Armas Calisterio Vs Calisterio
Armas Calisterio Vs Calisterio
Armas Calisterio Vs Calisterio
Calisterio
G.R. No. 136467 / April 6, 2000
FACTS: Teodorico died intestate and was survived by his wife, Marietta.
Teodorico was the second husband of Marietta who had been previously married
to James, who disappeared without a trace. Teodorico and Marietta were married
without having secured a court declaration that James was presumptively dead.
Antonia, surviving sister of Teodorico, claiming to be sole surviving heir of
Teodorico, alleged that the marriage between Teodorico and Marieta was
bigamous and thus, null and void. The RTC ruled that the marriage between
Marietta and teoderico is void; hence, Antonia was declared as the sole heir of
teoderico. The CA reversed the RTC decision.
Held:
The second marriage, having been contracted during the regime of the
Civil Code, is valid notwithstanding the absence of a judicial declaration of
presumptive death of James.xxxThe conjugal property of Teodorico and Marietta,
no evidence having been adduced to indicate another property regime between
the spouses, pertains to them in common. Upon the dissolution with the death of
Teodorico, the property should be divided into 2 equal portions: one portion to the
surviving spouse and the other portion to the estate of the deceased spouse.