Tax General Principles
Tax General Principles
Tax General Principles
H o m e o f the N a t io n s T o p B a r R e v ie w ers
GENERAL PRINCIPLES
2. The act or process by which the taxing 4. It is imposed by the State on persons,
power is exercised (Vitug and Acosta, Tax property, or excises within its
Lazo and jurisprudence, 2006 ed., p.l). jurisdiction, in accordance with the
principle of territoriality (Ibid. p.8).
Nature of taxation
5. It is levied by the legislative body of the
Taxation is both an inherent power and a State. Taxes are obligation created by
legislative power. The power of taxation is law (Vera vs. Fernandez, 89 SCRA 199). It
an essential and inherent attribute of creates a civil liability on the part of the
sovereignty, belonging as a matter of right delinquent taxpayer, although the non
to every independent government without payment thereof creates a criminal
being expressly granted by the people (Pepsi liability which could be the subject of
- Cola Bottling Co. o f the Philippines, Inc. vs. criminal prosecution under existing
Municipality o f Tanauan, Leyte, G.R. No. L- laws. It is one's civil liability to pay
31156, 27 Feb. 1976). The power of taxation national internal revenue taxes that
is generally vested with the legislature gives rise to criminal liability, not the
(Secretary of Finance vs. Ilarde, 458 SCRA other way around. Criminal cases
218). cannot operate to discharge defendant-
appellee from the duty of paying the
Characteristics of taxation taxes which the law requires to be paid,
since that duty is imposed by the statute
1. It is a forced charge, imposition or prior to and independently of any
contribution. As such, it operates ad attempts by the taxpayer to evade
invitum; i.e., it is in no way dependent payment (Republic vs. Patanao, 20 SCRA
upon the will or contractual assent, 712).
express or implied, of the person taxed.
It is not contractual, either express or 6. It is levied for a public purpose (Ibid.
implied, but positive acts of government p.8).
(Reviewer on Taxation, Mamalateo, 2nd
Ed., 2008, pp. 7-8). 7. It is personal to the taxpayer. A
corporation's tax delinquency cannot be
2. It is assessed in accordance with some enforced against its stockholders. A
reasonable rule of apportionment which corporation is vested by law with a
2. Tax avoidance is the lessening of tax 2. In countless times the Supreme Court
liabilities through maximization of has ruled that exemption must be clear
deductions, exclusions, and exemptions in the language of the law granting such
and minimization of income by legal for it is strictly construed and favoured
means. Tax avoidance is tire tax saving against the person invoking it (Manila
device within the means sanctioned by Electric Company v. The City Assessor,
the law. This method should be used by G.R. No. 166102, August 5, 2015) and
the taxpayer in good faith and at arm's liberally in favor of the taxing
length (Ibid.). This is also known as tax authorityit is the taxpayer's duty to
minimization. justify the exemption by words too plain
to be mistaken and too categorical to be
3. Tax evasion is a scheme used outside of misinterpreted (Radio Communications o f
those lawful means and when availed the Philippines, Inc. (RCPI), vs. Provincial
of, it usually subjects the taxpayer to Assessor o f South Cotabato, 456 SCRA 1).
further or additional civil or criminal
TAXATION LAW
p i| Txeroletos Hato Center
V iS a r H o m e o f t h e N a t io n s T o p B ar R e v ie w e r s
3. The basis for the rule on strict Airport Authority vs. Marcos, G.R. No.
construction to statutory provisions 120082, September 11, 1996).
granting tax exemptions or deductions
is to minimize differential treatment and The Congress, however, could impair a
foster impartiality, fairness and equality taxpayer's legislative franchise by
of treatment among taxpayers (Quezon making it liable for income tax from
City vs. ABS-CBN Broadcasting which heretofore it was exempted by
Corporation, 567 SCRA 496). virtue of the exemption provided in its
franchise (Cagayan Electric Power and
4. The rule that tax exemptions should be Light Co. Inc. v. CIR, G.R. No. 60126,
construed strictly against the taxpayer September 25,1985).
presupposes that the taxpayer is clearly
subject to the tax being levied against Rationale/grounds for exemption
him unless a statute imposes a tax
clearly, expressly and unambiguously, 1. The inherent power of the state to
what applies is the equally well-settled impose taxes naturally carries with it the
rule that the imposition of a tax cannot power to grant tax exemptions. The
be presumed (Commissioner of Internal power to exempt from taxation, as well
Revenue vs. Philippine American Accident as the power to tax, is an essential
Insurance Company, Inc., 453 SCRA 668). attribute of sovereignty, and may be
exercised in the Constitution, or in a
5. Flowing from the basic precept of statute, unless the Constitution
constitutional law that no law is expressly or by implication prohibits
irrepealable, Congress, in the legitimate action by the legislature on the subject
exercise of its lawmaking powers, can (Tax Principles and Remedies, Dimaampao,
enact a law withdrawing a tax 2nd Ed., 2011, p. 107).
exemption just as efficaciously as it may
grant the same (Republic vs. Caguioa, 536 2. Cemeteries are exempt from the
SCRA 193). payment of taxes because of the
difficulty of collecting taxes thereon and
Kinds of tax exemptions obvious impropriety of selling the
graves of the dead to defray the
1. Express. Exemptions which are expressly expenses of carrying on the government
granted by organic or statute law. of the living (Tax Principles and Remedies,
Dimaampao, 4th Ed., 2Oil, p. 105).
2. Implied. Exemptions which. exist
whenever particular persons, properties 3. Churches and parsonages or covenants
or excises are deemed exempt as they appurtenant thereto, etc., are exempt
fall outside the scope of the taxing from taxation because such institutions
provision itself. perform work which would otherwise
have to be carried on by the public at
3. Contractual. Since taxation is the rule the expense of the taxpayers and that
and exemption therefrom the exception, the expenses of such institutions from
the exception may thus be withdrawn at taxation lessens rather than increases
the pleasure of the taxing authority. The the burden upon other taxpayers (26
only exception to this rule is where the R.C.L. 316).
exemption was granted to private
parties based on material consideration 4. It would seem, however, that to be
of a mutual nature, which then becomes entitled to the exemption, lands,
contractual and is thus covered by the buildings and improvements of
non-impairment clause of the religious and charitable institutions
Constitution (Mactan Cebu International should be "actually, directly and
exclusively used" for religious and the governmental body which is not
charitable purposes (Tax Principles and included in the tax levy, it is plain that
Remedies, Dimaampao, 4th Ed., 2011, p. some legitimate and necessary
105). expenditure must be curtailed. If the
taxpayer's claim is disputed, the
5. The test of exemption from taxation of collection of the tax must await and
real property is tire use of the same for abide the result of a lawsuit, and
the purposes mentioned in the meanwhile the financial affairs of the
Constitution (Abra Valley College vs. Hon. government will be thrown into great
Juan Aquino, L-39086, June 15, 1988, 162 confusion (47 Am. Jur. 766-767.)."
SCRA 106),
3. In Domingo vs. Garlitos (G.R. No. L-18994,
6. Properties of the national government as June 29, 1963), the High Court reversed
well as those of the local government itself in holding that where the taxes
units are not subject to tax, otherwise it and the taxpayer's claim are fully
will result in the absurd situation of the liquidated, due and demandable, legal
government "taking money from one compensation under Art. 1279 of the
pocket and putting it in another" (Cooley Civil Code can take place by operation
on Taxation, Sec. 621, 4th Ed., as cited in of law, and both debts are extinguished
Board o f Assessment Appeals o f Laguna vs. to the concurrent amount.
Court o f Tax Appeals, 8 Phil. 227).
(NOTE: In Domingo, the Supreme Court
Doctrine of set-off took cognizance of the "fact that the court
having jurisdiction o f the estate had found
1. The doctrine presupposes mutual that the claim o f the estate against the
obligation between the parties. In Government has been recognized and an
taxation, the concept of set-off arises amount o f P262,200 has already been
where a taxpayer is liable to pay tax but appropriated fo r the purpose by a
the government for one reason or corresponding law (Rep. Act No. 2700).";
another, is indebted to the said such fact did not exist in Mambulao).
taxpayer.
4. In Francia vs, IAC (G.R. No. 76749, June
2. In Republic vs. Mambulao (G.R. No. L- 28, 1988), the Supreme Court denied the
17725, February 28, 1962), the Supreme claim of a taxpayer for set-off or legal
Court ruled that taxes are not subject to compensation between his tax liability
set-off or legal compensation. The to the Government and the amount that
Supreme Court further explained that the Government owed him by reason of
[t]he general rule, based on grounds of the confiscation of his property by way
public policy is well-settled that no set of eminent domain. The Supreme Court
off is admissible against demands for reiterated what it had said in Mambulao,
taxes levied for general or local that the circumstances of this case do
governmental purposes. The reason on not satisfy the requirements of legal
which the general rule is based, is that compensation set forth under Art. 1279,
taxes are not in the nature of contracts to wit: "(1) that each one of the obligors
between the parties but grow out of a bound principally and he be at the same
duty to, and are the positive acts of the time a principal creditor of the other;
government, to the making and xxx (3) that the two debts be due. xxx."
enforcing of which, the personal consent
of individual taxpayers is not required, 5. The recent cases of United Airlines, Inc.
x x x If the taxpayer can properly refuse vs. Commissioner o f Internal Revenue, 631
to pay his tax when called upon by the SCRA 567, 29 September 2010) and South
Collector, because he has a claim against African Airways vs. Commissioner of
6. As to graduation or rate
- 0O 0 -
TAXATION LAW