What Is A Negotiable Instrument? Give The Characteristics of A Negotiable Instrument

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 13

1.

What is a negotiable instrument? Give the characteristics of a negotiable


instrument.
A negotiable instrument possesses all the elements of negotiability of Section 1 of the NIL:
(a) It must be in writing and signed by the maker or drawer;
(b) Must contain an unconditional promise or order to pay a sum certain in money;
(c) Must be payable on demand, or at a fixed or determinable future time;
(d) Must be payable to order or to bearer; and
(e) Where the instrument is addressed to a drawee, he must be named or otherwise
indicated therein with reasonable certainty.
Characteristics:
(a) Negotiability
(b) Accumulation of secondary contracts
2.
A has a business arrangement with B. B would lend money to another, through
A, whose name would appear in the promissory note as the lender. A would then
immediately indorse the note to B. Is A an accommodation party? Explain.
3.

What is a crossed check? What are the effects of crossing a check?

It is one which bears across its face or corner 2 parallel lines diagonally, usually on the
upper left corner between which are either the name of a bank or the words and company
in full or abbreviated.
Crossing the check, either generally or specially, does not destroy its negotiability but
(a) the check may be negotiated only once to one who has an account with a bank;
(b) the check may not be encashed but only deposited in the bank; and

(c) the act of crossing the check serves as warning to the holder that the check has been
issued for a definite purpose; otherwise, he is not a holder in due course.
Failing in this respect, the payee is guilty of gross negligence amounting to legal absence in
good faith.
The effects therefore of crossing a check relate to the mode of its presentment for payment,
meaning that the drawer extended the check for deposit only by the rightful person, ie, the
payee named therein.
4.

Distinguish an irregular indorser from a general indorser.

A general indorser is a person signing his name on the back of an instrument, nothing else
appearing.
An irregular indorser is a person who,
(a) Not otherwise a party to an instrument,
(b) Places thereon his signature in blank,
(c) Before delivery

General Indorser

Irregular indorser

Makes either a blank


or special indorsement

Always makes a blank indorsement

Indorses the
instrument after its

Indorses before its delivery to the payee

delivery to the payee

Liable only to parties


subsequent to him

Liable to the payee and subsequent parties unless he


signs for the accommodation of the payee in which
case he is liable only to all parties subsequent to the
payee

5.
X was in desperate need of money to pay his debt to Y, as loan shark. Y
threatened to take Xs life if he failed to pay. X and Y went to see Z, Xs rich friend,
and asked Z if she could sign a promissory note in Xs favor in the amount of
P10,000.00 to pay Y. Fearing that Y would kill X, Z acceded to the request. Z affixed
her signature on a piece of paper with the assurance of X that X will just fill it up later.
X then filled up the blank paper making a promissory note for the amount of
P100,000. X then indorsed and delivered the same to Y, who accepted the note as
payment of the debt. What defense or defenses can Z set up against Y? Explain.
6.
Define the following: (a) negotiable promissory note; (b) bill of exchange; and
(c) a check

Sec 184. A negotiable promissory note is an unconditional promise in writing made by one
person to another, signed by the maker, engaging to pay on demand, or at a fixed or
determinable future time, a sum certain in money to order or to bearer.

Sec 126. A negotiable bill of exchange is an unconditional order in writing address by one
person to another, signed by the person giving it, requiring the person to whom it is
addressed to pay on demand or at a fixed or determinable future time a sum certain in
money to order or to bearer.

Sec 185. A check is a bill of exchange drawn on a bank payable on demand. Except as
herein otherwise provided, the provisions of this Act applicable to a bill of exchange payable
on demand apply to a check.
7.
You are a successful Bar examinee, as a new lawyer draft the appropriate
contract language for: (a) your negotiable promissory note; and (b) your check, each
containing the essential elements of a negotiable instrument.

A: I promise to pay X or order the sum of P10,000.00 on December 25, 2016. Signed
(Maker)

B: Date

Pay to the Order of X the Sum of Ten Thousand Pesos in Philippine Pesos.

To: Philippine National Bank

Signed (Drawer)

8-25 Your typical codal quiz


8. When is an instrument payable on demand under Section 7 of the NIL?
An instrument is payable on Demand
(a) When it is so expressed to be payable on demand, or at sight, or on
presentation; or
(b) In which no time for payment is expressed.
Where an instrument is issued, accepted, or indorsed when overdue, it is, as regards
the person so issuing, accepting, or indorsing it, payable on demand.

9. When is an instrument payable to order under Section 8 of the NIL?


The instrument is payable to order where it is drawn payable to the order of a
specified person or to him or his order. It may be drawn payable to the order of:
(a) A payee who is not maker, drawer, or drawee; or
(b) The drawer or maker; or
(c) The drawee; or
(d) Two or more payees jointly; or
(e) One or some of several payees; or
(f) The holder of an office for the time being.
Where the instrument is payable to order, the payee must be named or otherwise
indicated therein with reasonable certainty.

10. When is an instrument payable to bearer under Section 9 of the NIL?


The instrument is payable to bearer:
(a) When it is expressed to be so payable; or
(b) When it is payable to a person named therein or bearer; or
(c) When it is payable to the order of a fictitious or non-existing person, and
such fact was known to the person making it so payable; or
(d) When the name of the payee does not purport to be the name of any
person; or
(e) When the only or last indorsement is an indorsement in blank.

11. What constitutes negotiation under Section 30 of the NIL?


An instrument is negotiated when it is transferred from one person to another in such
manner as to constitute the transferee the holder thereof. If payable to bearer, it is
negotiated by delivery; if payable to order, it is negotiated by the indorsement of the
holder and completed by delivery.
12. When is a person deemed an indorser under Section 63 of the NIL?
A person placing his signature upon an instrument otherwise than as maker,
drawer, or acceptor, is deemed to be indorser unless he clearly indicates by
appropriate words his intention to be bound in some other capacity.

13. What are the warranties of a person negotiating an instrument by delivery or by a


qualified indorsement under Section 65 of the NIL?
Every person negotiating an instrument by delivery or by a qualified indorsement
warrants:
(a) That the instrument is genuine and in all respects what it purports to be;
(b) That he has a good title to it;
(c) That all prior parties had capacity to contract;
(d) That he has no knowledge of any fact which would impair the validity of
the instrument or render it valueless.
But when the negotiation is by delivery only, the warranty extends in favor of no
holder other than the immediate transferee.

The provisions of subdivision (c) of this section do not apply to a person negotiating
public or corporation securities other than bills and notes.

14. What constitutes a holder in due course under Section 52 of the NIL?
A holder in due course is a holder who has taken the instrument under the following
conditions:
(a) That it is complete and regular upon its face;
(b) That he became the holder of it before it was overdue, and without notice
that it has been previously dishonored, if such was the fact;
(c) That he took it in good faith and for value;
(d) That at the time it was negotiated to him, he had no notice of any infirmity
in the instrument or defect in the title of the person negotiating it.

15. What are the rights of a holder in due course under Section 57 of the NIL?
A holder in due course holds the instrument free from any defect of title of prior parties,
and free from defenses available to prior parties among themselves, and may enforce
payment of the instrument for the full amount thereof against all parties liable thereon

16. What is the effect of material alteration of an instrument under Section 124 of the
NIL?
Where a negotiable instrument is materially altered without the assent of all parties
liable thereon, it is avoided, except as against a party who has himself made,
authorized, or assented to the alteration and subsequent indorsers.
But when an instrument has been materially altered and is in the hands of a holder in
due course not a party to the alteration, he may enforce payment thereof according
to its original tenor.

17. When is an instrument subject to original defenses under Section 58 of the NIL?
In the hands of any holder other than a holder in due course, a negotiable instrument
is subject to the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable. But a holder who
derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any
fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in
respect of all parties prior to the latter.

18. When is the title of a person who negotiates an instrument defective under
Section 55 of NIL?
The title of a person who negotiates an instrument is defective within the meaning of
this Act when he obtained the instrument, or any signature thereto, by fraud, duress,
or force and fear, or other unlawful means, or for an illegal consideration, or when he
negotiates it in breach of faith, or under such circumstances as amount to a fraud.

19. What is the effect of a forged signature under Section 23 of the NIL?
When a signature is forged or made without the authority of the person whose
signature it purports to be, it is wholly inoperative, and no right to retain the
instrument, or to give a discharge therefor, or to enforce payment thereof against any
party thereto, can be acquired through or under such signature, unless the party
against whom it is sought to enforce such right is precluded from setting up the
forgery or want of authority.

20. What is the liability of the maker under Section 60 of the NIL?
The maker of a negotiable instrument, by making it, engages that he will pay it
according to its tenor, and admits the existence of the payee and his then capacity to
indorse.

21. What is the liability of a drawer under Section 61 of the NIL?


The drawer by drawing the instrument admits the existence of the payee and his
then capacity to indorse; and engages that, on due presentment, the instrument will
be accepted or paid, or both, according to its tenor, and that if it be dishonored and
the necessary proceedings on dishonor be duly taken, he will pay the amount thereof
to the holder or to any subsequent indorser who may be compelled to pay it. But the
drawer may insert in the instrument an express stipulation negativing or limiting his
own liability to the holder

22. What is the liability of an acceptor under Section 62 of the NIL?


The acceptor, by accepting the instrument, engages that he will pay it according to
the tenor of his acceptance and admits:
(a) The existence of the drawer, the genuineness of his signature, and his
capacity and authority to draw the instrument; and

(b) The existence of the payee and his then capacity to indorse.

23. When must Presentment of Acceptance be made under Section 143 of the NIL?
Presentment for acceptance must be made:

(a) Where the bill is payable after sight, or in any other case, where
presentment for acceptance is necessary in order to fix the maturity of the
instrument; or
(b) Where the bill expressly stipulates that it shall be presented for
acceptance; or
(c) Where the bill is drawn payable elsewhere than at the residence or place
of business of the drawee.
In no other case is presentment for acceptance necessary in order to render any
party to the bill liable.

24. To whom must Notice of Dishonor be given under Section 89 of the NIL?
Except as herein otherwise provided, when a negotiable instrument has been
dishonored by non-acceptance or non-payment, notice of dishonor must be given to
the drawer and to each indorser, and any drawer or indorser to whom such notice is
not given is discharged.

25. How is an instrument discharged under Section 119 of the NIL?


A negotiable instrument is discharged:
(a) By payment in due course by or on behalf of the principal debtor;
(b) By payment in due course by the party accommodated, where the
instrument is made or accepted for his accommodation;
(c) By the intentional cancellation thereof by the holder;
(d) By any other act which will discharge a simple contract for the payment of
money;
(e) When the principal debtor becomes the holder of the instrument at or after
maturity in his own right.

26. What is the liability of the maker?


a. Primary

27. Which one is a negotiable instrument?


(b) warehouse receipt

28. What is the liability of a drawee?


a. None, until he accepts the order to pay

29. Either of us promises to pay X or order P1,000 (signed) A and B The liability of
the makers is -- Joint and several/Solidary liability. (De Leon)

30. Pay to the order to X P1,000 (Sgd) Z.


To: The Dean of the College of Law of UE Recto or the
Dean of the College of Accountancy of UE Recto

Is this a negotiable instrument?

No. This instrument is payable on the specified persons (ie payable to order). By the terms
on the face of the instrument no further negotiation may be made

31. Arman drew a bill of exchange, stating I promise to pay to the order of Bob and
Cathy (Sgd.) Arman. Bob and Cathy are not partners. Who should indorse the
instrument?

32. I promise to pay to the order of bearer P1,000. (Sgd) Mel Changco. Is this a
negotiable instrument?
(d) No, because it is not payable to the order of a specified person or a specified person or
bearer.

33. Can a bill of exchange qualify as a negotiable instrument if the day and the month
but not the year of its maturity is given?
(Samplex choice) d) No, the intent is to make the instrument payable on a fixed date but this
year was omitted. Hence, the time for payment is not determinable in this case

d. No. It is necessary that the year of maturity be stated, otherwise, the time of payment of
the instrument, although payable at a certain time, is not determinable. (De Leon)

34. January 22, 2011


I promise to pay X or order the sum of P10,000, with interest at 20% per annum.
(Signed) Jun
When is the accrual date of the interest?
a. January 22, 2011

35. When is an instrument payable to bearer?


(c) when it is payable to the order of a specified person

You might also like