$MP 008 22 PDF
$MP 008 22 PDF
$MP 008 22 PDF
Paper presented at the RTO AVT Symposium on Design Principles and Methods for Aircraji Gas Turbine Engines,
held in Toulouse, France, 11-15 May 1998, and published in RTO MP-8.
22-2
diffuser appears highly distorted in both The rotor has an equal number of full blades and
circumferential and spanwise directions and subject splitter blades.
to severe unsteady conditions. Among many Close to the maximum efficiency point on the
aerodynamic causes, we can put emphasis on design speed curve, the impeller blade passing
curvature, viscosity and compressibility effects as frequency is superior to 5000 Hz. The compressor
well as Coriolis force influence. Then the vaned stage pressure ratio and the mass flow rate are
diffuser aimed at static pressure recovery from the respectively around 4.0 and 2.0 kg/s. The impeller
flow kinetic energy, receives strongly time- isentropic efficiency is then over 90%. This
dependant inlet conditions, whose influence on its compressor and its experimental mounting were
performances and stability is not yet accurately designedby Turbomeca company. In particular, the
known but undoubtedly has undesirable adverse optical access is provided by a shroud inserted
effects. Those assertions are indeed derived from window allowing measurements situated in the
experimental studies and industrial experience23456. vaneless diffuser and in the captation area (i.e.
Therefore future design methods will need to take semi-vanelessspace).
into account aspects of the flow field currently Experimental studies were performed in the
ignored. In particular, the previously mentioned Propulsion laboratory of the SLJPAERO (part of the
effects of the blade row proximity and LAMEP, Toulouse, France). The compressors
unsteadiness. Some 3D Navier-Stokes codes, either devoted test rig used is powered by an electric
in the form of commercial packages or research motor delivering 400kW. The air intake was
derived software, are now available to model those precalibrated to ensure accurate mass flow
features. But the designer needs an estimation of measurement. The outflow enters a plenum
the relevance of numerical results. Then, each chamber and the desired pressureratio is reached
constructor must assess his numerical design tools by means of a butterfly valve motion. The
on unsteady data, obtained by detailed operating point of the compressoris controlled with
investigations on engine representative machines, 42 pressure probes, inlet and outlet temperature
by carrying out a code validation phase. probes. A computer linked to the rig allows on-the-
TURBOMECA initiated such actions several years fly storageof those data with a view to taking into
ago and recently enhanced its data bases within a account small operating point disturbances in
joint research program with the LAMEP (Toulouse, experimental post-processing ( for instance mass
France) among others. flow recovery calculation). Figure 1, shows the
The present article is intended to give an outline of SUPAERO facility.
this process from the experimental work to the code
validation phase and the modifications of the
numerical package necessary to allow a design
relevant use of such tools, regarding current
hardware capabilities. The first part of the text will
briefly describe the test compressor and the test rig,
before examining the experimental data acquisition
carried out by means of a Laser Two Focus
velocimeter and fast responsepressuretransducers.
In a secondpart, after a brief numerical background
explanation, we will focus our attention on full
unsteady simulations of the centrifugal stage flow
field. Then, a steady mode of stage calculation,
involving Riemann invariant theory, will be
presented and assessedas an available design tool, Figure l- SUPAERO compressor test rig.
already in useat TURBOMECA.
focused laser spots. Histograms of particles absolute speed and over-deflected flow feature.
detection as a function of spot alignment direction Velocity fluctuations up to 20% and flow angle
and time of flight ( i.e. transit time) lead to flow variations of 15 to 20 are measured. However, the
velocity determination. The projection of the flow delivered by the rotor exhibits a relative
velocity vector on the plane perpendicular to the smoothness, i.e. no jet/wake pattern in the sense of
laser beams is obtained through its modulus, angle Dean and Krain* is observed. Turbulent rates reach
and turbulent rates by statistical calculations as 10 to 15% within the wake regions and are lower to
described by Schold. The measurement accuracy 5% elsewhere.
depends on the flow turbulence intensity. The question then arise, to know to which extend
Considering our experimental facilities, the these flow heterogeneities mix out before the radial
precision can be evaluated to +I- 1% on the diffuser leading edge as currently always assumed
absolute velocity and +I- 1 on the absolute flow in design process. Considering the second
angle, when turbulent rates are less than 5%. measurement section, in terms of velocity
magnitude, both the peak induced by the blade
Those measurements are intended to provide data wake passing and the outer gradients have been
for rotor-stator interaction mechanisms reduced. However, large level of fluctuations,
comprehension. Then, they have to be taken for around 15% remain. The mixing hypothesis is then
various relative locations of the impeller main blade contradicted in our particular case. Similar
in front of the diffuser passage. A magnetic pick-up observations can be drawn from the flow angle
situated on the machine rotation axis allow the fluctuations remaining around 10 to 15. Besides
necessary data storage triggering. the discrepancies between turbulent rates obviously
suggest that the mixing process is far to be
The choice of L2F velocimeter instead of LDV ( completed at the radial diffuser leading edge.
Laser Doppler) device was linked to the narrowness At the throat section, the flow is still highly time-
of the flow path and the restriction of flow dependant and spatially heterogeneous. However,
accessibility to a single window. The need of high due to the differences in streampathes, adverse
signal to noise ratio necessary for wall approaching pressure gradients and in the influence of the
investigations claimed in favour of the time of leading edge stagnation area across the diffuser
flight solution. Discussions on the technical aspects pitch, the time-organized blade passing feature has
of this choice, as well as interesting developments vanished.
on advantages and disadvantages of both devices
applied to small high speed turbomachinery should 3.3 Unsteady pressure measurement.
be found in Fagan and Fleeter and Elder, Forster
and Gill publications. 3.3.1 Transducers and measurements locations.
The transducers used for this application were
3.2.2 Measurement positions.
Kulite pressure probes of the XCQ-093 serie. They
Rotor-stator interaction influence on flow evolution fit the temperature and pressure conditions
has been investigated in three main test sections: encountered in that flow region and present a
. the mean radius of the vaneless diffuser. bandwidth suitable for high frequency
. the vaned diffuser leading edge. measurements. Each probe was calibrated in terms
l the throat of the vaned diffuser. of transient response in a shock tube with its own
Each of the three main sections contains ten protection screen, flush mounting device and
measurement locations. Several relative depths acquisition facility used during later compressor
were investigated. runs. The measurement configuration is presented
on Figure 2.
NB: Some results taken from a previous
experimental campaign from the ONERA and
conducted by Fradin are added to our currently
performed measurements with a view to increasing
our validation data base.
Q=(P.P.P.PW.)7
E=(pu,pu* +p,puv,puw,~(e+/7))~
I;=(pv,puv,Pv2+p,PVW,V(e+P))l
G=(pu,puw,pvw,pw+p,w(e+/~))~
ai, a(E-E,)+a(G-d.,+a(%-F.)=O
Figure 5 - Pressure evolutions (1). at+ ag aq at;
4. THREE DIMENSIONAL NAVIER-STOKES
SOLVER. where the vectors are given by :
A
Q = J-(p,pu,pv,pw,e)T
4.1 Foreword. b = J-(PU,PUU + S,P,PVU + <!P,PwU + 5,p,(e + PYJ - LP)
The NREC commercial software package
VISIUNTM constituted the basis of this numerical i = J-(PV,PUV + *I,P,PVV + rl,p,pwV + rl,p,(e + P)V - ?,P)~
written for turbomachinery purpose. The full 5, = J(Z& -x,zc) q, =J(x,z, -x$Q)
conservation form is used herein. Its compact form 6, = J(YlZ, -ZrY,) 5, = -G,-Y.L -a
specified ; while static pressure is given at the component so that Kl and K2 are small but Kl/K2
outflow boundary. stays as close as possible to Nl/N2. A periodic
azimuthal condition is implemented in each row
(Iper ad Iper. lines for the impeller and Dper and DperY
4.2.3 Two frames of reference lines for the diffuser on Figure 6). This results in a
The main difference between single blade row time lag cancelling at the extreme azimuthal
computations and stage simulations lies in the boundaries of each group of passages. The
existence of two frames of reference, one for each information transferred through the interfacial area
component, separated by an interfacial area, from one grid to the opposite must be compatible
through which numerical information has to be with those spatially periodic conditions. Then we
transferred in order to predict rotoristator have to use an expansion/contraction step at the
interaction effects. Several different approaches, interface. Let e,=2ITK,/N,, e,=2HK,/N, be the
either conservative or non conservative, have been respective azimuthal extension of each component
used. The matching of the two frames retained in grid on Figure 6 and ec= (e,+e,)/2. Fl is the
VISIUNTh is based on M. M. Rai 22 method. The downstream boundary of the first sub-domain
grid is split into a rotating zone and a non-rotating related to el, F2 is the upstream boundary of the
zone with an interfacial overlay. Flux vectors are second sub-domain related to e2. Fc is then a
interpolated from one grid to the other in this virtual frontier related to ec through which data are
overlaid area to obtain boundary conditions related transferred by interpolation on an equal azimuthal
to each component sub-domain. H-type meshes are extension ec thanks to previous
used to model the geometry. Two overlaid grids are expansion/contraction of the azimuthal gradient
generated, one for each component. The interface between Fl and Fc or between F2 and Fc as
area consists in a cylindrical surface situated at the represented on Figure 6.
ec=1/2(el+e2)
mean radius between the impeller trailing edge and
the vaned diffuser leading edge.
l
properties by wave frontsZ4.
A grid point, steady in its own frame,
receives informations from opposite points
I P - (a)V;, = P* - (a2)V,: = I,
Let D be the computational domain and n an inward Numerical flow fields obtained through this
directed vector. The five compatibility relations approach will be compared to experiments in the
obtained from the five eigenvalues sixth part.
approximate number of 10 to 15 blade passing position of 0.3. More details are given by Domercq
period were necessary to obtain a periodic solution. and Thomas*.
_.-._
Figure 12 - Unsteady flow field, Mach number.
22Rai M.M.
Navier-Stokes Simulations of Rotor-Stator
Interaction using Patched and Overlaid Grids.
AIAA paper 85-1519.