Restitution of Conjugal Rights
Restitution of Conjugal Rights
Restitution of Conjugal Rights
When two people are married, they owe obligations to each other. They must give each
other company. There must be cohabitation between them. When either of them fail to
fulfill such obligations or refuse to cohabit, the other person has right to seek restitution
of conjugal rights in a court of law.
When either of the spouses has withdrawn from the society of the other without
reasonable cause, the other person may file a suit for restitution of conjugal rights under
section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
A petition for restitution of conjugal rights is maintainable only when there is a valid
marriage. In Ranjana kejriwal v.Vinod Kumar Kejriwal (AIR 1997 Bom 380), the
petitioner wife alleged that the husband was already married and had suppressed the fact
from her. The Court held that the petition for restitution of conjugal rights is not
maintainable since there is no legal marriage.
Section 9 was challenged before the court as being violative of Article 21 of the
Constitution of India in T.Sareetha v. T.Venkata Subbaiah (AIR 1983 AP 356). Justice
P.A.Choudhary of the A.P.High Court held the section ultra vires since it offended
Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.
However, it was overruled by the Supreme Court in Saroj Rani v. Sudarshan Kumar
Chadha (AIR 1984 SC 1562). The court observed that, the object of the section is to bring
about cohabitation between estranged parties so that they can live together. That in the
privacy of home and married life neither Article 21 nor Article 14 has any place.
The aggrieved party may apply to the district court by way of petition for restitution of
conjugal rights.
The burden of proof lies on the person who has withdrawn from the society of his/her
spouse to prove that he/she had reasonable cause to withdraw from the society of his/her
spouse.
The person who has withdrawn from the society of his/her spouse may prove that it has
become impossible to live with the spouse. Persistent demand for dowry or causing
physical and mental torture was held to be a reasonable cause for the wife to withdraw
form the society of the husband in Vijay Kumar v. Suman (1996) 1 HLR 24 (P&H)
The court will satisfy itself about the truth of the statements made in the petition and also
that there is no legal ground for not granting the decree of restitution of conjugal rights.
The decree is then accordingly granted.
The decree of restitution of conjugal rights will be executed as per the Civil Procedure
Code. Appeal may be made to the High Court challenging the lower court order.
ALTERNATE REMEDIES………………………………………..………………… …