Understanding Our Criminal Justice System: Accused
Understanding Our Criminal Justice System: Accused
Understanding Our Criminal Justice System: Accused
Criminal Justice
Chapter 6 System
When we see someone violating the law, we
immediately think of informing the police. You might
have seen, either in real life or in the movies, police
officers filing reports and arresting persons. Because
of the role played by the police in arresting persons,
we often get confused and think that it is the police
who decide whether a person is guilty or not. This,
however, is far from true. After a person is arrested,
it is a court of law that decides whether the accused
person is guilty or not. According to the Constitution,
every individual charged of a crime has to be given a
fair trial.
Do you know what it means to get a fair trial? Have
you heard of an FIR? Or, do you know who a public
prosecutor is? In this chapter, we use a fictional case
of theft to try and highlight the process as well as
the role of different individuals in the criminal justice
system. Most cases go through a process that is
similar to the one discussed in our fictional case.
Therefore, understanding these processes as well as
the role that different persons should play within
the criminal justice system is crucial, so that if ever
the occasion should arise, you are aware of the
processes that should be followed.
I am sure it was in
this drawer! Where
could it be...?
Mr Shinde has come to the police station. Sub inspector (S.I.) Rao records Mr Shindes FIR.
S.I. Rao forcibly keeps Sushil in the police station for two days. Sushil is abused and beaten by S.I. Rao and other
police constables. They try and make him confess that he and his sister Shanti head a gang of domestic servants that
have stolen jewellery from other homes. There have been other complaints of theft of jewellery from Shindes
neighbourhood. As Sushil keeps repeating that he is an innocent factory worker, the police let him go after two days.
23.8.06
Although the court granted bail to Shanti after a month, she was unable to get anyone to stand surety for her for
Rs 20,000. She, therefore, continued to be in jail. She is very traumatised. She is worried about what will happen during
the trial.
14.9.06
The police files a chargesheet in the Magistrates Court. The court gives a copy of the chargesheet including
statements of witnesses to Shanti. Shanti tells the court that she has no lawyer to defend her against this false
case of theft.
The Magistrate appoints Advocate Kamla Roy as Shantis defence lawyer at the governments expense.
According to Article 22 of the Constitution, every person has a Fundamental Right to be defended by a
lawyer. Article 39A of the Constitution places a duty upon the State to provide a lawyer to any citizen who
is unable to engage one due to poverty or other disability.
8.3.07
20.4.07
Advocate Roy examines Sushil and his
employer as defence witnesses. Through
their testimonies, she is able to show that the
Rs 10,000 found in Shantis trunk could well
be the earnings of Sushil and Shanti.
From the above incident, you can see that the four key
players in the criminal justice system are the police, the
Public Prosecutor, the defence lawyer and the judge. You
have seen the roles each of them played in the above case.
Now let us try and understand their roles more generally.
You read in Unit 2 about the rule of law, which means that
everyone is subject to the law of the land. This includes the
police. Therefore, police investigations always have to be
conducted in accordance with law and with full respect for
human rights. The Supreme Court has laid down guidelines
that the police must follow at the time of arrest, detention and
interrogation. The police are not allowed to torture or beat
or shoot anyone during investigation. They cannot inflict any
form of punishment on a person even for petty offences.
The Supreme Court of India has laid down specific requirements and procedures that the police and
other agencies have to follow for the arrest, detention and interrogation of any person. These are
known as the D.K. Basu Guidelines and some of these include:
The police officials who carry out the arrest or interrogation should wear clear, accurate and visible
identification and name tags with their designations;
A memo of arrest should be prepared at the time of arrest and should include the time and date of
arrest. It should also be attested by at least one witness who could include a family member of the
person arrested. The arrest memo should be counter-signed by the person arrested.
The person arrested, detained or being interrogated has a right to inform a relative, friend or well-
wisher.
When a friend or relative lives outside the district, the time, place of arrest and venue of custody
must be notified by police within 8 to 12 hours after arrest.
Q
police lock up for two days. Was it legal for the police to detain him? Does it
violate the D.K. Basu guidelines?
b) Did S.I. Rao do enough to question witnesses and compile evidence before
arresting Shanti and filing a case against her? In keeping with the duties of the
police as stated above, what else do you think S.I. Rao could have done as part of
his investigation?
2. Now let us take a slightly different scenario. Shanti and her brother Sushil go to the
police station to complain that Mr Shindes 20-year old son had stolen Rs 15,000 that
they had been saving up. Do you think that the officer in charge of the Police Station
will promptly lodge an FIR? List a few factors that in your opinion may influence the
decision of the police to register or not register an FIR.
All of the processes, written in bold on page 74, are crucial to a fair trial. Write in your
Q
own words what you understand of the following processes based on the above description
of Shantis case.
a. Open Court:
b. Basis of Evidence:
c. Cross-examination of Prosecution Witnesses:
Discuss in class what might have happened in Shantis case if the following procedures
had not been observed.
a. If she were not defended by a lawyer.
b. If the court had not assumed her to be innocent.
Imagine that you and your classmates are now part of the criminal justice system. First divide the
class into the following four groups of persons:
The column on the right provides a list of functions. Match these with the roles that are listed on the
left. Have each group pick the functions that it needs to perform to bring justice to those who were
affected by the violence of the Fiesta fans. In what order, will these functions be performed?
Roles Functions
Police hear the witnesses
record the statements of witnesses
Public Prosecutor cross examine the witnesses
take photographs of burnt homes
Defence Lawyer record the evidence
arrest the Fiesta fans
Judge writes the judgment
argue the case for the victims
decide for how many years the accused will be put in jail
examine the witnesses in court
pass the judgment
get the assaulted women medically examined
conduct a fair trial
meet the accused persons
Now take the same situation but ask one student who is a supporter of the Fiesta Club to perform all
the functions listed above. Do you think the victims would get justice if only one person performed
all of the functions of the criminal justice system? Why not?
State two reasons why you believe that different persons need to play different roles as part of the
criminal justice system.
Accused: In the context of this chapter this refers to the person who is tried by a court
for a crime.
Cognizable: In the context of this chapter this refers to an offence for which the police
may arrest a person without the permission of the court.
Cross-examine: In the context of this chapter this refers to the questioning of a
witness who has already been examined by the opposing side in order to determine the
veracity of his/her testimony.
Detention: In the context of this chapter this refers to the act of being kept in illegal
custody by the police.
Impartial: The act of being fair or just and not favouring one side over another.
Offence: Any act that the law defines as a crime.
To be charged of a crime: This refers to the trial judge informing the accused, in
writing, of the offence for which he/she will face trial.
Witness: In the context of this chapter this refers to the person who is called upon in
court to provide a first-hand account of what he/she has seen, heard or knows.