Memory, Space and Time
Memory, Space and Time
Memory, Space and Time
Childhood
Dorothy Moss
Leeds Metropolitan University, UK
Abstract
This article discusses the research approach in Pathways through Childhood, a small qualitative
study drawing on memories of childhood. The research explores how wider social arrangements
and social change influence childrens everyday lives.The article discusses the way that the concepts
of social memory, space and time have been drawn on to access and analyse childrens experiences,
arguing that attention to the temporal and spatial complexity of childhood reveals less visible
yet formative influences and connections. Childrens everyday engagements involve connections
between past and present time, between children, families, communities and nations, and between
different places. Children carve out space and time for themselves from these complex relations.
Keywords
childhood, memory, society, space, time
Introduction
This article discusses the research approach in relation to findings from Pathways
through Childhood, a small qualitative study drawing on memories of childhood. The
research examines the influence of social arrangements and change in childhood related
to war, migration, employment, policing, technology, popular culture and religion, con-
sidering the ways these influence children whether or not they are directly caught up in
events. The central questions are: How do wider social, cultural, economic and political
events and systems influence childrens everyday lives? How do children practise child-
hood in relation to these influences? This article focuses particularly on the way that the
sensitizing concepts of memory, space and time have been drawn on to access and anal-
yse childrens experiences, arguing that this approach deepens understanding of childrens
lives by making visible previously underresearched aspects of experience. Attention to
the wider social landscape and childrens engagement enriches understanding of their
everyday lives.
Corresponding author:
Dorothy Moss, Carnegie Hall, Carnegie Faculty, Leeds Metropolitan University, Headingley Campus, Leeds
LS6 3QS, UK.
[email: [email protected]]
Moss 531
It is well established that sensitivity to space-time in research helps generate rich data
and to contextualize, ground and analyse this (Urry, 1996). Space and time are complex
concepts with different interpretations, both quantitative and qualitative. Ideas about the
social production of space and temporality have informed the research from the outset.
The research is also based on memory, and ideas about personal and social memory are
drawn on. Sociological understanding of memory, space and time enriches research by
facilitating lines of research enquiry from childrens lives to significant behind the
scenes influences (Layder, 1993: 249). These three concepts are now discussed in turn.
First, Halbwachs (1992 [1925]) distinguishes between different forms of memory,
drawing attention to the ways personal memories are channelled through familial and
other collective memories. These social memories provide social frameworks for
engaging with the everyday. The way society is arranged reflects social memories as cur-
rent social arrangements are based on past human practices. Each social encounter is
therefore also an encounter with the past. The Pathways research explores the relation-
ship between childrens experience and collectivized forms of memory related to family,
community and nation. Social memories are considered as part of the present time of
childhood.
The second concept is the social production of space (Lefebvre, 1991). Lefebvre
argues that places are historically produced from interaction. Space has a threefold char-
acter. First, space is practice, as there are everyday routes through space people are
required to follow. Consider, for example, the way childrens movement between public
and private spheres has changed over time. Second, space is representation, as mean-
ings are associated with places. These may encourage entry for some and deter others.
The concept landscape is drawn on to explore space as representation (Lefebvre, 1991).
Third, space is representational, as it is both living and lived. Children actively engage
with the landscapes they occupy. Space contains and conveys social memories of times
532 Childhood 17(4)
past. Combining Halbwachs approach to memory with this approach to space enables
lines of research enquiry to be drawn from personal experiences to the landscapes
children occupy and how they interpret, negotiate and move through these. The power
relations contained there and the boundaries on the ground also become visible
(Ardener, 1993: 11).
Of equal significance is the third concept, temporality. Temporal influences in child-
hood (Adam, 1995) involve the bodily times of development, times of the household,
school, industry and environment. Childhood is a time of complex transition. Life is
different from physics, (Jaques, 1990 [1982]: 22); our sense of time involves memories
in the present of the past, expectations and desires in the present of the future. Lines of
research enquiry may be drawn from childrens experiences to the complex temporal
influences shaping childhood. Childrens everyday lives are complex temporal engage-
ments that involve carving out space and time for themselves (Davies, 1990).
The sociological concepts of memory, space and time overlap yet are different and
open to interpretation. If used imaginatively, in different combinations, they facilitate
consideration of a wide range of influences in childhood that otherwise may be over-
looked. The dangers of seeing childrens lives as overly determined by social structures
and adult worlds or as restricted to particular arenas such as home and school may be
avoided. It is important to consider childrens perspectives, experiences and the events
influencing their lives which might be outside their understanding. These include the
influences of the wider social (and natural) environment and events distant in time.
The concepts discussed in the preceding section have been drawn on to access childrens
experiences in relation to the research questions. The sample comprises 17 adult respon-
dents, selected for two reasons. The first is the diversity of their experiences as children.
They come from different social class backgrounds, ethnicities, generations, faith com-
munities, colour, gender, sexual orientation and disability. The research is based in
England, but a significant number experienced part of their childhood outside England
including in Northern Ireland, Pakistan, India, Italy, St Kitts, Nigeria and South Africa.
The second is their professional and academic commitment to childrens rights and their
willingness to give up their time to research that is intended to deepen understanding of
childrens lives. This choice of sample made it possible to draw on a wide canvas of
childhood experience, to explore different times and places and to consider different
childrens engagement, with childrens interests in mind. The span of childhood remem-
bered is from 1950 to 1996.
Developing spacetime concepts as research tools is complex. Too rigid an approach
restricts the visibility of important processes, for example, attempts to log events in rela-
tion to the clock and map uses of space overlook both simultaneity and the meanings
attached to space and time (Rose, 1993; Saraswathi, 1994; Urry, 1991). On the other
hand, spacetime concepts may be too generic to be useful. It is important to draw on
concepts that make particular spatial and temporal relations visible.
Moss 533
The concepts of space and time were separately associated with different research
tools. This accorded with meanings of space and time as respondents understood them
and meant their childhood experience was viewed through the lenses of space and time
separately. This material could then be triangulated. In relation to the research analysis,
however, the concepts of space and time were used in more overlapping ways (see next
section). The research tools were threefold. The first was a guided semi-structured inter-
view. Respondents were invited to share memories of particular social experience related
to war, migration, employment and so forth (see Introduction). They were told these
memories could be direct experience, familial stories or other indirect experience. This
created legitimate space to share other peoples memories and provided one means of
accessing social memories. Ideas about time, social change and memory shaped the
design. The second tool also involved a guided interview. Here the focus was the influ-
ences of place and the social production of space. Respondents were asked for recollec-
tions of the places of childhood in relation to aspects of living such as play, learning,
working, travelling, etc. The diversity of their experience involved different living
arrangements and geographical connections. The focus was the child moving through the
setting and ideas about memory, space and childhood informed the design. The third tool
was a structured questionnaire designed to gather concrete data related to social and
familial position and transitions across spacetime, such as geographic and social mobil-
ity. Data elicited related to the child, parents (or carers), grandparents and some extended
family. Ideas about family, mobility and social divisions informed the design.
When reconsidering the literature and data gathered in relation to the influence of wider
social arrangements in childhood, five overlapping questions emerged. First, as social
arrangements are constructed and conceptualized through selective social memory, how
does this shape childrens experience? Second, as memory takes different forms (per-
sonal and social), how do these interrelate in childrens lives? Third, what are the effects
of movement through space and time, including encounters with new places and communi-
ties? Fourth, the selectivity of social memory leads to silences in the social memory. What
are the implications of this? Fifth, in light of complex spacetime relations, how do
children carve out spacetime for themselves? These questions are now considered in turn.
2003) and the social production of spatial arrangements (Lefebvre, 1991). Social
arrangements experienced in childhood involve selective memories of times past, devel-
oped in relation to particular interests (Hobsbawm and Ranger, 1983). The power of
social memory relates to this selectivity, Interpersonal rehearsal plays an important role
in maintaining and consolidating . . . memories (Finkenauer et al., 1997, cited in Misztal,
2003: 81). Social memories become anchored in social arrangements through dissemina-
tion and repetition, influencing the present time of childhood.
Some aspects of family experience are shared repeatedly with children; others are
hidden. Apara repeats the story of her grandmother, recounted to her in childhood. Apara
was born in Nigeria and moved to England at the age of 5, in the 1970s. Her mother is
from an English working-class heritage and her father, upper-class Nigerian. The story
emerges from the economic depression in England, 30 years before Apara was born. Her
grandmother worked in a meat factory during the 1930s:
. . . my grandmother . . . basically kept the family going . . . also her sisters family . . . she
worked in a factory . . . that made meat products. She used to look after the pigs . . . For years,
she kept [the two families] fed, by wearing [wellington boots] to work and stuffing pounds of
sausages down [them] by winding them round her legs. . . . So when you think of the weight of
them, and having to normally walk.
This is a story of a heroine committed to her familys welfare. The memory shared
with the child celebrates this containing education about the potential of women to over-
come adversity. The undercurrent is hunger associated with the depression, the struggles
against the owners of capital and the legitimacy of law-breaking in this situation. The
politics informing the story is from working-class struggle (Aparas mothers family were
socialists). In this way, Aparas experiences as a child are informed by a familial and col-
lective past. The memory belongs to the family archive and is formative in her childhood,
transmitting past events, a political position, a sense of pride and amusement.
National memories are selectively enacted in the celebrations that children engage
with (or not), designed in particular interests. Children are positioned differently to each
other in relation to these. Madhi remembers watching the Royal celebrations on the TV.
She is 5 or 6 in the 1980s, of Indian heritage living in England. Her family are low paid,
having moved from higher social status in India, to Kenya, before she was born:
There were these images of people . . . on the streets. . . . all white, all working class/middle
class, eating food, with balloons. . . . I remember thinking, I dont know what this is all about,
but were not doing anything. Nobody where we lived [was] doing it, so it was just something
on the TV. You just remember these mass produced teacups with the Queens face on them.
Hobsbawm and Ranger (1983) argue that events such as this perpetuate stories about
the social respect to be accorded certain people over others. They are a selective version
of a remembered past. For relative newcomers, the national memories being celebrated
relate to someone who ruled the British Empire. Madhis family have different memories
that cast a different light on empire and royalty, stories related to oppression by the
British in India:
Moss 535
I . . . got this lovely story from my . . . family. My grandfather used to get really pissed off . . .
with the British coming in and try and improve their rules, their laws, their culture, their
lifestyle, when my grandfather thought we had our own one that was very dear to him. . . . So
during times of curfew at night, my grandfather would go and stand on the rooftops. If there
were any helicopters or anything going up in the sky, he would basically say in Gujarat, Tell
them to Fuck Off!
The festivities are not celebrated in Madhis family and she feels an outsider, watch-
ing not participating. It is difficult to reconcile conflicting memories transmitted through
her family and the wider society. This positions her at a distance, attempting to under-
stand events through competing social frameworks (Halbwachs, 1992). Combinations of
social memories are transmitted through family, community and nation. These create
complex landscapes of social memory that children need to navigate.
My dad decided that we were going to do some voluntary work . . . it was on the river Ganges. . . .
I was a really spoilt, young teenager . . . who couldnt stop fighting with my . . . brother . . . and
acting like a right old pest. . . . Dad took us to do this thing and . . . we had to feed the poor . . .
my Dad was putting food on the plate and I was giving them the plates. . . . This queue of
hundreds of people . . . I was gonna burst into tears . . . I was like. . . Dont you dare cry,
because these people are homeless, hungry, have got nowhere to live, and youve been moaning
endlessly. . . . I had this knot in my throat. . . . It was just horrible seeing that poverty . . . my
Dad and I never really talked about why we did it.
This memory involves strong emotion at a personal level. In addition, it reveals the
relationship with father, who encourages her participation; the passing on of familial
memory to the British-born girl, this aspect of her Indian heritage. The tradition of giving
to poor people is, in Halbwachs (1992) term, a collective memory of the better-off in this
society and religion (Hinduism) to assist the poor. The requirement to bury personal feel-
ings is a strong part of the religious tradition; sublimation of self and personal desire.
This is a response to poverty in an unequal society with little organized welfare. The
place is highly significant: along the Ganges, a sacred place, where the tradition is
enacted. Madhi experiences shame at her selfishness and attempts to sublimate emotion
to navigate this landscape.
Powerful social memories may be experienced with no intervening human agent.
Richard is 11 in South Africa in the 1970s. His family moved from poverty and low paid
536 Childhood 17(4)
employment in Manchester. They are white, hence more privileged under Apartheid. On
his way from school he regularly crosses a foot bridge. White people are allowed to cross
on one side, black people on the other and there is a metal fence in the middle. Everyday
he jumps this barrier and walks on the side meant for black people. He is not necessarily
seen but the potential is always there. He is a bit scared each time, but far less so than a
black child would be in similar circumstances where the consequences would be worse:
. . . there was a footbridge . . . literally divided in half by a metal fence . . . there was one side
for the whites and one side for the blacks. You know they werent even allowed to walk on the
same bit of concrete across the footbridge. But what I remember doing . . . I used to hop across
and deliberately walk on the black side as my way of saying this was ridiculous I always
remember that, sort of deliberately hopping over the fence.
The design of the bridge is a template for cruel behaviour. The memories of those that
designed Apartheid dominate the social landscape the child is experiencing. His route is
prescribed and he transgresses these rules.2 However, his experience is not just informed
by memories of designers of Apartheid in the landscape. He has a counter-narrative from
his family about the evils of Apartheid:
. . . we were aware of things . . . like the murder of Biko . . . as a family . . . we used to read the
newspapers with the official police descriptions of what happened to people like Biko . . . and
there were others as well, you know they slipped on a piece of soap. . .
This also underpins his feeling of disgust and informs this small act of resistance (jumping
over also gives some physical pleasure).
Inequalities position children differently in the social landscape. The education they
experience (the form of social memory they encounter) influences their powers to navi-
gate and the direction taken. Particular pathways open and opportunities close. George
lives in England in the early 1960s, of English working-class heritage. He talks of his
parents work:
My first experience of work . . . was . . . my Dads absence . . . he would come in later, smelling
of Brylcreem and sweat. . . . My second . . . was going with . . . mum when she was doing this
cleaning to this posh house. So I associated work with, it was a bit exotic, going to a semi-
detached house, with a back garden, rather than a yard, and they had a pet . . . and reading
Womans Realm and posh biscuits, its all kind of connected.3
The class and gender pathways involved in the landscape are visible. Georges father
is often absent at work. His mother moves from a working- to a middle-class neighbour-
hood, to provide domestic service. George, for whom she is primary carer, sometimes
goes with her. Many similar women have to leave their own children behind. The routes
to work are laid out for women of her class. These are the spatial practices informing
the landscape, containing memories further back of many poorer womens journeys to
work for better-off families (Gregson and Lowe, 1994). George enjoys the garden, the
womens magazines, the posh biscuits and the pet. As well as current pleasure, these are
Moss 537
signs of other possibilities he has not experienced, relating to social class, gender and
sexuality. In Lefebvres (1991) terms, they are spatial representations signalling the
terms of entry to this space. Georges mother is providing domestic service and is permit-
ted time-limited access to this more privileged home. George is curious and takes plea-
sure in the exotic experiences associated with his mothers paid work. The space is lived
by the boy and is representational space (Lefebvre, 1991).
Although children navigate the landscape and the social memories conveyed there,
through prescribed routes, they are able to transgress boundaries they encounter, through,
for example, small resistances, inquisitiveness and play. Resources from the family
inform the nature and direction of these journeys and the capacity to detour. Encounters
on the way are formative for future times.
I dont think I was conscious of war per se . . . but I remember being at primary school . . . being
conscious of being different . . . people calling me names and perhaps not understanding things
very well . . . thinking that there was something not quite right. . . . Ive got memories of talking
to two boys about something, and I think that I was talking to them in German rather than
English, or using words that were German, and them looking at me, as if I was weird . . . thats
a very powerful memory.
Im also aware of anxieties at home . . . there . . . was a group of people . . . that were all in POW
camps over here . . . they formed this sort of social club. . . .You know, with children, your
conversations are like under the table . . . its hidden by the table cloth . . .
These events are informed by threads of social memories from the past and different
places, transmitted to her from her parents and school peers. Different social memories
of war underpin the playground encounter creating uncertainty. Where does Claudia fit
in the Second World War games? Traumatic past events related to war, imprisonment
and migration inform family life. The attempt to shelter the child from this has limited
success:
538 Childhood 17(4)
. . . the language . . . [my parents would] be speaking German . . . I was probably quite fluent . . .
could understand a lot. . . . Youd know, if they definitely started talking German amongst
themselves . . . you shouldnt be listening.
Claudias parents anxiety and lack of confidence arise from having being on the
German side during the war. Although the brutalities of the Second World War are past
(15 years), they shape everyday events. Claudia is part of the postwar generation but
the residues of war are powerful and highly formative. Here everyday engagement
involves weaving threads of memory from war. She learns not to ask her parents ques-
tions, I dont want to know what they think really, takes pleasure in the lighter atmo-
sphere in another childs house, I used to just love going round there . . . it was quite
different, slightly chaotic, but very friendly and open and warm, which my parents house
wasnt really. Her mother will not let her join the Brownies (a quasi-militaristic church-
based girls organization):
My mum absolutely forbad me to go, because she thought it would cost money, and was really
uncertain about it. Now whether it was anything else, whether she was reflecting back on her
own youth, and the Hitler youth, I dont know.
Threads of social memory are passed through networks of kin, artefacts, institutions,
ceremonies and other social arrangements. So there are powerful effects when children
move between places. These threads are disrupted through migration. Coser (cited in
Halbwachs, 1992: 21) argues that migration may involve people having to shed their
own collective memory like a skin. Rehana lives in Pakistan in quite a privileged house-
hold as a child. She remembers migrating to England aged 11 or 12. It is the 1970s and her
father is with her. All her siblings have preceded her: my dad brought us in bits and
pieces. Many parties have been held in Pakistan to mark her leaving. She sits on the plane:
I felt very hollow inside as if something had been removed from my guts. I had that feeling of
emptiness, something hollow in me, as if one chapter of my life, Im leaving behind. So many
happy, sad memories . . . when would I be able to go back and see them and what would it be
like? Its a very strange feeling, thinking that . . . I was very quiet . . . I kept going to the
aeroplane toilet and reading my friends letters, saying all nice things to me, Dont forget us,
Write to us . . . little poems in them for me . . . it was a night flight so the plane was dark . . .
just reading all these letters to keep myself moved, to keep as if I was still in touch, not letting
go of the memories.
Rehana attempts to anchor memories of the people she is leaving behind. Although
looking forward to joining her siblings, she fears a tailing away of social memories of
friends in another place and time.
Arriving in a new place means joining up with, somehow linking into, the collection
of interwoven stories of which that place is made (Massey, 2005: 119). Such stories
relate to environmental as well as social change. Apara and Richard migrated at a similar
age (4 or 5). They convey the physical as well as social experience of arrival. Apara
comes from Nigeria to England:
Moss 539
. . . it was real fog, and Id never seen fog like that and it was . . . standing on one side of the
road . . . you couldnt see the little green man when it was time to cross the road . . . it was only
the sound.
It was boiling hot . . . standing in this place . . . the shimmering heat . . . when you look across and
the horizon is sort of moving and shimmering with the heat . . . and the cattle with the long horns.
The pathways these children follow after arrival are different. Richard gains some economic
and social privileges as a white child. Apara faces racial violence in the white working-class
neighbourhood where her family moves to. Both societies are informed by racial and class
hierarchies that position children differently according to colour. Some of the wide social
arrangements these children experience may appear fixed and unchangeable, the processes
giving rise to these arrangements are only visible to the children when they are told about them.
Lara is English born, of Caribbean-Italian heritage and working class. She remembers
standing at a bus-stop in the 1970s:
I [aged 13] was just waiting for the bus . . . just stood, like everyone else, waiting for the bus,
and National Front rally going on, at city square, as they did in those days, and a few of them
must have come down . . . I was totally oblivious . . . the next minute, Id been kicked and
540 Childhood 17(4)
punched on the floor by these grown men . . . I was only a tiny, little, skinny girl . . . if it wasnt
for the police, I dont know what would have happened. [The police took her to hospital; the
men were arrested and prosecuted.]
Both these children may have been targets because of their lack of physical and social
power. The sexual attack remains unarticulated for many years. The racial attack has to
be acted on because of Laras physical injuries. Julie is very confused and has no frame-
work to understand the sexual attack. She may be relating it to her own sexuality, or you
think its your fault. Lara is more prepared but still deeply shocked, my mum used to
always say to us, Dont ever walk with your head down. Always walk with your head
straight up, and look somebody straight in the eye. Cause the minute you drop your
head, youre vulnerable. Both attacks are minimized through the social frameworks
available to understand and challenge events. The terms flashed and playing with him-
self are social clichs that minimize the sexual abuse of Julie (Haug, 1992). The National
Front rally provides a context for the attack on Lara where they gathered clearly to
incite each other to racial violence. The policemen support Lara but the weekly rally
remains un-policed. The term rally reduces social understanding of the purpose of this
gathering. The fossils (Halbwachs, 1992) in social memory at the time of both these attacks
are the social hierarchies related to gender, race and childhood. Both attacks aim to keep
particular children in their place. For Julie and Lara, their capacity to deal with these
attacks emotionally relates to the social frameworks available from the family and wider
society. These enable them to articulate the experience (or not), defend themselves and be
socially protected. Silences and distortions that arise in the social memory prevent this.
We had a leaving do at the end of primary school . . . all the parents got written to say were
having this disco . . . this is the dress code. Girls will be wearing skirts and dresses, boys must
wear smart trousers. . . . I just said, Im not going. The thought, by that point in my life, of
having to wear a skirt or a dress, was so traumatic for me. . . . My mother had battled with me
prior to that, to send me to childrens parties, in the party frocks, the last one of which I came
home with it rolled up under my arm, Id been up a tree the whole time . . . with frilly knickers!
And all the lace was hanging off, and I was covered in dirt.
This is a time of transition, to mark the end of one stage of schooling where the clock
times of school are relaxed and the school admits pupils in the evening. The dress code
regulates how these children will behave, even in this freed up spacetime. Clichs of
respectability and gender come to these children from the wider society. They are expected
to wear clothes that are fossils; representing ideas of what children should wear that
Moss 541
were generated in past times (in another higher social class). Rachel fiercely rejects this
apparel alongside the associated girly identity. Later, her clothing choice is freer:
I became a bit of a New Romantic once that all kicked off, with all the scarves and the pirate
look, that was an identity. That was quite fluid gender wise, that was something I became
quite aware of, so you had Boy George and Alison Moyet and you didnt know whether they
were male or female, and that was like, wow, thats really interesting, I like that.
The choice of gender fluidity in fashion reflects Rachels sexuality at 15 (she knows
she is a lesbian) together with her thoughtfulness in dressing. To some beholders her
sexuality is blurred (to others not) and the fashion is captivating. She selects this clothing
with reference to her own feelings, peers and cultural signals. Clothing previously pre-
scribed in relation to class and gender respectability is now chosen in relation to a desire
for gender and class fluidity. Clothing is intensely negotiated (both individually and in
groups) because it involves a presentation of self to others. Her negotiation of clothing
intersects with social ideas about respectability from interconnected systems related to
gender, class, race and religion. The global popular culture industries have presented
some fashion options. Out of this Rachel carves space and time for herself and avoids
forms of social labelling (Lees, 1993).
Cathy talks of her engagement with religious practices as a child. She is British born,
of working-class heritage, growing up in the 1960s1970s. Her parents both work long
hours for low pay, hence she and her sister are relatively unsupervised and carve their
own routes through the local community. This brings them in touch with different reli-
gious practices. This is a time of conflict in Northern Ireland and there are powerful
associations in Liverpool. Cathys family is (technically) Protestant. She remembers
being taken to Orange Lodge celebrations in the park:
. . . I do think of orange, this vivid colour, and I guess, in my memory, it was like a church fete,
that kind of atmosphere. . . . I remember the kind of bands. The music associated with it and
how it was very enjoyable, it was a good sing. It was like, Oh the Orange Lodge are here. I
had no notion of, of course, of what it was about at that age.
She also regularly visits a convent because of her links with an Irish Catholic neighbour:
Shed come over to Liverpool after the Dublin Uprising [in 1917]. We became almost honorary
Catholics. . . . We lived in the terraced houses . . . but there was this huge convent at the top of
the road. . . . These little girls of 9 and 7, thered be a secret knock and this door would open . .
. these huge high walls . . . we would be stood there, and a nun, in full regalia would be stood,
Ah sure . . . come on in girls, and youd come in, . . . youd see the door close behind you . . .
it was always as if there was nothing outside, youd come into this completely different world.
Then away from the convent and back in the terrace houses:
Sometimes the nuns would come to Aunty [Marys] house . . . and draw the curtains . . . then
wed be sat, in this little seance environment . . . clearly frightened, Whats going to happen
542 Childhood 17(4)
now? But actually, all it was about was that the nuns wanted to have a swill of sherry . . . they
didnt want anyone to see!! So this image of the two or three nuns crowded in this tiny terrace
house, knocking back the sherry.
Cathy sits outside the sectarianism of religious practices that surround her. Had she
been living in Northern Ireland at this time, she would have been more locked into
one religious community, her movement more limited. James talks about growing up
there during the Troubles in the 1960s1970s:
As children both Cathy and James are involved in religious practices grounded in
times past, including forms of worship, celebration and the re-enactment of conquest.
Later knowledge about the Troubles casts a shadow. These religious practices sustained
conflict into the future, celebrating, for example, William of Oranges victory over the
Catholic King James in 1690. The children carve space and time for themselves in dif-
ferent ways. For Cathy, religious practices provide pleasure, mystery, fear, confusion
and a sense of awe. For James, in addition, there is a deep sense of belonging that pulls
him into conflict:
Proud to be part of that . . . its more than civic pride, its more a national pride. . . . Very, very
proud of your identity and your culture and defended that, physically, on many occasions as well.
Conclusion
This article has discussed the approach in the Pathways through Childhood research, a
project concerned to illuminate childrens experience of social events and arrangements
(war, migration, religion and so forth), which has so far been underresearched. Such
experience has been of concern in relation to particular groups of children (refugees for
example), but less so children in general. It has been argued that research methodology
that gives attention to childrens part and place in the landscape (involving complex
Moss 543
relations of space, time and social memory) uncovers important (sometimes distant)
social influences, different routes and pathways, and different sorts of engagement
related to their position and circumstances.
Children are directly involved in wide social experience; social arrangements and
events are constructed and interpreted through familial and collective memory. Giving
attention to the temporal and spatial complexity of childhood reveals some less visible
formative connections in their everyday lives. These include connections between past
and present time, between children, families, communities and nations, and between dif-
ferent places. Children carve out space and time for themselves from this complex social
landscape.
Funding
Funding for this project was granted by the Carnegie Research Institute, Leeds Metropolitan
University.
Notes
1. Working in retrospect with adults remembering childhood involves the complexity of draw-
ing on adult reminiscences as research data or pockets of history (Brannen, 2004: 425).
Frameworks for social memory (Halbwachs, 1992) vary according to time perspectives
(Brannen, 2004).
2. Memories are imbued with knowledge of the present and of the past (Jaques, 1990). Events
associated with strong emotion may be recalled easily or may be buried. The selection of
memory relates to the contemporary lives of participants.
3. When the process of remembering is considered at a personal level, these memories are clearly
drawn from clusters of events including absences and presences, smells, tastes and journeys.
There is some pleasure in the memories. There may be aspects that are faulty.
4. Time perspectives inform the versions of childhood remembered and generation influences
this (Brannen, 2004). Analysis of the time perspectives shaping memory draws attention to the
different ways in which childhood is socially constructed.
References
Adam, B. (1990) Time and Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity.
Adam, B. (1995) Timewatch: The Social Analysis of Time. Cambridge: Polity.
Adam, B. (1998) Timescapes of Modernity: The Environment and Invisible Hazards. London:
Routledge.
Adam, B. (2006) Time, Theory Culture and Society 23(2-3): 119-38.
Aitken, S. (2001) Geographies of Young People: The Morally Contested Spaces of Identity.
London: Routledge.
Ardener, S. (ed.) (1993) Women and Space: Ground Rules and Social Maps. Oxford: Berg.
Brannen, J. (2004) Childhoods across the Generations: Stories from Women in Four-Generation
English Families, Childhood 11(4): 409-28.
Davies, K. (1990) Women and Time: The Weaving of the Strands of Everyday Life. Aldershot:
Avebury.
Giddens, A. (1991) Structuration Theory: Past, Present and Future, in C. Bryant and D. Jary (eds)
Giddens Theory of Structuration: A Critical Appreciation, pp. 20121. London: Routledge.
544 Childhood 17(4)
Gregson, N. and M. Lowe (1994) Servicing the Middle Classes: Class, Gender and Waged
Domestic Labour. London: Routledge.
Halbwachs, M (1992) On Collective Memory, ed. L. Coser. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago
Press. (Orig. pub. 1925.)
Haug, F. (1992) Beyond Female Masochism: Memory-Work and Politics. London: Verso.
Hobsbawm, E. and T. Ranger (eds) (1983) The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Holloway, S.L. and G. Valentine (2000) Childrens Geographies, Playing, Living, Learning.
London: Routledge.
Jaques, E. (1990) The Enigma of Time, in J. Hassard (ed.) The Sociology of Time, pp. 2134.
London: Macmillan. (Orig. pub. 1982.)
Layder, D. (1993) New Strategies in Social Research. Cambridge: Polity.
Lees, S. (1993) Sugar and Spice: Sexuality and Adolescent Girls. London: Penguin.
Lefebvre, H. (1991) The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell. (Orig. pub. 1972.)
Massey, D. (2005) For Space. London: Sage.
Misztal, B. (2003) Theories of Social Remembering. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Morrow, V. (2003) Moving out of Childhood, in J. Maybin and M. Woodhead (eds) Childhood in
Contexts, pp. 267301. Milton Keynes: Wiley/Open University.
Neale, B. and J. Flowerdew (2003) Time, Texture and Childhood: The Contours of Longitudinal
Qualitative Research, International Journal of Social Research Methodology 6(3): 189-99.
Rose, G. (1993) Feminism and Geography: The Limits of Geographical Knowledge. Cambridge:
Polity.
Saraswathi, T.S. (1994) Women in Poverty Contexts, in R. Borooah, K. Cloud, S. Seshadri, T.S.
Saraswathi, J.T. Peterson and A. Verma (eds) Capturing Complexity: An Interdisciplinary Look
at Women, Households and Development, pp. 16278. London: Sage.
Thomson, R., R. Bell, J. Holland, S. Henderson, S. McGrellis and S. Sharpe (2002) Critical
Moments: Choice, Chance and Opportunity in Young Peoples Narratives of Transition,
Sociology 36(2): 335-54.
Urry, J. (1991) Time and Space in Giddens Social Theory, in C. Bryant and D. Jary (eds)
Giddens Theory of Structuration: A Critical Appreciation, pp. 16075. London: Routledge.
Urry, J. (1996) Sociology of Time and Space, in B.S. Turner (ed.) The Blackwell Companion to
Social Theory, pp. 36995. Oxford: Blackwell.