What Is A Negotiable Instrument? Give The Characteristics of A Negotiable Instrument
What Is A Negotiable Instrument? Give The Characteristics of A Negotiable Instrument
What Is A Negotiable Instrument? Give The Characteristics of A Negotiable Instrument
It is one which bears across its face or corner 2 parallel lines diagonally, usually on the
upper left corner between which are either the name of a bank or the words and company
in full or abbreviated.
Crossing the check, either generally or specially, does not destroy its negotiability but
(a) the check may be negotiated only once to one who has an account with a bank;
(b) the check may not be encashed but only deposited in the bank; and
(c) the act of crossing the check serves as warning to the holder that the check has been
issued for a definite purpose; otherwise, he is not a holder in due course.
Failing in this respect, the payee is guilty of gross negligence amounting to legal absence in
good faith.
The effects therefore of crossing a check relate to the mode of its presentment for payment,
meaning that the drawer extended the check for deposit only by the rightful person, ie, the
payee named therein.
4.
A general indorser is a person signing his name on the back of an instrument, nothing else
appearing.
An irregular indorser is a person who,
(a) Not otherwise a party to an instrument,
(b) Places thereon his signature in blank,
(c) Before delivery
General Indorser
Irregular indorser
Indorses the
instrument after its
5.
X was in desperate need of money to pay his debt to Y, as loan shark. Y
threatened to take Xs life if he failed to pay. X and Y went to see Z, Xs rich friend,
and asked Z if she could sign a promissory note in Xs favor in the amount of
P10,000.00 to pay Y. Fearing that Y would kill X, Z acceded to the request. Z affixed
her signature on a piece of paper with the assurance of X that X will just fill it up later.
X then filled up the blank paper making a promissory note for the amount of
P100,000. X then indorsed and delivered the same to Y, who accepted the note as
payment of the debt. What defense or defenses can Z set up against Y? Explain.
6.
Define the following: (a) negotiable promissory note; (b) bill of exchange; and
(c) a check
Sec 184. A negotiable promissory note is an unconditional promise in writing made by one
person to another, signed by the maker, engaging to pay on demand, or at a fixed or
determinable future time, a sum certain in money to order or to bearer.
Sec 126. A negotiable bill of exchange is an unconditional order in writing address by one
person to another, signed by the person giving it, requiring the person to whom it is
addressed to pay on demand or at a fixed or determinable future time a sum certain in
money to order or to bearer.
Sec 185. A check is a bill of exchange drawn on a bank payable on demand. Except as
herein otherwise provided, the provisions of this Act applicable to a bill of exchange payable
on demand apply to a check.
7.
You are a successful Bar examinee, as a new lawyer draft the appropriate
contract language for: (a) your negotiable promissory note; and (b) your check, each
containing the essential elements of a negotiable instrument.
A: I promise to pay X or order the sum of P10,000.00 on December 25, 2016. Signed
(Maker)
B: Date
Pay to the Order of X the Sum of Ten Thousand Pesos in Philippine Pesos.
Signed (Drawer)
The provisions of subdivision (c) of this section do not apply to a person negotiating
public or corporation securities other than bills and notes.
14. What constitutes a holder in due course under Section 52 of the NIL?
A holder in due course is a holder who has taken the instrument under the following
conditions:
(a) That it is complete and regular upon its face;
(b) That he became the holder of it before it was overdue, and without notice
that it has been previously dishonored, if such was the fact;
(c) That he took it in good faith and for value;
(d) That at the time it was negotiated to him, he had no notice of any infirmity
in the instrument or defect in the title of the person negotiating it.
15. What are the rights of a holder in due course under Section 57 of the NIL?
A holder in due course holds the instrument free from any defect of title of prior parties,
and free from defenses available to prior parties among themselves, and may enforce
payment of the instrument for the full amount thereof against all parties liable thereon
16. What is the effect of material alteration of an instrument under Section 124 of the
NIL?
Where a negotiable instrument is materially altered without the assent of all parties
liable thereon, it is avoided, except as against a party who has himself made,
authorized, or assented to the alteration and subsequent indorsers.
But when an instrument has been materially altered and is in the hands of a holder in
due course not a party to the alteration, he may enforce payment thereof according
to its original tenor.
17. When is an instrument subject to original defenses under Section 58 of the NIL?
In the hands of any holder other than a holder in due course, a negotiable instrument
is subject to the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable. But a holder who
derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any
fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in
respect of all parties prior to the latter.
18. When is the title of a person who negotiates an instrument defective under
Section 55 of NIL?
The title of a person who negotiates an instrument is defective within the meaning of
this Act when he obtained the instrument, or any signature thereto, by fraud, duress,
or force and fear, or other unlawful means, or for an illegal consideration, or when he
negotiates it in breach of faith, or under such circumstances as amount to a fraud.
19. What is the effect of a forged signature under Section 23 of the NIL?
When a signature is forged or made without the authority of the person whose
signature it purports to be, it is wholly inoperative, and no right to retain the
instrument, or to give a discharge therefor, or to enforce payment thereof against any
party thereto, can be acquired through or under such signature, unless the party
against whom it is sought to enforce such right is precluded from setting up the
forgery or want of authority.
20. What is the liability of the maker under Section 60 of the NIL?
The maker of a negotiable instrument, by making it, engages that he will pay it
according to its tenor, and admits the existence of the payee and his then capacity to
indorse.
(b) The existence of the payee and his then capacity to indorse.
23. When must Presentment of Acceptance be made under Section 143 of the NIL?
Presentment for acceptance must be made:
(a) Where the bill is payable after sight, or in any other case, where
presentment for acceptance is necessary in order to fix the maturity of the
instrument; or
(b) Where the bill expressly stipulates that it shall be presented for
acceptance; or
(c) Where the bill is drawn payable elsewhere than at the residence or place
of business of the drawee.
In no other case is presentment for acceptance necessary in order to render any
party to the bill liable.
24. To whom must Notice of Dishonor be given under Section 89 of the NIL?
Except as herein otherwise provided, when a negotiable instrument has been
dishonored by non-acceptance or non-payment, notice of dishonor must be given to
the drawer and to each indorser, and any drawer or indorser to whom such notice is
not given is discharged.
29. Either of us promises to pay X or order P1,000 (signed) A and B The liability of
the makers is -- Joint and several/Solidary liability. (De Leon)
No. This instrument is payable on the specified persons (ie payable to order). By the terms
on the face of the instrument no further negotiation may be made
31. Arman drew a bill of exchange, stating I promise to pay to the order of Bob and
Cathy (Sgd.) Arman. Bob and Cathy are not partners. Who should indorse the
instrument?
32. I promise to pay to the order of bearer P1,000. (Sgd) Mel Changco. Is this a
negotiable instrument?
(d) No, because it is not payable to the order of a specified person or a specified person or
bearer.
33. Can a bill of exchange qualify as a negotiable instrument if the day and the month
but not the year of its maturity is given?
(Samplex choice) d) No, the intent is to make the instrument payable on a fixed date but this
year was omitted. Hence, the time for payment is not determinable in this case
d. No. It is necessary that the year of maturity be stated, otherwise, the time of payment of
the instrument, although payable at a certain time, is not determinable. (De Leon)