Clinical Pharmacology in Healthcare, Teaching and Research
Clinical Pharmacology in Healthcare, Teaching and Research
Clinical Pharmacology in Healthcare, Teaching and Research
Pharmacology
in Health Care,
Teaching and
Research
a lt h
e
H re
Ca Res
ear
ch
Teaching
Clinical Pharmacology
in Health Care, Teaching
and Research
Foreword and Acknowledgments
This position paper regarding the roles of clinical pharmacology in health care, teaching and research was composed
and edited by representatives of the International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology (IUPHAR), the World Health
Organisation (WHO) and the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). It is an updated
and edited version of a recent publication entitled Clinical Pharmacology in Research, Teaching and Health Care-
Considerations by IUPHAR, the International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology which was published in the
journal Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology (BCPT) in 2010, Volume 107, pages 531 559. This document
contains new chapters of special relevance to global health.
We thank Professor Kim Brsen, the editor of BCPT, the publishers of the journal, and the original and new authors for
generous collaboration during the editorial process.
We gratefully acknowledge financial support for the printing and publication of this paper from:
For IUPHAR Michael Orme (Liverpool, UK), Folke Sjqvist (Stockholm, Sweden), and Donald Birkett, (Sydney, Australia).
Abbreviations .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2
1. Executive Summary....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3
2. Introduction................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5
3. Definition of Clinical Pharmacology................................................................................................................................................. 7
4. History of Clinical Pharmacology.......................................................................................................................................................... 9
5. The Global Medicine Scene: The Place of Clinical Pharmacology..........................................11
6. The Clinical Pharmacologist in Patient Care..................................................................................................................13
7. Drug Therapy in Paediatric Patients.............................................................................................................................................17
8. Drug Therapy in Geriatric Patients..................................................................................................................................................19
9. Teaching Clinical Pharmacology.........................................................................................................................................................21
10. Research Domains of Clinical Pharmacology..............................................................................................................27
11. Emerging Roles of Clinical Pharmacology: Biologics and Biosimilars 31
12. Clinical Pharmacology and the Pharmaceutical Industry 33
13. Governments: Essential Roles for Clinical Pharmacology 37
14. The Clinical Pharmacologist and Traditional Medicines 41
15. Collaboration with Other Drug Experts 43
16. Organisation: Structural Models for Clinical Pharmacology 45
17. The Central Place of Clinical Pharmacology in Global Public Health 47
18. Overview.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................53
19. References.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................57
20. Editors and Contributors..................................................................................................................................................................................65
21. Addendum I.
Model Core Curriculum for Clinical Pharmacology,
Therapeutics and Prescribing for Medical Students.........................................................................................67
22. Addendum II.
Model Curriculum for Medical Specialisation in Clinical Pharmacology 73
Some forty years ago the World Health Organisation is worsened by the increasing use of combination
brought together a group of experts in Clinical therapies and the higher proportion of elderly patients
Pharmacology and Therapeutics to define the in the population. We know that ADRs (the formal
discipline of Clinical Pharmacology, and to outline study of which has now given rise to the discipline
how it could help to improve the use of drugs in the of pharmacovigilance) cause some 7% of admissions
delivery of health care (1). In the last four decades to hospital and they are also a not uncommon
the importance of drug therapy has changed cause of death, particularly in elderly patients (4,5).
markedly in terms of the potency of the drugs we Many of these ADRs are predictable and could be
use, in the number and diversity of drugs that are prevented if the process of educating prescribers was
available, and in the number of diseases that can taken more seriously. Another problem that has not
be treated. In addition the discipline of molecular improved significantly over the years since 1970 is
biology has had an increasing impact on the the errors made during the prescribing process in
development of drugs, but solid knowledge about spite of the widespread availability of computers and
the pharmacological principles that underpin the the internet providing easy access to appropriate
Rational Use of Medicines (RUM) is just as relevant information and knowledge (6). These problems are
now as it was in 1970. more written about in resource rich countries but are
just as relevant in resource-poor countries.
Since the production of the 1970 report the cost of
developing drugs has risen substantially and the cost It is clear then that the time has come to modernise the
of taking a new chemical entity to market can easily original WHO report in the light of lessons that have
be in excess of $US 1000 million (638 million, 764 been learned and problems addressed. This updated
million). As a result newly developed drugs are very report arises from a partnership between the World
expensive, making it more difficult for resource poor Health Organisation (WHO), the International Union
countries to fund drug therapy for their inhabitants of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology (IUPHAR) and the
although there are welcome exceptions in the Council for International Organizations of Medical
provision by Big Pharma of modern drugs at a very Sciences (CIOMS). After a period of expansion in
low or no cost (eg ivermectin for onchocerciasis). Even the last 20 years of the twentieth century, clinical
resource rich countries have limitations in financing pharmacology as a discipline declined somewhat
drug therapy and this has led to new concepts such in many countries. However during the last few
as the cost effectiveness of drug therapy and to the years there have been signs both of new growth
discipline of pharmacoeconomics. in and new enthusiasm for the discipline (7),
although the importance of clinical pharmacology
While clinical pharmacology is learning to face these to pharmaceutical companies has never been in
new problems we are still dealing with problems in doubt. A recent report on the relationship between
drug therapy that were recognised in the 1970s. We the pharmaceutical industry and the National Health
knew then that adverse reactions to drugs (ADRs) Service (NHS in the United Kingdom) has stated that
were among the more common causes of admission re-building clinical pharmacology as a core discipline
to hospital (3) and this problem has not decreased in the NHS is of vital importance for the future of
in importance over the decades largely because little health care in the UK and this is likely to be true in
is done about it. In addition the problem of ADRs many other countries (8).
Clinical Pharmacology is the scientific discipline that The descriptor clinical pharmacologist is normally
involves all aspects of the relationship between drugs used in a professional sense to refer to physicians
and humans. Its breadth includes the discovery and involved in the medical care of patients who are
development of new drugs, the application of drugs specialists in clinical pharmacology. They have
as therapeutic agents, the use of drugs, the beneficial usually undertaken several years of postgraduate
and harmful effects of drugs in individuals and training (see Addendum II) focussing on important
society, and the deliberate misuse of drugs. Clinical aspects of clinical pharmacology including clinical
pharmacology is a multidisciplinary team science trials, drug evaluations, pharmacoepidemiology,
that encompasses professionals with a wide variety pharmacoeconomics, pharmacovigilance and clinical
of scientific skills including medicine, pharmacology, drug toxicology. Some countries have accreditation
pharmacy, biomedical science and nursing. Other programmes for clinical pharmacology as a physician
professionals who are important in various aspects of specialty but many do not. The present document
clinical pharmacology include social and behavioural refers essentially to medical clinical pharmacologists.
scientists, dentists, economists, epidemiologists,
geneticists, toxicologists, mathematicians and
computer scientists.
Clinical pharmacology is both old and young. There is no doubt that the most vigorous attempts
The practice of drug therapy goes back to ancient to develop clinical pharmacology as an academic
times and the discovery of drugs such as quinine, discipline were made in the United States (13,14).
reserpine and artemisinin which were first used as Important landmarks are the first edition of
herbal medicines. William Witherings publication on Goodman and Gilmans The Pharmacological Basis
the use of foxglove in the treatment of heart failure of Therapeutics and the successful attempt (1960)
(see10) may very well be considered the first scientific by Walter Modell, also at Cornell, to launch the
account of the discipline but it took 200 years first scientific journal in the subject entitled Clinical
before the pharmacology of digitalis was explored Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
with accurate, clinical pharmacological methods.
As a scientific discipline, clinical pharmacology is In the early 1960s, the United States became
young having originated from the middle of the the world centre for the training of clinical
20th century. It is difficult to find who first coined pharmacologists. The NIH chief James Shannon and
the name as opinions differ between countries. his colleagues Bernard B. Brodie and Julius Axelrod
Several distinguished pharmacologists active in introduced biochemical pharmacology as a science
the middle of the century brought pharmacology and drug measurements in body fluids as tools in
and clinical know-how about drugs together and clinical pharmacology. Several centres of excellence
helped to transform drug evaluation from the trial in clinical pharmacology offered training to potential
and error state to a scientific discipline. In the Anglo- clinical pharmacologists from all parts of the world.
Saxon literature, Harry Gold at Cornell (10,11) is The efforts to improve clinical drug evaluation by
commonly quoted as the person who first introduced Louis Lasagna, a pupil of Harry Beecher at John
the name clinical pharmacology in the early 1940s. Hopkins Hospital, should be especially recognised
However, in 1914, a textbook was written by Hans (13,14). In1966, Lasagna published a brilliant,
Horst Meyer and Rudolf Gottlied in German the title still valid, account in Science of the present status
of which was translated as Pharmacology, Clinical and future development of clinical pharmacology
and Experimental. In addition, also in the German (14). The birth of clinical pharmacogenetics can be
literature, Paul Martini, professor of medicine in ascribed to the pioneering contributions of Werner
Bonn, published his monograph in 1932 entitled Kalow and A.G. Motulsky (15,16).
Methodology of Therapeutic Investigation and
he is considered by some as the first clinical Parallel developments occurred in Europe, particularly
pharmacologist (12). According to Shelley and Baur, in the UK, where the strong infrastructure in basic
his contributions escaped the attention of the English- pharmacology and clinical medicine formed an
speaking world (12). In the English literature, there excellent basis for a rapid growth of the discipline.
is a long tradition of materia medica, particularly Names that are usually mentioned in this context
in Scotland. In 1884, John Mitchell Bruce wrote his are those of Sir John Gaddum, Sir Horace Smirk
textbook entitled Materia Medica and Therapeutics. and Sir Austin Bradford Hill (10). Chairs in clinical
An Introduction to the Rational Treatment of Disease pharmacology were created at the end of the 1960s
and this, in its 20th edition, became Dillings Clinical in Germany, the UK and Sweden, although chairs
Pharmacology. This book was published in 1960, in Materia Medica had long been established in
the same year as Desmond Laurences textbook Scotland. Academic growth of the discipline also took
entitled Clinical Pharmacology. place in France (17). IUPHAR took early initiatives to
Modern drug therapy has unquestionably chemical libraries available to most pharmaceutical
transformed the health of peoples in developed companies, coupled with high throughput screening
countries over the last 50 years. Conditions such as and combinatorial chemistry, offer unimaginable
poliomyelitis, diphtheria and pertussis have largely rewards for us all. In addition, the emergence of an
been eliminated in wealthier nations. Many lethal array of biotechnological techniques offers unique
communicable diseases can be cured by modern approaches to the development of innovative
antimicrobial agents. And complex surgery, beyond medicines.
the imagination of our forefathers, can be performed
safely and effectively using modern anaesthetic Yet, despite the promise from the science, the
agents. Those with chronic diseases have benefited outlook is not favourable. Despite record investment
immeasurably with the emergence of safe and in biomedical research by the public sector and not-
effective treatments for asthma, hypertension and for-profit organizations, as well as by pharmaceutical
hypercholesterolaemia. and biopharmaceutical companies, the number of
new active molecules registered by drug regulatory
Nevertheless, there remains massive unmet clinical authorities has fallen dramatically. The costs of
need in developing, emerging and developed bringing a new product to the market are increasing
countries. There is, for example, a pressing need at a rate of 10% per annum, due in part to the
for effective vaccines against HIVAIDS, malaria failures of products during development, but also
and tuberculosis. We have nothing to prevent the to the extended requirements for evidence-based
inexorable decline in neurological function in people documentation from regulatory authorities (e.g. in
with neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimers elderly patients). Added to this, many of the largest
disease, Parkinsons disease or Huntingtons disease. pharmaceutical companies face large reductions in
And, when effective vaccines and treatments have turnover as their blockbusters come off patent.
been developed, they are too often unavailable to
those in the poorer parts of the world. During most There have also been spectacular withdrawals
of the second half of the 20th century, research- of some marketed medicines because of safety
based pharmaceutical companies were, for practical concerns. As a consequence, drug regulatory
purposes, the sole source of new medicines. They authorities have become increasingly risk averse and
discovered, developed and delivered products place ever greater demands on manufacturers to
often with considerable ingenuity for healthcare demonstrate the safety of their products before and
systems that were able to afford the costs required after marketing. While this may have some benefits
to maintain the industrys infrastructure. for drug safety, these measures are likely to increase
the cost of medicines unless they are implemented
People in poorer countries, unable to meet these with considerable care. Moreover, healthcare systems
costs as well as lacking an appropriate healthcare across the world are struggling to meet the apparently
infrastructure only rarely benefited. The prospect high prices that pharmaceutical companies seek to
for satisfying unmet medical need has, in some charge for new products that do reach the market.
senses, never been brighter. Advances in molecular Those responsible for meeting the health needs of the
techniques offer the promise of identifying drug- populations they seek to serve are under increasing
sensitive targets that might attenuate or cure many pressure to provide affordable care. The increasing
miserable and life threatening conditions. The massive numbers of elderly and very elderly people (many
The ways in which clinical pharmacological services controlled clinical trials and observed effectiveness
could be integrated in healthcare systems were first in clinical care (24,28). Clinical pharmacology with
outlined in 1970 in a WHO Technical Report referred its emphasis on critical drug evaluation, scientific
to earlier (1). methodology, drug development and involvement
in the work of drug and therapeutics committees
The quality and outcome of drug therapy in patient is strategically positioned to bridge the knowledge
care can be greatly improved by using cost-effective gap between stakeholders including patients,
and evidence-based treatment with drugs adapted clinicians, pharmacists, administrators, politicians
to the needs of patient populations and individual and pharmaceutical companies within and outside
patients. Advances in drug development provide healthcare institutions (26,27).
patients with new drugs, novel drug combinations,
expensive biological drugs and targeted drug therapy The quality of drug therapy can be improved in all
adapted to the molecular characteristics of the disease healthcare settings irrespective of the resources of the
(22,23,24). Increasingly cost-effective generic country or of individual health care facilities. Patients
drugs are available and should be used as first- can be provided with effective and safe therapy if well-
hand therapies to balance the economic pressures documented drugs are prescribed, and the drugs are
on all healthcare systems today (25). The rate of used according to medical, social, environmental and
implementation of this strategy varies widely across financial circumstances. The gap between knowledge
health care systems (25). Easy access to evidence- about drugs and their use in clinical practice needs
based drug information will assist physicians and to be reduced in order to promote the principles
healthcare staff in monitoring the effectiveness and governing the Rational Use of Medicines (RUM).
safety of drug therapy and optimal allocation of limited These principles have to be communicated, learnt and
resources (26,27).This is a priority since patients and practiced by students, doctors, healthcare staff and
patient organizations are eager to explore what patients in their daily clinical practice (24,27,29,30).
new therapies can offer in terms of health benefits An optimal strategy for eliminating the knowledge
compared to existing treatments, but new drugs practice gap in drug therapy is to apply a multifaceted
and drug combinations may not be affordable for all approach including practice-governed quality
patients and healthcare institutions. It needs also to assurance programmes combined with interactive
be considered that newly registered drugs are rarely continuous medical education and prompt electronic
innovative (24,27). As a result, great emphasis must access to evidence-based guidelines (24,27,31).
be placed on the overall cost-effectiveness and safety The principles of RUM have to be integrated with
of new drug therapies from a societal perspective in healthcare planning and with resource allocation
order to guide drug selection and reimbursement given the scarcity of resources that healthcare
decisions (22,28). The use and value of new drug institutions are facing. Clinical pharmacologists with
therapies have to be monitored within the healthcare their focus on drug evaluation and on the principles
institutions as part of a systematic introduction and of RUM are needed in patient care (22,27,28,29).
follow-up of new therapies by involving drug experts They should train healthcare staff in the principles of
across medical specialties and systematic use of drug evaluation and promote the use of guidelines
clinical outcome data (24,28). Such a procedure will and drug recommendations based on scientific
diminish the gap between documented efficacy in evidence. At the level of individual hospitals and
The well-known paediatric therapeutic disasters of between drugs and humans during growth,
the late 1950s (eg sulfisoxazole, chloramphenicol) development and maturation. Its breadth includes
revealed the need and gave the impetus for the the continuum between discovery, development,
development of paediatric clinical pharmacology. regulation and utilisation of medicines (as regards
Despite the fact that training of paediatric compounds and formulations) intended to benefit
clinical pharmacologists has been going on for the paediatric population. As well, paediatric clinical
decades, training capacity remains very small. pharmacology is concerned with the response to
Consequently the number of trained paediatric and the adverse effects of medicines, their use
clinical pharmacologists in the world is relatively and misuse, and the economics of drug therapy.
small, with the majority of countries having only a As the great majority of scientific research and
handful if any (44). In this context, paediatric clinical drug development is for many reasons first done in
pharmacologists are physicians with training in both adults, paediatric clinical pharmacology adds the
paediatrics and clinical pharmacology. However, translational element of adapting scientific methods
over the past two decades, professionals outside the and translating scientific information from adults to
discipline of medicine but who possess specialised paediatric patients (45).
expertise that is germane to the field of paediatric
clinical pharmacology have entered the discipline By virtue of the comprehensive scope of paediatric
and participate in a variety of settings (eg academic, clinical pharmacology, it involves numerous
regulatory, clinical and industrial). professional groups whose training and skills
are relevant to one or more of the scientific and/
The need for more and better development, scientific or clinical facets of the discipline of paediatric
study, regulatory assessment and appropriate use clinical pharmacology (eg physicians, biomedical
of paediatric medicines is recognised in the US, scientists, and non-physician health care providers
EU, and WHO paediatric medicines initiatives. such as nurses and pharmacists). Paediatric clinical
Implementation of all the paediatric studies pharmacology is therefore a scientifically driven field
mandated by these initiatives requires well trained of endeavour that depends on a variety of skilled
investigators and other experts (eg research professionals with a training or special interest in
trained nurses, pharmacists, laboratory scientists) appropriate aspects of paediatric drug therapy.
which in many countries do not exist in numbers
sufficient to embrace the demands associated with I Scope of Practice in Paediatric
paediatric drug development. Accordingly, building Clinical Pharmacology
enhanced capacity and strength in paediatric clinical Practice environments for paediatric clinical
pharmacology across the world is essential to ensure pharmacology are diverse and can include patient
the success of these initiatives. care, research, teaching, drug development and drug
regulation. Paediatric clinical pharmacologists may
I Definition of Paediatric participate directly in the care of paediatric patients
Clinical Pharmacology as either primary care givers or consultants, or may
Paediatric clinical pharmacology is a scientific work in scientific and/or administrative capacities to
discipline that involves all aspects of the relationship improve the quality of medicines use irrespective of
The most rapidly expanding age group world-wide research or educational needs, and attracting
is those 80 years and older (47). Multiple concurrent physicians and training them to do geriatric clinical
illnesses that may benefit from drug treatment pharmacology is a continuing challenge.
are the rule, not the exception, in this group. The
likelihood of adverse drug reactions increases Clinical pharmacology has an important role to foster
markedly as the number of concurrently administered the linkage of the principles of geriatric medicine and
drugs rises. This combined with the age-related disease-based therapeutics. In geriatric medicine,
decline in physiological functions (decreased cardiac advances in understanding the interplay of multiple
reserve, impaired baroreflex function, decreased concurrent illnesses and how these may result in a
immunological response, decreased renal function) common path to patient disability and death have
that in younger patients may reduce the severity of allowed definition of the frailty syndrome (50). In
an adverse drug reaction, make the older patient addition, the concept of competing morbidity such
particularly at risk for polypharmacy related adverse that in the older patient successful treatment of
drug reactions (48). However the benefits for the one illness may result not in restoration of health,
treatment of hypertension, coronary artery disease, but in the more obvious clinical presentation of
congestive heart failure, diabetes, arthritis, and other another concurrent illness, has advanced clinical
chronic illnesses associated with advancing age are decision making and end of life care. The clinical
well established. Clinical pharmacologists who focus pharmacologist has an important role in teaching
their research, teaching and clinical service toward about the changing balance of harm and benefit
older individuals have the opportunity to improve for specific drug therapy intervention in the context
RUM for this increasingly important segment of the of the individual older patient and their specific
worlds population. concurrent illnesses. The research opportunities in
this area for the clinical pharmacologist are both
During the past 30 years, clinical pharmacologists challenging and exciting. Research efforts by clinical
have conducted the research that has defined pharmacologists that have been translated into
the pharmacokinetics of aging (49). This work, improved clinical practice for older patients include
particularly in the area of drugs (or their metabolites) the development of expert opinion developed lists
that undergo renal clearance, has contributed of drugs to use such as the Wise List (27) and the
importantly to patient safety and well being. For Beers criteria (51). In addition, based on extensive
many drugs it is essential to assess renal function drug usage data, clinical pharmacologists in Europe
in order to choose the appropriate dosage. Looking have developed Unwise Lists of drugs that are
to the future, the research opportunities to define best avoided in older patients. Geriatric clinical
drug pharmacodynamics and altered drug harm/ pharmacologists also develop research tools such as
benefit relationships in older patients are abundant. the Drug Burden Index (52) that link anticholinergic
Similarly, teaching RUM for older patients and and sedative drug exposure to important clinical
placing this into a geriatric medicine perspective is functional outcomes in older patients.
an important role for the clinical pharmacologist.
The number of physicians trained as geriatric clinical Disease-based therapy focuses on the development
pharmacologists is inadequate to meet either the and implementation of treatment guidelines to
I Introduction I Pharmacokinetic,
In the first WHO report on clinical pharmacology in Pharmacodynamic and
1970 (1), the section on research emphasised the Pharmacogenetic studies in
need for studies that explored the mechanisms of Human Volunteers
action of drugs and identified their pharmacokinetics This research should lead to a fundamental
in humans. Improvement of the early studies of understanding of the mechanisms involved in the
new drugs in humans and conventional therapeutic actions of the drugs on the organism or the actions of
trials were also prioritised. Research in clinical the organism on the drugs. The research is particularly
pharmacology has now taken new paths and this focused on intra- and interindividual differences in
satisfies many principles of translational medicine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, an area in
defined as taking scientific data on drugs into rational which clinical pharmacologists have made important
patient care. contributions in the past. The mechanisms in such
variability usually involve inherited individualities in
However, we should be aware that not all research into the genes encoding drug targets, drug transporters
drugs falls within the remit of translational medicine. and drug metabolising enzymes. The perspective of
The endeavour of a pharmacologist working in a the research should not only be in understanding
clinical environment is to develop methods and the molecular mechanisms but also in designing
strategies that improve the quality of drug use in genotyping or phenotyping tests, which may be
individual patients and patient populations. Research applied to forecast drug response and to differentiate
in drug evaluation, drug utilization, pharmacovigilance between genetic and non-genetic modifiers of the
and pharmacoepidemiology areas that were only outcome of drug treatment . In vivo research is often
superficially mentioned in the 1970 document are combined with experimental studies in vitro and in
now the priority. All these research areas have great silico. The research aims to identify the routes of
potential for supporting healthcare personnel in their metabolism and excretion of drugs.
RUM. Rational use of medicines implies that drugs
should be chosen according to efficacy, ADRs and There are two separate approaches in pharmacoki-
cost as potentially equally important parameters. netic research, one based on several drug
Research in clinical pharmacology therefore also measurements over a fixed time schedule in a
includes studies that elicit new data about drugs few subjects and the other being based on sparse
in use, such as new indications and treatment of measurements in each subject of a large population of
neglected patient populations (children, elderly - see individuals (population pharmacokinetics). Such data
chapter 7 and 8). It also includes research into ADRs, may help to identify subpopulations with impaired
pharmacogenetics and drug interactions. Research in or enhanced elimination capacity. The population
clinical pharmacology is usually interdisciplinary and approach can also be applied to pharmacokinetic
hence often carried out in collaboration with other pharmacodynamic evaluation.
professionals: pharmacists, drug analytical chemists,
molecular biologists, statisticians, computer
specialists as well as clinical researchers from other
medical specialties.
I Pharmacovigilance I Pharmacoepidemiology
When a new drug enters the market, it has been Sometimes an RCT is either unethical (e.g. in
tested in only 35000 patients. There ought to be detecting harmful effects on the foetus) or impossible
solid documentation that its actions are superior because hypothesis testing or signal generation
to placebo or comparable to or even better than will require very large numbers of patients. Clinical
the existing treatment. Its most common harmful pharmacologists have been pioneers in establishing
effects should be known, in particular those that pharmacoepidemiology, which may be defined as
are predictable from their basic pharmacological the science of studying the utilisation and actions of
properties or readily explained in the context thereof. drugs in large populations. Pharmacoepidemiology
However, at marketing, serious or even lethal but uses methods from both clinical pharmacology and
very rare ADRs that cannot be explained by the basic epidemiology. The purpose of the research may be to
pharmacology of the drug and that occur in, say, 1 detect a signal, to estimate the risk of an ADR or to
out of 10,000 patients or even less commonly, may test a hypothesis. The results of the research can be
not have occurred or been recognised. Spontaneous used to give advice to healthcare organisations and
ADR reporting is carried out in order to detect individual patients or to formulate a policy regarding
unknown potential drug toxicity. The method the optimal use of the drug.
consists of collecting individual case reports of clinical
suspicions of ADRs. Data mining in ADR research is Cohort studies are carried out by registering a drug
the search for structures and patterns in large ADR effect (cure, death, ADR) in a sample of patients
databases, manual inspection no longer being treated with a particular drug. A sample of patients
possible. Data mining involves the development, not treated with the drug is used as a control group.
testing and implementation of computer methods, Random allocation and blinding are not applied
I Overview and the Industry are meagre. There have also been highly visible
Environment failures of potential blockbusters at a late stage in
Pharmaceutical companies have until recently driven development and a number of high-profile safety-
the discovery, development and marketing of new related post-marketing drug withdrawals that have
and established drugs. They include a range of resulted in an increased regulatory focus on risk
organisations varying from big pharma global management during the drug development process.
companies such as Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline, At another level, consumers, health insurers and
to smaller, usually disease-focused, specialised governments are increasingly focusing on paying for
companies, large (e.g. Genentech) and small health outcomes rather than drugs, and sales and
biotechnology companies, and companies focused marketing approaches used in the industry are being
on generic, over-the-counter (OTC) or complementary questioned with a resulting reduction in trust. What
medicines. The clinical pharmacologist has a changes are being driven by these factors?
broad perspective of all aspects of drug discovery
and use, and all of the sub-specialities of At the discovery level, there is recognition that
clinical pharmacology from pharmacokinetics diseases are complex and that a focus on single
pharmacodynamics to pharmacoepidemiology, targets may not be the optimal approach, resulting
pharmacovigilance (benefit harm management) and in a move back to disease models rather than
pharmacoeconomics are critical. More importantly, target-based R&D. The separate silos of discovery,
the clinical pharmacologist can integrate knowledge preclinical development and clinical development are
of the drug target, disease pathophysiology, context increasingly integrated vertically into development
and management and preclinical and clinical data to teams that include functions from early discovery
guide drug development in an ethical, informed and through to pharmacoeconomics and marketing.
efficient manner. Companies are emphasising translational research
to facilitate the efficient transition from in vitro and
Globally, pharmaceutical companies operate in a preclinical animal research to human applications,
complex environment where evolving economic, and medicines are developed for more tightly
regulatory, social and political influences constantly targeted patient groups who are identified as likely to
force change. Investment in R&D increases rapidly, respond using biomarkers and or pharmacogenomic
but is not matched by the rate of emergence of new approaches, thus improving the cost-effectiveness of
products onto the market. The high expectations the treatment (so-called personalised medicine).
of innovation models that involve combinatorial Companies increasingly market medicines coupled
chemistry, high-throughput screening, rational with related services and diagnostics to identify
drug design, pharmacogenomics, bioinformatics responsive patients, and there is recognition of
and disease and pathway modelling have not been developing markets and neglected diseases as targets
met despite the high level of investment. The risks for drug development and marketing. The focus
in a business model that concentrates on a few of payers on cost-effectiveness drives companies
blockbuster drugs are also apparent as patents towards development of medicines that produce real
expire or are challenged vigorously by generic health benefits, and the biotechnology paradigm
companies, and new drug pipelines to replace them replaces the chemical, with biologicals providing
The clinical pharmacologist is an individual who has to prepare guidelines to indicate how the ethical
had systematic training in the evaluation of drug principles that should guide the conduct of biomedical
therapy and drug products. This makes the specialty research involving human subjects, as set forth in the
suitable and valuable in a number of government- Declaration of Helsinki, could be effectively applied,
based public activities that relate, for example, to particularly in developing countries, given their
drug approval, post-marketing surveillance, drug socioeconomic circumstances, laws and regulations,
therapy selection, reimbursement decisions and and executive and administrative arrangements.
ethical review of research projects. Governments The most important of the publications of CIOMS
should be involved in the ethical, scientific and is its International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical
developmental aspects of medicines. Activities in Research Involving Human Subjects, first published
all these three dimensions are complementary and in 1993. The updated version was published in
underpin the most important role of any government: 2002 (72) and is designed to be of use, particularly
to protect its citizens through support and promotion to resource-poor countries, in defining the ethics of
of public health. biomedical research, applying ethical standards in
local circumstances, and establishing or redefining
Governments and their respective institutions have to adequate mechanisms for the ethical review of
take all necessary measures to make sure that clinical research involving human subjects. Although
research involving its citizens is not doing them harm mainly targeting ethics committees sponsors and
or ignoring their basic human rights. This challenging investigators, the CIOMS guidelines, to which several
task involves making sure that the research to decide clinical pharmacologists have contributed, have
which medicines (or other healthcare interventions) influenced the thinking of governments concerning
are authorised for use in human beings provides clinical research, especially in resource-poor settings.
enough grounds to ensure safety. It also involves the Another important facet of research in human subjects
task of assessing whether planned clinical research is good clinical practice (GCP) which is a standard
follows scientific principles that can justify both the for the design, conduct, performance, monitoring,
harms and the expected benefits from this research. auditing, recording, analysis and reporting of clinical
This forms the ethical dimension of the role of trials. GCP provides assurance that the data and
governments. reported results are credible and accurate, and that
rights, integrity and confidentiality of trial subjects
I History are protected. Many GCP guidelines are based on,
Following the two world wars, several initiatives or refer to, the Declaration of Helsinki, including
were taken around human rights and these were WHO GCP Guidelines published in 1995 (73) and
embodied in the World Medical Associations the International Conference of Harmonization (ICH)
Declaration of Helsinki in1964. In particular, the GCP (E6) from 1996 (74).
Council for International Organizations of Medical
Sciences (CIOMS) was founded under the auspices of
WHO and the United Nations Educational, Scientific
and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) in 1949. In the
late 1970s, CIOMS set out, in cooperation with WHO,
Traditional medicine is a comprehensive term used From a clinical pharmacologists perspective there
to refer to various forms of indigenous medicine - are several issues surrounding traditional remedies.
including traditional Chinese herbal medicine, African Preparation from natural ingredients plant, animal or
traditional medicine, Ayurvedic and Unani medicine, mineral, is not necessarily standardised and quality
homeopathy, naturopathy and other administered may vary between suppliers and seasons. Safety of
treatments derived from natural sources (81). It also traditional medicines cannot be taken for granted
covers manipulative physical treatments which are and several have demonstrated significant toxicity
not considered here. even after many years of use, e.g., nephrotoxicity
and carcinogenicity of Aristolochia found in some
Clinical pharmacology arose in the universities of the traditional Chinese preparations (82). Many of the
western world where modern prescription and over- claims for efficacy have not been substantiated in
the-counter medicines were the sole entities studied adequate clinical trials although the spectacular anti-
and where the expectation was that trained clinical malarial activity of medicines derived from Artemisia
pharmacologists would teach, investigate, and have species should caution against dismissing activity
clinical expertise in, the use of such medicines. Most until the evidence has been fully investigated.
clinical pharmacologists in practice today will have Moreover, the taking of traditional and conventional
had little or no exposure to traditional medicines medicines together predisposes to potential adverse
unless they have sought it out for themselves. interactions, e.g., the co-administration of St Johns
Wort (an enzyme inducer) may reduce the efficacy of
In the 40 years since WHO published its first medicines metabolised by the cytochrome P450 3A4
Technical Report on Clinical Pharmacology (1), the enzyme sub-type (83).
use of traditional (complementary, alternative)
medicines has grown rapidly in developed countries All physicians need to be aware and knowledgeable
many of which have now created national regulatory about the side effects or toxicity of some common
bodies to set standards for their quality and safety. herbal remedies. Patients often use traditional
Although access to conventional medicines in medicines without being aware of the potential
developing countries has improved, it is still side effects or interactions with their other current
estimated that a third of the worlds population, medications, and fail to disclose this to their
which is almost exclusively in developing countries, physician. In fact, it is up to the physician to be
has inadequate access to Essential Medicines. proactive by inquiring about the use of traditional
Therefore, in the developing countries the majority medicines. In one report, approximately 20% of
of the population still relies on traditional medicines hospitalised patients used traditional medicines
and its practitioners. concurrently with conventional medicines without
informing their physicians (84). The reasons for
However, the involvement of clinical pharmacologists non-disclosure included patients anticipation of
in traditional medicines has so far been quite small the physicians disinterest or negative response, a
despite the remarkable increase in their use in both misconception that the physician would be reluctant
developed and developing countries. or unable to contribute useful information, and
The rise in clinical pharmacology in the 1960s and clinical pharmacists and Ph.D. scientists
was in a large part due to the realisation of basic trained in clinical pharmacology have increased in
pharmacologists that their discipline was too far numbers, contribution and collaboration among
removed from the practice of medicine, but also these somewhat differently trained individuals
due to the desire of prominent clinicians specialising has strengthened and extended the contribution
in pharmacotherapy to develop their science of medically trained clinical pharmacologists.
and improve the quality of drug therapy. Clinical This is particularly the case for multi-disciplinary
pharmacologists at the time had to have fruitful Drug and Therapeutics Committees and drug
collaboration with both pharmacology and internal information services. In pharmacoepidemiology
medicine and usually had considerable training in and pharmacovigilance, collaboration with
both disciplines. epidemiologists is necessary.
Clinical pharmacology at its best now requires a much In TDM, collaboration with drug analytical experts
broader view of all aspects of medicine in which is vitally important to maintain accreditation of the
drugs are used be it internal medicine, paediatrics, analytical methods used. Such experts are usually
psychiatry, anaesthesiology, geriatric medicine or trained in chemistry or pharmacy. Collaboration
oncology. The role of clinical pharmacology in all with persons knowledgeable in molecular
these areas should be to educate physicians, to biology is of increasing importance, particularly in
perform collaborative research and to disseminate pharmacogenetics. Many clinical pharmacologists
information about the principles of drug evaluation depend on their collaboration with trained nurses
and RUM. These roles are facilitated by having who fulfil valuable roles in areas such as drug
access to diversified methods for monitoring and utilization measurement and evaluation and assisting
improving drug therapy. As the field has evolved with clinical trials.
39. Phillips E, Mallal S. Successful translation of 47. World Population Ageing: 1950-2050,
pharmacogenetics into the clinic: the abacavir United Nations, New York,2001. www.
example. Mol Diagn Ther 2009;13:1-9. un.org/esa/population/publications/
worldageing19502050/ (accessed 10 April
40. Eklf A, Thurelius A, Garle M, Rane A, Sjqvist 2012).
F. The anti-doping hot-line, a means to detect
and prevent the abuse of doping agents in the 48. Abernethy DR. Drug Therapy in the Elderly. In
Swedish society and a new service function Principles of Clinical Pharmacology, 2nd edition,
in clinical pharmacology. Eur J Clin Pharmacol AJ Atkinson, DR Abernethy, CE Daniels, PL
2003;59:571-7. Dedrick, SP Markey Eds. Academic Press, New
York, 2007, Chapter 24, pp 375-88.
41. Wu LT. Substance abuse and rehabilitation:
responding to the global burden of diseases 49. Klotz U. Pharmacokinetics and drug metabolism
attributable to substance abuse. Subst Abuse in the elderly. Drug Metab Rev 2009;41:67-76.
Rehabil 2010:1;5-11.
50. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB,
42. Sjborg B, Bckstrm T, Arvidsson LB, Hirsch C,Gottdiener et al. Frailty in older adults:
Andersen-Karlsson E, Blomberg LB, Eiermann Evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci
B, et al. Design and implementation of point Med Sci 2001;56:M146-56.
of care computerised system for drug therapy
in Stockholm metropolitan health region 51. Fick DM, Cooper JW, Wade WE, Waller
bridging the gap between knowledge and JL, Maclean JR, Beers MH. Updating the
practice. Int J Med Inform 2007;76:497-506. Beers criteria for potentially inappropriate
medication use in older adults: results of a US
43. Bttiger Y, Laine K, Andersson ML et al. Sfinx consensus panel of experts. Arch Intern Med
a drug-drug interaction database designed 2003;163:2716-24.
for clinical decision support systems. Eur J Clin
Pharmacol 2009;65:627-33. 52. Hilmer SN, Mager DE, Simonsick EM, Cao Y, Ling
SM, Windham BG et al. A drug burden index to
44. Bonati M, Breitkreutz J, Choonara I, Hoppu define the functional burden of medications in
K, Jacqz-Aigrain E, Langhendries J-P et al. older people. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:781-7.
Paediatric Clinical Pharmacology in Europe.
Paed Perinatal Drug Ther 2006;7:134-7. 53. Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C, Fried LP, Boult L, Wu
AW. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of
45. Borus LO. Principles of Pediatric Pharmacology. care for older patients with multiple comorbid
1982:193-204. Churchill Livingston, New York. diseases. JAMA 2005;294:716-24.
55. Dean B, Schachter M, Vincent C, Barber N. Causes 63. Giezen TJ, Mantel-Teeuwisse AK, Straus SMJM,
of prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: a Schellekens H, Leufkens HGM, Egberts ACG.
prospective study. Lancet 2002;359:1373-8. Safety-related regulatory actions for biologicals
approved in the United States and the European
56. Flockhart DA, Usdin YS, Pezzullo JC, Knollman Union. J Am Med Ass. 2008;300:1887-96.
BC.Teaching rational prescribing: A new clinical
pharmacology curriculum in medical schools. 64. Frank RG. Regulation of follow-on biologics. N
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmakol Engl J Med 2007;357:841-3.
2002;366:33-43.
65. Bennett CL, Luminari S, Nissenson AR, Tallman
57. Gwee MC. Teaching of medical pharmacology: MS, Klinge SA, McWilliams N et al. Pure red-
the need to nurture the early development of cell aplasia and epoetin therapy. N Engl J Med
desicured attitude for safe and rational drug 2004;351:1403-8.
prescribing. Med Teach 2009;31:847-54.
66. Gottlieb S. Biosimilars: policy, clinical and
58. Heaton A, Webb DJ, Maxwell SRJ. Undergraduate regulatory considerations. Am J Health Syst
preparation for prescribing: the views of 2413 Pharm 2008;65:S2-S8.
UK medical students and recent graduates. Br J
Clin Pharmacol 2008;66:128-34. 67. Roger SD, Goldsmith D. Biosimilars: its not
as simple as cost alone. J Clin Pharm Ther
59. Smith A, Tasioulas T, Cockayne N, Misan G, 2008;33:459-64.
Walker G, Quick G. Construction and evaluation
of a web-based interactive prescribing 68. Declerck PJ. Biotherapeutics in the era of
curriculum for senior medical students. Br J Clin biosimilars: what really matters is patient safety.
Pharmacol 2006;62:653-9. Drug Saf 2007;30:1087-92.
60. Maxwell SRJ, McQueen DS, Ellaway R. eDrug: 69. Lewis P. The clinical pharmacologist in drug
a dynamic interactive electronic drug formulary discovery and development. Br J Clin Pharmacol
for medical students. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1996;42:133-6.
2006;62:673-81.
70. Vane J, OGrady J. Clinical pharmacology in the
61. Rawlins MD. De Testimonio. www/rcplondon. pharmaceutical industry. Br J Clin Pharmacol
ac.uk/pubs/contents/304df931-2ddc-4a54- 1991;31:155 7.
894e-e0cdb03e84a5.pdf (last accessed April
71. Baber NS. The scope of clinical pharmacology in
12th 2012).
the pharmaceutical industry Br J Clin Pharmacol
1991;31:495 6.
92. The Institute of Chinese Medicine, 99. Laing R., Hogerzeil HV, and Ross-Degnan D. Ten
the Chinese University of Hong Kong. recommendations to improve use of medicines
http://www.icm.cuhk.edu.hk/icm/en/index.htm. in developing countries. Health Policy Plan
(last accessed April 11th 2012). 2001;16:13-20.
102. Richens A, Routledge P. Essentials of clinical 106. Gray J, Lewis L, Nierenberg D. Clinical
pharmacology for education and research pharmacology education in primary care
in developing countries. Br J Clin Pharmacol residency programs. Clin Pharmacol Ther
1984;18:123-26. 1997;62:237-40.
EDITORS ADDRESS
CONTRIBUTORS
Prof Darrell Abernethy Assoc .Director for Drug Safety, Office of Clinical Pharmacology
Chapter 8 at the FDA, Washington USA.
Dr Lembit Rgo World Health Organisation, Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27,
Chapter 13 Switzerland.
Prof Sir Michael Rawlins Chairman, National Institute for Health and Clinical
Chapter 5 Excellence, MidCity Place, London WC1V 6NA, United Kingdom.
Prof Marcus Reidenberg Clinical Pharmacology, Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300
Addendum II York Avenue, New York, NY10065, USA.
*The members of the Executive Board of the IUPHAR section of Pediatric Pharmacology are:
Gabriel Anabwani (Botswana), Facundo Garcia -Bournissen (Argentina), Madlen Gazarian (Australia), Kalle Hoppu (Finland),
Gregory L. Kearns (USA), Hidefumi Nakamura (Japan), Shalini Sri Ranganathan (Sri Lanka), Saskia N de Wildt (the Netherlands).