Albert Einstein - Autobiography (Excerpts)
Albert Einstein - Autobiography (Excerpts)
Albert Einstein - Autobiography (Excerpts)
Philosophers
AlbertEinsteinAutobiography(Excerpts)
MortimerAdler
RogersAlbritton
CommentsonQuantumMechanics
AlexanderofAphrodisias
SamuelAlexander (Alb ertEinstein:PhilosopherScientist,Ed.PaulArthurSchilpp,pp.8189)
WilliamAlston
G.E.M.Anscombe BeforeIenteruponthequestionofthecompletionofthegeneraltheoryofrelativity,Imusttake
Anselm astandwithreferencetothemostsuccessfulphysicaltheoryofourperiod,viz.,thestatistical
LouiseAntony quantumtheorywhich,abouttwentyfiveyearsago,tookonaconsistentlogicalform
ThomasAquinas (Schrdinger,Heisenberg,Dirac,Born).Thisistheonlytheoryatpresentwhichpermitsa
Aristotle unitarygraspofexperiencesconcerningthequantumcharacterofmicromechanicalevents.
DavidArmstrong
Thistheory,ontheonehand,andthetheoryofrelativityontheother,arebothconsidered
HaraldAtmanspacher
correctinacertainsense,althoughtheircombinationhasresistedalleffortsuptonow.Thisis
RobertAudi
Augustine
probablythereasonwhyamongcontemporarytheoreticalphysiciststhereexistentirelydiffering
J.L.Austin opinionsconcerningthequestionastohowthetheoreticalfoundationofthephysicsofthe
A.J.Ayer futurewillappear.Willitbeafieldtheorywillitbeinessenceastatisticaltheory?Ishallbriefly
AlexanderBain indicatemyownthoughtsonthispoint.
MarkBalaguer
JeffreyBarrett Physicsisanattemptconceptuallytograsprealityasitisthoughtindependentlyofitsbeing
WilliamBelsham
observed.Inthissenseonespeaksof"physicalreality."Inprequantumphysicstherewasno
HenriBergson
doubtastohowthiswastobeunderstood.InNewton'stheoryrealitywasdeterminedbya
IsaiahBerlin
BernardBerofsky
materialpointinspaceandtimeinMaxwell'stheory,bythefieldinspaceandtime.Inquantum
RobertBishop mechanicsitisnotsoeasilyseen.Ifoneasks:doesafunctionofthequantumtheory
MaxBlack representarealfactualsituationinthesamesenseinwhichthisisthecaseofamaterial
SusanneBobzien systemofpointsorofanelectromagneticfield,onehesitatestoreplywithasimple"yes"or
EmilduBoisReymond "no"}why?Whatthefunction(atadefinitetime)asserts,isthis:Whatistheprobabilityfor
HilaryBok
findingadefinitephysicalmagnitudeq(orp)inadefinitelygiveninterval,ifImeasureitattime
LaurenceBonJour
t?Theprobabilityisheretobeviewedasanempiricallydeterminable,andthereforecertainly
GeorgeBoole
mileBoutroux
asa"real"quantitywhichImaydetermineifIcreatethesamefunctionveryoftenandperform
F.H.Bradley aqmeasurementeachtime.
C.D.Broad
MichaelBurke Butwhataboutthesinglemeasuredvalueofq?Didtherespective
C.A.Campbell individualsystemhavethisqvalueevenbeforethemeasurement?To Einstein'sfatefulquestion:
Istherebutonepossible
JosephKeimCampbell thisquestionthereisnodefiniteanswerwithintheframeworkofthe measurementbeforethe
RudolfCarnap
[existing]theory,sincethemeasurementisaprocesswhichimpliesa actualmeasurement?
Carneades
ErnstCassirer
finitedisturbanceofthesystemfromtheoutsideitwouldthereforebe
DavidChalmers thinkablethatthesystemobtainsadefinitenumericalvalueforq(or
RoderickChisholm p),i.e.,themeasurednumericalvalue,onlythroughthemeasurementitself.Forthefurther
Chrysippus discussionIshallassumetwophysicists,AandB,whorepresentadifferentconceptionwith
Cicero referencetotherealsituationasdescribedbythefunction.
RandolphClarke
SamuelClarke A.Theindividualsystem(beforethemeasurement)hasadefinite
AnthonyCollins PhysicistAisa
valueofq(i.e.,p)forallvariablesofthesystem,andmorespecifically,
AntonellaCorradini determinist.Asystem
DiodorusCronus
thatvaluewhichisdeterminedbyameasurementofthisvariable. variablehasasingle
JonathanDancy Proceedingfromthisconception,hewillstate:Thefunctionisno determinatevalueatall
DonaldDavidson exhaustivedescriptionoftherealsituationofthesystembutan times.Theonlypossible
MarioDeCaro incompletedescription}itexpressesonlywhatweknowonthebasisof measurementistheactual
Democritus formermeasurementsconcerningthesystem. measurement.
DanielDennett
JacquesDerrida
B.Theindividualsystem(beforethemeasurement)hasnodefinite
RenDescartes PhysicistBisan
valueofq(i.e.,p).Thevalueofthemeasurementonlyarisesin
RichardDouble indeterminist.Thereare
FredDretske
cooperationwiththeuniqueprobabilitywhichisgiventoitinviewof manypossiblevaluesfor
JohnDupr thefunctiononlythroughtheactofmeasurementitself.Proceeding asystemvariable.Oneof
JohnEarman fromthisconception,hewill(or,atleast,hemay)state:thefunction thesebecomesactualina
LauraWaddellEkstrom isanexhaustivedescriptionoftherealsituationofthesystem. measurement.
Epictetus Wenowpresenttothesetwophysiciststhefollowinginstance:Thereis
Epicurus tobeasystemwhichatthetimetofourobservationconsistsoftwopartialsystemsS1andS2,
HerbertFeigl
JohnMartinFischer whichatthistimearespatiallyseparatedand(inthesenseoftheclassicalphysics)arewithout
Ow enFlanagan significantreciprocity.Thetotalsystemistobecompletelydescribedthroughaknown
LucianoFloridi function12inthesenseofquantummechanics.Allquantumtheoreticiansnowagreeuponthe
PhilippaFoot following:IfImakeacompletemeasurementofS1,Igetfromtheresultsofthemeasurement
AlfredFouille
HarryFrankfurt andfrom12anentirelydefinitefunction2ofthesystem2.Thecharacterof2then
RichardL.Franklin dependsuponwhatkindofmeasurementIundertakeon1.
MichaelFrede
GottlobFrege NowitappearstomethatonemayspeakoftherealfactualsituationofthepartialsystemS2.
PeterGeach
EdmundGettier Ofthisrealfactualsituation,weknowtobeginwith,beforethemeasurementofS1,evenless
CarlGinet thanweknowofasystemdescribedbythefunction.Butononesuppositionweshould,inmy
AlvinGoldman opinion,absolutelyholdfast:therealfactualsituationofthesystemS2isindependentofwhatis
Gorgias
NicholasSt.JohnGreen
donewiththesystemS1,whichisspatiallyseparatedfromtheformer.Accordingtothetypeof
H.PaulGrice measurementwhichImakeofS1,Iget,however,averydifferent2forthesecondpartial
IanHacking
IshtiyaqueHaji system(2,21,...).Now,however,therealsituationofS2mustbeindependentofwhat
StuartHampshire happenstoS1.ForthesamerealsituationofS2itispossiblethereforetofind,accordingto
W.F.R.Hardie
one'schoice,differenttypesoffunction.(Onecanescapefromthisconclusiononlybyeither
SamHarris
assumingthatthemeasurementofS1((telepathically))changestherealsituationofS2orby
WilliamHasker
R.M.Hare denyingindependentrealsituationsassuchtothingswhicharespatiallyseparatedfromeach
GeorgW.F.Hegel other.Bothalternativesappeartomeentirelyunacceptable.)
MartinHeidegger
R.E.Hobart Ifnowthephysicists,AandB,acceptthisconsiderationasvalid,thenBwillhavetogiveuphis
ThomasHobbes
positionthatthefunctionconstitutesacompletedescriptionofarealfactualsituation.Forin
DavidHodgson
thiscaseitwouldbeimpossiblethattwodifferenttypesoffunctionscouldbecoordinated
Shadsw orthHodgson
Barond'Holbach withtheidenticalfactualsituationofS2.
TedHonderich
PamelaHuby Thestatisticalcharacterofthepresenttheorywouldthenhavetobeanecessaryconsequence
DavidHume oftheincompletenessofthedescriptionofthesystemsinquantummechanics,andtherewould
FerencHuoranszki nolongerexistanygroundforthesuppositionthatafuturebasisofphysicsmustbebased
WilliamJames
uponstatistics.
LordKames
RobertKane
ImmanuelKant Itismyopinionthatthecontemporaryquantumtheorybymeansofcertaindefinitelylaiddown
TomisKapitan basicconcepts,whichonthewholehavebeentakenoverfromclassicalmechanics,constitutes
Jaegw onKim anoptimumformulationoftheconnections.
WilliamKing
HilaryKornblith Ibelieve,however,thatthistheoryoffersnousefulpointofdeparture
ChristineKorsgaard forfuturedevelopment.Thisisthepointatwhichmyexpectation Inhisfinalremarks,
SaulKripke Einsteinsaidanyfuture
departsmostwidelyfromthatofcontemporaryphysicists.Theyare theoryw illprobably
AndreaLavazza
convincedthatitisimpossibletoaccountfortheessentialaspectsof incorporatequantum
KeithLehrer
GottfriedLeibniz quantumphenomena(apparentlydiscontinuousandtemporallynot theory!
Leucippus determinedchangesofthesituationofasystem,andatthesametime
MichaelLevin corpuscularandundulatoryqualitiesoftheelementarybodiesof
GeorgeHenryLew es energy)bymeansofatheorywhichdescribestherealstateofthings[objects]bycontinuous
C.I.Lew is functionsofspaceforwhichdifferentialequationsarevalid.Theyarealsooftheopinionthatin
DavidLew is thiswayonecannotunderstandtheatomicstructureofmatterandofradiation.Theyrather
PeterLipton
expectthatsystemsofdifferentialequations,whichcouldcomeunderconsiderationforsucha
JohnLocke
MichaelLockw ood theory,inanycasewouldhavenosolutionswhichwouldberegular(freefromsingularity)
E.JonathanLow e everywhereinfourdimensionalspace.Aboveeverythingelse,however,theybelievethatthe
JohnR.Lucas apparentlydiscontinuouscharacterofelementaryeventscanbedescribedonlybymeansofan
Lucretius essentiallystatisticaltheory,inwhichthediscontinuouschangesofthesystemsaretakeninto
RuthBarcanMarcus accountbywayofthecontinuouschangesoftheprobabilitiesofthepossiblestates.
JamesMartineau
StorrsMcCall
Alloftheseremarksseemtometobequiteimpressive.However,thequestionwhichisreally
HughMcCann
determinativeappearstometobeasfollows:Whatcanbeattemptedwithsomehopeof
ColinMcGinn
MichaelMcKenna successinviewofthepresentsituationofphysicaltheory?Atthispointitistheexperiences
BrianMcLaughlin withthetheoryofgravitationwhichdeterminemyexpectations.Theseequationsgive,frommy
JohnMcTaggart pointofview,morewarrantfortheexpectationtoassertsomethingprecisethanallother
PaulE.Meehl equationsofphysics.Onemay,forexample,callonMaxwell'sequationsofemptyspacebyway
Uw eMeixner ofcomparison.Theseareformulationswhichcoincidewiththeexperiencesofinfinitelyweak
AlfredMele electromagneticfields.Thisempiricaloriginalreadydeterminestheirlinearformithas,
TrentonMerricks
however,alreadybeenemphasizedabovethatthetruelawscannotbelinear.Suchlinearlaws
JohnStuartMill
DickinsonMiller
fulfillthesuperpositionprinciplefortheirsolutions,butcontainnoassertionsconcerningthe
G.E.Moore interactionofelementarybodies.Thetruelawscannotbelinearnorcantheybederivedfrom
C.LloydMorgan such.Ihavelearnedsomethingelsefromthetheoryofgravitation:Noeversoinclusive
ThomasNagel
collectionofempiricalfactscaneverleadtothesettingupofsuchcomplicatedequations.A
FriedrichNietzsche
JohnNorton theorycanbetestedbyexperience,butthereisnowayfromexperiencetothesettingupofa
P.H.Now ellSmith theory.Equationsofsuchcomplexityasaretheequationsofthegravitationalfieldcanbefound
RobertNozick onlythroughthediscoveryofalogicallysimplemathematicalconditionwhichdeterminesthe
WilliamofOckham equationscompletelyor[atleast]almostcompletely.Onceonehasthosesufficientlystrong
TimothyO'Connor formalconditions,onerequiresonlylittleknowledgeoffactsforthesettingupofatheoryinthe
DavidF.Pears caseoftheequationsofgravitationitisthefourdimensionalityandthesymmetrictensoras
CharlesSandersPeirce
expressionforthestructureofspacewhich,togetherwiththeinvarianceconcerningthe
DerkPereboom
StevenPinker
continuoustransformationgroup,determinetheequationsalmostcompletely.
Plato
KarlPopper Ourproblemisthatoffindingthefieldequationsforthetotalfield.Thedesiredstructuremust
Porphyry beageneralizationofthesymmetrictensor.Thegroupmustnotbeanynarrowerthanthatof
Huw Price thecontinuoustransformationsofcoordinates...
H.A.Prichard
HilaryPutnam
WillardvanOrmanQuine
ABriefNoteonCompleteness
FrankRamsey Nowitwouldofcoursebepossibletoobject:Ifsingularitiesarepermittedatthepositionsofthe
AynRand
materialpoints,whatjustificationisthereforforbiddingtheoccurrenceofsingularitiesintherest
MichaelRea
ofspace?Thisobjectionwouldbejustifiediftheequationsofgravitationweretobeconsidered
ThomasReid
CharlesRenouvier asequationsofthetotalfield.[Sincethisisnotthecase],however,onewillhavetosaythatthe
NicholasRescher fieldofamaterialparticlemaythelessbeviewedasapuregravitationalfieldthecloserone
C.W.Rietdijk comestothepositionoftheparticle.Ifonehadthefieldequationofthetotalfield,onewouldbe
RichardRorty compelledtodemandthattheparticlesthemselveswouldeverywherebedescribableas
JosiahRoyce singularityfreesolutionsofthecompletedfieldequations.Onlythenwouldthegeneraltheory
BertrandRussell
ofrelativitybeacompletetheory.
PaulRussell
GilbertRyle (Alb ertEinstein:PhilosopherScientist,p.81)
JeanPaulSartre
KennethSayre [SoforEinstein,evenhisfourdimensionalfieldtheoryisnotyetcomplete.Completenesswould
T.M.Scanlon
MoritzSchlick eliminatepossibilitiesinfavorofasingledeterminateactualityifonlyonepossibility,thereare
ArthurSchopenhauer noprobabilities.Alliscertain.Nonewinformationispossibleintheuniverse.
JohnSearle Andthereisnoirreversibility.Alltimesarepresentinadeterministicblockuniverse.
WilfridSellars SeeEinstein'sremarksonKurtGdel'sideasonanarrowoftime.
AlanSidelle
TedSider NotethatEinstein'sviewsaboutquantummechanicsin1949wereessentiallyunchangedfrom
ick
HenrySidgw hisviewsin1930.Seehisexplanationofhowfieldtheoriescametobeapartofourdescription
WalterSinnottArmstrong
ofrealityalongsidematerialparticlesasaresultofMaxwell'sequationsinhis1931article
J.J.C.Smart
SaulSmilansky "Maxwell'sInfluenceontheEvolutionoftheIdeaofPhysicalReality."
MichaelSmith
BaruchSpinoza AndEinsteinarguablygrewpessimisticaboutthepossibilitiesfordeterministiccontinuousfield
L.SusanStebbing theories(bycomparisonwithindeterministicandstatisticaldiscontinuousparticletheories)inhis
GeorgeF.Stout lateryears:
GalenStraw son
PeterStraw son TohisdearfriendBessohewrotein1954,"Iconsideritquitepossiblethatphysicscannot
EleonoreStump bebasedonthefieldconcept,i.e:,oncontinuousstructures.Inthatcase,nothingremains
FranciscoSurez
ofmyentirecastleintheair,gravitationtheoryincluded,[andof]therestofmodern
RichardTaylor
KevinTimpe
physics."
MarkTw ain
PeterUnger
AndtoLeopoldInfeldhewrotein1941,"Itendmoreandmoretotheopinionthatone
PetervanInw agen cannotcomefurtherwithacontinuumtheory."
ManuelVargas
quotedinSubtleistheLord...,AbrahamPais,1982,p.467
JohnVenn
KadriVihvelin
Voltaire ]
G.H.vonWright
DavidFosterWallace Chapter1.5ThePhilosophers Chapter2.1TheProblemofKnowledge
R.JayWallace
Home PartTwoKnowledge
W.G.Ward
TedWarfield
Normal|Teacher|Scholar
RoyWeatherford
WilliamWhew ell
AlfredNorthWhitehead
DavidWiderker
DavidWiggins
BernardWilliams
TimothyWilliamson
Ludw igWittgenstein
SusanWolf
Scientists
MichaelArbib
BernardBaars
GregoryBateson
JohnS.Bell
CharlesBennett
Ludw igvonBertalanffy
SusanBlackmore
MargaretBoden
DavidBohm
NielsBohr
Ludw igBoltzmann
EmileBorel
MaxBorn
SatyendraNathBose
WaltherBothe
HansBriegel
LeonBrillouin
StephenBrush
HenryThomasBuckle
S.H.Burbury
DonaldCampbell
AnthonyCashmore
EricChaisson
JeanPierreChangeux
ArthurHollyCompton
JohnConw ay
JohnCramer
E.P.Culverwell
CharlesDarw in
TerrenceDeacon
LouisdeBroglie
MaxDelbrck
AbrahamdeMoivre
PaulDirac
HansDriesch
JohnEccles
ArthurStanleyEddington
PaulEhrenfest
AlbertEinstein
HughEverett,III
FranzExner
RichardFeynman
R.A.Fisher
JosephFourier
LilaGatlin
MichaelGazzaniga
GianCarloGhirardi
J.WillardGibbs
NicolasGisin
PaulGlimcher
ThomasGold
A.O.Gomes
BrianGoodw in
JoshuaGreene
JacquesHadamard
PatrickHaggard
StuartHameroff
AugustinHamon
SamHarris
HymanHartman
JohnDylanHaynes
MartinHeisenberg
JohnHerschel
WernerHeisenberg
JesperHoffmeyer
E.T.Jaynes
WilliamStanleyJevons
RomanJakobson
PascualJordan
RuthE.Kastner
StuartKauffman
SimonKochen
StephenKosslyn
LadislavKov
RolfLandauer
AlfredLand
PierreSimonLaplace
DavidLayzer
BenjaminLibet
SethLloyd
HendrikLorentz
JosefLoschmidt
ErnstMach
DonaldMacKay
HenryMargenau
JamesClerkMaxw ell
ErnstMayr
UlrichMohrhoff
JacquesMonod
EmmyNoether
How ardPattee
WolfgangPauli
MassimoPauri
RogerPenrose
StevenPinker
ColinPittendrigh
MaxPlanck
SusanPockett
HenriPoincar
DanielPollen
IlyaPrigogine
HansPrimas
AdolpheQutelet
JuanRoederer
JeromeRothstein
DavidRuelle
Erw inSchrdinger
AaronSchurger
ClaudeShannon
DavidShiang
HerbertSimon
DeanKeithSimonton
B.F.Skinner
RogerSperry
HenryStapp
TomStonier
AntoineSuarez
LeoSzilard
WilliamThomson(Kelvin)
PeterTse
HeinzvonFoerster
JohnvonNeumann
JohnB.Watson
DanielWegner
StevenWeinberg
PaulA.Weiss
JohnWheeler
WilhelmWien
NorbertWiener
EugeneWigner
E.O.Wilson
H.DieterZeh
ErnstZermelo
WojciechZurek
Presentations
Biosemiotics
FreeWill
MentalCausation
JamesSymposium