RSI) about their OPEB
liabilities.
The following are extensive summaries of each of the current updates. As your continued business
partner, we are committed to keeping you informed of new and emerging issues. We are happy to
discuss these issues with you further and their applicability to your City.
ACCOUNTING STANDARD UPDATE GASB STATEMENT NO. 75 - ACCOUNTING AND

FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS
The primary objective of this statement is to improve accounting and financial reporting by state and
local governments for postemployment benefits other than pensions (other postemployment benefits or
OPEB). It also improves information provided by state and local governmental employers about
financial support for OPEB that is provided by other entities. This statement results from a
comprehensive review of the effectiveness of existing standards of accounting and financial reporting
for all postemployment benefits (pensions and OPEB) with regard to providing decision-useful
information, supporting assessments of accountability and interperiod equity, and creating additional
transparency.
This statement replaces the requirements of Statements No. 45, Accounting and Financial Reporting by
Employers for Postemployment Benefits Other Than Pensions, as amended, and No. 57, OPEB
Measurements by Agent Employers and Agent Multiple-Employer Plans, for OPEB. Statement No.
74, Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefit Plans Other Than Pension Plans, establishes new
accounting and financial reporting requirements for OPEB plans.
GASB Statement 75 requires governments to report a liability on the face of the financial statements for
the OPEB that they provide:
Governments that are responsible only for OPEB liabilities related to their own employees and
that provide OPEB through a defined benefit OPEB plan administered through a trust that meets
specified criteria will report a net OPEB liabilitythe difference between the total OPEB
liability and assets accumulated in the trust and restricted to making benefit payments.
16
Page 235 of 334
City of Shakopee
Emerging Issues
ACCOUNTING STANDARD UPDATE GASB STATEMENT NO. 75 - ACCOUNTING AND

FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS
(CONTINUED)
Governments that participate in a cost-sharing OPEB plan that is administered through a trust
that meets the specified criteria will report a liability equal to their proportionate share of the
collective OPEB liability for all entities participating in the cost-sharing plan.
Governments that do not provide OPEB through a trust that meets specified criteria will report
the total OPEB liability related to their employees.
GASB Statement 75 carries forward from Statement 45 the option to use a specified alternative
measurement method in place of an actuarial valuation for purposes of determining the total OPEB
liability for benefits provided through OPEB plans in which there are fewer than 100 plan members
(active and inactive). This option was retained in order to reduce costs for smaller governments.
GASB Statement 75 requires governments in all types of OPEB plans to present more extensive note
disclosures and required supplementary information (RSI) about their OPEB liabilities. Among the new
note disclosures is a description of the effect on the reported OPEB liability of using a discount rate and
a healthcare cost trend rate that are one percentage point higher and one percentage point lower than
assumed by the government. The new RSI includes a schedule showing the causes of increases and
decreases in the OPEB liability and a schedule comparing a government's actual OPEB contributions to
its contribution requirements.
Information provided above was obtained from www.gasb.org.
17
Page 236 of 334
7.C.1.

July 5, 2017

TO: Mayor and Council
Subject:
Text Amendment to allow residential in the Major Recreation Zones as part of a PUD.
Approve Ordinance No. 966 to allow residential in the Major Recreation Zone as part of a
PUD.
Recommendation:
Approve Ordinance No. 966 to allow residential in the Major Recreation Zone as part of a
PUD.
Discussion:
There are three Major Recreation Zones in the City including Canterbury Park, Valley Fair
and The Landing (Three Rivers). Canterbury Park is working on a PUD Amendment to
make the 300 plus acres into a mixed use community..
This would allow residential uses in the Major Recreation Zone (MR) through a PUD
Amendment process. Since the two likely locations, Canterbury and Valley Fair both have
large structures, it would be appropriate to allow larger, higher density developments.
Canterbury Park is currently contemplating a development that would require structured
parking.
Planning Commission held a Public Hearing and then voted 6-0 to approve the change.
Budget Impact:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
Ordinance
Page 237 of 334

ORDINANCE NO. 966
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE AMENDING TITLE XV OF THE CITY

CODE BY ADDING RESIDENTIAL USES AND DESIGN STANDARDS IN MAJOR
RECREATION ZONES AS PART OF A PUD.
____________________________________________________________________________
151.044 Major Recreation Zone (MR)of the City Code is amended to add the following
(A) Purpose. The purpose of the Major Recreation Zone is to create a high quality environment
for large amusement and recreation attractions with a regional draw, with a high degree of land
use compatibility and street efficiency. It is further the intent of the Zone to protect existing
landscape features, to preserve open space, to sensitively integrate development with the natural
landscape, and to require the planning of entire land ownerships as a unit rather than permit
piecemeal or scattered small developments.
(B) Permitted uses. Within the Major Recreation Zone, no structure or land shall be used
except for one or more of the following uses:
(1) Public recreation;
(2) Restaurants, Class I; except those having an outdoor patio or congregation area that
customers are allowed to use after 10:00 p.m. and where the nearest point of the property on
which the restaurant is located is less than 100 feet from the nearest point of the property where a
residential use is located;
(3) Restaurants, Class II, except those having an outdoor patio or congregation area that
residential use is located.
(4) Public buildings;
(5) Utility services;
(6) Utility service structures, subject to the following requirements:
(a) Shall not be a water tower or electrical substation or a building constructed to house
sanitary lift station controls;
(b) Shall be 20 feet or less in height;
(c) May be used only to provide weather protection for utility equipment;
(d) Shall be designed, placed, and landscaped as necessary to assure that it blends with the
neighboring uses, and is unobtrusive;
(e) Shall comply with all applicable design standards; and
Page 238 of 334

(f) Single- and mixed-use developments which comply with 151.048, and have received
approval from the City Council;
(7) Uses having a drive-up or drive-through window, subject to the following requirements:
(a) Shall be screened to a height of 6 feet from any adjacent residential zone;
(b) Shall not have a public address system which is audible from any residential property;
(c) Shall provide stacking for at least 6 vehicles per aisle. The required stacking shall not
interfere with internal circulation patterns or with designated parking facilities, and shall not be
located in any public right-of-way, private access easement, or within the required parking
setback;
(d) Trash receptacles, including, but not limited to, dumpsters, shall be stored in any
enclosed areas, including the top. The enclosed areas shall be constructed of similar and/or
complementary materials to the principal structure and meet the standards of this code of
ordinances.
(8) Relocated structures, subject to the following requirements
(a) Shall obtain a moving permit from the city under 111.07;
(b) Prior to moving, the applicant shall have given cash, a cashiers check, or letter of
credit as a financial guarantee to the city to ensure completion of all work. The financial
guarantee shall be in an amount equal to the Building Officials estimate of the cost to bring the
structure into compliance with the Building Code;
(c) The structure shall meet all requirements of the Building Code within 6 months after
moving;
(d) If the structure is not in full compliance with the Building Code after 6 months of
moving, the city, in its sole discretion, may draw on the financial guarantee and take whatever
steps it deems necessary to bring the relocated structure into compliance with the Building Code.
In the event the city draws on the financial guarantee, 10% of the total guarantee shall be paid to
the city as its administrative fee;
(e) The applicant shall provide the Building Department with all plan review comments
and inspection records from Building Codes and STDS Division and from the city of origin
where constructed;
(f) An approved county highway moving permit will be required for the moving of the
structure;
(g) The structure shall be required to meet all setbacks, design, and performance standards
specified in this code of ordinances, unless otherwise approved; and
(h) Repair of any damage to city streets as a result of relocating the structure shall be paid
for by the applicant.
(9) Brewpubs.
Page 239 of 334

(10) Taverns, except those having an outdoor patio or congregation area that customers are
allowed to use after 10:00 p.m. and where the nearest point of the property on which the tavern is
located is less than 100 feet from the nearest point of the property where a residential use is
located.
(C) Conditional or planned unit development uses. Within the Major Recreation Zone, no
structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit or planned
unit development:
(1) Restaurants, Class I or Class II, that have an outdoor patio or congregation area that
residential use is located. Additional standards for such uses are contained in 151.013;
(2) Commercial recreation, major or minor:
(3) Hotels, motels, and conference centers;
(4) Horse care uses including boarding, training, showing, grooming, and veterinary clinic
facilities;
(5) Retail uses and entertainment facilities;
(6) Administrative, executive, and professional offices;
(7) Health and athletic facilities;
(8) Private lodges and clubs;
(9) Day care facilities;
(10) Adult day care centers as conditional use, subject to the following conditions: The
adult day care centers shall:
(a) Serve 13 or more persons;
(b) Provide proof of an adequate water and sewer system if not served by municipal
utilities;
(c) Have outdoor leisure/recreation areas located and designed to minimize visual and
noise impacts on adjacent areas;
(d) 1. The total indoor space available for use by participants must equal at least 40
square feet for each day care participant and each day care staff member present at the center.
When a center is located in a multi-functional organization, the center may share a common
space with the multi-functional organization if the required space available for use by
participants is maintained while the center is operating.
2. In determining the square footage of usable indoor space available, a center must not
count:
a. Hallways, stairways, closets, offices, restrooms, and utility and storage areas;
Page 240 of 334

b. More than 25% of the space occupied by the furniture or equipment used by
participants or staff; or
c. In a multi-functional organization, any space occupied by persons associated with
the multi-functional organization while participants are using common space.
(e) Provide proof of state, federal, and other governmental licensing agency approval; and
(f) Comply with all other state licensing requirements.
(11) Structures over the height allowed based on their setback;
(12) Developments containing more than one principal structure per lot;
(13) Farm wineries producing less than 50,000 gallons of wine per calendar year;
(14) Micro-distilleries;
(15) Small breweries with taprooms;
(16) Utility structures which do not meet the standard conditions under the permitted uses;
(17) Power generation facilities;
(18) Churches and other places of worship;
(19) Taverns having an outdoor patio or congregation area that customers are allowed to use
after 10:00 p.m. and where the nearest point of the property on which the tavern is located is less
than 100 feet from the nearest point of the property where a residential use is located. Additional
standards for such uses are contained in 151.013; or
(20) Other uses similar to those permitted by this division (C), upon a determination by the
Board of Adjustment and Appeals, may be allowed upon the issuance of a conditional use
permit.
(21) Residential uses where it is an incidental use of no more than twenty percent of the total
land area and is part of a Planned Unit Development.
(D) Permitted accessory uses. Within the Major Recreation Zone, the following uses shall be
permitted accessory uses:
(1) Parking and loading spaces;
(2) Temporary construction buildings;
(3) Decorative landscape features;
(4) Communication service apparatus/device(s) as permitted accessory uses, subject to the
following conditions:
(a) Shall be co-located on an existing tower or an existing structure;
(b) Must not exceed 175 feet in total height (including the extension of any
communication service device(s) apparatus);
Page 241 of 334

(c) Lights and/or flashing equipment shall not be permitted unless required by state or
federal agencies;
(d) Signage shall not be allowed on the communication service device(s)/apparatus other
than danger or warning type signs;
(e) Must provide proof from a professional engineer that the equipment will not interfere
with existing communications for public safety purposes;
(f) Shall be located and have an exterior finish that minimizes visibility off-site to the
maximum extent possible;
(g) Applicable provisions of this code of ordinances, including the provisions of the State
Building Code therein adopted, shall be complied with;
(h) All obsolete or unused towers and accompanying accessory facilities shall be removed
within 12 months of the cessation of operations at the site unless a time extension is approved by
the city. After the facilities are removed, the site shall be restored to its original or an approved
state. The user of the tower and/or accompanying accessory facilities shall be responsible for the
removal of facilities and restoration of the site;
(i) The applicant shall submit a plan illustrating all anticipated future location sites for
communication towers and/or communication devices(s)/apparatus;
(j) Wireless telecommunication towers and antennas will only be considered for city parks
when the following conditions exist and if those areas are recommended by the Parks and
Recreation Advisory Board and approved by the City Council:
1. City parks of sufficient size and character that are adjacent to an existing commercial
or industrial use; and
2. Commercial recreation areas and major play fields used primarily by adults.
(k) All revenue generated through the lease of a city park for wireless telecommunication
towers and antennas should be transferred to the Park Reserve Fund.
(5) Towers for commercial wireless telecommunications services shall only be allowed
subject to the following conditions:
(a) Shall also operate as a public utility structure;
(b) Shall be located within the public rights-of-way;
(c) Shall be limited to 75 feet in height;
(d) Shall limit the height of antennas and communication service devices to 10 feet
beyond the height of the structure;
(e) No setback shall be required when located in the public rights-of-way;
(f) Turf or other materials shall be established in the right-of-way consistent with the
materials in the right-of-way at the time of installation;
Page 242 of 334

(g) Lights and/or flashing equipment shall not be permitted unless required by state or
federal agencies;
(h) Shall be protected with corrosive resistant material;
(i) Signage shall not be allowed on the tower other than danger or warning type signs;
(j) Must provide proof from a professional engineer that the equipment is not able to be
collocated on any existing or approved towers and prove that the planned tower will not interfere
with existing communications for public safety purposes;
(k) Must be built to accommodate antennas being placed at varying heights on the tower;
(l) Existing vegetation on the site shall be preserved to the maximum extent possible;
(m) Shall be surrounded by a security fence 6 feet in height with a lockable gate;
(n) Shall have an exterior finish that minimizes visibility off-site to the greatest extent
possible;
(o) Applicable provisions of this code of ordinances, including the provisions of the State
Building Code therein adopted, shall be complied with;
(p) No tower shall be permitted unless the equipment planned for the proposed tower
cannot be accommodated on an existing or approved tower or building within the one-half mile
search radius of the proposed tower for any of the following reasons:
1. The necessary equipment would exceed the structural capacity of the existing or
approved tower or building and the existing or approved tower cannot be reinforced, modified, or
replaced to accommodate planned or equivalent equipment at a reasonable cost, as certified by a
qualified, licensed professional engineer;
2. The necessary equipment would cause interference as to significantly impact the
usability of other existing or planned equipment at the tower, structure, or building and the
interference cannot be prevented at a reasonable cost, as certified by a qualified, licensed
structural engineer;
3. Existing or approved towers and buildings within the one-half mile search radius
cannot or will not accommodate the planned equipment at a height necessary to function
reasonably, as certified by a qualified, licensed professional engineer; or
4. The applicant, after a good faith effort, is unable to lease space on an existing or
approved tower or building.
(q) All obsolete or unused towers and accompanying accessory facilities shall be removed
within 12 months of the cessation of operations at the site unless a time extension is approved by
the city. After the facilities are removed, the site shall be restored to its original or an improved
state. The user of the tower and/or accompanying accessory facilities shall be responsible for the
removal of facilities and restoration of the site; and
(r) The applicant shall submit a plan illustrating anticipated sites for future location for
communication towers and/or communication device (s)/apparatus.
Page 243 of 334

(6) Other accessory uses customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, as determined by the
Zoning Administrator.
(E) Design standards. Within the Major Recreation Zone, no land shall be used, and no
structure shall be constructed or used, except in conformance with the following minimum
requirements:
(1) Density: minimum lot area: 10 acres; 40 dwelling units per acre
(2) Maximum impervious surface percentage: 80%;
(3) Lot specifications.
(a) Minimum lot width: 300 feet;
(b) Minimum front yard setback: 1/2 of that structures height or 50 feet, whichever is
greater; residential setback can be from zero to 30 feet. Zero setback is allowed in areas where
there is an urban character that includes pedestrian connections and wider than required
sidewalks with boulevard street trees.
(c) Minimum side yard setback: 1/2 One-half of that structures height or 25 feet,
whichever is greater; residential is 20 feet.
(d) Minimum rear yard setback: 1/2 of that structures height or 30 feet, whichever is
greater; and residential is 20 feet.
(e) Minimum rear yard setback from residential zones: 1/2 of that structures height or 50
feet, whichever is greater and residential use to residential zone is 20 feet.
(4) Minimum access spacing.
(a) County Roads 83 and 16: no access is allowed other than to public and private streets
with a minimum spacing of 600 feet; and
(b) Shenandoah Drive and any continuation thereof to and including Secretariat Drive;
and Fourth Avenue. Street and driveway access points must be separated by a minimum of 300
feet.
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in effect from and after the date of its
passage and publication
Adopted in _______________ session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee, Minnesota,
held this ________ day of ____________, 2017
______________________________
ATTEST:
_________________________________________
City Clerk
Page 244 of 334

7.C.2.

July 5, 2017

Subject:
Orderly Annexation Agreement with Jackson Township
Approve Orderly Annexation Agreement with Jackson Township
Recommendation:
Approve Joint Resolution for Orderly Annexation Between the Town of Jackson and the
City of Shakopee
Discussion:
The City of Shakopee and the Jackson Township entered into an Orderly Annexation
Agreement on July 22, 2002, pursuant to Minn. Stat 414.0325, designating certain real
property for annexation.
Orderly annexation allows for both parties to provide for long term planning for their
respective communities and allows the City of Shakopee to specifically plan for certain
capital improvements that may be necessary to serve areas to be annexed.
The City of Shakopee and Jackson Township formed a steering committee in 2016 to revisit
the original agreement to ensure that it served the long term plans for both and in preparation
of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, there was adequate discussion on what areas may be
annexed.
The Township hired its own consultant to develop a map that identified a phasing plan for the
Township. The City used that map to provide preliminary concepts for how the areas could
be served by sewer and SPUC reviewed the plans to see how water service could also be
provided.
Through the process, there were lengthy discussions on how the Township could preserve the
Page 245 of 334

character of its existing subdivisions. Those subdivisions are now in an Exhibit and the City
will not annex those areas until 2050 unless requested by the Township and approved by the
City. Properties in the Township that have current working wells and septic systems will not
be required to hook up to City services until their systems fail, however, they will pay
whatever the current rate and charges are at that time for city services. This applies largely to
properties where new City infrastructure may pass by a property that may serve a new
nearby subdivision or commercial development.
Also, over time with the loss of commercial property through annexation into the City, the
Township would lose significant tax revenues from commercially zoned property.
Currently the City pays the Township two years of Township tax revenues for any property
annexed into the City. To put those amounts into focus, the D.R. Horton parcel payments
was just over $3,000. Two recent annexations, a single family house and another house with
commercial property, the payment to the Township was just over $1,000.
After several months of discussion the City and the Township has agreed to a new formula
for payments to the Township for property that is annexed into the City. The taxable value
for the Township properties will be fixed at the January 1, 2017 values and the City will pay
seven times the Township's taxes for any property annexed into the City. The January 1,
2017 values would increase 3% annually, not compounded. All parties agreed that this was a
fair way to compensate the Township for lost revenue.
If property values were not to increase over time in the Township to match the three percent
factor and the Township substantially increased its levy, the City could choose not to annex
property into the City and/or also renegotiate the OAA with the Township. This is the circuit
breaker that protects both parties from increasing levy's from the Township. One of the
Township's largest expenses is for fire protection that is contracted to the City. The current
rate structure actually lowered the fees to the Township, and theoretically, as more value is
created in the City by property value growth and annexation and development in the
Township, that cost should not substantially increase given the current formula.
As part of the new agreement, the Township agrees to reduce the adjacency requirement for
annexation from 50% to 25% and to allow areas to be annexed if certain percentages of other
areas have been annexed. Because of roads and parcel shapes, without this change, it would
have been difficult to annex much of the Township.
Annexations will largely occur based on market demand. The City has received funding
from the CDA as part of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan to develop a specific plan for the
Page 246 of 334

commercial corridor in the Township, currently guided in the County as reserve. This is a
future commercial growth area for the City for business and industry. This agreement will
allow that specific area to annex into the City in an orderly fashion and allow the City to
deliver services to the area.
Budget Impact:
ATTACHMENTS:
Joint Resolution for Orderly Annexation

Annexation Phasing Map
Jackson Township Values 2017
Page 247 of 334

Draft 6/22/2017
JOINT RESOLUTION FOR ORDERLY ANNEXATION BETWEEN

THE TOWN OF JACKSON & THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE
WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee (hereinafter referred to as the "City") and the Township
of Jackson (hereinafter referred to as the "Township"), both located entirely within Scott
County in the State of Minnesota, desire to accommodate growth in the most orderly
fashion, and have agreed that there is a clear need for cooperative future planning for the
land governed by the two jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Township entered into a Joint Resolution for Orderly
Annexation in 2002 (2002 Joint Resolution); and
WHEREAS, the City and the Township have established a committee to develop a new
joint orderly annexation agreement which has extensively discussed, studied, and
evaluated, pertinent issues regarding annexation and planning; and
WHEREAS, the Township Board and City Council have expressed their desire to
encourage future development of land near the City so as to promote the development of
municipal services and urban growth as much as is practical, while encouraging the
preservation of the character of the Township; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Township are independent local governing authorities that
represent the interests of the geographic areas and their constituents; and
WHEREAS, it is desired and expressly understood that decisions of said governing

authorities, irrespective of an agreement on a process for orderly annexation, will continue
to be made by each respective authority; and
WHEREAS, a new joint orderly annexation agreement is beneficial to both parties from
the standpoint of orderly planning and orderly transition of government within the area
proposed to be annexed, and provides the guidelines under which such annexation shall
take place.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, in consideration of the mutual terms and

conditions that follow, the City and the Township enter into this Joint Resolution for
Orderly Annexation (Joint Resolution or Agreement) and that the property herein
described may be annexed in the future by the City, and at the time annexation is
proposed, it shall occur, or may be applied for, subject to the following terms and
conditions:
Section 1- Administration
1. Municipal Boundary Adjustment Unit of the Minnesota Office of Administrative

Hearings. Upon approval by the Township Board and the City Council, this Joint
Resolution shall confer jurisdiction upon the Municipal Boundary Adjustment
492867v10 SH155-377
Page 248 of 334

Draft 6/6/2017
Unit, or its designated successor ("MBAU") so as to accomplish said orderly

annexations in accordance with the terms of this Joint Resolution.
2. Review and Comment by the MBAU. The Township and City mutually agree
and state that this Joint Resolution and Agreement sets forth all the conditions
for annexation and that no consideration by the MBAU is necessary for
individual annexations which occur in accordance with this Agreement. MBAU
may review and comment, but shall, within thirty (30) days, order the
annexation in accordance with the terms of this Joint Resolution.
3. No Alteration of Boundaries. The Township and City mutually agree and state
that no alterations by the MBAU of the stated boundaries of the area designated
for orderly annexation is appropriate.
4. Authorization. The applicable legislative bodies of the Township and City, as

well as the MBAU, are hereby authorized to carry the terms of this Joint
Resolution into effect.
5. Severability and Repealer. A determination that a provision of this Joint

Resolution is unlawful or unenforceable shall not affect the validity or
enforceability of the other provisions herein. This Joint Resolution and
Agreement supersedes and replaces the 2002 Joint Resolution in its entirety.
6. Geographic Limitation for Annexation. All of the land in the Township is subject
to orderly annexation in accordance with this Agreement under and pursuant
to State Statute, subject to the provisions contained herein.
7. State Statute. The terms and conditions of this Agreement are created as an
addition or complement to the requirements for annexation required by law.
The language contained herein shall in no way be deemed to circumvent or
reduce requirements established by law. If changes to State Statute are
enacted during the duration of this Agreement that are more restrictive or
otherwise negate the provisions herein, the State Statute shall rule. Nothing in
this Agreement, however, is intended to confer, or expand upon, any power or
authority that the MBAU does not have pursuant to State Statute.
8. Effective Date/Applicability. This Joint Resolution shall be effective upon

adoption by the legislative bodies of the Township and the City and acceptance
by the MBAU. This Agreement shall be applicable for any annexation petition
filed or initiated while the Agreement is in effect. Should this Agreement be
terminated following the filing of a petition for annexation, but prior to final action
on that annexation by the City, the provisions of this Agreement shall be binding
unless otherwise modified by a joint resolution of both the Township and the
City.
2
Page 249 of 334
Draft 6/6/2017
9. Annexation by Ordinance. Annexation by Ordinance shall be accomplished

according to Minn. Stat. 414.033, subd 2.
10. Duration of Agreement. This Agreement shall be in force and binding from the
date that it is accepted by the MBAU and shall continue to remain in effect until
the Township and City replace or renew this Agreement with an amended joint
agreement and resolution for orderly annexation.
11. Mediation/Arbitration. If a dispute of the terms or conditions of this Agreement

arises, the Town and City hereby agree to enter into mediation to attempt to
resolve this dispute. Mediation services shall be provided by a state agency or
other third party representative agreed to by both the Township and the City. If
mediation is unsuccessful, the Township and City hereby agree to enter into
binding arbitration to resolve disputes under this Agreement. Mediation and
arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with state statutes.
12. Amendment and Termination. Both parties reserve the right to initiate an
amendment or revision to this Agreement at any time. However, once in effect,
any amendment or revision to this Agreement shall require a joint resolution
approved by both the Township and the City, as well as acceptance by the
MBAU. Both parties reserve the right to request the termination of this
Agreement. However, termination of this Agreement shall require a joint
resolution approved by both the Township and the City. This Agreement shall
terminate immediately upon approval of both legislative bodies and acceptance
by the MBAU.
13. Planning and Land Use Control Authority. Scott County shall continue to
exercise all planning, land use control, and zoning authority over all property in
the orderly annexation area until such time as the City annexes the property.
The City shall exercise all planning, land use control, and zoning authority over
property after it is annexed into the City.
14. City Development Standards. The Township and City mutually agree and state
that there is an inherent financial benefit to utilize City development standards
within orderly annexation areas that will readily allow for the future extension of
public utilities. Furthermore, the Township and the City agree to work with Scott
County government to create, support, and develop standards that minimize
the amount of infrastructure, and potential assessment costs, associated with
annexation.
15. Joint Notification. Upon receiving or initiating a Petition for annexation, the City
shall send to the Town Clerk a copy of the petition, resolution, proposed plans,
and other relevant information to the Township not less than thirty (30) days
prior to adoption. This provision shall be considered in concert with, and not
necessarily in addition to, any required or existing notification procedure
maintained by the City or required by State Statute.
3
Page 250 of 334
Draft 6/6/2017
16. Joint Meetings. The Township and City mutually agree to conduct a minimum
of two (2) joint meetings each calendar year to discuss matters relating to this
Agreement and to facilitate communication between the City and the Township
with respect to annexation matters, such as topics relating to:
A. Potential amendments to this Agreement;

B. Specific development proposals on property within the annexation area;
C. Specific annexation petitions; or
D. Discussion of contemplated or ongoing planning studies or capital
improvement projects by the City that potentially impact or affect the
annexation area.
Unless otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties, the joint meetings will be held on the
(second Wednesday?) in (February and August?). The location and time for each meeting
shall be determined jointly by the Township and City. At a minimum, one elected official
of each legislative body shall be required to attend the meeting.
Section II - Initiation of Annexation, Petition
1. Requirements of Section. All petitions for annexation, or initiation of

annexation, shall occur in accordance with the provisions identified by this
section. Where state statute allows for a petition to be filed or initiated not in
conformance with this section of the Agreement, the legislative body of the City
hereby agrees that favorable action will not occur on said petition without the
prior or concurrent amendment of this Agreement in accordance with the
provisions identified herein.
2. Property Owner Initiated Adjacency Requirements. The following standards

shall be used to determine adjacency when a property owner, or combination
of multiple property owners with contiguous property, initiates annexation of
property: A property, or combination of contiguous properties, shall be
considered adjacent to the City when fifty (50) linear feet or more of the subject
annexation area boundary abuts the municipal boundary of the City.
3. City Initiated Annexation Adjacency Requirements. The following standards

shall be used to determine adjacency when the City initiates annexation of
property:
(a) Undeveloped property Twenty five (25) percent contiguous shall be

defined as at least twenty five (25) percent of the boundary of the subject
property, or combination of contiguous properties, which abuts the Citys
municipal boundary.
4
Page 251 of 334
Draft 6/6/2017
(b) Developed property - Completely surrounded shall be defined as one

hundred (100) percent of the boundary of the subject property, or
combination of contiguous properties, which abuts the Citys municipal
boundary.
(c) Township Limit - For the purposes of this document, the Township limit
shall be defined as those portions of the outer boundary of the Township,
not adjacent to the City, adjacent to other Townships, or jurisdictional
boundaries.
4. Property Owner Petition. Any landowner, or combination of multiple

landowners, with property adjacent to the municipal boundary of the City, may
petition the City to annex their property in accordance with this Agreement.
5. Subdivision Definition. For the purposes of this Agreement, a subdivision is

defined as one or more lots platted through the provisions identified within the
Scott County Subdivision Control Ordinance, as from time to time amended.
For those lots that predate the Subdivision Control Ordinance, a subdivision
shall be considered one or more parcels of land established by lot and block
number descriptions rather than a metes and bounds property description.
6. Existing Subdivision Petition. A simple majority of land owners within a

subdivision based on the total number of lots, when the subdivision boundary
is contiguous to the municipal boundary of the City, may petition the City to
annex the entire subdivision in accordance with this Agreement. In addition,
residential developments platted under the Urban Expansion Reserve
provisions of the County Zoning Ordinance may be petitioned in their entirety
by the owner, or owners, of a simple majority of the total property of the
subdivision, including the outlot(s) reserved for future development. A petition
to annex a residential subdivision which developed under the Urban Expansion
Reserve Zoning provisions of the County Zoning Ordinance may not be
considered valid unless it includes all the gross property of the subdivision,
including developed/platted lots, outlot(s), and any public or commonly owned
property as applicable. Any existing subdivision petitioning for annexation in
accordance with this provision shall be considered a petition of all the
representative property owners for the purpose of this Agreement. The
separate provisions identified when the City initiates annexation shall not apply.
7. Initiation of Annexation by City for Undeveloped Property. The City may in

accordance with the staging schedule contained in Section II.9 and without a
petition of the property owners, annex undeveloped property, or multiple
undeveloped properties, within the Township if at least twenty five (25) percent
of the boundary of the subject property, or combination of contiguous
properties, abuts the Citys municipal boundary. For the purposes of this
Agreement, whether or not a property is developed shall be determined at the
time of initiation of the annexation, based on existing conditions or approved
5
Page 252 of 334
Draft 6/6/2017
and recorded plans, whichever is more restrictive. Undeveloped property

means all property that does not meet one of the following criteria:
(a) Residential subdivisions/lots with a gross density greater than one (1)
dwelling unit for every five (5) acres of land based on either the number
of dwelling units or lots, whichever is greater. Residential developments
platted under the Urban Expansion Reserve Zoning provisions of the
County Zoning Ordinance shall include the outlot(s) reserved for future
development as part of the calculation of gross density, where
applicable.
(b) Non-residential development with 1,000 square feet of principal and/or

accessory building coverage per acre or greater.
For the purposes of this Agreement, a dwelling unit shall be defined as a

residential building or portion thereof intended for occupancy by one (1) or more
persons with facilities for living, sleeping, cooking, eating, and restrooms.
Motels, hotels, rooming houses, nursing homes, manufactured home parks,
campgrounds, and similar facilities shall be considered commercial and not
residential. Tents, seasonal cabins, motor homes, travel trailers, and other
similar temporary or moveable facilities shall not be considered a dwelling unit.
Land which is tax exempt, publicly owned, utilized for utility or transportation
purposes, or other similar property shall be considered undeveloped.
8. Initiation of Annexation by City for Developed Property. The City may at any
time, without a petition of the property owners, annex developed property or
multiple adjacent properties within the Township completely surrounded by the
municipal boundary of the City, subject to the following additional conditions:
(a) Certified Notice of Intent to Annex- The City shall provide a minimum of
six months notice by certified mail to each property owner within a
developed area prior to initiating annexation. This certified notice shall
also be sent to the Township. This notice shall be considered additional
to any requirements established by state statute. The notice shall
include the following information:
1. Improvements all proposed improvements with an estimated

installation date and approximate assessment cost (if applicable).
2. Benefits the major proposed services/benefits that are planned

to occur simultaneously with annexation. Benefits suitable for
notification shall be at the discretion of the City, but are intended to
include, but not be limited to, police and fire services, street
maintenance, and park system benefits.
6
Page 253 of 334
Draft 6/6/2017
3. Tax Rates the existing City tax rate compared to the existing
Township tax rate. The notice shall also include the estimated date
when the new tax rate would take effect and first be payable to the
City. Although an individual analysis of each property is not
required, at least one representative example shall be provided that
illustrates a typical before and after effect between City and
Township taxes identified in dollars per year. The purpose of this
provision is to provide general information to property owners
within a proposed annexation area.
4. Timeline for Annexation the anticipated schedule for future

notice, public hearing dates, and the ultimate effective date of
annexation. Although individual dates and times need not be
identified, the purpose of this provision is to make residents aware
of the general chronology of annexation in accordance with statute
and the provisions of this Agreement.
(b) Public Meeting Required The City shall conduct a public informational
meeting on the proposed annexation plans within ninety (90) days of the
certified notice. The date, time, location, and purpose of this meeting
shall be identified as part of the certified notice of annexation. The
purpose of this meeting is to provide general information to the public
and solicit public input on required infrastructure improvements.
(c) Effective Date of Annexation City approval of the Resolution for

annexation shall not be submitted to the MBAU earlier than one (1) year
from the date of approval of the Resolution. The effective date of
annexation shall be the date of MBAU approval.
(d) Assessment Period - The payback time on assessments for

improvements associated with annexation shall be for a period not to
exceed ten (10) years. Individual property owners may request the City
to consider increasing the payback time on assessments to a maximum
period of twenty (20) years, however, the consideration shall be guided
as follows:
1. Property Owner Initiated Annexation Approval of any requested

extension is solely in the discretion of the City.
2. City Initiated Annexation Although the City has the right to

review and approve assessment payback times, the burden shall
be on the City to identify valid reasons why an assessment should
not be extended at the request of an individual property owner. To
be considered valid, assessment extension requests shall be made
prior to or as part of the hearing process required for annexation.
7
Page 254 of 334
Draft 6/6/2017
Any dispute to this provision shall be governed by the

Mediation/Arbitration provision of this Agreement.
(e) Public Water and Sewer Service - To reduce pre-mature assessment

costs to developed property, public water and sanitary sewer need only
be provided to developed areas where there is either an existing or
eminent health concern identified by the City, or where the extension of
services is part of the implementation of the City's long range utility
plans. At any time, property owners may also petition the City for the
extension of services. At that time, the City shall prepare a plan/concept
outlining how, when, and at what cost services might be provided. The
City shall allow for input on the prepared plan/concept prior to
proceeding with implementing the request and assessing the cost to
individual property owners. The intent of this provision is to allow
property owners to evaluate the cost/benefit of services where other
health concerns or the implementation of long range plans does not
exist.
(f) Township Requested Improvements - The Township, on behalf of the

proposed annexation area, may request that specific improvements be
installed to address a specific problem and/or deficiency. To be
considered by the City, the Township shall notify the City of any
requested improvements prior to or as part of the first public hearing, as
required by state statute. Any request made after that time shall not have
standing and may be considered solely at the discretion of the City. If no
agreement can be reached regarding the need for the requested
improvements within the annexation area, the annexation may not
proceed until the disputed installation of improvements is resolved in
accordance with the Mediation/Arbitration portion of this Agreement.
9. Annexation Eligibility. Attached to this Agreement as Exhibit A is an Annexation

Staging Area Map. If all of the other requirements for annexation contained in
this Agreement are met, property within the Annexation Staging Area is eligible
for City-initiated annexation in accordance with the following schedule:
(a) Property located in Area A is eligible for annexation any time after both
the City and the Township approve this Joint Resolution.
(b) Property located in Area B is eligible for annexation any time after
December 31, 2017.
(c) Property located in Areas C and D is eligible for annexation any time
after December 31, 2017, provided, however that no property in Area C
can be annexed until at least 25% of the property located in Areas A &
B combined has been annexed into the City.
8
Page 255 of 334
Draft 6/6/2017
(d) Property located in Areas E and F are eligible for annexation any time
after January 1, 2050.
The City is not obligated to initiate annexation of all of the property in any
particular area before initiating annexation of property in another area.
Section III Municipal Reimbursement
1. Municipal Reimbursement. It is generally recognized that the fiscal planning for

any government entity occurs in the calendar year prior to the actual
expenditures. Whereas, the annexation of property could pose a hardship on
the Township having planned for a certain income that is no longer available
upon annexation. To address this potential hardship, the Township and City
mutually agree and state that, pursuant to state statute, a reimbursement from
the City to the Township shall occur for the taxes collected on land annexed
into the City. Reimbursement shall occur as identified herein. Any and all of the
applicable property taxes collected in the area designated for Orderly
Annexation shall remain the property of the Township. Excepting required
reimbursement, upon annexation, any and all property taxes collected from the
annexed properties shall be the property of the City. Reimbursement from the
City to the Township shall occur as follows:
(a) Rate/Amount The City shall reimburse the Township by a cash

payment, based on the Townships tax rate and the taxable market value
of each annexed parcel as of January 2 of the year in which the parcel
is annexed multiplied by a 7-year period of time. The year the property
is annexed shall be determined by the date of MBAU approval.
For purposes of calculating the amount of the Citys reimbursement, the

taxable market value of any parcel annexed into the City will be
determined by using the taxable market value of the parcel as of January
2, 2017 increased by 3% annual simple interest until January 2nd of the
year in which the parcel is annexed. The following examples illustrate
how that calculation will be made:
Example 1. Parcel A has a taxable market value of $100 as

of January 2, 2017. Parcel A is annexed into the City on July
1, 2018. For purposes of calculating the Citys required
reimbursement to the Township, the taxable marketable value
of Parcel A as of January 2, 2018 is $103.
Example 2. Parcel B has a taxable market value of $100 as

of January 2, 2017. Parcel B is annexed into the City on July
1, 2020. For purposes of calculating the Citys required
reimbursement to the Township, the taxable market value of
Parcel A as of January 2, 2020 is $109.
9
Page 256 of 334
Draft 6/6/2017
Attached to this Agreement as Exhibit B is a list of all of the parcels of

land currently located in Areas A, B, C, and D of the Annexation Staging
Area Map and the taxable market values of those parcels as of January
2, 2017. The taxable market value for each parcel listed on Exhibit B
will be used as the starting point for making the 3% annual adjustment
required by this provision.
(b) Reimbursement Payment The City shall reimburse the Township with
the amount of funds as determined herein by a single payment to the
Township within sixty (60) after the parcel is annexed into the City.
Reimbursement Payment Example: Parcel A is annexed into

the City on July 1, 2018 and the taxable market value of the
parcel as of January 2, 2018 as determined in paragraph (a)
above is $100,000. If the Townships tax rate as of January
2, 2018 as applied to that taxable market value for Parcel A
would result in $700 of property taxes being paid to the
Township, the City is required to pay $4,900 to the Township.
The payment is due by August 31, 2018.
2. Tax Exempt Property. Where a property is annexed that is publicly owned or

is currently exempt from local property taxes, the exemption shall be
maintained and no reimbursement shall be required from the City to the
Township.
3. Bonded Improvements. The Township may bond for capital expenditures in

accordance with applicable state statutes. However, the Township shall be
solely responsible for bearing the costs associated with paying back the bond
unless a previous agreement is reached between the Township and the City.
Section IV Miscellaneous Conditions.
1. Annual Area Limits. Within any given calendar year, the City shall be limited to
a maximum area it may annex without property owner petitions. The City shall
be limited to a maximum City-initiated annexation area of two hundred and fifty
(250) acres per calendar year of developed and undeveloped property
combined. For the purposes of this Agreement, publicly owned property, or
property currently exempt from local property taxes, shall not apply or count
toward the maximum area limitation.
2. Township Requested Annexation. Over time, it is likely that pockets or islands

of the Township will be created due to annexation. At which time, the Township
may determine that it is either a financial burden or undesirable to provide
service to specific properties. To alleviate the effects of continual annexation
and the creation of pockets and islands, the Township may at any time require
10
Page 257 of 334
Draft 6/6/2017
the City to annex properties that are completely surrounded by the City, as
defined within this Agreement. Annexation requested by the Township is
subject to the following:
(a) The Township shall notify the City of this request by certified mail
identifying all properties requested to be annexed.
(b) The City shall have a period of one (1) year from the date of notification
to initiate the annexation of the properties associated with the request.
(c) No reimbursement shall be required from the City to the Township for
Township requested annexation of property.
(d) There shall be no size or area limitation placed on Township requested

annexation.
3. Existing Platted Additions Sewer Hook-Up and Related Charges. The twenty
(20) existing neighborhoods set forth in Exhibit C (Qualifying Subdivisions) as
established platted subdivisions within the Township shall be subject to the
following special provisions:
(a) Notwithstanding any other provision in the City Code to the contrary, no
parcel of land in in a Qualifying Subdivision where lateral sanitary sewer service is
available will be required to hook up to the City sanitary sewer system after
annexation if the parcel has an operating septic system that complies with all
County standards, until the parcel is sold or until the septic system becomes
defective, whichever occurs first. A septic system becomes defective when: (1)
substantial repair, such as replacement of drain field lines, is needed; (2)
replacement of a well is needed; or (3) the system no longer fully complies with all
County standards.
(b) At the time of connection to the City trunk sanitary sewer, the property
owner will be required to pay all connection fees and lateral/trunk sewer charges
at the applicable rates in effect at the time of connection.
4. Exemption for Court Ordered Extension of Services. The Township and City
recognize that a situation may come to exist that a judicial decision may be
made that requires the City to extend water, sewer, or other municipal service
to a portion of the Township. If a legally binding court order exists with no
possibility of further disruption on appeal, and the contract for the extension of
services has been completed, the annexation of that property may be initiated
by the City in accordance with the Township requested annexation provisions
of this Agreement in the preceding section, rather than the more stringent City
initiated provisions. In cases where the order is relative to only a portion of a
residential subdivision, the annexation may include the entire subdivision to
facilitate the extension of services, at the discretion of the City.
11
Page 258 of 334
Draft 6/6/2017
5. Road Maintenance. If land is annexed into the City whereby ownership extends
to the centerline of a Township road, the City shall assume maintenance of said
road.
JACKSON TOWNSHIP
Approved this _____ day of ________________, 20___.
By: Attested to:

Thomas Weckman, Chair Rose Menke, Clerk
Jackson Township
Dated: Dated:
CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Approved this _____ day of ________________, 20___.
By: Attested to:

William P. Mars, Mayor Lori Henson, City Clerk
City of Shakopee
Dated: Dated:
By:
William H. Reynolds, City Administrator
City of Shakopee
Dated:
12
Page 259 of 334
Draft 6/6/2017
EXHIBIT C
QUALIFYING SUBDIVISIONS
Fox Meadows Estates

Glen Ellyn Park
Glen Ellyn Park 2nd Addition
Glen Ellyn Park 3rd Addition
Glen Ellyn Park 4th Addition
Glen Ellyn Park 5th Addition
Jackson Hills
Preserve South (Jackson portion)
Pribble Pond
Southview Heights 1st Addition
Theis Addition
Theis 2nd Addition
Wild Rose Estates
Preserve at Stonebrook
Clearview Acres (Jackson portion)
Kubes 1st Addition
Pondview Park Estates
Pondview Park Estates 2nd Addition
RLS 205
RLS 211
13
Page 260 of 334
City Boundary
Parcels
A
B
E
C F
City Initiated Staging

of
Jackson Township
Annexation
May 31, 2017
s Page 261 of 334
City of Shakopee
Jackson Township EMV as of 1/1/17 for Taxes Payable 2018
6/29/2017
PID # UNIQUE TAXING AUTHORITY CLASS INFO EMV

60000010 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 455 PP SA Gas Trans Pipeline 4,800
60000020 0802/JKSN TWP/ISD 720/LOW MN 459 PP SA Gas Distrib Utility 418,900
60000030 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 459 PP SA Gas Distrib Utility 44,700
60000040 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 459 PP SA Gas Distrib Utility 3,041,900
60000060 0802/JKSN TWP/ISD 720/LOW MN 443 PP SA Elec Trans >= 69KV 3,502,300
60000070 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 431 PP Tools & Mach 10,200
60000080 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 453 PP Leased L/B 30,000
60000120 0802/JKSN TWP/ISD 720/LOW MN 443 PP SA Elec Trans >= 69KV 699,400
60005000 0802/JKSN TWP/ISD 720/LOW MN 360 Pub Util RR 493,700
60010010 0802/JKSN TWP/ISD 720/LOW MN 952 State Property 700
60050010 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 100 Res 1 unit 258,600
Page 1 of 13
Page 262 of 334
City of Shakopee
6/29/2017

60050100 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 140 Res V Land 88,800
60050260 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 958 Muni Srvc Other 240,000
Page 2 of 13
Page 263 of 334
City of Shakopee
6/29/2017

60080010 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 983 Co Admin-TaxForf 14,100
Page 3 of 13
Page 264 of 334
City of Shakopee
6/29/2017

60110010 0802/JKSN TWP/ISD 720/LOW MN 300 Commercial 420,000
60120010 0802/JKSN TWP/ISD 720/LOW MN 305 Industrial 5,000
60120020 0802/JKSN TWP/ISD 720/LOW MN 952 State Property 14,900
60150090 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 952 State Property 2,700
60170010 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 300 Commercial 1,000,000
60170020 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 300 Commercial 320,000
60170060 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 200 Agricultural 261,400
60180040 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 211 Rural Vacant Land 11,700
Page 4 of 13
Page 265 of 334
City of Shakopee
6/29/2017

60230010 0802/JKSN TWP/ISD 720/LOW MN 300 Commercial 1,640,000
60240010 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 300 Commercial 1,143,300
Page 5 of 13
Page 266 of 334
City of Shakopee
6/29/2017

60250150 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 956 Muni Srvc Ent 100,000
60260010 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 140 Res V Land 300
60300010 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 915 Church 4,497,000
60320010 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 305 Industrial 1,675,000
60340040 0802/JKSN TWP/ISD 720/LOW MN 300 Commercial 200
60350010 0802/JKSN TWP/ISD 720/LOW MN 140 Res V Land 7,000
60350020 0802/JKSN TWP/ISD 720/LOW MN 140 Res V Land 4,300
60360010 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 305 Industrial 675,000
60370010 0802/JKSN TWP/ISD 720/LOW MN 305 Industrial 1,350,000
60370010 0802/JKSN TWP/ISD 720/LOW MN 100 Res 1 unit 300,000
60400010 0802/JKSN TWP/ISD 720/LOW MN 105 Res 2-3 units 289,600
Page 6 of 13
Page 267 of 334
City of Shakopee
6/29/2017

60410240 0802/JKSN TWP/ISD 720/LOW MN 962 T E Misc Co D 3 -
Page 7 of 13
Page 268 of 334
City of Shakopee
6/29/2017

69020020 0802/JKSN TWP/ISD 720/LOW MN 200 Agricultural 245,000
69020020 0802/JKSN TWP/ISD 720/LOW MN 211 Rural Vacant Land 33,100
69020030 0802/JKSN TWP/ISD 720/LOW MN 981 State Acquired 2,600
69100120 0802/JKSN TWP/ISD 720/LOW MN 958 Muni Srvc Other 100
69100160 0802/JKSN TWP/ISD 720/LOW MN 350 MH Park 1,379,300
69100170 0802/JKSN TWP/ISD 720/LOW MN 350 MH Park 778,400
69100180 0802/JKSN TWP/ISD 720/LOW MN 350 MH Park 1,029,800
Page 8 of 13
Page 269 of 334
City of Shakopee
6/29/2017

69100220 0802/JKSN TWP/ISD 720/LOW MN 958 Muni Srvc Other 100
69110030 0802/JKSN TWP/ISD 720/LOW MN 365 Pub Util Mach 12,800
69130033 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 100 Res 1 unit 800
69130040 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 915 Church 1,070,100
69130104 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 140 Res V Land 600
Page 9 of 13
Page 270 of 334
City of Shakopee
6/29/2017

69140050 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 952 State Property 600
69140100 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 200 Agricultural 1,439,600
69140140 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 958 Muni Srvc Other 600
69150040 0802/JKSN TWP/ISD 720/LOW MN 365 Pub Util Mach 12,763,400
69150040 0802/JKSN TWP/ISD 720/LOW MN 355 Pub Util L & S 772,100
69150050 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 350 MH Park 110,000
Page 10 of 13
Page 271 of 334
City of Shakopee
6/29/2017

69150341 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 953 Co Srvc Ent 1,178,100
Page 11 of 13
Page 272 of 334
City of Shakopee
6/29/2017

69230070 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 958 Muni Srvc Other 1,622,100
69230112 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 955 Co Srvc Other 155,000
69240020 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 901 Schools-Public 148,800
Page 12 of 13
Page 273 of 334
City of Shakopee
6/29/2017

69240150 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 320 Q Golf Course 45,000
69240160 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 981 State Acquired 1,800
69240250 0801/JKSN TWP/ISD 720 981 State Acquired 9,400
$ 178,699,100
Page 13 of 13
Page 274 of 334
7.C.3.

July 5, 2017

Subject:
Setting a Public Hearing for a Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing
District No. 18 and Redevelopment Plan for the Canterbury Park Redevelopment Project
No. 1
Approve Resolution 7909 calling for a public hearing on a tax increment financing district
and modifications to the redevelopment plan for Canterbury Park setting a joint meeting
between the City Council of Shakopee and the Economic Development Authority for
September 5, 2017 at 7:00 PM.
Recommendation:
Approve policy action as requested.
Discussion:
The City previously established a Canterbury Park Redevelopment Project No. 1. Since that
time, the City completed a required update redevelopment survey of the property and the
City and its consultants believe that the study shows that the area meets the current
requirements for a Redevelopment Tax Increment Finance District.
Canterbury has completed an initial development concept plan that shows the need for
substantial new public infrastructure that could be financed through a TIF Districts.
Currently, an EAW has been sent to the various agencies for review of the impact of the
proposed development. Current plans are for residential uses along with hospitality, retail
and entertainment uses.
The redevelopment and TIF plans will be submitted for the public hearing.
Budget Impact:
ATTACHMENTS:
Page 275 of 334

Resolution
Page 276 of 334

CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Resolution No. 7909
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON A TAX INCREMENT

FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 18
AND THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CANTERBURY PARK
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1
WHEREAS, the City of Shakopee (City) has previously established its Canterbury Park
Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the Project) pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to
469.047, as amended (HRA Act); and
WHEREAS, the Project is now administered by the Economic Development Authority for
the City of Shakopee (the Authority); and
WHEREAS, the City and Authority wishes to provide certain financial assistance in order to
make feasible a development of new market rate housing, office, retail, and commercial spaces to be
constructed within the Project; and
WHEREAS, the City is evaluating tax increment financing (TIF) as a form of assistance to
developers within the Project, and to that end the City and Authority have determined to consider a
modification to the redevelopment plan (Project Plan) for the Project and the adoption of a TIF plan
(TIF Plan) for the proposed TIF District No. 18, and to hold a public hearing regarding those actions
in accordance with the HRA Act and Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.179, as
amended (the TIF Act).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Shakopee, that:
1. The Authority, and its staff and consultants, are hereby authorized and directed to
cause to be prepared a modification to the Project Plan and a TIF Plan for TIF District No. 18, and to
file a copy of such documents in City Hall.
2. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to prepare a notice for publication in the
City's official newspaper setting a joint public hearing before the City Council and the Authoritys
Board of Commissioners on September 5, 2017, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers on the
modification to the Project Plan and a TIF Plan. The notice shall be in substantially the form attached
hereto as Exhibit B, shall be published in the newspaper at least 10 but not more than 30 days prior
to the public hearing, and shall include a map of the Project area and the proposed TIF District No.
18.
3. The Authority, its staff, and consultants are authorized and directed to send notice to
the County Commissioners who represents the area to be included in TIF District No. 18 of the
proposed TIF district at least 30 days before the date of publication of the notice of public hearing.
4. The Authority, its staff, and consultants are authorized and directed to transmit a copy
Page 277 of 334

of the modified Project Plan and the TIF Plan to the County Board and School Board at least 30 days
before the date of the public hearing.
5. The Authority, its staff, and consultants are directed to take all other actions necessary
to bring the modified Project Plan and the TIF Plan before the City Council at the time of the public
hearing.
Approved by the City Council of the City of Shakopee this 5th day of July, 2017.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
2
502314v1 SH235-21
Page 278 of 334

Exhibit A
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE is hereby given that the Board of Commissioners of the Economic Development
Authority of the City of Shakopee and the City Council of the City of Shakopee will hold a joint
meeting in the City Hall, 129 Holmes Street South, Shakopee, Minnesota at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday,
September 5, 2017, to conduct a public hearing on: (1) the modification of the redevelopment plan
(the Project Plan) for the Canterbury Park Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the Project) and (2) a
Tax Increment Financing Plan (TIF Plan) for a proposed redevelopment district within the Project
(TIF District No 18).
The proposed boundaries of the Project and the proposed TIF District No 18 are shown in the
maps below. The purpose of the proposed action is to facilitate development of new market rate
housing, office, retail, and commercial spaces to be constructed within TIF District No. 18. Details
on the proposal are contained in the Project Plan and the TIF Plan, a draft copy of which will be
available for public inspection at the Shakopee City Hall during regular business hours.
Any person wishing to express an opinion on the matters to be considered at the public hearing
will be heard orally or in writing.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
Dated: August 24, 2017
/s/ William H. Reynolds

City Administrator
City of Shakopee, Minnesota
A-1
502314v1 SH235-21
Page 279 of 334

7.C.4.

July 5, 2017

Subject:
Shaw-Lundquist Associates, Inc. has requested an exception to Ordinance 130.45 concerning
construction hours.
Allow the contractor to work early morning hours to construct the Shakopee High School.
Recommendation:
Make a motion to deny the request.
Discussion:
Various departments received complaints about early morning heavy truck traffic and
construction for this project and the contractor was notified they were in violation of City
Ordinances.
This site is located adjacent to residential neighborhoods and extended early morning work
hours or evenings would impact the quality of life of these residents.
Staff believes that this Ordinance needs to be revised to allow early morning hour or evening
construction only under extraordinary circumstances like emergencies or if a development is
located away from residential neighborhoods. Staff also believes that residents in those areas
should be notified that the city is considering extended construction hours. A revised
Ordinance will be brought back to Council for consideration.
Budget Impact:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS:
Request Letter
Page 280 of 334

Request for Exception to Ordinance
DATE: June 8, 2017
TO: Michael Kerski Shakopee Director of Planning & Development

David Kriesel Shakopee Building Official
FROM: Eric Munt Shaw Lundquist Associates, Inc.
RE: Shakopee High School Additions Working Hours
Dear Mr. Kerski,
We are requesting an exception to Shakopee Ordinance 130.45(C)(4) Construction

Activities, specifically weekday working hours 7:00 am to 10:00 pm. Our request is to
extend the construction activities hours from 6:00 am to 10:00 pm through summer break,
at which time we would re-evaluate and submit a new request should it be necessary.
Our request is due to the short timeline we have to maximize the completion of certain
construction activities while students are away. A great deal of this work is performed
outdoors, in the summer heat. These workers prefer to start earlier to finish ahead of the
late afternoon sun.
Should you deem it necessary, I am available to meet to discuss and/or provide further
information. If you need any further information, please let me know. I can be contacted
at [email protected] or 651.202.0722.
Sincerely,
Eric Munt
Project Manager
Shaw Lundquist
Cc: Dave LaPree Shaw Lundquist

Ted Ung Shaw Lundquist
Brian Jacobson Shaw Lundquist
Steve Fritz Shaw Lundquist
Page 281 of 334

7.C.5.

July 5, 2017

Subject:
Update on city-owned property located at 69/169
Direct staff to move forward with platting, zoning and road design and to bring to council contracts for sale of city-owned
property at 69/169
Recommendation:
Provide direction to staff to begin platting process and to complete necessary work to prepare
property for sale including installation of road and utilities.
Discussion:
This property was acquired by the City from the Minnesota Department of Transportation.
There were a number of title issues that have now been cleared by the courts.
Staff from Engineering, Finance and Planning & Development are working on a new road
design that will reduce the amount of right of way and also allow the road to be approved as a
State Aid Route. WSB would complete a final design including providing utilities and to
submit to the State for final approval of State funding.
Staff has worked with a number of potential purchasers and will bring contracts forward.
The site will need to be platted with a final master plan. A new Phase 1 and additional Phase
2 work will need to be completed. The former truck stop location still had VOC identified in
2014 that will need to be rechecked and possibly remediated. The current Phase 1
Environmental for the site will need to be updated.
Proposed uses include Doggie Doos Spa and Retreat, Northstar Regional Rehab, a potential
apartment development and business park parcels. The site is currently zoned Highway
Business and guided for commercial.
Page 282 of 334

Budget Impact:
State Aid Funding of approximately $1.1 million may be available for construction of the
road.
Page 283 of 334

7.C.6.

July 5, 2017

TO: Mayor and Council
Subject:
Proposal from WSB to design Vierling Drive Connection from Taylor Street to County Road
69
Authorize contract with WSB for $129,828 for design work.
Recommendation:
Approve to extend contract with WSB in the amount of $129,828 and authorize design
services for Vierling Drive from Taylor Street to County Road 69.
Discussion:
The City acquired approximately 30 acres from MNDOT for economic development
purposes. It has taken several years to get title issues resolved.
The property currently has a temporary road through it. The property has no utility services
and currently can not be developed.
This contract will design a road that meets State Aid requirements and allow the road to
potentially be funded by State Aid. The City has State Aid funds available but they need to
be designated for this road and the State must approve the final design.
These improvements are necessary for the City to sell its land. WSB has proposed an
aggressive design and construction schedule that will allow the property to be platted and
placed under contract for sale to various parties. Because access to the road can be closed
during construction, WSB feels that construction can be accelerated.
Budget Impact:
Project is in the CIP and funding will be from State Aid.
ATTACHMENTS:
Page 284 of 334

WSB proposal
Page 285 of 334

701 Xenia Avenue South | Suite 300 | Minneapolis, MN 55416 | (763) 541-4800
June 29, 2017
Mr. Bruce Loney, PE

Public Works Director/City Engineer
City of Shakopee
129 Holmes Street South
Shakopee, MN 55379-1376
Re: Extension Agreement for Professional Services

Estimate of Cost to Provide Engineering Services
Vierling Drive Connection from Taylor Street to County Road 69
Dear Mr. Loney:
Introduction:
According to our Agreement for Professional Services within the City of Shakopee and Section
I-C-2 (Major Projects), this extension agreement is written to provide you with an estimate of
cost for engineering services for the above-referenced project. We are proposing to complete
the work as detailed in the attached Scope of Design Services, Exhibit A and Scope of
Construction Administration/Survey Services, Exhibit B. WSB & Associates, Inc. (WSB) is very
familiar with the project with our work on the MnDOT Municipal Agreement Application we
prepared for this roadway segment back in 2012.
Background:
One of the important factors for the construction of this final segment of Vierling Drive to the
west is this Vierling Drive connection will provide a local reliever and parallel route to TH 169
from CR 69 to Eagle Creek Boulevard. Currently, if an accident were to occur on TH 169, which
causes lane restriction or roadway closure, there isnt a reasonable nearby alternative to TH 169
through the City of Shakopee. Completing the Vierling Drive connection also provides a route
for area residents to utilize local streets providing greater accessibility to their homes. Long
term, the connection will provide for additional collector route access to the Shakopee Town
Square shopping center.
The Vierling Drive connection is from Taylor Street West to County Road 69. The approximate
1,000 foot connection will provide a local roadway paralleling TH 169 from County Road 69 to
Eagle Creek Boulevard. The Vierling Drive connection is understood to be four lanes to match
the current roadway section. Turn lanes will also be provided at CR 69 and at the access into
the Shakopee Town Square shopping center. Pedestrian / bicycle facilities will also be provided
to match the existing roadway section with sidewalk on the north side of the roadway and trail
on the south side of the roadway.
Building a legacy your legacy.

Equal Opportunity Employer | wsbeng.com
Page 286 of 334
Mr. Bruce Loney, PE
City of Shakopee
June 29, 2017
Page 2 of 3
Scope of Services:
The attached scope of design services describes the approach and tasks proposed to be
completed by WSB for street and utility design for this project. The work plan includes
engineering design services for roadway, storm sewer, sanitary sewer and water main, signing
and striping, traffic control, trails, removals, erosion control, street lighting and conduit crossing
plans. The work scope also includes project coordination and topographic surveying.
We understand that no feasibility report will be required for this project and no fee estimate was
provided for this work in our proposal. We are proposing to complete the final design portion of
this work as described in the attached Scope of Design Services, Exhibit A, on a cost-
reimbursable basis in accordance with our current fee schedule. It is proposed that all work
under the final design portion of the contract would be considered complete after the
preconstruction conference. We will review our progress monthly and will not exceed these
amounts without your prior approval.
WSB is available to provide construction services if the City desires assistance. These would
be part of a separate contract with the City. WSB typically provides construction survey and
would be available for inspection as well.
Engineering Design Services Fees:
ITEM COST
FINAL DESIGN SERVICES $128,078
EXPENSES (PERMITS, SURVEY, LATH, ETC.) $1,750
TOTAL $129,828
Please see the attached Work Plan and Estimate of Cost for a detail breakdown of the
estimated hours for this project.
We are available to begin work as soon as authorized by the City, and we anticipate we will
complete the project according to the following schedule, assuming that we receive the notice to
proceed on July 19, 2017.
G:\Group Data\Transportation\Marketing\Proposals\Vierling Drive to CR 69 Proposal\1. LTR_b_Loney-Vierling Dr. to CR 69_20170629.doc

Page 287 of 334
Mr. Bruce Loney, PE
City of Shakopee
June 29, 2017
Page 3 of 3
We propose to complete the project according to the following tentative schedule:
Council Approves Extension Agreement and Authorizes Design ........................... July 18, 2017
Commence Final Design Work ............................................................................... July 19, 2017
Submit Plans to MnDOT, City and SPUC for review ......................................... August 18, 2017
Ready to Approve Plans and Authorize Bids ..................................................... August 15, 2017
Open Bids ........................................................................................................ September, 2017
Award Contract ..................................................................................................... October, 2017
Begin Construction............................................................................................. October 9, 2017
Substantially Complete Construction ................................................................ November, 2017
Final Wearing Course / Complete Construction .......................................................... May, 2018
This letter represents our entire understanding of the project scope. If you are in agreement,
please sign on the space provided and return one original signed copy to us for our records.
We will start immediately upon receipt of the signed agreement.
If you have any questions concerning the work plan or fee as discussed herein, please feel free
to contact me at 763-287-7189. We look forward to working with you and greatly appreciate the
opportunity to assist you and your staff in the completion of this project.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Donald W. Sterna, PE
Vice President
Enclosure
City Administrator
Mayor
Date
G:\Group Data\Transportation\Marketing\Proposals\Vierling Drive to CR 69 Proposal\1. LTR_b_Loney-Vierling Dr. to CR 69_20170629.doc

Page 288 of 334
Exhibit A
Scope of Design Services

Vierling Drive Connection from Taylor Street to County Road 69
City of Shakopee
WORK PLAN
1. Project Management
This task includes planning and coordination of all work tasks, establishment and
monitoring of budgets, meetings and correspondence with the City of Shakopee, MnDOT,
Scott County, SPUC and if necessary, the Watershed District on a periodic basis. The
project manager will provide technical direction on all aspects of the project review, all
work products and prepare monthly progress reports. The project manager will serve a
primary role in the many design considerations. Donald Sterna, PE, is proposed to manage
the project for WSB & Associates, Inc. (WSB).
2. MnDOT and County Agency Coordination

WSB will prepare and submit the funding application to MnDOT for the Local Road
Improvement Program. WSB will also coordinate with Scott County regarding the
intersection design at CR 69 including permit coordination with the County. Coordination
with both agencies will be required throughout the design process for agency approvals.
3. Geotechnical Evaluation
WSB team proposes to drill 3 soil borings to a depth 5 foot depth below the lowest City
utility elevation. The field investigation will include an estimated R-Value that will be used
to establish the pavement design. Additional soil boring information required for infiltration
testing required for design will be considered additional work which is not included in this
proposal. A brief geotechnical report will be prepared summarizing the geotechnical
findings.
4. Utility Coordination
WSB will call in a Gopher State One design locate and from that, identify all utilities in the
area. We will make contact with those utilities to obtain facility mapping along with
establishing our contact to discuss future utility plans. Based on the preliminary layout,
utility conflicts will be identified and design measures will be considered to accommodate
these conflicts. The cost for these utility conflicts, if any, will be identified and included as
part of the overall cost estimate.
5. Preliminary Layout and Cost Estimate

WSB will collect topographic and utility information along the project corridor that will be
utilized in the final design. WSB will collect record plans from the City of Shakopee, Scott
County, SPUC and private utility companies as necessary, to prepare the construction
documents. WSB will prepare the base mapping of the existing conditions that will be used
for the design. A preliminary layout of the project and 30% cost estimate will be prepared
along with a hydraulic evaluation to determine pond, rate control and infiltration
requirements that the project. Also the proposed sanitary sewer and water main systems will
be laid out and shown on the 30% layout. WSB will work with the City to finalize the
preliminary layout before the final design will begin.
Exhibit A Page 289 of 334 1

Exhibit A
6. Roundabout Justification Report (RJR)

WSB will prepare a Roundabout Justification Report (RJR) for submission to the City and
MnDOT State Aid for approval. The following subtasks will be completed in the
preparation of the RJR:
6.1 Data Collection: Available data will be collected from Scott County, the City of
Shakopee, MnDOT and other impacted agencies. This data will include but is not limited
to:
Historic traffic and pedestrian data

As built roadway plans
Intersection and corridor crash data
This task will include collecting new traffic volume data at the intersection of Vierling Drive
and the Shakopee Town Square access with a video camera and counting tubes. 48 hours of
data will be collected at the intersection. The information that will be determined from the
data will include; AM, PM and midday peak hour traffic volumes, average daily traffic
volumes, vehicle classification, pedestrian/bike volumes and speed data. In addition, WSB
will review the camera data and note any safety and/or operational issues at the intersection.
6.2 Roundabout Justification Reports (RJR): WSB will prepare a Roundabout

Justification Report (RJR) for a potential new roundabout at Vierling Drive and the
Shakopee Town Square access driveway for submission to the County and MnDOT State
Aid for approval. This will include:
Documentation of the existing traffic conditions

Project future traffic volumes for the adjacent sites
Documentation of crash data for the intersection
Conduct operational analyses of existing and projected traffic conditions using the
Synchro/SimTraffic and Rodel computer software for the roundabout configuration
Justification analysis
The RJR analysis together with the data collected in Task 6.1 will be assembled in the RJR
format required for submission to MnDOT State Aid.
7. Roundabout Design
WSB will complete the roundabout design based on the results of Task 6, regarding lane
configuration and following the design guidelines as indicated in Chapter 12 of the MnDOT
Road Design Manual and NCHRP 672. The roundabout will be designed to accommodate
the design vehicle and all necessary performance checks, such as fast path and phi angle,
will be completed during the preliminary design of the roundabout. It is assumed up to three
iterations of the roundabout configuration will be developed. Once a final configuration is
agreed upon, WSB will design the vertical component of the roundabout. This includes the
profiles leading to the roundabout and the longitudinal slope around the roundabout. The
roundabout will be modeled to tie into the existing topography, and construction limits will
represent those tie in points.

Exhibit A
WSB will develop a lighting configuration near and within the roundabout to State Aid
guidelines. A photometrics layout will be generated to ensure proper lighting of the
intersection.
8. Final Design and Plan Preparation

The construction plan phase involves the majority of our design effort. The plans will be
developed meeting City and State Aid standards. WSB will prepare a set of detailed
construction plans for the grading, sanitary sewer, water main, surface drainage, paving,
signing/striping and erosion control in accordance with City standards. We will coordinate
our work closely with the City of Shakopee, SPUC and Scott County during the design
process to ensure that the Citys expectations are satisfied. Design meetings will be held, as
appropriate, to discuss design elements and comments during the design process. A final set
of plans will be submitted to the MnDOT, City, SPUC and Scott County for their review and
approval. The final construction plans will include the following:
Title Sheet and Index Map

General Layout
Estimated Quantities
Typical Sections
Miscellaneous Details
Construction Staging/Traffic Control Plan
Alignment Plans and Tabulation
Removals
Construction Plan and Profile
Roundabout Plans and Details
Drainage Plan, Details and Quantities
Water Main/Sanitary Sewer Plans
Turf Establishment/Erosion Control Plans
Roundabout Lighting
Signing and Striping Plans
Cross-Sections
9. Drainage Analysis
From the previous plans, the roads within the site will be an urban design with storm sewer.
With partial installation of the facilities already complete, an analysis of the roadway
drainage area will be conducted to determine its existing condition and if additional special
stormwater management or ponding needs are required. This analysis would verify the flow
rates and determine what water quality and/or rate control will need to be designed for the
roadway portions of the project. This analysis would include catch basin spacing, per City
requirements, infiltration, pond designs, pipe and sizing of all storm sewers under the
roadway.

Exhibit A
10. Permits
Permits will be acquired as part of the construction plan preparation. WSB will prepare and
apply for the necessary construction permits. The cost of the permits would be paid by the
City of Shakopee. The permits we anticipate that will be necessary for this project are:
MPCA NPDES Construction Stormwater General Permit

MPCA Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit
MDH Water Main Extension Permit
Lower Minnesota Watershed District Permit Coordination
11. Project Bidding

Upon approval of the bidding documents by the City, WSB will sell and distribute the
necessary number of plan and specification sets to the contractors for bidding. The City will
be responsible for the expenses of the plan and specification printing. The bid tabulation
will be done by the City.

Estimate of Cost
VIERLING DRIVE Connection from Taylor Street to CR 69 IMPROVEMENTS

SHAKOPEE , MINNESOTA
SCOTT COUNTY
629/2017
Estimated Hours
PRELIMINARY, DETAIL DESIGN and R/W Senior Design Grad Eng Registered Survey
I Project Project Engineer / Engineering Engineering Land Crew Total
Manager Engineer Senior Tech Tech Tech Surveyor 2- Person Clerical Hours Cost
Task Description
1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT / MEETINGS
1.1 ) Administration 32 6 4 4 46 $7,118.00
1.2 ) Quality Assurance/ Quality Control 2 8 12 22 $3,112.00
2 MnDOT and COUNTY COORDINATION

2.1 ) MnDOT Coordination 8 6 4 4 22 $2,926.00
2.2) Scott County Coordination 4 6 1 11 $1,628.00
3 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION (WSB Engineering)

3.1 ) Soil Borings (3 Total at 20 foot depth) (WSB Engineering) $2,250.00
3.2 ) Laboratory Testing (WSB Engineering) $850.00
3.3 ) Engineering Analysis and Reports (WSB Engineering) $1,750.00
4 UTILITY COORDINATION
4.1) Utility Coordination (2 meetings) 1 6 1 8 $1,118.00
5 PRELIMINARY LAYOUT
4.1 ) Prepare MnDOT Preliminary Layout & Drainage Design 2 2 16 20 40 $4,862.00
4.2 ) Preliminary Cost Estimate 1 2 12 15 $2,060.00
4.3) Field Survey 1 6 1 18 26 $4,211.00
4.4) Base Mapping Preparation 2 6 8 $836.00
6 Roundabout Justification Rport (RJR)

6.1 ) Data Collection 1 4 20 25 $2,602.00
6.2 ) Roundabout Analysis and Justification 2 16 40 6 64 $6,664.00
7 Roundabout Design
7.1 ) Roundabout Geometrics and Profile Design 2 48 16 6 72 $10,154.00
7.2 ) Roundabout Lighting 1 16 8 6 31 $4,216.00
8 FINAL DESIGN AND PLAN PREPARATION

8.1 ) Final Plans, Specifications, and Estimates
A. Title Sheet 2 1 3 $371.00
B. General Layout 3 1 4 $504.00
C. Statement of Estimated Quantities 2 4 4 10 $1,292.00
D. Soils and Construction Notes 4 2 6 $742.00
E. Earthwork Summary and Standard Plates 1 2 4 7 $856.00
F. Typical Sections 1 6 8 15 $1,808.00
G. Quantity Tabulations 4 6 4 14 $1,542.00
H. Utility Tabulations 1 2 4 2 9 $1,046.00
I. Miscellaneous Details 4 4 8 $952.00
J. Standard Plan Sheets 2 2 4 $476.00
K. Traffic Control Plans 1 4 6 11 $1,332.00
L. Alignment Plans and Tabulations 6 4 10 $1,218.00
M. In-Place Topography and Utilities 4 6 6 16 $2,016.00
N. Removal Plans and Tabulations 6 6 4 16 $1,808.00
O. Construction Plan Sheets 4 2 40 16 6 68 $8,544.00
P. Roadway Profile Sheets 1 4 18 20 6 49 $5,822.00
Q. Drainage Plans and Profiles 4 24 6 34 $4,350.00
R. In-Place Drainage Tabulation 4 4 8 $912.00
S. Proposed Drainage Tabulation 6 4 10 $1,178.00
T. Temporary Erosion / Sediment Control Plans 6 4 2 12 $1,408.00
U. Turf Establishment and Permanent Erosion Plans 6 4 2 12 $1,408.00
V. Lighting Design 6 4 10 $1,218.00
W. Signing and Striping Plan 6 4 10 $1,218.00
X. Detailed Cross-Sections 24 24 $3,192.00
8.2 ) Plan Submittals 2 12 6 20 $2,506.00

8.3 ) Develop Cost Estimates 1 16 17 $2,298.00
8.4 ) Specifications 2 24 4 30 $4,132.00
9 DRAINAGE DESIGN
9.1 ) Catch Basin Spacing 1 4 12 1 18 $2,420.00
9.2 ) Storm Sewer Design 1 6 32 39 $5,308.00
9.3 ) Water Quality/ Pond Design 1 2 12 15 $2,060.00
9.4 ) Hydraulic Report Preparation 2 6 8 $1,092.00
10 PERMITS
10.1 ) Permit Application (NPDES) 4 6 10 $1,386.00
10.2 ) Wetland Evaluation 6 6 $798.00
10.3 ) MCES Sanitary Sewer Permit 2 2 4 $560.00
10.4 ) MPCA and Dept. of Health 2 2 4 $560.00
11 PROJECT BIDDING 6 8 4 10 28 $3,388.00
Total Hours 82 168 401 146 112 1 18 31 959 $128,078
Average Hourly Billing Rates 170.00 147.00 133.00 105.00 95.00 147.00 172.00 66.00
Detailed Design Labor Costs $13,940 $24,696 $53,333 $15,330 $10,640 $147 $3,096 $2,046 $128,078
Direct Expenses
Miscellaneous Expenses includes permit fees. MPCA Sewer Extension, Deptarment of Health, Scott County and NPDES $1,750
Subtotal Expenses $1,750
Subtotal Labor and Expenses $129,828
Key Personnel by Category:

Project Manager - Don Sterna
Project Engineer - Marcus Vanderbrug
Design Engineer/Senior Techs - Ted Witkowski, Chuck Kochmann
Page 293 of 334

8.A.

July 5, 2017

Subject:
Liaison and Administrator Reports
Recommendation:
Discussion:
Budget Impact:
Page 294 of 334

8.B.

July 5, 2017
FROM: Darin Nelson, Finance Director

Subject:
City Bill List
None
Recommendation:
Informational Only
Discussion:
Attached is the most recent monthly Financial Report for the General fund. These reports
reflect the expenditures as recorded for 2017 activity. The following transactions are notable
for this reporting cycle:
Midway Ford has requested payment for a Ford F550 4X2 Pickup truck for the Parks
Department. $33,071.00.
RJM Construction has requested payment number 17 for work on the Shakopee
Community Center Renovation & Ice Arena Construction. $731,299.51.
Pearson Bros Inc has completed the seal coating project and requests payment of
$296,782.65.
Included in the check list are various refunds, returns, and pass through.
Budget Impact:
Operating and capital expenditures within the 2017 budget.
ATTACHMENTS:
Monthly Financial Report
Page 295 of 334

Council Check Summary
Council Check Register
Bill List Transfers
Page 296 of 334

CITY OF SHAKOPEE
Monthly Financial Report
Di
YTD June YTD Budget June YTD
vis
2017 2017 2017 Balance Percent 2016
io
Budget Actual Actual Remaining Used Actual
n
01000 - GENERAL FUND
EXPENDITURES:
11 - MAYOR & COUNCIL (197,900) (2,585) (91,136) (106,764) 46% (96,786)
12 - ADMINISTRATION (1,707,000) (104,477) (743,830) (963,170) 44% (599,793)
13 - CITY CLERK (318,000) (22,690) (148,703) (169,298) 47% (135,001)
15 - FINANCE (1,207,900) (61,910) (685,378) (522,522) 57% (662,722)
17 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (586,800) (34,721) (267,984) (318,816) 46% (198,155)
18 - FACILITIES (384,800) (20,448) (157,023) (227,777) 41% (163,712)
31 - POLICE DEPARTMENT (7,980,000) (511,716) (3,629,557) (4,350,443) 45% (3,624,141)
32 - FIRE (2,160,400) (105,043) (880,384) (1,280,016) 41% (896,306)
33 - INSPECTION-BLDG-PLMBG-HTG (796,200) (62,965) (395,355) (400,845) 50% (317,440)
41 - ENGINEERING (786,200) (99,166) (300,459) (485,741) 38% (310,099)
42 - STREET MAINTENANCE (2,151,100) (517,320) (1,214,858) (936,242) 56% (803,327)
44 - FLEET (435,000) (26,500) (199,780) (235,220) 46% (195,078)
46 - PARK MAINTENANCE (1,936,300) (103,185) (733,625) (1,202,675) 38% (636,182)
66 - NATURAL RESOURCES (198,000) (5,334) (95,428) (102,572) 48% (85,067)
67 - RECREATION (3,190,000) (258,616) (1,295,779) (1,894,221) 41% (1,066,502)
91 - UNALLOCATED (217,600) (644) (3,313) (214,287) 2% (2,075)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES (24,253,200) (1,937,320) (10,842,592) (13,410,608) 45% (9,792,385)
Key
Varies more than 10% than budget positively
Varies more than 10% than budget negatively
Within 10% of budget
Page 297 of 334

5&.6 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((
1RWH3D\PHQWDPRXQWPD\QRWUHIOHFWWKHDFWXDODPRXQWGXHWRGDWDVHTXHQFLQJDQGRUGDWDVHOHFWLRQ &RXQFLO&KHFN6XPPDU\ 3DJH

&RPSDQ\ $PRXQW
*(1(5$/)81'
)25)(,785(
(&2120,&'(9(/230(17$87+25,7<
3$5.5(6(59(
&$3,7$/,03529(0(17)81'
7,)',675,&7
7,)',67- -6$10$5
7,)',67$//6$,17675,'(17
'$7$&$5'$%$7(0(17
&20081,7<&(17(5 ,&($5(1$
&,7<+$//
(0(5621$%$7(0(17
7,)',675$+5(;3$16,21
7,)',67$0$=21
75((5(3/$&(0(17
6(:(5)81'
685)$&(:$7(5)81'
(48,30(17,6)81'
,1)27(&+,6)81'
Page 298 of 334

6:0(752'58*7$6.)25&(
(6&52:)81'
,19(670(1775867)81'
5HSRUW7RWDOV
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUE\*/ 3DJH
&RXQFLO&KHFN5HJLVWHUDQG6XPPDU\

&KHFN 'DWH $PRXQW 6XSSOLHU([SODQDWLRQ 32 'RF1R ,QY1R $FFRXQW1R 6XEOHGJHU $FFRXQW'HVFULSWLRQ %XVLQHVV8QLW
67/,1(/((:(69(1785(6//&
0(5&+$1',6( 322/

$$$675,3,1*6(59,&(&2

3$9(0(1735(6(59$7,21 675,3,1*

$%%27752%621 $662&,$7(6

(1*,1((5,1*'(6,*1&2168/7$176 3$5.%/'*60$,17

$*32:(5(17(535,6(6,1&

(48,30(170$,176833/,(6 3$5.(48,30(170$,17

$1&207(&+1,&$/&(17(5

(48,30(170$,176833/,(6 3$752/
Page 299 of 334

$33/()25'2)6+$.23((,1&

(48,30(170$,176833/,(6 3$752/
(48,30(170$,176833/,(6 6(:(50$1$*(0(17

$552:$&(+$5':$5(

%8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 3$5.%/'*60$,17
-81( 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 675((7
-81( (48,30(170$,176833/,(6 3$5.(48,30(170$,17
-81( %8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 3$5.%/'*60$,17
-81( 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 '2:172:1
-81( 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 1$785$/5(6285&(6
-81( 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 322/
-81( %8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 &200&75)$&,/,7,(6

$63(10,//6

1(:;/6+,576 3$7&+(6 81,)2506&/27+,1* ),5(
1(:+,5(81,)2506 81,)2506&/27+,1* ),5(

5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

$67(&+&253 &RQWLQXHG
3$9(0(1735(6(59$7,21 6($/&2$7,1*

$67/()25',17(5

7 (48,30(170$,176833/,(6 3$5.(48,30(170$,17

$720,&5(&<&/,1*

5()86( &,7<+$//

%2/721 0(1.,1&

(1*,1((5,1*'(6,*1&2168/7$176 (1*,1((5,1*
(1*,1((5,1*'(6,*1&2168/7$176 (1*,1((5,1*
(1*,1((5,1*'(6,*1&2168/7$176 :+,63(5,1*2$.666(;7(16

Page 300 of 334

%2<(5758&.6
6$9 (48,30(170$,176833/,(6 6:((3,1*

%5<$152&.352'8&76

0$7(5,$/6 $//(<0$,17
0$7(5,$/6 &$7&+%$6,10$,17

&(17(532,17(1(5*<6(59&,(6,1&

*$6 &200&75)$&,/,7,(6

&,17$6,1&

-81( %8,/',1*0$,17 )$&,/,7,(63:%/'*6
-81( 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 )$&,/,7,(63:%/'*6
-81( %8,/',1*0$,17 )$&,/,7,(632/,&(
-81( 81,)2506&/27+,1* 675((7
-81( 81,)2506&/27+,1* 3$5.
-81( 81,)2506&/27+,1* )/((7
-81( 81,)2506&/27+,1* 675((7
-81( 81,)2506&/27+,1* 3$5.
-81( 81,)2506&/27+,1* )/((7
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

&,17$6,1& &RQWLQXHG
-81( 81,)2506&/27+,1* 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
-81( 81,)2506&/27+,1* 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
-81( 81,)2506&/27+,1* 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17
-81( 81,)2506&/27+,1* 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17

&/$5(<

66$)(7<(48,3,1&
23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 322/

&2&+5$15(&29(5<6(59,&(6,1&

'7 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 3$752/

&200(5&,$/$63+$/7&2

0$7(5,$/6 6($/&2$7,1*
0$7(5,$/6 675((70$,17
Page 301 of 334

&219(17,21 9,6,7256%85($8

0$< /2'*,1*7$; /2'*,1*7$;

'$9,6-,0

-81( &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* ,163(&7,21
(;3(16(

'(('

5()81'*5$17526(02817(0(5621 &'$3+ $:$5'6 '$0$*(6 ('$0$1$*(0(17
)<

',$1(/21*7,1

5()81''(326,7 '$0$*('(326,7 3$5.6(59,&(6

'25$1.5,67,1

-81( 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( &20081,&$7,216
(;3(16(
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

'25$1.5,67,1 &RQWLQXHG

((/(&75,&$/6(59,&(6,1&

%8,/',1*0$,17 &200&75)$&,/,7,(6
%8,/',1*0$,17 &200&75)$&,/,7,(6

(0(5*(1&<$8727(&+12/2*,(6,1&

/*$ (48,30(170$,176833/,(6 3$752/

)/((735,'(

(48,30(170$,176833/,(6 (48,30(170$,17

*$//

6,1&
81,)2506&/27+,1* &2'((1)25&(0(17
Page 302 of 334

*5$,1*(5,1&

%8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 &,7<+$//
%8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 )$&,/,7,(632/,&(
%8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 )$&,/,7,(63:%/'*6

*5(*:22'

5()81'2)0(0%(56+,3 0(0%(56+,36 &20081,7<&(17(5

+$:.,16,1&

5, 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 322/
5, 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 322/

+(,0$1),5((48,30(17

23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ),5(

+(50$16/$1'6&$3(

0$7(5,$/6 75((0$,17
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

+(50$16/$1'6&$3( &RQWLQXHG

+25,=21&200(5&,$/322/6833/<

- %8,/',1*0$,17 322/

+8(%6&+&2

-81( %8,/',1*0$,17 /,%5$5<
-81( %8,/',1*0$,17 &,7<+$//
-81( %8,/',1*0$,17 )$&,/,7,(632/,&(
-81( %8,/',1*0$,17 )$&,/,7,(6),5(
-81( %8,/',1*0$,17 )$&,/,7,(63:%/'*6
-81( %8,/',1*0$,17 <287+%8,/',1*
-81( %8,/',1*0$,17 ,&($5(1$
-81( %8,/',1*0$,17 &200&75)$&,/,7,(6
%8,/',1*0$,17 &,7<+$//
%8,/',1*0$,17 )$&,/,7,(6),5(
Page 303 of 334

%8,/',1*0$,17 )$&,/,7,(632/,&(
%8,/',1*0$,17 /,%5$5<
%8,/',1*0$,17 )$&,/,7,(63:%/'*6

,1129$7,9(*5$3+,&6

81,)2506&/27+,1* 322/
23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 5(&5($7,21352*5$06

,1129$7,9(2)),&(62/87,216//&

,1 2)),&(6833/,(6 5(&25'6
,1 2)),&(6833/,(6 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
,1 2)),&(6833/,(6 &20081,7<&(17(5

-76(59,&(6

-7 ,03529(0(176 675((7/,*+7,1*

/($*8(2)01&,7,(6,1685$1&(75867

/,$%,/,7< 32/,&(
/,$%,/,7< 32/,&(
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

/($*8(2)01&,7,(6,1685$1&(75867 &RQWLQXHG
/,$%,/,7< 32/,&(

/,*+7)2271,&2/(

5()81'<287+%8,/',1*)(( 3$5.)$&,/,7<5(17$/ 3$5.6(59,&(6

/,*+7+286(81,)250

&/$66$81,)2506 81,)2506&/27+,1* ),5(

/,1./80%(5,1&

23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 3$5.%/'*60$,17

/2*,6

)LQDQFH 62)7:$5($118$/)((6 ),1$1&(
Page 304 of 334

3D\UROO+5 62)7:$5($118$/)((6 3(56211(/3$<52//
&OHUN/LFHQVH 62)7:$5($118$/)((6 /,&(16(6
%OGJHSHUPLWV 62)7:$5($118$/)((6 ,163(&7,21
3,06 62)7:$5($118$/)((6 32/,&(
6SHFLDO$VVHVVPHQWV 62)7:$5($118$/)((6 3/$11,1*
6SHFLDO$VVHVVPHQWV 62)7:$5($118$/)((6 ),1$1&(
6SHFLDO$VVHVVPHQWV 62)7:$5($118$/)((6 (1*,1((5,1*
+XEEOH 62)7:$5($118$/)((6 ),1$1&(
3URMHFW'RFV 62)7:$5($118$/)((6 ,163(&7,21
HSURSHUW\ 62)7:$5($118$/)((6 ),1$1&(
,QWHUQHW 62)7:$5($118$/)((6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'

0$/.(5621*8110$57,1//3

),/( *$51,6+0(17 3$<52//&/($5,1*
-81(

0(/,66$3$*(+2//$1'

5()81'<287+%8,/',1* 3$5.)$&,/,7<5(17$/ 3$5.6(59,&(6

01&2002)),1$1&(75($6',9

5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

01&2002)),1$1&(75($6',9 &RQWLQXHG
),1(6 )25)(,76 )25)(,785(
),1(6 )25)(,76 ':,)25)(,785(
),1(6 )25)(,76 ':,)25)(,785(
),1(6 )25)(,76 ':,)25)(,785(

07,',675,%87,1*,1&

(48,30(170$,176833/,(6 3$5.(48,30(170$,17

08/7,+286,1*&5(',7&7/

27+(5352)6(59,&(6 32/,&(

09(&

-81( (/(&75,& 675((70$,17

Page 305 of 334

1$3$*(18,1(3$576&2

-81( (48,30(170$,176833/,(6 ,163(&7,21
-81( (48,30(170$,176833/,(6 (48,30(170$,17
-81( 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 )/((7
-81( (48,30(170$,176833/,(6 6:((3,1*
(48,30(170$,176833/,(6 ,163(&7,21

1867$5

, (48,30(170$,17(1$1&( &$5:$6+

2:(16&203$1,(6,1&

5(& %8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 )$&,/,7,(632/,&(

35$+$',67:$7(572<28

23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 5(&5($7,21
23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 5(&5($7,21

5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

48$/,),('/$%25$725,(6,1& &RQWLQXHG
23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,&($5(1$

5 563(&,$/7,(62):,6&216,1,1&

&0 (48,30(170$,176833/,(6 ,&($5(1$
,1 (48,30(170$,176833/,(6 ,&($5(1$

5(38%/,&6(59,&(6

27+(5352)6(59,&(6 &/($183'$<
'80367(5)52032'6 5()86( &200&75)$&,/,7,(6

5,9(5)521735,17,1*

2)),&(3$3(5 2)),&(6833/,(6 ),5(

Page 306 of 334

5,9(56('*(&21&5(7(,1&
0$7(5,$/6 &$7&+%$6,10$,17

52%(57%+,//&2

(48,30(170$,17(1$1&( 322/
3:62)7(1(56$/7 %8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 )$&,/,7,(63:%/'*6
3'62)7(1(56$/7 %8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 )$&,/,7,(632/,&(
67$7,2162)7(1(56$/7 %8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 )$&,/,7,(6),5(
67$7,2162)7(1(56$/7 %8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 )$&,/,7,(6),5(
/,%5$5<62)7(1(56$/7 %8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 /,%5$5<

52*(5520(52

5()81''$0$*('(326,7 '$0$*('(326,7 3$5.6(59,&(6

52<$/9(1',1*,1&

0(5&+$1',6( 322/

6&277&2$77251(<2)),&(

0$< ),1(6 )25)(,766-3$ 3$752/
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

6&277&2$77251(<2)),&( &RQWLQXHG

6&277&2$77251(<

62)),&(
%856+(,0 ),1(6 )25)(,76 )25)(,785(
-2+1621 ),1(6 )25)(,76 ':,)25)(,785(
+(00,1*6 ),1(6 )25)(,76 ':,)25)(,785(
.(03/( ),1(6 )25)(,76 ':,)25)(,785(
%5$.(),(/' ),1(6 )25)(,76 ':,)25)(,785(
(/$0,5 ),1(6 )25)(,76 ':,)25)(,785(

6&277&275($685(5'(387<5(*,67(5

6.9,1 3/$7(6 (48,30(17 (48,30(17,6)81'
9,1

6(+,1&
Page 307 of 334

(1*,1((5,1*'(6,*1&2168/7$176 (1*,1((5,1*
(1*,1((5,1*'(6,*1&2168/7$176 6$16(:(50$1+2/(5(+$%

6+$.23((',9(56,7<$//,$1&(

)(67,9$/ 27+(55(17 &2'((1)25&(0(17
%227+

6+$.23((38%/,&87,/,7<&200

:$7(5 322/

6+(5:,1:,//,$06&2

23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6

6+5('5,*+7$52+1,1'8675,(6&2

2)),&(6833/,(6 5(&25'6,0$*,1*
6+$.23((&20081,7<&(17(5 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 5(&5($7,21
27+(5352)6(59,&(6 32/,&(

5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

60,7+621(9(5(77 &RQWLQXHG
3(5)250$1&( +8%(53$5. 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 3$5.6(59,&(6

636&203$1,(6

6 %8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 3$5.%/'*60$,17

67$&(<6&+0,'7

5()81''$0$*('(326,7 '$0$*('(326,7 3$5.6(59,&(6

675(,&+(5

6
, 81,)2506&/27+,1* 3$752/

7(50,1$/6833/<&2

(48,30(170$,176833/,(6 3$5.(48,30(170$,17
Page 308 of 334

(48,30(170$,176833/,(6 (48,30(170$,17
(48,30(170$,176833/,(6 3$752/
(48,30(170$,176833/,(6 ),5(
(48,30(170$,176833/,(6 6:((3,1*

727$/5(17$/6+$.23((

27+(55(17 5(&5($7,21352*5$06

727$/722/,1&

23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 )/((7

81,)250681/,0,7('

81,)2506&/27+,1* 3$752/

8366725(

3267$*( ),5(
3267$*( 3$752/

5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

9$//(<632576 &RQWLQXHG
23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 5(&5($7,21352*5$06

9(5,),('&5('(17,$/6,1&

27+(5352)6(59,&(6 &/(5.
27+(5352)6(59,&(6 675((7
27+(5352)6(59,&(6 322/
27+(5352)6(59,&(6 (1*,1((5,1*
27+(5352)6(59,&(6 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
27+(5352)6(59,&(6 3$5.
27+(5352)6(59,&(6 &20081,7<&(17(5

9(5,=21:,5(/(66

$GPLQ 7(/(3+21( $'0,1,675$7,21
&RPPXQLFDWLRQV 7(/(3+21( &20081,&$7,216
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 (1*,1((5,1*
Page 309 of 334

(QJLQHHULQJ 7(/(3+21( (1*,1((5,1*
(QJLQHHULQJ 7(/(3+21( (1*,1((5,1*
(QJLQHHULQJ 7(/(3+21( (1*,1((5,1*
(QJLQHHULQJ 7(/(3+21( (1*,1((5,1*
(QJLQHHULQJ 7(/(3+21( (1*,1((5,1*
(QJLQHHULQJ 7(/(3+21( (1*,1((5,1*
(QJLQHHULQJ 7(/(3+21( (1*,1((5,1*
(QJLQHHULQJ 7(/(3+21( (1*,1((5,1*
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 (1*,1((5,1*
)$&,/,7,(6 7(/(3+21( )$&,/,7,(6
)$&,/,7,(6 7(/(3+21( )$&,/,7,(6
)LUH 7(/(3+21( ),5(
)LUH 7(/(3+21( ),5(
)LUH 7(/(3+21( ),5(
)LUH 7(/(3+21( ),5(
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

9(5,=21:,5(/(66 &RQWLQXHG
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
)LUH &20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
)LUH 7(/(3+21( ),5(
)LUH 7(/(3+21( ),5(
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
)LUH 7(/(3+21( ),5(
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ),5(
+5 7(/(3+21( 3(56211(/3$<52//
,QVSHFWLRQV 7(/(3+21( ,163(&7,21
,QVSHFWLRQV 7(/(3+21( ,163(&7,21
,QVSHFWLRQV 7(/(3+21( ,163(&7,21
,QVSHFWLRQV 7(/(3+21( ,163(&7,21
,QVSHFWLRQV 7(/(3+21( ,163(&7,21
,7 7(/(3+21( ,1)250$7,217(&+12/2*<
Page 310 of 334

,7 7(/(3+21( ,1)250$7,217(&+12/2*<
,7 7(/(3+21( ,1)250$7,217(&+12/2*<
,7 7(/(3+21( ,1)250$7,217(&+12/2*<
,7 7(/(3+21( ,1)250$7,217(&+12/2*<
1DWXUDO5HVRXUFHV 7(/(3+21( 1$785$/5(6285&(6
J,SDG &20387(5$&&(66 1$785$/5(6285&(6
3DUN 5HF 7(/(3+21( 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
3RRO 7(/(3+21( 322/
3DUN 5HF 7(/(3+21( 5(&5($7,21
3RRO 7(/(3+21( 322/
7HHQ&HQWHU 7(/(3+21( 7((1&(17(5
5HFUHDWLRQ 7(/(3+21( 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
&RPP&WU)DFLOLW\ 7(/(3+21( &200&75)$&,/,7,(6
&RPP&WU)DFLOLW\ 7(/(3+21( &200&75)$&,/,7,(6
,FH$UHQD 7(/(3+21( ,&($5(1$
,FH$UHQD 7(/(3+21( ,&($5(1$
3ODQQLQJ'HY 7(/(3+21( 3/$11,1*
&ULPH3UHYHQWLRQ 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
,QYHVWLJDWLRQ 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
5HFRUGV 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

9(5,=21:,5(/(66 &RQWLQXHG
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH &20387(5$&&(66 32/,&(
3ROLFH &20387(5$&&(66 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
Page 311 of 334

3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH,3$' &20387(5$&&(66 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

9(5,=21:,5(/(66 &RQWLQXHG
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
3ROLFH7ULEDO/LDVRQ &20387(5$&&(66 75,%$/6(59,&(6
3DUNV 7(/(3+21( 3$5.
6KRS 7(/(3+21( )/((7
52: 7(/(3+21( 52:0*7
3DUNV 7(/(3+21( 3$5.
3XEOLF:RUNV 7(/(3+21( 675((7
6WUHHWV 7(/(3+21( 675((7
6WUHHWV 7(/(3+21( 675((7
6KRS 7(/(3+21( )/((7
6WUHWV 7(/(3+21( 675((7
6WUHHW 7(/(3+21( 675((7
3DUNV 7(/(3+21( 3$5.
3DUNV 7(/(3+21( 3$5.
3DUNV 7(/(3+21( 3$5.
6WUHHW 7(/(3+21( 675((7
Page 312 of 334

52: 7(/(3+21( 52:0*7
3DUNV 7(/(3+21( 3$5.
6KRS 7(/(3+21( )/((7
6WUHHW 7(/(3+21( 675((7
3DUNV 7(/(3+21( 3$5.
3DUNV 7(/(3+21( 3$5.
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

9(5,=21:,5(/(66 &RQWLQXHG
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
*-HWSDFN &20387(5$&&(66 ':,)25)(,785(
('$ 7(/(3+21( ('$0$1$*(0(17
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
6HZHU 7(/(3+21( 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
6HZHU 7(/(3+21( 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
6HZHU 7(/(3+21( 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
6HZHU &20387(5$&&(66 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
3ZV,SDG &20387(5$&&(66 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17
6WRUP 7(/(3+21( 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17
6HZHU 7(/(3+21( 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17
:DWHU &20387(5$&&(66 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17
*86% &20387(5$&&(66 ,1)27(&+,6)81'

9,67$5&25325$7,21

0(5&+$1',6( 322/
Page 313 of 334

0(5&+$1',6( 322/
0(5&+$1',6( 322/
0(5&+$1',6( 322/
0(5&+$1',6( 322/

:(673$<0(17&75

62)7:$5($118$/)((6 5(&25'6

:6% $662&,1&

'(326,763$<$%/( (6&52:)81'
(1*,1((5,1*'(6,*1&2168/7$176 7+$9(5(&216758&7,21

(1*,1((5,1*'(6,*1&2168/7$176 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17
(1*,1((5,1*'(6,*1&2168/7$176 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17
(1*,1((5,1*'(6,*1&2168/7$176 9$//(<3$5.7+'5$,1$*(
(1*,1((5,1*'(6,*1&2168/7$176 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17
(1*,1((5,1*'(6,*1&2168/7$176 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17
(1*,1((5,1*'(6,*1&2168/7$176 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17

(1*,1((5,1*'(6,*1&2168/7$176 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17
(1*,1((5,1*'(6,*1&2168/7$176 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

:6% $662&,1& &RQWLQXHG
(1*,1((5,1*'(6,*1&2168/7$176 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17
(1*,1((5,1*'(6,*1&2168/7$176 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17
(1*,1((5,1*'(6,*1&2168/7$176 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17

(1*,1((5,1*'(6,*1&2168/7$176 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17

=(30$18)$&785,1*&2

(48,30(170$,176833/,(6 (48,30(170$,17

071-

66 (48,30(170$,176833/,(6 ,163(&7,21
66 (48,30(170$,176833/,(6 5(&5($7,21
66 (48,30(170$,176833/,(6 (1*,1((5,1*
66 (48,30(170$,176833/,(6 3$5.(48,30(170$,17
66 (48,30(170$,176833/,(6 (48,30(170$,17
Page 314 of 334

66 (48,30(170$,176833/,(6 6:((3,1*

6,6(&85,7<6<67(06,1&

27+(5352)6(59,&(6 )25)(,785(

$'9$1&('*5$3+,;,1&

(48,30(170$,176833/,(6 ),5(

$/3+$%,76

27+(5352)6(59,&(6 5(&5($7,21352*5$06

$1&207(&+1,&$/&(17(5

5$',2%$77(5,(6$1'&+$5*(56 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ),5(

$33/()25'2)6+$.23((,1&

)2&6 (48,30(170$,176833/,(6 3$752/

5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

$552:$&(+$5':$5( &RQWLQXHG
(48,30(170$,176833/,(6 322/
23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 '2:172:1
23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 6,*10$,17
23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 322/
23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 322/

$:$5'61(7:25.

6(59,&($:$5'6 3(56211(/3$<52//

%(&.(5$5(1$352'8&76,1&

23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,&($5(1$

%,))6,1&

: 27+(55(17 $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
Page 315 of 334

: 27+(55(17 $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
: 27+(55(17 3$5.%/'*60$,17
: 27+(55(17 48$55</$.(3$5.352-(&7
: 27+(55(17 $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
: 27+(55(17 $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
: 27+(55(17 $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
: 27+(55(17 $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
: 27+(55(17 $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
: 27+(55(17 $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
: 27+(55(17 $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
: 27+(55(17 $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
: 27+(55(17 $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
: 27+(55(17 $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
: 27+(55(17 $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
: 27+(55(17 $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
: 27+(55(17 $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
: 27+(55(17 $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6

%/$7=+(,0-,0

725&+581 5$&( :(//1(66352*5$0 3(56211(/3$<52//
5(,0%856(0(17

5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

%/$7=+(,0-,0 &RQWLQXHG
%28$9,&+,7+'$11<

0167$7( 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
)'&21)

%8(72:-2+1

725&+581 725&+581 :(//1(66352*5$0 3(56211(/3$<52//

&$5/621/,=

725&+581 725&+581 :(//1(66352*5$0 3(56211(/3$<52//

&':*29(510(17,1&

3&32:(5$'$37(5 -+' 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'

Page 316 of 334

&(1785</,1.
7(/(3+21( ),5(
-81(
7(/(3+21( (1*,1((5,1*
-81(
7(/(3+21( 3$5.6(59,&(6
-81(
7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
-81(
7(/(3+21( /,%5$5<
-81(
7(/(3+21( $'0,1,675$7,21
-81(
7(/(3+21( 322/
-81(
7(/(3+21( &20081,7<&(17(5
-81(
7(/(3+21( 675((7
-81(
7(/(3+21( 3$5.
-81(
7(/(3+21( )/((7
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

&(1785</,1. &RQWLQXHG
-81(
7(/(3+21( ),5(
-81(
$0 7(/(3+21( 3$752/
-81(
$0 7(/(3+21( $'0,1,675$7,21
-81(
$0 7(/(3+21( &/(5.
-81(
$0 7(/(3+21( ),1$1&(
-81(
$0 7(/(3+21( 3/$11,1*
-81(
$0 7(/(3+21( ,1)250$7,217(&+12/2*<
-81(
$0 7(/(3+21( )$&,/,7,(6
-81(
Page 317 of 334

$0 7(/(3+21( ,163(&7,21
-81(
$0 7(/(3+21( (1*,1((5,1*
-81(
$0 7(/(3+21( 675((7
-81(
$0 7(/(3+21( 3$5.
-81(
$0 7(/(3+21( )/((7
-81(
$0 7(/(3+21( 3$5.
-81(
$0 7(/(3+21( 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
-81(
$0 7(/(3+21( 322/
-81(
$0 7(/(3+21( ,&($5(1$
-81(
$0 7(/(3+21( &20081,7<&(17(5
-81(
$0 7(/(3+21( 3$5.6(59,&(6
-81(
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

&(1785</,1. &RQWLQXHG
$0 7(/(3+21( 7((1&(17(5
-81(
$0 7(/(3+21( 5(&5($7,21
-81(
$0 7(/(3+21( ),5(
-81(
$0 7(/(3+21( ),5(
-81(
$0 7(/(3+21( /,%5$5<
-81(
$0 7(/(3+21( ('$0$1$*(0(17
-81(
7(/(3+21( &,7<+$//
-81(

&+2,&((/(&75,&,1&
Page 318 of 334

23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 $7+/(7,&0$,17 ),(/'6
%8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 )$&,/,7,(63:%/'*6
%8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 /,%5$5<
%8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 )$&,/,7,(632/,&(

&,17$6,1&

-7%*0+&%//76.+ 81,)2506&/27+,1* 675((7
*+7.%(.:'%-60)-)-+ 81,)2506&/27+,1* 3$5.
-27/-: 81,)2506&/27+,1* )/((7
6(59,&(&+$5*( 81,)2506&/27+,1* 675((7
7%6%'5 81,)2506&/27+,1* 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
%7.5.5 81,)2506&/27+,1* 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17
%8,/',1*0$,17 )$&,/,7,(632/,&(
%8,/',1*0$,17 )$&,/,7,(63:%/'*6
-7%*0+&%//76.+ 81,)2506&/27+,1* 675((7
*+7.%(.:'%-60)-)-+ 81,)2506&/27+,1* 3$5.
-27/-: 81,)2506&/27+,1* )/((7
6(59,&(&+$5*( 81,)2506&/27+,1* 675((7
7%6%'5 81,)2506&/27+,1* 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
%7.5.5 81,)2506&/27+,1* 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17
%8,/',1*0$,17 )$&,/,7,(63:%/'*6

5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

&,17$6,1& &RQWLQXHG
&20&$67

0217+/<&20&$67,17(51(7 &20387(5$&&(66 ,1)27(&+,6)81'
-81

&29(5775$&.*5283,1&

23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 6:0'7))('(5$/)25)(,785(6

'(//:2&+5,6

725&+581 725&+581 :(//1(66352*5$0 3(56211(/3$<52//

'(3$8//(77(5,1*

23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ),5(

Page 319 of 334

(0(5*(1&<$8727(&+12/2*,(6,1&
/* (48,30(170$,176833/,(6 3$752/
$: (48,30(170$,176833/,(6 3$752/

(175867'$7$&$5'

67+$/) $%$7(0(176(77/(0(17 '$7$&$5'$%$7(0(17
$%$7(0(17

)$67(1$/

016.$ 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 6,*10$,17

*$5</),6&+/(5 $662&,$7(63$

27+(5352)6(59,&(6 6:0'7)0$7&+

*8**,6%(5*/,=

725&+581 725&+581 :(//1(66352*5$0 3(56211(/3$<52//

5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

+$1&2&25325$7,21 &RQWLQXHG
(48,30(170$,176833/,(6 3$5.(48,30(170$,17

+$:.,16,1&

5, 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 322/

+(1'5,&.6&2'<

725&+581 725&+581 :(//1(66352*5$0 3(56211(/3$<52//

+(11(3,1&2$77251(<

62)),&(
75$1+,%%$5' ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6

+20(72:1+(52

$ $'9(57,6,1* 5(&5($7,21
Page 320 of 334

+276<0,11(627$&20

+26()25135(6685(:$6+(5 (48,30(170$,176833/,(6 ),5(

+3,1&

&20387(5)253/$11,1* )851,6+,1*6127&$3,7$/,=(' ,163(&7,21

+8*+(6%5<$1

725&+581 725&+581 :(//1(66352*5$0 3(56211(/3$<52//

+817(/(&75,&

6+ &2&+$5*(3$<$%/( (6&52:)81'

,63$&()851,785(,1&

,$&21)(5(1&()851,785())( )851,6+,1*6127&$3,7$/,=(' ,&($5(1$
&&&21)(5(1&()851,785())( )851,6+,1*6127&$3,7$/,=(' &20081,7<&(17(55(02'(/

5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

,1129$7,9(2)),&(62/87,216//& &RQWLQXHG
2)),&(6833/,(6 ,1 2)),&(6833/,(6 5(&25'6
,1 2)),&(6833/,(6 5(&25'6
,1 2)),&(6833/,(6 5(&25'6

- -0,11($32/,6//&

67+$/) 7,)3$<* 7,)',67- -6$10$5
,1&5(0(17

-())(5621),5( 6$)(7<,1&

/$''(5%(/76 81,)2506&/27+,1* ),5(

.520,1*$7(55<

-81( 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 ,163(&7,21

Page 321 of 334

/$.(&28175<'225//&
(48,30(170$,17(1$1&( )$&,/,7,(63:%/'*6

/$1'5<'(6217$

725&+581 725&+581 :(//1(66352*5$0 3(56211(/3$<52//

/(6.2&5,67,(

725&+581 725&+581 :(//1(66352*5$0 3(56211(/3$<52//

/,1./80%(5,1&

0$7(5,$/6 0$1+2/( 3,3(0$,17
0$7(5,$/6 &$7&+%$6,10$,17

/,1.-($1

725&+581 725&+581 :(//1(66352*5$0 3(56211(/3$<52//

/2*,6

5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

/2*,6 &RQWLQXHG
&20387(56(59,&(6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'
&20387(56(59,&(6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'

/86,$1&+5,67,1(

725&+581 725&+581 :(//1(66352*5$0 3(56211(/3$<52//

0$548$5'71,&+2/(

725&+581 725&+581 :(//1(66352*5$0 3(56211(/3$<52//

0,':$<)25'

(48,30(17 (48,30(17,6)81'

0,11(627$3/80%,1* +($7,1*,1&
Page 322 of 334

53=5(3$,5 %8,/',1*0$,17 ),5(

01&2002)),1$1&(75($6',9

/$5248( ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
75$1+,%%$5' ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6

01'(372)$'0,1,675$7,21

&21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* 5(&25'6

0221(102//<

725&+581 725&+581 :(//1(66352*5$0 3(56211(/3$<52//

07,',675,%87,1*,1&

(48,30(175(17 6:((3,1*

081,&,3$/(0(5*(1&<6(59,&(6

67$7,216&%$),//67$7,21 ,1 (48,30(170$,176833/,(6 ),5(

5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

081,&,3$/(0(5*(1&<6(59,&(6 &RQWLQXHG
1$3$*(18,1(3$576&2

(48,30(170$,176833/,(6 3$752/
(48,30(170$,176833/,(6 3$752/
(48,30(170$,176833/,(6 (48,30(170$,17
(48,30(170$,176833/,(6 ),5(
(48,30(170$,176833/,(6 6(:(50$1$*(0(17

1$6&(1(&$50(/$

725&+581 725&+581 :(//1(66352*5$0 3(56211(/3$<52//

2)),&(2)01,76(59,&(6

: 7(/(3+21( 32/,&(
: 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 ':,)25)(,785(

Page 323 of 334

23*,1&
<($5/</$6(5),&+(0$,17(1$1&( 62)7:$5($118$/)((6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'

3($5621%526,1&

&+,36($/ 3$9(0(1735(6(59$7,21 6($/&2$7,1*

3/$1(763,5,7,1&

-81( 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
&$03

5$+50$/7,1*&2

67+$/) 7,)3$<* 7,)',675$+5(;3$16,21
,1&5(0(17

5,9(5)521735,17,1*

35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* (1*,1((5,1*

5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

5,9(56('*(&21&5(7(,1& &RQWLQXHG
0$7(5,$/6 685)$&(:$7(53,3(0$,17

5-0&216758&7,21

3$<0(17 352 %8,/',1*6 &20081,7<&(17(5 ,&($5(1$

52%621&5$,*

725&+581 725&+581 :(//1(66352*5$0 3(56211(/3$<52//

526(02817

67+$/) $%$7(0(176(77/(0(17 (0(5621$%$7(0(17
$%$7(0(17

6$17260,&+$(/
Page 324 of 334

725&+581 725&+581 :(//1(66352*5$0 3(56211(/3$<52//

6&277&2$77251(<

62)),&(
/$5248( ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6

6&277&275($685(5

,1 :$*(6)75(* 6:0'7)0$7&+
,1 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 6:0'7))('(5$/)25)(,785(6

6&277&275($685(5

67+$/) 7,)3$<* 7,)',67$0$=21
,1&5(0(17

6(1'(/%$&+3+,/

725&+581 725&+581 :(//1(66352*5$0 3(56211(/3$<52//

6+$.23((',9(56,7<$//,$1&(

5()81'+8%(5'$0$*('(326,7 5()81'+8%(5'' '$0$*('(326,7 3$5.6(59,&(6
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

6+$.23((',9(56,7<$//,$1&( &RQWLQXHG

6+$.23((527$5<&/8%

'8(6 '8(6 $'0,1,675$7,21

6+(5:,1:,//,$06&2

0$7(5,$/6 3$5.%/'*60$,17
23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 6,*10$,17
23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 &$7&+%$6,10$,17

6,03/(;*5,11(///3

%8,/',1*0$,17 3$5.6(59,&(6

63257681/,0,7('
Page 325 of 334

-81( 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
/$&5266(

675(,&+(5

6
81,)2506&/27+,1* &2'((1)25&(0(17

7+(7221,(6//&

+8%(56(5,(6 +8%(53$5. 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 3$5.6(59,&(6
3(5)250$1&(

7+251%(5*(5(&7,21 67((/6(59,&(6

%8,/',1*6 &,7<+$//

702%,/

27+(5352)6(59,&(6 3$752/

75$',7,21&$3,7$/%$1.

67+$/) 7,)3$<* 7,)',67$//6$,17675,'(17
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

75$',7,21&$3,7$/%$1. &RQWLQXHG
,1&5(0(17

78&&,*5(*

725&+581 725&+581 :(//1(66352*5$0 3(56211(/3$<52//

78&.(5$1*(/$

5()81'<287+%/'*'$0$*('(326 5()81' '$0$*('(326,7 3$5.6(59,&(6
'$0$*('(3

863267$/6(59,&(6&05632&

3267$*()25&,7<+$// 0(7(5 35(3$,'27+(5 ),1$1&(

8366725(
Page 326 of 334

3267$*( 3$752/

86%$1.23(5$7,216

67+$/) 7,)3$<* 7,)',675,&7
,1&5(0(17

9(5,=21:,5(/(66

7(/(3+21( 6:0'7))('(5$/)25)(,785(6

9,67$5&25325$7,21

0(5&+$1',6( 322/
0(5&+$1',6( 322/

:<&.2))-())

725&+581 725&+581 :(//1(66352*5$0 3(56211(/3$<52//

&25325$7(3$<0(176<67(06

+3 +3+20(6725( 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,163(&7,21
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

&25325$7(3$<0(176<67(06 &RQWLQXHG
)('(; 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 (1*,1((5,1*
25$&/($7 7 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ,19(67,*$7,21
0,//6)/((7)$50 0$< 0$7(5,$/6 75((5(3/$&(0(17
/2:(6 0$< 0$7(5,$/6 75((5(3/$&(0(17
/2:(6 0$< 0$7(5,$/6 75((5(3/$&(0(17
&8%)22'6 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 75((5(3/$&(0(17
&$5,%28&2))((&2 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 75((5(3/$&(0(17
/2:(6 0$< 0$7(5,$/6 75((5(3/$&(0(17
/2:(6 0$< 0$7(5,$/6 75((5(3/$&(0(17
7+(+20('(327 0$< (48,30(170$,176833/,(6 ,&($5(1$
81,7(' 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ,&($5(1$
&+,/,6%$5$1' 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ,&($5(1$
67$&.&,7<%85*(5%$5 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ,&($5(1$
7,0+25721
6 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ,&($5(1$
7,0+25721
6 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ,&($5(1$
35(0$; (50$ 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ,&($5(1$
+<$77+27(/6&2/80%86 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ,&($5(1$
Page 327 of 334

81,7(' 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ,&($5(1$
81,7(' 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ,&($5(1$
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 3$752/
67&/28'3$5.,1* 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( 32/,&(
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'
0<&$%/(0$57//& 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'
$'2%( &5($7,9(&/28' 0$< 62)7:$5($118$/)((6 5(&5($7,21
3$57<&,7< 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 &20081,7<&(17(5
27&%5$1'6,1& 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 &20081,7<&(17(5
',63/$<6*2 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 &20081,7<&(17(5
6:,0287/(7&20 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 322/
',63/$<6*2 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 &20081,7<&(17(5
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 3$5.6(59,&(6
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 &20081,7<&(17(5
$912: 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 &20081,7<&(17(55(02'(/
6:,0287/(7&20 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 &20081,7<&(17(55(02'(/
(/,9$7( 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 &20081,7<&(17(55(02'(/
(/,9$7( 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 &20081,7<&(17(55(02'(/
(/,9$7( 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 &20081,7<&(17(55(02'(/
(/,9$7( 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 &20081,7<&(17(55(02'(/
7$5*(7 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 322/
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

&25325$7(3$<0(176<67(06 &RQWLQXHG
2)),&(0$;2)),&('(327 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 322/
+2/,'$<6716725( 0$< &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
*29'2&6,1& 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 3(56211(/3$<52//
67$5%8&.6201,6(9(5,1 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
5$05(67$85$17,1'< 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
0,.$'25(67$85$17 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
67$5%8&.6201,6(9(5,1 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
67$5%8&.6201,6(9(5,1 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
6(9(5,1*5,//( 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
,1',$1$&&&21&(66 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
,1',$1$&&&21&(66 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
67$5%8&.6201,6(9(5,1 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
7+(/(*(1'6*2/)&/8% 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
8%(586$35.-91) 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
8%(586$351&:$= 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
:+,7(&$67/( 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
*(25*,$675((7*5,1' 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
Page 328 of 334

8%(586$35)$< 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
*5((1/($)6 %$1$1$, 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
'(/7$$,5%$**$*()(( 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
'(/7$$,5%$**$*()(( 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
'(/7$$,5%$**$*()(( 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
'(/7$$,5%$**$*()(( 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
5%)$%5,&$7, 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ),5(
$0$=21&20 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ),5(
6)'$33$5(/ 0$< 81,)2506&/27+,1* ),5(
.:,.75,3 0$< 02725)8(/6 /8%5,&$176 ),5(
$0$=21&20$0=1&20%,// 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ),5(
3$<3$/ &$03&+,02 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ),5(
*$50,1 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ),5(
&5$*816/2'*($1'*2/)5( 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( &2'((1)25&(0(17
&52:1(3/$=$3/<0287+ 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( &/(5.
0,11($32/,6$,53257 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( &/(5.
64 %,*521
6%,675 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
7+675((767 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
3$5.
1*2 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( ),5(
$0$=21&20$0=1&20%,// 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'
62/$5:,1'6 0$< 62)7:$5($118$/)((6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

&25325$7(3$<0(176<67(06 &RQWLQXHG
$0$=21&20 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,1)27(&+,6)81'
,1 +(5,7$*(0$,17352'8 0$< (48,30(170$,176833/,(6 ),5(
863632 0$< 3267$*( ),5(
&8%)22'6 0$< )22' 3/$11,1*
,1 287/,1(,1'8675,(6// 0$< (48,30(170$,176833/,(6 (48,30(170$,17
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 0$< (48,30(170$,176833/,(6 3$752/
5,1'$7(&+12/2*,(6,1 0$< (48,30(170$,176833/,(6 ),5(
7+(:(%67$85$176725( 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 &200&75)$&,/,7,(6
$&85,7(&20 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 &200&75)$&,/,7,(6
*5,1'0$67(5&(&,/:$5( 0$< (48,30(170$,176833/,(6 &200&75)$&,/,7,(6
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 0$< %8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 &200&75)$&,/,7,(6
32//87,21&21752/$*(1&< 0$< &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* (1*,1((5,1*
9,67$35 9,67$35,17&20 0$< $'9(57,6,1* 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17
9,67$35 9,67$35,17&20 0$< $'9(57,6,1* 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
9,67$35 9,67$35,17&20 0$< 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 3$5.
9,67$35 9,67$35,17&20 0$< 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 675((7
Page 329 of 334

(;&(/'5<(5,1& 0$< %8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 3$5.%/'*60$,17
$0(5,&$138%/,&:25.6 0$< 68%6&5,37,21638%/,&$7,216 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17
$0(5,&$138%/,&:25.6 0$< 68%6&5,37,21638%/,&$7,216 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
$0(5,&$138%/,&:25.6 0$< 68%6&5,37,21638%/,&$7,216 3$5.
$0(5,&$138%/,&:25.6 0$< 68%6&5,37,21638%/,&$7,216 675((7
86$,1)/$7$%/(6 0$< 27+(55(17 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17
86$,1)/$7$%/(6 0$< 27+(55(17 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
86$,1)/$7$%/(6 0$< 27+(55(17 3$5.
86$,1)/$7$%/(6 0$< 27+(55(17 675((7
86&877(5,1& 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 6,*10$,17
'2187&211(&7,212)6+ 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 &/($183'$<
9,67$35 9,67$35,17&20 0$< $'9(57,6,1* 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17
9,67$35 9,67$35,17&20 0$< $'9(57,6,1* 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
9,67$35 9,67$35,17&20 0$< $'9(57,6,1* 3$5.
9,67$35 9,67$35,17&20 0$< $'9(57,6,1* 675((7
:$/*5((16 0$< 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 675((7
:$/*5((16 0$< 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 3$5.
:$/*5((16 0$< 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
:$/*5((16 0$< 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17
3$57<&,7< 0$< 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 675((7
3$57<&,7< 0$< 35,17,1*38%/,6+,1* 3$5.
3$57<&,7< 0$< $'9(57,6,1* 6(:(50$1$*(0(17
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

&25325$7(3$<0(176<67(06 &RQWLQXHG
3$57<&,7< 0$< $'9(57,6,1* 685)$&(:$7(50$1$*(0(17
2)),&(0$;2)),&('(327 0$< 2)),&(6833/,(6 52:0*7
3$<)/2:3$<3$/ 0$< &5(',7&$5')((6 5(&5($7,21
3$<)/2:3$<3$/ 0$< &5(',7&$5')((6 ,163(&7,21
21/,1(/$%(/6 0$< 2)),&(6833/,(6 ),1$1&(
5(/,$1&(7(/(3+21( 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 6:0'7))('(5$/)25)(,785(6
*5$1'9,(:/2'*($1'7(11, 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( 6:0'7))('(5$/)25)(,785(6
*5$1'9,(:/2'*($1'7(11, 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( 6:0'7))('(5$/)25)(,785(6
*5$1'9,(:/2'*($1'7(11, 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( 6:0'7))('(5$/)25)(,785(6
82)0%%((526,21 0$< &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* (1*,1((5,1*
$0$=21&20$0=1&20%,// 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 (1*,1((5,1*
&8/9(5
62)6+$.23 0$< )22' (1*,1((5,1*
&%$ 0(',$3$576,17 0$< 62)7:$5($118$/)((6 &20081,&$7,216
%&$75$,1,1*('8&$7,21 0$< &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* 3$752/
1$7,21$/),5(635,1./(5$ 0$< &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* ),5(
1)3$1$7/),5(3527(&7 0$< 68%6&5,37,21638%/,&$7,216 ),5(
6</9$1(,1& 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,19(67,*$7,21
Page 330 of 334

)30$,/,1*62/87,216 0$< (48,30(175(17 5(&25'6
64 0$5/,15,1(+$57 0$< %$1.)((616))(( 5(&5($7,21
0167,$3$'030'3$5. 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( 5(&5($7,21
%52:1(//6,1& 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 3$752/
2%5,(16 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( $'0,1,675$7,21
%(632.(3267 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( $'0,1,675$7,21
7+(%28/'(57$3+286( * 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( $'0,1,675$7,21
%(632.(3267 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( $'0,1,675$7,21
7,5&+27(/ 0$< 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
3/<0287+3/$<+286( 0$< 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
82)0$5%25(7802/ 0$< 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 5(&5($7,21352*5$06
)97&),1$1&,$/6(59,&(6 0$< &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* 3$752/
)8//6285&(//& 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 3$752/
'6$506 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 3$752/
$0$=210.73/$&(3076 0$< 2)),&(6833/,(6 5(&25'6
(%7:,1&,7,(62 0$< &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* ,19(67,*$7,21
$'25$0$,1& 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ,19(67,*$7,21
(%7:,1&,7,(62 0$< &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* ,19(67,*$7,21
1257+(51722/(48,3017 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 48$55</$.(3$5.352-(&7
'36),5(),*+7(5/,&(16,1* 0$< 68%6&5,37,21638%/,&$7,216 ),5(
$6+/(<+20()851,785( 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ),5(
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

&25325$7(3$<0(176<67(06 &RQWLQXHG
+3 +3+20(6725( 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 (1*,1((5,1*
%(67:(67(51+27(/667 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( 32/,&(
67$5,1& 0$< %8,/',1*0$,176833/,(6 )$&,/,7,(632/,&(
0(;,&$19,//$*(5( 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( 32/,&(
67&/28'3$5.,1* 0$< 75$9(/68%6,67(1&( 32/,&(
6(16,%/(/$1'86(&2$/,7, 0$< &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* 3/$11,1*
$&7 *76/$1'86(:.6+3 0$< &21)(5(1&(6&+22/75$,1,1* 3/$11,1*
64 (/7$&2/2&2 0$< )22' ),5(
&8%)22'6 0$< )22' ),5(
$867,1+$5':$5( 6833 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ),5(
+,/,)7-$&.&2 0$< 23(5$7,1*6833/,(6 ),5(
'2187&211(&7,212)6+ 0$< )22' ),5(
&8%)22'6 0$< )22' ),5(
&8%)22'6 0$< )22' ),5(

86%$1.0(5&+$17&211(&7
Page 331 of 334

86%DQN0HUFKDQW)HHV2/ 0$< &5(',7&$5')((6 5(&5($7,21
86%DQN0HUFKDQW)HHV%OGJ 0$< &5(',7&$5')((6 ,163(&7,21
86%DQN0HUFKDQW)HHV69 0$< &5(',7&$5')((6 322/
86%DQN0HUFKDQW)HHV&LW\+D 0$< &5(',7&$5')((6 ,163(&7,21

$1&+25%$1.

$8720(0%(56+,35(78516$0$1 0$< %$1.)((616))(( &20081,7<&(17(5
$8720(0%(56+,35(7851'(/$7 0$< %$1.)((616))(( &20081,7<&(17(5
'(%,76&+(&.6)(( 0$< ,17(5(67 ,19(670(1775867)81'
'(326,7(',7(0)(( 0$< ,17(5(67 ,19(670(1775867)81'
$&+25,*,1$7,213(5,7(0)(( 0$< ,17(5(67 ,19(670(1775867)81'
326,7,9(3$<)(( 0$< ,17(5(67 ,19(670(1775867)81'

01'(372)/$%25 ,1'8675<

%/'*,163685&+7307 0$< %/'*3(50,7685&+$5*( 87,/,7<&/($5,1*
%/'*,163685&+7307 0$< 3/80%,1*3(50,7685&+$5*( 87,/,7<&/($5,1*
%/'*,163685&+7307 0$< (/(&75,&3(50,7685&+$5*( 87,/,7<&/($5,1*
%/'*,163685&+7307 0$< +($7,1*3(50,7685&+$5*( 87,/,7<&/($5,1*
%/'*,163685&+7307 0$< : 63(50,7685&+$5*( 87,/,7<&/($5,1*
%/'*,163685&+7307 0$< ),5(3(50,7685&+$5*( 87,/,7<&/($5,1*
%/'*,163685&+7307 0$< $'0,1,675$7,9(&+$5*(6 ,163(&7,21
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

01'(372)/$%25 ,1'8675< &RQWLQXHG

6+$.23((3')25)(,785(6

%856&+(,0 ),1(6 )25)(,76 )25)(,785(
%856&+(,0 ),1(6 )25)(,76 )25)(,785(
%856&+(,0 ),1(6 )25)(,76 )25)(,785(
%856&+(,0 (9,'(1&(5220'(326,7 (6&52:)81'
01'2563(&,$/)8(/7$;

',(6(/ 3$<0(17 )8(/7$;3$<$%/( *(1(5$/)81'
3523$1( 3$<0(17 )8(/7$;3$<$%/( *(1(5$/)81'

01'256$/(67$;

6$/(67$;3$<0(17 3$<0(17 )8(/7$;3$<$%/( *(1(5$/)81'
6$/(67$;3$<0(17 3$<0(17 86(7$; *(1(5$/)81'
Page 332 of 334

6$/(67$;3$<0(17 3$<0(17 6$/(67$;3$<$%/( *(1(5$/)81'
6$/(67$;3$<0(17 3$<0(17 6$/(67$;3$<$%/( 75((5(3/$&(0(17
6$/(67$;3$<0(17 3$<0(17 86(7$; 6:0'7)67$7(*5$17

021(<029(56

0217+/<)(( 0$< %$1.)((616))(( &20081,7<&(17(5

/<1&+&$3,7$/&253

&$3,7$//($6( &/ &$3,7$//($6(3$<0(17 &20081,7<&(17(5
&$3,7$//($6( &/ '(%76(59,&(27+(5&+$5*(6 &20081,7<&(17(5
23(5$7,1*/($6( 2/ (48,30(175(17 &20081,7<&(17(5

$%*

+6$6(59,&()(( -81( 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 3(56211(/3$<52//
)6$6(59,&()(( -81( 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 3(56211(/3$<52//

6:0'7))25)(,785(6

/$5248( (9,'(1&(5220'(326,7 6:0'7)67$7(*5$17
/$5248( ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
5&.5 /2*,6 &,7<2)6+$.23((

6:0'7))25)(,785(6 &RQWLQXHG
/$5248( ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
/$5248( ),1(6 )25)(,76 6:0'7))25)(,785(6
&,7<2)6+$.23((

6+5(&(,37 :$*(6)75(* 6:0'7)67$7(*5$17
6+5(&(,37 :$*(6)75(* 6:0'7)0$7&+
6+5(&(,37 29(57,0()7 6:0'7)0$7&+
6+5(&(,37 27+(5352)6(59,&(6 6:0'7)0$7&+

*UDQG7RWDO 3D\PHQW,QVWUXPHQW7RWDOV
&KHFNV
()73D\PHQWV
7RWDO3D\PHQWV
Page 333 of 334

FundstransferredelectronicallyJune21,2017toJuly5,2017
PAYROLL $ 325,379.21
FIT/FICA $ 103,819.80
STATEINCOMETAX $ 20,990.12
PERA $ 85,368.31
HEALTHCARESAVINGS $ 7,964.10
HEALTHSAVINGSACCT $
NATIONWIDEDEFCOMP $ 12,715.10
ICMADEFERREDCOMP $ 1,057.14
MSRS $ 3,651.85
FSA $ 2,410.68
MNWAGELEVY $
Total $ 563,356.31
Page 334 of 334

7/5/17 Shakopee City Council Meeting Agenda

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

7/5/17 Shakopee City Council Meeting Agenda

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

7/5/17 Shakopee City Council Meeting Agenda

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Shakopee City Council

Shakopee Mission Statement

Mayor Bill Mars presiding

Shakopee City Council

FROM: Chris Dellwo, Captain

1. 1999 GMC Yukon, VIN: 1GKEK13R9XJ769864

Shakopee City Council

FROM: Bruce Loney, Public Works Director

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

These policy changes shall become effective on July 5, 2017.

Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,

Minnesota, held this 5th day of July , 2017.

Mayor of the City of Shakopee

Shakopee City Council

FROM: Ryan Halverson, Assistant City Engineer

Lennar Letter - Extended Work Hours

Thank you for your consideration,

Shakopee City Council

FROM: Jamie Polley

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA

WHEREAS, on November 6, 2002, the City Council adopted Resolution

WHEREAS, Resolution No. 5794 specifies that donations or gifts shall be

WHEREAS, avid supporters of the City of Shakopee have generously

WHEREAS, the $1000 donator is Joe Theis in honor of his grandparents

WHEREAS, donations will assist in funding a unique playground that will

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF

FURTHER, the City staff is directed to send a letter to the donors,

Adopted in regular session of the City Council of the City of Shakopee,

Shakopee City Council

FROM: Lori J. Hensen, City Clerk

June 20, 2017

Mayor Bill Mars presiding

Councilmember Mike Luce made a motion to close public hearing, seconded by

Councilmember Jay Whiting made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 7898, a

Councilmember Jay Whiting made a motion to approve Resolution 7900, a resolution

Councilmember Jay Whiting made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 7782,

Councilmember Jay Whiting made a motion to approve Resolution Number 7901 to

Councilmember Kathi Mocol made a motion to approve Resolution Number 7902 to

14. Adjournment to Wednesday July 5, 2017 at 7:00 p.m.

Shakopee City Council

FROM: Nate Burkett, Assistant City Administrator

Mobile Communications Policy

C. BUSINESS NEED REQUIRED

D. MOBILE COMMUNICATION DEVICE AND SERVICE OPTIONS

E. CITY ISSUED MOBILE DEVICES AND SERVICE

G. PERSONAL MOBILE DEVICES AND SERVICE WITHOUT CITY STIPEND

H. MOBILE DEVICE USAGE, GENERALLY

Shakopee City Council

FROM: Lori J. Hensen, City Clerk

Shakopee City Council

FROM: Lori J. Hensen, City Clerk

Shakopee City Council

FROM: Lori J. Hensen, City Clerk

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA APPROVING

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SHAKOPEE,

Shakopee City Council

FROM: Michael Kerski, Director of Planning and Development

The application included six small subcontracts to six community-based organizations to