Cultsofgreekstat02farn PDF

m '^^~f^r^
I* SEP 30 1907 *
'^^Vt
Division Jj L i
8 \
Section
THE CULTS I
OF
THE GREEK STATES

HENRY FROWDE, M.A.
rUBMSlIER TO THE UNIVKRSITV OF OXFORD
LONDON, EDINBURGH, AND NEW YORK

THE CULTS
OF
THE GREEK STATES
BY
LEWIS RICHARD FARNELL, M.A.

FELLOW AND TUTOR OF EXETER COLLEGE, OXFORD
IN THREE VOLUMES
VOL II
WITH ILLUSTRATIONS
<D;cforb
AT THE CLARENDON PRESS

1896
>vfoti)
PRINTED AT THE CLARENDON PRESS

BY HORACE HART, PRINTER TO THE UNIVERSITY
CONTENTS OF VOL. II
CHAPTER
Artemis .........
Most of her worship aboriginal, but many
XIII.
alien elements engrafted

425-486
upon
PACK
it, 425-427 ; contrast between the Artemis of Homer and the Artemis of
cult, who belongs to a comparatively savage stage of society, 427 Arte- ;
mis associated with water, trees, and woodland-life, \ifiva[a, 'A\(peiajvia,

meaning of the 'hanging' divinity, Kapvaris, KiSpedns,
'AiTayxoij.fV7],
Artemis-Eurynome in Arcadia, 427-430 Artemis a sea-goddess in later;
period, 430, 431 Artemis associated with wild animals and with wild
;
vegetation, Artemis 'Ayportpa, 431-434; totemistic ideas in the worship

of Artemis, Arcadian myth of Callisto compared with the cult of Brauron,
434-439; human sacrifice in the worship of Artemis, often assumed on
doubtful evidence, 439 examination of the Iphigenia-myth and the
;
Tauric cult, the sacrifice of the '

theanthropic ' animal, 440-442 ; the
virginal character of the goddess not recognized in the earliest period, no
public cult of Artemis as virgin, her interest in childbirth, her ritual
sometimes lascivious, yet the dogma of her virginity accepted before the
Homeric period, possible explanation of the contradiction, cult of Ilap-
Oevos prevalent in Caria and elsewhere, TlapStvos meaning the '
un-
married '
goddess, the doctrine of the virginity of Artemis due to a change
in the sense of XlapOtvos,442-449 Artemis occasionally though rarely
;
associated with tame animals and agriculture, the goat-goddess, Evpiirna,

Tavpon6\os, the Tauric Artemis in Lemnos, Attica, the Crimea, 449-455 ;
'OpOia and 'OpOwaia, 453, itofe b; Artemis 1piK\apia, Artemis with

Demeter and Despoina, 455, 456 summary view of the earliest character
;
of Artemis, not a lunar goddess till the fifth century B.C., Artemis
êXaacpopos and âiacpopos no connexion with the moon, 456-460
titles of Artemis referring to social and political life, 461-468 none
;
designate her clearly as the goddess of marriage, EincAfia, 'HjeûvT],

IluOw, 461-463; 'n.ai5oTpu<po^, Kopv9aKia, Tlarpwa, IIap.<pv\aia, 463, 464;
her connexion with Apollo not original, probably arising at Delos,
influence of Apolline worship on that of Artemis, Artemis AtXfivia, TUvOIt],
OvXia, AvTj, 464-467 ; Artemis as the city-goddess, hovKaia, Âyopaia,

more frequently worshipped under this character in Asia Minor than in
Greece, Artemis of Perge, 467-470 ; titles referring to Artemis as goddess

of war, 470, 471 ; scarcely any recognition of her as goddess of the arts,
vi CONTENTS.
PACK
471, 472 non-Hellenic influences and cults, Artemis associated with
;
Cybele, Ma, Bendis, Britomartis-Dictynna, 472-479 Artemis of Ephesus, ;
480-482 ;
A(vKO(ppvTjvr], KoXoTjyT], 482, 483 Artemis sometimes combined
;
with purely Oriental divinities, Anaitis, Astarte, 4S4-487.
CHAPTER XIV.
Artemis Upis Nemesis 487-498
Cult and meaning of Artemis-Upis, 48 7-488 Nemesis no mere personifi- ;
cation, but a real cult- personage of Rhamnus, the name originally an

epithet of Artemis- Aphrodite, 488-493 ; the two Nemeseis of Smyrna,
493' 494 > t^^ meaning of Ne'/zeais as an epithet of the Rhamnusian god-
dess, 494-496 ; representations of Nemesis in art, 496-498.
Adrasteia
Originally a local
......... title
CHAPTER XV.
of Cybele, detached and misinterpreted, 499, 500.

499, 500
CHAPTER XVI.
Hekate 501-519
No satisfactory explanation of the name, Hekate not mentioned in
Homeric poetry, no fixed genealogy and scarcely any mythology
attached to her, probably an un-Hellenic divinity derived from Thrace,
500-503; examination of the earliest records, the Hesiodic fragment, &c.,
503, 504 Hekate and Artemis Pheraea, Hekate in Aegina, Samothrace,
;
and Asia Minor, Ephesus, Caria, 504-506 akin to the Phrygian earth- ;
goddess, the dog an alien animal in Greek worship, 507, 508 adoption ;
of the cult by Athens, 508, 509 reasons of her association with Artemis,
;
509, 510 Hekate associated with the moon, but also with vegetation and
;
the lower world, even with the sea, 510-513 ; more conspicuous as an
infernal power than as a 514; rites of purification, 515;
lunar, 513,
reciprocal influence of the cults of Artemis and Hekate, UpoOvpaia,
"AjjfKos, Hekate associated with childbirth and the Genetyllides, 515-
519-
CHAPTER XVII.
Monuments of the Cult of Artemis . . . 520-536
'
Aniconic period, Artemis dedicated by Nikandra, 520, 521 the Persian ;
'
Artemis, ? a primitive Greek type, 521, 522 Artemis the fish-goddess on ;
early Boeotian vase, 522, 523 ; representations of the tree-goddess, of the

TToTPta O-qpSjv, of the huntress-goddess, Artemis Aa<ppia, 523-526 ; Brau-
ronian type, 527 Artemis TavpowuKos, 529 Artemis-Selene only dis-
; ;
tinguished by the crescent, a late symbol, 531 Einrpaîa, 'Upaa, 531 ; ;
monuments associating her with Apollo, 531-533 ; Artemis rarely repre-

sented as city-goddess, or as goddess of war, 534, 535 ; Artemis Soteira,
"C/^fia, 535-536.
CONTENTS. vii
CHAPTER XVIII.
Ideal Types of Artemis

Works
......
of late archaic period, 537, 538 Pheidian period, Artemis on
;
537-548
PAGE
Parthenon frieze, Lansdowne Artemis, statue in Villa Albani, Argive
relief, 538-540 ; fourth-century monuments, Praxiteles probably the

creator of the ideal, statuette in Vienna, statue from Gabii in the Louvre,
540-543; Artemis on coins of Syracuse, 543, 544; Artemis Colonna,
Artemis of Versailles, on Pergamene frieze, Dresden Artemis, statue by
Damophon, 544-548.
CHAPTER XIX.
Hekate: Representations
Single form of Hekate, 549-551
in
;
Art
work
....
of Alcamenes, significance of the
549-557
triple form, 551-554; symbols and attributes, 554-556; Hekate on the

Pergamene frieze, 557.
References for Chapters XIII-XIX . . . 558-607
Eileithyia ......... CHAPTER XX.
Originally a form of Hera, identified sometimes with her, sometimes with

608-614
Artemis, 608, 609 ;

Eileithyia in Delos, with Sosipolis in Elis, 610-612 ;
612-614.
.....
artistic representations,
References for Chapter XX 615-617
Aphrodite-worship .......
CHAPTER XXI.
Aphrodite not an aboriginal Greek goddess, 618 reasons for this view, ;
618-669
Aphrodite nowhere regarded as autochthonous in Greece, her fictitious

adoption by Dione, 618-621 her association with Hephaestus Ares Hebe
;
the Charites Eros no proof of her Hellenic origin, 621-626 characteristics ;
and names of the Semitic goddess of Anterior Asia, 626-629; Aphrodite

Ourania, meaning of the term and prevalence of the cult, 629-631 ;
associated with Aegeus and Theseus at Athens, 631 Cretan Aphrodite- ;
worship connected with the names Pasiphae, Europa, and with the Attic
cult of Aphrodite 'Enirpa'îa, 631-633 grave of Ariadne in Cyprus and
;
Argos, confusion of sexes in the ritual, youths feigning travail, 634,

635 Ourania at Thebes and Corinth (the hetaerae or Upu5ov\oi an
;
Oriental feature in the latter worship), at Aegira and Olympia, 635, 636 ;
various titles and forms of the Oriental goddess in Greece, 'Acjipia, A(v-
KoOea (1), her maritime character derived from the East, 636-638
Aphrodite- Aeneias, source of the Aeneas myth, the wanderings of Aeneas
signify the diffusion of a cult. Aphrodite "</)( n-n-os, 638-642 ; Aphrodite
a goddess of vegetation in Oriental cult and in Greece, 'AcppobiTTj ""AvOeta,
642, 643 ; worship of Cybele, Attis and Adonis vegetation-deities, Adonis
viii CONTENTS.
the swine-god, Robertson Smith's and Frazer's theories discussed, 644-

647 ;
Athens, 648, 649 Aphrodite originally an earth-
Adonis-worship at ;
goddess, connected also with the lower world, the mourning Aphrodite,
the dead goddess in the legend of Pygmalion, titles of the chthonian
Aphrodite TlapaKv-nTovoa, Topfu, 649-653 armed Aphrodite of the ;
East at Cylhera and Sparta, Aphrodite ^Tpareia, iJiKrjtpupo^, 653-655

Aphrodite the cherisher of children, the goddess of marriage and the
clan/Apixa, 1fivix(pia, 'ATrarovpr], 655-657; Aphrodite UavStj/xos, political
title, erroneous views concerning it, the term misused by Plato, the
worship serious and austere, vrjcpaXia iepd in the worship of Ourania which
is the only recorded Aphrodite-cult with impure ritual, 657-664 Aphro- ;
dite as goddess of beauty and love, UtiOaj, Upaîs, 'EmaTpo^pla, 'Anoarpo-

<pia, 'AvSpo<p6vos, ? ^cuaavSpa, 'EKtrjfiwv, Mopfw, "VlOvpas, 664-667 ; impure
titles probably later, 667, 668 ; summary of the account given, the mean-
ing of Ourania deepened in Greek poetry, 668, 669.
CHAPTER XXII.
Monuments of Aphrodite 670-708

Aniconic forms, Oriental types of the naked and clothed goddess of
fertility, influence on early and possibly on later Greek art, 670-674
Oriental symbols adopted by Greek art, 674-677 representations of ;
Ourania, coins of Eryx and Ouranopolis, statue in Madrid, 677-679 statue ;
by Canachus for Sicyon, relief in Villa Albani, Aphrodite with Eros and
griffin on Aeginetan relief, 679-681 Pheidian statue of Ourania at Elis,
;
681-683 ;
Venus of Pompeii, 6S3, 684 Aphro-
characteristics of Ourania, ;
dite "E-nirpa-y'ia, work of Scopas, 684-6S6 phrodite on the ram, on the

;
horse, 686, 687 representations of the maritime goddess, the Cnidian

;
Aphrodite a cult-statue, 687-690 silver medallion in the Louvre, Aphro-

;
dite with Poseidon and aegis on vase, 690, 691 Aphrodite "AvOfia, the ;
'Venus Genetrix' of the Louvre, 691-693; representations of Adonis,

Aphrodite in the tree, the mourning goddess of Libanon, Aphrodite
Persephone, Aphrodite Gorgo, Melainis, 693-699 the armed Aphrodite ;
with Ares, 700-703 ; representations. Aphrodite the city-goddess, Korpo-

Tpu<pos, 'AiraTovp-q, 704, 705 Aphrodite with Apollo, with Peitho, with
;
Eros on relief from South Italy, Aphrodite 'Era/pa, 705-708.
CHAPTER XXIII.
Ideal Types of Aphrodite 709-7 3

Pre-Pheidian period, bronze in the Louvre, 709; works of Pheidias,
709, 710; Aphrodite head in Holkham Hall, 710, 711 the Cnidian ;
statueby Praxiteles, 711-717 head in Brocklesby Hall, head in posses-

;
sion of Lord Ronald Gower, 718, 719; the Capitoline Venus, the
Aphrodite of Syracuse, of Smyrna, the Castellani head, 719-722; Aphro-
dite of Melos, 722-730.
References for Chapters XXI-XXIII . . . 731-761

LIST OF PLATES IN VOL. II
PLATE XXVIII. Artemis-statue dedicated by Nikandra.
XXIX. {a) Artemis on early Boeotian vase.

{b) Artemis on bronze relief from Olympia.
XXX. {a) Artemis statuette from Lamaka, Vienna.

{b) Artemis on vase, riding on a roe.
XXXI. {a) Artemis standing on bull, statuette British Museum.

{b) Artemis and Apollo on relief, Villa Albani.
XXXII. iâ) Artemis Soteira, statuette British Museum.

{b) Artemis from Pompeii, statue in Naples.
XXXIII. Artemis from Gabii.
XXXIV. Artemis-statue in Lansdowne House.
XXXV. {a) Artemis on relief from Argos.

(b) Artemis-statue in Dresden.
XXXVI. Artemis Colonna, Berlin.

XXXVII A. Artemis on Pergamene frieze.
XXXVII B. Artemis-head by Damophon.
XXXVIII. \a) Seated terracotta figure of Hekate, Athens.

{_b) Hekate on vase in Berlin.
XXXIX. {a) Hekate on relief of Thasos.

{b) Fragment of Hekateion.
(c) Hekateion from Aegina.
{a) Hekate of Bruckenthal Collection.
XL. Hekate on Pergamene frieze.
XLI. (a) Statuette of Aphrodite in Louvre.

{b) Statuette of Aphrodite in Louvre.
{c) Torso of Aphrodite, Marseilles.
{d) Aphrodite on relief of Villa Albani.
XLII. {a) Aphrodite, terracotta relief from Aegina.

{b) Aphrodite, terracotta statuette from Cyprus, British
Museum.
XLIII. {a) Statuette of Aphrodite from Pompeii.
ib) Vase-representation of Aphrodite riding on goat.
X LIST OF PLATES.
I'LATE XLIV. {a) Aphrodite and Eros, silver medallion in Louvre. i
(/') Aphrodite and Poseidon on vase. y ;
XLV. Bronze statuette of Aphrodite, Bibliotheque Nationale, Paris. V ,
XLVI. Venus Genetrix, Louvre.

XLVII. Limestone statuette of Aphrodite in Louvre.
XLVIIL Relief of Hermes, Aphrodite, and Eros from Calabria.
XLIX. {a) Bust of Aphrodite.

{b) Aphrodite with Gorgoneium.
L. {a) Aphrodite and Ares on vase in British Museum.

{b) Aphrodite and Ares on relief in Venice.
LL {a) Aphrodite, limestone head from Cyprus. |
{b) Aphrodite with Eros, terracotta in Louvre.

j
LIL Head of Aphrodite in Holkham Hall.
LHL Head of Aphrodite in Louvre. !
LIV. Cnidian Aphrodite, statue in Munich. I
LV. Head of Aphrodite in Brocklesby Hall. ' ^
LVL Head of Aphrodite, in possession of Lord Ronald Gower. >
"
LVH. Head of Aphrodite in Smyrna.
LVHL Statue of Aphrodite in Syracuse. ]
LIX. Bronze figure of Eileithyia in British Museum.

Coin-Plate A. \
Coin-Plate B.
THE CULTS OF THE GREEK
STATES
CHAPTER XIII.
ARTEMIS.
The female divinities of the Greek religion have so much

of common character as to suggest the beHef that they
are all different formsunder different names of the same
divine personage. Such a theory can only be criticized a
posteriori, after a minute examination of the various cults and
the various ideas attaching to those cults. And it is at any
rate convenient to study side by side such cognate forms as
Artemis, Hekate, Demeter, Persephone^ and Aphrodite. Of
these the most prominent among the scattered tribes and
communities of the Greek world was Artemis. Perhaps no
other figure in the Greek Pantheon is so difficult to under-
stand and explain, not because the conceptions that grew up
in her worship are mystic and profound, but because they are,
or at first sight appear, confusing and contradictory.
Most of her cult is genuinely Hellenic, although in some
places we can discover Oriental influences and ideas. We
can trace back to a prehistoric period, and it is found in all
it
the chief places of prehistoric Greek settlement in Thessaly,

;
Euboea, Boeotia, Phocis, Locris, Aetolia, Sicyon, Achaca,

Elis, Argolis, and, in its most primitive form, in Attica
Laconia and Arcadia. Partly from its wide prevalence, and
partly from certain most primitive features that it possessed,
we must hold that this cult was either an aboriginal heritage
VOL. II. B
426 GREEK RELIGION. [chap.
of the Greek nation, or that it was borrowed by all the tribes

at some very remote time, and as no trace or remembrance of
its foreign origin has been preserved in the earliest traditions
that were rife in the chief centres of the worship, the latter
supposition appears idle and gratuitous. Again, the various
streams of Greek colonization in the Mediterranean diffused
the worship of Artemis, and we
more widely spread
find it
than that of any other Hellenic goddess it was implanted ;
at an early time in Lemnos, in the Tauric Chersonese, and

along the coasts of Asia Minor it was established in the
;
Greek colonies of Sicily, especially at Syracuse from Aetolia ;
it passed up the Hadriatic, and the Phocian emigrants brought
it to Massilia. Perhaps it was from this city that it spread to

Spain, where we find undoubted traces of it^.
Proofs of its early existence in Africa are not easy to dis-
cover; for the records of the cult at Cyrene and Alexandria are
comparatively late. It is probable that it was overshadowed
at Cyrene by the more prominent state-worship of the nymph

of that name, the subduer of lions, beloved by Apollo, a deity
of vegetation who, as Studniczka has ably shown, was a
primitive Aeolic form of Artemis ^
In many of these places, where the new settlers came into
contact with an earlier population, we cannot strictly say that
they introduced the worship as a new cult, but we have
reasons for supposing that they found an indigenous goddess
who bore a certain resemblance to their Artemis and with whom
they therefore identified her. And it is just because she was
so easily confused with foreign and Oriental goddesses, that
the difficulty is so great of defining her original significance for
the Greeks. The name Artemis or Artamis gives us no clue,
for the philological attempts to explain
it have led to nothing.
We
must have recourse to the various records of her worship
in those parts of Greece where Oriental influences were least
likely to have penetrated in early days, and where the myths
and cult have a character that we have the right to call most
primitive. On comparing these with the later and more
" Vk\(i Geographical liegisler, p. 603. chische Gditin, Leipzig, 1890, and the
^ Studniczka, Kyrene, eine altgrie- article '
Cyrene ' in Roscher's Lexicon.
XIII.] ARTEMIS. 427
advanced, we may not succeed in finding any single con-

ception that can explain the manifold character of Artemis,
but we may be able to group together many cult-names and
beliefs according as they refer to the same part of the original
nature of the goddess, and we can trace a very interesting
succession of ideas that throw light on the earlier stages of
development in Greek society.
The poems of Homer represent Artemis not at all as a lunar
goddess or a divinity of any special department of the natural
world, but as the chaste huntress, most beautiful among her
nymphs, the sister of Apollo, the goddess who sends a gentle
death to women. But his portrait of Artemis gives us not the
first but the last point in the development of her character
and the conception of her in later Greek literature is not more

advanced or more spiritual than his.
A different aspect of her is presented in the Arcadian and
Athenian rites and legends, which provide us with testimony
much earlier than Homer's and from these and other frag-
;
ments of evidence it appears probable that the aboriginal

Artemis was not a goddess of chastity, nor a goddess of the
moon, nor the twin-sister of Apollo, but an independent
divinity connected with the waters and with wild vegeta-
tion and beasts reflecting in her character the life of her
;
worshippers who were still in the savage stage, supporting

themselves by hunting and fishing rather than by agriculture,
possessing primitive marriage customs and giving a peculiar
status to women, and whose religion was full of ideas relating to
totemism and to the sacred character of the clan-animal. And
even in the later and civilized period her personality retains
more traces of savagery than that of any other Greek divinity.
The most primitive traits in her cult, those at least that
correspond to the most primitive life of man, are expressed
by such cult- titles as refer to the water, the trees, and wood-
land life. In Arcadia, Laconia, and Sicyon, she was wor-
shipped as and Aiîvaia ^> -, the lady of the lake
Aiixva.Ti'i '
' ;
near the lake of Stymphalus as Sru/xcâAta ^, the goddess who

bred the deadly birds which Heracles slew and 'EAeta, the ;
goddess of the marsh, appears to have been one of her cult-

B 2
names inArcadia and Messene >. She was associated fre-

quently with rivers, as in Elis, where she received the names
'AX(f)eLaLa and 'AAf/)eiw2'ia*, and where she was worshipped under
these an altar by the side of the Cladeus and at the

titles at
mouth Alpheus with these names is connected the

of the ;
ancient legend of the love of Alpheus for Artemis, a legend

transplanted from Elis to Syracuse, where the name Ortygia
proves the old association of the locality with the goddess
''.
The antiquity of this worship of Artemis 'AA(êtata and of the

combined cult of the goddess and the river-god is indicated by
the curious legend given in Pausanias'', how, to secure herself
from the pursuit of Alpheus, Artemis celebrated with her
nymphs by Letrinoe, where Alpheus
a festival in the night
joins the sea,and how she daubed the faces of her attendants
with clay to prevent him recognizing them. As clay-daubing
is a common practice in savage rites of initiation and purifica-
tion, we may believe this to be an aetiological myth invented

to explain some primitive ceremony performed by the wor-
shippers of Artemis on the banks of the river.
The goddess of still and running water is also naturally
a goddess of trees and fish. The strange worship of Artemis
'AirayxoiJiivi], the 'hanging Artemis,' at Kaphyae in Arcadia*'
must have originally been consecrated to the goddess of vege-

tation. Pausanias tells it which
us a curious story concerning
conceals the meaning of the ritual once upon a time certain
:
children in play attached a noose to the neck of her idol and

said that they were hanging Artemis whereupon the men of ;
Kaphyae stoned them, but the angry divinity smote their

wives with a disease, and the oracle bade them atone for
the innocents' death ; the Kaphyans obeyed its injunction, and
instituted the cult of the 'hanging Artemis.' The custom of
hanging the mask or image of the divinity of vegetation on a
tree to secure fertility, of which other instances will be noted '',
sufficiently explains these and similar stories ; and we may

"Vide p. 432. Tlie connexion andby the statement of Pindar's scholiast
between Syracuse and Delos, between that a temple of Artemis 'A^cftfiwa stood
Alpheus, Arethusa, and Artemis, is in Ortygia *. ''6.22,5.
illustrated by the passage in Pindar*, '^
Aphrodite-chapter, p. 634.
XIII.] ARTEMIS. 429
illustrate the ritual ofKaphyae by a relief found at Thyrea

showing the image of Artemis hanging on a garlanded tree^.
The tree-goddess was worshipped in Arcadia with epithets
such as Kapvaris ' and KeSpearts ^, the goddess of the nut-tree
and the cedar, and we may suppose the title Aat^rata^, the
goddess of the laurel, which was attached to her in Laconia,
to be derived from her original character and not to have been
borrowed from her later association with Apollo. In the
Laconian legend and cult of Boiae she appears to have been
identified with the myrtle ^^ and these records attest that **;
in Lacedaemon tree-worship was especially prominent in the
religion of Artemis.
It is noteworthy that there are no cultivated trees associated
with the goddess^'; and we may compare with the facts just
mentioned the story that her idol at Sparta was found in
a willow-brake, and was bound round with withies hence ;
came the title "Aprems A vyohia-ixa '^^. The close relation between
her and the n}'mphs of the wood may have arisen from their
common connexion with trees. Thus at Teuthea in Achaea
she was worshipped under the general name of Ne^xtSfa or
Ne/xDOta ^-, the goddess of the woodland pasture ^. As with the
trees of the wood, one instance, she
so, at least in is associated
with the wild flowers was probably not merely as a sister
; for it
ofApollo, but by the right of her own nature, that she was called
^^.
'TaKLi'6oTp6(f)os, 'the nurturer of the hyacinth,' at Cnidus
Though none of her titles expressly designate her as a fish-
goddess, yet the strange form of Eurynome in the Arcadian

worship ^^ seems to indicate that this conception was not alien
to the earliest character of Artemis in this country. We learn
from Pausanias that at Phigaleia a mysterious goddess was
worshipped at the junction of two streams, in a temple which
was opened once a year only and which was surrounded with
a grove of cypresses the image in the temple was chained
:
* Ann. delV Inst. 1829, Tav. c. custom of wrapping the idol round
''
We find the fir-cone a badge of with branches.
Artemis on a coin of Perge, according "^
We may compare with this title her
to Mionnet, Suppl. 5. 439. association with the nymphs of the
<^ The epithet âKfXiris '^
given her Amnisus in Crete Callim. Dian.
river ;
at Syracuse probably alludes to the 15; ApoU. Rhod. 3. 877. Cf. ^'.
to itsand had the upper parts of a woman and the

place,
lower of a fish to the popular mind, he tells us, this was
:
another form of Artemis but the learned knew that the ;
goddess of the temple and the image was Eurynome, the

daughter of Oceanus, the sea-goddess mentioned by Hesiod
and Homer. In Roscher's Lexicon the latter view is accepted
as correct but Preller and Welcker. without much discussion,
;
take what appears to have been the view of the people ^

Much may be urged in favour of the popular belief. In the
first place, why should a scarcely known sea-goddess receive
so strange a worship in a place so far inland as Phigaleia,

where the inhabitants were landsmen of a very primitive kind ?
And why should her temple be planted round with cypresses,
which as wild trees might belong naturally to Artemis ? ''
Again, the title Y.vpvv6}xr] seems to be one of the descriptive

and general appellatives, like KaAAtoro) and AeWoim, used to
denote one of the goddesses pre-eminent in the land. Now in
Arcadia this must either have been Artemis, or Demeter, or
Persephone ; but the fish-form would be appropriate to neither
of the two latter, but only to Artemis At/xt-ans. And even if we
took the other view, we should have to say on the evidence of
Pausanias that the popular imagination associated Artemis so
closely with the watersand the life of the waters that it could
see their native Artemis in a statue of a goddess of the sea *^.
It is doubtful whether we are to consider such titles as

Ntjo'to-oos^'', 'EK/Sarrjpta^'^, EiiTropia^'^, which designate the goddess
who brings the mariner to the haven where he would be, to

have come to her through a natural extension of the notion
and functions of the water-goddess, or whether she gained
them from her relations with Apollo, or from her association
with the Oriental goddess of Phoenicia, Asia Minor, and
" Roscher's Lexicoit, s. v. Eurynome ;

<=
It might be believed that Eurynome
Preller-Robert, Griechische Myth. i. p. was one of the titles that Artemis bor-
318 ; VVelclcer, Griech. Gdtterl. i. p. 6_î. rowed from the Oriental Aphrodite, as
The affinity of the Phigaleian goddess we hear of Eurynome the wife of Adonis
with Artemis I.imnatis is assumed bylm- in Servius (jE'c/i?^. 10, 18). But Arcadia
merwahr, Kultc und AJytken Arkadicns, lies remote from Oriental influences and
p, ijfi. was scarcely touched by the legend of
^ Vide Botticher, Bauiiuullus, Aphrodite.
p. 493.
XIII.] ARTEMIS. 431
Cyprus, whose maritime character was recognized. At

Troezen the temple of Poseidon was shared by Artemis
Aeginaea, and at Eleusis we hear of the common temple
of Artemis Propylaea and Poseidon the Father his statue ;
stood in the temple of Artemis Iphigenia at Hermione^^.

But whether they belong to the Greek Artemis proper or
not, these sea-titles are certainly of more recent date than the
very early period with which we are still concerned.
The worship of Artemis at Munychia, in its primitive form
at least, seems to have had no reference to the sea. And it is
unnecessary to regard the Artemis at Aulis as a maritime

goddess merely because she sent contrary winds for, as has ;
been often remarked, any deity or any departed hero might

do this and the legend of the anger of Artemis against the
:
Atridae is connected with an incident of the chase.

In certain cases these titles may have come to her by a
natural process of development ; for as the tribes of shepherds

and hunters who worshipped her became seafarers, the god-
dess herself might be supposed to take to the sea.
Still more light is thrown on the early character of Artemis
by considering what animals were habitually regarded as

sacred to her : it is rare and exceptional to find her related
by way of sacrifice, legend, or cult-name with the animals

of the community, with the ox or the
higher agricultural
horse or the domestic pig and in certain localities the calf
;
and the sheep were tabooed in her ritual ^^ She is rather

the patroness of the wild beasts of the field, the animals of the
chase, with which
be soon mentioned her life is con-
as will
nected by the mysterious tie which in very early religions
binds the deity to the animal world. The hare, the wolf, the
hind, the wild boar, and the bear are consecrated to her by
sacrifice or and we may take the description of the
legend ;
yearly offerings to Artemis Aa^pta at Patrae'^ as best illus-

trating her nature as a goddess of the wild life of the woods.
The priestess, a maiden regarded probably as the human
counterpart of the goddess, was drawn in a chariot by stags ;
and Pausanias speaks of the great holocaust of stags and

fawns, wolves and bears, and birds which were all thrown or
driven into the flames of a great fire ;

we gather also that
tame animals and cultivated fruit were offered, as was natural

in the later period. 11 may have been the costliness of this sacri-
fice that gave her the name âOv-nkovTo^ recorded by Suidas ^^ ^
The title Aacppia, signifying possibly '
the devourer,' is proper
to the Calydonian goddess, and it was from Calydon that the
worship of Artemis Aa^pCa probably spread to Phocis, Doris,
and Cephallenia, and certainly to Patrae and Messene ".
In the legend of the colonization of Boiae, the hare appears
to be the embodiment or representative of Artemis for the ;
oracle had said that the goddess would show the settlers where
they should dwell, and a hare suddenly appeared and, having
guided them to the spot, disappeared into a myrtle-tree '^.
The close connexion between Artemis and the wild boar is

illustrated by the story of Meleager, as sketched by the I/iad:
it was Artemis herself, for a reason that will concern us later,
who sent the boar ; and the strife that ensues between the
Kouretes and the Aetolians over the possession of his head
and skin is an indication of the divine character of the beast.
Much later and historical illustration may
be offered of this
association of the boar with Artemis a fragment of Diodorus
:
Siculus contains the story that Phintias, the tyrant of Acragas,

'^
dreamed that while hunting the wild boar he was attacked and
slain by the wild sow and he appears to have appealed to
;
the protection of Artemis 2wretpa by striking coins with the

head of the goddess under this designation on the obverse,
and a wild boar s head on the other side ". The title Kairpo-
(f)dyos -", by which the goddess was known in Samos, refers
probably to the sacrificial offering of the wild boar, at which

she was supposed to partake of his flesh or blood.
That the lion and the wolf were sacred to Artemis is proved
by the Syracusan custom, referred to by Theocritus, of leading
a lioness in certain festal processions instituted in her honour "\
and by the cult-epithet AuKeta which attached to her at
Troezen^^; and it is unreasonable to say that such a title
came to her merely from her later connexion with Apollo,
the wolf-god, as it belongs even more naturally to her than
Paus. 3. 22, 12. ^ 22. 5. Head, //wA Mtm. p. 108.
<=
XIII.] ARTEMIS. 433
to But the wild animals with which she was most

him"*.
frequently associated in cult and in legend were the boar *'
and the stag or fawn in the records of literature and in the

;
monuments of art, the latter appears as her most familiar

companion, and two at least of her cult-names were derived
from it we hear of Artemis 'EAac^ta in Elis, and 'EAa^?//3oAo?
:
'*
in Pamphylia^*% and we could infer that the latter was one of

her common sacred titles, both from the frequency of its use
in the older and later poetry and from the name of the Attic
month 'EAa^?//3oAtwz/, which, like most of the other months,
derived its name from a sacred title of a divinity; sacrifice
being offered in this month, according to the author of the
Etyuwlogiann Magnnin, to Artemis 'EAa(/)7]/3oAo?, A month
of the same name occurred in the calendar of lasos and
Apollonia-"*'' in Chalcidice and we hear of the festival of the
;
'EAa(/)Tj/3oAia, celebrated with great pomp down to the time of

Plutarch, at Hyampolis, to commemorate a Phocian victory
over the Thessalians ^^ '^.
Finally, in this connexion it may be mentioned that the

quail, the bird of spring, that migrated in the early months of
the year from Africa to Greece, was in some way consecrated
to Artemis. Ortygia, near Syracuse, near Delos, near Ephesus,
and in Aetolia-'', probably means the place of the quail-
goddess, and from an expression in a line of Aristophanes'
Bh'ds^ in which Leto is called 'the mother of the quail ,' we
gather that Artemis was herself at some time vaguely con-
ceived of as a quail, though the bird is not found as her emblem
in any of the artistic representations. We have little direct
evidence that Ortygia was a common sacred title, but we
gather from Sophocles that she was thus styled in Euboean
worship ^^. And we may believe that this association between
the goddess and the bird was derived from some primitive
cult-idea, for we note that in other parts of the Mediterranean
" Artemis is seen on coins of Troezen horns, captured by Heracles, was per-
of the imperial period holding the head haps an ancient form of A.rtemis herself,
of a wolf. Her title AvkocLtis was and, according to Pindar, was sacred to
derived from the Arcadian AvKva, the Artemis Orthosia ^^.
'
wolf-city ^^' <:
.-Iv. 870.
*>
The mysterious stag with golden
VOL. II. C
and in another religion the quail appears to have been a sacred

and mystic bird; for instance, there was an annual sacrifice
of the quail at Tyre in commemoration of the resurrection of
Heracles^.
All these special relations and affinities are comprised under
the title of Artemis 'Ayporepa ~'\ which Homer gives her, and
under which she was worshipped in Athens, Laconia, Megara,

Olympia, Achaea, Megalopolis, and elsewhere ''A The -'^
sacrifice at Agrae in Attica was of special importance five ;
hundred she-goats were offered annually by the polemarch to

Artemis 'Ayporepa as a thanksgiving for the victory of Mara-
thon, and it was one of the special duties of the ephebi to
assist in the ritual ^" ^. Spartan religion prescribed the sacrifice

of a she-goat to Agrotera before the king began the campaign
or the battle ^^ ^
As regards the relations between the goddess of the wild
and the animal world, it is important to observe that while
Greek poetry and art more usually describe her as the huntress
and destroyer, the older religion was more familiar with the
conception of her as the protector and patroness of wild
animals, and especially of those that were with young ^\
According to Xenophon, the true sportsman would spare
the very young hare for the sake of Artemis ^'^ ^. Very '
kindly is the fair goddess to the tender whelps of ravening

lions, and to the sucking young of all the beasts of the field '
'
she loathes the banquet of the eagles who devoured the '
'
pregnant hare.' These striking words of Aeschylus ", which

might seem to anticipate the modern sentiment of kindness to
animals, really express the view of very primitive religion, in
which that sentiment was in some cases a sacred belief and
possessed far greater force than it possesses now.
In fact these features of the earliest worship of Artemis
suggest a cult which, though it had already advanced beyond
totemism, yet retained traces of totemistic ideas. We may
thus explain the legend and ritual in which the animal is in
" Athenae. p. 392. Vide Robertson her as the destroyer are 'E\a^7;(3oAos and
Smith's Religion of the Semites, p. 449. probably Aa<ppia, and TloSa-ypa in La-
^ The only cult-titles that designated conia '-'''. Jg: 138. 135.
xiii.] ARTEMIS. 435
some way identified with the deity or with the worshipper,

and on rare and solemn occasions is eaten in the sacrificial
meal in which the deity and his people are drawn more
closely together. Now the early myths and cults of Artemis
furnish evidence of this stage of religious thought. The
above-mentioned epithet of Leto 'OpTvyojxriTpa would suggest
that there was once a belief that the quail was another form
of Artemis a legend is given by Apollodorus that she ran
;
between the Aloades in the form of a hind, and on a coin

which Mliller quotes, and which he ascribes to Delos, the
goddess appears to have been represented with stag's horns ^.
And we have the story mentioned by Pausanias'' that she
guided the new settlers to the site of Boiae, a town of Laconia,
in the form of a hare.
But it is the legends of Arcadia and Attica that best reveal
the strange bond that once existed between Artemis and the
animal world. In the old Arcadian myth of Areas and Callisto
we have a confused story, which has been well interpreted
by Miiller", and which contains vague allusions to a very
ancient cult-form that deserve notice. The evidence that he
puts together makes it certain that in this story Callisto, the
beloved of Zeus, the mother of Areas and of the Arcadian race,
the nymph who was the comrade of Artemis, wearing the
same dress and sharing her pursuits, and who was changed into
a she-bear, is none other than Artemis herself'^: he notices
that KaAAio-r?/ is a frequent poetical title of Artemis, and was
used at Athens as a term of cult^', and that on the very hill
where the nymph Callisto was supposed to be buried a temple

^'^.
was raised to Artemis KaXAto-rr;
From this myth alone, then, we might conclude that the bear
was regarded sometimes as the very goddess and this becomes ;
clearer still by comparing the Arcadian legend with the worship

of Artemis BpavpoovU at Brauron, Athens, and Munychia
^"' ''K
^ Other evidence for this view is given

" Dorians,
p. 379, note i, quoted
from the collection of Payne Knight ;

by the fact that her other names appear
I have been unable to trace this coin to have been yiiyiaTw and eîffrw,
further. evidently titles of a divinity, and that
b
3. 22, 9. she was called the daughter of Lycaon,
Pro/eg. pp. 73-76. a title probably of the Arcadian Zeus''*.
C 2
of which the significance from this point of view has been well
shown by Mr. Lang**. It is important to put together the
passages from which we obtain our knowledge of this ritual ^-,
which presents a very interesting problem, but one that is often

evaded in the study of Greek religion '\ We learn from Aris-
tophanes that it was the custom for young maidens, clothed
in a saffron robe, to dance in the Brauronian ceremonies of
Artemis, and that in this dance they, as well as the priestess,
were called bears the saffron robe was possibly worn in
'
'
;
order to imitate the tawny skin of the bear'', and probably in

the earliest times of the rite an actual bear-skin was worn by
the dancers. The dance was and the maidens called apKrda,
who took part in it and ten years of age.
were between five
Various explanations are given of this strange ritual by the

scholiast on the passage in the Lysistrate, by Suidas, and by
the writer in Bekker's Aiiccdota the bear was once a tame :
bear who lived amongst them or a wild bear appeared in :
the Peiraeeus and did much damage some one slew it and ;
a pestilence followed, whereupon Apollo ordered the people

to sacrifice a maiden to the 'bear Artemis'^,' but a goat was
offered instead by a man who called it his daughter. The
scholiast merely says that Artemis was angry, and ordered
every maiden by way of propitiation to dance the bear-dance
before marriage and to pass round the temple wearing the
saffron robe. The festival of the Brauronia acquired con-
siderable public importance, and was organized every five
years by the UpoirotoL.

* Myth, Ritual, and Religion, 2. pp. for granted by Welcker. But the ex-
212-215. planation is certainly doubtful; for
^ In Roscher's Lexicon there is no though the difference between saffron
critical reference to these Brauronian and tawny is not great, the usual bear-
ceremonies that is of any value ; they skin is brown. The saffron robe might
are collected without much criticism have come to be worn merely as a sacred
by Welcker, l. pp. 571-574. and adornment, and to admit this would not
by Preller-Robert, Griech. Mythol. i. invalidate the argument in the text,
pp. 312-315. Schomann, Griechischc ^ The phraseology in Bekk. .//w^r;/. i.
Alterth. 2. p. 458, merely repeats an p. 444, is quite correct 7ijj.a.v t}\v
impossible theory of Lobeck's {Âglaoph. ''Aprefxiv /cal Odaai Kuprjv t?) "'Ap/crai but
p. 74) concerning the meaning of a^/fTot. is misunderstood and regarded with
" This seems to be implied by the suspicion by Welcker, Griech. Gotterl.
scholiast on the passage, and is taken i. p. 574, n. 16.
XIII.] ARTEMIS. 437
Two things arc clear from these accounts : {a) that the
dance was a kind of initiation by which the young girls before
arriving at puberty vvêre consecrated to the goddess ^

;
[b) that
the goddess and her worshippers and the bear were considered
as of one nature, and called bythe same name''. All this accords
exactly with the many illustrations offered by totemistic re-
ligions of the belief that the tribe draw nearer to their deity by
assuming the form or skin of the beast which they consider to
be mysteriously related to themselves, and to be an embodi-
ment of their god or goddess. It would be consonant with
this belief if we found that at Brauron the bear was offered in
a sacrificial meal to the goddess on solemn occasions but the :
authorities make it clear that a goat or hind was usually

the animal of sacrifice. Weight, however, must be given to the
observation made by
the scholiast on the passage in the Lysis-
trate, that abear and not a hind was sacrificed in place of
Iphigenia, and that the offering took place at Brauron , It is
probable that we have here a real local tradition, and the

Brauronian sacrifice would be thus completely in accordance
with ancient totemistic ideas: the maidens dressed up as
bears assist at the sacrifice to the bear-goddess of an animal
considered as akin to her and to themselves, and thus, if the
sacrificial meal followed upon the act of oblation, they would
be recruiting their physical life and reviving the communion
between themselves and their divinity. At the same time
the feeling of kinship with the bear would easily lead to the
belief at a later time that the goddess was angry because her
animal was killed. The substitution of the goat for the bear
was a violation of the logic of the ceremony, and due probably
to the great difficulty of procuring the larger animal in the
later periods of the Attic sacrifice ;
perhaps also to the chance
that may have put the ritual into the hands of a goat-tribe,
" Vide Robertson Smith, Religion of goddess may be illustrated by the dance
the Semites, pp. 304, 309, for other of the Caryatides, the maidens who im-
instances of sacrifices upon initiation, personated "Apnuis Kapvans.
showing the same principle as the Brau- " The authority for the statement
ronian bear-dance. was probably Phanodemus in his
>
This view that the apicToi who Atthis.
danced were considered to represent the
for we have the legend that the female goat was treated as
a kinswoman.
As sacrifice of a bear, which
illustrating this ceremonial
I have assumed to have been part of the original Brauronian
ritual, we have the Arcadian myth of Callisto, which we may
believe to be based on certain ancient cult-practices. That
legend clearly attests the divinity of the bear ^ and yet the
animal comes to be regarded as hostile to Artemis, and in
certain versions of the story is finally slain. But in one most
important account the animal is not slain in the ordinary
secular manner, but is comes near to
sacrificially offered, or
being so offered, to a divinity, namely, to Zeus Aukcios, into

whose holy precincts she had accidentally strayed ^ Although
the bear has no real connexion with Zeus Lyceius, yet we
seem to light again upon the traces of the same strange fact,
concealed in doubtful myth, which we note in the cult of
Brauron ;namely, the offering up of a holy animal, to a
divinity the same in kind, by a tribe of worshippers who
were united to both by blood-relationship.
The main part of the mysterious Arcadian story may be
explained, if we suppose that the cult of Artemis KaAAto-rw,
the bear-goddess, had died out, and nothing remained but the
memory that the bear, a holy and peculiar animal, had been
offered up to a divinity the nearest analogies would be
:
supplied by the existing ceremonies of the worship of Zeus

AvKetoj, and this alien trait might have come into the story
to explain the fact of the sacrificial offering then it would ;
become difficult to understand why, if the animal had been

once beloved by Artemis, it should have been put to death at
all in her name. The bear, therefore, was supposed to have
incurred the enmity of the goddess, and, to explain the reason,
reference was made to the probably later notion of the
goddess's chastity'^.
" We have also a possible allusion to ''
Hygin. Poet. Astron. 2. i.
an Arcadian bear-dance, performed in "=

Many instances might be given
the worship of Demeter or Artemis at of this change in the point of view,
Lycosiira, in the human figure with the whereby the animal that was once
bear's head wrought on Damophon's the favourite and the kinsman of the
peplos of Demeter. divinity, and therefore on rare occasions
XIII.] ARTEMIS. 439
With this stage of ritual the tradition of human sacrifice

is closely connected ; and it has been often supposed that
even in historical times this rite, or a modification of it,
survived in the worship of Artemis. no clear and But there is
special evidence that this was ever the case. In the Thargelia
at Athens two human Kaddp^xciTa, being probably criminals,
were sacrificed in a sort of religious execution but though ;
Artemis, from her later connexion with Apollo ^^, came to

obtain a place in that festival worship, yet it does not appear
that the KaOdpixara were devoted to her. Again, the flagella-
tion of the Spartan ephebi before the altar of Artemis 'Opîa'^^'^,
which has been almost always regarded as a modification of

an earlier religious act of human oblation*^, is much more
naturally explained by Prof. Robertson Smith as a ceremony
of initiation, in which the youth is admitted into the full
status of tribesman, and in which the altar or the sacred idol
must be touched with his blood in order that the physical
bond between him and his divinity may be strengthened''.
At the same time this strange rite, which seems to have been
still in vogue in the time of Philostratus, wâs intended also,
no doubt, as a test of the youth's endurance; it is called

a dixiXXa, a contest of fortitude, by Plutarch ^^'^, and such cruel
tests have been frequently imposed by savage tribes before
the tribesman was admitted to the privileges of manhood. If
it had been merely a fiction put in place of the primitive fact
of a human sacrifice, it is not likely that the logic of the

ceremony would have demanded the fictitious immolation of
all the ephebi en masse.
But though we may not find much clear survival of actual
or fictitious human sacrifice in the Artemis-worship of the
historical periods, yet it might be thought that the tradi-
tions clearly imply its practice in the prehistoric age, and we
are often obliged to regard tradition as actual evidence of
becomes regarded as hostile
sacrificed, **
Vide Religion of the Semites,
to that The same change
divinity. pp. 303, 304 ; it was in accordance
happened in the relations of Bacchus with the same notion that boys' hair
and the goat. was shorn and offered to Artemis at the
" For instance by the Laconians them- Ionic festival of the Apaluria'*.
selves, according to Pausanias '''"^.
a prehistoric fact. But here it is quite possible that tradition,

in one important case at least, has been misinterpreted.
The crucial case is the legend of the sacrifice of Iphigenia
at Aulis. With this is connected the Brauronian cult and
the worship of the Tauric Artemis ^^' ^^' ^- ^ for Euripides,
;
in bringing Iphigenia and the image to the shores of Brauron,

is certainly following some local legend, and he is very ex-
plicit in his account of the local ritual ^ ; also the scholiast
on the passage in the Lysistrate says, '
Some declare that
the events connected with Iphigenia took place in Brauron
^^.'
and not in Aulis
Moreover, the legend of the Tauric goddess speaks much
about human sacrifice ^^' ^-, and we may believe that this
rite was actually practised in the locality that was the original
seat of the cult, whether Attica, Lemnos, or the Tauric
Chersonese. Euripides makes Athena herself institute the
ritual of the Tauric-Brauronian Artemis at Halae, and she
ordains by way of ransom to the goddess for Orestes' life,
that in the yearly sacrifice there the sword should be held to
a man's throat and some blood should be drawn, for the '
sake of righteousness and that the goddess might have

honour.' That warriors before a campaign require a sacrifice
of peculiar efficacy to bring them into the closest communion
with the divinity is quite in accord with primitive religious
thought ; and if a human victim were demanded, a kinsman
or kinswoman would be required rather than an alien.
Agamemnon, therefore, may have sacrificed his own daughter

before setting out from the same motive prompted that
Jephthah to offer his own on his return. But the only
historical instance, if we could trust the record in Clemens '',
* We should certainly gather from probably erroneously, though Euripides'

the passage at the close of the Iphigenia words are not quite conclusive ; vide
in Tauris that there were not two Wilamowitz, Hermes, i8. 254.
separatecults
one of Artemis Bpav/joii'ta "^
Hiller, in Her7nes, 21. p. 127, ques-
at Brauron and one of Tauropolos at tions the authenticity of the citation.
Halae but only one, namely of Artemis The citation from Uv9oK\rj^ irepl o/xo-
BfMvpojviaworshipped at Halae near voias may be fictitious, but the explicit

Brauron under the name Taiiropolos. statement about the Phocian sacrifice
But Strabo mentions two temples, the is not likely to have been wholly
one at Brauron the other at Halae, imaginary.
XIII.] ARTEMIS. 441
of human sacrifice to Artemis, would be the sacrifice in her

worship at Phocaea, where the human victim is said to have
been burnt alive As regards what
^^. we can gather from tradi-
tion, the cult-legends of Brauron and Aulis may be explained
otherwise. The central idea in them is that an animal-sacrifice
was a substitution for an earlier human victim but this ;
theory of substitution could have been suggested by the mere

form of the ritual itself, if the sacred animal was offered
sacramentally as being akin to the tribe and the tribal
divinity for instance, if it was partially dressed up in human
;
clothing, like the bull-calf of Dionysos in Tenedos, or if it was

called by a human name. Now we have the right to infer
that this was actually the case at one time in the Brauronian
ceremonies, as the legend says expressly that the man who
offered the goat ' called it his daughter ^".' A mass of evidence
has been collected and interpreted by Prof. Robertson Smith
on this primitive form of sacrifice, the sacramental offering
of the '
animal. This ritual which seems very
theanthropic '
strange but was quite natural from the totemistic point

to us,
of view, was certain to be misunderstood in the later period ;
the mysterious sacrificial animal, which was treated as if it

were man, was supposed to be treated thus, because it was
a mere make-belief for the human offering which the goddess
originallydemanded. But this may be really a varepovTrpoTepov.
the sacrifice where it actually was in vogue
human may
have been an outgrowth from the earlier offering of the quasi-
human animal. And if human life was at any time offered
up in the Brauronian rite, it would be probably truer to say,
so to speak, that Iphigenia was a substitute for the doe than
that the doe was a substitute for Iphigenia ^ In either case
there was a close affinity between the victim and the goddess ;
for we have abundant proofs* that Iphigenia, like Callisto,

is an appellative or a local cult-name of Artemis '\
Among these legends of human sacrifice that admit of
" The theory by which I have tried gard to other primitive sacrifices; vide
to explain the Brauronian cult is merely especially Religioi of the Semites, pp.
that which has been very skilfully set 345, 346.
forth by Prof. Robertson Smith in re- **
Vide Mliller, Dorians, p. 383.
the explanation suggested above may be placed the record

in Porphyry concerning the sacrifice at Laodicea'' he tells us ;
that originally a maiden had there been sacrificed annually

to Athena, but that in his day a hind was substituted. As
this animal is sacred to Artemis and has httle or nothing to
do with Athena, and as the Laodiceans claimed to possess the
original image of the Brauronian Artemis-cult, and we find an
armed figure of this goddess standing between two stags on
the coins of the city^ it is almost certain that Porphyry has
given the wrong name to this armed divinity, who was really
Artemis. And we may suppose that this sacrifice of the

hind at Laodicea, belonging really to the Brauronian goddess,
was accompanied by ritual that suggested an actual human
offering,and hence the story may easily have arisen that
the more cruel custom had once prevailed. Where the view
prevailed that the animal took the place of the human life,
we can believe that in times of great peril the latter might
actually be offered as the more real and acceptable sacrifice,
and might grow to be even the customary rite.
this
Before passing on to the more advanced ideas in the
worship of Artemis, we might consider the question whether
in this earliest period we already find the maidenly character
of the goddess recognized. It might be thought that this, which
is her sole quality of great importance for a higher and more
spiritual religion,must necessarily have been a virtue with
which the imagination of a more advanced age endowed her.
But though in one sense this is true, yet it is probable that
the germ of the idea was to be found in the primitive period.
In the first place^ the Arcadian myth of Areas and Callisto
appears inconsistent in its earliest form with the character of
the chaste goddess. A closely parallel myth is that which
deals with the birth of Telephos, who is sprung from Auge
the priestess, not indeed of Artemis, but of Athena Alea it :
may be only an accident of local worship that brings the
a Athena '\ cult. At Tegea, at the festival of Apollo

b Head, Hist. Num. p. 660. and Artemis, the priestess pursued one
c Vide pp. 453, 455 for further evi- of the worshippers with the pretended
him ^\
dence of human sacrifice in the Artemis- intention of slaying
xni.] ARTEMIS. 443
latter goddess into the story, for the traces of Artemis are
clearly in the background. We find that Telephos was born
on Mount Parthenion, and we hear of a Tr]\e(f)ov ka-Tia in the
neighbourhood of Artemisium near Oenoe he was suckled ;
by the hind, the familiar animal of the goddess ^. It seems,

then, most probable that the name Auge is an equivalent for
Artemis and this belief receives further support from the
;
statement of Pausanias that the mother of Telephos was

worshipped at Tegea under the title of Xvyi] h yovacnv ^ and
was identified with Eileithyia, a goddess who was frequently
regarded as another form of Artemis. It may also be more
than a mere coincidence that both Telephos and Areas come
near in the legend to slaying their own mother. The same
view of the primitive character of Artemis is presented by
another myth, the story of Atalanta and Meilanion, or Hip-
pomenes It becomes quite clear that Atalanta is Artemis
"".
under another name, when we examine certain particulars

of the legend of her life*^. She was fabled to have been
exposed as a new-born child by a spring on Mount Par-
thenion, and to have been nursed by a bear she becomes ;
the mighty and swift-footed huntress who refuses marriage,

which had been forbidden her by an oracle but she unites ;
herself with Meilanion, and Parthenopaios is their son, the

'
child born out of wedlock the head and skin of the boar
'
:
were offered to her by Meleager, and, like Artemis, she pos-

sessed a certain association with springs, as on the east coast
of Laconia a fountain was pointed out to Pausanias which had
been called forth by Atalanta ''. In these myths, then, we
see obscure traces of a primitive goddess who is only maidenly
in the sense that she rejects marriage. Now when we look at
the manifold worships of Artemis in historic Greece, and con-
sider how the cult-names interpret them to us, we are struck
with an apparent contradiction : whereas in the earliest poetry
and in many of the early myths the most prominent quality
Paus. Apollod.
8. 54, 5 ; i. 8, 6. 221, &c.; Pans. 3. 12,9; \iyg.Fab. 270
*>
Paus. 8. 48, 7. (' Parthenopains Meleagri et Atalantes
<=
Vide Roscher, s. v. Atalanta. filius ') ; Ov. Metam. 10. 560, &c.
^ Vide Callimachus, Zi^'ww /(? jyw//a, Paus. 3. 24, i.
in the goddess
is her chastity, this is never presented to us in
cult ;
no public worship of Artemis the chaste. The
there is
term riapê'ro?, where it is applied to Artemis, does not appear

to have been a cult-epithet, and the worship of Artemis Kopta in
Arcadia ^^, us. seems wrongly
about which Callimachus informs
understood by Welcker^ as devoted to Artemis the virgin:
for Ko'/ny does not mean virgin, and Kopia might merely mean
the goddess who assists girls and the legend that explains ;
the title refers to the madness of the Proetides, who lead a

wild life and reject marriage, until they are tamed at last by
Artemis 'H/xepao-i'a''^. It appears, in fact, from those of her
sacred titles that allude to the relation of the sexes, that she
was especially concerned with the loss of virginity and with
child-bearing for she was worshipped and
; invoked as
\v(Ti((iivos *\ Xo\da ^^\ (Tocahiva *^ maidens of marriageable age
;
did certain honours to Artemis as KavrjcjiopoL, and women in

travail called upon Artemis for aid "'^. And she not only
assisted but even encouraged child-birth for, as Euripides ;
naively says, Artemis Aoxta would not speak to childless

'
women In some communities she was identified with

''.'
Eileithyia *', and the title of Artemis Xtrm'ia or Xirwy?; ^'^j

by which she was worshipped in Miletus and Syracuse, was
explained as derived from the offerings of women's robes
made to her after child-birth, or, as Euripides implies ^^, made
in behalf of those who had died in child-birth ;
certain epigrams
in the AntJiology refer to these dedications'*^. And what is
still more important is and the allusions
that, while such titles
to these functions are numerous, we can find scarcely any that

recognize her as a goddess of marriage, though we must raise
the question in regard to epithets such as "Aprfjmts netf^w,
'HyepoVr;, and Ei;KAeta. On the other hand, as will be noticed,
she takes a special interest in the rearing of children, and
certain ceremonies connected with their nurture are conse-
crated to her.
* Criech. Gottcrlchre, 2. p. .^93. Artemis to forgive them for being no

The passage ^* quoted by the scho-
*>
longer virgins; but Artemis Aoxi'a
liast on Theocritus from Menander im- would require no such apology.
plies that women in travail called upon
XIII.] ARTEMIS. 445
But there is another feature occasionally discernible in her

worship which seems still more alien to the character of the
Greek Artemis, namely, orgiastic and lascivious dances and
the use of phallic emblems in the ritual. At Elis we hear of
the temple of Artemis KopSaxa, the worship being accompanied
with the dance that Pausanias considers to be native to the
region of Sipylos and to have been brought into the Elean
cultby the followers of Pelops and at Derrha on Taygetus,
'"^
;
where Artemis was worshipped, we hear of a dance of the

same character, called KaAAa^tSe? *'% performed in her honour ;
while Hesychius mentions the Ao/x/3at "*"

that were used in
one of her cults, and which he describes as having a phallic

significance *.
It may be said, and by way of apology it was said by the

worshippers of Elis and Laconia, that this ritual which had an
orgiastic taint upon it was a foreign, an Oriental, innovation ;
for the Eleans attributed the worship of Artemis KophaKa to

Pelops, and the procession that closed the festival of Artemis
'OpOia was called Avhcov ttoixtti]
'^*'.
This may be true in the
main, as much may have been borrowed across the sea for
the Greek worship from the closely related goddess of Asia
Minor. But these facts of ritual would in any case illustrate
the point upon which stress is being laid, that the earliest
worship of Artemis in Greece admitted ideas that were alien
to the purity of the later conception. Now if we suppose
this higher idea to have been prominent in the primitive
period to which myth and cult bring us back, in the first
place how could the virgin Artemis have been so frequently

identified with the various forms of the Asiatic goddess,
whose worship in many details showed an impure character ?
Again, how was it that the virgin-goddess had so much to do
with the processes of maternity? The cult of the primitive
divinity usually reflects the present or past life of the wor-
shipper, and human acts and states are attributed to the deity
according to his or her special character and range of functions.
" It has been suggested that the interpretation seems very far-fetched,
ancient title of Artemis 'OpOla in Laconia and the term may be otherwise explained
contained a similar allusion; yet this (vide p. 453, note b).
The idol of \vy\] kv yovaaiv worshipped at Tegea no doubt

represented the goddess of child-birth, who was closely
akin to the Arcadian Artemis, as herself in the pangs of

travail.
We have
then abundant evidence, both from cult and myth,
that the primitive Greek did not necessarily conceive of
Artemis as a virgin-goddess, and that the cults of historical
times scarcely, if ever, take notice of this side of her char-
acter ''.
on general grounds, it would be hard to show
In fact,
why a goddess of a primitive hunting and pastoral tribe,

a divinity of the fertilizing waters, who fostered the wild
growths of the earth and the sucklings of the beasts of the
field, should have been naturally regarded by them as a
virgin though a goddess whose character was derived from
;
that period might easily fail to become a divinity of settled

married life.
But, on the other hand, the belief in her virginal nature

must have become a dogma at a comparatively early time.
It is prominent in Homer, and it explains why the early
myths of the Arcadians were careful to detach such figures

as Callisto and Auge and Atalanta from Artemis herself, and
to make them, rather than the goddess who had come to
be regarded as virginal, the ancestresses of certain Arcadian
stocks. Moreover, in certain myths that are probably
pre-Homeric, the chastity of Artemis is plainly considered
essential there is the well-known Actaeon story, and the
;
special form of it preserved by Stesichorus'', that Actaeon's

love for Semele was thwarted by Artemis, a peculiar version
* There were certain rules of monastic was the case in most centres of the
severity and chastity imposed upon the Greek worship is doubtful. The priestess
priest and priestess of Artemis 'T/:^wa of Artemis 'Y/ii/ia was necessarily a
worshipped at the Arcadian Orcho- virgin, until the Arcadians found it
menos ^-* and this was undoubtedly

;
advisable to alter this rule and select
a very ancient cult. But we cannot a married woman : o/xcKias dvSpwv d-no-
always argue from the character of the XP"^^''''^^ 4'xov(;a. We hear of Artemis
priesthood to that of the divinity ; for Bpavpwvia served by married
being
we find the necessity of chastity in the priestesses. According to Artemidorus
priest of one of the worships of Heracles. an traipa would not enter the temple of
The priestess of Artemis TptKXapia in Artemis'''.
Achaea at Patrae ^^ as of 'Ay port pa at *>

Taus. 9. 2, 3.
Aegira ^"',
was a maiden ; whether this
xiii.] ARTEMIS. 447
which has been pressed to an unnatural interpretation by-
Klaus '.
And that this is pre-eminently her character in the earliest

literature must be due to some conception deeply rooted in
the popular worship. How then is this strange contradiction
to be explained ? The usual solution of it, that Artemis

became virginal through her close connexion with the Apolline
worship, seems idle ; for the Apolline worship, though we may
find certain high and spiritual conceptions in contained no
it,
essential idea of sexual purity : the sister of Apollo need not

by any means have been a chaste goddess ^. And it is much
more unreasonable to say that she became pure when she
became recognized as the moon for, in the first place, her ;
lunar character, though very prominent in modern accounts of

her, has no clear recognition in the more ancient and genuine
legend and cult and, secondly, there is neither reason nor
;
analogy for the supposition that in early mythology and

worship the moon was necessarily a virgin.
A different explanation may be hazarded. In the period
of the most primitive religion of Artemis the goddess was
considered and addressed as UapOhos, and this title would
explain many geographical names in Greece, in the islands,
and on the coasts of the Mediterranean'^; and it seems
* De Dianae antiquissima A'aturd, Uapeivio^. The goddess in the Tauric
Wratislaviae, Actaeon is
1881, p. 26: Chersonese bore the name of Uapeivos,
considered by him to be another form and the inscription from the Chersonese
of Zeus Artemis is his wife and jealous
;
published in the Revue des Aiudes
ofSemele. Grccques contains the formula of the
b We may add also that if the nymph oath taken by the magistrates (circ.
Cyrene is rightly interpreted as an older 150 B.C.) in her name ; a goddess Dap-
form of Artemis, the relations between Bivos was worshipped at Neapolis in
Apollo and Artemis were not always Thrace ^^ The same idea of a goddess
regarded as chaste and fraternal vide ; who was at once UapOfvo^ and Urir-qp
Roscher's Lexicon, s. v. Kurene. existed in Phrygian religion ;
vide Ram-
<^
The ancient name of Samos was i:iy, Hellejtic Journal, 10. 229. From
Parthenia, the island of the goddess the story told by Diodorus Siculus
Parthenos, given it, according to Strabo, (5. 62), which is very full of aetiological
by the Carians = : we have Mount Par- fancy, we gather that there was a wor-
thenion in Arcadia; the city Partheniori ship on the Carian Chersonese of a
in Euboea ; a river Parthenius in Paph- goddess UapOivo^, with surnames such
lagonia associated by legend with Ar- as Mo\7ra5ia, "Pom, 'UpiOia^^^, and not
temis, Staph. Byz. s. v. Il.apQtvi.ov and originally regarded as virginal. Swine
probable that the term was widely prevalent hi Asia Minor,

especially in Caria, designating a goddess who was closely
akin to Artemis and the Oriental Aphrodite ^^ But the
oldest sense of Parthenos was not 'virginal' but 'unmarried,'
as we might gather from the Carian legend alone and in ;
this sense her Oriental equivalent, a goddess of impure

character and worship, was also Ylapdivo'i^. In fact, Artemis
UapB^vos may have been originally the goddess of a people
who had not yet the advanced Hellenic institutions of settled
marriage, who may have reckoned their descent through the
female, and among whom women were proportionately
powerful. Then when society developed the later family
system the goddess remained celibate though not opposed to
child-birth and we may thus understand why she was always
;
pre-eminently the goddess of women, and why maidens before

marriage should offer their girdles and perform other probably
piacular rites to Artemis ^ Finally, as it was always neces-
sary to consider the goddess unmarried, and at the same time

her worship became more spiritual, the title YlapOlvo^ may
are tabooed in her worship as in the Aphrodite and roamed in madness about
cult of Aphrodite and Adonis the story ; the country, and whose example induced
of her leap into the sea is the same as the other Argive women to desert their
that told of Dictynna and Derketo the husbands and to slay their children ;
Syrian fish-goddess (Diod. Sic. 2. 4). the Proetides are pursued by Melampus
She is connected with Apollo and the and a band of young men who are
art of healing, and she aids women in taught to dance a religious kind of
travail. We have here a Carian-Crelan dance as a curative for the women ;
religion of an Artemis-Aphrodite vide ;

they are finally healed in the temple of
Aphrodite, pp. 637, 646. Artemis 'Hntpaaia, and the temple of
Vide Aphrodite-chapter, pp. 629, Artemis Kopia is consecrated in their
6-Hr. memory-". Perhaps the pursuit of the
There are two important Greek
* young men was a ceremony connected
myths in which the leading motive is with primitive marriage-customs and
the rebellion of women against the parallel to the race ofarmed youths in
married and both of them seem
state, the wooing of Atalanta. {b) The myth
to have some relation to the worship of of the Lemnian women who despise
Artemis {a^, the myth of the daughters
:
Aphrodite and slay their husbands.
of Proetus, who, according to one ver- The whole island was sacred to the
sion, treat the temple of Hera, the god- Tauric Artemis, and the legend in-
dess of marriage, with contempt (Phere- directly connects this slaying with the
cydes ap. Schol. Od. 15. 225 Acusilaus ;

spread of the Lemnian worship to the
Tauric Chersonese;cf. Hygin. Fab. 15.
ap. ApoUod. 2. 2, 2), were punished by
XIII.] ARTEMIS. 449
thus have acquired the higher sense, and expressed the stain-
less and chaste goddess, such as she came to be recognized, not
expressly in cult, but in the imagination of the Greek world. It
would on this theory have been the progress from the non-
moral idea of the unmarried goddess to the moral conception
of the virgin Artemis, a progress carried out by the change in
the meaning of YlapOivos, that was of the greatest import for the
Greek religious sense. For it was the personality of Artemis
rather than of Athena that consecrated that idea of the beauty
of purity, the ideal of the life unsullied by passion, which re-
ceived here and there a rare expression in Greek literature and
more frequently inspired the forms of art. The drama of the
Hippolytos is unique in Greek, and perhaps in any literature
for here the law of chastity is a spiritual law, presented with no
ascetic or unnatural sanction, but united with a genial delight in
pure forms of life and action. And the poet conceives that
such approved by Artemis. But in this play, as elsewhere,
life is
he shows himself above the religious thought of his age for ;
neither in the popular religion, nor in the general literature, is

there any view clearly expressed that purity in the abstract
was consecrated by any divine sanction, although unchastity
under certain special conditions, and sometimes the breach
of the marriage vow, were regarded as incurring divine
reprobation ^.
In tracing the development of the worship of Artemis from

the savage to the more settled and civilized period, we may
first notice that she comes to have some connexion with
agriculture and the breeding of the domestic animals. The
goat was the animal most commonly used in her sacrifices'*',
and it is possible that she acquired some of her cult-titles
from it^ the local legend of the city Atyetpa in Achaea
;
* Vide Hera-chapter, p. 197. Cf. the mis, sometimes supposed todesignate the
story in Pausanias 8. 47, 4, that the goat-goddess wasconnected in the local
tyrant of Orchomenos, having purposed legend of Laconia with the Cretan god-
maiden who destroyed her-
to violate a dess Britomartis, and was more probably
her chastity, was slain
self to preserve derived from the island Aegina, where
by a Tegean whom Artemis stirred up the Cretan cult had settled. Kfa/fearty,
in a dream. Ki'a/caATyaia, Ki'a7a, are appellatives"
^ Alyivaia^^ a doubtful title of Arte- that have been supposed to refer to the
VOL. II. D
connected the name with the goats to whose horns the natives
on one occasion attached torches and thus scared away the
invading army of the Sicyonians ^ a temple was then founded ;
near Aegira to Artemis 'AypoT^pa^'^, on the spot where the

fairest she-goat, the leader of the flock, rested on the ground,
the influence of the goddess being supposed to be working in
her favourite animal.
In Sparta, as has been mentioned above, the custom pre-
vailed of the king sacrificing a goat to Artemis in front of the
army before charging the enemy, and we hear frequently of
the great annual sacrifice in Attica of five hundred she-goats as
a thank-offering to the goddess for the victory of Marathon.
Once, at least, we may
believe that Artemis, like Athena,
was associated, only accidentally, with the breeding of
if
horses '\ In Arcadia, in the territory of the Pheneatae, was

the worship and temple of Artemis EvpiTnra^^, and near it was
a bronze statue of Poseidon Hippios of mythical dedication;
the local legend explained the statue and the temple by
saying that Odysseus' horses had strayed, and the hero found
them here. In this instance the local legend has probably
interpreted a cult-name correctly ; for ^vpi-n-na could not mean
'
the inventor of the use of horses,' but simply '
the finder of
them and it was natural for those who followed them and
'
;
found them when they strayed into the wilds to give thanks
to the goddess of the wilds, who led the owners to their lost
property. It is possible that this cult at Pheneos was intro-
duced by a Lapith-Thessalian immigration, and may have
been derived from that of Artemis Pheraea in Thessaly, who,
like her sister Hekate, was for some reason connected with
horses ". In any case the association of the Greek Artemis
with horses is slight enough, and it is hard to say why Pindar
once or twice speaks of her as '
the driver of the steed.'
goat Artemis, but the interpretcation " Pans. 7. 26, 2-3.
of them is doubtful, and Pausanias' *"

Vide Fraser, llie Golden Bough,
statements about the local cults are vol. i, p. 6, for the myth of Hippo-
not helpful. The only reason for this lytus and the significance of the horse
explanation is that io'tjku? means pale in the Artemis- cult.
yellow, and kvclkwv is a term applied to Vide Immerwahr, Kultcund Mythen
the goat by Theocritus. Arkadieiis, p. 40.
XIII.] ARTEMIS. ^'^J
It is not improbable that the epithet ' Hjuepacria ^^, which

attached to Artemis and was explained by the legend of the
taming of the Proetides, referred originally to the domestica-
tion of animals. We may conclude that the breeding of cattle
was in some places consecrated to Artemis for the natural ;
meaning of the epithet TavponoKo^ is the bull-tender/ and thus '
it becomes equivalent to the name YloXvôia ^^, which Hesy-
chius found in some of his authorities as a title of Artemis.

The worship of Artemis TavpoixoKos is proved to have existed
in Attica, in the island Ikaria near Samos, at Phocaea, Perga-
mon, Smyrna, Magnesia on the Maeander, and Amphipolis, in

Paros and Andros ^^. The name of the city TavponoKis in
Caria is probably of the same origin. We have a right to
interpret this cult-name of the goddess, which was rather
widely diffused among the Ionic communities, by simply refer-
ring it to her more advanced pastoral and agricultural func-
tions,although it has been supposed to have a lunar reference.
For, though the later tendency of Greek religious exegesis
was to give to names and persons of divinities a celestial
meaning where this was possible'', we find no expression of
the lunar character of Tauropolos in ancient cult and in the
older literature and art. In the passage in the AJax of
Sophocles, the chorus surmise that the madness of Ajax may
have been sent him from Artemis Tauropolos, because it
turned him against the cattle ^^ i. The coins of Amphipolis,
where this worship had been implanted from Athens, and
where the goddess was honoured by a XajXTrabrjôpCa, display
her wearing the polos on her head and riding on a bull with
a torch in each hand and this emblem, as will be noticed
;
below, need have no reference to the moon, although it might

seem natural to interpret the horns that are seen rising from
" For instance, vide the scholiast, ad goddess (and by no means certain,
this is
Soph. Aj. 172 1avpov6\os ri avr^ tjj vide p. 479), would not follow that
it
26X171^7; tarl ical irroxtiTai ravpois, ^v ravponoXos must be the same the bull ;
Kal TavpwTiov ovopaôvai ; Porph. de Ltin. appears in the worship or representa-

ch. 18 ; Suchier,rtt /??'./>;';'(?. p. 50, tions of many divinities that have no
and Preller, i.p. 252 ; vide Suidas, s. v. lunar character at all, such as Themis,
Tau/joTToAoy. If the bull-riding Europa Dionysos, Demeter, Hestia, Ti/x^)
were certainly a type of the moon- ApoUoj Poseidon.
D %
her shoulders on another coin of this city which bears the

inscription Tavpo-nokos as the crescent of the moon =^. The
cult of Munychia, which was connected with Artemis Tauro-
polos and the Brauronian worship''^, spread to Pygela on the
Ionian coast ^"'' from Ephesus or Miletus, and on one of the
coins of Pygela'' we have the head of Artemis Munychia on
the obverse, on the reverse the figure of a bull charging.
In connexion with the cult which has just been examined,
we must notice the obscure and almost legendary account of
the Tauric Artemis, and the chief localities of this worship,
Lemnos, Attica, and the Crimea ^^. The Brauronian worship
is associated, as has been shown, with the legend of Artemis
TavpiK-q, of Orestes and Iphigenia, with the bear-dance,
and with a ritual that seems to point to a primitive practice

of human sacrifice. We have also the legend that the
Tyrrhenian Pelasgi bore away the Brauronian image and the
sacred maidens to Lemnos ^^ and we hear of the [xeydki] Oôs
in this island to whom maidens were sacrificed ^'^'', and who
was called Chryse, the sister of Iphigenia according to the
later genealogists we have reason to think that the apKxda or
;
bear-dance was practised in Lemnos as in Attica and, finally, ;
Lemnos, as well as Brauron, is connected with the Tauric

Chersonese by the tradition that its king Thoas migrated
thence to the Crimea". The question as to the original home
of this worship has been much debated, and cannot be decided
on the evidence; and it is needless here to discuss Miiller's
plausible theory "^
that it originated in Lemnos as a Minyan
worship, and spread thence to Byzantium and the Black Sea
we may also hold that it was aboriginal in Attica, and that
the earliest Greek adventurers in the Black Sea found in the
Crimea a goddess whose name and whose rites reminded
them of the Tauric. It cannot, at least, have come from the
Black Sea originally, for the cults of Brauron and Lemnos
point to a ver}' early period, and the Crimea was opened to
Greek colonization at a comparatively late time. All that
* But vide Artemis - Monuments, ^ Orchotnenos, pp. 304-306 ; Dorians,
p. 529. I. 3S4 ; he conjectures that TavpiKT] was
" Head, I/ist. Num. p. 508. the original name of Lemnos.
c Hygin. Fab. 15.
XIII.] ARTEMIS. 453
we can gather about Artemis Tavp(a or TavpiKr} is that

this
this cult was associated with a vague legend of bloodshed %
with the name of Iphigenia, and with a certain type of
primitive idol to which the title 'Opdia was given. Where
this type prevailed in the Artemis-cults of various parts of
Greece, the legend was brought by Orestes and
that it
Iphigenia was likely to spring up and we cannot find any ;
other ground for the connexion between Artemis ''OpOia or

'Opdooa-M, in Laconia and other places, and the Tauric Artemis,
than the similarity of the traditional shape of their images
and the survival of certain cruel rites The question of ''.
interest is whether Artemis TavpiKi] and Artemis TavpoiroXo^,
who were connected in the legends of Brauron and Aricia ^^ \
" It is only in regard to the Cherso- this claim for their sacred image '^ if
nese that we can speak positively of we interpret the title Ôp9ta as desig-
human sacrifice in historical times, nating nothing more than a primitive

which seems have continued till a
to type of the erect wooden idol ; and this
late period, the second century a.d., if is the most natural explanation : the
we can trust the words of Scymnus phallic sense which Schreiber (Roscher's
Chius '^^. Lexicon, ss. 586, 587) imputes to the
^ We find the worship of Artemis word is quite impossible ; and the moral
'Opdia or 'OpOcuaia in Athens, Megara, sense of '
upright ' is most unlilcely when
Sparta, on Mount Lycone in the Argo- we consider the primitive age to which
lid, in Arcadia, Elis, and Epidauros, the worship belonged ; although in later
and atByzantium ^^. We hear most times the term may have advanced to
of the Laconian cult^-"', and we gather a higher meaning, as in Epidauros,
that in spite of its more humane fea- where, according to a late inscription''',
tures, the musical contests and the it denoted the healing-goddess who
procession of the maidens bearing the makes the sick man
and walk. arise
sacred robe, a singularly wild and bar- Schreiber's objection that most primi-
baric character attached to the worship tive idols were of the erect type, and
and the idol. The men who first found therefore the name 'OpOia would not
the idol in a withy-bed went mad, and have been used to designate a particular
came to blows
the earliest worshippers one, is no real objection the worshipper ;
and slew each other on the altar, and of one locality may name his image
the idea always prevailed that this without regard to those elsewhere ;
just
goddess craved human blood. For as all goddesses were beautiful, but one
this reason Pausanias considers that the was specially called '
the beautiful ' in
Spartan image had the best right of any a local cult. Then if, as seems likely,
to be considered the actual idol brought the Laconian idol called 'OpOia was the
from the savage Tauri by Orestes and most famous, its title and its legend
Iphigenia, although Attica, Cappadocia, of Orestes would come to be attached
and Lydia claimed this honour. We elsewhere to other idols of Artemis of
can understand why so many places in the same type and perhaps of the same
the Mediterranean should have made savage character.
are really cognate. They are pronounced to have been

originally quite distinct by Preller, Welcker, and Schreiber,
for reasons that seem insufficient to prove distinctness of cult.
Schreiber relies on the argument that the Samian ritual of

Artemis Tauropolos was genuinely Greek and harmless,
being innocently maintained with cakes and honey, while the
Tauric was a bloodthirsty goddess, whose ritual demanded
human and whose character was vicious and orgiastic.
victims,
l-Jut a different ritual might be consecrated in different places
to a divinity whose worship nevertheless expressed the same

idea and we do not know that the difference was so great as
;
he asserts for, on the one hand, that innocent Samian sacrifice

;
described by Herodotus ^^ was offered to Artemis, but not, so

far as we know, to Artemis Tauropolos. whose cult was found
in Icaria but not in Samos ", and, on the other hand, we hear,
though on doubtful authority, that human sacrifices were
offered to Artemis Tauropolos at Phocaea ''.
The Attic-Lemnian worship of Artemis I'avpiKr] may have

sprung up quite independently of the Tauropolos cult, but
it seems reasonable to suppose that it contained the same
reference to the agricultural functions of the goddess. For

if Tavpu) is not a name of Artemis that has been derived from
the Black Sea, a theory impossible to accept, what else could
it mean in its application to her but the 'bull-goddess'? The
Greeks of the fifth century certainly understood it as such ;
for Euripides speaks of the worship imported by Orestes and

Iphigenia to the coast of Attica, not far from Brauron, as that
of Tavpo-nokos, and from the natural connexion of the two
terms Nikander invented the story that it was a bull,and not
a hind, that was sacrificed as substitute for Iphigenia ^-. We do
not hear, indeed, that the bull was an animal ever consecrated
by sacrifice to the Tauric goddess in Attica or Lemnos, yet
the term Tavpo(\)ayos^'^, the bull-devourer, applied by Nikander
to Artemis of Aulis, is not likely to have been invented by
him, and it is analogous to the title Kairpoipdyo^- noted above'';
" Schreiber (Roscher'sZ^x/f(7,p.568) from Strabo (s. v. Tavpon6\ioy).

makes the same mistake as Stephanus ^ Vide
pp. 439, 440.
of Byzantium, who quotes carelessly " P. 431.
xiii.] ARTEMIS. 455
and a singular story is preserved by Aristotle ^^^ that a golden

bull stood on the altar of Artemis Orthosia, who, at Sparta at
least, was identified with the Tauric goddess. Whether the
ritual of Artemis Munychia, who was closely associated
with the Brauronian goddess, contained an allusion to the

agricultural Tauropolos is uncertain ; we only hear of sacred
aiJ.(]iL(f)(ovTs used in the Munychian sacrifice, which appear to
have been cheese-cakes stamped with torches ^^ '^.
We have also an allusion to Artemis as a goddess of agri-

culture in the legends at Patrae about Artemis TpiKkapia ;
when her temple was polluted by the unchastity of Comaetho,

the goddess refused to give the fruits of the soil: human
victims were led to the
river for sacrifice, crowned with '
wheat-stalks.' We
have here probably a ritual designed to
produce crops % and this is afterwards connected with the
worship of Dionysos Aesymnetes, who came in from the
North and caused the cruel practice to cease The chief '^'\
goddess of Hyampolis in Phocis was Artemis, and part of the

flocks were consecrated to her, and the fattest of the beasts
were those that she reared ^* .
The deity of agriculture and vegetation confronts us again
and still more clearly in the Arcadian worship of Artemis,
where she enters into very close association with Demeter and
Despoina^^. At Akakesion, before the temple of Despoina
was a shrine of Artemis Hegemone, and on one side of the
throne on which sat the two mysterious goddesses, Demeter
and Despoina, the statue of Artemis was placed, clad in a
fawn's skin, with the quiver on her shoulders, and in her hands
a torch and two serpents. The details of the worship and of the
artistic representation which are given by Pausanias, the asso-
ciation recognized here between these goddesses and Cybele,
the mythic connexion of Despoina with the water-god, are
facts enough to prove that we have here a primitive cult of the
earth-goddesses, regarded as deities of vegetation and that ;
Despoina, whose real name Pausanias was shy to pronounce,
* For instances of the human victim 249, 389-392 ; Mannhardt's Baunikul-

used for agricultural purposes, vide tiis, pp. 363, 364.
Fraser's Golden Bough, vol. i, p. 242-
was originally Persephone, akin to the great Arcadian goddess

Artemis. Elsewhere in Arcadia we find Artemis associated
with Demeter and her daughter ^^ and she enjoyed an altar '',
in common with the Despoinae in the Altis of Olympia'''^^
The serpents which she bore in her hand are the emblem of the
earth-goddess, and give to Artemis something of the character
of Hekate in this Akakesian cult at Lycosura, on the other ;
hand, the familiar animal of Artemis, the fawn, was con-

secrated to Despoina^^*^. It was probably this Arcadian
worship that led Aeschylus to call Artemis the daughter of '
Demeter ^^ and it is this same more advanced aspect of her

' ;
as a goddess of cultivated fruits that is illustrated by her later

participation in the Attic Apolline feast of Thargelia ^^ and
perhaps by the legend that she was born in the spring-month
'^^
of Thargelion ^
From that have been examined hitherto that
the facts
relate for the most part to primitive conceptions and cults,
it seems reasonable to conclude that Artemis in the earliest
Greek religion was an earth-goddess, associated essentially

and chiefly with the wild life and growth of the field, and
with human birth. It was natural enough that the goddess
of vegetative nature and fructifying water should become
also a goddess of herds and cattle and agriculture ^ But
this advance was not carried far in the religious conception of
Artemis, and it rarely appears in literature. The goat that
feeds in wild places, rather than the cattle that graze in the
field,was her pastoral animal in the worship of Tauropolos ;
it seems that the bull or the cow was rarely sacrificed to her,
and Cicero ^^ tells us that it was expressly forbidden to ofter
the calf to Artemis ^ The interesting myth given us in the
Iliad, that when the father of Meleager in Calydon was
offering OaXvaia, or the first-fruits of the harvest, to the gods,
he neglected Artemis and thus incurred her wrath, may
We may suppose the same de- Phocis where Artemis was especially
'*",
velopment in the functions and character worshipped, cattle in general seem to

of the local Semitic Baalim ; vide have been put under protection. Sacri-
Robertson Smith, Rel. of the Sein. p. loo. fice was made to Artemis Kacppia at Pa-
We may doubt whether this rule
''
trae of jepefaairai'Ta'^ which appear from
held everywhere ; at Hyampolis in the context to be domesticated animals.
XIII.] ARTEMIS. 457
illustrate the fact that she was only received among the agri-
cultural divinities with difficulty and at a comparatively late
time. Callimachus tells us that the man on whom Artemis
looks with 'smiling face and kindly heart' is blessed with
increase of crops and herds ^*''; but 'the peaceful sway over
man's harvesting was mainly appropriated by Demeter,
'
Persephone, and Dionysos while Artemis, in regard to her

:
physical functions and character, was never completely civilized.

The view that has here been taken about the original
character of this divinity is opposed to the older and tra-
ditional theory which has been maintained by Welcker and
Preller, namely, that she was originally a lunar goddess. To
maintain this is to go beyond the evidence and to confuse
the latest with the earliest period of the cult. It is obvious
that Homer does not know her as a goddess of the moon ;
neither was she known as such in the earliest centres of her

worship. And some of her cult-titles, which have been sup-
posed to have reference to the moon, have been misinterpreted
or are of doubtful interpretation. For instance, the epithet
Mowvxta has been supposed by Welcker to stand for Movvo-
iwxta, '
she who walks alone at night '
; but, though later writers
have countenanced it, this is entirely pre-scientific etymology %

and the word seems to have merely designated the harbour
near the Peiraeeus from which the goddess was named,
and is possibly derivable from a Phoenician term signifying
'
the haven of rest.' Another title has been regarded as con-
taining a clear reference to the moon, namely AWo-iria ^', by
which she was known on the Euripus, and perhaps at Amphi-
polis the word certainly means the 'burning-faced one'; but
:
it is hazardous to refer all words that denote fire or brightness
to the celestial bodies offhand, and to conclude that AlOoTTia

must mean the bright-faced goddess of the moon. We can-
' '
not trace the origin of the name, which may have arisen from
some peculiarity of an Artemis-idol '', or in other conceivable
* Even if the etymology were better, ^ Cf. Dionysos Mo^^xos and Kfxv^^î
itwould take much to persuade us that names which probably arose from cer-
the early Greek would apply such a tain features of the local idol,
phrase to the moon.
ways and if we could interpret it with certainty, even then it

;
would throw little light on the primitive period of worship, as

we do not know when it came to be applied to the goddess. It
seems to have been used byAnacreon as an epithet of Semele,
who was certainly no moon-goddess, and may have alluded to
the story of her fiery death.
There are other epithets which attach to Artemis, and
which have some reference to fire. She was worshipped as
45 CO (7 op OS-
(/) in Messenia, Munychia, and Byzantium''*; as
2eAa(Tta in Laconia'^^; as 2;eAa(r(/;o'/jo9"''^ in Attica. On Mount
Krathis, on the borders of Arcadia and Achaea, there was
a temple of Artemis from which the Argives rTv/ocorta^^
fetched fire the Lernaean festival.
But none of these
for
worships reveal an aboriginal lunar goddess for in the first ;
place we have no proof that they are very early, and in the
earliest literature in which Artemis is pourtrayed neither
torch nor fire is spoken of as her attribute the passage in ;
Sophocles which speaks of the 'gleaming torches of Artemis,

wherewith she speeds over the Lycian mountain '''V and
which is the first, so far as I am aware, that refers to the
fire-bearing goddess'', certainly does not show that the poet
regarded her as a lunar power '\ As regards the represen-
tations in art, the torch does not appear in the hands of
Artemis before the fifth century the first certain instance '^
;
would be the torch-bearing figure on the Parthenon frieze, if

the view now prevalent that this is Artemis be correct and ;
from the fourth century onward this is a common form.

In the next place, the cults of 2eAao-(/)o'pos and a) o-0o'pos- are
" Neither in the lines descriptive of kox iepou ical dyaXfxa.

Artemis in the Homeric hymn to Aphro- Welcker sees Artemis in the new-
dite '-'^,
nor in the smaller hymns to born child who
holds two torches and
Artemis and Selene, nor in Hesiod's stands on the knees of Zeus beneath the
Theogony has she any association with inscription Aioy <pws on a black-figured
the moon or fire: vide Theog. 371; vase published by Minervini; il/^. /M/.
Horn. Hymn to Helios,^. II ; Hymn io 1S52, Taf. i; but he has mistaken a
Her7n. 1. 100. male for a female child the babe is un-:
''
We may suppose that the poet doubtedly Dionysos, and Aios </)aiy, the '
alludes to the fact mentioned in Max. light of God,' is a free interpretation of

Tyr. Dissert. 8 Avkwis 6 "'OXtz/iiroj -nvp his name.
(kSiSoi . . . Kal ioTiv avrois to nvp tovto
XIII.] ARTEMIS. 459
not known have associated Artemis with the moon-goddess

to ;
in the former she was combined with Apollo Atoz/vcroSoros,

and the legend that explained the Attic cult of ^Jcoo-ôpo* at
Munychia told how Thrasybulus, when marching from Phyle,
was guided by a pillar of fire, and an altar was afterwards
raised to tj âxrcpopos'^. Again, when the torch had come to
be used in the ritual or to appear in the representations of
Artemis, it is very doubtful whether it was primarily intended
to designate the moon-goddess. For it belongs quite as
naturally to the huntress who roams the woods by night or
to the divinity of the earth, and it is still more frequently an
attribute of Demeter and Persephone and of the company of
Dionysos'' and Dr. Schreiber seems right in comparing
;
a religious idol of the torch-bearing Artemis preserved on an

altar of the Museo Chiaramonti with a type of Demeter on
Attic votive- reliefs. The character that Artemis bears in the
worship of Despoina has been already examined, and it is clear
that the torch which she carries in the group of Damophon is
a badge of the chthonian divinity. The ceremonious or magical

use of fire in the ritual of divinities who have power over
vegetative nature is well known the torch borne over the land
;
is supposed to evoke by sympathy the fructifying warmth of
the earth This would be the meaning of the practice which

^.
appears to have been observed in the cult of Artemis 'Ayporepa

at Aegira, of binding lighted torches to the horns of goats ,
which receives striking illustration from the ceremony per-

formed in the spring outside the temple of the great Syrian
goddess at Hierapolis, the sacrifice called the irvpri or Aa/x7ras,
in which trees laden with animals were set on fire ^. The
* There is another context where ritual of Artemis Triclaria and Dio-
<puai(p6pos is applied to Artemis with a nysos Aesymnetes in Achaea "^ She
particular
meaning an epigram in the appears to have shared a temple with
Anthology in which Artemis is praised him and Asclepios at Corone in Mes-
as the goddess who gives children to senia'''.
the childless and sight to the blind, *=

Roscher's Lexicon, p. 595.
and is therefore called the bringer of
' ^ Vide Mannhardt, Wald- und Feld-
light'^^^' Kulte, I. pp. 521-525.
Of Artemis' association with Dio-
'' The legend explained the custom as
nysos in cult we have no explicit jjroof a ruse de guerre ; vide p. 450.
except the account in Pausanias of the ' Luc. de Dca Syr. 49.
temple and statue of Artemis rfpoo-jjw'a, the goddess '

who
faces the on the promontory of Artemision in
rising sun,'
Euboea ^^, need not be supposed to have been consecrated
to the moon-divinity, although Hesychius gives avdriXios as
an epithet of Selene ; for it was natural and common for
statues to face in this direction, and the divinities to whom
the herald in the Agamemnon goes to offer prayer are called
the baCfjioves avTr\\ioi.
Again, we cannot conclude Greek Artemis was that the

from an early period recognized as lunar merely because she
was associated with Hekate in the poems of Hesiod and in
the Homeric hymn to Demeter for there is no proof that ;
Hekate herself, when she was first adopted into the Greek
religion, was regarded clearly or solely as a lunar goddess.
Nor, lastly, is Artemis to be called the moon-goddess because
she was from of old a goddess of child-birth for the functions :
of Aoxeta belong quite as naturally to the earth-goddess as

to the moon, although Plutarch chose to interpret Artemis
Eileithyia as identical with Selene *'*.
The first evidence that we have of this lunar character of

Artemis is the fragment of Aeschylus' Xaiitriae, containing
the strange words, '
whom neither the ray of the sun beholds
nor the starry eye of Leto's daughter,' if we suppose, as is
natural, that 'Leto's daughter' is Artemis ^ This miscon-

ception about the goddess, which the learned Alexandrine
poets avoid, is rife in later Roman literature and later art
which sets the crescent on her forehead '^
How it is a question upon which it is not

to be explained is
necessary to dwell here.It seems to have arisen first from

her close connexion with Hekate, and, secondly, from the
" It is true that Euripides calls He- conquered at Salamis and the goddess
kate also the daughter of Leto, but an slione with full moon.' Mommsen
Attic audience would certainly interpret {Heort. 404, note) points out the
p.
ArjTuia Kuprj as Artemis ; vide Hekate '. absurdity of this statement Plutarch is ;
*
It appears that Plutarch ^" sup- quite wrong in his chronology of the
poses that the Greeks at the time of battle,and the i6th of Munychion, which
the battle of Salamis already worshipped had probably always been consecrated
Artemis as a lunar deity, for he states that to Artemis, was not necessarily a fuU-
they consecrated the i6th of Munychion moon day.
to her, the day '
on which the Greeks
XIII.] ARTEMIS. 461
greater clearness with which the fifth century had come to

recognize Hekate as a goddess of the moon. We may also
suppose that Artemis acquired from her
this character partly
association with Apollo though she already appears as
; for
his sister in Homer, and there is no trace in his poems of the
lunar Artemis, yet the belief that Apollo was identical with
Helios comes into prominence about the same time as the
conception of the moon-goddess Artemis ^
It may be from her affinity to Hekate and the deities of
the under-world, or from the early belief that it was Artemis

who sent untimely or mysterious death, that we find her form
appearing occasionally on grave-monuments a relief' of ;
a late period has been found in Thrace showing the figures

of two dead children apotheosized as Apollo and Artemis.
The stories of Hekaerge in Delos and Aspalis in Phthia,
which will be afterwards examined, of Eucleia and Iphinoe
mentioned below, seem to reveal the goddess as a deity of
death and the lower world, who herself dies . But her
chthonian functions were not at all prominent in belief or
worship.
Turning now from the physical side of her character, we
find that her cult has some few relations with social and
political life. As regards the institution of the family, we
have seen that she has more to do with child-birth than with
marriage. None of her cult-titles have any clear reference to
a goddess of wedlock. We hear of the worship of Eucleia at
Thebes, the goddess of fair report,' to whom a preliminary
'
sacrifice was by bride

and bridegroom*"''*: 'the
offered
people/ says Plutarch, and consider Eucleia Artemis
'
call ;
others consider her to be a maiden who died unmarried, the

daughter of Heracles and Myrto 'V No doubt the people '
'
" For the recognition of Apollo as vegetation is naturally supposed to die

the sun-god, which is at least very and be buried at certain seasons ; we find
obscure in the older literature, cf, the this trait in the legend of the Cretan
fragment of Timotheus, Bcrgk, Fr. 13, Zeus, of Dionysos and Adonis, of the
and Plutarch, de dcfcc. Orac. p. 433 D Oriental Aphrodite and her Cretan and
and 434 E Cypriote counterparts.
**
Gazette Archdol. 1878, PI. 2, and "^ We may compare with this the
Rev. Arch. 1870, p. 248. ritualand story at Megara, where
' In primitive cult the deity of maidens before their marriage offered
were right, but the sacrifice may have been propitiatory of the
unmarried goddess, and we cannot say with certainty that
this title designated her as the divinity who brought about
and protected the '
honourable estate of matrimony '
; for
elsewhere, as will be noticed below, it is attached to her

with reference to the glory of war.
The other titles which, as Dr. Schreiber supposes *, may
have referred to wedlock are more than doubtful ; namely,
'Hyeju.o'i'rj, 'the leader'; Flet^ôj, 'the persuasive'; EwTrpafta, 'the
giver of good fortune.' We hear of the shrine of Artemis
^'^%
'the leader' at Akakesion, in Arcadia before the great
temple of Despoina ; and of her bronze statue that held
torches. But it is impossible to be sure that this title there
designated her as a goddess who led the bridal procession/
'
although in Sparta Artemis Hegemone and Apollo Karneios

shared the temple of Eileithyia *''''^.
In Callimachus the
epithet is applied to her as the divinity who led Neleus to
the site of Miletus, which he founded '^''
; a temple mentioned
by Pausanias at Tegea was said to have been consecrated to
this cult by the man who at the bidding of Artemis slew the
tyrant of Orchomenos and escaped to Tegea ^''' and we have ;
a very similar story about Artemis Hegemone, who freed

the Ambraciots from the tyranny of Phalaecus, narrated by
Antoninus Liberalis^"^. We might believe that in these
cults the goddess was regarded simply as she who shows the '
way as in the story of Artemis Phosphorus and Thrasy-

*",'
bulus, and the title 'Hye/xoV?? may have arisen from the wide-
spread artistic type of the running goddess with the torches
in her hand '^.
An Artemis rTet^w ^^ is known to us only through Pau-

sanias, who mentions her temple in or near the ayopa at
libations and locks of their hair to a goddess who leads men's lives : Ivxn is
maiden named 'Icpivorj, a mythical per- called Mfi\ixir]v,'Evo!>iTiv, . . /Aprtfiiv

sonagewho had died unmarried. There -^ye/xoi'Tjy ; Orph. Hymn, 72. 3.
can be no doubt but that Iphinoe is '^
The Hegemone who occurs in the
a forgotten cult-name of Artemis"". oath taken by the ephebi at Athens is
" Roscher"s Lexicon, p. 574. probably Aphrodite Pandemos^'f ; vide

''
In Orphic literature Artemis 'H7f- Aphrodite, p. 662.
yi.l)vr] becomes one with Ti/xv as the
XIII.] ARTEMIS. 463
Argos, and connects it with the legend of Hypermnestra and
the which she defended herself against her father ^.

trial in
The title, then, has probably a juridical sense, and we may

compare it with 'AyopaUi mentioned below. As regards
Evirpa^La ^^, a term which is found applied to Artemis on
a relief from Tyndaris in Sicily, it is probable that it alludes
to the goddess who gives women safety and success in child-
birth need not primarily denote the marriage divinity ^
; it
Still, though in ordinary cult there is no direct evidence of
the worship of Artemis as a recognized goddess of marriage,

and we have seen reason for supposing that the primitive con-
ception of Artemis was opposed to this, it would be quite
natural that the goddess of child-birth and the goddess who
had special charge of the lives of women should come to be
associated with the rites of wedlock ; and we may find occa-
sional testimony to this conception of her in literature and
art". But that this conception was rare we can conclude
from the hymn of Callimachus, who nowhere mentions it.
Her relations to the family-life are expressed by the titles

natboTpocpos'^^, the rearer and KopvOaXia''^
of children, the ;
former was attached to her in the cult at Corone in Messenia,

where she shared her temple with Dionysos and Asclepios
and the temple of Artemis KopvOaXCa stood by a stream
outside Sparta, where the nurses brought boy-children and
consecrated them to her, and the feast of TtO-qvCdLa was
celebrated with dance and masquerade and a sacrifice of
sucking-pigs and loaves. It was Artemis to whom boys
offered the locks of their hair on the Kovpewrts, one of the
days of the Attic 'AiraTovpLa, and who aided the growth of
girls and the athletic exercises of youth '^' The cherishing '^'*.
of children may have become assigned to her either as a
" It maybe that the temple ofPeitho, ^ Vide Artemis-Monuments, p. 531.

standing in the market-place at Sicyon, Prayer was occasionally made to
and connected with the myth that her for a happy marriage "l Plutarch's
Apollo and Artemis had departed from statement that those who are marrying
the land and were persuaded to return, need the favour of Artemis above all
may have had some association with an may allude to the propitiatory rites
Artemis XlnQij, a goddess of the a'ôpa ;
which she claimed and to her function
Pans. 2. 7, 7-8. as the goddess of child-birth ^K
primitive goddess of the earth and water, or as the sister of

Apollo Koi;porpo'(/)os ; and either view could be illustrated by
a line in Hesiod, who says of the water-goddesses
dVSpas Kovpiôvai aiiv ' AnuWwvi dvanji *.
With the higher social organization based on relationship

Artemis had little to do, and wâs very rarely recognized as
the ancestral divinity of the community. We hear, indeed, of
Artemis ITarpwa, the ' ancestress,' at Sicyon and of riarptwrts
'^'',
at Pleiae in Laconia, and a late inscription seems to attest the

existence of the same cult at Amyclae '^'^.
The Sicyon cult
must have been image of Artemis was aniconic;
ancient, as the
but wê know nothing about its institution, and we cannot
explain the origin of this strange title of hers, which does not
accord with her character in the popular belief, unless we sup-
pose it came to her from her association with Apollo Patrons,
whose seems to have shared at Athens
cult she '''.
Only at
Epidaurus does she appear to have been associated in public
cult with the tribal organization ; a single inscription of the

early Roman period from that place preserves the interesting
and unique title Artemis Uaixc^vXaia'^^, which stands near in
meaning to that of Aphrodite Pandemos.
In considering the relations of Artemis to the higher life of
the individual and the state, we may suppose that she came
into some of them through her relationship with Apollo, and
that others she acquired by a natural development of her
character. But it is difficult to estimate exactly how much
has been derived from the Apolline worship for the associa- ;
tion of the two divinities, though not aboriginal, is certainly

old, and came to be recognized, after the Homeric period, far
and wide throughout the Greek worlds We find it in Homer,
and we may conclude that his poems reflect the religious ideas
" Theog. 347. It has been suggested applied to Artemis, it is better in these
by Robert {Griech. Mythol. Robert- cases to interpret it as an epithet of Gaea.
Pieller, p. 780, 2) that 17 Kovporpofpos, ^ The references showing a joint
mentioned in the prayer of the women worship of Apollo and Artemis given
in the T/wsmop/iormzusac, and in an in- by Midler, Dorians, 2. p. 368, are not
scription concerning the ephebi sacrifice, all relevantand few of them prove that
;
is Artemis '^ ; but as no instance has yet it For

belonged to an early period.
been found in which this title has been a more complete list vide '*.
XIII.] ARTEMIS. 465
of the Aeolic shore of AsiaMinor and we might assign to the :
Homeric age the joint worship at Sicyon^'% Megara'^^ and ""j
Delos *. But the figure of Apollo plays no part in the

'^'^
earliest cults and cult-legends of Artemis for instance, the ;
primitive Arcadian, the Calydonian, those of Tauropolos and

Orthia : nor, on the other hand, does Artemis appear in the
earliest legends of the temple and oracle of Delphi. In what
way the later association came about has never been satis-
factorily explained ; we cannot simply enumerate the points
of affinity between the two divinities and give these as the
reason, since many of them are probably merely the result of
that association. And the union may have arisen with as
much likelihood from some local connexion of the two cults
and from the fusion of local myths as from some original
logical connexion of ideas.
The place where the two deities were first closely asso-
ciated, and whence the belief in their twinship spread, was
probably Delos For the legends that connected their
"''
''.
birth with Delos or the neighbouring island of Rheneia are

ancient, and the antiquity of the Artemis-cult in these
waters seems partly attested by the very ancient cult-name
Ortygia, which appears twice in the Odyssey to be attached
to Delos, and to Rheneia in the Homeric hymn to Apollo*.
Again, the hyperborean offerings at Delos were mythically
connected, not only with Apollo, but with Artemis and the
names of Oupis or Opis and Hekaerge and Arge ^ These
titles are applied to the maidens who brought the offerings
from the North, and dying in Delos were buried in or behind

the temple of Artemis and received honours at their tomb,
the Delian maidens consecrating to them their locks before
marriage ^ Now Hekaerge and Opis are known to be
'^^
names of the goddess , and the ritual at their tomb has no

" Od. 5. i?3 ; 15. 402 ; Jlom. Hymn chase ''".
to Apoll. 16. "^

'Eicaepyri is a term applied to
''
Herodotus gives the names "Apyr/ Artemis in an ancient hymn, quoted
(? the swift-footed one) and Opis, but hy Clemens and ascribed to Bran-
Hekaerge has as good authority; in chos"' her connexion with the name
;
Claudian Hekaerge and Opis are de- "'nn-ts will be mentioned below,
scribed as Scythian divinities of the
VOL. n. E
meaning except Artemis herself^; and divine

as performed to
epithets such as these, and such as Callisto and Iphigenia,
which have become detached from the divinity and have
changed their designation, must, for this very reason, be
considered ancient.
Therefore as one of these terms, 'EKoepy/, certainly asso-
ciates the goddess with Apollo, we have a proof of the
antiquity of this association at Delos. And we know of the
early fame and splendour of the Pan- Ionic festival held in
that island, where hymns were sung to the twin divinities.
It seems reasonable, then, to believe that it was from that
locality and that worship that the idea of the close relation
between Artemis and Apollo was diffused.
The two cult-names which she undoubtedly borrowed from
this connexion are AeA(/)trta '"^ and Uvdii]'^'^\ As regards
the first, by which she was known in Attica and Thessaly,
there are other titles mentioned already that show her as
a goddess of harbours and maritime life, and this title of her
brother's could the more easily be attached to her. But the
second, which was in vogue at Miletus, and which refers to
Delphi and oracular powers, finds very little illustration in
actual cult and belief. The doubtful designation of Artemis

as St/SuAAa'^^^ be compared with the vague stories about
may
the Sibyl recorded by Pausanias, who mentions a Delian hymn
in which she called herself Artemis the wife, the sister, and '',
daughter of Apollo these things she invented as one mad and

:
'
inspired.' We hear also of an oracle of Apollo and Artemis at

" With the ceremonies at Pelos in who dies and is born again (the tyrnnt's
honour of the maidens we may compare name is Tartarus). \Ve need not see in
the rites practised in honour of Aspalis, the Phthian the influence of the Thts-
who, according to the legend given by salian worship of Artemis Hekate ;

for
Antoninus Liberalis'^, slew herself to the main point of the legend of Phthia
preserve her chastity from the tyrant of is the virginity of the goddess, and this
Phthia; her body disappeared, but her is the special mark of the Greek Artemis
statue was miraculously found near the rather than Hekate. The name 'Ea-
statue of Artemis, and she became wor- ip-^r] occurs also in the worship of
shipped imder the title of 'A/xfi\TjTrj Ctesulla at Ceos, who, like Ariadne, was
'EKaepyrj. It is clear that 'AcTTraAi's is supposed to have died in travail, and
a forgotten name of the Artemis of who was a disguised form of Artemis
Phthia; there is a hint in the story of Aphrodite; vide Aphrodite 'I
the chthonian character of the goddess,
''
Paus. lo. 12, i.
xiir.] ARTEMIS. 467
Adrastea'''\and an Artemis-oracle in Cilicia''"" ;

but it is doubt-
ful if these are genuine Hellenic cult-names. And where she
was united in worship with Apollo Pythius, as at Anaphe,
Pheneos, and perhaps Sparta ^' ^. we do not hear that she
"''^ *"'
shared his prophetic power. At Delphi the oracle remained

exclusively ApoUine ;
and we have few traces of a cult of
Artemis, beyond an inscription '^^ ^ from which it appears that
the emancipation of slaves was sometimes performed in her
name as well as the god's ^ Her occasional association with
her brother in vase-representations that refer to the con-
sultation of the Delphic oracle is an artistic motive, and is
no proof of actual cult.
Whether the name of Artemis OiÂ-a''^'*, to whom, according

to Pherecydes, Theseus sacrificed before his journey against
the Minotaur, is derived from Apollo OvXios, with whom she
was associated at Lindos ^''-,
or whether it comes to be attached
to the goddess independently, is a doubtful question. The
titles and Artemis, the
belong to both as divinities of health :
goddess of waters, who produced the hot spring, might

naturally be invested with these powers, as the epithets
tvoLKoos and hii'iKoos expressed that she listened to the prayers
of the sick '\ Generally speaking, it may be said that any

prominent divinity of a community, whatever was his or her
original nature, might be regarded and invoked as the giver
of health and life, just as we have seen Athena worshipped as
Hygiaea at Athens. It was probably as the sister of Apollo
that Artemis became a goddess of purification, as Arctinos
in the Aithiopis mentions that Achilles was purified from
the blood of Thersites by ceremonies performed in Lesbos to

Apollo and Artemis, whose title \v-r] or Amta'''^ perhaps ex-
presses this idea.
The comparatively few Artemis that refer to
cult-titles of
civic or civilized life cannot be clearly deduced from any more

"
It is possible tliat the Lycian cult inscription of the fourth century B.C. on
of Artemis 'EAev5e'/)a" drew its name the rim of a bronze vessel from Achaea ;
from the protection and asylum which "AprtixisQipiJiia and EuaKooy'î in an in-
her temple afforded to the slave and scription of the third century B.C., found
the criminal. in some baths at Mitylene, dedicating
^ "ApTffMts Aovaidrts "P occurs in an an aqueduct to her.
E a
primitive idea nor from association with other deities. She

had little to do with property, or the acquisition or allotment
of land ; although she was worshipped as TpiKkapia at Patrae-^^,
and this name may have arisen from some tripartite division of
the land, which was given a religious sanctity, or, as Muller
supposes % from the chance that this temple at Patrae was
the central shrine of three old village communities.
The worship of Artemis had an important political bearing
in Euboea, where she was the presiding deity of the Euboean
^'^
league,and we find that the temple of Artemis 'Ajxripva-ia
was the place of a Pan-Ionic meeting. The cult existed in
Attica also, being especially prevalent in the deme of Ath-
monum, and the festival at Athens rivalled the Euboean in
splendour.
Her relation to the life of the city is expressed chiefly by the
titles BouAuia^^ and Bovki](f)6pos^''^, by which she was addressed
at Athens and Miletus though, as far as we know, these are
;
late, nor was she so essentially a deity of the fSovki') as Zeus
and Athena. It may be that this designation of her at
Athens arose from some statue that stood before the council-
chamber for in the Attic inscriptions, mostly of the first
;
century B.C., we find her in constant conjunction with Apollo

1 Ipoo-ran^ptos
^^
'^ Once at least she was recognized as
a divinity of the market-place, namely, at Olympia^', and
with this cult of Artemis 'Ayopaia we may, perhaps, associate
the Argive worship of Artemis riet^&j "-
Such political titles of Artemis are rare and of slight pre-
valence. Even at Athens, in spite of her title BovXata, we can

gather from the non-occurrence of her name in the formulae
of the state-oaths and the oath of the jurors that her religion
reflected but little of the civic life and government ''. The
" Dorians., 2. p. 374, n. S. federacy of Athens, the deities invoked

*
The witness in the law-couits of between Corcyra
in the treaty of alliance
Plato's idenl state might swear by Zeus, and Athens are Zeus, Demeter, Apollo
Apollo, and Themis ; the Athenian jury- {Bull, de Corr. Hell. 18S9, p. 357).
man swore by Zeus, Poseidon, and De- The name of Artemis occurs in the
meter; /.a7(yj,p.936 e; Dem. K. Tf/jo/c/)., formula of the oath of alliance in two
p. 747. In an inscription belonging Cretan inscriptions, and the treaty be-
to the time of the second maritime con- twecn Smyrna and Magnesia is ratified
xiH.] ARTEMIS. 469
practice at Pellene in Achaea, where the oath was taken in

matters of the greatest concern to Artemis Soteira, appears
to have been exceptional^-^ ^.
We may note also, that though there are very many localities
that gave a borrowed one from Artemis ^^~^'".
title to or
scarcely any of these, where the worship was purely Greeks
were actual cities, except the small community of Selasia *"'
in Laconia, the city Lycoas in Arcadia, the wolf city,' which '
was a ruin in the time of Pausanias, and Aptera in Crete '"'.

The rest are country districts, islands, rivers, or heights. It is
true that Zeus promises to give her, in the hymn of Callima-

chus, 'thirty cities which shall cherish no other deity, but
only thee, and shall be called of Artemis'; but either these
TTToXUOpa are not Greek cities proper or are unknown to us.
The epithet which ApoUonius Rhodius attaches to
7roAt?;o)(o?, '^
her, is not known to have belonged to actual cult. We hear

in Strabo and Pausanias of Artemis Aetolis '^^j the goddess
of Aetolia, the least civilized of the Greek communities, and
the chief divinity of Calydon was Artemis Aacppua, the wild
goddess. It is, in fact, not the Hellenic, but chiefly the
half-foreign goddess of Asia Minor, who was worshipped as
the patron deity of the city.
The and city of Perge
district was sacred to ^^\ in Lycia,
Artemis Flepyata, and her image in Cicero's time was em-
bellished with gold a yearly 7rar7yyupts was held there in her

;
honour, and mendicant priests appear to have been attached

to her as they were to Cybele. Astyrene, Mindos of Hali-
carnassus, Sardis, Tauropolis in Caria, and pre-eminently
Ephesus, were associated with her name and the various ;
in the name of Artemis Tauropolos ^'s. the Greek cities were necessarily promi-
For the mock-treaty in the Lysistrate, nent divinities of the iroAis ; the chief
1262, Artemis is invoked by the Spartan deity of the country, whatever his or
woman, but it is the wild Artemis, '
the her character was, would generally be
slayer of beasts ' ; in the Gortynian mentioned, and certain nature-powers
inscription we find was
that Artemis like lielios.
invoked in the formula of the oath by " Artemis êpala of Pherae is pro-
which a woman could clear herself before bably not the Greek Artemis pure and
a court of law*'. On the other hand, simple, but Artemis combined with the
we cannot always conclude that all the later goddess Hekate.
deities mentioned in the public oath of ''
yiriôu. i. 312.
cities called Hierapolis in Asia Minor usually derived their

name from the worship of the Oriental goddess*. We find
Artemis as a city-goddess under the name of 'Aorias^^ in an
which worshipped her as
inscription from lasos of Caria, a city
its npoKaOijyeixMv, or foundress. Possibly the title npojjyeVty, by
which she was united in the Lycian worship with Apollo
riporjyerr]?, may have been attached to her as the leader of
the migrations of peoples^^. But even in Asia Minor she was

very rarely identified, as in various places Isis and Hera were,
with the Tv'xr/ of the city. Perhaps the only instance is the
city of Gerasa^^^ in the Syrian Decapolis, which inscribed the
title of Artemis Tyche upon its coins of the second century
A. D. The naive words that Callimachus puts into the mouth of
the girl Artemis'', who prays for the possession of mountains
rather than cities the latter she will only visit when women
in travail invoke her aid are quite in accord with the character
of the goddess in the public religion of Greece proper.
She is slightly more prominent as a goddess of battle, or as
a divinity who aided the fight. In many cases this function
may have been attributed to her from the fact that the battle
occurred in a locality, often wild ground, where Artemis was
supposed to be powerful Thus the Greeks brought thank-
^.
offerings to her in commemoration of the battle of Artemision,

and the epigram of Simonides refers to these^^^; the annual
sacrifice of goats, offered by the Athenians for the victory of
Marathon, was due to the goddess of the mountain or the
marsh, who might be naturally supposed to have aided
them'-*''^. The Spartan sacrifice before joining battle has
been mentioned-^''; and, according to Pollux, the Athenian
polemarch made a joint offering to her and the war-god ^'^ ^.
She was also recognized as a deity who inspired the leader
with wise counsel, as 'Aptaro/Soy'ATj, to whom Themistocles
erected a temple on Melita after the battle of Salamis ^-".
* E. g. Hierapolis, another name for <=

We might explain in the same way
Bambyce, derived from the worship of the sacrifice to the nymphs of Cithae-
the Syrian goddess Atargatis ; Strabo, ron uiifxipais 'Sippa-yinfft before the
748. battle of Plataea ; Ph\t. Arist. 11,
^ Callim. //j'wi! to Art. 11. 18-22.
XIII.] ARTEMIS. 471
The association of Artemis with war was sometimes expressed

by the title Ef^/cAetfi^ for instance the monument of the
h'on that stood without the temple of Artemis EvxAeia at
Thebes was supposed to commemorate a legendary victory
of Heracles ""^^

also by a special application of the epithet
2coretpa, which she shared with many other divinities, and
which in Megara ^^^ ^ was explained by reference to the

destruction of a band of Persians; in Megalopolis it probably
^'-'^
conveyed an allusion to the victories of Epaminondas ''.
No doubt the title often had a wider application, referring

perhaps to safety in child-birth.
It is possible that Aacppia was an epithet of Artemis that

referred as much to war as to the chase and the common
;
type of the running goddess may represent the huntress or

'^'.
the warlike deity Although in mythological scenes
Artemis appears not infrequently engaged for in combat,
instance against Tityos and the giants, yet this aspect of her
is very rarely presented in the temple ayaXixaTa. But a statue
of Artemis existed in Messenia bearing shield and spear, and
there is reason for supposing the images of the Brauronian
and the Tauric Artemis represented her as armed ''.
It is rare to find the worship of Artemis associated with
any of the arts of life, and none of them are attributed to

her discovery or teaching. But Homer and the author of
the Homeric hymn to Aphrodite knew of her as a goddess
who delights in the dance and song and the lyre ^-^ No
doubt we must here reckon with the influence of the Delian
festival and her connexion with Apollo but in Arcadia, ;
where this connexion was least recognized the musical "",
character of Artemis was acknowledged in an independent

cult. The wôrship of Artemis 'Tjuyta ^^^^ common to the
Orchomcnians and Mantineans, was among the most im-
portant in Arcadia, and though Pausanias tells us nothing
The cult of Eucleia at Athens ap- whom she was coupled in Attic cult"^'*.
pears to have commemorated the battle Vide Artemis- Monuments, p. 527.
^
but it is doubtful whether " We only have two records of a

of Marathon ;
this figure was Artemis, or a mere per- joint vvoiship of Apollo and Artemis
''^ and ^^'^.
sonification likeEwoia and Eui/oî'a,with in Arcadia,
about the significance of the name, it must surely refer to the

hymns sung at her yearly festival, and it recalls the irapOhna,
the maidens' songs sung at Si)arta in honour of the maiden-
goddess. We may also explain the worship of Artemis
XeAvrts in Sparta ^-^ as paid to the goddess who loved the
music of the tortoise-shell lyre and it was in Sparta also ;
where she was worshipped with a special dance performed by

the maidens of Caryae. We gather, too, from a passage in
the Pliocnissac that on Parnassos a maidens' chorus danced in
honour of the addvaros 6ed, who from the context appears to
be Artemis. The goddess worshipped on the Carian Cher-
sonese, who may be called Artemis Aphrodite, was known as
MoATraStas, 'the songful one ^-^.' In fact, the dance and song
were indispensable in Greek religious service, and no cult
remained so backward as not to reflect some light from Hellenic
civilization. Even the bear-goddess of Brauron was supposed
to delight in the recitations of the Homeric poems in her
festival '\
Such is the main account of the Greek worship of Artemis ;
and it appears from it that, while in the imagination of the

poet and artist the character of the goddess possessed a high
spiritual value^ the cults have comparatively little connexion
with the moral and intellectual or even the higher material life
of the nation and individual. The conceptions of purification
from sin, and satisfaction for homicide, of the
of legal trial
sanctity of the suppliant and the stranger, which fostered the
growth of early Greek law and religion, and which we find in
the worships of Zeus and Athena, play little or no part in
this. Greek religious philosophy, in its attempt to idealize the
leading personages of the religion, to make each the embodi-

ment of an intellectual or spiritual abstraction, scarcely touches
Artemis; nor had she a very prominent place in the later
mystic and Orphic literature^', except under the form of Hekate.
" Vide '"'.
This recitation is often Pax 874, who is followed by Suidas,
associated with the supposed festival of and it is probable that he invented it
Dionysos at iirauron but there is no

; himself out of a misunderstanding of
proof that there was any festival of Aristophanes, who is really referring to
Dionysos called Bpavpwtna the only : the festival of Artemis,
authority for it is the scholiast on Arist. ''
Orphic Hy>?itt to Artemis, 1. 36
XIII.] ARTEMIS. 473
The Greek cult of this latter goddess must be separately

described with remains to notice here what we
some detail. It
can find of non-Hellenic or Oriental influence in the worship of

Artemis, and to trace its fusion with foreign but cognate cults.
And, first, we note a combination in which she is identified
or associated with a divinity whose worship^ may have spread
through Phrygia and Thrace to North Greece, and pro-
bably through Caria to Crete, and of whom Cybele, Bendis,
Semele, Dictynna, Britomartis, and possibly Ariadne and
Europa, are the various local names; secondly, a tendency
to attach the name of Artemis to Semitic goddesses, such as
Astarte, Derceto, Atargatis. It is with the first of these
combinations that we are here most concerned ; for it is not
only prior, but it reaches further throughout the various areas
of Greek religion. The view implied by Strabo ^^'^
that
Cybele, the goddess of Asia Minor, was identical or closely
connected with the Thracian Bendis, Kotys, or Hekate, seems
to be warranted by the facts that we can gather of North
Greek and Phrygian worship ; and that this goddess was, in
regard to her main character at least, an earth-goddess or

a divinity of vegetation seems proved by the nature of the
myths and rites of Cybele, her close association with Dionysos,
and by the newly discovered interpretation of the name
Semele ^ which is closely cognate to a Phrygian word for
earth. The details of this Cybele-worship must be given
in a later chapter. It is enough here to show its points of
connexion with that of Artemis, and the common idea from

which that connexion arose.
The direct and clear recognition in the earlier literature of
Artemis and Cybele as kindred divinities appears but rarely'':
a striking instance of it is a fragment of Diogenes o rpayt/cdy,
quoted by Athenaeus I hear that the Bacchic maidens of
:
'
hKOi 6ia aiiTiipa <pi\r] jxvarriaiv dnaai "^

Vide article by Kretschmer, Ai/s
hut it is not the Artemis of the old der Anomia, p. 17.
Greek religion that the hymn celebrates, ^ We find Artemis Munychia vvor-
but the goddess confused Hekate

witli shipped near Cyzicus in association
and Eileithyia ; cf. Orph. Argon. 1. 905, with the 'mother-goddess,' who in this
for the mystic rites of initiation con- locality must have been Cybele""'^.
nected with Artemis Hekate.
Lydia, d\\-elling by the river Pialys, honour Artemis the

goddess of Tmolus in a ^"'^.'
The god-
laurel-shaded grove
dess of Tmohis worshipped by maenads is certainly Cybele,
but is here given the name of the Greek goddess, and the
laurel-grove, sacred properly to the latter, is associated with
the goddess of Asia Minor.
Another form of Cybele was the armed Cappadocian Ma,
the mother-goddess, who came, perhaps in the later period,
to be identified with the Tauric Artemis ^^'',
owing probably to
the influence diffused through the Euxine of the Dindymene
and Pessinuntian rites, as these would naturally attract the
legend of the Tauric cult *.
The Thracian Bendis ^^^

was and
probably in origin
character the same as the great mother of Phrygia, and
was worshipped, according to Strabo, with the same orgiastic
rites ; her cult spread through Thessaly to Athens probably
about the time when that of Cybele had acquired public
prevalence there. We hear also of Bendis as the great '
goddess of Lemnos to whom human victims were offered,

'
and she may well have been recognized there as cognate to the
Tauric Artemis ^-'\ And though of close affinity to Cybele
and Hekate^ she was received into Greek religion chiefly as
a Thracian form of Artemis. Herodotus speaks of the
'
queen Artemis ^'^ ^,' to whom the Thracians and Paeonians
sacrificed, the queen being probably one of her native
'
'
titles''. The reasons for this association of the Greek

maidenly goddess with the Bendis- Hekate-Brimo, the
patroness of savage magic and terrifying superstition, may
have been some external resemblance of attributes, but also,
probably, some consanguinity Like Artemis of character.
Tavfjo-nokos, theThracian divinity was supposed to ride on
bulls; like Artemis, she was a mighty huntress, though her
weapon was not the bow, but the spear in each hand ''^'\
We find the feast of Bendis formally established at Athens
* The legend of Orestes and the certainly un-Hellenic ''*.
Tauric Artemis penetrated as far south **

As the queen-goddess, the Thra-
as Cilicia into the worship of Artemis cian divinity appears to have been once
Uepaaia at Castabala, whose ritual, so at least identified with Hera ; Polyaen.
far as Strabo describes it, appears to be Strat. 7. 22.
XIII.] ARTEMIS. 475
by the time of Plato'*, and the worship must have been known
to the Athenians at an earher date through the parrot, the
comedy of Cratinus. The well-known scene in the opening of
the Republic speaks of the torch-races on horseback held in
her honour at the Peiraeeus, the vantage-ground in Attica of
foreign cults. And this ceremony may perhaps explain why
Bendis was identified with Artemis; for the two Greek
goddesses, in whoserites and legends from the fifth century
onwards the torch is a specially prominent symbol, are

Demeter and Artemis; but the wild Thracian huntress was
more naturally associated with the latter than with the
divinity of settled agricultural life, although Bendis also,
like the Greek Artemis, had some connexion with agricul-
ture, were brought to her and the bull

as cereal offerings
appears to have been one of her sacred animals. It was
in Thessaly, and especially at Pherae, that this association

with Artemis took place. The cult and legends of Pherae,
where Admetus was probably a name for the god of the lower
world who, like Dionysos, yoked wild beasts to his chariot,
and where Hekate or Bendis was regarded as his daughter,
have a certain chthonian character and this was found in the
;
worship of Artemis 'êpaia, which was the chief Thessalian

worship of the goddess, and which spread to Acarnania,
Sicyon, and Argos "^' ^"''. The legend of Medea, the devotee
of Hekate and the Tauric goddess, and the part she played
in Thessaly seem to indicate that from an early time in
this land the cult of Artemis was infected with sorcery and
superstitious rites. As the worshippers of Bendis in the
Peiraeeus rode with torches on horseback, so the goddess of
Pherae was herself figured on coins mounted on a horse and
with a torch in her hand Millingen has published a relief
;
from Crannon'' with a torch-bearing Artemis standing by her

horse and hound; and we gather from Lycophron that 'the
goddess of Strymon,' whom he identifies with Brimo and
Pheraea, was honoured with torches. We may see also an
* An Attic inscription, circ. 429 B.C., dealing with the temple-moneys associates
^^*''.
Bendis with Adrasteia in the state-cult
b CneJ. Mon. 2. id.
and Artemis on the coin of the Thracian

allusion to Bendis
Aenos, which displays a goat bending over a torch set in
a socket as for a lampadephoria ^.
Finally, we can trace in Crete the close affinity between

Artemis and the goddess of a Cretan pre-Hellenic people
who in blood or religion were probably akin to the wor-
shippers of Cybele in Asia Minor. The Cretan goddess was
Britomartis ^''^ known especially in the western part of the
island, and generally in the Hellenic world, as Dictynna,
and associated with the Thracian goddess i^^'^^^"^, but more
closely still with Artemis. The Cretans worship Diana most
'
religiously, naming her by the national name of Brito-

martis,' says Solinus '^^'^; and Pausanias supposes that she was
originally a nymph who rejoiced in hunting and the chase,
and was especially dear to Artemis. The worship spread to
Deles, to Aegina, where her cult-title was 'A(j)a(.a, and where
she may have been identified with Hekate, who was pro-
minent in the local cult^ and to Sparta, where her temple
stood nearest to the wall . Euripides, in the Hippolytus,
appears to attest a worship of Dictynna near Troezen we ;
have evidence of its existence in Phocis, Astypalaea, and

Cephallenia, and of a feast of Artemis Britomartis in Delos,
and an inscription of the Roman period proves that the public
worship of the Qâ tîKJva spread as far north as Massilia. The
name by ancient lexicographers as
Bptro/iaprt? is explained
meaning 'sweet maid,' and Ûivvva was of course connected
with the Greek word for a net. As philology has not yet
settled to what group of languages these words belong, we
might think they were titles attached to Artemis by the
early Hellenic settlers in Crete. But the statement of Strabo
is against this, who says that the Dictynnaeon, or temple of
* Head, Hist. Kmn. p. 214, Fig. 157. but Wide, in Lakonische Kidte, p. 109,
^'
Steph. Byz. gives 'A00ata as a cult- shows good reason for doubting his
name of Hekate in a confused note ;
testimony on this point. Stephanus of
probably 'A(pala should be read. Byzantium and Hesychius do not appear
If we accepted Pausanias' statement,
''
to have known the Cretan origin of
we should have to believe that the Cre- Artemis Issoria, and as her temple stood
tan goddess was also worshipped on the on the height, it is not probable that
south coast of Laconia under the titles she would be identified with Artemis
of Artemis 'iaaapla and Aifxvaia^'-^''^ of the marsh.
xui.] ARTEMIS. 477
Dictynna, was in the territory of the Cydonians, an aboriginal

Cretan population and though, according to Herodotus, it
:
was built by the Samians in the time of Polycrates, yet we

cannot suppose that they introduced the worship, for the
legend is entirely Cretan. Originally independent, she be-
came regarded in the fifth century as a personality scarcely
distinct from Artemis: like her, she was worshipped as
a mighty huntress with her hounds, as iroXvO-qpos, the divinity
of the beasts of the wild and \a<ppia, the prevalent title of
;
Artemis in Aetolia, is mentioned as an epithet of Britomartis

Dictynna in Cephallenian cult. In Crete itself, where her
worship was of national importance, she does not seem to
have been actually identified in the cult of the autonomous
cities with her sister-goddess of the Hellenic religion, for
in the treaty of alliance between the men of Latos and
Olus inscribed about 200 B.C., and in the oath that bound
the citizens of Cnossus to those of Dreros, the two divinities
'^^
are mentioned separately '^ ; but on the Cretan coins of
the imperial period Dictynna appears altogether in the guise
of Artemis. It concerns us to examine the grounds of this
association. would have doubtless come about, if the
It
Greeks had only known

Dictynna as a divine huntress,
and had heard the Cretan myth that she had plunged into
the water to preserve her chastity from the pursuit of Minos.
But, besides this, there is reason to think that her significance
for the old Cretan worship was essentially the same as that
of Artemis for the Arcadian. The legend concerning her
rescue in the fishers' nets might perhaps have arisen from the
popular derivation of the name îKTvvva; yet even if Pausanias
was wrong in supposing that the title Aiixvaia was given her
in Spartan cult, it is still probable that she, like Artemis,
had some real connexion with the waters. This would arise
naturally from the seafaring character of her worshippers,
and the statement in Plutarch is of importance, that she was
constantly associated in cult with Apollo Delphinios^^' *, in
whose legend the Cretan mariner plays a part. And there is
evidence that, like Artemis, Aphrodite, and Cybele, she was
a divinity connected with the earth and its vegetative powers.
478 CREEK RELIGION. [chap.
In her ritual the wild trees appear to have been consecrated

to her as to Artemis. The story of the leap into the sea
was told not only of Dictynna, but of Aphrodite herself, the
fish-goddess Derketo, and the Carian maiden Rhoio, another
form of Artemis Aphrodite, and may have arisen from
some ritual practised in the worship of the divinity of
vegetation ^ Her name AtKrvwa, as the writer in Roscher's
Lexicon (p. cS22) remarks, may have been derived from some
locality in the west of Crete, and at any rate is probably
connected with the name of Mount Dicte in the east, where,
according to one legend, Zeus was born, and whence he took
his title At/crcuos^ And we might suppose that the relation
between the Zeus of Crete and Dictynna was different from
that which appears in the genealogical account of the
goddess's origin, and that originally she was scarcely distinct
from Amalthea, or the sacred goat-mother who nourished
Zeus in the Cretan legend of the god, the goat and the bee
;
are his sacred animals, the one being usually consecrated to

the Hellenic Artemis, the other to the Ephesian. Possibly
the Cydonian legend, of which we have sotne numismatic
evidence*^, concerning the nurture of Zeus by a dog, may be
derived from some association of the infant-god with Dictynna,
with whom this animal was associated. It is at least certain
that this character of Dictynna as KovpoTp6(j)os and as the
nurse of Zeus was recognized in the later period, for on coins
of the early imperial epoch we see Dictynna '
seated on a
rock holding a javelin and the infant Zeus on her arm, and
guarded on either side by the Curetes*^.'
The conception which we can trace in Thracian-Phrygian
worship, and which penetrated into Hellas, of an earth-
goddess and a god of vegetation who is sometimes her son
or fosterling, sometimes her lover, who suffers and is born
again, can be detected also in the religion of Crete, having
reached the island from Asia Minor, perhaps through Caria.
" Vide chapter on Aphrodite, p. 63!^ ; (p. 479) are not very weighty,
on Artemis, p. 447 note '^. <^
Vide Ephetn. Archacol. 1S92, p. 7;
''
This view was held by Callima.hus, Zeus-chapter, p. 109.
Hymn. Dian. 199. Strabo's objections '^
Head, Hist. Atim. p. 384.
xin.] ARTEMIS. 479
The solar element in that religion appears to me to have been

much exaggerated*. The Cretan story and cult of Zeus,
who is born and dies, whose foster-mother was the goat or
Amalthea or Rhea, and whose body-guard were the Curetes,
and whose religion there and there only was mystic and
orgiastic, must be attached, as has been already remarked, by
a close link to the cycle of the myths and cults of Dionysos,
Altis, Sabazios, and Cybele^'. In Ariadne the Greeks recog-
nized occasionally an Aphrodite, but more generally a female
counterpart of Dionysos Europa riding on the sacred bull
;
may be regarded as a personage of the Dionysiac circle, the

Cretan equivalent of Artemis Tauropolos, and her name was
probably that by which the Greeks designated the Cretan
earth-goddess , just as in Boeotia they spoke of Demeter
EvpcoTTr; ; and as the Cretan god dies, so his spouse, the earth-
goddess, dies, for we hear of the funeral rites of Europa in the

Corinthian festival of 'EAAwrta*^. Into this Cretan circle, then,
of divinities of vegetation, Dictynna Britomartis must be
placed and thus she could be rightly associated with Cybele
;
on the one hand, and Artemis on the other with the latter :
all the more naturally because she was a huntress connected
in some way with the water and the wilds, and, unlike the
Thracian-Phrygian goddess, necessarily a virgin.
It was through these half-foreign influences that the worship
of Artemis in Aegina, Crete, and Thessaly became tinged

with the ideas proper to a primitive and orgiastic nature-
" The Labyrinth and Minotaur and name Aikttj occurred in the region of
Europa riding on the bull have no clear Mount Ida in the Troad.
solar reference; the name of Pasiphae Europa seated on the
<=
tree on Cretan
and her legendary connexion with coins may be a representation express-
Aeetes, and thus with Helios, is the ing her half- forgotten association with
one atom of fact in this solar theory the earth. It is of course true that the
about the Cretan religion. Cretan myth points to Phoenician in-
''
The very name of the Cretan fliiences, and according to Lucian, ch'
Nymphs, the MrjTtpes, recalls that of >ea S_yrm. "j 2, the coin-stamp ofSidon
the Mfya\r] MijTrjp of Phrygia. They was Europa seated on the bull this :
are Cbpecially mentioned by Diodorus would show that in later limes she was
Siculus (bk. 4, chs. 79, So) as the Cretan identified with Astarte ; vide Aphrodite-
nurses of Zeus, and worshipped with chapter, pp. 632, 633.
great reverence at Agrigentum down to ''
Vide Athena-references, ''.
late times. We may note also that the For Preller {Gricch. Myth, i,
worship, of which the main area was Thrace, Phrygia, Lydia,

and some of the Eastern islands. The unmixed Hellenic
worship had not been wholly innocent in certain localities ;
but in ordinary Greek cult Artemis had not been hitherto

recognized as the Bacchic and Corybantic personage whom
Timotheus celebrated in his verse, calling her the raving '
frenzied Thyiad,' an emotional and questionable divinity,

against whom the saner Cinesias publicly protested ='.
The worship of Artemis at Ephesus is a conspicuous

instance of the fusion of Eastern and Western religious ideas ;
and of all these hybrid cults this is the most important for
the student of Greek religion, since, according to Pausanias, it
was known in every Greek city, and it spread to the western-
most parts of the Mediterranean. The Massilians inherited
it from the original Phocian settlers, and were zealous propa-
gandists, as they succeeded in planting it in all their colonies

and even in Rome itself ^^^. Besides Ephesus, the cities of
Pergamon, Smyrna, Sardis, Adramytteum, Prusa, Cyzicus, and
Astyra in Antandros stamped their coins with the figure of
the Ephesian goddess ^ At Ephesus, in the Artemision, the
goddess was worshipped as TrpooTodfjovia, supreme in divine
power and place and although she came to acquire
;
a Hellenic genealogy and some of the honours of the Hellenic

goddess the ancients themselves rightly regarded her as
'^j
in origin a non-Hellenic divinity. According to the view

expressed in Pausanias, she was the aboriginal deity of
a population consisting of Leleges and Lydians ;
and Tacitus
records the priestly tradition concerning the association of the
p. 252") Dictynna personifies the moon ;

* '
May your daughter turn out just
Rapp, in Roscher's Lexicon, regards such a character ' was the exclamation
her as a cloud-maiden (5. v. Britomartis). of Cinesias ; Plut. de andiend. poet. c. 4.
To say that any concrete figure of pri- ''

Brit. Mus. Cat., coins of Astyra
mitive religion is a personification of Zeitsch.fiir N^nviism. 18S0, Taf. i, 14.
anything is always a very doubtful " Ortygia was localized near Ephesus,
expression ; my statement is not that and the Ephesians plead for their god-
either Artemis or Dictynna was a i)er- dess before Tiberius as though she were
sonification of the earth, but that the sister of Apollo and daughter of
Artemis certainly, and Dictynna pro- Leto. We hear of musical contests in
bably, possessed much of the character honour of tiie Ephesian as of the Delian
of a deity of vegetation. goddess '^^.
xm.] ARTEMIS. 481
cult with the Lydian Heracles. Accepting this theory of its
origin, we should expect to find marks of close kinship with

'
the Great Mother of Phrygia and Lydia, the area of whose
'
worship has been traced above. And in fact we detect in the

Ephesian Artemis few or none of the characteristics of a lunar
divinity, but all those of a goddess of generation and vegeta-
tion, possessing the powers of the life-giving earth. The best
evidence of this is the traditional form of the Ephesian idol'',
the great antiquity of which is proved by its semi-aniconic

style : the many breasts are the uncouth symbol of fertility,
the lions, the rams, and the bulls wrought in relief upon her
shoulders and legs denote the goddess who fosters the life of
the wilds and the fields ; the bee which is wrought just above
her feet, a frequent symbol on the coins of Ephesus and '',
possibly of some religious significance in the worship ^'^''',
figures also in the cognate Cretan worship of Zeus with which

Rhea Cybele is associated.
Her affinity to Cybele isstill more marked by the turret-
crown that she wears on her head, which is the badge of

the city-goddess, and by the orgiastic rites practised by the
eunuch-priests, whose name M^ya^vCoi seems to point to the
influence of the Persian worship of Artemis'^. We hear of
hierodulae serving in the precincts of the Artemision as in
the worship of Mylitta and Ishtar, but we are not told that
temple-prostitution was a religious rite at Ephesus. In fact
the Ephesian religion, in spite of its orgiastic elements, appears
to have been in some
respects of an austere character rigid ;
and purity were imposed on the Essenes ^^*,

rules of chastity
a priestly society that was attached to the temple and ;
if the statement of Artemidorus is correct, no woman was
allowed under pain of death to enter the temple, and the

functions of the priestesses of various grades must have
been confined to its precincts. We cannot estimate exactly
how far the original worship was modified or purified by
" Vide coins of Ephesus, Brit. Mus. arms given, the rest aniconic.
outlines of
Ta/. /^;//a,Nos. 71, 72, 73, 76; alabaster ''Vide A. B. Cook, Hell. Joiirn.
statuette in Naples, Roscher, Lexicon, 1895, p. 12.
Cp.an archaic terracotta in Dres- The strong Persian influence in Ephe-
p. 588.
den, with many breasts, head, sleeves, sus is attested by Plutarch, Lysander, 3,
VOL. II. F
Hellenic influences but in any case it does not seem to

;
have been borrowed mainly from the Semitic people, but

rather to express the religious ideas of the ancient races
in Asia Minor who were nearer to the Hellenic stock, the
Phrygians, Lydians, Carians. The legends of the Amazons
and of their close relation with the Artemis of Ephesus appear
to point to the north of Asia Minor as the original home of
this cult.According to Hyginus"' the temple itself was
built by one of the Amazons, and Callimachus records the
story that the ancient idol was set up by the Amazons in the
trunk of a tree, and there is frequent reference in Greek myth
to the protection which the defeated female warriors sought
and found in the Artemision. Both in cult and in legend she
was recognized as the divinity of the suppliant, and, according
to the author of the Etyviologicnm Magmiui, sheep were never
sacrificed to her because of the sanctity of the woollen fillet
which the suppliant bore. The fact may be accepted without
the explanation. In purely Hellenic worship Artemis is not
conspicuously the deity of supplication ; and. on the other
hand, the conception of the huntress-goddess so prominent in
Greece does not appear in the Ephesian religion. may We
conclude that the early Greek settlers of the country of
Ephesus, as those of Crete, found established there the worship
of an indigenous goddess, to whom they applied the name and
some of the titles of the Greek Artemis; and that the character
of the Ephesian and Cretan goddess was identical or of close
affinity with that of Cybele. With the Ephesian we may
probably associate the Artemis of Perge, a city-goddess
whose cult, briefly mentioned above, appears in one important
respect, namely in the institution of mendicant priests, to have
been influenced by the Phrygian religion.
Next perhaps to these in prominence was the cult of
Artemis AevKO(ppvi]vi] at Magnesia on the Maeander^24^ which
again brings Crete into connexion w'ith Phrygia. The
ancient city with its temples had been destroyed by the Cim-
merians, but had been afterwards restored by the Ephesians,
who rebuilt the temple with such architectural skill and on
"^
lad. 237.
XIII.] ARTEMIS. 483
such a scale that it became famous in the ancient world.

The local worship of the Phrygian Cybele, which existed
there till some time after the residence of Themistocles,
appears to have died out, absorbed perhaps by the cult of
Artemis Leucophryene, who was probably akin to her. We
hear little of the details of the Magnesian cult but as the ;
Ephesians were its second founders, and as the type of

Artemis Leucophryene on later coins of the city resembles
that of the Ephesian goddess the conception of the divinity
>*,
came probably to be very similar in both worships. It is

true that we hear of no un-Hellenic features in the worship of
the goddess of Magnesia, who, like the Greek Artemis, appears
to have been associated with the lake and the hot spring.
But it is probable that she was originally a Cretan goddess,
and that the cult belonged to the Carian-Cretan group for ;
the Cretans claimed to have had a share in the colonization

of Magnesia, and the worship is proved by inscriptions
to have existed in Crete. An imaefe of the p-oddess was
carved for Amyclae by Bathycles of Magnesia, and the sons of
Themistocles are said to have set up her statue in Athens.
To this class we may also assign the worship of Artemis
Ko/\o?7Z'7/ ^'^, that was in great repute by the lake Coloe in the
neighbourhood of Sardis. Strabo tells us a strange story

about the miraculous dance of the sacred KaKadot, the baskets
that contained the cereal offerings consecrated to her, and
Pausanias speaks of certain lascivious dances that were
brought from Sipylos to Elis by the followers of Pelops and
performed in honour of "Apre/ztj Kopba^. The calathos-dance
was probably nothing more mysterious than the dance of the
maidens representing Artemis with the basket on their heads,
as we find similar figures dancing round the column of Hekate.
The Artemis of Sipylos and Coloe was probably a Hellenized
form of the great mother-goddess of Phrygia and Lydia.
Lastly, there is archaeological evidence of a goddess of
''
similar character worshipped at Lampsacus on the Hellespont.

A silver patera has been found on that site containing a curious
" \'ide Head, //ts(. Nicin. p. 502 ; Brit. Miis. Cat. Ionia, p. 163.
^ Gazette A7rkc'ol. 1877, p. 119.
F 2
representation of a female divinity with stag's horns on her

forehead, who holds a bow in her left hand and makes
a gesture with her right that signifies fertility on each side
;
of the throne on which she sits are dogs, and below negresses
leading lions a strange medley of attributes that allude to
Artemis, Hekate, and Cybele.
We have finally to notice the purely Oriental divinities
with whom Artemis became identified or associated. The
grounds of this association may often be uncertain, and the
interpretation often shifted : the Cappadocian goddess Ma,
for instance,was regarded as Selene, Athena, or Enyo the ;
Syrian goddess of Hierapolis, whom the pseudo-Lucian usually

calls Hera, had also something of the character of Athena,
Aphrodite, Selene, Rhea, Artemis, Nemesis, and the Fates ^
We may believe that wherever the Greeks found in the East
a prominent goddess who was regarded as a huntress and
controller of wild beasts, or as a goddess of vegetation, or as
an unmarried divinity, they would be inclined to name her
Artemis and in some cases the name might be given because
;
of certain details in the ritual '\ What at first sight is surpris-

ing is that it is attached to divinities of the East whose rites
were notoriously impure.

The old Persian goddess Anaitis, a divinity of the water and
vegetation and originally distinct, as Meyer maintains, from
the similar female deity of so many Semitic cults,came in
a later period into close contact with the Babylonian Nana and ;
this may have happened before the cult of the Persian goddess
was established by Artaxerxes II in Babylon, Susa, Ecbatana,
Damascus, and Sardes. And in Armenia the same impure
rites were practised in the temple of Anaitis as Herodotus
records of the Babylonian worship. Strabo vouches for the

same practice at Zela in Pontus, where the Persian goddess
became powerful. It was for this reason, perhaps that
Herodotus and Berosus were led to identify her with
Z>^ ZJâ .S/r. p. 32 ; Pint. ^'k//. ch. 9. in the worship of the Greek Artemis;
^ For instance, the practice of dedicat- de Dca Syr. p. 60; C.I.G. Ait. 3,
ing the hair of boys and maidens to the no. 131.

Syrian goddess at Bambyce occurs also " Roscher's Lexicon, p. 330.
xiii.] ARTEMIS. 485
Aphrodite. But usually she was regarded as the counterpart

of Artemis in the Greek theocrasy, and the worship of the
Persian Artemis ^^^ was specially in vogue in the cities of Lydia,
particularly at Hierocaesarea, where her
temple claimed
a peculiar sanctity. We
have also archaeological proof of the
long-continued prevalence throughout the Roman empire of
the worship of the Hellenized goddess of Persia for instance, ;
several votive reliefs have been found in Holland, and are

now in the Museum of Leyden, bearing Greek inscriptions
to Artemis Anaeitis and often associating her with the
Phrygian moon-god Men. She is usually represented with
peplos, chiton, and pointed shoes, and holding up her right
hand. In Lydia her image appears to have borne the typical
form of the Tauric goddess ^^ ^. How far the character of the
Persian and the Hellenic divinity really coincided is difficult
to determine precisely that both were divinities of vegetation
;
powerful over the animal world, and that the torch was used in
the ritual of both, may have been sufficient reasons for their rap-
procheinoit. And their association may have also led to the
occasional identification of Artemis with the Babylonian Nana.
For the Semitic goddess the most common name was
Astarte, or some form of this, and in the theocrasy of the
Hellenistic period Artemis sometimes appears as her Greek
equivalent, though much less frequently than Aphrodite.
A very curious legendary indication of the early existence
of an Artemis-Astarte worship in Greece proper is offered by
the story in Pausanias about the temple of Artemis 'Ao-rpareta'^^"
at Pyrrhichos in Laconia. The natives appear to have be-
lieved that it was founded to commemorate the incursion of the
Amazons and from the campaign' at this place:
their 'ceasing
near it was the temple of Apollo 'A/Ma^wios, and the images
in both temples were dedicated by the Amazons. We have
here the usual popular explanation of a perverted and mis-
understood title. 'Ao-rpareta is a comparatively late word of the
Athenian law-courts, denoting the offence of evading military
service, and is quite meaningless when applied to the goddess.
The cult is evidently from Asia Minor, and I would suggest that
Artemis 'Aorpareta is a corruption for 'Aaraprrj. Her connexion
486 GREEK RELIGION.
with Astarte probably arose from the same grounds as
her association with the Persian goddess and it cannot be
;
taken as evidence of the early lunar character of Artemis.

For as E. Meyer maintains % this Babylonian-Semitic goddess
is moon, this planet being
originally not a divinity of the
regarded as male both by the Babylonians and Semites and ;
although the Babylonian deity sometimes appears represented

with the crescent moon upon her forehead, this is probably
due to her late association with Isis, and to the misunder-
standing of the symbol of the sun which Isis bore on her
forehead. Even in the late account given by the pseudo-
Lucian of the worship of the great goddess of the Syrian
Hierapolis, properly Atargatis, but associated by the narrator
with Aphrodite, Rhea, Artemis, and other Greek goddesses,
it is specially said that there were no statues here to the
sun or the moon. It is true that in the later period of
Greek religious thought Artemis was regarded as a lunar
divinity, and in the latest Graeco-Asiatic religious system she
came to be closely associated with the Phrygian moon-god
Men'', But this lunar character of the Greek and Semitic
goddess was certainly not recognized in the seventh century
B.C. and before this period the Oriental goddess had probably
;
been adopted as Artemis in more than one Hellenic locality.

To those who regard Artemis simply as the pure virgin of
Greek religion, innocent of all orgiastic extravagance, it may
seem strange that her maidenly character could not save her
from this later association with the Oriental goddess of genera-
tion, with a Semitic divinity whose worship was solemnized
by temple-harlots. But it has been shown that that ideal
aspect of Artemis was the fair outgrowth of the popular imagi-
nation in literature, legend, and art, and was not her aspect
in the primitive rite and conservative cult of Greece. The wor-
ships of Arcadia and Brauron contained many ideas not alien
to those expressed in the rites and symbols of the earth-goddess
of Phrygia and Lydia and the Semitic divinity of Hierapolis.
" Roscher's Lexicon, s. v. Astarte and closely assimilated to Helios and Men ;
Atargatis. vide inscription published by Ramsay,

'"'^.
''
Similarly, in Phrygian cult Hellenic Journal, lo. 217.
Apollo Lairbenos was identified with or
CHAPTER XIV.
ARTEMIS UriS NEMESIS ^'^"'~'^'^
The human life, which did

idea of the righteous control of
not conspicuously appear in the cults that have just been
examined, essentially belonged to the worship of Nemesis.
This figure lost much of its personal force in proportion as it
developed moral significance. In the beginning the name

in
denoted more than a mere moral abstraction for there is ;
reason to suppose that both Nemesis and Upis were connected

titles or surnames of Artemis or Artemis Aphrodite. In
regard to the latter, of which the Doric form is 'Ûttl^, the
Ionic Ov-HLs, there is no doubt ; its usual explicit reference is
to Artemis ", who was worshipped by this title in Lacedaemon

and probably Troezen. We have, indeed, only the testimony
of late and learned writers such as Callimachus and the
lexicographers but this was drawn either from earlier
;
literature or from knowledge of actual legend and cult.

And we have indirect evidence that is even more trust-
worthy we hear in Athenaeus of the ovTrtyyot, the sacred
:
formulae or hymns by which Artemis was addressed at

Troezen, the name implying the invocation and the worship
of Artemis Upis and mention has already been made of thfe
;
Delian maiden Upis who with Arge first brought the Hyper-
borean offerings to the island, and arrived there in company
with the divinities themselves, as Herodotus emphatically
says. The sacred rites performed to her, the ceremonious
" Bergk's proposed emendation of the {Poef. Lyr. Grace.3. p. 499) has no
line in the epigram attributed to Simo- probability, and we know nothing of
iiides ^ (Ijb,;, n^,, 'k^vy^^)
an Athena Upia.
^
Warp'iba KvSaiyojv lepr)v n6\iv 'Cimas 'Adrjvas
offering made to her of the maidens' hair wound about a

spindle,make it certain that Upis was an ancient and half-
forgotten name of Artemis. It was resuscitated by later
poetry and attached vaguely to the Ephesian Artemis, to the

Rhamnusian goddess, and, in a doubtful fragment quoted by
Hesychius, to Artemis Hekate ^.
It isimportant to find the right interpretation of this

title. It is impossible perhaps to decide about its original
meaning and to say whether this was moral or physical

but it is Greeks themselves interpreted it as
clear that the
the watcher,' connecting it probably with oTiiC^crdai.
' But
of what was the goddess regarded as the watcher ? Of '
'
women in travail, according to the authority from whom

the explanation in the Etyinologiann Magnum is drawn ;
and this limitation of the reference of the word, though

probably groundless, is of some interest as showing that it did
not at once seem to accord with the traditional and accepted
character of Artemis that she should be addressed as the
'watcher' or overseer of right and wrong, of human life and
conduct in general. Yet the title 0\j~i^ must have come to
acquire this broader sense in the later period, for it occurs as
a synonym of Nemesis, the Rhamnusian goddess, who 'gazes
at the deeds of men^^^.' This application of the title, as we
know the moral connotation of Nemesis, not only serves to
decide what was the received significance of OStti?, but also
illustrates the connexion surviving in a late period of Nemesis
and Artemis.
It is the origin and the ground of this latter association that
we have now to consider.
The goddess may be studied from two different
Ne/xerrt?
points of view mere personification of the moral idea of

: as a
retribution, or on the other hand as a concrete figure of ancient
Attic religion, identical with a primitive goddess of Rhamnus,
to whom this exceptional title was attached, and who was pro-
bably a form of Artemis Aphrodite. In the first character she
" We may thus explain the epithet been attached to llekate; and we may
'nTToiT^poj, which, according to Hesy- compare the epithet 'Ounais in the
chius [s. V. 'ClnajT^pf), appears to have worship of Artemis at Zacynthus"^
XIV.] ARTEMIS UPIS NEMESIS. 489
will be noticed in a later chapter ;

it is the other aspect of her
that concerns us here *. And we have to consider, first, what
evidence there is of the existence of this concrete goddess in
Attic or Greek religion of an early period secondly, whether and ;
on what ground the surnameNeVe(n9 was ever applied to Artemis

or Aphrodite. In Homer, Nemesis is not a personal figure in ;
Hesiod she is, but probably only as a mere personification,

such as AiSw?*'. But in the fragment of the Cypria'^^'^ her
figure has life and vivid personality. She flies over land and
sea, like Dictynna of Crete, to escape her lover, and assumes
different shapes of animals Zeus overtakes her in Rhamnus
;
and form of a swan becomes the father of Helen. The

in the
locality and this latter transformation is not indeed mentioned
in the lines of the Cypria but we have fair reason for supposing,
;
as the account given by Cratinus agrees in most details

with the story of the Cypria, that it agreed also in the close of
the legend, which has not been preserved in the epic fragment.
This, then, is the myth which Dr. Furtwangler supposes to
have been afterwards in its main features transferred to Leda
by Euripides, while Herr Posnanzky*^ maintains that the legend
which makes Leda the mother of Helen is the oldest, and
that the author of the Cypria for a moral epic purpose chose
to make her the daughter of a personified abstraction, the
daughter of Retribution, The question whether the myth that
makes Leda or that which makes Nemesis the parent is the
older, is not of importance here. But it is certainly an error
to say that the Nemesis in the Cypria or in the comedy of
Cratinus is as abstract a notion, or is as weakl)'- personified, as
^ The most modern on the
literature have originally been, became identified
subject gives either an incomplete or an with a goddess of Attica,
unsatisfactory account : Athnt'sie et la ^ She is clearly so in the Works and
jalousie des Dieux, by Tournier, deals Days, 739, 754, and she is very pro-
and the
chiefly with the personification bably so in the passage of the Theogony
abstract idea Nemesis und Adrasteia,
; in which she is made the daughter of
by Hermann Posnanzky (Breslau, 1890), Night'"'; for Hesiod is fond of giving

is more useful for the archaeology and this sort of cosmic origin to the abstrac-
the account of Adrasteia than for its tions which he wishes to make divinities,
statements and conclusions about Neme- <^
Collection Sahouroff, note comple-
sis. Henowhere raises the question mentaire a la planche 71^.
why it was that a mere personification, ^ Op. cit.
which he seems to consider Nemesis to

490 GREEK RELIGION [chaf.
the Nemesis in Hesiod. For the sake of moral allegory a

poet might call Helen the daughter of Retribution, just as
Aeschylus called her bride of battle '; but he would scarcely
'
be likely to depict at great length the coyness of Retribution,

and to draw her through a series of transformation-scenes which
have the stamp of vivid primitive fancy upon them. It might
seem quite natural to a primitive Greek that his goddess should
assume the form of a goose, but he could hardly conceive of
an abstract moral idea in this form. The whole story which
Cratinus and the author of the Cypria give and the mention of
the locality of Rhamnus would be altogether ridiculous, unless
the poets had known of a real goddess worshipped at that spot
in Attica, one of whose names was Nemesis, and who was
supposed capable of bona-fide maternity ^ We can conclude

also from the form of the legend that, like Artemis and
Dictynna, this divinity was naturally regarded as chaste.
is one proof drawn from ancient authority of
This, then,
the existence of a real and concrete goddess known by this
moral title. Of no personified moral abstraction in the Greek
language is so personal a story told, and none of them had any
deep roots in local worship.
A
second proof might be derived from the funeral cere-
mony or feast of the Ne/xeVto at Athens It might be sup- ^''^.
posed that as the omission of any of the necessary funereal

rites might draw retribution or nemesis upon the kinsmen, the
name of this ritual might have simply arisen from this feeling ;
yet it would be much more naturally given to a celebration

which was consecrated to a goddess who, like Aphrodite, was
a goddess of birth and death, and who was considered to have
power in the underworld. Perhaps from this character of the
Rhamnusian goddess arose the idea of the Ne'juea-t? of the
dead, and the association of Nemesis with the QôX -naXaixvalob
and xôi'iot in the Locrian Timaeus''; though here the force of
the personified moral idea is felt also, as these are the powers
that are said to note and punish wrong-doing.
" Otto Keller, Thieredes Klassischcn divinity, akin to Aphrodite Astarte.

Altertlmrns (p. 288), also regards the i-
Pp. 104 E, 105.
Nemesis of Rhamnus as a concrete
P\irther evidence of the reality of the cult is gained from

the account of the famous statue at Rhamnus ^^' '', which was
assigned by some to Pheidias, by others, more correctly, to
Agoracritus '^. From the description of Pausanias we do not

gather that there was any which had trait of the figure itself
an allegorical meaning and whether the moral idea of

;
Nemesis was expressed in the face we cannot say, for the

fragment preserved in the British Museum of the right
upper part of the visage too small to bear witness to

is
anything more than the excellence and Pheidian character of

the work. the sculptor, though he may have
It is clear that
remembered Marathon and the nemesis that overtook the '

'
Persians there, and may have wrought the victories upon her
crown with allusion to that, yet thought of her, not as Hesiod
thought of atows and but as an actual territorial divinity
hUi^,
akin to Aphrodite and Artemis and therefore he set the ;
spray of the apple-tree, the symbol of the former, in her hand,

and the stag, the sacred animal of the latter, as an ornament
on her crown. The cup in her hand may denote the goddess
who dispenses blessing or who receives libation ; the mysterious
Aethiopians wrought on the cup have not yet been explained*';
the representation of the negresses below the throne of the
statue of Lampsacus mentioned above is not a parallel,
for there we may suppose a reference to Isis and Africa,
which is inconceivable in the Rhamnusian work. It is un-
necessary to suppose that the main work was inspired by
the Cypria story; had been we should have expected
if it
in the decoration of thecrown and the base some allusion to

the z%^ and the swan. Even the scene on the base of the
statue can be at most a mere allusion to the legend of
Helen's birth given in the Cypria according to the words :
^
There is some force in the argument an allusion to the celestial character of
of Posnanzky, p. 95, that if the statue the goddess; but this significance no-
were by Agoracritus, the Rhamnusians where else belongs to them in Greek
would be tempted to attribute it to literatiu-e and art. Perhaps the Homeric
Pheidias; while the reverse would notion of the '
blameless' people was in
scarcely be natural. the mind of the sculptor of the just
''
Furtwangler (op. cit.^ regards the goddess.
Aethiopians as the emblems of light,
of Pausanias, which need awake no suspicion, the scene

represented Leda leading back Helen to Nemesis, and no
doubt implies the tradition which the epic poet had followed,
that Nemesis^ not Leda, was her mother. The statue was
probably inspired by the local belief of Rhamnus, where, as
may have often happened when an epithet of a divinity had
for a long period been detached and had long passed current
as the proper name, the worshippers were no longer certain
about the precise character and original name of the divinity.
If Nemesis of Rhamnus
as is perhaps the most likely view
were originally an ancient Artemis akin to the Brauronian, it
was not at all unnatural that she should be partly confused
with Aphrodite^: we have seen how in the earliest cults the
functions of Artemis overlap those of the other goddess who
is generally regarded as her opposite ; and we have reason to
think that the Rhamnusian deity was a goddess of birth and
a goddess of death, being the mother of Helen Aphrodite, and
the divinity to whom the Ne/xeVta were consecrated. Hence
she would have sympathies both with Aphrodite and Artemis ;
and hence may have arisen the myth of her birth from the
ocean ^. And this double character can be illustrated by the
work of Agoracritus.
But on the whole this Rhamnusian goddess was more
often regarded as the double of Artemis than of Aphrodite.
'ApiCTToftovki], an epithet of the former, is connected by Arte-
midorus^'^"^ with seen how Artemis
NeVecrts''; we have
Upis becomes localized in the later literature at Rhamnus;
and it will be noticed later how Adrasteia became regarded
" At Patrae there was a temple of means the personification of retribution ;
Nemesis near to Aphrodite's '"

and a '', but the difficulty vanishes if we regard
statement in Photius connects Nemesis 'SSSefieais as an appellative given for
with Aphrodite and the marriage-ritual some special reason to the primitive
and in a later Attic inscription Neme- goddess of Rhamnus who possessed the
sis enjoys the Aphrodite-appellative character described in the text.
Ourania'"\ <^
He
seems to be referring to the
'' Posnanzky's statement (p. 12), 'doch Hours or the Nymphs who are men-
wird sichscliwerlicheine tiefere ausdem tioned in the immediate context; but
Wesen beider Gottheiten (Aphrodite und ÂptaTo0ov\r] is only known as an epithet
Nemesis) geschopfte Deutung finden,' of Artemis,
has only some point if by Nemesis he
as one both with Nemesis and Artemis. How strong was

this is shown by Solinus, who
syncrasy of the two divinities
speaks in an incorrect fashion of Rhamnus as the place where
stood the Pheidian statue of Diana
'
and one of the special '
;
characteristics of Artemis, namely, her maidenhood, becomes

assigned to Nemesis also '^^ '^.
Like the Rhamnusian divinity, the Nemesis of Smyrna

must be regarded as an actual and personal goddess, not as
a mere personification, though in this case, as in the other, the
latter view predominates in the later period. What is peculiar
to the Smyrniote cult is that there were two divinities of this
name, and that they were regarded as the daughters of Night^^^".
It was they w^ho appeared to Alexander in a dream as he was
sleeping under a plane-tree before their temple, and advised

him to remove the city to its later site'*. Above their heads,
or above their throne, in the temple of the new city were
placed statues of the Charites, archaic works of the sculptor
Boupalos. As the Charites were their attendants, and as the
plane-tree appears to have been consecrated to them, we
may conjecture of them, as of the ancient Rhamnusian god-
dess, that they were divinities of nature connected with the
vegetative world. Whatever view was taken of the Nemesis
of Rhamnus came to be taken of the Smyrniote figures also,
but there is no special mention of their association with
Artemis they seem closer akin to Aphrodite, being like
;
her divinities of the state and attended by the Charites,

and the pig appears to have been a sacred animal in their
worship as occasionally it was in hers. As earth-goddesses
they may also have had some connexion in cult with Dionysos.
On late coins of Smyrna they are represented wearing the
mural crown and drawn by griffins'', the animals of Oriental
cult that became associated at times with Aphrodite and
Artemis, and frequently in the later period with Nemesis.
The question arises, why at Smyrna only there were two
Nemeseis and not one. Posnanzky may be right in objecting '^
to Gerhard's explanation, who regards the one as expressing

* Paus. 7. 5, 2. ^ Head, Hist. Num. p. 510.
'^
Op. cit. pp. 61, 62.
the good side of the goddess, the other the evil but he ;
himself has no solution to and is content with Welcker's

offer,
suggestions^ that Nemesis becamxe double at Smyrna because

'Damonen' tend to become multiplied.
Perhaps a more natural reason for the duality was the
change of the city's site, as Pausanias' words imply that the
Smyrniotes made two Nemeseis because they had removed
from their ancient abode. We may suppose that the older
Smyrna had its Nejueo-is, the goddess who was the luck of the
city, and that she was retained and a new one created for the
new settlement.
It is perhaps through her early relations with Nemesis that
Artemis came to have some affinity with the Moirae ; this is
true at least of Artemis 'OpOia, who in a Greek inscription of

the Roman period is mentioned as receiving worship side by
side with Moira the Lacheseis and Asclepios ^^ but it may :
only have been the stress of some casual occurrence that

brought her into this company of divinities. For on the
whole the association with Nemesis, who, as will be shown in
a later chapter, becomes more and more a mere personifica-
tion, has scarcely affected the character of Artemis.
A question remains which is of special interest, and which
has scarcely been noticed by those who have dealt with this
subject on what grounds and with what meaning was the
:
appellative which has been discussed attached to the Rhamnu-

sian goddess ? The question is beset with the difficulties
which often embarrass the student of ancient religions. No
doubt many of the divine epithets which were in vogue in
local cults may be derived from some fundamental concep-
tion of the divinity;and others were applied as the worshippers
advanced in their modes
of life and thought, and regarded
their deity as their guide and helper. But others may have
been gathered and absorbed by the local god or goddess from
some alien worship that could not hold its own there might ;
be no logical reason but mere contiguity, or some accidental

special circumstance that gave rise to a peculiar myth and
hence to a peculiar epithet. The difficulty of offering a probable
" Gdtterleh7-e, 3. p. 34.
X n- .
] ARTEMIS UPIS NEMESIS. 495
explanation becomes of course all the greater when we are

not sure of the meaning of the and we are not quite name ;
sure of the meaning borne by the term Nejueo-t? when it was

first applied to the Rhamnusian goddess.
If we knew that it was not applied to her before the

Homeric period, then we should say that she was regarded
by the men of Rhamnus as the goddess who feels righteous
indignation at evil acts and evil words, and hence, by a natural
transition, as thegoddess who punishes men for these ^.
would then remain to ask, why did the Rhamnusian
It
divinity, whom we have seen reason for supposing to have been

an ancient Artemis-Aphrodite, come to acquire this high
moral function ? It may have come about owing to the
impression produced by some historical event of which we
know nothing. We cannot, at all events, say that it was
derived from the recognized character of Artemis or Aphro-
dite as the punisher of evil-doers. For such a character
was not specially acknowledged as theirs in general Greek
religion in the mythic account of Artemis her punishments
;
appear often capricious or non-moral, and are very limited in

their visitation. It may be that we here have an instance of
a moral idea that gained strong hold over a particular society,

and craved religious expression, and so became attached
mechanically, as it were, to the chief divinity of that com-
munity. Though we may not explain it, we may find
a parallel development of an Artemis-Aphrodite,
to this
a divinity akin to the earth-goddess, into a moral and retribu-
tive power, the guardian of right for we find that Ge herself
;
developed into a Ge Themis, and thence into Themis alone''.

* This is on the whole the Homeric dxovfxti'rjv eKOeiv Ikh Kara tw AtvKa-
meaning, and it is this meaning that Kiaivos KaraKKva jxuv . Here is an allu-
Hesiod personifies; vide the passages sion to a fûiy rau/joTroAoj, a type which
collected in Posnanzky, pp. 1-4. recalls the "'Apre^xis ravpo-rroKos. An
^ This suggested equation, between Attic inscription proves the association
Ge = Ge Themis = Themis and Arte- of Themis with Nemesis at Rhamnus
mis = Nemesis = Nemesis, is
Artemis and this is proved also by the statue
curiously illustrated by a legend pre- dedicated to Themis found in Rhamnus
served in Suidas, s.v. Povxtra- noXis and now in Athens ; j>/i. Arch. 1891,
\cit\ rrjs 'Hneipov, rjv (prjcri î\uxopos Tliv. 1, pp. 54-63.
uvofinaOat Sia to tt)v Qtpuv km Pods
But it is quite possible that the goddess of Rhamnus

was called Nemesis before the time of Homer for, as has ;
been maintained already, the peculiar form of the story

in the Cypria about the birth of Helen implies a pre-
existing belief in a real goddess Nemesis, who probably
became real and concrete through the word being attached

as an epithet to the Rhamnusian divinity. We are thus
carried back to an indefinitely remote period in order to
allow time for the name that was thus attached to have
become detached, and to have acquired vogue beyond its
own locality as the actual name of a goddess. And per-
haps in this early period the word veixecns, if, as is generally
agreed, it is to be derived from the root meaning distribution,' '
was not limited to the evil sense, but denoted distribution of

any lot, the lot of life to which each is born.
It may have originally designated the Rhamnusian Artemis-
Aphrodite naturally and properly as a goddess of birth as ;
time went on and ueixeais had its meaning changed and nar-
rowed in the ordinary language, the cult-title too would
get this new moral significance, and Artemis or Aphrodite
Nemesis would come to mean the goddess who distributes
evil for evil done. At last, when the proper name was
dropped and the appellative took its place, doubt might
arise whether this really designated either the one or the
other of these two divinities, whose ordinary worship and
legend did not well accord with the idea conveyed by the
epithet.
As the representations of Nemesis, by far the
regards
greater number deal only with Nemesis the personification.
The monuments of actual cult are few and doubtful. Of the
Rhamnusian statue nothing has survived save the beautiful
fragment in the Elgin room of the British Museum, and the
base, with some part of the relief-work, now in the Central
Museum of Athens. It has been supposed by Dr. Furt-
wangler'"^ and M. Six'' that a copy of the statue of Agora-
critus survives in the representation on a Cypriote coin
Op. cit.
^ Kutnis/n. Chron. 1882, p. 89, PI. 5.

of the fifth century B.C.'*; and stately female figure,

a tall
resembling in her drapery the type of the Athena Parthenos

of Pheidias, holding in her right hand a phiale over a thy-
materion, and a branch in her left. The theory is attractive
but by no means convincing ; there is no trace of the crown,
and the phiale and bough appear so frequently in repre-
sentations of a religious act that they are not by themselves
sufficient to prove that this figure is a direct copy of the
Rhamnusian. Dr. Furtwangler tries to clinch the argument
by pointing to the brooch which secures her chiton on her
right shoulder, and in which he, like M. Six, recognizes the
shape of a griffin. Their interpretation of this detail appears
to be correct. But the griffin-shape really proves nothing,
for we do not hear that this animal was associated at all with
the Nemesis of Rhamnus, and we cannot argue that it was
simply on the evidence of monuments of the later period.
As an Oriental symbol the griffin could designate Aphrodite,
and it is found also with Artemis because of her connexion
with Apollo*^. The goddess on the Aeginetan relief, drawn in
a car by griffins and accompanied by Eros, must surely be no
other than Aphrodite, as Dr. Furtwangler, who first named
her Artemis Nemesis, has since recognized in his article on
Eros in Roscher's Lexicon . The griffin probably came into
vogue in the representations of Nemesis through the cult of
Smyrna, and it was perhaps associated with the Smyrniote
divinity through her close relationship with Aphrodite.
We may conclude from the evidence of the coins of Smyrna
that themere abstract idea of right and retribution entered
far more into the representation of the Nemeseis of Smyrna
than into that of the Rhamnusian deity. They appear not
so much as divinities of real flesh and blood, but as forms of
moral allegory, bearing in their hands the staff and bridle,
the symbols of order and control'^. But we cannot say that
these coin-representations express the ideas of the genuine
ancient cult.
^ Gardner, Types of Greek Coins, lo. ''
Vide Arleftiis-Momtvients, p. 533.
27, with description, p. Head,
170; P. 1352.
Hist. Num. p. 625, who names the ^ Head, J/ist. A'um. p. eîo.
figure Aphrodite.
VOL. II. G
493 GREEK RELIGION.
In the large series of monuments of the legend and cult of
Nemesis examined by Dr. Furtwangler in the article already

quoted, few could be supposed to have any direct connexion
with local worship, and of these few none are with certainty
to be interpreted as representations of Nemesis. The ques-
tion might be raised about the terracotta in the Museum of
Syracuse published by Kekule^ showing an enthroned goddess
who wears a turret-shaped crown, a diploidion, and large
himation, a fold of which she raises above her head as a veil
with her right hand, while her left hand rests on a swan that
sits on the left arm The solemnity of the
of the throne.
representation suggests a monument of cult but, as far as we ;
know, Rhamnus and Smyrna were the only sites of the actual
cult of Nemesis, and their cult-monuments do not seem to
have employed the swan as a symbol of the divinity. The
bird is still more appropriate to Aphrodite, and it is her name
that this enthroned figure suggests, with its rich flowing hair,
matronly form, and earnest expression.
"
Tcrracotteii von Sicilien, 2. 3.
CHAPTER XV.
ADRASTEIA.
AdrasteIA, understood in the later period as the goddess

came to be a sort of twin-sister of Nemesis,
of inevitable fate,
and so was occasionally connected with Artemis '^^ ^.
At Andros and Cos there was a joint worship of Adrasteia
and Nemesis '^^, and we find the two connected by Anti-
machus, the learned epic poet of the latter part of the fifth
century, quoted by Strabo in the drama of the fifth century,
;
in the younger Attic comedy, in passages of the Anthology

and of Lucian, the functions of the one goddess cannot easily
be distinguished from those of the other ^ and in the later ;
literature the identity is completely established. We need

not look further than this for an explanation of the statement
in Harpocration that Demetrius of Scepsis identified Adrasteia
with Artemis, and for the presence of the statue of the
former in the temple of Artemis Leto and Apollo at Cirrha,
the divinities who brought down the due nemesis on the '
'
Cirrhaeans.
But the which can be clearly traced,
origin of 'A8pao-reta,
is There is no doubt that it was
independent of Nemesis.
a cult-name and probably a local title of Cybele detached
at an early period ^^^ ^ It was near Priapus, Cyzicus, and in
the Troad, localities where Cybele was especially worshipped,

that the cult of Adrasteia was established in a fragment of ;
the Phoronis she is scarcely distinguished from Cybele, being
^
This is not the view of Posnanzky, quotes do not seem to bear out this dis-
op. cit. pp. 75-77, who thinks that 'A5pa- tinction. The question will be further
ffxeia is appealed to in order to avert discussed in a later chapter on per-
the evil consequences of speech, Nemesis sonification of abstract ideas.
to punish "Tfipis ; but the passages he
G 3
500 GREEK RELIGION.
described as the mountain-goddess whose attendants were the
Idaean Dactyli. Later on, men came to know her not so much
as the great mother herself, but as a mountain-nymph, and
in Crete as the nymph who nursed Zeus while in Orphic
;
Cybele was recognized. As

literature her close relation with
early as the Peloponnesian war the worship of Adrasteia
had become established on the Acropolis of Athens, probably
in some association with Cybele and Bendis, who had gained
^^*
public recognition in Athens in the fifth century '\
How then did Cybele acquire this character of a stern

goddess of inevitable fate and justice? There is certainly but
little essential connexion of nature between the Phrygian
goddess of wild orgies and impure rites and the lofty and
austere impersonation of righteous judgement, such as was the
'Agpcio-reta of Plato and the Stoics. The explanation is
probably due merely to a misunderstanding of the name.
Cybele 'ASpao-reta meant the goddess of the city or locality
in Phrygia that took its name from the Phrygian hero
Adrastus ^. Then when was detached, it came to be
the title
interpreted as 'the goddess from whom

one cannot run away';
and this meaning may have been assisted by the confusion
between the Phrygian Adrastus and the Argive hero, whose
legend was a picture of inevitable fate. When afterwards
thisnew sense of 'AS/jao-Ttta came into vogue, she naturally
became connected with Nemesis, and so accidentally with
Artemis. But the general character of the latter goddess
in Greece was, as we have seen, scarcely touched by this
association with these powers of retribution and righteous
judgement. It is more important to consider her relations
with Hekate, in order to understand the part played by
Artemis in later Greek religion.
"
This on the whole is the view taken by Posnanzky, pp. 83, 84.
CHAPTER XVI.
HEKATE.
A GREAT obscurity hangs about the name, the origin, and

the character of this goddess. The name at least seems to be
Greek, and to be an epithet that may signify the '
far-off one,'
or the '
far-darting one,' if we consider it as a shortened form
of eKaT?j/3o'Aos ; but no explanation that has been offered is
very certain or significant ^

As to her origin, she is usually accepted as a Hellenic
divinity,and the question has scarcely been discussed by
modern If this view is correct ^ she was one whose
writers.
worship must have been obscured in the earliest period among
the leading Greek tribes, and have revived later. For there
is no mention of her in the Iliad and Odyssey, nor in any
fragment of the Homeric epic although,

'
had the epic
' poets ;
of the eighth or seventh century known of her as she was

known to the later Greek, she would probably have been
noticed in such a passage, for instance, as Odysseus' descent to
Hades. Again, neither early nor late did any real mythology
"*
Tlie derivation from eKaTijôKoi, an but endrr] is never found applied to
epithet of the archer-god Apollo, is not Artemis as a common adjective,
satisfactory for Hekate was never ^ This is the view tacitly taken by
imagined to carry bow or spear there ; Steuding in Roscher's Lexicon {s. v.

is only one statue of a very late period Hekate), by Petersen in his articles in
showing a quiver on her shoulders. the Archaeologisih-epigraphische Mit-
Another theory is that, as taTos was an thciliuigen aits II' ten,4 and 5, by
adjective sometimes attached to Apollo, Schoemann in his Opuscula Academica
so might have been the feminine
iKCLTr] -de Hckaic Ilesiodea, 2. pp. 215-249,
form of and applied to Artemis, and
it and by Koppen, Die dreigestaltete He-
subsequently, becoming personal, might kate. Preller and Welcker appear to
have been detached from her and re- believe in the foreign origin of the
garded as the name of a separate goddess cul t.

grow up about her : we nothing but a few stories of

find
Httle value or credit, invented sometimes to explain some of
her obscure titles, such as "AyyeAo? and only once does she
;
play some part in a dramatic myth, namely, in the Giganto-

machy as described by Apollodorus, as the legends of the
later period bring all the deities into the action and Hekate
is named among them, though she is not found in the early
accounts of the battle. In fact, the importance and reality
that she came to have in Greek religion may for the most
part have come to her through her association with Demeter
and Artemis.
Not only has she little legend, but there is no fixed and
accepted genealogy for her : she was regarded by Hesiod and
others as the daughter of the Titan Perses and Asterie ^, by
Musaeus as the daughter of Asterie and Zeus^, by Bacchylides
as sprung from Night^, by Euripides as the daughter of Leto-'
and in a Thessalian legend she was said to be the daughter of
Admetus and a Pheraean woman also she was believed to be ;
close of kin to Aeetes and Circe of Colchis. In the Hesiodic

fragment she is emphatically called ixovvoyin]s, having neither
brother nor sister and no clan or tribe claimed descent from
*"*
;
her. Neither her temple nor her images were associated with
a prehistoric period or legend, and the magic practices per-
formed in the name of Hekate, and the sorcery that made her
a form of terror, seem to us more savage or mediaeval than
Hellenic. There was, indeed, a certain part of true Greek
ritual that was tainted with magic, but no such atmosphere
of evil and debased superstition gathered around any figure
of the Hellenic religion as around Hekate.
These various facts suggest that this personage was not
Greek at all, but borrowed from a neighbouring people and ;
it may
be that her cult invaded Greece, starting from the
same land and following the same track as that of Dionysos.
" Mot;i'o7i'77s, in the two places where it mean though no one knows who was her
occurs in that passage, would make better father.This sense of the word is found in
sense if understood as sprung from one the later Orphicliterature, being applied
parent only fiowoyevfjs fXTjTpos ovaa to Athene, as sprung from Zeus alone, in
(77^^^^. 44S); Zeus honours her especi- Hymn 32. i; but in early Greek the
ally, though fxowo-yevrjs, which might word could hardly bear this meaning.
XVI.] HEKATE. 503
At first sight such a theory may seem to be contradicted

by the evidence that we have of the very wide prevalence of
the worship of Hekate throughout the Greek world we find ;
it in the central northern and southern islands of the Aegean,
on the coast and in the interior of Asia Minor, in Italy and

Sicily but this of course proves nothing, as the same is true
;
of the late worships of Mithras and Isis, which, like the

worship of Hekate, spread beyond the limits of the ancient
far
classical world ^ What
more important is that she was
is
less frequently found in the more secluded parts of Greece,
scarcely, for instance, at all in Arcadia, where we have only

a doubtful allusion to her worship in a passage quoted by
Porphyry from Theopompus ^^ and that she had nothing to'=,
do with the primitive cults of those divinities with whom she

afterwards became associated. Thus she does not appear in
the Arcadian worship of Despoina and Demeter Erinys nor ''
;
had she place in Eleusinian legend, nor in the ancient

Brauronian cult of Artemis.
The earliest literary record, and the Thessalian and
Aeginetan worships, give some support to the theory sug-
gested above, that we must trace back this goddess to some
land beyond the boundaries of Greece, lying probably to the
north ''.
The earliest references to her in literature are [a) The
quotation in Pausanias from the Karakoyos yvvaiKSiv attributed
to Hesiod, showing that the poet connected Hekate with
Artemis and Iphigenia ^ we may regard this as an early
:
Boeotian version which tries to adapt a Greek myth to a new

cult, and to discover the new goddess, who came from the
North and who, perhaps through Medea, had some connexions

with the Euxine, in the local Artemis Iphigenia of Aulis and
Tauris. {b) The well-known passage in Hesiod's Theogotiy,
which can scarcely be the composition of the author of the

Kardkoyos yvvain&v, and is probably an earlier account, the
earliest in Greek literature, of Hekate ^ for it connects ;
" Vide Geographical Register of baseless.

Helcate-Cults, p. 606. " This view has been already taken
^ The supposition of Kbppen {Die by Voss in his JSIythologische Briefe, 3.

dreigcstaltetc Hekate, Vienna., iS22'p.^) 190, 194, 212.
that Despoina was Hekate is perfectly
504 GREEK RELIGION. [chap,
her with no figure of Greek religion at

all, except Zeus she ;
has no ties Artemis or any other divinity.

at present with
These lines may be regarded as an interpolation in the
poem, which makes no other mention of Hekate, and which
devotes to no other divinity such an emphatic record of
function and rank. But they are a valuable fragment of
Boeotian poetry*: the lines show something of the zeal of
the propagandist who wishes to obtain recognition for a new
cult,and are of the first importance as evidence of the original
character that Hekate possessed. The poet regards her as
Titan-born and belonging to the older world, which may be
a way of saying that she had no recognized place at that time
in the Hellenic Pantheon Zeus maintains her in her rights
:
and gives her a share in Olympus and the 'earth and the
unvintaged sea'; she gives men aid in war, and sits by kings
in their judgement-seat she brings honour to the horse-
;
men and to the athlete in the contest she gives the hunter ;
or the fisher his prey, and works with Hermes to increase the
herds of bullocks, goats, and sheep in the stall : lastly, she is
KovpoTp6(pos, the foster-mother of children.

Many of these ideas reappear in later cults, but the poet
claims more than the Greek communities that received the
worship of Hekate were ever willing to accord to her, and he
probably omits certain darker traits of her original character,
such as her association with the lower world, wath magic,
and with the cross-ways. We may notice that he nowhere
hints at any connexion between her and the moon.
The poem then seems to suggest that the cult was a new
importation into Boeotia and we should then naturally think
;
of it as coming from the North. Of this there is certain other

evidence. It has been noticed above that there is a close con- ''
nexion between the Thessalian Artemis Pheraea and Hekate,

and the most striking illustration of this is the Thessalian
^ The Boeotian style is seen in the its tone is not unlike that of the later
use of the picturesque epithet for the Orphic hymn, and its main idea, namely
personal noun. Schoemann, in his trea- that Hekate is of omnipresent power, is

iise dc /leiaie //eswdca, may he right in that which is tediously applied to all
rejecting the theory that the fragment the divinities of later Orphism.
has an Orphic or mystic origin, although ''
P. 474.
XVI.] HEKATE. 505
story that Hekate was the daughter of Pheraea, and as

a newly-born infant was thrown out into the cross-roads, but
rescued and brought up by shepherds ^. The Artemis of
lolchos, with whom the legend couples the name of Medea, is
a goddess of magical incantations and of the arts of poisoning.
In the narrative of Diodorus Siculus^, Medea tells Pelias that
her tutelary goddess has come to him from Colchis riding '
upon serpents'; and she names her Artemis, though this

mode of travelling is suitable only for Hekate, of whom
Medea is the priestess and perhaps the '
double '
''. And the
evil reputation for witchcraft which attached to the whole
land of Thessaly can be best explained by supposing that the
worship of Hekate, bringing its original taint with it, struck
deep roots upon this soil. It is true that the superstitious
terrors thatwere connected with the name of this divinity
and with the practices of her votaries seem to have been felt
more in the later ages but supposing they were not there in
;
the beginning, we cannot easily explain how they grew up ;
for they could not have naturally come from the association
of this worship with that of Artemis or Persephone.
A which was particularly noted for the honour paid
locality
to Hekate was Aegina her mysteries were in vogue in that
"^
:
island at least as early as the fifth century, and are often

mentioned by later writers, the institution of them being
attributed to the Thracian Orpheus. This name, and the
prehistoric connexion between the heroic family of the
land, the Aeacidae, and Phthia, seem to suggest once more
that the worship travelled down from the North. Again, we
find it in the islands of the Thracian Sea, and in Samothrace
amalgamated with the mystic rites of the Cabiri". And
if Thrace had been its original home we should expect
it to have crossed the Hellespont as naturally as it travelled
southwards into Greece and in fact we find it in the Troad,

;
in Paphlagonia, Galatia, Lydia, Caria, Lycia, Pamphylia. Or

we may of course say that it passed over to the east side of
a A. 51. for a strategic purpose, was keeping up

'
The Thessalian Upua ttjs 'Ei'oSms, the tradition of Medea; Polyaen. S/ru^.
who poisoned the flesh of a mad bull 8. 42.
5o6 GREEK RELIGION. [chap.
the directly from Greece, at some time when the

Aegean
between Artemis and Hekate had become so recog-
affinity
nized that any centre of the cult of Artemis was likely to
attract the worship of the kindred goddess. We may thus
explain its existence at Ephesus^, to account for which
a curious story was invented telling how Artemis was in-
hospitably received there by the wife of Ephesus, and how

by way of punishment the goddess changed her into a dog,
but repenting at last restored her to her human form : the
woman then went and hanged herself for shame, but was
raised to life again and appeared in the costume of Artemis
and received the name of Hekate. We see why the dog
comes into the story, and we should understand the matter of
the hanging if Hekate were worshipped under the title of
airayxôixivrj, as Artemis was. All that we know is that there
was a statue, possibly more than one, of Hekate behind or
near the temple of the great Ephesian goddess.
In certain parts of Caria the worship appears to have struck
deep root. The original name of the city of Idrias was
Hekatesia, and the worship of Hekate Aaytz-ins was main-
tained there. The name was popularly derived from the hare
that fled to the site of the town, but in reality referred to the
neighbouring city of Lagina, the chief centre, at least in late
times, of Hekate-worship in Asia Minor. The cult of this latter

city '^
associated the goddess so intimately with the Carian Zeus
Panamerios, that we may suppose that she there took the
place of the great goddess of Asia Minor and was probably
regarded as his spouse. We hear of the annual festival 'of
the key,' the KAetSo? noix-ni], alluding to the mysteries of the
lower world the divinities were partly served by eunuchs,
;
and choirs of boys were trained under the supervision of the

state to sing a traditional hymn of praise. The part played
by the eunuch in the ritual reminds us of the Cybele cult,
and some ancient mythographers appear to have associated
the Corybantcs with the service of Hekate ^''^^, and we have
seen that the orgiastic mysteries of Samothrace were devoted
to her as well as to the Cabiri '^.
" Vide Geographical Register, s. v. Lagina, p. 607.

XVI.] HEKATE. 507
There seems, then, some ground for the belief expressed

in Strabo^ that Hekate belongs to that circle of Phrygian-
Thracian cults of which the chief figure is an earth-goddess,
and the orgiastic ritual a marked characteristic. And we
find that Hekate comes to be related to Cybele, and
plainly identified with the Cretan Britomartis, whose name
itself was explained in reference to an ancient prophecy
concerning the birth of Hekate ^ in Aegina itself the worship :
and mysteries of Hekate may not have been altogether

distinct from that of the Cretan goddess who came to the
island at an early period.
The theory that Thrace was her native country becomes
the stronger as we find the undoubtedly Thracian goddess
Bendis with many points of likeness to Hekate. The epithet
AtAoy}(os that belonged to the former is explained by Hesychius
as describing the goddess who, like Hekate,had power in more
than one sphere of nature and the torch seems to have been
;
the special symbol of both. The Thracian goddess what-

ever was her real name whom the Greeks called Artemis
Basileia or ôvaâTos ^ was connected with herds and the
fruits of the soil, and Hekate also was concerned with these,
as we find in the Hesiodic description and in later Greek

legend and ritual. A strong reason for believing that
Hekate was an intruder in the Hellenic world is that the
hound was her familiar and sacrificial animal, and that this
sacred character belonged to him scarcely anywhere else in
genuinely Greek religion or ritual For Artemis he was '^.
* P. 473. and himself also came from the

religion,
>
Artemis ^^' '. north Greece, and possibly from
of
'^
lb. ^* s, ^^'. Thrace. By becoming the son of
< Plutarch tells us that generally in Apollo he is adopted into Greek re-
Greek religion the hound was regarded ligion. The goddess of child-birth to
as unclean, and yet that he was used in whom, according to Socrates, the Ar-
rites of purification in Boeotia ; he is gives offered a dog, Sia r-qv paarujvrjv
probably referring to the rites of Hekate, ttjj Aoxiay, was called 'ElKtuveia, but
as Boeotia was an ancient home of her may be regarded as 'E/cdr^ EiAe/SiKa '^.
worship '^ A sacred character attached The Spartan ephebi sacrificed a young
to this animal also in the worship of hound to the war-god whether this
;
Asclepios at Epidauros; but Asclepios was a foreign element in the cult of

does not belong to the ancient Greek Ares or not may be doubted.
a purely secular beast, useful for the hunt she never assumes ;
his shape and he is never offered to her. But we have evidence

that he was regularly sacrificed to Hekate '", and the goddess
herself is clearly supposed to take his form in that Ephesian
legend mentioned above and in the ghostly stories such as
;
those that amused Lucian, he probably often figured as her

'
manifestation ' or her '
sending.' The dog was also the
animal used for purification in the rites of Hekate ^~. It is
true that we have no direct proof of the sacred character
of the dog in the religion of Thrace but in certain legends ;
the metamorphosed Hecuba, 'the dog with fiery eyes,' was

supposed to join the following of Hekate and to roam howling
through the Thracian forests'' and the statue of Hekate ;
Lampadephorus at Byzantium was supposed to commemorate

the good service of the dogs who aroused the citizens when
Philip of Macedon attacked them by night ''.
Accepting this theory of the origin of the cult, we should

say that Hekate was the Greek terra corresponding to some
Thracian title of this goddess, and that it obtained vogue first
in Thessaly, Boeotia, and Aegina at a much earlier period than
that at which the name of Bendis was received in Greece.
From Aegina or Boeotia it may have passed to Athens, per-
haps not earlier than the middle of the sixth century ^^. She
appears in the Homeric hymn to Demeter which is often
attributed to the age of the Peisistratidae ^^ ^. According to
one account, which however is questionable, it was to Hekate
that the Athenians offered sacrifice after Marathon at Agrae ",
and may be that her worship, like that of Pan, was for the
it
firsttime publicly instituted in Attica after this great event,

although we have proof of its earlier private recognition in
a terracotta of the sixth century b. C. "^
A fifth-century
inscription from Eleusis possibly contains a trace of the name
of Hekate in conjunction with Hermes and the Graces, with
whom she was associated on the Acropolis of Athens, at least
'
" Cf. Artemis ". who was the goddess worshipped at
Geograph. Reg. s. v. Byzantium.
''
Agrae and to whom the Athenians
Artemis ^^'. The name of Hekate
<>
vowed Marathon.
sacrifice before
has been substituted by the pseudo- ^ Hekate-Momimcnts, p. 549.
Plutarch for that of Artemis 'hyporipa,
XVI.] HERATE. 509
in the later period '^. The statue by Alcamenes that stood

by the temple of Nike Apteros at the top of the Propylaea
was called Hekate 'E77t7Tupyi8ta, or Artemis Hekate, or
Artemis '"^-amvpyihia, and a later Attic inscription com-
bines her with Hermes, and another mentions her torch-
bearer incompany with the priest of the Graces We ^'^' ^^.
know also that some time before the Peloponnesian war her
images were common in Athens, placed before the doors as
charms to avert evil -^ and she had become especially
'',
a woman's goddess and identified with Artemis ^^.

We have now to explain why it was that she was identified
with this particular Greek goddess, or at least more closely
related to her than to any other. The usual reason given is
very simple: namely, that both were merely different names
for the moon-goddess. But this view which is not often
challenged rests on a misconception of the original nature
of Artemis, and a very questionable interpretation of the
original character of Hekate. For the two goddesses had been
connected as early as Hesiod, as the passage quoted by
Pausanias from the KaToXoyos yvvaLKO)u proves * but at this
;
period, as has been shown, we can find no lunar element in the

character of Artemis on the contrary, there are reasons for
;
thinking that this view of her came later into vogue through
her association with Hekate, and therefore should not be
regarded as the ground of that association. On the other
hand, the belief that Hekate herself was pre-eminently and
originally a moon-goddess approves itself only to those who do
not pay sufficient attention to the Hesiodic fragment, and who
apply the logical deductive method of Roscher to primitive
forms of religion ^. The theory for which reasons have been
given above, that Hekate is one of many forms of a Thracian-
Phrygian divinity, brings with it the belief that she would
derive most of her functions from the earth rather than the
moon. Her torches and her interest in child-birth are thus
quite as well explained, and her care for the crops and the
herds, the hunter and the fisher, much better. The hound may
" Vide Steuding on Hekate in Ros- view as Preller, Welcker, and Petersen
cher's Lexicon, who takes the same {Arch. Epigr. Mitt. 4}.
5IO GREEK RELIGION. [chap.
have become her familiar, not because it was regarded as the

animal who bays the moon,' but because it was the natural
'
follower of the goddess who haunts the wilds, and because

in many legends the dog has an uncanny and infernal '
'
character. We may thus best understand her affinity with

Artemis, which was recognized in an early period for the ;
latter goddess drew most of her nature from the earth and
from the life of the wilds, and most of the description in the
Hesiodic passage would apply to Artemis as well. And apart
from any deep essential affinity, her torches and her hounds
and her wild nature would be enough to persuade the Greeks
that Hekate was a sort of 'double' of the Hellenic goddess.
Nevertheless it is also true that from the fifth century
onwards we have clear proof that the imagination of poets
and artists, and perhaps also the view of those who offered
sacrifice to Hekate, did connect her in some way with the
moon ^^
;
and insomething of genuine and
this there is
popular belief that cannot be ignored, and which is of more

value than the philosophic theory that begins as early as
the sixth century to resolve deities into elements Hera, for
instance, into the air.
In the Homeric hymn to Demeter, Hekate is said to have

been hiding in a cave when she witnessed the rape of
Proserpine, and to have come to meet the bereaved mother
with torches in her hands. Possibly the poet is thinking of
her as a moon-goddess, but it is an illusion to suppose that
only a moon-goddess could hide in a cave and could witness
things : the infernal divinities might also be thought to be
witnesses and to lurk underground. It is in the Attic drama
that she first emerges plainly in her lunar character, and at
the same time is so closely combined with Artemis that she is
called the daughter of Leto. Euripides addresses her as

'Hekate, child of Leto ^'; and when Aeschylus, in the frag-
ment already quoted, speaks of the narrepcdTTov S^j-ixa Ajjiwas
Ko/j?7s, which the context shows to be the moon, he is perhaps
thinking of Artemis Hekate, to whom he refers by name in

the Siippliccs^^^. The sun and the moon are clearly com-
bined as Helios and Hekate in the fragment of Sophocles'
XVI.] HEKATE. 511
and this view must have become popular, for

'PtCoroju,ot"=^ ;
sometimes the vase-painting of the fourth century plainly

characterized Hekate as the moon-goddess^. There were
also certain ritual-practices consecrated Hekate when
to
the moon was new or full ;
the '
suppers of Hekate were '
offered by rich people, and little round cakes set v/ith candles
were placed in the cross-roads, and sacred both to her and to
Artemis ^^''; but we cannot take this as certain evidence, nor
conclude at once that a divinity was recognized as lunar
because the phases moon marked the time when
of the
oblation was to be made; just as we must not offhand
regard a deity to whom prayers or sacrifice were addressed at
sunrise as a personification of the dawn.'The banquets of
Hekate' seem to have been offerings made, not to the lunar
goddess, but rather to the mistress of spirits, in order to avert
evil phantoms from the house. None of the household would
touch the food ^^ ^' . It was offered on the thirtieth day, which
was sacred to the dead.
However, we find a genuine lunar element in Hekate recog-
nized in popular belief and in the later public monuments
and some of the later scholiasts and expounders of mythology,
who were in no better position to judge than we are, seem to
have regarded this element as the essential and original one
in her nature. It very probably was original, in the sense that
she had it before she became a Greek divinity for it is diffi- ;
cult to see, on the theory of her foreign origin, how she could
have acquired this character in Greece, where the moon-
goddess received such slight recognition. But we need not
say that it ever constituted the whole of her nature, unless we
are bound to follow the method prevalent in the German inter-
pretation of myths and to trace the manifold character and
functions of a divinity deductively back to a single concept or
idea. On the other theory, which might be called the theory
of local 'contagion' or assimilation, an earth-goddess could
'
catch,' inherit, or usurp certain qualities or features of a
moon-goddess, or vice versa. And the Hesiodic fragment

The question as to the meaning of the triple-shaped Hekate of Alcamenes
will be discussed later.
512 GREEK RELIGION. [chap,
and other evidence allow us to believe that Hekate came

down into Greece as an earth-goddess with the usual interest
that such a divinity always had in vegetation and nutrition, in
wild and human life, but possessing also a certain attraction
for the moon, and trailing with her a very pernicious cloud of
superstition and sorcery. That her lunar aspect became
afterwards so prominent may be owing to the religious
economy of the Greeks, who had earth-goddesses in plenty,
and whose Selene, a retiring and faded divinity, may have
seemed to want new support.
But the Greeks themselves were much perplexed about her,
and knew that she was other than Selene and Artemis in ;
fact, the complexity of the Hesiodic portrait corresponds in
some measure to the later belief and cult. She became

associated, for instance, almost as closely with Demeter and
Persephone as with Artemis, and this by right of her original
character as a divinity who had power on the surface of the
earth and underground ^^. The Hekate of Sophocles' root- '
gatherers seems to have drawn her attributes and nature

'
from the moon, the earth, and the lower world for the moon- ;
light was her spear, and her brows were bound with oak-leaves
and serpents. Euripides, who spoke of her as the daughter of
Leto, called her also the dvohia 6vyaTi]p Ai]ixr]Tpo'i, the queen of
the phantom-world ; and on black-figured vases she appears in
company with Persephone, Demeter, and Hermes. It accords

with the wider character of her presented in the Hesiodic
poem, that, like Demeter and Ge, she was KovpoTp6(f)os ^' ^, and
an ancient inscription from Selinus possibly contains the
prayer made to her by a mother for her child. The Gauls
found her in Galatia, and learned to pray to her for themselves
and their crops^ In a late Greek inscription from Cilicia she
is regarded as one with Artemis Ev-nXoia, Selene, and Gaia ^\
and in a late oracle quoted by Eusebius ^^ Hekate, who

demands a statue, declares that her shape is that of Demeter,
'
the fair goddess of fruits.' We find her also allied with
the lesser powers that had some connexion with the earth,
" Vide Geographical Register, s. v. Galatia.

XVI.] HEKATE. 513
^
vegetation and the life of the woods; we find her with Pan
and the Corybantes and Cybcle, deities who, like Hekate,
inspired madness ^^ with Priapus at Tralles
; in Athens ^'^
;
with Hermes and the Charites, who must have been regarded
in this association as divinities of increase and growth. Also
the maritime character of the goddess claimed for her in the
Theogony was not altogether forgotten ^^ and as we have ;
such early testimony for it, we may regard it as original, and

not derived from Artemis EvTrAota, nor arising necessarily
from any view about the earth or the moon, but possibly only
from the seafaring habits of her worshippers ^\ Her ghostly
character also, which becomes very prominent in later times,
but was probably always recognized, must have kept her
chthonian nature clearly before men's minds for sorcery and ;
magic belong more naturally to the lower world, at least from

the Greek point of view, than to the Moon, who seems to have
been considered a fairly harmless divinity in Greece, being
occasionally a passive victim of sorcery when a Thessalian
witch laid her foaming and sick on the grass, but not being
herself a great sorceress. And
mocking Lucian, when
so the
Mithrobarzanes is into hell, makes him
preparing to go down
dig a pit and invoke the powers from below, the Furies and
the Poenae, nightly Hekate and praiseworthy Persephone '.'
'
And the magician in his PJiilopsetides brings up Hekate from

below in the form of a woman, half a furlong high, snake-
footed and with snakes in her hair and on her shoulders, with
a torch in her left hand and a sword in her right; while Selene
comes down from the sky in the shapes of a woman, an
ox, and a dog we may suppose the latter form to have been
;
assumed out of compliment to the other goddess.

In fact Hekate appealed to the later imagination more as an
infernal power than as a lunar she borrows her whip and
;
cord from the Furies, and her serpents made her an image of
fear like the Gorgon. But though such a character was likely
"^
HekateisclassedwithPanamongthe and, according to a legend preserved by
Gioi iiriynoi by Artemidorus; Oneirocr. the scholiast on Apoll. Rhod. 4. 826,
2. 34. she was the mother of Scylla.
''
The mullet was sacred to Hekate; " Nekyomant. 9.
VOL. II. H
to be impressive in the ages of decay and debased religion, it
probably influenced secret practice more than the public cult^,

and it never, as Welcker wrongly supposes ^ altogether
obscured the early Hesiodic conception of a Hekate powerful
on earth and sea and beneficent to men in certain parts of life.
Many details of this conception have been already shown to
have survived to a late period and Plutarch, Porphyry, and ;
the later Orphic literature express the same thought in formal

or philosophic terms she had for them something of the
:
same cosmic power, though her importance is evidently slight,

^*.
as she had for the early Boeotian poet
But the high moral functions that the latter claims for her
were never given her in Greek religion she never 'sat in the :
judgement-seat of kings,' and her mysteries are not known to

have had any moral or spiritual significance at all. Her
association with Zeus Meilichios at Athens, of which we have
some slight evidence'", does not prove that any of the moral
ideas which were infused into that worship attached them-
selves to her ; the casual conjunction of the two divinities
arose merely from the chthonian character of both. In the
inscription that dedicates the late Capitoline statue she is
called Meto-oTToVj/pos ^-, and this, which is the one moral epithet
'^
There are only two titles by which epithet of Deraeter. But the former inter-
Hekate was probably known in public pretation is more proliably correct, the
cult as a goddess of mystery and fear^^ word e^dvTTjs having the opposite sense,
d<ppaTTos at Tarentum (Hesych. s. v.), '
free of evil ' ; Plat. Phaedr. 244 E. The
an epithet of the unspeakable one,' and
' epithet IIANAINA attached to a goddess
avraia, of which the meaning is disputed. on fourth-century coins of Terina and
The passage in Hesychius {s. v. drTai'a), Hipponium has been regarded as a title
which is made clear by Lobeck's emenda- of Hekate and interpreted as T\av'buv7],
tion of ZaipLovia for Salfxova {Aglaoph. the 'all-terrible' {^Rev. Arch. 1848,
p. I2i), interprets the word as hostile,' '
p. 159 ; cf. Millingen, Considerations
being applied to Hekate as sending sur la Nu mis mat ique de rancien7ie
visions of ill, and so the author of the Italic, Florence, 1841, p. 72) : but the
Etymologicmn Magmun explains the inscription is perfectly legible and cer-
word oj'Tios asaiVfOf )3Aa/3?;s; but Hesy- tain, and cannot be a miswriting for
chius states that Aeschylus in the Semele Tlavii'ivr) ; nor does the figure hold
used the word as iKiaio?, and this agrees awhip or any other attribute of Hekate.
with the interpretation by the given Probably the name is not Greek and
scholiast on the Iliad, 22. 113, and with denotes a local nymph.
its use in Apoll. Khod. i. 1141, and in Griech. Gdtterl. 567.
* i.
the Orphic Hymn, 40. i, where it is an Vide Zeus'^"".

XVI.] HEKATE. 515
ever attached to her in cult, does not come to very much :
it may allude to her whip and her cord, or it may designate

the goddess who controls evil spirits. Her chthonian asso-
ciations may have suggested some vague belief in her as
a goddess who punished certain kinds of guilt, and in the
Antigone Creon's sin against the body of Polyneikes is sup-
posed to have incurred the wrath of Pluto and the Qia ivohla;
but we cannot further illustrate this belief, except with the
slight instance of a late inscription from Phrygia, in which the

disturber of a grave is threatened with the wrath of Hekate -".
The household purifications, called ofw^t'/xta^", performed

in the name of Hekate do not seem to have had any reference
at all The house was swept and
to moral stain or evil^.
smoked, and the pollutions were carried away in a potsherd,
apparently to the cross-roads, and then thrown away while
the bearer's back was turned. If these were connected with
the sacrifice of a dog at the cross-roads, of which we hear,
we may regard the dog as a KaOapixa, and the purifications
as having some reference to child-birth in the house. Also,
they may have been supposed to purge the household of
ghosts, who were taken thus to the cross-roads, and com-
mitted to the keeping of the infernal goddess''.
As there is very little morality that we can discover in her
on which appeal might be made to
religion, so the occasions
her appear to have been few it was good to invoke her in :
haunted places, because she could send up forms of terror

or benign apparitions ; it was important to have her image
at the cross-ways, probably because they were considered
likely places for ghosts, and before the threshold of the
* The SeicnSaifxojp of Theophrastus is possible that these were originally

purifies his house as an iirayajyr) ttjs placed there because of the ill omen
'Evarr;? ^^. that attached to the cross-ways in the
^ In Plato's State {Lan's 873 b) the popular belief of Greece and other
body of the murderer must be thrown nations.
out afterexecution,unburied,atthe cross- " In the Helena of Euripides (569}
roads. Why these places were of such Helen exclaims when she sees Menelaos,
evil character is hard to say; their Sj<pQja<p6p".icaTri,ir(tJ.irf (paanar tvfitvrj,
gloomy associations were no doubt en- to which Menelaos replies, ov vvKriâv-

hanced by the images of Hekate, the tov irpoiroXov 'EroS/ay jx opas.
way-goddess that stood there but it ;
H Z
5i6 GREEK RELIGION. [chap.
house, lest ghosts might enter. But in spite of the Boeotian

poet's assurances, the warrior in battleand the athlete and
horseman in the race do not appear to have often invoked
the aid of Hekate '\
It is a question how far her association with Artemis
affected the traditional character of either of the two

goddesses. In certain details we may suppose there was
mutual borrQwing. The torch in the hands of Artemis is
supposed by Petersen to have come from Hekate or Hekate
Eileithyia^'; his argument rests on the fact that Artemis is
not designated or represented as nu,)ô'po?, or the torch-bearer,
till a comparatively late period, the latter part of the fifth
century, by which time her connexion with Hekate had been

generally recognized and the torch had been no doubt an
;
aboriginal property of the latter goddess.

Acertain type of Artemis, the representation of her
speeding along with two torches in her hands, is almost
certainly borrowed, as we
North Greece a similar type
find in
of Hekate in swift motion with her torches raised and her
wild hounds at her side ''.
Again, the connexion of Hekate with the cross-ways was

no doubt primitive, although it does not appear in the frag-
ment of the Theogony, and probably both at the cross-ways
and before the house her image was intended to scare away
evil spirits it seems likely, then, that it was only as a double
;
of Hekate that Artemis was regarded as a irpoOvpaia or

ivobia d. But Artemis was in her own right, like Apollo 'Ayutevs,
a leader of the path and there is no reason for supposing
;
that she borrowed from the other goddess such titles as

'Hyejuoi'T] ^ And on the other hand Hekate, being often repre-
sented hurrying along with torches, may have been considered
There were games in her honour at sense : if it refers to the cross-ways it
Stratonicea; BitU. de Corr. Hell. 1881, must have come from Hekate; but it is
236. not known to have been a title of the
''
Arch. Epigr. Mitt. 4. p. 142. latter goddess it is attached also to
:
WAq Hekate- Monuments, p. 551. Hermes, not apparently as a deity of

d Hekate "'',''. the cross-ways, but as the divinity
XTpo(paia is an epithet applied to whose image stood within the house
Artemis (Hekate " and of doubtful and turned back the evil-doer.
' '
<=), is
XVI.] HEKATE. 517
as a leader of the ways in the Lycian worship of Hekate

Y\poKaQy]yiTi^ '^'
*^, independently of Artemis.
The place before the gate of the temple, or city, or house
was consecrated to Hekate '^, and it is only by confusion
that the 'E/caretoz- standing before the door was called an
Artemision Artemis in herself had no natural associa-
-^"^ ; for
tion with such places. It was perhaps only a local accident
that gave the latter goddess the name of UpoOvpaCa at Eleusis^

where she was worshipped before the great temple of the
mysteries, as for a similar reason Athene was called Ilpovaia
at Thebes and Delphi '^.
The titles which she may be supposed to have borrowed

from Hekate are"AyyeAo9-^^, KeAKata-'^^, and perhaps EvpiTura'-K
As regards the title "AyyeXos we have the curious story nar-
rated by Sophron and mentioned in the chapter on Hera*":
the maiden "AyyeAoj, to escape her mother's wrath, takes refuge
in places that were polluted by child-birth or the presence
of a corpse she was purified by the Cabiri by the lake of
;
Acheron, and was afterwards given a position in the lower

world. This quaint legend receives some light from the
gloss in Hesychius, from whom we learn that "AyyeAos was
a title of Artemis in Syracuse and we gather from Theocritus ;
that she and Hekate were sometimes identified there Thus *^.
the story may illustrate the character of the latter as

a divinity of the lower world, and her connexion with child-
birth ; while the purification of "AyyeAo9 by the Cabiri may
allude to the Samothracian mysteries, in which, as we have
seen,Hekate has a part.
But why she should be called the messenger is doubtful '
'
an imaginative Greek might have regarded the moon as

a messenger, but there is nothing in the very eccentric
'^
It may be that Antigone, in her the gates of hell,
appeal to Hekate, when she sees all ' ''
Artemis ^^.
the plain glittering with brazen arms,' In Aesch. Sitppl. ^^g TrpoaraTj^pias
<'
is thinking of the goddess who guards 'ApTefitSos twoiatai the title has no
:
the gate (Enr. Phoen. no); her titles local sense.

KAeiSoCxos, ^vXaKT}, TlpoiToXis''''^'^, refer ''
P. 449.
to the keeper of the gates; in the " P. 1S4; Schol. Theocr. 2. 12.
êneit/ ihe is mentioned as standing by ^ /</. 2. 12, 33.
behnviour of Angelos which suggests the moon at all, and

others prefer to explain the title as denoting the goddess
who reported to Demeter the fate of her daughter. This
is probable enough, as the Demeter-legend was so rife in
Sicily perhaps
;
also the application of the title was assisted
by the common representation of the goddess speeding

with a torch in each hand. If this Syracusan legend has
been properly interpreted, we have evidence of a peculiar
local genealogy invented for Hekate for she is made the ;
daughter of Zeus and Hera, a parentage which may perhaps

have been suggested by her association with Eileithyia.
The inexplicable epithet KeAKata, which was attached to
Artemis in Attica, may have come to her from Hekate for ;
Petersen calls attention to a late statue dedicated by an

inscription to Artemis KeAKata, and showing her triple-
formed *.
On Hekate on the
the whole, then, the proved influence of
traditional public cult ofArtemis does not appear very impor-
tant but it was an innovation which caused the figure of the
;
Greek goddess to lose its clearness of outline and her character

to become confused and bizarre. And being now more closely
associated with the moon and with unhellenic superstitions,
she became more exposed to the contagion of Oriental cult.
As regards the other question, how much Hekate may have
borrowed of the character and functions of Artemis, little can
be said. Though the later Orphic literature scarcely distin-
guishes between the two divinities in regard to their titles and
powers, the literature, cults, and monuments of the classical
period fail to show that Hekate usurped any considerable part
of the functions or legends or even appeared at all in the guise
of Artemis. She does not seem to have taken to hunting or the
bow '\ and she holds aloof from Apollo nor was her virginity ;
insisted upon, nor was she received, as Artemis was, by the

Eleusinian divinities. It is possible that the title Scoretp?],
which she enjoyed in Phrygia"^^, and that of KaAAiVr?p^ ',
which appears to have been attached to her at Athens, were

* Arch.Epigi-.Mitth.^.^.22;^.'Y:!ii.^ thequiver(in Rome,Matz-Duhn, ^/'/v
**
There is one statue of Hekate with Bildiverke, p. 617)-
XVI.] HEKATE. 519
derived from the worship of her sister-goddess. And it is not

impossible that she became interested in child-birth through
her association with Artemis or Eileithyia, with whom at
Argos she probably had some relations -''
^ ; for such interest
is not attributed to her in the passage in the T/ieogony, and
is only slightly and occasionally manifested. The first mention
of it occurs in the SnppUces of Aeschylus ^^ ^, in a line which
speaks of her as one with Artemis. Yet reasons might be
brought in favour of the belief that Hekate was regarded
from the beginning as a divinity of child-birth, either in
her own original right as an earth-goddess, or because her
torches suggested the torches of Eileithyia and were taken
as a sign that she had the same office, or because her
hound was really regarded by the Greeks as a symbol
of easy For the Genetyllides, the divine mid-
delivery.
wives, who, like most alien divinities, won favour with Attic
women, and over whose worship Aristophanes and Lucian
made merry, were sometimes identified^ with Hekate-^ 'î
but if it were thought necessary to attach them to some
higher power in the same profession, one would have expected
that they would have been attached to Artemis, unless
Hekate were recognized as of the same character and there-
fore a fitter '
proxenos ' for these questionable goddesses,
being herself of foreign extraction. Again, in the Troadcs
of Euripides, Cassandra in her fine frenzy invokes the aid of
Hekate approaching marriage -' ^ and it is hard to see
for her ;
why she should here have appealed to this divinity, unless as

a recognized goddess of marriage. And the divine powers
of marriage might easily be considered also powers of birth '\
But neither as a goddess of marriage or birth or agriculture
was Hekate of any real national importance in Greece her ;
worship was nvithout morality, and displayed energy only in

sorcery and imposture. It was one of the evil things that
grew up into prominence with the decline of Hellenism.
They are also confused with Aphro- before coming to the meeting the wife
dite ; vide Aphrodite "''s. of Theogenes has to consult her tKa-
*"
Like Artemis, Hekate is especially ruov '".
a women's goddess ; in the Lysistrate

CHAPTER XVII.
MONUMENTS OF THE CULT OF ARTEMIS.
As we can trace very primitive elements in the worship

of Artemis, so in her earHest monuments we find the very
ancient type of the religious emblem, the rude stock or the
shaped stone without any human semblance. The Artemis
of Icariawas represented by a piece of unhewn wood accord-
ing to Arnobius ^, and Pausanias describes the emblem
''*^
of the Artemis Patroa of Sicyon as a pillar of stone ^. A cone-

shaped stone, decorated below with metal bands and sur-
mounted with a human head, was the form under which she
was worshipped in her temple at Perge, which is represented
with the idol inside on coins of the city and we see an '',
Artemis-idol of similar shape on a Neapolitan vase '^.

The
temple-statue of the Ephesian goddess of many breasts also
preserves in the treatment of the lower limbs much of the
aniconic form and it is not unlikely that the statue of Artemis
;
MovoyLcrr'jin], which the legend ascribed to Daedalus '^ % was
of the same type, showing the transition from the pillar to the
human likeness. It is an interesting fact that the most
primitive representation of the human form which has come
down to us from the beginnings of Greek sculpture, and which
illustrates that transition, is an image of Artemis found in
Delos, and now in Athens, and dedicated according to the
inscription by Nicandra of Naxos to the far-darting one, the'
lover of the bow (PI. XXVIII). She wears a long chiton, from
'
beneath which the toes and sandals just appear the arms ;
are held down and pressed against the sides with scarcely an
" Zeus'^^b, ^ Gerhard, JhuL Abhandl. Taf. 59. 2, 3.

'^
Anh. Zcit. 1853, Taf. 55.
Plate XXVIII
To face page 520

MONUMENTS OF THE CUET OF ARTEMIS. 521
interval ; and the body has more of the columnar than the
human shape, only the breasts and hips being faintly indicated.
The face, which is much disfigured, seems worked out in very
low relief. The hands are clenched, but there is a slight
opening through them which suggests that she was holding
some emblem, possibly an arrow or bow. It is clear that so
immobile and indefinite a form as this could express but little
of the character with which the cults invested her ; the idea
of the huntress-goddess, for instance, could scarcely be clearly
given until the sculptor could show more movement in the
limbs.
The earliest monuments of the period when art had
gained power of expression speak clearly of her close associa-
tion with wild places and with the beasts of the wild for ;
one of the types that came very early into vogue in Greece
and the islands was that of the winged Artemis, who holds
in each hand a lion, having seized it by the hind paw head
downwards. Pausanias saw her thus represented on that
very primitive monument of Greek metal-work, the chest
of Cypselus ^^^, and we see the same form on a bronze-
relief from Olympia ^ and on a Melian amphora in '
'
Berlin ^. The conception of Artemis as the Troma diipcov is

Greek, but it is likely that this type of the winged goddess
came from the East, probably from the cult of Anaitis.
Some writers indeed regard it as genuinely Hellenic in its
origin, and handed down from the Mycenaean period ; we
find a female form somewhat similar, only without wings,
holding water-birds by the neck or a goat by the horns, on
gems of the island style found in the tomb of Vaphio ^, but
' '
it is open to question whether this type was created entirely
apart from Oriental influences. At any rate the later form

of this cult-figure, with its wings and with the heraldic arrange-
" n. XXIX. b. Curtius, Ausgra- alt-griecliische Gottin, p. 153 : in his

biingcn zn Olympia, KhhWA. '^,'Yî. 2,'},. article in Roscher, p. 17.S2, he has
^ Roscher, p. 1751 ; Arch. Zeit. 1854, somewhat modified this opinion.
Taf. 61. Eph. Arch. 1889, Ulv. 10,
">
nos. 5,
'^
Curtius, Silztmgsher. der Berl. 13, 33, 34; cf. Milchofer, Anfdnge,
Akad. 1887, p. 1172; Milchofer, An- p. 86.
fdnge, p. 86 ; Studniczka, Kyrcne cine

mcnt of the lions, seems to point clearly to the East. There

isa marked Oriental style in the representation on the Berlin
amphora and a wingless goddess holding lions in this hieratic
;
fashion occurs on an ivory relief in the British Museum from

the palace in Nimrud ^ And the Oriental origin of the type
has been recently strongly maintained by MM. Radet and
Ouvre, on the ground of a recent discovery at Dorylaeum in
Phrygia, a stone relief showing the winged goddess holding
a small lion by the front paws and wearing a Persian tiara on
her head^ Perhaps derived from this early type, and at all
events inspired by the same idea, are those representations

of Artemis, of which the recently discovered terracottas in
Corfu are examples which show her holding the stag and
'',
the lion, and with the hare leaping from her shoulder into her
hand. They may be as late as the fifth century, but preserve
the archaic form and the hieratic style.
As the primitive cults often recognized in her a goddess
of the lake and the stream, we might look for some allusion to
this aspect of her in the earliest monuments. But it is difficult
to find. We are told only of the mysterious image of the

divinity, half-woman half-fish, that Pausanias saw at Phigaleia,
and which was popularly regarded as a form of Artemis ''.
But there is no surviving trace of this uncouth representation;

and perhaps the only monument that has come down to us
from a very early period which recognizes Artemis as a fish-
goddess is the strange vase wrought with figures in relief,
recently found in Boeotia (PI. XXIX a). It belongs to the vases
of the geometrical style, and it exhibits a type of Artemis
closely akin to the '
Persian '
; the goddess, a stiff hieratic
form, stands with her arms extended over two lions, two
water-birds are symmetrically placed on each side of her
head, and the head and shoulders of a bull are drawn under
her right arm ". The vase-painter has thus given very manifold
''
Published by Roscher, p. 1753. on the Acropolis; Arch. Anzeig. 1893,
''
Bull, de Corr. Hell. 1894, PI. 4. p. 146, Fig. 24.
d P. 428.
p. 129.
" lb. 1891, pp. 1-117. An archaic " Eph. Arch. 1892, IliV. 10. i, p. 2 '
2.
terracotta of similar type has been found

Plate XXIX
XVII.] MONUMENTS OF THE CULT OF ARTEMIS. 523
expression to the idea of the divine '

mistress of animals,' and
has added also a clear allusion to the '
lady of the lake' ; for on
the lower field of her close-fitting robe he has drawn a large
fish. As regards the later periods, it is only in very few monu-
ments that this association of her with the waters is hinted at ^.
The aspect of Artemis that is far the most prevalent in

the earliest and latest periods of Greek art is that of Artemis
'AypoTf'pa, the goddess who fostered the life of the wood
and the wild. We have traces among the monuments of
an early cult-type of Artemis Êvh^vhpos, the divinity of the
tree, who was worshipped once at least under the actual form
of the myrtle-tree. On a coin of Myra we see the primitive
figure ofArtemis-Aphrodite appearing in the midst of a cleft
trunk (Coin PI. B 29) from which two serpents are starting,
the symbols of the earth-goddess and on a coin of Perge she ;
appears to be holding a fir-apple '', the wild trees being those

which are specially associated with her. On a fragment
of a beautiful Attic vase of the transitional period, found on
the Acropolis, she is holding a flower before her face. Her
character as a divinity of vegetation sometimes shown by is
the symbol of the calathus which she wears on her head, and
she commonly appears in the monuments of all periods as the
goddess to whom wood are
the animal and the tree of the
equally sacred. Thus on a coin of Flaviopolis of the time of
Marcus Aurelius we see a very primitive form of the goddess,
derived probably from some semi-iconic cult-statue, with the
calathus on her head and with two stags symmetrically
arranged by two pine-trees at each side of her '^; and we may
compare the form of Artemis on a vase published by Gerhard,
where she stands in a rigid and hieratic pose, with her fore-
arms held out parallel from her body, and a torch in each
hand above her is a wild fig-tree, from which a sort of game-
;
"^
On a coin of Pherae we see the find a head of Artemis, but with no
Pheraean Artemis riding on a liorse past peculiar emblem (Coin PI. B 38).
a lion-headed fountain from which water ''
Mionnet, Suppl. 5. p. 439.
flows (Miiller-Wieseler, Denkin. d. Alt. " AjzIL d. dcutsch. Inst. Ath. 5. Taf.
Kunst, 2, on a fourth-century
no. 173) ; 10.
coin of Stymphaius, where she was wor- <
Coin PI. B 31.
shipped as the goddess of the lalce, we
bag containing a hare is hung as a votive-offering *. A small

marble representation of Artemis was found at Larnaka in
Cyprus, and is now in the Museum of Vienna, which shows
Artemis leaning on her own ancient idol that wears the
calathus as the emblem of fruitfulness ; a coin of the city
of Eucarpia in Phrygia ^ reproduces the type exactly, and
proves that the larger figure was holding a bow in her left
hand over the idol, and was raising her right hand to her
quiver behind, while at her right stands a stag looking up to
her face (PI. XXX. a).
To monuments belongs the Artemis-statue

this series of
from Gabii now in Munich (PI. XXXIII), probably a temple-
statue or copy of one as Wieseler'' supposes. The exact
interpretation of its meaning is not easy. The goddess is
moving rapidly forward bearing a shut quiver on her back, and
something in her left hand, a torch more probably than a bow,
and holding in her right hand the paws of a roe that has just
sprung up caressingly towards her. On her head is a crown
and a veil her gaze is fixed upon the distance, and her
;
expression is earnest but indifferent. Her long girded

diploidion is flapping about her in the wind, yet something
of the solemnity and precision proper to the temple-statue is
retained insome part of the drapery as well as in the treat-

ment of the hair. It cannot be a momentary action that is
here represented she is not striking down her prey or protect-
;
ing her favourite animal from any immediate peril. If we

explain whole work, as Wieseler would, as showing
the
Artemis returning homeward through the woods at night by
the light of her torch, while the roe runs to her and leaps up
to be caressed, we might still regard the representation as
typical, and believe that the intention of the sculptor was not
so much to render a motive of merely passing interest, as to
express the manifold character of the earth-goddess, the
huntress, and the protectress of animals.
This last function of hers is most commonly expressed by
* Aniike Bildwerke, Taf. 42 ; Botti- <^

Miiller- Wieseler, Denki/i. d. Ait.
cher, Ban/nctilttis, Fig. 26. A'unst, 2. 168.
" Arch. Zeit. 1880, Taf. 17.
Plate XXX
To face page 524

Plate XXXIII
To face page 524

the symbol of the stag standing peacefully by her side, and

sometimes gazing up at her face as on the coins of Perge ;
(Coin PI. B 'J,^) and Abdera^ on those of the Syrian Laodicea

(Coin PI. B 32) that present us with a strange representation
of Artemis bearing the calathus and armed with the shield,
with two stags by her side and on coins of Athens that;
''
contain the figure of the goddess wearing the calathus and

holding the bow in her left hand and the patera in her right,
with the stag looking up. We have also an archaic repre-
sentation of Artemis on a gem in St. Petersburg", standing
by a laurel-tree and holding an arrow in her left, while her
right hand rests upon an altar and a fawn gazes up at her
and we may regard this as a traditional motive, derived from
temple-sculpture.
The intimate association through ritual and sacrifice between
Artemis and the stag or fawn has been noticed already it is :
illustrated by such representations as the vase-painting that

depicts her riding on a roe (PI. XXX. b), and indirectly by the
statue in Arcadia carved by Damophon with a fawn's skin over
her shoulders.
The representations that show her merely as the huntress,
and that can be directly or indirectly connected with public
cult, are not very frequent. The statue in her shrine at
Epidauros was of this type, but we only know it through
Pausanias' record '-^^ The cult-type of the huntress-goddess,
carved for her shrine at Pellene is perhaps preserved on ^^
,
coins of that and the same form appears inside a temple

city'^ ;
on the coins of Corinth ^. The image of Artemis Laphria^'-**,

which was carved by the Naupactian Menaechmus and Soidas
in the earlier part of the fifth century, presented her in the act
of hunting; and we find the figure of the huntress-goddess on
many coins that allude undoubtedly to the worship of Artemis
Laphria, whose title in Calydon and Patrae had
and cult
special reference to the chase and the life of the wild-wood.
On a coin of Patrae struck under Lucius Verus ^, we see the
Gardner, Types, PL 3. 31. ^ A'lim. Coinm. Pans. S. 12, p. 92.

>
Ahim. Coinm. Paus. BB. 5 and 6. lb. D. 68.
<=
Compte-Rendu, 1873, PI. 3. no. 9. ' Brit. Mus. Cat. Pelop. PI. 6. i.
figure of Artemis facing, with her right hand on her hip

holding her bow and arrow, and standing by an altar with her
hound near her and a similar type appears on two coins of
;
Nero and Domitian, with the title of Artemis Laphria"*; but

we have a dififerent type on an Aetolian gold coin that has on
its obverse the figure of Aetolia seated on shields, and Artemis
standing before her with her left leg advanced and with a bow
in her left hand and a torch in her right ''.
It is open to question whether either of these types repro-
duces the temple-statue of gold and ivory carved by the

Naupactian sculptors. Both show slight traces of an archaism
that may naturally have attached to the work of Soidas and
Menaechmus Professor Gardner makes out a strong case for
;
the claim of the former to reproduce the temple-image, as it
is of frequent occurrence, but, on the other hand, it is natural

to believe that the Artemis standing by the figure of Aetolia
should bear something of the semblance of the great national
image of Calydon. Doubt is all the more legitimate because
neither of them exactly conforms to Pausanias' description of
that statue (to /xh' a-^rnxa 67]p(vov<Ta (cttl).
Many cities took the type of Artemis the huntress as their

coin-device ; she appears on a coin of Syracuse, wearing the
short diploidion and buskins, discharging an arrow, with her
hound running at her side (Coin PI. B ;^'j), and on a coin
of the Tauric Chersonese, kneeling on a stag and transfixing
itwith a spear ^. Such representations, in which she appears
merely as the destroyer of beasts, while never very common
in religious monuments, had more vogue than any in the later
secular art; they are by no means adequate to the earlier
ideas in her worship.
Much has been said of the very interesting primitive
thought surviving in the Brauronian ritual of Attica and the
Callisto myth of Arcadia. But the monuments give no illus-
tration at all of this ; a votive-offering of a bear carved in

marble, found on the Acropolis, is the only object of art
" Num. Coiiim. Pans. Q. 9 ; see Kiitist, 2. 165.
Gardner, ib. p. 77. ^ B7-it. Mas. Cat. Thrace, Tauric

''
Muller-Wieseler, Denkm. d. Alt. Chers. no. 7.
that alludes to the bear-goddess and the bear-dance of the

maidens. But as regards the type of the Brauronian goddess
we have some numismatic evidence
slight for Pausanias ;
tells us that the image was carried

ancient off by the
Persians from Brauron to Susa ^^'

3-, and was afterwards
given by Seleucus to the men of the Syrian Laodicea.
Now Prof. Robert^ has shown weighty reasons for dis-
believing statement, and suggests that the story was

this
invented in the time of Seleucus by the Laodiceans, who
may have been jealous of the pretensions of the Brauronian
image ; still the story would scarcely have arisen unless the
idols of Brauron and Laodicea were of similar type. And
this latter city's coins as
has been mentioned above show
us a strange figure of Artemis bearing an uplifted shield and
battle-axe (Coin PI. B 32). It is more probable, as Prof.
Gardner argues'' on the strength of Pausanias' statement,
that this is approximately the type of the ancient Brauron-
image than that Beule is right in supposing that we have that

image reproduced on the archaic coin of Athens mentioned
above, that shows the goddess with the patera and bow. The
image would scarcely have held the axe but it may
Attic ;
well have been armed, as we have instances elsewhere in

Greece of an armed Artemis; and if we suppose that the
Brauronian divinity stood armed in her temple on the Attic
shore, we may suggest another reason besides those which
I have mentioned in a former chapter for the association
of Brauron with Orestes and the Tauric Chersonese namely, :
if the early Greek settlers spread the story of

the maiden-
goddess of the Crimea, whose image was armed like the
Palladion^ we can better understand why the armed Artemis
Parthenos of Brauron should have been identified with her ;
especially if, as we have reason to suppose, her cult-name
a Archacologische Marchen, p. 144. ''

Num. Coinm. Pans. t^\^ 57 and 139.
He points out that the closing words of '^
Pp. 45 1) 4.^2-
Euripides' Jphigenia in Tatiris are ^ The idol in the arms of Iphigenia

utterly inconsistent with Pausanias' had at times the exact form of the Pal-
statement ; the ancient idol which Pau- ladion ;
vide Gerhard, Arch. Zcit. 1849,
sanias mentions as still existing at Brau- PI. 7. p. 70'
ron was the aboriginal one.

at Brauron was Tauropolos, and the name of the Chersonese

resembled this in sound.
Of the original significance of the Arcadian Callisto-myth
we have no monumental illustration whatever, and the only
public recognition that it received from any Arcadian state,
so far as the monuments show, was
the coin-device of Orcho-
menos on fourth-century coins of that state we find on the
;
obverse Artemis kneeling and drawing her bow, and on the

reverse Callisto pierced and falling with the young Areas
behind her''.
It has been shown that in the Arcadian and other worships
there were ideas alien to the virginal character of Artemis.

But Greek art gives no expression to these there is no artistic :
type of Artemis Aoyîa and the other kindred titles '\ no

representation at all of the orgiastic and lascivious dances
practised at times in her worship for the calathiscus,' the ;
'
dance of the women with baskets on their heads, which

appears on one of the terracottas of Corfu and perhaps on
one marble relief*^, was not of this character.
The domesticated animals, and those of the agricultural
community which appear to have been rarely associated with
the goddess in cult, are also rarely connected with her in
art. The sacrificial importance of the goat in her worship
can scarcely be illustrated by any surviving monuments of the
state- religion; for we cannot regard as such the silver medallion
from Herculaneum presenting the head and shoulders of
Artemis and two goats bounding above her shoulders''.
A late coin of the Arcadian Kaphya^, where Artemis
KyaKoATjo-ta ^'^,
a title believed to refer to the goat-goddess,
was worshipped, shows the figure of the goddess merely
bearing two torches, and does not support that interpretation.
* Bnf. Mils. Cat. Pclopoincsc, 35. pretation appears to me most improb-

'3- able.

The Artemis figure on one of the *=
Denkm. d. Alt. Kiinst, 2. iSS.
very early Boeotian vases recently dis- <J
566 the goat on
Vide Roscher, p. :
covered {Eph. Arch. 1892, riiV. 8, 9) the coin of Aenos bending over a torch
has been interpreted by Wolters {il>.) refers probably to Artemis; vide supra,
as if the goddess was represented in p. 475.
the pangs of travail; but the inter- Head, ///V/. A w. p. 374.
Plate XXXI
a
To face pagt 529

Of Artemis Tauropolos, bull-goddess,' we have a few

the '
on coins. The most important

certain representations, chiefly
of these are the coins of Amphipolis (Coin PI. B 34), which
have already been briefly mentioned^; on one of these the
figure of Tauropolos has the calathus on her head, the torch
and spear in her hand, and the solemn hieratic pose of the
temple-idol. The horns behind her shoulders are usually
supposed to refer to the moon, and certainly much the same
symbol appears in representations of Selene if this is its ;
meaning here, we must suppose that the Attic worship of

Tauropolos, when transplanted to Amphipolis, acquired a
certain lunar character from the neighbouring worship of
Hekate but the horns may equally well be regarded as
:
a symbol of Tauropolos in the literal sense of the word.

Again, we find the bull-riding goddess, holding an inflated
veil, on a coin of Hadrianopolis^ struck in the reign of
Caracalla and on the coins of Eretria, Phigela, and Phocaea

;
the bull on the obverse is probably a symbol of this worship

in those cities'".
A relief from Andros is mentioned by Stuart*^, with
a representation of Artemis and a bull standing by her and ;
a figure in the British Museum, clad in chiton and mantle,

with a bull's head carved at her feet^ must be a fragment of
a statue of Artemis Tauropolos, standing on the bull and
carrying a torch (PL XXXI. a). We may give this name
also to the Artemis on a relief published in the Annali
dclT Institiito^, representing her by the
Dionysos in side of
a chariot drawn by bulls. She seems also to have had this
character in Ephesian worship^, for we find bulls' heads
carved in relief on the lower part of the Ephesian idol,
and we can thus explain the curious statement in Plutarch
that the horns of anox were hung in the temple of Diana
on the Aventine ^ for Strabo tells us that that temple
;
Pp. 451-2. It was found at Woodchester, and

*>
Brit. Mils. Cat. Thrace, ^'c.j^.w'i. shows fairly good style of the Roman
"=
Head, Hist. Num. pp. 306, 307 ;
period.
Mionnet, Suppl. PI. 72. 4.
f
18S1, Tav. E.
^ Antiquities of Athens, vol. 4. ch. 6, e Quacst. Roman. 4.
P1.5-
VOL. II. I
borrowed the type of its goddess from the Ephesian idol

at Marseilles ^^3".
The whose functions refer to the vegetative and

divinities
animal life become regarded also as powers
of the earth often
of the lower world, and it has been noticed that Artemis
acquired this character indirectly in the Arcadian worship
of Despoina, into which she was brought. The statue by
Damophon of the goddess holding two serpents, which he
carved for this cult, has been mentioned already ^'^ we find ;
serpents starting from the cleft tree in which the image of

Artemis appears on the coin of Myra described above ^
The serpent is proper to the earth-goddess and the divinities
of the lower world, and probably this is its meaning in these
representations while in a later period it becomes the badge
;
of Artemis Hekate ''.
It has been shown that the literature and cult very rarely
indeed associated Artemis with the cultivation of the land and

with the harvest she was the earth-goddess of the wilds
:
rather than of the tilth. The only representation, so far as

I am aware, that gives her something of the character of
Demeter is on a late Roman
carneole, where she is figured in
a chariot drawn by
and turning round and giving
stags,
ears of corn to a peasant^. Wieseler explains this as an
allusion to the lunar aspect of the goddess, and to the
fertilizing effects of the nightly dew, noticing that Selene
is called epe'/<ap7ro?, '
the corn-giver,' in an Orphic hymn ^.
As the work is of so late a period, this is possible. It
is also possible that it expresses simply the agricultural
character that may have belonged to her worship in
certain localities, and which certainly attached to her cult
in Calydon.
* P. 523. Apollo, for this would more naturally

>
Panofka rightly regarded the cult- be interpreted as Iris ; Annali deW Inst.
title of Artemis "AyyeXoi as denoting 1833, pp. 173, 174, Taf. d'Agg. B.
a goddess of the lower world (vide and C.
supra, p. 517); but he ought not '^
Denkm. d. Alt. Ktinst, 2. 171 b.
to have given this name to the ^ Orph. HyiiDi, 9. 5 ; cf. Catullus,

winged goddess on a vase who holds Eleg. 34. 17,
a KrjpvKflov and gives a libation to
w
<
xvii.] MONUMENTS OF THE CULT OF ARTEMIS. 531
said already to show how com-

Enough has perhaps been
paratively lateand scanty is the evidence for the lunar
theory about Artemis, and how the art of the early and of
the greatest period does not recognize her as a goddess of
the moon. The only certain symbol of Artemis Selene is the
crescent, and this only comes into use in the later epoch.
It designates the moon-goddess on a coin of the Roman
period on which Artemis of the Ephesians is represented,
and where stars are seen in the field ^ and it would be ;
safe to say that all the monuments of Graeco-Roman art

which place the crescent on the forehead of Artemis express
the Roman idea of the identity of the two divinities, but it
is doubtful if any of these are derived from any cult.

In regard to her relations with the life of the family, the
institutions of marriage and the clan, the monuments tell us
very little We
have no sure representation of Ar-
indeed.
temis KovpoTp6(f)os, the cherisher of children and if she appears ;
in vase-scenes in the bridal procession '^ it is not necessarily

as a goddess of wedlock who encouraged conjugal fidelity,
but as she to whom propitiatory sacrifices must be made
before marriage, or as the goddess who aided child-birth.
This is probably her character in the interesting votive-
relief from Tyndaris, dedicated to Artemis Ei;7rpata'*^, which
has been mentioned in a former chapter, and which has been
well interpreted by Brunn the goddess is clad in a short
;
chiton which leaves her right breast bare, and she stands
holding a sacrificial basket over an altar, and in her right
hand a lowered torch with which to kindle the altar-flame as ;
Brunn remarks, the 'priestess Artemis' of Arcadia** might

have been thus represented. The worshippers that approach
her appear to be father, mother, and daughter, and the
parents may be praying for their daughter's fruitfulness in
marriage.
Among the monuments that illustrate the more advanced
* DcnkiH. d. Alt. Kunst, 2. 163 b, in matronly fashion in mantle and coif;
with inscription 'A/)rf^$ 'Etpeaiaiv. cf. ;/'. i. 42.
''
For instance on a vase published " P. 463.
id. 2.182, where Artemis appears at
For x\rtemis 'Upeia at Oresthasion
tliehead of the bridal procession arrayed vide Geographical Register, Arcadia.
I 2
and spiritual character of Artemis, those are perhaps the most

important that associate her with Apollo. But as their
association in cult was not original or primitive, and her
state-worship was on the whole independent of the Apolline,
so none of these monuments go back to a very early period.
Of the groups of the two divinities in Greece mentioned by
Pausanias '^, only two need be supposed to belong to the
archaic period, the groups at Olympia'^-'^ and at Pyrrhichos
"^
in South Laconia ", and not all of them belong to temple-
worship.
The only coins on which Apollo and Artemis are found
together, so far as I have been able to discover, are those of
Megara, Rhegium, Leontini, Alexandria, Germe in Mysia,
Byzantium, Calchedon, Trajanopolis in this last-mentioned ;
city we may certainly suppose a close community of cult, for

the twin deities are clasping hands over an altar on which the
sacrificial fire is burning (Coin PI. B 39). A bronze coin of
Megara of the period of Septimius Severus gives us a free
reproduction, we may believe, of the group of Leto and her
children that Praxiteles carved for the temple of Apollo in
that city ; Artemis is clad in a long chiton and is raising
her hand to her quiver, and holds, according to Prof.
Gardner's interpretation % a plectrum in her left hand. We
have also a fairly large number of representations on vases
and reliefs in which the brother and sister appear side by
side, either alone or in large groups. Most of these are
inspired merely by the poetic imagination of the artists, who
invented pleasing and characteristic motives to express the
idea of the union and love of brother and sister, or who dealt
with the many myths that associated them in some action or
event, such as the slaughter of the Niobids, of Tityos, or of
Python. Among the most beautiful representations of Ar-
temis are those of which instances will be given below, in
which she is pouring a libation to her brother. In fact,
wherever Apollo appears, an artist would be likely to put
Artemis by his side and only a very few of these representa-
;
tions have any cult-significance. But a relief in the Villa

" Num. Coinni. Pans. i. p. 6, PI. A. 10.
Albani may be mentioned that no doubt alludes to their

common worship at Delphi. It was first published by
Welcker, and represents Artemis holding a torch and wearing
a bow and quiver on her back, Leto standing behind her, on
the right Nike pouring a libation to Apollo Citharoedus, and
the Delphic temple in the background. The style is hieratic
and affectedly archaistic (PL XXXI. b).
We have scarcely any direct monumental reference to their
common cult at Delos and the Hyperborean offerings a ;
'
pinax in the Louvre on which Artemis is seen riding on
'
a swan contains probably an allusion to this, for in the usual

legend this was the bird that conveyed Apollo back from the
northern regions in spring. The occasional association of
Artemis with the griffin probably arose in the same way ; as
this fabulous animal of Oriental cult had been transplanted in
Greek legend to the northern shores of the Black Sea, and
figures as the convoy of Apollo in the representations of his
return. And Artemis herself was sometimes depicted riding
on the griffin, as in the painting mentioned by Strabo in her
temple on the Alpheus*.
We have no representations that refer clearly and definitely
to any oracular powers exercised by Artemis through associa-
tion with her brother ; it is only possible that the coin of
Perge already mentioned (Coin on which she PI. B '^'>,),
appears in a short chiton, left hand and

holding a sceptre in her
a laurel crown ' in her right, with the fawn gazing up into her
face, may refer to an oracle in that city; but the laurel need
not refer to Apolline functions, but perhaps alludes to the

city games or to the woodland character of the goddess, to
whom all wild trees were sacred.
As Artemis OvXia, or the goddess of health, she is asso-
ciated with Apollo at least once, namely, on a coin of Germe
in Mysia, on which she appears standing by him and
Asclepios but this is of a very late period and illustrates
;
merely an isolated local cult.
* It does not seem quite clear from wears the laurel crown herself on the
the coin that the crown is laurel ; but it obverse of the same coin ; Head, Hisi.
is all the more probable because she A'zim. p. 584, Fig. 321.
Neither in the literature nor the art does Artemis appear

prominently as the city-goddess. Her figure is indeed the
usual or occasional coin-device of a very large number of
cities, yet only in a very few instances can she be supposed to
personify the city-community or its fortune. She wears the
turret-crown as the city-goddess on coins of the Tauric
Chersonese'' after the period of Alexander, and on a late coin
of Amphipolis we see the figure that personifies the state
seated and holding in her hand a small statue of Artemis
Tauropolos '\ It is usual to find the turret-crown on the head
of the Ephesian goddess. We have also on Milesian coins of
the Roman period a temple-type of Artemis, whose worship
was here combined with Apollo's, wearing the modius and veil
and holding in her hands the patera and bow, with her stag
standing by her feet the style points to a work of fifth-cen-
;
tury sculpture^. But we cannot quote monuments of the

autonomous period of unmixed Hellenic worship that recog-
nize her clearly as the patron goddess of the state, asHera
was recognized Argos and Samos, and Athena at Athens.
at
Where we find her head on coins, we may assume with some
probability that she was worshipped in those cities, but we
cannot conclude that she was in any special sense the city-
goddess ^.
The worship of Artemis BouAata was, as has been shown,
" Brit. Mus. Cat. T/irace, p. 2. Orthagoria, Thessalonica, Dium.
^ Ih. Macedoii, p. 60. In Thessaly and Central Greece ;
<
Head, Hist. Ahiin. p. 505. Apollonia,Demetrias, Phoenike, Pherae,
<i
The following is a geographical list Epirus ^coins of Pyrrhus), Nicopolis,
of coin-representations of Artemis, so far Zacynthus, Tanagra, Athens, Megara,
as I have been able to collect them : Corinth.
\In Sicily and Magna Graecia : Paes- Peloponnese : Methana, Caphyae, Or-
tum, Thurii, Bruttii, Rhegium, Leon- chomenos, Phigaleia, Alea, Pheneus,
tini,Larinnm, Capna, Neapolis, Agri- Stymphalus, Aegira, Patrae, Pellene,
gentura, Amestratus, Centnripae,?Iaeta, Heraea, Aegium.
Mamertini, Morgantia. The islands : Icaria.
In North Greece, Thrace, and Mace- Asia Minor: Parium, Pitane, Cyzicus,
don : Abdera, Adrianopolis, Perinthus, Miletopolis, Apollonia, Germe, Perga-
Tauric Chersonese, Marcianopolis, mum, Adramytteirm, Perge, Amisus,
Tomi, Anchialus, Deultnm, Pantalia, Sinope, Phanagoria, Prusa, Creteia,
Serdica, Trajanopolis, Coela, Lysi- Flaviopolis, Zeleia, Colophon, Mag-
machia, Olbia, Byzantium, Thasos, nesia, Phocaea, Oenoe, Miletus, Ephe-
Bizya, Amphipolis, Bottiaei, Chalcidice, sus, Phigela.
important in Athens, but of this or of Artemis Agoraia we

have no characteristic representation. An attempt has been
made by Wieseler to discover the goddess of the moral law,
Artemis Upis, on a gem*^ that presents her standing by a
pillar with her feet crossed, holding a branch in her hand,
with a roe standing by her ; the attitude expresses meditation,

but it is very hazardous to say that it is specially appropriate
to any particular cult.
The armed Artemis was as rare a type in the temples of
Greece as the armed Aphrodite. It is possible, as has been
already suggested, that the Tauropolos of Attica was armed,
and Pausanias speaks of a bronze statue of Artemis bearing
arms in Messene ^^^, whose shield fell from her arm as
a sign of the disastrous end of the Messenian war of inde-
pendence But this is not the usual representation of
''.
Artemis SMretpa, the saviour in war. On the coins of Pagae

and Megara (Coin PI. B 35) that reproduce the type of
Strongylion's statue carved for the latter city ^~^, we see the
figure of the goddess and buskins, hurrying
in short chiton
along with a torch in each hand the altar and the temple ;
that appear on some of the coins of this type make it clear

that the figure is derived from the temple-statue of Soteira,
as Pi'of. Gardner has pointed out The torch alludes to the
'^.
story of the night when Artemis bewildered the retreating

Persians, and it is probably to some such type as this that the
line in the Anthology refers

Artemis hot with speed is the
'
herald of the coming war '^.'
A statuette in the British Museum of fourth-century style,

dedicated to Artemis Soteira (PI. XXXII. a), shows a very
similar figure of the goddess clad in short chiton and fawn-
skin, striding quickly forward. We have also the Syracusan
coins" from 345 to 317 B.C., that commemorate the restoration
" Mliller-Wieseler, Denkm. d. Alt. <=

Num. Comm. Pans. pp. 4, 8.
Kunst, 2. 172 a. ''
9. 534 : ''ApTifxi'i iSpwovaa trpo-
^ She has the lance in her hand in a77A.oj ioTi KvSotfiov.

a few vase-paintings Lenormant, /.
;
" BrzL Mus. Cat. Sicily, p. 183,
Ceramogr. i. PI. 97, 100, 103 Denkm.
; no. 252 (Fig.) ; De^tkm. d. Alt. Kunst.
d. Alt. Kunst, I. 2, II on a relief from
; 2. 163.
Asopus, Arch. Zeit. 1882, Taf. 6. i.
536 GREEK RELIGION.
of the democracy and Timoleon's successes, and bear the head
of Artemis Soteira with the strung bow behind her or with
the shut quiver, and with the lyre or cithar that alludes to
the festal celebration of the triumph (Coin PL B 36). We
may lastly notice here a coin of Demetrias in Thessaly, of
the second century B. C, which contains the figure of Artemis
seated on a galley, probably alluding to her help in naval
warfare ^.
The monuments that in any way associate Artemis with

the arts are very rare indeed, and the few vases on which she
is found listening to the music of Apollo Citharoedus or
herself playing the lyre have no proved connexion with
any worship. Her statue in Praxiteles' group at Megara, if it
held the plectrum in the hand, as the Artemis on the coin

that reproduces this group appears to do, would appropriately
express the title of Artemis 'Tju^ta, but could have had no
direct reference to the Arcadian cult. Nor is there any
Arcadian coin that clearly expresses the idea of this worship ;
for the head of Artemis of semi-archaic style wearing her

hair in a net, which we see on a coin of Arcadia^', and which
Imhoof-Blumer would interpret as the head of Artemis
'Tfxpta, has nothing characteristic about it at all.
These, on the whole, are the chief monuments which can be

associated directly or indirectly with the cult of Artemis,
though theories might be advanced about the cult-significance
of many others and we see how far more meagre is this
;
source of our information about the ritual and ideas of her

worship than the literary evidence is we can scarcely doubt :
that much of the thought that was embodied in her religion

had ceased to have much meaning by the time that art
was developed enough to tell its own story,
'^
Brit. Mus. Cat. Thessaly, p. 34. *>
DciiIcdi. Alt. Kiaist, 2. 156 e.
CHAPTER XVIII.
IDEAL TYPES OF ARTEMIS.
The Hellenic ideal of the virgin-huntress, the goddess

kindly to boys and maidens and to the living things of the
wood, as it was perfected in the religious hymn and the Euri-
pidean drama, was not fully embodied in Greek art until the
age of Praxiteles and the great painters of Alexander's period.
Yet the developed archaic art had done something for the
expression of the Artemis-type, and had given it movement
and life. The fragment of an Attic vase quoted above ^ shows
a very striking representation of the divinity which we may
date about 470 B.C. She is clad in Ionic chiton and mantle
with a panther's skin over her shoulders, holding in her left
hand the bow and raising in her right hand a flower towards
her lips. The golden-coloured drapery and the white flesh
suggest a cult-image of chryselephantine technique, and the
figure may be a copy of the older image in the Brauronian
temple on the Acropolis.
Of considerable importance also for character and style is the
Pompeian statuette in the Museum of Naples (PI. XXXII. b),
representing Artemis striding forward, clad in a chiton with
sleeves and a finely textured mantle, with a quiver at her back ;
the fingers are restored, but the one hand must have been
holding a bow or torch, the other holding up the skirt of her
dress ; a diadem adorned with rosettes crowns her head, of
which the hair has been given a golden tinge. The maidenly
character is clearly expressed in the bright face and the
dimpled chin. The later copyist shows his hand in the soft
" Vide p. 523; Hirschfeld, Arch. Zeit. 1873, p. 109.
treatment of the flesh and the rendering of the eyelids, but on

the whole the spirit and style of genuine archaism survive in
the work'''.
The period of transitional art has left us one interesting

representation Actaeon-metope from the
of Artemis, the
younger temple of Selinus, on which she stands hounding on
the dogs against Actaeon. She wears a chiton with sleeves
and with the upper part falling over so as to conceal the
girdling above her forehead is a diadem, and the hair is
;
severely drawn away from the face and secured in a long plait
behind. The features are broad and strong, of the maidenly
type, and with the expression of sombre earnestness common
on the faces of this period.
When we look for the form of Artemis in the great periods
of Greek art, we find that no statue of her is ascribed to Phei-
dias or to any of his school, nor has any original survived that
we can attribute directly to him or his pupils. We may
believe that Artemis would be represented on the Parthenon
frieze in theassembly of divinities, but we cannot discover her
figure with any certainty there ^. Nor can we quote with any
conviction a head which has been regarded as that of Artemis,
and once as an actual fragment of the Parthenon gable-sculp-
ture, and shows certainly the Pheidian style We hear of '^.
an Artemis wrought for the group in the pediment of the

Delphic temple by Praxias the Athenian, a pupil of Calamis ;
but we know nothing of him or his work.
" Vide a long article by Graef in the there is reason for thinking that at the
Mitt. d. deutsch. Inst. {Rdin. Abtli.), 3. time of Pheidias the torch was by no
p. 280, who compares a bronze in Berlin means the common and accepted symbol
from Thresprotis, and who considers of Artemis, as it was of Demeter and
that the Pompeian statuette may repre- Persephone and if he intended this
;
sent something of the style and form of figure for Artemis, we may doubt if the
the Artemis Laphria carved for Pagae Athenian public would discover his in-
by Soidas and Menaechmus. tention ; still less would they be likely

^ It is almost hopeless to expect that to recognize her, as Dr. Furtwiingler
certainty will ever be attained as regards does {Aleisterwerke, p. 431, Engl, ed.),
the names of all the divinities on the in the goddess whose drapery is slipping
frieze. As regards probabilities, it is very from her shoulder and who is seated
difficult to believe with Flasch and many next to Aphrodite,
recent writers that the torch-bearing <^
Mon. del! Inst. 11. Tav. t6
figure of the matronly form is Artemis; Gazette Archeol. 1875, PI. i.
Plate XXXIV
To face page 539

XVIII.] IDEAL TYPES OF ARTEMIS. 539
The statue in Lansdowne House (PI. XXXIV) shows us

a conception of the goddess that may have been prevalent
in the Periclean age, though it is merely a Roman copy
the drapery, a Doric double chiton, displays something of the
earlier Pheidian style in its arrangement of the folds, but
the face, though it preserves to some extent the breadth of the
fifth -century heads, shows for the most part the forms of
the first decade of the fourth century. The expression is
thoughtful, but not without brightness -''.
The Artemis of the Phigalean frieze, which is a work of

provincial sculpture executed probably from Attic drawings,
and on which she appears as her brother's charioteer, is a figure
full of life and elasticity she has bare arms and wears a single
;
chiton that flaps about her limbs and is secured by a double

cross-band that passes over her shoulders and round her
breasts. But this is merely a dramatic figure in a mytho-
logical scene.
The solemnity of the religious sculpture of the fifth century
is better preserved in the statue in the Villa Albani of Artemis
holding a young calf: she is clad in a single Ionic chiton girt
round the waist, that leaves her arms and neck bare and falls
to the feet in austere columnar folds the pose of the lower ;
limbs reminds us of the Pheidian Parthenos ''.
Turning to the monuments of Peloponnesian art we find

a group of Artemis Leto and Apollo, attributed to Polyclitus,
who carved it for the temple of Artemis Orthia on the summit
of Mount Lycone but it is doubtful whether the elder or
;
younger sculptor of this name was the author of the work,

and we can say nothing of its character.
The most striking Peloponnesian representation of the
goddess is on a very beautiful Argive relief dedicated by
Polystrata (PI. XXXV. a). She stands in profile towards the

right, holding a bow in her left hand and a half-sunk torch in
her right, with her quiver at her back ; she wears nothing but
Vide Michaelis, Ancient Marbles, terracotta in Berlin, Artemis holding

Lansdowne House, no. 67. torch and cup in double Doric chiton of
^ Gerhard's Antike Bildwerke, Taf. later fifth-century style ;
Archaeol. Anz.
12; Roscher's Lexicon, p. 562. Cf. the 1892, p. 103.
a Doric chiton that falls to her feet in severe folds, the

girdling being concealed under the diploidion ; the hair is
pressed over the head in vertical plaits and gathered up in

a knot behind the face wears a bright smile, and the features
;
are most pure and maidenly, and the style of the whole work
is strong and noble. We may ascribe the monument to the
end of the fifth century. With this we may compare the type
of Artemis on some red-figured vases of the perfected style ;
for instance, on two vases, one in the Cabinet des Medailles of

the Louvre, the other in Carlsruhe, on both of which Apollo
is represented receiving a libation from Artemis the drawing :
of the figures on both is very beautiful, and the expression of

the faces solemn and profound.
is
The is of more importance for this chapter of

fourth century
Greek religious art, and nearly all its most famous sculptors
dealt with this theme. We have record of the Artemis Soteira
of Strongylion, whose figure we see on the coins of Megara
moving swiftly along in Amazonian attire with a torch in -''
each hand (Coin PI. B ^^), of the Artemis Soteira carved by

Cephissodotus for Megalopolis ^^^^ and of the Artemis EkXeta
that Scopas wrought for Thebes. As an instance of the type
prevalent in the earlier half of the fourth century, we may
note the head of Artemis on the coins of Stymphalus (Coin
PI. B 38) the countenance has something of the breadth and
;
fullness of the older style of religious sculpture, thecheek is

broad and the chin large the delicate fineness of the maidenly
;
type presented on the Syracusan coins mentioned below is not

yet attained.
The statues of Artemis by Praxiteles were of even greater
"
The Amazonian attire of the god- with an upper fold falling over, and this
dess, in short chiton and buskins, goes austerer style is preserved in some of
back to the middle of the fifth century the later monuments. From the fourth
we find her thus on the rude Laconian century onwards, the light drapery of
relief which is earlier than 450 B.C. the huntress, the short chiton with the
{Arch. Zcii. 1882, PI. 6), and on coins mantle rolled round the breast, becomes
of Patrae that probably reproduce the her usual costume. Cf. Claud, de Rapt.
type of the statue carved by Menaech- Proscrp. 2. 33 :
mus and Soidas of Naupactus. But <Crispaturgemino vestis Gortyniacinctu

before the fourth century she usually Poplite fusa tenus.'
wears the long Ionic or Doric chiton
Plate XXXV
To face page 540

importance, we may believe, than those just mentioned.

The charm maiden goddess and of the woodland
of the
secluded life that she impersonated would seem to have had
special fascination for him she must have appeared among ;
the twelve divinities that he carved for the temple of

Artemis Soteira in Megara% and that city possessed another
group by his hand of Leto Apollo and his sister""'. We
hear of a group of the same divinities wrought by him for
Mantinea of his statue of Artemis Brauronia on the Acro-
^''''',
polis of Athens'', and of the temple-image of the goddess at

Anticyra by him, or more probably by his sons ". We have
only the badly preserved coins of Anticyra and Megara that ''
may show us something of the motive and costume of the

Praxitelean statues in those cities, but of their style and
expression we know nothing. Yet we may believe that it was
this sculptor, more than any other, who defined the ideal
" Paus. I. 40, 3. archaic sculptor should have changed

^ Prof. Kekule {Ath. Mitt. 5. 256) the traditional form. We know from
and Prof. Robert {Archaeol. Miirchcn, the inscriptions that one statue in the
p. 157) believe that the Brauronian shrinewas standing and the other seated
image was the work of the elder Praxi- it me more probable that to
seems to
teles yet the inscriptions which Mi-
;
ayaXfia to earrjKos is the same as to
chaelis has published {^Partlienon, p. iSos TO dpxaiov.
307; cf. 744-758) appear

C.I. A. 2. " The text in Pausanias 10. 37, t
to support Studniczka's view {Ver- (reading (pyov tSiv Ylpa^niKovs instead

mutitngen zur GriechischeJi Kunstge- of ipyajv Twv IlpaîTi\ovs, which can
schichte, 18) that the Praxitelean statue, scarcely be grammatically translated)
which was evidently placed by the side ought more naturally to mean a 'work of
of an older one, was erected in 346-345 the sons of Praxiteles '; for there is no
B.C. The inscriptions, with their con- evidence that Pausanias could use such
fusing descriptions of two different a phrase for '
a Praxitelean work.' The
statues, do not seem to me to bear other instance often quoted to support
out Prof. Robert's conclusions, namely thismeaning is not really parallel : epyou
that the Praxitelean statue was of wood TWV Mvpasvoi Otas pLaXiffTa aîov (y. 30,
and a standingfigure, and that the older i) ; for there the genitive depends on
image, dedicated perhaps soon after the the comparative phrase that follows.
shrine was built in the time of the A coin of Anticyra presents us with an
Peisistratidae, was of stone and repre- Artemis that corresponds closely with
sented the seated goddess. A seated the description in Pausanias, but we
Artemis in the archaic period, as a cult- cannot judge of the style of the original
figure, is, so far as I am aware, an by its help and we cannot say how far
unknown type ; itwas very rare in any it reproduces the pose.
period. It is more likely that Praxi- ^ Num. Co7nm. Paus. A. 10, Y. 17.
teles made the innovation than that the
of Artemis for the Greek imagination. For Petronius, in

praising a woman's beauty, speaks of her small lips as such
as those which Praxiteles believed Diana to have.'
' It is a
slight phrase, but it proves that it was the Praxitelean Artemis

that would first occur to an appreciative writer when speaking
of the goddess and it suggests that the form of the mouth
;
was that which gave character to the whole countenance.

Now the Hermes of Olympia, the Cnidian Aphrodite of
Munich, and the relief of the Muses at Athens show how
much of the peculiar spiritual quality that belongs to the Praxi-
telean countenance was derived from his treatment of the
mouth, to which he gave that strange half-smile and expression
of dreamy self-consciousness. But we cannot suppose that he
would lend such expression to the face of Artemis, to whom it
would be quite inappropriate. An epigram of Diotimus speaks
of her proud and spirited look % and we find this not infre-
quently on works that belong to fourth-century art or are
descended from it. But this is not the Praxitelean expression
that hitherto we have known and we are left without
;
sufficient criteria for identifying among existing monuments

those that may have been derived from his originals ; for the
figure on the coin of Anticyra, even if we allow that it is
a superficial reproduction of a Praxitelean work, is of little
use to us, for it does not agree with the figure on the coins of
Megara in pose or drapery or treatment of the hair.
One or two representations of Artemis may be here men-

tioned that show much and feeling of Praxitelean
of the spirit
sculpture. The marble statuette in the Vienna Museum
(PI. XXX. a), of which the motive has already been described,
is probably a work of the younger Attic school, and claims
a high place among the monuments of the goddess for the

beautiful rendering of the flesh and for the expression of
character in the face. Her drapery, which preserves traces of
colour, is a high-girt Doric diplois open at the right side, and
a mantle which is brought in a thick narrow fold across her
body and falls over her left arm. The face is high, the
features maidenly and noble. The hair is carefully drawn
" Aiilh. Pal. 2. p. 674, no. 158.
away from the forehead and temples, the eyes are long and
rather narrow, the line of the eyebrows is straight and pure ;
the wall of the nose near the eyes is very large, as it is in the
Hermes' head ; the upper lip is slightly curved and the lower
very full
h'p is ; the chin is large and the cheeks are broad.
The eyes are full of thought, with a distant inscrutable look
in them, and the proud reserved expression accords with the
self-centred life of the goddess. This is a figure of the
temple-worship, but it is also the Artemis of the popular
poetic imagination.
To this period belongs a marble life-size figure in the
Louvre^ of a maiden securing the ends of her mantle over her
right shoulder in a clasp. It was found at Gabii, and may be
regarded with some probability as a representation of the

girl-Artemis though the genre action would be suitable
; for
enough to a nymph
or an Attic maiden arranging her dress,
we have one undoubted figure of the young goddess with
her hair arranged in the same fashion as we see in this''.
The face, although the shows

deadness of the surface
the hand of the Roman copyist, preserves something of
Praxitelean form and expression and the romantic or genre ;
treatment of a divine theme is in accordance with the

practice of Praxiteles. If this is Artemis, it is the girl-
goddess in solitude, absorbed in her own woodland life, and
naively indifferent to worship.
The coins of Syracuse which have already been mentioned,
and of which a specimen is given on Coin PI. B ^6, struck
not much later than the middle of the fourth century,
present an interesting and characteristic type of the Artemis-
head. The forms of the countenance resemble those of
Apollo contemporary art, but the expression is colder and
in
more reserved. The arrangement of the hair is simple and

displays the height of the forehead the features are broad ;
and strong and of a noble type. We may believe that this

resemblance to Apollo noted here became part of the received
ideal of Artemis from now onwards for we find it as the chief ;
^ Dcnkin. d. Alt. Kunst, 2. iSo.

^ Kekule, Griech. Tkonjigiir. atis Tauagra, Taf. 17.
feature in Claudian's description of her, which is perhaps

inspired by some was
representation of Alexandrine art: '
there
much of her brother in her face, and you might deem her cheeks
the cheeks of Phoebus, her eyes his eyes '.' This family Hke-
ness appears strongly impressed upon the countenances of the
twin divinities on the cameo published by Prof Overbeck,
a work of the Alexandrine period''; it is recognizable in the
Artemis of Versailles and the Apollo Belvidere.
It may be that some work of the younger Attic school is the
source whence the Artemis Colonna in Berlin (PL XXXVI)

has been derived . The statue is a Graeco-Roman copy of
average merit, but without much vitality. The pose and
action somewhat difficult to explain. She is hurrying
are
forward, with both arms partly stretched out the right hand ;
certainly held nothing, but the left was grasping something

that must have been either a torch or a bow. The expression
is one of proud indifference, and the eyes are fixed upon some
distant object ; we might suppose that she has just dis-

charged an arrow and is gazing upon the distant quarry, and
that the action of the archer still lingers, so to speak, in the
hands, the right still holding out the bow and the left just
drawn back after releasing the string. Her drapery is a long

Doric diplois without girdle. pure and The features are
and half open.
maidenly, the forehead rather high, the lips thin
We cannot say with certainty that the development and
perfecting of the ideal of Artemis was the achievement of
sculpture alone ; for Pliny places among the masterpieces
of Apelles ''
a picture of Artemis in the midst of a group of
" '
At Triviae lenis species, et mullus ^ Overbeck, Kunst-Mythologic, Gem-
in ore mentafel no. 7.
Frater erat, Phoebiqne genas et lu- Wieseler (^Denkm. d. Alt. Kunst,

mina Phoebi 2. 167) after a long discussion refers it
Esse putes, solusque dabat discri- to the younger Attic school Frie- ;
mina sexus. derichs to a Praxitelean original {Praxi-

Brachia nuda nitent, levibus prole- teles iind die Niobe-Gnippe). The
cerat auris quaint arrangement of the hair, which
Indociles errare comas, arcuque re- is twisted round the quiver and supports
misso it, is probably an affectation of the later

Otia nervus agit, pendent post terga copyist.
d pHny, A'. //. 35. 96: Peritiores
%2.g\X\.2ie.:DeRapt.Proserp.2.2i. '
Plate XXXVI
To face page 544

Plate XXXVI I a
XVIII.] IDEAL TYPES OE ARTEMIS. 545
maidens sacrificing and the names of other painters also

;
are recorded, Nicomachus % Timotheus^ Timarete % who

worked on this theme.
From the Hellenistic period two monuments may be
selected as typical of the later style. The Artemis of Ver-
sailleshas sometimes been wrongly regarded as intended to
be grouped with Apollo Belvidere the style of the features :
shows much resemblance, but the countenance of Artemis

expresses no anger or excitement, but only earnestness she ;
is equipped as the huntress, in short chiton with the mantle
wrapped round her body, but she is conceived by the sculptor

not as the capturer of the hind whose horns she is holding,
but as its protector against some beast of prey, towards which
she hurries while she draws the arrow from the quiver ; the
idea of the slim and strong maiden-divinity is well expressed
in the limbs and the details of the head '^. The Artemis
of the Pergamene frieze (PI. XXXVII. a) is a figure which
shows some external affinity to the Versailles figure : here
also she appears in the character of the huntress, wearing
a short woollen chiton which leaves the shoulders bare, and
which is drawn across
bound round her waist by a scarf that is
the breast the features are fresh and delicate, and do not
;
wholly conform to the usual Pergamene type, for the face has
not the fullness nor the protuberance of the forehead in the
middle above the eyes, that we usually find in the other
faces on the mouth remind us
frieze : the lines about the
slightly of the style of Praxiteles the hair is drawn back ;
so as fully to reveal the face, and is bound up in a high

knot behind. For vigour of movement and warm treatment
of the surface, this frieze-figure surpasses any other repre-
artis praefeiunt omnibus eius operibus '' Id. 36. 32.
. Dianam sacrificantium choro vir-
. .
<=
Li. 35. 147.
ginum mixtam, quibus vicisse Homeri ''
There is a close parallel between
versus videtur id ipsum describentis' (cf. the Versailles figure and the representa-
Od. 6. 102 ; Horn. Hytnn to Artemis, tion on a gem published from Millin
1. 16: 'Yi-fiirai xap'iivia vepl XP'' '"^<^' in Miiller-Wieseler's Denkmaler (no.
exo*"^" *''PX'""^" Xopovs). The text

/loi' 157 a), only that here the figure of
of Pliny is doubtful, but its difficulties Artemis has still more of the Amazonian
cannot be here discussed. character, the right breast being ex-
" Pliny, N.H. 35. loS. posed.
VOL. II. K
sentation of the goddess that has come down to us from the

Hellenistic age.
In the later period many of the earlier types may have often
been successfully reproduced. A striking example is the
statue in Dresden (PI. XXXV. b) of the Graeco-Roman age,
but derived perhaps from some original of the earlier Attic
period % representing the goddess in long Doric double chiton
that falls in austere folds down to the feet there is no girdle;
visible, but the quiver-band presses the light raiment over

the breast. The arms and hands are antique, with the excep-
tion of the finger-tips, and it is clear that she was holding the
bow in a peaceful way against her left side, and her right
hand was raised to the quiver. But as the whole pose of
upper and lower limbs is most tranquil, we must believe that
this hand is lifted not to draw an arrow but to close the
quiver, and this motive would agree with the mild gentleness
that appears in the face. In drapery and pose it shows
something of the solemnity of temple-sculpture, and it ex-
presses the ancient idea of the goddess who was friendly
to the beasts of the field and to the children of men.
The survey of the chief monuments that express the ideal
of Artemis may close with a notice of the singular work of the
Messenian sculptor Damiphon. We
have record of three
statues of the goddess carved by his hand, an Artemis Laphria
at Messene ^^^ an Artemis Phosphorus in the same city,
probably belonging to a group of which Tyche, Epaminondas,
and the City of Thebes were the other figures ^^, and an
Artemis in the temple of Despoina at Lycosura, standing near
the two divinities of the temple, Demeter and Despoina, bear-
ing a doe-skin on her shoulders, a quiver on her back, in one
hand a torch, and two serpents in the other "'^^ Until recently
all writers were agreed in reckoning Damophon among the
sculptors of the middle of the fourth century and in the ;
absence of direct evidence this would be the natural view.

We might suppose with Brunn that he was an artist who
maintained the tradition of the religious sculpture of the fifth
century and as his chief works were in Messenia and Arcadia,
;
" Dr. I'lutwangler, in Alcisteriverke, p. 324, maintains its Praxitelean origin.

Platk XXXVI I /^
To /ace page 547

and as the group which he carved the Artemis Phosphorus

for
commemorated the glory of Thebes and Epaminondas,
it might
be concluded positively that he flourished about the time of

the building of Megalopolis and the restoration of Messene.
But in 1889 the shrine at Lycosura was discovered, together
with much of the sculpture by Damophon, and one is now
compelled to assign him to a later date. For Dr. Dorpfeld %
whose authority on architectural questions is very weighty,
maintains that the excavated temple shows the bad work-
manship of the later period, and that the temple was built and
the sculpture carved of the same material and at the same
time. He determines that the building cannot be earlier than
the second, and may be as late as the first century B. C.
If the temple is to be assigned to the second century, it is
quite possible to reconcile the style of the sculpture with the

acceptance of that date. The heads of Demeter, Artemis, and
Anytos display neither the forms nor the purity of fourth-
century sculpture. But, on the other hand, few who have
seen and carefully studied the originals could believe with
Prof.Overbeck^ that they are as late as Hadrian's period.
For no work of this later age of Graeco-Roman art displays
such warm treatment of the surface, such soft modulation of
the flesh, or such exuberant life as these fragments of Damo-
phon's works. The monuments which they vividly recall are

those of the second Pergamene period ; the sculpture of the
altar-frieze displays the same warmth and the same exuber-
ance in handling and working out the forms. And the type
of Damophon's heads agrees in many essentials with the
Pergamene type The height of the skull is greater than
''.
the depth ; there is little or no marking of the bone-structure,

but the chief emphasis is on the flesh ; the breadth between
the eyes and the depth of the eye-sockets is very great.
These are Pergamene traits but what chiefly reminds us of
;
the Pergamene style in the heads of Demeter and Artemis is
* Athen. Mittheil. 1890 and 1893. the oriiînals.

^ Gesch. d. Griech. Plast. (4th ed.), <=
Vide my analysis of the Perga-
vol. 2.488 his account of the heads
p. : mene head in Hellenic Journal, 1890,
seems to imply that he has not seen p. 183.
K 3
548 GREEK RELIGION.
the treatment of the mouth and the full lips, which as it were
pout forward, and the strange convex shape of Demeter's
eyeball ;
this last detail of form the Pergamene school
inherited from Scopas. We may also note the close affinity
between the head of Anytos and some of the giants' heads
on the Pergamene frieze his beard, for example, shows
;
a singular resemblance to that of the giant confronting

Hekate.
We may take, then, this head of Artemis (PI. XXXVII b)
as one of the last among the monuments of the goddess
belonging to the Greek period. The religious severity and
purity of the older style are gone ; but the freshness and
warmth of life still remains. In spite of its colossal size, it
impresses us rather as the face of a healthy girl, joyous and
eager, than as the face of a goddess.
Plate XXXVIII
^'M^'4t
To face page 549

CHAPTER XIX.
HEKATE : REPRESENTATIONS IN ART.
The evidence of the monuments as to the character and

significance of Hekate is almost as full as that of the literature.
But only in the later period that they come to express
it is
her manifold and mystic nature. Before the fifth century

there is little doubt that she was usually represented as of
single form like any other divinity, and it was thus that the
Boeotian poet imagined her, as nothing in his verses contains
any allusion to a triple-formed goddess. The earliest known
monument is a small terracotta found in Athens, with a dedi-
cation to Hekate (PI.XXXVIII. a), in writing of the style of
the sixth century. The goddess is seated on a throne with
a chaplet bound round her head ; she is altogether without
attributes and character, and the only value of this work,
which is evidently of quite a general type and gets a special
reference and name merely from the inscription a, is that it
proves the single shape to be her earlier form, and her recog-
nition at Athens to be earlier than the Persian invasion.
With this single exception, the black-figured and earlier
red-figured vases are the only monuments that show us the
figure of Hekate in the archaic and transitional periods b;
and on these, as well as on the vases of the later time, her
form is single, and her usual attribute is the double torch.
Also, so far as we can define the significance that she has
" As Frankel {Arch. Zeii. 1882, beHekate,asWelcker supposes,/:/;w/z,

p. 265) points out, it is not distinguish- 2, p. 70. No Greek could have put
able in form from the seated Athena that interpretation upon the figure,
found in Athens. which has no attribute of Hekate, nor
''
The goddess on the Aeginetan has Hekate any right to be associated
relief in the chariot with Eros cannot with Eros.
in these early representations, we must say that there is no

reference to her lunar character, but clear reference to her as
a goddess of the lower world, or of the earth.
Thus on we see Hekate with
a black-figured vase of Berlin ^
torches, standing over against Cora, and between them the

chthonian Hermes riding on a goat*"; and with the same
form and attributes she is present on a Nolan vase in
a representation of the setting forth of Triptolemos with the
gifts of corn ^. The other persons present are Demeter,
Proserpine, probably Artemis, and Hades, so that Hekate
is here associated with the Eleusinian divinities of vegetation
and the lower world.
But on the evidence of this and one or two other similar
vase-paintings we have no right, in the absence of any literary
evidence, to assume with Steuding*^ that the goddess was
ever received into the mystic cult at Eleusis : it is a common
thing for the vase-painters to amplify their groups with
cognate or appropriate figures without any express sanction
of cult or legend.
Other vase-representations in which Hekate appears clearly
designated as a divinity of the lower world are very rare, and
the interpretation which discovers her in these is often very
doubtful. Thus in the various paintings of the carrying off of
Proserpine, a figure that has often been called Hekate ^ may
be a torch-bearing Demeter. The only certain instance that
PL XXXVIII. b {Arch. Zeit. i8r,8, Hekate,it may as well be Artemis.
Taf. 9). ^ Roscher, Lexicon, p. 1893.

^ We find Hekate again with Hermes *>
Overbeck, Kunst-AIyihologie, 2.
and in company with Demeter on a vase pp. 601-608. On a vase (published

of the fifth century, published in Ger- Afon. delV Inst. 2. Tav. 49) that repre-
hard, Auserles. Vasenb. i. 217. sents Heracles capturing Cerberus,
c Afon. deir Inst. i. Tav. But there isa figure which sometimes
4. is
we cannot always give the name of called Hekate thrusting a torcii into his
Hekate to the goddess with two torches face ; but it may be a Fury. And the
in vase-representations of this myth : statement that Hekate was regarded as
the name might suit this figure on the the a77eXos or the Iris of Hell rests on
Louvre vase (Overbeck, Kunst-AIythol. the interpretation of a figure holding
Atlas, 15. 20), but on the vase of the a torch and standing by Hades on
Due de Luynes [ib. no. 13) a similar a vase published in \.\\e. BuUetino Aâp.
figure must be called Persephone or vol. 3. Tav. 3 ; this again is very pro-
Demeter ; in all other cases, except bably a Fury,
where an inscription gives the name of
XIX.] HEKATE: REPRESENTATIONS IN ART. 551
may be quoted is a representation of this scene on a vase of

the fourth century, of South Itahan style, in the British
Museum. We see a goddess with a circle of rays round her
head and torches in her hand preceding the chariot that bears
Hades and Proserpine. It is impossible that this figure
should be Selene or Demeter or a Fury, or any other than

Hekate, who here appears as a lunar and also as a nether
divinity, possibly also a divinity of marriage, as in the
Troades of Euripides.
This is almost all that we can gather about Hekate from the
vase-paintings of any period ; there is nothing distinctive in
her form or drapery, and even the two torches are no sure
clue to recognize her by. We have accounts of the form of
Hekate in painting which give us certain details that the
vases fail to supply according to : the extract quoted by
Eusebius from Porphyry ^^t', she was represented with a white
robe and golden sandals on one of her shapes, and bronze
sandals on another but probably this is a type belonging to
;
a late period of art.
Among works of sculpture of the fifth century, the

the
chief representation of Hekate was Myron's; unfortunately
all that we are told of this statue is that it showed the
goddess in single form, and that it was wrought for the

Aeginetan worship. If Myron in this work indulged his
ruling passion for dramatic movement, then we might illus-
trate his Hekate by the relief which Dr. Conze discovered in
Thasos (PI. XXXIX. a) and published, on which the goddess
is seen sweeping along in long chiton holding two torches,
with her wild hounds leaping at her side ^

From Alcamenes onwards the triple form of Hekate is more
common than the single, although this latter never entirely
dies out. Pausanias in a well-known passage attributes to
Alcamenes himself the invention of this new type ; but
all that we have the right to conclude from his words is that
he was the first sculptor of eminence who carved a triple
statue of the goddess. It is probable that the triple form
had been seen in monuments before Alcamenes' work was
Conze, Keise auf den Itiseln d. thrakischcn Meeres, Taf. 10. 4.
produced. But the question what this triph'city meant must be

first discussed. Some of the late writers on mythology, such
as Cornutus and Cleomedes ^^ ^, and some of the modern,
''
such as Preller and the writer in Roscher's Lexicon and

Petersen, explain the three figures as symbols of the three
phases of the moon. But very little can be said in favour of
this, and very much against it. In the first place, the statue
of Alcamenes represented Hekate 'ETriTrupytSta, whom the
Athenian of that period regarded as the warder of the gate
of his Acropolis "^^^ and as associated in this particular spot
with the Charites ^^, deities of the life that blossoms and yields
fruit. Neither in this place nor before the door of the citizen's
house did she appear as a lunar goddess.

We may also ask, Why should a divinity who was sometimes
regarded as the moon, but had many other and even more
important connexions, be given three forms to mark the three
phases of the moon, and why should Greek sculpture have
been in this solitary instance guilty of a frigid astronomical
symbolism, while Selene, who was obviously the moon and
nothing else, was never treated in this way ? With as much
taste and propriety Helios might have been given twelve
heads.
If this had been actually the intention of Alcamenes, it is
difficult know how he could make the Athenian public
to
discover it in his figure and we too often forget to ask how
;
the ordinary Greek would naturally regard a monument. It
is fairly certain that unless Alcamenes put a crescent over the
forehead of each of his figures they would not be all clearly

recognized as moon-phases '
he may have done this, or any-
' :
thing else, as we know nothing at all of the details of his

work ; but, as only the latest monuments that show the
it is
crescent at all, and these only over one of the heads, it is not
probable that Alcamenes placed this badge over each. In the
relief found in Aegina (PI. XXXIX. c) we see that the one
figure holds the torches, the second a pitcher, and the third
a cup ; and Petersen supposes that all these things alluded to
the moon, who sheds the gracious dew on the herbs ^ The
" Arch. Epigr. Mittheil. ans Oesterreich, 4. p. 167.
Plate XXXIX
To face page 552

torch would occasionally, though not always, suggest to a Greek

that the person bearing it was Selene. But what evidence
have we that the pitcher and the cup allude to dew, and that
these are the ordinary symbols of the moon-goddess ? For
the figure that bore these could only be certainly recognized
as Selene if Selene were/r excellence a cup-bearer ; but she
is not. Alcamenes' figures merely carried torch,
Therefore if
cup, and pitcher, his great idea that the triple shape should
symbolize the three phases of the dewy moon would have
been scarcely revealed to the public.
In fact, among the many late monuments that represent the
triple none of which two of the figures do
Hekate, there is
not carry some attribute or property that cannot designate

Selene *. We can apply the name with certainty, then, to one
only of such figures ''.
A second explanation which rests also on ancient authority

is that the triple shape has reference to the Hesiodic idea of
a goddess whose divinity is of many elements ;
that the He-
kateion is in fact a trinity of Selene, Persephone, and Artemis,
or represents the /co'pTj (f)otia(f)6pos in shapes and with attributes
that are drawn from the moon, the lower world, and the earth.
Such an explanation may be supported by the analogy of
such figures as the double-headed Zeus, Zeus TpiocfyOaXixos, and
perhaps the two-headed Boreas on the vase representing the
pursuit of Oreithyia '^.
" In the description given by the curves of the waxing and waning moon
scholiast on Theocritus 2. 12, some of respectively. Perhaps it is only an
the attributes have evidently no refer- accident that the wiiter has got the
ence to the moon, for instance the cala- curves of the waxing and waning moon
thus; cf. ^^^. wrong, or has put right for left; the
''
The most curious argument in favour flaw in the argument is that the arrange-
of the equation of the triple Hekate to ment is not peculiar, as three figures
the three periods of the moon is ad- cannot be placed back to back in any
vanced by Steuding in his article in other way. Also it is asking a great
Koscher, p. 1S90. Alcamenes, he main- deal to ask us to believe that the Greek,
tains, must have been thinking of the when gazing at his statues, was in the
three phases of the moon because he habit of comparing the human profiles
has grouped his three figures in so with curves of astral bodies,
peculiar a manner that wherever you " One of his faces is dark, the other
stand you see a middle one en face light ; it may be that he is thus charac-
which equals the full moon, and left and terized as a divinity of the upper and
right profiles which correspond to the lower world.
The objection to this view is rather that it is insufficient
than incorrect. Artemis, Demeter, Hermes, Aphrodite have

each many natures and different spheres in which they act
but the idea of representing any one of these as a multiplicity
or trinity of never occurred to any Greek artist.
figures
And though Hckate may have been ordinarily recognized
as a goddess of three worlds, having associations with Selene,
Artemis, and Persephone, a triple shape would scarcely have
been given her for this reason only, had not her figure for
practical purposes already been made triple at the cross-roads.
It is true that we have no certain proof that this had happened

before the time of Alcamenes, but it is the only reasonable
motive for the shape of his statue at the entrance to the
Acropolis. All that we need suppose is that the 'Eicdreta at
the cross-roads or before the houses had already been given
three heads ^ This would suggest to Alcamenes to enlarge
upon this that had been invented for practical con-
type
venience only, and to group together three figures around
a column or back to back, as well as to invest each figure
with attributes that alluded to the complex nature of the
divinity, so that the triplicity was no longer merely a con-
venience but an expression of essential character.
After Alcamenes there was no great sculptor to whom
a triple Hekate isattributed ^ Among the many representa-
tions that have come down to us, then, we might expect
to find some traces of the influence of his work. It is quite
gratuitous to regard such works as the Hekate of the Capito-
" We know there were 'EKania before uncertain), cannot with certainty be re-
the doors in the time of the Pelopon- garded as forming a group of three with
nesian war and both here and at the
; the temple-statue of Scopas, so as to
cross-roads there was a motive for express the triple idea. We do not
tripling the heads at least, namely that know when they were wrought or
the countenance might guard egress and whether they stood in the same temple
approach from either direction, or make as the image by Scopas; for Pausanias'
the path of the traveller lucky which- words, rd diravriKpv, may refer to
ever way he took. But the monuments statues on the other side of the road,
fail to prove this, all the three-headed and do not seem naturally to apply
Hermae of Hekate being late. to a group, especially as they were
^ The two statues of Hekate at A rgos, of bronze while Scopas' work was of
wrought by Naukydes and Polycleitus"'' marble,
(whether the older or the younger is
line ^ or the Leyden Museum ^ as copies ; there is nothing in
the style of these that has any far-off association with the age
of Alcamenes. But the claim of the relief found in Aegina,
and now Konigswart in Bohemia (PI. XXXIX. c), to
in
represent something of the spirit of the original work is

certainly greater ^ The work appears to be of the fourth
century B. C, and to possess considerable artistic merit ; so
far as can be judged from the publications of it, the faces
have a dignity and breadth that recall the older style, the
hair is drawn away from the cheek, and the expression is
austere and solemn. But the archaism in the treatment of the
drapery is not what would be expected from a pupil of Phei-
dias, unless it were retained as a tradition of hieratic sculpture ;
and Petersen may be right in regarding a lately found frag-

ment of a Hekateion, which he has published in the Romische
Mitlhcilungen des deutschen Institutes \ as standing nearer
to the work of Alcamenes (PI. XXXIX. b). Unfortunately
nothing is preserved but the three torsos, set back to back
from the position of the arms we can conjecture that the
hands held such attributes as pitcher, cup, or torch. What is
most important in the fragment is the treatment of the dra-
pery, which shows the folds and the arrangement common in
works of the Pheidian school, the girdle hidden, and the
upper fold of the chiton drawn down so as to form a rich
border across the waist.
Among the later monuments representing the triple Hekate
we find illustration of nearly all the religious ideas that have
been already examined.
Her connexion with the Charites at Athens explains those
works on which, under the Hermae of the triple goddess,
three maidens are represented dancing hand in hand around
the shaft'': the maidens bear the calathus the emblem of
fruitfulness
on their heads, and themselves have something
of the form of Hekate.
" Published in Roscher, Alcamenes, dyaXfjara rpia npoffexo/jc-a
p. 1905.
^ .4}rh. Zeit. i. Taf. 8. dWrjXots, are not altogether clear.
" The grouping of the figures cannot * 4. p. 73.
make for or against the theory, for Pau- ^ Gerhard, Akad. Al'handl. Taf. 32, 4.
sanias' words describing the work of
The same idea, her association with the fruitfulness of the

earth, expressed by the symbol of the apple which one or
is
more figures of the triple group is often holding in her hand,

as on the monument from Catajo in Vienna''; and by the
fruits that aresometimes carved on the shaft of the Hekate
column. Between the shoulders of the figures on the monu-
ment just mentioned we see a small statue of Pan and some ;
association of her with the Phrygian worship may explain the

Phrygian cap which one of her figures wears in the bronze of
the Capitoline^ and another bronze of the British Museum.
The character of Hekate KAetSoCôs^*, the guardian of the
gate, is shown by the key which appears in the hands of many
of her figures and possibly this alludes not only to the gate
;
of the house and the city, but to the gate of hell, which she
might be supposed to keep as the key is known to have been
:
also the badge of Hades '^.
The later coins and gems and works of sculpture afford

ample illustration of her infernal and terrifying aspect her ;
hair is sometimes wreathed with serpents, like the Gorgon's ;
or the snake appears in her hand, a symbol of the same sig-
nificance as the whip and cord which she borrows from the
F'uries ; the sword or the dagger which she often holds refers
to the goddess of retribution.
A monument full of archaeological illustration of the bizarre
ideas in this worship is the marble Hekateion of the Brucken-
thal collection at Hermanstadt (PI. XXXIX. d). The body of
the front form is divided by parallel lines into different fields ^.
On her shoulders are carved in low relief two figures, the one
being Tyche holding a horn, the other perhaps Nemesis on ;
her breast is a rising sun on the second field women with

:
children, and Hermes with caduceus, and two animals

probably hounds : on the third the scene may probably be
interpreted as the initiation of a child ; there is the triple
image of Hekate on the left, and on the right a woman is
" Gerhard, Akad. Abhandl. Taf. 32. a key at Olympia (Paus. 5. 20).
I, 2. ^ Vide more detailed account in
''
Roscher, p. 1906. Harrison and Verrall'si^/f''''^-^'^'"^^^''"""
=
There was a statue of Plouton with tnents of Ancient Athens, p. 381.
Plate XL
To face page 557

holding a knife over an animal that seems to be a small

dog'.
In the latest gems we sometimes find her lunar character
very clearly shown, as on a gem published by

Miiller'', on
which the moon is seen looking out of a cloud above Hekate.

This representation shows a different treatment of the triple
form we see three heads and shoulders and six hands, but
:
the lower part of her body is single, and closely resembles

that of the Ephesian Artemis. We have probably here a real
reminiscence of this cognate cult, and as we find bulls' heads
wrought on the idol of Ephesus, so here on the gem we see
bulls at the feet of Hekate.
This type of the single body with the three heads and
shouldersmay have descended from the earlier Hermae of
the street and the cross-ways, and it existed by the side of the
full triple form in late times, though it was probably far less
commonly used for temple-monuments. But where Hekate

was represented in dramatic action, the former type was
more likely to be used, as it could be shown in much more
natural movement than the trinity of three complete figures.
The most memorable instance of the single body with the
six arms and three heads is found on the Pergamene frieze
(PL XL.), where she is armed with spear, sword, shield and
torch, and is engaged in conflict with a serpent-footed giant.
It is interesting to see that the form of the goddess in this
last monument of genuinely Greek sculpture is free from the

terrifying traits and the turgid symbolism with which later
literature and art had invested her. The deity of the nether
world marked by the protruding forehead, the forward fall
is
of the hair, the earnest and fixed expression, and the solemnity
given by the shadows into which the profiles are cast and ;
here, as in the earlier vase-paintings and in the Aeginetan

relief, the forms and the drapery are such as are proper to
the maidenly goddess.
* An initiation to Hekate might be is the inscription MV^TA; but the
alluded to in a vase-painting published interpretation given of it there seems to
in theAnimli deV Instituto, 1865, Tav. me very doubtful.
'^^&g' 1* (P- 95)) representing two ^ Denkm.d. alt. Kunst, i.'HS.
youths seated before a table, above which
558 GREEK RELIGION.
REFERENCES FOR CHAPTERS XIII-XIX.
Artemis of the water.

^
Artemis Ai,urariy at Limnae on the borders of Messenia and Laconia:
PaUS. 4. 4, 2 iCTTiv eVt Toi^ opoii rijs Mecrarivias Upov 'A/;Te/jtSo9 KiiXovfXfurjs
AtixvariSos, peT('i)(ov 5e avrnii fxoi'oi Acopie'coi/ aire Mf(rcn']vioi ku'i ol XaKfâtpoviot.
Strabo, 362 70 S' eV Aipvais T^? 'ApW/iilSos Up6v . . . iv fXtOoplois eVri rijf Tf
AnKoji't^r;? /cttl T^f Mfo-ar/rtay ottou koivtjv (TvveTeXovv Travi'iyvptv Kai 6v(riav
apcPoTfpot . . . ano 8e rav Aipi'wv Tovrav Ka\ to iv ttj 'EndpTj] Aipvaiov (iprjrai
Tî 'Apre'pibos Upov. 43 Auditae de hinc Lacedaemoni-

Tac. An. 4.
orum et Messeniorum legationes de iure templi Dianae Limnatidis

quod suis a maioribus suaque in terra dicatum Lacedaemonii firmabant
annalium memoria vatumque carminibus. Cf. inscription published
Arc/i. Zcit 1876, 130; Roehl, Ins. Graec. Ant. 50 archaic dedica-
p.
tion AipvaTi'i on a brazen cymbal. Cf. ib. 61. 73. Vide also Arch.
Zeit. 1876, Tat. v.
^ Artemis Aipmia at Sicyon : PaUS. 2. 7, 6 âSlCova-iv is rr/v dyopdv icTTi
vaos 'Aprf'/itS/f fV biîa Aipvaias. ALpvdris in Epidaurus: Paus. 3. 23, 10

KOTO. r!]v obov TTjv eK Boiwv e's 'E-rrldavpov ayovaav 'Apre/iiSot iepov tiTTiv ev tt]
'EnLbavpicov Ai/xwrnSoj-. At Patrae : Paus. 7. 20, 7-8 tPjs 8 dyopdi
("iVTiKpvs KOT avTijV TTjv 8Uô8ov Ttpevos i(TTiv ' ApTipibos Koi vuos Aip-vdribos.
fXovTcov b( rj8t] AaKfbaipova Km "Apyos Acopiewv iKpf'Kfadai IIpevyei't]v rijy
Aipvdnbos to liyaXpa Kara o'^cv oveipaTOs 'Xeyovcnv (K ^Trdprrjs . . . to oe
(iyakpa to (K ttj': AoKebaipofos top ptv tiK'Kov p^po'i/ov ixowriv ev M-eaoa . , .
fweLbdv be Trj AipudTibi ttjv fopTijv tiycdcri, Tr]s Oeov tis twv oiKerwv tK Meaoas
epXfTM TO ^davov Kop'iôv to dpxaiov eV to Tf'pfpos to ev t[i noXei. JNcar
Teêa : Paus. 8. 53, I I lepw 'Aprepibos eniKXTja-iv AtpvuTibos Kol (iyaXpd

ea-Tiv e'êvov ^vXoV Tponoi be rrji e'pyaaias 6 Alyivmos KciXovpevos vtto
'EXXr/i'cov. Eur. N/pp. 228 beaiToii' aXias "Aprepi Xi^J.l'ai Kal yvpvaaiav
Tcov imroKpoToiu.
^
Artemis STv/^^r/X/a at Stymphelus in Arcadia: Paus. 8. 22, 7 ev
2Tvp(j)ij\a> be Ka\ iepov 'ApTepibui ecTTiv dpxaiov ^TvpcfyrjXlas' to be tiyaXna
ôavov eiTTi to. noXXd enlxpvcrnv. npos be tov vaov too updcpU) neTTotrjpevai
Koi ai 'S.TvpCprjXlbes eia\v opviBes.
*
Artemis 'AX(f)(taui at Letrini in Elis : Paus. 6.22,8 eV epou be ohi'ipaTa
REFERENCES FOR CHAPTERS XIII-XIX. 559
Tf (XfiTTfTO oXiya Kai 'AXcpfialas 'AprZ/niSor nyaX/xa eV paa . , . id. ^ lO oi de
'HXelot ... TO TTapa (T(f)laiv 'A/jre/xifii es Tifxfjv rfi 'E\a(j)uua Kcidea-TrjKora (t
AfTpivovi re fieTTjyayov Koi t?] 'Apre/xiSt evoptcrav t^ 'AXêintg Spof, Kat ovtoo
TTjv 'AXrpeialav 6eov ÊXa(pialav dva xpovov f^fviKrja-tv ovofiauQqvai, PaUS. 5-

14, 6, at Olympia, 'AXc^ftw Ka\ 'Apre/xtSt dvovcnu eVi evos â)/xou. Cf.
Schol. Find. 0/. 5. 8. Strabo, 343 npos 8e rf} eK/3oX,7 (tov 'AXt/jfioi") to
T^s 'AXcpeicovias 'ApTepidos fj 'AXcpeiovarjs oXctos f'ort . . . ravTj] 8e rfj 6eS Koi iv
'OXv/iTTia Kar eroi a-vfrfXe'irai navrjyvpn, Ka6im(p Kai rf] E\a(f)[q koi rfj Aa(pina
. . . (V be Tw TT]i 'AXcfyeioii'iai: lepoi ypa(f)ai K\ea.v6ovs re Kai AprjyoVTOi, avbpiov
Kopivfficov, Tuv fiev Tpota? oKuxris Ka\ Adrjvcii yoval, tov 8" ApTfpis duacfxpo-
fxevr] en\ ypimos, acfiobpa evSoKipoi, Find. Nem. I. 16 " Ap.'nvivp.a aepvou
'AX<pfov KXeivav "EvpaKoacrav OaXns 'Oprvyla, bepvinv Apre/^tSor, AdXou Kacriy-
vi'ira. In Ortygia : Schol. Find. Pj'/k. 2. 12 o6fp 'AXcâ'wa? 'AprejatSos

(K(2 (f)aa\v fivai Upov . . . IhpvTai yap aynXpn 'Apre'îSoy eVi rrj ApeBoiicrrj.
Find. Pyth. 2. 12 'Oprvyiav . . . TTOTopias eSos 'Aprepiboi. Diod. Sic. 5.
3 Trjv 8' " ApTfpiv TrjV iv Tn'i.s '2vpaKov(Tati vrjcrnv \a[i(lu napa rwi/ deuiv ttjv an'
(Kflvt]s . . . 'Oprvyiav ovopaadt'iaav. Athen. p. 346 b oi'Sa 8e koi ttjv iv rfj
UiauTiSi ypaCJiTjv dvaKeifiivrju iv rat rrji A\<p(ia}aas ÂprepiSos if pa.
^ Artemis 'EXe/a : Strabo, 350 "EXoy 8' ol pev nep\ tov 'A\(pei6v x(>^P"^
Tiva (jmaiv . . . 01 be nep\ to 'AKoopiov eXos, oii to t/s 'EXei'ns 'Apripibos Upov
TTJs i'TTO Tols ApKacriv' iKiivoi yap eaôv ttjv lepuiavvrjv. Cf. Hesych. .5". V
ApTtpis iv Mfaarjvr].
* Artemis 'Anayxopivrj : Faus. 8. 23, 6, near Kaphyae, KovbvXia x<>>pi'Ov,
Ka\ ApTpi8os f/Xcros" koi vaoi iaTiv ivraida KaXovpivrjs Kov8vXedTi8os to
dpxalov' pfTOvopacrBip'ai. Se eV aiTia t>)v deov (pacri TouivTrj. naibia Tttpi to
Upov iralôvTa . . , inirvx^ KaXwSiw, brjaavra 8e to KaXccbiov tov ayaXparoi

nep\ TOV Tp(ix']Xov iniXeyev a>s d7ray;^niro rj"ApTepis . . . Kacpve'is be . . . ttjv
iv Ta7s KovbvXiais 6f6v . . . KaXovaiv ^ Array ô pi vrjv i^ iKelvov. Cf. Clem.

Proirepl. 32 V" ApTepw be ÂpKabes 'Anayxopivijv KaXovpevr]v npoaTpeTTovTai,
COS (f)>](Ti KaXXipaxos ev Airioif.
^ Artemis KapvCiTis at Karyae in Laconia : Faus. 3. 10, 7 '''^

y"P
Xoyplov 'Apre'yuiSof Ka\ 'Nvpcfjuv iariv al Ktipuat, (cni uyaXpa eartjKev ApTepibos
iv vnaidpco Kapvdnboi' ;ôpoi'S' be ivTavda al AoKebaipov'iuiv TTap6ci'0i Kara eTos
laTacri, Ka\ f7r(;^copioy avrals Ka6e(nr]Kev opxr](Tii. LuC. Trtpt opx- lO AaKebai-
povioi . . . irapa TloXvbevKovi Ka\ Yâaropos KapvoTLêiv paddvrei opx^jcreuii be
Ka\ TdiiTo eibos iv Kapvais Trjs Aaiccoi'iK^y bibaaKopevov. Follux, 4. 104 fjv
be Ttva Ka\ Aokcoviko. opxTjpara . . . KafwaTibes inl 'ApTepibi, Fholius, S. V.
Kapudrtta- eopT^] 'Apripiboi. Cf. Serv. cl. 8. 29 templum Caryalidae

Dianae a Lacedaemonibus consecratum.
* Artemis KebpedTis at Orchomenos in Arcadia : Faus. 8. 13, 2 npos
560 GREEK RELIGION.
ovopdôvaiv dno rrji Kedpov KtSpeaTW,
' Artemis Aa(j)vaia at Hypsoi on the Laconian mountains Pans. 3. :
24, 8 lepou 'Ao-kXtjttiov Koi'Apre/nSoy (TTiKkrjcnv Aa(f)vaias. At Olympia,

vide *.
'"^
Artemis AuyoSeV/xa at Sparta : Pans. 3. 16, 11 KaXova-i de ovk 'Op6lav
pnvnv, aWa Ka\ AvyoSeapav ttjv aiiTrjv, on iv 6dpvu> Xu-ycoi" evpedrj^ nepKiXridflaa
8e f] \vyos fTTOiTjae to liyaKpa 6p66v.
" Artemis âKiXim at Syracuse : Prob. Verg. Eel. p. 3 (ed. Keil)

Orestes . . .somnio admonitus simulacrum Deae quod
iuxta Syracusas
secum de Taurica advexerat, templo posito consecravit, quam appel-
lavit Facelitim, sive quod fasce lignorum tectum de Taurica simulacrum
extulisset.
"* At Boiae in Laconia : Paus. 3. 22, 12 to 8(u8pov en eKfivrjv
crej3ov(Ti ttjv pvpcnvrjv Ka\ "Aprfpiv ovopdôvai â>Teipav.
'^
Artemis ^fpibia (?) at Teuthea in Achaea : Strabo, 342 oirov t6 ttjs
NfjuuSi'ay Apre/ntSo? Upov.
" Artemis 'YaKivdoTp6(f)os at Cnidus : CoUitz,. Dialect. Inscn/len. No.

3502 Aprdpin YaKiv6orp6(f)a> koi 'ETrtcâcfi, as koi avras Upevs vndp)(ei dia
^lov.
^* Artemis 'Elpwopri near Phigaleia : Paus, 8. 41, 4 ean t^? Evpwoprjs

TO lept'w, ayiov Te iK TraXaiou koi vtvo Tpa^VTTjTos tov ;(a)piou BvaTrpoaodof wepl
avTo Kai KVTidpioTTOi iTe<l)VKacn ttoXXqi t Kai dXX;Xoir crvvex^f'n' ttjv pev 'Evpvvoprjv
6 pep Twv ^lyaXeMV drjpos eniKXrjaiu eiuai Tienla-TevKev Aprepidns. oaoi de
avTwv 7rapei\r](paaiv vTropvi]paTa dp)(a'ia OvyaTepa ^Keavov cpacriv eivai Ttjv
F.vpvvoprjv . . . rjpepa 8e ttj avTrj kotu eTos eKaarov to iepov avoiyvvovai ttjs
'Evpvvupiji' TOV Be akXov ^povov ov crcpiaiv dvoiyvvvni KadeaT-qKev. TrjViKaxna
oe Kai ovaias Srjpoaia Te Kai iStwrai diiovo'iv . . , tu>v ^tyaX/cof Se rJKOvcra wf

Xpvaal Te to ôavov avvdeovaii' oKvaen Ka\ eiKav yvvaiKOi to. n)(pt tuiv yXourcoi',
TO duo TtWTov he etTTiv Ix^vs. Cf. Athenae. p. 325 c 'Hyt]aap8pos 8' 6
AeX06y TpiyXrjv napacpepeadaL (^({)r](TiJ ev to'is dpTepiaiois.
'^
? Artemis ^rjoa-aoos : Ap. Rhod. I. 569 rolo-t 8e (poppiâu evdrjpovi
peXnev 00187 Oidypoio Trd'is vrjoaaoov eviraTepeiav ''Aprepiv, 7] Keivas (TKouLas
aXos ap<puTre(TKev 'Pvopeur] Ka\ ya'iav 'IwXki'So.
'
Artemis Einopia: Hesych. S.V.''ApTepis ev 'P68a>.
''
Artemis 'EKâTtjpia : Hes\ch. S. v. ÊKâTtjpias' "ApTepis ev Si'^fu.
" Artemis Alyivaia at Sparta: Paus. 3. 14, 2 Beuiv be lepd lloa-eibmvds
eaTiv InnoKovpiov Ka\ 'ApTepiSos Alyivaias. Cf. PauS. I. 38, 6 'EXevaivi'its

REFERENCES FOR CHAPTERS XIII -XIX. 561
. . . iari . . , UpOTTvXaias AprefjiiBos koI YlocreiSatvos narpos. Cf. ArtemiS

Evpimra '^^
and ^*. At Calauria worship of Artemis (?) connected with
Poseidon: Rang. Anf. Hell. 821 b.
Titles of the goddess of the wilds.
" Artemis Aacjipla^ at Patrae : Pans. 7. 18, 8 Uarpfva-i Be iv uKpa rfj
TToXet Aa(f>pias hpov ecrriv 'Aprt/iiSos' êviKov pep rfj 6ea to ovopa, ea-rjypevov 8e
irepaidev koi to uyftXpa. KaXuSwros Koi AirwXi'af Trjs aWr]s vno AvyovaTov tov
(SaciKecos epr]p(o6eiaris, ovto) to ayaXpa Trjs Aa(ppias oi TlaTpels ecr)(ov , . . to
pev (T\ripa tov dyoXparos 6r]pfvov(Tu e'crrt, e\e<pavTos de Koi xpvarov 7re7roiT]Tai,
NavniiKTioi Se Mevaixpos koL 2otSa? elpydcravTO , . .' Ayovcri 8e kol Ad(ppia

eopTt)ii Tt} ApTepiSi dva ttuv eTOS, ev j) Tponos emx'^Pôs dvaias ecrTiv avTo'is . . .
npaira pev 8r] Tropnrjv peyakonpeTvecTTdTi-jv ttj 'Apre/xiSi nopnevovffi,, Koi r] Upcoptvrj
Ttdpdepos o^dTai TfXevTaia ttjs 7ro/i7rf)s eVl eXdcPcov vno to appa eêvypeucov . . .
ea^dXKovcn ^SiPTas es tov ^copov opviBds re tovs eSoodipovs Kai iepela 6/xotco?
anavra, '4ti 8e vs dyplovs Koi eXdcfiovs re Koi dopKddas, oi Se koi Xvkuv koi
apKTcau (TKvpvovs, ol fie (cat to. TeXeia tq}V Grjpiav. KaTaTideacri fie eVl tov jScopov
Koi bevhpoiv Kapnov Ta>u fjpepoiv. to. fie drro tovtov TTvp evidcriv is to. ^vXa.
^ In Messenia at Ithome : Pans. 4. 31, 7 Anpo(})uivTOi fie' eWt tovtov
Kill T) Aa(f)p'iu KaXovpeur] irapa Mfifar]vioLi . . . KaXvBaiVLOis r] Aprepis, Tavrrjv
yap 6fov paKiaTa eaejSov, eniKXrjaiv ei;ê Aaf^pln, Meaa-rjpioov be ol XaôvTes
NavTroKTOj/ . . . irnpa KaXuficoiîcof eXaôv.
c Artemis in Cephallenia, ^^' e.

Cf. Heracleides, Miiller, Frag.
Hist. Graec. 2. p. 217, frag. 17.
d The month Aa0ptoy in Phocis and Doris: Le Bas, Bocotie 920.
6 Suidas, p. 702 B, .y. V.âQela' j:ia6vTrXovTov eivai Trjv Aacfipiav " Aprepiv.
^"
Artemis Kmrpocpdyos : Hesych. S. v. "Aprepn ev 2dpa. Cf. Hom.
Od. 6. 104 Tepnopevrj Kunpoiai Kai wKelrji eXdcfiOLui.
^^
Sacrifice at Syracuse : Theocr. 2. 66:
^vB" d Ta>v(3ovXoLo Kavt](j)6pos (ippiv AvaÛ)
aXaos es Aprtpibos, to. fir) roKa TToXXd pev liXXa
Brjpia TTopTTeCeaKe nepia-Tadov ev fie Xeaiva.
^^
Artemis AvKela at Troezen: Paus. 2. 31, 4 TrX-qaiov fie tov Bedrpov
AvKft'ay vaov ÂpTepiboi enoirjcrev 'iTnroXvTos. Cf. Avkootis at LyCOa in
Arcadia : Paus, 8. 36, 7 'A.pTepi8os Upov Km ciyaXpd iaTi x'^Xkovv
AvKoaTiBos.
^^ Artemis 'EXa0tat'a in Elis, vide* : Pind. 01. 3. 51 :
^pvcroKeptMiv eXa(ôi' 6r]Xeiav . , . av noTe Taijyera

dvTidela 'OpBaicrla eypa'êv Ipdv.
^^^ Artemis 'EXa0j/3dXos in Pamphylia: Bull, de Corr. Hell. 1883,

VOL. 11. L
562 GREEK RELIGION.
p. 263, inscription of early Roman period from Attalia, published
by Ramsay, Upiu 8ia îov . . . 6fas 'ApTf'niSos 'EXa^;/3oXov.
^ The month 'EAa0f;,'3oXic;)i' in Atlica and lasos : C.I. Cr. 2675 b,
2677 b : in Apollonia in the Chalcidic peninsula, Athenae. p. 334 E.

c 'EXa(/)T?/3oX(a at Athens and Phocis : Athenae. p. 646 E "EXaôs*
TrXaKOVs 6 rols e\n(f)r]ô\inii dvaTrXaaaonevns 8ui (TTaiTos kcu peXiTos Kai
(rrjadjxov : Et. ISIog. S. V , 'E\a(f)r]l3o\icov' /xr/i/ 'A6i]vaiu>v' otto toiv eXd(po>v
covoparrrac ai tw firivl iOvovro rfj eXnCprjISoha 'AprefjiiSi. At HyampoHs in

Phocis : Plot, de mid. virl. 244 E ioprrju (K naa-cov fiey'i(TTr]v Til 'EXacprjlBoXia
pexpi vvi> rfj Âprepidi rrjs viKrjs eKflurjs iv 'YapnoXiSi TfXovcrLV (in honOUr of
a victory over the Thessalians).
^ Strabo, 215, among the Heneti, fiw "tXcrri to pev"Upas'Apy(ias t6

8 ApTfp.i8os AiVwXiSoy, TvpocrpvBevovai 6', cos (Ikos, to (v toZs aXcrecn tovtois
rjpfpovadai tci drjpia Ko) Xvkois eXd(povs crvvayeXd^cTBai.
e Near Colophon, a small island sacred to Artemis : Strabo, 643

eis o diavT]xopfvai Tas eXdcpovs TiKTfiv.
^^ Artemis 'oîri^yia (f cult-title) : Soph. Track. 212 :
ôciTe Tav opoanopov

ApTfpiu OpTvy'iav, i\a(})aj36Xov, dp(î-nvpov,
yfiTovai Se Ni'/M(â9.
Tac. 3.61 primi omnium Ephesii adiere memorantes

A//fi. esse apud . . .
se .lucum Ortygium, ubi Latonam partu gravidam

. . edidisse ea . . .
numina; deorumque monitu sacratum nemus. Cf. Strabo, 639.

Schol. Ap. Rhod. I. 419 $aioSiKos eV To7s ArfXiaKols IcTTopriKep kcu NiVai/Spo?
fV y Ah coXiKwv . . . eK rJ;? iv AlrcoXia 'OpTvylas KXrjdiivai Trjv AijXoi^ 'Oprvyiav.
Athenae. p. 392 D âv68r]pos iv BevTepo) 'Atî'So? CJ)t](Tlv , . . ArjXov Tr]u
fTJcrov Ti)v VTTO To)v dp-)(aLa>v KoXovpivrjv 'OpTvyiav. Cf. *.
"^
Artemis 'Aypor/pa : Hom. //. 21. 470 noTVia dr]p(ov "Aprepis
dypoTeprj.
^ At Aegira : PaUS. 7. 26, 3 'YTrfprjatels Se riy re TrdXet to ovopa to vvv
pfTedevTO ano tcov alywv, Koi KadoTi nvToiv rj KiiXXiarr} Koi rjyvvpei'r] tcov dXXoyv
coKXacrei', ApTfpibos AypoTepas inouja-avTo lepou . . . *ApTipL86s re vaos Koi
liyaXpa tî>7]s r?]y i<p t'jpcoV lepaTai 8e napdevos, '4(Jt av is &pav d4)l.Kr]Tai
ynpov.
" In Lacedaemon : Xen. Hell. 4. 2, 20 a-cfjayiaadpevoi ol AaKeSaipovioi.
TJi AypoTepa, coanfp vopiêToi, ttjv p^t'/xaipai', rjyovvTo in\ tuvs ivavTiovs.
^ At Megara : PaUS. I. 41, 3 ÂXKdBow tw niXonos . . . hpov TJOLrja-ai
TovTo, AypoTipov ApTepiv Kai AjToXXcova Aypaiov inovopdcravTa.

'^
At IMegalopolis : PaUS. 8. 32, 4 'A-ypore/ja? vao^ 'AprfjutSof ava6r]â
Apt(rTo8rjfiov.
At Olympia : PaUS. 5- I5' ^ npvraveiov Se TTpo /xeV Tuv dvpav /Sco/xos
idTiv 'AprepiBos Ayporepas.
^ At Agrae in Attica: Paus. i. 19, 6 8ia(3d(n be tov ElXia-aov x<^pôv
Aypai KoXovpevcv Kcn vaos dyporepas earlv 'ApTepi8os. euravOa" Aprepiv npuiTOV
Brjpivcrai \tyova-iv fXdoiia-av tK Ai]\ov. Bekker's Anecdo/a, p. 326. 28 Kal
'Aprepibos Ka\ 'Aypaias aorodt to Upov. Schol. Arist. Eq. 657 t[] 'Aypo-
repa' rfj AprepiSi' Idtcos yap ol 'Adrjvnioi aelBovcrt, Kn\ ripcoai rrjv ^ Ayporipav
"Aprepiv. Ael. Var. Hist. 2. 25 Uepaai 8e TjTTrjdrjaav rfj rjpepa ravTr] {rfj
eKTTjTov QapyrfKioovosy koL 'Adrjvaloi e rfj 'Ayporepq dnodvovai ras )(ipai.pa^ ras
rpiaKoaias, Kara tj]V ev)(r]v tov MfXrtaSov SpavTes tovto. Cf. Xen. Anab. 3.
2, 12. Plut. de 7)ialign. Herod. 862 A Tip> 7Tp6s"Aypas nopirrjv, rjviripirovaiv
(Ti vvv TTj 'EKaTT] âpiCTTijpia ttjs vlki]s eopTaôvTfs. PoUux, 8. 91 6 ?)
TToXepapxos dvfi fiev 'Apreptdi 'AypoTipa kol tw 'EvvaXico. C I. A. 2. 467

ervfibfj ol f(prif3oi , . . fTTupnevadv re ti] 'ApTfpi8i Trj ' Ayporipa iv onXoii :
beginning of first century b. c.
e At Artamition in Euboea : A////, d. deut. Tnst. Ath. 1883, p. 202

Uvppix;] n'5X[w or 0)1'] llapdevov 'Ayporepav : mutilated inscription ? third
century b. c.
^ In Pontos : C.I. Gr. 21 17, inscription found near Phanagoria,

fourth century B. C, AtvoKKeldrjs Uoaios dvedrjKe TOV vahv ApTepidi 'AypoTepa
apxovTos JJaipiadbovs tov AevKcovos ôanopov.
i Artemis UoMypa in Laconia: Clem. Alex. Protrept. 32 P eori 8e

Kai Tlohdypas oKXrjs Apre/xtSos iv Trj AaK<ovLKr] lepov, as (f)r]cn Swo-i'/Stof.
^ Xenoph. Ven, 5- 14 Ta pev ovv Xlav veoyvd (twu Xayt'coi') ol (piXoKVVr]-
yeVat u(f)i.d(Ti ttj 6e(a I'ApTfpidi).
J
Worshipped as huntress at Epidaurus : Paus. 2. 29, i vao\ iv Tfj
TToXfi K(u /^loi'vaov Kcu ApTepi86s icTTiv aXXos' elKc'icTais av drjpevovcrr] ttjv
"Aprtpiv.
T^ At Pellene Paus. irX-qaiov Se tov 'AttoXXcoj/os vaos iaTiv 'Aprt-

: 7. 27,4
pibos' To^fvovoTji Se 17 deos 7rnpe;êTat a-xrjpa.
'"'
Artemis KaXXia-Tr} in the Academia near Athens: Paus. i. 29, 2
KUTiovai Se is avTrjv 7repi'/3oXos i(TTiv ApTepi8os Koi ôava 'ApiaTtjs kol KaX-
XicTTrjs' u>s pfv iyo) Sokco koi SpoXoyei tu i'm] to '2aTr(f)ovs, Tijs ' ApTtpihos elcriv
iniKXrjafis avTai. Near Tricoloni in Arcadia: Paus. 8. 35, 8 Ta(p6s ian

KaXXi(TTOvs, X'^y-^ y^^ vyj/rjXov, . . , eVi Se iiKpai tm ;^&)/iart Upov itjTiv
Apr/piSos enUXrjcnv KaXXicrTrjs' toKflv be pot kolX Ildpcf)a>s padaiv ti napa

ÂpKabcov TrpcoTos "Aprepii' iv toIs iTTfcriv uivopaae KaXXicrTrjv. Artsmis
L 2
564 GREEK RELIGION.
KaWlcfTT] in Syria: C. I. Gr. 4445, sepulchral dedication, 'Apr^VtSt
^^ Cf. Artemis 'Sipala, inscription found in the Peiraeeus, 'Upav

'ApTCfxidi 'Q,paiai: Eph. Arch. 1884, p. 69.
^^ Artemis KaXXjo-rw: Apollod. 3. 8, 2 EvfiriXos Se fcat T'e9 eVf/Jot Xeyovcri
Avfcaon (cat dvyarepa KaXXicrrw yeviaOai' avrr] avvdrjpos 'ApT(pi8os ovaa ttjv
avriju eKtivr] oToXiji/ (fiopovcra. Istros apud Steph. Byz. S. v. 'Ap/caSt'n :
Icrrpos 8e (prjcri on QeptaTovi Koi Aioj 6 ApKcis eyeufTo, 8ia de rrjv ttJ'S p.riTp6s
aTToor^piutaiv {^ttpKTa yap iitp "Hpas aiiTr]V Spoiaadrjuai) ravrrjs rv^êlu Trjs
npoarjyopias. Hygin. As/ron. 2. i Ariethus autem Tegeates historiarum

scriptor non Callisto sed Megisto dicit appellatam.
^^ Artemis Mowvxia :
a in the Peiraeeus: Paus. i. i, 4 6 ph eVl
Movvv;(ia Xiprjv koi Movvvx^s vaus ^
AprepiSos. Plut. De glor . Atheiliens.
p. 349 Tr]v hi iKry]v em S//ca rov Movvvxicovos 'Aprepibi Kadiepaxrav, iv fj
tols
EXXr;crt ntpl 'EaXapuva vikoxti ineXapyj/'ev fj Qfos TTavareXrjpos. Cf. Pollux, 6.
75 fip4"''t'^^'''^^> ^^ f<pepov els Movvvxâs ÂprepiSos, 8a8as Tjppevas TTtpiirr}-
^nvTfs.
^ At Pygela near Ephesus : Strabo, 639 Upov exov 'Aprepibos Mov-

vvxlas.
^ In CyzicUS : C. I. Gr. 3657 npoLepcDpeurjv 'Apre'/LiiSos Movvvxias.
d In Placia near Cyzicus : Jl/i//. d. d. Inst. Ath. 1882, 155 Upwpevrjv

MrjTpos nXaKiavrjs . . . Kal ÂprepiSos Movpvxias '.
? first Century B.C.
*' Mapaddvos
Artemis Bpavpavla: Paus. I. 33, I 8e dnexfi rf] piv
Bpavpcov tv6a Icpiyevtiav . , . (k Tavpcov (pevyovaav to ciyaXpa dyopevrjv to
ApTpi8os aTro^rjvai Xeyoviri, KaTaXnrovcrav 8e to tiyaXpa TavTrj koi is 'A6i)vas

Kal v(TTfpov is' Apyns d(fiiKa6aL' ôavov piv 81) Ka\ avTodi icTTW ApTepiSos
apxalov. Id. I. 23, 'J,
Oil the AcropoHs, 'A/jre'/xtSos Upov iari Bpavpavias
UpaîTeXovs pev t^x^^ to (iyaXpa, tji Beui fie idTiv uno Bpavpavos 8j)pov to
ovop.a. Id. 3. 16, 8 TO -yap ex Bpavpojvos (îiyaXpa) iKopicrdrj n is '2ovaa
Koi vaTfpov '2fXfvKov 86vtos Si'pot AaoStKeTs icf)" j]pa>v ^xovai. Strabo
399 BpavpoiV OTTOV TO Trjs Bpavpatvlas ÂpTfpi8os lepov, 'aXoI Apa(pr)vi8s,
onov TO Tjjs TavpoTToXov. Diphilos 'EXevr](popovvTs : Athenae. p. 223 A

S) To/'S' iTroTTTfiovrra Ka\ KeKTTjpivr] Bpavpu>vos Upov 6(o(fiiXicrTaTov tottov
Atjtovs Aios Te To^68api'e Ylapdivf. C. I. Gr. 150 a, b.
Ritual of the Brauronian worship.

^ Arist. Lysistr. 645 <aT ('xovaa TOf KpoKcorov apKTOs T) Bpavpcdviois,
Schol. id. "iXpKTOv pipovpevai to pva-Trjpinv iêriXovv. ai opKTfvopevaL fie ttj
5ec5 KpoKdJTov rjp(f)ivvvvTo Ka\ (Tvi/fTeXovv T7]i> 6v(rlav tj] Bpavpatvia 'ApTepi.81
KOI Trj Movjwx'O, imXcyopevai TvapBivoi, oiVe Trpea^cvTtpai fie'/ca eVcoi' ovt
eXarrous nevre' infTfXovu 8e rrjv Ova'iuv al Kopai fKfifi\i<T(T6[j.vai ti]v 6e6v,
(T!ei8ri Xi/XM TTfpnrenTWKaaiv oi 'Adtjvalot apKTOV fjixepav dvrjprjKores rrj 6ea' oi
fie TCI Trepl Ttjv Icpiye'vftav iv Bpuvpcivi (paaiv, ovk iv AvXldi. Ev(f)opia)V
''
'ApîaXov Bpavpwva KevTjpiov 'l(f)iyfveias. Koi apKTOv dvr avTjjs, ovk eXacpov,
(povevdrjuM . , . (8rjXo)6evros 8e tov ^prjafiov Tois 'Adtjvuiois i'^rjcp'icravTo prj
TTpoTfpov crvpoiKiâ6ai duSpl napOeuov, d p.f] dpKrevaeifu rrj deo) R). Cf. Suidas,
S.V. apKTOS. Hesych. S.Z-. Bpavpaviois' Trjv 'lXui8a fi8ov pa\JAa>8oi iv Bpavpaivi
T^S ArTiKrjs. Bpavpoivia eoprr}' 'AprepiSi Bpavpaivia ayerac Koi 6ueTai ai^,
Hesych. S.V.''ApKos . . . Ka\ to â>ov Koi fj Upeia Trjs 'Apre'/LitSof. HarpOCr.

S.V, dpKTevam' to Kadiepcodqvai npo ydpcov Tas irapdivovs Ttj 'Apre'piSi Trj
'Movvvîa 1] Trj Bpavpcovia. Eustath. //. p. 33 1. 26 i8pvaaTo yap . . .
Movvv)(iai 'ApTe'/itSos Upof' apKTov 8e yevoptvTjs iv airw Kai vn Adrjvaicov
dvaip(6('i<Trj<s, Xoipos eVeyeVero, ov dnaXXayrju 6 6e6s i)(pr](rpw8ri(TeVj e'l Tis tt]v
Qvyaripa Bvaei Trj 'ApTeptSi . . . "Efifiapos . . . tiaKoaprjcras Tr)v dvyarepa,

avTTjv p.iv dneKpvyJMv iv T<a dSvTa, alya 8e iaBrJTi, Koapfjcras as ttjv Svyaripa
Wvaev. Cf. Bekker's A need. p. 444 Avcrias t6 Kadiepudrjvai npb ydpoav Tas
7rap6evovs Trj ApTepi8i dpKTivdv iXeye . . . fls Tty av^p . . , x<ov aiya Kai
ovopd^wv TavTrjv QvyaTspa idvcre Xddpa. lb. 2o6 rf; 'ApTepiSi K<gt Trj apKTOi
dcjiocnaxraaBai Ka\ dvcraij ontp inolovv irpo tcov ydpcov ai Kopai. Et. Mag.
p. 747- 5^5 S.V. TavpoTToXoy. ot Se Xeyoucrti' on Tuiv EXXr^ccoi' (BovXopevwv
dvfXflv Tr]V ÎcpiyiVfiav iv AvXi8i rj "ApTfpis dvTf8a)Kev eXacfiov' KaTa 8f
'Pav68rjpov upKTOV KaTO. 8e T>iiKav8pov, Tavpov' 816 Ka\ tt)v oeov oii TavpoTToXov
dXXci Tavpo(j)dyov a>v6pa(Tav. Schol. Hom. //. I. 594 îXoxppos (fyrjai.
HeXaayoiis . . . ind irXeva-avTfs ey Bpavpu)va Kavrjcpopovs irapOfvovs rfpnaa-av.

^'^^. 8k Kai erepovs 8eKa (^lepoTroiovs) 01
Cf. Arist. A//l. Polit. C. 54 KXr\po~i
. . . Tas 7r(VTeTi]pi8us andcras 8ioikov(ti TrXrjv IlavaBrjvuLcov. eia^l Se rrevTeTrjpidfs
. . . 8fVTepa 8i Bpnvpuvia. Deinarch. in Aristog. p. 106 ly lipua r^y

'ApTfpi8os TTJs Bpavpoovias. Eur. Ip/i. Taur. 1450:
\o)p6s Ti'y i(TTiv Ât6i8os npos iaxûTois
opoLcri, ye'iTOiv 8eipd8os KapvcxTias,
lepos, 'AXds viv oiipos ovofid^fi Xtas'
ivTavda revây vaov iSpvcrai /Sperny,

irruivvpov yijs TavpiKrjs ttovcov t( (Tcov,
ApTfpiv 8i viv ^poTol

TO XoiTTOv vpvi](Tovai TavpoTToXov dfdv.
vopov 8i 6ei t6v8 '
oTav iopTa^t) Xecoy
Trji arjs acpayrjs I'tTTOiv', f7rtcr;êVa) ^((ôy
8ipr] npos av8p6s, aipd r eâvieray
Srriai cKaTi, 6fd 6 ottods Tipds eXJi-
at S' ap(p\ (Tfpvds, I<pi,yeveia, KXlpaKas

Bpavp(i)vias Set r^trSf KXetSoi^pêii/ dtds.
566 GREEK RELIGION.
ov Ka\ Teda'^fi KUTBavovaa, Koi ntn'Kav
(iyakfiu (joi Orjaovcriv evTn]vovs v(pds,
as ai> yvvalKes (V tokois ylrvôppayels
Cf. Callim. Dian. 173.

^^ ? Artemis Bpaupcoriy AWoTTia at Amphipolis: A/t/Ii. Pal. 7. 705 :
AjLK^tTToXt,
AoiTTci Toi Ai6oTTirjs Bpavpcovlbos i)(via vrjov
p!fj,v(i
"Aprepis BpavpMvla at Laodicea ad mare, ^^

: cf. Athena ' ^ : C. I. Or.
4470, 4471 17 Kvpia" Aprepii (Roman period).
^* "Aprepis 'l^tyeVf ta in Hermione : Pans. 2.35, I 'Aprepidos in'iKkrjaiv

'icpiyfveias earXv Upov Kai Yloaahuiv xoKkovs tov erepov TroSa e^^coj/ en\ 8f\<plvos.
HeS}'ch. S. V. 'l(j)iyeveia' 7] "Aprefxis.
^^ Human sacrifices to Artemis, vide ^^

: Clem. Alex. Protrept. P.
36 Tavpot TO eOvos, ol nfp\ Tt)v TavpiKriv x^ppovqaov KaroiKovvTes, ovs av
TU)V êv(i)v nap avrois e\ai(ri , . , avriKa paXa Trj TavpiKfj Karadvovcriv 'ApTtpidi.
lb. (citation of doubtful authenticity, vide Hiller in Hertnes 21. p. 127)

Yiv6oid^T]s iv TpiTto TvepX opovoias (^taiKads) ttj TavponoXco 'AprefiiSi I'lvOpoiTrov
okoKae'iu laropel. Cf. ScymnUS ChiuS, Perieg. 861 (oI lavpoi) IXaa-Kopevoi
ra dila Tols dcrtfit'jpaaiv, Paus. 7- 19; I~6 'iwfav toIs Âporju Ka\" AvBtiav kcu
MecraTii/ oiKovaiv rjv iv koiv^ Tspivos Kai vaos Aprepiôs TpiKXaplas eniKkijaiu,
Kai iOprr]v ol ' loaves avT>j ku\ TTUVvv\ida rjyou dva ixdv eros' lepcocrvvqv Se fl)(ê
TTJs 6fov napdevos, eV o dnoaTeWecrOai napa av8pa epeWe . . . ^'Xeyêv fj Uvdia

MeXdvimrov Kai Kopaidu)' Ka\ eKeivovs Te avrovs pdvrevpa dcpLKeTo dvaai rij
'Aprepidi, Koi dva nav eros TrapBevov ku\ iraiba, ol to eibos eiev KdWiaroi rf]
Beo) Bveiv' Tavrrjs pev S17 Trjs dvcrias eveKa 6 TTorapus 6 npos tco iepio Trjs
TpiKXapias aptiXixos eKXrjdr] . . . TvavaacrOai 8e ovtco Xeyovrai Bvovres Trj 'ApTe-

pi8i uv6pa)TTovs : the sacrifice connected with the worship of Dionysos
Ala-vpvrjTTqs. Tatian, Ad Graec. Schwartz, p. 30. i AaTidpmv Aia . . . to7s
OTTO Tuiv dvhpoKTaaiSiv aipaai Tepnopevov' "ApTepiv Se ov paKpav fie r?]s
M(yakr)s iroXeas tcov avTav Trpdêcov eTravrjprjpfvrjp to elBos. At Tegea : Paus.

8. 53, I eV TOV Ayviems ttj eoprtj ... 17 T}y 'ApTepidos lepeia StcoKfi Tivd.
Titles referring to the goddess of women and childbirth.
^^ Artemis napBevos at Paros : Roehl, I/iscr. Grace. Ani. 401,

poetical title. Artem. Oneirocr. 4. 4 ha'ipa 'iho^tv ds t6 ti]s 'Aprffiidos
lepuv daeXrjXvBfvat. KareXva-e ti)v eraipelaV ovSe yap els to Upov Trporepov
(laiXBoL av, e ^17 KaTaXva-fie tjjv tTaipeiav. Cf. PaUS. 3. 1 8, 4 Âprepidos
Tols Kpr](j\v Upov . . . TTapBevov Tr]v Upevopevrjv. Vide ', '^^
^, ^^, ^^*, ^^^ ^.
REFERENCES FOR CHAPTERS XIU-XIX. 567
^"
A goddess Uapdevos in the Tauric Chersonese: Herod. 4. 103
Bvovcri jiiv (Tav/joi) t[] napdevco tovs re vavrjyovs Kui tovs av Xd^co(nv'EX\T]VQ)v
(Trava)(^6(VTas . . . ttjv he haifiova Tavr-qv rfj Ovovcri Xeyovcnv avTu\ Tavpoi
I(j)iyiueuiv. Cf. Strabo, 308 uKpa fxeydXtj pepos ovcra r^j oT^rjs xeppovriaov . . ,
(V fi
TO Trjs UapOevov lepov, Sat/jLOvos vivos, i^s eiToiVvpos Kal n cixpa f) npo rrjs
TToXecof eariu , . , KaXovfjLfvr] Uapdeviov f^'"' ''f'"" T'/S' 8a//noi/oy Koi ôavov. In-
scription from the Tauric Chersonese, containing the formula of the oath
taken by magistrates : Revue des e'tudes Grecques, 1891, p. 388 opvvo) Alu
Tdv "AXiov Ilap6ivov Beoin 'OXu/littiouj kol 'OXvpTrias. Cf. Dittcnberg. S}'//.
252. Uapdevos at NeapoHs in Thrace: Schone, Griechische Reliefs,
No. 48. In Caria : Diod. Sic. 5. 62 rqv plv ovopaôpkvr\v najiBemu iv By-
âa-TM TTJg XppovT](Tov Ti/Ltas e'xdv kcu Tep-fvos. Cf. Athenae. p. 655 B KXvtos
8e 6 MiXrjaios, 'ApicrToreXovs 8e padrjrrjs, iv ra Trpwrw TT(p\ Mikr]criu>v ypa<pfi . . .
TTfpl 8e TO Upov Tijs IlapOevov iv Aipa elaiv ol KaXovpevoi opvides peXtaypides :
the goddess of Leros identified with Artemis, Aelian, I/tsf. An. 4. 42,
Strabo, 637 (^dpos) eKaXdro YlapBevia oIkovi^tcov Kapav.
^^ Artemis Kopla at Lousoi in Arcadia : Callim. in Di'an. 234 ^ piu toi

Ilpotroj ye bva iKadeicraro vrjovs' '
AXXov ixev Kopirjs, on oi crvveXeâo Kovpas
Ovpea nXaôpevas A^rjvia, tov 6 eVt Aovcrois Hpepr) ovveKa dvpbv cm' aypiov
eLXto TTaihoiv. Polyb. 4. 1 8, lO Tvporjyov (01 AiVcoXoi) ws iiri Aovacov' koi
Tvapayevopevoi TTpos to tiJs 'Apre/xiSoy lepov, o Kelrai pev pera^v KXeiTopos koi
Kvvaidrji, licrvXov 8e vevopiarai napa tols "EXXtjcriv, dveTelvovTO biapTrdcreiv to.
BpeppoTa TT]s 6eov. Hesych. S. V. uKpovxel . . , AKpni, opos ttJs 'Apyeias,
e(f) oil ApTepihos lepov IdpvaaTo MeXdpnovs, Kaddpas tus TlpoLTiSas. Paus. 8,
18, 8 Tas Se dvyoTepas tov JJpoiTOV Karrjyayev 6 MeXdpnovs is tovs Aovaovs

Koi rjKeaaro ttjs pavlas iv ApTepidos lepto' Kal an' iKeivov ti)v "ApTfpiv Tavvrjv
Hpepaaiav KaXovaiv ol KXeiTopioi.
^^ Schol. Theocr. 2.66 el6)6acn ydp Tjj 'ApTepi8i Kavi](popovv al peXXovcrai
yape'iadai, eVi d<po(naicrei Ttjs napdevias, iva prj vepecrrjOcocnv vri avTijs . , . Kal
Tvapa MevdvBpco' al KvlcTKOVffai iniKaXeiade ttjv' ApTepiv, dîovaBai avyyvMprjs,
OTi dieKopTjBrjTe.
^ Artemis Aoxeia, Anxia, Aexa : Plut. Quaes/. Symp. p, 659 A oQev

oipai Kol TTjv' Aprepiv Xoxetav Kal EiXeidviav, ovk ovaav eTepav tj ttjv SeXrjvrjv
onvopdadai, Eur. Supp. 958 ovS' ''Aprepis Aoxia TrpocrcpdiyâiT av Tas

oTeKvovs. Aoxeia in Phthiotis : C. /. Gr. 1768 'ApTepibi Aoxeia, private
dedication. In Pergamon : C. I. Gr. 3562, public inscription from
Gambreium in Pergamene territory, dvaypdâi Tovhe tov vdpov els dvo
aTTjXas Kal dvadelvai ttjv pev , , , ttjv 8e npo tov veco Ttjs 'ApTepiSos ttjs Xoxlas.
" 3, Artemis ElXeldvia, vide "*, at Chaeronea: C.I. Gr. 1596 'Apro'/xiSi
ElXeidvia (fourth cenlury e.g.).

568 GREEK RELIGION.
''
At Lebadea : C. I. Gr. 1598 'Aprinitriv irpdais xop'crTijpioi' (Roman
period).
c In Thisbe : Iû/I. de Corr. Hell. 1884, p. 402 UaaiKpiTa Aconvpav
'AprdpiSi ElXfidfij] lapav tlptv (act of enfranchisement in the name of
Artemis).
^ Orchomenos: Mi/t. d. d. Inst. Ath. 1882, p. 357 'ApTdfii8i ElXeLBvlrj
(dedication third century b.c).

e Thespiae : td. 1880, p. 129 rrjv Bvyarepa îK'nvnT]v ApTtpihi ElXfidvia
'
{? second century b.c).

f Tanagra : 'aStjv. 4. 294, No. 6 'AdaviKKda "ip.vco 'Aprapih ElXfidvir],
(? pre-Roman period).
g ? In Euboea Artemis : BoXoala = ElXeidvia: Procop. Jêll. Golh. 4. 22,
inscription at Geraestum, Tvwixo^ enoUi 'Apre'/xtSt BoXnaia- ovtw yap TTjv
ElXfi6viav iv Tols avco xpovois fKoXovv.
^^ Artemis 2oco8iVa at Chaeronea : C. I. Gr. 1595 'Atto'AXcoi'oj
Aa(pva(j)opioi 'Aprdpibos SowSiVaj.
*^ Artemis AvalCcovos Hesych. emderov 'AprepiSos.

: s.v. Schol. Ap.
Rhod. I. 288 Avai^dn'ov 'AprepiSos lepov iv 'Adrjvats.
** Artemis Xiravt]: a at Miletus: Callim. w Dian. 235 ttoVwo -novXy-

peXaflpe noXvTTToXi, X'^^P^ XiTuivrj, MiXtjtco eniSruxe' ere yap TToirjaaro NijXevs'
'Hytpovrji', orf vj]va\i' dvrjyeTO KtKponi'jSfv,
^ At Syracuse: Staph. Byz. s.v. XitwuiT ovtws tj "Aprepis Xeyerai, KOI

Xiruivia, ws Tlappeucov 6 Bv^dvrios Kai 'Enixoppos iv 2(piyyi " koI to rds XiTavias
avXrjadTO) tIs p-ot piXos." Cf. Athenae. 629 E Tvapd 8e ^vpaKoaiois Ka\ x'toJ-
veas 'Apre'/iiSos opxw'is ris (jt\v iStos Kai avXtjais. Cf. Anth. Pal. 6. 20I :
Soi/SaXa Kai pirprjv irepiKaXXea, tov re pvponvovv
ôarpvxov copaiav ovXov dnb TrXoKdpcov,

KOI âVTjV Ka\ XfTTTOV VTr(v8vpa TOVTO x'-'''^'^fî}
KOI rd Trep\ arepvois uyXad paarobfra,

ap^poTuu fvondivos enel (piiye vrjtvos oyKov
fv(f)pai>Trj VTjco BfjKev vir' ÂprepiSos.
Cf. id. 271-273.
*^ Pollux, yap (r^ "Hpa) Tols
3. 38 TavTT] TrpoTfXfiois npovreXovv rds
Kopus Ka\ 'Apre/iiSt Ka\ Moipais. Ka\ rrjs Koprjs 8e rorf dirrjpxovTO rah Bea'i^ at
Kopai. Plut. Quaes/. Rom. p. 264 B nxivn hfioQai deau Tovs yapovvras
o'lovTai, Aios TfXflov /cat "Upas TfXelas Ka\ * A(f}podiTt]s Ka\ Ilfidovs eVt irda-i 8'
'ApTf/xtSos. Evnpaîa at Tyndaris : C. I. Gr. 5613 b npwros kcCi
Mevinnt) 'ApTepi8i Evnpaîa (? seCOnd CCUtUry B.C.). Cf. Autiali del hist.
1849, Tav. H, p. 264.
^'''
Artemis KopSaKa in Elis in the Pisatid territory: Paus. 6. 22, 1
cr7;/Meta idTiv Upov KopBaKos iniKXTjcriv 'ApTfJii8os, on oi tov IleXonos cikoXovSol
ra emviKia ijyayov napa rrj 6ea> ravrr] koi u)p)(T](TavTo (ni)(^ci>pioi> to'is nepi tov
'S.'nTvKov KopbaKa 6pxr](Tiv. Hesych. S. ZK KnXa/3is' to nepianav tu io-;(ta,
KaXaôixrBai' iv tu) ttjs AepeaTiSos (f/JW 'Aprepidos abopevoi vpvoi (? restiluen-
dum : KaXajSiSes" eu tu> k.t.\. , , . dSopevoi vfivot' KaXaôiadai, to nepicmav

Ta 'lo-x^n)- Cf. Photius, p. I 26. 1 4 KriXXo/Sififs" to Biaâivfiu da^ripovMS k(u
duXKfLi/ to. 'i.a'xia tois x^paif. PaUS. 3. 20, 'J
ev rw 'lauyerco . . . Aeptiop, iv6a
'ApT(pi8os (iyaXpa iv vTTni6p(o AepeariSo?. Cf. Steph. Byz. S.V. Aepa.

Hesych. S.V. A6p(3ai' al Tfj 'AprepiSi Bvaioiv apxovaai dno ttjs KUTa Trjv
Traidiciv (jKivris' 01 yap (pdX-qTes ovtco KoXovvrai. Av8o)V nopni] in the WOrship
of Artemis 'opdia in Sparta: Plut. Art'sL 17 tos irepl tov ôopov 4v
^ndpTrj TTXrjydi tQiv ((prj^cov Koi T7]V pera TavTa AvdeJov nopnfjv avvrfXiiadai.
^'^ ^^ '\
Artemis the goat-goddess : vide Alyivaia '* ; 'AypoTcpa ^
Bpavpcovia ^'^
C. I. A. I. 5 : archaic inscription found at Eleusis
'Aprepidi alya. In Phthiotis : Antonin. Liber. 13. 65. Krayui in Sparta:
Paus. 3. 18, 45 ''"^ ^^ *^ '''^^ Kvayiav ''ApTeplv ecTTLV ovTa> Xeyopeva.
KvaKeaTii near Tegea : Paus. 8. 53, 1 1 'Apre'fitSos KvaKeaTt86s icrn vaov
TO. ipe'mia. KvaKaXrjaiu at Kaphyae : PaUS. 8. 23, 3 Kacpvarais Se lepa
6eu)V Tlo(Ti8a)v6i eVrt Ka\ eTTiKhrjaiv KvaKoXrjalas 'Apre/ntSoy' eort fie avTols Kui
opos KviiKoXos^ V0a eneTeinv TeXeTtjv ciyovcri Tij 'Apxe/xtfii.
^^
Artemis Evplmra at Pheneos in Arcadia: Paus. 8. 14, 5 dnoXfadm
yap cnnovs tco OSvaael, kcu avTov yr)v ttjv EXXdSa Kara ^rjTrjcnv eniovTa Tav
Itntoiv ibpvcraadai p.ev Upov ivTavOa 'ApTtpiSos koi Evpimrav ovopdaai Trjv 6(ov,
(vda Trjs êi'fnTiK^s ^^P^^ fvpe Tcts Ittttovs, dvadelvai Koi tov TIoaei8u>vos to
i'iyaXpa tov 'imriov. Cf. Pind. 01. 3. 26 AaTovs 'nnronoa dvydrrjp.
Frag. 59 Tt KdXXtou dpôpevoicriv fj Karanavopeuoicnv rj âOvûivov re Aarw

Ka\ 6oav nrnu>v eXdTeipav delaai ;
Artemis, goddess of cattle.
*^ JJoXvôia : Hesych. S.V. 6f6i tis, vn ivimv pev' ApTfpi^, vno fie (iXXav,
Koprj,
^" TavponoXos :
in Attica ^l
b In Icaria near Samos Strabo, 639 eam fie Kal 'ApTepi8os Upov
:
KoXovpevov TavpoTToXiov.Clem. Alex. Protr. p. 40 P ev 'iKapco TT]s

'AprepiBos to ayaXpa ^vXov rjv ovk flpyaapivov cf. Arnob. adz), gent. :
6. II.
c In Icaria in the Persian gulf: Dionys. Perieg. 610 061 TavpoiroXoio
6(o\o ûfjiol Kvi(TT](VT(S dbfVKf'a kokvov eôvai.

570 GREEK RELIGION.
<l
At INIylasa : C.I. Gr. 2699 [6 StJ/ioj eVZ/xf/treJi/ . . . Upea TavpoTToXov.
e At Phocaea : vide supra ^^
f Pergamon : Fiankel, Insclir. voti Pergajutm, No. 13, 1. 24 'Ofiuvco
dkia Tt]V . , . 'Adqvav 'Apeiav Koi Tqv TuvponoXov.
6 Smyrna and Magnesia : Artemis TavpoiroXos, invoked in the oath

of alliance: C. I. Gr. 3137.
^ Amphipolis: Diod. Sic. 18. 4 (after the death of Alexander) rovs
te . vaovs e'dei KciracTKevaaSrivai
. , Iv *Ap(j)in6X(i Se rrjs TavponoXov. . . .
Livy, 44. 44 Amphipolim cum iam fama pugnae pervenisset, con-

c.
cursusque matronarum in templum Dianae, quam Tauropolon \ocant,

ad opem exposcendam fieret.
i
At Andros : vide Artemis Monwnents, p. 527.
k TuvpoTxoXis : Steph. Byz. S.V. noXn Kaplas.
1 Soph. Aj. 172 :
Tj pd ae TavpoTToXa Aths '

Aprepis ...
*
ioppaae navdapovs iiii jioiis (lyeAaias
Schol. lb. ravponoXos r) avTt] rij êXi'jvr) (crrl koX ino^flTai ravpois rjv Ka\
Tavpunvov ovopdôvai,
11^ TavponoXia : Hesych. S.V. a (h eopTrjv uyovaLV 'ApTtpiSi,
n Hesych. s. v. EvXaKta- "Aprepis ? from Laconian evXaKr], a plough-

share.
^^ Artemis Tavpocpdyos,^- : of. Cic. De Invent. 2. 95 apud quosdam
lex erat : ne quis Dianae vitulum immolaret.
'"
Artemis Taupw, TavpiKrj, connected with the legend of Orestes
Hesych. S. v. Tavpa- tj iv Tavpois "Aprepis : cf. ^^, ^^, ^"^.
a In Attica, ^^
^ In Lemnos : Plut. de Mid. Virt. (247 A) Tvpprjpav tcov Arjpvov kcu
IplBpov KaTaax^vToiv, dpivacrdvTaiv 8e Bpavpojvodtv rds A6i]va'iu)v yvualKas . . .
(247 E) TO ôavov Trjs 'Aprepiôs 6 Trarpcoov rjv avTois els Ar]pvov c'k Bpavpcovos
KopiaBev eK 8e AJjpvov rravTaxôv avpnepLayopevov. HarpOCr. .S". V. dpKTfiicraL'
OTi 8e al dpKTevopevai napdevoi (ipKToi KaXovvrai Evpnridrjs 'Y\j/'i7TuAr/ Apicrro-
(puvr]s Aripviais Koi Avcna-Tpdrj]. Steph. Bvz. S. V. Afjpvos . . . otto rrjs
fifydXrji Xfyopevrjs 6eov Tjv Ar^pvov (fiacn' Tavrrj 8e Ka'i irapdevovs BvedOai '.
from Hekataeus.
c In Cappadocia, ''^
^^ Artemis 'op6ia and 'Opduio-ia : Lampridius Heliogab. c. 7 Orestem

quidem ferunt non ununi simulacrum Dianae nee uno in loco posuisse,
sed multa in multis. Cf. Plut. de ]\Iid. Virt. p. 247 D-F.
a At INIegara: C. I. Gr. 1064, inscription on basis of statue of

priestess, dôixsurj Kovp-qv Ar]Twc8a flox(cupav "Aprffxiv 'Opdaxrlrjv, iroXfas TVfpi
Tii\ia TTUVTU.
^ At Byzantium: Herod. 4. 87 tjjo-l pev vvu crTi]\r]cn TavTr]cn Bvfaj/not
. . . expi]cravTo npos tov ôopov rrjs 'OpdaxTLrji 'AprepiSos.
c At Sparta: Paus. 3. 16, 7-1 1 ro x^^piov t6 inovopa(6iievov Aipvaiov

'Opdlas Upov eaTiv 'AprepiSos. to ôavov exelvo eivai Xeynvcriv o nore OpeuTt]!
Koi 'l^tyewta e'/c rrjs TavpiKris (KKhiTTTOvcnv . . , SiapepevrjKfV en Koi vvv rrjAt-
KovTo uvopa Tjj TavpiK?) 6ico wore ap<pial3r}rovcn jueV ol KamraSoKai oi tov
"Evêivov OLKovvTes to ayaXpa eivai ivapu (T(\)i(nv, dp(pi(T^riTOvai koi Avoaii' ois
faTiv'ApTepiSos Jepof 'AwimSos . . . paprvpia 6e poi. kol Td8e ttjv ev AnKeoaipuvi
*0p6iav TO (K Tcov jBapjBi'ipcotf eivai ôavov' tovto ptv yap Acrrpn/SdKoy kui
AXcoTTfKos . . , TO ayd\pa eiipovres avTiKa napetppovrjcrav' tovto oe oi AipiciTai
^TTapTiaTwv (cal Kwoaovpels koi sk Meaoas Te kul IliTdvr]s 6vovts tt) ApTepioi
fS 8ia(f)opdv, OTTO Se avTrjs Koi e? (povovs TTpor]\6r)(Tav. dnodavovTcov oe (TTI ro)
^cojuw TToWSiv voaos f(p6(ipe tovs Xoittovs' kcu crtpiaiv eVl tovtm yiverai Aoyioj/
alpaTi dvOpunrcni' tov jiodpbv aipdacrdv' Bvoptvov Se ovTiva 6 KXfjpos eTTtXappave,

AvKovpyos peTtfdaXfv e's tcis eVi toIs f<pTjl3ois pdaTiyai, epTripTTKarai oe ourcoy
dvdpcoTTcov oipaTi 6 jBcopoi, T] be Upeia to ôavov e)(0vad crcpiaiv e(pe(TTrjKf.
Plut. T/ies. 31 TTjv Koprjv iv lepa 'Apre'piboi 'Opduis xopevovaav, Philostrat.
Apoll. Vit. 6. 20 TO Tuiv paa-riyav edus Trj 'ApTepidi ttj dub iKvButv bpdrai,
XP'](Tpa>v, (paaiv, e^rjyovpevav Tavra. Plut. If!Sf. Lacon. 239 KokeiToi he D
x] dpiKXa Siapaa-Tiyoia-is' yiverai 8e Ka6' eKaaTov eTos. Sext. EmpU'. Fyrril.
Hypot. 208 Adfccoi/ey Se eVi tov ^copov Trjs 'Opdcoaias 'Apre'/xtSos paaTiCovTai.
C. I. Gr. 141 6 AapoKXet'Sas . . . veiKauns to iraidLKOi) Kt'Xrjrt, \\pTeixiTi 'OpOeia.
Id. 1444 "ApTf/Lits 'Opêia* 'AcrKXij-mbs Molpa Aaxeiêis avyKadibpvpevat avTrj.
Cauer, Delect? 34 cjilXrjTop . . . 'ApTepiTi jSwpaea dvea-qKe (cf. Hesych.

âpdia' 'Op6iii). Ih. 37 ot NeiKJjcôpou veiKdavTep . . . pwav koi Xoap Apre/xr i
îx>pBea dveOrjKav (cf. Hesych. pwo' 0)817 ôid). Alcm. Frag. 23 dp\v 'OpOia
^.
<j)dpos (pepolaais. Cf.
d In tlie Argolid on Mount Lycone : Paus. 2. 24, 5 wKo86pi]Tai Se eVl

Kopvcpji TOV opovs 'ApTepi8os 'Opdlas Upov, kul dyaknaTa AnoXXoivos Kat
ArjTovs Kai 'Apre'/itSos neTvolriTai XevKov Xi6ov. IIoXv/cAeiVou fie (paaiv elvcu
epya.
e Artemis 'OpBla in Arcadia : Hesych. s. v. 'OpBla- "Aprepis- ovrois
e'iprjTai dirb tov eV ^ ApKah'iq ^(coptoi;, ev6a lepbv ÂpTepidos tSpvTai. Schol.
Pind. OL 3. 54 'OpBooa-ia rj "ApTepis irapd to 'OpOooaiov onep ecTTiv opos
'ApKaS/as . . . TTfpt Trjs 'ApTepiSos 'ATToXXdScopoj ypd(f)(i. 'OpdaxTia Se', ort
6p6ol eh craTrjpiav, rj 6p6ol tovs yevvcopevovs. Ka\ iv 'Adtjvais 'Idpvrai, to lepbv
fie' ea-Tiv ev KepupeiKa. km Trap' 'HXetots 'Qpduxrias 'ApTepi8os iepov, &i cj^rjai
Aidvpos, Cf. ".

572 GREEK RELIGION.
f At Epidaurus: Eph. Arch. 1885, p. 195 'Aprefjubi 'Opdla Aioviaios
Kar ovap {It connected with Asclepios "Opdios as divinity of health : vide
Cavvadias, id.).
e In Elis: supra e. Cf. Paus. 5. 16, 6 b^pos 'OpOia in Elis.
t In Athens : supra .
i
At Aricia: Solin. Polyhist. p. 37) Aricia ... hoc 2. 11 (Momms.
in loco Orestes oraculo monitus simulacrum Scythicae Dianae quod de
Taurica extulerat priusquam Argos peteret consecravit. Cf. Strabo, 239
rri% 6' 'AptKivrji to lepov (jov 'ApTepiboi) Xeyovcriv a(}il5pvpd tl ri]S TavponoKov.
k Arist. Mirah. Ausc. p. 847 B eV Âprepibos 'Opdmalai ^copc^ raipov

liSTaadai )(pvcr(tov, os Kvvr)ya>v dae'Kdoi'TOiv (ûivi]v (Tva(pir]aiv.
" Offerings to Artemis as goddess of agriculture and flocks,
a Hom. //. 9. 533 :
Kai yap Toiai KaKov xpvaodpovos Aprepis wpae
XÛKTapevr]^ o o! ovre BoKvaia yovvto aXco^J
Olufvs pi^ .
^ At Samos in the worship of Artemis: Herod. 3. 48 IcrTavTis tovs
Xopovs, TpQiKTO. ar](rapov re Koi peXiroi eTTOirjaavTO vopov (pepeadai.
c At Hyampolis in Phocis : Paus. 10. 35, 7 atôvTai. de paXiarra tijv
"ApTfpiv, Kal vaoi 'Aprepidos fcmv avTois . . . Sis yap Ka\ ov TrXe'oi/ eKaarov
fviavTOv TO Upov avoLyvvvai vopiôvaiv. OTToaa S av tcov jBnaKrjpaTotv lepa
inovopauaaLv elvai tj/ 'ApTe/ii5, uvev voaov TavTa Kal nioTepa tuv I'iXXav
fKTp(pcr6ai Xeyovcri. Cf. '

.
At Scillus in Elis, temple of Ephesian Artemis, dedicated by

i
Xenophon, Anad. 5. 3, 13, with inscription, Up6s 6 x<^pos t^s 'ApTepidos-

Tov e\ovTa Ka\ Kapnovpivov ttjv pev deKarrjv KOTudveiv fKaaTov eTovs : Vide ,
sub fin. Cf. ".
Callim. in Dian, 35 ov<i hk mv fvpabfji re Kal IXaos avyda-arjai Kfivois
(V peu (ipovpa (fiepei aTd)(VVj fv 8i yeffdXrj TfTpaTTOOcov,
f Eur. Ip/i. Taur. 20 :
o,rt yap eviavTos T(koi

KiiXKiaTov rjv^ci (})Q}cr<p6poi dvcrfiv deq {Âyapepvuivj.
S Herod. 4. 33 tos Qpr]iKLas Kal Tag UaiovlBas yvva'iKas, iueav dvacn Ttj
'ApTfpidi TJj BaaiXrjirj, ovk livev TTVpaip KaXdprji 6vovaas Ta ipa,
" Artemis connected with Persephone, Demeter, Dionysos.
^ At Lycosura in Arcadia: Paus. 8. 37, i otto di 'AKOKijalov Teaaapas

(xraSiou? a-m-^d to Upou rrji Aea-noivrjs' irpSiTa fiev 8r] avTo6i 'Hyeôj/r;? vaos
fCTTLV Apre/LitSoy, Koi âXKovu (iyaK/xn i'xov fiaSas" no8a>v e^ fiVnt paXiara avTO
eiKdôp.eV iVT(v6(v be is tup Upov TTfpl(Bn\ov Trjs Aecrnoivris (<tt\v ecroSoy . . .
4 Toil dpovov (eV (L KaOiôvrai Aecrnoiva Kal rj ArjfiTjTTjp) Se eKOTtpa^dev "ApTe/xis
fifv TTapa TT]v Ar]p,}]Tpa earrjKfp apTrfx^P-ff^ teppa eXacf)ov Kal eVl toov wpcov
(pdpeTpau e'xova-a iv 8i Tols X^P""' '''fl f^^" Xap.TTfi8a e\ft, Tjj fie dpaKOpras dvo.
'
TTapa 8e ttjv ApTfp,iv KaTUKeirai kvcov^ oiai 6rjpfveiv ila\v fTTiTrjSeioi.
^ At Zoitia in Arcadia: Paus. 8. 35, 7 Ar]pr]Tpos vaos Ka\ 'ApTepiSos. At

Megalopolis: Paus. 8. 31, i, before the temple of Demeter and Kore,
eTTftpyaapevoi eVi Tvnav npo ttjs e'croSou r/; piv' \pTepis TJj 8e 'A(TK\r]m.6s (ctti
Koi Yy Uia.
c At Olympia in the Altis Paus.
: 5. 15, 4 'Apre/ntSoj 'Ayopaias â>p6s,
'^ ^.
. . . TTfTToirjTai Be Kal AeaTToivais. Cf.
d At LyCOSUra : Paus. 8. 10, 10 17 Upa rjjy KoXovp-fvrjs AeuTrotv-qs
eXa(pos.
^ Herod. 2. 156 Alax^Xos 6 Ei(f)opio)vos . . . p.ovvos Si] noii]Teo)u tu>v
TTpoyeyevrjpevaV enoiT](T yap " ApTfp,iv elvai Bvyarepa Ar)pi]Tpos. Cf. Hekate,
4 14 15
) >
f ? With Dionysos at Alagonia in West Laconia : Paus. 3. 26, 1 1 Be'as
Se avTodi ciîa Aioviktov Kal 'Apripidos earip iepd. Cf. ^^, '",. Arie?niS JMotlU-
ineiits, p. 527.
^^ Et. Mag. p. 443. 18 Qapyi]Kia' kopTX] 'A6t]V1](ti . . . QapyrjXia 8e elai
TtavTes ol cmo yijs Kupnoi' ayeTai 8e pn^vl QapyrjXiavi, ApTep,i8os Kal
AnoXXavos.
" Artemis Aldmvia : Steph. Byz. s. v. Aldomov x^P'-^^ AuSt'a? . . .
fi TvXr)(jiov Tov EiptVou, d(j) ov 17 ApTepn AlBoTTia . . . 01 de ttjv avTrju tT]
2eXrjvr] napa to a'ldeiv, as KaXXip.axos , oi Se oti rj avTif eart tJ] EKar/; i)Tis del
8d8as Karexfi w? 'EpaToa-devrjs. ? At Amphipolis, ^'^ Cf. Anacreon, Fr.

135, Hesych. Aldionels Traififi (Bergk, COrr. AldoTrlrjs TTCitSn) 'AvaKpeav.
aXXoi TOP OLPOP, (iXXoi TTjp" ApTepiP.
^^ Artemis â>a(f)6pos ^ in INIessene at the city on Ithome : Paus. 4.
31, 10 Tvx^ Te Kal''ApTepts ^(oacpopos. to. pep drj XiBov AapicpaiPTOS.
t In Munychia: Clem. Alex. Strom, p. 418 P tw QpaavôvXa

vvKTUip . . . niip etoparo Trporjyovpepop onep avrovs dnTaiaTois TrpoTre'p,yf/ap Kara ttjv
Movpvxâp eîXiirep, epda viip 6 ttjs ^coacfiopov âp.6s eari. Cf C. I. A. 2.
432 TbiP dvoTLcop a>p edvop Tvpo Tap fKKXr]aio)P . . . Kal Tij 'ApTep.i8i rf)
âxTCJiopa.
c At Byzantium : Dionys. Byz. Anapl. Fr. 27 templum Dianae Luci-

574 GREEK RELIGION.
ferae et Veneris Placidae =; "Aprf/iif <>coo-^d/jos and 'K^pohirri Ta\T]vaia.
Cf. Hesych. Miles. Constant. l6 'Apre'/xtSos (repei/oj) Trpo? to t^? QpaKyjs
d ? At Segesta : Cic. Verr. 4. 33 Fuit apud Segestanos ex aere

simulacrum Dianae, quum summa atque antiquissima praeditum
religione, turn singulari opere artificioque perfectum. ... 34 Colebatur
a civibus. . . . Erat admodum amplum et excelsum signum cum stola
varum tamen inerat in ilia magnitudine aetas atque habitus virginalis
sagittae pendebant ab humero ; sinistra manu retinebat arcum ; dextra

ardentem facem praeferebat.
e At Anticyra?: Paus. 10. 37, i Upov . . . 'Aprepibos' i'pyov twv
Upn^LTeXovs, SaSa i'xovcra rrj beîa kui vjrep tojv cofxcov (paperpaV napa Se avrrjv
Kvoov iv apKTTfpa,
^^
Artemis ^fXaa-cjiopos at Phlya: Paus. i. 31, 4 'AnoWavos Alowo-o-
SoTov Koi 'A/jTf'ptfios 'EfXaa-cpopou ^wpo'i. In Pholegandros Rev. Arch. :
1865, I. 126 eSo^f TW ^W^ a-TecjinvuxTca MeveKpuTrjv . . . rerpaKis apxîeparev-
aavra rfj 2eXaa"0o'pa) 'Apre/xiSt.
*
Artemis ? 'EeXaa-ia : Hesych. S. v. ronos TTJs AuKcouiK^s, odfu (iKos
K\>]6iivai TTjv "ApTtpiv.
"'
Artemis Uvpavia on Mount Kpaî? near Pheneos : Paus. 8. 15, 5 eV
be Tjj Kp('i0i8i TO! opei Ylvpoivias Upov (cttiv 'Apreptbos' Koi to. eVi apxaiorepa
Tvapa T^s 6eov TavTtjs ini]yovTo 'Apyelot nvp is to. Aepvaiu.
^^
Schol. TheOCr. 2. 12 ('EKarr;) Koi vvv "Aprepis KaXeirot KoL ^vXuKrj Koi
Aadovvos Koi ^(oafpopos xai X6ovia. Soph. 0. R. 2o6 :
rds T iTvp(})(')povs
'Aprepibos u'lyXas (tvv ais

AvKi bpea biacrafi.
Anthol. Pal 9. 46 :
Urjpoi iinais, rj (f)eyyos Ibelv, *] TraiSa TfKea-dai
(vâpevrj, doiris i'ppoptv eirvxii]!.
"Aprepi? (ipcfôrepOKTii' vtttjkoos, rj Tf Xo^êir;?
paid, Km, apyevvSiv (f)0}(T<pupos rj (reXacov.
*' Artemis Upomjcoa on the promontory Artemision in North Euboea:

Plut. Themist. 8 "E^ft Se vabv ov peyav 'Aprtpibos iniK\r](Tiv Upoa-qaai : lb.
ini^cription on a stele there in honour of the naval victory, aTipara tovt
edeaav TrapOeva 'Aprepiî. Mitt. d. d. A/h. Inst. I 883, p. I 9 oiSe (Trr^yyel-
\avTo Kcn elarivfyKav els ttju enavopdaicnv toD lepov t^s 'Aprepidos t7]S
npotrijoj'af.
^*
Aesch. Frag. 169 :
as ovT 7r/i0t|' HX/ov TrpocrbeiJKfTai
ovT aarepanov ofxpa Arjrcoas Kopr]s.
Plut. Quaest. Conviv. p, 658 F olpai Ka\ Tt)u"ApT(piv Aoxfiav Kill El\fl6viau,
ovK ovaav erepav rj 'SeXi'jvrjv^ uivopLaaOai.
? Artemis as death-goddess.
5 Horn. II. 21. 483:
fTTft ere \(ovTa yvvai^l
Zfiff BrjKfV, Ka\ edcoK KaTaKTap,ev iju k edeXrjcrda.
Od. 15. 409 :
dXX' ore yrjpda-KaxTi ttu\iv Kiira (pvX dv6pa)TTCov,
fXdwv upyvpoToôi 'AttoXXcoi/ 'Apre/xtSj ^vv

ots dyavo'ifri (ieXecrcriv tTroiôfievos KarTTe(jiVfv.
Strabo, 635 <ai to. XoipLKu 8e Trddr] Koi tovs avrnpaTovi davdrovs tovtols
avdnrova-i roTs deois [' AnoXXcom Kn\ 'Apre/LttSt). In Phthiotis : Anton. Libci".
13, Artemis = 'AtTTraXiff upfiXi]Trj (Kciepyr]: ôavov irapci to rrjs Apre'/itSoy
icTTrjKos . . . CO Ka6' eKacTTOv eros al napBepoi îpapov cWopov eKpi]p.va)v^
oTi Koi fj AtTTraXly nap6fvos ovcra iavTrjv inrr]y^6vi(Tv. Cf. the legend 01
Ctesulla 'EKaepyrj in Anton. Liber, i, and the story of the Carian
^'^.
UapSevoi,
? Artemis as marriage-goddess.
^^ AntJl. Pal. 6. 2 7 6 "Apre/Lit, o-.iy
5' 16t7]ti ydpos 6" apa Kal yevos iirj rfj
AvKoprjbelo) TTOiSl (piXaiTTpaydXrj Cf. *^,

.
EvKkfia^ at Plataea : Plut. Arist, 20 Âydpevoi hi airov ol UXareifls
eSa'âv iv tco Upa rrj^ EuxXfias 'Aprepidos . . . ttjv S EvKXftav ol plv ttoXXoI
Koi KoXovai Koi vop'iôvcnv" Aprtpiv, evioi 8e' <l)a(TLV 'HpaKXeovs p(v dvyarepa Koi
MvpTovs yeveadai . . . TeXtvTrjcraaav 8e napOivov exft" Tvapd re Botcorotf Koi
AoKpoli Tipds. Boipos yap avrfj Ka\ ayaXpa Kara Trdaav dyopav ibpvTai, koi
TrpoBvovaiv at re yapovptvai Ka\ 01 yapovpres.
^ At Thebes : PaUS. 9. 17, I ttXtjo-Iov 81 ÂprepiSos vads eaTiv HvKXeias.

'
Ta(f)rjvai 6e evTos Toi> lepov dvyarepas Avtittoii/ov Xeyovaiv, Av8p6KXetdv re Ka\
'AXkiBu . . . rov vaov 8 . . . Xea>v iariv epnpo(T0fi/.
c At Paros: Le Bas, Iks 2062 dedication 27-par7?y[/S]t 'A^poStVi? An

'A(j)po8iaioi 'Eppfj 'ApTf'piSi EvKXf'irj.
d EvKXfia at Athens, .-'Artemis : Paus. i. 14, 5 va6s EvkXîus dvd6r]pa

Ka\ TovTo dnb tS>u Mtj8oov, ol Trjs X'^P"^ Mapa6a>vi eo-;ôi'. C. I. Gf.
258 Tov favTTJs avdpa 'lepDKXrjv leparfiiaavTa EvKXeia Ka\ Evvoia auf6r]Kv,
? fourth century, B. C. Cf. C. I A. ^. 2'J'J Upeas EvKXdas Ka\ Evvoplas,
on seat in Attic theatre, late period.

576 GREEK RELIGION.
'^^.
"^ Artemis 'Hyefn'ivr) a at Akakesion in Arcadia, vide
1'
At Tegea : PaUS. 8. 47, 6 is 8e Trjv''ApTefJ.iv rfjv 'HyeiJ.oi'rjv rfju alTi]V
Tou'ihf \iyov(Tiv. 'Opxofieviaiv Tuiv (v ' ApKah'ia rvpavviba ecrxfv 'Aptoro/ir/XiSas
. . . (f)ovevcrns Se iKtivou (Xpovios) Ka\ es Teyfav (pvywv (TToirjafV lepov t;j
'Aprtpibi.
^ At Sparta: PaUS. 3. 14, 6 tu 8e ElXeidvias iariv {[fpov) 'ATToXXioi'ds
re Kupveiov koi 'AprtpiSos 'Hyepovrjs,
d At Asea : Roehl, Inscr. Groec. Ant. 92 'Ayrip.o\ on base of statue
dedicated ? to Artemis Hegemone.

e In Ambracia : Anton. Liber. 4 rovs h\ ÂplBpaKiaras fK^vyovras ti]v
bovXe'iav "Aprepiv 'Hyefxovrjv iXnaaadai Koi noirjcrap.ivovs ayporipr^s tiKaapa
Trapaa-TTja-aadai ;âXK60i' avTa 6ijpa. Cf. Polyaen. 8. 52.
f ?At Athens: Pollux, 8. io6, oath of the Ephebi, taropfs 6eoi,
"Aypavkog, 'EwdXto?, "Aprjs, Zei's, 6aXXco, Au^co, 'Wyepovrj. PaUS. 9. 35, I
ripacTi yap e'/c TraXaioG Ka\ 'A^ryi-aiot XiipiTas Avô) kch Hy(p6vr]v.
g At Miletus, ** '^ : cf. Plut. de Jl/n/. Virt. p. 253 F oua-qs ovv eoprrji
Âprepibi Ka\ 6vaias nnpa MiXr;o-iot9, fjv N/yXj/i'Sa Trpo(Tayopfvov<Tiv.
^ Hesych. S. v. 'Hyepoi^rj- "ApTipis Kal 'A(f)po8iTr],
i 'Aprepiros 'Ayfpovoi, inscription (.? second century, b.c.) from Aetolia,

Jotirn. Hell. Stud. 13. p. 353.
"* Artemis nei^w at ArgOS : PauS. 2. 21, I Tpane'La-iv eiidvs eVi TT]V
ayopav ... to he t^? Âprepidos Upov enlK\r](Tii> Ilfidovs, 'YTTeppvijUTpa Kai
TovTo dvedrjKf, viKfjaaaa rfj 8iKr] tov irarepa.
Artemis the protectress of children.

*^
Diod. Sic. 5. 73 "ApTfpiv (patriv fipflu ttjv tuiv vrjTrLo>i> Traiîoiv 6epdneiav
Ka\ rpoc^ds Tiuai appoôvaas rij (ftiiaei rav ^pi<^Siv, atp' rjs ahias Kai K0vpoTp6(})ov
avTi]V ovopuêadni. Cf. Hom. Od. 20. 7 1 prJKOS S' eirop " Aprepis ayurj.
'"'
Artemis naiSorpdcô? at Corone in Messenia : Paus. 4. 34, 6
6fwv 8e iuTip ivravQa Aprepibos re KoXuvpfvrjs Ilai8oTp6cf>ov' Ka\ Aiovvaov Kai.
'AaKKrjTTioii vaos.
^^ 6 Upov îXopeipoKos
Artemis îXopelpn^ at Elis : Paus. 6. 23, rfjs
tariv 'AprtpiSos. rrj ptv 8f] 6fco yeyovfv t] eViKXr^cris are rov yvpvacriov -yeirocj.
Cf. Paus. 2. 10, 7, statue of Artemis, ra eV l$vv p6vov tlpyaapei/r], in the

gymnasium at Sicyon.
" Artemis KopvdaXla at Sparta: Athen. p. 139 A-B Koplôvai yap ai
TirBai TO. (ipptva Traidia Kara tov Kaipov tovtov els aypov Kai irpos tj]v Kopv0a\iav
KaK(>vpevi)v "Aprepiv^ fjs to lepov irnpu ti)v KuXovpe'vrjv Tiacrcrau ecrri . . . ovovcri
be Ka\ Tovs ya\a6rjvovs opBayopivKovs Ka\ TrapaTiOeaaiv eu rf) Bo'ivrj revs Ini'LTas
iipTOvs . . . ravra fiev 6 UoKffiav. Cf. Hesych. S.V. KopvOaWlaTpiai' al
Xopevovxrm rfj KopvdaXkia 6fa. S. V. KvpiTToi' ol fôvTfs to. ^vKiva Trpoa-onra,

Kara IraKiav, Kai eoprdôvres rfj KopvdaXXla, yeXoiaarai. Plut. Qliaest.
ConVlV. p. 657 E Tov 'ATToXXcdi/or hvo Tidrjvas, ttju 'A\fj^(âl' Koi rr]v
lôpvOakeiav.
'''
? KovpoTp6(l)os : Arist. Thesmoph. 295 evxeirde Toiv eeapo(j)6poiv, rfi
Arjprjrpi Kai rfj Kopt] Ka\ rw YlXovra Kal rfj KakXiyeveiq koI rfj Kovporpoffito Kai
Tw 'F.ppfj Koi ra'is Xapiaiv. C. I. A. 2. 48 1 Wvcrav {ol f(f)rjl3ot) rf] re Âdrjva
TTj YloKuibi Koi Trj KovpoTpu(f)(x),
Hesych. S.V. KovpewTis' pijvos tov Tlvaviyfncovos rjpfpa, iv fj

ras dno
T^S Kf4)a.\rjs Totv Trai'Sa)!/ dnoKeipovres Tpixas 'Apre/iiSt Bvovdi. Cf. -V. Mag.
P' 533" 42 fOpTT] eariv eirl rpeli I'jpepas reXovpevr] . . , rfj 8e Tpirr] Tovi
Kovpovs (LcrayovcTLv fts ttjv eopTrju, kciI avuLCTTaxri toIs avyyeveai koi yvmpipois,
Kai eyypdcpovaiv els Trjv TToXire/ai/.
''"
Artemis ? 'YnopeXddpa : Hesych. S. v. enldfrou 'Aprepibos, 1)J o
Mlvdios (?).
Artemis narpaa vide Zeus, "^b

''^
at Sicyon : Cf. C. I. A. 3. 176
hTToKkbivi Ttarpcoci) Koi 'Apre 1x181.
''''
Artemis narpiStris at Pleiae : C. I. Gr. 1444 U'puav . . . 'ApTepidos
narpttoTiSoj fv UXeiais. ? At Amyclae : F^p/i. Arch. 1892, p. 23 late
inscription found there mentioning ifpevs 'Aprtfiidos {naTpia))Ti8os.
' Artemis napcfivXala at Epidaurus : Fph. Arch. 1883, p. 28

Aprepidos HapcpvXaias EvKpdrrjs EvKpdrfos nvpocpoprjcras.
Common cult of Artemis and Apollo.

'"a
In Delos: Journal of Hell. Studies, 1890, p. 260 ; / Gr. C
2280, 2282, &c. Bull, de Corr. Hell. 1882, 48-49 dedications to
Artemis At^Xiq in the temple of Apollo: cf. 1878, p. 339. Bull, de
Corr. Hell. 1891, p. 291, Delian inscription found in a small island
near Amorgus, e'y Bvaiav tw 'AttoXXwi/i /cm TTj 'ApTpi8i, third century, b.c.
Herod. 4. 34 rô-t 8e napBivoia-i Tavrrjcrt rrjcriv e'^ 'Yvrf pôpttof TfXfvrrja-aai
eu A7;X<y, Kiipovrai Ka\ al Kopai koi al TTotSes ol ATjXtav' al pev Trpo ydpov
nXoKupov dnorepopeuai Ka\ n(p\ arpaKTOv elXiâaai, eVt to (rrjpa Tidt'ifn (to 8e
aripd e<TTi ea-O) t's to 'ApTeplaiov iatovTi . . . ) 01 8e Ttal8fi tcov Ar]Xi(ov, nep]
XX6r]v Tiva e'lX'iâvTfs tcov Tpixv, TrpoTidelcn Ka\ ovtoi eVl to (TTJpa . . . Tairras
piv ovv T'j EtXfi^vi'a dno<p(povaas airt tov o}KVt6kov tov (rdâvTo cf)6pov
dniKeadaf Trjv 8 " Apyrjv re Ka\ ttjv '^Qttiv apa avTo'iai to'ktl Sfo'iai dniKfadai
Xeyovat Kal crt^t Tipas aXXas 8(86a-6ai Trpos (TCptcoV Ka\ yap dyeipeiv acfit Tas
yvva'iKai, iirovopaôv(Tas to. ovvopaTa iv rw vpv(a' ivapa be acpeoiv padnvras
vrjcrioiTas Te Ka\ lavai vpvffiv Qniv Tf KaV'ApyrjV Ka\ tcov pr]pla>v KaTayiôptvuiv
VOL. II. M
578 GREEK RELIGION.
(TtI tS ^co/iM rrjv crnoôv, Tavrrjv en\ rrjv 6r]Ki]v ttjs "Slnioi Te Koi Apyrjs avaiai-
^(wa6ai (TTiâWofiepriv. fj Se drjKi] (wrecov itjTi omrrde rov 'AprfUKTLOv.
Arnob. Adv. Gent. 6. 6 Non in Dianae delubro, quod in Apollinis
constitutum est Delii, Hyperoche Laodilêque (humationis habuisse
perhibeniur officia) ? Pans, i .

43, 4, at Megara, to îvîia 'I0ii/d?y 'aXkôv
6vyarp6<i- imoQaviiv hi avTTjv (f)a(Tiv eVi napBevov. Ka6t(TTr]Kf 5e rais Kopais
Xoas Trpns to rrjs 'l(f)iv6T]S pvrjua npoacfiepeiv irpb ydfiov Kai airapxT6ai tu)V
Tpix^v, Ka6a Koi tj} 'EKaepyrj Kai "Qnibi al Bvyarepes irore anfKfipovTo ai Arj'Klav.
Id. 5. 7, 8 eVel Be abriv MeTidvumos Kvpmoy es 'OTTti/ Ka\ 'EKaepynv fjcrev,

ws fK TCdv 'Ynepôpeoyv o^/koito (s AtjXov. Et. Mag. p. 64 1. 55 OuTrtf
. . .
enlBfTou 'AprefxiSos, *] napa to oTriêaBai ras rtKTova-cii avrrjV . . . rj 8ia tos
vneplSoptas Kopas, Ovniv, 'EKae'pyrjv, Ao^co. Plato, 'Alto^. p. 37 I A xnAKecov
8e\T03V, as e'l 'YTrepôpeav eKOfiiaav 'fivri's Te koI 'EKaepyrj. Claud. de CoflS.

Stilich. 3. 253 lungunt se geminae metuenda feris Hekaerge, et soror,
optatum numen venantibus, Opis, progenies Scythiae. Clem. Alex.

Strom, p. 674 P 6 p.ev yap (Bpdyxos 6 /^tifriy) eTTippnivoiv to TrXrjdos Sacî'Jjs
K\d8ois TrpoKari'jpxeTO tov vpvov wSe TroiS' p-eXneTe 6) noises eKaepyov Kai
Uaepyav. Athenag. Leg. pro Christ. 14. p. 6i (Dechair) Ka\ 6 AijXtos
Kai ij "Aprepm TeKTaiov Koi 'AyyeXt'cofos Texvrj. Anonym. Vit. Plat. p. 6
Cobet TOV Qapyrj'Kicbvos ev eopTTjv eniTeXovcriu ol A17X101 tov

ev Tjj f fXTjvoi, ij
'AttoXXcoi/o?, eV Be Trj 5' tov avTov ixj]v6s, . . . ev fj

yeveGKiaKrjv eopTrjv 'ApTep.iBos
eTTeTeXow.
^ At Athens, common cult of Apollo UpoaTaTripios and Artemis

BouXaia, ^\ Cf. '^ ''^
Artemis Ae\(pivia at Athens: Pollux, 8. 119 t6
eVi AfXcpLviu) (^8iKa(TTi]pL0v) I8pv6r] pev inro tov Alyecoi Xe'yerai Se 'AnoXXoiVi
AeX(f>ivi(0 Ka\ 'Aprf'/xiSt AeX(()ivia. Cf. '^\ Demosth. k. 'ApiaTOKp. 74.

p. 644 8iKa(TTi]piov , 6 TTUvTOiV uyLwTaTa TovTcou exei /cat (ppLKcoBecTTaTa, civ tls
opoXoyfj pev KTe7vai, fvv6p.a)S Be (pjj BeBpaKevaC tovto B eVri to enl AeX(f)LVLa,
C. I. A. 3. 77, calendar of sacrifices (Roman period) nvaveyj/wvos

'ATrdXXwj/t Kai 'ApTepi8i ^ ironavov.
c Artemis AeXc/jij/in in Thessaly : Eph. Arch. 1884, p. 221 'ApTep.181.
AeXcpivia AiV^vXif . . , Xenopevaavcra (? second centUry B. c).
d Artemis êXaacjidpos with Apollo at Phlya in Attica, ^'.
e Artemis with Apollo at Delphi: CoUitz, Dialect. Inschr. No. 18 10

oneBoTo MvaatXaos ... too 'AndXXcjvi t(S IIv6i<o Ka\ ' ApTepuTt, a-a>p,a yvvaiKeiov.
Cf. C. I. Gr. 1688, inscription b.c. 379 containing Amphictyonic oath,

'Opvvu) Kara tov 'AttoXXcovos tov Ylvdiov Kai Tas AaroCs Kul tus ApTapiTos.
Cf. joint worship at Cyrrha, ^^^
f Artemis StoTftpa with Apollo nidios at Anaphe : C. I. Gr. 2481.

g Near Pheneos : Paus. 8. 15, 5 'AiroWavi fan iivBiov rnd? . . .
ivTav6a en Koi vvp 'ATroXXcoi/t êvtarai Koi 'ApTe/iiSi 6vovcnv.
^ Paus. 3. II, 9 'S.TrapTidTaLS 8i enl Trjs dynpas Hvdaecos re eaTiv
' AwoXkwvos Koi ApTefiibos Koi AtjtoCs dyciXiiara.
i
Artemis nvBlri at Miletus: C. I. Gr. 2866 'AprepiBi Uvdlrj koI Avto-
Kpdropi Kalaapi ^(l3aaTcS. lb. 2885 'Y8po(p6pos 'Aprepidos nvdirjs Makia

'Pov(f)e:va. Cf. ^^b.
^ Clem. Alex. Strom. I. p. 384 P Xeyerai (rtjv îl3vWau) . . . ^pvyiav

re (tvaav KeKKrjcrBai ' Aprepiv koi TavTrjv Tvapayevopevrfv eis Ai\(povs dcrai.
1 Strabo, 588 17 pev oSv noXis ('ASpdcrreia) pera^v Hpid-nov Ka\ Uapiov
e'xovcru vnoKelpevov TreSi'oi/ opuvvpov iv co koi pavre'iou rju AnoWcovoi AKTaiov
Koi 'Apreptbos.
"1 Strabo, 676 ev 8e rfj KiXiKia (crrl Koi to ttJs âpmjSovlas Âprepidos koi
pavrelov, tovs 8e xprjcrpuvs euBeni TvpoSeaniôvcn.
n Artemis OuXm: l\\^cr. Satur7i. i. 17, 21 Pherecydes refert Thesea
cum in Cretam ad IMinotaurum duceretur vovisse pro salute atque

reditu suo 'ATrdXXcoi'i OiXi'w Kai 'ApTfpc8i OvXta. ? At Liudos Artemis with :
Apollo OvXios ^"l
o Artemis Ai't; : Diomed. Bk. 3. p. 484 ed. Putsch. Morbo Sicilia
laborabat. Variis et assiduis ceremoniis Dianam placantes, finem

malis invenerunt, eandem Lyen cognominaverunt. Cf. Artemis 'EXevê'pa
in Lycia : Artemid. Oneirocr. 2. 35 17 Xeyn^h-r] Trr.ph AvkIoi^ 'EXeidepa
"Aprepis. Arctinus, Aethiopis Diintzer, Ep. Poes. p. 16 (Photius)

*A;((XXi'S 6(S Ae'trôf ixKa. Kai dixras 'ATioXXtoi/i Koi 'Aprepidi Koi AijtoI
KaOaipeTUi rou (bovov (OfpaiTDV) vtv 'OSucrcrecos'.
P Artemis Aovo-iSrij : Collitz, Dial. Inschr. 1601 Xapov dvi6r]Ke rat
'ApTfpi8i Aova-iaTi.. ? Achaean inscription of fourth century b.c.
q Artemis Qfppia, evaKoos, fTn'jKooi : C. I. Gr. 2172, inscription from

baths in INIitylene, rav Kpdwav km t6 vdpaycoyiov dno Keyxpfav Aprepidi
6(ppia evaKoa. On basis found at Milylene MeydXrj "Aprepis Qeppia
Pull, de Corr. Hell. 1880, 430, No. 14. Aristid. i. p. 503, Dind. Tr)v
Qfppaiav''.\pTfpiv, fj ras irrjyas rag dfppas e'xfi. Cf. PaUS. 5- ^S) 7 Ttrapros
fie ^copoi ApreptSos eniKXTjaiv Kokkcokos' koi AttoXXcui/o? TTfpTiTos Qfppiov . . .
dv6^ OTov 8e "Aprepiv enopopd(ov(Tiv KoKKuiKnv, ovx old re tjv poi 8i8a)(6r]vai.
Eiaxoo? in Crete: C. I. Gr. 2566 'Ap)ôviKa Zavkci . . . dva(a>aa Aprepibi
(iiaKoa evôpeva virep eavrds dxdv. 'Ettt^koos at Rome: C. J. Gr. 594^
Oea eTrrjKoa) 'Aprtpidi AuXi'St '2coTfipa Aip. ÊXniveiKi]. At EpidaurUS : Eph.
Arch. 1883, 3 'AprepiSi 'E/cht?; entjKoo), inscription of Roman period.
Samothrace inscription of late Roman period 'AprepiSi 'EnrjKoco Athen.
JMilthcil. 1893, p. 377.
M 2
580 GREEK RELIGION.
r At jMegara : PaUS. I. 44, 2 'AttoXXcoi/os Uijw . . . Upoa-Tarrjpiov . . .
'AttoXXcoi' 8e iv avra Kelrai Bias aîos KofAprefxis kcu Ar^rw kui aXXa dyaX/iard
(OTi., UpaîTfXovi Tioi'fjaauTos Aijtco Koi ol naidei. Cf. Artemis 'AypoTtpa with
Apollo 'Aypaios, ^^c.
" At Sicyon : PaUS. 2. 11, I 'Enoirea 8e Kai. 'AprepiBi Ka\ 'AttoXXcovi to
irXrjtjiov Upbv iroiricrai Xtyovai. Cf. 2. 7> "
t In the Argolid, ^^^: C. /. Gr. 1173 '-'^prfiJ-iôs 'AttoWmvos

Srore/Xioy IfponoXTjaas.
" At Pyrrhichus in South Laconia : Paus, 3, 25, 3 êwi^ 6e eV rfj yrj
<T(pi(nv If pa fo-Tiv 'Apre'/LtiSo's re eiriKXr](Tip ÂcrrpaTeUis, on r^r eV to TrpoVo}
(TTparelas evravda inaucravTO ^ Ap.a^6ves, km 'AttoXXcoi/ 'A/iafowos' |oai/a /îeV
''^^,
dpcfioTfpa dfaBelvai Se Xeyovo-ti/ aiira ras otto Gep/xcoSo^Toy yuvatKas. Cf.
V At Olympia in the temple of Hera: Paus. 5. 17, 3 ôpn 8e Ka\

Atjpi'jTrjp KOI 'Atj-oXXui/ koI "Apre/iU, al p.iv dWrjKav ilu\v cnraiTiKpv Kadi'jpevai,
'AnokXcov de evaurios eaTuar] tj] 'ApreptSi earrjKep.
"^
At Mantinea : Paus. 8. 9, I "Ean Se Mavrivevai vaos StTiXoCs . . . Tov
vaov Se Tjj pev ayaXpd eanv 'AaKXrjTriov Text"] ÂXKapeuovs, to 8e hfpov Atjtovs
e'ariv iepov Km tcov Trat'Swj'* UpaîT(Xr]i 8e to dyaXpaTa dpydaaTO.
X At Tanagra : Paus. 9. 22, I fvTavaypa . . . 6 rptVos rau mwj/ 'Atto'X-
XcDVOi, Spov Se aurw "ApTfpU re kui Aj^tco.
y At Abae in Phocis : Paus. 10. 35, 3 napa tov vaov tov peyav ia-Tiv aXXos
vaos . . . â<TiXfvs Be ' Abpiavoi e'lroirjae tw 'ArroXXwi't* to 8e dydXpuTa dpxaio-
Tepa Ka\ avTuv iuTiv 'Aâlwv dvddrjpa x^Xkov 8e e'lpyacTTai Kal opoias eWli/
dp6d, 'An-oXXcoj; Ka\ ArjTa) t6 Kfii "Aprspiy.
z At Eretria: Rang. An/. Helh'n. 1242 6 fi^po? 'Eperpucov ^Tijanrnov
dperrjs eveKa . . . 'AprepiBi 'AnoXXcovi At^to'i (fourth centUry B. c).
^^ At Mylasa: C. I. Gr. 2694 lepea 'AttoXXcocos kuI 'AprtptSoy.
l3b At Araxa in Lycia : Bennd. Jê/seji m Lykien^ vol. i, p. 77, Inscr.
53 b dvu(^vov(jr\s TTjS BtOTOKOV yrjs Xaiveovs pop(pds . . . Aprepiv re Kai
AnoXXciiva.
cc Artemis UporjyiTis with Apollo in Lycia: Bennd. Iêfsen in Lykien,

Inscr. 45 TUiV TrporjyeTcov 'Apre'ptSos kuI AttoXXwi/os.
dd Artemis KXapia and Apollo KXdpios on late coins of Colophon :
Head, His/. Ntan. p. 494. Brit. Mus. Cat. Ionia, p. 42.
ee Artemis KauKao-i's with Apollo Kauxacreus in Chios : Rev. Arch.

1877, p. 107 Tr]v lepr]Telav 'AttoXXcovos KavKaaecos Kal 'Aprepidos KavKa-
(Tl'SoS.
ff Artemis Ephesia wilh Apollo, "^^ (not in public cult) ; at

Massilia, "^b.
ss With Apollo MfiXearas ill Cynuria : C. I. Gr. 11 73 'Apr/îôs-

A73-(dAXa)i'os) '^TaTiiKio^ . . . Upano\r](Tas (Roman period).
hli With Apollo 'Ayvievs at Tegea, ^^.
i' In Cyrene : Athenae. p. 549 E, F, quoting Ptolemaeus Euerg.

(Miill. Frag. Hist. 3. 187, 6) 'AprfniTia fifyia-rr] ioprrf iv Kvprjvr], iv o
lepevs 70V ' AnoWoivos (eViaucriof S' ecrrY) demvlêi rovs npo avrov iepevcrapfvovs.
Cf. Inscr. Smith-Porcher, Discoveries at Cyrene, PI. 80, 8, p. 112.
Artemis as city-goddess.
Artemis 'Apapwdia or 'Apapvala^ at Eretria Livy, 35. 38 sacrum
^
:
anniversarium eo forte tempore Eretriae Amarynthidis Dianae erat,

quod non popularium modo sed Carystiorum etiam coetu celebratur.
btrabo, 448 ''''}'' ^^ bvvapiv Ti]v 'Ep(Tpt((ov fju ((T'xov nore paprvpel rj aTTjXrj^
rfv avt6f<Tav nore iv roi Up<o rrjs Âpapvvdias 'Aprepcbos. Cf. Rang. An/.
Fte/I/n. 689 TTjv pev piav {elKova) arrjarai iv too lepa rrjs Âpripidos rrjs
Apapv(Tias . , . avnyopfveadai 8e ras ripas 'ApTepicricov tco dyavi t^j 7Tvppi\r]s.

'.
Cf.
b In Attica: PaUS. I. 4-5 'Adpovels Se npwaiv 'Apapvaiav "Aprtptv
31,
. . , (oprrjv 8e Kai A6r]vaioi rrji 'Apapvaias ayovai ovdev ti Evôecov d(pavf-
artpov. C. I. A. I. 526 opo9 ÂprepiSos repevovs 'Apapv(Tias (archaic
period). Cf. t'd. 4. 521 h.
^^
Artemis BovXala a at Athens: C. I. Gr. 112, 113 tS)v 0v(nwv S}v
edvov TO npo tcov iKKXija-icov as tw 'AttoWcovi tw Trpoorar/jpio) /cat rr} 'Apripidi.

rjj BovXala. Cf. C. I. A. 2. 390, 392, 408, 417, 431, 432, containing
the same formula. Cf. Aesch. Sept. 449 npoaTaTr]pias 'Aprepidos
evvoiaiat.
t>
At Miletus : Bu/t. de Corr. Hell. 1877, p. 287 'Aprepa r^v v8po(f}vpov
TTJs IIv6iT]i 'Aprepi8os Kai iipeiav 8ia îov t?]s BovXaias 'ApripiSos (inscription
of Roman period).
^2 Artemis BovXrjcfiopos at Miletus: Dittenb. Sj'llog. 391. Rev. Arch.

l874"> P- ^04 ''S *^ Kxapia-p(V(os e^fi Koi rw 8rjpu. avp(f)ep6vTa)s Koi viv
Koi is Tov 6776176 {si'c) XP^vov o-vvTeXovvTi. Tcis dyipaeis 'ApripiSc BovXt](p6po}
^Kipibi KaOoTL ^KipiSai i^rjyovpfvoi fl(r(f)epov(Ti,
*^
Artemis 'Ayopma, ^"c.
The name of Artemis in the formulae of public oaths

C. I. Gr. :
2554, alliance between Latus and Olus in Crete. Cf. ^''g, ^'''f. In the
Gorlynian inscription the woman takes the oath in the name of
Artemis on a question of property, vide Hell. Journ. 1892, p. 65.
582 GREEK RELIGION.
At Dreros in Crete, Artemis associated with Leto and Apollo in the
public oath, Cauer, Deled? 121.
Titles taken from cities and localities.
***
Callim. til Dian. 33 :
Tp\s dina Toi TTTokUOpa, ra fifj 6fov <iKKov ae^fiv
t'laerai dWa fiovrjv ae, Koi Apre/ntSos KciXeeadai.
lb. 188 :
vfjo-cov jifv AoKlx^, noXlav 8e toi (vn8e JJepyrj,
TTjvyfTov 8' opeuiu, Xipeves ye pev 'Evplnoio.
^^
ALToiXrj in NaupaCtUS : Pans. 10. 38, 12 ean pev ini BakadCTT) mos
Uo<Ti8o)vos . . . eVrt 8e Kol Upov ÂpTepi8os koi ayaXpa XevKov 'Kiduv' a-^rjpa
8e aKOVTiôiKTTjs TvapexfTai, kul tTTLKkrja-iv e'iXr](f)v AItcoXtj, among the Heneti.
*" Alyiuaia, *.
*'^
Artemis ''AKpia : Hesych. S. v. eo-n 8e Ka\ fj "Hpa KOI "Aprepii Koi
'A0po6iVi; IT pocrayopevopevT] iv "Apyd, Kara to opoiov en aKpco ISpvpeuai. Cf.
Artemis Kopvcpaia on Mount Coryphon near Epidaurus, Pans. 2. 28. 2.
**
Artemis 'AXcpeiala, *.
'^
Artemis 'ApapwQla : Steph. Byz. S. v. 'Apdpwdos' vrjcroi Eiôias, dno
Tivos KVfTjyov 'AprepiSos 'ApapvvSov. Cf. .
Artemis 'Anrepa in Crete: Cauer, Delect? 128, treaty of alliance

'^'*
between Aptera and TeOS, dvaypa^pev 8e km hph t6 re nporepov 86ypa

Kiti Tuv dvavecocnv es to lepou to tos ApTepi8os Tas AnTepas. ^
^^
Artemis 'Ao-Wa? at lasos in Caria : C. I. Gr. 2683 'AprepiSi 'Ao-rtdSt
KOI AvTOKpaTopi Kaicrapi M. AvprjXia Kw/zoSo) 'Avrmvivco êâaTa. crTe(})avri-
0dpoy TTjS TrpoKadqyepovos Trjs iroXeas fjpav 'ApTe'pi8oi 'A<TTid8os, inscription
of first century a. d. (.?), Rev. des Eludes Grecques, 1893, p. 157.

Polyb. 16. 12 7ra/ a roTs 'lao-frevo-i, to t^s 'EcrrtdSor (leg. 'AcrrtdSos).
^'
Artemis 'Aarvprjvr) : Strabo, 606, in Antandros, "Aarvpa, Kcopr] koL
I'iKaoi TTjs 'Aa-rvpr]pris ÂpTe'pL8os dyiov. Cf. 613-
"' Artemis Av\i8e[a at Tanagra: Bull, de Corr. Hell. 1879, 385,

No. 32, inscription at Tanagra, ; ôvX-q Ka\ 6 8rjpos ' OXvmrixnv . . .
Uparevaaaav 'Apre/itSt Ai/XtSet(a), ? SeCOnd CCntury B.C. Cf. /. G. A. 170.

^*
Artemis BopeiTrjvi] in Thyatira: C. I. Gr. 3477 'ApTepi8i BopeiTrjvrj
Kai TTJ TraTpi8i VXvKav . . . dredrjKe. Cf. 35'-'7*
^^ Artemis Ar;Xia in Delos, "''.
^^ ArjXidi in Halicarnassus : Newton, Halle. 2. 698, No. 6 a 6 8iipos
TiSepia KXavSto) KaiaapL 2eâaTcS TeppaviKf . . . 'Apreju(Si Arj'Xiddi.

'^
Artemis AepeSrtf, ^\ Cf. C. I. Gr. 4300 A.
^
Artemis 'EXeucrti'ta : Hesych. S. v. naX iv "liKiKla TifJLarai "ApTfîs. Cf.
^^^*'.
T} 'EXeuo-iVa,
^' Artemis ''Ecptcria, "^.
1 ? 'lo-o-copt'a, ^'''^l.
"' KavKaats, êe.
^"
? KeKot'o in Rhodes: -5^^//. de Corr. Hell. 1885, 100 rhv Uprj
'AprdfJiiTos Kf Kolas AafidTpiov. RoSS, hiscr. Ilied. 3. 272 Aevctpxos . . .
iepaTV(Tai 'AttoXXcoi/oj Uvdaews Koi ' ATroXXcovos 'OXiov 'Apre/utSos ray eV KeKoia
^6019. Ross, Arch. Aufsiilze, 2. 594 ÂpidToKoxos . . . Uparevaas'Adavaias

AirSaiy Koi Aios IloXiecof Kcit \\pTdfiLTOS rds iv Kf Kola dfois, ? third CentUry B. C.
^^
Artemis KoXotjvt] near Sardis: Strabo, 626 iv 6e aruSi'oty rfTrapd-
Kovra OTTO t^s TroXecuy (cttiv fj Tvyaia fiev vno tov TTOirjToii Xeyop-ivrj {\ip.vT]j,
KoXot; 8' varrepov pfTovofxaaOelaa, ottov to Upov ttjs KoXorî'^s 'Apre/ntSos /xeya-
Xr]v ayiareiau eôi/. 0ao"i 8' ivrauda xopfveiv tovs KaXudovi Kara rcii ioprds.
^*
Artemis KovbvXfans, ^
"^ Artemis Kti/8vas : Strabo, 658, on the Carian coast, n\r]crlov 8' iarl
ru)V BapyvXiojv to ttjs 'Apre/xiSos lepov to r^y Kiv8vd8os . . . fjv 8e ttots koi
xapiov Kivtivr]. Cf. Polyb. 1 6. 12. Cf. Classical Review, 1894, p. 217
idv Se Tts napd Tavra noLr'](rr] dnoTfLaet 'ApTp.i8i Ki.v8vd8i, Sepulchral
inscription with fine, .''
found near Kindya.
'<"=
Artemis KXapia at Colophon. Cf.
'^\
1"^ Kpr^crla: Diod. Sic. 5. 77. Cf. '''<'.
^" Artemis Avkoutis, '^'^.
108a Artemis Mowyirr7;i')7 : Steph. Byz. J. 27. MoTOyio-a' {jroXis Kapias odfv)
"ApTefjiis Movoyicrrjvr], T^pvpa Aat6dXov . . . ylaara yap tT] Kapav (fxovij
\i6os ppT}Vfv(Tai.
b Artemis Mvv8Ln on coins of Myndus in Caria, Roman period :
Head, Hi'sl. Num. p. 529.

c Artemis Mvo-i'a near Sparta : Paus. 3. 20, 9 Muo-iay Up6v'ApTpi8os.
" Artemis olvadTis in Argolis : Paus. 2. 25, 3 olvdr] xî-'-o^ ^'o"^'"
'ApTipicnov, Koi Upov 'ApreîSoy e'771 Kopv(j)r] tov opovs. Steph. Byz. J". Z'.
O'lvT]' 7ru\iv"Apyovs' . . . OlvcoaTH "Aprepis, t] iv Olvoij] ttjs Apyetay i8pvij,ivr]
vno UpoiTov. Cf. Eur. Here. Fur. 375 :
rai' Tf ;^pvcroKapai'Oi'
SdpKa ....
KTfivas, 6rjpo(^6vov 0eav
Olvcoariv dyaXXet.
584 GREEK RELIGION.
^'"
Artemis olvala in Attic deme Ohori: C. I. A. i. 534 Olvorâi
'Ap7-[/it8t ?]. Ih. 3. 336 'ApTefxi8os Olvatai.
""a Artemis 'OXvfnrla from the mountain north of Eretria : Fp/t.
Arch. 1892, p. 141 XpucraXAiff 'Srjfiiov 'AprcjuiSi 'OXv^TTi'a. Cf. ?^'. p. 126,
fourth-century inscription from Eretria, dvaypdyj/ai. iv aTrjkri \i6ivr^ rrjv
jrpoêviav kiu crTrjam eu t2 Trjs 'Apre/itSos If pa.
'" Artemis Tlfpyala at Perge in Pamphylia, ^^^: Strabo, 667 Uepyij

TToXts Koi TT^Tjcriov eVi p(T(a>pov tottov to Trjs Tlepyaiai Aprepidos iepov, iv a>
TTavTjyvpis KUT fTos (TvuTtXe'iTut, Cic. in Vtrr. 2. I, 54 Pergae fanum

antiquissimum et sanctissimum Dianae ... ex ipsa Diana, quod
habebat auri, detractum. Phot. s. v. f] Tlfpyala "Aprepts* Tda-aeTai eVl
rSiv dyvprcov koi n\avr]Tci>v' Trapocrov koi fj deoi iv avrrj. At Halicarnassus :
C. I. Gr. 2656 e8o^ Trj /3ouX,7 Koi TM drjfjLCO . , . TTpiap.fvi) ttjv ifprjrfiav rrii
'ApTfpi.8os rrjs Tlfpyains Trape'êrot Upfiav dcrrrjv i^ daruiv dp(j)OTfpa)v im Tpftv
vfi/eos yfyfvr]pfvrjv Kai irpos Trarpos koi Trpoi p.rjTpoi' rj 8f npiapevrj . . , ducrfi
TCI ifpd TO. 8r)poTf\fa Kai to. ifiicoriKa , . . iv a> Se pr]v\ tj Bvaia (rvvrfXtlrai
fj 8i]poTf}\.j]s dyfipiT<o TTpo vrjaov ras Tjpipas Tpe'ii, in oiKiav ^17 TTopfvupivrj,
6 bf dyfppos 'ia-Tu ttjs ifpfias. At Lindos : Rev. Arch. 1867^, p. 25,

No. 67 'AprdpiTi Hfpycnai,
" Artemis Upimrivrj ? at Priapus : Plut. Llicull. 1 3 Xeyerat yap 'Apri-

piSos )(6K(o ripiaTTLVTjs 6 )(fip(i}v ip.TTf<jf'iv To'is TlovTiKOLs crv\r]aa(Tiv avrijs to
ifpov Kai to ôavov dvacntdcracn.
''^
Artemis âpBiavrj at Sardis : C. I. Gr. 3459 'AnoXXavtos dpxifpfvs
. . . TTjv Upiav Tijs 'Sapbcavrji ApTfpi8os dvrJKfv tov (fiopov 'Aftrjvds (? third
century b.c).
"* Artemis âpcovla on the coast near Troezen : Pans. 2. 32, 10
(TTpfUTov he iiTovopdôvcn tovtov, oti . . . aveTpdnrj 'imroXvTov to dppn, tovtov
bf ov TToXv TTJs "Sapcoviai Aprffiibos a(f>eaTr]K to iepov . . . '2ap(l)via yap bf] Kara
fTOS TTj 'ApTf'pibi fopTrjv ayova-i. Eur. Hipp. I I26 :
o) y^dpaBoi noXifjTibos axTaj

bpvfios T opdos, o6l kwu)v
(i)KVTr6ba)v (ifTa 6rjpas evaipev
AiKTvvvav d/xî crefivdv.
'''
Artemis leXaorta?, <"'.
" Artemis S/ctaSmj near Megalopolis Paus.

: 8. 35, 5 ^Kidbn koXoC-
pfvov xatpiov Ku\ ApTffiibos SkioSitiSos ipfinid ioTiv ifpov.
"''
Artemis ^fpata: Callim. m Dian. 259 Ylmvia 'ôvwxir] XipfvoaKonf,
;^mpf, ^fpaiT]. At Sicyon : Paus. 2. 10, 7 ^fpalas Ifpov 'ApTtpibos,
KopiaBrivai be to ôavov Xiyuvaiv iK ^fpcov. At ArgOS : id. 2. 23, 5 rrjs be
'ApTepiSos TTjS ^fpaias, (Tfîovfji yap Ka\ 'Apyt'ioi ^fpaiav ApTfpiv Kara Taurd
Adrfvaiois Koi SiKucowotj, to ciyaXna Koi ovtoi cpaaLV (K êpcov tcov fv QfcraaXia
KOfxia-drjuai. At Athens : Hesych. S. v. epaia' 'Adfjvrja-i êviKTj ^fdf oi 8e

TTjv 'EKaTrjv : /d. 'AS/zijrou Koprj' 'Ekott;, rives Se ttjv Bfvb'ii' : vide '''*'.
In
Acarnania : C. I. Gr. 1837 'ApreixiSi êpaia (Roman period).
"^ Artemis Tvxn on Imperial coins of Gerasa in the Syrian

Dekapolis Head, I/is/. Num. p. 665 "Aprf/xis Tv;^?; Ytpaawv.
:
Artemis as goddess of war.

*'^
Vide ^^b^f; Epigram of Simonides, Bergk, 135 :
TVavTohanuiv dv8pa>v yeveai Acrias diro x'^P^s
TTotSes Adrjvaioiv rtoSe nor iu ntXayei
vavpaxia 8ap.acrauT(S eVfl arpaTos wXfro MtjSoiv

(Trjp.aTa ravr' dvedev TrapOfvat 'ApTepi8i,
"" Artemis ' ApicrToôvXrj : Plut, de Herod. Malign, 869 rov eepiaro-
kX(ovs ôvXevfiaros, b ôvXevcras rfj 'EXXaî vavp.axÔ'î- Trpo Tr]s âXapivos,
ISpvaaro vaov ApKTToôvXrjs 'AprefiiSos iv MfXlrj], rov âp^dpov KaranoXtpTj-
BivTos. Cf. Plut. Thcmist. 22 eKeiro 8e Kol tov QepiaroKXeovs eiKoviov iv tco
vam rrjs ' Apia-roôvXrjs en Ka6' fjpds. ? At Rhodes: Porph. de Abstin.

2. 54 ^vcrTacrrii be r^s enpTrjs npoayayovres tov civOpainov eô) ttvXcov avriKpvs
rov ApicrroôvXt]! e8ovs, o'lvov noricravrfs ecrffjarrov.
^^^
In Messenia : Pans. 4. 13, i t6 rrjs 'AprepiSos liyaXpa, ov xttXnuvv
Kai avTO KOL ra onXa Trapi]K rqv dcnriba.
" " Anth. Pal. 9. ^'^\"Apr epis idpdciovcrn TrpodyyeXos ecm Kv8oipoxJ.
^'^
Artemis lareipa'^ at Megara: Pans. i. 40, 2 dpxaiov eanv iep6v, ..
Koi ayaXpd re Keirai x'^^'ôvv 'AprepiSos e'niKXrjaiv Scoreipa?. At PagaC in

Megara: td. I. 44, 4 ev Sf Tciis Unyals deas vneXeiTrero nîov 'Aprepidos
^(OTfipas eTTiKXi](nv x^-^'^^^" (lynXpa, peyedei tS Trapa Meyapevaiv icrov kol
(TXfjfid ov8ev Staô'pws fX""- ^- ^* ^^'- ^"ô^b, I063 17 ôvXrj koi 6 brjpos
âvirrelvav âvcrreivov Upeiav 'AprepiSos Scoreipar.
t"
At Megalopolis: Paus. 8. 30, 10 KaBeôpevw he Tw All ev 0p6vw
napear-qKacri rfj pev f] MeydXrj TroXty, ev dpia-repd 8e 'Apre/itSo? ^coreipas ayaXpa.
raiiTa pev XWov rov HevTeXrjaiov Adqva'ioi Kr](pi(T68oTos Kai Sevo<paiv elpydaavro.
c At Phigaleia Paus.
: 8. 39, 5 eari be ôreipas re Upbv ivravBa Apre- '
pibos Ka\ ayaXpa 6p66v XlOov' eK rovrov be rov lepov koi rds TTopnus (Kpiai
irepireiv Karearrj.
^ At Troezen : Paus. 2. 31, I iv r^ dyopa Tpoi^rjvlcov vaos Koi dydXpara

AprepiSus eari âreipcis. QrjiTea be eXeyero ibpvaao'dai koi ovopdcrai '2a)Teipav,
fjviKa 'AarepLOiva rov MtVco Karayioviadpevos dvecrrpexj/ev eK rrjs Kprjrrjs. Cf.
Pull, -deCorr. Hell. 1893, p. 93, inscription from Troezen, fourth
century B.C, 'Apxearparos 'AprdpiTi 2(oreipa. . . .
586 GREEK RELIGION.
e At Boiae, "a.
f At Pellene Paus.
: 7. 27, 3 vTrep 8e roi^ I'nw t^s 'Al^r^fus earw uXaos
7TepicpKo8ofir]fXPop Ti)(fi 2a>Tfipas iniKkrjcnv 'ApTe/niSof, Kol 6p.vvov(n,v iin
fityioTois avTTjv' tcrobos re nXriv toIs Upevaiv, nWco ye ovbevi (cttlv dvdpoiTroiv.
iepf'is 8e apdpes rS>v cVtp^tupicoi' den Kara boâp yevovs paXiora alpovpepoi.
1 lut. Aral. 32 avTo\ 8e UfXKrjpeis Xeyovai to (iperiis rrji deov top ptp ciWop
anoKilcrdaL ^^povov (i'âvaTOP, orap 8f Kivrjdep inro tj]s Upfias eKCpfprjrai, prjhiva
TTpoa^XeTTfiP fvaPTiop . . , ov yap dpdpoiTTOis popop opapa (ppiKTop eiVat Koi
XaXfTTup, aWa Koi dep^pa noie'ip acpopa koi Kapnovi dnap^XiaKfiv.
s In Thisbe: îdl. de Corr. Hell. 1884, 401, 402 Qowias . . .
'Aprapibi ^coTeipjj (fourth century b.c).
t At Anaphe, '"^.
i
At Athens : Eph.Arch. 1893, p. 59 'AprfpiSi 2coT{ipq Mdpap dvedrjKe :
cf. inscription of first century B.C. (?). Id. pp. 52-54, inscription
mentioning and 01 ^coTrjpLaarai. CL z5. 1883, p. 205, No. 5
tj Sojretpa
on a terracotta representing Artemis holding a hare

Scoreipa inscribed
and resting her hand on the head of a fawn.

^ At Anaphe : Collitz, Dialect-inschriften, 3433 6 hdpo<: 6 'Apa^palcop
. . . 'AnoWctiPi Ilvdlco 'ApTfpiSi Swreipai. Cf. 3449 345 1.

^ An/A. Pal. 6. 267 ^coa-(f)6pns, w Scoretp', eVi IlaXXaSoy laradi KXrjpcop,
ApTtpi, Koi ^(apifp 0cof eop ai/Spj hibov.
^^* Artemis 'Yppia in Arcadia 'Aprepibos Upop

. : Paus. 8. 5, 11 eo-rtv
Ypvias eniKXriaiv' tovto eV opois fJ.fP icrriv 'Opxopevlaip, npos 8e tj} MaPTiPiKrj'
(removal Koi K noKaiordTov Kal 01 irdpTes 'ApAcaSes 'Y pviap" Aprepip. eXdpâpe
fie Trjp iepaavpriv Trjs Geov Tore tri Kopi] TvapBeva^ . . , pere^Xtjdrj 8e i^ eKe'ivov
Koi 6 popos. dpTi yap napdepov SiSdacrt rrj 'AprepiSi lepeiap yvpalKa, opiXlas
ap8pS>p dno)(pCL)PT(os e'xovcrap. Id. 8. 1 3, I ev vTvrioi rov opovs lepop io-ri rrjs
Ypp'ias Aprepihos' pereari 8e avrov Ka\ Mapripevai '^ * koi lepeiap Ka\ au8pa
iepea' rovrois ov popop ra es ras pixels dXXa Kal es ra aXXa dyicrreveip
KaBearrjKe top xpovop rov jBlov navra, Ka\ ovre Xovrpd ovre diaira Xonrfj Kara
TO avra cr(Pi(n, Ka6a Kal rots ttoXXoIs e'crrip, ovSe es oIkmp Tvapiacnv dp8p6i
Ibiarov. TOiaiira oiSa erepa eVtauroi' Kal ov Trpdcrco 'Eêcriwi' eTTLr-qhevopra^
Tovs rji Aprepibi iaridropas rfj Eêrrta yipopepuvs' KoXovpepovs 8e vtto tcop
TToXiTcop 'Ecro-î/as* rrj 8e Apre'piSi T[j 'Yppia Kal eoprrjp ayovaip enereiop.
Sparta: Clem. Alex. 33 P Xe\vri8a 8e''Aprepip

'^'^^
Artemis XeXOns at
^napridrai aeôvrn. Homeric hymn to Aphrodite, 18 :
Kcu yap rfj (ÂprepiSif d8e roâ, Kal ovpecn 6ripas epaipeip,
(poppiyyes re X'*P' ''"^ 8ianpvaiol r oXoXvyai,
dXaed re aKiuepra biKaiup re tttoXis dp8pQ>p,
CL'EvLV. Phoeji. 234. Cf. the Carian worship of MoXTraSms 'H/xtêa :
Diod. ?ic. 5.62-63 MoXTraSuJi/ Se (the sister of UapBivos) 'Knideav oivofidadai
Ka\ TifiaaOai napa iracri rois iv Xtppovrjaa. ev be rals dvaiais avriis . . . ras
fjiiu (nrov8as p-tXiKpara noioi/ai, tov 8e a-âpevov r) (})ay6vTa ios ov vopipov
T7poatk6(iv TTpos TO repfvos . . . raj bvaroKovaas tCov yvvaiKav r^9 iv rais
coSicri ToKanvoiplai Kai Kivbvvu)V unaXkaTTfiv rr]v Oiov.
Artemis associated with Cybele, Bendis, Britomartis, Dictynna.

^^^
Strabo, 470 Tourot? 6' (the rites of Rhea-Cybele) eot/ce km to. napa
Toli paÎ TCI re KoTVTTia Ka\ to. BerSt'Seia, Trap* ols Ka\ to. Op(f)iKa rr]v
KaTapxrjf ^'""X^-
^" Athenae. 14. p. 636 Atoyei/r;s 6 TpayiKos . . . eV ttj Sf/xeXr/ :
kXvco 8e Avbas BoKjîas re napBevovs

TTOTapu) irapoLKovs "AXv'i TpaXiav 6e.ov
8a(j)p6aKiou KUT (iXaos ApTepiv aeêiv.
""^
Steph. ByZ. S. v. Mdaravpa' rroXis Avbias dno Ma? . . . eKaXf'iTO be
Ka\ T] 'Pea Ma Ka\ Tavpos avTjj iOviTO Tvapa Avbuls. Strabo, 535 ^" Ko'/xaj^n Kal
TO Trjs Êvvovs iepov fji> eKe'ivui Ma ovopdôvcri . . to. be iepa raCra boKfl
.
'OpeVr/)? peTa r^f dbeX(j)rjs 'icpiyeveias Kopiaai bevpo otto ttjs TavpiKrjs ^Kvdias,
Ta r^y TavponoXov 'ApTepibos. Cf. Paus. 3. 16, 8; Dio. Cass. 36. 13

(Dind.) TCI be br] Kopava Tqs re vvv KamraboKias (ctti kch eboKd to re Trjy
\\pTepibos TO TavpiKov jBpeTas Ka\ to yeuas to 'Ayapepvweiov bevpo ae\ exeiu.
Artemis nepaa-ia at Castabala in Cilicia identified with the Tauric
goddess : Strabo, 537 ev roIs Kao-ra/3uXoty e'o-Ti to ttjs Ilepaaias 'Apre-
pibos Iepov, onov (paa\ Tas Upeias toIs ttoo-I fit' dvBpaKids j3a8iCeiv drradels'
KdvTaiida be' Ttves ttjv ovttjv OpvXovcnv laToplav T7]V irepl Toi/ 'OpeaTOv Koi Trjs
TavpoTToXov. Inscription from Byzantium Mr^rpl 6eS)v Ma, Mordtmann

und Dethier, Epigraphik von Byzcmtuim, Taf. 6. 8.
Artemis-Bendis.
^^^
Hesych. Hevbh- rj "Aprepis, GpaKicTTL Palaeph. de hicred. 32
KaXoCcrt TT]v " ApTepiv QpaK.es Bevbeiav Kp^res be AiKTVvvav, AaKebaipovioi. be
Oviriv. Plat. Rep. 327 A KaTelSrjv x^S neipota . , . irpocrevôpevos re r//
6ecS (Bevb'ibi) . . . 328 A ovb' 'iaTe on Xapmn eVrdt npos eairipav d(j>' (.Trnoov
Tjj deco. At Salamis : Foucart, Associations Religicuses, 209. Hesych.

S. V. BovcTâToV tt]v "ApTepiv QpaKes. Id. S. V. AiXoyôs" "^h^ Bevhlv ovTOi
KpaTlvos ev Gparrais eKoXeaev, rjroi on bvo TLpcis eKXrjpwcraTo olpavUw re
KOI xôviav . . . t] OTI, bvo Xoyxas (ji^pei, KVvrjyeTiKt) ovcra . . . ttjv yap 2eXr)vr]V
Bevblv Ka\ "ApTepiv vopiCovai. Id. S. V. MeyaXj; Qedr ' ApiaT0<f)dvris e^J? ttjv
Bevblv. epciKia yap r] 6e6s. Cf. PhotiuS, LeX. MeydXr)v dfoV 'Apiarocpdvrjs
ev ATjpviais- IWy ttjv Bevblv. Strabo, 466 ooo-re Kal to. Upa Tpouov Tiva
588 GREEK RELIGION.
KnivoTTOie'icrdaL Tavrd re (the Corybantic rileS of Crete) kui tu)V Sa/xo^/JUKWi'
Kat Tct iv ATjfiva.
"''
Artemis êpala and Bendis"'': Lycoph. Cass, ii 74-1180:
w iifjTfp, a> 8v(TfiT]Tp, ov8e crhv Kkeoi
mrvcTTOv earai, Ylepcrecos 6e irapOtvos
Bpipcj Tp!.pnp(J)oi 6!](Terai a eVwTrtSa
KXayyaicri raplîjaovcrnv fVVv)(OLS ^poTovs,
Saoi peSovarjs ^rpvpovos Zrjpvvdias

deiKTjXa firj creôvcTL \np.na8ovxi"tS
6v(j6\ois êpalav iâKivptvoi 6(av.
At Alexandria to Bei/8iSeioi/ mentioned by Synesius, Epist. 4 ad init.
Artemis Dictynna-Britomartis.
'^'
Died. Sic. 5- 76 BpiTopapTiv ttjv Trpocrayopfvofievriv AiKTVVvav pvdiAo-
yoOtrt yeviadai pei> iv Kaiyoi rrjs Kpr]Tr^s fK A(6j Km Kdppr^s Trjg Ei;/3ouAou tov
yfvvrjde'vTo^ k Arjprjxpos. Tavrrjv evperiv yevopevrjv Biktvuv eis Kvvrjyiav Trpocr-
ayopevSrjvai AiKrvvvai'. Koi rdi pev diarpiâs Tvoirjaaadai pern rrjs Apre/itSoj,
dcf)' j]i alrias ei'iovs SoKf'iv ttjv avTi)^ flvai AiKTvi/vav re Koi "ApTepiv. AriSt.
Jân. 1359:
dpa fie AiKTvupa Traii,
Aprefjiis KoXd,
Tcis KwicTKas e;(oiicr' eXdiTco.
^ In Crete: Strabo, 479 Tijs pevroi Kvâvias opos eVrl Tirvpos, fv (o
Upov (TTiv ov AiKTulov, oXXci AiKTWpalov. Herod. 3. 59 ra Ipd rd iv

Kv8u>vir] iovTU vvv QVToi (ot '2dpioi\ fieri ol TToirjo'avTfs, Koi tov ttjs AiKTVvrjs
vrjdv (in the time of Polycrates). At Phalasarna in the west of Crete :
Dicaearch. 118 :
(f)acT\ S' iv Kpt'jTT) TToXiv
(ivai âXdaapva Keipevrjv irpos fjXtov
dvvovTa, KXfiaTov XtêV fôvaav Kai Upov
ApTpt8os ayuiv, KaXuadai, Trjv deov AiKTVvav.

At Olus : PaUS. 9. 40, 3 eTfpa ^6ava lÂaihakov) iv ^prjTi], BpiTo-
pMpTis iv 'OXovuTi. Cf. C. I. Or. 2554 (alHance between Latus and
Olus) "OpKOs AaTiav' Ôpvvas rav 'EcrTiav Koi tov Zrjva tov KprjToyevia . . .
Koi TOV ÊXfvaivnv koi tciv BpiTopapTiv. Cauer, Delect. Itiscr. Graec?
12 1 (oath between Cnossus and Dreros) 'O/xj/uo) Tav 'Eariav kqI tov
Arjva , . . tov AneWoiva tov Hoitlov koi tov AaTovv koI Tav Aprepiv '
, . .
Kal ran BpiTopapriv. Solinus, II. 8 Cretes Dianam religiosissime

venerantur, Britomartem gentiliter nominantes, quod sermone nostro
sonat virginem dulcem. Hesych. BpiTonapris- iv KpTjTj] 17 "ApTtpis. Id. s. v.
BpiTv' yXvKv K.py]Tef. Callim. VI Dia7i. 200 (at the feast of Britomartis in
Crete) to Se crTecpos rjpaTi Kfivco rj Trirvs fj cr;^Tfos" pvproio 6e X^'^P^^ "iBiktoi.
^ In Aegina: PaUS. 2. 30, 3 (vAlylurj SenposTo oposrov IlaveWrjviov Atos

lovcTtu icTTiv 'A(f)aias Ifpov, (s r]v Koi Uivdapos acrfia Aiyivi]Tais eVotr^cre. âtri
8e o( KprjTcs, rovrois ycip iari to. is avrrjv e7rt;^copta, . . . Atoy 8e Koi Kapp.ris
TTis 'EvôvXov BpiTofxapriv yeveadai' ;â/pe' 8e avrrjv 8p6pois re kcu drjpais, koi
ApTpi8i ixaXiara (piXrju fivai' Mlvco Be ipaaOevTa (f)fvyovcra fppf^fu iavrrju es

BiKTva d(peip.iva in Ixdvcov 6rjpq. Taiirrju pev deov inoirjaev' Aprtpii, ufiSovat
8e 01) KprjTes povov aXAa koi AlyivrJTai, Xeyoi/res (paivecrdai a(f)icnv iv rrj vrjcrco
TTjv BpiTopupTLv. inl.K\r](Tis Be ol napd re Alyivijrais earXv A(paia koL AiKTvvva
iv KprjTTj. Steph. Byz. S. v. 'A<p6ma . . . Koi 'A(j)daia fj 'Ekutt)' ? Â(puia. Cf.

Callim. m Dian. 189.
c At Sparta : PaUS, 3. 12,8 eVl he tw Trepan 'A(/)erat'3or, iyyvrara fjhr) tov
reixiivs, AiKTvvvrjs ia-rlv UpoVj koi âcrlXetui rdcpoi rSav icakovpevuiv EvpvTraivTiBcov.
d On the south coast of Laconia : Paus. 3. 14, 2 enave\6ov(nv
oniau) irpos rfjv XeaxTjv i<n\v 'Aprepihos 'icrcriipas lepoV iTTOvopaôvai Be avTt]v
Kai Aipvaiav, ovaav ovk "Aprepiv, BptTopapTiv Be rrjU Kpr]Ta)v. Hesych. S. V.
'lacrcopia' rj "Aprepis. Koi eoprrj' Kai tottos iv ^Trdprr]. Stcph. Byz. S, V. \(T-
aapioV opos T^s AaKcoviKrjs, dcp" ov rj "Aprepu'la-aoipia. Cf. V\ut. A^ês. 32.
e In Delos: Bull.de Corr. Hell. 1882, p. 23, inscription concerning

the treasure in Apollo's temple mentions tovs x^P'^^^ 'Apreptaiuis
BpiTapapriois.
^ ? Near Troezen : Eur. H/pp. 145 :
ovB' dpcf)l Tav noXvdqpov
ALKTvvvav dpTrXaKtaii
dvifpoi ddvToov neXdvcov rpvxei
^^*.
(Schol. id. Tives Be Tr]v avrrjv elvai (rrjv AUrvvvav) rfj 'EKarr)), Cf.
s ? In Cephallenia : An/. Lib. Trans. 40 'inena Be eK tov "Apyovs els

Kecf)aX\T]viav dve^rj {BpiTOfxapTis) Ka\ avTijv avopaaav ol KecpaWrjves Aatppiav'
Kai ipov rjyayev a>s Bea.
^ In Massilia: C. I. Gr. 6764 Bed Aiktvo. Bjjpos M<ro-[t\twTwi/].
i
Connected with Apollo Delphinios : Plut. de Soil. Am'm.p. 984 B
'AprepiBos ye Aiktvvvtjs Ae\(f)ii'iov re Ân6X\ct>vos lepd Ka\ ôjpol napd ttoXXoIs
'EXXjji'coi/ elvlv.
^ ? Connected with Hekate in Crete : Et.Mag. 214. 26, j-. v. Bptro-
papris. êdvdijs iv t<m Trpwrw irepl reXerav (f)r]a\ xpfjo'pov Au Bodrjvat on e'fc
Tijs pfjTpas Tt]s 'Ekottjs yevvTjaopevos peraaTrjaei T/y? jâa-iXetas avrov. ytv-
vr]6elar]s Be TrjS 'EKdrrjs, ras avpnapoiKxas Kopas rfj Xf;ôI dvalBorjaai, Bpirov,
rovTiCTTiv ayaBov.
1 Artemis AiKrvwala near Ambrosus in Phocis : Paus. 10. 36, 5 Aiktw-

va'ias iniKXrjcnv lepov ivTiv 'AprepiBos. Tavrrjv ol Âp^paxre'is ayovai. paXia-ra ev
TipiJ' TO) Be ayaXjuart ipyaaia re icrnv Alyivaia Kai peXavos tov XlOov TrenoirfTai.
590 GREEK RELIGION.
m ?At Astypalaea: 'R.zxi^. Aniiq. Hdle'n. inscr. No. 1199 Ti/joKXaa
tivavhpov tîKTvvva (? fourth century b.c).
^ Strabo, 472 Îktt} tottos iv rrj ^Krj'îa Koi opos iv KprjTj],
""^
The Persian Artemis-Aphrodite, vide Aphrodite ^^' ^ : ? on the
chest of CypseluS, PaUS. 5. 19, 5 "Aprtfiis 8e ovk oUa e(f)' OTO) Xo'yo) irrepvyas
exova-d eartv eVt Ta>v uficov, koi rff fiev fiesta Kurepêt TrdpbaXiv, rfi 8e (Tepa raiv
Xfipcov X/oirrj. Diod. Sic. 5* 77 '''i-H-^Tnt ^^ âi rrapa Tolt Htpcrais rj debi
avTT] Biacpfpovrais Kal pvcrrrjpia TroLoiiatv ol [idplBapoi Tci Trap' erepoi? uvvreKovpiva
peXP'- '''^^ '^^^ xpovutv AprfjUtSt Uepcrla. Strabo, 532 anavra peu ovv ra
Tuiv Ilfpcrcov lepa Ka\ M^8ot Koi Appivioi TeTiprjKacri, to. 8e ttjs 'AwurtSo?
8ia(f)ep6vT0}s 'Appevioi . . . Koi. dvyare'pds ol enKpai'f'aTaToi tov edvovs civiepnvcri
TvapBevovs, ali vopos ecrrt KaTaTTopvfvdeiaais Tro\vi> ^povov napa rfj deco pera
ravra dlôcrdai nphs ycipov. Plut. Lucull. 24 ôf? Upai vepovrai Tlepalas
Aprepibos, 1]V paXicTTa 6ea>v ol nepav Ev(f)pdTOV ^dpjâpot Tipmcn' ;^pco2/rat Se
Ttns ôvdi jrpos Ovcnav povov^ /iXXtu? 5e ivKdôvTai kcitci ttjv x^puv ("i<pfToij
XapdypaTii (pepovatu ttjs deov XapndSa. Polyb. 3 1. II Kara 77)1/ '2,vpiav
AvTioxos 6 âaiKfVi ôvXopaos fvTroprjcrai xPIP-dro)!', npoedero crrpaTfimv (ttI
TO Tr)i 'ApTfpiSoi Upov (h rfjv 'E\vpat8a. Clem. Alex. Pi'olrept. p. 57 P

(from BerOSUs) 'Apraêpôv TOV Aapeiov tov "Q^^^ . . . oy TrpcoTos ttJs
AcppotiTTjs Tavaidos to ayoKpa dvaaTrjcras iv Ba/3rXwn Kni 2ov<tois kcu 'E/c/Sa-
Tapois Tlepaais koi BuKTpOLs koi Aapd(TKa koX ^dpSeaiv vnedeiê aeêiv. Plut.
'
Artax. 27 TTjs 'AprepiSus Tî iv 'EKâTdvois, fjv Avoxtt^v KaKovaiv, iepeiau
dvfSfiêv avTrjV onixts ayvov Sidyr} tov fTTiXoinov fSlov. At Zela : Strabo, 5 1 2.
At Hierocaesarea and Hypaepa in Lydia : Tac. Ami. 3. 62 Altius

Hierocaesarienses exposuere Persicam apud se Dianam delubrum rege
Cyro dicatum. Cf. ^^c. Pans. 5. 27, 5 : id. 7. 6, 6 tov Se 'ASpatrrov
tovtov x"^'^']^ (iKova dvideuav ol AvSoi TTpo lepov YlfpaLKrjs 'ApTfpiSoi, At
Philadelphia: Ba//. dc Corr. Hell. 1884, p. 376 Mj^rpi 'Ai^nftViSi. Cf.
C. I. Or. 3422 lepia Trii \\pTfpi8os. At Koloe Bii/L de Corr. Hell. :
1880, 128 'ApTfpi8i 'AvaeiTi Kai Mrjvl Tuipov. Cf. Mover, /cat B(/3X. S/nupv.
1875, 47 nyaXpa 'AprepiSos

p. Ka\ Mijvos ayaXpa. Artemis Ndva . . .
in the Peiraeeus C.I.A.^- 131 "Alio? Km KXfw 'AprZ/ntSt NnVa tv^dpfvoi

:
dvidrjKavQ third century b.c). Philo, Bybl. Frag. 2. 2o(]\Iuller, Frag.

Hist. Grace, vol. 3, p. 568) Kpoi'M iyevovro uno 'AaTupTrji Ovyarfpes
enTQ TLTavibei fj 'ApTeptbes. At Attaleia in Lydia: Mova-. Kal Bi/3X. 2pvpv.
1885 1886, p. 51 'Apre'/xtSt Hepa-LKi'i Kal rw 8i]pM T\{jK(,iv, &C. Cf. C. I. Gr.
3424 TO. /LteyuXa 2ej3a<TTa. 'AvaeiTfia.
^^^
Artemis of Ephesus*: Paus. 7. 2, 4 ttoXXw TrpeajBuTfpa *] kuto.
'
laivas TO. es ttjv' ApTeptv ri]u 'Effxaiav flvai . . . AeXf-yes de tov KapiKov po'ipa Kai
Avhwv TO TToXv ol vfpopevoi Tqv xî'pav iprav. cokdvv Se Kal nfpl to lepbv uXXoi Te
REFERENCES FOR CHAPTERS XIIUXIX. 591
'iKfaias evfKa koI yvvoLKes tov 'A/nafo'i'&ii' yevovs. Id. 4. 31,8 'E(peaiciv fie "Aprefxiv
TToXds Te vofMiôvaiv a'l nliaai Koi avdpes l^la 6ea)V nuKiaTa liyovcriv eV Tiixrj. to.
fie aiTta ffioi doKtlv farlv Apaôvcav to kXcos, ai (prjurju to ayaX/xu e\ovcnv
idpvcratrdai, koi oti (K TraXaiOTciTov to Upov tovto iTroii-jQj}. Tp'ia fie I'lWa eni
TovTOis crvveTeXeaev es 86âv, peyedus re tov vaov to. irapa nacriv dvdponroi':
KaTaCTKfvacrpaTa vnepjjpKOTOs, koi E<f)e(ri(ov tijs n6\(ais ij uKpi], koi iv avTj] to

fTTtcpapes Trjs 6~ov. Callim. i/l Dian. 237 2o\ koI 'A/xafoi'iSey . . . eV Kore
TrappaXti] E(/)ecrcp 0peTa>; iSpvcTcwTo <p']y(S vtt einpepvu). Tac. Aim. 3. 6

Primiomnium Ephesii adiere, memorantes non, ut vulgus crederet,
Dianam atque Apollinem Delo genitos esse apud se Cenchrium :
amnem, lucum Ortygiam, ubi Latonam parLu gravidam et oleae, quae

turn etiam maneat, adnisam, edidisse ea numina . . . Mox Liberum
patrem, bello victorem supplicibus Amazonum, quae aram insederant,
ignovisse. Auctam hinc concessu Herculis, cum Lydia poteretur,
caeiimoniam templo. Strabo, 639 etVa \ipi]v ndvoppos KoKovpfvos f'xav
tfpov TTjs 'Ecpfalas 'ApTepiBos' eld' t] noXis. iv fie T77 avTfi TrapaKla . , . ecrrl
Kn\ T] 'OpTvyta, dianpenes ciXaos. Thuc. 3. IO4 rjv fie' ttots Kal to TTaXai
peydXr] crwoSoy es ttjv AtjXov twu 'lavav . . . ^vv re yap yvvai^X Koi Traialv
iBeiopovv, uxTnep vvv e's 'E(f)eaia "laves. PaUS. lO. 38, 6 ev Se 'Apre'/xtSoy Trjs
Ecpfaias . . , VTrep tov (icupov tJJ? UpoiTodpovias KaXovpevr]s'ApTepi8os. Dion.

Halic. An/. Rom. 4. aSÎwi/es pev, eV 'EêVw, TO T^s'ApTepidos (Ifpov KUTe-
aKevuaav^ . . . evda crvviovTfs , . . dya>vas eneTeXuvv ittttlkovs koi yvpvLKovs, Kal
TwvTTfpl pnv(n.Kr]v dKovapdTcov. C. I. Gr. 2954, a fragment of an Ephesian

decree, nai/ra;ô{i dvfioQai avTr]% iepd . . . avrfj re (Idpvadiu Kal ûipovs
avaKeidOai fita tcls vtt avTrjs yetvopevns evapyels inicfjaveiai . . , 816 8ed6v6ai
oXov TOV pr}va tov 'ApTfpiaiwva eivai [iepoi/ Tracni? rjaj rjpepas, (iyfadai fie eV
avTals Tas e'opras Kal ti]V twv 'ApTeplia-luiv Travriylvpiu. Et. Illao, 383. 30
E(T(TT]v' 6 âaiXevs kuto. 'Ecpeaiovi' dno n^Tarpopas Toij peXiaamv âcriXeas,
vide ^~*. Strabo,
OS f'lprjTiU eacrrfv : 641 lepeas S' (vvovôvs fixov ovs
eKuXovv MfyajBvôvs . . . Kal rjyov (v Tipfj peydXr]' avvupdadai fie tovtols exprjv
napdevovs . . . aavXov Se pevfL to Upov Kal vvv KalwpoTepov. Cf. Xen. Auab.
5. 3, 6 Meya/3i;fc<) tw Tr\% 'ApTfpibos vecuKopcp. Plut. An. sen. sit ger. rcsp.
P*795 ^ '^'^^ '" 'E(piaa> Trepi Trjv"ApTepiv, opolas eKdcTTr^v MeXXieprjv ToirpuTov
fha 'if prjv, TO fie Tpirov UapUpr^v KoXovaiv ; priestcss of Aitemis, Heliod.
Aet/l. I. 12. Et. Mag. p. 402. 2 iKerria yap 17 0f6s (r) 'E(/)eo-ia "Aprf pis)
a-T((f)dvois Se fiia SaXXuyv Tas iKea-ias noiovanv' odev ouSe npofioTa avTrj Bvovm
8ia TO Tovs keTas paXXovs npocrcpepeiv. C. I. Gr. 2955 eVt npvTaveas Ti/3.
KXav^LOv TiTiavov, . . . apxiêpeats, lepaTtvovTOs ôaixtavov . . . vavjBaTovvTav
Xnpibrjpov, ... CI, Gr. 6797 :
IrjTTjpi vvacov, (f)af(Tip^p6Tco 'AnoXXavi

avacrarav Eipecrov Kprjalav (paea-cpupov
fvxw 'i&i'^fv ElTvx-qs (? third century B.C.),

592 GREEK RELIGION.
Al'Leni. Olieirocr. 4. 4 ywi] eSoêf eij Toi/ vfinv T^s' 'ApTefjLibos ttjs E(pf(TLas
el(re\T]Xvdevai' ovk es fiaKpav anedave' ddvaros yap rj Crjp.ia rrj (laeXOiwcrr] fxet
yvvaLKi. lb. 2. 35 toii Se roi' mp.voTipov fnavjjprjfxepois îov 1) KaTfaraXixevr]
TO) (TpîjjLiaTi ("ApTf/iis-) ajieivuiv, niov tj 'E(j)eaia Koi fj Tlepyaia K(u rj Xiyufxivrj
napa AvKiois 'E'KfvOipa. Hesych. S. V. 'EXovala' "Aprepis trapa Êcfxaiocs.
''
At ]\Iassilia : Strabo, 179 ev 6e rrj aKpa t6 'Ecpâiov tf^pvTai Kai TO
Toil AeXcpiviov 'AttoXXcovoj lepov . . . dnaipovai yap tuIs ^(OKaieiiaiv eK ttjs
oiKeias Xoyiov iKTifcrfiv (f)aai,v r^yepovi xprjcracrdai tov ttXoO Trapa ttjs E(f)f(rias
'ApT(pi8os Xaôvcri . . . ev be t tu'is dnoiKOis noXecri TravTa-ôv Tifidv iv to'is
7rpa>T0is TavTTjv ti]v deov Ka\ tov ôavov t^v 8idd(aiv ttjv avTijv Ka\ TaXka
vupipa (pvXaTTdv to. avra anep iv ttj prjTponoXei vevopiUTai. Another temple
at the mouth of the Rhone, id. 184.
c In Rome : Strabo, 180 Ka\ Sfj kuI to ^6avov ttjs 'Apre/itSoy TTJs iv
Tto 'A/3ei'rtVo) oi 'Ptoixaioi Trjv avTtjv Btddeaiv e\ov tw napd toIs MaaaaXioiTais
dpedeaav. Cf. I59> i^l Spain, Tpia TToXl)(VLa MaaaiXiooTcov iCTTiv ov ttoXv cmcoBeu
TOV TTOTapov' TOVToov 8 fCTTt yvcopipuiTaTOP TO fip.fpno'Konelov i'x^ ^'^'-
"''U ^'^P'}
Tijs 'Ecpeaias 'ApTtpibos Upou a-0oS/ja Tipo3p.evov. At Emporiae : id. l6o.
'1 In the territory of Scillus in Elis : Xen. An. 5. 3, 7 Sfvocpap Se
Xaû>v Ytopioi/ wpelTai Trj 6fa , . , 6 8e vaos ws fitKpbs p.eydX(o tco (p Ecpecra
f'lKaaTai, koi to ôopop eoiKfp as KVTrapiTTiPOP ;^/3iicrc5 opti tco ip 'Eê'o-w : vide
''^. Cf. Paus. 5. 6, 5.
e At Alea in Arcadia: Paus. 5. 23, i {If pop) 'ApTep.ib6s eaTip *E(/)eo-taj.
f At Megalopolis: Paus. 8. 30, 6 'Ecpea-ias /iyaXpa Âprepidos.
8 At Corinth: Paus. 2. 2, 5 evTip ovv eVl t^s dyopds . . ."ApT(p.is re
eTriKXr](np 'Ecfifaia.
^ Smyrna: C. /. Gr. 3155 ^"'^^ Idpva-aPTO t6 Tep.(pos Apre/LiiSt 'Eêcria
(early Roman period.)
i Aphrodisias : C. I, Gr. 2823 .\lXlav AaîXXap, 'Ao-t'as dpx'epnav, Ka\

KocrprjTfipap Trjs E(jif<Tias 'Apre/xtSos koi dpxifpfi-ap ttjs XaprrpoTdTijs A0po-
di(Tua)v TToXems.
^ At Panticapaeum : C. 1. Gr. 2104b (6 hilpo) vnep ttjs dvyaTpos 'ItItjs
'ApreptSi 'EcpeaeiTj (fourth century B. c).
1 At Chios: C. I. Gr. 2228, private dedication.
"4a Artemis Aeu/co^pvr/rij at Magnesia on the Maeander : Xen. ffelL

3. 2, 19 TO piv (TTpaTfvpaTa aTTr]X6e , . . to K 'EXXtjpikop els A(VK0(f)pvp, ep6a
T)P
'
ApTipibos T( if pop pdXa ayiop, kcCi Xip.PT} irXfOP rj (TTadiov vnoiâppos atpaos
TTOTipov Ka\ 6(ppov vSoTos. Tac. Afifi. 3. 62 Proximi Magnetes

L. Scipionis et L. Sullae constitutis nitebantur ut Dianae Leuco-

phrynae perfugium inviolabile foret, Strabo, 647 (vravOa 8' t,v koI t6
TTJs AivSvurjvrji Upov firjrpos Oeoov' iepdcraadai S" avrov ti)v QfpicTTOKKfovs
yvviuKa. vvv S ovk eort to Upov 8ia to Tr)v noXiv ds t'lXKov peTcoKLcrdcu tuttov' iv
Of Ttj vvv TToXet TO Trjs Af VKO(jipvrjvrj': Upov (<ttlv 'ApTfpidos, o tco pev peyedei
Tov vaov KOI TM TvX^Qei. tcov dvadrjpaTcov XfiVerat tov kv 'EêVw, Tfj 5e evpvOpia
Kai Tjj Te-)(yrj . . . noKv 8La(pfp(i. koI tco ptyidd vnepaipd navTas tovs iv 'Acrla
TrXr/v 8ve'iv, tov ev 'E(f)eaa> koI tov iv AiSu/iot?. Kai to niikaiov 8e avve^rj to7s
MayvT](Tiv vtto Tprfpwv np8t]v dvaipfdTJvai, KtppepiKov (Ovovs, . . . to 8e eî/y roiis
'Effxaiovi KaTMTXf'iv tov tottov. Bull, de Corr. Hell. 1 89 1, p. 539,

inscription of (?) first century b.c. found on the site, 17 ôv\r) Ka\ 6 di^pos
Koi T] yepovaia irLpTjfrav êpipiov KXoviov Mav(î)ov viov . . . evafjBcos pev
dtaKelpevov npos Tfjv"ApT(piv Trjv AfVKo(ppvr)vr]v.
In Crete: C. I. Gr. 2561 b, 1. 25 aTvobd^BivTa ovv Ka\ avroX KpiTiu

irapaxprjpa ava^dvTes ini tov ûipov ttjs \\pTepi8os ttjs AfVKocfypvTjvijs . . .
wpoaapev Kaff UpS>v ; ? towards the end of second century b.c.

Cf. Strabo, 636 Mayvrâia i) irpos Maidv8pco MayvfjToiv dnoiula twv iv
QeTTaXia koi KprjTav.
c At Amyclae PauS. BadvKXiovs 8e MdyvrjTos OS TOV dpovov

: 3. 18, 9
inoitjae dvadrjpaTa eV i^fpyacrpivco t(3 Opovco Xdpires Koi dyaXpa 8e AevKO-
(ppvr]VTJi iarlv 'ApTepiSos.
*^ At Athens: PaUS. I. 26, 4 x^foi^J' 'ApripiSos dyuXpa eaTTjKev ini-

Kkfjcriv AevKo(ppvr]viis, dvidta-av 8e ol iraiSts oi QepiaTOKkeovs.
Artemis-Upis.
^^^
In Lacedaemon, vide ^-l At Troezen: Schol. Apollon. i. 972
opniyyos (.? ovmyyos) irapa Tpoi^rjvtoLi (^vpvos) iWApTtpiv. Athenae. p.619
ov-myyoi 8k (y(i8ai) ai eh "ApTfpiv. In Ephesus, Upis-Artetnis : Macr.
Sat. 5. 22, 5, quoting from Alexander Aetolus, Taxioi>v^Q,Tnv ^XrjTfipav
oia-Tcov. Callim. m H/an. 204 ^SItti dvaaa evwTvi (paf(j(f)6pf. Et. Mag.
p. 641. 55 CX^^ts" inlQiTov 'Apripidos ^ irapa to OTTi^fcrdcii to? tiktovitqs
avTrjv, rj napa ttjv 6pi\j/aa-av avTrjv Ovniv. Hesych. S. V. ^Q.ni (ivaaaa irapa
upoBvpois. Cic. de Nat. Deor. 3. 58 Tertiae (Dianae) pater Upis traditur,

Glauce mater; eam saepe Graeci Upim paterno nomine appellant.
C. I. Gr. 6280 ^ T eVi %pya jBpoTosv Spaas 'Papvovaids Oviri.
"^
Artemis 'OiriTais in Zacynthos : C. I. Gr. 1934 \\pxiK\^s . . . kuI
AX/ciSd/xa Tav avTa>v GvyaTtpa diOKoXrjaaa-av 'ApTepiTi 'OinTat8t.
? Artemis-Nemesis.
^^"^
Hesiod. Theog. 223 :
Ttxre 8k Kai êpeaiv iir]pa 6vt]to2iti l3poTo'i(Ti
vii^ oXorj,
VOL. II. N
594 GREEK RELIGION.
Cypria, Frag. 5 Diintzer
Tovi he fiira TpiTaTJ)v '^Xivrjv Tpe(f)( 6avfia ^poroiai,
7r]v TTOTt KaXXiKOfxoi Ne/nftrts (piXiWrjTi fxiyfian

Ztjvi 6fu>v âcriXrji tK( KpnTeprji im amiyKrjs
(fifvye yiip ovd' i'dtXep fj.i)(6r]fjifvai iv (piXoTTjTi
irarpl AiC Kpovtcovi' , . .
Kara yrjv fie koi arpvyfTov peXav vSap

(jifvye, Zevs 5 e'S/wfce. . , .
aXKorf pev Kara Kvpa no\v(f)\oia(Soio BaXaacrrj^

l)(6vi fidopevrj' , , . yiyvero 8 aui
6r]pi! OCT rjufipn^ alva rpiCpei, o(ppa (pvyoi viv.
EratOSth. Catast. 25 Kwkj/os . . . 'Kiyixai 8e Tov At'a opoiaidrivai rep ^cow rourw
^fpeafcos fpaadrjvai . . . opiOiaBivra rfj opvew KaraiTTTJvai tls 'Popvovvra Trjs Attik^j
KOKn TijV 'Se'pecriv (pdelpar rr)V Se TfKflv u>6v e^ ov tKKo\a(j)6rii'ai Ka\ yevecraai
rf]v 'E\evT]v, as <j)rjai Kparlvos 6 noirjTTjs. Cf. Meineke, Frag. Com. Graec.
2. p. 82. Clemens Rom, Homil. 5. 13 (Dressel, p. 143. 12) NfîeVft
Tp GecTTriou t_^ koli Ar]8a vopurBdar) kvkvos fj )(rjv yevopfvos EXeprjv iTfKvaa-aTO.
Bekk. Afiecd. p. 282. 32 lîepeaui navT]yvpis Tis eVt rois veKpo'is ayopivr],
Vet 7] Nipfais fTTt tS)v aTToOavovrav TiraKrai, Dcmosth. npos SttouS.
p. 1 03 1 flaeveyKOvarjs t^s fprjS yvvaiKOi eli ra vepeaeia t<o narpi pvav

dpyvpiov. Cf. Soph. /. 792 "AKOve, Ne'/xeo-t rov Bavovros apriws. Cf. Tim.
Locr. De An. Mund. c. 12 ad fin., MuUach, Frag. Phil. Graec. 2. p. 46.
Nemesis at Rhamnus : Paus. i. 33, 2 boKii 8e koI to'is nno^da-iv is
Mnpadcbva twv I3a pfic'i pwv dnavTrjcrai prjvipa K tov 6(ov ravrrjs ySepeaecos)
. . . \ldov Hctpiov (OS in iêipyaa-ptvois rjyov is Tfonaiov noirjcriv. Tovtov

êibUis TOV \i6ov dpyciaaTo, nyoKpa piv dvai Nf/xeVeo)?, Tij Ke(f)a\-p de enecTTi
Trjs 0fov arecpavos iXd(f)ovs f'xcov Koi Nlnrjs dyaKpara ov peydXa' Tats 6e ;^fp(rii'
e;(et r^ pev kXu8ov prjêas, Tfj heîa Se <Pid\r]v. AWiOTres 8e em tt] (puiXj]
ir7roir]VTai . . . Nf/xecrft fie fivai Traripa ^^Kfavov {(paalj . . . TTTfpa de 'ixov
ovTf ToiiTO TO fiyakpa 'Ntpicreays uvTe iiXXo Trfnoirjrat twu apâiaiv . . . em rw

^ddpa . . . $fiStns TTtnoirjKe pev 'EXivrjv iino hr}bas dyopivrjv irnpa ttjv 'Nipeaiv.
Zenob. 5. 82 'Papvovala 'Ni/xeais' iv 'PapvovvTi NejueVfWf ISpvTat ayaXpn
tfKdnrjxv 6\6\i0ov epyov ^fi8iov, e;(ei be iv Trj

X^'-P'- M^^"^ KXdhov' i^ ov
cfiTjcriv 'AvTiyovos 6 KapvaTios riTvxtdv ti piKpov i^rjpTTJadai ttjv i7rLypa(f)tjv e'xov'
'AyapoKpiTos Tldpios fTTOiijcrfv. Phot. S. V. 'Papvovaia Nepeais' avrtj TrpcoTov

d<pi8pvT0 iv 'A(ppo8iTr]s rrxW^''''-' ^'" '^"' <Xd8ov eixf prjkeas. Plin. 36. 1
Certavere autem inter se ambo discipuli (Alcamenes et Agoracritus)

Venere facienda vicitque Alcamenes non opera sed civitatis suffragiis
contra peregrinum suo faventis. Quare Agoracritus ea lege signum
suum vendidisse traditur ne Athenis esset et appellasse Nemesin id :
positum est Rhamnunte pago Atticae. Solinus, Collect, rer. Memorah.

REFERENCES FOR CHAPTERS XIIUXIX. 595
7. Ramne quoque in qua

26 Phidiacae signum Dianae. C. I. A. . . .
289 lepeas Ovpavias Ne/zeVftof, late period dedications to Tiiemis and

3. :
Nemesis C. I. A. 2. 1570 and 1571. Artemid. 0/tet'r. 2. 37 'Apia-roôvXr]

Kai 'EvvofjLia ra avra Ttj Nf/xeVei (Tr}âivov(TL,
^ At Patrae : Pans. 7. 20, 9 rov Bfurpov S oii noppay Ne/xeo-ews vaos

Kai erepos eariv 'A(ppo8iTT]i,
^ At Smyrna : Paus. 7- 5, 3 ovrco fieTOKicravTO ideXovrai (oi ^fxvpvaloij
Kol 8vo N(pe(T(is vopiôvaiv dvrl pias. Koi prjrepa avrais â<T\v tlvai 'Svkto.
J-d. 9. 35, 6 2,pvpvaiots . . . iv Tw jfpw Ta>v 'Nepecrecov inrtp tu>v dyaXparcov
Xpvaov XdpiTfs dvaKeivrai, rex^r] BovnaKov. C. I. Gr. 3161, inscription
from Smyrna, ? tiiird century b. c, dyaQri tvxt] ras Nf/xeo-eis MeXiVwi/
dve6r]Kf 6fu Bp^trft Aiopda-a. Id. 6280 A: late inscription mentioning
swine-sacrifice to the Nemeseis.
d Septals with nfj(9co at Mylasa: BuH. de Corr. Hell. 1881, p. 39.

'^*
Adrasteia connected with Cybele : Strabo, 588 (in the neigh-
bourhood of Priapus on the Hellespont) eKoXfTro 5'
17 x^^p" avrr, 'A8pd-
(TTeia KOI A8pa(TTfias neSlov . . . (1)t](t\ fie KaWtaBevr]: irno 'ASpdorou
/Sao-iXewy, 6s irparos NfpeVecos Upov iSpva-nro, KoXelaOai 'A8pd(TT(iav. Aesch.
JVio5. Frag. 155 BtpeKwra ^copor evd' 'AdpaaTelas edos. Schol. Ap.
Rhod. I. 1 129 (fragment of the Phoronis) evda ySrjres 'iSalot ^pvyes
apBpts opearepoi oIkC, (vaiov KeXpis Aapvapevevi re peyas Koi v7rep/3toy "Akpcdv
'EvmiXapoi GfpdTrovTes dpdrjs 'ASpTjoreiTjy. Cf. Charax in Miill. Frag.
Hist. Graec. 3, p. 637, fr. 2 'ian 8e kcu TpcodSos 'ASpacTTfta Tonos drro
'A8pa(rTeias Ovyarpos MfXicranv tou "idrjs. Steph. Byz. S. V. 'AdpdaTfia'
AioyevT]! ovras fP iTpu>TTj nfp\ KvÎkov (pT}cr]v ano ASpacrrf/as /ce/cX^crât pids royv
6pe(TT(id8u)v vvpcpwv. Cf. Strabo,575 (near Cyzicus) t6 dvriKetpevnvopos o
KaXovaiv 'A8pa(TTflas. Id. 588 ivravQa piv oZv (near Priapus) ov8kv l(p6u
ASpaartias 8iLKvvTai, ov8i 8f) NepeVea)?, rrepi 8i Kvîkov (anv ASpaareias
'
Upov. Callim. 2?t lov. 47 Zei) o-e 8i Kvp^dvrap erapai TrpoafTrTJxvpavTo

AiKTolat peXi'ai, ere Se Koipicrev 'A8pT]crTfia XUvo) i'vi p^pviweo). Cf. Procl.
Theol. Plat. 4. 16, p. 206 Trap' 'Op(f)fl kuI (f>povpeiv Xeyerai ('ASpaorfia)
Tov Skov 8r]piovpyov Kai ;^dX(cea ponrpa Xaôvaa ku\ Tvpiravov a'lyrjKd. Plut.
Quaest. ConviV. 657 E oI -naXaioi rov pev Aios dvo Troteiv TtBrjuai rr]V "lrr]v
Koi TTjV A8pdaTiav.
t With Artemis : HarpOCr. S. v. ' Adpdareiav' ol pep Trjv uvTr]p Xeyovo-t
TJ] Nfpeo-ft . . . Ar]pqTpios 6e 6 2Kr)îos "AjiTtpip cprjcrip eivai ttjv 'A8pd<TTfiav

VTTo 'A8pd(TTov TLPOi I8pvpfpr]p. C. I. A. 1 . 2 I O '
A8pâ(TTeiai\ Ka\ Be[i/S(Sor]
y((VKX[iou] Kapirov en [tJjj'] Upwp. At Cyrrha: Paus. 10. 37, 8 naptxerac 8e
Kui es 6eap AnoXXapos Ka\ ApT(pi8os Ka\ ArjTovs pnop re Ka\ dydXpara peyedei
peydXa koi epyaaias Attik^s. fj Se 'A8pdaTfia 'l8pvTai pep ep tw avra crcpicn.
N 2
596 GREEK RELIGION.
c 'A8pa(n-eta-Ne/:ieo-ts joint worship in Andros : Miil. d. d. Ath. lint.
1876, p. 243 'SifjLfo-is KOI 'A^pciareta : ? second ccnlury B.C. In Cos:

ul/. de Corr. Hell. 1881, 223 Upa^ 'AS/jaoreuis Kai êni(TLOs: ? first
century B. C. Strabo, 588 AvrifMaxos ' S" ovro) (prjalv e(TTi Se Tis Ne/xeo-tf
fjLfyaXr] Beos, ^ Td8e ndvra npos ^.aKapav i'Xaxc' iStojuoi' 6e ot eiaaro TrpaJros
"AdprjaruSj 7roTap.olo itapd poou AlcTTjnoio ev6a TfTiprjTai re kch 'ASpTjcrTfta
KuXfiTai. Aesch. Pr07fl. 936 ol npoa-KWovvres Trjv'Adpdarfiav cru(f)oi. Eur.

Rhes. 342 'AS/iucrreta pkv a Aioy TTUiy i'ipyoi (TTopdrcov cf)66vov : id. 468 cri/v
8' 'AbpatTTfla \eyco. Menander, Koch, Frag. Com. Ailic. 3, p. 93 \\.hpd-

areia kul 6ea a-KvOpcuire Repeat crvyyLvu)aK(re. Nonn. Dionys, 48. 45 1 ITap-
devos 'AbprjcrTfia p,eTTj'i{ dvayapov Avprjv ypvTTas dpikXrjTrjpas vTTO^fvâaa \aXiP^.
Anth. Pal. 9. 405 ^ Ahpr](TTiid <T( dla Kol l)(yair] ire (jiv^dcraoi YlapOfvos f]
TToWovs êvaapevr] Nepeais.
HEKATE.
^ Hes. Theog. 409 :
'A(TTfpir]v (vu>vvpov r]v noTf Yleprriji
Tjydyer fs peya 8a>pa (fyiXTjv KfKkrjcrdai (ikoltlv.
rj d vTroKV(Tapevr] EKdrrjv reKf, rrjv nepi ivavruiv
Zevs Kpovidrjs Tiprjaf. nopev de ol dyXad duipa,
poipav e^f"' ynirjs re Kcii drpvyeToio daXdacrrjs.

T) Be Kol darepoevTos ott' oipavov eppope Tipt]s . . .
a> 8 fdeXei peydXas Trapayiverai j]d ovivqaiV
(V T dyopfj Xaolcri peTUTtpenei, ov k edeXjjcriv.
ot 8 onoT s TToXepov (pdifJTjvopa dcup-qcrcraivTat
duepes, euOa Bed napayiverai, ois k edeXrjcri,
viKTjv 7rpo<ppoi'e(jos ondaai Ka\ kv8os dpeâi'

ev re Bikt] jiaaiXevtri vap aldoioicri KadlC^C
ttrdXr] 8 aiid', ottot avdpes dyoivi aedXevaxTiv . . .
KOI TOis 01 yXavKrjf 8v(rTTep<peXov (pydôvrai,
fvôvTM S' 'Ekutt] kol eptKTvnci Evvocriyaio),
prj'iSiws 8' ciypTjV Kv8vf] 6ebs unracre ttoXXi]v . . .
ecrOXi] 6 ev (TTaBpdlcn avi> 'Eppfi Xrpb aeêiv , . .
oi/Tco Tot Koi povvoyfV7]s eK prjTpos eovaa

irdcri per' ddavdroiai Teripr^Tui yepdecrcri.
6t]K.e 8e piv Kpovi8rjs KOvpoTp6(pov.

^ Schol. Ap. Rhod. 3. 467 e'v 8e TOIS 'Op0iKoty Ai'jprjrpos yeveaXoyelrai'
Kol Tore 81) 'EKdTT]v Aiju) reKev evTvarepeiav . , . Movaaios 8e Aarepias Koi
Aids. êpeKvSrjs 8i 'Apiaratou tov Ilaicovos' AnoXXdiPios 8e JJepcreais.
^ Bacchyl. fr. 40 Bergk 'EKdra 8aô(p6pe Nuktos peXavoKoXnov Bvyarep.
Eur. Phoen. 108 nal Aarov^ 'Exara.

* PauS. I. 43, I otSa 8'e 'W<j[o8ov Troirjo-avra ev KaraXoyu) yvvaiKUiV
'l(piyei'eiav ovk dnoOavelv, yvrnprj 8e AprepiSos Ekotiji' eifai.

REFERENCES FOR CHAPTERS XIU-XIX. 597
Hekate of Pherae.
''
Schol. LvCOphr. 11 80 ^>epaiai'" 'Exar?/, eV fêpaias, ti^s Al6\ov dvyarpos,
KUK Tov Alos fTfx^^, '<:"i f" Tptoboii fppi<p6r] . . . êpaiav 8e wy eV rat? <l>f/3nlr
Tipcopevrjv. Cf. Artemis "^ ; Schol. Theocr. 2. 36.
* Polyaen. S/ra/. 8. 42 iVpaa ttjs 'Evoblas in Thessaly.
^
In Aegina : Paus. 2. 30, 2 êwi/ Se Aiyti^Jji-at npaa-iv 'EKaTTjv puXiara
Kai TfXfTTji/ ayovaiv dva ttiw T0S 'Ekot;;?, 'Optpea a-cfiicn tov QpaKa KaraiTTrj-
aaaBui ttjv TeXerrjV Xeyovres. tov nepiôXov Se eVros vaos ecrrr ôavov Be
f'pyov Mvpavos, opoias i> npoacnTTov re Kai to Xomov (rcopa. Cf. Liban. vntp
Âpi(TT, p. 426 R (fiCKos 'EfcaVr; Kai Iloa-eibcovt liXiav piv is Aiytz/ai' vrnp twv
(Kelvrjs opyicov. Cf. Lucian, Navi'g. 15. Schol. Arist. Pax 276 eV âpo-
BpaKTj TJaav TeXerat Tii>es as (86kovv reXeicrât npos dXfî(f)dppaKd Tiva KivdvvuV
fu Be TT] 2npo6pdKr] rd T(ou KopvddvTav rju pvaTrjpia Kai Tci ttjs Ekutt;? Ka\
8ia^6T]TOv ^v tu Zrjpivdov avTpnv evda ttju 'EKaTrjv opyid^fiv eXeyero Ka\ TfXerds
rjyov avTfi Tivds Kai Kvvas fdvov. Ka\ 6 ttjv ' AXf ^dvbpav 7Tenoir]Ku)s pfpvrjTai
" Zrjpiv6ov livTpov Km KvvotKpuyovs Beds Xmoiv epvpvbv KTia-paKvp^duTcov 2dov.'

At Delos : Pull, de Corr. Hell. 1882, p. 48 (list of treasures in the
temple of Apollo) ("XXo noTrjpiov . . . iiTiypa^r]v f'xov. en apxovTos UoXvôv
TinoKpdTt]s 'AvTiyovov 'ApTepi^L 'Efcdrei. Cf id. 1 882, p. 344 'Adrjvayopas

'Adrjvayopov ÂBrjva'ios 'ApTepibi 'EKarei,
"
AtlEphesus: Eustath. Horn. Od. p. 17 14. 41 KaXXlpaxos ovv iv
vwopvrjpaai Trjv "ApTepiv e7n^fvco6r]vai (f)T]a-iv 'Ecf>ea(a via Kava-rpov, eKJSaXXo-
pevTjv de vtto ttjs yvvaiKos, to pev TrpcoTov peraâXelv avrfiv ds Kvva, eiT avdis
eXei]a-aaav dnoKaTacTTrj(Tai els avOpanoV Kai avTtjV pev alaxwOelaav enl tw

(Tvpl^fl^riKOTi dndyâa-dai, Tr]v Be deov Trepidelcrav avTrj tov olKelov Koapov
'EKdTtjv dvopdaai. Strabo, 64 1 fjpw Be eBeiKvvTo Ka\ tuv Qpda-avos Tiva, olnep
Kai TO 'EKaTrjatop ecTTi. Plin. A''. H. 36. 32 Mcnestiati Ephesi Hekate in
temple Dianae post aedem.

^^
At Athens : Arist. Lys. 6^ rj yovv Qeoyevovs u>s Bevp" lova-a GouKdreiov
r^ptTO. Cf 700. C. I. A. I. 208 "ApTepis 'EKarr/ (fifth CCntUry B.C.).
Paus. 2. 30, 2 'AXKapevrjs Be, epol BoKelv, irpSiTos dydXpaTa Ekuttjs Tpia
eiToirjae Trpoaexdpeva dXXrjXois, rjv 'Adrjvaôi kuXoiktiv 'Eij-iTrvpyiBiav' effTrjKe
Be napd ttjs 'ATrre'pov Ûtjs tov vaov.
" Strabo, 472 ol Be 'EKdTtjs nponoXovs vopiôvai tovs Kovpr^Tas tovs
avTovs To'is KopvjBacnv ovtos.
Animals associated with Hekate.

^"^
Porph. de Abst. ^. l^J t] Be 'E/cdrfj Tavpos Kvav Xeaiva aKovovaa pdXXov
vTTUKOvei. Id. 4. 16 TTjv 6' 'Ekuttjv tTTirov, Tuvpov, Xeaivav Kvva {npoariyopevaav).
Plut. Qliaest. Rom. 52. p. 277 faanep ovv ol "EXXrjvts rf] 'EKdrrj, Kai t?)
598 GREEK RELIGION.
Yevf'iTij iMavT]) Kvva 'Pwfialoi Ovovaiv vnep rcou oiKoyevcop' Apyelovi Se
'2o)KpdTT]s (pT](r\ T>] ElXioveiq kvvu 6vei.v 8ia ttju pacTToivqv T^y \o-xiiai. lb. 68
Tco be Kvvi iravTfS, wf eiros eitvelv, "EXX/jres fXpoi>vTO Ka\ xpavral ye fiexP'- ^^*'
evioi (T(payia> npos tovs Kadappovs' Koi rfj 'EKarr] aKv'KaKta . . . eKcfxpovai Koi
TrfpipaTTOvcri aKvKaKiois tovs ayviapov heopivovs , TTfpKTKvXaKin-pov to toiovtov
yevos Tov Kadappov KciKovvTes. QLtb. Ill ov prjv ovde Kadapevetv wovto TravTUTracriu
oi naXaiol to ^coov' ÔXvpnionv pkv yap ov8(vi df(oi> Kadiepoyrai. Xduvia 8e Stlnpov
'EKaTjj TTepTTopfvos fs Tpi68ovs . . . iv de AaKedaipovi tw (poviKcoTaTco 6ewv
'EvvaXico, (TKvXaKas evrtpvovcn' BoicotoTs Se drjpoaia Kadappos eaTi, kvvos
BixoToprjdtvTos Twu pepoiv 8ieie\6f7v. Cf. Artemis ^^": Artemis êpaia
associated with the dog-shaped Hecuba. Paus. 3. 14, 9 kwos Se
(TKvXaKas oiiBevas aWovs oida 'EWrjvaiv vopiôvras Ovuv oTi prj Ko\o(f)a)V lavs'
dvovcri yap Ka\ Ko\o(f)a>vioi pekaivav ttj Evobia (TKvXaKa.
Hekate a lunar goddess.

^^^ Horn. Hymn to Demeter, I. 52 fjvTeTo ol 'Ekutt] aeXas iv ;^ft/)eo-o-t!'
ivovaa. Soph. 'Ptôro/xot, fr. 490 HXte deanoTa Ka\ nvp Upov ttJs etroStas
'EKaTTjs <yx^ '''^ ^'* OvXvpnov TrcoXovcra (f)epei kol y^s vaiovcr Upas rpiodovs
(TTediaucoaapevrj 8pvL (cat nXeKTals wpoiv (nrcipaicn hpUKovroiv.
t>
Schol. Arist. Pint. 594 naTa Se vovprjvlav ol nXovaioi enfpirou fielnvou
ernrepas clianep 6v(ruw tJi 'Ekutt] eV toIs Tpiobois. Plut. Quaes/. Conviv.
708 F uxjTe TTa(Tx(iv tovs SemviCovTas, a ndaxovaiv oi ttj 'Ekcitt] koI toIs
niTOTpoTraiois (KCpepovTes Ta dflnva, pi] yevopevovs avTovs prjSe tovs o'ikoi.
Athenae. p. 645 A 'A/it^t(^w/' nXaKovs 'ApreV'S' uvaKeipevos, e^fi 8f iv
KVKXa Kaopeva babta' îXrjpcov iv TItcoxiJ fj 'Pobia . . . pvrjpovevei S' avTov (cat
Ai(f)iXos iv 'Ekuttj . . , îXoxopos . . . (f)rja\ is to TTjs'ApTepibos Upa. (f)ipe<Tdai,
fTi be Ka\ is Tas TpioBovs, 7ret iv eKtivr] tj] fjpipa iniKaTaXap^dveTai 17 atXrjvr]
inl Tals 8v(Tpals vno rrjs tov rjXiov dvaTiiXrjs Ka\ 6 oiipavos ap(pi(pa)s yivfTat.
c At INIethydrion in Arcadia : Porph. de Ahstin. 2. i6 (quoting from

Theopompus) Kaid prjva iKacTTOV Ta'is vtoprjviaLS (TT((f)avoiiVTa Kal (f)ai8pvvovTa
TOV 'Eppijv Ka\ TTjV 'Ekuttjv.
*i Alhenae. 325 A Kal tu'is rpta/cdo-i Se avTTJ to delnva (pepovai.
Harpocr, S. v. TpiaKas' to'is TertXfVTqKocnv fjyeTO fj TpiaKoaTi] fjpepa . . . koi
iXeytTO TpiuKds.
^ SuidaS, S.V. 'EKaTij. ol pev TJ]v''ApT(piv, oi he Trjv 2(Xr]vr}v.
f Schol. Eur. Med. 396 orav ?] Tpioyv f]pfpu)v 2fXf]VT] 6vopd^Tai, otqv 8e
e^,"ApT(pis,OTav fie 8fKdn(VTf, 'Ekutt]. Schol. Arist. P/ilf. 59 I t^v 'Ekuti^v
iv Tals TpioBois iTipa>v 8ia to ttjv avTr]v 'êXfji'rjv Koi ApTtpida Ka\ EKdTtjv
KaXe'ia-dai. Plut. de Defect. Orac. p. 416 E Typ> aeXfjVTjv . . . p^ôi/t'ay opov

Ka\ ovpavias KXrjpov 'Ekutjjs Trpoa-emov.
REFERENCES FOR CHAPTERS XIH-XIX. 599
s Porphyr. ap Euseb. Praep. Evatig. 3. 11, 32 ''Ekutt) f] o-fXiji/j; TruXcf-
. . . 816 rpifxopcfios rj 8vvafxii, Trjs fiev vovfxT^vias cfifpovaa ttju \fV)(fifiot'a Kal
Xpvcroa-dvâXou Koi ras \ap.ndha9 fjufievas' 6 Se KiiXados ov ewl vols p-frecopois
(pfpfi TTjs TU)V KapTTuiv KciTipyaaiai ovs dvarpecpei Kara rrjv rnv (pcnTos napaC-
^rjaiv' T^f 5' av navcriKrjvov )(aKKO(TdvhaKos avp.BoKov.
17
^ Serv. Virg. Aen. 4. 511 Tergeminainque Hekaten quidam Hekaten

dictam esse tradunt quod eadem et Diana sit et Proserpina Tria . . .
virginis ora Dianae Lunae Dianae Proserpinae et cum super

. . . :
terras est creditur esse Luna; cum in terris, Diana; cum sub terris,
Proserpina. Quibusdam ideo triplicem placet, quia Luna tres figuras
habet.
' Cleomedes, Mfrfwp. 2. 5, III ol pkv ovv naXatoi Tpia elvai nepl ttjv
Vf\T]vr]v f(f>a(rav, to firjvoei8fs, to diôTOfiov, to TTeTrXrjpcofjLfvov. odev Koi Tpirrpo-

acoTTOv Trjv ApTffJuv ttokIv Wos (cttiv.
k Cf. Schol. Theocr. 2. 12. Cornutus, p. 208, Osann. ol^X *''rf'/J oiô-a
avT^s ('A/jTt'/xtSos) f] 'Ekott] Tpi/xopcpos tla^KTai 8ia to Tpia a\TinaTU yeviKWTaTa
a7TOT(\e7v TTjv criK-qvqv.
1 Plut. T:(p\ Toi) 7Tpoad>Tr. r^j ceX. p. 944 C ISadrj TavTa ttJs (rekiiVrji fari
Kai KoiXupara' KaXovai 8 avToiv to pev ptyiaTov 'Ekutt]! pvxpv, ottov koi SiKoy
StSoaaiv al ^vâl koi Xap^dvovai.
m ? Lunar goddess in Caria, Stratonicea : C. I. Gr. 2720 Upen tov

Travlapnpiov Aios) Kai 'EKaTrjs ttJs 8a8o(f)6pnv. Vide Zeus *.
Hekaie connected with Demeter, Persephone, and the lower world.
'* Mullach, Frag. Phil.

Cf. Eur. /(? 1048 Elvo8ia dvyaTep Adp.aTpos.
Grace . I, Orphic. L Kal roVe 8r) 'EK.dTr]V Ar/w TiKiv (vnaTepeiav. SeiV. Virg.
Aen. 4. 511 nonnuUi eandem Lucinam Dianam Hekaten appellant ideo,
quia uni deae tres assignant potestates nascendi valendi moriendi, et
quidem nascendi Lucinam deam esse dicunt valendi Dianam moriendi
Hekaten. Schol. Theocr. 2. 12 Tfj Arjpt^rpi pi^dtls 6 Zevs TiKvo'i 'Ekottju
8ia(l}epovaav laxî Koi ptyedei, rjv vtto yrjv irepcfydrivai (paaw vno tov nuTpos
Trpos Il(pae(p6vTis dpaCr]Tr](Tiv. Clem. Alex. Protr. I3 P p.r\vi'i . . . Trjs
At]ovs, rjs 8r]

X'^P'^" Bpt/io) TTpoarayopevdfjvai Xeyerat. Euseb. Praep. Evatig.
5. 13 ôuvo) S' lip 6V auT&J fjLopcpT] p.01 neXfTai Arjp.i]Tfpoi dyXaoKdpnov, Etp.acri
TTaXXiC-Kois nepl Trocrfft Se )(pvaoTrf8iXos' Ap.(pl Se toi ^mvij 8oXiôl Beiovcri

8pdKovTes (oracle quoted from Porphyry n(p\ ttjs in Xoyiav (PiXoa-o(p.).
C, I. A. 3- 268 Upiios XapiTcov Koi ÂpTpi8os ÊTnnvpyi8ias nvpcôpov.
Id. I. 5 ('Ekot)// (?) 'Eppjj (paycovico Xdpiaiv alya. Id. 2. 208 'Eppov Kai.
ApTefiidos 'EKaTtjs.
6oo GREEK RELIGION.
'^
Eur. Hipp. 142 :
oil yap (vdfos, CD Kovpa,
(IT eV JJavos f'i6 EKaras

fj irep-vuiv KopvlSavTCtiv
(poiTas rj parpos opeias (cf. '^).
'^
Inscription from Tralles : JBti//. de Corr. Hell. 1880, p. 337 ITptaTrtoi'
KQi 'EKOTfou 011X17 (second or third century a. d.).
'*
Thera : C.I.Gr. 465 bEicrarorî/S EKdTrjvTj-aKvwwpov'AprfpiScLipos
â>(T(f)6pov, ^v TifiaxTiv oaoi âpav KOTexovaiv 'Mvr]po(Tvvqv Brjpas 7r6Xea>s Trapiov-
inv fTev^fv Budpa rdd^ (? third century B. c). Cf. Artemis ***.
^ 'EKaTrjS vrjaos : SuidaS, S. V. TTpo rrjs ArjXov Kflrai Ti vrjcrvbpiov b vtt'
fpiav 'âp.LTi] KoKfiTai' Kokfladai Se ovras (jiacriv aiiTrjv Sin to toIs yf/'apiTois
Tip,a(rdai Tt]v 6f6v' yjrapirop Se eVri yl/aicrrihu tis I8ea. Cf. Athenac. 645 B,
quoting Semos, mentioning Iris as the divinity on the island.
'" Diod. Sic. I. 96 (ivai Se Xtyovcn TrXrjaiov rav t6ttu)v tovtuv koi (TKorias
'EKtiTrji Upov Koi rrvXas Kcokvtov, C. I. Gr. 3857 K 6y av npocrolaei X^'^P^
TTjv j3api)(j)dovov 'EKarjj? pfXaivt]! nepnTfaoiTO daipoaiv ; inscription on a tomb,

late period, Phrygia. Cf. Soph. Afi/. 1199.
^^
Athenae. 325 B 'AnaiXKobcopos Se eV To7s TTfpl 6(0}p TTJ 'EKUTrj (firjal
Bvecrdai Tply\r]v 8ia ttjp tov ovoparos oiki6ttitu' Tpipop<pos yap tj 6f6s'
MfXdvdios S' fv TO) Trepi twv iv E\ev(nvi pLvarr/plav Ka\ Tpiy\r]v Ka\ paiviba, on
Kal BaXaTTLos r] 'EKarrj. . . . 'A6i]vr](Ti Se koi tottos tis TpiyXa KaXflrai, Ka\
avTodi ((TTiv dvddrjpa Tjj 'Ekutt] TpiyXavdivrj. Sio koi XapLKXfi8r]s iv 'AXucret
(pTjdX " bfCTTToiv 'Exrira Tpiohlri Tpipopcfx TpnrpoaaTre rplyXais KrjXevpe'va,' Cf.
late inscription from Cilicia : Hell. Joiwri. 1890, p. 252 elVe êXrjvairjv,
fiT "Aprepiv, eiVe ere', dalpov IIvp<f)6pov, iv rpioBa Tqv afôp.faO' Ekuttiv,
'- Hekate 'Avraia : Hesych. S. v. dvTala' ivavTia, iKfaios, arjpaivei Se
Kal Salpofa (leg. SaipovLo), Ka\ ttjv 'EKarrjv Se avraiav Xeyovcriv dno tov
eTrnripndv avrd. Id. S. V, a(j)paTTOs' rj 'Ekutt], napa TapavTivois. Schol.
Arist. Ran. 295 Epirova-a . . . ^dvTacrpa Sat/uoi/tcoSes vno 'EKaTrji
innrfpiTopfvov koI (f)aiv6pevov to7s 8v<ttv\ov(ti . . . SoKei Se Ka\ Tals pfo-rjpjiplaii
(})avTd^(T6ai., orav toIs Karoixopivois ivayiâui. 'ivioi Se Tr)v avrrju tt] 'Ekuttj,
i)S 'Api(TTo(f)dvi]s iv Tols Tayr]vi(TTals " xôvia ff 'Ekutt; aireipas o(j)e(t)v
iXfXiôpivT]. '
etra ini(f)fp(i " tl KaXfis ttjv "Epnovirav " SuidaS, S. V.
j
'Ekutt]' iv (pdapaaiv {KTOttoh (paivopivrjv toIs KaTapoapivon, to. Se (pdapnTa

avTijs 8paKOVTOKi(f)uXoi avdpanoi Ka\ VTVeppeyeSfis. Theophr. Chai'act. 1
ntpi 8fiai8aip, (cat ttvkvu Se ttjv oiKiav KaOdpai beivos, 'EKdTrji (pdaKCOv
inayayrjv ytyovevui. Dio Chrvs. 4. p. 168R as eladaaiv evioi twv irepl
TO? reXeray Ka\ tcl Kaddpcria prjviv Ekuttis IXaa-Kopevoi t( koi iî'wTT] (pdaKovrts
TTOirjafiv, (TTtira olpai (f)dapaTa noXXd npo tuv Ka0appa>v i^rjyovpfvoi Kal
REFERENCES FOR CHAPTERS XII I-XIX. 60
(wtbeiKvvvTfS, a (pa(Tiv ennreiJiireiv ;ôXoi'/xfV;i' rrjv 6e6v. HarpOCl". S. V.
6^v6vîa Aidvfios . . . iv rw inrofivijfxari es tov Kara Arjuddnv to. iv raii TpioSois
(})T]a-\v 'EKarala, onov ra Kaddpaia f<pep6u rives a o^vdnpua Kakflrai. EvrroKis

" bu rpidSois Kav toIs o^vOvpiois TrpoarpoTTaiop
Arjixois XP^^ "" '"^ '''"'^ rrji
TToXfcoy Kafadai rerpiyoTa." SuidaS, S. V. o^vdvpia' ra Kadappara' ravra yap

cnTo<pfpeadai els ras rpioSovs, orav ras olKias KaQaipaaiv. Cf. ZeuS ^ '^.
EKaTT] peia-OTTOvrjpos C. I. Gr. 595.

Common or cognate titles of Artemis and Hekate.
"^^ Schol. TheOCr. 2. 12 ttj AfjprjTpi pixde'is 6 Ztvs TeKvol 'EKaTTju . . .
Koi vvi'"Af)TepLs KoXelTai Ka\ ^vXaKrj Koi Aa8ovxos Kal ^coacfiopos Kol Xdovia.
^ Hekate UponvXala : Hesych. J. v. irponvka (leg. TrponvKala). Cf.

Arist. Vt'Sp. 804 wdirep 'EKUToiov navraxov Ttpo rav 6vpa>v. Aesch. Frag.
386 8e(nroiv 'EKarri j3a(ri\eiaiv irp68popos peXadpoov. C. I. Gr. 2*796, inscrip-
tion third century 13. c, 'Ekotj; -nponoKis, at Aphrodisias in Caria.
Hesych. s. v. ^vKaha- f] 'EkcItt] (? <^v\aKd ov ^vXaKa, Lob. Aglaoph. p. 545).
Diphilus, Frag. 42, Meineke Ke(PaKds exovres rpe'is &(T7rep 'ApTepia-inv.
"Aprepis irpoBvpala in Eleusis, Artemis '^ Cf. inscription of late period

from Epidaurus : Eph. Arch. 1884, p. 27 'AprdpiTos npodvpmas.
C. /. Gr. 2661 "Aprepiv evioAô) rmSe napa TrponvXco (from HalicarnaSSUs).
c Artemis 2Tpo(pa[a, ? ' the goddess who stands by the hinge of the
door,' at Erythrae : Athenae. 259 B ^v eoprrj koI 7ravt]yvpis dyopevrj 'Apre/xtSi
iTOêa (leg. Irpocpaia). Schol. Find. 01. 7- 95 JôXepcov yap (prjcrt. . . . nap'
'Epvdpalois 8e to e8os ttjs 'Aprepibos dedetrSai. Cf. (TTpoc^yaios HermeS.
<^ Hekate npoKadrjyens : Benndorf, Rei'sen in Lykien, 68. No. 43
rr]s TrpoKaBrjyeridos 6eov 'EKarr}s (Roman period). Cf. '^ "c,
^ Artemis 'Evohla : Hesych. s. v. 'EfoSi'a* jJ

"Aprepis. In Thessaly
Bull, de Corr. Hell. 1883, p. 60. No. 14, inscription from Pherae
(private dedication to Êvahia): in Euboea tb. 1891, p. 412, private
dedication, ? third century b. c. Artemis 4>(oa(]i6pos eVoSt'a : Robert-
Preller, Griech. Mythol. p. 870. Sext. Emp. txphs (pvaiKovs A, 185
elye pf]v f] "Aprepis 6e6s e'crriv Ka\ fj evobia Tis av e'ir} 6e6s' en 1(Tt]s yap eKfiv>]
^^
Kal avTT] 8e86âcrTai eivai 6ed. Hekate eVoSi'a, (Soph. Frag. 490).
Steph. Byz. S. v. rploSos' avrij (^ 'EKaTT]) koi evo8la eKXrjdr) on ev Trj 68(S
evpedr] vno 'ivdxov.

f Artemis "AyyeXos : Hesych. S. v. "A-yyeXoi/* "SiVpaKOVCrioi ttjv "Aprepiv
Xeyovai = Hekate "AyyeXos.
S Artemis KeXKaia = Hekate: Arr. Anab. 7. 19 dnevexGnâi onia-oa es
'Adfjvas KOI r^s 'Aprepi8os rrjs KeXKaias to e8os. C. I. Gr. 1 947 'Apre/iiSi
KfXKfl/a (private dedication) : inscription of late period, probably found

at Athens.
6o2 GREEK RELIGION.
^ Hekate ^wTflprj in Phrygia: C. I. Or. 3827 Q 'Ayadfj tvxjj Icoreiptjs
EKaTTjs . . . Arjfioa-Beur] tov eavTiou vlov, T(ifiT]6evTa vno 2a)re('p;s 'Ekcltt]!,
Karuipuxrav (Roman period). Cf, 'Ekut?? inrjKoa on late gem. C. I. Gr.

7321b and vide Artemis "<i.
1 Hekate KaXXt'o-Tr; in Athens : Hesych. s. v. KaWla-rrj- . . . koL fj iv

T<u Kf/ja/ifiVo) i^pvfjLtvT] 'Ekott], fjv evioi "ApTtfiiv \eyov(Ti. Cf. Artemis '^^,
ad fin.
^ Aesch. Supp. 676 "Aprepiv S' 'EKarav yvvaiKtav \6xnvs icpopfveiv.
Roehl, Inscrip. Grace. Aniiq. 517 [eVi rf'/c;/]&)? ra'^Kora (from Selinus).
Hekate EvKoXiur]: Callim. Frag. 82 D (Schneider). /. Mag. p. 392. 2
"EvKoXivrj -q EKaTT) \eyeTai. ivapa Ka\Xt/i(i;â) kot dvTi(f)a(Tiu, r] pf] ovcra evKoiXos.
Eur. Troad. 323 :
hlbov 8', d) 'Eicara, (pdos,
TrapOevav eVl XeKTpois, a vopos X"-

HerodaS, 7- ^5 y^P f^Koa-rfj toO Tavpeuyvos
'''ii
T] 'EKarrj ydpov 7roti rijt
ApraKrjvTis. Hcsych. S.V. ytvervWis' yvvaiKeia 6f6s nfTToirjpevov tov ovoparos
irapa ras yevearfis, foiKvIa rfj 'EKurrf hib Koi tqiitt] kvvos npoeTideaav' eVrt Se
^fviKT] f] debs Koi eopn) rmv yvvaiKa>v. Cf. Aphrodite "^ 8. ? Connected
with Eileithyia at Argos : Pans. 2. 22, 7 tov he lepov ttjs ElXeidvias nepav
eariu EKarrjs vaos, '^Kona Se to ayaXpa epyov' tovto pev XiOov, to. fie dnavTiKpii
XoXku' Ekutt)! Kal TavTa dydXpara, to peu HoXvKXfiTos enoirjaf, to Se dSeXipos
noXvKXfiTov NavKvbrjs Mdduvos. ? KovpoTp6(j)os at Samos : Plut. Vi/a Horn.

30 eyxplpTVTfTai yvvai^X KovpoTpocfxo dvovcrais iv tj] Tpi68<o. At Athens :
ochol. AriSt. Vesp. 800 'EKdraiov, Upov 'E/cdrf)s, cos Tav 'Adrjvaioov navTaxov
I8pvopevo)u aiiTTjv, cos ((jiopov TrdvTMv Kal KovpoTpocpov,
^*
Orph. Argon. 979-983 :
TpicraoKdpTjvos ISelv oXoov repm ovTe taiKTov

TapTaporrais EKar/j* Xaiov 8/ o'l ecrcrvT en wpov
mnos ;âtTi5fts' KaTci 8eîd S fjev a6p?]crcu
XvaacoTTis aKvXdKaiva' peo'tj 8' ocîs dypi6pop(pos

XepCTtv 8' dp(f}OTepais e'xeu aopa Koynêi/Ta.
Orph. Hyftm, Hekate, I.
E'tvo8ir]p 'EKdTr]v kXtj^co TpiobiTiv epavvrjv,
ovpavirjv xôvlr^v Te koi elvaXirjv KpoKOTteiiXov
Tvpî8irji', ^vxais veKvunv pe'ra âKxevovuav

dyaXXopevrfv eXdcpoirriv,
TiivponoXou, TTavTos Koupov KXei.8i>vxov nvaacraVj
Tjyepovrjp vvp(prjv KovpoTpocpov ovpfaKpolriv.
Cf. oracle quoted by Porphyry : Euseb. Praep. Evang. 4. 23.

GEOGRAPHICAL REGISTER OF ARTEMIS CULTS. 603
GEOGRAPHICAL REGISTER OF THE

CULTS OF ARTEMIS.
Abydos : Polyb. 16. 31, 2.
Achaea, ='^ "p :
Patrae, ^ '^^; Aegira, "''^

; Pellene, 'n, ^'^f; Teuthea, ^\
Adrasteia on the Propontis, ^^1.
Aegina, ^^'^.
Aetolia, "i.
'^".
Alexandria,
Ambracia, ''ê,
Amphipolis, ^^, ^"b.
Anaphe, "f ^^sk.
Antandros, ''^.
Anticyra, ^ê.
Apollonia in Chalcidice, "^^ ^'.
Arcadia, ^ ""', -\ 'ê,
Kaphyae, ^,
*''
; Orchomenos, **, '^^ Lycoa, ^^; Alea, '''^;
; Megalo-
polis, ^'''i, ^ ^^b 116^ 123
b^
133.
Mantinea, ^^^ '2*, Paus. 8. 12, 5.
Pheneus, '\ ", "g; Stymphelus, ^ ; Tegea, 2,
-s^ ", 67b .
Qrestha-
sion, Paus. 8. 44, 2 'Apre/ii8oj 'ifpeiar tfpoj/ ; Lousoi, "* ; Zoitia, ^'b;
Lycosura, ^^^ ^-''l;
Phigalea, ^*, ^^^cj Asea, ''"^l; Teuthis, Paus.
8. 28, 6 'AcfypodiTTjs re Upov Ka\ 'ApTfpi86i ((tti.
Argolis and Argos, ='^ ^''i, ", "^ ^ '^ "'.
Aricia, ^î.
^"-.
Armenia,
Astypalaea, '''m; ?the month 'hpTupirms, Bull, de Corr. Hell. 1884,
p. 26. Cf. "'"^

Attica.
Athens, ^-^^^ ''\ ^', '\ '\ ''e, ^, ^f 't>, sâ, m^ i23i^ 129
(Artemis-Ben-
dis), ^^^
(Dictynna), ^^*
; Agrae, 2f; Athmonia, ^b Brauron, ^2; ;
Eleusis, '8, "^ ; Halae, =>-

; INIelite, '- ; Wunychia, ^^ ''\ Myrrhinus,
Artemis KoXmvis : Paus. i. 31, 4-5. C. I. A. 3. 216 AeWoti/u
6o4 GREEK RELIGION.
"Apre/xi KoKinvl (late period) : tb. 275 Upia>i 'ApTfîBos KoKaiuiBoi (on
a seat in the theatre): cf. 360. Cf. frag. 4, Metagenes, Mein.
Fra^. Coin. 2. p. 752. Oinoe, "" ; Peiraeeus, ^^ ^^^; Phlya, ^^.
Boeotia.
Aulis : PaUS. 9. 19, 6 Nnos 'Apre^tSds eVrti/ evravda Kai dyaXfiara Xidov
\(VKov, TO 8a8ai *"
fj.(v (fiepov to 8e foiKf Toêvovcrr]. Chaeronea, *'^, ;
Lebadea, '^^'
; Orchomenus, "'d ; Plataea, '''^
; Tanagra, " f, "x^ ^^
Thebes, ''*t>.
Therapne Solin. : Polyhist. 7. 8 Therapne unde
primum cultus Dianae. Thespiae, ''ê- Thisbe, ""^ '''^g.
Byzantium, '"b^ '^^c; Hesych. Miles. (Muller, Frag. Hist. Graec. 4,

p. 152, 33) Tov fnl T(a ^pLôv Xeyopeva Xtpevi Trji 'ApTfpiSos oikov
aveKiiivKTfv {Tip-rjo-ios), in the fourth century b. c.
Calauria, '^
Calydon, "l\ ^*'\
Calymna, the month ' ApTapiTios : Bull, de Coir. Hell. 1884, p. 35.
Cappadocia, '-^l
Capua : Athenae. 4^9 ^ ^^ KanCrj noXei tiJs Knp.naviai avaKe'ipfvnv ttj
Âprepidi noTr]piov.
Caria, '^^
Aphrodisias, ''^ Cnidus, ^"^ ^^*;
;
^^
; lasos, ^^'', ^' ; Kindye, ; Magnesia,
Myndus, '"^b. Mylasa/''^, s^d^ 79aa
Halicarnassus and Miletus,
;
vide infra. Near Calynda : Strabo, 650 'ApTtfiia-iov I'lKpa koX lepSv.
Carthaea : Anton. Liberal, i,
Cephallenia, "c, "'?.

Chios, "ee.
Cilicia, "m^ 128,
Colophon, "dfi, -"e.
Corcyra, the month 'ApTtpmos : C. I. Gr. 1845.

Corinth, "^: Paus. 2. 2, 3 ttjv hi Ktyxpeas lovToav e'l ^laBfiov vaoi 'Aprepibos
Kal ôavov upxalov. C. I. Gr. 1104, inscription of Roman period,
mentioning temple of Artemis.
Crete, ^ ^\ "q, , '^^^, "*.
^"^
Gortys, ; Dreros, *^ ; Latus and Olus, *^.
Cynuria, ^^gg.
Cyrene, "".
'''^
Cyrrha,
Cyzicus, ^"c^ d.
Delos, ^^"^ "'e; Hekate, .
Delphi, 'e.
Doris, "d
Dyrrhachium : App. Bell. Civ. 2. 60 uphv 'ApTipiSos.
''
Elis,\ '\ ''^, g, '^<i, ; Olympia, \ -'^, ''\ a.
Ephesus, ^^ ^''^\ ^^ ^^^ ".

ssf 78^ 79q^ 87.
Epidaurus, ^ 2m^ Hekate, "î>.
Erythrae (Ionia) Hekate, ^^c.

;
Euboea, ''^s, "' ; Hecate, -='e; Eretria, ^z, ^<'a.
Halicarnassus, '^, ^'\
Heneti, ^'<^.
Hermione, ^*.
Icaria (near Samos), ^"l".
Kobe in Lydia, "^ ^"^
Laconia, \ ^ 2^^ 2k 46^ eo^ uid.
Amyclae, ''^, "^c. Alagonia, ^^f ; Boiae, "a; Caryae, \- Hypsoi, %
Pleiae, "; Pyrrhichus, 'û; Sparta, ^.z'.
Lampsacus, the month 'Aprf/iio-tcov : C. I. Gr. 3641b.

Lemnos, ^-^^ ^'^^.
tdcc,
Lycia, ", ''^t)b
Lydia, "", ''", ^^s^
^''^'l^'^^: Thyatira, *; Philadelphia, '='1

'Sardis, Hierocaesarea, '"^ ;
Macedon, the month 'Apra/x/cnos : Plut. Alex. 16.

Magnesia on Sipylus, ^^".
MassiUa, "ff, '^^\ ^'\
Megara, ^ê, ''% ''^, '''.
^â^ , 121.
Messenia, \ ^ ''-"b,
Miletus, ', *â^ ^'s, "i, ''^, '\
Mitylene, ''1.
Mysia, 'a.
^^.
Naupactus,
Naxos, the month 'Aprefjuawi^: C. I. Gr. 2416 b.
Pamphylia, Attalia, ^'^

'''
; Perge, '", ''\
Panticaepaeum, "^
Paros, '^'^c.
'^^.
Pergamon, *",
Persia, "I
Phanagoria, ^î.
Phocaea, =^^ '^"e.
Phocis, "d, ^*c.
Abae, ''^y, inscription found near the supposed site of Abae : Btd/.
de Corr. Hell. 1881, p. 449, private dedication to Artemis.
^^c- '^^1.
Hyampolis, Ambrosus,
"'.
Phthiotis, ^
Pisa, \
6o6 GREEK RELIGION.
Pisidia, Termessus: C. I. Gr. 4362 17 dov\ri kuI 6 brjfioi . . . Kavr}(f)6pov
6eas 'ApTffxibos (late period).

Priapus, "".
Rhodes, ^, "-, ^ô. Lindos, ", "'.
Rome, "q, '3\
Samos, 20, 5*b
Samothrace, ^'fi.
Sicily, ô, ^.
Acrae : C /. Gr. 5430, inscription mentioning t6 'ApTefxinov. Syra-

cuse, S
'^',
Tyndaris, ^^; Segesta, =^d.
"î^';
Sicyon, 2, ", '\ ', ^^s^ "\

^''.
Siphnus,
Smyrna, ^"g, "^ '^l
"'.
Spain,
^nartci
opai lev,
1" 18 46 47 53c 67c 72 7Ph 125 131c
5 J J , > , , , ,
Syria, ", "^ ; Laodicea ad Mare, ^l

Tauric Chersonese, ^^, ^'', ^^
Tauromenium, the month 'ApTtpia-ios /. Gr. 5640. : C

Tenos, the month 'Aprepiaioiv. C. I. Gr. 2338.
Thera, the month 'Apre/xiVtor C. I. Gr. 2465 f. :
Thessaly, '^c; pherae, "\ "<>; Hekate, 'ê,

Thrace, ^*g, '2^; Neapolis, ".
Troezen, '2,1'*, '^sci^ 135^ 131 f
Zacynthos, ".
CULTS OF HEKATE.
"^
Aegina, cf. Artemis '^\
;
Aphrodisias, 2^^,
Arcadia, ^'c,
Argos, '^
Athens, ^^ ", '^ -\ 22^ 23 b g^ i .

Hesych. S. v. Zea- f) 'EKdrrj, irap 'Adrjvaioii.
Byzantium : Hesych. Miles. (Miiller, Frag. Bis/. Graec. 4.p.i4g) 'EKdTrjs
Tepevos Kara tov tqxj liTTrodpopiov tottov : id. p. I g I XapTra^rjcfiopov 'EKaTrjs
dva(TTr]aiivT(s aya\pa. Cf. Codinus, De Origin. Constant, p. 9.

Caria, ^, sub fin. : vide Lagina, Stratonicea.
''^^.
Cos, ?
Crete, ? Artemis "^ k,
Cyrene Arch. Epigr. Miitheil. aus Oesterreich, 4,

: p. 154 (Petersen):
Hekateion found in the temple of Aphrodite.
Delos, ^ Cf. Athenae. 645 B 'Ekut??? vrjdos (near Delos) : Harpo-
crat. s. V.
'*.
Eleusis,
Ephesus, .
Epidaurus, ^^^\ Cf. Artemis '^'i.
Euboea, ^ê.
Galatia : C. I. Gr. 41 21 ^^yoi.aoKO\i.r]Tai vnep eavTwv /cat rav Kapncov Mr]Tp\

(Tpi)Kpdvco fifydXj} fvxrjv (late period).
Heraclea in LatmOS : C. I. Gr. 2897 'HpaKkfldrji ScoT-aSou vecoKopos 'EKarrj
(? third century, b. c).

Lagina in Caria : Le Bas-Waddington. Asie Mineu7-e, 519, 520 {C.I. Gr.
2715), inscription describing the KXetSoy Tvopiri] honour of
in
Hekate; regulations concerning the ritual of Zeus Panamerios and
Hekate, rhv kh& tKacnuv iviavTov yeivopfvov Upea ttJs 'EKaTrjs Karakeyeiv
(V Tw TTepiTToXieo rijs 6(ov icai TOiv (rvveyyvs Traidas . . . Ka\ airovs acrovras
Tov (Tvvi]6r) vpvov rrj 6((o . . . 8i86uTos rov If peas Koi t[ov pa^Sovlôv
fvvov)(ov TCI ovoparn tco (jraiSovopcoJ. Cf. zd. 542. Steph. Byz. S. V.
'EKaTTjaiu' ovras fj iSpias noXis fKoXflTu Kapias' vaov yap Tfvâvrei 01
Kapfs TTjV 6eup AaytPiriv eKoXtcrav dno rov (jivyovTOS ^dov eK(7, Koi ra
E(caTjcrta rtXoiiVTfS ovtcos wvopaaav,
Lycia, ^^J.
Lydia, on coins of Mastaura: Miiller, Denkm. d. a. Kunst, 2. No. 883.

Miletus: Hesych. s.v. vnoXapnTfipa' 'Ekutt] iv MiXijTO). Cf. C. I. Gr.
2852. 37.
Pamphylia, on coins of Aspendus Head, Hisl. Num. p. 583.
:
Paphlagonia : Miiller, Frag. Hist. Graec. 3, p. 15 (Schol, Ap. Rhod. 4.
247) Nu/iiC^ty iv rw iKZiia izepi 'HpaKXelas 'EKarrji (prjaiv Upov eiVai eV rrj
ITa^Xayoi'tg, MrjBeias ihpvcrapfvrjs.
Phrygia, '\ ^^K

'^^^.
Samos,
Samothrace, '^.
Sicily, .?on the river Elorus, Lye. Cass. 1174 : at Syracuse, "^f; Sclinus,
23 k^
Stratonicea, ".
Tarentum, ^l
Thera, '\
Thessaly, ^ ; Pherae ^, Artemis "^

Tralles, ".
CHAPTER XX.
ETLEITHYIA.
The figure of Eileithyia, whose worship was ancient and

widely prevalent, illustrates the strong tendency in the Greek-
polytheism towards the multiplicity of personages for while ;
Hera and Artemis were pre-eminently goddesses of child-

birth, thegoddess Eileithyia was developed to take special
charge of this department, and to play a direct physical part
in assisting the processes of birth. She was developed in all
probability out of Hera and is identified most fre-
herself,
quently with her, though sometimes also with Artemis. The
name whatever its exact original sense may have been has
an adjectival form, and was primarily, we may believe, an
epithet of Hera, and then detached from her and treated
as the name of a separate divinity*. We hear of the worship
of Hera Eileithyia in Attica, and there is some reason for
believing thatit existed in Argos also a passage in Hesychius
;
seems to explain Elkeidvia as the Argive Hera ^, and Suidas

mentions a strange statue of Hera at Argos which represented
her with a pair of shears in her hand ^, an emblem which can
scarcely belong to her as an agricultural goddess, and which
can only be interpreted as alluding to the cutting of the
umbilical cord ^\
It is true also that the assimilation of the goddess of birth
" We have the same process in the ^ Welcker, Kleine Schriften, 3. 199.
case of Adrasteia and Peitho, titles that Vide Arch. Epigr. JMiltheil. aus Ocster-
were detached from Cybele and Aphro- rcich, 7. (1883), s. 153-167, Taf. 3.
dite.
EILEITHYIA. 609
to Artemis seems to have been no less frequent. Plutarch

speaks of the worship of Artemis Eileithyia, and inscriptions
prove that it existed at Chaeronea and elsewhere in Boeotia,
and on an inscription from Lebadea we find a woman return-
ing thanks to '
the gentle Eileithyiae/ whom she calls 'Apre-
ixihes ^. We may conjecture, too, that in Attica also the
two were occasionally worshipped as one for an
divinities ;
inscription found in the theatre of Dionysos at Athens speaks

of the Arrhephoroi of the goddess Y^lXiiOvia iv "Aypats^ but ',
this is a locality of which Pausanias mentions one worship

only, that of Artemis 'Aypore'pa, whose statue carried a bow*.
Women in travail invoked Artemis Aoxeta, and very many
of the titles of Artemis express the functions of Eileithyia ;
the two goddesses were not infrequently worshipped in the

same temple, and in some representations their symbols and
their features are not distinct. Even at Argos, where the
goddess of child-birth was more closely associated with
Hera, she bears on Argive coins the quiver of Artemis
(Coin PI. B 51).
There might, then, seem more reason for deriving Eilei-
thyia from Artemis rather than from Hera but the most ;
ancient tradition makes for the view expressed above. For

we find both in Homer and Hesiod that Eileithyia is regarded
as the daughter of Hera, and is sent or kept back at Hera's
command ^ and the legend in Crete gave her the same
;
genealogy. Being developed, then, from the conception of

Plera as a goddess of marriage who had power over the lives
of women, and being associated with Artemis, she cannot be
explained away as a lunar goddess for it has been shown ;
that neither Hera nor Artemis had originally any proved

connexion with the moon. And though a very late writer
misnames Eileithyia Selene^, and some Greek wTiters
believed that the moon affected the processes and condi-
tions necessary to child-birth ^ there is no proof that any
genuine Greek cult gave her that name or adopted that
physical theory.
Cf. the quiver-bearing Eileithyiae on coins of Argos (Coin PI. B 51.)
^ Vide Artemis *".
VOL. II. O
6io GREEK RELIGION. [chap.
As Hera-worship prevailed throughout the whole of Greece,

we should expect to find the cult of her daughter Eileithyia
prevalent also, and we hear of it in Athens, Boeotia, Arcadia,
Argos, Sparta, Messene, EHs, and Achaea, in the Greek islands
Crete and Delos, and in Italy ^~^*. It is impossible to fix
upon any single locality as the cradle of the cult, and the
reasons seem insufficient for accepting Miiller's theory that it
spread from Crete to Delos, and thence to Attica ^ There
certainly appears to have been a vague Attic tradition pointing
to the great antiquity of the worship of the goddess in Delos,
and to its connexion with the Attic, while two of her primitive
xoana Athens are connected with Crete ^. And the influ-
in
ence of the Attic-Delian cultmay have propagated the worship

in certain places. The temple of Eileithyia in Argolis was
connected with the return of Helen from Attica and with the
probably Attic myth that Helen was the mother of Iphigenia
by Theseus ''.
In the Delian worship*, so far as the hymn of Olen

expressed she was more than a divinity of childbirth the
it, :
poet invoked her as a primaeval goddess, older than Cronos,

a dispenser of destiny, and the mother of Eros. Whether
these ideas were inspired, as Welcker supposes, by the in-
fluence of the Samothracian belief that Eros was the son of
earth, and by a certain affinity between Eileithyia and the
earth-goddess , or whether Eileithyia had for Olen and the
Delian belief something of the character of Aphrodite-Moira,
it is clear that the goddess who brings life into the world was,
in Delos at least, a divinity of ancient cult, and allied to the
highest of the Olympians. This more august conception of

her is presented also in the stately lines of Pindar's ode"*.
We can thus understand the special sanctity that in certain
places attached to her shrine as at Hermione, where none ;
but the priestess might approach her statue ^^ and at Sparta,

where she was worshipped in company with Apollo Kapretos
and Artemis 'HyejutoV?/, and at Bura in Achaea, where her
" Miiller, Doriaju, i. p. 312. although on p. 128 of vol. 3 he regards

*
Pans. 2. 22, 6. her as a lunar goddess,
^'"'.
c Welcker, Griech. C'dtterl. i. p. 359, ^ Artemis
XX.] EILEITHYIA. 6ii
shrine was next to those of Demeter, Aphrodite, and

Dionysos-. In Crete and probably elsewhere she acquired
a political significance as a city-goddess, in whose temple
state decrees and inscribed treaties might be treasured "
and we may find the same idea in the Elean worship on
the hill of Cronos at Olympia, of which Pausanias gives
us a very curious account ^^ Under the name of Y^lkdOvia
'OAu/iTTta she was invoked in hymns and attended by a yearly
priestess and she shared her temple with a mysterious divinity
;
called Sosipolis, the saviour of the city,' who was imagined

'
to take the form of a serpent or a little child ^ and to

whom the greatest reverence was paid. For of the double
temple that part which contained the altar of Eileithyia
was accessible to the crowd but none might enter the inner
;
part, the shrine of Sosipolis, except the priestess, and she

only with veiled head in the outer shrine the maidens
;
and married women waited and sang the hymn in matters ;
of the greatest import oaths were taken in the name of

Sosipolis. The mystery and sanctity of this worship and
its connexion with Eileithyia were explained by the local
legend, which recounted how, just before a great battle

between the men of Elis and Arcadia, an Elean woman
arrived bringing a new-born babe in her arms, saying that
she had been bidden in a dream to take it to her countrymen's
aid. The trustful Elean generals thereupon placed the infant
in the forefront of the battle when the Arcadians charged,
;
the babe turned into a serpent before their eyes, and in their
dismay they were routed with great slaughter by the men of
Elis, who, after the battle, raised the temple on the spot
where the serpent disappeared. The story explains, and was
perhaps invented to explain, the meaning of the name 2coo-t-
TToAt?, and the form of his manifestation.
The question who this infant-god really was concerns our
<> I would suggest that the female 'ElXiievia'OXvixma: and that the snake
head, inscribed 'OXvfiiria, on fourth- seen on some of the Elean coins set
century coins of Elis is not that of an over against the eagle is the animal form
ordinary nymph as Dr. Head supposes of Sosipolis.
{Hist. Num. p. 356), but represents
O 3
view about the character of Eileithyia in this worship.

Some thrown on Sosipolis from another passage in
light is
Pausanias' description of Elis, where he mentions a temple of

Tvxi], in or near which was a small shrine of the saviour of the '
city '
the deity of the shrine was represented under the form
;
in which he appeared to some one in a dream, as a young boy

clad in a star-bespangled cloak and holding in his hand the
horn of plenty. The Sosipolis of Elis is probably the Zeus-
Dionysos of Crete in the form of infant or boy'', and Eileithyia
was regarded as his foster-mother and as the Tv^'/ of the
stated We may note that at Elis the altar of Pan and
Aphrodite " was shared by Tyche, whom Pindar calls (J>epe'-
This development of the character of Eileithyia may have

been very ancient, and yet need not have been deduced from
the primary idea of a Hera Eileithyia it may be due merely ;
to the conception of the birth-goddess who through her func-

tion had relation with Aphrodite and the deities of growth
and vegetation on the one hand, and with the Fates on the
other, and who therefore would aid the growth of the state
and personify its fate.
As regards the representation of Eileithyia in monuments,
Pausanias supplies us with some evidence. We find that the
torch was her frequent emblem and was sometimes held in
such a way as to distinguish her statues from those of
Artemis : thus her image in the temple at Aegium repre-
sented her with one hand stretched out straight before her,
and holding up a torch with the other ^^. This enables us, as
Professor Gardner has pointed out to interpret as ElK.eiQvia
<3,
the figure or two figures on coins of Argos holding in each

hand a torch, one raised, one lowered (Coin PI. B 51); and
we find on coins of Bura a similar figure with one hand
raised and a torch in the other hand ^.
* Vide Zeus-chapter, p. 3S. certified representation of a child 'A7a0uy
^ Gerhard's view {Ueber Agatho- Sainaiv.
daemon und Bona Ded) that Sosipolis "^
Pans. 5. 15, 4.
is an 'A7a6oy Salfj.coi' is open to the **
Num. Com. Pans. p. 39.
objection pointed out by O. Kern {Âth. lb, S. I.
Mittheil. 1891, p. 24) that we have no

XX.] EILEITHYIA. 613
Besides the torch there is no traditional attribute by which

we can recognize the goddess. The treatment of the drapery,
for instance, is not at all uniform in the various representa-
tions^ although on many of the vases we see her clad in
;
a single sleeveless chiton, and Pausanias describes the statue

at Aegium as covered from the head to the feet with
a lightly woven garment, which might seem to be a natural
characteristic of the goddess of child-birth. But on some of
the coins she has the chiton and himation ; and we can draw
no conclusion from the account of the various statues in
Pausanias for though he says that only at Athens were the
;
ôava of Eileithyia enveloped in drapery from head to foot,

he contradicts this by his account of the figure at Aegium.
As the goddess was an austere divinity, the daughter of
Hera, and associated with Artemis and the Moirae and the
fortune of the state, her form was always draped, and a
nude Eileithyia is an inconceivable representation although ;
it has been supposed that her statue, the work of the Athenian
Euclides, in her temple at Bura ' was undraped. As I have

elsewhere suggested ^ this incongruity only arises from
a misunderstanding of Pausanias' phrase : if the last sentence
quoted in the note must mean '
and Demeter is clad,' the
statement can have no point unless it implies that the other
figures were naked, and we should have the absurdity of
a nude Eileithyia, the goddess of Bura, who appears on the
coins of the city in full attire. But we avoid the difficulty if
we interpret the words to mean Demeter has a sacred robe,'
'
perhaps a woven peplos, such as was often laid on the images

of goddesses.
That which is most significant of Eileithyia is the gesture
of the hands, one of which in many representations of coins
and vases is upraised with the palm opened outwards,
" Vide Mliller-Wieseler, Denkm. d. Demeter is draped '

; for in another
alt. 2. 229, 228,393, 729; Ban-
Kitnst, passage, 2. 30, i, Pausanias does use
meister, p. 218. this clumsy expression for the descrip-
*
Vide note in the Classical Review, tion of a draped statue ; but this
1888, p. 324. I was wrong in saying does not concern the rest of my argu-
that the phrase koX rrj Arju'rjTpi kaTiv ment.
ea^Tjs could not possibly mean 'and
6i4 GREEK RELIGION.
a gesture which belonged to a sort of natural magic or
mesmerism, and was supposed to assist child-births The
lifting of the torch, which in itself was the emblem of light
and life, had probably the same intention.

As regards the expression and treatment of the face, little
can be said for no great plastic representation of Eileithyia
;
has come down to us ^ while the faces of the vase-figures lack

meaning and character, and the coin-types are mostly late
and bad. If the head on the Elean coins, inscribed 'OAu/xTTta,
is as I have suggested the head of Eileithyia, we can only
say that the Eleans in the fifth century represented her with
the forms of Artemis or the nymphs we should have expected
;
to find a certain solemnity and matronly character, as in heads

of Hera an archaic bronze of the British Museum (PI. LIX)
;
gives her something of the form and character of Aphrodite.

The only famous name among those of the artists to
whom statues of Eileithyia are attributed is Damophon's,
who carved an acrolithic statue of her for her temple at
Aegium we ^
'
; are told that her form was covered with
a finely woven garment, and that she held one hand straight
out and a torch in the other ; but as regards its general

character and expression we have no grounds for conjecture.
" Vide coins of Bura, Alim. Com/n. Athens and now in private possession,
Pans. S. I, and compare Eileithyia described and represented in ^;W?V,f/

standing with upraised hand behind Inst. 1864, Taf. d'Agg. 8. p. 108. We
Zeus at the birth of Athena; Gerhard, see a tall female figure, clad in a high-
Auserles. Vasenb. vol. i. Taf. 3, 4. The and himation, holding in one
girt chiton
reverse gesture, which retarded birth, hand what seems to be a torch, and in
was the '
digiti inter se pectine iuncti the other something which Kekule
[Ov\A, Met. (j. 299). interprets as swaddling-clothes; she is
^ Of the very archaic period there are hand on the head of a male
resting this
certain kneelingand naked female figures person whose diadem and drapery show
which are of the same type as the Auyi; to be Asclepios, and he argues that
kv 'ôvaaiv'^'^ : but we can scarcely call there is no other divinity to whom
these "EXXi'iQviai. They are more pro- Asclepios could be thus subordinated
bably Genetyllides, inferior 5a(/ioj/s that but Eileithyia. The style appears to
watched over child-birth. Kekule dis- be of the fourth century B.C.
covers an E(Ai6wa in a relief found at
REFERENCES FOR CHAPTER XX. 615
References for Chapter XX.
^
Eileithyia connected with Hera : ^ in Attica, vide Hera, -^ ^.
13 In Argos, vide Hera, ^^
^ In Crete : Pans. I. 18, 5 Kpf/re? 8e X'^P"^ '''^^ ^^varria^ iv 'Aixviadi
yfveadai voniôvaiv ElXeldviau Koi TrmSa "Hpa? eivai. Hom. Od. 1 9. 188 eV
Afiviaa, 061 re aireos ElXeidvlrjs. Strabo, 476 MiVo) 8e Cpacriv enivfico xp^âo-6ai
TcS 'AfiviacS, oTTci' TO Trjs 'ElXeiSvias iepov. Hom. //. II. 270 :
fioyoaroKoi F.lXeidviai,
'Hp;j? Gvyarepes niKpas wdlvas exovacu.
Hes. Theog. 922 76' ("Hpa) "H^î/ km "Aprja Kal EiXfLdviav e'riKTf. Cf.
*
(Pindar, AV;;. 7. i).
2 Connected with Artemis: Artemis, "*

: Diod. Sic. 5. 72 A16? fVyo-
vovs cfiaal {01 Kpr^Tfs) yevecrBai, . . , EiXfidviav Koi ti)v Tavrrjs (Tvvepyov
At Chaeronea, Orchomenos, Thisbe, Thespiae, Tanagra, vide

"ApTfp.iv.
Artemis, "^ Cf. Nonn. Dionys. 38. 150 ElXetdvia êXrjvrj. At Agrae
in Attica: C. I. A. 3. 319 epa-r]cp6pvi (i ElXidvim iv" Ay pan. Bekker's
Anecd. p. 326. 30 KXeiSr;/ios' eV nparco At6!.ôs' tci pev ovv livu) to. tov '\Xi(tov
TTpos ayopav EiXrjdvia' tS Se o^Bc^ TTtiXat 'ovop.a tovtco os I'vv Aypa KaXeiTM,
'eXikcov. At Sparta, vide Artemis, " ^.
Localities of her cult,
^ Crete, ^ . In Einatos : Steph. Byz. s. v. E'lvaTos. lioXts KprjTrjs, ws

Sfvicov (j)t]ai . . . Tives ê opos Koi iroTapos, iv at Tifiaadai ttjv ElXeiflviav
EtvaTir]V. At LatUS : C. I. Gr. 3058 (public decree) uyypd^j/m 8e Ka\ to
Boypa eh to lepov tus 'EXevBvas. Macedonian period.

* Delos : Herod. 4. 35 TrjV "Apytjv re Kal Ti)u ^D.Tnv . . . aTTiKicrSai is
ArjXov eVi npoTepov YTr{p6)(r]s re Kn\ AaodiKrjs. Tavrai pev vvv Trj ElXetdvLrj
dnocpepovcras dvjl tov wkvtokov tov iTuâvTO (popov aTTiKecrdai. PaUS. I, 1 8,

5 Koi 6vov(tL Te ElXfidvia Ar]Xioi Kal vfivov a8ov(nv 'QXrjvos. Id. 8. 2 I, 3 Avkios
be QXf]v . . . AtjXlois i/pvovs koi aXXovs iroirjcras mi is ElXelBviav, evXivov re
6i6 GREEK RELIGION.
aiiTrjv ai/UKciXn, dijXov djs rf) TlfTrpajiivr] ti)v avTTjv, Koi Kpovov TrpfcrfivTepav
(pTjaii) (ivai. Id. 9-2 7) 2 ovTos 6 'Q^rjv iv ElXdOvias vp-vca pr]Tepa''EpoiTOs Tr]v
ElXfidviav (f)T](Tiv (Ivai. Cf. Pind. Nem. 7. i :
EXet^vta TTapftpe Moipav (iaBvcppovav,

TToi fieyuKoddevios, iiKovcrou, "Hpas, yeverdpa TKua>v, iwev crfdev
ov (paos, ov p.eXaii>av 8paKVTes fv<pp6vau

reav d8(X(p(av (Xa)(Ofiev ayXaoyviov "H/Sai'.
^ Athens, ^*, ^: Paus. I. 18, 4 tov 6e Upov roO 2apdTn8os ov TToppa

)((op'tov i(TT\v . . . TrXtjcriof 8e wKoSo/xr/ro vaos ElXtiBvias . . . (jlovois Se ' Kdr^vniois
TTji ElXeidviui neKdXvTTTm to. ôava '

y aKpovs tovs nodas. rh pev Si) 8vo eivai
KpTjTiKci Koi atSpas di/aBfjpara eXtyov a'l yvvalKf^, to 8e dp)(ai6TaTov Êpv(Ti)(^6ova
(K AtjXov Koplaat. C. I. A. 3. 836 a na)X[\a] . . . vov ^daaov . . , ElXftdvia

dvdi]Kev. Cf. 925, 926.
Boeotia.
^ Orchomenos, Artemis, *K
"^
Chaeronea, Artemis, *^.
* Tanagra, Artemis, ".
".
* Thespiae, Artemis,
" Thisbe, Artemis, ".
" ArgOS, ^^: Paus. 2. 22, 6 nX-qa-iov 8e tSuv 'AvaKTwv ElXrjOvias iariv
upov dvddqpa 'EXtV^jr, ore avv Tleipidco Qt]aOis aTreXdovros es QeanpcoTovs
'A<pi8vd re vivo Aioa-Kovpccv edXco kol TJyero es AaKe8alp,ova 'EXev?;. /d. 2. 1 8,

3
(by the gate) t6 If pop ea-nv ElXfLdvias. ? ElXioveia = Eileithyia : vide
Hekate, I
'^
Hermione : Paus. 2. 35, 11 npos Se tt} TrvXji . . . ElXeidvlas (o-riv
fVTos TOV Tfixovs Upov. ciXXms p-fv 8r) KUTCi 7]ppav eKdcTTrjV KOL 6vcriais Ka\
Bvpidpaai peydXws Trju 6(ov IKdaKOVTai, koi dvadrjpaTa Si'Sorat irXelcTTa tj}
ElXeidvia' TO 8e ayaXpa ov8(vi 77X151/ t pfj apa TaTs ifpeiais i(TT\v lh(1v.
^^ Tegea : Paus. 8. 48, 7 Tr]V be ElXeiBviav ol Teyearat, Ka\ yap Tai'rrjs
(XovcTiv iv Trj dyopa vaov koi ayaXpa, enovofjLdôvaiv Ailyrju iv yuvacri, XeyovTfs
as NauTrXto) napaSoir) ti)v dvyuTepa AXeoy fUTeiXdpevos (navdyovra aurrjv es
ddXaaaav KaTonovTuKTai' Tt)u 8e, coy rjyeTO, neaeiu is Ta yoj/ara Koi ovto) Tfudv
TOV naida ev6a T^y ElXeiQvlas icrrX to lepou.
'* Cleitor : Paus. 8. 21, 3 KXeiTopiots de UpuTci inKpavearara . . Tplrov

,
6e iaTiv EtXadvias.
^ Megalopolis: Paus. 8. 32, 4, herme-formed image of Eileithyia.
" Sparta,'^: Paus. 3. 17, I ov noppco 8e r^y 'Opdlas ta-Tw ElXii6vias

Upov' otKoSoprjcrai di (paaiv avTO koi ElXelOvtav vopiaai 6e6v yivoptvov crîcnv
REFERENCES FOR CHAPTER XX. 617
6/c AfXtprnv fiavrevfiaros. RoSS, Arch. Aufsatze, 2. 667 yiaxav'iha^ dpidrjKf
TO. 'EXeuo-i'a (close of third century b. c). Roehl, I/iscr. Grace. Ant. 52
K^XOL : ? FAXetOvia (Archaic).
" MeSSene : PaUS. 4. 31, 9 ncn-oirjTat. 8f Koi ElXfidvlas Miora-rjvloLs P'tos
Kai ("yaXfia Xi6ov.
^^
Olympia : Paus. 6. 20, 2 eu 6e to7s Trepaai Tov Kpoviov Kara to npos
Ttjv apKTov icTTiv ev fifo'co Tav drjcravpoiv Kai tov opovs Upov EiXetîn'nf, iv de
avTO) 2cocri77oXjff 'UXeiots e7Tix<^ptos taijiciiv f'xfi. Tijxds. ttjv /nei/ S17 ElXeldviau
(TTOvopaôvTfs ÔXvpniaVj Upaaofiivrjv alpovvTM t[i 6em Kara eros e*rncrrof, 7; fie
TTpfcrlBvTLS T] BepaTTivovaa tov 'ScoainoXiu vop-coTC ayi(TTevei, t(3 HXfioov Ka\ avTrj,
XovTpd re idêpei tio 6ico Kai /xfifus KaTaTidrjaiv avTw pLffxayixevas peXiri' iv pev
bi] TM epTTpoadev tov vaov, SltvXovs yap 8r] nenoirjTai, Trjs re ElXeidvLos /3a)^6s
Kai etroSos e's avro ecrriv dvdpanrois' (v Se tm evTos 6 ScoctittoAis e;^t Tijias, kui
e's avro eVoSos ovk eari irXrjv ttj depaTrfvova-i] tov deov, eVi ttjv Kf(f)aXf]v Kai to
npoaconov ecpetXKvapevrj v(})0i XfVKov, Trapdevoi 8e iv roi Trjs ElXfidvias i-rrip-e-
vovaai KOI yvimiKes vpvov aSovaL' Ka6ayt(ovai 8e kuI Bvpiapara navro'ia avrS,
. . . ini(Tnfv8fLV ov vopiôvaiv oivov. Ka\ opKos Trapa rw ScocriTroXtSt inl peyKT-
TOii Ka6e(TTr]Ke. Cf. 6. 25, 4 Tols 5e 'HXei'oij Kai T^vx^JS Ifpov iariv . . ,
ivTavOa i'xei Tifias Kai 6 2(ii(TlTroXcs iv dpiaTepa ttjs Tux^JS, iv olKtjyâTi ov

(ifyaXoo. KaTa 8e oxj/iv ovdpaTos ypacpjj p.epipT]pfvoi iaTlv 6 êos, nals p-iv
rjXiKiav, d/LiTreêrai fie p^Xa/ûSa noiKiXrjv vno dcTTipcov, r//

X^'-P^ ^^ ^'x^' "''fj
^^fp?
TO Kepas Ttji 'ApaXdeiav.
Achaea. ^Âegium : Paus. 7. 23, 5 Alyievcn Se ElXeidvlas Up6v iartv

dp^âlov, Kai rj ElXeidvia is (iKpovs fK K((})aXrjs Tovs TTodas v(f)d(Tp.aTi KfKdXvnTat,
XeTrrco, ôavov TrXfjv tt/joctcottou re Kai x^'-P^^ uKpcov kuI ttoScov' tovtu 6e tov
HevTfXrjCTLov Xidov TrenoiJjTai. Kai Tals X^P^'^ '''H P'^'' ^^ fîî) iKTiTarai, TJj 8e
avfxî' 8a8a . . . epyov 5e tov MeaarjVLOv âpoipavros ecrrt to ayaXp.a*
^'^
Bura : Paus. 7. 25, 9, vide Aphrodite, ^^^
^^ Pellene Paus. 8 eVrt 6e Kai ElXei6vias neXXrjveva-iv Upov.

: 7. 27,
^^
? ParOS : C. I. Gr. 2389 îXovp.evr] êiXrjvrjs ElXeidvirj evxi]V.
23 Pyi-goij port of Caere : Strabo, 226 'ixîblElXriBulas Upov, neXaaymv

idpvpa, TvXovaiov nore yev6p(vov.
^* In the Aegyptian Thebaid : Strabo, 817 ElXeidvias ttoXis Kai Up6v.

CHAPTER XXI.
APHRODITE-WORSHIP.
The worship of Aphrodite was perhaps as widely diffused

around the Mediterranean lands as that of any other Hellenic
divinity. We find it in North Greece, and in especial honour
at Thebes in the country of Attica, in the city, and the coast;
;
in Megara, Corinth, and the Corinthian colonies in Sicyon, ;
Hermione, Epidauros, and Argos in Laconia there was ;
a special and important form of the worship ; there are com-

paratively slight traces of it in Arcadia, but abundant testi-
mony of its prevalence in and on the coast of Achaea.
Elis
The most famous centres of the cult were the Greek islands,
Cyprus, Cythera, and Crete. It spread with Greek coloniza-
tion over the shores of the Black Sea, to Phanagoria for
example and it was one of the chief public worships in most
;
of the Greek cities of the coast of Asia Minor, notably at

Cnidos; while from the Troad issued the worship of Aphrodite,
that was associated with the name of her favourite hero
Aeneas, and was borne to the mainland of Greece, to Sicily,
and Italy. Finally we have proofs of the worship of the
goddess at Naucratis and Saguntum ^~^^.
But in spite of its wide prevalence in the Hellenic world,
there is no valid evidence that the cult of Aphrodite belonged
to the aboriginal religion of the Hellenic nation. The com-
parison of the texts and the monuments leads to the conclusion
that she was originally an Oriental divinity, and that after her
adoption into Greece she retained in many local worships
many traits of her Oriental character.
But this view has not been always accepted ; some writers
-"^
" E.g. Preller, Griech. Mythol. pp. on the other hand,

i. 404, 405;
271-'; Roscher, Aphrodile Z^x/tw;, ^^'elcke^ {Griechische Gotterlehrc, i.
APHRODITE-WORSHIP. 619
on Greek religion holding the opinion that, though for the

most part the goddess appears as an Oriental or Graeco-
Oriental personage, yet there was a primitive Hellenic divinity
who became merged in this. This opinion is sometimes put
forth without any statement of evidence, and it is a necessary
question what the evidence is that might be stated in its
favour. Now the criteria for judging that any given worship
was aboriginal Hellenic are such as these the evidence of :
the name, where the interpretation of the name shows clearly

its Greek origin or its origin among the larger race to whom
the Hellenic family belonged the existence of the worship, ;
and the traditional antiquity attaching to it, among those

tribes whose seats were especially remote from foreign influ-
ence its association with certain ritual and ideas of a primi-
;
tive Hellenic cast ; or, lastly, the prevalence of ancient

tradition connecting by lineal descent certain Hellenic stocks
with the divinity in question.
We have such proofs as these of the aboriginal character of
the leading worships that have been examined hitherto but ;
these tests applied to the origin of the Aphrodite-cult lead to

a different result.
The name tells us nothing ^ \ so far as philology has hitherto
attempted to explain it, it or Semitic. To may be Aryan
explain the name Kvupis as a Greek form of the Sabine
goddess Kupra ^ is altogether unnatural, for the Sabine god-
dess so far as we know her bears no relation to Aphrodite,
and KvTT/ns is undoubtedly a Greek local title of the goddess
pp. 60S and 666) maintnins the wholly Bedingungen wie Athene und Artemis
Oriental character of the goddess, and Landschaften als Gottin,' p. 17,
in alien
finds no place for a goddess of love is demonstrably untrue. For the sus-
in the older Hellenic system ; and this ceptibility of early Hellas to Oriental
view is tacitly accepted in the last influences vide Otto Gruppe, Die grie-
edition of Preller: Preller-Robert, i. chiscken Culte,Y>'^. 156, 157.
p. 345. The only recent attempt to dis- " An ingenious attempt has been
prove the Oriental origin of the cult, and made to explain the name as a Greek
to claim it entirely for the primitive mispronunciation of Ashtoret by F.
Greek religion, has been made by Enman Hommel in Fleckeisen's Neue Jahr-
(^Mim. de V Acad. d. St. Petersboiirg, biichcr fiir Philologie, 1882, p. 176; but
34. 1886), who ignores much of the philological analogies are wanting,
evidence one of his chief premises,
;
^ Vide Enman, op. cit.
' Aphrodite erscheint unter den gleichen
of Cyprus, whom no one could maintain to be Hellenic in her

origin.
When we examine the centres of this worship in Greece,
we find nowhere attaching to it such autochthonous sanctity
as for instance attached toDemeter at Eleusis, to Athena
on the Acropolis of Athens and at Alalcomenae, or to
Artemis in Arcadia. In the last-named region, of all Hellas
the land of most primitive cult^, the only two temples of
Aphrodite that might according to the record have been
ancient, were that on Mount Cotilum, above Bassae, and that
of the Paphian Aphrodite at Tegea ^'^, ^^ the worship of ;
Aphrodite Erycine at Psophis was evidently a late importa-

tion ^^. In Attica and at Athens the older cults of Aphrodite
betray their direct or indirect connexion with the East in
the names, or traditions, or practices associated with them.
Such religious titles as OvpavCa, 'E-n-trpayta, ev Ki]'iTois are to be
referred to the Oriental goddess ; in the Attic deme Athmon,
the rites of Aphrodite Ourania were said to be introduced
by King Porphyrion, who may be regarded as the personifi-
cation of Phoenician commerce ^^, and at Phalerum and
Athens the goddess was connected with the immigrant The-
seus ^* '^
and her Cretan double Ariadne, and her ritual at
Athens illustrated the curious Oriental idea of the confusion
of the sexes ^*'*.
In fact^ whenever an Aphrodite-cult in any
Greek state claimed to be of remote antiquity, its foreign
origin usually stood confessed.
In no Hellenic community was Aphrodite regarded as the
divine ancestress, with one salient exception, which itself
strongly supports the view here maintained. At Thebes she
was closely related to Cadmus ', the mythic founder of the
city; and it is probable that the name Harmonia was a title
of the goddess herself, as we hear of an Aphrodite "Apâ at
Delphi ''.
Therefore the chorus of women in the Septem
contra TJiehas appeal to Cypris for aid as '
the first mother of
the race, for from thy blood we are sprung ^^^^ although we
do not hear that she was designated even at Thebes as irarpwa.
But Cadmus and Aphrodite were not autochthonous person-
ages of the Theban soil the stranger hero coming from the
;
XXI.] APHRODITE-WORSHIP. 621
East brings with him the worship of the Eastern divinity, and
among the ancient anathemata of Harmonia at Thebes was
a statue of Aphrodite Ourania, a title that points always to
the East. In Semitic cities, as will be noted, she was promi-
nently a city-goddess ; that to some extent she was this at
Thebes, bears witness not to any primitive idea of Hellenic
religion, but to the surviving influence of Oriental tradition.
Again, her connexion with other genuinely Greek worships
was neither so ancient nor so close as to incline us to believe
that the cult of Aphrodite belonged from the beginning to the
Greek circle, or grew up spontaneously within it. Because in
the Iliad Aphrodite is styled the daughter of Zeus and
Dione ^^, and Dione is a name that belongs to the oldest
native religion, we have no right to conclude that we are here
on the track of a primitive Greek goddess of love, who faded
at the coming of her more powerful sister from the East.
The daughter of Dione was never distinguished from the
foam-born goddess of Cyprus, except by later mytho-
graphers nor have we any evidence that her relationship
^'^j
with Dione was acknowledged in a single Greek cult*^ so far ;
as we know it was a poetical fiction, or a popular belief that

may have arisen at Dodona, and the cause of the fiction or
the belief was the desire to admit the Oriental divinity into
the Hellenic pantheon by a sort of legal adoption, as we find
the later and partly alien deities, Bacchus and Asclepios, were
admitted. As Zeus was given her for a father, it is not easy
to explain why Dione rather than Hera was selected as her
adoptive mother for we hear of no prominent Dodonean
;
cult of Aphrodite. It may have been due to the epic arrange-
" We have no certain trace of any known, but rather with Athena Polias
public worship of Aphrodite at Dodona, {Mitiheilungen d. deittsch. Inst. 1889, p.
the chief seat of Dione's cult ; Carapanos 350) ; the monuments

that show Aphro-
believes that one of the chapels dis- dite and Dione together are extremely
covered near the temenos of the great rare and have no discoveralile reference
temple was Aphrodite's (Dodone, p. to cult the relief in the Museum of
;
156), but the single inscription which he Vienne found in that locality, repre-
found *" is not sufficient evidence. Dione senting Aphrodite and Dione seated
was worshipped on the Acropolis of together under an oak, is of a late
Athens, but not in any connexion with period {Gaz. Arch. 1879, PI. 12).
any worship of Aphrodite, as far as is
ment of the tale of Troy, with its marked antagonism between

Aphrodite and Hera. Or it may be supposed that the foreign
origin of Aphrodite was too obvious for the early genealogist
to affiliate her to any of the leading Olympian goddesses ;
and that therefore she was made the daughter of the faded
divinity Dione, whose worship was of scant fame and vogue
in Greece. The Homeric genealogy is not mentioned in
Hesiod, who speaks only of her birth from the sea, and in
Homer generally the Oriental character of the goddess is
less clearly presented than it was in contemporarj^ worship,
for in his poems she appears merely under the aspect
of the effeminate goddess of love. In Eastern and also in
Greek religion she was always more than this, and Homer
was probably aware of her more manifold aspect; but it suited
his epic purpose thus to represent the goddess of Asia Minor,
the friend of the heroes of the Troad and the enemy of the
Greeks and after all he clearly recognizes in the daughter of
;
Dione the divinity of Cyprus. Putting together the accounts

of Homer and Hesiod, we can conclude that some time before
the Homeric period the goddess had become partly Hellen-
ized, but that the foreign elements in the local cults and
legends were marked and strongly felt, and that in Homer's
time she had no very clearly defined relations with any of the
Greek divinities. It has often been observed that the song of
Demodocus in the Odyssey^ in which she appears as the faith-
less wife of Hephaestos, is inconsistent with the other Homeric
passages that mention Charis as his wife and Lucian makes ;
merry over the bigamy of the fire-god ^^. The Homeric

hymns to Hephaestos and Aphrodite nowhere make mention
of these divinities together and the later poetical tradition
;
may have been inspired by the lay of Demodocus or the ;
singer in the Odyssey^ as well as the later poets such as

Apollonius Rhodius, may have been following the religious
tradition of Lemnos, the specialhome of Hephaestos, where
possibly the worship of Aphrodite also was indigenous ^
" There has not as yet been found the goddess of the island, is only another
any direct evidence of an Aphrodite- name for the great goddess of Asia
cult in Lemnos but probably Chryse,
; Minor. At Athens, where the cult of
But no other local cult in Greece associated the two divinities;

we cannot therefore say that their casual association in litera-
ture at all supports the theory that she was a goddess of the
primitive Hellenic religion.
Nor is this theory confirmed by her relations myth and
in
religion with Ares, even if the latter were known to be
genuinely Hellenic in his origin'^. The poetical legends in
Homer and Hesiod no doubt point to some real connexion
in the local worships of Ares and Aphrodite ; we hear of
a temple of Ares at Athens near the Council-hall, that con-
tained two images of Aphrodite, and of a temple dedicated to
Ares and Aphrodite on the road from Argos to Mantinea at ;
Latus in Crete the two were invoked together in the formula

of a treaty of alliance, and Pindar styles him the husband of '
^^.'
Aphrodite, the lord of the brazen chariot
But the occasional combination of two cults, of which one
may be native to the soil, is never any reason at all for
denying the foreign origin of the other in fact it was generally
;
through such combination that a foreign worship took root

in the new land, according to some affinity of ritual or divine
character, or for some local reason. The reason in this case is
not hard to suggest, if we suppose that the connexion between

the two divinities sprang up at Thebes, For Ares was the
prevailing god of the city and land, and with the coming of
Cadmus and Harmonia came the worship of the Oriental
goddess, and the older and the imported cult may have been
reconciled by the fiction of a marriage, of which Harmonia
was afterwards regarded as the offspring. This alliance would
have been all the more natural, if the Aphrodite of Thebes
appeared in the form of the armed goddess, a very common
type of the Oriental divinity.
The must have been a primitive Greek
belief that there
Aphrodite has been often maintained on the ground of
the frequent rapprocJicment of her cult to that of Hebe and the
Charites, and from her occasional connexion with the Horae.
Hephaestos was probably very ancient, * Vide Tiimpel, Ares und Aphrodite,
he had a temple in common with Fleckeisen'sya/^;-/;. Suppl. 641.
Athena; Aug. de Civ. Dei, bk. 18. ch. 12.
Certainly these goddesses are often and naturally mentioned

together^*. In the Iliad it is the Charites who wove her
ambrosial robe and Demodocus sang of the Charites who
;
washed her and anointed her with oil when she retired to
Cyprus. We hear in the Homeric hymn to Apollo of Har-
monia, Hebe, and Aphrodite dancing hand in hand. In the
Hesiodic description of the creation of Pandora, the -norvia
YleiOhi, the lady of persuasion,' who with the Charites adorns
'
the dangerous maiden, is probably none other than Aphrodite,

who is mentioned at the beginning of the TJicogony,
also
together with Themis, Hebe, and Dione, among the divinities
of whom Hesiod is going to sing. And the poet of the Cypria
speaks of the Nymphs and the Graces with golden Aphrodite
singing their fair songs about the slopes of Mount Ida. The
natural affinity of these goddesses was recognized in more
^^.
than one public cult
We have also epigraphical evidence that the worship of
Aphrodite Colias on the Attic promontory opposite Aegina was
connected with a temple of Hebe in that vicinity. At Sparta
there was a statue of Aphrodite 'A/j/3oAoy);pa, '
the putter-off of
old age,' standing apparently near to the statues of sleep and
death, and Plutarch quotes the line from one of the choral
hymns, '
Set old age far from us, O
Aphrodite ^^ s.' The
fair
relationship of the Charites with the goddess appeared in

certain statues of them which Pausanias saw in their temple at
Elis, wearing some of the emblems of Aphrodite, the rose and
the myrtle, for he says of all divinities they are most akin to
'
this goddess,'and the statue of Eros stood by their side on the

same base. In the Homeric hymn to Venus, the Hours are
said to adorn the goddess with the same golden necklaces as
they deck themselves with, and their figures also on later
''''^\
monuments bear close resemblance to Aphrodite's ^'*'
But these facts are explained if we suppose that the great

goddess of anterior Asia came at an early date to the shores
of Greece with the character of a divinity of vegetation, who
had power over the various forms of life and birth in the
world, and who was therefore akin to the Charites of ancient
worship at Orchomenos and Athens ; and that she came also
with the aspect and functions of a divinity of love, beauty, and

youth, and was thus brought near to the Greek Hebe.
It has been suggested by Kekule * that the last-named
goddess who was worshipped at Phlius and Sicyon, under the

name of Dia, was originally the Hellenic Aphrodite herself,
daughter of Zeus and Hera. But the mere coincidence
between the names of Dia and Dione, who was made the
mother of Aphrodite, is a very slight argument his suggestion :
would have more weight if Hebe, Dione, and Aphrodite were

closely associated in ancient myth and widely prevalent cult.
But this is by no means the case in the myths and the ;
monuments of art Hebe approaches nearer to Hera than to

Aphrodite their combination in the Attic worship is an
;
isolated and not known to be very ancient, and

instance,
Hebe has no prominent function as a goddess of love and
marriage.
Nor can we say that the association of Aphrodite and the
Charites belongs to a primitive period in the most ancient ;
and solemn worship of these latter goddesses at the Boeotian

Orchomenos, Aphrodite cannot be found to have had any
place ^ and their cult on the Acropolis of Athens seems to
;
have been equally independent of her, nor did she borrow

their names or titles.
Nor, lastly, can any proof of the antiquity of her religion
in Hellas be derived from her relations with Eros for as :
the child and companion of Aphrodite, he figures only in the

later literature and occasional later cult ^^. The only ancient
centres of Eros-worship were Thespiae and Parion, where he
* Kekxile, Hebe (1867). fountain and that locality were sacred

^ Miiller, on the contrary, in his to Venus ; it may be that Viigil knew
Orcko??icnos, p. 173, supposes a close of the fountain as one of the chief haunts
local connexion between Aphrodite and of the Graces, with whom in later litera-
the goddesses of Orchomenos ; but the ture Aphrodite is so closely connected,
sole evidence is Servius' interpretation The writer ;Dr. Roscher) of the article
of the epithet Acidalia applied to Aphro- on Aphrodite in Roschcr's Lexicon
dite in Virg. ^^-w. I. 720. He refers this merely follows Miiller. The view ex-
Orchomenos where
to the fountain near pressed in the Bulletin de Correspond-
the Graces were wont to bathe: it is ance Helleniqiie, 1889, p. 471, about
merely an unfortunate literary epithet of '
Aphrodite, la deesse de qui relevent
Virgil's, and it does not prove that that les Charites,' is quite untenable.
VOL. II, P
was regarded probably not merely as the personification of

human love, but as a physical and elemental force, a divinity
of fertility. With these cults Aphrodite has nothing to do.
This itself is a strong negative argument against the aboriginal
antiquity of her worship in Hellas; for had it been part of the
common religious inheritance of the people, one would suppose
that it would have been attracted into the circle of the most
ancient cult of Eros, whose character and functions were so
like her own.
It does not appear then that the belief in the primitive
Hellenic origin of Aphrodite is borne out by her relations
with other recognizably Hellenic divinities.
The belief sometimes seems to rest on the difficulty of
imagining that the ancient Greeks could have dispensed with
a goddess of love but this difficulty would be only serious
;
if it were proved that every other old Aryan race had been
blessed with such a divinity^. But this is by no means
certain, and the danger o^ a priori reasoning from one religion
to another now sufficiently recognized.
is
We can now deal with the question under what form and
with what characteristics the goddess of the East was known
and worshipped by the earliest Greeks. If her original
personality were made clear and precise, we could then
estimate how far this was transformed in the later Hellenic
imagination. But to give a precise picture of the Oriental
goddess is difficult, because, as her names were many, her
aspect and functions may have varied even more than we
know in the various centres of the Semitic worship. The
names Ishtar, Attar Athare, Atargatis-Derceto, Astarte de-
signate the same goddess in the Assyrian, Aramaic, Canaanite,
Phoenician tongues. The female Baal, known as Belit and
* It is probable that a divinity of law. Therefore it would be unreasonable

human love in the abstract is a creation to suppose that before the arrival of
alien to the spirit of any very ancient Aphrodite there was a mysterious
religion ; the early Aryan and Semitic vacuum in Greek religion which the
races had divinities enough and to spare people would feel. She may have
of vegetation and fertility, and any arrived not necessarily because she was
of these could supervise human love wanted, but because she was brought,
and birth as part of a wider physical
to the Greeks as Mylitta, at Carthage as Tanit, was origin-

ally in all probability the same divinity, although some-
times distinguished in local worship. The Persian Anaitis,

though naturally and in origin distinct, came to be coloured
with the religious ideas of the Babylonian Nana-worship ;
and these and the name appear in the later Hellenic cult
of Artemis Nanaea ^ Lastly, we have the Syro-Arabian
Allat, an armed goddess identified sometimes with Athena,
sometimes with Aphrodite Ourania. As regards the character
of this widely worshipped goddess of the Semitic peoples,
there is much obscurity in detail; but there are certain leading
traits which may be gathered from the cults and myths, and
which may be on account of their impor-
briefly stated here
tance for the Greek worship, as they reappear in the Hellenic
goddess ^^ In the Assyrian myth of Ishtar who descends
into the lower world,and whose lovers come to an untimely
end, we have whose myth and cult refers to the
a goddess
vegetation of the earth, and with whom in some places,
Byblos for example, Adon or Tammuz was associated. It was
easy for such a divinity to come to be considered as a power
of the lower world also, and this may explain why terracotta
images of her were put into Phoenician graves'', and it probably
explains many of the Greek views and titles of Aphrodite.
Ithas sometimes been asserted that the Semitic goddess was
a lunar divinity; but that she was originally this is most
improbable, as in the Semitic imagination the moon was
a male power, and the lunar qualities and symbols came to
Astarte from her early connexion with Isis Under her "".
Syrian and Phoenician name Atargatis or Derketo, at

Bambyce and Ascalon she was regarded as a divinity of the
waters. But this nature-goddess became a goddess of the
city at Ascalon, Byblos, and Carthage, wearing a mural crown,
and sometimes represented as equipped with bow or spear.
She was also prominently a goddess of love and sexual
Vide pp. 484, 485. explains the form of Astarte on the

^ Perrot and Chipiez, vol. 3. p. 202. stele ofJehav-milk, king of Byblos, as
<=
Vide Baethgen, Beiiriige zur Semi- due to the blending of Phoenician and
iischen Eeligionsgeschuhte, p. 31, who Egyptian ideas.
P 2
passion, and her rites at Babylon, Byblos, and Bambyce were

notorious for the temple prostitution practised there ^^^
A different illustration of the prominence of the sexual idea
was the practice of voluntary mutilation of which we hear at
Bambyce, and which found its way into the rites of Cybele.
To the same darker side of this worship belonged that strange
idea of the confusion of sex, the blending of the male and
female natures in one divine person. The usual illustration
of this mysterious Oriental fancy is the description found in
Macrobius of the statue of the Venus Barbata of Cyprus :
'
there Cyprus a statue of her bearded, but with female
is in
dress, with the sceptreand the signs of the male nature, and
they think that the same goddess is both male and female.
Aristophanes calls her Aphroditos.' This statement which
explains the duplex Amathusia in Catullus' ode, is repeated
' '
by Servius, and is supported by the similar statement of

Joannes Lydus that the Pamphylians once paid worship to
'
a bearded Aphrodite
î^^' As no such statue has yet with
certainty been found in Cyprus, it has been doubted whether

we can fairly attribute this idea to the Semitic religion at all.
But there is much that is proved by literary evidence that
cannot be attested by archaeological, and the lack of illustra-

tion from the monuments ought not to invalidate such
a precise assertion as that of Macrobius about a fact which he
could scarcely have invented, and which explains better than
anything else the origin of the Greek Hermaphrodite*. In
fact the Semitic idea of the androgynous divinity is not
attested merely by Macrobius on a Ninevite inscription pre-
:
served in the British Museum there appears to be an allusion

to this double character of Ishtar, just as a later Phoenician
inscription speaks of a 'King Astarte The same idea ''.'
appears in the legends of Semiramis, the warlike goddess-

queen who wears male attire and repudiates marriage . This
It seems more reasonable to derive the doubleHerme of male and female
thisabnormal type from certain religious on a late Chaldean (?) relief;
divinitj'
ideas than from the observation of cer- Lajard, Culte de Vinns en Orient,
tain abnormal phenomena in nature. PI. i. i.
^ Vide letter from Mansell to Lenor- <=

Diod. Sicul. 2. chs. 6 and 14.
mant, Gazette Archt'ol. 1879, p. 62 ; cf.

strange conception may have had its origin in a theological

dogma : that the divinity being perfect must possess all the

powers passive and active of creation but the forms in ;
which the idea was expressed were likely to be tainted with

sensuality.
A no less remarkable belief was that which, according to
some authorities, prevailed in certain communities devoted to
the Semitic goddess : namely, that though a mother, she was
also a virgin ^^^ . At least, we hear of the '
virgo caelestis '
at
Carthage % the virgin-Allat in Arabia'', the virgin-mother
ta Petra and the same contradiction has been found in the
;
cult and legends of Phrygia and Caria . Whether this is a deve-

lopment and a purification of an older and grosser conception
of Tshtar, regarded in the Babylonian legend as a mother-
goddess but unmarried, or choosing her temporary partners
at will, does not concern us here ; the same perplexing double
character of the divinity has been noticed in the Artemis-
worship, and it has been supposed to have left traces even
in the Hellenic Aphrodite.
Such in very brief outline are the main recognized traits of
the Oriental goddess ; and it remains to trace her forms and

further development in Greece. We may distinguish between
those Aphrodite-cults which preserved in name or rite clear
traces of their Oriental origin, and those which had become
fully Hellenized, and we shall find even in the latter very few
ideas that may not have been developed from the original
character of the Semitic divinity.
The clearest sign of the Eastern goddess in the Greek
community is the title Ovparia. This was the literal transla-
tion for the Semitic title the queen'

Meleket Aschamaim,' '
of the which Ezekiel applies to her.

heavens,' Semitic
scholars have not been able to give a very precise significance
to this phrase, and the Greek term that translates it is also
Aug. de Civ. Dei, 2. 4. who gave birth to Dusares; it is possible

*> Vide Epiphanius, Patiarium, 51 that in these beliefs HapOkvos or Ko/>7
(vol. 2, p. 483 Dind.), who speaks of only meant the 'unmarried' goddess,
the Y>.6pri or XlapQkvo's at Alexandria, and that they do not contain any idea
who brought forth kXiiv, and the of a miraculous conception,
'maiden' divinity among the Arabs, Vide chapter on Artemis, pp. 446, 447.
rather vague. We should be probably wrong in assigning to
it any distinct solar or hinar or astral meaning ; it is probably

sufficient to interpret it as the name of the goddess whose
seat was in heaven, and whose power reached through the
world *. And the Greek epithet may have been as vague as
the title 'OKvjx-nia, which v.as applied to her at Sparta-^
The moral or spiritual intention of the term Ovpavia is cer-
tainly probably derived from the

late, being Platonic
philosophy and perhaps never recognized in actual cult. Its
chief importance for us, in tracing the origin of the Aphrodite

cult, is that the title alludes as a rule to the Eastern worship ;
the direct and indirect evidence of this is too strong to be ques-

tioned ". Pausanias tells us that the Assyrians were the first
who instituted the worship of Ourania, which was afterwards

held in honour by the Cyprians, Paphians, and the Phoe-
nicians of Ascalon the goddess of Hierapolis in Syria is
;
regarded as Ourania by Lucian, or the writer whose treatise

on the Syrian divinity bears his name. The statement in
Pausanias seems mainly derived from Herodotus, who regards
the temple at Ascalon as the oldest sanctuary of Ourania, to
which the temple in Cyprus was affiliated according to Cypriote
belief. The historian adds that the Persians acquired this
worship at a later period from the Assyrians and Arabians.

The Carthaginian goddess was also known by this name
and its non- Hellenic connotation is further attested by the
freedom with which the Greeks applied it to the foreign
divinities of other nations than the Semitic. Thus the armed
goddess of Libya, sometimes identified with Athena, wâs
styled Ourania, and so also was the goddess Artimpasa of
the Scythians '''^
^ ; we may suppose that the reason of this
lay in the likeness these divinities bore to the Asiatic goddess
rather than in the purity of the worship.
From the prevalent application, then, of this title to the
" In Greek cult it certainly never con- the title 'AcTTf^/a is not found in cult,
veyed any allusion to the moon or star.-, and her association in the cult of Achaea
in Greek religion, which did not recoj;- with Zeus Amarios in no way suggests
nize any lunar or astral nature in that she was there a divinity of the
Aphrodite this is only assumed in the
; lights of heaven '"".
later physical or theological literature ;
foreign divinity, we might fairly conclude that it had the

same denotation in the temple-worship of the Greek com-
munities, at least in the earliest periods. And we have more
or less direct evidence of this ; for we find the title and the
worship especially in those places of which the tradition, the
ritual, or the commercial relations suggest a connexion with
the East. It was instituted in Cythera ^-^
^ according to
Herodotus and Pausanias, by the Phoenicians, and the dif-
fusion of the cult is here connected in all probability with the
purple-trade. We learn further from Pausanias that the
temple Cythera preserved the name of Ourania down to
in
his own day, that of all the temples of Aphrodite in Greece it
was regarded as the most sacred and ancient, and that the
goddess was here represented as armed. It may be for this
reason that Homer calls the island '
divine '
^^.
The worship of Aphrodite Ourania was found in the city

of Athens and the Attic deme of the Athmoneis, where
in
it was associated with the legendary Porphyrion, the purple- '
king.' In the city the temple stood in the Ceramicus, near

the temple of Hephaestus, and outside the ancient burgh ;
we hear also of a herme-statue of Aphrodite Ourania in the

district called and can conclude that the worship of
Kt/ttoi,
Aphrodite h Kr/7Tots
was closely connected with the former ^^ ^
Now with nearly the whole of this religion at Athens the
names of Aegeus and Theseus were interwoven, and the
foreign character of these heroes and their significance as
the propagators in Athens and Attica of new cults has been
established in a paper by M. deTascher^ He deals more
particularly with the importation of the worships of Poseidon
and Apollo ; but the Athenian or Attic cults of Aphrodite are
still more closely associated with the early Ionic settlem.ent,
with the names of Ariadne, Theseus, and Aegeus, and with
a stream of myth that circles round Attica, Delos, Naxos,
Crete, Cyprus, Troezen, and Argos, which it will here be
convenient to trace ^"*.
Ariadne or 'kpiayvi) of Crete, who was known there also by

Les cultes ioniens en Attique, Revue des Chides grecques, i8yi, Janvier-
Avril, p. I.
the sacred epithet 'A.pLbrjXos, was a name that itself must have
been an epithet of the Hellenized goddess of the East. It is
true that we have no expHcit record of the identification of
Ariadne and Aphrodite in Crete itself. But we have proof
of a cult of Aphrodite Antheia at Cnossus the place of ''^ =,
the Labyrinth and the Minotaur ; in the territory of the Latii
was an ancient Aphrodision, and its general prevalence in the

land is attested by the claim asserted by the Cretans for their
island to be regarded as the original home of the Aphrodite-
worship ^'\ though this name was here scarcely so much in vogue
as those which we may regard as her sacred epithets, Pasiphae
and Ariadne. In fact, there is evidence that in Crete there
was a mingling of a Semitic and a Phrygo-Carian current of
worship and myth, that the Semitic goddess whose sacred
animal was the goat, and whose lover was the bull or the
bull-headed god, was here brought into the company of
a Zeus-Dionysos, Europa, and Cybele, while a virgin goddess,
Britomartis or Dictynna, of probably Carian origin, whose
myth and worship were rife in the island, was perhaps herself
near of kin to the unmarried goddess of the East^ The
worship of Pasiphae was found in Laconia, where
be as will
shown we
have clear proof of the early admission of the
Oriental Aphrodite the name Pasiphae itself was a wide-
;
spread local title if we may trust Joannes

of the goddess,
Lydus and Pasiphaessa appears as a synonym of Aphrodite
;
in a verse quoted by Aristotle ^^^. The bull that is so con-

spicuous a figure in the Cretan religious myth may have
belonged originally to the Eteocretan earth- goddess Europa '\
and the animal is as closely associated with Hellenic ritual
and religion, with the worships of Demeter and Artemis for
instance, as with Oriental cult. But taking into account the
connexion between Europa and Cadmus, and the statements
that the representation of Europa on the bull was one of the
types of Sidonian coinage, and that Astarte herself was sup-
posed to assume the bull's head as a symbol of supreme
power", and comparing these facts with such legends as those
^ Vide chapter on Artemis, pp. 475- ^ Vide p. 47.S.
478. "^
Lucian, </d Dea Syi: 4 To vofxta/xa
concerning Pasiphae and the Minotaur, we have grounds for
concluding that Europa herself came at least to acquire

a close affinity with the chief personage and sacred legends
of the Eastern worship. And the story repeated by a scholiast
^"*
that Ariadne was mother of a certain Tauropolis
the
comes probably from some association between Ariadne and
a bull-riding goddess, who may have been a Cretan equivalent
of Artemis Tauropolos.
We find also a worship of Aphrodite 'ETrtrpayta on the Attic
coast ^*, connected by the legend with Theseus and his voyage
to Crete: the Delphic oracle had advised him to make
Aphrodite his guide and to invite her to be his fellow-
voyager he was therefore sacrificing to her a she-goat on
:
the shore, which was suddenly transformed into a male, so

that the goddess was henceforth known as Aphrodite who
rides on the goat. The story does not fully explain the
name, and is useful merely as indicating the association of
Theseus with Aphrodite and of the goddess with the male
animal'^; and it is to the Oriental Aphrodite that the
monuments which represent 'ETrirpayia seem to point. Her
close connexion with Crete, which the Attic legend makes
clear, may help to explain the prominence of the goat in the
sacred Cretan legend concerning the rearing of the child
Zeus that is, we should understand the meaning of the goat
:
as the foster-mother, if we recognize in the Cretan Aphrodite

a divinity closely akin to Cybele, and in the Cretan Zeus
a Zeus-Dionysos. Reasons have been already given for
the latter view, and for the former some will be mentioned
later on''.
As we follow the voyage of Theseus back to Athens ^* it
becomes clear that his beloved whom he leads away and
Tw "Xihwvioi xpiovTai TTiv EvpwnTju f(ptô- riding on their sacrificial animals, not
fxivrjv t'xet to) Tavpw ra> Aii. Cf. Philo infrequent both in Hellenic and Oriental
Bybl. 2. 24 {Frag. Hist. Graec. 3. monuments, was probably in
religious
p. 569) 'H hi 'XaTaprrj (ntOrjKi rfj ISia its sacramental symbol from
origin a
Kf(pa\fi fiaaiXtias rrapaarjij.ov Hf(pa\'qv which much misunderstanding and much
ravpov . . . Ti)v 5^ 'AarapTTju 4>oiVt/ces ttjv myth arose (vide Robertson Smith,
'A<f)po5iTr]v eiuai Xijovaiv. Religion of the Semites, p. 457)-
* The representation of divinities ^ Vide also p. 478.
deserts Aphrodite herself or her Cretan representative";

is
the divinity of Ariadne and her real personality are betrayed

in the Cypriote worship and legend. According to one story
of that island, when deserted by her lover, she hanged herself
on a tree''; or wearied with travail and sickness she was put
ashore in Cyprus and died there, and was buried near Ama-
thus in a grove which was called after the name of Ariadne
Aphrodite. Sacred rites were instituted there in her honour
by Theseus when he returned to the island, and the most
curious was the practice of one of the youths lying-in on '
'
one of the festival days and imitating the cries of women in

travail. At first sight it would seem that we have here
a sort of consecration of the 'couvade': but it is less
hazardous if we merely regard this rite as an illustration of
that idea found in the worship of the Eastern goddess of the
unnatural confusion of the sexes. And we find it twice again
in the track of Theseus and Ariadne. At the Oschophoria at
Athens, an ancient harvest festival with which the names of
Theseus and Ariadne and the legend of his Cretan journey
became entangled, we hear boys being dressed up of chosen
as girls and taught to imitate the gait and voice and bearing
of maidens ''.
At Argos also the grave of Ariadne was shown ^"*, and as

the worship of Aphrodite Ourania found its way to these
shores --
we may refer to it the mysterious feast called
" Movers {Die Phonizier^ vol. i. of the mother; the story is connecttd
p. 641) holds the opinion that Ariadne with the local feast called tKSvaia,
is a Cretan form of Aphiodile Astarte. and certain preliminary marriage rites
^ These '
hanging ' stories about di- were performed by the statue of Leu-
vinities come from the custom of hanging cippus. The latter may possibly be
up their images or masks on a tree; a title of the male Aphrodite, and the
e.g. the story of Helen and the Rhodian feast may have been very similar to the
women arose from the sacred title of Argive 'T^ptariKa. and have belonged
Helene Aiu8piTt9, the goddess whose
'
in reality to an Aphroditc-cult, though
image hung fiom the tree cf. Artemis '
; Nicander connected it with Leto Phytia.
'Anayx"lJ-^^V- The Story in Herodotus of the Scythian
" Antoninus Liberalis '_c. 17) quotes 'Ai'6/)o7vi'0 "^^ who worshipped Aphro-
from Nicander a Cretan legend about dite may be indirectly connected with
a certain Leucippus of Phaestum, wlio theandrogynouscharacter of the Oriental
had been born a girl but was trans- goddess,
formed into a man through the prayers
'T^pt(TriKa"^^ at which women wore the men's dress and

men women's the quasi-historical event which Plutarch
the ;
records by way of explanation is clearly a fiction invented to

explain a misunderstood rite. The real significance of it is
suggested by the statement of Philochorus, that in Cyprus
the two sexes exchanged dresses in the worship of Aphroditos
or the Venus Barbata '^^.
These prove the Oriental origin of

facts are sufficient to
the Attic worship of Ourania, and point to the track along
which it arrived at the Attic shores. One of its chief points
of connexion was Delos, where we come upon traces of the
Theseus- Ariadne legend and of the Aphrodite-worship ^".
It penetrated at an early date to Thebes, where Harmonia,
probably another form of Aphrodite herself, dedicated three
statues of Aphrodite Ourania, Pandemos, and Apostrophia '*.
Whether the two latter titles express characteristics that

belong to the Oriental conception of the divinity is a question
that will arise later. It is enough to notice here the asso-
ciation of the goddess ofThebes with Cadmus and the East

and her Oriental origin may explain why she was here the
goddess of the city and the wdfe of Ares, as at Sidon and
elsewhere in Asia Minor she bore the character of a political
and warlike divinity. We have proof that the goddess at
Corinth had the same title and was of the same origin ^^' '''^^.
Euripides celebrates Acrocorinthus as the '
holy hill,' ' the city
of Aphrodite' ^^% and Alciphron gives us the legend that she
came up from Cythera, perhaps the earliest home in Greece
of this foreign wôrship, to greet Acrocorinthus. The early
commerce with Asia Minor will explain the many Oriental
traits that are noticeable in the the most
Corinthian worship ;
striking and un- Hellenic was the practice of religious prosti-

tution, to which we have an unambiguous allusion in that
strange fragment of Pindar ^^^, in which he employs his best
style to glorify the 'hospitable young women, the ministrants
of Persuasion in rich Corinth, whose thoughts ofttimes flit
towards Ourania Aphrodite,' in whose temple they burned
frankincense. They are expressly termed by Strabo Up6-
bovkoL and hetaerae dedicated to the goddess, and these are
'
'
the same characters that figure in the impure worships of

Cyprus, Byblos, Babylon, and Armenia ; the immorality that
Herodotus imputes to the Lydians had probably a religious
intention^ and we hear of the Upohovkoi yvvatKi^ in the
Phoenician wôrship on Mount Eryx'^^; but such practices
were certainly excluded from the ordinary Greek worships
of Aphrodite, whose ritual seems to have been as austere as
any other. The only other Hellenic community besides
Corinth wherein we hear of unchastity in the temple-cult of
Aphrodite is the city of the Locri Epizephyrii'-'^'^, who,
according to the story, to gain the goddess's aid in a war,
vowed to consecrate their daughters to this service.
The title of Ourania was also attached to her worship at
Aegira^^ in a temple to which access was only allowed to
women ; at Olympia '*
where a Pheidian masterpiece repre-
sented her with her foot upon a tortoise, an Oriental symbol,
and at Megalopolis ^".
At Panticapaeum "^, the Milesian
colony on the Tauric Chersonese, the worship of the goddess
would be likely to have some Oriental character, and the
name Ourania is applied to her in two inscriptions of the
third and second century B. C. found in this place. And we
have the evidence of another inscription of the same cult at
Smyrna ^^ p. In regard to the later period to which, for
instance, the Roman sepulchral relief at Verona belongs,
dedicated to the high-priestess of Aphrodite Ourania ^' ^, we
may doubt whether the epithet possessed any Oriental con-
notation or only a vague moral or ritualistic sense.
Even where she is not expressly styled Ourania, we can
recognize the Eastern divinity in Greece by many signs. The
foam-born goddess is derived from the Semitic religion, and
perhaps from the maritime commerce of the East and the ;
goddess of Cyprus and Cythera is called 'A0/)oye^'r;9 by

Hesiod '"^^ But except in the cult-titles 'A^/ita and 'Ap(peCa'-\
which were probably in vogue at Larissa and in the Thracian
Chersonese, there is but little reflection of this story of the
birth in Greek public worship. Yet her connexion with the
sea and her interest in navigation are attested by a long
array of titles. Harbours and rocky promontories were
named from her or gave her names ^'^'*' "^ At Troezen she
was worshipped as 'the watcher from the sea-cliffs ^^ in ' ;
the Peiraeeus, at Cnidus, Mylasa, and Naucratis, as the

goddess who gave the fair wind '^^^ ^ she appears as the ;
saviour from shipwreck in the story told by Athenaeus ^'^

of the Greek sailor who was sailing from Paphos to Naucratis
bearing in his ship the little idol of Aphrodite a great storm :
arose, and all the crew ran with prayers to the sacred image :
when suddenly fresh myrtle-boughs grew about the vessel and

a delicious fragrance filled it, and there was a great calm.
We gather that she bore the same character in the maritime
cities of Achaea ^^, and we hear of her idol at Patrae ^" being '^
dragged up from the sea in a fisherman's net.

At Panticapaeum, as the ruler of ships, she was worshipped
by the side of Poseidon the Saviour '^^^ ^ and her title ;
Hegemone or '
leader 'may have alluded originally to this
function of hers ^, and may have arisen from the practice which
the Greeks may have
derived from Phoenicia of carrying her
image on board ^'"'.
There are two other Greek titles that may with probability
be traced to the Oriental goddess of the sea. Leucothea is
usually interpreted as the name of a Hellenic divinity of the
waters, but when we consider that the chief centre of her
worship was Corinth, and that it was found in many other
districts of the Aphrodite-cult, we n:ight surmise that there
was a connexion between the goddess and the sea-
close
nymph and much stronger evidence is given by Leucothea's
;
relationship with Cadmus, and with Melicertes the Phoenician

Melkarth, who even when Hellenized seems to have retained
his Phoenician character as a devourer of infants. We meet
also with ceremonies of mourning and sadness in the worship
of Leucothea at Thebes, and perhaps in Crete'', as we find
them elsewhere in the worships of Aphrodite. Moreover, her
leap into the sea reminds us at once of those divine personages
who haunted Crete and the Carian coast, who leap into the
* The context in Hesychius suggests a political significance, vide infra,

vaguely that the title is connected with p. 662.
the sea. It came afterwards to have ^ Plutarch, 228 F.
sea for various reasons, and who seem to have been different
forms of an Artemis Aphrodite '\
Lastly, it is possible that the maritime goddess of the

East appeared in the form of Aphrodite Aeneias, the story
of the wanderings of Aeneas being the legendary record of
the diffusion of this cult*'"'^. To understand the origin
of Aeneas and the myth concerning him, we must keep
in view the peculiar and sacred character of Aeneas in
Homer, and we must consider the meaning of the title
AiVetas as applied to the goddess ^. The Aeneas of Homer
is unlike any of the other heroes, Greek or Trojan he ;
appears as a mysterious religious figure to whom the future

rule of the land was reserved by Providence his character ;
and the prophecy about him are only to be explained if the

poet was aware of a family of Aeneadae having power in
the land, who themselves or whose mythic ancestor were con-
nected with a certain cult. And this view is supported by
the statement of Strabo ^, made probably on the authority of
Demetrius of Scepsis, that for many generations there survived
in this city the descendants of Aeneas who were still called
kings, and who enjoyed certain honours, the kingship probably
possessing here as elsewhere a priestly quality. We gather
also that Arctinus, the author of the 'lAiov Trepo-i?, was aware
of the legendary settlement of the Aeneadae on Mount Ida.
" Vide p. 645 and pp. 477, 478. ve<;ctation for the purpose of recovering
Aphrodite herself, according to a doubt- the lost vigour of the land ; vide Fraser,
ful version of the Adonis-myth (Ptolem. Golden Bough, vol. i, pp. 258-261.
Hephaest. Nov. Hist. Bk. 3. p. 198, Probably the many myths of women
Westermann) flung herself into the sea in being put to sea in a chest are derived
sorrow for his death ; human victims to from the same ritual ; some divinity is
Apollo were thrown from the Leucadian disguised under the woman's form and
rock and from a promontory in Cyprus name in such stories. Aiige is a forgotten
(Strabo, pp. 452 and 6S3) Firmicus ; name of either Athena or Artemis;
Maternus yde Erroj-e Profan. Kelig. p. Rhoio is the Carian Aphrodite- Artemis
85) records the myth that Dionysius, (Diod. Sic. 5. 62) ; Danae is probably
the god of vegetation, was thrown into the title of the Argive Hera,
the sea by Lycurgus; these myths are ''
1. h..\\^\\A. La legended' Ence avant
probably derived from a very widely Virgile, Paris, 18S3; Klausen, Aeneas
spread harvest- ritual, of which an es- uiid die Penaten.
sential feature was the throwing into the "^
Pp. 607, 608.
water the effigy of the decaying deity of
And from his evidence and Homer's we can conclude that

the story of the wanderings of Aeneas was of later growth,
and that the Troad was the centre from which the name
of this hero and this worship spread over various parts of
the Mediterranean. But what meaning can we find for the
title AtVeta?, which belonged to Aphrodite in her cults at
Actium, in Leucas, and in Sicily ? From its form it might be

a patronymic, but it could not mean the mother of Aeneas,' '
nor can we suppose it to mean the 'daughter of Aeneas,' though

this would be consistent with the form of the word *. The
divinity may have sometimes taken the name of the mortal,
when the clan desired to identify their mythic ancestor or
chieftain with the divinity, and so we may account for the
title of Zeus-Agamemnon. A man however might be identified
with a god but scarcely with a goddess.

It is much more likely that this title of Aphrodite is of
independent origin, indigenous in the Troad and not to be

derived from the later and unimportant city of Aeneia on the
Thermaic gulf; that the goddess lent her title to her particular
clan of worshippers, and that to explain their name and their
position in the country the priestly hero Aeneias was imagined.
If he arose in this manner, as the mythic priest of the goddess
taking her title in a masculine form, we could understand the
mysterious character that attaches to him in the Iliad. We
can easily gather instances from Greek myth and religion
of heroes and heroines who
are merely the shadows or
emanations of Auge, Iphigenia and Atalanta
divinities, as
of Artemis, Trophonius of Zeus- Hades. What would be
exceptional in the present case, if this theory were fully
proved, would be tiiat the hero embodied the title not
of the male but the female divinity. But this would be
especially likely to occur where the goddess was served by
priests and while in the native Greek cults it is usual to find
;
the female ministrant in the ritual of the female divinity '\ it
" This has been pointed out by Pro- the contrary ; as for instance at Pellene
fessor Nettleship in the fourth edition Artemis Swreipa was served by priests
of Conington's FiV^//, p. xlvi. (Artemis '^f) and Athena Kpavaia at
^ Examples however are recorded of Elatea w.as served by boy-priests ; Paus.
is not unusual to find the priest attached to the service of the

Oriental goddess.
Thus even in late times we hear of the Cinyradae, the
priestly family attached to her cult in Cyprus ; the king
of Paphos down to the time of Alexander is priest of Queen '
Aphrodite %' and according to the legend in the Theogony it

was the fair Phaethon whom Aphrodite carried off and made '
^-.'
a secret minister in her holy temples
The name and hero Aeneas then may have arisen directly
from that title of the goddess or indirectly from it, if he were
;
the imaginary ancestor of the Aeneadae the priests of

'AippobiTT] Alveids. What is the true explanation of the title
itself, probably never know it may be as Worner

we shall :
ingeniously suggests, a derivative from Alvrj ^ the name of

the goddess of Ecbatana whose temple is described by
Polybius, and who was probably closely akin to Anaitis ;
or it may denote 'Aphrodite the consenting,' coming from

the Greek root. The later story of the wanderings of
Aeneas is the story of the diffusion of a cult and : in most
places where we find the name of Aeneas we find it in con-
nexion with the worship of Aphrodite*^"; at Aeneia, in Cythera,
at Actium, on the coast north of Buthrotum, on the south-east
coast of Italy, and notably in Sicily. His landing at Delos and
10. 34, 4; at Calauria, a young girl ference male animal in her

for the
officiated in the temple of Poseidon sacrifices"' both facts may be

''*;
until she was of marriageable age i7>. ; explained by her androgynous character,
2. 33, 3- These are certainly excep- vide Robertson Smith, Religion of the
tional facts ; but where the worship of a Semites, p. 453. From some of her
god and goddess was combined, a male temples women were excluded, for in-
ministrant was naturally appointed. stance from the temple on the Olympus
The chief functionary in the cult of promontory in Cyprus"; and accord-
the Ephesian Artemis was a priest, and ing to Artemidorus it was death for
this again may be due to Oriental in- a woman to enter the temple of Artemis
fluence. at Ephesus, the Ephesian Artemis being
" Timocharis Echctimos and Timai- a semi-Hellenic form of the goddess of
ros, kings of Paphos, are all Upfis ttjs Asia Minor (Artemis"^).
vide Six, Revue Nuinisma- ''
Roscher, Lexicon, p. 173; Polyb.
dmcro-Tjs;
tique, 1883, pp. 350, 351, and Kevuc 10. 27.

This is also Woraer's view and on
des Etudes greajiies, 1S92, pp. 55, 56.
<=
As the male-ministrant was sometimes the whole Klausen's, Aeneas und die
preferred in her worship, so she seems Penaten, pp. 316, 317.
to have exhibited at times a pre-
XXI.] APHRODITE-WORSHIP. ^. 641
Crete, recorded by Dionysios of Halicarnassus ^ and Virgil,

may from some legendary association with that Cretan
arise
and Delian worship of Aphrodite which has been described.
And in Argos, where Pausanias saw a statue of Aeneas, we
have noticed traces of the Oriental worship of the goddess.
In Sicily the cult becomes naturally blended with that of
the Carthaginian goddess of Eryx, and hence probably arose
the legend, which is hardly earlier than the third century,
of the relations between Aeneas and Dido ''.
In her own land, the Troad, Aphrodite Aeneias was in all

probability another form of the earth-goddess Cybele, and hence
we may understand the stories that were told of the burial of
Aeneas among the Berecyntes '^^ ^, the votaries of Cybele,
and that connected him and his Penates with Samothrace^.
But as the divinity of a clan that wandered far over the
Mediterranean she would naturally become regarded as
a goddess of the sea in this as in many other of her cults. We
have a proof of this on a coin of Leucas of the second
century B.C., that shows us a figure of Aphrodite, derived
probably from a public statue, with an 'aplustre' among her
emblems, and a ship's prow upon the reverse (Coin PI. B 45).
This has been rightly connected by Curtius^ with the statue
in the temple of Aphrodite Aeneias which Dionysius mentions
as standing on the small island between the canal and the

city of Leucas. And her maritime character may possibly
be illustrated by the title e(/)i7r7roy, which we may believe she
bore in some well-known centre of her worship, although we
have only a mysterious allusion made to by the scholiast of it
the Iliad, who tells when Aeneas had

us the simple story that
sailed to the west he mounted a horse and commemorated the
* Dionysios regards the city called about the origin of the Eryx-cult but ;
Aeneiaon theThermaic gulfasafounda- itmay reasonably be supposed to have

tion of Aeneas and we find a represen-
; been derived from Carthage, for we find
tation ofAeneas carrying Anchises on its in it the Oriental feature of the Updhov-
coinsof thesixth century B.C.; Head, Z^w/. Aot -fwaiKis^-'.
Nu7n. p. 189 Roscher, Lexicon, p. 167.
;
" The connexion between Aeneas and
''
For the view of Dido as the Saifiaiv theCabiriprobablyexplainsthepicture of
KapxrjSui'ioi, another form of Astarte, Parrhasius. 'Aeneas Castorque ac Pollux
vide Mowers, Die P/tom'zter, vo\. i.
pp. in eadem tabula.' Plin. A^. .^. 35.. to, 71-
609-611. We have no direct evidence ^ Hermes. 10. 243.
VOL. II. Q
event by dedicating a statue to his mother that represented

^''
her on horseback .
The title and the story are so pecuHar that no scholiast

could have gratuitously invented it. The term ^î-mros must
have been known to have been somewhere connected with the
worship of Aphrodite Aeneias, although there is no other hint
at all of her connexion with horses, except that Hesychius
identifies Hippodameia with Aphrodite. Now the symbolic
sense of the horse in Greek religion was manifold we find it :
in the worships of Apollo and Helios, the chthonian divinities

and the wind-gods, and especially of Poseidon who delights '
in the neighing of steeds and in the war-ships of dark-blue

prow ^' We might believe, therefore^ that the horse comes
into the legend and cult of Aphrodite as a symbol of the sea-
goddess. But another explanation may be offered, when
we consider another and more important aspect of this
divinity ^.
The goddess of the waters also had charge of the flowers

and growths of the earth, and the Oriental goddess was
known as "At'êta 'the flower-goddess' in Crete, and worshipped
with offerings of fruits and herbs ^^ .
The name of the locality '\epoKr\-ia ^^"^

'^, near Paphos, must
be derived from a sacred title of Aphrodite. And her func-
tions as a divinity of vegetation are alluded to by the similar
name of her temple in Athens, the temple '
in the gardens,'
near which stood the statue of Aphrodite Ourania^^^

According to Hesychius, trees were cut down and set up in
dedication to Aphrodite by the portal of the house, a custom
perhaps confined to Cyprus, and probably connected with the
worship of Adonis ^"'^ ^.
We may believe that the association of Aphrodite with the
^"'^
Hours, found in a worship at Olympia and appearing ',
occasionally in surviving monuments, alluded to the processes

of birth and growth which all these divinities protected. The
pomegranate was sacred to Aphrodite in Cyprus, and on
coins of the Roman period of Magnesia on the Maeander we
'^
Arist. Eqtiit. 551. Cf. Artemid. Oneirocr. i. 56.
>
Vide infra, p. 650,
find the figure of the goddess with this fruit in her hand
and with the inscription 'A^po5tVr] MrjAeia ^ Therefore when
Empedocles and Sophocles describe her as the giver of life,' '
'the goddess of abundant fruits,' they may have been deriving

these epithets from actual cult ^"'"^
^.
probable that the aspect of the Oriental Aphrodite as

It is
the earth-goddess is primitive. The Ishtar-myth is certainly

explained most naturally in this way, and the great festal
sacrifice offered to thegoddess of Hierapolis, called the festival
of 'the torch %' at which large trees were erected in the court
of her temple, and various sacrificial animals were suspended
from them and all burnt together ^^'^
^ belongs to that wide-
spread ritual of fire, which was intended to evoke the necessary
warmth and heat for the crops. Its efficacy lay partly in the
supposed power of sympathetic magic partly in the pleasant '',
oblations to the tree-spirit or earth-spirit ; such festivals have

taken place Europe usually on May-day or on Midsummer-
in
day at Hierapolis it fell on some day in early spring, and in
:
many of its details it resembles the sacrifice offered to Artemis

at Patrae, which has been described in a former chapter, and
of which the essential parts were the erecting green trees
round the altar, the kindling a great fire, and the driving into
it droves of wild and tame animals. The divinities to whom
these rituals were consecrated must have been closely akin in
some parts of their nature *'.
Another worship with which the Oriental goddess, at least

at a later stage, was nearly connected was that of Cybele, the
great earth-goddess of Phrygia, who herself may be only
Head, Hist. Num. p. 502. cult of Artemis, the two ideas of

*>
Vide chapter on Artemis, pp. 430, a goddess of vegetation and a goddess
458. Forparallelpracticesandtheirsigni- of fresh water are blended. This was
ficance among other nations, vide Frazer, probably also the case in the original
The Golden Bough, vol. 2. pp. 246- cult of Aphrodite in the East; but in
285 Mannhardt, Baumkultus, ch. 6.
; Greek religion it does not appear to
pp. 508-512 the kindling of trees, the
; have been so; she is prominently
passing of cattle through or into the a goddess of vegetation, but the stream,
flames, the semblance of human sacrifice, the fountain, and the lake, were not con-
occurred in most of these, and at Hiera- secrated to her. We hear only of the
polis :
vide Lucian, de Bea Syr. ch. 58. Aphrodite iv Kakdfiois or iv 'i\ei at
= It has been shown that in the Greek Samos '^.
Q3
another form of Ishtar Astarte. The GaUi, who were promi-

nent in the Phrygian rites, seem to have played their part
also in the temple-worship at Hierapolis and it would appear ;
from certain details in Lucian's account of it, that their practice

of self-mutilation was partly for the purpose of securing
fertility either for the family or the fields. The Phrygian
goddess who rides on the lion has her counterpart in the
Babylonian-Assyrian religion the armed Cappadocian Ma ;
the mother-goddess, a divinity of like nature with Cybele, is

a type that recalls the armed Astarte of Ascalon the bull and ;
the ram were sacred to Cybele as they were to Aphrodite ;
and as the Eastern goddess showed a predilection for the

priest and Aphrodite is worshipped by her Aeneas, so Cybele
was served by Hermes Cadmilos; as the Semitic goddess was
the tutelary genius of cities, so Cybele came to wear the
turreted crown. Lastly, the lamentations for Thammuz, who
appeared to the Greeks with the form and name of Adonis,
are found in the Phrygian worship as the mourning for Attis.
The character of the Eastern goddess as a divinity of vegeta-
tion emerges into the clearest light when we examine the
traits of Attis and Adonis, different local names for the same
personage in These have been gathered
her religion ^"^
together and clearly set forth by Mr. Frazer in The Golden
Boiigh^ and his;
conclusion that Adonis is a form of the spirit
of vegetation, the tree or corn-spirit, seems sufficiently certain.
He is born from the myrtle -tree, which like the rose is his
emblem ^"^ ^ Autumn-fruits are offered to him, and small
beds of flowers that grow up and wither rapidly, called the '
gardens of Adonis ^* ". In Lucian's account of the worship

'
'''
of the Dea Syria, and in the famous idyl of Theocritus,

describing the ritual at Alexandria, we have the record of the
young god, who dies and lives again ; at the latter city an
essential part of the ritual that refers to his death and
resurrection is his immersion in the sea^ with which we may
1 Vol. I, pp. 278-285. the worship of Aphrodite at Eryx, who
'
The same idea of a divinity of crosses the sea to Libya and returns
vegetation who away over the
passes (Aelian, de Nat. Anim. 4. 2) ;
pro-
sea and returns was expressed in the bably also in the artistic type of Aphro-
feasts of 01/070)710 and Karaywyia in dite riding on a swan over the waves.
compare many instances collected by Mr. Frazer of the

primitive rural practice of throwing the dead and decayed
god into the water ^. We
by Firmicus Maternus
are told
that in the Phrygian rites of the mother of the gods a pine-
tree was cut down each year, and in the midst of it was bound
the image of a youth ^^^ ^ this must have been the image of
:
Attis, and from Lucian's account of a similar rite at Byblos

we may conclude that the pine-tree and the image were burnt
at the end of the ceremony. The mourning for the dead or
departing god was interpreted by Eusebius ^*^^ ^ as alluding to
the fall of the year, the withering of flowers and herbs, and in
this he is followed by most modern writers. But Professor
Robertson Smith expresses the view that the mourning for
'^ '
Adonis was not originally a lament over decaying nature, but

simply the official mourning over the slaughter of the thean-
thropic victim in whose death the god died.' And he believes
that those who mourned for him had originally pierced him,
but that this part of the rite had been dropped when the
mourners could no longer understand why they should slay
their own god, and when they came to believe that his passing
away was due to the same natural law by which the life of
the fields and woods passed away. The earliest form of the
sacrifice would be the offering of a holy swine to Adonis the
swine-god, in fact the offering of the god to himself, a most '
ancient form of sacramental and piacular mystery in which

the worshippers attest their kinship with the animal god, and
offer in sacrifice an animal of the same kind, which, except on
these mystical occasions, it would be impious to bring to the
altar ^.' We have the same mysterious idea in the Brauronian
worship of Artemis examined above, in the sacrifice of the
bull-calf to Dionysos at Tenedos, and in the sheep-offering to
Aphrodite in Cyprus, if we accept a convincing and brilliant
emendation made by Professor Robertson Smith in the text
of Joannes Lydus 'I His view that just*as Dionysos was the
" T/ie Golden Bough, vol. i, pp. 260, p. 80, Bona, ed.) : in Cyprus irpoParov
261. KcoSiw koKi-naap-ivov avviOvov rfj 'Acppo-
^ Keligion 0/ ihc Semites, -p. Z^2,n.i. Birr) he points out that the phrase
:
* /i>., p. 460. KwSiai kaKe-naapivov is quite meaning-

<^
P. 45 1 (Jo. Lydus, de Mensibtts, 4. less, and proposes kaKi-naapivoi : the
bull-god, so Adonis was originally the swine, and that '

in this,
as in many other cases, the sacred victim has been changed

by false interpretation into the enemy of the god,' lacks direct
evidence, but the indirect evidence which has been collected
by Mr. Frazer is very weighty; and to this may be added the
explanation of Adonis' death given in a later version of the
myth, namely that the swine who slew Adonis was really
the embodiment of the jealous Ares for in this version the
;
consciousness of the divine character of the animal seems to be

preserved. This story is one of the many that arise from
a misunderstanding of sacrificial ritual we have a much more ;
absurd myth, arising from the same origin, given us by

Diodorus Siculus to explain why swine were sacred or tabooed
in the Carian worship of Hemithea, a Carian goddess who
may be called Artemis- Aphrodite, and why no wine was used
in her worship two maidens, Molpadias and Parthenos
;
(whose names are certainly titles of Aphrodite-Artemis her-

self), were watching their father s wine-pots, when they fell
asleep and swine entered and broke the pots as he was a man ;
of violent temper, and the loss of the wine was all the more
serious as this inestimable boon to mankind had only recently
been invented, the maidens flung themselves into the sea,
and received divine honours ^ Wherever the swine were
sacred in Aphrodite's worship, we may safely infer that they
had some reference to Adonis. Ordinarily in the Greek com-
munities the swine was not offered to this goddess ^'^*^ as we
learn from Aristophanes, and though the Greeks were ignorant
of the real reason, we may believe this to have been the
peculiar sanctity that belonged to this animal in the Oriental
cult, as we hear from Lucian that at Hierapolis the pig was
too sacred to be either sacrificed or eaten. But it is probable

that the especially sacred beast would be offered on rare
occasions by way of solemn expiation and we hear of such '' ;
sacrifices at Castniae in Pamphylia at Metropolis in Thessaly ^,

^*',
sacrificers will then have been arrayed * Vide Artemis-cult'^', Diod. Sic. 5.
in the skin of the sacred animal, testify- 63.

ing their kinship to it and to their ^ Vide Frazer, The Golden Bough,
divinity. vol. i. p. 52.
and of the offering of wild swine in Cyprus ^^* where, as ''j
Antiphanes says in a h'ne of his Coj'inthia, 'Aphrodite took

particular pleasure in pigs,' and where we have more than one
proof of the presence of Adonis. The 'To-r?/pta, or feast of
pigs at Argos, had reference probably to the cult of Adonis
and Aphrodite, and we have other traces of the Eastern
goddess in that city, such as the Hermaphroditic feast of
^'^
'T/3pto-rtKa and also clear record of the worship of Adonis
'',
there
'^^^
Now whether we regard Adonis as the swine-
'.
god and accept Professor Robertson Smithes interpretation of

the sacrifice of the divine animal that embodied him and
of the lamentations for the god's death, or whether we say
that the mourning was only for the passing away of the glory
of the year, we may in either case regard Adonis as the spirit
of vegetation. For we have independent evidence that he was
intimately connected with the growth of the fields and the
woods and if we had indubitable proof that he was ever
;
regarded as incarnate in the swine, this incarnation would

reveal the same character of the god, for among many com-
munities of Northern Europe the boar or the sow is regarded
as the embodiment of the corn-spirit.
Therefore, when the cult and ritual of Adonis came to the
shores of Greece, it must have helped to express more clearly
the character of Aphrodite as a divinity of vegetation. But
the Adonis-cult was a comparatively late importation into the
Greek Peninsula. No doubt it had at a much earlier time
been diffused from its Syrian and Phoenician centres through-
out the Greek cities of the Asia Minor coast and to the
Eastern islands but two centuries may have passed, since
;
Sappho sang the dirge of Adonis in Lesbos ^"^ before the '^,
Greek mainland received this strange orgiastic worship. The

earliest allusion to its introduction at Athens is in the frag-
ment of the BowKo'Aot of Cratinus, composed probably before
the Peloponnesian war. The poet is satirizing some archon
who refused a chorus to Sophocles, but granted one to some
poetaster who was not fit 'to train a chorus even for the
Adonis-festival '
; when this was written, the Adonia were
^"^
probably recent and of small prestige ^.
It may be that the introduction of the Phrygian worship of

Cybele, which made its way to Athens and Thebes at a not
much earlier period ^, either brought with it the ritual of
Adonis or prepared the minds of the Greeks to tolerate it.
The close affinity between the two worships has been noticed ;
and Aristophanes, in the Lysistrate, when he inveighs against

the luxury of the women,' and declares that the cries of
'
lamentation for Adonis disturb the debates in the Ecclesia,

speaks in the same context of the Phrygian drums and the
Phrygian Sabazius^^*. And at a later period Aphrodite is
addressed as Cybele, and the figures of Attis, Adonis, and
Dionysos are scarcely distinguishable, as we gather from
Plutarch's account of the two Atteis, from the lines of an
oracle given to the Rhodians, and from a late Orphic
hymn ^"^^ ^. But the Greeks who adopted and transformed
Dionysos and Aphrodite never completely Hellenized Adonis:
the more masculine tempers were averse to the effeminate
Eastern god with his train of emasculate priests and
'',
a lascivious ritual that the more austere state-religion of

Greece probably failed to purify the saner minds bred in ;
a religious atmosphere, that was on the whole genial and

temperate, revolted from the din of cymbals and drums, the
meaningless ecstasies of sorrow and joy that marked the new
religion . Yet it won its way, thanks partly to the plague
and the Peloponnesian war that lowered the ethos and the
intelligence of Greece. We have sufficient proofs of its
prevalence at Athens : at the time of the departure of the

host for Sicily, theAdonia were being celebrated, the figures
of Adonis were laid out on biers before the doors, and the
women were performing the pageant of a funeral, smiting
their breasts and singing dirges for the dead god the omen ;
Vide Gerhard's Gcsammelte Akade- <=

The old-fashioned Greek view is ex-
mische Abhandhmgcn, no. 15 : Uberdas pressed by Lucian, who reprobates '
the
Metroon und die Gottermutter. The Phrygian demon, the lascivious orgy
importation into Attica of the Syrian over the shepherd ; the secret rites of
worship of Aphrodite from Citium was initiation, the disreputable mysteries
still later (vide '^*). from which men are excluded . . . mere
**
In a line of the Orphic hymn ' * ^ corruption of the mind
'
''" e,
Adonis is addressed as male ai.d female.

was afterwards understood and long remembered ^^ We *.
have mention of the Adonis-gardens in Plato and Theo-

phrastus, and an inscription belonging to the end of the fourth
century B.C. speaks of a vote of thanks passed by the com-
pany of Aphrodite's worshippers in honour of a certain
Stephanos who conducted the procession of the Adonia
'^ tradition
according to the traditional rites ; the ' '
is
Eastern, and we may regard Adonis as a Hellenistic rather

than a Hellenic divinity. For the celebrity and nature of his
worship at Alexandria, the great centre of the Hellenistic world,
we have the evidence of the Theocritean idyl although the ;
song of Aphrodite's love is human in its tone and very

winning, yet there are no moral or spiritual ideas in the
worship at no conception of a resurrection that might
all,
stir human hopes in this, as in Bion's verses, Adonis per-

:
sonifies merely the life of the fields and gardens that passes
away and blooms again. All that Hellenism could do for
this Eastern god was to invest him with the grace of its
idyllic poetry.
It seems probable from the evidence that has been given

life and
that this function of Aphrodite, the protection of the
growth of the earth, belongs to the earliest conception that
the Eastern peoples formed of her. And this would explain
and imply her close connexion with the fertilizing waters as ;
we have the analogy in the Semitic religion of the Baalim,

the gods both of the land and the waters that nourish it ^ But
her maritime character is probably of later and accidental
growth, coming to her naturally as her cult was spread by
a maritime people from East to West. Nothing is so con-
servative of primitive ideas as the sacrifice and, though we ;
hear of her sacred fish in the lake near her temple at

Hierapolis, none of the animals sacrificed to her in the Greek,
and as far as we know in the Semitic, cults, allude at all to
the goddess of the sea ^^'*. Among birds, the partridge and the
goose were offered to her, the sparrow, if not sacrificed, was
sacred, the dove was too sacred even to be sacrificed in the
" Robertson Smith, Religion of the Semites, p. 09.

East, but in Greece was certainly offered, as we can conclude

from those monuments which represent the worshipper stand-
ing before the goddess and holding a dove but these animals ;
belong to the goddess of spring or the goddess of fertility.

The other animals, of whose sacred character in this worship

we have direct or indirect evidence the swine, ram, goat, bull,
kid, lamb are the natural animals for sacrifice or consecration
in an agricultural community. And the horse itself, if this
animal also on somewhat scanty evidence may be supposed
to have been sacred to Aphrodite, may have alluded to the
fruits of the earth at least as naturally as to the waves
of the sea. For we have the record of the horse-headed
Demeter of Phigaleia, and we see from the evidence collected
by Mr. Frazer, that the horse is one of the most common
embodiments of the corn-spirit.
We may be sure, then, that the Eastern divinity which
spread over the Mediterranean through Cyprus to Greece,
came rather as a goddess of the earth, akin to Demeter
Proserpine and Dionysos, than as a goddess of the sea,
though she always retained her interest in the seafarer.
Both in Greece and the East the connexion between the
powers of life and nature and the powers of the lower world
and death was natural and close and needed to be expressed
in worship.
As Ishtar mourns for the beautiful youth Dumuzi or
Tammuz, so among the tribes of the Lebanon we hear of
the type of the mourning Aphrodite who sat with head
veiled and bowed and the tears streaming down her
cheeks This sorrow Macrobius explains and in a cer-
^**'\
tain sense he may be right

as the image of the winter.
But the myth of the East and the poetry of Greece later
interpreted it as her dead Adonis, and
sorrow for the
Bion calls to her, No longer slumber on purple draperies,
'
but rise, sad one, thou of the mourning robe, and smite thy
breasts.' And according to another legend, the goddess flings
herself down the Leucadian rock in grief for her beloved.
This myth may be a meaningless fancy but it corresponds, ;
as has been partly shown, with certain facts of ritual and with
another better known legend. The grave of Ariadne-Aphro-

dite was actually shown in ^ Cyprus Zeus"^^
as the grave of
in Crete and of Dionysos in Delphi. From the record of the
ceremonies performed in the worship of Adonis we gather that
^^
the dead body of the god was laid out on the bier we ''
;
are nowhere told that the dead goddess was placed by his
side but we may well believe that this was the case when we
;
examine the myth of Pygmalion as told by Ovid,, and

interpret it in reference to the love of Adonis and Aphrodite ;
Pygmalion loves the dead image which he decks in fine

raiment, and which at last gains the breath of life. But,
according to Apollodorus, Pygmalion is related to Adonis,
and Hesychius gives us the name Ylvyixaio^v as a Cypriote
synonym for Adonis ^^^*'; and Clemens Alexandrinus gives us
the interesting information that the image which Pygmalion
carved and loved, and brought to life by the power of his
prayer, was that of Aphrodite herself ^" Through these ''.
obscure hints of legend a certain fact seems to be partially

revealed that in Cyprus in some religious ceremony, some
;
scenic representation of the Adonia perhaps, the image of the

dead goddess ^ was exposed, and then after due performance
of certain rites she was supposed to be restored to life. We
have the parallel belief in the Assyrian religion about the
descent of Ishtar into hell, and her rescue by the messenger
of the gods, who sprinkles her with the waters of life and
recovers her ^ and the legends of the deaths of Semiramis
;
and Dido, if we interpret these as names of the Assyrian and

Phoenician divinity, embody the same conception of the
divinity that must die. This dual character of the Eastern
goddess is summarily expressed in the lines of the pseudo-
Plautus, who appeals to '
divine Astarte, the strength, the
life, the salvation of men and gods/ and again '
the power of
^^^^.'
destruction, death and decay
" There is possibly an allusion to such power or as an '

eidolon ' of Aphrodite ;
a form in that mysterious passage'"*' in 'eidolon' in this context must either

Hesychius (s.v. 'Epii'vi/s), which hasnever mean phantom '
' or image,
been successfully interpreted, in which ''
Vide De la Saussaye Religionsgc-
<;he Erinnys is explained as an infernal scliichte, vol. i, pp. 338, 339
Finding then in Greece the frequent worship of Aphrodite

as a divinity of death ^^'^'
and the lower world, we can regard
from the original tradition. We
this aspect of her as derived
hear of the worship at Delphi of Aphrodite on the tomb,' '
by whose image the spirits of the dead received libations ;
at Argos, the same cult is attested by the strange title

Tvixôdpvyos, denoting the goddess of graves ; at Thespiae,
'
Corinth, and Mantinea by the name of MeAati'ts, the '
dark
goddess^; and the same allusion was probably conveyed by the
epithets Muxeta, mentioned and probably wrongly interpreted
by Suidas, Ei/jnet-jj? attached to Aphrodite by Hesychius, and
EvjSovka a title that appears to belong to her on an inscription
found at Paphos ; both these two latter terms being known
appellatives of the lower gods. The story given in Plutarch
about the funeral ceremonies held in honour of Aphrodite in
Aegina and commemorating the heroes of the island who fell
at Troy, shows us the same character of the goddess ^ From
an inscription quoted by the author of a work ascribed to
Aristotle, we gather that there was a close cult-relation
between Aphrodite and Persephone at Thebes ^^" ^
Other indirect but interesting evidence of a similar worship
can be extracted from the legends given by Ovid, Plutarch,
and Antoninus Liberalis ^^''s, of the hard-hearted maiden in
Cyprus, whom Plutarch calls by the impossible name of
' Parakuptousa,' and whom divine retribution turned to stone
because she looked unfeelingly on the corpse of her lover. But
Ovid and Plutarch were both aware that the goddess herself
was by the same name in Cyprus, and the poet tells us
called
that there was a statue in Cyprus representing the frozen
petrified form. And when Plutarch goes on to say that a
similar story was told in Crete about a maiden named Gorgo,
who came to a like end, we have an easy clue to these
romantic legends about callous young women with remark-
able names we detect a worship in both islands of
;
an Aphrodite Gorgo, a goddess conceived as dead and

represented in frozen slumber ; and we have monumental
" The Aphrodite Me\ajm of Thespiae with the moon: vide next eh., p. 699.
seems also to have had some connexion ^ Quaes/. Grace. 44.
evidence for this''. Moreover, this worship must in some

way have been combined or confused with another in which
Aphrodite was known by the very different name of YlapaKvu-
Tovaa, 'the goddess who looks out of the corners of her eyes,'
an epithet alluding to the sidelong glances of the lover. As
usual, the epithets become detached and the stories about the
maidens arise from them.
It may have been from this original belief in her as a power of
the shadowy world, the home of destiny and retribution, that an
association in cult arose between Aphrodite and the Fates and
Furies, who according to Epimenides' genealogy were her
sisters and, again, between Aphrodite and Nemesis, the
;
Rhamnusian goddess, who, as I have tried to show, was no

mere personification, but a real divinity akin to Aphrodite, if
not another form of her, and possessing a marked character as

a goddess of doom or punishment ^^^^''\ It is probable also
that the cult-relations of Aphrodite with Hermes, of which
we have record at Argos, Megalopolis, Cnidos, and Lesbos,
arose from the chthonian aspect of the two divinities ^^'^ .
So far it is the physical or elemental nature of Aphrodite

that has been traced in the cults of the various Greek com-
munities does not appear that the Greeks have added
; and it
anything new to the tradition which they received.

But we have seen that the Eastern goddess was not merely
a nature-divinity,' but a divinity of the state and the city^^*'%
'
and at Ascalon a goddess of war. We may believe that the

cult of the armed Aphrodite belongs to the first period of her
worship in Greece ^"^. In Cyprus, if we may look to that as
her first Hellenic settlement, we hear of Aphrodite "Eyx^tos,
and probably the epithet denotes the goddess of the spear.' '
But in Cythera we have still clearer proof given us by Hero-

dotus of the very ancient worship of the Eastern goddess as
a warlike divinity. We may believe it to have existed in
Corinth, the ancient home of Aphrodite Ourania ^^, and we
may suppose that it came at an early time to Thebes, and
brought about the close association between her and Ares at
that city. But nowhere was it of such repute as among the
" Vide infra, p. 699.
Spartans, who doubtless derived it from Cythera % and who gave

^^.
to the new goddess the martial epithets of Areia and Âpiovria
We have a string of epigrams in iht Anthology referring to this
Spartan worship, and playing in various ways on the idea that
the stern Lycurgean constitution would only admit Aphrodite if
she put off her effeminacy and learned the use of weapons. This,
of course, is a misunderstanding it was the Phoenician, not the
:
Lycurgean, state-religion that gave her the spear or the bow, and
for this reason she was once at least mis-named Athena^ at the
Syrian Laodicea \ and for this among other reasons was more
^^''^
frequently identified with Artemis. I have already suggested
that the cult of Artemis 'Ao-rpareia on the Laconian coast pre-

serves in a meaningless title the Phoenician name Astarte ^
In the later Greek literature, the references to the shield and
the spear in the hands of the goddess of love are generally
mere playful allusions to her love for Ares. But down to the
last period of Greek history she preserved her inherited
character as a goddess of war in some of the Greek states.
The most famous of these worships was that of Aphrodite
Stratonikis at Smyrna *'^, whose temple claimed rights of
sanctuary we gather from Tacitus that this title was of
;
ancient origin in that city, and could not have been attached
to her, as has sometimes been supposed, out of mere compli-
ment to Queen Stratonike. At Mylasa, Aphrodite was the
goddess who goes with the army (^rpareia) ^^ at Amorgus,
'
' ;
the locality in which she was worshipped appears to have

been called 'Ao-tti?, 'the place of a shield '"^^^ whence she took
her title of 'Acppohm] Ovpavia rj h aanioL. At Mantinea, the
temple of Aphrodite l^vixyLoyCa commemorated the aid given
by the Mantineans to Rome and Augustus at the battle of
Actium ^^ and in the oath of alliance between the Arcadian
;
Orchomenos and the Achaean league we find the name of

Aphrodite ^^. At Argos, where the Oriental cult had struck
deep roots, the worship of Aphrodite Nt/crjô'po? must have
been inspired by the Eastern idea of the warlike goddess,
though the people explained it in another way " ^.
" An inscription recently discovered attests the cult of Aphrodite Ovpavia near
Amyclae ^^ ^ ^ p. 485.
When Sulla, after his victory at Chaeronea, inscribed his

trophy with the names of Ares, Aphrodite, and Nike, it is pro-
bable that the association of the two former divinities on such
a monument was a recognition of the warHke character which
may have belonged to the goddess in certain parts of Boeotia.
But her civic and political functions came to her chiefly
through her interest in the family and in births and marriages ^^'^.
She was revered as the cherisher of children at Cyprus and
' '
elsewhere ^ and before marriage a kid was sacrificed to her

'^'^
;
while at Paphos, where she was worshipped as a civic divinity

by the side of Zeus Polieus and Hera*'^, we find that as late
as the second century A.D. children were consecrated to her
charge ^^'^ a custom derived perhaps from the East, as we
'',
are informed by Lucian that the young men and girls at

Hierapolis were in the habit of offering locks of their hair to
the goddess of the city ^ and in a late Greek inscription we
;
find Astarte invoked in the same prayer with Eros, Harpo-

crates, and Apollo as the protectress of the family^.
The charge of the actual processes of birth was assigned in
the Greek states usually to Artemis or Eileithyia ; but it is
possible that Aphrodite herself was invoked under the name

Genetyllis^^^s^ if by the scholiast on
the view expressed
Aristophanes is But though we have the Venus
correct.
Genetrix in Rome, we have no Aphrodite Fej/eVeipa in Greece,
and no clear proof of an Aphrodite FeiêTuAAis. The
Genetylhdes are contemptuously mentioned by Aristophanes
and Lucian as powers of doubtful origin and doubtful
character, who maintained themselves on the luxury and
superstition of married women, and whom the husband
regarded with suspicion and dislike. In her worship on the
Attic coast, under the title of KojAidy, she may have been
regarded as a goddess of child-birth ^^ i^^S; for though the '^'
epithet, which has been identified by E. Curtius with the "^
Samothracian epithet KaAm? the goddess in the grotto,' gives

'
us no clue, yet the Koliades are mentioned by the side of

the Genetyllides in Lucian's tirade against these expensive
" Dc Dea Syria, p. 58. b Athenaion, 4. p. 458.
^
Gbtting. Gel. Anz. i860, p. 418.
divinities of midwifery. In the cult of Aphrodite Ctesylla

in Ceos'^^ and the legend explaining it, we may see an
allusion to the goddess of child-birth, especially as she was
evidently related closely in this worship to Artemis Hekaerge.
At Oropus^'^ she shared an altar with Athena the Healer and
the daughters of Asclepios'', and perhaps we have here an
expression of the same idea that gave her the name of
Her connexion with marriage is much closer : in fact she

appropriates the functions, and at Sparta even the name of
Hera^^^ We hear of an Aphrodite of the bridal-chamber
[QaXdjxoiv) "^ ^ of an Aphrodite "\p\xa at Delphi ', the goddess
;
who joins together in matrimony, a title which gives us

perhaps the clue to the real meaning of the name Harmonia,
the daughter of Aphrodite, who was originally the goddess
herself at Thebes we find an Aphrodite Nu/x^ta, the goddess
;
of the bridal "^ ^ on the road between Troezen and Hermione.

And among the ideas concerning the character and worship of
Aphrodite, to which the later Greek writers give expression,
those which are associated with wedlock have most moral
interest. Artemidorus in his Oneirocriticon maintains that
Ourania Aphrodite, using the term in its transformed Hellenic
sense, had especial virtue in regard to marriage "^'^; and
Stobaeus exclaims 'What could love, what could Hera or
Aphrodite preside over more legitimately than over the lawful
intercourse of man and woman ?^^^^.' Plutarch comments
eloquently on the worship at Delphi, saying The honour and '
charm, and mutual love and trust, that grow up daily (in
a happy marriage) prove the wisdom of the Delphians in
calling Aphrodite the goddess who joins together.' These
passages are the more interesting, because in Greek literature
panegyrics on marriage are few the romantic aspect of love
;
was more commonly associated with the divine power of Eros ;
and the later worships of Aphrodite that refer not to marriage

but to free love are sometimes marked, as we shall see, by
cult-epithets that are neither spiritual nor pure.
And what is of greatest importance is that this refined cult
" Cf. theRhodian worship of Apollo, Asclepios, and Aphrodite^'.
XXI.] APHRODITE-WORSHIP. 6^1
of the goddess, as the patroness of married life, is probably

a native development within the Greek religion. The record
seems to show that the Eastern religion failed to present her at
all, or at least prominently, as the goddess who sanctioned and
encouraged lawful union. It is true she was at times regarded
as the wife of Baal, and was styled 'Virgin' at Carthage, a title

which provokes the indignant sarcasm of an early Christian
writer. But so far as we can gather from certain Oriental
institutions and legends, she seems to have been regarded as
against the purer relations of man and woman. In Hierapolis,
Armenia, and probably Lydia, she was supposed to demand
the sacrifice of virginity before marriage and in the legends
;
of Ishtar and Semiramis the goddess herself was represented

as wanton and murderous. Some part of this evil character
has been transplanted into Greek legend, but very little into
Greek worship, and the few traces of it that we can find belong
probably to the later period.
The life of the family was closely associated in the Greek
communities with the system of the clan and Aphrodite in ;
some of the Ionic settlements was connected with this also ;
inscriptions of the second and third, and possibly of the fifth

century, B. C, prove the existence of the worship of Aphrodite
'ATraroupos or k-naTovprj in Phanagoria and Panticapaeum "^' ^^
""
Strabo gives us a Phanagorian legend, explaining the name by

some myth, possibly genuine, of the deceit of Aphrodite who
'
'
lured the giants to her cave where they were destroyed by

Heracles; and at Troezen^ the same title, which was there
attached to Athena, was explained by a legend arising from
the same false derivation of the word from aTranj or deceit.
The word is of course derived from the Ionic festival of the
Â.-aTovpia and from the system of the phratriae, into which the
new-born child of the citizen's family was admitted^ and which
at Athens, and apparently at Troezen, were sanctioned by the
worihip of Zeus Phratrios and Athena Apaturia. This asso-
ciation with the clan, even more obviously than her connexion
with marriage, came to Aphrodite after her settlement in
Greece and not from the Eastern tradition.
* Paus. 2. I.
33,
VOL. II. R
The highest political idea which attached to the worship

of Aphrodite was expressed by the cult-title \\avhy]ixos , about
which, from the time of Plato downwards, there has been
a strange misunderstanding, but which now, owing to recent
discoveries, can no longer be considered of doubtful meaning"'^.
We find the cult of Aphrodite Pandemos at Erythrae **^ '^
mentioned in an inscription dealing with the sale of priest-

hoods another inscription proves its existence at Cos^'"*'; we
;
have Pausanias' testimony of its establishment at Megalo-

polis^^, and at Thebes^ where the legend referred its institu-
tion to Harmonia ^. But its chief importance was at Athens,
and it is only from Attic inscriptions and Attic records that
we can gain a clue to its meaning. Pausanias, after describing
the monuments on the south side of the Acropolis, the temple
of Asclepios, the temple of Themis, and the tomb of Hippo-
lytus, states abruptly that Theseus, when he drew the citizens
together into one city, instituted the worship of Aphrodite
Pandemos and Peitho ; and he adds that their ancient statues
no longer existed in his time. The context makes it clear that
some way beyond the tomb of Hippolytus was the temple
of Aphrodite, to whom Pausanias found the title of Pandemos
given. It is also probable that she was connected in the Attic
legend with Theseus, as Apollodorus in his treatise concern- '
ing the gods takes the same view as Pausanias about the
'
origin of the cult and also in some way with the worship and
:
myth of Hippolytus for we have epigraphic evidence of the

;
existence of a temple of Aphrodite e0' 'l-n-aokvTM, near '
Hippolytus,' that is, '

near the tomb of Hippolytus.' And
this shrinemust be the same as that which Euripides in the
Hippolytus. the scholiast on that passage and the scholiast
on the Odyssey, all designate by the name e^' 'IttttoAi; or
'
Hippolyteion ^^ Now the Hippolyteion must either be
''.'
another name for the temple of Aphrodite Pandemos, or Pau-

sanias must have omitted to mention the former in his account.
But if we take the view that there were two buildings, the one
called the Hippolyteion, the other the temple of Aphrodite
* At Olympia there is no proof, as has been wrongly supposed, of its recog-
nition by the state. Vide infra, pp. 681-684.
Pandemos *, doubt but that they were in close

there is little
vicinity to each other on the south and south-west slope of

the Acropolis, for two inscriptions have been found on the
south-west slope of the Acropolis relating to the worship
of Pandemos and this position of the temple is not irrecon-
;
cileable with Apollodorus' statement in the above treatise,

that it stood in the ancient agora,' if we suppose the ancient
'
agora to have lain between the Pnyx and the Areopagus, so

that it might be said to include in its circuit a temple that
stood on the slope of the Burg-Hill ^ Whatever its exact
locality was, it was associated in the local legend with Theseus
and Phaedra, that is to say, with that circle of cult which
included Crete, Troezen, and Athens.
The question now arises as to the meaning of the word
Pandemos we have seen that Apollodorus gives it the
;
political meaning which is certainly the true one'^'^^ But

Nicander of Colophon, quoted by Athenaeus "" *, finds for it
a very different significance, stating that Solon, to whom
writers of the New Comedy ascribe the organization of
prostitution at Athens, collected money from this class of
women and raised a temple to Aphrodite Pandemos as the
Miss Harrison maintains that there the entrance to the Acropolis. Lolling,
were two separate shrines of Pandemos in the AiXriov 'ApxaioKoyiKuv, 1888,
and e(p' 'InnoXvTw, on the ground that p. 1S7, identifies the two, and places the
both titles occur in official inscriptions, latter near to the approach to the Acro-
and we have no instance of the same polis on the west (so also in his article in
temple being called by two official IwanMiMers I/ain/heirk dcs C/assiSi-/icn
names \Myth. Mon. Anc. Aih. p. 334). Alterthitftis, vol. 3, p. 330) ; but in the
This is a reasonable but not quite AeAriW of 1891, p. 127, he seems to
certain argument ; for the inscription conclude, on the strength of an inscrip-
nientioning 'A(ppodiTr) ef' 'lirrroXvTqj '^ ^ tion on an altar found not far from the
refers not to any temple but to a statue, temple of ' Theseus '
in the Ceramicus
and we have evidence that in these quarter, that the '
ancient agora ' to
financial inscriptions the same statue which Apollodorus refers was in the
was sometimes called by different de- Ceramicus, and the temple of Aphrodite
scriptive names, as in the case of the Pandemos was that which Pausanias
Artemis Brauronia on the Acropolis. wrongly calls a temple of Ourania, and
^ This is Foucart's view in Bti//. de stood near the temple of Theseus ' '
Corr. Hell. 1889, pp. 157-161 he sup- ; but the existence of an altar does not
poses the Hippolyteion to have stood quite prove the existence of a temple on
on the same terrace as the Asclepieion, that very site, and this contradiction in
and the temple to Aphrodite Pandemos Pausanias is too much to suppose,
somewhat further westward nearer to
R 2
66o GREEK RELIGION. [chap.
goddess of common and venal love. And this is the sense in

which Plato in the Symposiinn misunderstood or deliberately
misused the word ^ He there distinguishes between Ourania
Aphrodite, the elder goddess, the eternal one without father
''^
or mother who personifies the intellectual love of the soul S
and Aphrodite Pandemos, who is the younger, the daughter
of Zeus and Dione, who personifies the sensual love of the
body. This idea is borrowed by Xenophon or whoever is
the author of the Symposiitm attributed to him, and we find the
same distinction there between Ourania and Pandemos, though
he hints at the possibility of the two terms expressing different
sides of the same goddess but he also attests an important
:
distinction in ritual, saying that he is well aware that Ourania

and Pandemos were worshipped at different altars and in
different shrines, and with difference of ritual'', Ourania
with the purer, Pandemos with the less pure form ^^ ^ This
interpretation of the two terms was certainly accepted
in the later Greek periods. At Thebes the very archaic
images of Aphrodite, supposed to have been dedicated by
Harmonia, were called Ourania Pandemos and Apostrophia,
and Pausanias interpreted the two former titles as Plato had
done^. At Olympia Pausanias found the Pheidian statue
of Aphrodite called OvpavCa, another in an adjacent enclosure,
called Pandemos carved by Scopas and representing her
'^^
'",
riding on a goat. But it is evident from the phraseology of the

text that these distinctions between the two statues were not
attested by any inscription. We have in the Anthology an
epigram, describing a statue of Aphrodite, beginning '
Cypris
is not here the goddess of vulgar love (Pandemos) ;
do
^.'
reverence and call her the heavenly one ^'''
Modern writers'^ have accepted too readily this philosophic
" It has been suggested that Plato 2. i, 25.
vilified Pandemos through his dislilce *^

Even Prof. Robert in his new
of the democratic connotation of the edition of Preller's JMytJiologie. Miss
name. Harrison, in the Mythology and Menu-
b pqSiovpyoTfpai is contrasted in the 77ientsof Ancient Athens, p. 332, re-
sentence with a-^voTtpai, and is also jects the lower meaning of Xiavhr)ixo'i
explained by the use of pahiovp-yia for but does not discuss the question what
sensual indulgence in the Memorabilia, positive significance it might have.
XXI.] APHRODITE-WORSHIP. 66i
and popular misinterpretation of the terms. There is
certainly sufficient evidence that the people understood

Pandemos, from the fourth century onwards, in the lower
but there is no evidence that the state-religion of Greece
sense ;
ever recognized this meaning of the title. The people who

forgot the meaning of the obvious epithet 'A-narovpia might
easily suppose that Pandemos could designate the common
'
'
and unclean goddess and Plato, the arch-juggler in the

;
interpretation of words, is perhaps answerable in part for

the degradation of this one. The title Ovpavia had, in the old
religion ofGreece and the East, no such high significance
the Cypriote Aphrodite was Ourania and by no means austere
the Corinthian Aphrodite was Ourania and, here only in
Greece proper, was served by young women of loose reputa-
tion, whom Pindar grandiloquently calls the daughters of
'
Persuasion, who lift up their hearts to Ourania Aphrodite' ^^^ ;
and it is a curious comment on Plato's interpretation of the

term that the only impure element which we can find in the
Greek state-religion of Aphrodite, before the fourth century,
we find in this worship of the '
heavenly ' goddess at
Corinth.
The hetaera in Lucian appears to have been better acquainted
than Plato with the significance of Greek religious terms,
when she offered sacrifice to Pandemos and Ourania impar-
tially^^". In fact the title Ovpavia had in the genuine state-
religion no more definite moral sense than '0Au/x7rta, but denoted
originally the Eastern good or for evil, and
Aphrodite for
perhaps afterwards came to mean nothing more than the
'
goddess of the ancient worship.' The monuments of her
that have survived, or have been recorded, present us with no
attributes or symbols that have any moral meaning at all ;
nor on the other hand, in the monuments that with any

certainty refer to the cult of Pandemos, is there any hint of
the sensual significance supposed to belong to the title.
There are weighty reasons for saying that this supposition

is entirely errroneous. In the first place, the lower meaning
of Pandemos is always correlate with the higher meaning
of Ourania. But this latter is not known to be older than
Plato, and there is no clear evidence that it ever had this

meaning in any state-cult for supposing that the statues
;
mentioned at Olympia and Thebes were originally designated

by these titles, yet Pausanias cannot be said to be giving us
more than the popular and late interpretation of the names.
Secondly, the word -navhrjixo'i has always, in other applications,
a serious and often a religious sense, being attached to Zeus
in Attic and other worships as the guardian of the political
community ^ Therefore, as applied to Aphrodite, it ought
to mean the goddess worshipped by the whole people,' hence
*
the goddess of the political community, and if there were

a festival called -navh-qixia it would mean the same for the
worship of this goddess as the Panathenaia and Pandia meant
for the worship of Athens and Zeus. In the feast of
Aphrodite Pandemos.that comes as an episode into Menander's
play, The Flatterer, the religious-minded cook prays solemnly
to all the Olympians for safety and health and all bless-
ings the phrases are borrowed from the public formula of
:
^^'^.
prayer
This political significance and the serious nature of the cult
are attested by the inscriptions found on the Acropolis. On
the relief dedicated by Arctinos and Menecratia, in the fourth
century B. C, the inscription begins with an address to
Aphrodite as the great and holy goddess.' The priestess
'
who was given the continual charge of the sacrifice was a state-
official, and from time to time the aorwo'/iot were directed to
cleanse the temple and to superintend the public procession

held in her honour ^^'^ And the more recent discovery of the
'.
altar, dedicated at the end of the third century to Aphrodite
'Hye/ioV?; tov h'îov^^' \ 'the leader of the people,' and to the
Graces, would be by itself almost conclusive evidence of

the political significance of the cult and title of Aphrodite on
the Acropolis, and, as Lolling maintains ^ we may now believe
that the Hcgemone mentioned, together with the Graces, among
the divinities by whom the Attic Ephebi swore to defend the
country and obey the laws was this Aphrodite Hegemone
'^
Zens^''; cf. the phrases TrafStjuil ^ AfKriov 'Apxaio\. 1891, p. 12;-.
Ovfiv and Trav^rjixios iopTrj. c
Artemis *'
^
Tov hr\\xov or Aphrodite Y\avhr)\xos. We can then understand

why this political worship was connected with the name of
Theseus, the mythic founder of the Ionic settlement and the
higher state-organization; andwhy it was instituted at Thebes,
where Aphrodite was regarded as the ancestress of the race,
and why it was chosen for establishment at Megalopolis as
one of the cults suitable for binding together the new con-
federacy of Arcadia. As the Aphrodite-worship of Theseus
is connected, as we have seen, by so many links with Crete
and the East, the Aphrodite Pandemos may be a Greek

development of the goddess who already at Ascalon had
taken under her patronage the city-life.
It remains to notice the apparently authoritative statement
in Xenophon^s Symposium, that vouches for the laxer char-
acter of this worship. But we cannot vouch for the author
of Xenophon's Symposium. What we know is that until the
' '
declining period of Greek history, the cult of Aphrodite, so far

as it appears in written or monumental record, was as pure and
austere as that of Zeus and Athena,, purer than that of Artemis,
in nearly all the Greek communities, rules of chastity being
sometimes imposed upon her priestess ^^ that the only impure ;
practices in this worship, of which we have any hint before

the fourth century, were connected with the name of Aphrodite
Ourania at Corinth, and that even in the later period, when
the influence of the hetaerae in the Greek cities had at last
'
'
corrupted certain parts of the public religion, and impure

titles seem to have become attached to the goddess with the
sanction of the state, the cult of Pandemos is associated with

none of these.
In fact, it implies an ignorance of the earlier spirit of Greek
worship, and a confusion of a religion which was mainly pure
with a mythology that was often the reverse, to suppose that
a pre-Solonian cult could have given a religious sanction
to practices which endangered family life. The Corinthian
worship being demonstrably Oriental is the exception which
proves the rule.
And the mistake made by the author of Xenophon's Sym-

'
'
posium may be partly explained. His phrase 'Ovaiat pahiovp-

yoTepai is, in any case, obscure, and it is not easy to explain

'
what a pure or impure sacrifice would be. Possibly he may

' '
have been aware that at Athens vi](l)d\La Upd, that is libations

of water and honey without wine, were offered to Aphrodite
Ourania and he may have supposed that such libations
''^
'1,
were ceremoniously purer and implied a purer idea, such,

for instance, as was in the mind of Oedipus when he boasts
that he comes to the Eumenides of Colonus as a man '
innocent of strong drink to goddesses who love not wine.'

But it is and honey in
certain that the use of wine, or water
libations, did on any moral distinction
not originally rest
between one worship and another", although Theophrastus
and others may have believed that the rr;(/)aAta Upd were the
more innocent and ancient ritual. Again, the writer may have
had in his mind the immorality associated with the worship of
the Eastern goddess in certain communities, and arbitrarily
attached this to the cult of Pandemos in its vulgar sense even ;
then pahiovpyoT^pai Ovaiat is still an inappropriate phrase.

In public worship the distinction did indeed exist in the
later times between the goddess of honourable marriage and
the goddess of free love, but it is not expressed by the titles
justexamined.
In the minds of the people, and in most of Greek mytho-
logy, no doubt Aphrodite was little more than the power
that personified beauty and human love and this idea, which ;
receives such glowing expression in the poetry is expressed '',
also by a sufficient number of cult-titles, which are neither

moral nor immoral, but refer merely to the power of love in
life. The most interesting of these is Peitho, by which title
Aphrodite was worshipped at Pharsalus^ and in Lesbos ^^''*'
as the goddess of Persuasion. It has been already suggested
" Vide chapter on Zeus-ritual, pp. '

The words with which the short
88, 89. iirj(pd\ia were offered to Zeus fragment of an Homeric hymn to
Ttaipjvs, Poseidon, the wind-gods; at Aphrodite begin, give us almost the full
Athens to Mnemosyne, the Muses, Eos, picture of the Homeric goddess, '
I will
Helios, Selene, the Nymphs, and Aphro- sing of Cytherea of Cyprus, who gives
dite Ovpavia, lo Sosipolis, the city-genius sweet gifts to men, and who wears
of Elis (Pans. 6. 20, 2) ; sometimes a smile ever upon her lovely face and
even to Dionysos. No one explanation brings the flower of loveliness.'
suits all these cases.
that at the creation of Pandora in the Hesiodic account

Peitho takes the place of Aphrodite herself, and it is probable
that she whom Sappho
daughter and the golden-
styled the '
gleaming handmaiden of Aphrodite, had no original inde-'
pendent existence as a divinity, but grew up from a title of

the latter goddess which became detached and personified.
The statues of Peitho and Paregoros, a synonymous per-
sonification,stood in the temple of Aphrodite IT/ja^ts atMegara'-";
the temple-statue was of ivory and earlier than the Praxitelean
period. As
might mean 'result' or 'success,' and
Ilpafts
Peitho and Paregoros are terms that help to explain it, we
can interpret the temple-worship as that of the goddess who
gives success in love. A similar term is Maxavlns, by which
she was worshipped at Megalopolis as the goddess who con-
^" ^.
trives ways and means for lovers
The goddess who turns men's hearts to love was also
worshipped by the name 'E7rta-rpo(/)ta ^^ as at Thebes the '',
goddess who turns hearts away ^ was recognized under

' '
the reverse name

of Aphrodite 'ATTO(rTpo(f)La^.
The contrast between the healing and destructive force of
love in human lives may be that which is expressed by the
two interesting titles avbpocpovos and a-oicrdvbpa. We are told
by Plutarch and Athenaeus, who quotes from Polemon, that
'
Aphrodite was called avhpocpovos or avoaCa, the '

slayer of men
or the 'unholy' one, at Pharsalus^^^, and this is explained by
the story that the famous courtesan Lais was murdered in the
temple of Aphrodite by the Thessalian women who feared
the effects of her beauty on the men of the country *. There
may be some truth in the story, but the title is not likely to
have arisen from this incident. If the word '
Sosandra,' the
saviour of men, which denoted a famous statue, evidently of
some divinity, ascribed by Lucian to Calamis, were proved to
A writer in the Gazette Areheologi- and does not correspond with the part
que of 1880 interprets Airoarpocpia as usually played by Aphrodite in Greek
the goddess who frees men from evil mythology; for instance, in the myth
passions ; this special sense of the word of the daughters of Cinyras, Aphrodite
rests merely on the popular sense given 'EiTiaTpo(pia and 'A-noarpocpia are equi-
to the word at Thebes in Pausanias' valent to Eros and Anteros.

time: it is probably quite groundless
be really an epithet of Aphrodite as has been often sup-

posed % then this would be an exact counterpart to the
Thessalian term, and we should have in these two the dual
conception that appears in Plautus' description of Astarte. To
this class belongs the epithets MaySpayoptrts ^^^, designating
the goddess who soothes or lulls to sleep, or gives the love-
charm, and 'EAeTj/xwi' ^^, name the of the compassionate goddess
of Cyprus. But Hesychius, who is our sole authority for these,
does not say whether they are poetical or cult-terms. There
is the same doubt about the title '
Automata,' by which,
according to Servius^^, the Ephesians designated Aphrodite
as the source of spontaneous love.
The worships in which she appears as a goddess of beauty
merely are very rare. A
probable instance is the Spartan cult
of Aphrodite Mop(/)w ^''^ ^, as it is difficult to interpret this word
except as the shapely one, the goddess of beautiful form ^,
'
'
and the veil which she wore on her head may mark the
goddess of the bridal. The only other name of the same
kind attached to Aphrodite is Batwrts"'^, the goddess 'of
small ears,' by which, according to Hesychius, she was known
at Syracuse, but whether in public cult or merely popular
language he does not say.
In Greek mythology, the goddess is not only the power
that sends love, but is also herself the lover ; and it is
" Michaelis, ^;r//. Zi'/A 1S64, p. 190. all in literature before Ovid. Curtius
It seems, however, more probable that in {iXuove Memorie deW Institut. pp. 374,
Lucian's treatise (EtVoi/es, c. 6) it really 375) ingeniously explains the chains
designates Hera; for in the next dia- round the feet, which Pausanias men-
logue l-ntp rUbv tiKovcuv, he writes as if tions, as nothing more than the common
he had been making special reference to Phoenician ornament of the feet to which
Hera in the ElKovts ; but if she is not Isaiah refers, and he interprets Mop(puj
Sosandra, she is scarcely mentioned at as alhiding not to the beauty of her
all. body but to her decorations but in any
;
''
Gorres, in his Studieti zur griech- case the epithet would designate the
ischen Mythologie, 2, p. 60, explains goddess whose chief concern was
Mopftv as a term of the Aphrodite of personal beauty. The common expla-
the lower world who sends up dreams nation given of the chains is that they
{fiopipai), but Aphrodite was never be- were put round the slatue, in accord-
lieved to do this, and Mop<pfvs whom he ance with the naive belief of very
quotes as a parallel figure does not primitive times, to prevent it running
belong to Greek religion nor appear at away.
probable that the Eastern stories of the goddess whose love

was often dangerous to its objects appears in the legends of
Hippodameia ^^'* and Phaedra, both of which names there is
reason for attaching to Aphrodite. But in Greek religion
this aspect of her is presented only by the titles 'i'lOvpos and
UapaKv-nTovaa ^^^ \ the one referring to the whispering voice,
''
the other to the side-long glance.

Although we have no proof of immorality being at any
time a common characteristic of the "worship of Aphrodite in
the Greek states, but, in fact, strong evidence to the contrary,
yet we have signs of a degeneracy that belongs probably to
the later period. As the influence of the hetaerae spread in
the social and the national pride sank, we hear of altars
life,
and temples dedicated under the name of Aphrodite to the

mistresses and wives of the Epigoni and their favourites ^-*^.
The worship of Aphrodite Belestiche at Alexandria excited
the indignation of Plutarch, and the blasphemous profligacy
of Harpaliis was the theme of a letter written by Theopompos
to Alexander, in which he denounces Alexander's minister,
who, despising the divine vengeance,' dared to erect altars
'
and a shrine at Athens to Aphrodite UvOtovLKi]'^-^'^.

To the same later period ^ may probably be ascribed those
few worships in which the goddess was designated by some
impure name, or by one that referred to the life of the
courtesan ^-". Some of them that Clemens and Hesychius
record may have been merely popular epithets, and may have
had no place at all in cult. But there is good evidence
for the worship of Aphrodite Uopii] at Abydos^'', and for that
of Aphrodite 'Eratpa^-'"' at Athens and Ephesos, which some
ancient apologists try to explain away as referring to the
bonds of friendship between comrades, but must certainly
designate the goddess of the courtesan-world.
It is not for nothing,' exclaims the comic poet Philetaerus,
'
'
that everywhere there are temples of Aphrodite the mistress,
but nowhere shrines of Aphrodite the married goddess.' The
first statement is an exaggeration, the second an untruth ;
*The cult of Aphrodite Miyuviris'^ ancient, and was probalily derived from
at Gythium appears to have been more the Oriental worship of Cythera.
and it was probably his own age that was responsible for the
base worship which he satirizes.
We have, indeed, no direct evidence for fixing the date of

the institution of these cults ;
the writers who record them
belong to the Alexandrine period, and there is no epigra-
phical testimony of their public importance. The only place
where the hetaerae played any part in the ritual of the state
was Corinth, where whenever the state prayed to Aphrodite
'
on matters of great import, it took as large a number as

possible of the hetaerae to aid in the prayer,' and individuals
in private prayer often vowed to consecrate a certain number
of these women to the divinity ^''
, We hear of them as
early as the Persian wars, when they put up public petition
to Aphrodite for the cause of Hellas. But the recognition of
such '
Hierodulae' in the state-religion of Corinth is unique in
Greece, and may be ascribed directly to the influence of

Phoenicia and the East. As regards the other cults of the
class just examined, we have no reason for supposing that
even in them there was anything impure in the ritual.
A review of the religion of Aphrodite presents us, then,

with a goddess who has less to do than most of the other
Greek divinities with the arts of civilization ^ or the con-
ceptions of advanced morality and law; we find her prominent
in the public worship as controlling the life of the earth and
the waters of the sea, and as ruling in the shadowy land of the
dead revered also as the goddess of physical beauty and
;
love, though to this aspect of her Greek poetry paid more

regard than Greek worship finally, we find her cult pure on
;
the whole and austere, and satisfying certain moral and

political aims by its connexion with marriage and the com-
munity of the people.
" An inscription of the Imperial the Homeric hymns prays to the goddess
period" has been foimd in the theatre to inspire him and give him victory, and
at Athens containing the title 'A<ppo' the name of the legendary Cypriote
SiTT] 'Eua-ydivios, wliich must refer to the king, ' Cinyras,' is derived from the
dramatic performances. In Cyprus there Phoenician word for a harp. But this
were musical contests in honour of proves nothing as regards the general
Aphrodite; the singer whose short character of the Hellenic goddess,
prelude to Aphrodite is preserved among
We can also observe that, for the greater part of this

worship and for most of the ideas expressed in it, Greece
has been indebted to the East. But though the religion of
Greece was conservative of the tradition that it had received,
merely purifying the cult from a few touches of Oriental gross-
ness,Greek philosophy and poetry showed its constructive
power in spiritualizing and transforming certain inherited
ideas. The meaning of Ourania is changed and deepened,
and the name personifies the power of love that is higher
than sense, that inspires wisdom and the purest spirit of life.
In that passage of Euripides ^^ where the physical and
'^
spiritual powers of Aphrodite are strikingly combined, the

goddess who from the streams of the Cephissos breathes
'
over the Attic land the tempered breath of fragrant breezes,'

is also she who sends '
the loves that are seated by the throne
of wisdom, fellow-workers of all virtue.' By a natural
development of ideas, the Oriental Queen of the Heavens'
has led us up through Greek philosophy and poetry to the

modern conception of '
platonic affection.'
Lastly the idea, that undoubtedly grew up on Eastern soil,
of a goddess who personified the cosmic power of love in the

world of animal and vegetative was transplanted to Greece,
life,
and received the deepest and most spiritual expression in the

national poetry, and even acquired a certain philosophic sig-
nificance as a pantheistic doctrine ^^^. The noble fragment of
the Daiiaides of Aeschylus ^^ ^ shows us the Aphrodite Ourania
of the East conceived by the Greek imagination as the power
that causes the love that is in heaven and earth, the love that
works in the rain, and brings forth cattle and herbs for the use
of man. The same idea with more mysticism and less poetry
appears in the later Orphic literature ^^ ^' ^^^
CHAPTER XXII.
MONUMENTS OF APHRODITE.
It has been shown that in the cult of Aphrodite, Greek

religion was mainly conservative of Oriental ideas the ritual, ;
the attributes, and most of the characteristics of the goddess

are derived from the East.
On the other hand, the comparison of the monuments of the
two nations proves, perhaps more than any other archaeo-
logical study, the freedom and the originality of the Hellene.
'La deesse de la fecondite sera devenue pour les contem-
porains de Scopas et de Praxitele la deesse de la beaute *.'
It was the signal achievement of Greek art to have replaced
the Oriental type, of which the forms were often gross and at
best had little more than a merely hieratic meaning, with
a type that became of significance for religion through its
depth of spiritual expression, and of the highest importance
for the history of art through its embodiment of the perfected
forms of corporeal beauty.
The debt of Greece in this worship to the art of the East,
was only superficial yet the monuments of the Oriental cult
;
are of very great importance in their bearing on the religious

question discussed in the preceding chapter ; for they
strengthen the conclusion derived from other evidence that
Aphrodite was of Semitic birth.
It is probable that in many localities of the Semitic
worship, the earliest representations of Astarte were aniconic,
for we find the conical stone as her symbol on the coins of
Mallos, and its reference is often made clearer by the con-
comitant type of the swan ^ As regards her representation at
" Perrot et Chipiez, Histoire de l' Art Antique, vol. 3, pp. 626, 627.
*> Head, Hist. Num. p. 606.
MONUMENTS OF APHRODITE. 671
Paphos, we are told by Tacitus ^^ that her temple-image was

not of human form, but simply a conical stone shaped h'ke
a Greek meta or goal-post. And on a coin of this city we
see this emblem enclosed within temple-walls and pillars
that show non-Hellenic forms of architecture ^, and we find it
also on a slab from the temple of Tanit in Carthage ^ It is

possible to trace the influence of this very primitive symbol of
Astarte. in such representations as the statue of Aphrodite
Urania in the 'gardens' at Athens^' % which was only partly
iconic,and in certain terracotta alabastra from Rhodes, of '

'
which the upper portion consists of the head and shoulders of

the goddess, and the lower preserves the ordinary form of the
vase. But neither of these crude types, nor that of the little
wooden idols occasionally found in Cyprus <=, some of which
are in Berlin and one at Dresden thin pieces of wood with
head, breast, and arms indicated seem to have had any
vogue in Greece proper.
Looking at the Eastern monuments that present the
goddess in complete human
main form, we notice two
types, the representation of the naked divinity, whose
forms and pose express simply the idea of fecundity, and
that of the fully-draped figure. The first is of very little
importance for the earlier or later monuments of Greek
religion'*; originating atBabylon, and there representing the
goddess Nana, became prevalent in Cyprus, where it was
it
afterwards slightly modified by Greek style, and it penetrated

into the Mycenean kingdom at an early date". But it was
scarcely ever the theme of genuine Greek art in the archaic
period and whether it has anything to do with the develop-
;
* Head, Hist. Num. p. 62S. of the naked goddess, with her hands
> Gazette Archcologiquc, 1S80, PI. 3; pressed on her breast,
on a Carthaginian metal-band belong- The Cypriote figure
published in
ing to the worship of Tanit we find Roscher, p. 407, may be compared with
a cone with outstretched arms attached; the Babylonian idol of Nana or Astarte
id. 1879, PI. 21. {id. p. 647) and the Mycenaean rcpre-
e
Roscher, p. 407, 1. 68. sentalion on a gold plate of the goddess
^ A typical instance is the terracotta with the dove on lier head and with
idol in the Louvre published by Heuzey both hands pressing her breast (Schlie-
(^Les Antiques Jigurines dc terre cuite mann, Mycenae, Figs. 267 and 268).
dans le Musê du Louvre, PI. 2, no. 4),
ment undraped Aphrodite of the later age

of the type of the
is an open question. The
idea of representing the goddess of
beauty and love as naked may have occurred quite naturally
and spontaneously to the Greek artists of the fourth cen-
tury, or the Eastern art may have suggested and excused
this unusual freedom. The theory that would trace back
the type of the Cnidian Aphrodite, the perfected ideal of the
Greek goddess, to the rude Semitic form of Astarte with her
hands across her body, has been rejected by MM. Perrot and
Chipiez ^, who maintain that there is no Phoenician or any
Semitic monument earlier than the Cnidian that resembles it
at and those that resemble it are of later date and are

all,
merely copies of it in the style of Phoenician art. But this

is not entirely true the Ashmolean Museum at Oxford
;
possesses a small bronze figure of the late Mycenaean age,

found in a cave on the mountain in Crete, which the Lyttians
called Mount Dicta, representing the Oriental goddess with
her arms held across her body as the Medicean Venus holds
hers^. It is true there are many missing links between this
rude type and the Cnidian Aphrodite. But it is quite con-

ceivable that Praxiteles may have been influenced by an
ancient and vaguely remembered form of hieratic art. The
Babylonian idols ofNana in the Louvre betray rather
the influence of the later Greek style of the Alexandrine age
upon the representations of Semitic divinities. One of the
most striking of these has been published in the Gazette
Archeologique, an alabaster idol of Nana^ undraped but laden
with ornaments, wearing an Oriental head-dress surmounted
with a crescent, and showing nothing of Hellenic character
except in the naturalistic rendering of the flesh. It is probably
intended to represent the Babylonian goddess in the semi-
Hellenic form of Artemis Nanaea.
More important in the archaic Greek art, and in those centres
where Oriental influence was strongest, was the type of the
draped female form, with one hand pressed against her breast
Histoire de FArt, 3. pp. 557- Mr. Arthur Evans, kindly called my

659- attention to this work.
*
The Keeper of the Ashmolean, <=
1876, PI. 4.
Plate XLI
To face page 673

Plate XLII
To face page 673

XXII.] MONUMENTS OF APHRODITE. 673
and often holding a dove, the other drawing her robe tightly
across her lower limbs and holding it a little away from her
side. We have proofs that this representation existed at
Ephesus, at Dali and elsewhere in Cyprus, at Rhodes and
Camirus'^; a slight modification of it is shown us in a terra-
cotta figure from Corinth, of which both hands are held
against the breast, with a dove in the right hand, an apple
in the left (PI. XLI b). And in Etruscan art, we find a similar
figure serving as a support to a candelabra, the left hand
holding the skirt, the right uplifted^ and the feet resting on
a tortoise^.
Now these representations are not the genuine products of
the archaic art of Hellas, although the pose of the hand on the
drapery reminds us often of the archaic figures found on
the Acropolis of Athens. For we notice on many of them
an Oriental style of head-dress, especially on the figures from
Cyprus and we can discover what is probably the germ
'^5
of this type in a sacred figure of early Babylonian art, fully
draped, wearing a high coif or tiara, with the hands pressed on

the breast*^. It has been often regarded as doubtful whether
these figures represent a divinity, or priestesses who by these
offerings dedicated themselves to the temple they served the ;
latter interpretation may sometimes be true, but it is quite

certain that they often are actual idols of the goddess, and it
is probable that this was their primary meaning, for in the

figures of Semitic, as of Greek art, the divine type was
probably fashioned earlier than the human. And many of
these statuettes betray their divine character by many infal-
lible signs some of those
; for instance from Dali, now in the
British Museum, that bear the dove as an emblem, wear also
the diadem on their heads ; nor can we suppose that any other
" In marble torso, PI.

Marseilles goddess wears a calathus and veil, but
XLI c ; from Rhodes, PI.
terracotta both hands are outstretched. Coin PI.
XLI a; from Ephesus, marble statuette 2. 49.
in British Museum from Dali, vide
;
''
A
bronze in Berlin, Gerhard, Gesam-
limestone figures in the British Museum. 7neltcAbhandltmgcn, Taf. 29. 3.
On coins of Aphrodisias an ancient cult- ''Vide Cypriote figure in Lajard,
form of an Aphrodite idol is preserved Culte de Venus en Orient, PI. 20. i.
of a somewhat different type ; the **
Roscher, p. 647, Y\g. 2.
VOL. II. S
divinitywas originally meant than the Eastern goddess, as the

dove and the apple are her fitting emblems and the tortoise, ;
which we see under the feet of the Etruscan figure, and which
Pheidias carved under the feet of his Aphrodite Urania at
Elis
probably without much significance, but simply as
a traditional emblem
belongs to Astarte Aphrodite alone ''.
An Attic tetradrachm of the fourth century (?) shows a female

figure, wrapped in a long garment, carrying a bird and
wearing a modius on her head, which Beule interprets as ''
Aphrodite and refers to the semi-Oriental Cnidian worship

introduced into Attica by Conon .
We need not suppose that the type of the draped Eastern
goddess was absolutely uniform ^ ; it is enough if the wide
prevalence of this special type, which has been briefly ex-
amined, shows that the monuments of the Eastern cult were
before the eyes and the imagination of the Greek artist when
he carved the Aphrodite. It was possibly
earliest idols of his
he who first gave more
and delicacy to the rigid and rude
life
Oriental idol by the motive of the hand that draws the

drapery across and slightly away from the body, a motive
which in the later Hellenic period becomes expressive of
feminine grace in general, and of Aphrodite's in particular.
Apart from the artistic types, the symbols that appear on
the monuments, such as the sacred animals and the inanimate
objects consecrated to her, give still stronger support to the
theory that this worship travelled to Greece from Semitic
lands. The dove, for instance, her most common emblem,
denoting probably the goddess of spring, appears in the repre-
sentation of her temple at Paphos above the side-pillars on
a The animal probably alludes to the c
Professor Gardner believes this
water-goddess ; but it mubt have been personage to be Isis ; Ninfi. Com. Pans.
a rare symbol. It has been found p. 138.
carved on a limestone slab consecrated d The terracotta figures of the goddess
to Aphrodite in the neighbourhood of Cyprus show much variety, and Pot-
of Paphos ; vide Journal of Hellenic tier, who has examined them in the Bull.
Studies, 1888, p. 253. The tortoise on de Corr. Hell. 1879, p. 92, considers
the coins of Aegina may refer to the that we have not yet discovered the
local worship of the maritime Aphro- canonical type of the Aphrodite Astarte
dite ;
Gardner, Nu?n. Com. Fans. p. 45. of this island. Perhaps there never was
^ Monttaies d'Alhenes, p. 227. one.
the roof a miniature Aphrodite temple, probably an import

"^
;
from Cyprus, has been found at Mycenae^; also a figure of

the naked type, already mentioned, who is generally and with
great probability interpreted as Astarte, and who is pressing
the dove against her breast the holy bird in the ritual of
'',
Hierapolis and in the sacred legend of Semiramis '^.
In the legend told by Hyginus, the egg that fell from

heaven was hatched by the dove, and from this Aphrodite
and apparently the divinities of Syria were born . The G:gg
became an emblem of the Semitic goddess ^, but never was in

Greece a recognized symbol of Aphrodite but this Oriental ;
fable about the birth of the goddess from the &gg plays its
part, not only in the wide-spread myth of Helen's birth from
Nemesis or Leda, but also in the Laconian worship, as
Pausanias speaks of the sacred egg in the temple of Hilaeira
and Phoebe, at Sparta ^ and Helen is probably one of the
;
many 'doubles' of Aphrodite '\ The iynx, the wrynecked

bird, that was used as a love-charm, and appears in many
vase-representations where Aphrodite is found, appears also
on some Assyrian reliefs that Lajard has published ^ And
most of the animals known to have been consecrated to the
goddess in Hellenic ritual were sacred symbols in the Oriental
art that was dedicated to this worship. The goat is seen on
certainChaldean cylinders by the side of the Semitic goddess ^,
the sacred character of the ram in the Eastern ritual explains
probably the strange design on the Cypriote coins of Marium
or Amathus of a naked goddess clinging to the fleece of
a running ram, who is almost certainly Aphrodite'. The
" Head, Hist. Num. p. 628. ^ Paus. 3. 16, i.

I'
Schliemann, Mycenae, p. 423. '^
She was worshipped, for instance,
^
lb.pp. 267, 268. in Rhodes as a deity of vegetation like
<*
For the significance of the dove in Aphrodite, and appears like the latter
the Oriental and Greek religion, vide in the legend of Theseus; in certain
I'errot and Chipiez, Hisfoire de FArt, Helen may also have been
localities
vol. 3, p. 200, n. 2. worshipped as a divinity of the sea,

^ Wyg. Fab. K)"]; ci.Amoh. Adv. Gent. vavriXois awr-qpios as Euripides calls
I. 36 '
Ovorum progenies Dii Syrii.' her, Orestes, 1637.
' Vide the ornamentation on the '
Culte de Vdnits, Planche 17.
silver band found near Batna; Gazette ^ lb. PI. 4. la.
Arched. 1880, p. 23. > Head, Hist. Num. p. 623.
S 3
fashion of representing divinities riding on their sacrificial

animals has been already mentioned ^, as explaining the form
of Artemis Tauropolos and the Cretan myth of Europa on
the bull. The was probably a genuinely
bull-riding goddess
Hellenic type was found also in Oriental art, as it was
; but it
used as a device on the coins of Sidon that must have referred,

not to the Cretan myth, but to the Oriental cult. Hence
also we can explain the design on a coin of Citium struck
about 400 B.C., of a goddess riding on a running bull, whom
it is more reasonable to name Astarte Aphrodite than Europa''.
The ritualistic importance of the bull in the Astarte-worship

was probably the cause which led to that strange representa-
tion of the goddess of which Philo Byblius speaks" 'Astarte :
placed upon her head the badge of royalty, the head of the
bull and on a Cilician coin of the later Imperial period
'
;
we see the bull-headed Astarte holding a rudder, the sign of

her maritime power '^.
It is probable that the horse also was a symbol of the

Eastern goddess; for the horse's head was a coin-device
of Carthage, and belongs to the legend of the foundation of
the city by Dido. Hence may have been derived the cult and
title of Aphrodite *'E(^t7T-oj, mentioned in the preceding chapter,
as'ETTtrpayt'a was derived from the sacred character of the goat
in her ritual.
As regards the monuments of the special Greek cults, we

need not believe that there was always a cult-image and type
appropriate to the special aspect of Aphrodite, and to the
special appellative by which she was known and worshipped
in this or that locality ; and it is often impossible to decide
what the distinctive character of the image was. P'or literary
evidence fails many cases, and among the many monu-

us in
ments that have come down to us there are comparatively few
to which we can give with certainty the fitting name, and which
we can attach to a particular cult. And though the statues
* p. 450. whether this is a syncretism of Astarte

Head, p. 622. and the cow-headed Isis.
>=
Vide p. 632. Vide Robertson Smith, Religion of
''
Lajard, PI. 3. i. One might doubt the Semites, p. 458.
and other representations of Aphrodite are most numerous, yet

most of them have in all probability no religious reference at
all, being designed not for any temple or worship, but for
decorative purposes and private luxury. It is nevertheless
true that most of the ideas in the Aphrodite-worship that are

preserved in the literature can be illustrated by the symbols
and forms of art.
The first question will be whether we have any monuments

that present us with the Ourania Aphrodite of Greek religion ;
for this was probably her earliest title among the Hellenic
communities. In so far as the term merely denoted the
goddess of the East, whose power was omnipresent in the
world, most of the ancient representations were those of
Ourania for most of them in symbol or in type attested her
;
Oriental origin. But those which ancient writers expressly

designate by this name have not survived even in copies, so
far at least as we can pronounce with certainty. The ancient
Ourania of Corinth, be the armed
for instance, can scarcely
goddess on the coins of that city^ mentioned below, but
might be represented by the other coin-device of the goddess
holding out the apple in her right hand and grasping the edge
of her garment in the left''. We hear of her worship at
Megalopolis and of that of Pandemos also ; on a coin of this
city we see the naked Aphrodite with her hands held across
her body as the Medicean holds hers, and a dolphin at her
left side the latter emblem speaks rather of the maritime
:
goddess of the East, but the nudity and the attitude express
the ideas that came to be attached to the term Pandemos "".
The worship at Eryx had, as has been noted, many links

of connexion with the Semitic religion ; and the temple-statue
would represent Aphrodite Ourania possibly the coin of ;
Eryx struck towards the end of the fifth century, and showing
the seated goddess holding the dove with Eros standing before
her, presents the form with which this worship invested her
(Coin PL B 40). We have also an undoubted monument of
Ourania in the device on the coins of Ouranopolis (Coin
AMm. Com. Fans. p. 26. ^ 3. FF. 7 : cf. D. 70.
^
3. n. V. 8.
PI. B 41), the city founded by the brother of Cassander on

the peninsula of Acte and named after the ancient title of the
goddess ; the British Miisaon Catalogue^ gives this description
of the type, '
Aphrodite Urania clad in long chiton and peplos
fastened on right shoulder seated, facing, on globe on her :
head a spike surmounted by a star she holds in right hand :
long sceptre ending above in circle (of the universe ?), from
which hang two fillets in field left a pyramidical object
;
surmounted by a star.' On the reverse is a sun with rays.

We have here then an undoubted representation of the goddess,
and symbols that prove the term Ourania to have been
interpreted at that time and in that city not indeed in the
spiritual Platonic sense
but as a mystical term denoting
the cosmic power that ruled the sun, stars, and earth. But
the monument scarcely illustrates any genuine and early
idea of Greek religion it is interesting chiefly as showing
;
the habit of the Alexandrine age, caught from the contact

with the East, of giving to native and foreign divinities
a solar and astral character. On a few Assyrian monuments
the star is seen and was perhaps occasionally a symbol of the
Semitic goddess, and the rays around the head of an Etruscan
bronze statuette of Aphrodite express the same idea''. But
Etruscan art sometimes misinterpreted divinities as powers
of light and we have seen that in the Hellenic worship
;
neither solar, lunar, nor astral character belonged to the

goddess, nor can any such aspect of her be clearly recognized
in the genuine Semitic worship.
The only other monument which external evidence helps us

to name is a statue in Madrid representing the goddess with
",
veil and diadem-shaped modius, with both hands on her

breast, and inscribed Ovpaviav BovkoKos. Even if the inscrip-
tion is of doubtful authenticity, the title probably names
her rightly, for as regards the pose the statue recalls the
ancient Semitic type, and the head-dress marks the imperial
divinity.
" Macedon, p. 133. c

Hubner, Die antiken Bihhoerke,
*
Gerhard, Akademische AbhiDid- p. 552.
hiiigen, Taf. 31. 5.
It appears, then, that if we leave out of sight the later

representations that have nothing to do with public worship,
the external evidence of inscriptions or literary record by
which we can recognize the Ourania of Greek religion is very
slight indeed.
Even the statement in Pausanias about the Pheidian statue
called Ourania in the temple at Elis is of no more value than
the statement which accompanies it, that Scopas' statue which
stood in the enclosure outside represented Pandemos ; we
cannot gather from this that these images were so designated
at the time of their dedication, as it is clear from Pausanias'
own words that there was no epigraphical proof.
We have to look then to internal evidence, and especially
to the symbols. From the review that has been taken of
the character of the Eastern goddess and of those attributes
of her which impressed the early Greeks, we might say that,
when the representations express something more than the
goddess of merely human love and desire, when the symbols
allude to her general physical power in the world, or when
she appears as the armed divinity that guards the city or
wearing a mural crown, we have the Greek conception of
the ancient high-placed goddess of the East to whom human
love was no more than the power which works in the birth
and increase of animals and plants. And we must look to
the whole representation, not to one special detail for many ;
of the symbols, derived as most of them were from the P2ast,

had become purely conventional, and might be attached to
Aphrodite in any character; and no single one of them,
except perhaps the tortoise, is a clear token of Ourania.
We may give this name to the seated figure, the most
striking representation of her in the archaic period, which
Canachus carved of gold and ivory for that temple in Sicyon
which only the priestess and her attendant maiden were
allowed to enter ^^. The ritual in one detail at least points to
the East the pig was a sacred animal in the Sicyonic cult, too
;
sacred to be offered "^"^ and we are reminded of the Semitic

;
goddess by the symbols which Canachus attached to his temple-

image. The 'polos' on her head was the badge of the 'queen of
68o GREEK RELIGION. [chap.
the heavens '

; the apple in her hand referred to the processes
of life, the power of fertility in the world of plants and animals
that was her prerogative =*
; the poppy in her other hand may
have been a symbol of 'Ac^poStV?} IslavhpayoplT is, the goddess
who lulls the senses and gives sweet sleep^ and may be
supposed to convey also an allusion to the lower world, in
which as we have seen both the Eastern and Hellenic goddess
had her part ^\
It would seem natural that the ancient goddess of earth
and heaven, Ourania or Olympia,' should be represented on

'
her throne, and the enthroned goddess was certainly a pre-

valent form on Semitic monuments. She may be represented
on the relief of late archaic style in the Villa Albani on which
we see a seated female figure in solemn pose and drapery,
with a hare carved beneath her throne the hands and head- ;
dress are restored, but the hare makes it probable that this is
Aphrodite^; and this reference to her power in the animal
world, together with the solemnity of the whole representation,
gives us some right to style this figure also Aphrodite Ourania
(PI. XLI d).
With still more right may we apply the term to a most

interesting representation of the goddess on a terracotta relief
from Aegina, in private possession at Naples, on which she
appears drawn in a chariot by griffins, bearing a young roe
in her hands, or rather wearing it badge
as an embroidered
on her drapery, and with Eros by her side as charioteer
* Bernoulli's perplexity in finding the two mere genre-represen-

tions one or
right name for the statue of Canachus With the Albani relief we
tations).
('^/Aw(///^,' p. 6i) arises from the error may compare the type on coins of
which runs all through his book in his Nagidos in Cilicia of the latter part
interpretation of the terms Ourania and of the fourth century, Head, p. 609,
Pandemos. '
Aphrodite seated holding patera,
^ We find poppy-stalks in the hand crowned by flying Eros.' She is half-
of Demeter in some of her representa- draped, but probably Ourania ; the
lions; possibly they may have been animal faintly drawn under the throne
merely a symbol of fertility owing to is, perhaps, a hare or a rabbit ; on one
the number of the seeds. of these coins of Nagidos the goddess
<=
The only other divinities with whom wears the calathos and a flower, and
the hare was occasionally connected looks like the pomegranate is
fruit that
were Dionysos and Pan (vide Stephani, one of the symbols.
Compie-JRendii, 1862, p. 62, who men-
XXII.] MONUMENTS OF APHRODITE. 68i
(PI. XLII a). The work is of all the more value as it
belongs to the earlier part of the fifth century when the

original significance of the goddess was more clearly felt.
Once more she appears as the power that rules the animal
world, and what is of special interest here is that the griffin
and the roe are animals that are characteristic of the Oriental
goddess*. Perhaps Eros himself in this scene is more than
the personification of human love, and has the character of
a physical or elemental power which belonged to him in the
worship at Thespiae.
The most important temple-image to which antiquity
attached the name Ourania was the statue of gold and ivory
carved by Pheidias, probably in his later period, for the
shrine of Aphrodite in Olympia. We have no monumental
illustration of it at all and Pausanias'
; account is very
meagre. We gather that the goddess was draped and
standing with one foot on a tortoise. We may conclude at
once that, though there is no trustworthy external evidence
for the title, the Eleans were right in giving the name
'
Ourania to the statue.
' The tortoise was an Oriental
symbol of the goddess, alluding perhaps to the firmament
or the waters it certainly could not have referred, as
:
Plutarch supposes, to the housekeeping life of the married

woman. The Parthenon sculptures, among which we have
probably more than one representation of Aphrodite, teach
us much concerning the forms and expression with which
the Pheidian school conceived and represented the goddess.
We may be sure that the temple-image at Elis displayed
the grandeur of style, the dignity and solemn grace, the
spiritual quality that belonged to the religious monuments
of Pheidias' hand. It is even not unlikely that its ideal
character and its celebrity assisted the acceptance in the
following generation of the false interpretation put by Plato
There are two terracotta representa-
* a polos adorned with anthemium and
tions in the British Museum, brought holding a fawn ; the other a representa-
from Cyprus, showing the goddess with tion of the seated divinity, holding a
the fawn, one in the style of the later patera in her right hand and a fawn in
part of the fifth century (PI. XLII b), her left, probably a work of the fourth
an erect figure of the goddess wearing century.
on the terms Ourania and Pandemos since the Pheidian

;
work, an austere impersonation of a great elemental power,

would contrast strikingly with the later emotional and some-
times sensuous representations of a goddess of human love
and passion. But it is wholly wrong to suppose that Pheidias
wished to give any expression to the distinction between
spiritual and physical love ; which is found in Plato and the
epigrammatists, but not in any genuine Greek cult. The
religion of the Greek states showed itself conscious enough of
the nobler and baser, the broader and narrower, conception
of the love-goddess ;but never gave any recognition to the
idea of a love that was beyond sense and transcended the
physical world. Nor again ought we to say that the Pheidian
masterpiece intentionally rendered the higher and purer aspect
of the divinity, so as to contrast with lower and more impure
types of her. P'or, so far as we know, these latter were not
dealt with by the Pheidian or any contemporary school, nor,

as we have seen, is it certain that any cult-title of impure
significance came into vogue as early as the fifth century.
We may even say that if there had been an Aphrodite
Pandemos, to whose worship that lower sense attached which
was never attached to it by the state, and if Pheidias had
been commissioned to carve her image, the face at least would
have displayed the same earnestness and decor as without'
'
doubt were present in the Olympian statue. For these were

a necessary part of the Pheidian expression of divinity: to
carve upon the features the look of troubled passion and
sense-desire was the gift of later art. We may believe then
that his chryselephantine statue in the temple of Olympia
was a real representation of Ourania, partly because through
a certain symbol was connected with the East and for the
it ;
more important reason that it probably embodied the idea

which was drawn from the East, but had been given a pro-
founder meaning in the poetry of Aeschylus, of the goddess
of a physical creative power that worked in heaven and earth
and the life of man. And thus this image might be said to
contrast with the Cnidian Aphrodite of Praxiteles, not as
being purer or more spiritual, but simply as belonging to
a worship of broader significance. The Cnidian statue might

also be technically called Ourania, because of its allusion to
the maritime origin of the goddess. But in regard to its
forms and expression the term would be out of place; for
the Praxitelean work was not the impersonation of the
elemental power of Eastern worship, but of the Hellenic ideal
of human love and human beauty.
In its application to later monuments, we cannot be sure
that the title Ourania retained its early and historical sense
it seems that when a Greek of the Alexandrine and later
period saw a statue of the draped goddess with an austere
expression he might give it this name, and with still less
historical correctness might call a statue of the opposite
character Pandemos. But we do not know that the state-
cults or their monuments were affected by this unhistorical
use of the terms. Looking at the well-attested public repre-
sentations we may say that the Ourania of Greek religious
worship was portrayed as a draped goddess sometimes seated
on a throne and sometimes standing; and her ancient and
wider character was expressed by means of symbols, such as
animals and flowers that seemed to be most full of her pro-
creative force. It is not easy to say that there is any special
arrangement of drapery that is characteristic we might ;
conclude from Lucian's remark ^ that the girdle was usually

'^^
shown but the monuments do not confirm this some have

;
:
supposed that the mantle arranged crescent-wise round her

head, or raised up in her hand, and drawn over her shoulder,
is significant of Ourania but the former is natural to the
;
goddess when riding, the latter is only an instinctive move-

ment of modesty, and a common motive in art*. The
Herme-form may have also been peculiar to her type and ;
when we find an Aphrodite of younger form leaning on

a herme of the goddess, we may regard the latter as an
image of Ourania The Venus of Pompeii in the museum
''.
Aristaen. i. 15 t^s d/z7rx<^''?s aKpots Thespiae,i^'^MW.Comm. Pans. PI. X. 19.

Sa/fTi;A.ojy ecpairTopiivr) rSiv Kpoaawv. Benndorf und Schoiie, Alomwienis of
^ See Gerhard, De Venere Proser- Laleran, PI. 13. 2.
pina, PI. 7-12, and compare a coin of
of Naples (PI. XLIII a) is leaning on a statuette of archaic

form of a goddess in a sea-green chiton and saffron mantle,
who is wearing a modius on her head and holding a flower
to her breast, and whom we may call Ourania *.
The Eastern goddess, whose power was pre-eminent in the
animal world, was sometimes represented by the Greek
artist riding upon her favourite animals, the goat, the ram,
and the swan. Of these the last type had nothing, as far as
we know, to do with public cult ^ the most important from ;
this point of view was that of Aphrodite 'ETrtrpayta, the

*rider on the goat,' a type that has been much misinter-
preted both in ancient and modern times. The most famous
instance of it was the bronze statue carved by Scopas and
set up in the precincts of the temple at Elis which con-
tained the Ourania of Pheidias. As regards the forms and
expression we are told nothing, but from certain surviving
monuments and from Pliny's statement that another statue
by Scopas was the earliest representation of the naked
Aphrodite, we can conclude with certainty that the 'E-n-trpayta
was draped The Eleans in the time of Pausanias, and
*^.
perhaps earlier, called it Pandemos, giving no doubt to this

title its lower and fictitious sense for the false interpretation :
had become prevalent after the fourth century, and the goat
was considered an immoral animal. But it is probable that
in the time of Scopas the term Pandemos still retained its
political and proper meaning, and, as the goddess was draped,

and as the ancient accounts of Scopas' work and the monu-
" The triple herme with the

Medi- '
connexion
literary evidence of a religions
cean '
Aphrodite below, pub-
figure of between the bird and the goddess vide ;
lished by Gerhard, Akad. Abhandl. 31. Eph. Arch. 1893, IIiV. 15, mirror from
3, is of doubtful significance. Eretria with a very beautiful representa-
''
Vide Kalkmann, Aphrodite auf dem tion of Aphrodite riding on a swan, and
Schvian, Jahrbuch des deuischen Insti- holding a patera before its beak.
tuts, I, p. 231. The swan may have *=
There are two Elean coins which
appeared in actual cult-monuments of present to us in faint outlines the statue
Aphrodite as a subordinate symbol of Scopas (Coin PI. B 42). On both we
represented at her side, as in the monu- see the fully draped goddess, with a large
ment mentioned in the chapter on veil waving about her head, seated on
Nemesis (p. 498) Kalkmann seems
; but the back of a goat that is galloping to
right in maintaining that we have no the right.
Plate XLIII
a
ments that survive of his hand and style make it impossible

to imagine that there was any sensual expression in her face,
the traditional theory about this work and its traditional
name are probably wrong. It is more likely that its original
and proper name was 'ETrirpayta, an ancient cult-title of the
Aphrodite-worship, and that it had no reference to the
immoralities of city-life. The original meaning of 'E-Trtrpayta
and the symbolism supposed to attach to this type have
been much debated one writer regarding the goat as the
;
symbol of vice ", another as the sign of the starry heavens.

But facts of ritual are usually of more value than theories
about symbolism. The goat was a sacred animal in the
Semitic worship of the goddess, being carved on her monu-
ments and offered in sacrifice ^, and may even have been some-
times regarded as the goddess herself, her close association
with the goat being one of the many signs of her power over
the animal world. Aphrodite riding on the goat is therefore
merely a hieratic or ritualistic motive, and the monuments
help to show, what was partly proved by the legends about
the cult of 'ETTtrpayta on the Attic coast, that this is a special
representation of Ourania Aphrodite. Also, none of the
representations contain any allusion at all to the goddess of
sensual desire, but some of them express clearly enough the
traits of the celestial Eastern divinity. One of the earliest
representations that may be quoted is an archaic Cypriote
work published by Lajard*": but the most interesting is
perhaps that which he published in the ArcJiaeologiscJie
Zeitung of on an oinochoe of fine style we see the
i<S54'^;
goddess riding on the goat, clad in a star-embroidered peplos,

and playing on the lyre (PI. XLIII b). The stars may be
"
E.g. the author of a strange article chius, and the Cretan story of the goat
in thejahrbiich des dctitschen Instituis, that nourished Zeus: and there may be
1889, p. 208 who gives to Aphrodite
; an obscure allusion to the identity of
'EmTpayia the entirely improved signifi- the goddess and her animal in the story
cance of '
eine Gottin der unfruchtbaren of Theseus' sacrifice on the shores of
Liebe.' Attica '*\
''
The sacred character of the animal *=
Lajard, Cidfe de Vmus, PI. 21, i.
in her ritual might explain the mys- *

PI. 71, with account given of it in
terious ai^ ovpavia, mentioned by Hesy- 1855, p. 263.

a merely conventional ornament, and the lyre may indicate

Aphrodite MoA7ra8tas*, if from the legend of the Carian
maidens we can conclude that she was somewhere known
by this title. Lajard indeed would read a deep cosmic
meaning in the attribute of the lyre and the device of the
stars but whether he is right or not, the austere solemnity
;
of the whole representation excludes the idea of any sensual

allusion in 'ETiirpayia, Another representation of the same
type on a terracotta medallion published by Gerhard pro-
duces the same impression the goddess is here fully draped
;
and has rather a sombre appearance, which suggests to

Gerhard the theory that the Aphrodite on the goat is partly
a divinity of death and the lower world we might thus explain ;
the presence of Hermes in a similar representation on a vase

in Berlin ^ where Aphrodite appears riding on the goat, her
upper body undraped but a mantle drawn over her head, in

company with Hermes and Eros but this is not sufficient ;
evidence to show that Aphrodite 'E-n-trpayta had in herself any

real chthonian character.
The Oriental colour of the Aphrodite worship in Lace-
daemon has been noticed, and at least one monument of the
type under discussion comes fiom Laconian territory namely, :
a marble relief showing Aphrodite on the goat, clad in a high-

girdled under-garment and an upper garment that passes
over her shoulders and legs, and holding a large veil
crescent-wise about her head, with two small Loves arrang-
ing the ends of the veil ^
A
similar representation, having probably the same origin
in ritual, is that of Aphrodite borne by the ram. An unique
instance is the Cypriote coin-device noticed above the '',
goddess clinging to the fleece. In the other instances that

have been collected, the goddess sits in the usual position on
the back of the animal. A late, but interesting, illustration
Vide Artemis ^^^, and p. 646. Kertsch, representing Aphrodite riding
^ Furtwangler, Beschreibiing der Va- on the goat with Eros and dove accom-
sensammlung iin Antiquarium, 2^'x^l,. panyingher; Compte- Rendu, 1859, PI.
" Mitt. d. dcutschen Inst. 2. p. 420. 4. i.
Cf. the small terracotta of rather coarse ^ P. 675.
style found in the neighbourhood of

of this % with a sufficiently clear allusion to Aphrodite Ourania,

is given us on a bronze patera of perhaps the second century
A. D., showing us the goddess half-clad in a peplos that leaves
the upper part of her body bare, riding on a ram, and holding
a mirror in her hand, and accompanied by her dove behind
;
her are seven stars, doubtless the Pleiades.

We have seen reason to suppose, on the evidence of a scholiast
and a late Byzantine writer, that a type existed of Aphrodite
"0177770^% the goddess on horseback, which would be similar in
idea to the last two that have been examined. But the
interpretation of the monuments that have been quoted in
illustration of this is very doubtful. A curious bronze ^ exists
in Paris, found in '
the grave of Achilles ' in the Troad, repre-
senting a goddess in a chiton of unusual shape and a peplos,
holding the edge of her drapery in her left hand, and resting
her right arm against her breast ; she wears a strange Egyptian
head-dress flanked by two sphinxes and topped by a lion ;
and she stands on a small pedestal which rests on the back of

two horses, each bearing a rider also. The chief interest of
this enigmatical monument is its combination of a type
of Aphrodite with some of the symbols of Cybele ; also that
it comes from a locality that gave birth to the cult of
Aphrodite Aeneas, with which the type of "Ec^tTr-n-o? was closely
associated.
Much evidence has been given of the maritime character
of Aphrodite, which, though perhaps not originally belonging
to her, she brought with her from the East. The monumental
evidence of this is even clearer than the literary ; but the
representations of the goddess under this respect that can be
closely associated withany public cult are not very many.
We head on the coins of some of the
find her figure or her
cities where she was worshipped as a sea-goddess, Aegium ,
Naucratis*^, and Cnidus for example; and we may connect
* Jahrhuch des deutschen Institiits, her feet ; Gardner, A'um. Comm. Paus.
1890 (Anzeiger), pp. 27-29. R. 23.
Arch. Zeit. 1862, Taf. 166. 4.
'' ^ Naucratis coin of Ptolemy Soter
:
^ Aegium coin-device of Aphrodite

: Head, Hist. Nûrn. 71S, head of Aphro-
arranging her tresses with dolphin at dite with ear-rings and necklace.
these with the public worship and with the cult-image in her
temples in these places. Two of them bear express allusion to
the sea, a ship's prow appearing on the Cnidian coin (Coin
PI. B 44) behind the head of the goddess, and the coin of
Aegium presenting a device that must be associated with

a type of Aphrodite ' Avahvoixivr] or 'A(^poyerr/?, and of which
there was some celebrated representation in sculpture.
The lines of Ovid,
'
Cum fieret lapis asper, nunc nobile signum,
Nuda Venus madidas exprimit imbre comas'','
refer to a marble statue of which the main motive survives on

the last-mentioned coin, on one of Methana*", and on a Bithynian
coin ". How far this is related to the famous Anadyomene
of Apelles need not be discussed here ; for the exact motive
of that work is doubtful, and there is no proof that it was
painted for any state-worship ''.
An Aphrodite is preserved
interesting type of the maritime
on the Leucadian coin mentioned above" (Coin PI. B 45), if
Curtius' interpretation is correct and on the whole the name ;
of Aphrodite Aeneas seems to suit the figure better than that

of Artemis, which is given it in the British Museum Catalogue;
for the fawn at her side, the common symbol of Artemis, may
also belong to Aphrodite, to whom the aplustre held in the
hand, and the bird, which looks like a dove on the top of the
column behind, are more appropriate ^ On some specimens
a very much larger bird, a swan or a goose, appears behind
her, and both are symbols of Aphrodite rather than Artemis.
Among the larger plastic monuments of some religious
importance, that represent her as goddess of the sea, the
group in the western gable of the Parthenon, preserved only in
" Ars Amat. >,.222,. The type pene- Cos; the cult-relations between Aphro-
trated to Carthage, for it is found on dite and Asclepios were very slight,
a Carthaginian metal-band ; Gaz. Arch. * P. 641.
1879, PI. 21. 'On another coin of Leucas we have

*>
Head, Hist. Ntitn. p. 370; cf. an undoubted head of Aphrodite with
Mionnet, .?//. 5. p. 227, no. 1342. steph.ine and long hair, large full
<=
Catalogue of Greek Coins, Pontus, features and a half smile Cat. Greek
;
p. 194. Coins, 28. 5.

d It was kept in the Asclepieion at
Carrey's drawing, is of great interest. If Carrey's eyes did

not deceive him, and if the naked figure seated on the lap of
the elder goddess was really female, then she could have been
none other than Aphrodite supported by her mother Thalassa;
and this group was probably copied for the relief-work that
adorned the base of Poseidon's chariot in his temple at Corinth *,
It has been supposed that this remarkable representation was
suggested by some Attic cult such as that of Aphrodite Colias,
but the motive of the supported and supporting figures would
not be appropriate for the central statue of a temple.
The pre-eminent monument of the maritime goddess was
the Cnidian statue by Praxiteles^ which is known to us
through Cnidian coinage and some surviving statues that
are copies of it, and also through a very full literary record.
A detailed account of it will be given below it is only ;
mentioned here because it was probably designed for the

temple-worship of Aphrodite EvTrAota. It is true that certain
archaeologists maintain that it was wrought simply as a work
of art and not for public worship ^'
but there appears to be
;
more reason for Welcker's view that Praxiteles' work is the

third and which were dedicated in
last in that series of statues
the Cnidian temples of Aphrodite mentioned by Pausanias ^* :
'the Cnidians pay particular reverence to Aphrodite, and

possess certain temples of the goddess the oldest is the ;
temple of Aphrodite Doritis (the giver of good things), the

second the temple of the goddess " on the height " (Acraea)
but the youngest is that of the goddess whom most people
call the Cnidian, but the men of Cnidus themselves call
Euploea, the goddess of fair weather.' Now it seems
probable that the masterpiece of Praxiteles was actually the
temple-statue of this last shrine; because 'most people' called
it '
the Cnidian par excellence, and the great work was
'
known
throughout the whole ancient world as the Cnidian' goddess; '
because also the smile upon its face and the allusion to
the water and to the bath conveyed by the vase at its
* Paus. 2. I, 7 iirdp-yaaTai BaXaaaa dcr gricchischen PlaHik, 2. p. 170,

avkxovaa 'AfpoSlrrjv naida. n. 54 ; and Friederichs, Praxiteles.
Overbeck, for instance, Geschichte
* *"
Griechische Gdtterlehre, 2. 705.
VOL. II. T
side (Coin PI. B 50) would well express the divinity of the calm
summer sea ; and, lastly, because we hear that it stood on a
high and conspicuous place a chapel open at both ends %
in
whence it could be seen from afar on the sea. There is no
reason why
this chapel should not have been the same as the
'
temple mentioned by Pausanias, built specially to pro-
latest '
tect and at the same time reveal the temple-image. It may
be that it is this Praxitelean statue of EI^TrAota that the epigram

of Anyta alludes to :
'
This spot is sacred to Cypris ; for
she ever loves to behold from the land the glittering main,
that she may give to the mariners a voyage such as they
desire ; and all the surrounding sea trembles when it sees
the radiant image ''.'
And the same function and power is
attributedby Lucian to the Cnidian Aphrodite of Praxiteles '^.
But as the image was more than all monuments in the world
the embodiment of love and loveliness, it is likely that if the
name EwTiAota continued long to be attached to it, the title
came to comprise the notion of faring well in love as well as

prosperous voyaging on the sea. For we find this double
meaning in it on a gem that has the word inscribed upon it
and shows us Eros riding on a dolphin ^ and an epigram in ;
the Anthology, written as if it were the inscription on one of

her statues, makes her say, 'Do reverence to Cypris; for I will
breathe on thee with a favourable breeze in love or on the
.'
bright-visaged sea
Of the smaller monuments showing the same aspect of
Aphrodite, two may here be mentioned for the importance
of the religious idea they express, although they are not to be
connected immediately with any public cult. One is the
very beautiful silver medallion in the Louvre (PI. XLIV. a) that
cannot be later than the end of the fifth century B.C., show-
ing Aphrodite of slim maidenly form rising from the waves
" ' Aedicula quae totaaperitur,' Pliny, the sea-born Aphrodite as the tt^Bwv
36. 21 ;
i'ais a.jjiiplOvpo';, Lucian, Erotes, /^^Te/) aiWo-nohoiv in the Anthology, lo.
13 ;
ntpiaKi-nro) kvl X'^PVt -^^^th- E'lan. 21.
e
4. i6o. AntJiol. 9, p. 143 :
**
Aitth. Pah 9. 144. 'WaaKiv rfjv Kvvpiv 701 5e ffoi q
" Erotes, 2. Iv epwri
* C. I. G. 7369 ; cf. the invocation of ovpios fj xo-poirw vvivaopLai iv TrtXayft.
Plate XLIV
a
To face page 690

Plate XLV
To face page 691

and lifting up her mantle, and Eros, a youth with large

wing-s, who stands behind her and assists her to ascend ^ No
other monument could so well embody the title of A(f)poyvr]s
^
or "A^ptos, the foam-born goddess, or the lines of Hesiod, who

tells was by her side at the moment of her birth
us that Eros
and when she came into the company of the gods ^'^. The
unique character of the composition, the fineness and nobility
of the forms, compel us to believe that this is a direct copy of
the same scene carved in relief on the base of the throne of the
Zeus Olympios of Pheidias^'.
The other representation is that of a black-figured vase
published by Lenormant and De Witte, on which Aphrodite,
wêaring the aegis, is driving in a chariot with Poseidon.
The doubt about the personages,
inscriptions leave us in no
and the aegis is clearly given (PL XLIV. b). There is
much that is very remarkable in this. Nowhere else does
the goddess wear the emblem of Athena, which cannot be
interpreted here as an ordinary goat's fell, appropriate to
Aphrodite 'E-rrtrpayta, but is a badge of war marking the
Eastern war-goddess nowhere else is the warlike
; and
Aphrodite represented same time as a maritime
at the
power, as she certainly is here through her companionship
with Poseidon. We know that the goddess at Corinth, as
often in the East, was worshipped under her warlike aspect
and we might conclude that in this character she was also
closely related by cult wîth Poseidon, the chief divinity of
the land ; but even this hypothesis would not fully explain the
enigma of this vase-representation.
Generally, as a divinity of vegetation, of fruits and flowers.
Aphrodite was, as wê have seen, the frequent theme of early
art and the statue of Canachus was a great monumental
;
illustration of this aspect of her. But it is not certain whether

any surviving work can be regarded as the cult-image of
'
Antheia,' or as the copy of one. This title would be appro-
priate enough to such an image of her as the bronze in the
* Cf. the relief published in Jiom. by the Hours.

Mitth. d. dent. Inst. 1892, on which ^ Paus. 5. 11, 3 'Epo/s tariV : 0a\dff-
Aphrodite is seen rising and received (tt/s 'A<ppo5iTr]i' dviovaav ujroSexu/^fos.
T 2
Bibliotheque Nationalc in Paris, representing her as holding

the hem of her robe in the left hand and an apple in the right,
and wearing a flower-wrought crown (PI. XLV). The flower
by itself is so common a symbol that it cannot be regarded as
alluding to any special cult of the goddess. But perhaps the
well-known statue called the Venus Genetrix in the Louvre
(PI. XLVI) reproduces some religious image of the divinity
of vegetation, as we may believe that the hand with the apple

is a correct restoration '*.
The name Genetrix '
' refers to the
mythical descent of the Julian house from Venus, and has, as

we have seen, no exact equivalent among the Greek cult-
titles and the type presented by the Louvre statue was cer-
;
tainly used for the Roman goddess, for we find it on a Roman

coin with the title inscribed and it was possibly adopted by
''
;
Arcesilaus, who carved the statue for the temple of Venus

Genetrix that was dedicated by Julius Caesar B.C. 46*= but ;
this is and different types appear on Roman

uncertain, as other
coins. In any case, the Louvre statue goes back to a much
older original, of which the Greek title is lost to us. The
half-concealed pensive smile on the lips and the sidewards
inclination of the head recall the expression characteristic of
Praxitelean works; and the treatment of the features and hair
displays a pure and almost severe grace. But the broad
cheek and large chin, the large forms of the body and the
noble breadth between the shoulders, show the style of a
period still earlier than that of Praxiteles. And Professor
Furtwangler ^ inclines to believe that Alcamenes, the pupil of
Pheidias, was the author of the original work, as M. Reinach
had already suggested. The chief difficulty in the way of
assigning to it so early a date as the close of the fifth or the
beginning of the fourth century is the treatment of the drapery,
which falls over the limbs like transparent gauze, the surfaces
being traced over with very faint lines. The delicate compli-
* The terracotta replicas of the slatiie, Frohner, Sculpture dii Louvre, p. 167.
as well as the figure on the Roman coins, <=
Pliny, N. H. 35. 155.
prove this; vide Frohner, Terres-ciiites ^ Ausfiihrliches Lexicon, p. 413; so
de rAsie Mineiire, PI. 21. i ; Bull, de also in the Mcisterwerke ; cf. Reinach
Corr. Llell. 6. PI. 18. in Gazette ArdUologique, 1887, p. 255.
''
Coin of Sabina reproduced in
Plate XLVI
To face page 692

cation of these cross- folds may have been added by the later
copyist, to suit the later tastebut the for mere effect ;
exceeding transparency must have been a quality of the

original, and this is generally regarded as a mark of later
fourth-century work. But it is beginning to appear in the
Victories of the balustrade of the temple of Nike Apteros
at Athens, and this voluptuous treatment of the drapery,
which Polygnotus introduced into painting, may have come
into sculpture earlier than is supposed ^ and expressly for
the representations of Aphrodite at a period when the austerity
of the fully draped figure was relaxed and the sculptor did
not }'et venture to represent her unclad. And in one respect
the drapery of the Genetrix of the Louvre may incline us, in
spite of these doubts, to place it early in the fourth century
for the stately columnar disposition of the folds at her left side
reminds us of the '
chiton ttoSj/ptj? '
of the earlier Pheidian
monuments. And
arrangement was especially retained
this
for representations of divinities and statues connected with
temple-worship The Venus Genetrix then may be
''. '
'
believed to preserve the type and forms of some temple-

monument of the beginning of the fourth century, and ex-
presses the same idea of the goddess as that which probably
appeared in the famous Aphrodite iv ki]itols of Alcamenes.
Her character as a divinity of vegetation was further
attested by her associations with the Horae, with Cybele
and Dion}'sos ; but the monuments that illustrate this are
very rare, and cannot be connected with any known cult ^.
" The instances which M. Reinach '^

The relief published in Stackelberg's
adduces to prove that this style is Grader der Hellenen, Taf. 29, is the
earlier than is generally supposed are only certain instance I can find of
not quite sufficient. Aphrodite with the Hours : her affinity
^ Compare the drapery of the sacred with Cybele might be illustrated by the
maidens on the Parthenon frieze with bronze from the Troad described above,
that of the Caryatids of the Erechtheum, also possibly by the coin published in
and the divinity standing amidst the Gerhard's Akadeinische Abhandlungen
figures on the 'Alcestis' column from Taf. 43.on which are seen two
18,
Ephesus. Traces of this columnar dis- goddesses, at each side of a
seated
position of the folds appear also on the temple-door above which is a dove,
terracotta figure published by Frohner each with the calathus on her head, the
mentioned above (p. 692, note a). one mounted on two lions, the other on
It is more clearly attested by her association with Adonis ;
but the surviving monuments that show her in his company

refer usually to the story of her love and his death, and have
a purely artistic and mythological significance^. The most
beautiful of these appears to be an Attic aryballos from
Kertsch, with figures in relief, recently brought to St. Peters-
burg and not yet published the scene clearly alludes to the
;
Cypriote legend, for the group of Aphrodite, Peitho, Adonis,

and Eros are combined with the Salaminian hero Teucer,
Tecmessa, and Eurysaces. Professor Furtwangler, who is the
first who has written an account of it states that the inscrip- '',
tions on it and the style assign it to the same date as the

Parthenon frieze. The vase then has a singular interest as
being the first monumental illustration of the introduction of
the Adonis-cult into Attica, and also as attesting the influence
of the Ajax of Sophocles.
We cannot quote any representations of Adonis that
throw light on the ritual connected wîth him. The
beautiful bronze found at Paphos, now in the Biblioth^que
Nationale of Paris, is proved to be an Adonis ^, partly by the
resemblance between the almost feminine head and the head
of Adonis on the coins of Euagoras '\ king of Cyprus, and
partly by the remains of a garland of roses wrought in silver
upon his hair in one hand he holds what is probably a grain
;
of incense to be placed in the censer which he carries in his

left. The work is of the early Alexandrine period, and
embodies the idyllic sentiment that the poetry of that age
attached to Adonis.
On the other hand, we have one or two representations of
Aphrodite, inspired by the myth and ritual of Adonis, that are
of value as illustrations of cult. The story, mentioned before,
of the birth of Adonis from the split trunk of the tree into
which Myrrha had been transformed, arises probably from the
two bulls. On the relief in lihts. romantic Alexandrine sentiment.
Chiaram. (Tav. 36) Aphrodite appears "^
Meisterwerke, p. 275 (Engl, ed.),
witli Eros in company with Maenads. note 10.
* The group of Aphrodite, Eros, and <=
Gazette Archeol. 1876, PI. 16.
Adonis described in an epigram of the ^ TrJsor dc Niimism. des rois Grecs,
Anthology, II. 174, is full of the PL 32, no. 2.
Plate XLVII
To face page 695

practice, which was very common in the worship of divinities

of vegetation, of hanging his idol from a tree or placing it in
the hollow trunk. Now on
under a Lycian coin struck
Gordian (Coin PI. B 29) we see the curious type of an idol
placed in a hollow tree, from which two serpents are issuing
and scaring away two woodcutters who had come to fell it.
There is a possible allusion to the Adonis myth, but the idol
is a cult image, not of the god but of a veiled goddess wearing
the calathus, the symbol of fertility, upon her head, who must
be Artemis-Aphrodite and who is here clearly conceived as
a divinity of vegetation ^ The type has much in common
with the very archaic type of the draped divinity examined
above.
There is another typical representation of Aphrodite that can
with more certainty be referred to this subject (PI. XLVII).
A small statuette of limestone in the Louvre presents the
figure of a woman seated on the ground, her right hand and arm
supporting her, and her left lifted to her face and almost buried
in the veil which covers the head. The expression of the
face is pensive, and well accords with the pose. In itself the
figure would not be recognized as Aphrodite's but it exactly ;
tallies with the type of the Aphrodite of Libanos described
by Macrobius ^^'^ ^ And reliefs of the Roman period have

been found in the same locality, on which the goddess appears
in this pose and with this expression. The statuette probably
preserves a cult-type, and in cult the mourning Aphrodite
would be naturally associated with her dead lover ''.
The monuments that represent Aphrodite as a divinity of

the lower world are independent so far as we can see of
her association with Adonis. The interpretation of many of
these is very difficult. None of those published by Gerhard in
the ArchdologiscJie Zeitimg'^ have any certain reference to
a '
Venus Proserpina ' ; his supposition that by leaning on
"
Vide p. 523. eliteby her entourage and the high
''
A very similar representation of stephane with anthemion that she wears.
a mourning female figure is found on Heydemann interprets this as the raourn-
a vase in Naples (Heydemann, Be- ing Aphrodite, without deciding whether
schreibung no. 2900, Alite Ceram. 4. there is reference to the Adonis-myth.
PI. 87), which is proved to be Aphro- *^
1861, PI. 146, 147.
a pillar and standing with their legs crossed they proclaim

their connexion with the lower world is eccentric enough, and
arises from the fallacy of attaching a deep symbolism to
details of pose that often arise from merely artistic motives.
There is more to be said about another series of figures that
are quoted and examined in his treatise on Venus Proserpina,
and are put together and briefly described by Bernoulli ^ the :
qualities common to this type are {a) the severe hieratic form
of idol, [h) the calathus on the head, [c] the left hand holding
the edge of the garment and the right pressed against the
breast with or without an attribute, [d) dimensions under life-
size, so that the idol can serve as a support to a leaning figure.
No doubt we have here the forms of an image intended for
worship. But what are the signs of Proserpine and what of
Venus, and what evidence is there that the type expresses the
joint divinity of the two ? There is no proof that the hand on
the breast alludes in these figures to death and the lower
world ; it was, as we have seen, a common motive in a very
early Aphrodite type derived from the East, in which so far as
it had any meaning at all it alluded to fertility and later it ;
became probably only a conventional motive borrowed from

archaic works for hieratic sculpture of archaistic style. The
calathus, again, is the emblem of fruitfulness ^\ not directly of
the lower world. But when any of these figures bears the
fruit or the flower of the pomegranate, we have good reason
for believing that this is a symbol of the chthonian divinity''.
" Bernoulli, Aphrodile, pp. 64-66. Persephone ate of the fruit of the pome-
Most of tliem are published in Ger- gianate and belonged therefore to the
hard's plates to his Akademische Ab- lower world : it is never regarded as
handlnngen, 28-32. a token of marriage and fertility, except
^
See Euseb. Fraep. Ev. 3. 11 Ka\a- in a doubtful passage of Antiphanes in
Oov ixovai Tov fxev -rwv avOiojv, av/jifio- Athenaeus, 3. 84: therefore, he con-
Kov TOV eapos, tov SI tSjv araxvwv tov eludes, the monuments wliere the pome-
Oipovs. granate is held in the hand, such as the
<=
Vide pp. 216, 217. Botticher, in the Polycleitean statue of Hera, the Athena
Archdologische Zeitimg, 1856, p. 170, Nike in the temple on the Acropolis,
collects many legends proving that the are to be interpreted in reference to
pomegranate was the symbol of strife and strife and death. But had the same
death in Greek myth: a pomegranate tree attribute always the same meaning?
sprang from the blood of Zagreus, from We find the pomegranate-fruit and
the graves of Eteocles and Polyneices flowers in the hands of one of the
>
w
<
v.5-
ft,
5?
Thus we may give the name Persephone to the statuette ^ of the

goddess holding the pomegranate flower, on whom Dionysos
leans, she being more usually associated with him than
Aphrodite and it is scarcely believable that a Greek or
;
Latin would have been helped to recognize in this idol

Aphrodite Persephone by the fact that the figure happens
to hold her drapery in the same way as Aphrodite often holds
it. He would only be likely to recognize such a double
divinity when the image combined attributes and tokens of
both personages and these cases are very few. The goddess
;
who holds a dove in her left hand and a pomegranate flower

in her right, and wears a long veil that falls from over a
stephane down her shoulders, may be called the chthonian
Aphrodite and the Aphrodite on the votive terracotta
'' ;
tablet from South Italy, who holds out the pomegranate

flower and stands opposite to Hermes, is probably a divinity
of the same character (PI. XLVHI). For Hermes himself was
a power of the nether world. And the solemn and balanced
pose of these figures, as well as of Eros who stands on her
outstretched arm, allows us to believe that these are cult-types
of actual worship.
Where Eros is seen, the goddess whom he accompanies
would be naturally regarded as Aphrodite, unless the repre-
sentation obviously referred to some well-known myth about
some other divinity. Therefore such scenes as that on the
fine cylix published by Lenormant and De Witte^, showing
Eros receiving a goddess who is rising from the earth, must be
Hours on the cup of Sosias (Miiller- but that it does not always and of
Wieseler, i. and we should
45, 210a), necessity bear this sense: its blood-red
naturally interpret it here as a symbol colour could symbolize strife and death,
of fertility the flower also in the hands
; its seeds life. The maiden called "Poiw,
of the running Eros on an archaic Etrus- who received divine honours in Caria,
can mirror (Gerhard's ^/rwj-X'. ^zV^. I was probably another form of the
120, and Roscher, Lexicon, p. 1350): Asiatic goddess : the legend tells of
and here it would more naturally be her death and divine honours (Diod.
a symbol of marriage than the lower Sic. 5. 62) vide supra, pp. 446, 447.
;
world. Eros indeed is occasionally "^

Gerhard, Akad. Ahhandl. Taf. 32. 5.
associated with death but the Hours
;
''
Id. Taf. 30. 4.
very rarely. We may say then that '
Elite Ct'ram. 4. 34 cf. Mon. dell'
;
the pomegranate is a symbol of the Inst. 4. 39, and Frohner, MusJes de
lower world in the hands of Proserpine ;

Ira nee, PI. 21.
698 GREEK REEIGION. [chap.
the representations of the return of Aphrodite Kore ; and the

connexion, brought about probably through Orphic hterature,
between Eros and the divinities of the lower world may have
helped to familiarize the popular imagination with the idea of
a chthonian Aphrodite, one of whose types is probably shown
us in the figure of the goddess who stands in hieratic pose
near to Eros on a terracotta relief found in Italy % crowned
with the calathus and holding a poppy-stalk in one hand and
a lowered torch in the other.
The bust or Trporoju?; published in the Gazette ArcJicolo-
giqiie"" may also be accepted as a representation of the same
goddess (PI. XLIX. a); the shape of such monuments suggests
that they were intended to be hung up in graves, as were the
images of Astarte in Phoenician tombs. The mitra on her
head and the veil falling down over her shoulders would be
appropriate to a divinity of the lower world, and as the upper
parts of her figure are naked we may believe that the sculptor
intended Aphrodite rather than Persephone. And the Cypriote
pomegranate flower held in one
idol of archaic type, with the
hand against its breast, may be brought into this small group
of monuments on account of its provenance and this attri-
bute . Whether we can include in this series the small idol
in the Ildefonso group at Madrid '\ as Gerhard and Bernoulli
propose, is very doubtful. If wc could with certainty interpret
the two main figures as Antinous and the genius who quenches
the torch, and knew that this interesting group was a monu-
ment of the youth's voluntary death, then the goddess whose
image stands near the genius would naturally be of the lower
world, and the motive of the hand that holds her drapery,
combined with the attribute of the apple in her hand and the
calathus upon her head, testifies to Aphrodite. But as excessive
restoration has made the meaning of the whole very uncer-
tain, we are not justified in finding more in the idol-figure
than the ordinary idea of Aphrodite as a goddess of fertility.
" Gerhard, Akad. AbhanJl. Taf. 56. 2. Gerhard, Taf. 33. i ; Friederich's Atttike
''
1879, PI. 30. Bildwerke, 1665.
<=
Gerhard, Taf. 47 a. <>
The argument of Bernoulli that this
^ Vide Bernoulli, Aphrod. p. 66 must be the chthonian Aphrodite,
Plate XLIXa
a
"^X
/
These monuments convey the notion by means of external

symbols only. Of far more interest is another work that
gives a very different and deeper expression to the same
idea a female head published in the AixJidologische Zeitung^,
:
having a striking look of pity and soitow on the face, and

wearing as a kind of head-dress the face of the Gorgon with
closed eyes (PI. XLIX. b). The head is pi'obably a work of the
Alexandrine period, this peculiar expression of pathos being
such as we find on many monuments of this period. But at
first sight the work is an enigma it cannot represent a mortal,;
as no woman could wear such a head-dress. Nor is there any

known representation of Athena at all like this, to whom this
profound sentiment of pity and sorrow is not appropriate, and
who never wears the Gorgoneum as a covering for the head.
The writer who published it is no doubt right in connecting it
with the legends of Gorgo in Crete and Parakuptousa in '
'
Cyprus '\ But it cannot represent the hard-hearted maiden

herself for even if a daring sculptor were to give her the frozen
;
Gorgon's head as a coif, he would scarcely spoil the story by

giving her that look of compassion. In fact the head does not
refer directly to the story, but to that from which the story was
by misinterpretation derived, to the cult of Aphrodite Gorgo,
the mourning goddess of the lower world ; hence comes the
sorrow in the face and the symbol of death on the head.
The cult of Aphrodite MeAat^'ts at Thespiae has been inter-
preted in the former chapter as referring to the goddess of the
under-world ; but on a Thespian coin of the fourth century
in the British Museum we see a very striking Aphrodite-head
and two crescent moons in the field (Coin PI. B 4cS}. If this is
the goddess MiXaivLs, we should suppose that her cult came to
be associated with a moon-goddess such as Hekate, though it is
very unlikely that the epithet originally referred to the moon.
because the same type is used for one world, nor of necessity has the calathus,
of the figures of the triple Hekate, is but these may be the badges of Hekate
of little force ; for the shape of the or Aphrodite as the givers of increase
triple Hekate is borrowed partly from on the earth.
' the fair- fruited ' Demeter, and not every "
1857, l^f- ^
one of her three figures is chthonian ^ Vide p. 652.

the apple has no reference to the lower
It has been suggested that from this aspect of Aphrodite as

a goddess of death arose her association with Nemesis and the
Fates ^^- ^ Possibly we have an illustration of this in the bronze,
60 centimetres high, found in perfect preservation in Ostia in
the temple of Cybele, representing a naked goddess seated
with legs crossed, holding a small object on which to wind
thread ; Visconti proposes to call her Aphrodite KAoo^w ^
The monuments that may be quoted as illustrating the
worship of Aphrodite as a city-goddess fall generally into two
groups, the one consisting of those that show her armed as
a divinity of war, the other of those that represent her with
the turreted crown, the badge of the state, both types being
ultimately derived from the East.
In considering the first group we must distinguish between
those representations of the armed Aphrodite that are mere
mere sentimental expressions
caprices of the sculptor's fancy,
of her love for Ares, and those on the other hand which are
derived from an ancient conception, and seriously express the
character of the Eastern goddess of war. Unfortunately the
monuments of this latter species are scarcely known to us
except through literary record ; nearly all those that have
survived have no direct connexion with state-worship. We
hear of the statue of the armed goddess of Cythera, and in
many epigrams and other literature of the armed Aphro-
dite of Sparta and whose statue,
the Aphrodite 'A^êta,
according to Pausanias, was 'most archaic But we find -''

'.'
this type on no coin or monument of Cythera, and not with

certainty on any of Lacedaemon. The question however
may be raised about the meaning of the figure represented
on a Spartan coin of the third century B.C. (Coin PI. B 43),
a divinity who is enveloped from the breast downward in
a stiff circular garment that gives to more than half the
body the form of an aniconic idol, and who wears a helmet
and holds a lance in the right hand, a bow in the left the :
right side of the statue adorned with a cock standing on

is
an aplustre ; at the left side stands a goat The type corre-

''.
" Mon. deir Iiist.<.j.'6; Aiiniili,i?>G^, ^ The replica published by Head,

p. 20S. Hist. A'liin. p. 364, Fig. 240, does not
spends very closely with that of Apollo of Amyclae as described

by Pausanias % and the figure is given this interpretation by
those who have published the coin but they fail to explain ;
satisfactorily the symbols of the aplustre and the goat. The

former might no doubt have been added as an allusion to
some naval triumph but the latter animal can scarcely be
;
shown to belong to the Apolline worship ''. Prof. Furtwângler ^
therefore, prefers to interpret this figure as the armed

Aphrodite of Laconia and Cythera, as we know that the bow
and spear were her weapons in the East, and as the goat and
aplustre are specially appropriate to her. But we have no-
where any minute description of this warlike Aphrodite, and
the figure on the coin undoubtedly corresponds very strikingly
with the description of the Amyclaean Apollo.
As regards the statue on the Acrocorinthus which Pau-
sanias saw^'^^ probably did not belong to the older and
it
genuinely religious type, but was of such form as we see on

some of the coins of Corinth (Coin PL B 46), that show us the
goddess in her temple, naked to the waist and gazing at her
reflection in the shieldwhich she holds, as the Capuan statue
shows her. The type of the statue and of the coin-figure is
a Graeco-Roman or Alexandrine invention, a j'eii d esprit
referring to her sentiment for Ares ^. But it possibly replaced
show the cock on tlie aplustre; but showing much of the type of ' Venus
vide Gardner, Ntan. Conitn. Fans. N. Genetrix,' representing the goddess
16. wearing the sword-belt of Ares and
"
3. 19, 2. Vide Head, op. cit. carrying in her left hand not the apple
Gardner, op. cit. p. 59 Bompois, Por-
;
but probably a spear, has been found at
traits atlribnes h Cleoinhie. Epidauros {Epheni. Arch. 1886, IIiV.
*>
The naked on the fourth-
figure 13) and mentioned by Reinach in the
century coin of Tylissos of Crete (Head, Gazette des beaux Arts, 1888, p. 75 :
Hist. Num. p. 406) holding a bow and probably a copy made in the first
the head of a Cretan goat niay be, but century B. C. of an earlier work of a
is not certainly, an Apollo. good period. It is difficult to include
<^
Roscher, p. 408. among the representations of the armed
^ Vide Gardner, Num. Comm. Pans. Aphrodite the strange relief found at
p. 27; Bernoulli, p. 161. Compare as Beirut and published in the Mitt. d.
a salient instance of the same idea the d. Ath. Inst. 1S85, PI. I, showing a
group in the Louvre of Aphrodite and goddess whose drapery and pose are on
Eros trying the arms of Ares; Frohner, the whole those of the Athena Parthenos
Sculpture du Louvre, no. 152 Clarac, ; of Pheidias, but who wears the quiver-
Music, Fl. 343, n. 1399. A statue belt of Artemis and by whose side is
on the Acrocorinthus an older image of the armed goddess of

Oriental origin.
Among the representations of Ares and Aphrodite it is
necessary to mention here those only that refer to the actual

cult-relation that, as has been shown, existed in many places
between them "*'.
The oldest surviving monument that illus-
trates this association is where he appears
the Francois vase ^,
with Aphrodite in the procession of the gods next come two ;
vases of the late archaic style, signed by Oltos and Euxitheos'',

and a cylix painted by Sosias^ on all of which Ares and
Aphrodite are seated together in solemn union in the com-
pany of the gods. To the finest period of style belongs
the representation on the cylix of the British Museum of
Ares and Aphrodite amidst other wedded divinities she ;
stands erect, wearing a snood and long Ionic chiton, holding

a cup in her right hand and raising the left to her chin, as she
gazes down on Ares with a profound expression in her face.
He is reclining on a couch, wearing a liimation round his
lower limbs and holding a sceptre (PI. L. a).
The relief in Venice'^ of early fourth-century style is some-
times quoted among the religious representations of the union
of the two divinities (PI. L. b). On the right stands a bearded
warrior in helmet and chiton, with a shield resting at his feet,
holding out a cup to receive wine from a female figure arrayed
in long chiton and peplos, a fold of which she draws over her
head in one hand, while pouring from an oinochoe with the
other. Behind her stands a smaller male figure, clad in
a himation, in an attitude of adoration. Her pose and solemn
expression are in keeping with the style of religious art.
The features show many traits of the Pheidian style, but the
surfaces of the cheeks are not so broad as on the Parthenon
frieze. Now, but
for the smaller figure, we should interpret
this merely as a representation of the leave-taking
relief
between the wife and the husband who is departing for battle.
Eros. The writer of the article considers very incongruous.
her to be Aphrodite, of a form that " Alon. deW Inst. 4. 54.
shows a reaction against Hellenistic lax- >
lb. 10.23,24.
ness; but any interpretation of the relief <=
Gerhard, Akad. Abhandl. PI. 15.
must be doubtful, as the details are ^ Roscher's Lexicon, p. 406.
To face page 702
But, looking at the whole group, we must say that the scene
has a religious meaning. Can the two main figures be the
defunct parents regarded as powers of the lower world ?
But no other grave reliefs which express this idea with clear-
ness have any resemblance at all to this the surviving ;
children are only represented of smaller size than the heroic

dead, when these latter appear enthroned, as on the Spartan
reliefs, or lying on the couch at the family meal, and when the
children are bringing their offerings. But here the two larger
figures are taking no notice of the worshipper, and the one is
offering libation to the other. Therefore it seems impossible
to explain them except as divinities and if divinities they
;
are Ares and Aphrodite, to whom the worshipper is praying,

possibly for his own safety on some campaign. But it is
necessary to say that this interpretation wants more support
from other monuments than it is easy to find.
Many of the other representations in which the two divinities

are brought together are 'archaistic,' but probably derived from
archaic works that had a serious reference to cult ''^.
The only myth of battle in which Aphrodite played a part

was the Gigantomachy, and here only in the later repre-
sentations and descriptions and it is doubtful whether these
;
are to be taken too seriously, and whether we can say that

the ancient idea of the armed goddess at all accounts for her
presence in these scenes. On a vase in the Louvre we see
her driving with Ares in his chariot against the giants, but
the figure of the infant Eros poised above the horses and
drawing a tiny bow robs the representation of all serious
significance, and shows it to be a mere sport of Alexandrine
fancy. She takes a serious part in the action on the Per-
gamene frieze and a small bronze found not long ago in
;
Athens of Aphrodite Gigantomachos seems also to represent

her in real and earnest conflict, but these representations of
her in the battle of the gods may be due merely to the later
enlargement of the myth which came to comprise all the
Olympians in the struggle.
" Vide Bernoulli, Aphrodite, p. 144; d. a. Kunst, i. 44; puteal in the Capi-
the Borghese altar, Miiller, Denkmiiler toline Museum, ib. 2. 197.
Among the monuments of the war-goddess we may include

a bronze coin from Smyrna, representing Aphrodite, who
gave victory in battle, NtK>j(/)o/3oj or ^rpaToviKi^. appearing in
the form of a cult-statue, clad in a long chiton and wearing
the calathus, and supporting Nike on her left arm, which rests
on a column ^. It may well be that we have here a repro-
'^'^
duction of the actual temple-statue '\
The monuments of the city-goddess with the turret-crown

are less doubtful, though not very numerous. The best
illustration of this type comes from Cyprus, whither the
Phoenician conception of the city-divinity Astarte, who wears
a turreted crown on the coins of Ascalon. was most likely to
travel ; if we find such a goddess in Greek form in
so that
Cyprus more reasonable to give her the name of Aphro-
it is
dite than any other. There can be no doubt that it is her

head that appears turreted and adorned with earrings on the
coins of Salamis of the latter part of the fourth century (Coin
PI. B 47); and two limestone heads found in Cyprus, published
by Jahn in the ArcJidologischc Zeihing^\ can be proved by the
analogies of the coins with which he compares them to be
representations of Aphrodite the city-goddess. The larger
one (PI. LI a), about i<S inches in length, belongs to the
best period*'; the goddess wears the turret-crown, and her
expression is solemn and appropriate to the city-divinity: the
smaller one isof later style, and there is a soft smile on
the features, the type being the same as that of the head
on the coin of Nicocles'^ of Paphos.
Aphrodite Kouporpo'ôs and Aphrodite Hera, the goddess
who nurtured children and who encouraged marriage, is not
clearly presented to us on any monument. There are many
0eat KovpoTp6<poL the title more especially belongs to Demeter
and Gaia and among the many representations of divinities
holding children none bear any attribute or symbol that
reveals Aphrodite ^ Nor can we find any clear expression
* Catalogue of Greek Coins, Ionia, ^ lb. Taf. 188 (2); cf. coin 2 c.
p. 239. Vide V>txx\ov\\\, Aphi odite, pp. 121-

^ Arch. Zeit. 1864, Taf. 1S8. 123: a fragment of an Acropolis vase
//'. Taf. 188(1); cf. coin i b. sliows Aphrodite with two little boys
Plate LI
To face page 704

except in literature of her functions in regard to marriage. The

apple held in the hand of the archaic and later statues may have
had some indirect allusion to wedlock, but in itself it was merely
a symbol of fertility and increase the lifting of the veil or ;
the folds of the peplos upward over the head was a gesture
of modesty not peculiar to the bride. Neither have we any
sure monumental representation of the goddess of the clan or
the civic community, unless we accept as genuine the relief
and the inscription found in Sarmatia described already *'-
We should then have to say that the sculptor knew no other

way of designating her as the clan-goddess, except by adding
the figure of Ares for the idea of marriage and of Eros for
the idea of love and without the inscription no one would
;
recognize in her the goddess 'ATraroyp?;. It is equally difficult

to say beforehand what expression Greek religious art would
be likely to give to Aphrodite Pandemos, the guardian of the
state-community; the monuments that are certainly not those
of Pandemos in the political and original sense have already
been partly discussed. One might think that there would be
no better way of revealing the goddess under this aspect to
her worshippers than such a representation of her as appears
in the group on the Parthenon frieze where, partly through :
what remains, partly through Carrey's drawing, Aphrodite

is presented with Eros before her, and with the goddess
who is probably Peitho at her back, in majestic posture on
her throne, witnessing the great religious and political festival
of the whole people. And we have record that the worship
of Peitho was associated in the legend of Theseus with that of
Pandemos ^^ ^.
It has appeared from the examination of the literature

that there is scarcely any record of Aphrodite as a patroness
of the arts of civilization, or as a divinity who inspired oracles
or who was associated with Apollo '\ And in the monuments
on her arms (or rather on her elbows), " There are only two inscriptions
both of black colour. Miss Harrison from Delos and Erythrae that prove
may be right in naming this figure a slight connexion between her and
Apollo. Vide *".
Aphrodite KovpoTp6<pos, Hell. Journ. *' **,
vol. 10, Transactions, p. xxxvii.
VOL, II. U
we find only very scant recognition of these aspects of her. It

is true that Gerhard discovers an Aphrodite with Apolline
attributes in a statue of the Louvre belonging to the Greek
period which has been restored as Euterpe ^ ; but he was
biassed about Aphrodite, and his interpretation is entirely
fanciful ''.
The only monument of importance where she is found

with Apollo is in the vase-painting in Vienna, published by
Benndorf,and rightly interpreted as the consultation of
Apollo by Aphrodite and the other goddesses concerning
the fate of Troy ^ ; but this alludes to the cyclic version of
the myth, not to any Another representation of Aphro-
cult.
dite, same idea, but inspired only

expressing probably the
by myth, is a bronze relief from Paramythia in Epirus, of
very fine style, showing her with Anchises, and in such an
attitude as suggests that she is prophesying his future to
him ^.
At Salamis the goddess was probably invoked as the

patroness of song and the lyric contest ; and a few terra-
cottas found in Cyprus, now in the British Museum, show
us a female figure, often of Oriental countenance, playing
on the lyre some of them wear the modius, and one a sort
;
of turban bound round with a fillet of wool, and it is probable

that they show us a type of the Cypriote Aphrodite.
In the later periods the Hellenic goddess became little more
than the divinity of love and desire, and a few cult-titles,
probably of late origin, designated her thus in the later ;
monuments this aspect of her predominates, but scarcely any

of these that represent her merely as the goddess of sense-
beauty can be connected with any cult. But some of those
that associate her with Peitho and Plros may be considered as
possibly derived from the actual state-religion.
The group of the two goddesses on the Parthenon frieze
* Frohner, Sculpture du Louvre, Wieseler, 2, PI. 27. 293: cf. Fricderich's
No. 379. Bausteine, 196 1, who ascribes it to the
*"
Arch. Zeit. 1861, Taf. 147. 2. later period.
Vorlege Blatter, E, Taf. 11. Ohnefalsch Richter, Ancient places
<* In Bignor Park, Sussex; Miiller- of worship in Cyprus, 12.5.
XX 11.] MONUMENTS OF APHRODITE. 707
mentioned above, though in no sense cult-figures, may have

reminded the Athenian of the worship of Aphrodite and
Peitho near the Acropolis. Another relief found in Athens,
and now in the Central Museum ^, probably represents these
two divinities we see two female figures in close union, the
;
one with her upper body undraped and with large forms that
speak of the earlier style, the other clad in semi-transparent
drapery. The composition is full of repose and refined
expression, and the relief may belong to the earlier part of
the fourth century. A more famous and more certain repre-
sentation of Aphrodite and Peitho is the beautiful fourth-
century relief in Naples, on which Aphrodite is seen seated
by Helen and persuading her to give herself to Paris, who
stands in converse with Eros ^ By the goddess is a pillar, on

the top of which sits Peitho the inscription proves the name
clad in ample drapery, and wearing the calathus on her head,
her form being perhaps derived from some cult-type. The
personification had possibly at Athens a political allusion ;
but nearly always in monuments and in literature Peitho is

a goddess of love, the power of love's persuasion, and there-
fore she appears with Aphrodite and wears the calathus, and
the earlier and later poets speak of her as if she were herself
the Love-goddess.
The very numerous groups of Aphrodite and Eros are
almost all '
he figures in nearly all of them
secular '
; for
merely as the personification of human love, and as such he
had scarcely any recognition in public worship Mention '^.
has been made of the monuments from South Italy that show
him associated with an Aphrodite-Kora and it is probable ;
that these correspond to a prevailing religious conception.

The figure of Eros on the goddess's extended arm on the
" Milchhofer, Die Museen Athens, figure does not appear very early in art,
p. 18. and in his oldest

Thespiae
worship at
^ Baumeister, Deukmciler, p. 638, his idol was not of human form at
Fig. 708. all,merely an ap'ôi \i9os (see "^^).
" In Hesiod cosmogonic and
the Perhaps one of the earliest examples of
physical character of Eros is combined Aphrodite associated with Eros is a
with the personal and human which in representation on a mirror-handle in the
the later lyric poetry prevails. His British Museum.
U 2
7o8 GREEK RELIGION.
votive relief from South Italy (PI. XLVIII) has the severe
pose of a temple statue, the hand being outstretched to receive
offerings or to give blessing ; the lyre may allude to the
musical contests in his honour on Helicon. In a terracotta
group from Cyrene, now in the Louvre, we may see in the tall
figure of Eros, who leans on Aphrodite and wears the calathus

on his head, an independent god of ancient cult (PL LI b).
But in these instances he is probably more than the personal
form of the abstract idea of human love ; he is the god of
Thespiae, a god of birth and increase and probably of death,
and very close akin to Hermes.
From the close of the fourth century onwards many repre-
sentations of Aphrodite have survived that are purely 'genre,'
some of them and some sensual, though none actually
frivolous
gross. They are not of direct importance for the history of
public cults, with which none of them can have any proved
connexion *. They illustrate indeed a decadence in art
parallel to a certain decadence that has been noticed in the
religion and those who dislike the expression and motive of
;
the Medicean Venus may call her Aphrodite 'Eratpa but there ;
is no evidence whatever that a statue of this type was conse-
crated to the worship of that goddess where such worship

existed. These representations of the later period have of
course great value for the history of art ; for the student of
Greek they have merely an indirect value as illus-
religion
trating changes in private sentiment about the gods, important
enough, though not necessarily expressing themselves in the
public forms and ritual. In the later art, Aphrodite more
rarely appears as a goddess than as a gives and woman who
requires loveand does her best to excite it. But in general
worship, even down to the end of paganism, she was always
more than this.
The statue sometimes called Aphio- erected to Aphrodite Ka\kiirvyos at
dite KaA.XtJrt;7oy in the Museum at Syracuse an image expressing the title
Naples is probably a representation of was also consecrated to the worship ;
an ordinary era/pa : it is not necessary vide Jahrbuch des dciit, lust. 1887,
to suppose that if a chapel or altar was p. 125 (Heydemann).
CHAPTER XXIII.
IDEAL TYPES OF APHRODITE.
We cannot quote from the period before Pheidias any

great monument that presented the inner character of the
goddess by means of spiritual expression in the face or whole
form. It would be tempting to take as a masterpiece of the
religious sculpture of this period the Sosandra of Calamis,

the greatest master before Pheidias in this field of work,
and to call it Aphrodite. But reasons have been adduced
against this interpretation A
beautiful bronze, of the pre-
*.
Pheidian style, has been recently acquired by M. Caraponos

and published in the Bulletin de Correspondance Htilcniqne^'
under the name of Aphrodite. female figure of tall slim A
maidenly form stands holding a dove in her left hand and in
her right hand some object that has disappeared but was
probably a flower ; very earnest, and free from all
the face is
sentiment, so far as one can judge from the photograph. The

nobility and purity of the work, its naive unconscious grace,
would give it an important place and an original value among
Aphrodite-monuments, if the name were sure. A religious
dedication of some kind it is undoubtedly, and the drapery
with the folds of the chiton and its arrangement of
-nohripiis
the upper mantle strikingly recalls the Vesta Giustiniani ;
the symbols also are appropriate to Aphrodite. But no

certain representation of this period shows us an Aphrodite
of these virginal forms, these half-developed features "",
and
arrangement of the hair. It
this girlish simplicity in the may
be therefore that the bronze is a representation of a girl-
priestess of Aphrodite, and dedicated to the goddess.
'^ See p. 666. c

\ am following the account given
''
1891, Taf. 9 and 10, discussed, by M. Lechat, ib. p. 467, not having
p. 461 ; height 27I cent. seen the original.
7IO GREEK RELIGION. [chap.
We can discover more about the type of Aphrodite in the

next period, the zenith of Greek reh'gious sculpture, when
Pheidias was working for Greece. His chryselephantine
statue of the goddess at Ehs has left no trace of itself in any
copy or later work as far as we know'\ But the Aphrodite
on the Parthenon frieze reveals the style and spirit with
which the Pheidian school handled this theme. The striking
characteristics, which the mutilated original and Carrey's
drawing present to us, are the dignity of the pose, the majesty
of the ample forms, and the austere disposition of the drapery,
the Ionic chiton leaving bare only the lower part of the arms,
while the veil denotes the goddess of marriage. The face has
disappeared. But a fragment in the Louvre may preserve for
us an Aphrodite's head in the style of Pheidias (PI. LI 1 1).
It has been described by Frohner as superbe sculpture '' '
grecque de I'ecole de Phidias.' And Overbeck supposes

that it may have belonged to one of the figures on the
Parthenon pediments. This conjecture is certainly far more
reasonable than Stark's comparison of it with one of the
Niobids for it has no resemblance with any figure in the
:
Niobe group, while no work that is not actually known to

have come from the Parthenon recalls so vividly the style and
forms of the Parthenon sculpture. It has, in fact, all the
prominent forms of the Pheidian type of head the great :
breadth of cheek and depth of skull, the full chin, the simple
grandeur of the line of eyebrows, and the large circles of
the eye-sockets, the striking breadth of the forehead and
of the space between the e}-es, the simplicity in the rendering of
the hair. The lips are full, the upper high-arched. The
eyes are gazing upward, and the whole countenance is full of
thought and power without severity. For warmth of spiritual
expression, perhaps, no head of ancient sculpture surpasses this.
" '1 he type of the Aphrodite Oura- period, and the arrangement of the
nia carved by Pheidias for Athens hair is not in accordance with the usual
Prof. Furtwangler would discover in a Pheidian manner ; but the figure seems
statuette at Berlin, published in Meisler- in its main features to belong to this
^ve7ke, p. 71, Y\g. 24 the drapery does
: school.
not appear to be treated as we should *
Frohner, Sculptu7-e du Louvre,
expect in a temple-statue of this 163.
Plate LIII
To face page 710

Plate LI
To face page 7 1
XXIII.] IDEAL TYPES OE APHRODITE. 711
It is the head of a goddess, and the bright look on the face
and the faint smile speak of Aphrodite.

There is, perhaps, only one head in Europe that shows us
how the countenance of the goddess was treated by the sculp-
ture of the fourth century in the period before Praxiteles ;
namely the head in Holkham Hall in Norfolk*, a good

Graeco-Roman copy of a great original (PI. LI I). The skull
is strikingly deep, but the surface of the cheek is not so broad
as in the earlier type, while the sidewards inclination of the
head, which becomes from time onward a common
this
characteristic of the goddess, more marked. Yet it is free
is
from excessive or voluptuous sentiment, and the expression is

spiritual and noble. The hair is drawn away from the high
broad forehead in rippling lines, but a small crescent-shaped
tress falls on the cheek as is more usual in heads of the later
period. The eyesockets are rather large, the eyes somewhat
long, and the upper eyelid is slightly drawn down. The nose
and chin are large, and the lips slightly parted. In the forms
and expression the idea of love is purely and impressively
given, but still with some reserve and without too much self-
consciousness. The original was probably of the same period
as the very beautiful Kertsch vase in the Hermitage of
St. Petersburgh, on which is drawn the judgement of Paris
and the three goddesses and the work of the sculptor has
''
;
many affinities with that of the vase-painter, who has given

his Aphrodite the same large and noble feitures and the
languid droop of the head.
The masterpiece of Praxiteles, the marble statue of the
goddess of Cnidus, is the most important monument of
the worship of Aphrodite. It is necessary first to examine
the statements made concerning it by ancient writers. The
records suffice to prove enjoyed a more
that this statue
widely spread reputation than any of the other works of
Praxiteles, and there are passages in literature which describe
not only the outward motive but also the intrinsic character
of the work. The words in Lucian's treatise " tell us some-
" Michaelis, A>iciettt Marbles, p. 314.
* Reinach, Antiquilils dit Bosphore Cimnihicn, PI. 79. "=
Anions , 13.
thing of the pose, and then go on to define certain formal

excellencies in the work which helped to convey the highest
impression of external beauty and charm. This, in Lucian's
eyes and the eyes of the whole ancient world, was the perfect
ideal of the undraped Aphrodite, and the nudity itself was
part of the novelty of the representation. Usually, except
where an Oriental type survived, she was represented with
drapery in the older and more austere Hellenic art. She
must, indeed, have been represented unclad, or nearly so, in
the scene of her birth from the waters carved on the footstool
of the Olympian Zeus, and we see in Carrey's drawing a figure
that seems to be the naked goddess on the western gable of
the Parthenon. But it was a much greater departure from
religious convention to erect such a statue of a divinity in
a temple for worship ; and the conservative Greeks of Cos,
with more regard for religion than for art, rejected this
wonder of the world. Was Praxiteles the first who made
this change? It is not at all certain, for Pliny ^ speaks of
a famous Aphrodite statue by Scopas, naked and Praxiteliam '
illam antecedens,' a phrase which may mean 'surpassing in

merit,' or '
preceding in time,' the famous Praxitelean work.
It is would seem to refer to
true that in the context the words
artistic merit rather than to time any case, we may
;
but, in
believe a priori that any statue by Scopas was earlier than
one which Praxiteles could only have carved when he was in
the zenith of his power and at the height of his reputation.
At all events it was in the Praxitelean period that this
innovation was made''. And we need not accuse Praxiteles of
venturing in his handling of the religious subject to go beyond
what the spirit of the age conceded. To embody the perfect
ideal of the goddess for his generation, it had become necessary
to show her unclothed and, if there had been no other reason,
;
the formal of Praxiteles' art, his consummate

excellencies
power of giving life to the surface of the marble, would have
prompted him to this.
* ^- H. 36. 26. Achaea, and mentioned by Pausanias
''
has been assumed that a statue
It (7. 25, 9) and Diogenes Laertius (3. 42),
of Aplirodite, carved by luicleides before was undraped ; but vide supra, p. 613.
346 B. c. for the temple of Bura in
Plate LIV
To face page 712

XXIII.] IDEAL TYPES OF APHRODITE. 713
Still less need wc accuse him, as Brunn in his Kiinstlcr-

gescJiicJitc has done, from the evidence of certain epigrams and
other references in literature % of infusing into his work any
predominant sensual quality. The anecdotes on which he lays
overmuch stress prove nothing but that the statue was nude
and surpassed all others in the Greek world in formal beauty.
Praxiteles is not necessarily answerable for the sensual effect
produced by his work upon certain minds. Brunn's examina-
tion of the epigrams aims at proving that they express a
certain contrast between the loftier spiritual beauty of the
Pheidian Athena (the Lemnian statue or the Parthenos) and
the lower sensually fascinating beauty of the Cnidian : but it is
difficult to see this clearly in the verses. One epigrammatist

tells us that when you stand you greet her
before the Cnidian
as the queen of gods and men, and Pallas and Hera themselves
would admit that the judgement of Paris was true: 'wrong-
fully do we blame the Phrygian shepherd but when you '
;
stand before the Athena you call Paris a boor for withholding
the palm from her. There is nothing here said about any
difference of impression that the two statues produce upon the
mind or senses we only gather that each in turn, when men
;
gazed upon it, overpowered the judgement. We must not

read between the lines we know that there was a marked
;
difference between the spiritual character of a Pheidian work

and one of the younger Attic school but the epigrams are ;
silent about this. We have then the anecdotes of Athenaeus

and Clemens Alexandrinus, who aver that the courtesan
Phryne was his model. Literary gossip about artists is rarely
of value but if these stories wêre true, they prove nothing
;
concerning the impression and idea of the Cnidian statue for ;
though we know something about Phryne's life, we know

nothing of her face and expression. Athenagoras ^ speaks of
the Aphrodite Hetaira, the 'courtesan-goddess in Cnidus '
but if the epithet refers to the worship of Aphrodite Hetaira

that we hear of at Samos and elsewhere, the reference is
entirely unhistorical if it is merely vituperative, in such a
;
^ Overbeck, Scht-iftqiicUcn, 763, 1 237-1 240.

''
Leg. pro Christ. 14.
context it Both Clemens and Athenafroras

has small value.
are writing with intention. On the other hand these facts
must be weighed. The statue was chosen as a monument of
the state-religion of Cnidus, and reasons have been shown for
believing that its official state-title was EîmXoLa and the ;
goddess of the sea was another form of the ancient Ourania,

who was much more than a goddess of human love. And
there is a passage in Lucian ^ where the statue is regarded as
the very counterpart of Ourania herself; a statement which is
interpreted by Erunn as if it only pointed the contrast between
the actual Aphrodite in the heavens and her image on earth,
but which is more naturally understood as signifying that the
image represented Ourania, according to the meaning of the
term current in Lucian's day, as the celestial divinity of
pure love.
No doubt Praxiteles may not have intended this. But
how could Lucian, the most subtle art-critic in antiquity,
have called her Ourania if that which was prominent in her
form and face was the idea of sensual passion ? Of course
nothing would so clearly reveal the inner intention of the
work as the expression of the face and Lucian alone tells us
;
something of this. He enumerates its characteristics in terms

which refer mainly to spiritual expression and partly to
certain physical forms. No uncertainty attaches to the sense
of the words to (paibpbv koX KexapKrixivov ^, denoting the radiant
charm of the face. When he speaks of the quality of to vypov
in the countenance, he refers to the dreamy or languishing
expression of yearning imparted by the slight drawing-up of
the lower eyelid, which we see in many heads of Aphrodite,
and of Alexander the Great also. If we insist that it must
have added a sensual trait, how could it have appeared in the
face of the ideal maiden Panthea"^, whose countenance and whole
form were full of the very modesty of Sosandra herself? But
the meaning of vTtpri<pavov jxuhiSiaa and aecrripoTL ye'Acort is not '^
quite clear at a glance. It would hardly be in accordance

either with the Greek construction or with the rhythm of
the sentence to take vTTp7](f)apov with KoAAto-roi' asmeaning
Dc Itag. 23, ^ Imag. G. '
lb. ^'
Anions, 13.
XXIII.] IDEAL TYPES OE APHRODITE. 715
'
beautiful beyond measure '
; we must take it with ixeihiQxra.
If this should denote a disdainful and haughty smile, how could

such a have been united with the radiant charm of the
trait
visage? Both aearjpoTi and virep/jcfyavov are words that would
imply as a rule nothing attractive yet it is clear from the ;
context that they are here used in their rarer sense, the one to
express the smile on the parted lips, the other in the sense of
'lofty' or sublime.''
Both these usages are justified and the ;
countenance of the Hermes of Praxiteles, with its indefinable

expression, may give us reason to suppose that the sentiment
of his Aphrodite's face was equally baffling for ordinary words
to explain, and that Lucian is therefore obliged to resort to
far-fetched phrases.
The written evidence then does not warrant us in imputing
a sensual character to this, the greatest of Praxiteles'
works ; tells us rather that this statue was in
the record
spiritual expression worthy of ranking with the Aphrodite of
Alcamenes, with the Zeus and Athena of Pheidias, and the
Hera of Polyclitus that what Pheidias had done for the type
;
of Athena Praxiteles did for that of Aphrodite^, both having

created the perfect image that men might worship as the
ideal form of these divinities.
We must also take account of the evidence afforded us by
certain monuments in the first place by coins of Commodus
;
and Caracalla, which of themselves contribute little or nothing

to our knowledge of the intrinsic qualities of the work, as they
possess no merit of style, but which help us to settle certain
questions of motive and to discover other reproductions of the
original. When we compare the figure on these coins with
Lucian's account we can have no doubt that the coin-cutter
has given us a mechanical but more or less accurate copy of the
Cnidian statue and they help us to fill up the gaps in his
;
description (Coin PI. B 50). The whole weight of the body

was thrown on the right leg, and the left knee was slightly
inclined inwards. The head appears on the coins altogether
in profile, but this is probably a departure from the original
made by the unskilled copyist, who may have tried unsuccess-

" Lucian, Ima^. 23; PhilostraUis, ]'it. Apoll. Tyan. 6. 19.
fully to represent thus the sideward and downward turn of the

head, whereby the modesty of the Cnidian statue may have
been partly expressed or the character of Aphrodite EwTrAota,
surveying the sea beneath her,may have been conveyed.
But what is the meaning of the water-vase and the raiment
which she holds above it ? These would have been in place
by the side of the statue, both as a necessary external support
and as alluding to the goddess of the water ; and it is incon-
ceivable that the coin-cutter should himself have invented and
added this detail, as there was no external necessity for it in
the coin-representation. The
positive evidence of the coins
then counts more than the silence of Lucian, and we may
suppose that the vase and the robe were part of the original
idea, but that they were not placed so near the figure as to
hide the left side for Pliny says that the execution was
;
equally admirable from whatever side the statue was viewed,

implying that it was visible from every point of view^ If
this motive, then, of the right hand holding the drapery which
touches the vase is authentic, a certain part of the meaning of
the whole work depends on the way in which we interpret it.
Is the goddess laying it aside or is she raising it to clothe

herself with it ? That is to say, is she undraping herself to step
down into the sea, or is she Aphrodite 'AraSvo/xtVi/, the goddess
just risen from the waves and not yet draped ? The shame-
faced gesture of the hand, the timidity expressed in her pose,
would be equally appropriate on either interpretation but ;
the pose of the body which is displayed by the coin-figures,

and by the Munich statue that will be mentioned directly,
makes for the latter explanation. For her body inclines
away from the vase, and this is natural if she is raising the
drapery off it and drawing it towards her whereas we usually ;
incline towards the object upon which we place something.

And again, the goddess rising from the sea was a common
theme of Greek art and myth, and only slight allusions were
needed to suggest it to the ordinary Greek's imagination but ;
neither art nor myth had much to say about the goddess
stepping from the shore to bathe.
" N. H. 36. 20.
Among the numerous statues of Aphrodite that survive

there are only two that, on the evidence of the coins, may be
pronounced to stand in very close relation to the Praxitelean
original^the statue in the Glyptothek of Munich, and one in
the Vatican. The details of the composition are almost the
same in both, with the exception that the drapery is held
rather differently in the Vatican statue, in which the idea of
Aphrodite Arabvon^vij is by no means so clearly expressed %
'
and that its glance is more downward and sidelong. In both

the pose of the limbs and the balance of the body is the same
as on the coins. The hair of both is treated with the same
simplicity and purity, being drawn away from the face and
passing in light rippling waves into a knob at the back. Of
the Munich statue much has been restored (PI. LIV), namely,
most of the upper part of the head, the and the centre nose,
of the lips, arm from the
half of the right fore-arm, the left
bracelet downwards, the fingers of the left hand, the feet, and
some parts of the vase and drapery. Nothing of the Vatican
figure is new, except the left arm, and the right from the
elbow downwards. Neither the one nor the other displays in
the rendering of the surface of the body any striking excel-
lence of style, and though the Vatican statue may be nearer
to the original as regards the position of the vase, we cannot
prove that in other respects it is a more faithful copy. The
high value of both works lies in the rendering of the
countenance, which more completely and more profoundly
than any other monuments displays the ideal character of
Aphrodite.
Both faces are free from all sensual expression, all coquetry
and affectation, and both have a certain stamp of divinity.
The yearning pensive sentiment is expressed in each, the eyes
of the Vatican figure being fixed on the ground, those of
the other gazing dreamily into the distance and slightly
uplifted. The forms and expression display the x"P'?' the
"^
Overbeck, in the Geschichte der and of the coin-figures proves that she
Griechischcn Plaslik, and Michaelis, in is laying her robe aside but they do
;
the Archdologische Zcitung, 1876, de- not take into sufficient account the in-
clare that tiie pose of the Vatican figure clination of the figure.
spiritual grace of Praxitelean sculpture, but the countenance

of the Munich statue alone shows the faint smile which was
the masterly trait of the original, giving to the visage of the
Cnidian goddess its radiant charm. The goddess and the
woman are blended in these works as they were in the later
worship.
The influence of the Praxitelean type on the whole pre-
dominates in the later monuments. Yet the religious
sculpture after Praxiteles preserved in some of its repre-
sentations of Aphrodite a certain tradition from the period
before him. The most important work that illustrates this
survival is the Melian statue, which will be described later
it is also illustrated by two Aphrodite heads in England,
one belonging to the collection at Brocklesby Hall in Lin-
colnshire, the other in the possession of Lord Ronald Gower
in London. The first is probably a good Graeco-Roman copy
of a late fourth-century work (PI. LV), for the hard lines

of the throat and the shallow dry treatment of the parts about
the eye betray the later hand and yet many of the forms are
;

those of the early fourth-century type the very broad cheek,
the great breadth between the eyes, the rather austere
arrangement of the hair. In the whole head there is a large
vitality combined with a very serious expression, and in fact
we could not be sure that this is the face of Aphrodite, if
itwere not for the pose of the head, the half-opened lips,
and the holes for ear-rings in her ears. The forehead, which
was once surmounted by a stephane, is extraordinarily high,
and its height and triangular form remind us of the head of
the Demeter of Cnidus.
The head belonging to Lord Ronald Gower (PI. LVI) is
an original Greek work, and unique among the Aphrodite
heads in England it is of lifesize and of Parian marble, which
;
has suffered much from corrosion, but not at all from the hand
of the restorer, except that the eye-sockets, which were
originally hollowed out for the insertion of eyeballs of metal,
have now been filled up with plaster, and this has given a dull
and lifeless look to this part of the face. Otherwise the face
and forepart of the head is in perfect preservation, and the
Plate LV
To face page 7 1
Plate LVI
To face page 718

warmth and the purity of the Greek work is felt in the treat-
ment of the hps and the parts about the mouth. The hair
shows the same graceful simphcity of arrangement as the
Cnidian head, being carefully drawn away from the forehead
and cheeks, and worked in fine rippling lines and gathered
in a knot on the neck. The forehead is high, the cheeks of
little depth, and the contour of the face suggests a period
in the fourth century a little later than the Praxitelean. But

the broad-ridged nose and the large chin are forms that recall
an earlier type, and the characteristic expression is not so
developed as in the Praxitelean masterpiece. The eyes were
not so narrow, the face is less full of yearning sentiment
a faint trace of this is visible in the half-opened lips, and
though many of the usual traits that reveal the goddess, such
as the sidewards inclination of the head, are wanting, yet we
need not doubt but that this is Aphrodite, with a countenance
more austere and reserved than Praxiteles gave to his Cnidian
work. The impression on the features is rather one of deep
thought than of sentiment.
A
certain degeneracy in religious sculpture that we can
trace from the beginning of the third century downwards
can be well illustrated by some of the statues of Aphrodite
that we have inherited from the Alexandrine period. Long
before any falling off in formal skill, we note the loss of
seriousness, the decay of imagination. Nearly all of the
crowd of Aphrodite statues in our museums are Graeco-
Roman, but three at least may be mentioned that belong to
the Greek period, though of later origin than those already
described. The Capitoline Venus is almost the best-preserved
statue of antiquity, having been immured in a cell during the
Middle Ages. There is far more reason for regarding it as
a Greek original of the third century B.C. than as a Graeco-
Roman work for none of these show in the surface such finish,
;
warmth, and modulation. The glistening lustre of the surface,

the liquid transition from part to part in the handling of the
organism, are chief qualities of early Alexandrine sculpture''.
Cf. ' Eiitycliides fecit Eurotan in quo artem ipso amne liquidiorem plurimi
dixere,' Pliny, 34. 78.
The softness of each detail hi the CapitoHne statue is as

remarkable as the rhythm of the whole, the fascinating
undulation of the lines. Its formal merits, in fact, are far
higher than those of the two copies of the Cnidian statue,
but in spirit and idea it falls far below them. All is calculated
for external and transitory effect the emphasis is on the flesh
;
and and there is no marking of the permanent struc-

surface,
ture of the organism nor of the forms of the skull which are
clearly shown in the heads of the Cnidian type. Neither in
the face nor in the whole form is there any deep sentiment
expressed, any inward life revealed. The statue is, indeed,
free from the vicious self-consciousness of the later Medicean
Venus of Florence, but neither in the pose of the limbs nor in
the countenance does the atScos, the diffident modesty of the
Cnidian, appear. The pose is without naivete, and the action
of the hands is full of reflection. There is nothing sensual in
the face, but when we compare it with the Praxitelean, we feel
the loss of imagination, of ideal character, here ; it is not so
much that the expression is degraded, but it has become
narrower and shallower : what is expressed in the mouth and
large circles of the eyes isnothing more than a serious dignity.
In certain details, also, we note the lack of purity and reserve;
the hair in the crobylus arranged for the most effective
is
display, and some of the luxuriant locks have escapeci and

lie on the cheek, and this lavish treatment of the hair and this
crobylus rising above the forehead become characteristic of

the later Aphrodite type. The face and body show more
fullness and maturity of form. The Praxitelean ideal has been
changed by the sentiment of the Alexandrine period, when
the images of the divinities became part of the pageantry of
the court. It is not the goddess, but the queen, that is
presented to us with studied and brilliant elegance in the

Capitoline statue.
A work of the same type, and probably of the same period
asthis, is the Aphrodite of Syracuse (PI. LVIII). The head
is missing, but it was evidently turned towards her right, as in
the other statues of this type. The pose of the Cnidian

original has been altered for this as for the Capitoline figure.
Plate LVIII
To face page 720

The weight is thrown on the left leg, and both hands are used
to screen her body, but in the Syracusan figure the left hand
raises a portion of the drapery for this purpose ^, the rest of
which is most artificially arranged as a sort of framework or
shell for lower limbs. The modesty which was an inward
quality of the Cnidian work becomes over expressed., or
expressed by merely mechanical signs in the later sculpture,
and is paraded in the Syracusan statue so as to lose all spiritual
impressiveness. All that we are struck with in this, as in the

statue of the Capitoline, is the workmanship of the very warm
and soft surface, and the articulation of the torso.
A fragment of great interest, as illustrating the sentiment
of the later period, is the Aphrodite head at Smyrna, that
may be attributed to the early part of the third century. In
certain details, but not in expression, it resembles the Cas-
tellani head in the British Museum for instance, in the two
crescent-shaped locks in the middle of the forehead. The
hair is arranged in the later luxuriant style with a touch of
Alexandrine fashion ; it is not drawn away from the cheeks,
but is allowed to cover most of the ears
above the forehead ;
appears the rather low crobylos. The head shows the later
proportions, being a high oval with more height than breadth.
Neither in the expression, which is one of refined voluptuous-
ness, nor in the relaxed features, is there any nobility or divine
character. The mouth and chin are comparatively small, and
the cheek has little breadth ; the eyelids are large, as is usual
in heads of Greek workmanship, but the eyeballs narrow and
long, so as to give the languishing look of Aphrodite.
On the other hand, a few monuments have been preserved
which prove that in some works of Alexandrine art the power
of the older religious sculpture still survived. The Castellani
bronze head in the British Museum must have belonged to
a statue of Aphrodite ; for the sideward turn of the head,
the brightness of the face and its expression of yearning, are
" I have suggested in a paper in the breasts and on her left upper arm are
Hellenic Journal, 1891, p. 58, that the due to the external supports that were
right hand was drawing a strip of her riveted here to keep the right forearm
drapery across her breasts : but this is in its position,
impossible ; the marks between her
VOL. TI. X
characteristic of her, although the eyes appear to have had

nothing of the usual narrowness. And some of the forms of
the older types of sculpture survive, for instance, the great
breadth between the eyebrows. Yet the head is entirely of
Alexandrine type a large full oval, with considerable breadth
;
of centre, and rather narrow width of cheeks ; and a sure mark

of the Alexandrine period is the prettiness of the two crescent-
shaped locks on the forehead.
But no monument can show so strikingly how, in spite
of decay, the older ideal style could survive in the repre-
sentations of this divinity as the Melian statue in the Louvre ^
This statue was found in the island of Melos in the year
1820, and fragments of other statues of the Herme form were
discovered at the same time ; also part of an upper left arm,
a hand holding an object which is probably an apple, and
a fragment of a basis with a large socket
in the area of it. and
on the face an inscription with the name of an artist of the
Carian Antioch on the Maeander Now we have no accurate '*.
information as to the exact spot or position in which these

fragments were found, and therefore their provenance does
not oblige us to connect any of them with the statue itself.
The most important of all the external evidence as to the
date and motive of the work would be afforded by the block
with the inscription, if we could prove that this was part of
the statue's basis. For then we should know, looking at the
square socket in this plinth, that some object such as a trophy,
Herme, or pillar, stood at her left side and might have served
as a support for her left arm, or might account for the pose
and action of it ; and, again, we should know that no other
figure except possibly a Herme could be grouped with her
on her left ; and, lastly, that the work must at least be later
than the foundation of the city on the Maeander (circ.280-
270 B.C.).
" For recent literature concerning this d. griech. Plastik, 4th ed., vol. 2, pp.
work, vide Ravaisson, Venus de Milo 383-398.
{Menioire de r Academie des inscriptions ''
. . . ANAP02 . ENIAOY
. .
T. 34. i, 116 pages);

et belles lettres, . . . IOXET2 AnO MAIANAPOY
Furtwangler, Meisterwerke, pp. 367- EnOIHSEN.
401 (Engl- Ed.) ; Overbeck, Gcschichte
Plate LVII
To face page 722

The style of the writing belongs to the middle or first half

of the second century C, if we can trust the copyist of the
B,
inscription. But the fragment cannot be immediately brought

into evidence, for it has mysteriously disappeared. It is
a gratuitous insult to suggest, as has been suggested,

that the authorities of the Louvre deliberately destroyed it
because it proved that their great acquisition did not belong

to the best period of Greek sculpture. must be content We
to depend on the records of those witnesses who saw it, and
on the drawing made of it by the artist Debay.
Dr. Furtwangler has subjected the whole question to a very
searching analysis in his Meisterzvcrke, and has come to the
conclusion, from evidence that cannot easily be controverted,
that the plinth with the inscription certainly belonged to the
original work; and this view is gaining general acceptance.
This, then, is the important point from which all theories as
to the restoration of the statue should start.
Before discussing these, it is well to examine what remains
of the statue. We see a female figure larger than the natural
size naked to the waist, with her lower limbs enveloped in
a peplos, which is very carefully arranged around the loins,
and which is saved from falling by the disposition of the end
of the garment over the left thigh, also by the drawing-up of
the drapery under one of the folds on the right, where possibly
the right hand was supporting it, and lastly by the inward
inclination of the left knee a studied but perfectly possible
:
arrangement. The whole weight of the body is thrown upon

the right leg, and inclines greatly to this side, so that the
right shoulder is sunk below the level of the other. But her
head is turned somewhat to her left and bent forward, and the
direction of her right side is the same. The left upper arm
appears to have been held almost straight out from the shoulder
and slightly forward, and the elbow not to have been sharply
bent, as we may judge from the fragment of a left arm which
was discovered near the spot, and which, as some of the edges
exactly correspond, certainly belonged to the statue. The
right arm was held obliquely across the body. There are two
possible explanations of such a pose : it may be energetic and
X 2
dramatic, that is, she may be raising some heavy object,

a shield for instance, or she may be partly resisting, partly
yielding, to which bears upon her from her left
some force :
or it may be inactive, that is, she may be leaning with one or

both of her hands grasping some support which frees her left
side of any effort and allows her to recline as it were upon her
right limbs. But there are no signs in the face of any energetic
action ; the expression which has been very variously inter-
preted is certainly full of repose.
So far there appears no sure reason for giving to the figure
any particular name. But the forms of the face and torso,
considered together with the arrangement of the drapery, may

help to solve the question. It is in the body where the chief
excellence and charm of the work is found. The large

manner of the great style is still preserved in the organism
which is treated so as to reveal much of the main fabric, the
surface showing the shadow of the bone-structure beneath.
But there is also consummate Veritas in the surface itself, in
'
'
the rendering of the folds of the skin the marble is lustrous ;
and liquid,' and the breath and life are seen in the body as
'
they are never seen in a Graeco-Roman work. The shallow

modulations of the left sideshow the warmest workmanship.
Certain irregularities may
be discerned which prove that the
sculptor worked from the living model. But the whole is
a striking combination of natural truth with high ideal concep-
tion. The arrangement of the drapery may betray a certain

study of effect, and does not obey the severe necessity which
adjusts the drapery of the Parthenon figures. But none the
less the style here also is large and dignified. The pre-
dominant quality of the whole is decor,' the union of beauty '
with dignity, which is the ideal that the Greek style of the
best age chose for the feminine type and this quality accords ;
with the expression of the face. Some writers have persuaded

themselves that certain sensuous traits are marked upon it,
especially by the treatment of the mouth and eyes. The
eyeball is somewhat rounded in the centre, as we find in
the heads of Scopas and, at a far later date than these, in the
Pergamene heads and the corners of the eye are rather
;
Plate LIX
To face page 724

XX in.] IDEAL TYPES OF APHRODITE. 725
narrow, but the lower eyelids are not drawn up sufficiently to

give to the eyes that expression of yearning that the Greeks
called vypoTrjs. As regards the whole expression many various
and contradictory accounts have been given. Veit Valentin sees
in the face a look of alarmed wonder and high scornful
disdain^; it suits his theory of restoration to discover such
an expression, but his account is almost as untrue as that
of those who find amorous desire in it. Even the forms of
the head, though in some respects they betray the style of the
later period, retain much of the nobility of an older type.
We note the broad sweep of the eyebrow, the breadth of
the upper part of the face, the purity in the arrangement
of the hair, which is drawn severely away from the cheeks,
and features that are not small nor over-delicate. Viewed from
near or from far, the countenance appears free from human
weakness or passion, and is stamped with an earnestness lofty
and self-contained, almost cold. There is a distant interest in
the eyes, which are fixed on no near object.
From we can conclude that the work is genuinely
all this
Greek, and thatit is a goddess who is thus represented. But

what goddess ? The pose and expression would not be
unsuitable either to Athena or to Hera, but neither of these
two divinities could be represented with undraped body nor :
would this strongly modulated face be appropriate to them.

The imperious face and posture might suggest a Nike adorn-
ing a trophy, or a Muse playing on the lyre but there is no ;
instance of a half-draped Nike or Muse except in the Graeco-

Roman period. The drapery and the face confirm the belief
that this is Aphrodite represented in forms not wholly alien
to the Pheidian representation of her.
This conclusion may enable us to choose between various
theories of restoration. Many of these can be dismissed
without much consideration. We cannot, for instance,
seriously consider whether this is the voluptuous goddess
" In his two treatises die hohe Fran purely impossible explanation (he siip-
von Milo and Ncues iiber die Venus poses she is struggling to resist Ares
von Milo, in which he gives a subtle who grasps her right wrist),
analysis of the pose, but suggests a
of pleasure tempting Heracles. And the distant and forward

gaze of her eyes is in itself sufficient to show that she cannot
be looking at her reflection in a mirror held in either of her
hands, nor can be pouring oil from a flask in her left hand
into her right ; and it is difficult to reconcile the calm
reposeful face with the supposition that Ares is present, and
that she is repelling his advances, even if Greek sculpture
of this period could represent divinities in such a situation.
Again, the Florentine group of Ares and Aphrodite laying
her hands on his shoulders shows the goddess in a pose
essentially differentfrom the Melian in whose face there ;
is no expression that could at all suggest a love-scene.

This is admitted by some, who still maintain that Ares is
present not as the lover but as the divine husband, and
that the group represents the union of the austere divinities
of Thebes. But, if we believed this, we should not be a step
nearer towards explaining the peculiar pose of her arms, and
all theories are useless that fail to give some reasonable
account of this. No doubt the presence of a second person
would relieve the monotony of line on the left side of the
goddess, but her distant and strangely self-contained expres-
sion make us rather believe that if anything was placed
by her left side it was some inanimate object. Finally, the
strongest objection to the theory that a second person was
present is the evidence of the inscribed plinth ; for if this,
with its rectangular socket in the middle, really belonged to the

original work, as there is every reason to suppose, then nothing
could have been placed at Aphrodite's left side except a pillar
or a herme. May we then suppose, with Dr. Furtwangler, that
she was holding out an apple in her left hand and leaning with
her left arm on a column? There is some external evidence
that might seem to support this supposition ; for the fragment
of a hand holding an apple was found somewhere near the
statue. But it is of far too rough and coarse execution for us
easily to believe that it is part of the Melian figure. And
there are internal reasons against this theory: if she is holding
out the apple, she is holding it in a very remarkable manner.
Not unobtrusively, as in many older and later monuments, as
a permanent and silent symbol of the goddess of fruitfulness

and marriage, but parading it in her left hand raised nearly
to the level of her head ; held thus, it could only be a sign
triumphantly displayed of her victory over her rivals. But
the face is perfectly free from excitement or hint of display.
Dr. Furtwangler, indeed, would restore the left arm quite
on the supposition that the elbow was bent and
differently,
the fore-arm was resting on the pillar in such a way that
the hand with the apple lay over the edge pointing to the
ground. But his restoration is by no means convincing,
and his theory depends on the assumption that the hand
with the apple must be part of the work. In spite of his
arguments, which do not rest on direct evidence, it is still
reasonable to doubt whether such a hand could have belonged
to such a statue ^
As the left foot appears to be considerably higher than the
right, and might be only touching the ground with the ball of
the sole, it has been supposed that the balance of the whole
figure would be very frail and uneasy unless both hands were
occupied in grasping some support, and that this might well
be a spear held free of her body on her left side hence we ;
might account for the complicated pose of the various parts of

the body. The spear, indeed, might be an attribute of the
goddess, alluding to her romantic relations with Ares, or to
her ancient Eastern character. But as the left arm was held
almost straight out, the spear grasped by both hands must
have produced a very ludicrous effect ^. Nor can we imagine
how the spear could be placed in relation to the pillar or
herme. And that both hands should be used to support her
balance is not necessary, when we consider that the plinth
with the inscription was higher than the rest of the basis, and
that thus the left foot, though higher than the other, could
still be resting firmly on this raised part.
"^
Vide Overbeck, op. cit. p. 388. that the left elbow was very slightly
*
Keil {Die Venus von Milo, Han- bent and apart from this the figure of
;
over, 1882), who restores the figure on the goddess in his sketch suggests an
this theory, takes no notice of the frag- athlete with a leaping-pole, about to
ment found of the left arm, which shows take a leap.
Among the probable explanations of the mysterious figure

and perhaps probability is all that we can hope to attain
are two that commend themselves. The socket in the plinth
would agree with the theory that by her left side stood
a herme-representation of the goddess herself in the form of
an archaic image, and that she is resting her left arm on the
head of her own idol. Many analogies might be quoted for
this combination of a younger type of a divinity with an
older the statuette of Artemis from Larnaka is a conspi-
:
cuous instance. Or she may be holding a shield erect with

the left hand, while its lower rim rests on the pillar. The
right hand would then be steadying the lower part of it, or
simply employed in keeping her drapery in its place. The
motive of other cognate works does not, of course, give us
a conclusive proof as to the motive of the Melian statue ;
but if this we should understand why

theory were correct,
other representations of Aphrodite with the shield show in
general treatment a strong resemblance to this work. Thus
the figure of the Venus of Capua in the Museum of Naples,
the goddess who is probably using the shield of Ares as
a mirror, and whose foot is on his helm, though it differs from
the Melian in many important details of the pose, is a work
derived from the same original. We find a similar figure
with almost the same arrangement of drapery on the coins of
the Roman colony of Corinth (Coin PI. B 46). A terra-
cotta figure at Carlsruhe of some beauty of style^ possibly
a Nike writing on a shield, is of the same type as the Melian.
It is evident that some representation to which all these might

be closely akin was known in the Alexandrine period for the ;
device of the goddess, whose drapery has slipped from her

shoulder, and who is gazing at her reflection in the shield of
Ares, mentioned by ApoUonius Rhodius^"''^ amidst the
is
figures wrought on the shield of Jason ^
It must be also borne in mind that her body inclining slightly to her left
the ' Melian motive appears in other
' she is draped like the Melian statue,
representations than those of the shield- and has the same large and noble
holding goddess : e. g. in a terracotta structure of torso, but the face and ex-
statuette in Vienna of Aphrodite with pression recall the Praxitelean style,
her left leg resting on a dolphin, and
XX III.] IDEAL TYPES OF APHRODITE. 729
The goddess with the shield for her mirror is Jen d esprit
2i
of Alexandrine imagination, suggested perhaps by her older

serious cult-relations with Ares. But the Melian statue must
have a more serious significance for if she is holding the
:
shield on a support she is neither looking into it nor writing

on it. What she is doing or what she is looking at we shall
perhaps never discover. In the meantime we may believe
that in the statue we have a great monument of Aphrodite
worship, free from the triviality of much contemporary art.
The question as to its date is, of course, mainly decided by
the inscription, but it may also be judged on purely internal
evidence. Sonie critics of the last generation confidently
attributed the work
Scopas or Alcamenes, merely because
to
of its high ethical qualities and the large treatment of the
forms and drapery. But this theory has never been supported
by any real criticism. That the Melian goddess is more
austere in respect of drapery, form, and expression than the
Cnidian is no proof at all that this statue is earlier than the
Praxitelean. The older type with its appropriate qualities
was often preserved in a certain locality for certain reasons ;
and a post-Praxitelean sculptor whose theme was Aphrodite

was not bound to adhere to the type of Praxiteles, and he
might attach himself to the severer style of the older Attic
school. It may have been Praxiteles who brought into
fashion the type of the undraped goddess, and before his
epoch we may believe that the form of the fully-draped
Aphrodite had become less austere, and representations of the
half-draped figure, such as the Melian statue and the Venus
of Aries, a Graeco-Roman copy of a possibly pre-Praxitelean
original, may have come into vogue. But of course it is
absurd to argue that therefore any statue of a half-clothed

Aphrodite must be older than the Cnidian. In judging the
date of any ancient monument the marks of the later style
are more valuable as chronological evidence than those of an
older style that may be found in it. The latter may be
a survival, the former can scarcely be an anticipation. Thus
in the treatment of the structure of the torso, we find in the
Aphrodite of Melos much of the older ideal manner ; but at
730 GREEK RELIGION.
the same time we note the liquid and lustrous surface, and
the high effect of '
Veritas '
or '
surface-truth ' that Praxiteles
was the first to achieve in a conspicuous degree. Again, the
throat is longer than is usual in the earlier type, and the small
head bears a proportion to the body that was not adopted
before the time of Lysippus. It is the head that proves
most conclusively that we must assign to the Melian statue

a relatively late date in the history of Greek sculpture for ;
we find on it the workmanship of the later Alexandrine hand.

There no marking of the bone-structure the cheeks lack
is ;
breadth and fall away suddenly towards the centre, where the
surface is deeply modulated, and strong shadows fall about
the mouth and nose and in the deep eye-sockets. The
Tegean heads of Scopas show a surface of face quite as
varied in modulation, but the lines are firm and plastic. But
here the deeply-shadowed face gives us the impression of
forms unfixed and relaxed. And this is the contrast that
this head presents to the head from Tralles now in Vienna,
which in its pose and slope of its shoulders displays a marked
likeness to this, but shows a severer scheme, more plastic
firmness. In fact, the Melian head may attest the influence
which was strong in the Alexandrine period of painting upon
sculpture. It is probably a work of the second century B.C.,
somewhat earlier than the monuments of the second Per-
gamene style, with which it has very little affinity; the female
head from Pergamon (circ. 170-160 B. c), with which it has
been rather arbitrarily compared, shows a far greater departure
from the plastic style, a far more mobile and picturesque
handling of the features and the Pergamene artists in their
;
religious sculpture fall below the sculptor of the Aphrodite of

Melos in spirit and imagination.
REFERENCES FOR CHAPTERS XXI- XXIII. 731
References for Chapters XXI-XXIII.
Local worships of Aphrodite.
In North Greece.
^ Byzantium: Hesych. IMiles. Constantinop. 16 aj^cortpo) h\ [iikôv
Tov TJoa-fiîbvos vaov /cat to rrjs 'A^/joSiVt^j npoaayopfveTai Te/xf I'os.
^ Pharsalus : Aphrodite ndda : Roehl, Lis. Grace. Anti 327

Ta{(pp)o8iTT]i ra netô(i) (inscription of fifth century b. c).
^ Larissa : "Acfipios : Ussing, Inscrip. Graec. 8. 8 b (inscription of

Roman period) Mt/ws 'A(ppiov. Cf. the name 'Apqbeir; for Aphrodite in
oracle found at Callipolis in Chersonnese, Kaibel, Hermes, 19, p. 261.
*Athenae. 589 B, Lais was slain in Thessaly by Thessalian
women in the temple of Aphrodite, rats ^vKivai% ;:^fXa)i'ay TV7rTop.vr]v
iv 'A(f)poBiTris Upw' 8l6 Km to Ttfievos KXr)6rjvat, dvoaias 'A^pofiiVjjy (from
Polemon).
At Metropolis in Histiaea: Strabo, 438

^ 'Ac^poSiV?? r] evrj] MrjTpono'Xei:
worshipped with swine-offerings there.

a Epirus : C. I. Gr. 1823 (inscription of second century a.d.). At
Dodona Carapanos Dodone,
: PI. XXVI, i 'QêAiW 'A(ppu8[Ta avtSriKf.
^ In Aetolia, at Phistion : CoUitz Dialect- Inschr. 14281 aTreSoro
AvKos . . . 'AcppobiTO. 2vpia tcrrviSi awpa aj/Spôi/ . . . eV eXevdepia.
''
Delphi ; Plut. Aj/ia/. 23 (p. 769) jj . . . dva^XaaTavova-a Ka6' ijptpav
Tifjifj Ku\ X"P'f Ka\ dy('nn]a-is dWt'jXav Kai TriaTis ovre AeX(/)ovs iXeyx^'^ \r]povvTas
oTi TTjv A(ppo8lTr]v Apfia KaXovaiv.
^
Thespiae : PaUS. 9. 27, 5 eari Se Km irepadi, 'A(f)po8LTT]s MfXaivitos
lepov.
Thebes : Pans. 9. 16, 3 'A<Ppo8ltt]s Orjâims ^6avd ecmv ovTco Si) dpxala
&(TT( Koi dva6r](xaTa App.ovias (ivai (paaiv ' . . . KoKovai Se Oiipaviav, rrjv Be avTuiV
Udvbrjpou, Km ' AitoaTpofîav ttjv TpiTajv. Cf.
^^
Oiopus : Paus. I. 34, 3'i2/3Ci)7n'oif va6s earivÂfXtpiapdov . . . TrapexfTm
be 6 0cofj.6s fiepr] . , . TfTdprq de eari Tov /Sco/ioO p.olpa 'A0po6iTJ^s kol HafaKdus
eTi Se 'laiTovs Kai 'Yyiems Kai Âdrjvds llMcovias.
732 GREEK RELIGION.
In Attica.
Athens: *Paus. i. 14, 7 n'krja-lov (near the temple of Hephaestus

''
beyond the Ceramicus) Upov ianv 'Acf)pobiTr]s Ovpavias 'Adrjvalon Se . . .
KaTfcrTTjcraTo Alyfvs . . . to 8e e(f} rjptov ert ayaX/ia \i6ov Ylapiov Koi tpyov
i>(,8iov.
^ 'A(^poSi'rjj V KTjnois : PaUS. I. 1 9, 2 ttjv ^ A(f)po8iTrjv ^ tov vaov (ev Ktjttois)

TvKrjaiov e(rTr]Ke. Tavrrji yap (j-)(rip.a pev rerpdycovov Kara Tavra koi toIs 'Ep/noiy, to
Se eniypappa arjpaivei ttjv Olpaviav A(f)po8iTr}i' tcov KciKovpevcou Moipaiv di'ai
TTpea^vTUTi^v. C. /. yl. 273 f. 1. 12, publication of temple accounts circ.
422 B.C., ('A^po8tV)jr ev Krjnois. Paus. I. 1 9. 2 ciyaXpa Âcppobirrji t^j eV
Krjnois i'pyov earlv A\Kapevovs koi tcov ^ ABrivrjcriv iv oXi'yois 6eai a^cov.
c Aphrodite Uavhr^pos : Paus. I. 22, 3 Â(ppodiTr]v Tt]V ndv8r]pov, end

re Âdrjvaiovs Qrjcrevs is piav rjyaye otto tcov Srjpcov TroXif, avrrjv crefiecrdai
Ka\ UdOcii KOTecTTrja-e. The worship attributed to Solon by Nikander

vide '".
d Temple of 'A^poSiVr; e'^' 'irrnoXiiTco : Schol. Eur. Hipp. 25 fVt neTpas
'
Tivbs ev Trj AttiktJ d(ji rji rjv diTofSXeTrecxdai rrjv Tpoiîjva, 'A<ppo8LTt]s vuov
l8pvcraa6aL ttjv ^ciidpav âa'iv' eKokeae 8e 'AcppodiTrjv e<p' 'IttttoXvtco, r]V koi
'iTTTToXvTLav KaXoiKTi. Hom. Ocfyss. II. 320, Schol. âiSpa lep6v'A(Ppo8iTr]s

ev 'Adrjvais l8pv(TaTo to vvv 'hmo^vTiov KctXovpevov, C. I. A. I. 2 12 C
I I b ^b 'A<ppo8LTr]s eVi
~~
"'OUYTO 'iTTTToXiTCO-
one of the inscriptions found on the Acropolis of Athens, referring to

the accounts of temples. Eurip. Hipp. 30 :
neTpav nap avrqv IlaXXaSof KaToyj/iov

yrjs T7]cr8e vaov KvTrpi8os eyKaBiaaro,
epuicr epa>T fK8i]pov' 'IttttoXutw 8' em
TO XotTTOf uvopaêv i8pva6ai 6edv.
Aphrodite ''Evaycovios, on inscription of Imperial period found in

theatre at Athens, C. I. A. 3. 189.
^ Athenae. 57^ ^ ''"'l^

Trap' Â6r]vaiois KoXovpevrjs 'Eraipas 'A(f)po8iTr]s . . .
eraipav 8e ' A(\)pit8iTrjV ttjv tovs eTaipovs Ka\ rds eraipas (Tvvdyovaav. Hesych.
S. V. eTaipas' lepov Trjs 'AcppobiTTjs 'A^rjvrjcn.
g Aphrodite 'i'ldvpos at Athens, vide "^ \

^^
Attic DemeS : Paus. I. 14, 7 8rjpos 8e iaTivÂdrjvaioisÂdpovecov ot
Ilop(pvpicova ert Trporepov 'Aktoiov â(TiXevcravTa Trjs Ovpaviai cpaal to irapa.
acplcriv lepov ISpvcracrdM.
^^ At Alopecae : C. I. Or. 395, inscription second century a. d.
c Temple of Aphrodite on the way between Athens and Eleusis

REFEREXCES FOR CHAPTERS XXI-XXIIL 733
Paus. I. 37, 7. At Plotheia, sacrifice to Aphrodite: C. I. A. 2\

570.
*1 At Cephale : IsaeUS, 2, 31 i^fwoi o)x6(TavTi^ fjnlv npos rw ôofxio T(3
Tr]i 'A(ppoSiTr]s KfcfioKfjai. Cf. Atheii. JMittheil. 1893, p. 209 opos rffievovs
'A(f)po8lrr]s Ke(f)a\rjdev (circ. 400 B. c).

^^
Peiraeeus :
^ Paus. 1.1,3 ''^P"^
^' '^fl
BaXaaaj] KoVwi^ (fKo?.6nT](rev'A(f)po-
dirrjs Upov, rpirjpeis A.aKe8aip.ovia)u KUTfpyacn'ipfVos nepl KviSov. Schol. Arist.

Pax 144 KaXXi/cparr;? <^r]<x\v r] Mfi/exXi^s eV rut nepl \\6t]vu>v ypc'iipooi' ovrco, "e^ft
8e 6 nfipatevv Xtpevas rpels . . . eis pev 6 Kav6dpov Xiprjv . . . elra Â(f)po8icnoi'.'
^ Aphrodite Eun-Xota, vide Rhang. Antiq. Hellen. No. 1069 'Apyflor

'Apyelov TpiKopvcrto^ aTpaTrjyi-jcras eVt tov Tleipaia ' A(ppo8iTi] EuTrXota rv^rj
ayaOfi dueOrjKev. Inscription of latter part of fourth century b. c

c Oriental worship of Aphrodite in the Peiraeeus: C. I. A. 2. 168,
inscription b. 333-332, recording the leave given by the
c. state to the
men of Citium to found a temple to the goddess there. Id. 2. 627,
inscription found in the Peiraeeus, . . . Trtpl wv dnayyi'k'Kd 1) i[i)peia
Tijs "Svplas (deov^ . . . nepl tu>v 6v[ata>v o)u idviv^ t?] t 'A(Ppo8iTei rft Ivpia,
K.T.\. (circ. 100 B.C.). Id, 3. 136 Mjjrpi Qewv (vavTrjTco larpivrj ^ A^pohiTj]
dvtdrjKev (Roman-Imperial period).
On the Attic coast,

"a On the promontory of Colias : Paus. i. i, 5 KwXiaSos 8e ia-nv
f'vTcivSa 'A(j)po8LTr)s ciyaXpa Kdl TevervWiSfs ovopaôptvai Seal. Strabo, 398
TO TTJS KcoXuiSoS 'A(j)po8iTT]S UpOV, (IS OV TOTTOV iKKVpavdrjVai TO. TekiVTola TCI
iK T^y TTfpl SflXa/iiva vavpax'as fijs nepaiKrjs vavdyui (paaiv. VarioUS explana-
tions given of the name Ku>\uis by the Scholiast on Arist. lYud. 52.
Cf. Harpocr. and Suid. s. v. KcoXidy : her name occurs on an inscrip-

tion on a seat found in the Erechiheum, CIA. 3. 339. Cf. Aphrodite
KaXms- worshipped on Hymettus, Photius, p. 185, 21.
b Probably near Phalerum, Aphrodite enirpayia : Plut. T/ies. 18 X/yerat
ai)Ta> (Gj/cTfi) TOV pev iv AfXcpo'is dve\('iv 6(ov AcppoSiTTjp KaOrjyfpova ' irois'icrOai
Koi napuKdXelv awtpTropov, Buovti 8e irphs Oakdircrr) rrjv aiya 6i]\eiav ovaav
avTopdrcos rpdyov yevidBaC 8lu Kcii Koke'ladai ti)i/ 6ebv ''EniTpuyiav, CIA.
3. 335 \\(f)po8iTr]s 'Ejnrpayias, inscription of Imperial period on seat
found in the Erechtheum.
^^
In Megara : ^PaUS. I. 43, 6 pirn de tov Aiovva-ov to lepov iCTTiv
' A(f)po8iTrjs vnos, ayaXpa 8e (XfCpavTOs Â(f)po8iTr]s Tifnoirjpivov, Ylpaîs eVi'/cXr/crii'*
toCto icTTiv apâuWaTOV ev tw vaco. YleiBa 8e /cut erepa êoy, rju Uaprjyopov
ovopd^nvcnv, f/jyc UpaîreXovs.
b Paus. I. 40, 6, near the Acropolis of Megara, TTenoir]Tai 'A(^poSiVrjj
'EniCTTpocpias lepdv.
734 GREEK RELIGION.
" Corinth Êuripides, Frag. (Strabo, 379)
: ijkco ireplKkva-Tov TvpoKinova
^ AKpoKupivOov, lepov o)(6uv^ nokiv A(j)po8iTrjs : il?. rj Kopvcprj vaidiov ('x^'-
'Acppoi^lrtji, PaUS. 2. 5) I dvfXdoiKTiv is tou 'AKpoKopivdov, vaos eariu
' A(ppo8irT]s' aydXpiaTa 8e alrr) re oaiiKicrfievr} Kui "HXioj koi Epus fX(ov toôv,
Alciphron, 3. 60 âo-l rrjv 'A(ppo8iTT]v fK Kvdrjpayv dvaa-xovaav rfju 'AKpoKopiv-
60V daivacracrQiu' d pfj apa rots pev yvvaiois ' AcfypodiTt] Tro\iov)(os. . . . Plut.
de JMallg. Herod. 39 eV rw va^ r^s 'A<ppo8iTr]s, ov IdpCaacrdat Mrjbtiav
\eyov(Ti (at Corinth).
^ Paus. 2. 2, 4, in a cypress-grove before the city, BeXXepo(/)oi'Tou re

icTTi Ttpevoi Koi 'A<ppoBiTr]s vans MeXatw'Sofj koi rdcpos Aal8os.
^ Paus. 2. 2, 3 (V 8e Kfyxpeais 'AcppoBirrjs re iari vans kol (iyaXpa \idov.

'''
Corinthian colonies :
f^
Corcyra : C. I. Gr. 1872 and 1873.
'^ Syracuse : Hesych. S. v. Batwrt?* 'A(ppo8iTT] Trapd ^vpaKoa-lois.
'^ Sicyon Paus. 'A(j)pobiTr]s Up6v' peu es avTO yvvrj t(

: 2. 10, 4 icrlaa-i 81]
veoiKopos, f]
prjKeri depis Trap av8pa (ôiTr](Tai, Ka\ napdevos lepcocrvvrjv errereiov
e'xovara' XovTpo<p6pov rrjv napdevov ovopdûvcn' rois 8e aXXois Kara ravra Kai
opdv dnb rrjs iadbov tijv 6(ov Ka\ avTodev TrpoaevxÔ'dai' to pev 8fj ayakpa Kad-
Tjpevov Kdva^ns 'EiKviivios iiroirjijev , . . nenoiriTai '4k re xpvcrov Ka\ e\e'(j)avTos,
CJ)povaa fnl rfj ntcpaXij iroKov, tuiv x^'-p'^^ ^^ ^'x^' '"S H-^" Pî^^^â t[j Se ^T^pa
p.rj\ov.
^^ Hermione : ''Paus. 2. 34, 11 'A(j)po8ir7]s va6s ecmv eniKXrja-iv TlovTias
Ka\ Aipevlas Ti]i avrris.
^^
Paus. 2. 34, II Ka\ vaos (T(p6s fcrriv 'A0poS(Vj?s' avrt] Ka\ nWas e;êt
Trapci 'Eppioveav ripds, Kai rats ivapQlvois Ka\ rjv yvvt) ^rjpevovcra npos liv^pa peWrj
(poirau, dndcrais TTpo ydpov 6vfiv KadiarrjKev evravBa. Cf. C. I. Gr. I2 33'
"
Epidauros : Paus. 2. 29, 1 'A^poStVr^s Uphv TrenolrjTai.
-^
At Troezen: Paus. 2. 32, 3, worship of Aphrodite Karaa-Konia,
connected with HippolytOS : id. I eKua-TT] trapdevos nXoKupov diroKfiptTai
ol i^hrTToKvTCi) Tvpo ydpov, Kfipapevr] Se dvedrjKev is tov vaov (pepovaa. Cf.
Lucian, De Dea Syr. 60.

b 'At^poSiTj; eV Bijrr(rais : inscription at Troezen third century b. c
ColHtz, Dialed-hischrifteii, 3364, 1. 14.
^^ Argos Paus. AtppoSlrTjs Ka\ 'Eppov
: 2. 19, 6, ^prehistoric ^dava ' . .
'YTreppvfja-Tpa Kpiddaa (for sparing her husband) iv toIs 'Apyelois drrocpevyn
Ka\ A(ppo8iTr]v im TcoSe dvedqKe T>iiKr](f)6pov.
b Paus. 2. 23, 8 liKrja-iov tov Atoi/iVou Ka\ 'A(f)po8LTt]s vaos i(TTiv Ovpavias.
Hesych. S. v. 'AKpia . . . 'AcppoSiTrj Trpoa-ayopevopivq iv " Apyti. Cf. * ^.
c Aphrodite Tvp^copvxos : Clem. Alex. Protrept. 33 P. iv> 81 'Apyeiovs at
A(f)po8iTr]v Tvp^copvxov 6prjaK(vov<Ti.

REFERENCES FOR CHAPTERS XXI^XXIII. 735
^^
Tegea: Paus. 8. 53, 7, near the temple of Demeter and Core,
(i/aoy) 'A(ppobiTr]S KaKovfxevrjs Uacfiias' iBpvaaTO avTTji' i\.ao8iKr] yeyovv'ia fiev , . .
dno Ayanrjvopos
' . , . oiKovaa Se ev IIa(pa.
^* Mantinea : Paus. 8. 6, 5, by a fountain about a mile from the

city, 'A0poSirjyy Upbv MeXaii'tSor. Id. 8. 9, 6, near the theatre in the city,
vaov T 'Ac^poStTTjj eTriK\r](Tiv '2vppa)(iai epeima Koi ayoKpa eXflneTO . . . to S
iepov KnTeffKevdaavTO tovto ol MavTivf'is vnopvrjpa is tovs (Treira TJjy 6/xoO
'Ptofiaiois eV 'Akt/w vavpa)(ias.
^^ Sparta: Paus. 3. I5j 10 II ^vahs apâios Ka\ 'AcPpo^lrrjs $6avov

coTrXtcr/xeVT^y.
^ Paus. 3. I5j II vawv 8e, wv olba, povio Tovrcd Kcil vnfpaiov aXXo (ttcokoSo-
prjTai Mop(f)ovs Upuf. eiriKXrjiris pfv 81) ttjs 'A(ppo8LTrjs eorii' 7; Mop(pu>, Kadtjrai
8e KakvTTTpav re eôvaa Ka\ neSas nepl rols nocri. Plut. Instit. Facon, 239 A
'A(f)po8iTr]i> aeôvai t^v fvonXiuv Km Travras 8e roiis deovs BrjXea kol (ippevas
Xoyxas e'xovTas nniovvrai. Inscription from Sparta of Imperial period,

mentioning 17 lipem twv Moipou/ Aa-)(i(Taiv Ka\ 'Acf)po8LTr]s (VottXlov, C. I. Gl'.
1444. Cf. inscription of Imperial period found near Amyclae, Eph.
Aixh. 1892, p. 23: mentioning the lepevs'A(f)po8eLTr]s Ovpavlas. Lactantius,
Dtv. Inslit. I. 20, the Lacedaemonian women armed themselves against
the Messenians, propter huius facti memoriam aedem Veneri armatae
Simulacrumque pOSUerunt. AnthoJ. 9. 320 d-rvk ttok Eiparai n-orl rav
KvTTpiv' rj X(i;3e T(V)(r), fj 'î&i ras '2n(ipTas' a noXis OTvKnpavfl. Cf. Anth.
'Palud. 173 al8opevr) 8' apa decrpa pevenrokepoio AvKovpyov (plXrpa 0epet
^ndpTT] Tiv)(ecnv ay)(fpcf)(pis.
^ Paus. 3. 17) 5 oTTiadeu 8e r^? XoXkloIkov vaos iariv A<ppo8iTrii 'Apdas'

Ta 8e ôava dpxala, e'lnep tl aXXo iv "'EXXrjai.
*1 Aphrodite 'Apiovrla: Roehl, Inscr. Gr. Ant. 79.
Paus. 3. 13, 9 ôavou upxaiov KaXoi>(Tiv'A({)po8i.Trjs'llpas' em 8e dvyarpl
yap.ovpfvj] vevopiKadi ras prjrepas rrj 6fa> Bveiu,
f Jd. 3. 12, II npos 8e olKo86piipd icTTL rrepKpepfs, eV Se avrco Aioj

rfi 'Eku'iSl
Ka\'A(f)po8LTris dydXpara (TTLKXTjariv'OXvpTricoi'. tovto F,7Tipei'L8i]v KoTacTKevdaai

Xeyovai.
S Id. 3. 18, I T(i>v8i dvhpidvTUiv Tov TLavtraviov nXrjcriov earlv'ApôXoyrjpas
'A(j)po8iTr]i (iyaXpa. Cf. Plut. Quaest. ConviV. p. 654 C AiyovTii iv toIs

Ta>v 6fO)v vpvois' avdâXe avui to ytjpcis, w KaXh Acppn8iTr].
Paus. 3. 18, 8 TIoXvkX{itos 8e 'A<ppo8LTr]v napd 'ApvKXaid} KaXovpivrjv.

Cf. inscription found at Amyclae mentioned above.
" MegalopoHs: ^Paus. 8. 32, 2 ipfiina Ka\ ttjs \\(Ppo8iTt]s rjv t6 Up6v,
736 GREEK RELIGION.
n\i]V 0(TOV irpovaoi re eXdneTo tri kol ayaX/nara dpidfiov rpia, eTn'/fXr/o-tj Se
Ovpav'ia, Ti] 6e eWi Havbrjpos, rij rpirr] 8e ov8tv irldevTo.
^ PauS. 8. 31, 3 i(TTi ei'Toy TQv nepiôkov tcoi> p.eya\oiv 6(U)V Kai AfppodiTrji
lepnv . . . dyoKp-ura iv rm vaio Aafio<f)ci)v fnoirjaev, 'Epprjv ^vXov Kcn 'A<^po6irfjs
ôavov Kill TavTTjs X^'P*'^ *'''^' \ldov Ka\ Tvpouairov re Kcn uKpoi nodes' ttjv oe
(niK\r](Tiv Tjj 6ea> Maxaflrii' opdoTara edevTO, ep.o\ SoKflv' 'A(^/)o6ir/;y yap IvtKa
KaX i'pycov tcou tcwttjs TrXfTorat pev TriT(^VT}(Tis, iravTo'ia 8e iiv6p6inois
avfvprjpiva ts Xoyoi;s earriv.
28 Phigaleia: Paus. 8. 41, 10, on Mount Coiilum above the temple
of Apollo of Bassae, 'A<^/joSi't?7 ecrrlv V KcoTiXu)- Kai avrfj vaos re iju ()V<
i'vcov eVt opo(pov KoL nyaXpa eTT(iroir]TO.
-^
Psophis : Paus. 8. 24, 6 ^cocpibloLS ev tt) noXei TovTo pev 'A(f>po5iTr]S
Ifpbv 'EpvKLi'Tjs iarh eniKXijaii', rji epelina e<^' rjpwv iXdnfTO avrov pova.
Achaea.
^^ Patrae : * Paus. 7. 21, 10 eV narpats oh noXv una>Tepa) ToO Ilo(rei8uivos
if pa eariv 'A(f)po8iTrjs' to 8e erepov twv dyaXpdruiU yeved npoTepov j) Kar epe
dXie'ii civbpfs dufiXuvcrav iv SiKTuut' eari Se /cat dydXpara rod Xipivoi iyyvTaTto
. . Koi 'Acjypobirrjs fjs Kai rrpos ra Xipevi eVri repfvos' XWov pev -rrpoacoTiov
Ka\ oKpai X^'P^^ '^"'' ^'^Sfî ^vXov 8e to. Xoittu flpyaorrai..
^ Paus. 7. 2 1, II : in a grove near the shore another temple of

Aphrodite.
^'
Aeeium : Paus. 7. 24, 2 trpos daXda-arj 'A(ppo5iTr]s Up6v iv Alyla Ka\
ufT avTO Uoafibcbvos.
32
Aeo'ira : Paus. 7. 26, 7 rrjv Bi Ohpavlav aijBovaL piv ra pdXiara, iaeX-
Btiv ht eV TO Upov ovK 'iaTLv di'6po}TTOts.
^- a Bura : Paus. 7. 25, 9 va6s ivTa<6a Ai]priTpos' 6 Se AcfypobiTTjs Aiovva-ov '
Ka\ aXXos ElXeiOvUis Xidov tov IlfVTeXrjalov Tci dydXpaTa, 'A6t]valov 8e

re f(TTi
'ipya EvkX{l8oV Ka\ t;j Ai)p.rjTpi i(TTiv i(T6t]s.
33
Dittenberger, Sy/I. hiscr. Graec. 178, inscription from the
Arcadian Orchomenos containing the oath of alliance between the
Orchomenians and the Achaean league, opvv(^> Ala 'Apdpiov, "AOavdv
'Apaplav, A(P[po8y{Tav Ka\ tov)s 6{fovs Trdrras).

'
3* Elis :
^ Paus. 6. 20, 6 nXTja-luv Tijs ElXeidvlas epfinia ' A(f)po8LTr]s
Ovpavlas lepoii XeimTai, 6vov(n 8e Ka\ avTodi enl toiv (3o)po)i'.
t Paus. 6. 25, 2, at Olympia near the Agora a va6s and Tepevos of
Aphrodite, tt)v pev ev tu vaw KuXovaiv Ovpavlav, eX((j)avTos 8e iari Ka\ xpvcroii,
TfXvrj êi8iov, tm 8f kepm no8\ eVl xf^^'"is êÎKe' t^s 8e TrepiexfTai pev to
Tfpevoi- 6piyK(p, Kprjms 6e euros tov Tepevovs TvenoirjTai Ka\ ejrl ttj KpTjn'ioi
ayaXpa 'A(f)po8iTT]s â^'ô'''' <^'' Tpdya Kadrjrai x"^'<?' 2/cdn-a tovto epyov,
'A(ppo8iTT]v 8e ndv8r]pov ovopdôvai.

REFERENCES FOR CHAPTERS XXI-XXIII. '^^j
c Near the Leonidaeum in the Altis Paus.

: 5. 15, 3 'A(ppo8lTT]s
/3co;^6s Koi Qpuiv per aiirov.
^ Paus. 6. 26, 5 Qecov 8e lepa ev KvWrjvrj 'Ao-kXtjttiov, to Be 'Ac^poStVr;?

e(TTi' Tov "Eppov 8e to ayaXpOj ov oi Tavrrj 7rfpi(raa>s atjBovcriVj opdov eaTiv
aldo'iov enl tov ^cWpov.
^^ NaupactOS : Paus. 10. 38, 12 'AcppobiTT] e^ft pev iv (nrriKala ripa^-
(V)(ovTai 6e Koi aXAwi/ v(Ka, Kal u'l yvvoLKes paXiarTa ai y^pov alrovai
XW'^''
napa tijs 6eov, At Oianlheia : ii. 'A^poSiV?;? re Upoi/.
^^ Ambracia: C. I. Gr. 1798, 1799.

" Epirus : C. I. Gr. 1823, Imperial period,
"a Corcyra: C. I. Gr. 1872, 1873.
Asia Minor, and coasts of the Black Sea.
^^ PhanagOria : Strabo, 495 âvayopeia . . . noXi^ aîo\oyos . . . Kol to
'AnuTovpov TO T^s 'AcppobiTTjs Upop : the name explained by a legend that

Aphrodite tcov yiyavTav (Kaarov dexopevrj Kaff eva t(3 'HpaKXei 7r<ipaSiSoi'f/
8oXu(f}ovnv e^ dnciTrji. Cf. inscription from Phanagoria 303 b. c, C. I. Gr.

2120.
^* Panticapeum C. I. Gr. 2108 G, 2109, inscriptions of
: third
and second centuries b. c, Bâ 'AcppoipiTrj) (Ôu^pavia 'Anarovpr].
^^ In a city of Sarmatia an inscription E . . . APATOPO
(circ. 500 B. c.) on a relief representing Aphrodite with Eros and Ares ;
its style is quite out of keeping with the date of the inscription, C. I. Gr.
2133-
*'
Scythian goddess 'Aprlpnaaa identified with 'Acppodirr] Olpavia
Herod. 4. 59.
*^ Cf. Catalogue of
Amastris in Paphlagonia: C. I. Gr. 4150 C.
Greek Coins, '
Pontus/ p. 84 (Brit. Mus.) Aphrodite on throne with
calathos, veil, chiton, and peplos, sceptre in left hand, on right Nike
holding out wreath : PI. XIX ^
*^
Chalcedon : Hesych. S.V. eXerjpcov. 'Acppo^lrr] eXfTj/^wV ev KvTTpco
/cat \a\Kri8ov!.a.
" At Abydos : Athenae. 572 E Uopvrjs Se 'A(ppo8iTr]s Upop iim napa

'A^vSi^poIs, S)S (prj(Ti YldpfjitXoi.
*^ Troas: "C /. Gr. 6165 otto ttjs ip TpwdSi 'A(ppobiTrjs. Cf. Plut.
Lucull. I 2 f IS Se TpoiaSa Ka.Ta-)(6e\i iVKxpiuxj^ pip ip t<5 Upu) rfjs 'AcppobiTJ]!.
b Near Gargara an Aphrodision on a promontory called Tlvppd :
Strabo, 606.
c Diffusion of the cult of Aphrodite Aeneas from the Troad. Dion.
Halic. I. 49, Aeneas and his followers, -nputTop pep els QpuKrju ucptKopevoi
VOL. II. Y
738 GREEK RELIGION.
Kara rrjv x^ppovvrjcrov, fj KaXe'irai TiaWrjurj, mpfiKTavTO . . . fieiuavTfs 8e . . .
i/ewi/ 'AcjipuSiTtji ibpvaavTo . . . Kai jtoKiv Alveiav iKTicrav. Id. I. 50 eneira

els Kvdrjpa . . . lepov 'Ac^poStTTys \8pvovTai. Id. in ZacynthoS, Qvovaiv
'A(f)po8iTi] Trpos Tw Karaa-KevacrOevTi iepa dvaiav : (many signs of this WOrship
surviving in the island) Alveiov kuI 'A<ppo8LTr]s 6 8p6pos, Kai ôava rovrav
idTTjKfv ap(f)OTfpa>v . . . els AevKuâ Kardyovrai . . . Kav ravTrj waXiv lepov
Acppobirrjs idpvovrai, . . . /caXetrai 8e 'AcppoShrjs Aiveiddos. lb. in Actium,
A(f)po8iTris Alveid8os lepov . . . ev de ' ApfipaKiq lepov rrjs avTrjs 6eov Koi fjpfSov
Alveiov. lb. on the coast north of Buthrotum, lepov Km uvtoBl tt^s 'A(f)po-
8[Tr]s Idpva-apevoi. Id. I. 5 1, Xiprjv 'A(ppo8iTT]s on the south-east coast of

Italy where Aeneas landed. Temple at Eryx : Diod. Sic. 4. 83 Alvelas
o A<ppodtT)js TrX/wi/ els 'IraXiav koi TvpocroppiaSels rrj vrjaca iroWo'is dvadrjpaai
TO lepov, a)f av Idias prjrpos vnapxav, eKoaprjae. Dion. Halic. I. 53 TeKp.r]pia
Ti]s (IS îKeXovs Alveiov re Kai Tpuiaiv dcfiiêois noXkci pev Koi aX\a, Trepicpave-
arara be ttjs Alveidbos 'AippodiTtjs 6 (Bcopos eVt rfj KecfinXrj rov 'EXvpov l8pvpevos,
Kai lepov Alveiov ihpvpevov ev AlyeaTj]. PaUS. 3. 22, II, AphrodisiaS in
South Laconia regarded as founded by Aeneas; td. 8. 12, 9, INIount
\\yxia-ia in Arcadia near Orchomenos where Anchises was buried, np6s
8e Tov 'Ay)(i(Tov tw rdcpa epcLTTia ta-rlv 'AcppotiTrjs lepov. Statue of AeneaS at
ArgOS, zd. 2. 21, I. Schol. //. 2. 820 nXdrrovariv avrijv {Â(f}po8iTt]v) Ka\
ecpmnov, on 6 Alveias 6 vios avrrjs nXevaas pe)(pi r^? Svcrecor perd rovro imrco
enefSr] kiu ttjv prjrepa eriprjae toiovto) dydXpart. Cf.^^^^, Iliad, 20. 293
300. Cf. Acesilaus (Schol. //. 20. 308-309), Miiller, Frag. Hist.
Graec. i, p. 103, No. 26. Festus, p. 269 (Miiller) ait quidem Aga-
thocles complures esse auctores qui dicant Aenean sepulium in urbe
Berecynthia. Schol. Aen. 2.717 Atticus (Penates) dicit ex Samothracia
in Italiam devectos.
*
At Pergamum : Polyb. 17. 2 ro t^j ' At^pohW^s lepov . . . Kai to
t'îKT)Cf)6piov, d Kare'cpdeipe {îXiTTTTos). C. I. Gf. 3542 emjKoep 6ea 'A^poSiVi;
(first century b. c. .'').
*'
At Smyrna 'Aippobirr] Ovpavla,
^ : late Roman sepulchral relief from
Smyrna at Verona, dedicated to the dpxiepeia 'AcppobiTrjs Ovpavias.
C.IGr.si51.
^ Aphrodite ^rparoviKis : C. Gr. 3137, treaty between Smyrna and
I.
Magnesia ad Sipylum (third century b. c), 1. 83 dvadercoaav 'Spvpvaloi

piv (rrjv opoXoyiav) ev rco rrjs ÂcppodiTTjs r^s SrpaTOWKi'Sos iep^. Cf. Tac.
Ann. 3. 63 Smyrnaeos oraculum Apollinis, cuius imperio Stratonicidi
Veneri templum dicaverint, referre.
** EpheSOS :
^ Athenae. 573 A EvdXKrjs ev toIs 'Ecpea-iaKoU Ka\ ev
'Eêcrw (pTjalv lepd ISpvcrdai eralpa 'A(Ppo8iTrj.

REFERENCES FOR CHAPTERS XXl-XXIII. 739
b Serv. Virg. Aen. i. 720 Apud Ephesios Venerem Automatam

dixerunt vel Epidaetiam.
" At Erythrae :
'
Aphrodite ndi/57;/Lio?, in inscription concerning the
sale of priesthoods (circ. 270 B.C.): Dittenberger, Sylloge, 370, 1. 57.
^ 'A(})pobiTr] IlvdoxprjaTos lb. 1. 75-

c 'A0poStV// 17 eV 'E/Li/Sarw (a district of Erythrae), 1. 40.
Caria.
""
Miletus : Posidippos, Aiith. Pal. 12. 131 :
a Kvwpov, a re Kvdt]pa Koi a MiXtjtov erroix^vels
Koi TO KoXov ^vpirji ImroKpoTov 8uTre8ov,
Cf Theocr. 28. 4 :
TToXiv es Nfi'Xeof dykadv

ona Kvnpibos Ipov KaXdpu) )(\a>pov vn anaX(o.
^'
At Mylasa C. I. Gr. 2693 : f 'A(ppo8iTi]s '^Tprndas Up(vs, inscrip-
tion from second century b. c.

^^ At OeCUS : Theocr. 7. 116 OlKivvra âv6ds edos amv Aiuivas.
^^ At Aphrodisias : rights of asylum given to the temple of Aphrodite

there in a letter from Antony (37 b.c), C. I. Gr. z'j^'j. Cf 2782, &c.,
an dv6r](f)6pos of the goddess of Aphrodisias mentioned in 2822. Cf.
Tac. Ann. 3. 62 Aphrodisiensium civitas Veneris . . . religionem
tuebantur.
^* At CnidoS : PaUS. 1 .
1,3 Kv'iBioi TifiSxriv ' A<^pobirr}v pdXiara, koi
(T(f)i(nu ecTTiv Upd Trjs deov, to peu yap dp)(aL6TaTov AcopirtSo? ^, pfTa 8e to
'Afcpai'as^, vediTaTov 8e rjv KviSiav oi noWoi, Kvl8ioi 8e aiirot KaXovcriv 'EvnXoiav^.
Inscription dedicated to Aphrodite and Hermes found in Cnidus,

Newton, Halicarnassus, n. 3 1 : vide series of Aphrodite heads on
Cnidian coins, Choix de medailles grecqties du cabinet de M. Lnlioof-
Blumer, 4. 127-135.
^^ At Halicarnassus : Bull, de Corr. Hell. 1880, p. 400.
Pamphylia.
^^ At Aspendos on Mount Castnium : hence Aphrodite Kao-ma in
Lycophron, 403. Strabo, 437438 KaWlfiaxos fxfv olv (ptja-iv iv to\s
IdpôLS TO? 'A(/)/3o8tra? (17 ^fo? yap ov pin) ttjv KacrrvtfJTiv vnfp^dWf(rdai
ndaas tco (f)povfiv, oti povq irapabexeTai, ti]v tu>v vSiv Bvaiav,
Cilicia.
" At Aegae : C. I. Gr. 4443, dedication to 'A^poStVi; Ei/TrXota
together with Poseidon 'Aa^dXetos (first century b. c).
Y 2
740 GREEK RELIGION.
The islands.
^* Rhodes : worshipped with Apollo and Asclepios there, Bull, de
Corr. Hell. 1880, p. 139.

'"'**
At Cos : vide inscription in Revue des Etudes Grecques, 1891,
p. 361 and Paton and Hicks, Inscriptions 0/ Cos, No. 387. Cf. mime
:
of Herondas, i. 26, 62, Aphrodite called 6e6s. Head of Aphrodite 17
on tetradrachm of Cos, JMuse'e Hunter, p. 142. i. Cf. '"^, ^" f.

'^'
Crete : the Cretans claimed this island to be the original home
of the Aphrodite worship: Diod. Sic. 5-77 ^'" 8e tijv enKpaveiav kcu ti)v
eVt TrXelop e-mdrjiiuiv avTTJs tovs 'y;â)pi'ouy fîSuiêadai riju dfov, KaXovvras
'A<f)po8iTr]v 'EpvKivav Km Kvdepeiav (cat na<plav, en Se Ka\ 2vpiav.
Ancient 'A(ppo5iaLov in the territory of the Latii, C. I. Gr. 2554

a :
Aphrodite mentioned in the federal oath sworn by the men of

Hierapytnia, C. I. Gr. 2555.
'>
In Lyctos and Dreros: Cauer, Delect? ii^j.
c At Cnossus under the title "Avdeia, Hesych. s. v.
""
Delos : Callimach. Del. 307 lp6v ciya'kpa KvTrpidos apx^îs apirjKOov,
iji' TTore Qrjcrevs elcraTO avv naiîeacTii', ore KprjTi]6(v dvenXei.. PaUS. p. 4O) 3
AtjXiots Â(ppobLTT]s icTTLv ov ptya ôavov . . . Karnai de dvri Trobcov es rerpa-
y<i)Vov ayrjH-'^' ireidopai tovto ^

Apidhvrjv Xa/3fii/ irapa AaidciXov. Plut.
Theseus, 2 1 r 6eQ> Ovcras Kai dvade\i to A(j)po8iaiov, o napa tj]s Aptdbvrjs
eXaiiev. Bull, de Corr. Hell. 1882, 23, 1. 189, inventory of temple-

property (circ. 180 B.C.), 'A(/)po8to-/(wv rw XP? Xa/xTrdSfy. lb. 1. 131
'AttoXXo)!/! 'A^poSiV/?. Worshipped with Isis there in later times : vide
inscription in 'AOrjvmov, 4, p. 458, No. 7 "laiSt âreipai 'Aa-Tuprei 'A(f)pa-
(5irj;i Kai "EpcoTi 'ApcpoKparei 'ATToXXcoft ' Avdpopaxoi âfopd^ôv yimep eavToiij
Koi yvvaiKos Koi reKvcov )(âpi(ni]piov.
* At Aegina Quaest. Graec. : 44, Plut. Pans. 2. 29, 6 ttXtjo-iW be

rov Xipeuos iv w /idXiora opplôvTiu vaos ('(Ttiv AcppoBirr)!.
Cyprus.
"^
Paphos: Horn. Od. 8. 362 :
^7 d' cipa Kinrpov iKave (piXoppeibtjs Afppobirr]
S Tld(f)ov, fvda re ol repevos ^copos re Bviêii.
PauS. 8. 5, 2 ndcpov re 'AyaiTTjvcop yeyovev oIkkttt]^ koi ttjs 'AffypoBiTrjs
KaTeaKevdaaTO eV IlaXanrdcpci to iepov' recos 8e tj 6eos irapci KvTrpiuv Tipas
elxeif iv Vokyoh KoKovpeva ;(oopia). Strabo, 683 noKainaôs, oaov iv
8eKa (TTaSlois vnep ttJs daXaTTrjs Ibpvpevt], v(f)oppov f)(nv(Ta Kai iepciv apxcnov
TTii nafpias 'A(ppoblTr]i. Tac. A fin. 3. 62 Exin Cyprii tribus delubris,

quorum vetustissimum Paphiae Veneri auctor Aerias, post filius
REFERENCES FOR CHAPTERS XXI-XXIII. 741
eius Amathus Veneri Amathusiae posuissent. Id. Hist. 2. 3 . . .
fama recentior tradit a Cinyra sacratum templum, deamque ipsam

conceptam mari hue adpulsam. Sed scientiam artemque haruspicum
accitam, et Cilicem Tamiram intulisse mox tantum Cinyrades . . . . . .
sacerdos consulitur. Hostiae ut quisque vovit sed mares deliguntur

certissima fides haedorum fibris. Sanguinem arae obfundere vetitum
precibus et igne puro altaria adolentur simulacrum deae non effigie . . .
humana, continuus orbis latiore initio tenuem in ambitum metae

modo exsurgens; et ratio in obscuro, ib. Conditorem templi regem
Aerian vetus memoria, quidam ipsius deae nomen id perliibent (? 'A<^po-
SiVtj 'Apft'a). Cf. Max. Tyr. 8. 8. For connexion of Aphrodite worship
with the Cinyradae in Cyprus, vide Philologiis 24. 226. Cf, ^txv.Aen.
I. 720 Apud Cyprios Venus in modum umbilici vel ut quidam volunt
metae colitur. Inscriptions found on site of Paphos, e.g. C. I. Gr.
'A(f>po8iTr] Uacpia ttoXis na(f)icov (in the time of Ptolemy Euergetes II).
rj
C. I. Gr. 2640 'AcpipoSiTTji Koi Atos iioXucos Kai "Upas (third century B.C.).
^^ ToXyoi, ? older name of the site of the Paphian temple (vide
Neubauer, Co?fwi. Mommsen, 673, etc.). Cf. Steph. Byz. j-. v. VoXyoi-
TToXis KvTTpov . . . Xe'yerat Koi ToXyiov ovSerepcos' d(f>' ov FoXyia f] 'A(f)po8iTr].
Theocr. 15. 100 Aeanoiv, a ToXyou re Koi 'iddXiou eCpiXdaas AlTreivdv t

"EpvKa, XP^^^ TraiaSoia 'A^poSiVa. Schol. Zi$. FoXyds' TToXis Kvjrpov,
wvopacrpevi) dno ToXyov tivos 'aScowSos kol 'AcjypoSiTrjs. Catull. 64. 96
Quaeque regis Golgos, quaeque Idalium frondosum.
^ Citium : vide supra "<^. C. I. A. 2. 168; C. I. Gr. 2641.
* Amathus: PauS. 9. 41, 2 eWt Se 'Anadovs iv Kvnpa noXis' 'A8d)vi8os
^^
iv alrfi Koi 'A(ppobiTr]s iepov eaTiv dpxaiov : vide SUpra (Tac. Afin. 3. 62).
Catull. 36. 14 Colis quaeque Amathunta quaeque Golgos. Hesych.

S.Z'. KapTTcocris' Ovaia Â(ppo8iTr]s tv'Apadovvri ((cap7ra)(rij = burnt-offering :
vide Stengel, in Hermes, 1892, p. 161); grave of Ariadne there, Plut.

Thes. 20 KoXiiv 8e TO aXcros 'Apadovcrlovs ev d> rov rdcpov deiKwovaiv AptaS-
vr]s'A(j)poMTr]s. Cf. "k,
'^^
The promontory Olympus on the north-east of Cyprus : Strabo,
682 f'xovcra 'AcppodlTrjs 'Afcpnt'a? vaov t'idvTOv yvvai^l Koi doparou. Ib. aKpn
HtjddXiou, r]s vrripKdTai Xocpos . . . Upos 'A(ppo8iTr]s, Id. 683 'Apatvorj Spoiios
npocroppou e'xovaa Kot Upbv Kai aXcros. In 682 he mentions the locality
'AfjipoblcTLOl' KaO' O (TTfVrj T] VTjcros.
'^^
Hesych. "Eyêioy (?) 'A(f}po8iTr] Kunpiot. Cf. *'.
" Aphrodite napaKviiTovcra in Cyprus, ""s.

** Cythera : Paus. 3. 23, I to Upbv t^? Olpaviw: dyii>TaTOv Ka\ UpCov
oTTocra AcppobiTTji nap EXX?j(TtV eaTiv dpxaioTaTov' avrt) Si) 1) deos ^davov
tonXiaptvov. Cf. //. 15- 432 KvBrjpoKn âdeoicn. Cf. ^^.
742 GREEK RELIGION.
*"
In Cranae off Gythium: Paus. 3. 22, i Up6v e'cmv 'A</)poSirr;s eV tjj
iiTTfipo) Miycoi'iTiSoy, koX 6 totjos ovtos anas KaXelrai Miydoviov. Tovto /Mff 8rf
TO Upov TTOirjaai. Xeyovaiv 'A\f âvdpov.

^^
Amorgus : C. I. Gr. 2264 Oipavla rf] iv daniî (inscription circ.
100 A.D.). Cf, Plut. Cleoin. 17 and 21, district outside Argos called 17
'^
Anaphe : C. I. Gr. 2^^'i.
''''
Ceos : Inscr. Grace. Antiq. (Roehl) 397 eeoKil8r/s 'Apiaralxpov
'A(f)po8tTT] dvf6r]K(v apâs. 'Acfypobirr] KTrjavWa AntOn. Liber. Transf. I 01
hk Bvovcriv c'ixpt pvv 'lovXt^rat pLev (a family in Ceos) 'AcppodiTTj, KTr]<TvK\av
ovofidôvTfs, ol 8e a'XXoi KTTjavWav EKaepyrjir.
a Gyaros : vide " f
''^
PLemnos: Schol. Ap. Rhod. i. 614, the legend of the Lemnian
women despising Aphrodite.
a Lesbos : inscription to Aphrodite-Peitho, and Hermes, published
by Keil, PhilologtlS Supple?)!. 2. 579 o xe 6i\T) 6vtv eVi tS rds 'Acppodiras
rds Ilii6(i)S Ka\ Ttp 'Eppa.
'^*
Paros : /user. Grace. Antiq. (Roehl) 405 ' A(f)po8iTT]s.
^^
SamOS : Athenae. 572 F "AXeîs 6 ^dpios iv Senrepw 'Q,p5>v âpiaKSav
rfjv iv 2dpa> 'A(ppo8iTrjv, rjv ol pev iv KaXdpois KaXovcriv, ol 8e iv eXei, drriKai
(d}r](Tiv) erdipav IbpvcravTo al avvaKoXovdriaacrai IlepiKXei, ore enoXiopKfi rr^v
^'*i.
'Edpov. 'A<^poSiVj? KovpoTp6(pos at Samos,
''
Samothrace. Inscription (? of fourth century b.c.) in Conze
Retse auf den Inseln des Thrakischen Meers, p. 69, Taf. 16. 10 'Atppo-
HiTT] KaXidSi.
Sicily.
"^
Syracuse. ^Baiwris : Hesych. S.V. 'Atppohirr] irapa '2vpaKO(Tlois.
^ ? KaXXiTTvyos : Athenae. 554 C, E.

"
Acrae : C. I. Gr. ^42^ TrpoaTarfvcTavTfs''Hpq Ka\'A<Ppo8LTa. /(5. 5425.
PanormUS C. I. Gr. 5553 KXtayopas 'Ac^poSiVi?

^*
:
dvidrjKe rpdntâv.
Sappho (Strabo, 40) at Kim-pos ^ Udcpos ndvoppos. rj fj
*" Messana: C. I. Gr. 5615, dedication to Aphrodite by temple-

officials.
**
Catana : C. I. Gr. 5652 Uparevova-rjs 6(5.^ 'Acjipodiras.
^'^
Segesta : C. I. Gr. 5543 leparfvova-av 'A^poSiVa Ovpavia.
^^
Eryx : Paus. 8. 24, 6 eWt yap koi iv tij StêXia T^f 'EpvKivris Upov iv
rfj X'^Pt "^11 "^p^Kos dyioiTUTOv ex TraXaiorarou *cai ovk dno8(ov nXovTa> tov
Upox) Toil (V Uaâ. Diod. Sic. 4. 83 : the temple founded and

enriched by Eryx, Tr)v e^ ula>vo9 ap^rju XajSov ovSeTrore SieXme riyicojxevov :
its prestige was great among the Sicanians and Carthaginians, to 8e

TfXfvrdiov 'Pafialoi irdarjs StKfXi'a? KpaTrjaavreg vnfpefiaXovTo ndvras roiis npo
avTcou Tois els TavTTjv Tifxals . . , ol pev yap KaTavravTes fis ttjv vijcrov VTvaroi
Koi crTpaTT]yo\ , . . ('neidap els tov '

EpvKo TrapnBaKaxri, peyaXoTrpeTrea-i 6viriais
Koi Tipais Kocrpnvui to Tepevos, Kai to aKvOpaixov Trjs eôvcrlas anoBepevoi
peTa^dWov<Tiv els 7rai8ias koi yvvatKuv 6pi\ias peTo. TroWrjs IXapoTrjTos, povcos
ovTO) vop'iôvTes Ke)(api(Tpevr)v Trj 6ec3 noirjaecv ttjv envTav Trapowiav. Aelian.
Nat. Hist. 10. 50 d.va nxav eros koi ripepav ndaav Bvovcrt, tj) 6e<S Kal 01 ejri-
)(u>pioi Koi oi êvoi . . . ecos 8e Koi vnoXtipnei Koi eKelvos (6 ^copos) ovk dv6pa-
Kidv, ov cnroduv, ov^ TjpiKavaTav TpiKprj 8a8cov vnofpaivei, 8p6aov 8e dvd7rXea>s
e(TTiv Ka\ Txoas veapds, T]iyep ovv dva<pveTai ocrai vvKTes' rd ye prjv lepela eKaa-Tris
dyeXrjs avTopaTa (poira, koi ro) â>pa TrapeaTrjKev. Cf. "*f. Polyb. I.
55
TovTov ("EpvKos) eir avTTJs pev r^f Kopvtpiis ovcrrjs eTnTTe8ov, Ke'iTai to ttjs Â(ppo-
8!.Trjs TTJs 'EpvKivrjs lep6i>, onep opciKoyovpevuis eTviâvecrraTov ioTi tw Te ttKovto)

Kai rfj Xonrf] TrpocrTiia-ia tu>v Kard ti)v 2iKe\uiv iepatu. Strabo, 272 olKel-
Tai Kal 6 '

Epv^ Xo(f)6s vy^rjXos, lepov e)((i>v A(f)po8iTT}s Tipuipevov 8ta(f)epupTU)S
lepo8ovXcov yiivaiKcbv nXrjpes to ttoXmoi', as dvedeaav (car' evxi]v ol Te eK ttjs
2iK.eXias Kill eû)6ev ttoXXoL For Aphrodite worship in Sicily, vide also
Aphrodite-Aeneas, *^c.
***
Argyros : Ampelii lAhtv, 3Iemor. 8. i6 Argyro est fanum Veneris
super mare : ibi est lucerna super candelabrum posita lucens ad mare
sub divo.
^^
For Aphrodite-worship in Italy and along the Adriatic, vide
Catullus, 36. 1 1 :
Nunc o caeruleo creata ponto

Quae sanctum Idalium Uriosque apertos,
Quaeque Ancona Cnidumque harundinosam
Colis quaeque Amathunta, quaeque Golgos,
Quaeque Durrachium Adriae tabernam.
(See Robinson Ellis's note on '
Urios,' Conime?itary on Catullus,
p. 98.)
8 At Naples: C. I. Gr. 5796. Cf. Add. 3, p. 1255.
" At Rome, worship of Aphrodite of Eryx before the Colline gate :
Strabo, 272. Cf. Serv. Virg. Aen. i. 720 Est et Erycina (Venus)
quam Aeneas secum advexit.
^* In Spain, at Saguntum : Polyb. 3. 97, 6 to tt^s 'A(f)pn8l.Tr]s lepov.
"^
At Cyrene : vide Plautus, Rudens (Act i, sc. i, 1. 6), for the
worship and temple of Venus Cyrenensis.
744 GREEK RELIGION.
"" Naucratis : Athenae. 675F-676A (quoting from the book of
PolycharmuS of Naucratis, irfpX 'A^poStV^y) Kara fie Tr]v rpiTrjv np6i Tois
f'lKoatv oXv[nri(iSa HpocTTpaTos ttoXittjs rjperepos . . , 'iTpo(Ta)(u>v nore Koi Tlu<pco
rrjs KvTTpov dyaXpaTiou 'Acfypodirrji cnnQapiaiov ap-âiov Trj ri-^vj] ci)vr]cra.fj.evos
yjfi cfiepoiv els ttjv NavKpariv' Ka\ , , . eVet )(eipav al<pvidiov eTreVecre . . . Kari-
(f)vyov anavres eVt to rrji A<ppobiTT]s ("lyaXpa, au>îv avTovs avTr/v 8e6p.(voi. fj
fie 6(6s, Trpocr(})i\r]i yap rois NavKpaTiTais tjv, ui(^vibiov (nolrjcre navra to. irapa-
Keipeva avrfj pvpplvrjs ;:^Xajpa? iT\r]pr] odprjs re jjSiVrrjy Tvkripco(Te rfjv vavv . . .
Koi 6 'Hpocrrparoi eôpprjcras rrjs veus pera tov dydXparos f)û>v Koi rcii al<pvi-
810V avTa dpa(f)av(iaas xK^P^^ pyppivai dvedrjKtv iv tu> ttjs 'A(^/3ofitVr;s UpcS,
6v(ras re t[] 6(a koi dvadeXs ti] 'Acppodirr] rdyaXpa.

^'
At Tentyra : Strabo, 815 (ol TevTvplrai) ripwaiv 'A<ppo8lTr]V onicr6(i>
8e TOV veo) ttjs 'Acf)po8!.TT]s laidos icniv Upov.
^^^ Zephyrium, near Alexandria Strabo, 800 aKpa vnta-Kov

: ex"^'^'^
'ApaivoTjs 'Acppooirrjs. Cf. Athenae. 318 D.

^> Aphrodite Zr^pwdla in Thrace (? Hekate) : E/. Mag. p. 411. 30
Ztjpvvdia' 'AcppobiTT] iv QpaKj], Zrjpvvdov yap avrpov iv QpaKrj . , . AvKOCppav.
Hellenic Aphrodite ?
^ Daughter of Dione and Zeus: Horn. //. 5. 312 Ai6s dvydrrjp 'a0-
pobiTT]. Cf. Id. 370 ; Eur. He/. 1098 Koprj Aiavr]^ Kvnpi. Dione identified
with Aphrodite in Theocr. 7. 116: vide ^^ Cf. Serv. Virg. Aeti. 3. 466.
'^ Connected with Hebe : C. I. Gr. 2138 6idv KoXtafia ei'y 'AjSaloi'
iiro'i-qaa " A\Tipos (circ. 500 B.C.). Cf. C. I. Gr. 2 1 4, worship of Hebe
near that of Aphrodite KcoAtos on Attic promontory opposite Aegina.
At Sparta, vide ^ê. Hesiod, Thcog. i6, 17 :
Ka\ Oepiv al8oirjV, e\iK0^\i(})ap6v r 'At^pofitTTjt',
"H^rjv Tf XP'^^^^'^'^^'^ôv KaXj]v re Aioavijv.
^^ With the Charites and Horae Paus. 6. 24, 7, statues of the :
Charites at Elis, with some emblems of Aphrodite, Xapiras fie 'A^pofi/rr/

(olKfias) pakiara eivai 6ea>v, Aristoph. J-'ax, 456 'Eppjj,Xdpia-iv,''Clpaiaiv,
'AcfipobiTT], JJodco. Cf. Homer, //. 18. 382 :
Xdpii XiTvapoKpijdepvos
KoXr] Tt]v u>7rvie TiepiKXvTos dp(f)Lyvr](is
with Odyss. 8. 270.
// 5- 338 :
aplipocriov 8ia TreVXov, ov 01 XdpiXfs Kapov avrai.
Odyss. 8. 362 :
T] S' dpa KvTrpov "iKave <f>i\oppeibfjs 'A^pofi/rjj . . .
e'fpa fie piv Xdptres Xovaav Ka\ ;^pio"ai' iXaico.

REFERENCES FOR CHAPTERS XXI-XXIIL 745
Horn. Hymn Apoll. 1. 194

airap fiinXoKanoi XapiTfs Koi fv(ppoves 'Qpai
'Apjxovii] & "HfBrj re Aios duyarrjp r 'A(f)podiTr}
6p)(vvT , aKkrjkav iiri Kapnu) xelpas f'xovaai.
Horn. Hymn io Aphrodik, 6. 1 1 :
oppoKTt xpv(reoi<Tiv fKoapeov, oicri nep avrai

'
Qpai K0(Tpia6i]v xP^'^^'H-'^'^x^^-
Hesiod, 0/>. 73
apcpi Se 01 'KapLTe's re deal Koi TTOTVia Ileiffa)
oppovs ;^pu(reiouf e6e(rav xpo^ (the creation of Pandora).

Athenae. 682 F (quoting from the Cypria), 17 Se arvv dpcfuTroXoian (piXop-
pfibrjs AcPpodirri TrKeâpivq arecpdvovs evmSeas avdea yairjs , . . av Kfrf)a\aiaiv

eofvTO 0fcn XnrapoKprjSfpvoi, Ni'/i0nt Ka\ Xdpires apn Se )(pv(Trj 'A(j)po8iTr] koXov
afiSovaai kut opos TroXvTnSaKOV "idrjs.
^" Aphrodite with Hephaestos : Odyss. 8. 266-369. Cf. Ap.

Rhod. 3. 36. Lucian, Deor. Dial. 15 tto)? ov ^rjXoTvnn 17 'A^poSiV;; Tj)v
'H.aptv T] 7] Xdpii ravTrjv J
^* Aphrodite with Ares: //. 5. 311-364; 21. 416. Pindar, Py/k.

4. 87 XakKapparos noais 'AcfypobiTTjs. Hes. Theog. 933 :
avTcip Aprj'i
ptvoTopa Kvdepfia <^6,3op Koi Aeip,ov eTiKTe . . .
Appovirjv 6' , r]i> Kddpos inepdvpos 6eT tiKOiTiv.
Temple of Ares at Athens: Paus. i. 8, 4 near the ôvKevTripiov

tv6a dydXpara 8vo , . . ' AcfypobiTrjs Kelrai. Joint temple of Ares and
Aphrodite on the road from Argos to Mantinea : Paus. 2. 25, i
Kara pev 8rj tovto 'A(ppo8iTr]s Kelrai ôavov, npos de fjXiov 8vcrpds"Apeu)s.
?Ares worshipped with Aphrodite in Crete, the two deities being
mentioned side by side in the pubHc oaths taken by the men of Latus
and Hierapytna. C. I. Gr. 2554 and 2555.
'^
Hesiod, Theog. 201
8' "Epos apdpTTja-e koi "ipepos eaneTO koXos
rfi
yfivoptvr] Til TTpcoTa dioiv T is (f)uXov loiKTr], Cf. "^k_
Cic. de Deor. Nat. 3. 23 Venus prima Coelo et Die nata cuius

^
Eli delubrum vidimus, altera spuma procreata, ex qua et Mercuric

Cupidinem secundum natum accepimus, tertia love nata et Dione,
quae nupsit Volcano. Sed ex ea et Marte natus Anteros dicitur,
quarta Syria Cyproque concepta, quae Astarte vocatur, quam Adonidi
nupsisse proditum Mem. 9 Veneres quattuor prima
est. Amp, Lib. ;
Coeli et Diei filia, secunda quae ex spuma nata esse dicitur Aetheris et
Oceani filia, tertia quae Volcano nupsit quae cum Marte se miscuit unde :
Cupido natus esse dicitur, quarta Cypri et Syriae filia quam Adon habuit.
746 GREEK RELIGION.
Oriental Aphrodite.
'^'^^
Aphrodite Ovpavla: Paus. I. 14, 7 Tr/jwrot? dv6p6)Tra)v 'Ao-frupi'ot?
KaTecTTT] ae^fddai ttjv Ovpaviav, jifTa 8e 'Aacrvpiovs Kvnpimv Tlacpiois Kai

'PotviKcov to'ls 'AcTKaXmva ('xovcri. Luc. de Dea Syr. 33, description of
the goddess of Hierapolis, e^fi 5e n /cat 'Adrjvalrjs Ki \\(ppo8iTr]i Koi SfXr;-
vairjs Ka\ Pe;jr Kai 'AprepiBos Koi Ne/ieVtos xai Moipecov' x^'P' ^^
''"'/ 1^^^ ^'^^PB
(TKrfnTpov ('x^ty tPj erepr] be nrpaKTOv koi ini Tjj Kf(pa\^ aKrlvai re (poptei koL
TTVpyov Koi KetTToP, Tw p.ovvr]v ttjv Oiipavirjv Koapfovai.
b At Cythera, "*
: Paus. 3. 23, i. Herod, i. 105 tj";? ^vpirjs iv
'AcTfcuXcoi'i TToAi . . . T^j ovpavirjs 'A(ppoBiTr]s to ipov. eari 8e tovto to ipov
. . . navTcov apxmoTaTOV Ipcov ocra TavTi]s r^y dfov. Ka\ yap to iv KvTTpw Ipbv
iv6iX/Tev iyeveTUj as avTol Xeyovai Kinrpioi' Ka\ to iv Kv6r]poi(n ûiviKei elaiv

oi i8pv(rafj.V(H < TnvTijs ttjs '2vpirjs iovTfs. Id. I. I3I inipfpadijKacTC de ol
Ilfpa-ai Ka\ Trj Ovpavirj dveiv, napa re 'Aaavpicov padovres Ka\ Âpa^laV KnXe-
ovai be 'Aaa-vpioi. ^^^.
tj)v 'Acppobirrjv MvXiTTa. Cf. ArtCmis,
c Religious prostitution in the worship of Mylitta at Babylon: Herod.

I. 199 sud Jin. iviaxrj be Ka\ Trjs Kvnpnv eVrt TrapaTrkrjCTioi Tovroi vopos.
The same rites in the worship of the goddess at Byblos: Lucian

de Dea Syr. 6. In Lydia and Locris : Athenae. 516 A oh povov be
Avbav yvvmKfs cicpeToi ovcrai Toli ivTvxovcriu^ dXXci kol AoKpcov tcov Êmêcjiv-
piu>v, eTi be Toiv irepl Kvnpov (quoting from Clearchus nepl (3lo3v). Justin.
21. 3 speaks of this practice among the Locrians, and (18. 5) in
Cyprus. At Eryx ^": in Armenia in the worship of Anaitis, Strabo, 532
TCI TTJs 'AvaiTLbos (e/Jci) biacpepovTcos Âppevioi TeTiprjKacri , . . kol dvyarepas ol
inKpaveaTarui rov eQvovs avupovcn napOevovs, ais vofios e'crrl KnTanopvevQei.a'ais
TToXw xpovov Tvapa Tjj 6f<o peTO. TaiiTa bibocrdai irpos ydpov, ovk dnaîovvTOi ry
ToiavTTj crvvoLKeiv ovbevos.
^ Paus. 3- 8, 4 ol 'Apdj3ioi Aiowo-ov deov povvov Ka\ ttjv Ovpaviqv tjyevvTai

fivai.
6 Herodian, Ai Exc. Div. Marc. 5. 6 r^r Ovpavias t6 iiyaXpa pere-

nepyf/'aTO, aeôi/Tcnv avro vnepipvcbs Kapxi]bovia)V Te Kai tmv Kara Tr)v Ai^vrjv
dvdpanrav . . . Ai/3ver pev ovv avrrjv Ovpav'iav KaXovai, ôiviKes be 'AaTpodpxrjv
ovopdôvo'i,, aeXrjvrjv eivai 6eXovTes.
f Herod. (the Scythians) IXdaKovTai 'A7rdXX<ui/a re KalOvpavlrjv

4. 59 . . .
Â(j)pobiTr]v . . . Ovpavirj be 'AtppobiTrj, 'ApTlpTraaa. Cf. 4. 67 ol 'Evdpees (a

Scytnian tribe) ol dvbpoyvvoi t!]v 'AcppobiTrjv cr(pi Xeyovai pavTiKfju bovvai.
s In Corinth : Strabo, 378 t6 Ttjs 'A(ppobiTr]s Upov ovt(o ttXoixtiov
inripêv wore irXtiovs 17 ;(iXins UpobovXovs iKeKTrjTo eraipas, as dveTidecriiv Trj
6em avbpes Ka\ yvvalKes. Pind. Frag. 87 :

YloKvîvai vfaviSes, aficplnoXoi Ilfidovs iv a(})veia KopLvda,

uire ras ;;^X(Bpay Xi^dvov âvda baKpva Ovjiiarf,
TToXXaKi ârep epaircov Ovpaviav TTTafxevai vorjfia ttottciv 'Acppobirav

(Tvv 8 audyKa ndv koKov,
Athenae. 573 C vopufiov eariv apxaiou fv Kopivd<o . . , orav 17 rroXt?
fvxrjrai, iTep\ peyakmv rfj ÂcppoBlrrj, avixivapakaixfidvea-dai npbs ttjv UeTeiau ras
eraipas as nXfiaTas koi ravrai irpoaev^êadai rfj BeS Kal va-repov em to2s lepo'is
n-apupai . . . Ka\ ol iStcorat Se KaTfvxovrai rrj Bern, rfXtadevTwi/ rrepl av av
TTOidivTai Trjv deijcriVj dndêiv avrfj toktos eraipas.
^ At Thebes, ^
i
At Athens, ".
^ In the Peiraeeus, ^"^.
1 At Argos, 22.
m At Megalopolis, '-'.
n At Aegira, ^^
o At Panticapaeum, ^^ C. I. Gr. 2108 G, 2109.

P At Smyrna, "â.
C. /. (?r. 3157.
q Polemon, Frag. 42 (Schol. Ocd. Col. 100) 'xOrivaioi . . . V7j({)d\ia
fiev tepa dvovaiv . , , 'A^poSiV?; Ovpavia,

"^
At Olympia : Paus. 6. 25, I ti-iv ptv iv rw vaa koKoixtlv Ovpaviav e\e-
âvTOS be ea-ri Ka\ xP'ô-ov, re^vr] <êi8iov, tw 8e erepa TroSt eni ^fXtuj/^s
ê^TjKe. Cf. *.
8 Xenophon, Symp. 8. 9 eKaripa ('A(/>poSiV>7) xap\s IBoipoi re Ka\ vuol

Kal dvaiai, rfj pev liavhripff padiovpyoTepat, t[j fie Ovpavia dyvorepai.
* Plato, SympOS. 180 D 17 . . . npea^vrepa Kal dprjTcop Ovpavov dvydrrjp,
T]v Brj Kal Ovpaviav enovopdôpeV r) 8e vea>Tepa Atos Kal Aidivrjs, rjv 8i] ndv8r]pov
KaXovpev.
u Lucian, Dialog. Meretr. 7. I Qvcrai pev rrj Uav8rjpca Xevicfjv prjKada, rfj
Ovpavia 8e rfj ev Ktjttois ddpaXiv.
V Artemid. Onetrocr. 2. ('A0po8ir>; Ovpavia) paXiara dyadq nepl

37
yafxovs Kal Koivcovias Kal npos TeKVcov yovrjv.
^ Orphic Hymn, 55. 5 :
Kai KpaTf'eis rpicraMV poipa>v, yevvqs 8e ra navra,

oaa-a r ev oiipava eVri Kal e'v yaiij noXvKdprrco
ev TTovTov re ^v6u>.
^ Epigram, Anih. Pal. I. 297 els ayaXpa t^? Ovpavias 'A(ppobiTT]s'
Tj KvTTpis ov ndvdrjpos, iXda-Keo rfjv 6eov eljrcov
Ovpaviav.
y Appuleiusj Me/. 11. 2 Caelestis Venus quae primis rerum

748 GREEK RELIGION.
exordiis sexuum diversitatem generate amore sociasii et aeterna subole
genere humano propagate nunc circumfluo Paphiae sacrario coleris :
the moon is addressed in his prayer as Regina Caeli, Caelestis Venus.
^ StobaeUS, Physica, Kecf). 6. irepl 'AfppoblTrjs Olpavlas Kui"Ep(,iTOS 6(lov.
^"^
Aphrodite 'oXvpnia at Sparta, "f
'^
Aphrodite 'Acjypoyevlji, poetical title, of. C. I. Gr. 5956 : Hesiod,
Theog. 191 :
TW S 'ivi KOVpT]
(dpe(f)dr]' TvpaiTov 8e KvSrjpoicri âOeoiaiv
enXr^T, fvOev eneiTa TrepLppvrov iKiTO Kvwpov ;
cf.
'.
Anacreon, 54 :
^(apoTTrjs OT K 6aXa(T(rr]s
debpoacopevrjv Kvdijprjv
\6)^fve TTOVTOS a(ppo).
^^
'Acrrepia: Cram. Anecd. Pan's. I. 319 'A(f>po8iTr]v av rt? eiV)/ TTiv
Tov irdvTOS aladrjTov (jivaiv TovTea-ri ttjv Trpwroya/jj vXrjv, rjv Kai Acrrepiav fcai
oipaviav Kokfl to. Xoyia. Aphrodite with Zeus 'Apnptos and Athena
'Ap.ap'ia on an inscription of the Achaean league, Rev. Arch. 1876,
p. 102. Cf. the legend in Hesiod, Theog. 988 about Phaethon, son of
Kephalos, and Eos whom Aphrodite carried off Kai piv âdeoLs ivi vtjo'ls
vqoTToKov pv)(j.ov TTOu'jaaTO 8alpova dlov, Strabo, 73^ Tlepaai . . . Tipaxri
Kai "HAtoi', bv KaXovai Midprjv koi aeXr)vr]V Ka\ 'A(ppo8LTT]v.
'"^
iiacTiâr], goddcss worshipped at Thalamae in Laconia : x^'f
((TTTjKev ayaXpara iv vnaidpm tov lepov (^'ivovs) rrji re naaKpdijs ku\ HXi'ov to
fTfpov , . . "EiXrjvrj^ 8e eTTi/cXr^crtr, Knl ov QaXapaTais inix<JcipLOs baipcuv ecniv rj
llao-tâf/. Cf. Cic. de Div. i. 43. Arist. Mirab. 133, referring to the
cows of Geryon, ray S' t^dpaaae ttoOco Iiaai<l>df(T(xa Bed. Ila(Ti(j)drj Con-
nected with Apollo and Daphne by Plutarch, Agis, 9. Jo. Lyd.
de Ulens. 4. p. 89 (17 'A<ppo8Lrr]\ KoXelTai fie noXXaxov Koi HaaiCpdr].
^"^
Aphrodite-Ariadne at Amathus in Cyprus ^^
: Plut. Thes. 20 ol
pev yap aTrdyâcrdai (pacriv avrtjv drroXeKpde'icrav vno Toii Qrjaecoi. la. at the
sacrifice to Ariadne, KaTaKXivopevdv Tiva twu veavia-Koiv (f)6eyyf(j6ai. Ka\
Tioie'iv anep (LfitVoutrai yvva'iKes. Grave of Ariadne in Naxos : two

different sacrifices there, z6. t>i peu yap fjbopevovs Ka\ nalCovTai ioprdêiv,
Tas 8e TavTT) Spco/xeVay Ova'iai iivai Tnvdei tivl kqI CFTvyvorr^Tt, pepiypevas.
Naxos, sacred to Dionysos and Aphrodite Ariadne : Orphic Hyinn

to Aphrodite, 55) 1. 22 ?; pvpcpais repTrrj Kvavdmia-iv iv ;^ôw At'a. At
the feast of w^xo^^dpia at Athens : Plut. Thes. 22 enKpCfOVflv iv rah
<Tnov8a7s, 'EXeXfO, 'loii 'lov, revs Trapovras' aiv to pev (rnevdovTes ava(j)(oi'f iv Kai
REFERENCES FOR CHAPTERS XXI~XXIII. 749
naioiviôires fliodacn, to te exTrXj^^fcay Koi Tafax>is fCTTi. BoyS dreSSed Up

as girls : zd. (pcovrjv khI cr;(j//ia Koi (SddicTLV a>s evi /muX terra napBevois (ôfioiov-
fievot) , . . cpfpovai (tovs oaôvs) ^lovixrai Koi 'Apiddvrj âpi^dixfvoi 8ia tov
jjLvBov 7; pdWov oTi (xvyKopLiôfxivris onupas inavrikOov. At ArgOS in the
temple of DionySOS K/)?7crtoy : PaUS. 2. 23, 8 'Apidbvriv uiroBavovcrav Wa-âv
evraida . . . TrXrjcriou be tov Aiovvcrov Koi 'xXcfipobiTrjs vaos icTTiv OvpavUis.
Hesych. s. v. 'Apihij\av ttjv 'Apidbfrfv KpiiTes. Ariadne, mother of
Tauropolis, Schol. ap. Rhod. 3. 997.
Armed Aphrodite.
^5fi
At Corinth with Helios, ^\
b Aphrodite ^vpnaxla at Mantinea, ^*.
^ Aphrodite 'QnXiapevr] 'Apeia, 'ApiavTia at Sparla, ^'.
^ At Mylasa : 'A^poSiV?; ^Tparda, ^^
e "Eyxf LOS 'AcppobiTT] in Cyprus, ^^.
f In Cythera $duvov umXiajxivov, ^^.

:
s At Amorgus : Aphrodite Ovpavla ; iv da-nldi,

'"'.
^ Vide epigrams, An/Zi. Plan. 1 71-177.

i
Plut. Stilla, 19, the names of Ares, Nike, and Aphrodite inscribed
on Sulla's trophy after Chaeronea, w? ov;^ KaTopdwaas ^
r\TTov fvTvxiq.
deivoTTjTi Koi 8vvdfii TOV noXepop, Cf. Plutarch, Parall. 37, statue of
Aphrodite NiKtjcpdpos sent to Rome by Fabius Fabricianus.
t Ap, Rhod. I. 742 :
iêiTjs S' ijaKTjTO âSvnXoKapos Kvdepaa

Apfos o^pidôvaa 6oov crdKos' (k he oi cupov
nii)(vu TtI aKoiou ^vvoî^ KeÂXacrTO ^^tTwi/oy

vepOev inreK paôlo' to S' "ivtiov drpeKes avTcos
XaXKfirj hflKrjXov iv daniSi (jyalveT IheaOai.
^ Porph. cfe Ads/. 2. 56 idveTO Ka\ iv AaohiKeia ttj kuto ^vp'iav t>] ' A6r]va
KUT fTOs irapdivoSy vvv 8e 'iXacpos.
Aphrodite ^TpaToviKis at Smyrna, ".
Q Aphrodite ^TpaTTjyis at Paros : Le Bas, Iks, 2062, dedication

A(j}po8iTr] '2TpaTr]y!.8i.
"^ Maritime Aphrodite * at Byzantium, \
^ In Attica, "". Aphrodite KccXids, "^ At Aegina, ^"a,
c At Hermione : Aphrodite liovTia koI Ai/ifvia, ^â.
d At Patrae, ^\
750 GREEK RELIGION.
e Aegium, ^^
f On south-east coast of Italy : Ai^^v *A0poStT)j, *^c.
^ Aphrodite 'AKpaia on the promontory of Olympos in Cyprus, **.
^ Aphrodite EvnXoca at Aegae in Cihcia with Poseidon 'Ao-âXeior, ".

At Cnidos, " C. /. Cr, 4443, 7309.
: Aphrodite EwXota worshipped
at Mylasa, inscription published in Mova-. kui îfi.\io6. ^nipvrjs, 1875,
p. 50. At Naucratis, ^".
i
Aphrodite KaraaKoma at Troezen, ^^.
^ Plut. 983 F [De

'
p. Sollert. Am'm.) AcJ)po8ltt]v ofMov Kara ddXaaaav

TTOiovîtvTjV avTrj's lepa Koi dbeXcpa Koi prjbeu (f>ovevop,eva> \aipovcrav.
1 Plut. Crassus, 17, the goddess at Hierapolis in Syria, î^ ol pev

AfjipoblrriVj ol te "Hpav, ol 8e ttjv dp)(as Koi aireppara ndfriv e^ vypu>v irapa-
(TXoixrav aiTiav. Ampel. E/d. Hfem. 2. 32 Bello gigantum Venus per-

turbata in piscem se transfiguravit. Lucian, de Dea Syr. 45, 46,
lake with sacred fish near the temple of the goddess, Kaza piaov avrrjs
(Trjs \lpvr]s) ^copos \i6ov dviarr^Kev.
^ AfVKodea : ? a marine Aphrodite, akin to Dictynna and Derketo.

" "E^mTToy? referring to the sea: Schol. //. 2. 820 TrXdrrovai Se
avTTjv Kai fCpiTTTTOV, on 6 Aiveias 6 vlos avTr]s, Tfkfvaas P^XP'- '^^^ Sucrecos pirn
TOVTO inna) inflSr] Kal rrjv prjzepa (rlprjaf toiovtco dydXpari,
Bion, Id. g. i :
Apepe Kv7rpoyei/eta, Aios reKot i]8e 6aXd(T(rT]s.
P Anf/i. Pal. 10, 21 KuTTpt yaXrjvair] referring to the sea-goddess).

(?
16. 9. 143 'iXdaKev rrjv Kinrpiv' iyo) Se aoi fj iv tpcoTC ovpcos ^ ;âpo7rca
TtvivcTopai. iv TTeXdyet. Lucret. 1.6:
Te, dea, te fugiunt venti te nubila caeli
adventumque tuum.
1 Aphrodite Navap;^/? associated with Poseidon Scoo-ii'e'wy on inscription
found at Kertsch (of Roman period), Rev. Arch. 1881, p. 238.
^ 'HyepovT] : Hesych. S. v. "Aprepis Koi ÂcppoBiTrj' Koi pavs Tts ovro)

^^'^
KaXeirai : but cf. '.
^ Himer. Or. I. 20 rfjv 'A(f)po8lTT]v eV peaov Tov ne'Kdyovs dviuaav i'ri
Tov acjypop pfTa r-qv BuXaacrav e'^ uKputv irXoKap-av (TTa^nvaav.
Aphrodite, goddess of vegetation.

107 a "Aêeia at CnOSSUS, ^\
^ 'AcfipoSiTrj iv KaXd/ioi? at Samos, ^.
c Sacrifice of herbs to Aphrodite at Eryx, ^^

REFERENCES FOR CHAPTERS XXI-XXIII. /DJ
<1 Aphrodite 'UpoKfjuii in Paphos : Baudissin, Studien zur Setnii.

Relig. 2. 2IO. Strabo, 683, in Cyprus near Paphos, [iiKpov anh daXda-
ar]s Kol f) 'hpoKrjTria. Cf. " b.
^ At Hierapolis : Lucian, de Dea Syr. 49 {(opTTjv) ol ph nvpjjv ol 8e
AafinuBa KaXeovai' dvairjv 8e ev avrrj roiTjvde nouovari' 8iv8pfa peyaXa^

(KKOâvTes iv rrj avXij earacTL' fiera 8e dyiveovTes aiyas Tf khl oi'ar kul aXXa
KTrjvea fact (K tcov 8ev8pa>v anapTeovcTi . , , ra b( avTiKa iravra Kaiovrat,.
f 'AoTa Hesych. 8(v8pa K0TrT6p.eva Ka\ avariBifxeva 'A(f)po8lTr] npos

: rfj . . .
Tois i(r68oii.
s Pomegranate sacred to Aphrodite in Cyprus : Athenae. 84 C,

quoting from AntiphaneS, ttjv yap 'Acjipobirrjv iv Kinrpa hevbpov (jivrevaai
TovTO cjyacriv fv pnvov.
^ Plutarch, 756 E êiSupou avrrjv 'E[j,ire8oKXTJs (vKapnov 8e 2o0o/cX^s

eppfXcoi Tvdvv Koi TVpeTrovTOiS iivopacrav.
i
Her worship connected with that of the Horae at Olympia, Paus.
Cf. =*.
5- 15. 3.
Aphrodite and Adonis as divinities of vegetation and death.

^^"a Cf. Ovid. Mefa?>i. 10. 512 (Adonis born from the myrtle-tree).
Apollod. 3. 14, 34 'HcTioSos avTov ("y\5co!'ti') ôiviKos Koi 'AXcêa-tôias
XeyeC Ilaviiaa-is 8e (f^rjat QeiavTos ISaaiXecos 'Ao-avpiu>v, os fcrx^ Bvyarepa

'SpvpvaV avrrj Kara iJ.rjviv ^ Ac^poh'iTrjs, ov yap avTrjv eripa, icr;êt tov narpos
(pcora . . . 6eol 8e KaToiKTeipavres avrrju eis devBpou pfTriXXaâv, o KaXovcri
(rp,vpvav . . . TOV SevSpov payevTos yevvijBrjvai tov Xeyopevov' Aûiviv.
^ Gardens of Adonis: Plato, Phaedr. 276 B -noTtpa (rnovdrj tw Bipovs
tls 'A8o)vl8os KTjnovi dpu>v X'^^P'' Becopcov koXovs iv rjpLipaiaiv vktw yLyvo/xevovs.
Theophr. His/. Plant. 6. 7, 3 iv oaTpdKois Sidivip ol 'a8<x>vi8os k^ttoi
aneipeTm tov 6epovs. Hesych. S. V. 'aScoi'iSo? k^ttoi : iv rot? ASwwoiy

eiScoXa i^dyovfJi Kai KTjTTOVi eV* ooTpa/ccof, koi TTavTo8anr]v onaipav, oiov eK p.apa-
Bpoiv Koi 6pi8aKa)v napacrKfvdôv(Tiv avT<a rovi Krjnovs' koi yap iv 6pi8aKivais
avTov KaTaKXiv6r]vai vno Â<f)po8iTr]s (j)aatv (? the Kvnpiai Bvaiai mentioned
by Plato, p. 738 C, to be referred to the Adonis Aphrodite worship
at Athens).
*^ Paus. 6. 24, 7 po8ov pev Koi fivpaivr/V A(f)po8LTr]s re lepa eivai Ka\ oiKfia
Tta is"A8toviv Adyw. Theocr. /d. 15. 112 :
Trap pfv OTTuipa KtlTai, ocra 8pv6s aKpa (pipovTi,

Trap 8 aTTaXol Kairoi, 7tf(pvXaypevoi iv TaXapl.(TK0i,7
upyvpiois.
d Plut. Alcib. 18 'aSmi'io)!' fff To.^ Tjtiepas iKfivas (at the time of the
departure of the Sicilian expedition in the summer) KadqKovTav ttoX-
752 GREEK RELIGION.
XaYov veKpoii iKKOfjuôufvois ofio'ia TrpovKeivro Tali yvvaiî,K(u racpa^ e'/xifiovvTO kott-
T6p.ivaiKa\6prjmvs?i8ov. Hesych. S.V.Kadedpa' Ovaia' AdooviSos. Sapph. 7^'', 62:

KcndvacrKfi, Kvdf'prj'j <i[Spos "A^covis, t'l Ki 6elpei>
KaTTVTTTeade Kopat koi KaTepeiKeude )(iT(i)uns.
e Arist. Fax, 419:

nucras re ras tiWai reXeras Tctj Twi/ $ea)V
pv(TTi]pi 'Epfjijj, AirroXfi, Abuivia.
Lysistr. 387 :
ap fê\ap\j/f tcou yvvaiKcov rj rpvcprj
;(a> Tvp.rraviap6s X"' ttvkvoI 2a^d^coi . . .
eXeyei' S' 6 prj apacri fxiv Arjpoarparos
TrXeii' els StKeXi'ai/, rj yvvi) 5 opxovixfVT],
alal "AScoviv, (fyrjaiv, 6 fie ArjiMoarpaTOi
fXeyev OTrXirciy KaTokiyiLV ZaKvvQiav'
1]
6' vnonenoiicvV , i) yvi'rj irl rod reyovi,
KOTTTiaG' "Ahcoviv, <pr](Ti.
f Cratinus BuvkoXol, fr. 2 :
OS ovK eSw/c' uItovvti '2o(f)oK\e(t )(opov
TO) KKop,a)(ov 5', ov ovk av rj^lovv e-yw
epol Si8d(TKeiv ov8 av els AdcovLn.
s Dittenb. Syllog. Inscr. Grace 427 . eSoê toIs diacrcoTais (r^s 'Ac^po-
biTrjs) (TTfidrj 2T(f>avos . . . Tfjv TTop.TTi]v Tcov ' A8(x>vLoiv 7rf/i\|/e Kara TO ndrpia,
B.C. 302-1, found in the Peiraeeus.

b Athenae. 456 A-B nXdrav iv rm 'Afiebi'tSt xpô'H-ov bodrjvaL Xiyov Kivvpa
ijrep Tov 'ASwwSos tov vlov . . . Xeyet Se Â(})po8iTt]u kqi Aiovva-of' dp(j)6Tpo(,
yap fjpav rov 'AfiwctSoj. Cf. the Oracle given to the Rhodians, Socrates,
Hi'sf. Eccl. iii. 23 :
"Arrtf iXdcTKffrâi 6eov piyav dyvov Ahioviv
fvîov, oX/3idficopoi', fVTrXoKapou Atovvaov.
Plut. Sertorius, I hvdv "Arrewi^ yivop-ivbiv ep.(pavcov, rov fxeu 2vpov,
TOV fie 'ApKubos, eKarepos vno avos dncoXeTo. Ofph. Hymn, 56, Adonis
addressed with epithets of Bacchus, EvôvXeC . . . Kovpr] Ka\ Kope . . .
8iKpcos. Firm. Mat. ed. Halm, p. 120 in sacris Phrygiis quae

matris deum dicunt, per annos singulos arbor pinea caeditur et in
media arbore simulacrum iuvenis subligatur.

i ArgOS : PaUS. 2. 20, 6 o'Urjpa '4v6a TOV "Ahaviv al yvvalKis 'Apyfiav
odvpovTai,
k Samos : Athenae. 451 B Ai(pi\os iv Orja-d rpels noTe Kopas Paulas (prjaiv
'AdcovloKTt ypi(j:>eveiv TTupa ttotov.
1 At Alexandria in Caria : Steph. Byz. s. v. npos t(3 Adrpa ttjs
Kapias iv rj Âhu>viov tjv e'xov npaîTtXovs Â(ppo8iTr]v,

REFERENCES FOR CHAPTERS XXI XXIIL 753
"1 Cyprus : ? at Golgoi, "^
" At Amathus, "^
f>
Byblos: Lucian, de Dea Syr. 6 aSoj/ 5e Kat eV Bu/3Xm /ix/ya Iphv
AfppoSiTrjs /3u/3Xi7S, eV rw /cai to o^jyia e'y "A^coi'ir fnirc'Kiovaiv, eSarjif Se jcai
Td bpyia' Aeyouut ya/j S/) coy to epyov to es "A^coviv vito tov ctloj eV t^
;^w/)77 T7 (TCperepr] yiverrdai Ka\ nvrjiirjv tov Trddeos TviTTOUTa'i re (kikttov ereos
Km aprjveovcn Km tu opyiu eTriTeXtnvrTii> . . . (TTfav 5e aTTOTV'draivTaL re Km

dnoKXavacuvTm npuna pev KaTayiôvai rc5 'A8u)Vl8i okcos iovTi viKv'i, pfrh 5e
T7] (Tepj] Tjpeprj âifLV re' piv fxv0o\oyeova-i Koi e'? tou rjepa nepnovcrL koi tci^
K(<f)aXas ^vptovTM okus AiyvTTTtoi tinodm'ovTos Anioi. Cf. Strabo, 755

17 . . . Bv^Xns . . . Upci ecTTi tov 'aSojuSoj. Luc. o/>. cit. 8, the river called
Adonis in the territory of Byblos, kKdfTTov eVeoy ni/uio-o-erat . . . Km
rrrjpaivet to7s BvlBXuui tu nei'dea' pv6fovTai oti TuvTrjai Trjaiv 7]peprja-ip 6
AScows ava tov Aiâvov TirpiâKeTai koi to nt/xa e's to v^cop (pvopevnv
aWacrcrei tuv noTapov <a\ rc5 puui ti)v eTTcovvpirjv StSot.
P Antioch : Ammian. Marcell. 22. 9, 15 evcnerat autem isdem

diebus annuo cursu complete Adonea ritu veteri celebrari,amato
Veneris, ut fabulae fingunt, apri dente ferali delete, quod in adulto
flora sectarum est indicium fiugum . . . ululabiles undique planctus
et lugubres sonus audiebantur.
fi
Sestos : Musaeus ra Ka6"'Hpco, 42 :
At] yap Kvirpibirj navbi]pios rj\6ev (opTTj,

TTjv ava 'SrjaTov dyovaiv Abwvibi Kal Kvdfpflr].
1.47:
ov8e yvvq Ti^ epipvev ev\ TrroXt'etrat KvSfjpaiv.
J"
Alexandria in Egypt: Theocr. /o'. 15 : departure of Adonis, I. 150:
vvv fiav Kvnpis (xpina tov avTcii \aipiTU) avSpa,
acodev S' apes vtv a^xa Spocrw ddpoai e^co
oiaevpes ttoti KvpaT eV atovt tttvovto.
11. 143-144 :
iXa6i vvv (jiiX! 'ASwi/i, Ka\ (s vtcoT fvGvpi'jaats,
Ka\ vvv rjvdes, ASoji'I, /cut okk dcpiKr), (jiiXm- ij^dS.
s Apollod. Bl'bl. 3. 14, 5 ["Abaviv) 'A<ppo8iTr)s 8ia KaXXos en vrj-rrim;
Kpv(f)a 6(ci)V, els XiipvaKa Kpv\j/aaa, Hepa-ecpovr] TâpldTciTo. eKeivq be 6)s
iOedaaTO ovk ciTreSiSov. Kpicrecos 6e eVt Aios yevopevqs, (Is po'ipas dirjpedrj 6
eviavTos' Kai p'lav pev Trap eavTcS peveiv tov "aSwviv p'tav he nnpd 'nepae<puvr]
napeTaê^ ti]V 8e eTtpav nap Acppoh'LTrjv.
' Schol. Theocr. 5-92 t')"^ dvepdivrjv ^'iKavhpos (l>r](Tiv eK tov 'AScortSos
aipaTos (pvrjvat.
VOL. II. Z
754 GREEK RELIGION.
lO'Ja
Aphrodite mourning for Adonis: Macrob. Sat. i. 2r, 5
simulacrum huius deae in monte Libano fingitur capite obnupto,
specie tristi faciem manu laeva intra arnictum sustinens : lacrimae
visione conspicientium manare creduntur (he explains this as the
image of winter) . . . sed cum sol emersit ab inferioribus partibus
terrae . . . tunc est Venus laeta.
^ Bion, Id. \. \:
jxrjKeTi Tvopc^vptois iiri (jyapecri, KvKpi, Kad(v8e,
typeo, BeiXaloj KvavoaToKe, Koi nXaTdyrjaou

(TTddea.
1-32:
apea Trdvra XeynvTi koi at bpves, at tov Aâviv^
Koi TTorajLtot kXaiovTi to irevdea ras A(j)po8iTas.
c Eus. Praep. Evattg. i. 28 (speaking of the Phoenicians) KXav6p.6u

KOI eXeoy Koi oIktou ^XacrTijuaTi yijs dTnonTi Kadiepovu.
Chthonian Aphrodite.
iioa
piaut. Mercator, scaena supposita, Act 4 suh fin. :
Diva Astarte, hominum deorumque vis vita salus,
rursus eadem quae est pernicies mors interims.
'^
Hesych. S. v. 'Evp.evrjs' Â(ppo8iTT}.
c 'A(})po8iTTj lla(f)iq EvôvXq, inscription of the later Ptolemaic period :
Hell. Jour ti. 1888, p. 223.
^ Plut. Quaest. Rom. 269 B koL yap fV AeXcôTs Âffipobirrjs 'Ettitv/x-
jBias dyaXpnriov eari, ivpos o tov? Karoiôpfvovs eTTi rcii ;ôas avaKoXovvrai.
He compares Venus Libitina of Rome.

^ Clem. Alex. Proirept. 33 P. 'Apyelovs, ot 'AcPpobirrju Tvpâpvxov
Bpr](TKevov(Ti.
f Aphrodite MeXaivU, at Corinth, Thespiae and Mantinea ^, ^ ^*.
? Mv;êia : Suidas, s.v. MvxaiTaTov ; cf. inscr. found in Gyaros, 'A^poSfiV;/
{m)vxiq: Bull, de Corr. Hell. 1877, p. 357.

s Aphrodite napa/cvTrTOKo-a = Aphrodite Topyco : Plut. Amat. 766 D
TL yap au Xeyoi ris 'Ev^lvBfTov Ka\ AevKopu'ivriha rrjv iv KvTTptt) YlapaKuTTTOVtrav
eVt vvv Trpoaayopevop.fvtjv ' dXXd Tt)v Topyovi 'ktcos TTOivr]v ovk aKrjKoare ttjs
KpTjaarjs irapanXTjaia Trj UapaKVUTovcrr] TTadovcrrjs' irXrjv eKeiprj p.ev dirfXiOixiBr)
napaKvyj/aaa tov epaarrjV Idelv eKKOfuôfifuov. Ovid, Metam. I 4. 759
dominae sub imagine signum

servat adhuc Salamis Veneris quoque nomine templum
:
Prospicientis habet.
Anton. Liber. 39, gives the love-story without any reference to the cult
from which it arose.
REFERENCES FOR CHAPTERS XXI-XXIIL 755
b Aphrodite AaBpir^: Meineke, Del.
Epigr. p. 115.
1 Hesych. S. v. 'Epiwvs' dai/xciov Karaxdovios fj 'AcppoSirrji t'doiXov.
^ Clemens Rom. Homil. 5. 23 {ratô^ ns ht'iKwrai) 'Acppoblrt^s iv

KvTTpa).
1 Inscription quoted by the author of Arist. Mirab. AusciiU. 145,

perhaps from the Ismenion of Thebes :
HpaKXerjs T(fji(vi(T(Tf Kvdrjpa ^fpae(pad(r(Ta

TTjpvovfvs dyeXtjv rj6' ''EpvBdav aytov
Tcis Se ddpaaae rrddoi JJaa-Kpdfcrua 6fd.
^ Plutarch, Coniug. Praecep. 138 D ol naXcuoi rrj 'A^poStVi/ t6v

'Epytrfv (TvyKaQibpvaav. Cf. '^^, "^"^
, *, '^ ^.
* Apollod. 3. 14. 4 'Kivvpas . . . yrjpus Mf6dpvT]v Koprjv IlvypaKiMvoi

KvTTpiav âcriXfais . . . (yivprjatv . . . "Adcoviv,
^ Clem. Alex. Protrept. p. 51 P. 6 Kvtt/jios o Iluy/xaXtmi' eKflror

fXecâvTivov rjpdadr] dydXparos to ayaXp,u 'A(f)po8LTr]i |i/ koI yvpvr] ^v .
^CKo<TTe(pavos icTTopfi.
c Ilvypai(x)V Hesych. S. v. 6 "AScopu Tiapa Kvnpion,

"â Aphrodite connected with the Moirae and the Erinyes:
Schol.
Soph. 0. C. 45 'EmpfviSr]: Kpofov (f)T](Tl ras EvpepiSas K tov KaXXiKopos
yiViTO XPI'O"'} 'Acppodirr], Moipai t dBdvaroi Ka\ 'Epiwes aloXoûjpoi,
^ Connected -with Nemesis at Rhamnus : Pliny, JV. H. 36, 17,

Cf. inscription on a seat in the Attic theatre : C /. .4. 3. 289 'Upiv^
''^.
Ovpavias Ne/itcrecos' also at Sparta,
Male Aphrodite.
"^^ Macrob. Sal. 8 Signum etiam
3. eius est Cypri barbatum
corpore sed veste muliebri, cum sceptro et natura virili et putant
eandem marem feminam esse. Aristophanes eam 'AcftpoSirov
ac
appellat . . . Philochorus quoque in Atthide eandem affirmat esse
Lunam, et ei sacrificium faciunt viri cum veste muliebri, mulieres
cum virili, cum eadem et mas aestimatur et femina.
^ Serv. Virg. Aen. 2. 632 Est etiam in Cypro simulacrum barbatae

Veneris, corpore et veste muliebri, cum sceptro et natura virili, quod
'A(f)p6îTov vocant, cui viri in veste muliebri, mulieres in virili veste

sacrificant. Cf. Firm. Mat. De erroreprof. relig. p. 80, ed. Halm.
c Cf. Catull. 68. 51 duplex Amathusia.
'^ Hesych. S. v. 'A^potiros' 6 fie ra TTfpi 'Apadovvra yfypa(f)(os UaidvL-
aov (? leg. Halav wy) avSpa ia^rjpaTla-dai fv Kvwput X'yf<.
Z 2
756 GREEK RELIGION.
^ Jo. LyCl. De Alens, 4? p. 89 n.afjL(f)v\o\ kuI TTa>yu>va exôvaav (Tifxrânv
1'
Plut. jD( Mul. Viri. 4, p. 245 F (at Argos) \i.ixp*- "^^ ''^ 'yi^p^rTiKa
TfXovai yviaiKcis fxiv ai'8pftois ;^tr(x)(r( /cat xXafivaiv, ai/8pas Se TTfTrXnts
yviraiKcov Koi KoKvnTpais cip-cfyuvvvvTes.
K Cf. Schol. //. 2. 820, the women at Rome, ev^npevm tij 'A(ppodiTii
avaTpi)(co6rivaij riprjcral re avTrjv ayaXpari KTtva (fiepovaav Kai ytvfiov '4)(ôv(Tav,
ShjVi koi c'lppeva Kai 6ijXea \(i opyava.
^ Cram. Anecd. Paris, I. 320 w? km avn) rj \\cf)po8iTT} rrjv re tov

uppevos Ka\ TOV SrjXfOi (ôvaa (pvaiv.
* Theophrast. Char. iKpi 8fiai8aipovius' koi elaeXSelv flaw (TTt (jidfcvv
Tovs Eppii(ppodiTovs i\rjv ti]v rjpepuv.
Animals sacrificed to Aphrodite.
114 a Swine offered at Castniae in Pamphylia, ^^: at MetropoHs in
Thessaly, ^
b Bonn. Ed. p. 80 eripciTO 'Afppobirr]
Jo. Lyd. Z)e ]\IniS. 4, 45. rj to'h
avTo^s ois Kai rj "Hpa' iv 5e r^ Kvnpm npoârov KfoSlco iaKinaapivov (? leg.

((TK(TTaapevot) trvveduov ti) 'AcppoSiTTp 6 8e rponns tjjs Uparfias iv rf) Kvnpco
ano t7]s KopivSov jrnprjXdi nore. elra 8e koi avas dypiovs tBvov aiiTr] dia rtjv
KUTci 'AScohSoj iml3ovXrjv.
<^ Athenae. 96 A, quoting from Antiphanes' Kopivdla' tv tJj Kvnpco 8'
ovTd) (f)i\T]8el ToTs vaiv ('A^poStVr;) . . . ort 8' oi>tci)s \\(ppo8[rT] vs 6vfTni
fiapTvpil KaXXipaxoi 7] Zt]vu8oro-: iv laTopiKols v7roppr]paai ypd<p(iiv a>8(
" Apyeloi A(ppo8iTrj vp Qvovai, km fj eoprr] KaXflrai vcrTTjpui."
d Arist. Achat ovxi xo'ipos Td(ppo8'LTrj dverm. At Hierapolis

}i. 794 dXX'
ovovai 8e ôas apaevds re koi BrjXfas koi aiyas Kcil oias' crias 8e povvas
erayfas voplôpres ovt Bvovatv ovre criTeovTai . . . 6pvl6a>v re aiiTeoicrt
neptartpT] XPW^ IpoTarov, Koi ov8e \//aveti' airetou 8iKaifvat. Luc. De Dea
Syr. 54.
^ Paus. 2. 10. 4 TU)v Updcov TOVS prjpuvi Ovovcri nXfji' vu>v to Aphrodite
at Sicyon.
f Ael. De Nat. Afiitn. 10, 50 tl -yoOi/ idiXms Bvaai oh', I80V ffoi
T(S [Soypco TTapeaTrjKfu oii . . . fire aiya eire fpi(f>ov (referring tO the worship
at Eryx). At Cos, goats offered to Aphrodite : Paton and Hicks,
Inscriptions 0/ Cos, no. 369 ; an epKpos îjXfio, id. no. 401.
Aphrodite *^
^ 'EwiTpayla, in Attica, "^ ; at Elis, ^* ; cf. ". Tac.
His/. 2. 3 (in C}prus) hostiae ut quisque vo\it, sed mares deliguntur;
REFERENCES FOR CHAPTERS XXI -XXII I. 757
certissima fides haedorum fibris. Plaut. Poenul. sex agnos immoLn i I
Veneri.
^ Jo. \^yd. De Mens. 4, 44. p. 79 ''ipov^tyow hi uiirrj

x^F"^ fî nepSiKas,
OTi al lieu Tots vSairi ôlpovcn [iTikayla Se r} 'A(^poSiVr;).
i Empedoclis ap. Porph. de Abstinent. 2. 21 :
(iXAa V^vnpii jSaaiXeia . . .
Ttju 01 y evcre^ffacriv aydXfxaaiv IXi'njKovTo

ypauTols re ^(uoiai fjivpoiai re 5ai5aX'io"/Jois
apvpvrjs r UKpaxov 6v(Tiais Xiûvov re SvaSovs

^Qv6a}v re crnovbas /xeXirrwi/ pnrTovvTfs eV ou8as.
(For emendations in the text vide Bernays, Theophrastus Schrift iilnr
Frommigkeit, p. 178.)
^ Theocr. 27- 63 p/^w mpTiv "Epoin. kiu amd ôvv 'A(j)po8LTa. CI.
'Ac^poSi'r/j TavpoTToXos Schol. Dionys. Perieg. 609.
1 'lepe'iuv Ti] 'A(f)po8iTi] ^biarov' olcrda yap nov to irepi Tuii XaySi Xeyopfvor^
tbs noXi) Trjs A0poStVf/s ptTtariv avTOt. ,
" ^ Horn. Hymn to Aphrod. i-6 ; Aesch, Danaides (Athenae. 600 A):
(pa pkv ayvos ovpavos Tpuxrat, xôfu,
epws Se yatav XajMâvfi ydpov TVêiv^
op^pos S arr (IvdfVTOs ovpavov mauv
fKvae yaiai'' r; 8e TiKTerai ^poToli
pijXcov Te ûaKas Koi îov Ar]priTpioi>, i
8ii>8pci)Tis (opa d' (K voTiôvTos ycipov
TeXtios f'(JTi* Tcii/ S eyco Trapairios.
Imitated by Euripides, Frag. 890 ; Athenae. 599 F.

^ Soph. Frag. 678 (Stobaeus, 63. 6):
w TToiSey 17 TOi KvTTpis ov KvTj-pis p-ovov^ i
dX\' eVrl noXXcof ovopdruiv end^vvpus. j
eariv pev "AiStjs, eVrt 8' a<pdiTos î-os^ !
tiXTCv be Xvaaa paivds^ eari S' ipfpos
uKpavTus, ear olpaypos' iv Keivrj to ttuv

aTTovbalou rjavxc'iov es ^lav ayov.
Eur. Hipp. 447 :
(poiTo. d av aldip ^ etrri S iv OaXucriTM

KXvbiovi Kvnpis, ndvTa S in. Tavrrji >/jv.
*1 Eur. Med. 835 :
Krj(j)iaov podv
rav Kvrrptv kX^ôvq-ip affivaa-aptfav
Xpus KaTaTTVfvaai. perpias avipujv
Z3
758 GREEK RELIGION.
)(âiTaiaiv tvaibrj podeuv ttXokov avQtuiv

TO. (To(f)iq wapedpovi nepneiv eparas,
TTavTotas operas crvvfpyovs.
Aphrodite as a city-goddess.
Jo. Lyd. De Mens. 4, p. 91
116 a
ol ôiVticey 'AcrrdpTrjv TTjv cr(Pci)v 7ro\ioii)(ov.
^ Aesch. Sep/. 140:

KvTTpis are yevovs TTpopdrap
aXfvaov' credfu yap i^ alparos

yeyouapfv.
At Paphos ", in Achaea ^^
: Aphrodite 2vppaxia at Mantinea, '*.
"â Aphrodite UdvBripos : Xen. Symp. 8. 9,'^^.

b Plat. Symp. 180 D,^n.
c Paus. 6. 25. i,^^r,
d Anihol. I. 297/* X.
e At Thebes, ^
f At Megalopolis, ".
s At Erythrae, '^
^ At Cos: Paton and Hicks, hiscriptmis of Cos, no. 401 'A(ppo8iTi]
TlavdafiOi epicpov BrjXeiav,
i
At Athens : Athenae. 569 D 'SUavbpos 6 KoXotpavios la-Topfl iv
TpLTM K6Xo(j)u)i>iaKcov (pdcTKcov aiiTou {ôXcova^ Ka\ Tlavdrjpov ' A(ppo8iTrjs ifpov
TrpcoTou IbpvaacrBai a(p hv -qpyvpiaavTO al TrpoaTaaai tcov oiKrjpaTcov.
HarpOCr. S. v. UdvSrjpos AcppoSiTi]'

' 'ATruXXoSaipos iv rm 7rep\ 6fibu ndv8i]p6v
(prjatv A6r]vr](ri Kkr]6iji>ai rrjv d(})i8pv6(laau nepl Trjv dp)(alav dyopav 8ia to
ivTav6a Trdvra tov drjpov avvdyeadai to TraXaiou iv rals eK*cX?jrrtnf, as iKoXovv
dyopds. Bull, de Corr. Hell. 1889, p. 161, inscription found on the
south-west side of the Acropolis fourth century b. c., rovbe aoi, w
peydXr] afpvf] IldvSrjpe 'A(j)po8iTr], . . . MfVfKpdTfia AeîKpdrovs 'iKupiitos
OvyaTi-jp Upfia ttJs 'A(f)po8iTr]s rrjs Ilavbrjpov. Id. p. 1 63, inscription 284
B. C, . . . OTTCos av ol dcTTVvdpoL . . . ijripeXeiav TtoiSivrai tov Upov Trjs
'A(ppo8[Tr]s Tiis Uav^Tjpov kuto tu Trdrpia, found on the Same spot as the
above (published also in Dell. Arch. 1888, p. 188). Cf. Dell. Arch.
1891, p. 127, inscription of latter part of third century B.C., 17 iSovXi)
q eTTi Aiovvaiov ap)(0VT0S dvedqKev 'A^poStVft Tjyepovjj tov Brjpov Ka\ Xdpicn.
Athenae. 659 D Mivav8pos iv KoXuki . . . pdyapov iv tj] ttjs Ilav8i]pov
A(f)po8iTT]s ioprrj noiu tuvtI Xiyovra
6tols oXvfjLniois ev)(i>pfda
uXvpnutKTi ndcri Trdcrais
BiSdvai acoTTjpiav
vyUiav dyaOa TToXXd . . .

"* ^ Connected with the clan and with marriage: 'A(ppo8iTr] 'Ann-
Tovpr], ^* and '^.
^ Children consecrated to Aphrodite at Paphos : C. I. Gr. 2637

(second century a. d.).
c Aphrodite "Upa at Sparta, ^^ e.
^^ ^.
<i
Artemidor. Oneirocrit.
e Aphrodite *Ap/xa at Delphi, ''.
f Aphrodite Nu/x^/a: Pans. 2. on the road between Troezen and

32, 7,
Hermione, 'Afjypodirrjs Up6v Nu/i(îay TToirjcravTos Qrja-tus, fjviKa (cr}(f yvvaiKa

'E\ivr]V. Cf. '^
8 Aphrodite TiveTvXKis: Arist. Nub. 52 Schol. FfffTuXXly 17 tjJs
-yeveVecoy efjiopos 'A(f)poîTT]. Lysistr. 2 Schol. rei/ervXXls yui/at/cf/a Qôs

7T(p\ TTjV 'A(ppo8iTT]v. Lucian, Pseudol. 1 1 ein-e yap p.01 TTpos Ylavbrjpov Kal
TfveTvWlbcov Koi Kv^t'j^rjs. Ff'O/es, 42 rras 6(os firiTpi^cov tovs ytyaprjKoras,

iov ivMV oi KaKuhalpovis avbpes ovê avTci 'icracrL to. ovopLora^ KcoXtaSar,
(I 'J'vxoi, Koi TtvervWidas *] ttjv ^pvyiav Saipova Koi tov Svaepcora Ka>p.ov iirX
Tw TTOipevC TfXeral Se aTTopprjToi Kal x^P^^s dvdpav vrroirra pLvaTtipia Kai ri
yap 8(1 TvtpniKeKiiv; 8ia(f)6opa. \lrvxrjs. Alciphron, 3. II nov yap e'-yo) Kar
aypov IdpixTca KwXtaSa? ^ TevervWiSas ] oib' UKOvcras oXXa Tiva baipovcov
ovoparaj oov 8ia to TrXfjdos dnaXiade pov rrjs pvrjprjs ra TrKeiova (cf. Hckate, ^^ '^).
'i
Aphrodite OaXdpodV : Hesych. S. v. avaaaa, 'Atppobirr].
i KovpoTp6(pos : Athenae. 441 F (from Plato) irpaTa pev e/xol ydp

KovpoTp6(pa> npodverai n'kaKovs ivopxrji. Allth. Pal. 6. 318 YJjTrpihi
KovpoTpotpai 8apa\iv peâvres e(pr][ioi ;âipoi'rfr vvp(j}as (< diikdpuiv ayop.ev.
In Samos at the feast of 'ATrarovptu Homer Tiopivopfvoi yvvui^\ Kovporpoffxa
Bvovaais iv ttj rptodcp. Cf. Athenae. 592'% who identifies KovpoTp6<poi

with Aphrodite.
^
StobaeUS, 67. 20 IIoO pei/ yap "EpcDS TiapayivoiT av SiKuioTfpov rj enl
v6pip,ov uv8p6s Kal yvvaiKos opiXiav ; nov 8e Hpa J
tiov 8e 'A<ppo8iTrj j cf.
Died. Sic. 5. 73.
Aphrodite as goddess of beauty, and love.
'"I Mop(f)oi at Sparta, '^^^: Hesych. s.v. Mopcfxii- fj 'Ac^poStV?;.
^ 'Ano(TTpo(p'ia: in Thebes, ^ Cf. 'Emo-Tpucjiia in Megara, ^^ ^.
c 'Av8poc}^6vos or uvocria in Thessaly, *: Plut. 768 A eVi viiv t6 Upcu

'A(ppo8iTT]s dv8po(^6vov Kokovcriv.
d Aphrodite lif t^w in Pharsalus ^

: cf. inscription from Lesbos, " *.
Hesiod, Works and Days, 1. 73 description of Pandora's creation,'*.

Ilepo-c 6ia : rj ' A^po8iTri Hesych. .f , V. ? leg. Ileiaidea,
760 GREEK RELIGION.
e Mai/Spayopirt? : Hesych. j.z/. ^ 'a^/joSiV^. Maxai/mr at Megalopolis, " '\
^^.
f Miycoj/ms in Cranae south of Laconia,
K Upaîs Aphrodite at Megara, ''.
h napa/cilTTTouo-a at Cyprus, '""g.
> "iridvpos : HarpOCr. S. v. ylndvpia-TTjs. 'Epp^t iripaTO 'Adrjvrja-i Koi îOvpos
'A<ppobiTrj Kat*E/3&)r yj/idvpos.
BaimTis at Syracuse, "a,

k Fragment of Homeric hymn to Aphrodite, 10 (Baumeister) :
Vyvapoyivi] Kvdepeiav delcropai, rj re ^poroiai
peiXiX^ Scopa 8l8a)(Tiv, i(p' IpfprS fie Trpaaairw
aU\ /ieiSiaet Koi ecp' Ipeprov (îpei avdoi.
;(a(/3e, Gio.
fioff 8' Ipfpoeaaav iioibqv.
Cf. fragment 6. 19. "Epoos as the personification of human love:
Plato, SympOS. I 1 9 C (Scopav koI dvatav oiiSev yiverai nepl avTOV. Eur.
Ni;pp. 539.
'
Apollod. 3. 14, legend of the daughters of Cinyras, aXXoTpUns
avbpadt, avvevvaôpevM 8ia prjviv Ac^poStVijy.
n 'Innobapda : rj Bpiar^ts koi 'A(Ppo8lTr] Hesych. S. V.
n Firm. Mat. De err ore profan. relig. p. 78 ed. Halm (Phryges

qui Pessinunta incolunt) . . . mulieris divitis ac reginae suae amorem
quae fastus amati adulescentis tyrannice voluit ulcisci, cum luctibus
annuis consecrarunt.
o Firm. Mat. p. 80 Assyrii et pars Afrorum aerem nomine lunonis
vel Veneris virginis si tamen Veneri placuit aliquando virginitas
consecrarunt.
^'^^
Aphrodite 'Eraipa: ^ Athenae. 571 C t^s napa toIs 'Adtjvaion
Ka\ovpevT]s haipas rr]s 'A(f)po8iTrjs, irepX ^s (br]ah 6 'A6r}vaios 'ATroWoSwpos iv

Tols Trepl 6eu>v ovrws " iralpav fie ttju 'Acf)po8iTi]v Trjv tovs iraipovs Kai ras
inupas crvmyovaaV " tovto S' tari (f)[\as. Photius S. V. 'Eraipas 'Acjjpodlrrji'
iepov 'A6fjvr](nv dno tov avixiyeiv iraipovs Kcn iraipas. At Ephesus, *^.
^ Aphrodite nopvrj at Abydos, **.
c Cf. Clem. Alex. Protrept. p. 33 P. ovxi 'Aippobirrj neiîiSaalri ptv
'A/jyeioi, iraipa fie 'Adtji'dlot. Koi KaXKmvya dvovaiv IvpaKovcrioi î/ NiKavSpos ;
6 TToiT]TrjS KaXXiyXovTou ttov K(K\riK(v. Vide Hesych. s. V. Hepiâaroj and

TpvpaX'iTis, epithets of Aphrodite.
d Aphrodite KaXXtVi^yo? : Athenae. 554 C-E IBpCaavro 'AcppoBlrrji Upbv

K(i\((Ta(Tai KaWiTTvyov rrjv Beuv, ois laTopel Kai ApxêXaos tv toIs uipôis.
Coin Plate B
End of Vol. II
REFERENCES FOR CHAPTERS XXIXXIII. 761
Aphrodite \vKaiva : OrpJiic Hymn, 54. 11, ? meaning of lille.
f Dedications by hetaerae in Pharos in the Adriatic : C. I. Gr.

1837 D, E. Philetairos in the Kwriyli (Athenae. 572 D):
ovX (Tos fTaipai Upou eari Ttavraxov
aXX ov)(^L yafxerris oiiSu/ioO ttjs
'
EXXdSus ',
Aphrodite identified with women.

'"' * Aphrodite 'Apatvor] near Alexandria, *" '.
^ Aphrodite BeAetTW;^;/ : Plut. 753 E r; 8e BfXeori^T;, npis Atos, ov âp-
âpuv e^ ayopai yvvaiov J

^j Upa Kai vaoiis AXeâvtpds exovaw, iTTiypa\\ravTos
81 fpuiTa Tov ISaaiXecos, 'A(ppoSLTt]s BeXecTTixî.
'^ Aphrodite Aapia : Athenae. 253 B Qrjû'ioi KoXaKevopres tov AyjprjTptov,

S)S (pT]ai TLoXepcciv, , . . ISpvaavro vabv 'A(f)po8iTT]s Aup'ias. Cf. 'A(f)pu8irr)
Ae'aiva id. 253 A.

d Aphrodite Uv6ioi/lkt] at Athens : Athenae. 595 A-C eeoVo/xTros eV rfj
TTpos 'AXeâvdpou eTTKTToXij rrju 'ApndXov StaâXXcuv a.<oXaa[av (prjcriv . , , rju
TtdvTfs jjSecrav oXiyrjs Sawuvrii Koivrjv tols ôvXoaivois yivop.evrjv^ ravrrji
fT6Xp.r]<Tiv 6 (piXos eivai aov (âcTKcuv Upou Kai Tiptvos Idpvaaadai, kih
TTpoaayopevaai tov vaov Ka\ tov ("iu^pov YlvdtoviKrjs AcppobtTrji^ apii ttjs re nnpa
Becov Tipapias KaTa^povwv.
Aphrodite in Orphic literature.
^'"^
Hymn 54, lines 1-8 :
OvpavLT], TToXvvpve, (f)iXoppi8r]s 'Ac^ôSiVj/,
novToyevTji , ytvirtipa did, (piXondvwxf, (TepvT],
vvKTiplr], ^(VKTtpa, doXoTrXoKf, M^Tfp uvdyKTjs,
ndvTa yap (k atdfv icrTi, lirf^cvôi 8e re Koapov,

Koi KpaTits Tpiacruiv poipcov, yevvus 8e to. ttuvtu,
oaaa t iv ovpavcS i(TTi Ka. iv yair] TTuXvKdpTrco,
iv TTOPTOV Tf ^v6a)' afpvr] EdKôio ndpeSpf,

repTTopevT} duXlrjai, yapocnoXe, prjTep epmTaiv.
11. 22, 23 :
7 vvp(f)ais Tepnr] Kvavunriaiv tv \6ov\ Ala,

6vids err alyiaXols yp'oppateaiv aXpari KovcfiM.
Frag. 28. 4 :
TToXtpos pev "Aprjs, dpi'jvrj 8' ioT 'AcppoSiTTj.
KND OF VOL. II.

Oxforb
PRINTED AT THE CLARENDON PRESS
BY HORACE HART, PRINTER TO THE UNIVERSITY
WORKS
PUliLISHED BY
THE CLARENDON PRESS,
ART AND ARCHAEOLOGY.

Historia Numorum. A Manual of Greek Numismatics. By
Barclay V. Head, D.C.L., Keeper of the Department of Coins and
Medals in the British Museum. Royal 8vo, half-morocco, 42J.
Catalogue of the Greek Vases in the Ashmolean Museum.

By Percy Gardner, M.A., Litt.D. Small folio, linen, with 26 Plates.
Price 3/. 3.f. net.
Three lumdred andfifty copies only p-inted, all of rvhich are numbered.
Introduction to Greek Sculpture. By L. E. Upcott, iNI.A.

Crown 8vo, 45. 6d.
A Critical Account of the Drawings by Michel Angelo

and RaflFaelle in the University Galleries, Oxford. By .Sir
J. C. RoBiN-
so.N, F.S.A. Crown 8vo, 45.
The Drawings by Raffaelle in the University Galleries, Oxford.

Drawn on Stone by Joseph Fisher. In an ornamental box, 21s.
Ancient Coptic Churches of Egypt. By A. Butler, M.A.,

J.
F.S.A. 2 vols. 8vo, 305.
The Churches and Monasteries of Egypt, &c. Attributed

to Abu Salih, the Armenian. Translated from the original Arabic, by
B. T. A. EvETTS, M.A. ; with added Notes by A. J. BuTLER, M.A.
Small 4to, with Map, buckram, 21^.
Oxfotb
LONDON : HENRY FROWDE
O.XFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS WAREHOUSE, AMEN CORNER, E.C.
CLARENDON PRESS, OXFORD.
SELECT LIST OF STANDARD WORKS.
STANDARD LATIN WORKS .... Page i
STANDARD GREEK WORKS . . . .

3
OXFOBD CLASSICAL TEXTS . . . . ,. r,
MISCELLANEOUS STANDARD WOliKS . 7
1. STANDARD LATIN WORKS.

Aetna. A critical recension Juvenal. Thirteen Satlves.
of Text, based on a new
tlio I']dited, with
Introduction au<t
examination of MSS., with Prole- Notes, by C. IT. Pearson, M.A., ami
fiomena, Translation, Textual and Plerbert A. Strong. M.A., LL. 1>.
]<]xegetical Comniontary, Excursus, Second EcUdon. Crown Svo. (js.
and complete Index of the words.

By Robinson Ellis, M.A., LL.D. Ad Sat tram Sextain
Crown Svo. 7s. 6rf. net. in Codice Bodl.Canon. 2' LI Additi
Avianus. The Fables. Edited, versus XXZVI. Exscripsit E, O.
witli Prolegomena, Critical Appa- Winstedt, Accodit Sinnilacruni
i-atus,Commentary,&c., by Robinson Pliotographicuin. In Wra))p>-i'.
IS. net.
Ellis, M.A., LL.D. Svo. S.^. 6d.
Catulli Veronensis
Llhev.
Iterum recognovit, Apparatum Cri- Livy. Booh I. With Intro-
ticum Prolegomena Appendices ad- duction, Historical Examination,
didit.R. Ellis, A.M. Svo. lOs. and Notes. By Sir J. K. Seeli y.
M.A. Tliird Edition. Svo. 6s.
Catullus, a Commentary on.
By Robinson Ellis, M.A. Second
Edition. Svo. 18s.
Manilius Nodes Manil ian a e ;
.
Bisseriationes in Astronotniau Ma-

Cicero. De Oratore Lihri st'i'e
nila. Accedunt Coniecturae in Ger-

With Introduction and Notes.
Trca.
tnanici Aratea. Sci-ipsit R. Ellis.
ByA.S. Wilkins.Litt.D. Svo. iSfj. Crown Svo. 6s.
Also, Heparatdii
Book I. 7s. dd. Book II. 5.S.
Selected Fragment
Merry. t<
Book III. 6.S.

o/Eomcm Poetry. Edited, with Intio-
Pro Milone. Edited by duction and Notes, by W. W.
A. 0. Clark, M.A. Svo. S.<?. 6rf. Merry, D.D. Second Edition. Crown
keeled Letters. With Svo. 6.S-. 6rf.
English Introductions, Notes, and

Appendices. By Albeit Watson, Ovid. P. Ovldii Nasonis Ibis.
M.A. Fourth Edition. Svo. 18s. Ex Novis Codicibus edidit. Scholia
Horace. With a Commentary. Vetera Commentarium cum Pio
liy E. C. Wiekham, D. D. Two Vols. legomenisAppendicelndiceaddidit,
Vol. I. The Odes, Carmen Seeu- R. Ellis, A.M. Svo. los. 6d.
lare, and Epodes. Tliird Edition.
Svo. 1 2S. P. Ovidi Nasonis Tris-
Vol.11. The Satires, Epistles, and liu,n Lihri V. Recensuit S. CJ. Owi-n,
De Arte Poetica. Svo. 1 2s. A.M. Svo. i6s.
Oxford : Clarentlon Press. London : Hknrv Feowdk, Amen Corner, E.C.
H, 2000
STANDARD LATIN WORKS.
Persius. The Satires. With Tacitus. The Annals. Edited,

a Translation and Commentary. with Introduction and Notes, by
By John Conington, M.A. Edited H. Furneaux, M.A. 2 vols. Svo.
by Henry Nettleship, M.A. Third Vol. I, Books I-VI. Second Edition.
Edition. 8vo. 8s. 6rf. iSs.
Vol. II, Books XI-XVI. 20s.
Plautus. Rudens. Edited,
witli Critical and Explanatory De Germania. the By
Notes, by E. A. Sonnenschein, same Editor. Svo. 6s. 6d.
M.A. 8vo. 8s. 6d. Vita Agricolae. By the
The Codex Tumehl of same Editor. Svo. 6s. 6rf.
Plautus. By W. M. Lindsay, M.A. Dialogus de Orator ihus.
Svo, 2 IS. net. A Revised Text, with Introductory
Essays, and Critical and Explana-
Quiutilian. Institutionis tory Notes. By W. Peterson, M.A.,
Oratoriae Liber Decimus. Revised A LL.D. Svo. I OS. 6d.
Text, witli Introductory Essays,
(Critical Notes, &c. ByW. Peterson, Velleius Paterculus ad M.
M.A., LL.D. Svo. I2S, dd. Vinicinm Libri Duo. Ex Amerbachii
praecipue Apographo edidit et
Rushforth. Latin Historical emendavit R. Ellis, Litterarum
I ascriptions, iUustrating the History of Latinarum Professor pul)licus apvid
the Early Empire. By G-. McN. Oxonienses. Crown Svo, paper
Rushforth, M.A. Svo. los. net. boards. 6s.
Anthologia Oxoniensis, Nova. Nettleship. Lectures and

and Latin Verse.
Translations into Greek Essays on Subjects connected with Latin
Edited by Robinson Ellis, M.A., Scholarship and Ijiteratnre.
and A. 1). Godley, M.A. Crown
Svo, buckram extra, 6s. 7iet ; India Second Series. Edited by
I'ajêr, 7s. 6d. net. F. J. Haverfield, with Memoir by
Mrs. Nettleship. Crown Svo. 7s. Gd.
King and Cookson. The Prin-
ciples of Sound and Inflexion, as illus- Contributions to Latin
trated in the Greek and Latin Languages. Lexicography. Svo. 21s.
By J. E. King.M. A., and Christopher
Cookson, M.A. Svo. iSs. Sellar. Roman Poets of the
An Introduction to the Augustan Age. By W. Y. Sellar,
Grammar and M.A. viz.
of Greek
;
Comparative
Latin. Crown Svo. 5s. 6d. I. Virgil. New Edition. Crown
Svo. 9s.
Lewis and Short. A Latin
II. Horace and the Elegiac
Dictionary, founded on Andrews'
Poets. With a Memoir of the
edition of Freund's Latin Diction-
Author by Andrew Lang, M.A.
.iry, revised, enlarged, and in great
Seco)id Edition. Crown Svo, 75.6^?.
part re-written l)y Charlton T.
Lewis, Ph.l)., and Charles Short, Roman Poets of the Re-
LL.D. 4to, 25s.
pitblic. Third Edition. Crown Svo. 10s.
Lindsay. The Latin Lan-
guage. An
Historical Account of Wordsworth. Fragments and
Latin Sounds, Stems and Flexions. Specimens of Early Latin. With Intro-
By W. M. Jiindsny, M.A. Demy ductions and Notes. By J. Woids-
Svo. 2 1 .<;. worth, D.D. Svo. iSs.
Oifoid: Clarendon Press.

STANDARD GREEK WORKS.
2. STANDARD GREEK WORKS.

Chandler. A Practical Intro Head. Hidorla Numoruni:
rhirjinn /o G reck Arxcntualion , J)y H. W. A Manual of Greek Numismatics,
< 'li;in<llcr,M.A. ScamdEili/ion.ios.Gd. By Barilay V. Head. Royal Svo,
Farnell. The (Jidta of the Greek half-bound, 42s.
s/aks. With Platen. By L. II. Farnoll, Hicks. A Manual of Greek
M.A. Historical Inscriptions. New and
Vols. I and II. Svo. 32s. net. Keviscd Editioji l)y E. L. Hirks,
Vols. Ill and IV in tite Press. M.A., and G. F. Hill, M.A. Svo.
Grenfell. An Alexandrian 1
Hill.
2s. 6d.
l.'njfic Fm and other Greek Papyri,

(J
It tent j
iSourcesfor Greek Ifia-
chief!;/ rtolniiaic. Edited l)y B." P. lory between the Persian and Velopi<n-
(JrcnfoH.M.A. Sni. 4to. Sn.Gd.îeL ncsiau Wars. Collectcdand arranged
by G. F. Hill, M.A. Svo. lo.s-. M.
Grenfell and Hunt. New Kenyon. The Palaeography
( Fragments and other Greek
tmsicul
and Latin Papijri. Edited by B. P. of Greek Pajnjri. By Frederic <;.
(ircnfell. M.A., and A. S. Hunt, Kenyon, M.A. Svo, with Tvsrenly
M.A. With Plates, 12s. 6rf. net.
Facsimiles, and aTable of Alphabets.
10s. 6d.
Menancler's
fecoproc.
A Revised Text of tlio Geneva
Liddell and Scott. A Greek-
English Lexicon, by H. G. Liddell,
Fragment. With a Translation T>. D., and Robert Scott, 1). D. Eiglith
and Notes by tlic same Editors. Edition., Eerised. 4to. 7,6s.
Svo, stiff covers, is. dd.
Monro. Modes of Ancient
Grenfell and Mahaffy. llec- Greek Mxsic. By D. B. Monro, M.A.
enue Laies of Plulrirn/ Philadclplius. Svo. S.s. 6rf. nrt.
2 vols. Text and Plates. T,is.6d.7i(t.
Paton and Hicks. Tlie In-
Haigh. The Attic
Theatre. scriplioiis of Cos. By W. R. Paton
A Dcscrij)tion of the Stage and and E. L. Hieks. Royal Svo, linen,
Theatre of the Athenians, and of the with Map, iSs.
Jtramatic Performances at Athens. Smyth. The bounds and
By A. E. Haigh, M.A. Second Edition, Inflections of the Greek Dialects (Ionic\
L'':vised and Enlarged. Svo. 1 2s. 6d. By H.Weir Smyth, Ph.D. Svo. 24s.
The Tragic Drama of Thompson. A Gloi<mry of
the Greeks. With Illustrations. Greek Birds. By D' A rcy W. Thomp-
Svo. I 2S. 6d. son. Svo, buckram, los. net.
Aeschylus. Tn SI lajle Inlays. Tli(,>Acharnians. Fourth Edition, 35.

With Introduction and Notes, by The Birds. Third Edition, 3.S. 6d.
Arthur Sidgwick, M.A. New The Clouds. Third Edition, 3.S.
Edition. Extra fcap. Svo. 3.s'. cacli. Tlie Frogs. Third Edition, 3s.
I. Agamemnon. II. Chuephoroi.
The Knights. Second Edition, 3>?.
III. Eumenides. IV. I'ersae.
The Peace. 3s. 6d.
V. Septem contra Thebas.
The Wasps. Second Edition, 3s. Gd.
Prometheus Boaiul. By
A.O.Prickard,M.A. Third Edition. 2s.
Aristotle. Ex recensione
Im. Bekkeri. Acceduut Indices
Aristophanes. In Single Plays. Sylburgiani. Tom i XL Svo. The
Edited, with English Notes, Intro- volumes (except I and IX wh ich arc
ductions, &c., by W.W. Merry, D.D. out of print) may be had separately,
Extra fcap. Svo. pi-ice 5s. 6rf. each.
London; Henrv Fkowue Amen Corner E.C.

STANDARD GREEK WORKS,
Aristotle. EtJdca Nicomachea, Euripides. Tragoediae ct

rpcognovit brovique Adnotatione Fragmenta, ex rccensione Guil. Din-
oiitica instnixit I. Bywater. Svo. ()s. dorfii. Tomill. Svo. los.
Also in crown 8ro, paper cover, 3 s. Gd.
Heracliti Ephesil Reliquiae.
Contributions to the Kecensuitl. Bywater, M.A. Appen-
Textual Criticism of tlie Nicoma- dicis loco additae sunt Diogcnis
cliean Ethics. By I. Bywater. 2,s.6rf. Laertii Vita Heracliti, Particulac
Notes on the Nicoma- Hippocratei De Diaeta Lib. I. Epi- ,
cheanEthics. By J. A. Stewart, M. A. stolae Heracliteae. Svo. 6s.

2 vols. Svo. 32s.
Herodas. HPXIIAOT ISIIMI-
êlecta ex Organo Arl- AMBOI. ri/c Mimes Herodas.
of
Capifuhi,
xtnfeleo In usiim Scho- l']dited, with Introduction. CriticHl
larum Acadeniicarnm. Crown Svo, Notes, Commentary, and Illus(i-a-
stiff covers. 3.5. (yd. tions, l\v .T. Arbuthnot Nairn. M.A.
Do Arte Poet! a r Liber. Nvo, 1 2s. 6f7. net.
Recognovit Brovique Adnotatione Hex'odotus. Books V and VI

Critica Instruxit I. Bywater. Post Terpsichore and Erato. Edited,
Svo, stiff covers, is. 6d. with Notes and Appendices, by
TJte Politico, with Intro- Evelyn Abbott, M.A., LL.D. Svo,
ductions, Notes, &c., by W. L. New- with two Maps, 6s.
man, M.A. Medium Svo. Vols. I Homer. A Complete Con-
;ind II. 28s. n<'(. Vols. Ill and
cordance to the Odyssey and Hymns //
IV. 285. 7Uf.
Homer; to which is added a Con-
The Politics, trans- cordance to the Parallel Passages in
lated into English, with Intro- the Iliad, Odyssey, and Hymns.
duction, Marginal Analysis, Notes, By Henry Dunbar, M.D. 4to. 2 is.
and Indices, by B. Jowett, M.A.

Medium Svo. 2 vols. 21s.
A Grammar of the Ho-
meric Dialect. By D. B. Monro, M.A.
Aristoxenus. 'Apio-rofeVov Svo. Second Edition. 14.S.
'Apixoviica SroiYfTa. Tlie Harmonics ex

Ilias, rec. Guil. Din-
of Aristoxenus. Edited, with
dorfii. Svo. 5s. 6d.
Translation, Notes. &c., by H. S.
Macran, M.A. Crown Svo, 10s. 6d. ^cliolia Graeca in
Hladem. Edited by W. Dindorf,
Demosthenes and Aeschines. after a new collation of the Venetian
The Orations of I>cmostlienes and Mss. by D. B. Monro, M.A. 4 vols.
Aeschines on the Crown. By Svo. 50.S.
G. A. Simcox, M.A., and W. H.
^5imcox, M.A. Svo. 12s.
êliolia Graeca, in
Hiadcni Toionleyana. Recensuit
Demosthenes. Orations Ernestus Maass. 2 vols. Svo. 36'-.
a'jainst Witli Introduction
Philip.
and Notes, by Evelyn Abbott, M.A., Odyssea, ex rec. G.
and P. E. Matheson, M.A. Dindorfii. Svo. 5s. 6d.
Vol. I. Philippic I. Olynthiacs ^:icholia Graeca, in

I-III, Extra fcap. Svo. 35. Odysseam. Edidit Guil. Dindorfius.
Vol. II. De Pace, Philippic II. Tomi II. Svo. 15s. 6d.
De Chersonese, Philippic III.
Extra fcap. Svo. 4s. td. Odyssey. Books I-XII.
Edited with English Notes, Ap-
On the Croicn. 3s, 6d.
pendices, &c. By W. W. Merrv,
Against Meidlas. By D.D., and .Tames Riddell, M.A.
J. K. King. 3s. 6r/. Second Edition. Svo. ifss.
Oxford: Clarendon Press.

STANDARD GREEK WORKS.
Homer. Odyssey. Books XIII- Plato. Selections. Withlntro-

XXIV. Edited with English Notes and Nods. By -Toh n Purve.s,
dnc/ions
Aj>pendiccs, by D. B. Monro,
.iiid M.A., and Preface liy B. Jowett,
M.A. 8vo. i6s. M.A. Second Edition. Extra fcap.
Hymn I Homeric I. Codi- Svo. 5s.
ciljus demio colhitis recensuit

Alf'iediis Goodwin. Small folio,
A Selection of Passages
from Plato fur English Eeaders ; from
AVith four Plates. 21s. net.
the Translation byB. JoAvett, M.A.
Homeri Opera et Reliquiae. Edited, with Introductions, by
Monro. Ciown Svo. India Paper. M. J. Knight. 2 vols. Crown Svo,
Cloth, los. 6rf. net. gilttOJ). I2S.
Also in various leatluT bindings.
Polybius. Selections. Edited
Plato. Apology, with a re- by J, L. Strachan-Davidson, M.A.
vised Text and English Notes, and With Maps. Medium Svo. 21,?.
a Digest of Platonic Idioms, by
James Riddell, M.A. Svo. 8s. (xl. Sophocles. The Plays and
Philebus, with a revised Fragments. With English Notes and

Text and English Notes, by Edwai'd Introductions, by Lewis Campbell,
Poste, M.A. Svo. 7.9. 6d.
M.A. 2 vols. Svo, i6s. eucli.
Republic. The Greek Tragoedlae etFragmenla,
Text. Edited, with Notes and ex I'ecensione et cum commen-
Essay.s, by B, Jowett, M.A., and tariis Guil. Dindoriii. Third Edition.
Lewis Campbell, M.A. In thi-ce 2 vols. Fcap. Svo. 21s. Each Play
vols. Medium Svo. 42.S. separately, limp, 2s. 6d.
i:iophideH and Pulit(vus,
with a reA'ised Text and English Sophocles. Tragoedlae et
Notes, by L. Campbell, M.A. F/agfmwta cum Annotationibus Guil.
Svo.
Dindoriii. Tomi II.
j
I OS. 6d.
Svo. los.
I
The Text, Vol. I. 5s. 6d.

I'keaetetus, with, a revised '
The Notes, Vol. IL 4s. 6d.

TextandEnglishNotes, byL. Camp-
Ijell.M.A. SecondEdition. Svo. ios.6rf, Strabo. Selection.^, with an
Tlie Dialogues, trans- Introduction on Strabo's Life and
lated into English, with Analyses Works. By H. F. Tozer, M.A.,
and Introductions, by B. .Towett, F.R.G.S. Svo. With Maps and
M.A. Third Edition. 5 vols. Medium Plans. i2s.
Svo. Cloth, 849. half-morocco, loos.
;
Thucydides. Translated into
Tlie RepiM'tc, translated English, to which is prefixed an
into English, with Analysis and Essay on Inscriptions and a Note on
Introduction, by B. .Jowett, M.A. the Geography of Thucydides. By
Third Edition. Medium Svo. i 2s. 6rf. B. Jowett, M.A. Second Edition, Be-
half-roan, 74s. rised. 2 vols., Svo, cloth, 15s.
Res PublUa : recoirno- Vol. I. Essay on Inscriptions
vit brevique adnotatione critica and Books I-III.
instruxit loannes Burnet. On 4to Vol. II. Books IV-VIII and
pajier for marginal notes. los. 6d. Historical Index.
With Introduction and Xenophon. A Commentary,
Notes. By St. George Stock, M.A. with Introduction andAppendices,
Extra fcap. Svo. on the Hellenica of Xenophon. By
I. Tlio Apology, 2s. 6d. G. j;. Underbill, M.A. Crown Svo,
II. Crito, 2s. ill. Meno, 26. 6rf. 7s. 6d.
London: Henry Froavue, Amen Cornsr, E.C,

OXFORD CLASSICAL TEXTS.
3. OXFORD CLASSICAL TEXTS.

(ff) Paper Covers; (/'; Limp Cloth ;
(c) Imjl\ Paper.
Crown 8vo.
GREEK. i
LATIN.
ArscHVLi Tragoediae. Cuin Caesakis Commentarii. K. L
! ragmenlis, A. Sidgwick. ()
A. Du Pun TET. De Pcllo Gallii.i>.
Zs. ; {b) IS. Gd. ;

(c) 45. 6d. (a) 2s.; {d) 2s.6d. De Pcllo Civili,
(<z) 2s.6d.; {p) 35. Complete, (c; 7.V.
Ai'OLLONii RiiODii Argonautica. Catulli Carjiina. R. Ellis.

R. C. Seaton. {a) 2s.6d.; (/') 35. {a) 2S. ; (/') 2s. 6d.
CiCERONIsORATIONEsProIMilonr.
Akistophams Comoediae Cum
Caesarianae, I'hilippicac I XI\'.
P'ragmeutis. F. W. Hai.l and
A. C. Clark, (a) 2s. 6d.; {(>, ;vf.
W. M. Geldart. Tom. I. {a)
.^^; {b) 5^- 6a'. Tom. II. (a) 3j. ;
CicERONis Epistulae. L. C.
3^. 6d. Complete, (c) 85. Gflf.
Purser. (Complete) (<) 21s. Ad
v/')
Familiares. {a) -jS. ;
{b) 6s. Ad
DlMOSTHEXIS Ok.vtiones. S. H. Atticum. In two Parts, each (a)
IJUTCHER. Tom. I. (rt) ^s. ; (//} 4^. {b) 4s. 6d.
;
Ad Q. P'ratrcm.
4.3. 6d. {a) 25. 6d. {b) 35. ;
CicERONis Opera Rhetorica.

EiRiPiDis Tragoediae. G. G. A.
A. S. WiLKiNs. Tom. I. (rt)
Murray. Tom. I. (a) ^s.; (/')
2.V. 6</. [b; y. Tom. II. (d) 35.
;
35. 6d. Tom. II. (fl) 3j'. (/^) 35. 6(/.

;
(/' 35. 6d. Complete {() 75. 6d.
Complete, (c) ()s.
CORNELI NepOTIS VlTAE. E. O.
IloMERi Opeka. Ilias. D. B. WiNSTEDT. {a) IS. 6d.; {l>) 2s.
I\l0NR0 and T. \V. Allen. Tom. HoRATi Opera. E. C. Wickham.

I. (a) 25. 6d.; (^) 35. Tom. II. (fl) 2S. 6d. ;
(U) IS. ;
{c) 45. 6d.
() 7s.6d. ;
{d) y. Complete, (c) 7^.
LucRETi Cari De Reium Nalura.
Platonis Opera. Blrnet. C. Bailey. {d)2s.6d.\ {l>')is.;{()s,s.
J.
Tom. I (Tetralo(,'iae I, II). (a) Martialis 1">IGRAMMATA. W.
55. (d) 6s.; (<) 7^-. Tom. 11
;
M. Lindsay, {a) 55.; (/-) 6s.;
(Tetralogiae III, IV). (a) -.s.; {<) "js. 6d.

{/>)6s.; {c) 'js. Tom.ilI(Tetralo- .School Edition, expurgated, 35. 6d.
;,nae V-VII), (a) ^5. : (<^) 6s. ; (0 -js. Peksi et Juvenalis Satirae.
Tom. IV (Tetralogia \1II). {a) 6s.; S.Ct.Owen. (a) 2s.6d. (/') y. {cj^s. ; ;
{b) 7^. ;
(c) Ss. 6d. Res Publica. Pi.ALTi Comoediae. W. M.Lind-
(a) (i) 6s. (f) 75. Also on 410 Tom.
5.?. ; ;
say. Tom. I (a) 55. ;
{b) 6s.
paper for marginal notes, lo^. 6d. II (a) 55, {b) 6s, Complete, (< ) 16:.
;
Clitopho, Timaeus, Critias. â) 2s.
Sexti Properti Carmina. J.
i^.
1'hucydidis Historiae. H. Phillimore. (a) 2s.6d.; {b) 35.
Stuart Jones. Tom. I (I.ibri Si ATI SiLVAE. J. S.

Phillimokk.
I-IV). {a) 35. (i>) y. 6d. ; Tom. () 3^- ;
{l^ IS. 6d.
II (Libri V-VIII). (a) 35.; (/') CoRNELii Taciti Opera INlinora.
35. 6d. Complete, (c) 8s. 6d. H.Furneaux. \d) \s.6d.; {b) 2s.
Terenti Comoediae. R. Y.
Xenophontis Opera. E. C.
Tyrrell, (a) 35.; {b)y.6d.; (OfiJ-
Marchant. Tom. I (Historia
(iraeca). (a) 2s. 6d. Tom. TiBULLI SIVE AlBI TiBL LLI. J.
P.
; {6) ^s.
II (LibrI Socratici). (a) Pos'lGATE. {a J IS. 6d.; (b) 2s. 6d.
35.; (/>)
Zs. 6d. Tom. III. Êxpcditio Vergili Opera. F. A. Hirtzel.

Cyri). (a) 2s. 6d. {b) 35. ; (a) 5s. ;
{b) y. 6d. ;
(c) 45. 6d.
Oxford : Clarendon Press,

MISCELLANEOUS STANDARD WORKS.
4. MISCELLANEOUS STANDARD WORKS.

Arbuthnot. The Life and Gower. The Complete Works
Worlds of John Arbuthnot. By G. A. of John Edited from the
Goicer.
Aitken. Svo, with Portrait, i6.s. MSS., with Introductions, Notes,
and Glossaries, by G. C. Macaulay,
Bryce. Stiulics in Hidory M.A. With facsimiles. 4 vols. Svo,
mid Jurisprndr)ice. By the Eight buckram. i6.s. each.
Hon. James Bryce, D.C.Ti. 2 vols. Vol. I, The French Works. Vols.
Svo, 25s. net, II and III, The English Works.
Casaubon (Isaac), 1559-1614. Vol. IV, The Latin Works.
By Mark Pattison, Lite Rector of Greene. The Plays and Poems
Lincoln College. Ed. II. Svo. i6s. of Robert Greene. Edited, with In-
troduction and Notes, by J.Churton
Chambers. The Mediaeval
Collins, Litt.D. 2 vols. Svo. iSs.net.
stage. 2 vols., Svo. 255. net.
Hodgkin. Ltaly and her Ln-
Chaucer. Th e Complete Works raders. 8 vols. With Plates and
Cluiucei:
"f (U'offrey Edited, from Maps. By Thomas Hodgkin, D.C.L.
numerous Manuscripts, by W. W. A. D. 376-744. Svo. Vols. I and II,
Skeat, Litt.D. In Six Volumes, Second Edition, 42s. Vols. Ill ami
Demy Svo, with Portrait and Fac- IV, Second Edition, 36s. Vols. V and
similes. 96s., or 16s. each volume. VI, 36s. Vols. Vil and VIII, 24-;.
Chaucerian and' other HoUis. The Masai; their

Pieces. Edited, from numerous Language and Folklore. By A. C.
Manuscripts, by W. W. Skeat, Hollis. Svo, with 27 lull-page
Litt.D. Svo. i8s. Illustrations. 14.S. tiet.
Cromwell. The Life and Ilbert. The Government of

Li'tlers of Thomas CronvreU. By R. B. India ; being a Digest of the Statute
Merriman, A.M. Harv., B.Litt. Law relating thereto. By Sir
Oxon. With a Portrait and Fac- Courtenay Ilbert, K. C.S.I. Svo,
simile. 2 vols. Svo. iSs.net. half-roan, 21s.
He Necessariis Observantiis Legislative Methods and

Scaccarii Dialogus commonly :
Forms. Svo, half-roan. 16*.
called Dialogus de Scaccario,' by
'
Justinian. Imperatoris Lus-
Richard, Son of Nigel, Treasurer of tiniani Institutionum Libri Quattuor;
England and Bishop of London. with Introductions, Commentary,
Indited by A. Hughes, C. G. Crump, Excursus and Translation. By J. B.
and C. Johnson. Moyle, D.C.L. Fourth Edition. 2 vols.
Revise<l Text and full Critical Svo. 22s.
Notes, an Introduction, Notes, and
an Index. Svo. 12s. 6d. net.
Kyd. The Works of Thomas
Kyd. Edited from the original
Finlay. A History of Greece Texts, with Introduction, Notes,
from its Conquest by the Romans to the and Facsimiles, by Frederick S.
present time, b. c. 146 to a. n. 1864. Boas, M.A. Svo. 15s. net.
By George Finlay, LL.D. New and Lyly. The Works of John
revised Edition, by II. F. Tozer,
Lyly, now for the first time collected
M.A. 7 vols. Svo. 70.S-.
and edited from the earliest Quartos,
Fisher. jSfudies in Napo- with Life, Bibliography, Essays,
Ironlc SliiliSiHdnship. CUrnmnij. ByH. Notes, aud Index, by K. Warwick
A. L. Fisher, M.A. Svo. 12s.6d.net, Bond, M.A. 3 vols, Svo. ^2s. net.
rômlon : Henry Frowpe, Amen Corner, E.C,

8 MISCELLANEOUS STANDARD WORKS.
Morris. The WeUli Wars of Ramsay. The Cities and

Ednanl the First. By John E. Morris, Bisho2)rics of P]iriiqiu. By W. M.
M.A. With a Map and Pedigrees. Ramsay,D.C.L.,LL.D. Vol.1. Part
Svo. 9s. 6d. )ict. I. The Lycos Valley and .South- Western
Oman. Hidory of th e Pe nin- Phrygia. Royal Svo, linen, iS.s. net.

sidar War. By Charles Oman, M.A. Vol. I. Part il. West and West-Central
Svo. With Maps, Plans, and Por- Phrygia. Royal Svo, linen, 21.S. net.
traits. Vol, I, 1807-1809 (from the Ranke. A History ofKiujland,
Treaty of Fontainehlau to tlie Bat- principally in the Seventeenth Cen-
tle of Corunna). 14s. ie/. Vol.11, tury. By L, von Ranke, Trans-
.Tan.-Sept., 1809 (from the Battle of lated under the superintendence of
Corunna to the end of the Talavera G. W, Kitchen, D.D., and C. W.
Campaign), 14s. nof. (^The work Boaso, M.A. 6 vols. Svo. 63.S.
will be completed in six volumes.) Rerised Index separately, paper
Oxford History of Music. covers, is.
Svo. I :;s. (!! each ; but upon issue
Vols. li and VI will be sold (o-

Rhys. Celtic Folklore, Welsh
and Manx. By John Rh^s, M,A.,
gether for 15s. tief, and the tem-
D,Litt, 2 vols, Svo, 2 IS.
porary price of tlie whole set of
six A'olumes will be 3 15s. net. Studies ill the Arthuria n
Vol.1. The Polyphonic Period. Parti, Legend. Svo. 12s. 6d.
Method 0/ Musical Art, .^30-13^0. Sanday. Sacred, Sites of the
By H. E. Wooldridge, M.A. Gospels. By W. Sanday, D.D.' Witli
Vi>l. II. Tlie Ecclesiastical Period. By 63 full-page Illustrations, Maps and
H. E, Wooldridge, M.A. Plans, Svo. 13s. 6d.
Vol. III. The Music of the Seventeenth
Century. By Sir C. Hubert H. 77c e Criticism of tlie
Parry, Bart. Fourth Gospel. Svo. 7s. 6d. net,
Vol. IV. The Age of Bach and Handel.
By J. A. Fuller Maitland.
Thomson. A Handbook of
Anatomy for Art Students. With many
Vol. V. The Viennese Period. By Illustrations. By Prof. Arthur
W. H. Hadow. Thomson, M.A. Second Edition.
Vol. VI. The Romantic Period. By Svo, buckram. i6s. net.
v.. Dannreuther, M.A.
Pattison. Essays by the late Walpole. The
Letters of
Horace ]V(dpole. by Mrs.Edited
Mark Pattison, sometime Rector of
Lincoln College. Collected and
Paget Toynbee, with over one
Arranged by Henry Nettleship, hundred Letters hitherto unpub-
lished and fifty Photogravure Por-
M.A. 2 vols. Svo. 24s.
traits of Walpole and his circle.
Payne. History of the Nev^ 16 vols. Vol, XVÎ comprises the
World called America. By E, J. Indexes, which have been prepared,
Payne, M,A. Svo. Vol. I, iSs. with great care and labour, under
Vol. II, 14s. the superintendence of Andrew
Poole. Historical Atlas of Clark, M,A, It contains Indexes
Modern Europe, from the decline of of Plates, Persons, and SubjeetN.
the Roman Empire. Comprising In three styles, viz. limited edition
also Maps of parts of Asia and of of 260 copies, in demy Svo, on hand-
the New World connected with made paper, cloth, ;6i6 net ; Crown
European history. Edited by Svo, on Oxford India Paper, in S
R. L. Poole, M.A., Ph.D, Imperial double volumes, ^6 i6s. 7iet Crown ;
4to. Half-Peisian, 115s. 6rf.; each Svo, in 16 volumes, on ordinary

map sold separately at is. 6d, paper, '^ 1 6s. net.
OXFORD
LONDON: IIENRV FROWDE
OXFORP UNIVERSITY TRESS WAREHOUSE, AMEN CORNER, E.C.
Date Due

Cultsofgreekstat02farn PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cultsofgreekstat02farn PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cultsofgreekstat02farn PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

m '^^~f^r^

THE GREEK STATES

LONDON, EDINBURGH, AND NEW YORK

THE GREEK STATES

LEWIS RICHARD FARNELL, M.A.

AT THE CLARENDON PRESS

PRINTED AT THE CLARENDON PRESS

alien elements engrafted

mis associated with water, trees, and woodland-life, \ifiva[a, 'A\(peiajvia,

Artemis-Eurynome in Arcadia, 427-430 Artemis a sea-goddess in later;

vegetation, Artemis 'Ayportpa, 431-434; totemistic ideas in the worship

Tauric cult, the sacrifice of the '

associated with tame animals and agriculture, the goat-goddess, Evpiirna,

'OpOia and 'OpOwaia, 453, itofe b; Artemis 1piK\apia, Artemis with

designate her clearly as the goddess of marriage, EincAfia, 'Hje^uvT],

OvXia, AvTj, 464-467 ; Artemis as the city-goddess, hovKaia, ^Ayopaia,

Greece, Artemis of Perge, 467-470 ; titles referring to Artemis as goddess

Cybele, Ma, Bendis, Britomartis-Dictynna, 472-479 Artemis of Ephesus, ;

with purely Oriental divinities, Anaitis, Astarte, 4S4-487.

cation, but a real cult- personage of Rhamnus, the name originally an

of Cybele, detached and misinterpreted, 499, 500.

Artemis, ? a primitive Greek type, 521, 522 Artemis the fish-goddess on ;

early Boeotian vase, 522, 523 ; representations of the tree-goddess, of the

tinguished by the crescent, a late symbol, 531 Einrpa^ia, 'Upaa, 531 ; ;

monuments associating her with Apollo, 531-533 ; Artemis rarely repre-

Ideal Types of Artemis

Parthenon frieze, Lansdowne Artemis, statue in Villa Albani, Argive

relief, 538-540 ; fourth-century monuments, Praxiteles probably the

triple form, 551-554; symbols and attributes, 554-556; Hekate on the

References for Chapters XIII-XIX . . . 558-607

Eileithyia ......... CHAPTER XX.

Originally a form of Hera, identified sometimes with her, sometimes with

Artemis, 608, 609 ;

References for Chapter XX 615-617

Aphrodite nowhere regarded as autochthonous in Greece, her fictitious

the Charites Eros no proof of her Hellenic origin, 621-626 characteristics ;

and names of the Semitic goddess of Anterior Asia, 626-629; Aphrodite

associated with Aegeus and Theseus at Athens, 631 Cretan Aphrodite- ;

Argos, confusion of sexes in the ritual, youths feigning travail, 634,

the swine-god, Robertson Smith's and Frazer's theories discussed, 644-

East at Cylhera and Sparta, Aphrodite ^Tpareia, iJiKrjtpupo^, 653-655

dite as goddess of beauty and love, UtiOaj, Upa^is, 'EmaTpo^pla, 'Anoarpo-

Monuments of Aphrodite 670-708

Ourania, coins of Eryx and Ouranopolis, statue in Madrid, 677-679 statue ;

dite "E-nirpa-y'ia, work of Scopas, 684-6S6 phrodite on the ram, on the

horse, 686, 687 representations of the maritime goddess, the Cnidian

Aphrodite a cult-statue, 687-690 silver medallion in the Louvre, Aphro-

'Venus Genetrix' of the Louvre, 691-693; representations of Adonis,

with Ares, 700-703 ; representations. Aphrodite the city-goddess, Korpo-

Eros on relief from South Italy, Aphrodite 'Era/pa, 705-708.

Ideal Types of Aphrodite 709-7 3

statueby Praxiteles, 711-717 head in Brocklesby Hall, head in posses-

References for Chapters XXI-XXIII . . . 731-761

PLATE XXVIII. Artemis-statue dedicated by Nikandra.

XXIX. {a) Artemis on early Boeotian vase.

XXX. {a) Artemis statuette from Lamaka, Vienna.

XXXI. {a) Artemis standing on bull, statuette British Museum.

XXXII. i^a) Artemis Soteira, statuette British Museum.

XXXIV. Artemis-statue in Lansdowne House.