Alhambra City Council - Agenda - June 12, 2017
Alhambra City Council - Agenda - June 12, 2017
Alhambra City Council - Agenda - June 12, 2017
CAPERS on or belore By 1, 2017. option of the inal
‘Reston by th cate not ecute
California Public Employee's Retirement Systom
‘ww.calpers.ca gov‘utsceusayeous PAN OF THE CITY OF ALHAMERA (CALPERS Ib: 2596057773)
Maes 2017
Pose?
“Tha Nature of Actuarial Work’ A sca! ckaltons, nding the anes this cost estate a
ies on numerous azzmptors abou te fture This nudes denogechie asturytors out the
Decentage of your empoyes that il tennate, ce, become dled aa ten each uur yn, and
lonomie sumptions, abat what sary ireases each employee recsves and the most Important
‘sung, wna the saat CAPERS ler or ech yer mothe tire ute st do pal to
rent meters oF your plan Whe CAPERS nae st hase essen sur Dest estat ofthe el
Fue of your pan, must be Unerstond tht these aesumptons are vr long te petors ard ll
‘Xialy ot be fein each Year se me go frward This means that your employer contbution
‘equlremant can vary dramatiealy with or without any benefit changes Because short torm
‘perience does nt conform tothe longterm actuarial sumptions
‘+ vesonent return much more vl than aity Fucus ad can cause employer contbatos to
vary santcanty, Fr example, fr te pat eny year perid ending ne 30, 2045, furs a each fc
or ranged rom 24% fo 42079 The moat of iesmert ren on ero conten vanes
‘Snanty bed onthe pa’ wlan (erat the marke vale oases toe ya.
+ Proiectod Volatility Index: 86 sot above, the cost estimates spl nti commun are
{eed on 9 numer of ssuoton about vey lng tam demogragi ad econorc beer. ven ¥
‘hess seaumotions (wminnons, cat, abit relent, sry gon ar nvestment tun) a
‘soci resi tre ml be dllerences ona ya to yer basis Yeo to year difference betnee
‘stil experience ard the assumption cle gai ass wh seve lone rae the ene
‘hrs fom ya yer respecte. So, eyurd coniowne wil Ruse, epecy duet Oe
‘pro dons oF nvesment rrs
“The obit in annua erlyer contain requrements may be fects by tls amet. The reson
lethat haber bots and eri reteement ages reaue the sccuulsin of more esas per mene
‘Gotan ho ewer Conn vat an be mens bythe aoe bn ess to ave ember
Davo. Tegher ate pyolates reduce mare veal employe corti
‘Your plan's current volatility index (seat to payroll ale) 6 9.8, When you amend your plan, the
Ibi enager tases dat So, the vetity Index does pot change Freda. Hower, at
‘exam to es yur ew acre int, you vatty née ldo grow, we aso de the
"i of pac sty to aw to Som what your ute velty new come whe You re
{00% farded. The ger ts a, the roe veal you uur conto requ wl be The
fae Boo cota hese messes of pote Tati cntinton vty.” We call tis the Projected
oti nde
‘As of une 30,2015 ‘current Plan Post-Amendment
‘ecrued Uabiliy + waa aA
Payroll 15,125,728,
Projected Volatity Index 38
ehout sea ba ot nthe tnd sate the ln mates, hot a plans wh rt
‘Sevier tr ves wit oo esa nr ssa ~ tus, ase payors and abi 0
aye rato afe ctl to zero. However, a5 tne goes by test rts ban tke and then tend to
Sabie at some eorstant amount ae te elon mires. Wier bend lvls endear expaced
‘brant rogue her conan tre aioSCELLANEOUS PLAN OFTHE CITY OF ALHAMG®A (CALPERS ID: 2546057773)
waren 2097
ages
1F you have questions about the cost aah lease cll (63) COPERS (25-7277) ese ack to speak 0 ©
Contact anh for questions aboot the ing 6 he cetact aradent. Pas ack to Spek to me fo questons
Boatths ent malas
RANDALL DZTUBEK, ASA, EA, MARA
‘SotrPein Bein, CAPERS
EncosresStee escrin:Cetfor Unused Sek Lanes
Dune 30,2018
Present Value of Projected Benefits
‘The ble tlw shows the change a the pls tal presen vale of benefits forthe proposed plan amend
‘The preset vale of Dents repreans he ttl dlrs Pedad today to Ard afte beefs fr cient
Tambor othe la (ry wu pare to fre employes. The sieronce between thi Saute ahd ent
fe sts ra te a yur oye an ne cna, heh he charge he ese ae
ower, for lans Wh excess asst same olla hi "cost mayen be covered Dy cre excess ase.
‘As of2une 30,2015, ‘current Plan Post Amendment
‘Present Value of Projected Benefits (PVB) $ 165,656,205 + 166,450,716
Marat Vale of Asots (HVA) $ — smos26255 $16. s28253
Protent Valu of Future Employer and cannon -
Employes Contributions (PVE MVA) ‘ $49,805
change to PvE. amanea AMENDMENT CO HALSI-ALATION BASS one 38,2085
(Siperso:s8acon77V3
‘Spat Description: Cet for Uousod Sick eave
‘Accrued Liability
nis not equtes, nor nacesaly dead, t hve accamunted asa sce to cover the ttl pest vale of
Denes stl every member has le emloymene ita, the actarl ang proces cases reply
otrbton sched of employes coro nd ergoyer sets (alee not css) whic af sped
{0 sceuulate wah inarest tea the otal preset vale of anes bythe tne every menber ast
tion A of ech Dane 30, the acm clades he “drab” level pan aes os of tat pont tine
[Grattan tne rent wou sce fle enpiye corrbtons en fare emfoyr rams eos om
‘etotl resin value of Donets Therealng“esrebe” elo aces alle he aed TSE
1 pl with aut enact equal to the ps ecu Raby s oly Yn sched” funding that pan, and ey
{hee enpoys conratore and itr ere rma as re neaé. A lan Wt sss ol te cued
Tait behind scede” oe si hove an untae Aa, and mis tempor reese contbutons to
fet buck op sce A lan vty ats neces ofthe alas acrved Tabi Ievahead of eres. Ofcourse,
ents uch a on smandments on vestent or eroprapic gas or scscan change pls endon fh
‘sto yaa Tor ame, aan amendment cole use «panto ave om have exes es to bin nan
teundes pot.
“Te changes in your lars accrued abit, unfunded ecu Hadity ard the acura vales fasts unde ato
‘of Dawe 0, 05 aueto the pan aradmert ae shown nthe tale belo.
‘As ofSune 30, 2015, Current Plan Post amendment
‘entry Age Normal Accra Lnbiity (AL) 197.7536 $s Mee3.05
Market Value of Assets (HVA) 115928253 116,908,253
‘Unfunded Lablty/(Becoss Assets) (UAL $308.81 s Maws.ire
Franded Rao (HVA / AL) 7% 78%
‘change to AL os374
Total Employer Contribution
nl te table above ge he changes she acu bly ad furded sats ofthe plan de tothe amendment,
thereremanethequeton of wha wl happen tthe requtedarelyer cortowons because ef the charge plan
provers
CaPERS poy Implement conrbuton changes de to pan anerdments Imedy on the eet date of
the change pon bans" Thew choos are dsaayed"an the flowy page. he crack amendment
tect at on or afore ne 2, 201, hw noe ne erpayr conten eqn soul be eerie
{er the 2017 2018 fal yes In govern, he poy also pons Wat the change in unfurled fbi de tthe
btn amendment wi be Separatay amortzed ove pred f 20 years om the eflecive date ofthe sender
{Et a ar component of he pans fund foiyevcst esas wl catrue be amore sere
er 3, 2007 Tar‘lant Deion’ Ceaor Une Sick Leave
‘ha tl ow show the change n your plan’ erloyer contin requirements Beto the lan amennent for
(yer 200718
‘As of une 30,2015 Curent Plan Post-Amendmont
'2017/28 Employer Contribution
| Payment for Normal Cast 2450 asim
Payment on Amortization 2.746380 207.515
Change to Normal Cost ot
Change te Payment on Amortization Bases 61035
2017/18 Employee Rata* (Classic Members)
‘otal Employee Rate ‘sono 000%
‘change to Employee Rate .c00%
2017/18 Employee Rate"(PEPRA members**)
Total Employee Rate stot 500%
‘Change to Employee Rate 00%
2018/19 a
| Testimated Employer Normal Cost Rate 35% 2.6
nthe above ttle, the Post Ameren es wil pay deg fsa year 2017/18 you apt he amend
haze ests do nit incorprete ho veer er fr he sal Year ag ue 3,20,
+ Hisrateis the evpoye rte before any ci secu mocstons
s+ the employe rate ferent for cassie and new members. The change to the nmol cost due to ths
Amvenarant aston 13 od therfore the PRA ensayo crtbubon fate or 2017-2018 br uneced.
Not thatthe change in norma! ast the table ove may be much more ndtv ft fg tm change I the
tiple onrarten reqarement et he pon eendmet. The pars payer on sortaton bakes son
the table sve ta tenporry ater to te employer conveon ta get the pan back on shee. This
{emery adusment te empinyer contour equronert vars curator Fam ante Han
ieneTRACE enone CDT MALY WALUATION BASIS: 2382085
nips 112586057773.
‘patie Devcon: Cre or Unused ick Leave
Additional Disclosure
your apency sequins cost Infomation fort o mae banat changes, the oso adopting mre than ne ot
{haze changes may notbeobaned bya the tne. intad 2 sapere valuation mst be cone to
Drove 3 cst aaa fore conbhton of beret Cianges If he popscea pan amen apes to ony
{nme ofthe enpayes nthe pln the chonge i eared cnkbutons duet the an amendment tl apps >
{he entre plan a stl basdon the tt an pay
Pleoe nate that th cost anata rien hie document may not be rel upon after yu receive you net
‘Sul alton Bf you havent aon acon to omen our crea by ths a, You must aract ou fe for
‘n upbted cot ana, based onthe new sal vaso.
Desciptone of he acu mete, actuarial sumtin and an benef rovsons my be ound nthe
‘ppendes ofthe dune 2, 2018 aa report. eve note that he ress shown hare are subject to change any
‘the da or Han roles change rom at as used is su.
Cortification
“ne acuar valu forthe propose pin amennnt is tased onthe parca, benefits and ast data used
inthe une 0, 2015 anal vation, th he banelits ead necessary torts what scarey proved
Unde your contract wn PERS and ther modded to rele the proposed pan amendment Te valustion Nas
bien performed accorsnce vith tno of practice prescribes by te Acar Stancads Bur, andthe
‘Stunpons and methods are teal consstet and ressonale fxs pany a rscbed by he CAPERS Board
‘sf aaranrotonaecodng proven fon te Calflora Pub mays Reema La
ANAL OZIUBE, ASA, EA, AAA
Senior Penn Actiry, CAPERS
Fr Proces is: Anusiess6s sase485529 Poposl188330,
Near 2007 a7Sana Descipin: et or Une Sce Lente
‘Summary of Plan Amendments Valued
‘COVERAGE GROUP 70000
Premendment
PostAmendiment
Rech, 2007
oeonc enone cos ANALYSIS VALUATION BASE 3,205,
cipes 12586057773
Sa Description: re torUnaed Sc Lente
COVERAGE GROUP 70999
Premendment
Noctange
Poet Amendment
Noetonge
Wee, 07‘OWTRACT AMENDMENT COST ANALYSIS VALUATION BASS: one 30,2015,
‘COVERAGE GROUP 60000
Presmendeent
Post-Amendment
{lows nase ck eve ob conve to Serves,
Fae, a a7California Public Employees? Retirement System
‘Actuarial Office
P.O. Box 942709
‘Sacramento, CA, 94228-2708
2 TTY: (01) 195-3240
CalPERS (688) 225-7377 phone + (916) 795-2744 fax
‘wovw.calpers.ca.gov
ach 10,2017
aurens io: 256057773,
Employees CIT OF ALKANERA
fae on SAFETY PLAN
Dear Requestor:
Acanact ender) cst nas othe alan) requested and reed ifrmation encsed
“Te changes nthe ersloer cotton requlraments as ofthe effective dite ofthe propose! amend, ae
spay en pe 3
1 you are ava of other rete a this Ifanston (2, payol sa, county cout employees por ss,
22), place frm them ‘Secon 20463 () anc) a he Cfo ube Enloees Ratner Law rewae the
oven body of «publ sgeny whch requats a contact arena cutee tb provi coh feted
atoye erencon with copy win Ine cays of recap, Uae f this co nao requested by on
‘eeloye orpanzaton, te employee ogenation request provide copy of the aaa tthe publ agency
eine day fei.
‘This cost analysis expres July 1, 2017, A Resten of Intention (8 of 1) approved by the agency govering
{aay to amand recat mut bers yt fie ono Before July 2017 and the amendmen eetve
at uate before 51, 2018. Wer of these two caatons net mean upested cost analy s equred
{o'amand the cont An ested ost ans maybe ovata cay as Rover 217
“Tocompete te contact amendment proces based onthe encosed ana, you mst doe long:
+ Folon the Contract Amendment Request process a Hy CAPERS wth cur Retremer Contac Seve Unt
+ Complete ad tetun te adopted R of Ito CAPERS on oF bere Jy 1, 2017. Adoption ofthe Fa
Resin by ths dates at equ,
Callfornia Pubic Employee's Retirement Systom
‘wor.calpers.ca govSAFE OF THE CTY OF RA (CAPERS: 280573)
ane?
“imaocant Ris Disclosure
“The Nature of Asura Work: Al scnralcaktos, nung the ones this cost estimate are
ied on numerous asunptons abou the ftire The includes donoqapalc assume about the
Dcenage of your erpoyers tat wil teint, ce, become ible a een each ure yee, and
fononie ssoumpens, abt wht salary increases each employee veceves and the most impotant
‘Supine the uote at Cass wi enn fr ech yr mote tire ul te ast sal 0
lire mfr your in We CAPERS has set hav eu as ou? bet esate the el
‘ite of your lan mst be Understood tht these ateamptons af very lang tem prodcors a wil
‘Sry ot be reals each ear sb ne go forward This mears that your employer contribution
‘eaulament can vaty dramatialy with or without any benefit changes because short term
‘Seperlence does nt conform tothe longterm actuarial assumptions.
Invest retun much ere veal than tabltyPuctuatons and can cause employer craton ©
‘vary snicanty, Fr expe, fr the past beny yer ptiod ending Jue 30, 2015, returns fe exch Foca
{oor rangeé fom “24% fo #20754 The gat 9 mesent Teun on enoyerconrbutons varies
“Taint tse onthe p's tty aoe eats of he market vale oases tothe pyro
Projected Volatility Index: A: ats abv, the cost estimates sipped inthis communication ae
teed on 9 number of suralins atout vey lng fom onogeaghic and economic behavior. Even
these amumpton ermine, deat, dab, rtrenemts, sory got, on Investment etm) re
‘Sacty reaieg thee ll be fteences ona Yea to Yer Dass Ths ye to Year éleence betwee
Stal experience an the ssirpans scald a oes wh serves to lame o ae De enolyers
entities from yet yr, respecte. 50 Feed carrion vl uae spec re tthe
Ups ond downs of vestments
‘The watt annul emplyer contbutonrequrerets my be ect by this amendment The reason
(Etat hah Beno ans evr relent ages requre Ue acuruaton of ore assets per member
fren tr eave. Contato volt can be measured Ey tert flan asso achve member
Dav Hine acto pol rir proauce mare vale encloyer corbin.
‘Your pln’s current volatility index asses to payroll ati) 16 15.7. hen you send your pan,
‘he iby changer bur ast noo, ewe Indes does ret change ned HONEY, 28
‘ests grow to equa your nw Scud ay, yout voy or wl also grow. S, we abo dscose the
‘fo faecal to ayo owt sow wat your tre vot nex wl Bone when you ae
10 unde. Th niger thts rat, the ore volte your fue conan recirereis lBe The
{atl bel contans these messes of peal ture cvtbton vy. We cl this the Pose
ort index
‘As of une 30, 2015 Curent Pian——_Post-Amendment
‘eerued Uabilty e Biswas —F—_BasTaaBT
Payroll 15158473 15158479,
Projected Volatlity Index 187 357
chou sz be ot that thes rite tn aioe 2 tha lan mata. Tat pare with pra
‘eves thes i oo aes ond vero exon ley ~ tus ase to pyro ra ah abit 1
Boy ro ora eqal to ze, However, be tne gor by Use rt bei tse and ten ton 1
bite a some constant anoint 3 te pon tures. Higher banat lvls and arr epee
ebremens rosie ghar conan fare ati,SAFETY LAN OF THE CITY OF ALMABERA(CALPERS 10: 2546057773)
ere 2017
ase 3
1 you have questions abut the cost aaj, lease cll (889) CAPERS (25-7377). Pease ask to speak to 2
‘pag gm eptnetrtmt tn cre ner. Pe ao o e te
RANDALL ZIUBEK, ASA, EA, MANA
Setr Pein Aan, CAPERSRAs enone cos Sts -ALUATION BASS ne 36,2085
‘Snatt Denton Cel for Unused Sik Lave Safety
Present Value of Projected Benefits
The able below sons he change ate lars taal reson ae of bees fr the pepo plan amendent
‘The preset ole of beefs rajreants the tata dlrs nase today to nd future bets fr curent
rember of the lon (ey nite reget future erpoyecs). The afence between ts arour ad cent
flan azts must be pi y ftir oro ond employer canibuters. As su, he charge m the pest value
Danes due ote pan amendmen epee tect of he plan ardent
Howey, for pane wh excess zzt me olf his "cost may ready be covered by ere acess ass.
‘As of June 30, 2015, ‘carent Plan Post Amendment
[Present Value of Projected Benefits(@VB)—«G~~=~«CSR TIO —«S~—~«UTORRGAST
Market Volu of sets (VA) $ sean 166,708
Prorent Value of Future Employer a —
Employee Contibutions (PV ~ MV $ marist STAN
Change to PVE exam
ea‘CONTRACT AMENDMEHT COST ANALYSIS - VALUATION BASIS: ne 30,2015,
Accrued Liability
1s not equce, nor cesar desta, to have acct at scent to cover the ttl pest ale of
erefes nt every arbor has kt employmert.— Ines, the acura fundng process calcuates = rer
‘onthton scat af employee coeur and erloyercortbutos (dled naa css) whic are designed
{o scumulste mith ines t eal he taal preset vole ef bones by the Oe every merber ha i
‘Sloe Asef each Du 2, he scuaty eater he "are" evel lan asst sof hat ore ire
Up tocig te preset vou shed ure enpaye erator ond futire employs fal este om
‘hottest va of Dees The vesting eSrabe” vl oats cle the azued fay
A pln with sts exact equal tothe plan's acd aby Is Spy on schaule”afundng tat pla, ad ey
‘tire employes carbons a ure emeojer arma ot are needed. A sn wh assets tc the accued
Tobi i etn sche, or sido have an unfunded at, and mus eaorry nease cnttons to
‘te ck on schoade lon wth aaats In excess ofthe a's cued by aheed of schedule" OF couse,
‘vets sch a ln nenarans a vesinert oe deogrpie gas oss can change a plans contin fom
oor year. For ample pln enardmen auld cause 3 plan rove From hag excess assets to bag oan
Und postin.
“Toe changes your os acted aby, wntunded accrued abit, and heat values of assets fund ato
{35 0F dine 0, 215 det the lan aetna ae shown tease Bao.
‘As of une 30,2015 ‘current Pin Postmendment
Entry Age Normal Accrued Liaity (AL) + 2797896 $ Beseeot
Market Value of Assets (VA) 16,731 16681731
Unfunded bilty/(Excass Asets) (UAL = AL~MVA) $71,098,165 #7587070
Funded Ratio (HVA / AL) 7% 70.0%
‘change to AL 20505
Total Employer Contribution
Whe the table above ges he charges nthe aus abiy ane une stats of the plan det the amen
‘here rennet gut what wt nappa othe rms erpoyer canons becouse of the ange = ah
prowions
CER poly iso npement conten changes eto pon anenenents meaty onthe flee dete of
{he choge in plan tones. These citoes re asplayed on te folowing peg. | He carat amendment
‘iv te eon er alr une 3, 2017, te charge Inthe enpbjercntrtonrequemet shoul be etre
{orth 20172018 ucal year. tn ened th ply alco provis tha he henge unfunded ay diet he
pie amendment wi be spay aoaed cnr 9 prod ef 20 years Fen the facie date ofthe amendment
nda othr components fe pls unfunded Iabltyfexes aes wl cote tobe amortized seperate
Sieh 5,207 Teonear amenonor coer MALYSI- VALUATION MASI: a9, 2085
af Description: Creditor Unused Sick Lene Safty
‘The tobe below shows the change n your plas employer canriuten requirements due othe lan amendment for
‘eyo 2017/18
‘a of Sune 30, 2035, Curent Plan Past-Amendment
[2017/18 Employer contribution mal
aymene or normal cst sone ss.0so%
Payment on Amortization Bates 957201 44505952
‘change to Normal Cost 0.35556
Change to Payment on Amortization Bases 6751
2017/18 Employee Rate” (Classic Members)
‘otal Employee Rate 20008 s.00%
change to Employee Rate 0.000%
2017/18 Employee Rato"(PEPRA members**)
“otal Employee Rate 1.250% 1.250%
‘Change to Employes Rate s.c00%
isis —
Estimated Employer Normal Cost Rate 135% 19.1%
Inthe soo table, the Post Ameren” resus wl py dng faa yes 2017/8 you aor he amener.
‘hes esis ora ncrprate te mvs er or he sal Yee nding Jone 30, 206.
Tisrate ithe employe ata fre any sei secant moststns,
“+ The employee rte eden for case and nn merbars. The change to te neal cast duet this
‘Seerdeat sts than san tae the PEPRA employee conto ae for 2017/2018 sete,
ete tat oe change inna cot n te table ove may be much more ndcafve ofthe lng tam change In tbe
‘Sve contain requrement dus othe an amencment. The Han’ punt on arta bse son
‘he able above isa tarps acjsenat fo the employer carbon to "get the plan bak on schedule This
‘npr aden to the employer contre requreere varies duration fom pln fo pnCONTRACT AMENOMENT COST ANALYSIS - VALUATION BASS: une, 2085
Shrurvpvan ron erry OF ALMASORA
aera 12546057775
Sonat Despont for Unued Sick Lave Safety
Additional Disclosure
your agency requesing cost informatio fo to ot mae bent changes, the nso ating mre than one of
these changes may not Ue eisined by ating he td este Tnstead, 9 spare vaunton rst be dane to
rode 8 cst aise fr te combination of Benet anges If he propore pan smenarah apes to ely
‘ie ofthe enpoyees the pay, the change a requredeontrbutons do fo the plan Seamer il ples 2
‘heen an ands tl basd onthe tal Ban pal
eae ate that the cost anays proved this document may not be reled upon after you resive your next
‘mal alate. 1 you Rave fot taen action to een our contra, by this de, you must contacto fee fr
‘a upeated cos rays, based onthe new enn vauatn,
Desrtone of the stu mated, actuarial assumes and lan bene rons may be found nthe
pyendces ote De 30,2015 an reper. Pease eta the ess shown here re saber cage any
‘the dt or pan proves cng om twas used nS uy
Certification
“This actul vation for he proposed plan amendments based on the partir, benefits, and asst data used
inte June 20,2015 tal vation, th the Eanfta madd neces fo refs what carey roid
‘nce your cae wh CAPERS nd th mode tort to posed pan arrest. Te vaio Nas
ton performed in accordance withstands of practice pescbd bythe Acts! Standards Gow ahd the
‘numptonsoné etd are tral eonsstet and veasanbl forth plan prescribed y the CPERS Board
‘ mniraton acorn prover Sto te Calor Publ poy Reema La
ADOALL DZIUBEK, ASA EA, MAA
Ser Pension Actiay, CAPERS
Fa Process ds Amusl486005 Base 480331 Popol 485332
Wwe 30oer sananon Cos uALSIS-VALUAION ASS ne 36,2088
Senet Description: Credit for Unused Sick Love Safty
‘Summary of Plan Amendments Valued
COVERAGE GROUP 74000
Presamendment
PostAmendmentCONTRACT AMENDMENT COST ANALYSIS -VALUATION BASS: une 30,2015
‘Sonate Oeripton Cred fer Unused Sick Leave Safety
COVERAGE GROUP 74999
Preamendment
Nectange
Post-Amendment
Nechargeovr AMENDMENT COS MALYSIS-VALATION BAS 02,205,
‘enefe Descriptions Cre for Unused Sick Leave = Safty
‘COVERAGE GROUP 75000
remenrnt
Post Amendment
ows ruse ck eave tobe converted to Serv,
a6CONTRACT AMENOMENT COST ANALYSIS - VALUATION BASIS: 630, 2025
aft Despina for Used Sk eave Sey
COVERAGE GROUP 75999
PreAmendment
‘Nockenge
Peet Amendment
NochangesSargaera i abiges smote smn
naft Description: Credit for Unused Sick Laave-Safery
COVERAGE GROUP 84000
re-Amendnane
Prst-Amendment
2 Alone use ck ae tobe conte to Sav.
Saiapes fs 3546057779
oe Descin:reitorUnued Sick Leave Safety
COVERAGE GROUP #5000
Post Amendment
ols ruse ck eave tobe covet to Savi,NO STAFF
REPORTNO STAFF
REPORTAGENDATTEMNO._7_
y of Alhambra
PRESENTED TO
oP ae
CROSSING GUARD
ALHAMBRA POLICE DEPARTMENT
IN APPRECIATION FOR HER DEDICATED AND
OUTSTANDING SERVICE TO OUR
COMMUNITY FOR THE PAST 14 YEARS
By
THE ALHAMBRA CITY COUNCIL
MAYOR DAVID MEJIA VICE MAYOR STEPHEN SHAM
COUNCILMEMBERS BARBARA A. MESSINA, JEFF MALONEY, LUIS AYALA
\ Issued this 12” day of June, 2017
~~ DAVID Le: a _
om xDNO STAFF
REPORT
Is‘ara
Dare
To:
‘SUBMITTED BY:
‘SUBJECT:
tim No, _
CITY OF ALHAMBRA
"AGENDA REPORT
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: {yw\
osiian7
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Mary Chavez, Depuly Cy Marnaye/Divecir of Pubic Works | ate
Public Hearing — Public Works Maintenance and Improvement District and
Police Faclity Assessment District 2017-2018
RECOMMENDATION:
It fs recommended that the City Counc! ater conducting @ public hearing adopt the attached
resolutions renewing the Public Works Maintenance and improvement Dstctand the Police Faciity
‘Assessment District, for the 2017-2018 fiscal year at the same rates since 1998-97 and 1991,
respectively, and direct staff to undertake the steps necessary to finalize Counci's action
BACKGROUN!
1.11986, the Cty Coune! acted to replace the Landscaping and Lighting District, which had
‘been in existence since 1982, with a benefit assessment district, called the Public Works
‘Maintenance and Improvement Distict (PWMID). The district provided the Cty with greater
flexibility to address the various City public works infrastructure deficiencies, including the
ability to sel bonds to provide funding for major capital improvements projects.
‘As presently structured, the PWMID contai
three zones: A, Band C.
Zone A includes the downtown area only and was set up to provide a source of|
{unding to operate and maintain the specialized improvements which were installed
in the downtown area atthe redevelopment agency's expense in 1982. Those
improvements include such items as the decorative sidewalk planters, the
landscape medians, decorative sidewalk and paving and the Washington Twin
streetighs.
Zone B of the PWMID was originally established to fund debt service on bond
issue, ena ongo!ng maintenance ana operation of the Cli-wide street lights,
‘sidewalks, curb and gutters, streets, sree rees, median landscaping and municipal
parking ois and structures, The aforementioned work is performed by a combination
‘ofa five person concrete crew, a two person electrical crew (which also maintains
{raft signals), a five person asphalt crew, and contractors.
‘Zone C was established in 1987 and includes generally those properties located on
both sides of Main Street, between Atantic and Palm and on both sides of Palm,
between Main and Commonwealth. ‘The purpose of Zone Cis o provide funding for
‘the ongoing maintenance and operation of the public improvements, which wereconstructed in the Auto Row area in 1988 at Redevelopment Agency expense.
‘Those Include the grass parkway, the feature lights between Atlantic and Olive and
the treet trees,
3, Therecommended FY 2017-2018 assessment lavelfora single family in Zone B is $83.17,
“which io identical to this year’s level. The aseessments for Zone A and Zone C are
recommended to remain athe current level
4, The Police Faciity Assessment District (PFAD) was ereated in 1991 bythe Cty Councl ater
{a vote in which nearly 60 percent of the voters indicated approval forthe proposal. The
‘assessment pays the debt service onthe bonds that were used to build the poe faciity. AS
With the PWHMID, the assessment lavel wil remain at the current year level, which for a
‘inglafarily home ie $58 54
5. The notice ofthe public heering pertaining to the renewal ofboth assessment districts was
published and posted in accordance with the law.
6. As required by the enabling ordinance, engineers reports were prepared regarding the
renewal of both the PWMID and PFAD. In addition, in order to comply with snother
provision of Propostion 216, reports have been certified by the City Engineer. Copies of
{hese reports are attached. Both reports, as well asthe assessment tapes must be sentto
the Los Angeles County Tax Collector.
7. Inorderto insure that adequate income is received next scal year to fully fund all expenses
associated withthe Public Werks Maintenance and Improvement Disc, and the Police
Facilities District, i ie necessary that the Cily Councl take formal action to renew the
Districts prior to July 1 of each year.
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS:
‘The assessments for Zones A, B and C will generate approximately $120,000, $2,000,000 and
$57,742, respectively. The Police Facility Assessment District vill generale approximately
$2,200,600.
ATTACHMENTS:
Final Enginger’s Report Public Works Maintenance and Improvements Distt No.1, Fiscal Year
2017/2018, dated June 12, 2017
Final Engineer's Report Police Facities Assessment DistictNo. 91-1, Fiscal Year 2017/2018, dated
‘tune 12,2017RESOLUTION NO. R2M17.17
A RESOLUTION OF THE ALHAMBRA CITY COUNCIL ORDERING
THE RENEWAL OF CITY OF ALHAMBRA PUBLIC WORKS
MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENTS DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2017-2018 CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM AND
ASSESSMENT THEREFOR AND PROVIDING FOR THE
[ASSESSMENT LEVY IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. R8B-134, adopted on June 5, 1986, the Alhambra City
Council formed the Pubic Works Maintenance and Improvements Assessment District No. 1
(Qhe "District, pursuant to Chapter 3,50 of the Alhambra Municipal Code for the purpose of
constructing ‘certain. street lighting, curbs, gutters, sidewalks and ciiveuays (the
“improverents’), and providing the following services” watering, fertilizing, mowing, weed
contol, shiubbery and tree pruning, removal and replacement of weed growth, maintenance of
Irigetion facites, cleaning and repairing of curbs, gutters and concrete intersections, street
‘weeping, weed and graffti abatement and stale mandated refuse reduction measures
{recyting) required by AB 939 and related work, as necessary (the "Services'), within the City
and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. R86-195, adopted on June 5, 1986, the ity Council
‘ordered the performance of tho Sorvioes and the construction of the Improvements. and
provided forthe levy of assessments under Chapter 3.50 ofthe Code: and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. R86.202, adopted on August 26, 1988, the City Council
‘authorized the issuance of the “City of Alhambra, Improvement Bonds, Public Works
Maintenance and Improvements Assessment District No. 1, Series 1986” (the “1986 Bonds”)
and
WHEREAS, by Resolution Nos. R942 and R94-3, adopted on January 10, 1984, the
‘City Council commenced proceedings for the refunding of the 1986 Bonds for the levy and
collection of the reassessments as security for the Bonds relating fo the construction of the
Improvements within the Distict and for the proposed levy of the annual service assessments
{or the fiscal year 1984-85; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. R84-12, adopted on February 28, 1994, the Alhambra
City Council approved the final feasibility report for the Distict, confirmed the annual service
assessments and reassessment, and ordered cther actions related thereto, which such
‘Assessment District was contrived for Fiscal Year 1995-06 by Resolution No. R9S-40 duly
adopted on June 12, 1996; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. R96-12A, adopted on May 13, 1996, the Alhambra City
Council found and determined It necessary, desirable and in the best interest of the City to
continue the Assessment District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 1996-97;
and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 97.21, adopted on May 12, 1997, the Alhambra City
Council found and determined it necessary, desirable and in the best interest of the City to
Ciyaty-in 17 'continue the Assessment District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 1987-8;
and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No, R9@-18, adopted on April 27, 1998, the Alhambra Cy
Council found and determined it necessary, desirable and in the best interest of the City to
continue the Assessment District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 1988-99;
and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No, REG-11, adopted on April 28, 1999, the Alhambra City
Council found and datarminad i necessary, dasicabla and ia the heal interest of the City to
Continue the Assessment District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 1996-00,
and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. R2M-8, adopted on February 28, 2000, the Alhambra
Cty Council found and determined it necessary, desirable and in the best interest ofthe City to
‘continue the Assessment District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 2000-01
and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No, R2M1-11, adopted on January 22, 2001, the Alhambra
ty Counal found and determined it necessary, desirable and in the best interest ofthe City to
‘continue the Assessment District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 2001-
22002, and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. R2M2-20, adopted on June 10, 2002, the Alhambra City
Council found and determined it necessary, desirable and in the best intorest of the City to
continue the Assessment District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 2002-
2008; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. R2M3-19, adopted on June 9, 2008, the Alhambra City
Council found and determined it necessary, desirable and in the best intorest of the City to
continue the Assessment District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 2003-
2004; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No, R2M4-11, adopted on April 12, 2004, the Alhambra City
Council found and determined i necessary, desirable and in the best inorest of the City to
Continue the Assessment District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 2004-
2008; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No, R2M5-18, adopted on May 9, 2005, the Alhambra City
Council found and determined it necessary, desirable and in the best interest of the City to
Continue the Assessment District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 2005-
2006; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No, R2MB-16, adopted on June 12, 2006, the Alhambra City
‘Council found and determined it necessary, desirable and in the best interest of the City to
continue the Assesement District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 2008-
2007; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. R2M7-16, adopted on June 11, 2007, the Alhambra City
‘Council found and determined it necessary, desirable and in the best interest of the City, to
ciyany-im-sit7 2continue the Assessment District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 2007-
2008; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No, R2M8-13, adopted on June 8, 2008, the Alhambra City
Council found and determined it necessary, desirable and in the best interest of the City to
continue the Assessment District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 2008-
2008; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. R2M®-19, adopted on June 8, 2008, the Alhambra Cty
‘Council found and datarminad it nacassary, dasivabla and ia the eat intrest of the City t0
continue the Assessment District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 2009-
2010; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. R2M10-18, adopted on June 14, 2010, the Alhambra Clty
Council found and determined it necessary, desirablo and in the best interest of the City to
‘continue the Assessment District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 2010-
2014; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No, R2M1-9, adopted on June 13, 2011, the Alhambra City
‘Council found and determined It necessary, desirable and in the best interest of the Cy to
Continue the Assessment District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 2011-
2012; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No, R2M12-15, adopted on May 14, 2012, the Alhambra City
‘Council found and dotermined it necessary, desirable and in the best interest of the Cy to
‘continue the Assessment District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 2012-
2013; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No, R2M13-7, adopted on May 28, 2019, the Alhambra City
Council found and determined it necessary, desirable and in the best interest of the City to
continue the Assessment District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 2013.
2014; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No, R2MI4-8, adopted on May 12, 2044, the Alhambra City
Council found and determined it necessary, desirable and In the best interest of the City to
continue the Assessment District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 2014-
2016; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. R2M15-10, adopted on June 8, 2015, the Alhambra Cty
Council found and determined it necessary, desirable and in the best interest of the City to
Continue the Assessment District and accordinaly levied the assessment for fiscal year 2015+
2018; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No, R2M16-17, adopted on May 23, 2016, the Alhambra City
Council found and determined it necessary, desirable and in the best interest of the City to
Continue the Assassment District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 2016-
2017; and,
WHEREAS, the City desires to consider the continuance of the District for the ensuing
fiscal year to assist in the provding and construction of the Services and Improvements for the
benefit and use of the City and thereby improve and enhance the abilty ofthe City to provide
Ccayary-lmsi17 3‘essential public Services and Improvements forthe cltzens of the City; and, therefore, pursuant
to Section 350,228 of the Alhambra Municipal Code, the City Manager, or his designee,
herelofore has caused to be prepared a District report entied Final Engineer's Report Public
Works taintenance and Improvements Distt No. 1 Fiscal Year 2017/2018 Cily of Alhambra,
dated June 12, 2017, (the *Report’) and has fled the same with the City Clerk; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 350.020 of the Alhambra Municipal Code and
applicable law, dune 12, 2017, atthe hour of 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter asthe matter may
be hearg, in the Council Chambers of the Alhambra City Hal, was set as the time and place of
the hearing of protests or objections, # ary, in raferenca to tha raneual of said District, and
notice of sald public hearing was duly given as required by law, and,
WHEREAS, said public hearing was duly held before the City Council at which ime the
City Manager, oF his designee, caused a full and accurate statement to be made to the City
Counei of al the information relating to the renewal of said District as proposed as well as an
‘Assessment Diagram and Assessment Roll hich included a description of each lot included in
the District and a proposed assessment for each such lot based upon the formula fr the spread
fof such assessment as approved by the City Counci, and all persons were afforded an
‘opportunity to present their views,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Alhambra City Council as follows:
SECTION ONE: The City Council hereby accopts that certain Final Enginoer’s Report
Public Works Maintonance and Improvements District No. 1 Fiscal Year 2017/2018 Cily of
‘Alhambra {ihe "Repe), and raconfms the Assessment Diagram and Assessment Roll as
‘submitted on June 12, 2017. The adoption of this resolution shall constitute the levy of
‘assessments forthe fiscal year commencing on July 1, 2017 and ending on June 30, 2018.
SECTION TWO: This Council hereby further finds and determines that upon the
conclusion of the hereinabove-deseribed pubic hearing, writen protests fled, and not
withdrawn, did not represent owners of lots which would be liable for more than fity percent of
the said total estimated assessment proposed to be imposed upon said District.
SECTION THREE: By no later than the third Monday in August, 2017, the City Manager
shall cause a certified copy of said Assessment Diagram and Assessment Roll tobe fied with
the Tax Division ofthe Los Angeles County Audtor-Controlle's Office, whereupon it shall be the
duty of the Audtor-Contrler to add the amounts of those respective assessments to the next
regular tax bils levied against said respecive lots and parcels of land for municipal purposes;
‘and, thereafter, said amounts shal be collected at the same time and in the same manner as
Ordinary municipal taxes are collet, and shall be subject to the same penalties and the same
Drocedure under foreclosure and sale in case of delinquency as provided for ordinary municipal
(aves.
SECTION FOUR: Said assessment shall nat be payable prior to entry upon the tax rll
‘as provided hereinabove in Section Three.
SECTION FIVE: The City Clerk shall cory to the adoption ofthis resolution and shall
cause a copy of same to be recorded in the Office of the Registra-Recorder of the County of
Los Angeles.
Cayany-im-s17 4SECTION SIX: This Resolution shall take effect and be in ful force from and after its
adoption by the City Counc
‘Signed and approved this 12" day of June, 2017.
DAVID MEJIA, Mayor
ATTEST:
TAUREN MYLES, Gi ark
City 37 s| HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by
the Alhambra City Counell ats regular mesting held on the 12" day of June, 2017, by the
fellowing vote to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
TAUREN TIYLES, Giy Clerk
Cciyaty-msi17 6RESOLUTION NO. R2M17-18
‘A RESOLUTION OF THE ALHAMBRA CITY COUNCIL ORDERING
THE RENEWAL OF CITY OF ALHAMBRA POLICE FACILITIES
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017-2018,
CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT
THEREFOR AND PROVIDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT LEVY IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH
WHEREAS, the City of Alhambra (‘ity’) is a municipal corporation and charter cty of
the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the Alhambra Capital Improvements Corporation (‘Corporation’) is. a
nonprofit publle benefit corporation duly organized and existing under the Nonprofit Public
Benet Corporation Law, being Part 2 of Division 2 of Title + (commencing with Section 5110) of
the Corporations Code of the Stale of Califia ("Act’), for the purpose of benefiting and
carrying out the purposes of the City, by providing forthe planning, development, acquisition,
Construction, improvement, extension, repair, renovation andlor financing of public buldings,
‘work, projects, facilis, furnishings and equipment forthe benefit and use ofthe City; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. R90.58, dated September 17, 1990, Alhambra City
‘Council intiated proceedings under Chapter 3.50 ofthe Alhambra Code forthe formation of the
City of Alhambra Police Facities Assessment District No. 91-1 (Assessment District’) to
Conslruct and finance certain police faites (Facities") within the City; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No, R9I-48, dated October 10, 1991, the Alhambra Clty
Council ordered the formation of the Assessment District pursuant to Chapter 3.50 of the
‘Alhambra Municipal Code and taking certain other actions related thereto; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. R93-51, dated June 28, 1993, the Alhambra City Counci
{ound and determined it necessary, desirable and inthe best interest ofthe City to continue the
District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 1993-94; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. R94-18, dated February 28, 1994, the Alhambra City
Council found and determined it necessary, desirable and in the best interest of the City to
continue the District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 1904-95; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. R95-39, dated June 12, 1995, the AIhambra City Council
found and determined it necessary, desirable and in the best interest ofthe Cy to continue the
District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 1995-96; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolition No, R96-12B, dated May 13, 1996, the Alhambra City Counc
{ound and determined i necessary, desirable and inthe best interest ofthe City to continue the
District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 1996-97; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. R97-22, dated May 12, 1997, the Alhambra City Council
‘ound and determined it necessary, desirable and inthe best interest ofthe City to continue the
District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 1997-98; and,WHEREAS, by Resolution No, R98-19, dated April 27, 1998, the Alhambra City Council
found and determined it necessary, dasrable and inthe best interest ofthe City to continue the
District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 98-99; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No, R99-12, dated April 28, 1989, the Alhambra City Council
{ound and determined it necessary, desirable and inthe best interest ofthe City to continue the
District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 1996-00, and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. R2N-9, dated February 28, 2000, the Alhambra City
Council found and datarminad it nacessary, dasivabla and ia the heat inetest of the City to
continue the District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 2000-01; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No, R2M"-12, dated January 22, 2001, the Alhambra City
Council found and determined it necessary, desirable and in the best inerest of the City to
Continue the District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 2001-02; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No, R2M2-11, dated June 10, 2002, the Alhambra City
Council found and determined it necessary, desirable and in the best interest of the Cty to
Continue the Distct and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 2002-03; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. R2M3-20, dated June 9, 2003, the Alhambra City Council
found and determined it necessary, desirable and inthe best interest ofthe City to continue the
District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 2003-04; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. R2M412, dated May 10, 2004, the Alhambra City
‘Council found and determined it necessary, desirable and in the best interest of the City to
‘continue the District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 2004-05; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. R2MS-19, dated May 9, 2005, the Alhambra City Counci
{ound and determined it necessary, dasirable and inthe best interest ofthe City to continue the
Distict and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 2005-06; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. R2MB-17, dated June 12, 2008, the Alhambra City
Council found and determined it necessary, desirable and in the best interest of the City to
continue the Distict and accordingly levied the assessment fo fiscal year 2006-07; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No, R2M7-16, dated June 11, 2007, the Alhambra City
Council found and determined it necessary, desirable and in the best interest of tho City to
Continue the District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 2007-08; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. R2MB-14, dated June 9, 2008, the Alhambra City Counc
found and determined it necessary, desirable and in the best interest ofthe City to continue the
Distiet and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 2008-08; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. R2M0-20, dated June 8, 2008, the Alhambra City Council
found and determined it necessaty, desirable and inthe best interest ofthe City to continue the
Distt and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 2008-10; an,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No, R2M10-17, dated June 14, 2010, the Alhambra City
Council found and determined it necessary, desirable and in the best intrest of the City to
‘continue the District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 2010-11; and,
ayaWHEREAS, by Resolution No, R2M11-8, dated June 13, 2011, the Alhambra City
Council found and determined it necessary, desirable and in the best interest of the City to
continue the Distct and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 2011-12; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. R2MI2-14, dated May 14, 2012, the Alhambra Cy
Council found and determined it necessary, desirable and in the best interest of the City to
continue the Distict and accordingly evied the assessment for fiscal year 2012-19; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. ROMI2-8, dated May 28, 2019, the Alhambra City
Council found and determined it necessary, desirable and in the best interest of the City to
continue the District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 2013-14; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No, RaM14-9, dated May 12, 2014, the Alhambra City
Council found and cetermined it necessary, desrable and in the best interest of the City to
‘continue the District and accordingly levied the assessment for fiscal year 2014-15; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No, R2M15-11, dated June &, 2015, the Alhambra Cty Council found
{and determined it nacessary, desirable and in the best interest ofthe ity to continue the District
and accordingly levied the assessment fr fiscal year 2016-18; and,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. R2M16-18, dated May 23, 2016, the Alhambra City Council
found and determined it necessary, desirabie and inthe best interest ofthe City to continue the
District and accordingly lave the assessment fr fiscal year 2016-17; and,
WHEREAS, the City desires to consider the continuance of the Distict for the ensuing
fiscal year to assist in the financing, planning, development, acquisition, construction,
improvement, furnishing andlor equipping of the Facilites for the benefit and use ofthe City and
thereby improve and enhance the abilty of the City fo provide essential public services and
facilites forthe citizens ofthe Cty; and, therefore, pursuant to Section 3,50:228 ofthe Alhambra
Municipal Code, the City Manager heretofore has caused to be prepared a district report entitled
Final Engineer's Report Police Facities Assessment District No. 91-1 Fiscal Yeer 2017/2018
ily of Aambra, dated June 12, 2017, (hereinafter referred to as the "Report’) and has fled the
‘same wih the City Clerk; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 350.020 of the Alhambra Municipal Code and
applicable law, June 12, 2017, atthe hour of 7:00 p.m. or a soon thereafter as the matter may
be heard, in the Council Chambers of the Alhambra City Hal, was set as the time and piace of
the hearing of protests or objections, f any, in reference to the renewal of said District, and
otice of said public hearing was duly given as required by law, and,
WHEREAS, said public hearing was duly held before the City Council at which time the
City Manager, oF his designee, caused a full and accurate statement to be made to the City
Counei of al he information relating to the renewal of sald District as proposed as well 5. an
‘Assessment Diagram and Assessment Roll wich included a description of each lot included in
the District and a proposed assessment for each such lot based upon the formula for the spread
‘of such assessment as approved by the City Counc, and all persons were afforded an
‘opportunity to present their views;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Alhambra Cty Council as follows:
Ciyaty-im17 3SECTION ONE: The City Council hereby accepts that certain Fina! Engineer's Report
Police Faciios Assessment District No. 91-1 Fiscal Year 2017/2018 City of Alhambra (the
“Report” and reconfirms the Assessment Diagram and Assessment Roll as submited on June
12, 2017. The adoption of this resolution shall constitute the levy of assessments forthe fiscal
year commencing on July 1, 2017 and ending on June 30, 2018,
SECTION TWO: This Council hereby futher finds and determines that upon the
conclusion of the hereinabove-described publ hearing, writen protests filed, and not
withdrawn, did nat represent owners of lots which would be liable for more than fity percent of
the eed total estimated aeseesment proposed ta he imposed span sald Pistriet,
[SECTION THREE: By no later than the third Monday in August, 2017, the City Manager
shall cause a carted copy of said Assessment Diagram and Assessment Roll to be fled with
the Tax Division of the Los Angeles County Austor-Contoller's Ofice, whereupon it shall be the
dlty of the Auditor-Contaller to add the amounts of those respective assessments tothe next
‘regular tax bils levied agalnst said respective lots and parcels of land for municipal purposes;
fand, thereafter, seid amounts shall be collected atthe same time and in the same manner as
‘ordinary municipal taxes are collect, and shall be subject to the same penalties and the same
procedure under foreclosure and sale in cate of delinquency a8 provided for ordinary municipal
taxes,
SECTION FOUR: Said assessment shall not be payable prior to enity upon the tax roll
{8 provided hereinabove in Section Three.
SECTION FIVE: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption ofthis resolution and shall
‘cause @ copy of same to be recorded in the Office of the Registrar Recorder of the County of
Los Angeles.
SECTION SIX: This Resolution shall take effect and be in ful force from and after its
Adoption by the City Counc
‘Signed and approved tis 12 day of June, 2017
DAVID MEJIA, Mayor
ATTEST:
TAUREN MYLES, Gily Clerk
CCiyaty-imi17 4| HEREBY CERTIFY thal the above and foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by
the Alhambra City Counel at its regular meeting held on the 12" day of June, 2017, by the
following vote, to wit
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
TAUREN MYLES, Gy Giork
‘ciyany-m st sFINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT
POLICE FACILITIES
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91-1
FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018
CITY OF ALHAMBRA
June 12,2017CITY OF ALHAMBRA
ASSESSMENT REPORT
FOR
POLICE FACILITIES
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91-1
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
1. Background 3
[Nature of Improvements or Services 4
3. District Boundaries 4
4, Necessity for Improvements or Services 4
5, Benefits Derived from Improvements or Services 43
6. Costs 5
7. Estimated Total Assessment 56
8. Definitions 67
9. Proposed Method of Assessment 19
10, Summary 10
Exhibie "A" Boundary Map
Exhibit “B” Sample Assessments BBACKGROUND,
In the late 1980's, it was determined that the existing Alhambra Police Facility had
outlived its usefulness and a nevr facility was necessary to provide cost-effective police
service forthe foreseeable future. The existing building had no public parking and too
litle parking for the staf. The jeil could no longer accommodate the growing number of
arresiees, and the antiquated electrical and plumbing systems had crested numerous
problems including occasional power failures. The facility also lacked a shooting range,
0 stafThad fo rely on an adjoining city’s range.
On September 17, 1990, the City Council of the City of Alhambra adopted Resolution
"No. R90-S8, commencing the proceedings under Chapter 3.5 ofthe Alhambra Municipal
‘Code for the formation of a public improvements assessment district for a new police
facility. At an election on September 17, 1991, 59 percent of the voters approved the
formation of the District, Following a public hearing held on October 10, 1991, the
District was formally approved by the City Couneil and the process was started to finance
the improvements through the sale of Certificates of Participation in the amount of
$27,000,000,
‘This willbe the twenty fourth year that assessments will be levied, however, unlike the
fist five years when the assessments were increased 5 percent each yoar, the assessments
‘for 2017/2018 will be the same as those levied in the past nineteen years.
‘The assessment report contains the following:
'* A description of the nature of the improvements constructed or services to be
rendered;
‘© A deseription of the boundaries of the district,
© A.statement of the necessity for such improvements or services;
© A description of the nature of the special benefits to be derived ffom such
{improvements or services by parcels within the di
‘© The estimated cost of construction of such improvements or providing such services;
‘+ The estimated total assessment to be spread upon all of the parcels included in the
distit; Definitions;
‘© The method of assessing the parcels included in the district; and
‘© Assessment Report Summary.NATURE OF IMPROVEMENTS OR SERVICES
“The improvements constructed and services proposed under this assessment report are as
follows
‘The Alhambra Police Facility built with the proceeds of the aforementioned Certificates of
Participation is located on a 120,500 square foot ste atthe northwest comer of First Street
‘and Commonwealth Avenue in the City of Alhambra’s downtown civic center area. The
facility consists of « 60,489 square foot building, a subterranean parking garage. and an
additional paved parking area at grade level. ‘The site contains adequate parking for police
and visitor vehicles.
Aaditional site features include landseaping and irigation, exterior lighting, signage, and
appurtenances
The facility also includes interior office improvements, fumiture and office equipment,
expanded telephone and radio communications, an emergency operations center, police
information and security systems, and firing range
DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
“The boundaries of Assessment District No. 91-1 coincide with the established boundaries
‘of the Cty of Alhambra as incorporated on July 11, 1903, all annexations to date, and all
future annexations to the Cty. (See Exhibit “A”)
SSITY FOR IMPROVEMENTS OR SERVICES
In order to maintain high quality police services for the etizens of Alhambra, it was
necessary to upgrade the existing facility as recommended by the independent 15 member
Citizens Police Facility Advisory Committee. The old facility had been utilized far
beyond its original design intent. The new facility located adjacent to the city hall and
the municipal court building now provides the citizens with a central location for all
police or City business and will continue 10 efficiently serve the community for many
years to come.
BENEFITS DERIVED FROM IMPROVEMENTS OR SERVICES
The special benefits derived from the new police facility include not only the existing
services provided but the ability to handle those services more efficiently and effectively
inthe future, As before, the police services include all the vehicles, equipment, personnel
and facilities necessary to provide police protection, With a new facility, those items
hhave boen upgraded and the facility itself provides a more effective police force for
4service to the public. Individuals calling for police services clearly benefit from the
facility and the related services, Those residents that never call for those services also
benefit because of the preventive measures which are so important in police seiences and
related services. Overall, the new facility helps speed up responses to calls, better
addresses the public concerns, and brings to the City a level of police protection
necessary to provide order in our society,
costs
“The cost of providing the new police facility was approximately $26.7 million. This
‘igure includes building costs, permits, engineering fees, communications equipment,
land acquisition and contingencies,
{Gross Floor Area 60,482 SF.
Site Area 120,500 SF.
1EM AMOUNT
‘Construction Contract Award $14,895,272
Insurance, permits, and bonds 407,839
Construction change order contingency 1,042,669
Professional fees 2,475,000
“Testing and Inspection 135,000
Fumiture, fixtures, and equipment 670,419
‘Communications Equipment 2,400,000
Land Acquisition 4,639,863
TOTAL $26,665,662
ESTIMATED TOTAL ASSESSMENT.
In order to service the debt on the bond proceeds, the estimated assessment fr fiscal year
2017/2018 isas follows:
Land Use
1, Residential Gnchodes condominiums) -$—=——«$8.56—_perunit
2. Multifamily(75 ofsingle familys) $48.67 peut
3. Commeria S 145861 perace
4. Indust S 1.09395 porace5. Departmen Stores S 291750 porsee
6. Regions Shopping Centers 5 291780 perecre
7. Supermarkes $ 291750 peraere
8 Resturans with Entertainment Liquor $2,187.92 peracre
9. Banks S$ 218792 poracre
10, Vacant Resident 5 608 peepwest
1, Vacant Commerilndustia S887 parece
12, Exempt s 0.00 perparest
‘The assessment levels for 2017/2018 will be the same as those for 1995/1996, In
accordance with the provisions of Proposition 218, the assessment proceeds can only be
‘used for debt service on the bonds sold to finance the building ofthe police facility. Any
assessment proceeds generated in excess ofthe amount needed to fully fund the annual
principal and interest payment onthe bonds will be used to pay for early retirement ofthe
‘outstanding bonds.
DEFINITIONS
For the purpose of implementing and administering the assessment authorized. by
Assessment District 91-1, te following definitions shall apply:
Residential Properties: Residential properties shall be defined as all properties that are
improved with residential units
Residential Unit: A residential unit shall be defined as any structure or portion theo
contains facilities for sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation for not more than
‘one family. By way of example, this would include, but not be limited to, single family
homes, individual apartments, condominiums, mobile home spaces in parks, and any
other facilities for housing people. Temporary housing such as hotels and motels are
included under commercial properties.
Commercial Properties: This category includes all properties that contain improvements
‘that are not being used for purposes such as residential, industrial, department stores,
regional shopping centers, supermarkets, restaurants with entertainment and serving
liquor, banks, vacant, or tax-exempt, It also includes utility parcels Le, distribution
‘yards, administrative and service offices and facilites which are industrially zoned, but
‘are primarily commercial uses such as office buildings. ‘The assessment applied to suck
6properties shall be applied on the basis of equivalent area of the parcel expressed in
‘square feet. This wil, in most cases, be the area indicated or calculated as such area as
shown on the latest county assessor maps.
Industrial Properties: This category includes properties included in an industil,
manufacturing Zone which are used for industrial purposes. It also includes properties
sed forthe sale and service of automobile, recreation, and construction vehicles,
Picpartmen Stone Propertios: This estegory includes properties having stores offering a
wide varity of retail sales merchandise.
ng Center Properties: This category includes properties offering a wide
variety of retail sales merchandise and services. These properties differ from other
‘merchandise sites in that they aract customers from a much broader customer area.
‘Supermarket Properties: This category includes properties which are used by a
‘supormarket chain for retail food and grovery sales.
‘RestauranvEntertsinment/Liquor Properties: This category includes property which is
‘used for restaurant purposes and also sels liquor and has an entertainment license issued
by the City. Restaurants without both liquor and entertainment are included under
‘commercial properties
‘Bank Properties: Ths category includes properties used by banks, and savings and loans.
Vacant Properties: This eategory includes all zoned properties which have no structures
‘constructed on them and are otherwise unimproved,
“TayBxempt Properties: Tax-exempt properties shall be properties upon which property
‘axes are not levied within the City of Alhambra and shall include properties or portions
‘of properties under pubic or private ownership which are normally tax-exempt under the
lavis ofthe United States or the State of California, such as public schools, srets, parks,
churches, hospitals, cometeris, utility ighs-oF way, ete. Properies that are designated
{or conveyance to the public, but which may not be publily owned at the time of
recordation of maps, willbe included inthis category as exempt from the special tax at
the time af recording the final subdivision map or deed with respect to such properties,
PROPOSED METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
“The Police Facility Assessment District (PFAD) was created in 1991 by the City Councit
after a vote in which nearly 60 percent of the voters indicated approval for the proposal
‘As was indicated at the time of the election, in order to provide revenues to fund the debt
service on the bonds that were sold to finance the new facility, as well as some of the
‘additional operating costs thatthe new facility had necessitated, such as additional jailers,
it was necessary that the assessment level increase by 5 percent per year, forthe first
7several years ofthe District's existence. As a result of Proposition 218, the portion of the
assessment that represented the added operating costs ofthe new building can no longer
be levied for that purpose, However, the assessment could legally be continued at the
1996.97 level, and any proceeds in excess of those needed to fund debt service on the
‘bonds can be used to retire some of the bonds early. As with the PWMID; the assessment
evel would remain atthe current year level, which for a single family home is $59.56,
‘On March 1 of each year, all properties within Assessment Distict 91-1 shall be assigned
‘one of the land use categories as flows
‘+ Single Family Residential Properties with a specific number of residential units
assigned thereto,
‘+ Multi-Family Residential Properties with a spec
assigned thereto,
number of residential units
. St
estan ih nfeainment and Haun than selene fg:
assigned thereto.
‘© Vacant Residential Properties shall be defined as all properties not containing any
‘stveture oF other beneficial land use but which may be developed under current
zoning conditions and entitled to residential land use.
‘© Vacant Commercial/industral Properties not containing structures or being used for
‘storage, parking, etc. which may be developed under current zoning conditions and
entitled fo commerciaVindustrial land use. Assessable square footage is assigned
thereto,
“The proposed assessment to be placed on properties as discussed in this report is based on
the special benefit derived ftom the facilities and services provided. The benefits of
police services include all of the personnel, equipment, and especially the building that
‘supports the basic aspects of police protection. Property owners and City residents may
‘benefit in varying degrees ftom the service. Also, their need, and thus the benefits, may
‘be greater in some years than others, The fact that some residents have not required
police services reaffirms that police service does as much to prevent and deter erime as it
does to react to eriminal and civil situations.
‘The City has conducted random samples an finds that approximately 35% ofall police
calls are devoted to commercial and industrial properties. We find the records of police
calls give an equitable perspective of how the benefit should be spread,
Since a police facility, the personnel, and equipment therein all support the function of
police service calls, it Would be appropriate to assess approximately 35% of the benefit of
these services to commercial and industrial properties. The remaining 65% wold be
assessed against residential properties. Therefore, the assessment rate to provide a newpolice facility is established such that approximately 65% ofthese costs willbe funded by
residential property owners and approximately 35% of these costs will be funded by
commercial and industrial property owners.
“The special benefit of police services for each residential property is proportionate to the
number of residential units on the property. For example, a property with three
residential units would pay three times the cost as that of a property with only one
residential unit, However, industrial uses and uses such as auto, recreational vehicles and
large construction equipment dealerships require large land areas by the very nature of
their business, Those large areas do not require the same amount of police services as
‘would the more intense commercial developments. In recognition of this reduced need
and a corresponding benefit reduction, industralvehicle dealerships are assessed at
‘three-quarters the rate of commercial users. Therefore, the special benefits and the
assessment rate are based on the amount of area devoted to this use and its intensity.
[Not only are there differences between the required police services for commercial and
industrial users, but there are differences in categories of commercial users. Department
Stores, Regional Shopping Centers, and Supermarkets by their very nature attract
‘substantial numbers of people. Police calls and the need for police patrols and thus the
special henefit of police services is highest in those eategories. ‘Therefore the assessment
for those categories is twice that for other commercial users. In the same manner,
restaurants with entertainment that sll liquor inthe course of normal business and banks
require more police service than standard commercial users but not as greatly as shopping
centers, ‘Therefore, their benefit is one and one half times that of regular commercial
Multi-family units usually house fewer persons than do an equivalent number of single
family units. In recognition ofthis fact, multi-family units are assessed at 75% the rate of
single family units,
‘Vacant properties benefit from police serves to a much lesser degree because of the
lower levels of activity associated with those parcels. They are assessed at 1/10th the
level of other properties to account for that lower activity. No assessment for police
services is placed on tax exempt properties.SUMMARY.
In summary, this assessment report discusses the pertinent fies related to the need,
special benefit, and financing ofthe police facilities building adjacent to the existing City
Hal. I proposes to continue to assess those owes of property in proportion to special
benefits they receive fom police services and facilites. The quality of this service and
facilities affords them the opportunity to enjoy the quality of life and to protest thee
investment in the community. Since the facility willbe funded over a period of 30 years,
the yearly assessment wil be paid by thse residents and owners for only thse years
during wich they receive special benefit from the facili,
In conclusion, itis my opinion that the assessments for the City of Alhambra Police
Facilities Assessment District No. 91-1 are spread in direct accordance with the benefits
that the land within the district boundary receives from the works of the improvement
aciliy).
‘This Final Report dated this 12" day of June, 2017.
‘TRANSTECH ENGINEERS, INC.
10EXHIBIT “A’
BOUNDARIES
The boundaries ofthe Distict contain approximately 7.619 square miles.
Legal Description:
THE BOUNDARIES OF POLICE FACILITIES ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 91-1
COINCIDE WITH THE ESTABLISHED BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF
ALHAMBRA AS INCORPORATED ON JULY 11, 1903, ALL ANNEXATIONS UP
TO JULY 22, 1991, AND ALL FUTURE ANNEXATIONS TO THE CITY.
SEE ATTACHED MAP.EXHIBIT A
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM - ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91
2017/2018 FISCAL YEAR
| Alhambra Police Assessment Zone
Exhibit B
‘Assessment Diagram
‘Athambra Poles Facliles Assesment Dletrlet 9-1
4
oes
CD osrater 91-1EXHIBIT “BY
POLICE DISTRICT
SAMPLE ASSESSMENTS
RESIDENTIAL ONLY.
Residential and 59.56 per unit
Condominiums
Units Assessment
1 5956
2 119.12
3 178.68
4 23824
5 29780
10 595.60
20 1,191.20
502,978.00
Multi-Family 44.67 per unit
Units Assessment
1 4867
2 8934
3 13401
4 178.68
5 2335
10 446.70
20 893.40
50 2,233.50
NON-RESIDENTIAL AND EXCEPTIONS
Note: A Square Foo is 0,00002295684 of an acre.
Commercial 1,458.61 per acre (0.033485 per Square Foot
Industal 1,093.95 per acre 0.025114 per Square Foot
Department Stores 2,917.50 per sere 0.066977 pee Square Foot
Regional Shopping Centers 2,917.50 per acre (0.066977 per Square Foot
Supermarkets 2,917.50 per acre 0.066977 per Squate Foot
Restaurants with
Entertainment/Liquor 2,187.92 per acre £0,050228 per Square Foot
Banks 2,187.92 per acre (0.050228 per Square Foot
Vacant Residential 6.08 per pateel
‘Vacant Commercial/ladustrial 145.87 per acre 0.003349 per Square Foot
Exempt 0.00 per pateal
BFINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT
PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE AND
IMPROVEMENTS DISTRICT NO. 1
FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018
CITY OF ALHAMBRA
June 12,2017TABLE OF CONTENTS
0.
mL,
Vv.
ML
vu
vil.
BACKGROUND
BOUNDARIES OF ZONES
DESCRIPTION OF THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, AND
OPERATION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
[NECESSITY FOR IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES
[BENEFITS DERIVED FROM IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES,
2017-2018 LEVY OF ASSESSMENT
SUMMARY
EXHIBIT A.- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
[EXHIBIT B - METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
EXHIDIT C - ZONE A COST ANALYSIS
EXHIBIT D- ZONE B COST ANALYSIS
EXHIBIT E- ZONE. B SAMPLE ASSESSMENTS
LIGHTING, LANDSCAPING AND STREETS
EXHIBIT F - ZONE C COST ANALYSIS
E
36
8.10
u
u
u
14
8
6
17-04
2s
234
35FINAL ENGINEERS REPORT
PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE AND
IMPROVEMENTS DISTRICT NO. 1
FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018
CITY OF ALHAMBRA.
BACKGROUND
‘The City established Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Nos. and 2 in 1982 under
the authority of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, In 1983, the City combined those
distriets into one district called “Landscaping and Lighting Distrit No. 1"
‘On November 12, 1985, the City Council passed Ordinance No. 085-3997 which added Chapter
3.50 to the Alhambra Municipal Code, thus authorizing procedures “for the creation of
assessment disticts for the construction of public improvements and/or for the providing of
public services alternatives fo procedures established by State Law." On November 25, 1985,
the City Council initited the process of ereating a new assessment district that, by adopting
Resolution R8S-285, would supersede and replace the Landscaping and Lighting Distrit No. 1.
Following the receipt and review of a Feasibility Report, the City Council adopted Resolution
[No. RR6-54 on February 24, 1986, declaring its intention to supersede and replace Landscaping
and Lighting Distict No, 1 with the Public Works Maintenance and Improvements District No.
1. Following a public hearing on the creation of the assessment district, the City Couneil
‘adopted Resolution No, R86-134 on June 5, 1986, ordering the formation of the Distrit. On the
same date, the City Council subsequently approved Resolution No, R86-135 which: 1) ordered
the performance of er
services and the construction of certain improvements (as previously
detailed in Resolution No. R86-134); 2) confirmed the assessment diagram and assessment rol
as submitted; and 3) levied
ending on June 30,1987.
assessment for the fiscal year commencing on July 1, 1986, and
(On July 28, 1986, che City Council ofthe City of Alhambra, by approval of Resolution No. R86-
181, awarded to the lowest bidder the sale of $9,930,000 in improvement bonds designated,
"CITY OF ALHAMBRA, IMPROVEMENT BONDS, PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE
3AND IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT'NO. 1, SERVICES 1986", and authorized
such actions necessary to complete the issuance, sale, and delivery of such bonds.
(On June 22, 1987, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 87-63 which modified the District
and provided additional maintenance along Auto Row Alhambra, This resulted in the creation of|
an additional benefit zone, thus capturing the costs of the addtional maintenance and assessing it
‘back to the benefiting parcels annually
‘On Iune 22, 1992, the City Council adopted Resolution No. R92-29 which further modified the
Distict by adding street swoeping, wood and graffiti abatement, and stote mandated refuse
reduction measures (reeycling) required by AB 939, to the list of maintenance and operation
activities fnded by the District. ‘The Zone B assessment level was increased to fully fund those
Since the sale of the improvement bonds in 1986, the City has used the proceeds to find
approximately $2,000,000 in concrete repairs, and $7,000,000 in street lighting improvements
‘The street lighting improvements resulted in the upgrading of nine substandard city owned street
lighting systems containing series circuits and incandescent lamps, to multiple circuits with high
pressure sodium lamps. In addition, two systems owned by the Southern California Edison
Company were replaced with modern city owned systems, ‘The result of those improvements
‘was a fivefold increase in steot lighting level, and a reduction in annual energy charges of more
than 25 percent, in 1994 dollars. However, the completion of the two Faison area projects
effectively depleted the 1986 Bond proceeds set uside for the street lighting improvement
program.In order to maximize the benefits of the street lighting improvement program, it became
necessary that reassessments be made and refunding bonds be sold so that the thre remaining
areas ofthe City served by Southern California Edison owned stret lighting systems could have
‘those systems replaced by modem city-owned systems. This work was accomplished for
approximately $1,850,000.
[Now that those three remaining areas have been improved, the City has assumed maintenance
responsibility for nearly all street lighting systems in the City, with no
erease in the manning
level ofthe existing street light maintenance crew.
In recognition of the need to refund the initial bond issue, the City Couneil, on February 28,
1994, approved Resolution No. 94-12 wiih authorized the making of reassessments and the
refunding of the 1986 Bond issue. By taking advantage of the lowest interest rates in decades
Which existed in early 1994, and increasing the term of the refunding bonds to 25 years as
‘opposed to 15 years for the 1986 Bonds, the City was able to accomplish the following: (a)
‘maintain the total annual assessments for improvements and services at the levels originally
projected, and (b) provide bond proceeds to complete the street lighting improvement program
tnd since assessment revenue needed for debt service will be reduced, the excess assessment
revenue above that needed for ongoing operational costs and debt service was used to repay a
Joan from the City totaling approximately $1,185,160 which was advanced during the intial
years following the District's formation. The City loan was fully repaid in 2003,
‘This Feasibility and District Report contains information in connection with the 2017-2018 levy
of the annual installment of the reassessments and of the service assessments (collectively, the
2017-2018 Levy). ‘The proposed reassessments were imposed beginning with the 1994-95 fiscal
‘year and will be levied on an annual basis until 2019. The service assessments are imposed and
Ievied on an annual basis until the services are no longer needed.
‘The method of reassessment for improvements and assessment for services uses the same
‘formula that has been used fo spread the original assessments. See Exhibit B.
5‘The reassessment and assessment levels are proposed to remain at the same level as for the
previous year, and the services proposed to be funded by the assessments will be conducted
in the "stret" (including alleys and municipal parking lots) and sidewalk vights-of-way. As
such, we believe thatthe assessment district will be in full com
Proposition 218, which was passed in November 1996,
2e with the provisions ofFINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT
PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE AND
IMPROVEMENTS DISTRICT NO. 1
FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018
CITY OF ALHAMBRA
M1. BOUNDARIES OF ZONE:
The District has coterminous boundaries with the City and is divided into three zones:
Zone.Ais the area generally known a the Main Sweet revitalization area which is located
along the Main Street corridor between Atlantic Boulevard and Hidalgo Avenue, and
Garfield Avenue between Woodward Avenue and Commonwealth Avenue,
Zone B coincides with the existing
ity boundaries and ineludes all parcels within the
City of Alhambra, Zone B also inludes the parcels mentioned in Zones A and C.
Zone.
‘includes all parcels in the rea generally known as Auto Row Alhambra which is,
located north and south of Main Street between Palm Avenue and Atlantic Boulevard,
and along Palm Avenue between Main Street and Commonwealth Avenue. Non-
commercial parcels within this zone are not assessed
Parcels which are considered utility rights-of-way and public property as described in
22595 and 22663, respectively ofthe Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and
are located within Zones A, B, and C are considered exempt from these special assessments and
reassessmentm.
FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT
PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE AND
IMPROVEMENTS DISTRICT NO. 1
FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018
CITY OF ALHAMBRA
DESCRIPTION OF THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, AND
Improvements
“The improvements in Zone A were constructed and financed by the Alhambra
Redevelopment Agency. The project is known as the "Downtown Alhambra
Revitalization - Main Street - Phase I and LA." A copy of the as-built plans is on file in
the Publie Works Department,
Maintenance and Operation
The services to be provided for Zone A areas follows:
1. Maintaining, operating, and improving street lights, holiday decorations,
landscaping and other public improvements in the vicinity of Main Street and
Garfield Avenue (Downtown), including watering, fertilizing, mowing, weed
control, shrubbery and tree pruning, removal, acquisition, installation,
‘maintenance, repair, cleaning and replacement of dead growth of trees, irrigation
facilities, municipal parking los, curbs, gutters, sidewalks (including sidewalk
furniture such as benches, trash containers, pots and planters), and concrete
imtersections, and related work, as necessary,
2 All clectrcal energy snd maintenance costs for the decorative strect lighting
located in Zone A.
3. All maintenance costs related to the improvements associated with the
"Downtown Alhambra Revitalization - Main Strest-Phase I and IA" projectZone B
Improvements
1. Street Lighting. Replacement or upgrade of approximately 3,316 steeet lights
within boundaries of Zone B. Those improvements have been completed.
2, Sidewalks and Driveways. Replacement of approximately 190,000 square feet of
damaged curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and driveways within the boundries of Zone
1B, These improvements were replaced during the 1986-87 and 1987-88 fiscal
years
and Operation
1. Maintaining, operating, and improving stret lighting systems, the repair of
damaged curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and driveways; the maintenance of median
landscaping and street tees;
2. Maintenance and operation (Including watering, fertilizing, mowing, weed
control, pruning, removal, acquisition, design, installation, maintenance, reptir,
cleaning, and replacement) of median landscaping, street trees, parkways, sect
furniture (including trash containers), curbs, gutters, strets (including alleys),
sidewalks, and driveway approaches within the publi rights-of-way (including
alleys), and municipal parking lots;
3. Maintenance (including removal, acquisition, design, installation, maintenance,
repair, cleaning, and replacement) and operation of all street lighting
‘improvementImprovements
Installation of interlocking street pavers, street trees, median lawns, and decorative
‘entrance features along the "Auto Row Alhambra" corridor.
Maintenance and Operation
1, Maintaining and operating decorative lights, landscaping and other public
improvements on Main Street between Alantic and Palm Avenue, and Palm
Avenue between Main and Commonwealth (Auto Row), including watering,
fertilizing, mowing, weed control, shrubbery and tree pruning, removal and
replacement of dead growth, removal and installation of tees, maintenance of
inrigation facilities, cleaning and repair of all curbs, guiters, sidewalks, and
cconerete interseetions, and related work (including maintenance and installation
‘of stret furni
it necessary,
2. All electrical energy and maintenance costs associated with the decorative
lighting system.
3. All maintenance costs for the Improvements installed along the "Auto Row
Alhambra! corridor.
10FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT
PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE AND
IMPROVEMENTS DISTRICT NO. 1
FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018
CITY OF ALHAMBRA
Iv. ASSESSMENT
GRAM
‘The Boundaries of the Assessment Distret are within the City limits ofthe City of Alhambra and
are shown on a map entitled Assessment Diagram, Public Works Maintenance and Improvement
District No. 1, City of Alhambra, which is on file with the City Clesk of the City of Alhambra, A
‘copy of the Assessment Diagram, in reduced scale is attached as Exhibit “A”.
V. NECESSITY FOR IMPROVEMENTS AND.
SERVICES
In onder to provide forthe safety and well being ofthe citizens of Alhambra, itis necessary that
the streetlights on both local streets und major highways are in accond with moder accepted
standards. Those improvements provide security for residents as well as better safety conditions
for both pedestrians and motorists. Replacement or repair of damaged streets, alley, municipal
parking lots, landscaping, tees, sidewalks, curbs, guters and driveways to generally accepted
standards also provides for better safety conditions for both pedestrians and motorists. Proper
‘maintenance of those facilites is essential
VL BENEFITS DERIVED FROM IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES,
The security and protection afforded by a modem street lighting system together with a well-
raintained roadway (including curbs, gutters, sidewalks, driveways and alleys) or landscaped
ret is nterded w enanee Ue heal, safety sad welfare associated with those parcels adjacent
to this infrastructure system. A citywide improvement, such as has been carried out under Zone
B of this District, provides direct, special benefit to the parcels and achieves the goals of
enhanced health safety and welfare.FEASIBILITY AND DISTRICT REPORT
PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE AND
IMPROVEMENTS DISTRICT NO. 1
FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018
CITY OF ALHAMBRA.
vu, 2017-2018 LEVY OF ASSESSMENT.
In order to fund the deb service requirement in 2017/2018 forthe Improvement Bonds issued by
the City and the operational and msintensnee services mentioned above in FISCAL YEAR
2017/2018, itis nocessay to proceed withthe hearing on the Reassessments and the annual levy
of service assessments for the 2017/2018 Fiscal Year as outlined in Chapter 3.50 of the
Alhambra Municipal Code,
[As required by Section 3.50.228 of suid cade, this Report contains A) information required of a
Feasibility Report; B) a statement reflecting whether the services proposed are fo be changed or
altered from that provided during the previous fiscal year and/or whether any new services(s) are
to be provided; and C) whether any change in cost is anticipated or proposed with reference to
the providing of such services(5)
Te en ee ee
‘The information required of a Feasibility Report is contained in the February 21,
1986 Feasibility Report, which has been made @ part hereof, The method for
‘establishing the assessments in Zones A and B is detailed in the Final Engincer's
Report - 1984/85 Renewal of Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No.
1, ‘The method for Zone © Js detailed in the Final Engineer's Report 1987/88
Renewal.
Fora detsiled explanation ofthe method for each zone, refer to Exhibit "B". Both
reports are on fle with the City Clerk of the City of Alhambra
R‘Proposed Improvement and Services
Zong A. The services deseribed in Section III of this report are proposed forthe
2017/2018 fiseal year and are the same services provided during past fiscal year.
‘The deseriptions of activities have been further defined and clarified.
‘The improvements described in Section II of this report were financed with
‘ditional bond proceeds resulting from the bond refunding that occurred in the
1994/95 fiscal year.
Zone C, The services described in Section Il ofthis report are proposed for the
2017/2018 fiseal year and include the same services provided during the past
‘ical year. The descriptions of activities have been further defined and clarified,
Estimated Costs
Zone. The estimated 2017/2018 costs for proposed services in Zone A are
$112,697 with the assessment being $459.40 per 10,000 square feet of parcel area.
‘That assessment amount isthe same as the last ten years’ assessment levels. See
Exhibit C for a eost analy
Zong B. The estimated 2017/2018 costs for proposed services in Zone B are in
excess of the proposed $3,016,276, ‘The total 2017/2018 proposed levy, including
the annual reassessments, fora single-family residential parcel is $93.17. That
assessment amount is the same as the last ten years’ assessment levels. See
Exhibit D for a cost analysis.
Zone C, The estimated 2017/2018 costs for proposed services in Zone C are
{$55,550 with the 2017/2018 assessment being $207.50 per 10,000 square feet of
Bparcel area. That assessment amount has not changed. See Exhibit F for a cost
analysis.
4FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT
PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE AND
IMPROVEMENTS DISTRICT NO. 1
FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018
CITY OF ALHAMBRA,
VII. SUMMARY
In summary, the 2017/2018 levy of assessment for Public Works Maintenance and
Improvements District No. 1 is necessary to provide funds for: 1) financing the 2017/2018 debt
service for the $8,300,000 in Refunding Bonds sold in 1994 which totals $630,260; and 2)
partially financing the $2,374,531 in stret lighting, landscaping, and street services proposed for
Zones A, B, and C of this District during the 2017/2018 fiscal year for a total annual levy of
$3,116,367.00
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the assessments for Zones A, B, and C of the City of
Alhambra Public Works Maintenance and Improvements District No. 1 are spread in direct
accordance with the benefits that the land within the boundary of the Zones receives from the
works of improvements and the maintenance thereof,
This Final Report dated this 12th day of June, 2017,
TRANSTECH ENGINEERS, INC.
GaP DLIGHTING LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT ZONES
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1
201770 YEAR
Lighting/Landscape Assesment Zones
Exhibit a
‘Assesment Diagram
Publ Works Maltenance and inprovement leet No.
| | DEE TD ene
{ J A) BB zone a Co)zone
WY) Ml zone ©EXHIBITB
METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
2017/2018 FISCAL YEAR
‘The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, after which the City of Alhambra Public Works
Maintenance and Improvement District is patterned, states that maintenance and improvement
assessments may he apportioned hy any foemula or method which fairly distibutes ensts among
al parcels within the dstict in proportion to the direct, special benefits received.
Zone A - The primary benefit of landscaping, safe sidewalks, street, parking, additional street
lighting and seasonal enhancements in the "Downtown Alhambra Revitalization - Main Street
‘the enhanced ambiance which atracts additional patrons to the area. The method of
allocating the costs associated with the Zone "A" serviees is by parcel square footage, Each
parcel is assessed its proportionate share of the costs based on its square footage. Since all ofthe
‘maintenance activities are confined to improvements within the street rightof-way, and the
assessment level is to remain atthe curent level, it is felt that the provisions of Proposition 218
ssessment districts have been complied with.
—
that apply to exis
ing benefit
Zone B Street Lighting ~ The diveet, special benefits of street lighting are for the convenience,
safety, and protection of people and, to a lesser extent, the security or protection of property,
property improvements and goods. ‘The intensity or degree of illumination provided can have a
bearing on both,
People Related Benefits (People Use)
1. Reduction in night accidents and attendant human misery and decrease in personal and
property loss
2. Less vulnerability to criminal assault at night
73. Promotion of business during nighttime hours.
4. Increased nighttime safety on roads and highways.
Inspiration for community sprit and growth,
‘Sevurity of Property Protection (Security Benefi
1, Reduction in vandalism nel other criminal ate, andl damage to improvements
2. Reduction in burglaries.
Intensity
Intensity or degree of illumination provided on streets inthe City of Alhambra varies with the
type of street, date of installation, and the use ofthe property adjacent thereto.
Based on lund use information provided by the County Assessor, about 86 percent of the parcels
in the City of Alhambra are in the residential category. OF those, approximately 70 percent are
single-family homes or condominiums andthe remainder are multiple family dwellings, A value
cof one unit has been assigned to the single family home, condominium, or vacant residential
parcel (Group 1). The basic unit consists of a value of 4 for People Use, % for Security Benefit,
and % for Intensity. Parcels in other land use categories were then rated by comparison with the
basic unt
For multiple family dwellings (Group 2), the value for Intensity remains at Yé but the other two
items are increased in proportion to the number of family dwelling units on the parcel. For
example, a duplex is assessed % for Intensity, 1 for People Use and ' for Security Benefit, for a
total of 1% units, The owner of such property would be assessed 1% times the owner of a
single family residence. In consideration of the distance some units would be ftom the lighted
roadway, Security Benefits in the residential category are not increased beyond a value of 1
‘Thus, a S-unit apartment is assessed % for Intensity, 2 % for People Use, and 1 for Security
Benefits, or a total of 3% units. As the number of apartments on a parcel increases, the service
charge units assigned for People Use follow a declining scale as follows:Group 2.1 - 21 dough $0 Apartments
Units for 20 apartments plus 1/3 unit foreach apartment over 20, (20 apartments
People Use, | for Security Benefitand % for Intensity = 11% Units)
Example: $0 Apartments: (50-20) divided by 3 = 10;
114+ 10= 21 4 Units
Group 22-1 theough 100 Apartments
Units for 50 apartments plus unit foreach apartment over 50.
Example: 100 Apartments: (100-50) divided by 4 = 12%
21 %HID% = 33% Units
Group 2.3 - Over 100 Apartments
‘Units over 100 apartments plus 1/5 unit for each apartment over 100
Example: 200 Apartments: (200-100) divided by 5 =20
33% + 20=53% Unit
‘The Assessor's tax rolls do not indicate the number of units per multiple family residence in
excess of five, Consequently, records of the City of Alhambra were used to determine the
‘number of units in excess of five units per parcel
‘The remaining 14 percent of the lots or parcels, most of which were commercial or industrial in
nature, were separated into 11 land use categories (Assessor's codes are shown in parentheses)
‘and units assigned on the basis of average benefits received. Pease note that units assigned to
Groups 10-12 were doubled due to the larger sizeof these establishments and, therefore, greater
benefit from street lighting.
1»Group 3 - | Unit (Minimum charge for improved property)
1 - Cemeteries (77) - Not Used.
2- Dump Sites (89) - Not Used.
Group 4-2 Units
‘Moderate Intensity Lighting, nominal People Use, moderate Security Benefit
1- Animal Kennels (28)
2.- Nurseries and Greenbouses (29)
3 - Industrial Parking Lots G8)
4-Churches (71)
5 Private Sehools (72)
6 - Utility (81)
17 Petroleum and Gas (83)
Group $-2.%4 Units
High Intensity Lighting, nominal People Use, moderate Security Benefit
1 - Commercial Parking Lots (27)
Group 6-301
High intensity Lighting, nominal People Use, high Security Benefit
1 - Office Buildings (17)
2 Professional Buildings (19)
3 Banks, Savings and Loans (23)
4 Serviee Shops (24)
5 - Lumber Yards (6)
6 - Camps (68)
7 Homes for the Aged (75)
Group 7-4 Units
High Intensity Li
ing, dciate People Use, high Security Benefit
1 -Stores (11)
2 Store with Offi or Residence (12)
3 Service Stations (25)
4- Clubs and Lodge Halls (64)
0Group 8-5 % Units
‘Nominal Intensity, high People Use, high Security Benefit
1 - Rooming House (same as 8-unit apartment) (08)
Group 9 = 6 Units
High Intensity Liviting. high People Use. high Security Benefit
1+ Restaurant (21)
2- Theater (61)
‘Group 10-5 Units
Moderate Intensity Lighting, nominal People Use, hgh Security Benefit
1 = Light Manufacturing (31)
2 Warehousing (33)
Group 11-6 Units
‘High Intensity Lighting, nominal People Use, high Security Benefit
1 - Auto, Recreational Equipment Sales Services (26)
Group 12-8 Us
High Intensity Lighting, moderate People Use, high Security Benefit
1 - Department Stores (13)
2 Markets (14)
3 - Hotels and Motels (18)
4 Bowling Alleys (63)
Group 13
1 was determined, because of the great variance in the arca of the 39 parcels, that proportics
within the six land use categories in this group (which represents less than percent of the
18,425 parcels within the City) would be assessed on an area basis. An approximation of the
‘number of the units per square foot used by the County of Los Angeles in establishing their
‘County-wise LLA was uilized with a minimum number of unis assessed to each parcel based
on usage.
2Group 13.1 = not les than 5 Units per Parcel
‘Nominal People Use
1 -Mineral Processing (37)
= 0.56 Units per 10,000 square feet
7 than 8 Units per Peel
High People Use
1 -Neighborhood Shopping Centers (15)
1.44 Units per 10,000 square feet
2 Regional Shopping Centers (16)
=2.18 Units per 10,000 square feet
3 - Heavy Manufacturing (32)
= 0.64 Units per 10,000 square feet
4 Hospital (74)
+= 1.29 Units per 10,000 square feet.
‘Vacant non-residential parcels were assigned three units (% intensity, two people use, %
security), which approximates the average for all non-residential parcels, This
‘methodology is flt to be consistent with the provisions of Proposition 218,
Zone B Landscaping and Sireets - The diteet, special benefits of the landscaping and street
‘maintenance programs funded by the assessment are the enhancement of health, safety and
‘welfare associated with those parcels that are located within Zone B.
‘Method of Determining Landscaping and Street Units
‘Determining the Cost pee Lot or Parcel
‘As with the lighting assessment, the assessment units for landscaping and stret services were
determined on the basis of dites, special benefit received for the occupants of each type of land
ed to each single family home and
‘condominium unit for both the landscaping and street assessments
use, For example, a value of one-half unit was ass
For multiple family dwellings, a value of one-half unit was assigned for each unit up to 20. For
those complexes with 20-50 units, the first 20 units were assigned a value of one-half nit, and
the second 30 were assigned a value of one-third unit for both the landscaping and street
2assessments. Fr complexes of 50-100 units, each unit over $0 was assigned a value of one
quarter unt, For complexes over 100 units, each unit over 100 was assigned a value of onecfifth
uit
For non-tesidental land uses, the numberof landscape and steet units was assigned based on the
average for cach particular category. The following table lists the number of units assigned for
‘both landscape and street assessments by land eatezory:
Gro ents) 20.units
Example: $0 apartments: (50-20) divided by 3 = 10;
10+ 10= 20 units
ns) 32.5 units
Example: 100 apartments: (100-80) divided by 4 = 12.5;
20-+ 12.5 = 32.5 units
Group 2.3 (0 34.3 units
Example: 109 apartments: (109-100) divided by
325+ 1.8% 343 units
(Groups 4-6: Landseape - unit; Sueet = unit
Group 7: Landscape -2 units; eee -2 units
Group 8: Landscape - 4 units; Steet - 4 units
Group 9: Landscape - 3 units, Stwet = 3. units
Group 10: Landscape -2 units: Sevet - 2 units
Group 11: 7 2
23Landsea its
‘As with the lighting assessment, those larger parcels tat fall nto Group 13 were assessed on the
basis of area for both the landscape and street assessment
‘The methodology used to determine the landscape and street assessment is felt to be consistent
with the provisions of Proposition 218.
Using the aforementioned procedures, the sum of the total number of units applicable to all of|
the eligible parcels in Zone B of Alhambra was determined (Total Units). The estimated cost of
carrying out all ofthe maintenance and operation activities within Zone B was determined (see
[Exhibit D) and eredits from the existing ad valorem based lighting district were subtracted fiom
that cost to determine the net amount to be raised by assessment (Net Assessment). The cost to
‘be assessed per unit (Unit Cost i the Net Assessment divided by the Total Units; the cost to be
assessed to cach eligible pareel in the City is determined by multiplying the number of units
assigned to that parcel by the Unit Cost
Zone C - The direct, special benefit of additional landscaping and omamental street lighting
slong the "Aulo Row Alhambra - Main Street Arca” is the enhanced ambiance which attracts
‘addtional patrons to the area, ‘The method of allocating the costs associated with the Zone C
service is by parcel square footage. Each commercial parcel located in Zone C is assessed their
proportionate share ofthe costs based on their square footage as a proportion of the total square
footage of all parcels subject to assessment within Zone C. This methodology is felt to be
‘consistent with the provisions of Proposition 218.
aEXHIBITC
ZONE A
COST ANALYSIS
201772018 FISCAL YEAR
Estimated Cost of Services $130,247
‘Total Parcel Area Within Zone A. 2,453,171 Square Feet
“Assessment Per Square Foot 8.045939
Assessment Per 10,000 Square Feet $459.39
25EXHIBIT D
ZONE B
COST ANALYSI
201772018 FISCAL YEAR
Street
Lighting Landscaping Streets Total
Assessment Units 29844 16576 16576 62,996
Assessment per Use Unit $27.76 $78.80 $852.00
Sample Assessments:
Single Family
Residential $2176 $l $26.00 $93.17
6.40 11820 78.00 $265.60
173.50 394.00 260.00 827.50
58990 1,576.00 1,040.00 3,205.90
98687 2,702.84 1,783.60 5,473.31
Store (Use Code 11) 111.08 157.60 104.00 372.64
[LL Manufacturing
(se Code 31) 138.80 157.60 104.00 400.40
26EXHIBIT E
Streets
26.00
52.00
78.00
104,00
130.00
156.00
192.00
208.00
234.00
260.00
286.00
312.00
338.00
364.00
390.00
416.00
442.00
468.00
494,00
520.00
53733
584.67
572.00
589.33
606.67
1,040.00
1,083.00
1,066.00
1,079.00
ZONE B SAMPLE ASSESSMENTS
LIGHTING, LANDSCAPING AND STREETS
2017/2018 FISCAL YEAR
RESIDENTIAL ONLY
Units Lighting Landscape
GROUP 1 A 27.76 39.40
GRouP2 2 4858 78.80
3 6940 11820
4 9022 137.60,
s 104.10 197.00
6 11798 236.40
7 13186 275.80
8 \4s74 31520
9 15962 384.60
10 1730 394.00
n 18738 433.40
2 20126 472.80
B 21514 512.20
“4 229.02 551.60
Is 262.90 $91.00
16 25678 630.40
” 270.65 669.80
Is 2e4ss 709.20
19 29842 748.60
20 31230 788.00
GROUP 2.1 2 32155 81427
2 33081 840.53,
2B 340.05 866.80
oy 34931 893.07
as 35857 919.33,
50 589.90 1,576.00
GROUP 22 st 59684 1,595.70
2 603.78 1,615.40
33 610.72 1,635.10
100 936.90 2,561.00
7
1,690.00
Total
BAT
17938
265.60
351.82
431.10
510.38
589.66
668.94
748.22
827.50
906.78
986.06
1,065.34
1148.62
1,223.90
1,303.18
1392.46
1461.74
1,541.02
1,620.30
1,673.18
1,726.01
1778.86
1831.71
1884.57
3,205.90
3,245.54
3,285.18
3,324.82
5,187.90ZONE B SAMPLE ASSESSMENTS
EXHIBIT E
LIGHTING, LANDSCAPING AND STREETS
GROUP 23
ol
102
103
109
201772018 FISCAL YEAR
Lighting Landseape
942.45
948.00
983.56
986.87
NON-RESIDENTIAL & EXCEPTIONS
Lighting Landscape
GROUP 3
GROUP 4
‘GROUPS
GROUP 6
GROUP 7
GROUPS,
GROUP 9
GROUP 10
GROUP 11
GROUP 12
GROUP 13.11
GROUP 13.2.1
GROUP 13.2.2
GROUP 13.23
GROUP 13.24
216,
5552
69.40
83.28
111.04
145.74
16656
13880
16636
222.08
2,516.76
2,592.52
2,608.28
2,702.84
0.00
7880
7880
7880
157.60
31520
23640
157.60
157.60,
315.20
Streets
1,700.40
1,710.80
1721.20
1,783.60
Streets
0.00
52.00
52.00
52.00
104,00
208.00
156.00
104,00
104.00
208,00
(0.56 PER 10,000 Square F
1.44 PER 10,000 Square Feet
2.18 PER 10,000 Square F
(0.64 PER 10,000 Square Peet
1.29 PER 10,000 Square Feet
7
Total
5,219.61
5251.32
5.29.04
547331
Total
21.76
186.32
200.20
214.08
372.64
668.94
358.96
400.40
428.16
145.28EXHIBIT E
ZONE.B SAMPLE ASSESSMENTS:
LIGHTING, LANDSCAPING AND STREETS
201772018 FISCAL YEAR
RESIDENTIAL ONLY
see pages 20-25 For Multiple Units (2 1020)
= of omits X_§ for Peale Te
-# of units X25 for Security Benefit (capped at 1)
always 25 for Intensity
People Security Lighting 27.76
Units Use Benefit Intensity Units Lighting
GRouP1 1 050 028025 1.00 27.76
GROUP 2 2 100 0500251754858
3 150075025250 69.40
4 200° 100025325 9022
5 250 100 0253.75 104.10
6 300 100025425 11798
7 350-100-025 475. 131.86
8 400-100 025525 145.74
9 450 100025 SS 159.62
10 500100025628. 173,50
1 550 100025675 187.38,
12 600 100025725 20126,
1 650-100 0257.75. 218.14
14 700-100-025 825 22902
18-750 100 0258.75. 242,.90
16 $00 100025925 256.78,
17 850-100-025 «9.78 270.66
1B 900-100-025 1025 284.54
19 950 1000251075. 29842,
20 1000 © 1000251128 312.30EXHIBIT E
ZONE B SAMPLE ASSESSMENTS
LIGHTING, LANDSCAPING AND STREETS.
2017/2018 FISCAL YEAR
GROUP 2.1 - divi us 11.25 (20 wits, simes $27.76
Pls
Minus Divided Units (20) Lighting 27.76
ty
Units 203 11.25 Units Lighting
21 1033-1158 11.58 321.85
2 2 067 1192 1192 32081
2B 3 Loo 12251225 340.06
24 4133 1258 1258 34931
25 5 1671292 129235857
50-30 10000-2125 21.25 589.90
GROUP22 For $1 to 100 - # of units minus 50, divided by 4, plus 21.25 (50 units), times
2716
Plus
Minus Divided Units (50) Lighting 27.76
by
50 4 2125 Units Lighting
st 1 025 2150 21.50 596.84
32 2 050 275-275 603.78
3 3 075 2200 22.00 610.72
100 «5012803375 -33.75 936.90
GROUP 23 00 # of units minus 100, divided by S, plus 33.75 (100 unit), times $27.76
Plus
Minus Divided Units Lighting 27.76
by (100)
Units 100 S 3875. Units Lighting
101 1 020 3395 3395. 942.45
102 2 dd 34153415 948.00
103 3 060 34.35 34.35 953.56
109 9 1803555 35.55 98687
30EXHIBIT E
ZONE B SAMPLE ASSESSMENTS:
SHITING, LANDSCAPING AND STREETS
201772018 FISCAL YEAR
NON-RESIDENTIAL & EXCEPTIONS
Lighting 27.76
Units Lighting
GROUP 3 1.00 27.76
GROUP 4 200 $5.52
GROUP s 250 69.40
GROUP 6 3.00 $3.28
GROUP? 4.00 111.04
GROUPS 525 145.74
GROUPS 6.00 166.56
GROUP 10 5.00 13880
GROUP 11 6.00 166.56
GROUP 12 800 22208
GROUP 13.1.1 0.56 PER 10,000 Square Feet
GROUP 13.2.1 1.44 PER 10,000 Square Feet
GROUP 13.2.2 2.18 PER 10,000 Square Feet
GROUP 13.23 (0.64 PER 10,000 Square Feet
GROUP 13.24 1.29 PER 10,000 Square Feet
3EXHIBIT E
‘ZONE B SAMPLE ASSESSMENTS
LIGHTING, LANDSCAPING AND STREETS
201772018 FISCAL YEAR
RESIDENTIAL ONLY
see pages 25-27 For Multiple Units 2 1020)
= Sper unit
Landscape 78.60 Streets 52.00
Units Units Landseape Us Streets
GROUP 1 1050 39.40 050 26.00
GROUP 2 2 100 78.80 1.00 52.00
3 15011820 150 78.00
4 200 157.60 2.00 104.00
5 250 197.00 250 130.00,
6 300 236.40 3.00 156.00
7 380 275.80 3.50 182.00,
8 400 31520 4.00 208.00
9 450 354.60 450 234.00
10 5.00 394.00 5.00 260.00
M550 433.40 5.50 286,00
12 600 472.80 600 312.00
1 65051220 650 338.00
4 7.0 551.60 7.00 364.00
1s 750 $91.00 750 390.00
16 800 630.40 8.00 416.00
17850. 669.80 850 442.00
18 9.00 709.20 9.00 468.00
199.50 748.60 9.50 494.00
20 10.00 788.00 10.00 520.00,
GROUP 21 For 21 to 50 - # of units minus 20, divided by 3, plus 10 (20 units), times
$878.80 or $52.00,
Plus
Minus Divided by Units 20) 7880 52.00
Units 20 3 10 Units Landscape Streets
2 1033-1033 1033,814.27 537.33
2 2 067 1067-1067 840.53 55467
2B 3 1.00 11.00 11.00 866,80 $72.00,
ry 4 133 1331133 893.07 58933,
25 5 167 1167116791933 606.67
50 30 10.00 20.00 20.00 1,576.00 1,040.00
322017/2018 FISCAL YEAR
GROUP22 For $1 10 100 # of units
$878.80 or $52.00,
Plus,
Minus Divided by Units (50)
Units 0 4 0
st 10252025
32 2 050 2050
33 3 07s 2075
100 501250 32.50
‘GROUP 23
NON-RESIDENTIAL & EXCEPTIONS
GROUP 3
GROUP 4
GROUP Ss
GROUP 6
GROUP 7
GROUPS
GROUPS
GROUP 10
GROUP LL
GROUP 12
GROUP 13.1.1
GROUP 13.21
GROUP 13.22
GROUP 13.23
GROUP 13.2.4
EXHIBIT E
ZONE B SAMPLE ASSESSMENTS
LIGHTING, LANDSCAPING AND STREETS
Units
2025
20.50
20.15,
32.50
7880
Landscape
1,595.70
1615.40
1635.10
2,561.00
1s 50, divided by 4, plus 20 (50 units), times
52.00
Streets
1,053.00
1,066.00
1079.00
1,690.00
Over 100 - # of units minus 100, divided by 5, plus 22.5 (100 units), times
$878.80 oF $52.00,
Units
iol
102
103
109
Plus
‘Minus Divided by Units
100
5
020
0.40
0.60
1.80
33
100)
325
32.70
32.90
33.10
3430
Landscape
Units
Not listed
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
4.00
3.00)
2.00
2.00
4.00
Units
32.70
32.90
33.10
34.30
Streats
Units
not listed
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
2.00
4.00
78.80
Landscape
2,576.76
2,592.52
2,608.28,
2,702.84
7880
Landscape
78.80
78.80
78.80
157.60
315.20
236.40
157.60
157.60
31520
52.00
Streots
1,700.40
1,710.80
1,721.20
1,783.60,
52.00
Streets
52.00
52.00
52.00
104.00
208.00
136.00
104.00
104.00
208.00
0.56 PER 10,000 Square Feet
1.44 PER 10,000 Square Feet
2.18 PER 10,000 Square Feet
0.64 PER 10,000 Square Feet
1.29 PER 10,000 Square Feet4EXHIBIT E
ZONE C
COST ANALYSIS
2017/2018 FISCAL YEAR,
Estimated Cost of Services $55,550
‘Total Parcel Area Within Zone C 2,677,092 Square Feet
Assessment Per Square Foot 3.020750)
“Assessment Per 10,000 Square Feet $207.50
35tom No.
CITY OF ALHAMBRA
on "AGENDA REPORT
‘hates
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
bate: June 12, 2017
To: Honorable Mayor and Members ofthe City Council =a
SUBMITTED BY: Vanessa Reynoso, Interim Director of Development Servicas”—
By Marty Reiner, Contract Planner
‘SUBJECT: Public Hearing to adopt Ordinance O2M17-4713 approving, Specific. Pan
‘Amendment SP-16-1; and Zone Change Z-18-1 and adopt a Resolution approving
General Plan Amendment GPA-16-1,. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program, and Miigated Negative Declaration, adjusting the line Between the Mult
Family (R-3) zone district and the Valley Boulevard Corridor Specific Pian, Sub
Regional Commercial (B) District (Specfic Pian-SRC(B)) on the subject parc
increasing the area ofthe land designated Spectic Pian-SRC(B) District rom 1.76
acres to 2.0 acres forthe properties located at 1428 South Marengo Avenue in the
City of Alnamora,
‘Address: 1428 South Marengo Avenue
‘Applicant St. Clar Partner, on behalf of TAG-2 Medical Investment Group, LLC
Property Owner: TAG-2 Medical Investment Group, LLC
‘Architect JZMK Partners
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a Public Hearing and after which take the following
actions
A. City Council direct the City Altomey to introduce and give first reading by ttle only,
walving further reading tothe following ordinance ented:
Ordinance No, O2M17-4713: AN ORDINANCE OF THE ALHAMBRA CITY
COUNCIL ADOPTING SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT SPA-16-1, ZONE CHANGE
2-161 ADJUSTING THE LINE BETWEEN THE MULTI-FAMILY (R.9) 70NF
DISTRICT AND THE VALLEY BOULEVARD CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN, SUB-
REGIONAL COMMERCIAL (B) DISTRICT (SPECIFIC PLAN-SRO(B)) ON THE
SUBJECT PARCEL (ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS 536-007-003, 5956-007-
(004, §366-007-016), INCREASING THE AREA OF THE LAND DESIGNATED
SPECIFIC PLAN-SRG(B) DISTRICT FROM 1.78 ACRES TO 2.0 ACRES FOR
THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 1428 SOUTH MARENGO AVENUE IN THE
CITY OF ALHAMBRA
“which ordinance shall return for @ second reading and adoption atthe next City Council
1meeting
B. City Council direct Staff to return at the next City Council meeting with the folowing
resolution for adoption entitled
Resolution No. R2M17-19: A RESOLUTION OF THE ALHAMBRA CITY COUNCIL
APPROVING THE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
GPA-16-1, ADJUSTING THE LINE BETWEEN THE HIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL AND THE VALLEY SPECIFIC PLAN DESIGNATIONS OF THE
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR THE SUBJECT PARCELS (ASSESSOR
PARCEL NUMBERS 6396 007-003, 6356-007-004, 5356.007-018), INCREASING
THE AREA OF THE LAND DESIGNATED SPECIFIC PLAN-SRC(B) DISTRICT
FROM 1.76 ACRES TO 2.0 ACRES FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 1428
‘SOUTH MARENGO AVENUE IN THE CITY OF ALHAMBRA
BACKGROUND AND FACTS:
This is an application for a General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment and Zone Change to
modify the General Plan land use designation of a portion of an existing property from High Density
Residential to Valley Boulevard Speci Plan with @ related Zone Change from R-3 (High Densiy
Residential) to Valley Boulevard Specific Plan for a proposed 128 unit 3-story townhome condominium
complex, a 2story 14,600 square foot commons building addition to an existing 36,000 square foot
‘skilled nursing facity, a 1-story 12,490 square foot retall bulking and a 2-story 18,000 square foot
mecical ofce building on a combined ste area of 11.6 acres which will be dvided into 4 lots. The
project ste is 11.6 acres and is currently looated within the R-3 (Multiple Family Residential) and Valley
Boulevard Specific Plan zones. A Nitigated Negative Declaration has previously been prepared and will
also be considered as part ofthe Public Hearing
(On April 17, 2017, The Planning Commission approved:
Resolution 17-11 approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map TT 77413, Residential Planned Development
Permit RP-16-16, Commercial Planned Development Permit CP-16-18, and Conditional Use Permit CU-
4615 to build a. 126 unt condominium complex. @ 14,600 square foot dining and assembly building
which would serve an existing sklled nursing facity and two commercial bulcings with atolal combined
trea of 30,490 square feel on an approximate land area of 11.6 actes located in the VSP (Valley
Boulevard Corridor Specie Plan) zone and the R-S (Multiple Family Residential) zone.
[At that meeting the Planning Commission also approved Resolution 17-10 recommending that the City
‘Council of tne City of Alnambra approve the Mitgation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Miigated
Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment GPA-16-1, Specific Plan Amendment SPA-16-1, Zone
Change 2-16-1 adjusting the line between the Mul-Famiy (R-3) zone district and the Valley Boulevard
Sontdor Spout Pla SubrRoyional Cusiivercial (D} Dietrick (Gpectie Mlan-ERC(B)) on the oubject
parcel, nereaaing the area ofthe land designated Specific Pian-SRC(B) District from 1.76 acres to 2.0
Bcres for the properties located at 1428 South Marengo Avenue inthe City of Alhambra.
‘The commercial element of the proposal requires a General Plan Amendment (GPA), Specific Plan
‘Amendment (SPA) and Zone Change. The northernmost 1.74 acres of the site is located within the
\Valley Boulevard Corridor Specific Pian, Sub-Regional Commercial (8) District (Specific Plan-SRC (B))
and carries the same designation on the General Plan Land Use Map. The Specific Plan SRC (B)
District requires a minimum fot area of two acres for new development. This restriction is intended to
encourage the consolidation of parcels and prevent disjointed development along Valley Boulevard, The
2existing area of the commercial portion of the site is 1.76 acres and therefore not eligible for
redevelopment. To comply with tis requirement, the applicant is propesing to adjust the Zoning, General
Plan and Specific Plan boundary lines, adding an adaltional 0.26 acres along Marengo Avenue to the
portion of the site covered by the Specific Pian. This change would accommodate the applicant's
proposed replacement ofa litle used, existing surface parking lot with a new, twosstory, medical office
building and one-story commercial with a combined area 30,490 square feet (SF). The proposed retall
land medical office development would provide employment opportunites as well shopping and services
that would serve nearby residents and revitalize this porion of Valley Boulevard. Figure 1, on the
following page, shows the current zoning boundary lines and the proposed boundary lines.
Althe Apil 17, 2017 Planning Commission Public Hearing, concems were raised about the preservation
land poeeible relocation of tree specimens on the propery. In response ta thes cancers, Planning
Condition PLSS was added at the Nearing and read into the record. ‘The condition requires the applicant
to submit a Tree Survey Report prior to the City Council Hearing. The Report was received on May 8,
2017 and shall be used by staf to develop recommendations forthe project's landscape-pian submittal
Staff's recommendations shall be incorporated into the landscape plans prior to the issuance of bulding
permits
Figure 1 ~ Current & Proposed Zones
PROPOSED TONEGUNGETETNEAL PUN NeoNoise - The intial Study identified potential significant noise impact fo nearby residences east and west
ofthe elle, and required thal acoustic blankets be instaled at a height of six feet along Marengo Avenue
‘nd at a height of eight feet along the northern portion of Benito Avenue, ending at a point across from
the southemmost residences. The Iniial Study did not identify impacts or require mitigation for the
school due tothe distance ofthe classrooms from the site, Nevertheless, the applicant has committed to
extending the acoustic blanket south along Benita Avenue, to the comer of Glendon Way which provides
’ continuous acoustic barrier between the construction site and the school
Furthermore, the applicant explained thatthe existing one story buldings that make up the now vacant
senior apartment development have been constructed of materials that are valuable as recycled lumber
tnd that tno buidinge are conetructed with perimeter foundations rather than slab foundations. As stich,
removal ofthese buldings wil be accomplished with much more hand labor and lighter equipment than
would be used for mass demolition, and this would significantly lit the noise during site clearance.
‘Alc Quality - Parents also expressed conoem about air qualty Issues that may impact students and
facuty at the school, The Inilal Sludy identified potential impacts related to emissions from large
eearthmoving equipment and from finish coatings used during final construction. Measures intended to
address these concerns include requirements that earthmoving equipment be compliant wth applicable
California Air Resources Board standards and that only Low Volatile Organic Compound pains,
‘compliant with standards of the South Coast Ar Qualty Management District be used.
‘The intial Study also identiied ai-bome particulate matter generated during construction as a significant
Impact. Mitigation measures to address this include stopping clearing, grading and earth moving
activites when wind exceeds 25 mpi, watering disturbed areas three time daily and atthe end of each
day and limiting vehicle speed on site to 15 mph,
‘These mitgation measures would reduce impacts to a less than significant level based on thresholds
established by the South Coast Air Qualty Management District Although no adkltional mitigation
measures are required, the developer has offered to take adcitional steps to futher minimize impacts to
the school. The extension of the eight-foot tll acoustic blanket fo the soulhwest corner ofthe site will
Create a physical baer between the school and the construction site that would further minimize
particulate intrusion into the school site. The applicant has also offered, to the extent feasible, to do
‘grading and site preparation work during summer months when the school is on break. Also, to the
‘extent feasibie, the applicant would remove the perimeter structures last, and construct permeter
Structures first, thereby using existing and future perimeter buldings as a barter from the school
Circulation - The Initial Study has net Mentified any significant impacts related to traffic and crcuation
affecting ether student commuting or general traffic in the immediate ares; however, parents of students
have expressed concer about congestion on streets adjacent to the school and student safely as they
‘ross streete and load and unload from cars on adjacent streets. Marguerita Elementary School has no
on-site student picicup or drop-off area; however, there is one formal drop-off area along West Glendon
Way, which has identification signs and Is seoarated from travel janes usina cones during the moming
drop-off Because there are no on-site érop-of of pick-up faciities, and only limited, formal on-street
facies, student drop-off and pick-up aceure on all three frontages of the school, with chien crossing
‘mid-block to get to and from carpool veces,
To avoid compounding exiting, school related circulation issues, the applicant is proposing thal
construction trafic enter the site off South Marengo Avenue at the northern portion of the sit, isolating
Construction traffic from the strsets adjacent tothe school, Furthermore, the applicant is proposing an
‘cvess gate at the south-east driveway which would prevent project related traffic from impacting the
‘student pick-up and drop-off activity along Bento and Glendon Way. Staff has included a Condition of
4‘Approval P23 requling installation of a gate atthe south-east entrance to the residential portion of the
project, that wil restrict both ingress and egress to and from the project one hour before and one hour
Batter the baginning and end of the school day. Scheduling shall be peridically adjusted to compensate
for changes in school class scheduling and vacations.
In addition o these speciic steps related to noise, ar quality and traf, the applicant has otfered to meet
with parents and echool representatives on a regular basis during construction to work cooperatively to
address unanticipated issues.
Zoning and General Plan Consistency
The Project fs consistent will all development standards and General Pan designations within the
proposed Zoning and the proposed General Plan Amendment
Environmental Status
‘The project was reviewed pursuant to Section 15083 ofthe California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
{An Inbal Study and Mitgated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for this project have been prepared in
Compliance with CEQA.” The ISIMIND identited that tha project impacts wil be reduced to below
‘ianficant levels through the implementation of mitigation measures. In adaition tothe issues discussed
in the Pubic Outreach section contained in this repor, the IS/MND also identified three other areas of
study where the project requires the implementation of mitigation measures. These areas requitng
miigation measures are Tribal Cutural Resources, Geology and Sols, and Hazards and Hazardous
Materials. The specific mitigation measures are discussed In greater detail in the altached Mitigation
Monitoring Program contained in Section 6.0 ofthe IS/NIND.
‘The Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was posted for public review on
December 2, 2016 ta January 3, 2017, at Alhambra City Hall and at the offices of the Los Angeles
County Clerk, The Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration was also published with the
Pasadena Star News on Decembar 2, 2016. These documents are part ofthis administrative record and
are on fle withthe Planning Division
Pablo Note
(On June 2, 2017, a Notice of Public Hearing was sent to the owners of 544 property owners who own
properties within an expanded notice area approximately two blocks in each direction. A legal notice
Bdvertsing the public heating was placed in the Pasadena Star News on June 2, 2017, and posted on
the subject property on June 2, 2017. No comments have been received from any ofthe notified parties,
Pubio Outroach
(On January 25, 2017, the developer, at Staffs direction, held a public meeting on site from 7:00 p.m. to
0.00 pm. The purpese of the meeting vas to provide a full nrviaw of the project and the measures
that would be taken to reduce impact ofthe projec to nearby residents, students and schoo! faculty. To
fensure ease of access to interested parties, the meeting was held on-site in a multi-purpose room,
known a6 Bloy Center, atthe sklled nursing facity. Applicant representatives at the meeting included
the property ovnerideveloper, the project manager, @ representative of Applied Planning, who prepared
the intial Study and Mligated Negatve Declaration (ISIMND) for the project, and the transportation
consultant who prepared the traffic and circulation analysis for the project. The Executive Director for
Facilities and Transportation Services for he Alhambra Unified School District also attended.
The City wanted to ensure that concemed parents and neighbors were afforded ample opportunity to
5team about the project. To accomplish ths objective, Staff developed an expanded public notification list.
which included a substantially greater area of the local neighborhood. Consequently, the 85 addresses
‘which were originally generated rom the required 300 foot radius lst was increased to 544 addresses,
Parents of students attending the adjacent Marguerita Elementary School expressed significant concern
‘with regards to noise and air quality that may occur during the construction phase of the project, and
Sludent pedestrian safety bath during and after construction of the project
{All concerns which were brought up a the outreach meeting and in public comments were addressed
On June 2, 2017, a Notice of Puble Hearing forthe June 12, 2017 City Council meeting was sent to $44
propery owners who own properiag within an expand area approvimately twa blacks in each ditecton,
‘legal notice advertising the public hearing was placed in the Pasadena Star New on June 2, 2017. A
natice was also posted on the property on June 2, 2017,
‘The Gity ecelved written comments from:
+ Christopher Fethauer (resident) dated December 12, 2016
+ Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority dated December 22, 2016,
+ John & Stacy Du Bols (residents) dated December 27, 2018
+ California Department of Transportation dated December 28, 2016
+ Los Angeles County Sanitation District dated December 20, 2016,
‘© Michael Au (resident) dated January 3, 2017 - Letter
Copies of these letters and emails with responses are addressed in the MND, Response to Comments
(Attachment 2)
|An area resident, Dr. Steve Kasper, who resides at 1529 South Marengo Avenue, met with Planning
Division Sta. Dr. Kasper had questions and concerns regarding the timing ofthe phased construction,
coneerns regarding the on-site and street parking, and questions about the street trees and on-site trees.
Following the Api 17, 2017 Planning Commission hearing, the applicant's representative met with Dr.
Kasper fo discuss concarns he and Mrs. Kasper raised regarding various aspects of the project
Concems were expressed regarding phasing, employee parking and Marengo Street parking, and
preservation of mature trees, and Dr. Kasper indicated that the concems were addressed by the
‘applicant to his satisfaction.
Jina letter dated February 15, 2017, an area resident, Midred Stratton, who resides at 1511 S. Marengo
Avenue, directly aerass the street from the project, expressed concems the excessive amount of on-
street parking along Marengo Avenue that was being used by the skilled nursing staff, and questioned if
the project would incorporate on-site parking for the employees. Her letter was recelved after the MND
Comment Letters were published, however, the project has been designed with 38 on-site parking
‘paces for the skilec nursing facy, © spaces more tran required uikler lhe Zoning Ordnance. Those
138 spaces are sufficient forthe skied nursing faciity staf use as the 3 shifts servicing the fecity dally
‘consist of 38 AN shit emplayees, 30 PM-shift employees, and 14 Night shift employees.
(On April 3. 2017 the business owner, Dr. Sim, sent a memo to all Sunny View Care Center employees
instructing that, effective immediately, ali employees are to park in the north parking lat fronting along
Valley Boulevard and not to park on the steATTACHMENTS.
4. Mitigated Negative Declaration (Under Separate Cover as Exhibit B of Aitached Resolution
RaM17-19)
Miigated Negative Declaration Response to Comments (Under Separate Cover)
Migred Stratton Comment Leter
Ordinance O2M17-4713,
Resolution R2M17-19
Planning Commission Staff Report Dated March 6, 2017 and Api 17, 2017
(Unde Separate Cover)
7. Notice of DeterminationATTACHMENT 1
Mitigated Negative Declaration
(Under Separate Cover as Exhibit A of Attached Resolution R2M17-19)ATTACHMENT 2
Mitigated Negative Declaration Response To Comments
(Under Separate Cover)ATTACHMENT 3
Fabry 15,2017,
Development Serves Department
21250, Fest street
‘hy of hamibre.cA 98801,
Re: mela Cour Development
‘Tosi concamat:
Wo ul ou house 3.151150. Marengo Av. n 1942 and have led here er
slne, Athan the Eicon Home was gute all ast continued to expend
‘0 our baie problems. st was emang our canter medlum to
_icommodete eves cushing tothe new Freeway
For yours we hav fought for prkngn ont of aur homes. st dos not
apoen. thas been the tt who have parked on Marengo. Whoever comesto
st uses parkour dey
"have vein Alhambra yeni Ife and natural some changeshave come
shout come god same net so ood) 98 years.
{am aware tht thera planned pang ulthnthe development but does that
Include parking for lf? Even wtn decreased acvty across te stret our street
(sed wih parked cars
Tank ou for your stontin tts mater.
Mes, Mile. Staton