Five Postulates of Extradition
Five Postulates of Extradition
Five Postulates of Extradition
1)
In this era of globalization, easier and faster international travel, and an expanding ring
of international crimes and criminals, we cannot afford to be an isolationist state. We
need to cooperate with other states in order to improve our chances of suppressing
crime in our own country.
2)
By entering into an extradition treaty, the Philippines is deemed to have reposed its trust
in the reliability or soundness of the legal and judicial system of its treaty partner, as well
as in the ability and the willingness of the latter to grant basic rights to the accused in
the pending criminal case therein.
3)
4)
We are bound by pacta sunt servanda to comply in good faith with our obligations
under the Treaty. Accordingly, the Philippines must be ready and in a position to deliver
the accused, should it be found proper.
5)
Indeed, extradition hearings would not even begin, if only the accused were
willing to submit to trial in the requesting country. Prior acts of herein respondent:
a)
leaving the requesting state right before the conclusion of his indictment
proceedings there; and
b) remaining in the requested state despite learning that the requesting state is
seeking his return and that the crimes he is charged with are bailable.