CE 3003 Advanced Process Design - Individual Project: Executive Summary
CE 3003 Advanced Process Design - Individual Project: Executive Summary
CE 3003 Advanced Process Design - Individual Project: Executive Summary
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The main objective of this project was to carry out a design on the Propane
distillation column for a process that produces 1,3 Butadiene. The raw materials
used are Butane, Oxygen and Water and the process capacity is 100 000 tonnes
per annum nominal. In the previous work it was stated that the plant is located
in China. The main location of the plant is in the capital city of the Gansu
Provence, Lanzhou. This was decided as the location over other provinces due to
the excellent transport links and the availability of raw materials and cheap
labour. The close proximity to suppliers, customers and skilled labour all make
Lanzhou the ideal location for the plant to be located.
The design of the distillation column consists of the packed type. The distillation
is a multi-component distillation involving separation of Propane from the other
components at very high pressure. The number of theoretical stages chosen was
16 stages based on a reflux ratio of 0.608. The column diameter calculated was
0.61 at maximum pressure gradient possible for distillation columns and 0.66m
for minimum pressure gradient, which was then scaled up to 0.65m. This was a
reasonable decision as it may be helpful when the plant capacity increases. The
column has a height of 8m. Feed location for the arrangement of packing is at
stage 3 from the top of the column. Pall rings constructed out of stainless steel
with a size of 25mm is used for packing. The vessel thickness of the column is
around 5mm, constructed out of stainless steel also to avoid corrosion.
A preliminary design on the condenser for this distillation column was also
carried out. The type of condenser is a fixed plate with a 1 shell and 1 tube pass.
The tubes are stainless steel, 119 in number, 2.44m in length, and with a square
pitch arrangement. The overall heat transfer coefficient was also calculated as
486.026W/m2C. The pressure drop on the tube side was 7.306 N/m2 (almost
negligible) as only one tube pass is used with a very short length. The pressure
drop on the shell side was 46.64 N/m2
The next section details on the Piping and Instrumentation over the column. The
control system used for better efficiency of the units is also featured in the same
P and ID.. The control mainly used for this, is the cascade control for the
temperature and product composition, also in the varying of the bottom product
flow rate to control the level at the bottom of the column. The variables
controlled are the top and bottom temperatures including product composition
and the reflux drum and also the level at the base of the column.
There were two group tasks performed in this term along with the individual
design. The first group task performed was the HAZOP on the feed line of the
propane distillation column. The aim of the HAZOP was to evaluate the selected
process line and identify the possible deviations which could result into a hazard;
the possible causes to the deviations, consequences and actions needed to
avoid the consequences were also discussed. An improvised P and ID was then
produced after Hazop was done. The Hazop was done with Dr. Titiloye as the
Study Leader. The deviations discussed include no flow, less flow, less
temperature due to weather conditions, more temperature likely to occur as a
result of external fire and extra phase in an event of poor separation, presence
of heat transfer fluids, presence of off gases, corrosion inside the pipe catalyst
pellets in the pipe and excess residue due which leads ultimately to
contamination.
The second group work is the economic appraisal, which was useful in
concluding that if this project were to be operational; the payback period would
be two years which would leave 13 years of net profit. So, from a financial
aspect, the project was found to be very viable and attractive.
Both the group works are attached in the Appendix VI and VII
Contents
1.0 Project Brief:....................................................................................................5
1.1 Introduction to the product:.........................................................................5
1.2 Production:...................................................................................................6
[4]
1.3 Location ....................................................................................................7
2.0 Project Plan and Objectives:..........................................................................10
2.1Technical Objectives:...................................................................................10
2.2 Personal Objectives:...................................................................................12
2.3 Schedule....................................................................................................13
2.3.1Project Schedule...................................................................................13
3 The Revised Process:........................................................................................15
4 The Chemical Design:.......................................................................................17
4.1 Calculations:...............................................................................................20
4.1.1 Reflux ratio and the number of Theoretical Stages..............................21
4.1.2 Determination of the Diameter of the Column:....................................28
4.1.3Feed Location:.......................................................................................31
4.2 Choice of Plates and Packing:....................................................................33
4.2.1 Types of Packing:..................................................................................34
4.3 Column Internals [21][22]:...............................................................................43
5.0 CONDENSER:.................................................................................................48
5.1 Energy Balance Over the condenser:.........................................................49
5.2 Shell Side Coefficient:................................................................................54
5.3 Tube Side Coefficient:.................................................................................55
5.4 Overall Heat transfer Coefficient U;...........................................................56
5.5 Shell side Pressure Drop:............................................................................59
The butadiene industry originated during the World War II. Many of the
belligerent nations realized that in the event of war, they could be cut off from
rubber plantations controlled by the British Empire, and sought to remove their
dependence on natural rubber.
Butadiene is the raw material used [2] in the making of various synthetic rubbers
and polymer resins as well as a few chemical intermediates.
It is mainly used to make styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) which is used to make
automobile tyres. It is also used in adhesives, sealants, coatings and rubber
article such as shoe soles. SBR is has a high molecular weight, as it has
excellent resistance to abrasion, it is widely used in the automobile tyre industry.
Various other uses of butadiene are detailed in the table attached in Appendix I
Section (b).
1.2 Production:
Butadiene is produced commercially by three main processes:[3]
Steam Cracking of Paraffinic Hydrocarbons: In this process, butadiene is a
co-product in the manufacture of ethylene (the ethylene co-product
process).
Catalytic Dehydrogenation of n-Butane and n-Butene (the Houdry process).
Oxidative Dehydrogenation of n-Butene (the Oxo-D or O-X-D process).
Each of these processes produces a stream commonly referred to as crude
butadiene that is rich in 1,3-butadiene.
In the United States, western Europe, and Japan, butadiene is produced as a by-
product of the steam cracking process which is used to produce ethylene and
other olefins. The quantity of butadiene produced depends on the hydrocarbons
used as feed. Light feeds, such as ethane, give primarily ethylene when cracked,
but heavier hydrocarbons favour the formation of heavier olefins, butadiene,
and aromatic hydrocarbons.
Since 2002, the Global Butadiene industry has maintained relatively fast growth
especially in Asia due to its variety of uses. The global annual butadiene output
increased from 8.08 million tons in 2002 to 10.15 million tons in 2007, with an
average annual growth rate of 4.68%.
China is one of the fastest developing Asian countries in the world. Along with
the rapid development of china butadiene industry, the national output of
butadiene increased from 725,000 tons in 2001 to 1.36 million tons in 2007, with
an average annual growth of 9.4%. Even after increase in production, China has
to import huge quantities of butadiene from different countries. Korea is the
biggest supplier of butadiene to china.
It was decided that the best place locate the butadiene plant in China which can
satisfy the demands of its market in near future is in Lanzhou, the capital of the
Gansu province which is in north western china.
While deciding the plant location several factors were taken into consideration:
Productivity - Since 1949 Lanzhou has been transformed from the capital of
a poverty-stricken province into the centre of a major industrial area. The GDP
per capita of Lanzhou was 25,566 Yuan (RMB) (US$3,681) in 2008, ranked no.
134 among 659 Chinese cities.
River - Lanzhou is situated at the upper course of the Yellow River. The river can
provide water to the plant as the process requires large quantities of water for
scrubbing and cooling. Also the river provides hydropower to the industries and
cities in Gansu. A large multipurpose dam has been built in the Liujia Gorge on
the Yellow River above Lanzhou. The river also helps in transportation.
Natural Resources - Lanzhou has many natural resources which include coal,
gold, silver, nickel, manganese, clay and dolomite. The Coal is obtained from
Qinghai which provides thermal power. The catalyst for our process is nickel
which will be cheaper to buy and will be available in large quantities.
Cheap Labour - Due to the presence of the Yellow river the site is a residential
area for more than 3.3 million people. Cheap labour is available for the plant.
There are many top ranked universities in this province which means qualified
staff will be available at the site.
Industrial area - Gansu has one of the largest oil refineries in the country and
Lanzhou itself is the centre of the province's petrochemical industry. The main
industries include rubber, petrochemical, oil refinery and machinery industry.
Butane which is the raw material for our process is readily available and also
Butadiene (product) can be sold to the neighbouring industries. Also, the
machinery parts will be available from the neighbouring industries which will
reduce the cost of transportation and energy and time.
The process development project aims to give third year Chemical Engineering
students a chance to experience what working on a project in an industry might
be like. Working in groups, they must cover all the major areas involved in
designing a process. The main process unit which has been discussed in this
project is a Distillation Column which separates Propane from 1,3 butadiene.
Within this task other objectives have been set to ensure that the goal is met
which are outlined below:
2.1Technical Objectives:
Description of a control system for the distillation column for best possible
results is to be done
To study concepts of process control including principles of feedback
and feed forward, apply these concepts to the design of
instrumentation and control system for a distillation column.
Propose a control system which will execute the desires of the process
functionality
Carry out a group study on the HAZOP for any one of the individual
selected processes to achieve the following outcomes
Richie Gandhi Page 69
SUN - 075909279
CE 3003 Advanced Process Design Individual Project
To be able to investigate how the chemical plant might deviate from the
design intent
To be able to identify scenarios that would lead to the release of
hazardous and flammable materials to the environment and also to
determine whether a particular deviation would result into an hazard
Work effectively in a team to achieve the project goal
Economic appraisal (group work) for the full process on production of 1,3
Butadiene in order to gain the following outcomes
Work effectively in the group to enhance team work skills
To estimate the costs and benefits of production of products using the
desired process route
To study the economic feasibility of the production of products
Written report preparation based on the selected design to achieve the following
Assemble and use relevant background information
Provide Complete Referencing
Appendices containing lengthy derivations, calculations, large drawing,
computer printouts etc.
To utilize our initiative: Many decision making processes will be used in the
undertaking a couple sections of this project. Each member will need to
use their initiative to come to a sensible and reasonable conclusion, which
will benefit the entire group.
2.3 Schedule
To support me in achieving these objectives a schedule has been devised to plan
the project and ensure that all required tasks are undertaken, within the time
period set for the study to be completed. This can be seen below. A Gantt chart
is also attached for assistance in the Section 3(b) in the Appendix II. This is the
revised Gantt Chat according to with the schedule has actually been carried out.
A Gantt chart which was made earlier to aid in maintain time is attached in
Section 3(a) in the Appendix II
2.3.1Project Schedule
Serial
No. Objective Start End
Date Date
Get feedback on
1 report/presentation and mass and
energy balance from Dr. Titiloye 19/01/1 22/01/1
Submit project plan. 0 0
To complete the objectives of the project various sources would be utilised for
research work. The main source of information used will be university library,
Birmingham city library, Aston Universitys access to online journals, internet
and contacting companies in relation to scope of the project. Discussions would
be carried out with Dr. Titiloye to check the track of the work and to ensure
correct research is carried out.
[3]
Phillips OXO-Process
The n-butene, steam and air react at 590-650C on a fixed bed heterogeneous
catalyst (probably a ferrite (iron or iron alloy) with Zn, Mn or Mg). Addition of
steam controls the selectivity. With butane conversions between 75-80%, the
butadiene selectivity reaches
roughly 88-92%.
Magnesium ferrite
C4H8 + O2 C4H6 + H2O..................................(1)
1 bar / 590-650C
It is a one step process, where Butene gets oxidised straight away, without the
need of butane dehydrogenation. Since our plant is close to an oil refinery plant,
where butane can be obtained at a cheaper price in abundance, a decision to
integrate the conversion of Butane to Butene in our process was made. This
reaction would take place in the first reactor and then the produced butene is
fed into the second reactor for further processing. The catalytic
dehydrogenation of Butane to Butene is not a part of our OXO process
which we had considered in the previous report.[3] The same method
was carried out in the first project, but it was not stated clearly stated
in literature.
Tubular Rector
C4H10 + O2 C4H8 + H2O.................................(2)
1Atms/5900C
Cromina-Alumina
The advantages for this process are that the catalyst life is long which lasts for
around 1000 hours. The capital costs compared to the other oxidative
dehydrogenation process routes are more favorable because of the low steam
requirements for the mixture and the relatively high concentration of butadiene
leaving the reactor. Reactors are set up to de-coke the catalyst and restore its
activity, and to allow more effluent output of butadiene. At high temperatures
(up to 6000C), oxygen acts to oxidatively regenerate the catalyst. Also there are
a class of metal Vanadate catalysts that are newly being used, which has highly
selectivity and high conversions and the formation of oxygenated by-products is
suppressed. The feedstock raw materials are inexpensive in the United States; a
major factor causing this is the trend towards greater usage of feedstock such as
natural gas liquids (ethane, propane). However, there is a growing shortage of
these raw materials, encouraging the use of heavy feedstock such as ethylene.
During this process, various by products are produced. These by-products must
be removed to produce butadiene, so it can be polymerised. One major by
product is vinyl acetylene, which is a highly unsaturated compound, a poison for
the catalysts that polymerise butadiene. Therefore there is a need to produce a
purification process by providing a stream with distillation steps. This allows the
process to be energy-conserving and simple.
A revised Flow Sheet is attached in Appendix III. A compressor is added after the
extractive distillation column, in the new flow sheet that increases the pressure
of the process before it can be sent to the Propane Distillation Column for further
purification.
I assume the mass balance to be correct as it was based on many assumptions
which were acceptable. A Copy of the Mass Balance done in the previous project
is attached in Appendix IV.
main objective of this unit is to get rid of propane from the process. The
distillation is a multi-component distillation thereby it involves more than two
components. It operates at very high pressure of 13.5 bars and consists of three
streams. The feed enters the distillation column at a temperature of about 350C.
On distillation, the Propane vapour leaves the top of the column to the
condenser and collected in the reflux drum. Partial amounts of 1,3 Butadiene is
also lost at the top of the column. The bottom product majorly comprises of 1, 3-
Butadiene, 1, 2-Butadiene and Pentane.
The table below shows the preliminary Mass Balance over the Distillation
Column
Table 1 (a): FEED:
Kmols/hr Kmols
Components Flow rate (kg/h) fraction
Propane 424.23 9.64 0.04
1,3 butadiene 11904.76 220.46 0.91
1,2 butadiene 500.00 9.26 0.038
Pentane 138.84 1.93 0.008
Total 12967.83 241.29 1
4.1 Calculations:
Basis: 1hr
Units: 1 Kg
Propane boiling point: 40C/313K @ 13.5 bars
Specifications
Calculations:
[8]
The minimum reflux ratio is calculated by using Underwood method.
A x fA B x fB C x fC D x fD
+ + + =1q .(1)
A B C D
A x dA B x dB C x dC D x dD
+ + + =1+ R (2)
A B C D min
Since the minimum reflux is calculated for a distillation column which consists of
four components, four variables are used in the above equation. For a multi-
component mixture to be split into two streams (distillate and bottoms) by
distillation, it is common to specify the separation in terms of two key
components of the mixture. Hence in this way multi components can be
reduced to equivalent binary systems.
The next step is to find the relative volatilities of each component with respect
to the HK which in this case is 1, 3 Butadiene. The calculations are attached in
the Appendix V, Section (b) and are tabulated below:
Table 3:
Components
Propane =2.724
1,3 Butadiene = 1
1,2 Butadiene = .66
Pentane = .31
Heat
q= vapourside 1 mol of feed .(3)
molar latent h eat of t h e feed
Therefore,
mc p T + m H vapuorisation
q= ( 4)
m H vapuorisation
[9]
Table 5: Specific Heat of the Components inside the Column
Components Specific Heat
in KJ/KmolK
Propane 81.84
1,3 138.78
Butadiene
1,2 136.08
Butadiene
Pentane 182.88
22647.224
q= =1 .267
17880.454
q = 1.267
Using the above value of q in the Underwood Equation (1), is obtained;
2.7240.04 10.91
+ =1+ R
2.7242.67 12.67 min
0.684 0.95
log
0.316 d 0.0005 w
N m= = 8.30(approximately 8)
log 2.724
Therefore,
R 0.515
= =0 . 34 ... ..(6)
R+ 1 0.515+1
R min 0.468
= =0 . 319 .(7)
R min+1 0.468+1
Nm
=0.4 .. ...(8)
N
8
=0.4
N
N= 20 theoretical stages
Table 6: Number of theoretical stages at different Reflux Ratios
R R/R+1 Nm/N N
1.1*0.468 = 0.34
0.515 0.4 20
1.2*0.468 = 0.36
0.562 0.42 19
1.3*0.468 = 0.39
0.608 0.49 16
1.4*0.468 = 0.4 0.53 15
0.655
1.5*0.468 = 0.41
0.702 0.55 15
1.6*0.468 = 0.43
0.749 0.58 14
From the above observations it is clear that increasing the reflux ratio reduces
the number of stages. But it is seen that increasing the minimum reflux ratios by
1.4 to 1.5 does not changes the number of theoretical stages.
There are two options available to decide which reflux ratios could be used in
our design. Either a line can be drwan from the origin of the graph as shown
below which means that the best available technique is a mid way between the
number of stages and the reflux ratio or this can be debated on the basis of
economic costs.
The increase in the reflux ratio reduces the number of stages in a distillation
column. But energy costs shoot up which has to be considered as well. Since the
Distillation column is almost running for (350 days* 15 years) approximately, it
is not a good option to run the column at high reflux ratios. But if very low reflux
ratios are opted, the metal costs to build the column go up. The reflux ratio
chosen for the process is 1.3 Rmin. I have decided to use a reflux ratio of 0.608
which requires reasonable costs and the number of stages are also acceptable. [8]
If the Feed is assumed to enter the column at its boiling point there is a huge
difference in the reflux ratios
Using the CHART flooding velocity, sieve plates, in Graph 2 and taking a
generalized plate spacing of 0.6m:
K1 (top) = 0.1
The velocity can now be calculated by;
( L V ) 0.5
u f =K 1(top)[ ] .(10)
V
Hence,
0.5
(599.6930.324)
u f =0.1[ ] =0. 4333 m/ sec
30.324
1063.22 Kg/h r
Top= =9 . 74103 m3 / sec
(30.324 Kg/m33600 sec /hr )
3 3
9.7910 m /sec
A= =0 . 028 m2
0.34664 m/sec
Allowing 10% for down comer and 10% for support rings;
There total area = 0.028*1.1*1.1 = 0.034 m2
Hence column diameter above the feed point;
d=
A4
=
0.0344
=0 . 21m
Using the CHART flooding velocity, sieve plates in Graph 2; taking a generalized
plate spacing of 0.6m:
K1 (bottom) = 5*10-2
The velocity can now be calculated by;
(599.6930.324) 0.5
u f =0.05[ ] =0 .21665 m/sec
30.324
4525.63 Kg/hr 3
Bottom= =0 . 041 m /sec
(30.324 Kg/m 33600 sec/ h r)
Allowing 10% for down comer and 10% for support rings;
There total area = 0.237*1.1*1.1 = 0.288 m2
d=
A4
=
0.2924
=0. 61 m
4.1.3Feed Location:
The number of stages is greatly affected by the subsequent position of the feed
into the column. The feed should enter the column at a point that matches best
with the composition of the feed. It is always a wise decision to provide two or
three feed point nozzles around the predicted feed point which will account for
the changes in the feed compositions after the start up.
The propane Distillation column is operating under high pressure. Hence, the
feed is either compressed or pumped into the column. It can be made to
compress to a slightly higher pressure into the feed pipe, approximately 14 bars,
so that when it enters the column which is slightly at a lower pressure than the
pipe, some of the propane from the components will immediately expand and
undergo a partial flash vaporisation resulting in vapour liquid separation as it
enters the distillation column.
[ ]
B
x 2
Nr D fHK x bLK
log =0.206 log (12)
Ns x fLK x dHK
Where,
Nr = number of stages above the feed, including any partial condenser
Ns = number of stages below the feed, including the reboiler
B = Molar Flow Bottom Product
D = Molar Flow Top Product
XfHK = concentration of the heavy key in the feed
XfLK = concentration of the light key in the feed
XbLK = concentration of the light key in the bottom product
XdHK = concentration of the heavy key in the Distillate
[ ]
277.336
0.91
Nr 13.954 0.0005 2
log =0.206 log
Ns 0.04 0.316
Nr
log =0.607
Ns
Nr
=0.2472
Ns
The calculated value for the distillation column is approximately 0.6 m. The
choice between packing and trays was made on the basis of advantages and
disadvantages of each type, and it is concluded that a PACKING would be best
[14]
for such small diameters. This decision was made because:
Plate columns are generally designed to handle wider range of vapour and
liquid flow rates than packed columns. Since the gas flow rates in the top
of the column is minor, plate installation would not be a good idea.
Packed columns are not suitable for very low liquid flow rates.
The pressure drop per equilibrium stage (HETP) is lower for packing than
plates. Since, the column is operated at high pressures; it would be a
better option to choose packed column rather than plates to avoid
complications.
After the decision is made, the design over the packed column has to be done.
[14]
This includes the following procedures:
The type and packing size has to selected corresponding to the diameter
of the column
Determining the height of the column required for the desired separation
Calculation of the column diameter (capacity), to handle the liquid and
vapour flow rates.
Selection of column internal features like; packing support, liquid
distributor, redistributors.
[14]
A packing should always fulfil the following requirements:
Provide a large interfacial area between the gas and the liquid.
Should have an open structure for low resistance to gas flow.
Should provide consistent liquid distribution on the packing surface
Promote unvarying vapour gas flow across the column cross section
Raschig rings are the oldest types of random packing whose length is equal to
the diameter. These are cheaper compared to any of the random packing
structures but not as efficient as others.
These were then modified to Pall rings which have openings made by folding
strips of the surface into the ring. This increases the liquid distribution by
increasing the surface area.
Other types of random packing are, Berl Saddle Ceramic, Intalox Saddle
Ceramic, Metal Hypac and Super Intalox Ceramics.
Selection of Packing:
high pressures and has a very small diameter. Also the components inside the
column are non-corrosive. It would require too much effort and capital to install
structured packing inside the column which would separate the same amount of
propane. Also Ceramic pall rings can be considered, but they are more
expensive than the metallic ones.
Hence, for the Propane distillation column Metallic Pall rings with a size of
25mm is used.
Pressure gradient over the enriching section using column diameter as 0.61m
Values for x and y axis can be calculated and the flooding line can be plotted
in the figure above.
X axis :
L
G g
L
(13)
Where,
L = Liquid Rate per Area
G= Gas Rate per Area
Since the area remains same; the ratio can just be taken as the normal flow
rates of vapours and liquids.
Hence;
X axis :
16832.22 30.524
4525.63 599.69
=0 . 839
Now,
2 0.2
G F p L
Y axis: (14)
v Lg
Where,
Fp = Wet Packing Factor; Appendix V; section (d)
= Ratio; (density of water/Density of Liquid inside the column)
L = Liquid Viscosity of 1,3 butadiene is considered in the calculations, as major
fraction of the liquid comprises of 1,3 Butadiene
g = Gravitational constant
Hence;
4525.634
36000.612
21601000
0.250.2
599.69
Y axis:
The values of pressure gradients for the lower range over the distillation column
can be used to calculate a new diameter. Any of the values between the two
ranges can be used for the design.
From the same graph above a new value of Y is plotted at 40mmHg/m is now
calculated.
Hence the Flooding line would be,
40 mm Hg
=2.9 3 ..(15)
13.6 mm Hg
0.01530.324599.699.81
G= =3 . 64
1601000 0.2
0.25
599.69
Since,
V
G=
A
Therefore,
V 4525.63 2
New Area ( A )= = =0 . 345 m ..(16)
G 36003.64
Since the gas flow rate per area in decreased; the diameter has to be increased.
Hence,
D=
A4
=
0.3454
=0.662m 0 .66 m
Since, the change in diameter is not drastic the packing used can still be
suitable for this diameter. The capacity of the column can be anything between
0.61m 0.66m depending on the flooding line.
Hence, it has been concluded that the capacity will be 0.65m; which can also be
helpful when the production capacity of the plant increases. The flooding like
can be changed accordingly.
Hence, HETP for the propane distillation column is 0.5m as the size for pall rings
used is 25mm.
This means, one stage is 0.5m since there are 16 stages calculated earlier, total
height of the column = 0.5*16 = 8m
Flooding is prevented due to the tall height of the column.
Since the feed stream is put after 3 stages; the position of the feed stream is
(0.5m*3 stages) 1.5 m at the top and the length below it is 6.5 m.
Where,
Pi = Internal pressure
s = Design Stress for stainless steel @ 1000C; Appendix V; section (e)
e = minimum thickness of the material
Hence,
1.3750.651000
e= =2.99 mm 3 mm
( 2150 )1.375
The thickness of the Domed Section of the column can be calculated by:
C s=
1
4( ) ( )
R 1
3+ c = 3+
Rk 4
0.65
0.039
=1. 77
Pi Rc C s
e= (18)
2 fJ + Pi (C s0.2)
1.3750.6510001.77
e= =5 . 24 mm
(21501)+1.375(1.770.2)
A tank diameter of less than 15m should have a minimum allowable thickness of
[16]
5mm . The thickness obtained from calculation would hold the weight of
content in the vessel, but would not stand depression or dent. Therefore, a 5mm
minimum allowable thickness was given for any vessel less than 1m because
this can withstand depression. Hence, the results obtained are acceptable.
And;
13.547.48
t= =0 .22 mm
(20145)+13.5
1063.22
3600
d ,optimum =260
And,
13.539.02
t= =0 .18 mm
(20145)+13.5
13.554.38
t= =0 .252 mm
(20145)+13.5
Liquid Distributors:
In the Weir types the liquid flows over the notched weirs in the gas stand-pipes.
These stand an upper grade over the orifice type in handling wider range of
liquid flow rates. The column designed uses Orifice type of distributor. A pipe
manifold distributor shown in figure 17 is used when the liquid is fed to the
column under pressure and the flow rate is reasonably constant. The distribution
pipes and orifices are accurately sized for equal uniform distribution.
Orifice
type is exploited in the propane distillation column.
Liquid Redistributors:
The maximum bed height that should be used without liquid redistribution lies
solely on the type of packing and the process. The wall-wiper type is mainly
used in small columns of less than 0.6m in diameter. This operates in a
mechanism were a ring collects liquid from the column wall and redirects it into
the centre packing.
Installing Packing:
The column is filled with water and the packing is dumped into the water
ensuring the level of water always being above the packing at all times. Metal
and Ceramic packing are generally deserted into the column WET. This
ensures random distribution and prevents any damage to the packing.
In case of DRY packing the packing should be lowered into the columns in
buckets or other containers.
Concept Drawing:
The Concept Drawing Details the application of column internals more in detail.
Bit-Map is used to create the column showing every possible detail and
dimension. The non calculated values are assumed to British standards.
5.0 CONDENSER:
Condensers are units similar to heat exchangers, which are used to condense
the vapours to their liquid state. Condensers vary in size ranging from hand
handled units to large industrial scale units.
For condensers used in distillation columns, the process fluid generally flows
through the shell side and the cooling fluid is made to flow through the tube
side. The two fluids never come in contact with each other. The diagram below
shoes a one tube pass condenser.
Horizontal shell side and vertical tube side is widely used as condensers. The
other two are usually used in arrangements for heaters and vaporisers using
steam as the heating medium.
Assumptions:
It is assumed that a horizontal shell side condenser is used to cool the
propane vapours.
It is a complete condenser. Hence all the vapours are cooled down.
There is one shell and one tube pass inside the condenser and the flow is
counter current.
Since the top product mainly comprises of the propane, the physical
properties of propane are used for all the calculations.
The cooling fluid chosen is chilled water that enters the tube side at 150C
and leaves at 450C.
The tube layout for this particular design is arranged in a squared pitch.
Basis: 1 hour
Flow rate entering the condenser; V
V = L+D; 402.39 + 661.83 = 1063.22 kg/hr
661.83 Kg
1.75 KJ
sec
mC p T = 10 K =3.22 KJ /sec
KgK
Since the Heat lost by the condenser is calculated the flow rate of water
required can also be calculated as relevant from the following formula;
It is assumed earlier that the chilled water enters the condenser @ 15 0C and
leaves @ 450C. Hence T = 300C
Hence,
X Kg
4.2 KJ
sec
(mC p T )1=98.434 KW = 30 K=0 .781 Kg/sec
KgK
From the diagram above it now becomes easier to TLM. The Log mean
temperature difference is given by:
( T t OUT )(T OUT t )
T LM = ..(23)
T t
ln ( OUT )
T OUT t
Where,
TLM = log mean temperature
TIN = inlet temperature of process fluid
TOUT = outlet temperature of process fluid
tIN = inlet temperature of cooling water
tOUT = outlet temperature of cooling water
( 4540 )(3515)
T LM = =10.820 C
4540
ln ( )
3515
Graph 4: Overall Coefficients (join process side to the service side and
read U values from the centre line)
Trial Area:
Q=UA T LM (24)
Where,
Q= Heat Transfer per unit Time
U= Heat Transfer Coefficient
A= Area
TLM = Log Mean Temperature difference
Q 98.4341000W
A= = =15 .16 m 2
U T LM 600 W /m2 K10.82 K
Hence, the surface area can now be calculated from the above data specified.
Therefore,
Total Trial Area
Number of tubes=
Suraface Area of one tube
15.16 m2
Number of tubes= =99 tubes
0.1533 m2
Nt
K1
Db=d o
Where,
Nt = number of tubes
K1 and n = constants obtained from table 9[25]
Do = Outer diameter
Table 9: K and n constants for square arrangements:
Square pitch, Pt = 1.25 do
Number of 1 2 4 6
Passes
K1 0.215 0.156 0.158 0.0402
n1 2.207 2.291 2.263 2.617
Hence,
99
0.215
Db=20
Db
Tubest h e centre row = ..(26)
Pt
321.91 mm
Tubest h e centre row = =12 . 87 tubes 13 tubes
25 mm
Mean temperature:
35+45
S h ell side= =400 C
2
15+40
Tube side= =27.5 0 C
2
Where,
Wc
h=
L Nt
2
N r= number of tubest h e centre row ..(28)
3
2
N r= 12=8
3
Hence,
0.295 3
h= =1 . 2210 Kg/m sec
2.4499
hc
hc
The value obtained is close enough to the value assumed (1500W/m 2K), hence
the estimated Tw is acceptable.
Eagle and Ferguson (1930) adapted a much reliable formula for the heat transfer
coefficient for water used in the tube side. This is stated as below:
0.8
4200(1.35+0.02 t)u t
hi= 0.2
(29)
di
Where,
hi = inside coefficient for water
0.781
ut = =0. 0394 m/ sec
995.650.0199
Hence, substituting the values of velocity, the heat transfer coefficient of water
inside the tube is;
4200(1.35+0.0227.5)0.03940.8
hi = 0.2
=1375. 49 W / m2 0 C
(.016)
Where,
20
U = the overall coefficient based on the outside area of the tube, W/m C
Richie Gandhi Page 69
SUN - 075909279
CE 3003 Advanced Process Design Individual Project
20
ho = outside fluid film coefficient, W/m C
20
hi = inside fluid film coefficient, W/m C
20
hod = outside dirt coefficient; fouling factor, W/m C
20
hid = inside dirt coefficient; fouling factor, W/m C
kw = thermal conductivity of the tube wall material, W/m0C
di = tube inside diameter, m
do = tube outside diameter, m
Fouling Factors: As neither of the fluid is heavily fouling, the dirt coefficient at
2 0
both the sides has been assumed to be 6000 W/m C and kw is assumed to be
50 W/m0C
20 20 20
(20103 ) ln ( ) 1 1
1 1 1 16 16 16
= + + + +
U 1646.979 6000 250 6000 1375.49
1
=1.9354103
U
The value obtained is significantly lower than the assumed value of 600 W/m2 0C
The calculation has to be repeated using different values of Overall heat transfer
coefficient by trial and error method; and the closest possible answer firms up
the final design.
Q 98.4341000 W 2
A= = =18 .19 m
U T LM 500 W /m2 K10.82 K
3
Surface Area ( A ) =dl=3.142010 2.44
Nt
K1
119
0.215
Db=d o
Db 349.899
Tubest h e centre row = = =14 tubes
Pt 25
Where,
0.295
h= =1. 009103 Kg/m sec
2.44119
And
2 2
N r = number of tubest h e centre row= 14 9tubes
3 3
hc
hc
Again using Eagle and Fergusons (1930) formula tube side coefficient is
calculated. But the velocity of the water in the tubes changes;
0.781
ut = =0. 033 m/sec
995.650.0239
Hence, the new calculated value for the Tube Side Coefficient;
4200(1.35+0.0227.5)0.0330.8
hi = 0.2
=1220 . 06 W /m2 0 C
(.016)
1
=2.0575103
U
The results are satisfactory. The values obtained are close enough to the values
assumed hence, the design is confirmed.
Specifications:
j f Ds
L
de
u s2
lb .14
Ps =8 ( ) .(32)
2 w
Where,
Jf = Friction factor
L = Length of the tubes
Lb = baffle Spacing
All the unknowns are calculated below.
D s=D b+ clearance
Cross Sectional Area As for the hypothetical row of tubes at the Shell Equator
( pt d 0) D s l B
As= (33)
pt
Where,
Pt = Tube Pitch
Ds = shell inside diameter
LB = baffle spacing
( 2520 ) 438.899438.899106
As= =0 . 039 m2
25
Where,
Ws = Fluid Flow Rate on the shell side in kg/sec
0.295 2
G s= =7 . 56 Kg/m sec
0.039
Linear Velocity us
G s 7.56
us = = =0. 26 m/sec
29.16
1.27
de= ( 25 20.785 202 )=19 . 8 mm
20
Friction Factor; jf
Friction factor is estimated from a graph in FIG; which is a correlation between
Reynoldss number and baffle cut.
Hence,
G sd e 7.5619.8103
Re = = =18 , 711
v 0.008103
Substituting all the above calculated values in the pressure drop equation;
2
84.810 438.899
2.44
19.8
29.160.262
0.438899 .14
Ps = ( )
2 w
ut2
[ j L
]
m
Pt =N p 8 f
di w ( ) +2.5
2
(36)
Hence,
0.03316103995.65
Re = =876 . 172
0.6 103
2
Pt =7 . 306 N /m
6.0 REBOILER:
Reboilers are used with the distillation column to vaporise a fraction of the
bottom product.
[28]
There are three different kind of reboilers used:
Forced Circulation; where the fluid is pumped through the exchanger. The
vapour formed is separated and sent back to the bottom of the distillation
column and rest is removed.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/57/Thermosyph
on_Reboiler.png
Kettle Reboilers, also called submerged bundle reboilers; where boiling
takes place on the tubes immersed in a pool of liquid. The liquid does not
circulate through the heat exchanger. These are the most expensive kind
of Reboilers.
Hence,
Assuming; that the bottom product is liquid at boiling point which enters the
Reboiler at 368K.
4525.63 Kg
1 hr
hr
335.55 KJ
3600 sec
Q= =421 . 826 KW
Kg
Heat obtained by the process fluid is the heat lost by the steam entering the
Reboiler.
Hence the Q remains same. Assuming steam entering the Reboiler at 2.6 bars,
Hence, H for steam at 2.6 bars = 2177.42 KJ/Kg
Q 421.826 KW
S= = =0 .194 Kg/ sec
H
vapourisation
2177.42 KJ /kg
The choice of the kind of reboiler used with a distillation column solely depends
on the following:
The viscosity and the propensity to fouling of the process fluid
The operating pressure
The headroom available to layout the equipment.
The Energy Balance over the column could not be calculated in the first part of
the assignment as the Reflux Ratios were unknown.
The Heat Duty over the Condenser and the Reboiler is calculated. It is
summarised in the table below.
Units Energy Required Energy Released
Condenser - 98.434 KW
Reboiler - 421.826KW -
Total -323.392 KW
The Negative Sign shows that the Energy is required to run the unit.
Since the Process of Butadiene production is very complex which includes many
units, the P and ID is only done over the Propane Distillation Column which is
attached in Appendix, 6 (issue number 002) The basic units and symbols used in
the P and ID are briefly described below:
Control Valves [31]: The parameters such as temperature, pressure, flow and
level are controlled by the control valve. Control Valves can be manual or
automatic which are partially or fully open or closed. The action of the
control valves are in response to the signals received from their respective
controllers that compare the set-point to the process variables.
Drain Valve: As the name suggests, these valves are used to drain the
components from the unit or pipelines. These are generally closed and are
in operation usually during site or unit maintenance.
Relief Valve: The relief valve is a type of valve used to control or limit
the pressure in a system or vessel which can build up by a process upset,
instrument or equipment failure, or fire. The pressure is relieved by
allowing the pressurised fluid to flow from an auxiliary passage out of the
system. Since the distillation Column taken into consideration is operating
under high pressures, a relief valve can act as a precautionary measure
which would help to get rid out the extra pressure built up into the unit. It
is built on the reflux drum, as building it over the column can lose its
components in the vapour phase that is released. As it is the last stage the
purified butadiene cannot be afforded to be wasted.
Pneumatic Lines: The signals transmitted from a controller to the valve are
generally shown by pneumatic lines on a P and ID.
Electric Lines: The dotted lines show the transmission of electric signal in
the P and ID. The electric signal is send by the transmitter to the
controller.
High and Low Level Alarms: Alarms alert the operators of serious and
potentially hazardous deviations in the process conditions. Key
instruments are fitted with switches. If there is a delay or lack of response
by the operator a hazardous situation can occur in a short span of time.
Often drills are practiced to overcome such catastrophic situations. When
this system turns on, a trip system automatically comes into action which
includes, shutting down of pumps, closing valves, operating emergency
systems etc.
A principal prerequisite of the plant is to operate safely for the well being of
plant stakeholders and to continue satisfying the economic goal. To achieve
this, temperature, pressures, flow rates etc need to be controlled within
allowable limits.
Operational Constraints [33]
Different process equipment have variable process constraints i.e. tanks should
not overfill, distillation columns should not be flooded and centrifugal pumps
must maintain a certain net positive suction head, these need to be considered
when determining the control system.
Environmental Constraints [33]
Involves ensuring discharges are within acceptable limits e.g. as prescribed
under IPC.
Economics [33]
Plant operating conditions need to be controlled to ensure that the plant is
operating at its optimum, thus ensuring maximum profitability.
Although control is essential, it is known in industry that trying to tightly control
absolutely every stream in the process is very costly and unrealistic and can
result in total inflexibility and even destabilisation of the plant, (control loops
may start to interfere with each others actions). Similarly measurement
sensors and control valves are expensive, so unnecessary measurement is a loss
of money. Therefore these factors will need to be taken into account when
deciding upon the control.
Various control measures have been taken into account to meet the objectives
of the plant such as safety, operation, environmental constraints and economics.
Sensors have been installed at various process lines and equipments to make
the operator aware of the situation with the equipment and the process. The
sensors transfer signals to the controller which then send back commands to the
respective valves to carry out the action.
Control system of the process will be explained as we go along the PID from left
to right.[34][35]
Richie Gandhi Page 69
SUN - 075909279
CE 3003 Advanced Process Design Individual Project
FC 1: the feed pipe is installed with a flow controller, which helps to control the
flow throughout the pipe. The flow rate is received as input to the FT-1, which
then sends output signals to the flow controller FC, which then sends on
information to the automated control valve CV-1. This ensures a steady state
and control flow rate of feed to the distillation column.
PC 1: The distillation column is operating under high pressures. The pressure is
a very crucial variable and has to be controlled to avoid flooding. The pressure is
read by a pressure gauge and this input is received by a PT1 which sends signal
to the PC 1 which then forwards the information to the control valve on the
condenser. The condenser would reduce the flow rate of water if the pressure
drops; this intern increases the temperature of the distillate entering the reflux
drum as desired heat exchange was not possible; which increases the pressure
back into the column. The reverse action is carried out if the pressure inside the
column increases. There is a relief valve on the reflux drum which also operates
when the pressure inside the column increases drastically.
Indicators:
There are three main indicators used in the P and ID. These are mainly to
provide information of the operating conditions. There are two sample indicators
SI (1-1) and SI (1-2), which provide information about the purity of the fluids
entering and leaving the column.
Since, the columns top temperature is different from the bottom one, two
temperature indicators are required.
preventive measures had been taken to ensure the safe working condition of the
operators and the environment.
In our study we carried out a Hazop with Dr. Titiloye on the Feed pipe entering
the Propane Distillation column. (As highlightedGreen in Figure attached in
Appendix VII). General consequence of a Hazop leads to an updated version of
the PID to be made after including all the safety features discussed during the
meeting. Hence the slight deviation in the final P and ID (ISSUE no. 2) is due to
Hazop done on the pipe.
In practise Hazop should be carried out over the whole process, but due to time
constraints and requirements of the project only one line of the process is looked
at.
Hazop discussions have also been added, this includes all the causes and their
consequences looked at and also preventive actions have been highlighted. The
Hazop is attached in Appendix VII.
10.0 Conclusion:
The design project has been successful in its aims of providing a detailed
knowledge a chemical process unit. This project was a learning process where
different challenges were faced. At this stage, such a project is aimed to
increase general design knowledge of a given operating unit in this case; a
packed bed distillation column. As this was just a preliminary design, the amount
of detail of the design and the accuracy of the final calculations might be
questionable. However, it remains a fact that this project targets more than just
design but also gives an idea of how to make reasonable assumptions and
where data is not available, the use of values which can be used to make
reasonable estimates. Overall the project enhances ones ability to play around
with available data in order reach a reasonable estimate.
After calculating all the values over my distillation column I conclude that one
distillation column can be used to separate propane and recover 1,3 butadiene.
A stepped column can be used as the diameter for the pentane distillation
column, (the unit where the 1,3 butadiene is pumped to for further purification.)
is 2 m as suggested my group mate. Since the diameter for the propane
distillation column is 0.65m the top part of the column can have this diameter
and the lower part of the column should have a diameter of 2m. This can
reduce the operating costs and also a significant amount of raw material to build
the column would be reduced.
Also a separator can be used instead of a distillation column, but the
temperature has to be reduced too low, to obtain such separation. This can be
more expensive than providing high pressure inside the column.
11.0 References:
[1]: http://www.wakefield.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/F456AD74-5BC2-4697-9414-
55C32FCBE9E2/0/s1_13Butadiene.pdf,( (Part 1: Group Project on1,3 Butadiene
Production) accessed date 28/11/09
[5]: http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/166112/distillation-column;
accessed date 13/02/10
[8]: Dr. Bruce, 3rd year Chemical Engineering Advanced Separation Class Notes,
Aston University, 2010; Lecture 1
[10]: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F Chemical Engineering Design, 4th ed., vol.
6, Pergamon, Oxford, 2005 page 567-569,
[11]: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F Chemical Engineering Design, 4th ed., vol.
6, Pergamon, Oxford, 2005 page 579
[12]: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F Chemical Engineering Design, 4th ed., vol.
6, Pergamon, Oxford, 2005 page 569
[13]: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F Chemical Engineering Design, 4th ed., vol.
6, Pergamon, Oxford, 2005 page 526
[14] : Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F Chemical Engineering Design, 4th ed., vol.
6, Pergamon, Oxford, 2005 page 588-593
[15]: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F Chemical Engineering Design, 4th ed., vol.
6, Pergamon, Oxford, 2005 page 592
[16]: Dr. Bruce, 3rd year Chemical Engineering Advanced Separation Class Notes,
Aston University, 2010; Lecture 3
[17]: http://www.tower-packing.com/metal/metal_pall_ring_tower_packing.htm,
accessed date 29/02/10
[18]: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F Chemical Engineering Design, 4th ed., vol.
6, Pergamon, Oxford, 2005 page 593
[19]: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F Chemical Engineering Design, 4th ed., vol.
6, Pergamon, Oxford, 2005 page 812
[20]: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F Chemical Engineering Design, 4th ed., vol.
6, Pergamon, Oxford, 2005 page 216 and 221
[21]: http://www.zehua-chem.com/
[22]: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F Chemical Engineering Design, 4th ed., vol.
6, Pergamon, Oxford, 2005 page 609-616
[23]: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F Chemical Engineering Design, 4th ed., vol.
6, Pergamon, Oxford, 2005 page 709
[25]: Dr. John Brammer, 2nd Year Chemical Engineering Heat transfers Notes,
Aston University.
[26] : http://www.processglobe.com/Liquid_Specific_Heat.aspx
[27]: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F Chemical Engineering Design, 4th ed., vol.
6, Pergamon, Oxford, 2005 page 711
[28]: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F Chemical Engineering Design, 4th ed., vol.
6, Pergamon, Oxford, 2005 page 729
[29]: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F Chemical Engineering Design, 4th ed., vol.
6, Pergamon, Oxford, 2005 page 195-199
[31]:
http://www.documentation.emersonprocess.com/groups/public/documents/book/
cvh99.pdf ; accessed date 14/03/10
[32]: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F Chemical Engineering Design, 4th ed., vol.
6, Pergamon, Oxford, 2005 page 197 -198
[33]: Dr. Fletcher, 2nd Year Chemical Engineering Control Process Notes, Aston
University
[34]:Page S. Buckley, William L. Luyben and Joseph P. Shunta Design of
Distillation Column Control Systems
[35]
:http://www.see.ed.ac.uk/~jwp/control06/controlcourse/restricted/course/fourth/c
ourse/module3-1.html
[36]: Dr. Drahun, 2nd Year Chemical Engineering Advanced Design Process,
Aston University.
Graph 1 : Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F Chemical Engineering Design, 4th ed.,
vol. 6, Pergamon, Oxford, 2005 page 524
Grapgh 2: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F Chemical Engineering Design, 4th ed.,
vol. 6, Pergamon, Oxford, 2005 page 568
Graph 5: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F Chemical Engineering Design, 4th ed.,
vol. 6, Pergamon, Oxford, 2005 page 646
Graph 6: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F Chemical Engineering Design, 4th ed.,
vol. 6, Pergamon, Oxford, 2005 page 574
Graph 7: Coulson J.M & Richardson J.F Chemical Engineering Design, 4th ed.,
vol. 6, Pergamon, Oxford, 2005 page 668