This document provides instructions for an assignment analyzing inventory management strategies for HP's DeskJet printer supply chain in Europe. Students are asked to answer 5 questions analyzing inventory levels and costs under different supply chain options, including maintaining the current policy of holding one month's average inventory versus developing an optimal inventory model. The document provides guidance on developing inventory models, assumptions to make, and factors to consider when comparing supply chain strategies and developing a recommendation.
This document provides instructions for an assignment analyzing inventory management strategies for HP's DeskJet printer supply chain in Europe. Students are asked to answer 5 questions analyzing inventory levels and costs under different supply chain options, including maintaining the current policy of holding one month's average inventory versus developing an optimal inventory model. The document provides guidance on developing inventory models, assumptions to make, and factors to consider when comparing supply chain strategies and developing a recommendation.
This document provides instructions for an assignment analyzing inventory management strategies for HP's DeskJet printer supply chain in Europe. Students are asked to answer 5 questions analyzing inventory levels and costs under different supply chain options, including maintaining the current policy of holding one month's average inventory versus developing an optimal inventory model. The document provides guidance on developing inventory models, assumptions to make, and factors to consider when comparing supply chain strategies and developing a recommendation.
This document provides instructions for an assignment analyzing inventory management strategies for HP's DeskJet printer supply chain in Europe. Students are asked to answer 5 questions analyzing inventory levels and costs under different supply chain options, including maintaining the current policy of holding one month's average inventory versus developing an optimal inventory model. The document provides guidance on developing inventory models, assumptions to make, and factors to consider when comparing supply chain strategies and developing a recommendation.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4
UBCSauder School of Business
COMM 204: Logistics and Operations
Management Sections 206-208, Tom McCormick Assignment3:HPDeskJetcase Recall that you can work on this assignment (and other assignments in this course) either individually, or in groups of up to four total students (you can organize groups on your own, from any students in Sections 206-208). Your written assignment is due on or before 9:30am the morning of Tuesday, 15 March, to the assignment dropbox on the courses Connect webpage. Remember to write the names and students numbers of all students in your group on your submitted assignment. Read the HewlettPackardCompanyDeskJetPrinterSupplyChain(A)case. Answer these five questions (the current policy referred to in question 2 is described at the bottom of this document):
1. Develop an inventory model for managing the DeskJet printers in
Europe assuming that the Vancouver plant continues to produce the six models sold in Europe. Using the data in the Europe table in Exhibit 4, apply your model and calculate the expected yearly investment in DeskJet printer inventory in the Europe DC. 2. Compare your results from question 1 to the current policy of carrying one months average inventory at the DC. 3. Evaluate the idea of supplying generic printers to the Europe DC and integrating the product by packaging the power supply and the instruction manual at the DC just prior to delivery to the European resellers. Focus on the impact on DC inventory investment in this analysis. 4. Instead of supplying generic printers to the European market, another alternative suggested by Kay Johnson (the Transportation Department supervisor at HP) was to air freight the printers to the European DC. Using air freight would cut the shipment time from 5 weeks to 1 week. She said (on p. 8 of the case) that Shortening the lead time means faster reaction time to unexpected changes in product mix. That should mean lower inventory and higher product availability. I tell you, air freight is expensive, but it is worth it. Suppose that air freight costs an additional $10 per unit. Should this option be used instead of supplying generic printers?(Hint: Does the reduction in inventory cost per unit offset the increase in the transportation cost per unit?) 5. What is your recommendation to HP?
OtherHintstotheCase:
In comparing different options (e.g., using air freight, localization of a
generic printer at DCs, etc.), you need to quantify the benefits from each. The best way to do that is to use the inventory models from class to calculate the total cost of inventory per unit (for all DeskJet models) under different options. Use demand data from the Europe table in Exhibit 4. For your convenience, the European data from Exhibit 4 have been pre-entered into a spreadsheet posted on Connect, along with computation of the monthly mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation, and a template for further computations. Question 1 asks for an inventory model; this just means that you need to compute the safety stock SS for each option: We already know that we are using the periodic review policy. This policy requires that you figure out SS for each printer option. Then this SS would give you the Target level, which would allow you to compute the order quantities each week. Computing SS also allows you to compute average total inventory. Assume a 98% Cycle Service Level. The zvalue to ensure a 98% CSL is F-1(0.98) = 2.05. Assume 4.33 weeks in a month. P. 8 says that inventory carrying cost estimates ranged from 12% to 60%; you should assume h = 25% and the manufacturing cost of each printer is C = $250. Note that this is a fixedtimeperiodmodel(periodicreviewmodel) with review period = 1 week. Lead time for ocean transit = 5 weeks, and lead time for air freight = 1 week. While calculating annual inventory costs, remember to include pipeline (in-transit) inventory, safety stock, and cycle stocks. The annual average inventory cost is computed as follows: Annual Average Inventory Cost= (Safety Stock + Average In- Transit Inventory + Average Cycle Inventory) (unit cost) (percent carrying cost). Note that in a fixed time period model, the ordering cost is fixed and can therefore be ignored. We can find the average inventory cost per printer by dividing the annual average inventory cost by mean annual demand (mean monthly demand 12). The total supply chain cost per printer sold is given by(unit cost) + (average inventory cost per printer) + (transportation cost per printer). Your recommendation to HP should be to use the option that minimizes total inventory cost per printer. CurrentPolicyforQuestion2: The current policy used by HP is not clearly explained in the case. According to the case, the the target inventory levels at the DCs were based on safety stocks that were a result of some judgmental rule of thumb (p. 7), which you should assume is equal to one-months average sales. To be consistent, use the following interpretation: Target physical inventory level at the DC = Average physical inventory at the DC. Recall that (avg physical inv) = (avg cycle stock) + (safety stock), whereas (avg inv position) = (avg physical inv) + (avg pipeline inv). Thus if we are keeping one months average sales as physical inventory, then we have (1 months avg sales) = (avg cycle stock) + (implied level of SS), or SS = (1 months avg sales) (avg cycle stock). Since we know that (avg cycle stock) = (avg demand during T)/2, and since T = 1 week, we get SS = (1 months avg sales) (1 weeks avg sales)/2. Under the fixed time-period (periodic review) model, the average inventory at the DC is the cycle stock plusthe safety stock (= Q/2 + SS), where the cycle stock is half of the sales during the review period. For example, for Option Aone-months average sales = 42.3 units, i.e., one-weeks average sales = 42.3/4.33 = 9.8 units. If the average physical inventory at the DC is set to 42.3 units, then: 42.3 = (avg cycle stock) + Safety Stock Safety Stock = 42.3 (avg cycle stock) = 42.3 (9.8)/2 = 37.4 items. You should be able to compute that if the safety stock is 37.4, then the service level for Option Awill be less than 98%. So, under the current policy, inventory for Option Awill probably be lower than what you computed in Question 1 (and thus inventory cost will be lower), but the service level for Option A will be lower than the required 98%. Note that pipeline (or in-transit) inventory is not held by the DC, but its cost should be included in the supply chain cost. Suggested length: 2 pages, possibly more when Excel printouts are included.