Stella Adler On Ibsen
Stella Adler On Ibsen
Stella Adler On Ibsen
I really enjoyed what Stella Adler had to say about Ibsen. I specifically
liked the way her writing was structured as equal parts historical information
practical and useful. Stella presents an idea in Ibsens writing and then gives
an example to make it relevant and accessible for the actor in todays world.
I found that it was in many of these moments that Stellas voice really came
through in her writing. Her unique voice is stamped all over her writing and it
really gave me some insight into what this woman was like. I found myself
laughing at some of the comments she would make like, I want you to go
home, kneel down, and thank God that he gave us a dining room instead of
learned about Stella from this reading is just how intelligent this woman is.
She makes many comments about society and why people do what they do.
To me, it seems as if she looks at the world through a sociological lens. I was
talk about it. Not only was Stella very intelligent she was also really
progressive. The year was 1976 and I can only imagine that her views of
society and the world were pretty progressive for the time.
Towards the beginning of the Ibsen reading, Stella presents an idea I
was vaguely familiar with prior to this reading. She says, Interpretation
Ibsen if its Chekhov (Adler 4). Shes basically saying that you can and
should play every playwright differently. I feel like in the past year I was
made aware of this concept but it wasnt really taught as being very
important so I kind of forgot about this idea. After this reading, I absolutely
importantly, I feel like I finally understand how to. I now know that I should
be researching the playwright of the show and diving into their life to get
insight into what their world experience has/had been like. In this research it
can be possible to find out why the playwright wrote the play because the
playwright writes in and about their time. All of this information will be useful
in crafting the world of the play I as the actor, have to step into. As Stella
One of the huge, lasting impacts Ibsen has made on the theatre is
all the thinking for you before Ibsen. The problems in the play were always
settled before the curtain fell and the audience walked away knowing how to
feel. Ibsen presented pieces of theatre based on ideas that could not be
resolved but they could be discussed. This was the first time the audience
walked away possibly not knowing what to think or with audience members
leaving with different takeaways from the show. I really love that Stella says
Ibsen, challenges the spectator to think and discuss and--from the
discussion--to learn who he really is (Adler 9). I love that Stella sees the
discussion as being illuminating about what our beliefs are and how we
watch and interpret theatre. I really agree with that. Speaking from personal
experience the discussion after the show is probably my favorite part of the
talking about the different types of people Ibsen defined in society. In Stellas
words, Ibsen felt that, most people are either unaware or actively do not
want to be aware. They just want to be happy (Adler 14). Ibsen describes
this type of person as, The Idealist (a vast majority) hides from the truth
about life and believes in the illusion...people insist on their illusions (Adler
21). The whole part about actively not wanting to be aware is totally me. Im
not oblivious enough to not be aware, which Im thankful for, but sometimes
reality is too hard to face. I think what makes the idealist human is that
sometimes, I have to believe that things will get better and work out in the
Disappointment in the fact that the world let you down or things didnt turn
out for the best. I identify as the idealist because Im always hoping for the
best and I do believe that putting out positive energy and making positive
actors. Ibsen says, the actor has to have eyes to see the world. He must
take in, suck in life (Adler 77). He further goes on to explain the thorough
detail in which the actor must take in the world around him from everything
etc. I feel that taking in my surroundings is something I really excel at. Ever
since I was a young kid my mom would always tell me how observant I was. I
always just kind of dismissed that and assumed it was one of those things
that your mom would say about you but nobody else would. It wasnt until
the past few years in college when I started meeting more and more people
and living in close proximity with new people, that I began to see that Im
observation because I feel it helps me enjoy all the small things in life but
now I see how this skill can really help me in my acting. As Stella says, I as
the actor have to use myself in a play and bring my experiences to the table.
The more I observe and take in about the places and people around me, the
larger the database of experience Ill have to use when creating a character
I really enjoy Stella as a writer and the detailed insight she has on Ibsen and
if this first section is any indication about the rest of the book, Im really
looking forward to hearing what she has to say about Strindberg and
Chekhov.
Work Cited