Motivation - An Economic and Social Analysis: Rushil Anand - 20151219 Joseph Moses Parambi - 20151273

Motivation An Economic
and Social Analysis
Rushil Anand - 20151219
Joseph Moses Parambi - 20151273

Abstract
Our project encompasses the concept of motivation and its application
in promoting an efficient organisation.
The research paper that we present will contain an in depth analysis
into economic as well as social approaches of motivation in terms of
monetary, social and other tangible and non-tangible motivators.
Over the years, methods of measuring and interpreting motivation,
based on the concepts of Maslows Hierarchy of Needs have been
heavily criticized for being classical models that can no longer apply a
world that has evolved. In our presentation we aim at providing our
audience on what we believe would be the future of motivation and
how to replace existing modes of motivation.
We begin by approaching the theory behind motivation through an
insight into the social and economic analysis between these models.
We will consider whether organizations should be more polarized
toward either economic or social approaches and from the answer
derive, we will go further to determine whether a perfect balance
between these two will achieve the highest efficiency.
Motivation An Economic and Social Page 1 of 5

Analysis | Rushil Anand - 20151219
Our research paper is inspired by a study done by Margaret Clark, Judson
Mills and Alan Fiske on market and social norms and its effect on motivation
and the workplace. In their study, they inferred that individuals
simultaneously live in two separate worlds one where social norms prevail
and another where market norms place precedents. By social norms we refer
to acts like friendly requests such as helping a friend move furniture or
helping a friend repaint their house. By market norms we talk about are
governed by forces such as demand and supply, wages, prices, rents etc.
In a study done by Dan Ariely and James Heyman, they inferred people
were less likely to give their best effort when paid to do certain tasks.
THey got volunteers to complete a mundane of dragging a circle on a
computer screen into a box, whereupon it would re-appear on another
part of the screen and be repeated. He would then measure how many
times they did this in five minutes. The first group would be paid 5
dollars for their efforts; the second group 50 cent and the third group
wouldnt be paid anything, but instead told they were doing him a
favour. The group that was paid 5 dollars dragged on averaged 159
circles and the group that were paid 50 cent dragged 101 circles. Two
things to note, firstly that this shows evidence of incentive pay, that if
you pay workers more, theyll work harder. Secondly that although the
first group were paid 10 times as much they were only 50% more
productive. However, the most interesting was the third group which
was not paid and dragged 168 circles. This group was the most
productive despite not getting paid, which shows that social norms can
trump market norms.
There are plenty of examples of this. Ariely quotes the example of

some lawyers who were offered $30 an hour to work for poor elderly
people. The lawyers refused. Then they were asked if they would do it
for free and they agreed. How could nothing be more enticing than
$30? When they were offered $30 lawyers judged it based on market
norms and decided that was too little money. When they were offered
to do it for nothing, lawyers judged it based on social norms and
considered it an act of charity, so they agreed. Why couldnt they have
taken the $30 and still considered it charity? Because the social and
market norms dont mix and we can only be in one world at a time.
Social norms greatly affect our behaviour and should not be ignored.
Deals among friends and relatives are not motivated by pure economic
considerations but by social norms. The public service is guided not by
the wages (which are rarely that good) but by social norms and the
knowledge that they are helping people. It would be difficult to get
police officers, fire-fighters or soldiers to risk their lives simply for
money, they do it to protect others. Few teachers or nurses will put in
the long hours on the job if you appeal to their market norms, but they
will if you appeal to their social norms. Contrary to an economics
education will tell you, we are not solely motivated by money.
But what would happen if we replaced the payments with a gift? Are
gifts methods of exchange that keep us within the social exchange
norms? Would participants receiving such gifts switch out of the social
norms and into market norms, or would offering gifts as rewards
maintain the participants in the social world?
To find out just where gifts fall on the line between social and market
norms, they decided on a new experiment. This time, they didn't offer
our participants money for dragging circles across a computer screen;
they offered them gifts instead. they replaced the 50-cent reward with
a Snickers bar (worth about 50 cents), and the five-dollar incentive
with a box of Godiva chocolates (worth about five dollars). The
participants came to the lab, got their reward, worked as much as they
liked, and left. Then they looked at the results. As it turned out, all
three experimental groups worked about 72 the cost of social norm s
equally hard during the task, regardless of whether they got a small
Snickers bar (these participants dragged on average 162 circles), the
Godiva chocolates (these participants dragged on average 169 circles),
or nothing at all (these participants dragged on average 168 circles).
The conclusion: no one is offended by a small gift, because even small
gifts keep us in the social exchange world and away from market
norms.
Companies must also try to establish social norms with their

employees. It wasn't always this way. Years ago, the workforce of
America was more of an industrial, market-driven exchange. Back then
it was often a nine-to-five, timeclock kind of mentality. You put in your
40 hours and you got your paycheck on Friday. Since workers were paid
by the hour, they knew exactly when they were working for the man,
and when they weren't. The factory whistle blew (or the corporate
equivalent took place), and the transaction was finished. This was a
clear market exchange, and it worked adequately for both sides. But as
work becomes more specialized companies must make their
employees highly motivated to continue work even when they arent
on the clock. Today companies must see the advantage in creating a social exchange.
After all, in today's market we're the makers of intangibles. Creativity counts more than
industrial machines. The partition between work and leisure has likewise blurred.
In treating their employees, much as in treating their customers,

companies must understand their implied longterm commitment. If
employees promise to work harder to achieve an important deadline
(even cancelling family obligations for it), if they are asked to get on an
airplane at a moment's notice to attend a meeting, then they must get
something similar in returnsomething like support when they are

sick, or a chance to hold on to their jobs when the market threatens to
take their jobs away. Although some companies have been successful
in creating social norms with their workers, the current obsession with
short-term profits, outsourcing, and draconian cost cutting threatens to
undermine it all. In a social exchange, after all, people believe that if
something goes awry the other party will be there for them, to protect
and help them. These beliefs are not spelled out in a contract, but they
are general obligations to provide care and help in times of need.
Again, companies cannot have it both ways. In particular, I and Rushil
are worried that the recent cuts they saw in employees' benefitschild
care, pensions, the cafeteria, insurance etc.are likely to come at the
expense of the social exchange and thus affect workers' productivity. I
am particularly worried that cuts and changes in medical benefits are
likely to transform much of the employer employee social relationship
to a market relationship. If companies want to benefit from the
advantages of social norms, they need to do a better job of cultivating
those norms. Medical benefits, and in particular comprehensive
medical coverage, are among the best ways a company can express its
side of the social exchange. But what are many companies doing? They
are demanding high deductibles in their insurance plans, and at the
same time are reducing the scope of benefits. Simply put, they are
undermining the social contract between the company and the
employees and replacing it with market norms. As companies tilt the
board, and employees slide from social norms to the realm of market
norms, can we blame them for jumping ship when a better offer
appears? It's really no surprise that "corporate loyalty," in terms of the
loyalty of employees to their companies, has become an oxymoron.
Organizations can also think consciously about how people react to

social and market norms. Should you give an employee a gift worth
$1,000 or pay him or her an extra $1,000 in cash? Which is better? If
you ask the employees, the majority will most likely prefer cash over
the gift. But the gift has its value, though this is sometimes ill
understoodit can provide a boost to the social relationship between
the employer and the employee, and by doing so provide longterm
benefits to everyone. Think of it this way: who do you suppose is likely
to work harder, show more loyalty, and truly love his work more
someone who is getting $1,000 in cash or someone who is getting a
personal gift? Of course, a gift is a symbolic gesture. And to be sure, no
one is going to work for gifts rather than a salary. For that matter, no
one is going to work for nothing. But if you look at companies like
Google, which offers a wide variety of benefits for employees
(including free gourmet lunches), you can see how much goodwill is
created by emphasizing the social side of the company-worker
relationship. It's remarkable how much work companies (particularly
start-ups) can get out of people when social norms (such as the
excitement of building something together) are stronger than market
norms (such as salaries stepping up with each promotion). If
corporations started thinking in terms of social norms, they would
realize that these norms build loyalty andmore importantmake
people want to extend themselves to the degree that corporations
need today: to be flexible, concerned, and willing to pitch in. That's
what a social relationship delivers.


Motivation - An Economic and Social Analysis: Rushil Anand - 20151219 Joseph Moses Parambi - 20151273

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Motivation - An Economic and Social Analysis: Rushil Anand - 20151219 Joseph Moses Parambi - 20151273

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Motivation - An Economic and Social Analysis: Rushil Anand - 20151219 Joseph Moses Parambi - 20151273

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Motivation An Economic

and Social Analysis

Rushil Anand - 20151219

Joseph Moses Parambi - 20151273

Our project encompasses the concept of motivation and its application

in promoting an efficient organisation.

The research paper that we present will contain an in depth analysis

into economic as well as social approaches of motivation in terms of

monetary, social and other tangible and non-tangible motivators.

Over the years, methods of measuring and interpreting motivation,

based on the concepts of Maslows Hierarchy of Needs have been

world that has evolved. In our presentation we aim at providing our

audience on what we believe would be the future of motivation and

how to replace existing modes of motivation.

We begin by approaching the theory behind motivation through an

We will consider whether organizations should be more polarized

toward either economic or social approaches and from the answer

derive, we will go further to determine whether a perfect balance

between these two will achieve the highest efficiency.

Motivation An Economic and Social Page 1 of 5

There are plenty of examples of this. Ariely quotes the example of

Companies must also try to establish social norms with their

In treating their employees, much as in treating their customers,

Motivation An Economic and Social Page 4 of 5

Organizations can also think consciously about how people react to

Motivation An Economic and Social Page 6 of 5

You might also like