Case Study
Case Study
Case Study
a) Is it fair agreement?
b) Would it contravene with the concept of equal pay for equal work?
CASE STUDY
The case discusses the compensation management practices at Tata Consultancy Services Ltd.
(TCS), one of the leading Indian IT companies. TCS compensation management system was
based on the EVA model. With the implementation of Economic Value Added (EVA)-based
compensation, the salary of employees comprised of two parts fixed and variable. The variable
part of the salary was arrived after considering business unit EVA, corporate EVA, and also
individual performance EVA. During the fourth quarter of the financial year (FY) 2007-2008,
TCS announced its plans to slash 1.5 percent of the variable component of employee salaries
since its EVA targets for the third quarter of FY 2007-2008 were not met The announcement
came as s jolt not only to TCS employees but also to the entire Indian IT industry. The company
came in for severe criticism and it was accused of not being transparent with respect to EVA
calculation. However, some analysts felt that the pay cuts were a result of the macroeconomic
challenges that the Indian IT companies were facing rapid appreciation of the rupee against
the US dollar and the recession in the US economy (USA was the largest market for the Indian
IT companies)
Questions
1. Analyze TCS HR practices with respect to its policy related to compensation of its
employees.
2. Discuss various concepts related to compensation management.
3. 3. Discuss the importance of variable compensation in light of its ability to motivate
employees and enhance organizational productivity.
4. 4. Discuss the pros and cons of the EVA-based compensation management system and
also analyze EVA as a performance measurement tool.
5. 5. Understand the rationale behind the cut in the compensation of the employees at TCS.
6. 6. Understand how macroeconomic variables could affect a companys HR policies.
7. 7. Appreciate the importance of HR goals and strategies in the success of an organization
Wages Fund Theory:
This theory was developed by Adam Smith (1723-1790). His theory was based on the basic
assumption that workers are paid wages out of a pre-determined fund of wealth. This fund, he
called, wages fund created as a result of savings. According to Adam Smith, the demand for
labour and rate of wages depend on the size of the wages fund. Accordingly, if the wages fund is
2. Subsistence Theory:
This theory was propounded by David Recardo (1772-1823). According to this theory, The
labourers are paid to enable them to subsist and perpetuate the race without increase or
diminution. This payment is also called as subsistence wages. The basic assumption of this
theory is that if workers are paid wages more than subsistence level, workers number will
increase and, as a result wages will come down to the subsistence level.
On the contrary, if workers are paid less than subsistence wages, the number of workers will
decrease as a result of starvation death; malnutrition, disease etc. and many would not marry.
Then, wage rates would again go up to subsistence level. Since wage rate tends to be at,
subsistence level at all cases, that is why this theory is also known as Iron Law of Wages. The
This theory was developed by Karl Marx (1849-1883). This theory is based on the basic assump-
tion that like other article, labour is also an article which could be purchased on payment of its
price i e wages. This payment, according to Karl Marx, is at subsistence level which is less than
in proportion to time labour takes to produce items. The surplus, according to him, goes to the
owner. Karl Marx is well known for his advocation in the favour of labour.
4. Residual Claimant Theory:
This theory owes its development to Francis A. Walker (1840-1897). According to Walker, there
are four factors of production or business activity, viz., land, labour, capital, and
entrepreneurship. He views that once all other three factors are rewarded what remains left is
paid as wages to workers. Thus, according to this theory, worker is the residual claimant.
John Davidson was the propounder of this theory. According to this theory, the fixation of wages
depends on the bargaining power of workers/trade unions and of employers. If workers are
stronger in bargaining process, then wages tends to be high. In case, employer plays a stronger
Based on research studies and action programmes conducted, some behavioural scientists have
also developed theories of wages. Their theories are based on elements like employees
acceptance to a wage level, the prevalent internal wage structure, employees consideration on