Ethics, Use of Force by Police
Ethics, Use of Force by Police
Ethics, Use of Force by Police
process of moral and ethical decision making when enforcing laws and processing
offenders. --Develop a fundamental framework of analytical skills when examining
ethical situations in the criminal justice system. --Obtain insight into how decision
making impacts not only offenders but also the victims, and society. --Provide
opportunities to examine personal attitudes values, and beliefs in relation to the
crime, the offender, the victim, and the justice system. --Become aware of ethical
issues in criminal justice research.
ByTimothyRoufa
UpdatedOctober12,2016
It'softensaidthatnootherprofessiondemandsahigherethicalstandardthanthatoflaw
enforcement.Regardlessofwhetherornotthereareothercareersthatrequireasimilar
dedicationtodoingtherightthing,itisundeniablethatthereisanunderstandablytremendous
degreeofexpectationsplaceduponpoliceofficers,andrightlyso.
Friends,relatives,neighborsandstrangerswatcheverymovelawenforcementofficersmake,
bothonandoffduty.
Thefactisthatthepublicscrutinizespoliceofficersmorethanmostotherprofessions,either
becausethey'recynicalandhopetocatchthemscrewinguporbecausethey'rehopefulandare
lookingforagoodexampleandastrongleader.Ineithercase,it'suptotheofficertobeabove
reproachinbothhispublicandprivatelife.
In Law Enforcement, a Few Bad Apples Spoil the Reputation of the
Bunch
Dayinanddayout,wereadstoriesofofficerswhodowrong.Theft,excessiveuseofforce,
misuseofpublicoffice,abuseofauthority,andevensimplethingslikespeeding,areall
examplesofunethicalbehavioronthepartofthosethatthepublichasentrustedtoserveand
protectthem.
Itmustbenotedthatthevastmajorityofpoliceofficersaretrulygood,hardworkingand
dedicatedpeoplewhostrivetoservethepublicanddotherightthingateveryturn.
It'sunfortunate,butthegoodworklawenforcementdoesrarelymakesnews,andwhenitdoes,it
doesn'tcarrywithitthesamelongmemorythatbadnewsseemsto.
Decadeslater,westillbemoantheRodneyKingincident,andlawenforcementcontinuestoreel
fromtheperceptionsandimplicationsthatwereleftinitswake.
Lessthanappropriateresponsestoraceriotsandpeacefulprotests,aswellaswidespread
mistreatmentofracialminorities,stillaffectshowofficersapproachtheirjobshalfacentury
later.Moreover,thoseeventshaveservedtowhittledownanderodethepublic'strustintheir
police,makingitthatmuchharderforofficerstodotheirjobs.
Unfortunatethoughitmaybe,asingleuncouthactcommittedbyasingleunprofessionalofficer
canimpacttheentirelawenforcementprofession.Rarelydoesthepublicmakeadistinction
betweenuniforms;attheendoftheday,allpoliceofficerslookandactthesameintheeyesof
theaveragecitizen.That'swhyitissovitallyimportantthateachandeveryofficerdoesher
utmostbesttomaintainandbuildonthetrustthatthepublichasgivenher,insteadof
squanderingitsimplyforthesakeofbravado,greedorselfgratification.
Withinsociety,wehavepersonalvaluesandsocietalvalues.Ourpersonalvaluesareoursalone
andareinformedbyourupbringing,culturalandethnicbackground,religiousbeliefsand
personalexperiences.Becausepersonalvaluesareuniquetoeachindividual,theyaregenerally
notaproperplatformonwhichtobaseprofessionalethics,thoughtheymayinformhowwe
view,appreciateandapproachethicalbehavior.
Therearesomevalues,though,thatareessentiallyuniversallyheldbyasociety.Thesesocietal
valuesarethoseidealsthatareheldmostdearbyacultureorgroup,andthesearethevalues
fromwhichwederiveourunderstandingandexpectationofethicsandethicalbehavior.Such
idealsinclude:
Integrity
Honesty
Hardwork
Kindness
Compassion
Empathy
Sympathy
Justice
Bravery
Theseideals,thesesocalleduniversalvalues,helpguideustowardethicalbehaviorandethical
decisionmaking.Theyhelpinformusofwhatisexpectedofusandwhatactionsweshouldtake.
Whenofficersfailtodowhatisright,andespeciallywhentheydowhatisclearlyandblatantly
wrong,theyerodethepublictrustjustalittlemoreandfurtherdegradelawenforcement'sability
toworkwithinthecommunityandcarryoutitsmission.Adherencetohighethicalstandards,
then,isasvitaltoachievingtheoverallgoalofmodernpolicingasanyothertactic,techniqueor
practice.
Understoodwithintheconceptofactinghonorablyistheideathatofficersshouldownuptotheir
mistakes.Farmorerespectisreservedforthosewhoscrewupandadmititthanthosewhotryto
hidetheirmisdeedsorblameothersfortheirownshortcomings.Infact,itisanoftrepeated
mantrathat,inlawenforcementcareers,lyingwillgetonefiredfasterthananythingelse.
Withinanagency'scodeofethicsarespecificprovisionspromotingthesafeguardingoflivesand
property,theimportanceofavoidingbiasandtheunderstandingthatthebadgeisasymbolofthe
publictrust.
Inshort,thecodeofethicsrequiresthatofficersarenotonlypreparedtoenforcethelawbutto
followit.Theyarecalledtobeexamplestothepublicandtodemonstratetherightwayto
behave,ratherthantheentitlementmentalitytheyaresooftenaccusedofexhibiting.
Allofthisiswellandgood,buthowdoofficersapplythiscodetotheireverydayprofessional
lives?Theshortandeasyansweris"dotherightthing."Becauseethicsarebaseduponsocietal
values,itisnotdifficulttodiscernthedifferencebetweenrightandwronginnearlyany
situation.
Ethical Decision Making for Police Officers
Forthosesituationsthatmayprovedifficultforofficers,severaltestscanbeappliedtohelpin
theethicaldecisionmakingprocess.Perhapsthebestknownethicaldecisionmakingtestsarethe
criticalthinkingtest,themediatest,andtheguttest.
Ismyactionlegal?
Willtheendresultbegood?
Willitwork?
Isthereabetter,lessharmfulwaytoachievethesamegoal?
Willmydecisionundermineorcontradictanotherequallyimportantprinciple?
Eveniftheendresultisgood,dothemeansviolateanethicalprinciple?
Canmydecisionbejustifiedifitismadepublic?
Media Test
Asimilarbutsimplertool,theMediaTestrequiresanofficertoansweronesimplequestion:
"HowwouldIfeelifmydecisionmadethefrontpagetomorrow?"Thisremindsofficersthatall
toooften,perceptionbecomesrealityandthatitmaynotbeenoughjusttobeabletojustifyour
actionsiftheycausethepublictoseriouslyquestionpolicepracticesandtactics.
TheMediaTestrecognizesthatthepublicdoesnotalwaysseethingsthesamewaythelaw
enforcementcommunitydoes.Ittakesintoconsiderationthat,becausepoliceofficersare
ultimatelypublicservants,theymustbecognizantofwhatthepublic'sperceptionsareregarding
policebothonandoffthejob.
Gut Test
PerhapsthesimplesttestofallistheGutTest.Theguttestessentiallyreliesoninstinctandthe
beliefthat,deepdown,allofficerscanintuittherightdecision.Essentially,theGutTestrelieson
theprinciplethatifitfeelswrong,itprobablyiswrong.Thisisnottobeconfusedwiththe
differencebetweenfeelinggoodandbad,butbetweenrightandwrong.Thereareplentyoftimes
thatthingsthatfeelbadareright,andthingsthatfeelgoodarewrong.
GoalofLawEnforcementinUsesofControl
Mostoften,whenmembersofthepublicquestionanofficer'suseofforce,theyfirst
questionwhetherforcewasnecessaryinthefirstplace.Likewise,courtstendtofocus
firstonwhetherornotanyforcewasjustifiedatallbeforebroachingthetopicof
excessiveforce.
Tolookatthisquestionproperly,wemustfirstunderstandtheultimategoalofofficers
whentheyapplyforce.Generally,thepurposeistoeffectanarrestandbringapotentially
dangeroussituationtoasquickandpeacefulaconclusionaspossible,withoutinjuring
theofficerorinnocentmembersofthepublic.
Obviously,thepreferredoutcomewouldbeforaresistingsubjecttoallowhimselftobe
arrestedpeacefully.Whenthatdoesn'toccur,though,officersmustmakeaquick,split
seconddecisionwhetherornottoemployforceandjustwhatforcetoemploy.During
thatdecisionmakingprocess,thewellbeingofthesuspectismostoftenasecondary
concern.
ObjectiveReasonableness
Becausethesedecisionsmustbemadequickly,officersmaynothaveallofthe
informationregardingthelevelofthreatasubjectactuallyposesbeforetheyfeelthatthey
musttakeaction.InGrahamvs.Connor,theU.S.SupremeCourtestablishedthe
"objectivereasonablenessstandard"todeterminewhetherornotforcewasjustified.
Objectivereasonablenesssimplyaskswhetherornotareasonablepersonwiththesimilar
training,knowledgeandexperiencewouldhaveactedthesameundersimilar
circumstances.Inmakingthisdetermination,threefactorsareapplied:whetherornotthe
subjectposesanimmediatethreat,theseverityoftheallegedcrime,andwhetherornot
thesubjectisattemptingtofleeorresistarrestattempts.Implicitinthesocalled"Graham
factors"isthequestionofwhetherornottheofficerwasjustifiedinexercisinghisarrest
authoritytobeginwith.
Mostimportantly,theobjectivereasonablenessstandardrecognizesthatofficersmust
thinkfastandactfast.Underthesecircumstances,thefactsavailabletotheofficeratthe
timeshemadeherdecisiontouseforcearewhattheofficerisjudgedby,asopposedto
whatmaycometolightafterthefact.
Forexample,ifanofficershootsasubjectwhoisthreateninghimandpointingagunat
him,itdoesnotmatterifitturnsoutlaterthatthegunwasnotloaded.Iftheofficercan
articulatethatatthetimeoftheincidenthebelievedhislifeorthelifeofsomeoneelse
wasindanger,thenhewillhavebeenjustifiedinhisuseofdeadlyforce.
JusttheFacts
Ifanofficerlearnsafterthefactthatwhatheperceivedtobeaweaponwasactuallyatoy
gun,acellphone,orevenawallet,thestandardbywhichtheactionwillbejudgedwill
comefromwhattheofficerknewatthetime.Officersneednot,andoftentimescannot
affordto,waitforasubjecttopullthetriggerortrytostabthembeforetheyreact.
Instead,theymustweighthetotalityofthecircumstancesandmakeadecisionbasedon
thefactsavailabletothematthemoment.
ReasonableChoices
Theobjectivereasonablenessstandardalsoestablishesthatofficersarenotnecessarily
limitedtotheleastamountofforcepossible.Rather,officersarecalledtouseonlythat
forcewhichfallswithintherangeofwhatmightbeconsideredreasonable.Thisisan
importantdistinctiontomakebecause,asanyofficerknows,inmostsituationsthereisa
rangeofforceoptionsavailable,allofwhichmaybeanappropriateresponse.
Forexample,ifasubjectisfightingandresistingarrest,anofficermaychoosetouse
pepperspray,anelectroniccontroldevice,orhandsoncontroltechniquessuchasjoint
manipulationinordertogaincompliance.Anyoneofthesechoicesmaybereasonable,
thoughthepublicmayperceivethetaserorpepperspraytobemoreinvasiveandless
necessarythangoinghandson.Anofficer'sactions,then,arenotevaluatedbasedupon
whatshecouldhavedonedifferently,butrathertheyareassessedbasedonwhatmightbe
consideredreasonable.
JudgingDeadlyForceSituations
Thisstandardbecomesespeciallyimportantwhenlookingatinstancesofdeadlyforceby
policeofficers.Byandlarge,officersaretaughtatthepoliceacademytomeetdeadly
forcewithdeadlyforce.Theyaretrainedandgiventhetechniquesandtacticstomake
suretheymakeithomeattheendoftheirshift,andtheyspendextensivetimetrainingin
theuseoffirearms.
It'simportanttorecognizethat,whendiscussingtheuseofdeadlyforcebyofficers,the
expectedresultofasubject'sactionsdon'thavetobedeath.Instead,deadlyforceis
describedasactionsthatarelikelytocauseeitherdeathorgreatbodilyharm,which
couldincludepermanentdisfigurementwithoutcausingdeath.
Thetypeofweaponusedisanimportantfactorinanofficer'sdecisiontousedeadly
force,butitisnottheonlyfactor.Toapoliceofficer,deadlyforceisdeadlyforce,
whetherthesubjectiswieldingaknife,anax,agunorevenabaseballbat.Allofthese
havethepotentialtotakealifeorcausegreatbodilyharm.Instead,tobejustifiedin
employingdeadlyforce,officersmustbeabletoarticulatethatthesuspecthadthe
apparentability,opportunityandreasonablyperceivedintenttocommitanactlikelyto
causedeathorgreatbodilyharm.
JustifiableDecisions
Thoughimportanttolawenforcementandcorrectionalofficers,thisstandardisoftenthe
sourceofconfusiononthepartofthepublicwhenitcomestopoliceuseofforce.Asan
example,anofficermayshootasuspectwhoisholdingaknife.Somemembersofthe
publicmaydisagreewiththeofficers'sdecision,suggestinginsteadthatheshouldhave
usedanonlethalweaponsuchasatasertodisarmthesubject.
Whileatasermayhavebeenoneofmanypossibleoptionsavailable,itmaynothave
beenthemostreasonableor,morelikely,itmayhavebeenoneofmanyreasonableforce
optionsandthus,giventhefactthataknifeisquitecapableofcausingdeathorgreat
bodilyharm,theofficerisverylikelyjustifiedintheuseofdeadlyforce.
OfficerandSubjectFactors
Anotherimportantconsiderationinevaluatinganofficer'suseofforcesistheofficer
himselfascomparedtothesubjectinquestion.Anofficerwhois5'2"and100pounds
maybejustifiedinusinggreaterforceagainstasubjectwhois6'2"250poundsthan
wouldataller,heavierandpresumablystrongerofficerinsimilarcircumstances.
UsesofForceMoreComplicatedThanFirstLooksSuggest
Allofthisgoestodemonstratethatusesofforcebycorrectionsandpoliceofficersare
mostoftenfarmorecomplicatedthanasinglenewsstoryorInternetvideomayinitially
makethemappear.Lawenforcementcareersareknowntobeinherentlydangerousjobs,
andofficersareoftenplacedinsituationswheretheyarerequiredtomakeinstantaneous
lifeanddeathdecisions.
Whileitisentirelycorrectandappropriatetoevaluateandscrutinizetheactionsof
police,especiallywhentheyemploycontroltechniques,itisalsoveryimportantto
withholdjudgementuntilallofthefactsleadinguptotheincidentareknown.Itis
especiallyimportanttojudgethesedecisionsbasedonlyonthosefactsthatwereknown
orperceivedbytheofficeratthetimeoftheincident,asopposedtothosefactsthatmay
becomeknownafterthefact.
SoundLawEnforcementRequiresSoundJudgement
Likewise,itisimportantforofficerstousesoundjudgementandduediligencewhen
determiningwhetherornottoemployforceandexactlywhatforetouse.Thepublic
rightlyholdsitslawenforcementofficerstoahighethicalstandard.Itisincumbentupon
officers,then,toadheretothatstandardandtoalwaysactintheinterestofsafeguarding
livesandproperty,whileatthesametimepreservingandprotectingtherightsofthe
innocent.