JMEPEG (2013) 22:17831789 ASM International

DOI: 10.1007/s11665-012-0461-3 1059-9495/$19.00

Effect of Strain Rate on Stress Corrosion Cracking of 316L

Austenitic Stainless Steel in Boiling MgCl2 Environment
A. Hassani, A. Habibolahzadeh, A.H. Javadi, and S.M. Hosseini

(Submitted May 1, 2012; in revised form November 22, 2012; published online December 27, 2012)

Stress corrosion cracking behaviors of AISI 316L austenitic stainless steel at slow strain rates in two
environments of air and MgCl2 at ambient temperature and 154 C were investigated. The results revealed
that a decrease in strain rate, during testing in boiling MgCl2 environment, led to a rigorous deterioration
of the mechanical properties of the material, causing brittleness of the steel. The results obtained from
fractography indicated that the samples tested in air had typical ductile fracture surface appearances, while
the fracture surfaces of the samples tested in a corrosive environment showed a combination of inter-
granular and transgranular fracture modes, having a brittle macroscopic appearance. The transgranular
mode became predominant as strain rate decreased. The results suggested that the presence of deformation
bands in front of crack tips were responsible for transgranular cracking caused by stress corrosion.

on the test environment (Ref 9). The MgCl2 data suggest that
Keywords corrosion, ferrous metals and alloys, scanning electron
microscopy Mo addition beyond 1.5% increases the SCC resistance of
stainless steel. No such pattern is in evidence in NaCl tests
(Ref 8). In addition, low carbon contents of stainless steels
decrease the susceptibility of the alloy to SCC due to lowering
the possibility of precipitation of chromium carbides in the
1. Introduction matrix. It has been suggested that the minimum resistance to
chloride SCC in austenitic stainless steel occurs when carbon
content is between 0.06 and 0.1% (Ref 8). Then, the 316L
Stress corrosion cracking (SCC) is one of the most
austenitic stainless steel, which is a low-carbon-containing steel
important phenomena, which causes many engineering failures
and containing appropriate amount of Mo, has a noticeable
in stainless steel pipes, ttings, and equipments at chemical and
resistance to SCC compared to those with higher carbon
petrochemical industries. This phenomenon, which is almost
content.
unpredictable, occurs even at very low stresses like residual
In this paper, the effect of strain rate on SCC resistance of
stresses due to welding or machining leading to catastrophic
316L austenitic stainless steel has been investigated.
failures in industries (Ref 1-3). The total SCC damage can be
divided into two steps of induction time: the time necessary for
a crack to initiate on an apparently smooth surface, and crack
propagation time. The most important factors that affect SCC 2. Experimental Procedure
are metallurgical (or internal) and environmental (or external)
factors. Although signicant investigations have been con-
ducted on this issue, still there is no comprehensive theory to AISI 316L austenitic stainless steel specimens, with the
completely explain SCC phenomenon in alloys (Ref 4-6). composition as shown in Table 1, were received for the
Among the common alloys employed in chemical indus- experimental investigation. Slow strain rate tensile test (SSRT)
tries, austenitic stainless steels are probably the most important was carried out to evaluate susceptibility of the steel to SCC in
class of corrosion-resistant metallic materials. Their high Cr boiling MgCl2 bath, according to NACE TM0198-98 standard
content is responsible for formation of protective oxide lm (Fig. 1) using INSTRON universal testing machine, model
layers, and high Ni content enables the steel to remain 6027. The specimens were machined according to ASTM E8
austenitic (Ref 7). Common austenitic grades of Ni-Cr and standard (Fig. 2). Strain rates were measured based on velocity
Ni-Cr-Mo stainless steels are usually sensitive to SCC. This of cross-head displacement. To relax stresses and stabilize
type of cracking affects mostly the steels containing Ni, with dimensions of the specimens, the specimens were solution
the greatest damage occurring in the most common range of Ni treated at 1085 5 C for 120 min and then air cooled,
content (Ref 8). SCC in stainless steels mainly occurs at followed by heating at 300 C for 90 min. Surfaces of the
temperatures above 50 C in chloride environments (Ref 9). specimens were ground and polished by 0.25 lm diamond
The effect of Mo on SCC resistance of stainless steels depends paste and then rinsed. Two samples, as the reference samples,
were tested in air at ambient temperature and at 154 C,
respectively, at a strain rate of 1.1 9 10 4 s 1. The strain rates
A. Hassani, A. Habibolahzadeh, A.H. Javadi, and S.M. Hosseini, of 1.1 9 10 4 s 1, 1.1 9 10 5 s 1, and 1.1 9 10 6 s 1 were
Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Semnan University, selected to evaluate effect of strain rate on SCC behavior of
35131-19111 Semnan, Iran. Contact e-mail: [email protected]. the alloy in boiling MgCl2. Table 2 demonstrates the test

Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Volume 22(6) June 20131783

Table 1 Chemical composition (wt.%) of AISI 316L
austenitic stainless steel
C S Si Mn Cr Ni Mo Cu V W Co

0.01 0.02 0.35 1.68 16.5 10.25 2.02 0.5 0.16 0.11 0.1

conditions of ve different experiments. Work hardening

exponent, n, was calculated from stress-strain curves using
the Hollomon equation, r = Ken (Ref 10). Macro- and
microfractography analyses of fracture surfaces were performed
using scanning electron microscope (SEM) make Camscan,
model MV2300. Samples of optical microscopy were prepared
by cutting cross-sectional proles out of the specimens,
grinding, and then polishing them by 0.25 lm diamond paste.
Longitudinal sections of the failed specimens were also
prepared for metallographic examinations. Samples were
cleaned by ultrasonic cleaner using 5% ethanol solution before
SEM examinations.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1 Slow Strain Rate Tensile Tests (SSRTs)

Figure 3 shows the engineering stress-strain curves. The Fig. 1 Test setup for SSRT experiments
graphs shown in Fig. 4 are the resulting mechanical properties
the amounts of UTS, elongation to failure, and reduction of
of all samples, examined at low strain rate tensile tests. As seen
cross-sectional area are recorded to be about 57, 88, and 82%,
in Fig. 3, the graphs for all samples, except for the one tested at
respectively. The results indicate that this type of chemical
room temperature, have serrated appearances. The serration
environment employed has a detrimental effect on ductility of
may implicate the occurrence of dynamic strain aging during
the steel in low strain rates. However, yield stress is not
the tests. This behavior is usually observed at higher work
signicantly affected by strain rate during the test in MgCl2
hardening rates and negative strain-rate dependence of ow
boiling environment (Fig. 4c). In this study, the yield stress of
stress (Ref 10). Dynamic strain aging implies that a solute atom
the steel decreased signicantly as the temperature increased
must be able to make at least one diffusive jump while the alloy
from room temperature to 154 C at air.
is being deformed, and therefore the process is sensitive to
temperature and to strain rate (Ref 10). Accordingly, it is
3.2 Fractography
evident from Fig. 4(a) that the work hardening exponent
increases when the temperature increases to 154 C in air. Figure 5 illustrates the macrofractography of the samples. It
Comparison between work hardening exponents of the samples is evident that the fracture of austenitic stainless steel in air is
tested at 1.1 9 10 4 s 1 and 154 C, but in different environ- completely ductile. The brous appearance of the fracture
ments of air and boiling MgCl2 (Fig. 4a), reveals that the surface which represents ductile fracture becomes granular as
exponent increases slightly when the test was carried out in the the testing environment changes from air to boiling MgCl2
boiling MgCl2 environment. While comparing the results representing brittle fracture. Granular appearance becomes
obtained in boiling MgCl2 environment with different strain more distinct as strain rate decreases (samples No.4 and 5 in
rate values, it is obvious that the exponent would increase when Fig. 5). These observations are in accordance with the decreas-
the strain rate decreases. This discrepancy might be due to the ing ductility of the steel when tested in MgCl2 environment
domination of the corrosion phenomenon at lower strain rates. (Fig. 4d). Necking and formation of cracks on peripheral
Therefore, there is a competition between increasing work surfaces of the samples observed in the other fracture features
hardening exponent due to decreasing strain rate (resulting from are absent. At high strain rates, peripheral surface cracks are
activation of dynamic strain aging at 154 C) and decreasing small, shallow, and straggly, but they are larger, deeper, and
the exponent due to the progress of SCC. The latter has a localized at low strain rates.
predominant effect at lower strain rates and reduces the Micrographs of the fracture surfaces are shown in Fig. 6.
resulting work hardening exponent as strain rate decreases. The fracture surface of the sample tested in air is rather ductile
Strength and ductility of the alloy decreases appreciably at and subtends small dimples (Fig. 6a), while the fracture
154 C and in boiling MgCl2 environment (Fig. 4b, d, e). As surfaces of the samples tested in boiling MgCl2 (Fig. 6b, c)
seen, at strain rate of 1.1 9 10 4 s 1, the ultimate tensile show both the intergranular (IG) and transgranular (TG)
strength, elongation, and reduction of cross-sectional area for fracture modes; the latter becomes predominant on fracture
the samples tested in boiling MgCl2 are respectively 5, 20, and surface as strain rate decreases to 1.1 9 10 6 s 1 (Fig. 6c). It
10% less than those tested in air at 154 C (sample No. 2 in should be noted that although TG has normally been introduced
Table 2). Upon decreasing the strain rate from 1.1 9 10 4 s 1 as fracture mode of austenitic stainless steels in boiling
to 1.1 9 10 6 s 1 for the specimens tested in boiling MgCl2, magnesium chloride, depending on the sensitization condition,

1784Volume 22(6) June 2013 Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance

Fig. 2 Geometries and dimensions of tensile test specimens according to ASTM E8 standard, used for SCC tests

Table 2 Applied conditions during slow strain tensile tests of AISI 316L austenitic stainless steel
Sample no

Conditions 1 2 3 4 5

Strain rate, s 1 1.1 9 10 4

1.1 9 10 4
1.1 9 10 4 1.1 9 10 5 1.1 9 10 6
Environment air air Boiling MgCl2 Boiling MgCl2 Boiling MgCl2
Temperature, C 20 154 154 154 154

Fig. 3 Engineering stress-strain curves of different samples from 316L austenitic stainless steel

a mixture of TG and IG has also been observed for this grade of IGSCC (Ref 11-13). To clarify the details, some cases should be
stainless steel during fracture (Ref 11). pointed out. First, sensitization can be caused by the formation
Many reasons have been summarized in the literature to of chromium carbides (e.g., M23C6) on grain boundaries and a
explain the sensitization of stainless steels and the occurrence of concomitant reduction of chromium in the adjacent grains. The

Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Volume 22(6) June 20131785

Fig. 4 Effects of strain rate, environment, and temperature on mechanical properties (a-e) of 316L austenitic stainless steel

depletion in chromium concentration adjacent to the grain bundles around the cracks, which are propagated from fracture
boundaries gives rise to a reduction in passivity relative to the surfaces as evidenced by Fig. 7 (high strain rate). These areas
grains themselves and susceptibility to IGSCC. However, even consist of strain-induced e-martensite. The occurrence of
thermal sensitization is not taken place in low carbon grades strain-induced transformation (SIT) in austenitic stainless steels
(L-grades; rd type 304L or 316L), in which the bulk carbon is frequently reported (Ref 14, 15). It is postulated that the
content is limited to C 0.03%. Second, for stabilized grades product of SIT leads to formation of e- and/or a -martensites in
of stainless steel, IGSCC can occur clearly not in a sensitized austenitic stainless steels. In support of these statements,
condition. It has been shown that their susceptibility to IGSCC Staudhammer et al. (Ref 13) suggested that high strain rate
is due to the cold work induced during fabrication. The may promote more irregular shear band arrays compared with
mechanism by which cold work renders austenitic alloys the low strain rate. This led to a greater number of shear band
susceptible to IGSCC can be ascribed to an unfavourable intersections and higher volume fraction of a-martensite at the
interaction between deformation-induced martensite, high resid- early stages of tensile deformation.
ual stresses, and localized deformation. Third, other environ- Furthermore, microhardness of these areas prove that these
mental conditions such as ow conditions, temperature, and the deformation bands are harder (327 HV0.1) than adjacent austen-
presence of impurities such as sulphate and chloride also itic matrix (260 HV0.1) developing a low-ductility zone in front of
inuence the occurrence of IGSCC (Ref 12, 13). Finally, the the crack tips. Low-ductility bands would assist propagation of
simultaneous occurrence of IG and TG fracture modes would be cracks through the grains (transgranular fracture). Branching
assisted by formation of shear bands consisting of stacking fault behavior of the propagating crack is also noticeable in Fig. 7.

1786Volume 22(6) June 2013 Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance

Fig. 5 Fracture surfaces of different samples form 316L austenitic stainless steel: (a) top view; (b) side view, with sample numbers correspond-
ing to Table 2

Fig. 6 SEM micrographs of fracture surfaces from different samples of 316L austenitic stainless steel which were tested at (a) ambient temper-
ature and air 1.1 9 10 4 s 1 strain rate, (b) boiling MgCl2 at 154 C 1.1 9 10 5 s 1 strain rate, and (c) boiling MgCl2 at 154 C 1.1 9 10 6 s 1
strain rate

Longitudinal sections of fracture surface are shown in Fig. 8 due to mechanical loading. These pits are observable even
and 9. The presence of two crack paths in front of a crack tip in around inclusions as shown in Fig. 9. It is seen in Fig. 9 that
Fig. 8b is also remarkable, which conrms the prevalence of a the crack path does not inevitably pass through inclusions or
lm-induced mechanism during the SCC process (Ref 1, 2). MnS particles.
Tiny holes on crack path and also dispersed holes in matrix are In this respect, initiation of TGSCC cracks in our experi-
the other appreciable features of both IG and TG cracks in the ments is apparently assisted by establishment of low-ductility
samples (Fig. 8, 9). These corroded holes are apparently deformation bands in austenitic matrix during plastic deforma-
localized and random. These tiny holes, or pits, can act as tion of the steel. The discrepancy in ductility between
points of cracks initiation, coalescence, and then propagation deformation bands and the matrix promotes propagation of

Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Volume 22(6) June 20131787

Fig. 7 Micrographs of a propagated crack in matrix of 316L austenitic stainless steel tensioned under 1.1 9 10 5 s 1 strain rate in boiling
MgCl2 at 154 C. Branching behavior of the crack is assisted by deformation bands (in white circles) in fronts of crack tips

Fig. 8 SEM micrographs of a transgranular crack in sample no.5 (Table 2); (a, b) pits on the transgranular crack (BSE image); and (c) two
white crack paths in front of a crack tip (BSE image)

Fig. 9 SEM micrographs of (a) and (b) intergranular cracks passing beside inclusion and MnS particles, and (c) some pits on interface of an
inclusion (MnS particle) and matrix, in sample no.5 (Table 2)

cracks through the grain, inducing TG crack mode. In addition, zones in the matrix helps in crack propagation. These pits later
the presence of pits in the matrix which could be resulting from connect together under mechanical load, and the TG crack
the preferred corrosion in localized chemically heterogeneous propagates faster until it culminates in fracture (Ref 13, 16).

1788Volume 22(6) June 2013 Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance

4. Conclusions 4. R.B. Rebak and Z. Szklarska-Smialowska, The Mechanism of Stress
Corrosion Cracking of Alloy 600 in High Temperature Water, Corros.
Sci., 1996, 38, p 971972
It is revealed that boiling MgCl2 provides a highly 5. D. van Rooyen, Review of the Stress Corrosion Cracking of Inconel
aggressive and corrosive medium which completely degrades 600, Corrosion, 1975, 31, p 327337
the mechanical properties of 316L austenitic stainless steel 6. E.J. Minehara, A. Nishimura, and T. Tsukada, Preparation Femtosec-
ond Laser Prevention for The Cold Worked Stress Corrosion Crackings
because of the progression of SCC. The effect of boiling MgCl2 on Reactor Grade Low Carbon Stainless Steel, Proceedings of the 2004
on mechanical properties of steel becomes more signicant as FEL Conference, R.J. Bakker and R.P. Walker, Eds. (Trieste, Italy),
strain rate during SSRT decreases. Lowering the strain rate in 2004, p 665666
the presence of boiling MgCl2 environment changes macro- 7. A.F. Padilha and P.R. Rios, Decomposition of Austenitic in Austenitic
fracture mode from ductile to brittle, and microfracture Stainless Steels, ISIJ Int., 2002, 42, p 325337
appearance becomes a mix of intergranular (IG) and transgran- 8. J.R. Davis, SCC and Hydrogen Embitterment Stainless Steels, ASM
Specialty Hand Book, J.R. Davis, Ed., ASM, Ohio, 1994, p 181204
ular (TG) modes. The TG fracture mode becomes almost 9. M. Liljas, Development of Superaustenitic Stainless Steels, Avesta
predominant at the lowest strain rate of 1.1 9 10 6 as observed Corrosion Management and Application Engineering, Shefeld, 1995,
in this study. p5
It appears that the promotion of TG fracture would be 10. W.C. Leslie, Physical Metallurgy of Steels, McGraw-Hill, Tokyo, 1981,
assisted by the presence of low-ductile deformation bands in p 9094
front of the crack. The presence of tiny holes or pits on crack 11. O.M. Alyousif and R. Nishimura, The Stress Corrosion Cracking
Behavior of Austenitic Stainless Steels in Boiling Magnesium Chloride
path and dispersed pits in matrix would indicate that SCC in Solutions, Corros. Sci., 2007, 49, p 30403051
316L austenitic steel can initiate from these random and 12. J. Talonen, Effect of Strain Induced a -Martensite Transformation on
localized pits which then become interconnected and propagate Mechanical Properties of Metastable Austenitic Stainless Steels,
further in matrix. Doctoral Dissertation, Helsinki University of Technology, 2007
13. N.M. Wilmshurts, Stress Corrosion Cracking in Light Water Reactors,
International Atomic Energy Agency, LAEA Nuclear Energy Series,
Vienna, Austria, 2011
14. J. Talonen and H. Hanninen, Damping Properties of Austenitic
References Stainless Steel Containing Strain-Induces Martensite, Metall. Mater.
Trans. A, 2004, 35, p 2401
1. B. Craig, Environmentally Induced Cracking, Metals Hand Book, 15. J. Talonen, Effect of Strain Rate on the Strain-Induced c a 
ASM, 1992, vol 13, p 145188 Martensite Transformation and Mechanical Properties of Austenitic
2. P. Marcus, Corrosion Mechanisms in Theory and Practice, 2nd ed., Stainless Steels, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2005, 36, p 421443
Marcel Dekker Incorporated, New York, 2002, p 399445 16. B.T. Lu, Z.K. Chen, J.L. Luo, B.M. Patchett, and Z.H. Xu, Pitting and
3. Y. Huang, Stress Corrosion Cracking of AISI, 321 Stainless Steel in Stress Corrosion Cracking Behavior in Welded Austenitic Stainless
Acidic Chloride Solution, Bull. Mater. Sci., 2002, 25, p 47 Steel, Electrochim. Acta, 2005, 50, p 13911403

Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Volume 22(6) June 20131789