Fim Angul Sukinda Railwal PDF

FINANCIAL INFORMATION MEMORANDUM
Angul-Sukinda Road New Rail Line Project
August 2013
Angul-Sukinda Railway Limited

7622/4706, Press Chhak, Gajapati Nagar
Post Sainik School, Bhubaneswar-751005
E-Mail: [email protected] Website: www.asrl.in
Prepared By
FEEDBACK INFRA PRIVATE LIMITED
Disclaimer
This Financial Information Memorandum (FIM) has been prepared by Feedback Infra Private Limited
(Feedback Infra) inter alia on the basis of information and documents available in the public
domain, information and data made available by Rail Vikas Nigam Limited (RVNL), Angul Sukinda
Railway Limited (ASRL) and in-house analysis undertaken by Feedback Infra as part of their
professional practice. Feedback Infra has not carried out any independent verification for the
accuracy or truthfulness of information and data provided.
The delivery of this FIM at any time does not imply that the information in it is correct as of any time
after the date set out on the cover page hereof, or that there has been no change in the operation,
financial condition, prospects, creditworthiness, status or affairs of the subject or anyone else since
that date.
Neither Feedback Infra or any of its associates, nor any of their respective directors, employees or
advisors make any expressed or implied representation or warranty and no responsibility or liability is
accepted by any of them with respect to the accuracy, completeness or reasonableness of the facts,
opinions, estimates, forecasts, projections, or other information set forth in this FIM or the underlying
assumptions on which they are based or the accuracy of any computer model used and nothing
contained herein is, or shall be relied upon as a promise or representation regarding the historic or
current position or performance of ASRL, or any future events or performance of ASRL.
This FIM has been divided into chapters & sub-sections solely for the purpose of reading convenience.
Any partial reading of this document may lead to inferences, which may be at divergence with the
conclusions and opinions based on the entirety of this FIM. By accepting a copy of this IM, the
recipient accepts the terms of this Disclaimer, which forms an integral part of the IM.
Page 1
Contents
1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 4
2. THE COMPANY ................................................................................................................. 6
2.1. General Particulars of ASRL.............................................................................................. 6
2.2. Activities of ASRL .............................................................................................................. 6
2.3. Board of Directors ............................................................................................................ 6
2.4. Capital Structure & Shareholding Pattern........................................................................ 7
2.5. Present arrangement with Banks and Financial Institutions ........................................... 7
2.6. Existing operations and past Financials ........................................................................... 8
3. PROMOTER PROFILE ........................................................................................................ 9
3.1. Board of Directors .......................................................................................................... 10
3.2. Capital Structure & Shareholding pattern...................................................................... 11
3.3. Financials of RVNL .......................................................................................................... 12
4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................... 13
4.1. Project Background ........................................................................................................ 13
4.2. Scope of the Project ....................................................................................................... 14
4.3. Location of the project ................................................................................................... 14
4.4. Project Structure ............................................................................................................ 15
4.5. Project Agreements........................................................................................................ 15
5. PROJECT COST ................................................................................................................ 20
5.1. Project Agreements........................................................................................................ 20
6. MEANS OF FINANCE ....................................................................................................... 24
6.1. Means of Finance ........................................................................................................... 24
6.2. Equity from Shareholders .............................................................................................. 24
6.3. Rupee Term Loan from Banks ........................................................................................ 24
7. MARKET ASSESSMENT & TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ................................................................. 26
7.1. The Alignment ................................................................................................................ 26
7.2. Commodities identified as primary Cargo ..................................................................... 26
7.3. Hinterland & Cargo clusters ........................................................................................... 28
7.3.1. Individual Traffic Streams............................................................................................... 28
7.4. Connectivity ................................................................................................................... 42
7.5. Impact of Competing Facility ......................................................................................... 43
Page 2
7.6. Infrastructure Capacity Analysis..................................................................................... 44
7.6.1. Coal Traffic ..................................................................................................................... 44
7.6.2. Iron ore Traffic ............................................................................................................... 44
7.6.3. Dhamra Port ................................................................................................................... 44
7.6.4. Paradip Port ................................................................................................................... 45
8. PROJECT TIMELINES & PRESENT STATUS ....................................................................... 46
8.1. Current Status of the project ......................................................................................... 46
8.1.1. Land Acquisition Status .................................................................................................. 46
8.1.2. Civil construction............................................................................................................ 47
8.2. Permission and approvals .............................................................................................. 47
9. PROFITABILITY PROJECTIONS ......................................................................................... 49
9.1. Sensitivity Analysis ......................................................................................................... 60
10. RISK & SWOT ANALYSIS .................................................................................................. 61
10.1. Risk Analysis: Allocation & Mitigation............................................................................ 61
10.2. SWOT Analysis ................................................................................................................ 63
11. CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................ 65
11.1. Recommendations ......................................................................................................... 65
ANNEXURE I: RVNL PROJECT STATUS................................................................................................. 66
ANNEXURE II: DETAILED TERM SHEET ............................................................................................... 69
ANNEXURE III: ORIGIN-DESTINATION OF PROJECT TRAFFIC .............................................................. 71
ANNEXURE IV: MAJOR ASSUMPTIONS............................................................................................... 72
ANNEXURE V: WORKINGS OF O&M COST FCVC Method ............................................................... 74
ANNEXURE VI: FREIGHT RATES .......................................................................................................... 88
ANNEXURE VII PROJECT P&L STATEMENT ......................................................................................... 89
ANNEXURE VIII: PROJECT CASH FLOW STATEMENT .......................................................................... 90
ANNEXURE IX: EQUITY PARTICIPATION ASSURANCE- GOVERNMENT OF ODISHA ............................ 92
ANNEXURE X: EQUITY PARTICIPATION ASSURANCE- ODISHA MINING CORPORATION .................... 93
ANNEXURE XI: LAND ACQUISITION ASSURANCE- GOVERNMENT OF ODISHA .................................. 94
Page 3
1. INTRODUCTION
Indian Railways is one of the largest and busiest rail networks in the world, transporting over 22
million passengers and more than 2.6 million tonnes of freight daily. It is an important mode of
public transportation in the country. It is a multi-gauge network consisting of Broad, Metre and
Narrow gauges.
Government of India (GoI) conceived an investment plan for rail sector to eliminate capacity
bottlenecks on Golden Quadrilateral1 and Diagonals to provide strategic rail communication links to
ports, construction of mega bridges for improving communication to the hinterland and
development of multi-modal transport corridors. To implement the said plan GoI launched a scheme
in the name of National Rail Vikas Yojna (NRVY) on 26th December, 2002 comprising the following
investment planning components:
Strengthening of Golden Quadrilateral and Diagonals connecting the 4 metro cities i.e. Delhi,
Mumbai, Chennai and Kolkata
Providing Rail based port-connectivity and development of corridors to hinterland including
multi-modal corridors for movement of containers
Construction of 4 mega bridges at Patna and Munger on river Ganga, at Bogibeel on river
Brahmaputra and at Nirmali on river Kosi
To implement the above mentioned plans, Ministry of Railways (MoR) incorporated Rail Vikas
Nigam Limited (RVNL), a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) on January 24, 2003. It is a wholly owned
Government company under the provisions of Section 617 of Companies Act, 1956 and in terms of
legal status of RVNL is a Railway Administration under Railways Act, 1989.
RVNL is created for the following purpose and mandate:
RVNL is a PSU, the equity of which may be given to other PSUs, Banks, Financial Institutions
or other strategic partners
To develop various projects, as covered under the above mentioned investment plans of
NRVY, to enable non-budgetary funding, mobilize financial resources and execute those
projects. The projects are offered to railways for train operation and maintenance under the
specific financial arrangement
RVNL is an umbrella Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), which undertakes project development,
resource mobilization and can undertake the projects directly or by creation of Project
Specific SPVs or any other financing structure, which is found suitable for a particular
project. These projects could be undertaken directly or as per Memorandum (MoU), signed
between MoR and RVNL on October, 2003, the projects could be undertaken by the project
specific SPVs
1 Golden Quadrilateral and Diagonals are the rail links between the four metropolitan areas in India i.e. Mumbai, Chennai,
Delhi and Kolkata
Page 4
RVNL is to take up capacity augmentation projects on the Golden Quadrilateral and other
bankable projects covered under National Rail Vikas Yojana. This programme included
capacity augmentation projects on Golden Quadrilateral and its diagonals, last mile port
connectivity and corridors to hinterland.
In order to achieve the objectives, RVNL creates project specific SPVs for implementation of these
projects. The following are the projects being planned / executed under SPV route by RVNL.
Haridaspur Paradip Railway Line (Odisha)

Bharuch Samni Dahej Gauge Conversion (Gujarat)
Surat Hazira New Line (Gujarat)
Obulavaripalle Krishnapatnam New Line (Andhra Pradesh)
Arisikeri Hassan Mangalore Gauge Conversion (Karnataka)
Gandhidham Palanpur Gauge Conversion (Gujarat)
Angul Sukinda new Line (Odisha)
Angul Sukinda Railway Limited (ASRL), a SPV, has been incorporated by RVNL for developing,
financing, construction, operation and maintenance of an 104.24 km broad gauge single railway line
between Angul and Sukinda in Odisha to establish direct link between iron-ore rich areas of Odisha
viz. Joda-Barbil to steel and sponge iron industries in Angul region and between coal mining region in
Talcher to industries in Jakhapura, Joda-Barbil and areas in Kendujhar district (hereinafter referred
as the Project) . In the long term, the Project is also expected to reduce distance between
industrial areas such as Rourkela and Dhamra/Paradip ports.
A concession agreement (CA) has been signed between Ministry of Railways and ASRL on May 14,
2010.
The total cost of the Project is estimated at about Rs.1,337.90 crores. The Hard Cost (Rs 1202.7
crore) of the project has been estimated by RVNL, the executing agency of the project, based on
prevailing rates for similar works in the peripheries, while the Pre-Operative expenses and Interest
During Construction (IDC) at Rs 135.2 crore has been calculated by M/s. Feedback Infra Private
Limited (external consultants). The Total Project Cost is proposed to be funded with a Debt Equity of
68.6:31.4 viz. debt of Rs.917.90 crores and equity of Rs.420 crores. Existing three share holders of
ASRL have so far contributed Rs.135.56 crore towards their share of equities. These share holders
have been issued partly paid shares of the company. The company management is making cash calls
from the share holders depending upon the progress of the project.
ASRL has appointed M/s Feedback Infra Private Limited to prepare Financial Information
Memorandum for the Project. Feedback Infra with a team of railway experts has also carried out
market and traffic study for the project.
Page 5
2. THE COMPANY
Angul Sunkinda Railway Limited (ASRL) has been incorporated by RVNL for the purpose of setting up
the Project.
2.1. General Particulars of ASRL

Name of the Company Angul Sukinda Railway Limited
Date of Incorporation February 20, 2009
Constitution Public Limited Company
Sector Infrastructure-Railway
7622/4706 , Press Chhak, Gajapati nagar, Post Sainik
Registered Office
School , Bhubaneswar-751005
To setup 104.24 Km broad gauge single railway line in
Project Description
Odisha
2.2. Activities of ASRL
According to Memorandum & Article of Association, ASRL is responsible for the following:
To carryout maintenance and manage on the business of development, establishment,

financing, construction, operations, maintenance of railway projects and facilities and in
particular for the development, establishment, financing, construction, operations,
maintenance and management of the Project linkage.
To carry on further business of the Project and implementing additional railway lines in the
vicinity of the Project
Raising the necessary finances for the Project
Completion of Civil Works , installation of equipment and facilities for the Project, testing
and commissioning and subsequent operations, maintenance of the railway line for a period
as specified in the Concession Agreement.
Collect all specified revenues generated by the Project and also undertake such other
activities as may be considered necessary to implement the Project successfully and in
accordance with the Concession Agreement
2.3. Board of Directors
As on July 24, 2013, the Board of Directors of ASRL comprises of seven directors as follows:
Table 2-1: Board of Directors of ASRL
S. No. Name of Director Designation

1 Mr. Pradeep Kumar Chairman (Nominee of Ministry of Railways)
2 Mr. Dilip Kumar Samantray Managing Director
3 Mr. Vinay Kumar Singh Director (Nominee of RVNL)
4 Mr. Arun Kumar Director (Nominee of RVNL)
5 Mr. Hare Krushna Sahu Director (Nominee of RVNL)
6 Mr. Anil Ahuja Director (Nominee of Bhushan Steel Limited)
7 Mr. Kapil Rawat Director (Nominee of Jindal Steel & Power Limited)
Page 6
2.4. Capital Structure & Shareholding Pattern
The capital structure of ASRL as on March 31, 2013 is as under:
Table 2-2: Capital Structure of ASRL (Provisional)
Share Capital Particulars Rs. In Crores

Authorized Capital 4,20,000,000 equity shares of Rs. 10 each 420.00
Equity Shares fully paid 50,000 at Rs.10
per equity share and partly paid up shares
Subscribed & Paid up Capital 29,39,50,000 at Rs. 3.02, and 840,00,000 98.82
at Rs. 1.19 per shares (Previous year
50,000 Equity Shares of Rs. 10 each)
The shareholding pattern for ASRL as on March 31, 2013 is as under
Table 2-3: Shareholding Pattern of ASRL
Name of shareholder % of the shareholding

Rail Vikas Nigam Limited 45
Jindal Steel and Power Limited 25
Bhusan Steel Ltd.** 20
Equity Gap 10
**The allotted partly paid shares of Bhusan Steel Ltd. have since been forfeited due to cash calls
defaulting on their part.
Current Status on equity Gap: Consequent to the exit of M/s Bhusan Steel Ltd, who had consented
to subscribe 20% of the equity share of the SPV, Govt of Odisha has agreed in principle to subscribe
maximum up to 26% of the equity shares, in a phased manner. The decision of the Govt. of Odisha
has since been communicated vide their letter 8th July 2013 (ANNEXURE IX: EQUITY
PARTICIPATION ASSURANCE- GOVERNMENT OF ODISHA). The state government has also informed
that Rs.42 cores (10%of the equity amount) will be released in the current financial year (2013-14).
IDCO, a PSU under Government of Odisha has also given its consent to subscribe 1 % of equity share
capital. Further in a letter dated 26th July 2013, CMD, Odisha Mining Corporation (OMC), a State
Government PSU has conveyed in-principle approval of their Board of Directors (BoD) to the
proposal from ASRL for OMC to contribute Rs. 63.00 Crore towards equity participation in ASRL
(ANNEXURE X: EQUITY PARTICIPATION ASSURANCE- ODISHA MINING CORPORATION). In the above
circumstances, the envisaged equity requirement of the project is adequately taken care of.
2.5. Present arrangement with Banks and Financial Institutions
The current account of ASRL is with AXIS bank, Bhubaneswar. ASRL has currently no exposure to
banks or Financial Institutions.
Page 7
2.6. Existing operations and past Financials
ASRL has been formed for the purpose of implementation of the Project and as of now, there are
no existing operations of the company. The financials of the company for the past two years as
are follows.
Table 2-4: Financials of ASRL (Rs. In crores)
2013
Particulars 2012 2011 2010
(Provisional)
Income 1.07 0.11 - -
Net Profit 0.17 0.007 - -
Shareholders funds
(including share
98.82 69.55 45.05 31.55
application money
pending allotment)
Current Liabilities 2.01 1.48 0.11 6.96
Non Current Assets
(including capital work in 84.92 70.36 29.13 28.92
progress)
Current Assets 15.91 0.67 16.03 9.59
Source: Unaudited financial results for year 2012-13 & audited financial results for respective years, ASRL
Page 8
3. PROMOTER PROFILE
Rail Vikas Nigam Limited (RVNL) has been incorporated by Ministry of Railways. It is created with the
objective of raising non-budgetary resources for rail capacity projects and implements them on fast
track basis. It has established itself as a major developer of fixed rail infrastructure projects. The
model followed by RVNL is to form a SPV for connectivity/strengthening of Golden Quadrilateral,
with partnership from the stakeholders like ports, the users of line and the respective state
governments.
As on March, 2013 RVNL has formed five SPVs which are mentioned below:
1. Kutch Railway Company limited: This SPV has completed gauge conversion work between
Gandhidham, Samakhiali and Palanpur, and cut short the rail transportation between
Gujarat ports and the Northern hinterland. The length of the project is 301 Kms. The project
cost is around Rs. 453 crores. This is the first operational SPV of RVNL, which commenced
operations in the year 2007 .
Status: As per Annual Report of RVNL FY 12, the turnover and the Profit Before Tax of the Company
for the year 2011-12 has increased to Rs. 380 crore (provisional) and Rs. 94 crore (provisional)
respectively from Rs. 300 crore and Rs. 60 crore (respectively) in the previous year.
2. Krishnapatnam Railway Company Limited: This SPV provides freight traffic movement
between Obulavaripalle in Kadapa district to Krishnapatnam port in Nellore district in
Andhra Pradesh. The length of the project is 113 kms. The project cost is estimated to be
around Rs. 1000 crores. It shall cater to significant volumes of freight traffic which shall be
generated by iron ore export traffic of Hospet-Bellary region, import of coke/coal to support
Jindal Steel Vijaynagar Limiteds (JSVL) increasing steel manufacturing capacity and other
planned projects in power, cement and steel sector
Status: It has commissioned the part line (23 kms) connecting Venkatachalam Railway Station with
Krishnapatnam port. This has facilitated evacuation of traffic from/to the Krishnapatnam port
through railways. Currently, an average of 8 loaded trains per day has been moving on this section
and a rapid increase of rail traffic is anticipated and doubling of the section from Venkatachalam to
Krishnapatnam, funded by KRCL at an estimated cost of Rs. 87 crore, is under execution.
3. Bharuch Dahej Railway Company Limited: The SPV provides freight traffic connectivity from
Bharuch to Dahej. The length of the project is 68 kms. The project cost is estimated to be
around Rs. 285 crores. It shall cater to significant volumes of freight traffic which shall be
generated by existing and future industries at Dahej. It shall also be an important feeder
route to the Western Dedicated Freight Corridor currently under construction.
Page 9
Status: The first goods train was run on the section on 01.12.2011. The volume of traffic has recently
been increasing and 210 trains have been loaded on the project section during the period March
2012 to May 2012
Haridaspur Paradip Railway Company Limited (HPRCL): The SPV has been incorporated by RVNL for
developing, financing, construction, operations and maintenance of an 82 km broad gauge single
railway line between Haridaspur and Paradip stations in Odisha to establish a direct link between the
iron-ore rich areas of Odisha viz. Barbil region to Paradip port. The project cost is estimated to be
around Rs.1185.99 crores.
Status : Currently the project is under progress and contract for important bridges on Luna &
Mahanadi Rivers is under execution. The process of award tender for balance work for Roadbed,
Minor Bridges, Buildings, etc is presently under process.
Angul Sukinda Railway Limited (ASRL). The project matter is discussed at length, subsequently.
RVNL is presently executing/executed 89 projects broadly classified under two heads as mentioned
below:
1. Strengthening of Golden Quadrilateral and Diagonals

2. Provision of Port Connectivity and corridors to hinterland
The status of 89 projects is as under (detailed list of projects is provided in ANNEXURE I: RVNL
PROJECT STATUS):
1. Projects completed upto March 31st, 2013: 26

2. Projects with Work in Progress: 19
3. Projects under development stage: 37
4. Projects recently sanctioned: 2
5. Projects yet to be sanctioned: 5
3.1. Board of Directors
As on March 31, 2013, the Board of Directors of RVNL comprises of five directors.
Table 3-1: Board of Directors of RVNL
S. No. Name of Director Designation

1 Mr. S.C. Agnihotri Chairman & Managing Director
2 Mr. Mukul Jain Director (Operations)
3 Mr. AK. Ganju Director (Finance)
4 Mr. Vijay Anand Director (Projects)
5 Mr. Gita Mishra Director (Personal)
Page 10
The brief profile of the directors of RVNL is as follows:
S.C. Agnihotri: Mr. Satish Agnihotri (Chairman & Managing Director) is an officer of 1984 batch of
Indian Railway Service of Engineers. He has done M.E.(Structures) and B.E.(Civil) from IIT, Roorkee.
Before joining as Chairman & Managing Director, he worked as Director (Projects) in RVNL. He also
headed the Metro Project Directorate of Ministry of Railways dealing with upcoming metro line in
metropolitan cities. As Executive Director (Corporate Coordination) & OSD/Chairman Railway Board,
he was engaged in substantive decision making in the Ministry of Railways.
Mukul Jain: Mr. Mukul Jain (Directors-Operations) is an officer of 1981 batch of Indian Railway
Traffic Service (IRTS). He has done M.E. (Logistics & Supply Chain Management) from Massachusetts
Institute of Technology-Boston and Zaragoza Logistics Center-Spain and B. Tech (Mechanical) from
IIT. Delhi). Prior to joining RVNL, Mr. Jain was the Executive Director in Container Corporation of
India Ltd. (CONCOR), a PSU of Government of India. He had.
A.K. Ganju: Mr. Ashok K Ganju (Director-Finance) is an officer of 1981 batch of Indian Railways
Accounts Service. He has done M.A. (Sociology) from and B.A. (Hons) from Delhi University.. Prior to
joining as Director (Finance), he had worked as Executive Director (Finance). Mr. Ganju had also
worked in various capacities in the Railways in the Division, Workshop, Production Unit, EDP Centre,
Traffic Accounts and Construction Offices etc.
Vijay Anand: Mr. Vijay Anand (Director-Projects) is an officer of 1981 batch of Indian Railway Service
of Engineers and a graduate in Civil Engineering from Punjab Engineering College, Punjab University,
Chandigarh. Prior to joining RVNL, he has held various responsible positions in Indian Railways and
Delhi Metro Rail Corporation in maintenance and construction of Railway and Metro assets.
Ms. Gita Mishra: Ms. Gita Mishra (Director-Personnel) an officer of 1982 batch of Indian Railway
Personnel Service and is a graduate from Lady Shri Ram College, Delhi University and also holds an
Advance Diploma in Russian Language from Delhi University. Before joining Rail Vikas Nigam Limited
as Director (Personnel), she was working as Executive Director Establishment (Non Gazetted)/
Railway Board, Ministry of Railways, New Delhi.
3.2. Capital Structure & Shareholding pattern
The capital structure of RVNL as on 31st March, 2013 is as under:
Table 3-2: Capital Structure of RVNL
Share Capital Particulars Rs. In crores

Authorized Capital 3,00,00,00,000 Equity shares of `10 each 3000.00
2,08,50,20,100 Equity shares of `10 each fully 2085.02
Paid up Capital
paid up
All the shares of RVNL as on March 31st, 2013 are held by Government of India.
Page 11
3.3. Financials of RVNL
Particulars (in Rs Crore) 2013 2012

Total Revenue 2204.96 1654.29
Profit Before Depreciation and Tax 171.36 122.80
Profit After Tax 135.55 98.38
Total Non-Current Assets (A) 875.11 744.33
Total Current Assets (B) 10531.93 8336.45
Total Current Liability (C) 847.21 720.63
Net Current Assets (D = B-C) 9684.72 7651.82
Non Current Liabilities (E) 8142.22 6048.37

NET WORTH (F) 2417.61 2311.79
Represented By:
Paid up Share Capital 2085.01 2085.01
Share Application Money - -
Reserves & Surplus 332.59 226.77
Ratios
Current Ratio (= B / C) 12.43 11.57
Debt to Equity Ratio (= E / F) 3.37 2.62
Source: Provisional audit statements for year 2012-13, RVNL
Page 12
4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
4.1. Project Background
Angul Sukinda Railway Limited (ASRL) has been incorporated for construction and maintenance of
104.24 km broad gauge single railway line between Budhapankh station (Angul) and Baguapal
Station (Sukinda) in Odisha. Proposed rail line provides a shorter connectivity and would facilitate
faster goods movement. This line will be connected to Banspani-Dubri line, which is currently being
used by steel plants in Sukinda region for inbound iron ore movement from Banspani and Barbil
region. Major beneficiaries of the this proposed line would be steel plants in Angul region
(transporting iron ore from Banspani and Chromate from Sukinda), coal based thermal power plant
in Sukinda (transporting thermal coal from Talchar coal fields, presently most of the power plant are
captive) and steel & power plants in Lapanga and Rengali area of Sambalpur district (transporting
iron ore from Banspani and coal from Talcher).
The proposed alignment will also establish a direct link between coal producing areas i.e. the Talcher
Coalfields and the coal consuming area of Daitari Industrial Complex near Sukinda Road Railway
Station. This will avoid the existing congested and circuitous route of the Talcher Rajatgarh
Kapilas Road Jakhapur and will provide an alternative and shorter route for the coal traffic.
Dispatch of finished products of the steel plants of Daitari Industrial Complex to destinations in
Mumbai and Delhi area via Talcher Sambalpur Jharsuguda will also be cheaper via the proposed
alignment in comparison with the route via Kharagpur.
This rail line may also facilitate the transportation of iron ore, coal, bauxite from nearby quarries to
the upcoming industries in Jharsugoda Industrial Cluster and to nearby Thermal Power Plants. The
project line starts at Budhapank Station near Angul and terminates at Baguapal Station near Sukinda.
The map of the proposed railway line is under
Page 13
Figure 1: Alignment Map of Angul Sukinda Railway Line
A concession agreement (CA) for the project has been executed between Ministry of Railways and
ASRL on 14th May, 2010. The major users of the proposed project viz. Jindal Steel and Power Limited,
Bhushan Steel Limited have also entered into shareholders Agreement with RVNL and ASRL on 27th
May, 2009.
4.2. Scope of the Project
As per Concession Agreement, the Concessionaire is authorized to develop, finance, design,

engineer, procure, construct and operate and maintain the broad guage rail link connectivity
between Talcher Road in Angul District at km. 0.000 and Baghuapal in Jajpur district at km 93.165
and to exercise and /or enjoy the rights, powers, benefits, privileges, authorizations and
entitlements as set out in the Concession Agreement during the Concession Period.
4.3. Location of the project
The location of the project is between Budhapank Station near Angul and Baguapal Station near
Sukinda. The major stations in this route to be constructed during the project are Kamlang, Parjang,
Muktaposi, Kamakhyanagar, Rangamati, Tengaria, Bhuban, Sukinda and Duburi. The districts through
which the railway line passes through are Angul, Dhenkanal and Jajpur.
Page 14
4.4. Project Structure
The relationship among the Projects various key parties are set out hereunder:
## Current Equity Gap position as explained in section 2.4

#O&M Contract is yet to be signed with East Coast Railway
*Construction agreement is yet to be signed with RVNL
The structure as shown above details out the role and relationships between different parties
involved in the project. MoR is the Concessioning authority and RVNL is the major shareholder while
the other being Jindal Steel and Power Limited. There is an equity gap of 30% as on July, 2013 due
the forfeiture action on the partly paid equity shares of Bhusan Steel ltd for non-subscribing of due
Cash call money .
RVNL also performs the role of EPC contractor and ECoR is responsible for Operation and
Maintenance of the project. The construction agreement with RVNL expected to be signed shortly
while O&M agreements with East Coast Railway are expected before commencement of Goods
traffic.
According to Master Circular-Exposure Norms for Financial Institutions of RBI, rail system has been
classified as infrastructure facility and any credit facility extended to an infrastructure facility is
considered as lending to infrastructure project.
4.5. Project Agreements
I. Concession Agreement
The Concession Agreement (CA) between Ministry of Railways and ASRL was signed on 14 th May
2010. The key terms and conditions of the CA are summarized below.
Page 15
a) Concession Period: The concession period would be determined with reference to
attainment of the NPV payback benchmark at the rate of return of 14%. The concession
period shall be 30 years of operation or till the time NPV payback equal to the equity
investment is reached, whichever is earlier. (Clause 4.6.1)
As per the above mentioned formula for estimation of concession period, the concession
period with a maximum limit of 30 years of operation may get shortened, therefore it may
be suggested to keep a provision of cash sweep of entire cash surplus from the operation of
the project line over and above Rs. 50 crores at any point during the currency of the loan
shall be utilized towards repayment of the outstanding debt with no repayment penalty. The
cash surplus shall be adjusted with the last installment of the outstanding loan.
b) Construction Period: The construction period means the period beginning from the date of
signing of this agreement and ending on commissioning (Clause 1.1) The construction period
is assumed to be 5 years
c) Rights of Concessioning Authority: The concession authority/MoR shall be entitled to the
following:
a. MoR shall be entitled to run on the Project Railway2, BG passenger services without
paying any access charges to ASRL, provided however that, any new passenger
service on the Project Railway shall be commenced only with prior written consent
of ASRL
b. The right to collect traffic from non-container traffic originating, terminating and
moving on the Project railway, and haulage charges from container operations.
c. Without in any way adversely affecting the movement of traffic on the Project
Railway or otherwise adversely affecting the functioning of the Project Railway, the
Concessioning Authority can connect other rail lines which are constructed in
accordance with the normal expansion plans of MoR; to the Project Railway, at any
point along its length
d. The right to modify, suspend or revoke the rights of the concessionaire under
National Emergency during the period of National Emergency, limited for the period
of such National Emergency (Clause 4.4)
d) Rights of ASRL: The concession hereby entitles ASRL, inter-alia, to the following:
a. To exercise all the rights and authority vested in the Concession under this
Agreement;
b. To have the exclusive right and authority during the Concession Period to implement
the Project
c. The right to Commercial Exploitation3
d. The right to develop Additional facilities4 in the Project Area;
2 Project Railway means broad gauge rail link connectivity between Budhapankh at km 0.00 and Baghupal at km 104.24
3 Commercial Exploitation means the right of the Concessionaire to put the Project Assets to commercial use, as permitted
under Applicable laws and rules framed by MoR, which shall, however , specifically exclude the rights of ASRL, to lay or
permit optical fibre alongside the project railway
Page 16
e. The right to quote special tariff rates for freight moving within the Project Railway
i.e. where the origin and destination both are on the Project Railway in terms of the
policy instructions issued by MoR from time to time
f. The right to receive from MoR, its share in accordance with the rules of inter-railway
apportionment of earnings, of the tariff collected from the freight traffic originating,
terminating and moving on the project railway, including haulage charges and
maintenance costs, in accordance with the Project related Agreements (Clause 4.2
Concession Agreement). The due share of ASRL in the freight traffic earnings shall be
apportioned and paid to it by MOR as per the rules of inter-Railway Financial
adjustment after defraying the operation & maintenance cost in accordance with
the related agreements.(clause 4.4b)
g. The apportionment of freight traffic earnings will be made at 100% of the revenue
normally accruable to ASRL for the first four years from COD, and thereafter , at the
rate of 80% of revenue in case of non-originating traffic and 90% of the revenue in
case of originating traffic.(clause 4.4b)
e) Transfer of Assets to MoR: upon Expiry, the Project Assets shall be handed over by ASRL to
MoR in accordance with the provisions of Article 8. (Clause 5.1).
f) ASRLs Event of Default: ASRL shall be deemed to have committed an Event of Default if any
of the following occurs, unless such event has arisen on account of Force Majeure Event or
Concessioning Authority Event of Default;
a. Unlawful repudiation of this Agreement by ASRL;
b. Appointment of a liquidator provisional or otherwise for winding up of ASRL, unless
such appointment has been set-aside within 90 days
c. Failure to comply with the lawful directives given by Central Government having the
statutory rights to issue such directives with respect of the Project Railway
d. Breakdown of any of the Project Related Agreement (the Concession Agreement,
Shareholders agreement between RVNL, JSPL, BSL and ASRL, Lease Agreement,
Agreement for construction to be entered into by ARSL and RVNL, Agreement for
Operations and Maintenance to be entered into by ARSL and East Coast Railway) on
account of ARSL default, rendering the Concession Agreement inoperable
e. Abandonment of the construction of the Project Railway
f. A breach of any of its obligations under a material provision of the Concession
Agreement
g. Failure on the part of ARSL to perform its obligations under any of the Financing
Documents(collectively the documents evidencing Lenders commitment to finance
the Project) that led to recall of the financial assistance by the Lenders
h. Non-payment by ASRL a material amount defined as amount equal to lease charges
payable for one year (Clause 7.1)
4 Additional Facilities means the facilities which ASRL may provide or procure for the benefit of the users of the Project
Railway and which are in addition to the facilities planned in project estimate prepared and sanctioned by RVNL, and
includes additional stations and freight handling facilities.
Page 17
g) Concessioning Authority Event of Default: Concessioning Authority shall be deemed to have
committed an Event of Default if any of the following occurs, unless such event has arisen on
account of Force Majeure event or ASRL Event of Default;
a. Unlawful repudiation of this Agreement by MoR including expropriation of Project
Assets by any Government Authority
b. Breakdown of any of the project related Agreements on account of MoRs default,
rendering this agreement inoperable
c. Failure to pay ASRL the payment of its share of revenue, for the haulage of freight on
the project Railway within a period of 20 days
d. A material breach of its obligations under the provisions of this agreement by MoR
(Clause 7.2)
h) Lenders Step in Rights: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Concession
Agreement, the parties hereby agree that (i) upon the lenders recalling and demanding the
debt outstanding under the Financing Documents (following an event of default under the
Financing Documents) or (ii) upon a termination Notice being issued by MoR, the lenders
shall, without prejudice to any other remedy available to them, have the option to propose
to MoR the substitution of the Concessionaire by another suitable Concessionaire . Any such
proposal shall contain in sufficient detail all the relevant information about the Proposed
Concessionaire and the terms & conditions of the substitution (Clause 7.4 )
i) Transfer payment on normal transfer: Upon normal transfer, ASRL shall be entitled to
receive and MOR shall pay to ASRL an amount equal to Book Value. The existing assets
leased to ASRL by MOR shall revert back to MOR and MOR shall pay to ASRL an amount
equal to cost of land, which was financed by ASRL at the time acquisition of land without any
interest.( clause 8.1)
j) Transfer payment on termination on Account of Concessining Authoritys Event of default:
ASRL shall be entitled to receive and MoR shall pay the following transfer payment:
a. 130% of DRV5 if the default occurs within 15 years of COD
b. 120% of DRV if the default occurs after 15 years but within 25 years of COD
c. 110% of DRV if the default occurs after 25 years of COD (Clause 8.2 )
k) Transfer payment on termination on Account of Concessionaires Event of Default: ASRL
shall be entitled to receive and MoR shall pay 50% of Book value as Transfer Payment
(Clause 8.3)
l) Leased Assets: In consideration of the premises aforesaid, and of the rennet reserved and of
the covenants and agreements on the part of the Lessee to be observed and performed, the
Lessor. Does hereby lease unto the Lessee all the Existing Assets and the land to be newly
acquired together with all rights, easements and appurtenances thereto , to have and to
hold, for the duration of the Concession period (Schedule 1 Clause 2)
5 DRV means Depreciated replacement Value of New Assets and Additional facilities and is the aggregate cost of
replacing each asset on termination date minus aggregate depreciation on Straight Line Method, where depreciation on
Straight Line Method for each asset means the number of years the asset has been in use divided by the codal life of the
asset multiplied by the cost of replacement of asset on Termination Date. The asset life shall be computed as per the
provisions in the codes and manuals of MoR. The cost of replacement of each asset shall be determined by the then
prevailing accepted rate for the relevant assets of MoR
Page 18
m) Terms of Lease: The term of the lease shall be co-terminus with the Concession period,
unless extended for a further period by the mutual agreement of the Parties (Schedule 1
Clause 3)
n) Lease rent: The Lessee shall pay to the Lessor, an annual lease rental in respect of the
Leased Assets. This lease rental shall be payable in advance in one single installment first
week of January (Schedule 1 Clause 4)
II. Construction Agreement
Currently the draft Construction Agreement is in final stage and is expected to be signed between
ASRL and RVNL, shortly.
III. Operations & Maintenance Agreement
O&M Agreement shall be signed between ASRL and East Coast Railway (ECoR) before the completion
of construction work of the project and before the COD of the project
Page 19
5. PROJECT COST
5.1. Project Agreements
The TPC has been estimated around Rs. 1337.9 crores, based on the hard cost estimates provided by
RVNL. The same is based on internal assessment/ prevailing rate of contracts awarded in the vicinity
of the project area. The detailed breakup of the same is provided in the table below.
5-1: Project Cost Details
Particulars Amount in crores % of TPC

Hard Cost Item
Land 79.42 5.94%
Civil Works 789.54 59.01%
S&T Engineering 43.96 3.29%
Electrical Engineering & OHE 109.68 8.20%
Gross Total 1022.60 76.43%
Contingency @ 3% 30.68 2.29%
Sub Total A 1053.27 78.73%
D&G charges @8.75% on A 92.16 6.89%
Sub Total B 1145.43 85.61%
RVNL Charges @5% on B 57.27 4.28%
Total Hard Cost 1202.70 89.89%
Soft Cost (Consultants Estimation)
Preliminary & Pre-Operative Expenses 6.00 0.45%
Interest During Construction 129.20 9.66%
Financial Charges
Debt Service Reserve
Total Soft Cost 135.20 10.11%
Grand Total 1337.90 100.00%
a) Land: The total land required for the project is 1679.06 acres, out of which, Government land is
222.50 acres, forest land is 251.06 acres and private land is 1205.50 acres. The total cost of the
land acquisition as estimated by RVNL is Rs.79.40 crores. The land acquisition work is done by
East cost Railway through Odisha State Govt agency. Rs. 64.05 crores has been spent to end of
30.06.2013 towards cost of land . Details of land acquired as on 30th June, 2013 is as follows.
Status of Private Land

Requirement of Land Possession Taken
Name of District
Village (Nos) Area (Acres) Village (Nos) Area (Acres)
Angul 7 122.055 3 11.420
Dhenkanal 49 804.326 31 286.905
Jajpur 13 279.120 4 32.680
Total 69 1205.501 38 331.005
Page 20
The state government has assured that all the required private land for the project will be acquired
by September 2013 (Please refer to Annexure XI).
Status of Government Land

Alienation
Sanctioned
Name of District
Village Area Village Area Village Area
(Nos) (Acres) (Nos) (Acres) (Nos) (Acres)
Angul 5 3.940 2 1.060 0 0
Dhenkanal 44 154.025 24 13.425 0 0
Jajpur 11 64.540 6 15.020 6 15.020
Total 60 222.505 32 29.505 6 15.020
Current status: The state government has decided for revision of the cost of government land at par
with the bench mark price of private land, based on the representation of Railways against the
supposedly higher rate for govt. land. The government has also allowed the arrangement of taking
over of government land, pending completion of paper formalities.
Status of Forest Land

Diversion proposal filed
Requirement of Land
( Nos. of village)
Name of District
Village Area Village Area
(Nos) (Acres) (Nos) (Acres)
Dhenkanal 33 125.430 33 125.430
Jajpur 13 125.630 13 125.630
Total 46 251.060 46 251.060
Current Status: ASRL has engaged a Forest Consultant firm to assist in the process of forest diversion
and environment clearance work. Work is progressing on forest diversion work by way of state govt.
identifying the substitute degraded forest in lieu of the affected forest land and also in the digital
survey (DGPS) work. The stage-I forest clearance proposal is planned to be presented to Government
of India before the end of this year.
b) Civil Works: The civil works include excavation, earthwork, buildings mainly consists of station
and quarters etc. As per the estimates 9 stations have been proposed excluding Budhapankh and
Baghupal. Apart from this, civil works also include rail & fastenings, sleeper & fastenings, costs
for platforms, various offices for the railways, passenger amenity works etc. The total cost of the
civil works including land cost has been estimated at Rs. 868.96 crores.
Details of civil contracts awarded: At present only one contract for Major Bridge No.12 on River
Brahmani and two other bridges on Rengali Canal is in progress. There is 30% physical progress
Page 21
in this bridge work. Another tender for Earth Work & minor Bridge works for a stretch of 25km
has been floated by RVNL and it will be opened in August, 2013. The other works tenders for
remaining stretch will be called as per progress of acquisition of land.
c) Signalling & Telecommunications: The signalling and telecommunication works mainly consists
of installation of solid state interlocking, DC track circuits, LC gate, Telecom facility, modification
in existing route relay interlocking with MACL (Multiple Aspect Colour Light) signalling motor
operated points with DC track circuits. The detailed description of S&T works include:
S. No Description Details
Std-III : 09 (New Stations)
1 Interlocking
Std-III :02 (Existing Stations)
Motor Operation : 09 (New Stations ) + 02 (Existing
2 Operating of Points
Stations)
3 Signals LED Colour Light : 09 (New Stations ) + 02 (Existing Stations)
4 Block Working TLBT with SSDAC : 10 Block Sections
1) OFC for Control, administrative purposes and 6 quad
Communication
cables for emergency, communication and block working
5 OFC and 6 Quad
: 09+02 stations
Cable
2) Radio Patching : Between Talcher and Kamakhyanagar
Overhead equipment, traction, sub-stations, SCADA,
6 Electric Traction
switching Stations and feeding post
The total cost of Signalling & Telecommunications has been estimated at Rs. 43.96 crores.
d) Electrical Engineering & OHE: The electrical engineering works mainly constitute Traction
Distribution Works, Over Head Equipment for running trains, traction sub stations, etc. The
detailed description of electrical engineering & OHE include:
e)
S. No Description Details
1 Traction Sub-Station 02 Nos.
2 Sectioning & Paralleling Post (SP) 03 Nos.
3 Sub-Sectioning & Paralleling Post (SSP) 06 Nos.
OHE & PSI Depth with Tower Car at Sukinda and 02 Nos.
4
Kamakhyanagar
5 11 Kv Sub-Stations at all stations 08 Nos.
The Electrical Engineering and OHE cost has been estimated at Rs. 109.68 crores
f) Preliminary and Pre-Operative expenses: Preliminary expenses include expenses incurred for
the company formation and other expenses related to feasibility study & detailed project report.
These expenses are estimated at Rs. 6.00 crores
g) Interest During Construction (IDC): Interest During Construction has been estimated at Rs.
129.20 crores (about 9.4% of the Total Project Cost) based on the schedule drawdown of the
Page 22
finance facilities. It is assumed that the debt drawdown will commence from year 2015. The rate
of interest has been assumed at 11% p.a
h) Contingency: An amount of Rs. 31.58 crores has been provided for as contingency at the rate of
3% of capital cost based on standard norms being followed in railways.
Page 23
6. MEANS OF FINANCE
6.1. Means of Finance
Taking into account the overall funding requirement and the project cash flows the cost of the
Project is proposed to be funded by a combination of equity from shareholders and Rupee Term
Loan (RTL) in the Debt to Equity ratio of 68.6:31.4 as shown below:
6-1: Funding Structure (Rs. Crores) (to be revised)
Particulars 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total

Project Cost 90.8 130.0 327.0 459.9 330.2 1337.9
Means of Finance
Equity 90.8 130.0 199.2 - - 420.0
RTL - - 127.8 459.9 330.2 917.9
Total 90.8 130.0 327.0 459.9 330.2 1337.9
Note: The project is an Infrastructure project and the proposed DER of 68.6:31.4 is well within the
acceptable ratio
6.2. Equity from Shareholders
Based on the proposed capital structure, the equity contribution works out to Rs. 420 crores. It is to
be mentioned that the shareholders have already brought in Rs.135.56 crores as share application
money in the company, out of which, they have spent Rs.104.40 Crores (approx.) as on June 30,
2013. Currently there is an equity gap of 30% resulted due to forfeiture action taken against BSL
failing to subscribe due cash calls money of allotted Equity share. The company has suitably
addressed the equity gap as brought out (at paragraph 2.4 of chapter 2) . The company proposes to
spend the equity already brought in by the shareholders before the first debt drawl.
6.3. Rupee Term Loan from Banks
ASRL proposes to approach Banks and Financial Institutions to raise Rs. 918 crores of RTL at the
following brief terms:
Name of Borrower Angul Sukinda Railway Limited

Purpose Setting up of broad gauge single railway line of 104.24 kms
Nature of Borrowing Rupee Term Loan
Loan Amount Rs. 918.00 crores
Rate of Interest 11% p.a
Upfront Fee Will be confirmed during debt syndication stage
A moratorium period of 12 months is proposed from COD i.e.
Moratorium Period
April, 2018
Step up repayment in 40 quarterly installments commencing
Repayment
from April, 2018
Page 24
Repayment Start Date April 1st, 2019
Repayment End Date March 31st, 2029
a) First pari-pasu charge on all the present and future fixed assets
including movable assets of the Borrower excluding those assets
which have been leased by Ministry of Railways (MoR) to the
borrower as per the Concession Agreement between MoR and
ASRL
b) First pari-pasu charge on all the tangible movable machinery and
plant of the Borrower together with spares, tools, accessories and
Security
other movables, both present and future
c) A charge on the Escrow account having Debt Service Reserve
Account and each of the other accounts required to be created by
the Company under any project document or contract
d) Assignment of the rights, title, benefits, claims, demands and
interests whatsoever of the Borrower by way of first charge in, to
under all Contracts
Trust & Retention account /Escrow Account of the project/ASRL
will be maintained with a bank (to be decided by the
participating lenders) to collect all revenues/inflows generated
Trust & Retention Account /
for the ASRL.
Escrow Account
The company will upfront execute an agreement to assign to
the lenders their future revenue/inflows during the currency of
the loans.
An indicative detailed term sheet for the proposed RTL is enclosed in ANNEXURE II: DETAILED
TERM SHEET
Page 25
7. MARKET ASSESSMENT & TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
The Project section links Jakhapura-Banspani line with Cuttack-Angul-Sambalpur line. The Project is
expected to cater to iron ore traffic from Joda-Barbil region and coal traffic from Talcher region to
consumer industries in the hinterland.
An initial traffic and bankability study for the project was carried out by PriceWaterhouseCoopers in
the year 2006. In order to update the traffic forecast for the Angul-Sukinda rail link in light of the
development of changed economic scenario, M/s Feedback Infra (P) Limited, with a team comprising
of experts in railway sector, has been appointed as traffic consultant to assess the traffic volume.
7.1. The Alignment
The proposed rail link is between Budhapankha station and Baghuapal station in the state of Odisha.
The map below represents the proposed project section
7.2. Commodities identified as primary Cargo
Page 26
Following are the major traffic drivers near the proposed new line between Budhapank and Sukinda
Road Stations. A detailed analysis of the same has been done in the subsequent sections to
determine the impact, direct or indirect, on traffic of the project line.
Ports Mines Steel Plants Power Plants

Paradip Port Mahanadi Coal Various Steel Various Power
Dhamra Port Fields Plants around Plants around
Chromate Mines Angul and Angul and
Sukinda Rd. Sukinda Rd.
A preliminary location analysis of the project catchment area reveals that there are, primarily, four
major activity regions along with two ports that may have an impact on the project stretch traffic.
These include:
Talcher coal fields and surrounding activity

Banspani-Barbil Iron Ore mines and surrounding activity
Steel Plants in proximity to Sukinda
Power & Steel Plants in and around Angul
Dhamra and Paradeep Ports
The above activity regions, together, comprise the following traffic movements:
Coal Movement:
o Talcher to Sambalpur/Jharsuguda
o Talcher to Sukinda
o Talcher to Banspani-Barbil
o Talcher to Dhamra
Iron Ore Movement:
o Banspani-Barbil to Sambalpur/Jharsuguda
o Banspani-Barbil to Angul/Talcher
o Banspani-Barbil to Sukinda
Finished Iron & Steel Products:
o Angul to Eastern India
o Sukinda to Northern, Central and Western India
o Angul to Paradeep Port
o Angul to Dhamra Port
Page 27
o Sukinda to Dhamra Port
o Banspani-Barbil to Dhamra Port
7.3. Hinterland & Cargo clusters
For assessment of potential traffic for the project line, the Consultants have adopted a location &
distance centric approach towards traffic calculation. The process, broadly, comprises of assessing
the potential traffic for the project stretch based upon a detailed location and distance analysis of
existing and upcoming traffic drivers in the region. It also includes a comparative analysis with other
rail lines in the region, expected to be in direct competition with the project line. This helps the
Consultants to establish the effective catchment of the rail line and eventually lead to a realistic
assessment of traffic.
Traffic on the project line will, primarily, comprise of input resources and outputs of various Iron &
Steel and Thermal Power Plants in the region. RTCs have been granted to about 24 plants, in the
region, by the Zonal Railway (details annexed to the report). All such plants having influence on the
project stretch have been analyzed based on their annual capacity, traffic movement and current
status of the plant. Analysis was also done to establish the most feasible route for commodity
movement for each of these plants. This finally led to identification of traffic streams that are likely
to get diverted, from other competing routes in the region, to the project line. As a result of this,
traffic to or from the following plants is likely to use the subject rail line for movement of
commodities:
7-1: Possible Traffic Generators for the Project Line
S. No Name of the plant Location of the Plant Annual Capacity (MTPA)

1. BRG Iron & Steel Meramandali 0.60
2. Jindal Steel & Power Kerejanga 6.0
3. Bhushan Steel and Strips Meramandali 4.7
4. VISA Steel Jakhapura 1.5
5. Jindal Stainless Jakhapura 1.75
6. Patnaik Steels and Alloys Pvt. Ltd. Nayagarh 0.27
7. Maithan Ispat Ltd. Jakhapura 0.2
8. Tata Steel Ltd. Kalinganagar 3.0
9. MGM Steels Limited Meramandali 0.3
10. Monnet Ispat & Energy Ltd. Kerejanga 1.0
11. Odisha Sponge Iron Ltd Porjanpur 0.35
12. Sree Metaliks Limited Kerejanga 0.25
13. Mahanadi Coal Fields Talcher 39.2
Source: Traffic Consultant Research & Interactions with East Coast Railways
7.3.1. Individual Traffic Streams

Page 28
BRG Iron & Steel
BRG Iron & Steel Co. Pvt. Ltd. has multiple integrated units in Dhenkanal, Odisha near Meramandali.
The current capacity of the plant is 0.60 MT and manufactures sponge iron, ferro manganese, silico
manganese & stainless steel slabs. Currently there are no plans for expansion of the plant.
The plant sources its Coal from Talcher Coal Fields, and iron-ore from Barbil, Joda mine fields. The
current traffic stream of the Plant is as follows:
Table 7-2: Origin-Destination based Traffic Movement of BRG Iron and Steel
Traffic (FY 2012) in

S. No. Commodity Origin Destination In/Out
Million Tonnes
1 Iron Ore Barbil Meramandali In 0.21
2 Iron Ore Joda Meramandali In 0.21
3 Iron Ore Keonjhar Meramandali In 0.21
4 Coal MCL, Talcher Meramandali In 1.12
5 Chrome Ore Dhenkanal Meramandali In 0.16
6 Chrome Ore Jajpur Road Meramandali In 0.16
7 Manganese Ore Koenjhar Meramandali In 0.10
8 Manganese Ore Sambalpur Meramandali In 0.10
9 Coke Paradeep Meramandali In 0.09
10 Coke DHN Meramandali In 0.09
11 Limestone Dhenkanal Meramandali In 0.02
12 Limestone Rajgangpur Meramandali In 0.02
13 Dolomite Odisha Meramandali In 0.02
14 Dolomite Rajasthan Meramandali In 0.02
15 Scrap All Over India Meramandali In 0.07
16 Steel Billets Meramandali Haryana Out 0.03
17 Steel Billets Meramandali Punjab Out 0.03
18 Steel Billets Meramandali Delhi Out 0.03
19 Steel Billets Meramandali UP Out 0.03
20 Steel Billets Meramandali Gujarat Out 0.03
21 Sponge Iron Meramandali TATA Out 0.05
22 Sponge Iron Meramandali North India Out 0.05
23 Ferro Chrome Meramandali North India Out 0.08
24 Ferro Manganese Meramandali North India Out 0.08
25 Mild Steel Meramandali Koenjhar Out 0.09
26 Mild Steel Meramandali Sambalpur Out 0.09
27 Pig Iron Meramandali North India Out 0.01
28 Pig Iron Meramandali Jharkhand Out 0.01
29 Pig Iron Meramandali Bihar Out 0.01
30 Pig Iron Meramandali West Bengal Out 0.01
Source: Traffic Consultant Research & Analysis
Page 29
Traffic consultants have analyzed the above Origin and Destination pairs and found that a part of this
traffic is likely to move on the project stretch. The same is detailed in the table below:
Table 7-3: Origin-Destination based Divertible traffic of BRG Iron & Steel on Project Stretch
S. Traffic (FY 2020) in

Commodity Origin Destination In/Out
No. Million Tonnes
1 Iron Ore Barbil Meramandali In 0.21
2 Iron Ore Joda Meramandali In 0.21
3 Iron Ore Keonjhar Meramandali In 0.21
Total Traffic in Million Tonnes 0.63
Jindal Steel & Power Ltd.
Jindal Steel and Power Limited (JSPL) is setting up a 6 MTPA integrated steel plant with captive
power plant of capacity 1142 MW at Kerejanga (District Angul) in Odisha. The project would be
executed in three phases. In phase 1, the steel plant will commence operation with 1.5 MTPA steel
production capacity followed by capacity addition of 4.5 MTPA in phase 2. The company also has
plans to add another 3 MTPA steel production capacity in phase 3. The company further has plans to
subsequently increase the capacity from 9 MT to 12.5 MTPA in due course. Following is the phase-
wise plan of JSPL at Kerejanga:
Phase 1 Commencement of operation from 2013-14 with production capacity of 1.5 mtpa.
Phase 2 Commencement of operation from 2014-15 with capacity addition of 4.5 mtpa.
Phase 3 Commencement of operation from 2019-20 with capacity addition of 3 mtpa.
The plant, when commissioned, would require substantial amount of raw material including Iron
Ore, Coal, Coke, Limestone, etc. The finished steel products are expected to be transported for
domestic consumption to destination in Eastern, Southern, Western, Northern and Central India
The rail-relevant traffic streams (along with the expected capacity for each stream) for the said
industry are as follows:
Table 7-4: Origin-Destination based Traffic Streams for Jindal Steel & Power Ltd
Expected capacity in Million

Commodity Origin Destination In/Out Tonnes
2017 2021 2036
Iron Ore Fines Deojhar Kerejanga In 7.06 10.59 14.71
Iron Ore Lumps Deojhar Kerejanga In 3.75 5.63 7.82
Imported Coking Coal Paradip Port Kerejanga In 2.20 3.30 4.58
Imported Coking Coal VSKP Kerejanga In 2.20 3.30 4.58
Non Coking Coal Bilaspur Kerejanga In 0.41 0.62 0.85
Non Coking Coal Jharsuguda Kerejanga In 0.41 0.62 0.85
Non Coking Coal for coal Paradip Port Kerejanga In 5.13 7.69 10.68
washery
Page 30
Non Coking Coal for coal VSKP Kerejanga In 5.13 7.69 10.68
washery
Non Coking Coal for coal Bilaspur Kerejanga In 5.13 7.69 10.68
washery
Non Coking Coal for coal Jharsuguda Kerejanga In 5.13 7.69 10.68
washery
Raw Dolomite & Rajasthan Kerejanga In 0.68 1.03 1.43
Dolomite Fine
Lime Stone and Lime Rajasthan Kerejanga In 1.34 2.00 2.78
stone fines
Lime Stone and Lime Jamshedpur Kerejanga In 1.34 2.00 2.78
stone fines
Quartzite Rajasthan Kerejanga In 0.26 0.39 0.54
Misc, Flux & Ferro alloy Rajasthan Kerejanga In 0.11 0.17 0.23
Steel Kerejanga Various Out 6.00 9.00 12.50
Destinations
From the above traffic, the amount of traffic that is expected to get routed to the subject project line
is as follows:
Table 7-5: Origin-Destination based Divertible traffic on the project line for Jindal Steel & Power Ltd.
Commodity Origin Destination In/Out 2017 2021 2036

Iron Ore Fines Deojhar Kerejanga In 7.06 10.59 14.71
Iron Ore Lumps Deojhar Kerejanga In 3.75 5.63 7.82
Steel Kerejanga Various Destinations Out 1.20 1.80 2.50
Total Traffic in Million Tonnes 12.01 18.02 25.03
Bhushan Steel and Strips

BSSL Meramandali Plant (1.5 MT) is based on the Directly Reduced Iron (DRI) - Electric Arc Furnace
(EAF), Blast Furnace Ladle Furnace & RH-OB - continuous casting rolling mill route with waste
heat recovery based captive power plant (CPP). Plant is situated about 5 km from Meramanadali
Railway Stations (on Angul Cuttack broad gauze main railway line). The National Highway no. 42
touches northern side of plant. The plant is 18 km from Angul and 42 km from Dhenkanal. Nearest
Railway station is Meramandali on East coast railway and nearest port is Paradip, which is more than
215 km away. Plant has fully functional rail siding.
BSSL is contemplating to modify and expand the existing 1.5 MT integrated steel plant to 4.7 MT
level which is expected to be completed by this year (2013). With this additional 3 million tones
augmented capacity, BSSL would touch total steelmaking capacity of 4.7 million tones. The plant has
ambitious plans to expand its capacity to 7.0 MT in future years
Bhushan steel would be the major beneficiary of upcoming line with its inbound traffic (coal and iron
ore) using the proposed line.
Page 31
The rail-relevant traffic streams (along with the projected traffic for each stream) for the said
Table 7-6: Origin-Destination based Traffic Streams for Bhushan Steel & Strips Ltd.
Traffic in Million
Tonnes
2012 2017
Coal Talcher Meramandali In 3.30 3.30
Steam Coal Talcher Meramandali In 2.05 2.05
I/Ore Banspani Meramandali In 2.84 6.06
I/Ore (BF Grade) Banspani Meramandali In 0.27 0.58
I/Ore (Finer) Banspani Meramandali In 0.85 1.82
Lime Stone Satna Meramandali In 0.33 0.71
Lime Stone Paradeep Meramandali In 0.33 0.71
Coking Coal for BF Paradeep Meramandali In 0.96
Coking Coal for BF Haldia Meramandali In 0.96
Coal for CDI - BF Paradeep Meramandali In 1.23 1.23
Dolomite - SP Bhardawar Meramandali In 0.13 0.15
Semi Finished Meramandali Howrah Out 0.41 0.88
Finished Products Meramandali New Delhi Out 0.37 0.79
Finished Products Meramandali Chandigarh Out 0.37 0.79
Finished Products Meramandali Mumbai Out 0.57 1.23
Finished Products Meramandali Chennai Out 0.36 0.76
Finished Products Meramandali Haldia Out 0.06 0.13
Finished Products Meramandali Paradip Out 0.06 0.13
From the above traffic, the amount of traffic that is expected to get routed to the project line is as
follows:
Table 7-7: Origin-Destination based Divertible traffic on the project line for Bhushan Steel & Strips
Commodity Origin Destination In/Out 2018 2021

Iron Ore Banspani Meramandali In 6.06 8.22
I/Ore (BF Grade) Banspani Meramandali In 0.58 0.79
Iron Ore Fines Banspani Meramandali In 1.82 2.47
Coking Coal for BF Haldia Meramandali In 0.96 3.41
Finished Products Meramandali Haldia Out 0.13 0.19
Total Traffic in Million Tonnes 9.55 15.08
VISA Steel
VISA Steel Limited is a subsidiary of VISA Infrastructure Limited. VISA Steel is operating a 0.5 MTPA
Special Steel Plant and 75 MW Power Plant at Kalinganagar. The current operations include 400,000
TPA Coke Oven plant (8 Batteries of 11 Ovens each with Stamp Charging facility), 225,000 TPA Pig
Iron plant (250 Cu.m. Blast Furnace), 300,000 TPA Sponge Iron plant (2 x 500 TPA DRI Kilns), 50,000
TPA Ferro Chrome plant (2 x 16.5 MVA Submerged Arc Furnace), 75 MW Power plant (3 x 25 MW
TG), 0.5 Million TPA Special Steel plant (70 T EAF with VD, LRF & Continuous Caster) and 0.5 million
Page 32
TPA Bar & Wire Rod Mill. The company plans to set up a 0.5 MTPA Iron Ore Sinter Plant, 300 TPD
Lime Plant and 1 x 150 MW Captive Power Plant. An additional 0.5 MTPA Special and Stainless Steel
Plant with 425,000 TPA Pig Iron Plant, 300,000 TPA Sponge Iron Plant will also be set-up to raise
capacity to 1 MTPA.
VISA Steel is operating a 75 MW captive Power Plant and have plans to eventually expand its power
generating capacity (totaling to 375 MW at Kalingnagar plant) along with commencement of
production at the Coal Block at Patrapada in Talcher.
The location at Kalinganagar offers logistic advantages with
Talcher coalfields situated 110 km away,

Daitari iron ore mines located 30 km away,
the Keonjhar and Barbil mines 100-150 km away,
the Sukinda Valley having nearly 99% of India's chrome reserves just 35 km away,
both Dhamra & Paradip ports 120 km away, and
Jakhapura Railway Station 2 km away
Presently all iron ore requirement is fulfilled by Joda Barbil Area and ore is transported by road.
Coking Coal is transported from Paradip, Vizag and Dhamra port.
A subsidiary of VISA Steel (with a shareholding of 65%, the balance 35% being held by Baosteel - one
of the largest Steel and Stainless Steel manufacturers in China) is setting up 4x16.5 MVA Submerged
Arc Furnaces for production of 100,000 TPA Ferro Chrome at Kalinganagar. The Company will add
value to the locally available Chrome Ore and Chrome Concentrates into Ferro Chrome. A significant
quality of ferro chrome produced at this plant will be exported to China and the balance to Japan, S.
Korea, Taiwan, Europe & USA etc.
The rail-relevant traffic streams (along with the projected capacity for each stream) for the said
Table 7-8: Origin-Destination based Traffic Streams for VISA Steel Ltd.
Total Traffic in Million

Tonnes
2012 2018
Iron Ore Barbil/Daitari Kalinga Nagar In 0.48 1.16
DRI Grade Iron Ore Joda Kalinga Nagar In 0.48 1.74
Coking Coal Paradeep Kalinga Nagar In 0.54 1.31
Non-Coking Coal Talcher Kalinga Nagar In 0.48 1.74
Lime Stone Biramitrapur Kalinga Nagar In 0.04 0.09
Dolomite Biramitrapur Kalinga Nagar In 0.04 0.10
Steel Billets Kalinga Nagar Various Destinations Out 0.50 1.21
Coke Kalinga Nagar Rourkela Out 0.01 0.07
Coke Kalinga Nagar Jamshedpur Out 0.01 0.07
Coke Kalinga Nagar Kharagpur Out 0.01 0.07
Coke Kalinga Nagar Other destinations Out 0.01 0.07
Page 33
From the above traffic, the amount of traffic that is expected to get routed to the project line is as
follows:
Table 7-9: Origin-Destination based Divertible traffic on the project line for VISA Steel Ltd.

Non-Coking Coal Talcher Kalinga Nagar In 1.74 2.32
Steel Billets Kalinga Nagar Various Out 0.24 0.32
Destinations
Jindal Stainless Limited
Jindal Stainless Limited, has its manufacturing facility located at Kalinganagar. The plant has current
production capacity of 1.6 Million tones. All iron ore requirement is fulfilled by Banspani area and
coke is imported via Paradip port. The plant comprises of 250,000 tons per annum of Ferro Alloys
facilities and 1 MTPA of stainless steel making facilities with state-of-the-art technology. This
complex with captive power generation is scalable up to 3.2 million tons per annum of stainless steel
making, which will make it the worlds largest stainless steel facility at single site.
The plant is well connected by the Road (connectivity through NH-5) & Railway (Dubri-Banspani rail
line) and networks and is located within 150 kms from the mines and shipping port.
The rail-relevant traffic streams (along with the projected traffic for each stream) for the said
Table 7-10: Origin-Destination based Traffic Streams for Jindal Stainless Ltd.
Total Traffic in Million

Tonnes
2012 2018
Coke Paradeep Kalinga Nagar In 0.80 0.80
Iron Ore Banspani Kalinga Nagar In
1.80 1.80
Lime/Dolomite Satna Kalinga Nagar In
0.93 0.93
Lime/Dolomite Birmitrapur Kalinga Nagar In
0.19 0.19
DRI Koenjhar, Joda Kalinga Nagar In 0.16 0.16
Cast stainless Kalinga Nagar Domestic Out 0.29 0.29
Market
Cast stainless Kalinga Nagar Paradeep Out 0.29 0.29
Hot/cold Rolled products Kalinga Nagar Paradeep Out 0.46 0.46
Hot/cold Rolled products Kalinga Nagar Domestic Out 0.46 0.46
Market
Cold Pigs Kalinga Nagar Kolkata Out 0.04 0.04
Page 34
Cold Pigs Kalinga Nagar North Out
0.04 0.04
Ferro Chrome, Coke Kalinga Nagar Hissar Out
Breeze 0.18 0.18
From the above traffic, the traffic likely to move on the project stretch is as follows:
Table 7-11: Origin-Destination based Divertible traffic on the project line for Jindal Stainless Ltd.

Cast stainless Kalinga Nagar Domestic Market Out 0.14 0.14
Hot/cold Rolled Kalinga Nagar Domestic Market Out 0.23 0.23
products
Patnaik Steels and Alloys Pvt. Ltd.
Patnaik Steels & Alloys Ltd. has a fully Integrated Steel Manufacturing Plant at Purunapani in
Keonjhar. The plant comprises of (i) DRI Unit (ii) The Steel Melting Furnace (iii) Continuous Billet
Casting Plant and (iv) Captive Power Plant.
The annual capacity of the plant is 0.30 MTPA. The plant has Rail transport Clearance for the siding
but is yet to take action on the same. There are no future expansion plans of the plant for the next 5
years.
The traffic streams of the plant are as follows:
Table 7-12: Origin-Destination based Traffic Stream for Patnaik Steel and Alloys
Commodity Origin Destination In/Out 2012 (Traffic in MT)

Coal Talcher Nayagarh In 1.00
Iron Ore Raigarh Nayagarh In 0.50
Iron Ore Raipur Nayagarh In 0.50
Plates Nayagarh North India Out 0.15
Plates Nayagarh Western India Out 0.15
Page 35
From above analysis divertable traffic from the plant on the project stretch is as follows:
Table 7-13: Origin-Destination based Divertible Traffic on Project Stretch from Patnaik Steel
Commodity Origin Destination In/Out 2021 (in

MT)
Coal (MT) Talcher Nayagarh In 1.0
Maithan Ispat Ltd.
The plant is located in Jakhapura location and produce DRI grade iron. The annual capacity of the
plant is 0.27 MTPA. There are no expansion plans for the plant in next five years. The traffic stream
of the plant is as follows:
Table 7-14: Origin-Destination based Traffic Stream for Maithan Ispat
2012
(Traffic in MT)
Iron Ore Barbil Jakhapura In 0.36
Coal for DRI Talcher Jakhapura In 0.30
Coal for BF Talcher Jakhapura In 0.08
Coal for BF Paradeep Jakhapura In 0.08
Finished Products, Billets Rolled Products Jakhapura Kolkata Out 0.03
Finished Products, Billets Rolled Products Jakhapura Hyderabad Out 0.03
Finished Products, Billets Rolled Products Jakhapura Chennai Out 0.03
Finished Products, Billets Rolled Products Jakhapura Mumbai Out 0.03
Finished Products, Billets Rolled Products Jakhapura Raipur Out 0.03
Finished Products, Billets Rolled Products Jakhapura Delhi Out 0.03
Finished Products, Billets Rolled Products Jakhapura Paradeep Out 0.03
From above analysis divertible traffic from the plant on the project stretch is as follows:
Table 7-15: Origin-Destination based Divertible Traffic on project stretch from Maithan Ispat
Commodity Origin Destination In/Out 2020 (in MT)

Coal for DRI Talcher Jakhapura In 0.30
Coal for BF Talcher Jakhapura In 0.08
Tata Steel Ltd.
Page 36
Tata Steel is setting up a 6 MTPA integrated steel plant at Kalinganagar Industrial Complex at Duburi,
in the Jajpur district. The Steel Works will be established in two modules of 3 MTPA of steel each and
when completed, will have a capacity of 6 MTPA. The first phase will have 3 MTPA capacity and will
be completed in 2014, while the second phase is expected to be completed in 2020.
The traffic stream for the plant is as follows:
Table 7-16: Origin-Destination based Traffic Stream for TATA steel
2026
Commodity Origin Destination In/Out 2015 (MT)
(MT)
Iron Ore Banspani Kalinganagar In 2.63 5.25
Iron Ore Nayagarh Kalinganagar In 2.63 5.25
Thermal Coal Dhamra Kalinganagar In 0.53 1.05
Thermal Coal Domestic Coal Mines Kalinganagar In 0.53 1.05
Coal Dhamra Kalinganagar In 1.18 2.35
Coal Barkakhana Kalinganagar In 1.18 2.35
Limestone Dhamra Kalinganagar In 1.10 2.20
Steel (Coil, HR, CR) Kalinganagar Dhamra Out 0.40 0.80
Steel (Coil, HR, CR) Kalinganagar NGP Out 0.40 0.80
Steel (Coil, HR, CR) Kalinganagar GZB Out 0.40 0.80
Steel (Coil, HR, CR) Kalinganagar Bangalore Out 0.40 0.80
Steel (Coil, HR, CR) Kalinganagar Kolkata Out 0.40 0.80
Slag Kalinganagar Central India Out 1.00 2.00
Table 7-17: Origin-Destination based Potential Divertible traffic on project stretch from TATA Steel

Slag Kalinganagar Cement Plants in Out 0.20
Central India
Tata is currently sourcing its Coal for Barkakhana where they have their own captive mines. If in near
future plant intends to source its coal from Talcher Coal Fields, then it will be a potential traffic
which will move on the project stretch. Thus, consultants have taken the Coal traffic in their
optimistic scenario, which is as follow:

Thermal Coal Domestic Coal Mines Kalinganagar In 0.53 1.05
Coal Barkakhana Kalinganagar In 1.18 2.35
Page 37
MGM Steels Limited
The Company signed a MoU with Government of Odisha in the year 2006 for establishment of an
integrated steel plant in Dhenkanal district having a capacity of 0.25 million tonnes per annum. The
plant is under construction and will start production in next few years. Thus the traffic of plant is a
potential stream on the project stretch.
The traffic streams of the plant are as follows:
Table 7-18: Origin-Destination based Traffic Stream for MGM Steel
Commodity Origin Destination In/Out 2026 in MT

Coal Talcher Meramandali In 0.25
Coal Paradeep Meramandali In 0.25
Iron Ore Nayagarh Meramandali In 0.54
Steel Billets Meramandali Odisha Multiple Locations Out 0.12
Steel Billets Meramandali Paradeep Out 0.12
Pig Iron Meramandali Odisha Multiple Locations Out 0.06
Table 7-19: Origin-Destination based Potential Divertible traffic on project stretch from MGM Steel
Commodity Origin Destination In/Out 2026 in MT

Iron Ore Nayagarh Meramandali In 0.54
Monnet Ispat & Energy Ltd.
Monnet Ispat has signed a MoU with Odisha Government to set up a steel and power plant in
Kerejanga, Near Angul, Odisha. The power plant of the company is under construction while steel
plant is yet to take off. The steel plant with capacity of 1 MTPA is expected to come up in next few
years. The plant has the potential traffic to move on the project stretch.
The traffic streams for the plant will be as follows:
Table 7-20: Origin-Destination based Traffic Stream for Monnet Ispat

Iron Ore Joda Kerijanga In 0.69
Iron Ore Banspani Kerijanga In 0.69
Iron Ore Barbil Kerijanga In 0.69
Iron Ore Barajamda Kerijanga In 0.69
Dolomite Mandla Kerijanga In 0.90
Coke Paradeep Kerijanga In 0.36
Coal Kerijanga Bhupdeopur Out 0.73
Page 38
Coal Kerijanga Raipur Out 0.73
Coal Kerijanga Mandirhasaud Out 0.73
Finished Products, Billets Rolled Products Kerijanga All over India Out 1.00
Table 7-21: Origin-Destination based Potential Divertible traffic on project stretch from Monnet Ispat

Iron Ore Barajamda Kerijanga In 0.69
Odisha Sponge Iron Ltd
The production facilities are located at village Palaspanga, District Keonjhar, Odisha, which is about
245 kms from Bhubaneswar and 21 km from Keonjhar Town. The plant has the following production
facilities at the plant
Sponge Iron- 2,50,000 TPY,

Billet -1,00,000 TPY, and
Captive Power Plant of 36 MW.
The plant produces DRI grade iron and has the total capacity of 0.35 MT. Currently, the plant is not
operational due to some internal issues. There are no future expansion plans for the plant in next
few years. Once operational the plant will have potential traffic streams that will move on the
project stretch.
The traffic stream for the plant is as follow:
Table 7-22: Origin-Destination based Traffic Stream for Odisha Sponge Iron Ltd

Non Coking Coal Talcher Porjanpur IN 0.13
Non Coking Coal Paradip Port Porjanpur IN 0.32
Billets & Rolled Products Porjanpur Various Destinations Out 0.40
Iron Ore Porjanpur Bamra Out 1.10
Sponge Iron Porjanpur Various Destinations Out 0.08
Table 7-23: Origin-Destination based Potential Divertible traffic on project stretch from Odisha
Sponge Iron Ltd

Non Coking Coal Talcher Porjanpur IN 0.13
Page 39
Sree Metaliks Limited
Sree Metaliks comprises of a large integrated Steel Complexes at Angul with a production base for
Sponge Iron. The plant has total capacity of 0.25 MT. The plant has no expansion plans in the near
future. The traffic stream for the plant is as follows:
Table 7-24: Origin-Destination based Traffic stream for Sree Metallicks

Iron Ore Daitari Kerijanga In 0.09
Iron Ore Tensa Kerijanga In 0.09
Coal Brajrajnagar Kerijanga In 0.12
Coal Paradeep Kerijanga In 0.12
Coal Dhanbad Kerijanga In 0.12
Iron Ore Fines Kerijanga Paradeep Out 0.07
Iron Ore Fines Kerijanga Haldia Out 0.07
Finished Products, Billets Rolled Products Kerijanga Tata Out 0.03
Finished Products, Billets Rolled Products Kerijanga Bangalore Out 0.03
Finished Products, Billets Rolled Products Kerijanga Raipur Out 0.03
Finished Products, Billets Rolled Products Kerijanga Vizag Out 0.03
Finished Products, Billets Rolled Products Kerijanga Mandi Out 0.03
Govindgarh
Table 7-25: Origin-Destination based Potential Divertible traffic on project stretch from Sree
Metallicks

Iron Ore Daitari Kerijanga In 0.09
Iron Ore Tensa Kerijanga In 0.09
Mahanadi Coal Fields (MCL)
Presently, there is an outward movement of about 28 rakes per day from MCL. The company plans
to upgrade the rail loading capacity to 60 rakes per day by installing silos. Out of the 28 outward
rakes, approximately 14 are being transported to Paradip (11) and Dhamra (2~3) Ports for coastal
shipping to various parts of India. Some of the important coastal shipping destinations are Mundra
and Tuticorin. The difference in movement to both the ports is primarily because unlike Paradip
Page 40
Port, Dhamra Port does not have the facility to work with the bottom discharge BOBRN wagons that
result in faster unloading of wagons.
Table 7-26: Origin-Destination wise Existing Rake movement from MCL
Traffic
Traffic
(2012) in
Commodity Origin Destination In/ Out (2013) in No
No of
of Rakes
Rakes
Coal Talcher Dhamra Out 3 3
Coal Talcher Paradeep Out 11 11
Coal Talcher other Out 14 14
Total 28 28
Table 7-27: Origin-Destination wise Existing Traffic from MCL
Traffic Traffic
In/ (2012) in (2013) in
Company Commodity Origin Destination
Out Million Million
Tonnes Tonnes
Mahanadi Coal Fields Coal Talcher Dhamra Out 4.2 4.2
Mahanadi Coal Fields Coal Talcher Paradeep Out 15.4 15.4
Mahanadi Coal Fields Coal Talcher other Out 19.6 19.6
Paradip port is currently handling 23 MT coal and has proposal to expand its coal handling capacity
to approximately 30MT per year. The table below presents the traffic projections of Paradip Port.
Table 7-28: Expected Traffic Projection as on March 2012 of Paradip Port (in Million Tonnes)
Other
Year (FY) POL Iron Ore Coal Container Total
Cargoes
2008 1.74 12.95 18.08 0.05 9.62 42.44
2009 3.24 14.27 20.16 0.03 8.71 46.41
2010 6 15.55 24.97 0.3 9.48 56.3
2011 10.7 17 23 0.3 11 62
2012 13 22 23 0.5 11.5 70
2017 30 25 30 1 14 100
Dhamra port is also developing the facility for handling of BOBRN wagons. The facility is expected to
complete in next 2~3 years. With time, as the coastal shipping of coal increases and advent of
handling facilities at Dhamra, the traffic is expected to be equitably distributed to both the Ports.
Page 41
7.4. Connectivity
The traffic consultants have carried out a detailed analysis of this directional movement of various
commodities and the following observations are noteworthy:
Coal Movement:
o Talcher to Sambalpur/Jharsuguda: This comprises movement of coal to:
Bhushan Ltd (Lapanga)
SMC Power Generation Ltd (Brundamal)
Aryan Ispat & Power Ltd (Lapanga)
Viraj Steel & Energy (Rengali)
Shyam DRI Power (Rengali)
Considering that this movement is in the opposite direction to the project stretch,
these plants will not influence the traffic on the project stretch.
o Talcher to Sukinda: Coal movement from Talcher to Sukinda is for Maithan Ispat
(Jakhapura), Jindal Stainless Ltd (Jakhapura), VISA Industries (Jakhapura) and Tata
Steel (Kalinganagar). The consultants expect significant portion of this traffic to
move on the project line.
o Talcher to Banspani-Barbil: Talcher to Banspani movement feeds to the coal
requirement of various Iron & Steel Plants located in the Iron Ore belt. These include
Uttam Galva Steels (Porjanpur), Odisha Sponge Iron Ltd (Porjanpur), Patnaik Steels &
Alloys Ltd (Nayagarh). The shortest route for this movement is Talcher-Sukinda-
Banspani and, therefore, this traffic is expected to move on the project stretch.
o Talcher to Dhamra: Movement of Coal from Mahanadi Coal Fields, Talcher for power
houses in Southern and Western India via coastal shipping takes place through
Dhamra port and Paradip Port. Presently this traffic is moving to Paradip and
Dhamra port via via Rajatgarh, Cuttack, however the rail link from Talcher to Dhamra
port via the proposed project line will be shorter by 32 Kms. Thus, this coal traffic
from Talcher for Dhamra port is expected to move on the project line.
Iron Ore Movement:
o Banspani-Barbil to Sambalpur/Jharsuguda: This comprises of Iron Ore movement to
Steel Plant located in and around Jharsuguda (identified above). The present
movement of this Iron-Ore is from Banspani to Lapanga/Rengali is via Bondamunda
and Jharsuguda. The consultants expect this movement pattern to continue in future
as well. This traffic, therefore, is not expected to have any impact on the project
stretch.
o Banspani-Barbil to Angul/Talcher: Banspani to Angul movement feeds to the Iron
Ore requirement of Steel Plants located in and around Angul. These include:
Bhushan Steel & Strips (Meramandali)
BRG Iron & Steel (Meramandali)
Monnet Ispat & Energy (Kerejanga)
Sree Metaliks (Kerejanga)
MGM Steels (Meramandali)
Page 42
Jindal Steel & Power (Kerejanga)
As previously discussed, this OD pair will involve traffic movement via the project
stretch (Banspani-Sukinda-Angul) and, therefore, will have a direct impact on project
traffic.
o Banspani-Barbil to Sukinda: This comprises of movement of Iron Ore to steel plants
in and around Sukinda (as identified above). Considering that the movement is
outside the immediate catchment of the project line, it is unlikely that this will have
any impact on the project traffic.
Finished Iron & Steel Products:
o Angul to Paradeep Port, Sukinda to Dhamra Port & Banspani to Dhamra Port: All the
three OD pairs comprise of movement that is not in alignment with the project line.
The consultants, therefore, do not expect them to influence the project stretch
traffic.
o Angul to Dhamra Port: This comprises of export of finished iron & steel products
originating at various steel plants in Angul region (as identified previously).
Considering that the most feasible route for this movement is Angul-Sukinda-
Dhamra Port, the consultants expect significant portion of this traffic to move on the
project line.
Besides the above, traffic in the region also comprises of movement of commodities like Dolomite,
Limestone and other minerals to and from various locations, as identified above. There are also
three other steel and power plants located in close proximity of Cuttack that influence traffic in the
region. However, this traffic is not expected to move on the project stretch. These plants include:
SCAW Industries (Dhenkanal)

Arti Steels (Ghantikhal Nidhipur)
Maheshwary Ispat (Rajathgarh)
7.5. Impact of Competing Facility
Proposed Angul Sukinda new railway line connects Banspani-Daitari line (which caters to export iron
ore traffic from Joda-Barbil region and Import traffic from Dhamra and Paradip Ports) with Cuttack-
Sambalpur line (which caters to coal traffic from Talcher region destinaed to various parts of the
country by coastal shipping via Paradip Port)
Due to severe capacity constraints on Chennai-Visakhapatnam-Cuttack-Kolkata line (especially on

Barang-Cuttack section) coal traffic currentaly takite Dhenkanal-Cuttack-Paradip may shift to Angul-
Sukinda and Haridaspur-Paradip lines (both lines under construction). However, ongoing
improvements on Cuttack-Barang section might ease the capacity constraints currently faced by coal
traffic from Angul.
Page 43
Apart from coal traffic destined to Paradip port, Angul Sukinda line becomes the shortest route for
iron ore traffic from J0da-Barbil region and coal traffic from Talcher region. Hence no competing
facility can affect the estimated traffic on the Project line.
7.6. Infrastructure Capacity Analysis
7.6.1. Coal Traffic
According to Ministry of Coal, the state of Odisha has coal reserves of 71,447 Million Tons which
includes 25,547 MT of proved reserves, 36,465 Tons of indicated reserves. The states coal reserves
are divided mainly between two regions namely IB valley and Talcher coalfields. According to
Geological Survey of India, Talcher coalfields account from more than 60% of Odishas coal reserves.
Apart from catering to primary hinterland consumers in Sukinda and Joda-Barbil region, proposed
project will cater to the demand from various thermal power plants being developed across the
country (through coastal shipping from Paradip and Dhamra ports)
7.6.2. Iron ore Traffic
According Odisha mining department, the state accounts for 32% Iron ore, 24% coal, 59% Bauxite
and 98% Chromite of India's total deposits. Odishas iron ore is known for high quality iron content.
Due to various initiatives taken by State Government, many national and international steel making
companies have shown interest to setup manufacturing plants in Angul-Sukinda region. Proposed
Angul-Sukinda railway line will cater to incoming traffic (Iron ore) apart from Outgoing traffic
(finished goods) destinaed to various parts of India, especially the Eastern region which includes
Bihar, West Bengal, Jharkhand and North-Eastern states.
7.6.3. Dhamra Port
Proposed Project line is expected to cater to coal traffic destined to various parts of the country via
Coastal shipping from Dhamra port. Dhamra port is a 50:50 Joint Venture between Larsen & Toubro
and TAT steel. Known as one of the deep draft ports in the country, the port started commercial
operations in May 2011. Currently the port has two fully mechanized berths of 350 meters each
along with backup facilities for handling imports of coking coal, steam/thermal coal, limestone and
export of iron ore. The company also constructed a 62 kilometers rail link from Dhamra to Bhadrak
to provide evacuation by railway mode.
The master plan of the Port envisages 15 berths, capable of handling more than 100 Million Tons per
annum of dry bulk, liquid bulk, break bulk, containerized and general cargo, making Dhamra one of
the largest ports in the country. Proposed Angul Sukinda project line is expected to cater the
growing coal demand (thermal coal meant for coastal shipping and imported coking for steel
industries) through Dhamra port
Page 44
7.6.4. Paradip Port
Paradip port is one of the major ports under Central government catering mainly to mineral and
industrial traffic. The ports hinterland extends to the states of Odisha, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh,
West Bengal, Madhya Pradesh and Bihar. Currently the port is undertaking various capacity
expansion projects in order to accommodate larger vessels and to cater to increasing demand from
consumers. Major ongoing/proposed infrastructure projects of the port include:
1. Deepening of existing entrance and approach Channel to handle 1,25,000 DWT vessels
2. Development of Deep draught Iron Ore berth on BOT basis of 10 MTPA Capacity
3. Development of Deep Draught Coal Berth on BOT basis of 10 MTPA Capacity
4. Development of Multipurpose berth to handle clean cargo including Containers on BOT basis
with 5MTPA capacity
5. Mechanization of general cargo berths
Page 45
8. PROJECT TIMELINES & PRESENT STATUS
The main mile store and the corresponding critical dates for implementation of the project are
summarized below
Timeliness for the proposed projects (as fixed by ASRL)
Particulars Timeliness
Acquisition of Private Land December -2013
Acquisition of Forest land March - 2014
Commencement of Civil Works January - 2014
Commencement of Electrical & S&T works April - 2015
Completion of all Works March 2017
Commencement of operation March - 2017
8.1. Current Status of the project
The status of the project as on 30th June 2013 is as follows
8.1.1. Land Acquisition Status
Status of Private Land

Name of District
Village (Nos) Area (Acres) Village (Nos) Area (Acres)
Angul 7 122.055 3 11.420
Dhenkanal 49 804.326 31 286.905
Jajpur 13 279.120 4 32.680
Total 69 1205.501 38 331.005
The state government has assured that all the required private land for the project will be
acquired by September 2013.
Status of Government Land

Alienation
Sanctioned
Name of District
Village Area Village Area Village Area
(Nos) (Acres) (Nos) (Acres) (Nos) (Acres)
Angul 5 3.940 2 1.060 0 0
Dhenkanal 44 154.025 24 13.425 0 0
Jajpur 11 64.540 6 15.020 6 15.020
Total 60 222.505 32 29.505 6 15.020
Page 46
The state government has decided for revision of the cost of government land at par with the
bench mark price of private land, based on the representation of Railways against the
supposedly higher rate for govt. land. The government has also allowed the arrangement of
taking over of Govt. land, pending completion of paper formalities. Therefore the work can start
on government land immediately.
Status of Forest Land

Diversion proposal filed
Requirement of Land
( Nos. of village)
Name of District
Village Area Village Area
(Nos) (Acres) (Nos) (Acres)
Dhenkanal 33 125.430 33 125.430
Jajpur 13 125.630 13 125.630
Total 46 251.060 46 251.060
ASRL has engaged a Forest Consultant firm to assist in the process of forest diversion and
environment clearance work. Work is progressing on forest diversion work by way of state govt.
identifying the substitute degraded forest in lieu of the affected forest land and also in the digital
survey (DGPS) work. The stage I forest clearance proposal is planned to be presented to
Government of India before the end of this year.
8.1.2. Civil construction
The construction of the project has already been started by RVNL by awarding civil contracts
for Bridge work. The construction of Major bridge on river Brahmani , the longest bridge of
the project, is in progress having physical progress of 30%. Similarly work of bridges ( 2 nos)
on Rengali canal has also been taken up.
The tender for roadbed and minor bridge work for a stretch of 25 kms is expected to be
awarded by the end of year 2013.
The contract for track linking, Signalling and OHE will be awarded after achievement of 40 %
physical progress of civil works.
8.2. Permission and approvals
ASRL has initiated the process of arranging the necessary permission/approvals required for the
smooth implementation of the project. The process for obtaining environmental clearance from
the MoE&F, Govt of India is also in progress.
The project is planned to be completed by the year 2017. Proposed construction plan for the project
is as follows
Page 47
8-1: Proposed Construction Plan for Angul Sukinda Railway Line
Construction Cost (Rs. Crores)

Department up to 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total
Civil 84.75 130.00 320.00 340.00 147.25 1022.00
S&T 18.50 33.20 51.70
Elect 62.00 67.00 129.00
Total 84.75 130.00 320.00 420.50 247.45 1202.70
The Project has been identified as an important infrastructure Project for the state of Odisha and is
now featuring in the review of the Project Monitoring Group of union cabinet secretariat. With
expertise of RVNL in rail link construction and association of State Govt as equity partners, the
Project is expected to be completed within the targeted period.
Page 48
9. PROFITABILITY PROJECTIONS
The detailed assumption sheet for the profitability projections is given in ANNEXURE IV: MAJOR
ASSUMPTIONS. A brief of the same is given below:
Revenue Assumptions
a. Traffic
The traffic estimation as provided by traffic consultant is given below.
Traffic in MT
S. No. Commodity
2018 2023 2025 2028 2033 2038 2043 2047
1 Coal 7.96 14.01 14.70 19.01 21.81 23.64 23.64 23.64
2 Iron Ore 19.27 26.68 27.98 30.59 31.96 38.69 38.69 38.69
3 Steel 1.90 2.74 2.88 3.25 3.25 4.11 4.11 4.11
Total 29.13 43.43 45.56 52.84 57.01 66.43 66.43 66.43
The traffic through proposed line is provided by traffic consultant for years 2018, 2023, 2025, 2028,
2033, 2038, 2043 and 2047. The traffic projections for remaining years are estimated through linear
extrapolation of the traffic numbers as provided in the table above. Based on the traffic estimation
for different years, the number of rakes is also estimated which are given in the table below.
b. Freight Rates
The traffic revenue is calculated based on the freight rates as effective from April 1, 2013. The
freight rates are given in ANNEXURE VI: FREIGHT RATES .The commodities are classified into
different classes based on which freight rates could be identified for that particular lead.
According to Goods Tariff No.46 Pt. I (Vol. II), the corresponding classes for commodities travelling
through ASRL line is given in the table below.
S. No Commodities Class
1 Iron Ore 180
2 Thermal Coal 150
3 Coking Coal 150
4 Steel 180
I. Traffic Scenarios
Based on the individual traffic streams discussed in the previous section, the consultants have done
a detailed traffic analysis to assess the current traffic on the project line by taking into consideration
various factors. The factors being likelihood of the traffic using the project section, distance
advantage on using the project section, current status of the plant etc.
Page 49
Consultants have prepared three scenarios of traffic considering all the factors which will affect the
project line. The three scenarios are described as below:
a. Pessimistic Scenario
The scenario is prepared by taking the traffic of the plants on the current capacities. Future
Capacities of the plants wherever available is taken as per their plans while where no expansion plan
was available the capacity of the plants is kept constant for the project. Traffic of the plants that are
not operational as per our survey is not considered. The capacity of the plants and the phasing are as
below:
Table 9-1: Assumed Capacities of Plant in Pessimistic Scenario
Capacity (MTPA) 2012 2018 2026 2036

Bhushan Steel and Strips 2.2 2.2 4.7 4.7
Jindal Steel & Power - 6.0 9.0 9.0
Jindal Stainless 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75
VISA Steel 0.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
BRG Iron & Steel 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
Uttam Gulva Steels Ltd Plant yet to start construction
Mahanadi Coal Fields
Odisha Sponge Iron Ltd Production Closed
Patnaik Steels and Alloys Pvt. 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27
Ltd.
Maithan Ispat Ltd. 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Tata Steel Ltd. 3.0 3.0 3.0 6.0
MGM Steels Limited No information
Monnet Ispat & Energy Ltd. Plant yet to start construction
Sree Metaliks Limited No information
9-2: Traffic for Mahanadi Coal fields in Pessimistic Scenario
Commodity Origin Destination In/Out 2012 2018 2024 2030 2036 2042
Coal in MT Talcher Dhamra Out 4.2 5.6 9.8 11.2 12.6 14.0
No of Rakes Talcher Dhamra Out 3 4 7 8 9 10
b. Realistic Scenario
The scenario is prepared by taking the traffic of the plants on the current and future capacities.
Future capacities of the plants wherever available is taken as per their plans while where no
expansion plan was available the capacity of the plants is assumed as given in table below. Traffic of
the plants that are not currently operational are assumed to become operational in a phased
manner. The capacity of the plants and the phasing are as below:
Page 50
Table 9-3: Assumed Capacities of Plant in Realistic Scenario
Capacity (MTPA) 2012 2018 2026 2036

Jindel Stainless 1.75 1.75 2.5 2.5
VISA Steel 0.5 1.5 1.5 2.0
BRG Iron & Steel 0.6 0.6 0.6 1.0
Odisha Sponge Iron Ltd - - 0.35 0.35
Patnaik Steels and Alloys Pvt.
0.27 0.27 0.27 0.5
Ltd.
Tata Steel Ltd. 3.0 3.0 6.0 6.0
MGM Steels Limited - - 0.3 0.3
Monnet Ispat & Energy Ltd. - - 1.0 1.0
Sree Metaliks Limited - - 0.25 0.25
9-4: Traffic for Mahanadi Coal fields in Realistic Scenario
c. Optimistic Scenario
The scenario is prepared by taking the traffic of the plants on the current and future capacities. It has
been assumed that the plants will expand in the future based on the trend of their current expansion
plans. It has also been assumed that the existing expansion plants will materialize on time.
Moreover, the plants that are not currently operational due to internal issues will become
operational in a phased manner in near future. The assumed capacity of the plants and the assumed
phasing are provided in the table below:
Table 9-5: Assumed Capacities of Plant in Optimistic Scenario
Capacity (MTPA) 2012 2018 2035 2040

Jindel Stainless 1.75 1.75 2.5 4.0
VISA Steel 0.5 1.5 2.0 3.0
BRG Iron & Steel 0.6 0.6 1.0 1.0
Odisha Sponge Iron Ltd - 0.35 0.35 0.35
Patnaik Steels and Alloys Pvt. Ltd. 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5
Tata Steel Ltd. 3.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Page 51
MGM Steels Limited - 0.3 0.3 0.3
Monnet Ispat & Energy Ltd. - 1.0 1.0 1.0
Sree Metaliks Limited - 0.25 0.25 0.25
9-6: Traffic for Mahanadi Coal fields in Optimistic Scenario
II. Company Wise Traffic
The resultant total potential traffic for the region in pessimistic scenario is provided in the table
below:
Table 9-7: Total Traffic of the Region in Pessimistic Scenario
Traffic in MT
Company
2012 2018 2023 2025 2028 2033 2038 2043 2047
BRG Iron & Steel 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2
Jindal Steel & Power - 46.3 69.4 69.3 69.4 69.4 69.4 69.4 69.4
Bhushan Steel and Strips 13.5 23.2 23.2 23.2 23.2 23.2 23.2 23.2 23.2
VISA Steel 2.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6
Jindal Stainless - 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6
Mahanadi Coal Fields 39.2 47.6 51.8 54.6 67.2 74.2 84.0 84.0 84.0
Odisha Sponge Iron Ltd - - - - - - - - -
Patnaik Steels and Alloys Pvt. 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3
Ltd.
Maithan Ispat Ltd. 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Tata Steel Ltd. - 12.8 12.8 12.8 12.8 25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5
MGM Steels Limited - - - - - - - - -
Monnet Ispat & Energy Ltd. - - - - - - - - -
Sree Metaliks Limited - - - - - - - - -
Total 61.8 149.6 176.9 179.7 192.3 212.0 221.8 221.8 221.8
Page 52
Table 9-8: Commodity wise traffic in Pessimistic Scenario
S. Traffic in MT
Commodity
No. 2012 2018 2023 2025 2028 2033 2038 2043 2047
1 Coal 49.6 92.1 109.2 111.9 124.6 134.9 144.7 144.7 144.7
2 Iron Ore 6.9 31.4 36.8 36.8 36.8 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0
3 Minerals 1.6 8.6 10.5 10.5 10.5 11.6 11.6 11.6 11.6
4 Steel 3.7 17.5 20.5 20.5 20.5 23.5 23.5 23.5 23.5
Total 61.8 149.6 176.9 179.7 192.3 212.0 221.8 221.8 221.8
The resultant total potential traffic for the region in realistic scenario is provided in the table below:
Table 9-9: Total Traffic of the Region in Realistic Scenario
Traffic in MT
Company
2012 2018 2023 2025 2028 2033 2038 2043 2047
BRG Iron & Steel 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 5.3 5.3 5.3
Bhushan Steel and Strips 13.5 23.2 23.2 23.2 36.8 36.8 36.8 36.8 36.8
VISA Steel 2.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 10.2 10.2 15.3 15.3 15.3
Odisha Sponge Iron Ltd - - 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Patnaik Steels and Alloys Pvt. 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 3.8 3.8 3.8
Ltd.
Tata Steel Ltd. - 12.8 12.8 12.8 25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5
MGM Steels Limited - - - - 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
Monnet Ispat & Energy Ltd. - - 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2
Sree Metaliks Limited - - - - 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Total 61.8 151.0 188.9 188.9 236.6 245.0 289.2 289.2 289.2
Table 9-10: Commodity wise traffic in Realistic Scenario
S. Traffic in MT
Commodity
No. 2012 2018 2023 2025 2028 2033 2038 2043 2047
1 Coal 49.6 93.5 115.0 115.0 138.8 147.2 174.4 174.4 174.4
2 Iron Ore 6.9 31.4 40.6 40.6 52.3 52.3 61.6 61.6 61.6
3 Minerals 1.6 8.6 11.4 11.4 16.4 16.4 19.2 19.2 19.2
4 Steel 3.7 17.5 22.0 22.0 29.1 29.1 34.0 34.0 34.0
Total 61.8 151.0 188.9 188.9 236.6 245.0 289.2 289.2 289.2
Page 53
The resultant total potential traffic for the region in optimistic scenario is provided in the table
below:
Table 9-11: Total Traffic of the Region in optimistic scenario
Traffic in MT
Company
2012 2018 2023 2025 2028 2033 2038 2043 2047
BRG Iron & Steel 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3
Bhushan Steel and 13.5 23.2 36.8 36.8 36.8 45.4 45.4 45.4 45.4
Strips
VISA Steel 2.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 10.2 10.2 15.3 15.3 15.3
Odisha Sponge Iron Ltd - 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Patnaik Steels and 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8
Alloys Pvt. Ltd.
Tata Steel Ltd. - 12.8 25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5
MGM Steels Limited - 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
Monnet Ispat & Energy - - 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2
Ltd.
Sree Metaliks Limited - 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
61.8 156.8 220.5 221.9 243.1 285.7 305.4 305.4 305.4
Table 9-12: Commodity Wise traffic in Optimistic Scenario
S. Traffic in MT
Commodity
No. 2012 2018 2023 2025 2028 2033 2038 2043 2047
1 Coal 49.6 96.2 126.2 127.6 143.2 167.1 179.8 179.8 179.8
2 Iron Ore 6.9 33.5 50.5 50.5 53.4 63.0 66.6 66.6 66.6
3 Minerals 1.6 8.6 15.8 15.8 16.9 20.5 21.7 21.7 21.7
4 Steel 3.7 18.4 28.0 28.0 29.7 35.2 37.3 37.3 37.3
Total 61.8 156.8 220.5 221.9 243.1 285.7 305.4 305.4 305.4
III. Commodity Wise Railable Traffic
On the basis of the analysis of individual traffic streams, as provided in the previous section, the total
railable traffic under various scenarios is provided in this section.
Page 54
The total railable traffic in pessimistic scenario is provided in the table below:
Table 9-13: Commodity wise Railable Traffic on the project stretch in Pessimistic Scenario
Traffic in MT
S. No. Commodity
2018 2023 2025 2028 2033 2038 2043 2047
1 Coal 6.56 11.08 13.88 15.28 16.68 18.08 18.08 6.56
2 Iron Ore 19.27 25.31 25.31 25.31 25.31 25.31 25.31 19.27
3 Steel 1.90 2.74 2.74 2.74 2.94 2.94 2.94 1.90
Total 27.73 39.13 41.93 43.33 44.93 46.33 46.33 27.73
The total railable traffic in realistic scenario is provided in the table below:
Table 9-14: Commodity wise Railable Traffic on the project stretch in Realistic Scenario
Traffic in MT
S. No. Commodity
20181 2023 2025 2028 2033 2038 2043 2047
1 Coal 7.96 14.01 14.70 19.01 21.81 23.64 23.64 23.64
2 Iron Ore 19.27 26.68 27.98 30.59 31.96 38.69 38.69 38.69
3 Steel 1.90 2.74 2.88 3.25 3.25 4.11 4.11 4.11
Total 29.13 43.43 45.56 52.84 57.01 66.43 66.43 66.43
The traffic expected to be generated on the project line is approximately 29.13 MT in the first year of
operations 2017-18 and 66.43 MT for the target year 2046-47, which will be beyond the capacity of
the project line. There will be requirement of double line in the year 2024-25 where traffic is
approximately 45.56 MT and will exceed the capacity of single line (considering 50% empty returns
of rakes). Thus for financial analysis, traffic has been capped at 45.56 MT for analytical purposes.
The total railable traffic in optimistic scenario is provided in the table below:
Table 9-15: Commodity wise Railable Traffic on the project stretch in Optimistic Scenario
Traffic in MT
S. No. Commodity
2018 2023 2025 2028 2033 2038 2043 2047
1 Coal 9.49 18.43 19.83 22.47 24.85 27.41 27.41 27.41
2 Iron Ore 19.27 30.59 30.59 31.01 41.97 41.97 41.97 41.97
3 Steel 1.90 3.01 3.01 3.25 4.00 4.48 4.48 4.48
Total 30.67 52.02 53.42 56.73 70.82 73.86 73.86 73.86
Page 55
IV. O&M Cost
This section briefs the procedure used for calculation of O&M cost and the calculated O&M cost for
the project corridor.
Table 9-16: Project Details for calculation of O&M cost by Fixed Cost & Variable Cost method
S. No. Characteristics Detail

1 Length of Section 104.24 Km
2 Equated Track Km 184.24
3 Single / Double line Single line
4 Mode of Traction Electric
5 Number of Stations 9
6 Length of Bridges 3161.9 M
7 Wagon Days 380063
8 GTKM (in 000 for year 2017-18) (Diesel) 4480632
9 NTKM (in 000 for year 2017-18) 3039612
10 Engine Hours (for year 2017-18) 50880.56
Further, it may be noted that relevant cost items for various faucets of cost have been adopted from
relevant statements of East Coast Railway. In the fixed cost, staff cost has not been taken into
account. Staff cost has been taken separately. Loco hire charges and wagon hire charges have been
taken from Railway Boards circular. All the performance parameters have been adopted from
Annual Statistical Statement 2011-12, General Managers Annual Narrative Report.
The basis of the cost components for each department are provided in ANNEXURE V: WORKINGS
OF O&M COST FCVC Method.
a. Cost Components
Total O&M cost comprises of following components:
a) Fixed Cost
Engineering Dept.
S&T Dept
Electrical Dept
Traffic Dept
Staff Cost
b) Variable Cost
Cost of Running Repairs of Wagons
Loco Hire Charges
Wagon Hire Charges
Lube Costs
Fuel Costs
Cost of Crew
c) Indirect Cost
Cost for Compensation Claims
Page 56
Documentation Cost
b. Staff Cost
The number of Railway staff along with their total cost has been projected for operations of the
project line in the year 2017-18 and the same is presented in the table below:
Table 9-17: Staff Strength
STAFF Reqd. In Total Staff Cost (In

Group C Group D
(2017-18) Rs.)
Engineering
Permanent Way 69 6 63 14574936.00
Works 30 5 25 6811660.00
Bridges 30 5 25 6811660.00
S&T
Signal 17 5 12 4290076.00
Telecom 17 5 12 4290076.00
Operating 58 29 29 17007340.00
Commercial 8 4 4 2345840.00
Mechanical 0
Electrical (Genl.) 21 6 15 5264472.00
Traction 42 12 30 10528944.00
General Services 23 3 20 5056836.00
TOTAL (in Rs.) 315 80 235 76981840.00
Staff Cost Rate as per ASS-2011-12 392492.00 193968.00
(in Rs.)
[For Group C & D - Others] For Running Staff For Others 76981840.00
GRAND TOTAL (Rs. In Lakh) Rs. in Lakh 769.82
Escalated to 2013-14 from 2011-12 25.29% Rs. in Lakh 964.51
-Factor
Based on the estimated number of additional staff for the project and using average staff cost on
East Coast Railway for 2011-12 (from Annual Statistical Statement 2011-12, Statement 40 II,
Column 24 (b)), total staff cost has been arrived at. Total staff cost has been escalated by 25.29% to
arrive at the cost in 2013-14.
c. Total O&M Cost
Total O&M cost has been estimated as the sum of Fixed Cost, Variable Cost and Indirect Cost. O&M
costs estimated for the project line is presented below for year 2017-18.
Table 9-18: Details of O&M Costs for 2017-18
Sl. No. Cost Items Costs in Rs. Million for 2017-18

Fixed Costs
1 Engineering Dept. 31.31
2 Signal & Telecom Dept 5.82
3 Electrical Dept 20.45
Page 57
4 Traffic Dept 3.28
5 Staff Costs 96.45
Sub-Total Fixed Cost 157.30
Variable Costs -
6 Cost of Running Repairs of Wagons 26.35
7 Loco Hire charges 61.63
8 Wagon Hire Charges 455.30
9 Lub. Costs 0.13
10 Fuel Costs - Electric 196.23
11 Cost of Crew 122.10
Sub-Total Variable Cost 861.73
Indirect Costs
12 Cost For Compensation Claims 0.46
13 Documentation Cost 0.32
Sub-Total Variable & Indirect Costs 862.52
Total Costs 1019.816
d. Summary of O&M Cost
Summary of O&M Cost is provided in the table below:
Table 9-19: Summary of O&M Cost (in Rs. Million)
Year 2018 2023 2025 2028 2033 2038 2043 2047

O&M Cost 1,019.82 1,443.63 1,506.41 1,506.41 1,506.41 1,506.41 1,506.41 1,506.41
V. Funding
The cost of debt has been assumed at 11%. The funding pattern for the project that emerges is as
follows:
Table 9-20: Landed Project Cost
Construction Phasing C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 Total

Construction cost 848 1,300 3,200 4,205 2,475 12,027
Preliminary and pre-operative expenses 60 60
Total 908 1,300 3,200 4,205 2,475 12,087
IDC - - 70 393 828 1,292
Total Landed Cost (in Million) 908 1,300 3,270 4,599 3,303 13,379
No escalation in cost has been considered for the analytical purposes. The Preliminary & pre-
operative expenses have been assumed at 0.5% of the capital cost. The interest during construction
cost comes to Rs. 1,292 Million.
Table 9-21: Financing Schedule
Financing Schedule\FY 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Page 58
Equity 908 1,300 1,992 - -
Debt - - 1,278 4,599 3,303
Total 908 1,300 3,270 4,599 3,303
The landed cost of the project comes to Rs. 13,379 Million.
For the amortization of debt, following assumptions have been used:
The principle debt details are as follows:

o Moratorium for principle repayment post construction: 1 years
o Debt repayment tenure post moratorium: 10 years
o Interest rate: 11%
VI. Key Indicators of Financial Analysis
Based on the above stated inputs, the exercise of financial analysis has been carried out for the
proposed project. The indicators estimated in the process are:
a. Post-Tax Project Internal Rate of Return (P-IRR)
IRR indicates the return a project will generate over a period of time. It is that rate of discount,
which makes the Net Present Value equal to zero. Internal Rate of Return on Project is the return on
the total project cash flows.
b. Post-Tax Equity Internal Rate of Return (E-IRR)
IRR indicates the return a project will generate over a period of time. It is that rate of discount,
which makes the Net Present Value equal to zero. Internal Rate of Return on Equity (E-IRR) is the
return that accrues on the equity investment. The return for viability depends upon the expectation
from the investment and accounts for taxes, interest, loan repayment, etc.
c. Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR)
DSCR is the amount of cash flow available to meet annual interest and principal payments on debt,
including sinking fund payments. DSCR = Net Operating Income / Total Debt Service
d. Results
The financial analysis has been carried out using the inputs as already explained above. The outputs
for the financial indicators are shown in the table below:
Table 9-22: Key financial indicators
Key Financial Indicators

Pre-tax IRR 21%
Post-Tax IRR 18.1%
Equity IRR 23.2%
Minimum DSCR 1.46
Average DSCR 2.52
Page 59
9.1. Sensitivity Analysis
Project Cost vs IRR
Project IRR Equity IRR M-DSCR A-DSCR

-50% 28.9% 31.5% 5.64 10.76
-40% 25.7% 29.5% 3.45 6.45
-30% 23.3% 27.6% 2.54 4.64
-20% 21.3% 26.0% 2.03 3.63
-10% 19.5% 24.6% 1.69 2.97
0% 18.1% 23.2% 1.46 2.52
10% 16.8% 21.8% 1.28 2.19
20% 15.7% 20.4% 1.14 1.94
30% 14.7% 19.1% 1.03 1.75
40% 13.9% 17.9% 0.94 1.59
50% 13.1% 16.7% 0.87 1.46
Revenue vs IRR
Project IRR Equity IRR M-DSCR A-DSCR

-50% 6.9% 5.8% 0.53 0.92
-40% 9.8% 10.2% 0.75 1.25
-30% 12.2% 14.0% 0.93 1.57
-20% 14.3% 17.4% 1.10 1.89
-10% 16.3% 20.4% 1.28 2.21
0% 18.1% 23.2% 1.46 2.52
10% 19.7% 25.7% 1.62 2.83
20% 21.3% 28.0% 1.77 3.14
30% 22.7% 30.1% 1.92 3.45
Page 60
10. RISK & SWOT ANALYSIS
10.1. Risk Analysis: Allocation & Mitigation
Any infrastructure project, normally, undergoes three standard stages in its entire duration. These
are:
Project Development Stage

Project Construction Stage
Project Operations Stage
The kind of risks that a project may get exposed to during each of these stages differ significantly
from each other and, therefore, the approach towards their planning and mitigation has to be
accordingly appropriate. The following table enumerates the various risk and mitigation strategies,
thereof, for the Angul Sukinda new line project.
Table 10-1: Project Risk & Mitigation Strategies
Type of RIsk Allocated to Mitigation Measures

RVNL has executed projects like Gandhidham-
Palanpur Gauge conversion Project of Kutch
Railway Company Limited, a part line of the
Construction
Krishnapatnam Port Connectivity project of
Agreement is
Krishnapatnam Railway Company Limited, etc.
Project Cost & Time over run expected to
the experience of which is expected to enable it
be signed
to complete the Project within the estimated
with RVNL
time and cost. Further a contingency of 3% of the
hard cost in order to take care of any time and
cost over run
ECoR is a zone of Indian Railways which is one of
the largest rail networks in the world. ECoR has
extensive expertise in managing rail operations
O&M and is already acting as an O&M entity for
Agreement is number of projects and has the expertise to
expected to handle current Project.
O&M Cost overrun
be signed Various facets of O&M cost have been adopted
with East from relevant statements of East Coast Railway
Coast railway provided in Annual Statistics Statement of Indian
Railways.
Hence occurrence of O&M cost overrun is

extremely minimal
ASRL is a SPV with RVNL, a public undertaking of
Indian Railway, Odisha Govt. (since consent has
ASRL
been received) and Jindal Steel & Power Ltd as
Management Risk RVNL
stake holders. Further ASRL has a Railway
ECoR
professional person as Managing Director backed
by other expert personnel in the BOD of ASRL.
Page 61
RVNL, responsible for executing the project work
has got immense expertise and experience in
railway infrastructure works. Besides RVNL has
the largest share in the SPV and therefore will
take all steps to ensure that the project is
completed in most economical & minimal period.
The State Govt. now being the stakeholder will

extend all possible help in land acquisition &
forest and environmental clearance of the
project. East Coast Railway has the distinction of
having one of the lowest Operating Ratio, the
index of overall performance of a Zonal railway
and they will be responsible for operation and
maintenance of the project line. Besides Angul-
Sukinda line is a mid section connectivity line for
a East Coast Railway network, the later will
ensure better operating performances over the
new line as that would add up to East Coast
Railways revenue.
Will be confirmed prior to the signing of Construction Agreement

Technology Risk
with RVNL
Three different scenarios are considered for

traffic projections (Optimistic, Pessimistic &
Realistic) in order to understand potential traffic
risk. Moreover, this being mid-section line, the
major risk of generated traffic is not applicable
Traffic Risk ASRL on this line. Moreover, once it is operational it
will become the shortest route between Iron Ore
rich Joda-Barbil and Steel industries in Angul
region; Between Talcher coal fields and
consumer industries in Sukinda, Joda-Barbil &
Consumers in Eastern India
Once operational, Angul Sukinda line will
become the shortest route between Iron Ore rich
Joda-Barbil and Steel industries in Agul region;
Between Talcher coal fields and consumer
Competitors Risk ASRL industries in Skinda, Joda-Barbil/Consumers in
Eastern India
No significant competition is expected for the
current Project from any of the existing or
proposed Infrastructure projects
Both Paradip and Dhamra ports have plans to
increase the total handling capacity to 100
Capacity Constraints NA
Million Tons. Mahanadi Coal Fields is also
planning to increase production capacity.
Page 62
Hence capacity constraints risk is minimal
Dhamra port is planning to increase the capacity
to 100 million tons
Adequate insurance cover shall be obtained for
Force Majeure Risk Insurer
insurable Force Majeure risks
Current sponsors of ASRL include RVNL and JSPL
(Apart from confirmed assurance from Odisha
Government and Odisha Mining Corporation).
RVNL has expertise in construction of similar

projects across the country. The company has
already formed four Special Purpose Vehicles to
implement similar projects
With production capacity of 4.5 Million Tons (3

mn Tons steel and 1.5 mn Tons of Hot Briquetted
Iron), JSPL is one of the largest steel
manufacturers in the country. The company has
a revenue of USD 3.64bn and cash profit of USD
0.84 bn
Funding Risk Shareholders
The state of Odisha is known for its mineral
resources. With development of infrastructure
and connectivity, the state is expected to receive
large scale investments in mineral based
industries
Established in year 1956, Odisha Mining

Corporation is a state owned PSU of Government
of Odisha. The company is engaged in mining of
Chrome, Iron Ore and manganese Ore catering
to mineral based industries such as steel, sponge
iron, pig iron, Ferro-manganese, Ferro-chrome,
etc. OMC is 100% debt-free company and has a
turnover of RS. 1658.14 crores and net profit of
Rs.896.10 crores (FY-13, provisional)
Concessionaire Event of Default ASRL
10.2. SWOT Analysis
As part of the bankability study for the Angul-Sukinda Rd rail line, the consultants have identified
various strengths and weaknesses of the project that, depending upon the turn of events, will serve,
both, as opportunities as well as threats to the project. The figure below presents a summary of the
SWOT analysis carried out for the project. This analysis is critical, not only to the scope of the current
study, but will also be relevant in case of future decisions, as and when they need to be made.
Page 63
Figure 2: Summary of SWOT Analysis
STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES
The project route is the Despite being the shortest in
shortest route to serve the length, the project route faces
requirement fo Steel and competition from multiple
Thermal Power plants for coal alternative routes that may
and iron-ore negatively impact the project
Majority of traffic is through in traffic
nature, reducing the cost for Due to the limits raised by its
provision and maintenance of direction & alignment the
terminal facilities project route can not cater to
part of the region's traffic for
areas like Lapanga, etc
OPPORTUNITIES THREATS
There is a possibility of a Despite the scope for
further increase in project significant increase in traffic,
traffic in case the traffic the project route is limited by
originating from Mahanadi its own capacity. Timely plans
Coal Fields and destined to for capacity expansion are
Paradeep Port shifts to required
Dhamra Port Some of the existing plants in
The project route can serve as the project vicinity are not
a potential route of choice for operational. The project may
any upcoming plants in the severely be impacted if any of
region the other plants in the region
share a similar fate
Page 64
11. CONCLUSIONS
It is evident from the financial appraisal of the project, that the project is viable as well as bankable.
Since the Angul Sukinda Rail Project is already sanctioned work and the SPV for the project is already
operating, this report reaffirms the high returns of the project which had already been brought out
in the previous bankability study conducted by RVNL.
Moreover, the project is able to withstand cost and revenue variations of up to 20%. The only major
point to be kept in mind while implementing the project is that no further cost / time overruns are
allowed to happen on the project else the plans of various steel plants in the region may go haywire
and same shall have serious implications on the viability of the project.
11.1. Recommendations
With respect to implementation of the project, the consultants recommend the following:
The project influence region is mineral rich; hence the steel and power plants planned in the
region have high probability of materializing. The traffic assessed under the realistic scenario
for the project is as provided below:
Traffic in MT
S. No. Commodity
2018 2023 2025 2028 2033 2038 2043 2047
1 Coal 7.96 14.01 14.70 19.01 21.81 23.64 23.64 23.64
2 Iron Ore 19.27 26.68 27.98 30.59 31.96 38.69 38.69 38.69
3 Steel 1.90 2.74 2.88 3.25 3.25 4.11 4.11 4.11
Total 29.13 43.43 45.56 52.84 57.01 66.43 66.43 66.43
Keeping in view the quantum of traffic assessed and the line capacity of the single line, we
have capped the traffic after FY 2024-25 at 45.56 MT for the purposes of financial analysis.
The actual assessed traffic is much higher in the future years, thereby mitigating the traffic
risk to an extent.
The project has impressive returns and is able to withstand cost and revenue variations of
up to 20%. Hence, the investors for the project will not have any difficulty in getting the
anticipated returns on the project.
Since the line capacity is getting breached post 2025-26, we recommend that planning for
the doubling of the project may be initiated as early as possible so as to initiate the doubling
project by 2019-20 and complete it before the single line capacity gets exhausted.
Page 65
ANNEXURE I: RVNL PROJECT STATUS
I. Completed Projects
1 Abu Road - Sarotra Road patch doubling

2 Aligarh - Ghaziabad 3rd line doubling
3 Arasikere-Hassan-Mangalore gauge
4 Barauni - Tilrath Bypass doubling
5 Bharuch - Samni - Dahej Gauge Conversion
6 Bhildi - Samdari Gauge Conversion
7 Bhubaneswar - Kottavalasa Elect
8 Cuddalore - Salem Gauge Conversion
9 Daitari - Banspani new line
10 Delhi - Rewari Gauge Conversion
11 Diva - Kalyan 5th & 6th line
12 Gandhidham - Palanpur Gauge Conversion
13 Gooty - Renigunta patch doubling
14 Gurup - Saktigarh Extn of 3rd line
15 Hospet - Guntakal doubling
16 Kharagpur (Nimpura) Bhubaneswar
17 Pakni - Mohol doubling
18 Pakni - Solapur doubling
19 Panskura - Haldia PH 1 doubling
20 Panvel - Jasai JNPT doubling
21 Pattabiram - Triuvallur 4th line &
22 Pullampet - Balapalle PH I of Gooty -
23 Talchar-Cuttack-Paradeep doubling with 2nd bridge on Rivers Birupa and
Mahanadi
24 Thanjavur - Villupuram Gauge Conversion
25 Tomka -Banaspani RE
26 Vallaparpadm - Idapally New line
II. Projects under Implementation
1 Angul - Sukinda new line

2 Attipattu - Korukkupet 3rd line doubling
3 Baranagar -Barrackpore & Dakshineswar - Construction of Metro Railway Line
4 Barauni - New Loco Shed to home 100 Electric Locos
5 Barkhera- Budni 3rd line
6 Bhagat ki Kothi - Luni doubling
7 Bhopal - Bina 3rd line doubling
8 Bilaspur - Urkura 3rd line doubling
Page 66
9 Bina - Kota doubling with re
10 Budni - Itarsi 3rd line
11 Buramara - Chakulia - New line with upgrading of Rupsa - Buramara
12 Construction of Multi-Functional Complexs(mfcs)
13 Cuddapah - Bangalore New line
14 Cuttack - Barang doubling
15 Dalli - Rajhara Raoghat
16 Dankuni - Furfura New line
17 Dankuni - setting up of Electric loco Assembly and Ancillary unit of CLW
18 Daund - Gulbarga doubling
19 Dighi port - New line
20 Dimapur - Kohima - New line
21 Dum Dum airport - New Garia via Raerhat
22 Goelkera - Manoharpur 3rd line doubling
23 Guntur - Tenali doubling with electrification
24 Habibganj - Barkhera 3rd line
25 Haridaspur - Paradeep new line
26 Hospet - Tinaighat - Vasco-da-Gama doubling
27 IOCL siding at Salawas (deposit work)
28 Jakhpura- Haridaspur 3rd line doubling
29 Jaroli (Banaspani) - Jakhpura doubling
30 Joka - Binoy Badal Dinesh Bagh via Majerhat
32 Kharagpur Workshop - setting up of Centre of Excellence for Wagon Prototyping
33 Khurda road - Barang 3rd line doubling
34 Lucknow- Pilibhit via Sitapur, Lakhimpur GC
35 Nabadwipghat - Nabadwipdham - New line
36 Naupara(EX.) Baranagar
37 Neora - Daniwan & Barbigha - Shekhpur - New line
38 New Delhi - Tilak Bridge 5th & 6th line
39 Obulavaripalle - Krishnapattnam New line
40 Palwal - Bhuteswar 3rd line doubling
41 Panskura - Haldia PH II doubling
42 Panskura - Kharagpur 3rd line doubling
43 Pune - Guntakal RLY Elect.
44 Raichur - Guntakal doubling
45 Rail connectivity to Vizhinjam intl. Seaport ltd.(VISL)
46 Raipur - Titlagarh doubling
47 Rajatgarh - Barang doubling
48 Rajgoda - Tamluk (JN. CABIN) doubling
49 Renigunta - Guntakal Elect
50 Rewas Port - New line
51 Rishikesh - Karnaprayag New line
52 Road Over Bridge at Bardhman(yard) - 4 lanes
Page 67
53 Salka road - Annuppur doubling
54 Sambalpur - Titlagarh doubling
55 Sarotra road - Karjoda Patch doubling
56 Surat - Hajira New line
57 Surenderanagar - Viramgam doubling
58 Tamluk JN. cabin - Basulya Sutahata doubling
59 Tikiapara - Santragachi doubling
60 Tiruvallur - Arakkonam 4th line
61 Titlagarh (Excl.) - Raipur RE
62 Vijaywada - Gudivada - Bhimavaram - Narasapur, Gudiva da - Machilipatnam & Bhimavaram -
Nidadavolu doubling with RE
63 Villupuram - Dindigul doubling
64 Yelahanka - Dharmavaram - Gooty RE
Page 68
ANNEXURE II: DETAILED TERM SHEET
Borrower Angul Sukinda Railway Limited

Promoter RVNL
Jindal Steel Private Limited
Co-Promoter Government of Odisha (Under Process)
Odisha Mining Corporation (Under Process)
Arranger
Facility Rupee Term Loan
Facility Amount Rs. 918.00 Crores
To part finance the Project envisaging setting up an 104.24 km broad
gauge single railway line between Budhapankh station (Angul) and
Purpose Baguapal Station (Sukinda) to provide direct link between iron ore rich
Joda-Barbil region, Talcher coal production region and consuming
industries in the hinterland
Availability Period Upto 3 months after COD
The Concession Agreement was signed between Ministry of Railways
Concession Agreement
and ASRL on 14th May 2010 for implementing the project
Project cost Rs.1337.90 crores
Commercial Operation
April 2018
Date (COD)
Moratorium Period A moratorium of 12 months is proposed from COD i.e. April 2018.
Rate of Interest 11% p.a
Step up repayment in 40 quarterly installments commencing from April
2019 as shown below
Year Amount (Rs. Crores) % of Debt
Mar-19 91.8 10.00%
Mar-20 91.8 10.00%
Mar-21 91.8 10.00%
Mar-22 91.8 10.00%
Repayment
Mar-23 91.8 10.00%
Mar-24 91.8 10.00%
Mar-25 91.8 10.00%
Mar-26 91.8 10.00%
Mar-27 91.8 10.00%
Mar-28 91.8 10.00%
Door to Door Tenor 14 years taking 2015 as cutoff date

Upfront Fees Will be confirmed during debt syndication stage
The disbursement shall be as per the draw down schedule submitted
Drawdown Schedule
by the Borrower at the time of documentation
Commitment charges
Liquidated damages Will be confirmed during debt syndication stage
Pre-Payment Charges
a) First pari-pasu charge on all the present and future fixed assets including
Primary Security movable assets of the Borrower excluding those assets which have been
leased by Ministry of Railways (MoR) to the borrower as per the
Page 69
Concession Agreement between MoR and ASRL
b) Fisrt pari-pasu charge on all the tangible movable machinery and plant of
the Borrower together with spares, tools, accessories and other
movables, both present and future
c) A charge on the TRA account having Debt Service Reserve Account and
each of the other accounts required to be created by the Company under
any project document or contract
d) Assignment of the rights, title, benefits, claims, demands and interests
whatsoever of the Borrower by way of first charge in, to under all
Contracts
Trust & retention Account
Will be confirmed during debt syndication stage
/ Escrow Account
The borrower would take a comprehensive insurance consisting to the
Insurance satisfaction of lenders. The borrower shall agree to assign all such
insurance policies to the Lenders
Conditions Precedent to
first disbursement Will be confirmed during debt syndication stage
Financial Covenants
Other Special Conditions
Special conditions of the project shall be confirmed during debt syndication stage
Normal Terms and Conditions
Normal Terms & Conditions of the project shall be confirmed during debt syndication stage
Page 70
ANNEXURE III: ORIGIN-DESTINATION OF PROJECT TRAFFIC
Project Foreign
Total
S. No. Name of Generator Commodity Origin Destination Route Route 2018 2023 2025 2028 2033 2038 2043 2047
Km
Km Km
Inward
1 Jindal Steel & Power Steel Kerejanga Various Destinations 104.24 161.78 266.02 1.20 1.80 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89
2 Odisha Sponge Iron Ltd Non Coking Coal Talcher Porjanpur 104.24 220.99 325.23 0.00 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14
Finished Products, Billets Rolled
3 Bhushan Steel and Strips Meramandali Haldia 104.24 359.96 464.20 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13
Products
4 VISA Steel Non-Coking Coal Talcher Kalinga Nagar 104.24 273.96 378.20 0.00 1.74 1.83 1.83 1.83 1.83 1.83 1.83
5 Mahanadi Coal Fields Coal Talcher Dhamra 104.24 140.22 244.46 7.00 9.80 10.28 10.28 10.28 10.28 10.28 10.28
6 Maithan Ispat Ltd. Coal for DRI Talcher Jakhapura 104.24 44.76 149.00 0.00 0.30 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31
Maithan Ispat Ltd. Coal for BF Talcher Jakhapura 104.24 44.76 149.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08
7 Patnaik Steels and Alloys Pvt. Ltd. Coal Talcher Nayagarh 104.24 239.22 343.46 0.00 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05
Outward
8 Jindal Steel & Power Iron Ore Fines Deojhar Kerejanga 104.24 253.54 357.78 7.06 10.59 11.11 11.11 11.11 11.11 11.11 11.11
Jindal Steel & Power Iron Ore Lumps Deojhar Kerejanga 104.24 253.54 357.78 3.75 5.63 5.90 5.90 5.90 5.90 5.90 5.90
9 Bhushan Steel and Strips I/Ore Banspani Meramandali 104.24 217.75 321.99 6.06 6.06 6.36 6.36 6.36 6.36 6.36 6.36
Bhushan Steel and Strips I/Ore (BF Grade) Banspani Meramandali 104.24 217.75 321.99 0.58 0.58 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61
Bhushan Steel and Strips I/Ore (Finer) Banspani Meramandali 104.24 217.75 321.99 1.82 1.82 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91
Bhushan Steel and Strips Coking Coal for BF Haldia Meramandali 104.24 359.96 464.20 0.96 0.96 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01
10 VISA Steel Steel Billets Kalinga Nagar Various Destinations 104.24 299.49 403.73 0.00 0.24 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
11 Jindel Stainless Cast stainless Kalinga Nagar Domestic Market 104.24 299.49 403.73 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Jindel Stainless Hot/cold Rolled products Kalinga Nagar Domestic Market 104.24 299.49 403.73 0.23 0.23 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24
12 BRG Iron & Steel Iron Ore Barbil Meramandali 104.24 305.83 410.07 0.00 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22
BRG Iron & Steel Iron Ore Joda Meramandali 104.24 254.69 358.93 0.00 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22
BRG Iron & Steel Iron Ore Keonjhar Meramandali 104.24 34.07 138.31 0.00 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22
13 Monnet Ispat & Energy Ltd. Iron Ore Barbil Kerijanga 104.24 345.93 450.17 0.00 0.69 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72
Monnet Ispat & Energy Ltd. Iron Ore Barajamda Kerijanga 104.24 336.48 440.72 0.00 0.69 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72
Cement Plants in
14 Tata Steel Slag Kalinganagar 104.24 1174.00 1278.24 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21
Central India
ANNEXURE IV: MAJOR ASSUMPTIONS
Project Phasing
Year YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5
%age of cost incurred 7.0% 10.8% 26.6% 35.0% 20.6%
17.9% 44.5% 79.4% 100.0%
Length of Line 104.242 km

Construction period 5 years
Base year 2012
Start of construction (FY) 2013
Completion of construction (FY) 2018
Project Cost
Construction Cost (Rs. Million) Capital Cost
Civil Engineering 8,690
Electrical Engineering 1,097
S&T Engineering 440
Mechanical 0
Gross Total 10,226
Contigencies@3% 307
Sub Total 'A' 10,533
D&G Charges @8.75% on 'A' 922
RVNL Charges @5% on 'A' 573
Total Projected Cost 12,027
Preliminary and pre-operative expenses 0.50%
Cost escalation during construction 0.00%
Means of Funding Assumptions
Cost of Debt during Construction 11%
Cost of Debt - Reset 11%
Debt 68.6% 9,179 Mn
Equity 31.4% 4,200 Mn
Debt Terms
Moratorium for principle repayment post construction (yr) 1
Debt repayment duration post moratorium (yr) 10
Total debt tenure (yearsr) 16
Repayment start year 2019
Repayment end year 2029
Depreciation Assumptions
CA Depreciation SLM 3.3% p.a.
Tax Depreciation WDV 10% p.a.
Revenue Related Assumptions
Annual Escalation in Freight rates 0%
Base year 2012
Revenue accruing to SPV 100%
Inflated Km Multiple 1.0
O&M Related Assumptions
Base year 2012
Annual Escalation to bring 2008 unit cost to base yr (2010) cost 0.00%
Annual Escalation on base year unit cost for successive years 0.00%
Service tax payable on O&M expenses 0.00%
Wagon Empties Calculation Assumed
Wagon Assumed Empties
Engine Speed 21.5 kmph
Other Assumptions
Terminal value of assets (civil + RS) at end of life - 30 years 10%
Taxation Assumptions
Corporate MAT
Base Tax Rate 30% 18.5%
Surcharge 5.00% 7.5%
Education Cess 3.00% 3.0%
Effective Rate 32.45% 20.48%
10 years in block of first 15
Section 80IA benefit available for
years of operation
80IA benefit starts from year 2018
Traffic Assumptions
No. of Loco for loaded train (WDG 4) 1
No. of Loco for empty train (WDG 4) 1
Weight of Loco 126 Tonnes
Weight of Brake Van 23.5 Tonnes
Terminal Charges
Terminal Charges Incorporation None
Rs/tonne
Rs/tonne for Rs/tonne
Commodity for loading
unloading rly for both
rly
Coal 56 45 101
Iron Ore 45 45 90
Steel & Finished Products 45 45 90
Terminal Charges
None
Incorporation
Page 73
ANNEXURE V: WORKINGS OF O&M COST FCVC Method
Expenditure ECoR
Sr BG (in Rs) - Excl. Basis of
Description of Item A/c Head Value of App. Units Expenditure in Rs.
No PUs 1 to 16 & 34 Apportionment
for freight traffic
ECoR Proj.Sec Per Unit Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Engineering Dept.
1 Contingent Expenses in Offices 04B-130 1564812 ETKM-BG 8510.60 184.28 183.8662 33882.67
2 Maintenance of P. Way & Works 04B-240 308071475 ETKM-BG 8510.60 184.28 36198.5612 6670631.16
3 Girder Bridges 04B-310 92368526 Length of Bridges 47597.67 1950.1 1940.6102 3784384.04
4 Other Bridges 04B-320 41597908 Length of Bridges 22485.63 557.5 1849.9774 1031362.42
5 RUB/ROB/FOB 04B-340 4621353 Length of Bridges 1110.35 654.3 4162.0687 2723241.56
6 Maintenance of office buildings 04B-410 42546915 No. of stations 270 9 157581.1667 1418230.50
7 Maintenance of Stations & Goods Sheds 04B-420 102507644 No. of stations 270 9 379657.9407 3416921.47
8 All other structures 04B-440 4978449 No. of stations 270 9 18438.7000 165948.30
9 Water Supply 04B-510 63068324 No. of stations 270 9 233586.3852 2102277.47
10 Sanitation 04B-520 24937840 No. of stations 270 9 92362.3704 831261.33
11 Service Roads & Other Misc. 04B-531 21796138 No. of stations 270 9 80726.4370 726537.93
12 Fencing & Level Crossing 04B-532 14642099 No. of stations 270 9 54229.9963 488069.97
13 Station Machinery other than water 04B-620 0 No. of stations 270 9 0.0000 0.00
supply
14 Tree Plantation etc 04B-642 4487228 No. of stations 270 9 16619.3630 149574.27
to 04B-
644
15 Misc Expenses 04B-651 95105330 ETKM-BG 8510.60 184.28 11174.9266 2059303.21
Expenditure ECoR
for freight traffic
to 04B-
654
16 Other Adjustments 04B-656 0 ETKM-BG 8510.60 184.28 0.0000 0.00
17 Other Misc Expenses 04B-657 0 ETKM-BG 8510.60 184.28 0.0000 0.00
18 Plant & Equipment incl Furniture 07E-210 319145 No. of stations 270 9 1182.0185 10638.17
19 Track & Other Equipment 07E-221 & 40482295 ETKM-BG 8510.60 184.28 4756.6911 876557.81
07E-222
20 Repairs of service motor cars & trolleys 07E-231 8563129 ETKM-BG 8510.60 184.28 1006.1722 185416.31
21 Other unclassified equipment 07E-233 0 No. of stations 270 9 0.0000 0.00
22 Other Misc Repairs 07E-234 0 ETKM-BG 8510.60 184.28 0.0000 0.00
to 07E-
237
23 Credits from Materials released from 04B-911 & -77929910 ETKM-BG 8510.60 184.28 -9156.8056 -1687406.10
revenue works (Civil Engg) 04B-912
Total 24986832.48
Escalated to 2013-14 from 2011-12 Factor 25.29% 6319169.93
GRAND TOTAL 31306002.41
Signal & Telecom Dept ECoR Proj.Sec. Per Unit Total
1 Contingent Expenses (S&T) 07E-130 2275499 Signalling Units 195778.05 6525.94 11.6229 75849.97
2 Maintenance of Signals 07E-520 & 46847654 Signalling Units 195778.05 6525.94 239.2896 1561588.47
07E-530
3 Circuits of Signalling System & Line wire 07E-700 28566494 Signalling Units 195778.05 6525.94 145.9126 952216.47
4 Signalling Tools & Plant repair 07E-541 3564888 Signalling Units 195778.05 6525.94 18.2088 118829.60
Page 75
Expenditure ECoR
for freight traffic
5 Service motor car and trolleys 07E-542 2570356 Signalling Units 195778.05 6525.94 13.1289 85678.53
6 Electric clock & office equipment 07E-544 32598 No of stations 270 9 120.7333 1086.60
7 Workshop repair - S&T apparatus 07E-546 0 Signalling Units 195778.05 6525.94 0.0000 0.00
8 Over and Under charges on manufacture 07E-547 & 0 Signalling Units 195778.05 6525.94 0.0000 0.00
repair & oncost - Signalling apparatus 07E-548
9 Misc Expenses 07E-551 & 39216 No of stations 270 9 145.2444 1307.20
07E-553
10 Telecom Microwave and wireless 07E-611 & 3764926 Telecom units 98703.063 3290.10 38.1440 125497.53
07E-613
11 Service motor car and trolleys 07E-614 173378 Telecom units 98703.063 3290.10 1.7566 5779.27
12 Railway telephone exchange 07E-620 8843437 Telecom units 98703.063 3290.10 89.5964 294781.23
13 Line communication system 07E-630 14041391 Telecom units 98703.063 3290.10 142.2589 468046.37
14 Workshop repair and overhaul - Tele 07E-640 1490 No of stations 270 9 5.5185 49.67
apparatus
15 Administrative Telephone Channel 07E-730 2540024 Telecom units 98703.063 3290.10 25.7340 84667.47
16 VFT sets 07E-740 0 Telecom units 98703.063 3290.10 0.0000 0.00
17 Credit for material released from revenue 07E-940 0 Signalling Units 195778.05 6525.94 0.0000 0.00
works - S&T
18 Operating Expenses - Signal 08F-710 0 Signalling Units 195778.05 6525.94 0.0000 0.00
19 Operating Expenses - Telecom 08F-720 26026470 Telecom units 98703.063 3290.10 263.6845 867549.00
Total 4642927.37
Page 76
Expenditure ECoR
for freight traffic
Electrical Dept ECoR Proj.Sec. Per Unit Total
1 Contingent Expenses - Electrical 07E-160 3408312 No of stations 270 9 12623.3778 113610.40
2 Overhead Equipment for electric traction 07E-410 46915740 Electrified Track 3299.82 184.28 14217.6664 2620015.98
Kms
3 Power Supply Equipment for Traction 07E-420 11347523 Electrified Track 3299.82 184.28 3438.8309 633703.99
Kms
4 Power Supply Equipment for General 07E-430 13036581 No of stations 270 9 48283.6333 434552.70
Service
5 Other Plant & Equipment - Elec. General 07E-480 53842444 No of stations 270 9 199416.4593 1794748.13
Service
6 Misc. Expenses 07E-490 0 No of stations 270 9 0.0000 0.00
7 Supply of power to service buildings 08F-651 321758072 No of stations 270 9 1191696.56 10725269.07
8 Distribution of General Service 08F-630 0 No of stations 270 9 0.0000 0.00
Total 16321900.26
Traffic Dept ECoR Proj.Sec. Per Unit Total
1 Sanitary Staff 09G-291 20194086 No of stations 270 9 74792.91 673136.20
2 Sanitary Stores 09G-293 22644846 No of stations 270 9 83869.80 754828.20
3 Clothing 09G-295 7624044 No of stations 270 9 28237.20 254134.80
4 Fire Light & General Stores 09G-297 5956415 No of stations 270 9 22060.80 198547.17
5 Contingency Expenses 09G-298 17885620 No of stations 270 9 66243.04 596187.33
6 Safety 09G-610, 1257583 No of stations 270 9 4657.71 41919.43
Page 77
Expenditure ECoR
for freight traffic
620 & 630
7 Office Establishment 09G-121 0 No of stations 270 9 0.00 0.00
& 122
8 Commercial Contingency 09G-123 0 No of stations 270 9 0.00 0.00
9 Traffic Dept Equipment 07E-810 & 893264 No of stations 270 9 3308.39 29775.47
830
10 Other Staff & Misc Expenses 09G-560 198580 No of stations 270 9 735.48 6619.33
11 Misc Charges 09G-760 -2124 No of stations 270 9 -7.87 -70.80
12 Traffic & Movement Inspection 09G-210 91414 No of stations 270 9 338.57 3047.13
13 Train Passing & Control 09G-250 1647973 No of stations 270 9 6103.60 54932.43
14 Other Joint Cost 09G-260 61861 No of stations 270 9 229.11 2062.03
Total 2615118.73
Page 78
Variable Costs (Excl. Staff) for Operation & Maintenance of Angul - Sukinda Road New Line in East Coast Railway (104.24 RKm.)
Cost of Running Repair of Wagons For 2013-2014
Expenditure
ECoR BG (in Rs)
Basis of
Sr No Description of Item A/c Head excl PUs 1 to 16 Value of App. Units Expenditure (in Rs)
Apportionment
& 34 only for
Freight Traffic
ECoR Proj.Sec. Per Unit Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 Running repairs in sick lines 06D-310 100135891 Wagon Days 6714905 380063 14.91 5667686.46
2 Running repairs in workshops for 06D-320 13400 Wagon Days 6714905 380063 0.00 758.44
sick lines
3 POH 06D-330 225945250 Wagon Days 6714905 380063 33.65 12788489.94
4 Special repairs 06D-340 10704236 Wagon Days 6714905 380063 1.59 605859.23
5 Other Repairs 06D-360 0 Wagon Days 6714905 380063 0.00 0.00
6 Misc Expenses including adjusments 06D-370 0 Wagon Days 6714905 380063 0.00 0.00
7 Credits for released materials for 06D-913 & 0 Wagon Days 6714905 380063 0.00 0.00
revenue works 914
8 Misc Expenses - Mechanical Dept 06D-611 to 428916 Wagon Days 6714905 380063 0.0639 24276.62
614
9 Direct Supervision - Rolling Stock 03A-600 2113479 Wagon Days 6714905 380063 0.31 119622.81
10 Direct Supervision - Furniture & 07E-361 & 58914 Wagon Days 6714905 380063 0.009 3334.53
Office Equipment & Service Motor 362
Cars
11 Plant & Equipment - Repairs & 07E-330, 2204372 Wagon Days 6714905 380063 0.33 124767.35
Page 79
Maintenance 340, 354,
366 to 369
12 C&W Optg Expenses - Optg Staff: 08F-521, 29832909 Wagon Days 6714905 380063 4.44 1688541.17
Rolling Stock & Equipment 522, 531,
532, 541,
542 to 545
13 C&W Optg Expenses - Supervisory & 08F-510 & 80576 Wagon Days 6714905 380063 0.0120 4560.60
Office Staff 515
14 Hire of Vehicles 08F-914 0 Wagon Days 6714905 380063 0.00 0.00
Total 21027897.14
Rs. in Lakh 263.46
Page 80
For 2013-2014
Lub & Other Stores
Expenditure
ECoR BG (in Rs)
Basis of
Sr No Description of Item A/c Head excl PUs 1 to 16 Value of App. Units Expenditure (in Rs)
Apportionment
& 34 only for
Freight Traffic
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 Lube Oil 07E-330 1385272 GTKMs 59747075 4480632 0.0000232 103886.16
000 000
2 Other Stores 08E-332 0 GTKMs 59747075 4480632 0.000000 0.00
000 000
Total 103886.16
Rs. In Lakh 1.30
Calculation of Cost of Fuel
Sr No Item Value Unit
1 Average Specific Energy 6.49 KWH. per 1000
Consumption for ELECTRIC Locos GTKMs
2 Average cost of Electricity per KWH. 5.386 in Rs
3 GTKMs of the section 4480632.000 in '000'
4 Cost of Energy 1*2 34.95514 in Rs per 1000
GTKMs
Page 81
5 Cost of Fuel for the section 3*4 156621118.85 in Rs
Total 156621118.8
5
1
Rs. In Lakh 1962.31
Page 82
For 2013-2014
Cost of Documentation
Expenditure
ECoR BG (in
Rs) excl PUs
Basis of
Sr No Description of Item A/c Head 1 to 16 & 34 Value of App. Units Expenditure (in Rs)
Apportionment
only for
Freight
Traffic
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 Forms & Stationery 09G-294 1151427 No of wagons loaded 1845201 413265.00 0.624012 257882.19
on the system
Total 257882.19
Rs. In Lakh 3.23
Note: For No. of Loaded wagons in ECoR based on Statement - 7A of Statistical Dte./Rly. Bd. For 2011-12.
Page 83
For 2013-2014
Cost of
Crew
Expenditure
ECoR BG (in
Rs) excl PUs
Sl. Basis of
Description of Item A/c Head 1 to 16 & 34 Value of App. Units Expenditure (in Rs)
No. Apportionment
only for
Freight
Traffic
E Co R Proj.Sec. Per Unit Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 Running Staff - Loco Crew 08F-312 863582115 Thou GTKM (Electric) 59747075 4480632 14.4540 64762896.91
2 Running Staff - Guards 09G-510 493615255 Thou GTKM (All 94833385 4480632 5.2051 23322043.26
Traction)
3 Other Operating Staff accompanying the 09G-520 0 Thou GTKM (All 94833385 4480632 0.0000 0.00
trains Traction)
4 Contingent Expenses 08F-333 48147807 Thou GTKM (Electric) 59747075 4480632 0.8059 3610764.29
5 Misc Expenses 08F-341 to 0 Thou GTKM (Electric) 59747075 4480632 0.0000 0.00
344
6 Other Unclassified Expenses 08F-345 11509543 Thou GTKM (Electric) 59747075 4480632 0.1926 863138.93
7 Running Staff - Supervisory 08F-311 65311042 Thou GTKM (Electric) 59747075 4480632 1.0931 4897892.40
Total 97456735.80
Rs. In Lakh 1221.04
Page 84
For 2013-2014
Cost of compensation Claims
Expenditure
ECoR BG (in
Rs) excl PUs
Sr
Description of Item A/c Head 1 to 16 & 34 Basis of Apportionment Value of App. Units Expenditure (in Rs)
No
only for
Freight
Traffic
E Co R Proj.Sec. Per Unit Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 Claims Settlement & Prevention 12K-210 6929310 Thou NTKMs 58967961 3039612 0.1175 357184.03
Organisation
2 Compensation Claims & Misc Expenses 12K-230 & 193450 Thou NTKMs 58967961 3039612 0.0033 9971.74
240
3 Compensation Goods settled through 12K-260 0 Thou NTKMs 58967961 3039612 0.0000 0.00
book adjustment
Total 367155.76
Rs. In Lakh 4.60
Page 85
Fixed staff Costs for Operation & Maintenance of Angul - Sukinda Road New Line
in East Coast Railway (104.24 RKm.)
STAFF REQD. IN Group C Group D Total Staff Cost
2017-18 (In Rs.)
Engineering
Permanent Way 69 6 63 14574936.00
Works 30 5 25 6811660.00
Bridges 30 5 25 6811660.00
S&T
Signal 17 5 12 4290076.00
Telecom 17 5 12 4290076.00
Operating 58 29 29 17007340.00
Commercial 8 4 4 2345840.00
Mechanical 0
Electrical (Genl.) 21 6 15 5264472.00
Traction 42 12 30 10528944.00
General Services 23 3 20 5056836.00
301
TOTAL (in Rs.) 315 80 235 76981840.00
Staff Cost Rate as per ASS-2011-12 (in Rs.) 392492.00 193968.00
[For Group C & D - Others] For Running Staff For Others
76981840.00
GRAND TOTAL (Rs. In Lakh) Rs. in Lakh 769.82
Escalated to 2013-14 from Factor 25.29% Rs. in Lakh 964.51
2011-12
Page 86
Loco Hire Charges For 2013-2014
For Speed of
Year Type of ENGINE Km. Speed of Good Engine Engine Hire Total
Goods Tr.
ASS 2011-12,
Loco - Electric of Project Trains in Kmph of ECoR Hrs. Charge/Hr Amount
Stat.-20,
Col.-13 (Page-
2017-18 (in Rs.) (in Rs.)
320)
Electric 1093932 21.5 50880.56 966.75 49188779.58
Escalated to 2013- Factor 25.29% 12439842.36
14 from 2011-12
Total 61628621.94
Total Rs. In Lakh 616.29
For Loco Hire Charges Pl. Ref. Rly. Bd. Letter No. F(C)/2003/27/1, Dtd.06.03.2012.
Wagon Hire Charges For 2013-2014
Year TOTAL No. of Wagon Rate of Wagon Wagon Hire
Wagons/Day Day Hire Charge
2017-18 Charges (in 8-W) Amount (in Rs.)
In Rs.
1041.27 380063.29 956.137 363392573.82
Escalated to 2013- Factor 25.29% 91901981.92
14 from 2011-12
Total 455294555.73
Rs. In Lakh 4552.95
Note:
Rs.387.10 is in terms of 4-Wheelers. To convert it in 8-Wheelers, Multiply the rate by 2.47, i.e. Rs.956.137 .
For Wagon Hire Charge, Pl. Ref. Web Site of Indian Railways directorate/IRCA/functions.jsp
Page 87
ANNEXURE VI: FREIGHT RATES
Freight Rate (Rupees Per Tonne) w.e.f. 01.04.2013
Distance Class Class Class Class Class Class Class Class Class Class Class Class Class Class Class
(Kms) LR4 LR3 LR2 LR1 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200
1-100 63.5 74.1 84.7 95.3 105.9 116.5 127.1 137.7 148.3 158.9 169.4 180 190.6 201.2 211.8
101-125 75 87.5 100 112.5 125 137.5 150 162.5 175 187.5 200 212.5 225 237.5 250
126-150 87.1 101.6 116.2 130.7 145.2 159.7 174.2 188.8 203.3 217.8 232.3 246.8 261.4 275.9 290.4
151-175 97.7 114 130.2 146.5 162.8 179.1 195.4 211.6 227.9 244.2 260.5 276.8 293 309.3 325.6
176-200 109.2 127.4 145.6 163.8 182 200.2 218.4 236.6 254.8 273 291.2 309.4 327.6 345.8 364
201-225 119.9 139.9 159.8 179.8 199.8 219.8 239.8 259.7 279.7 299.7 319.7 339.7 359.6 379.6 399.6
226-250 131.3 153.2 175.1 197 218.9 240.8 262.7 284.6 306.5 328.4 350.2 372.1 394 415.9 437.8
251-275 142.8 166.6 190.4 214.2 238 261.8 285.6 309.4 333.2 357 380.8 404.6 428.4 452.2 476
276-300 154.2 179.9 205.6 231.3 257 282.7 308.4 334.1 359.8 385.5 411.2 436.9 462.6 488.3 514
301-325 164.9 192.4 219.8 247.3 274.8 302.3 329.8 357.2 384.7 412.2 439.7 467.2 494.6 522.1 549.6
326-350 176.1 205.5 234.8 264.2 293.5 322.9 352.2 381.6 410.9 440.3 469.6 499 528.3 557.7 587
351-375 187.1 218.3 249.5 280.7 311.9 343.1 374.3 405.5 436.7 467.9 499 530.2 561.4 592.6 623.8
376-400 198.6 231.7 264.8 297.9 331 364.1 397.2 430.3 463.4 496.5 529.6 562.7 595.8 628.9 662
401-425 209.9 244.9 279.9 314.9 349.9 384.9 419.9 454.9 489.9 524.9 559.8 594.8 629.8 664.8 699.8
426-450 221.3 258.2 295.1 332 368.9 405.8 442.7 479.6 516.5 553.4 590.2 627.1 664 700.9 737.8
451-475 232.4 271.2 309.9 348.7 387.4 426.1 464.9 503.6 542.4 581.1 619.8 658.6 697.3 736.1 774.8
476-500 244.1 284.8 325.4 366.1 406.8 447.5 488.2 528.8 569.5 610.2 650.9 691.6 732.2 772.9 813.6
501-550 267.1 311.6 356.2 400.7 445.2 489.7 534.2 578.8 623.3 667.8 712.3 756.8 801.4 845.9 890.4
551-600 289.9 338.2 386.6 434.9 483.2 531.5 579.8 628.2 676.5 724.8 773.1 821.4 869.8 918.1 966.4
601-650 312.5 364.6 416.7 468.8 520.9 573 625.1 677.2 729.3 781.4 833.4 885.5 937.6 989.7 1041.8
651-700 335.1 391 446.8 502.7 558.5 614.4 670.2 726.1 781.9 837.8 893.6 949.5 1005.3 1061.2 1117
701-750 357.8 417.4 477 536.7 596.3 655.9 715.6 775.2 834.8 894.5 954.1 1013.7 1073.3 1133 1192.6
751-800 380.1 443.5 506.8 570.2 633.5 696.9 760.2 823.6 886.9 950.3 1013.6 1077 1140.3 1203.7 1267
Source: Annexure to RC-06 of 2013, Traffic Commercial, Indian Railways
ANNEXURE VII PROJECT P&L STATEMENT
(Rs. Crores)
O&M Book
Year Revenue Interest EBT Tax EAT
Cost Depreciation
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018 3,825.62 1,019.82 402.50 1,009.69 1,393.61 285.47 1,108.14
2019 4,199.40 1,104.58 402.50 959.20 1,733.11 355.01 1,378.10
2020 4,573.18 1,189.34 402.50 858.24 2,123.10 501.78 1,621.32
2021 4,946.96 1,274.11 402.50 757.27 2,513.08 660.07 1,853.01
2022 5,320.74 1,358.87 402.50 656.30 2,903.07 815.19 2,087.88
2023 5,694.52 1,443.63 402.50 555.33 3,293.05 674.55 2,618.50
2024 5,834.04 1,475.02 402.50 454.36 3,502.15 717.38 2,784.77
2025 5,973.55 1,506.41 402.50 353.39 3,711.25 760.22 2,951.03
2026 5,973.55 1,506.41 402.50 252.42 3,812.22 780.90 3,031.32
2027 5,973.55 1,506.41 402.50 151.45 3,913.18 801.58 3,111.60
2028 5,973.55 1,506.41 402.50 50.48 4,014.15 822.26 3,191.89
2029 5,973.55 1,506.41 402.50 -0.00 4,064.64 832.61 3,232.03
2030 5,973.55 1,506.41 402.50 -0.00 4,064.64 832.61 3,232.03
2031 5,973.55 1,506.41 402.50 -0.00 4,064.64 832.61 3,232.03
2032 5,973.55 1,506.41 402.50 - 4,064.64 832.61 3,232.03
2033 5,973.55 1,506.41 402.50 - 4,064.64 1,368.62 2,696.02
2034 5,973.55 1,506.41 402.50 - 4,064.64 1,376.69 2,687.94
2035 5,973.55 1,506.41 402.50 - 4,064.64 1,383.96 2,680.68
2036 5,973.55 1,506.41 402.50 - 4,064.64 1,390.50 2,674.14
2037 5,973.55 1,506.41 402.50 - 4,064.64 1,396.39 2,668.25
2038 5,973.55 1,506.41 402.50 - 4,064.64 1,401.69 2,662.95
2039 5,973.55 1,506.41 402.50 - 4,064.64 1,406.45 2,658.18
2040 5,973.55 1,506.41 402.50 - 4,064.64 1,410.74 2,653.89
2041 5,973.55 1,506.41 402.50 - 4,064.64 1,414.61 2,650.03
2042 5,973.55 1,506.41 402.50 - 4,064.64 1,418.08 2,646.56
2043 5,973.55 1,506.41 402.50 - 4,064.64 1,421.21 2,643.43
2044 5,973.55 1,506.41 402.50 - 4,064.64 1,424.03 2,640.61
2045 5,973.55 1,506.41 402.50 - 4,064.64 1,426.56 2,638.08
2046 5,973.55 1,506.41 402.50 - 4,064.64 1,428.84 2,635.80
2047 5,973.55 1,506.41 402.50 - 4,064.64 1,430.89 2,633.75
ANNEXURE VIII: PROJECT CASH FLOW STATEMENT
(Rupees Millions)
Capital
Pre-tax Post tax Equity
Expenditure Book Book Principle Equity
Year EBT Interest Tax Project Project Share EAT
(incl Pre Ops, Depreciation Depreciation Repayment IRR
IRR IRR Capital
excl IDC)
21% 18.1% 23.18%
2013 907.64 -907.64 -907.64 907.64 0.00 0.00 -907.64
-
2014 1300.00 -1300.00 -1300.00 1300.00 0.00 0.00 1300.00
-
2015 3270.30 -3270.30 -3270.30 1992.36 0.00 0.00 1992.36
2016 4598.50 -4598.50 -4598.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2017 3302.56 -3302.56 -3302.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2018 1393.61 1009.69 402.50 285.47 2805.80 2520.33 1108.14 402.50 0.00 1510.65
2019 1733.11 959.20 402.50 355.01 3094.82 2739.81 1378.10 402.50 917.90 862.70
2020 2123.10 858.24 402.50 501.78 3383.84 2882.06 1621.32 402.50 917.90 1105.93
2021 2513.08 757.27 402.50 660.07 3672.85 3012.78 1853.01 402.50 917.90 1337.62
2022 2903.07 656.30 402.50 815.19 3961.87 3146.68 2087.88 402.50 917.90 1572.48
2023 3293.05 555.33 402.50 674.55 4250.89 3576.33 2618.50 402.50 917.90 2103.10
2024 3502.15 454.36 402.50 717.38 4359.01 3641.63 2784.77 402.50 917.90 2269.37
2025 3711.25 353.39 402.50 760.22 4467.14 3706.92 2951.03 402.50 917.90 2435.63
2026 3812.22 252.42 402.50 780.90 4467.14 3686.24 3031.32 402.50 917.90 2515.92
2027 3913.18 151.45 402.50 801.58 4467.14 3665.56 3111.60 402.50 917.90 2596.21
2028 4014.15 50.48 402.50 822.26 4467.14 3644.88 3191.89 402.50 917.90 2676.49
2029 4064.64 0.00 402.50 832.61 4467.14 3634.53 3232.03 402.50 0.00 3634.53
2030 4064.64 0.00 402.50 832.61 4467.14 3634.53 3232.03 402.50 0.00 3634.53
2031 4064.64 0.00 402.50 832.61 4467.14 3634.53 3232.03 402.50 0.00 3634.53
2032 4064.64 0.00 402.50 832.61 4467.14 3634.53 3232.03 402.50 0.00 3634.53
2033 4064.64 0.00 402.50 1368.62 4467.14 3098.52 2696.02 402.50 0.00 3098.52
2034 4064.64 0.00 402.50 1376.69 4467.14 3090.45 2687.94 402.50 0.00 3090.45
2035 4064.64 0.00 402.50 1383.96 4467.14 3083.18 2680.68 402.50 0.00 3083.18
2036 4064.64 0.00 402.50 1390.50 4467.14 3076.64 2674.14 402.50 0.00 3076.64
2037 4064.64 0.00 402.50 1396.39 4467.14 3070.75 2668.25 402.50 0.00 3070.75
2038 4064.64 0.00 402.50 1401.69 4467.14 3065.45 2662.95 402.50 0.00 3065.45
2039 4064.64 0.00 402.50 1406.45 4467.14 3060.69 2658.18 402.50 0.00 3060.69
2040 4064.64 0.00 402.50 1410.74 4467.14 3056.40 2653.89 402.50 0.00 3056.40
2041 4064.64 0.00 402.50 1414.61 4467.14 3052.53 2650.03 402.50 0.00 3052.53
2042 4064.64 0.00 402.50 1418.08 4467.14 3049.06 2646.56 402.50 0.00 3049.06
2043 4064.64 0.00 402.50 1421.21 4467.14 3045.93 2643.43 402.50 0.00 3045.93
2044 4064.64 0.00 402.50 1424.03 4467.14 3043.11 2640.61 402.50 0.00 3043.11
2045 4064.64 0.00 402.50 1426.56 4467.14 3040.58 2638.08 402.50 0.00 3040.58
2046 4064.64 0.00 402.50 1428.84 4467.14 3038.30 2635.80 402.50 0.00 3038.30
2047 4064.64 0.00 402.50 1430.89 5805.04 4374.15 2633.75 402.50 0.00 3036.25
Page 91
ANNEXURE IX: EQUITY PARTICIPATION ASSURANCE- GOVERNMENT OF
ODISHA
ANNEXURE X: EQUITY PARTICIPATION ASSURANCE- ODISHA MINING
CORPORATION
Page 93
ANNEXURE XI: LAND ACQUISITION ASSURANCE- GOVERNMENT OF
ODISHA
Page 94
Page 95

Fim Angul Sukinda Railwal PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Fim Angul Sukinda Railwal PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Fim Angul Sukinda Railwal PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

FINANCIAL INFORMATION MEMORANDUM

Angul-Sukinda Road New Rail Line Project

Angul-Sukinda Railway Limited

RVNL is created for the following purpose and mandate:

Haridaspur Paradip Railway Line (Odisha)

2.1. General Particulars of ASRL

2.2. Activities of ASRL

To carryout maintenance and manage on the business of development, establishment,

2.3. Board of Directors

Table 2-1: Board of Directors of ASRL

S. No. Name of Director Designation

The capital structure of ASRL as on March 31, 2013 is as under:

Table 2-2: Capital Structure of ASRL (Provisional)

Share Capital Particulars Rs. In Crores

The shareholding pattern for ASRL as on March 31, 2013 is as under

Table 2-3: Shareholding Pattern of ASRL

Name of shareholder % of the shareholding

2.5. Present arrangement with Banks and Financial Institutions

Table 2-4: Financials of ASRL (Rs. In crores)

1. Strengthening of Golden Quadrilateral and Diagonals

1. Projects completed upto March 31st, 2013: 26

3.1. Board of Directors

Table 3-1: Board of Directors of RVNL

S. No. Name of Director Designation

3.2. Capital Structure & Shareholding pattern

The capital structure of RVNL as on 31st March, 2013 is as under:

Table 3-2: Capital Structure of RVNL

Share Capital Particulars Rs. In crores

Particulars (in Rs Crore) 2013 2012

Non Current Liabilities (E) 8142.22 6048.37

4.1. Project Background

The map of the proposed railway line is under

4.2. Scope of the Project

As per Concession Agreement, the Concessionaire is authorized to develop, finance, design,

4.3. Location of the project

## Current Equity Gap position as explained in section 2.4

4.5. Project Agreements

II. Construction Agreement

III. Operations & Maintenance Agreement

5.1. Project Agreements

5-1: Project Cost Details

Particulars Amount in crores % of TPC

Status of Private Land

Status of Government Land

Status of Forest Land

6.1. Means of Finance

6-1: Funding Structure (Rs. Crores) (to be revised)

Particulars 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total

6.2. Equity from Shareholders

6.3. Rupee Term Loan from Banks

Name of Borrower Angul Sukinda Railway Limited

7.1. The Alignment

The map below represents the proposed project section

7.2. Commodities identified as primary Cargo

Ports Mines Steel Plants Power Plants

Talcher coal fields and surrounding activity

7.3. Hinterland & Cargo clusters

7-1: Possible Traffic Generators for the Project Line

S. No Name of the plant Location of the Plant Annual Capacity (MTPA)