10 Uon
10 Uon
10 Uon
Content
Back again. Sometimes someone asks us the reason why we publish UON
so irregularly. The answer is: In order to publish UON we need
articles/games from contributors. If we receive them very irregulary.....
We wish to express our appreciation to all the players/writers who freely
contributed with their articles to this issue. Without their support this issue
would have never come to light. Were also grateful to
Erik Jensen who put Snchaud and Zilbermints articles as e-articles
(see attached 13 games and 20 games files).
Jon Sveinsson who changed the word file into a pdf one.
In this issue you will find:
Page 2
Page 3
**************************************************************************************
***
Another Hydra game. 90 minutes per game. The King should be the Chessmaster engine.
[Event "4th Intl.CSVN"] [Site "Leiden NED"] [Date "2004.04.25"] [Round "7"]
[White "Hydra"] [Black "The King"] [ECO "D00"]
1. d4 d5 2. Nc3 Nf6 3. f3 c5 4. e4 cxd4 5. Qxd4 Nc6 6. Bb5 Bd7 7. Bxc6 Bxc6 8.
e5 Nd7 9. e6 fxe6 10. f4 Nf6 11. Nf3 g6 12. Bd2 Bg7 13. O-O-O O-O 14. Qe3 Qd6
15. Rhe1 Bd7 16. Qe2 Rac8 17. Kb1 Qc7 18. Rc1 Qb6 19. Ne5 d4 20. Ne4 Bb5 21.
Qf2 Nxe4 22. Rxe4 Bc6 23. Ree1 Bd5 24. g3 Bxe5 25. Rxe5 Rc4 26. h4 Qc7 27. Qe2
Rf5 28. b3 Rc6 29. g4 Rf6 30. h5 Qd6 31. Qd3 Ra6 32. c4 dxc3 33. Qxc3 Rc6 34.
Qe3 Rxc1+ 35. Bxc1 gxh5 36. Rxh5 b6 37. Kb2 Bc6 38. Bd2 Bf3 39. Rh4 Rf7 40. g5
Be4 41. Bc3 Bg6 42. Qe5 Qxe5 43. Bxe5 Rf8 44. a4 Rd8 45. Rh2 Kf7 46. Kc3 Rd3+
47. Kc4 Bf5 48. Kb5 Rxb3+ 49. Ka6 Ra3 50. Kxa7 b5 51. a5 Rxa5+ 52. Kb6 Ra8 53.
Kxb5 Rd8 1/2-1/2
****************************************************************************************************
****
1.g4 adventures
Never trust the books lines blindly. . . .
by D. Rozzoni
Rozzoni,D - Conato,L [A00]
Corr. ASI Coppa Italia, 1997
I was so excited to play my Grobs attack once again! I felt I could deal with every kind
of difficulty arising, in fact I had many books dealing with this openings, so.
1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 c6 3.h3 e5 4.d4 [After this game I started to play 4.d3!?] 4e4 5.c4 Bd6
6.Nc3 Ne7 7.Qb3 00 [7...Bc7!?] 8.Bg5 f6 9.cxd5 cxd5 10.Nxd5 Be6 11.Nxe7+ Qxe7
12.d5 fxg5 13.dxe6 I was quite happy with my position. I.M. Basman comments on this
position in his 1993 book The killer Grob pag. 49 were the following: when White has
a pawn more in a complex position. (see diagram)
******************************************************************************
Petakov,U (2251) Klasan,V (2151) [A00]
It Indjija SCG (2), 12.04.2004
[Fritz 8 (30s)]
A00: Irregular Openings 1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 c6 3.h3 e5 4.d3 Bc5 5.Nc3 [5.Nf3 f6 6.Nc3 Be6 7.0-0 Nd7 8.e4
d4 9.Ne2 h5 10.g5 h4 11.c3 dxc3 12.bxc3 Be7 13.Qd2 Rh5 14.d4 Bc4 15.Rd1 Bf7 16.d5 cxd5 17.exd5
Bc5 18.Rb1 Rb8 19.Re1 Kf8 Fischer,LCzech,L/Hofbieber 1996/DB20034/0-1 (41)] 5...Ne7 6.e4 Be6
7.Nf3 Qc7N [7...Nd7 8.exd5 Nxd5 9.Ne4 f6 10.d4 Bb4+ 11.c3 Be7 12.Qe2 00 13.0-0 Qc7 14.Rd1 Rae8 15.dxe5 Nxe5 16.Nd4 Bf7 17.c4 Nxc4 18.Qxc4
Ne3 19.Qe2 Nxd1 20.Qxd1 Rd8 21.Be3 Qb6 22.Qa4 Nagley,T
James,M/IECC email 1997/DB20034/- (48)] 8.0-0 Nd7 9.exd5 cxd5
10.d4 exd4 11.Nxd4 Bxd4 12.Qxd4 0-0 13.Bf4 Qb6 14.Rfd1 Rac8 15.Qxb6
Nxb6 [15...axb6? 16.Bd6 Rfe8 17.f4+] 16.Bd6 Rfe8 17.Nb5 Nc6 18.Bc5
Nd7 19.Ba3 Red8 20.f4 Nb6 21.f5 Bd7 22.Nd6 Rc7 23.b3 Ne5 24.Rd2
[24.c4!? dxc4 25.Nb5+] 24...Bc6 25.f6 d4 26.fxg7 Bxg2 27.Kxg2
[27.Rxg2 Nd5 28.Nb5 Rcc8=] 27...Nd5 28.Nf5 (see diagram)
[28.Rxd4 Ne3+ 29.Kg3 Nxc2] 28...Rdc8? [28...Rc3!? 29.Rf1 Ne3+
30.Nxe3 Rxe3] 29.c4 [29.Rxd4 Rxc2+ 30.Kf1 Nf6+] 29...Ne3+ 30.Kf2
Nxf5 31.gxf5 Kxg7 32.Bd6 [32.Bd6 Nc6 33.Bxc7 Rxc7 34.b4+] 1-0
XABCDEFGHY
8r+lwqkvl-tr(
7zppzpp+pzpp'
6-+n+-sn-+&
5+-+-zp-+-%
4-+-+P+-+$
3+-sN-+N+-#
2PzPPzP-zPPzP"
1tR-vLQmKL+R!
xabcdefghy
4.xe5!?
A start of an opening system called the
Halloween Attack. Utterly strange and strong sac
demanding precise play from both sides and
White must perform to the utmost to be able to
regain the piece.
4...xe5 5.d4 g6 6.e5 g8
Black has been forced to give up most of the
space in the middle and White is free to "roam
the bord at will" it seems.
7.c4!
Whites aim is to get his pieces into attacking
positions as soon as possible and before Black
has time to gather his forces and orgenize the
defence.
7...d6!
Best defence
8.f3 d7 Black is solely defending the best he
can.
9.0-0
[ even 9.h4 is an option to try here.]
9...dxe5 10.dxe5
XABCDEFGHY
8r+l+kvlntr(
7zppzpq+pzpp'
6-+-+-+n+&
5+-+-zP-+-%
4-+L+-+-+$
3+-sN-+Q+-#
2PzPP+-zPPzP"
1tR-vL-+RmK-!
xabcdefghy
10...xe5!?
This is danger. To gobble up the pawn you must
be ready to eventually give back the sacrificed
from the beginning of the game.
[ other roads could be 10...c6 11.e6 fxe6 12.d1
c7 ( 12...f7?? 13.d8+ xd8+) 13.e4-+;
and 10...f6 11.e1 ( 11.xg8 xg8 12.exf6 f5
13.e2+ e6 14.e4 h6) 11...e7 12.b5! (
12.d1 xe5-+) 12...a6 13.e6 d8 14.d1 d6
15.xd6+ with great pressure on the Black
defences; Probably the best continuation is
10...c5! ]
11.e1!?
[ 11.e2! e7 12.d5 g4 13.e4 ( 13.e3
xc4 14.f4 e5 15.xc7+ d8 16.xe5
xe5 17.xa8 f6 18.h3-+) 13...f6 14.xf6+
gxf6 15.xb7 d8 16.b5+ with relentless
pressure]
11...d6 12.f4!
[ also 12.g3 can be played leading to 12...f8
13.xe5 f6 14.d5 xg3 15.xd7 xf2+ 16.xf2
xd7 with increasingly more difficult for white to
come up with an equalizing plan.]
12...f6 13.b5?-+
[ 13.b5 f5! 14.d4 g6 and now 15.b5+!
14...e6
[ 14...cxb5? 15.xe5 xe5 16.xd7 xd7
17.xb7 d8 18.f4; perhaps better is to play
14...c7 15.d3 e7 ( 15...f8 16.d5 d7
17.xe5) 16.xd6 xd6 17.xd6 cxb5
18.xe5 fxe5 19.xe5 would not give White
suficcient play for the attack]
XABCDEFGHY
8r+l+k+ntr(
7zpp+-+-zpp'
6-+pvlqzp-+&
5+L+-sn-+-%
4-+-+-vL-+$
3+-sN-+-wQ-#
2PzPP+-zPPzP"
1+-+RtR-mK-!
xabcdefghy
15.g3! g5!
[ 15...f8! 16.xe5 xe5 17.f4 cxb5 18.fxe5
b6+! 19.h1 ( 19.e3 f5 20.d6 c5
21.d5 c7? ( 21...c8) 22.xb5 Brause
Deep Modem/ICS Rated blitz match, 1997/ 1-0
(57)) 19...b4? ( 19...f5 20.f4 e7 21.exf6
xf6 22.xe7 xe7 23.xf5+ g8; 19...g6!)
20.d5! e7 21.xb6 f5 22.b3 axb6
23.d8+ Godden,DMills,M/corr IECG Internet
2000/ 1-0 (37); 15...e7 16.e4 b4 17.xg7
f8 ( 17...g8? 18.xf6+! xf6 19.xf6+)
18.c3 f5 19.xh7 e7 20.e2+ and white is
winning]
16.xe5 fxe5!
[ worse is 16...xe5 17.f4 gxf4 ( 17...g4?=)
18.g7 g4 ( 18...cxb5 19.e4) 19.xh8=]
17.xg5 e7
[ 17...f6? 18.c4 e7 19.xd6 xd6 20.xe5+
d8 21.e4 d1+ 22.f1 d7 23.xf6 c8
XABCDEFGHY
8r+l+k+-tr(
7zppvl-sn-+p'
6-+p+q+-+&
5+L+-zp-wQ-%
4-+-+N+-+$
3+-+-+-+-#
2PzPP+-zPPzP"
1+-+RtR-mK-!
xabcdefghy
18...c7 19.c4 g6!
and White should be lost at this point.
0-1
Chessplayers
@Chess has just released a new DVD with
the chess theory complete. More then
50.000.000 positins with evaluations and
22 move long variations.
This is a must for all players that want to
have what is new in chess at hand at all
times when you studie your game.
Your copy you can order from us at only
69.- Euro by money order.
@chess
O.Forstadsgatan 50
212 12 Malmoe
Sweden
[email protected]
5
1.e4 Nc6, 2.b4 Nxb4, 3.c3 Nc6, 4.d4 e5, [4d5, 5.e5 Bf5, 6.Nf3 e6, 7.Be2 Be7,
8.0-0 Qd7!, IM E. Schiller ] 5.Nf3 exd4, 6.Bc4 Na5, 7.Qxd4 Nxc4, 8.Qxc4 f6,
9.Bf4 d6, 10.Na3 Ne7, 11.Nb5 Nc6, 12.0-0 a6, 13.Nbd4 Ne5, 14.Qd5 Nxf3+,
15.Nxf3 Qd7, 16.Rab1 Qc6, 17.Rfe1 Qxd5, 18.exd5+ Kf7, 19.Nd4 Rb8, 20.Nc6
Ra8, 21.Nd8+ Kg6, 22.Nxb7 Bf5, 23.Rb4 a5, 24.Rb3 Bd3, 25.Rb2 Bc4, 26.Rd2
Kf5, 27.Bg3 g6, 28.h4 Bh6, 29.Rd4 Bxa2, 30.Bxd6 g5, 31.g4+ Kg6, 32.h5+ Kf7,
33.Re7+ Kg8, 34.Bxc7 Bf8, 35.Re2 Bb3, 36.d6 Kf7, 37.d7, 1-0.
O. LEQUEUX M. POUYDESSEAU, corres. Cojeli, 2001
Wheeler gambit
1.e4 Nc6, 2.b4 Nxb4, 3.c3 Nc6, 4.d4 e6, [ 4d5!? ; 4e5 ]
5.Nf3 d5, 6.e5 b6, 7.Bd3 Bb7, 8.0-0 Qd7, 9.Nbd2 Be7, 10.Re1
h5, 11.Nf1 Nh6, 12.Ng3 Ng4, 13.h3 0-0-0, 14.hxg4 hxg4,
15.Ng5 Rdf8, 16.Qxg4 Kb8, 17.a4 Na5, 18.Ba3 Bxa3, 19.Rxa3
Qe7, 20.Ra2 Rh6, 21.Nf3 Rg8, 22.Qg5 Qf8, 23.Nd2 Bc8,
24.Qe3 f5, 25.exf6 gxf6, 26.c4 Qg7, 27.cxd5 Rgh8, 28.dxe6
Bb7, 29.Be4 Nc6, 30.e7 Qxe7, 31.Bxc6 Qd6, 32.Bxb7 Kxb7,
33.Rc2 f5, 34.Qe7 Qf4, 35.Nf3 R6h7, 36.Qe5 Qg4, 37.Rxc7+
Rxc7, 38.Qxh8, 1-0.
4/ And now, ladies and gentlemen, the Diemer Gemeinde :
O. LEQUEUX S. SCHMITT, corres. Cojeli, 2002
Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
1.e4 d5, 2.d4 Nc6, 3.Be3 e5, 4.dxe5 d4, 5.Bf4 g5, 6.Bg3 h5, 7.h4 Bg7, 8.Nf3 Bg4,
9.Be2 Bxf3, 10.Bxf3 g4, 11.Be2 Nxe5, 12.c3 d3, 13.Bxe5 dxe2, 14.Qa4+ Kf8,
15.Bxg7+ Kxg7, 16.Kxe2 Nf6, 17.Nd2 Re8, 18.Rhe1 Qd5, 19.f3 Rad8, 20.Rad1
Qd3+, 21.Kf2 g3+, 22.Kxg3 Qd6+, 23.Kh3 Kh6, 24.e5 Qe6+, 25.Kh2 Nd5, 26.f4
Reg8, 27.Nf3 Qg4, 28.Rd2 Nxf4, 0-1.
E. RODRIGUES C. MALVEAU, corres. 2002
Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
1.d4 Nf6, 2.Nc3 d5, 3.e4 dxe4, 4.f3 exf3, 5.Nxf3 Bg4, 6.h3 Bxf3,
7.Qxf3 c6, 8.g4 Qxd4, 9.Be3 Qb4, 10.0-0-0 e6, 11.Nb5 Na6, 12.Nd4 Qa4?
[ 12...Nd5, 13.Bxa6 bxa6, 14.Nxc6 Qd6, 15.Nd4 (15.Rhfe1!?) 15Qc7,
16.Rhe1(f1) Rc8 ] 13.Bb5 cxb5, 14.Qxb7 Rd8, 15.Nc6 Nd5, 16.Rxd5 exd5,
17.Re1 Qe4, 18.Qxa6 Bb4, 19.Bd2 Bxd2+, 20.Kxd2 Qxe1+, 21.Kxe1 Ra8,
22.Qxb5 0-0, 23.Qxd5 h6, 24.c4 Rae8+, 25.Kd2 Re6, 26.b4 Rfe8, 27.a4 Re2+,
28.Kd3 R8e3+, 29.Kd4 Rxh3, 30.Ne7+, 1-0.
Blackmar-Diemer gambit
1.d4 Nf6, 2.Nc3 d5, 3.e4 dxe4, 4.f3 c6, 5.fxe4 e5, 6.Nf3 exd4, 7.Qxd4 Qxd4,
8.Nxd4 Bb4, 9.Bd3 [ 9.Bc4 Nbd7, 10.O-O Ne5, 11.Bb3 Bc5, 12.Nce2 Bg4,
13.Kh1 O-O, 14.Bf4 Rae8, 15.Nf3 Ng6, 16.h3 Rxe4, 17.hxg4 Rxe2, 18.Bg3 Nxg4,
19.Rad1 Ne3, 20.Rfe1 Rxe1+, 21.Rxe1 h6, 22.Nd2 Nf5, 23.Bh2 Nd4, 24.Ba4 b5,
25.Nb3 Bb4, 26.c3 Nc2, 0-1. Mariette C. Mandel A., Cappelle la Grande 1995 ]
9...O-O, 10.Bd2 Re8, 11.O-O-O Nbd7, 12.h3 Nc5, 13.Rhe1 Bxc3, 14.Bxc3
Nfxe4, 15.Bxe4 Nxe4, 16.Rxe4 Rxe4, 17.Nxc6 Bxh3, 18.Nxa7 Bxg2, 19.Rg1 Rg4,
20.Nb5 h5, 21.Nd4 h4, 22.Nf5 h3, 0-1.
FURET - J.-P. SEBBAN, www.echecs.com, 2001
Englund Gambit
1.d4 e5, 2.dxe5 Nc6, 3.Nf3 f6, 4.e4 Bc5, 5.Qd5 d6, 6.Bc4 Qe7, 7.exd6 Bxd6, 8.c3
Bd7, 9.0-0 0-0-0, 10.Re1 Bg4, 11.Qf7 Bxf3, 12.Qxe7 Ngxe7, 13.gxf3 Ne5,
14.Be6+ Kb8, 15.f4 Nf3+, 16.Kf1 Nxe1, 17.Kxe1 Ng6, 18.f5 Nf4, 19.Bxf4 Bxf4,
20.h3 Rd3, 21.Na3 Rhd8, 22.Nc4 Rxh3, 23.Ke2 b5, 24.Ne3 Bxe3, 25.fxe3 Rh2+,
26.Kf3 Rdd2, 27.Rg1 Rdf2+, 28.Kg3 Rxb2, 29.Rd1 Rbd2, 30.Rb1 c6, 31.a4 a6,
32.c4 Rb2, 33.Rd1 Rhd2, 34.Rxd2 Rxd2, 35.cxb5 cxb5, 36.axb5 axb5, 37.Kf3
b4, 38.e5 fxe5, 39.Ke4 Re2, 40.Kd3 Re1, 41.e4 h5, 42.Kc4 Rxe4+, 0-1.
5/ Two Splatvian gambits to close this article :
X. BARDIN O. LEQUEUX, corres. Cojeli, 2003
Latvian gambit
1.e4 e5, 2.Nf3 f5, 3.Nxe5 Qf6, 4.d4 d6, 5.Nc4 fxe4, 6.Nc3 Qg6, 7.Bf4 Nf6,
8.Nb5 [ 8.Ne3! ] 8Na6, 9.Qd2 Be7, 10.0-0-0 0-0, 11.Be2 Nd5, 12.g3 Bd7,
13.Nc3 Nab4, 14.Ne3 Nxc3, 15.bxc3 Nc6, 16.h4 Nd8, 17.Nd5 Qf7, 18.Bc4 Be6,
19.Nxe7+ Qxe7, 20.d5 Bf5, 21.f3 exf3, 22.Rde1 Qd7, 23.Re3 b5, 24.Bb3 a5,
25.a3 Nb7, 26.Rhe1 Rae8, 27.Rxf3 Nc5, 28.Rfe3 Re4, 29.Rxe4 Nxe4, 30.Qd4
Re8, 31.g4 Bg6, 32.h5 Qxg4, 33.Bh6 gxh6, 34.hxg6 hxg6, 35.Rg1 Qf4+, 0-1.
D. MAILHAN M. DELIGNY, corres. Cojeli, 2002
Latvian gambit
1.e4 e5, 2.Nf3 f5, 3.Nxe5 Qf6, 4.d4 d6, 5.Nc4 fxe4, 6.Be2 Qd8, 7.Nc3 d5, 8.Ne5
Nf6, 9.0-0 Be7, 10.f3 exf3, 11.Bxf3 0-0, 12.Bg5 c6, 13.Qd3 Kh8, 14.Qe2 Nbd7,
15.Rae1 Nxe5, 16.Qxe5 Bd6, 17.Qe2 Bd7, 18.Qd2 Qc7, 19.h3 Bg3, 20.Re2 b5,
21.a3 a5, 22.Nd1 Ne4, 23.Bxe4 Bh2+, 0-1.
*
More informations on gambits with the kind french website : Mieux Jouer Aux
Echecs, http://www.mjae.com : Emil Diemer, David Gedult and B.D.G., Diemer
duhm gambit, Latvian gambit, Bogart gambit, Fajarovicz gambit, Boden gambit,
[and Chess history, Chessbooks, Links, etc.]
10
by Lev D. Zilbermints
Chapter 1: History
The Euwe Defense to the Blackmar- Diemer Gambit is a solid, yet very passive
set-up. It was originally recommended by former World Champion (1935-1937) Dr. Max
Euwe in 1950/1951 in the German chess press. Euwes original line ran 1 d4 d5 2 e4
de4 3 Nc3 Nf6 4 f3 ef3 5 Nxf3 e6 (Euwe Defense). Diemer continued 6 Bg5 here,
pinning the Knight to the Queen. Now, here Dr. Euwe originally suggested 6...c5?!.
This was refuted brilliantly by
7 Bxf6! Qxf6 8 Bb5+ c6 9 00! with advantage to White. The point is that after
9...cb5 10 Ne5! leaves White with a crushing attack and a lead in development. Thus,
it was not long before improvements were found for the Black side.
HISTORICAL GAMES:
(1) Diemer - Locher, Correspondence 1950:
1 d4 d5 2 e4 de4 3 Nc3 Nf6 4 f4 ef3 5 Nxf3 This is probably one of the first games
that Diemer played with the 5 Nxf3 line. Prior to 1950 he always played 5 Qxf3!, the
Ryder Gambit. 5...e6 6 Bg5 Be7 7 Bd3 Nbd7 8 Qe2 00 9 00 Re8 Probably the
first game with the Re8-Nf8 maneuver. 10 Qf2 Nf8 11 Qh4 Ng6 12 Bxg6 fxg6 13
Ne5 Nd5 14 Ne4 Nf6 15 c3 Nxe4 16 Bxe7 Qxe7 17 Qxe4 c6 18 Rf7 Qd8 19
Raf1 Qd5 20 Ng6! 1- 0.
(2) Diemer - Berner, Aulendorf, 1951:
11
Rastatt, Germany
1955
1. d4 d5 2. e4 dxe4 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. f3 exf3 5. Nxf3 e6 6. Bg5 Be7 7. Bd3 Nc6 8.
Ne2 Nb4 9. a3 Nxd3+ 10. Qxd3 h6 11. Bf4 c5 12. O-O-O O-O 13. h3 cxd4 14. Nexd4
a6 15. g4 Nd5 16. Bd2 Bd7 17. h4 Rc8 18. Bxh6 gxh6 19. g5 h5 20. Ne5 Nf4 21. Qf3
Ng6 22. Nxd7 Qxd7 23. Qxh5 Qa4 0-1
In 1960, two little-known players, J. Capdevila and A. Brizzio, played what became the
pre-Stammpartie (pre-Stem game) of the Zilbermints Gambit. Although the move order
and position varied slightly, the position that arose that day in the Argentine tournament
set the tone for further exploration.
J. Capdevila - A. Brizzio, Argentina, 1960
1 d4 d5 2 e4 de4 3 Nc3 Nf6 4 f3 ef3 5 Nxf3 e6 6 Bg5 Bb4 This Bishop move used to
enjoy some popularity in the early days, but not anymore. Its main drawback is that it
leaves the Nf6 pinned, and loses a tempo after White plays a3 at some point. 7 Bd3
Nc6 8 00 Nxd4 9 Ne4 Not the best, but then, 9 Kh1 was yet unknown. 9...Be7 This
makes 6...Bb4, in effect, a wasted move. 10 Ne5 Bf5 In this position Black is two
pawns up, while White has all the pieces developed. Now the fireworks start. 11 Nxf6+!
gf6 12 Nxf7+ Kxf7 13 Qh5+ Kg8 14 Rxf5! Qd4+ 14...ef5 15 Bc4+ ++- 15 Rf2 Bd7
16 Raf1 Qc5?
16...Bc5! offered better holding chances. 17 h4 Be8 18 Qh6 fg5 19 Qxe6+
Kg7 20 Kh1! And now the Rook comes into decisive action. 20...Qd6
21 Rf7+ Bxf7 22 Qxf7+ Kh6 23 hg5 Bxg5 24 Rf3 Raf8 25 Rh3+ 1- 0.
The above game was the forerunner of the Zilbermints Gambit in the Euwe Defense. It
has both 7 Bd3 Nc6 and 8 00 Nxd4. However, the follow-up move 9 Kh1 was not first
played until 1968. It would be another quarter-century (1968-1993) before 7 Bd3 Nc6 8
00! Nxd4 9 Kh1! was extensively analyzed and understood by myself. Still another ten
years (1993-2003) would pass before this gambit began slowly showing up in BDG
correspondence games by German players.
In 1968, the first round of the First Blackmar-Diemer Gambit World
correspondence tournament started. The game Joachim Fechner - Walter Schneider,
went 1 d4 d5 2 e4 de4 3 Nc3 Nf6 4 f3 ef3 5 Nxf3 e6 6 Bg5 Be7
7 Bd3 Nc6 8 00! Nxd4 9 Kh1! A new and radical move. However, this was the
1960s, and all sorts of new things were tried and invented Nxf3 10 Qxf3 c6 The
9...Nxf3 line is the easiest to play against. White piles up the pressure on the squares
f7, h7, and the open d- and e- files to get good play. 11 Rad1 Bd7 12 Ne4 00 13
Nxf6+ Bxf6 14 Qe4 g6 15 Bf6 Qe8 16 Qf4 1- 0.
13
However, the dynamics of 8 00! Nxd4 9 Kh1! Were not well-understood in the late
1960s by the public at large. It would be another 25 years (1968 - 1993) before the
whole line was thoroughly analyzed and rediscovered by Lev D. Zilbermints. In this, the
Zilbermints Gambit in the Euwe Defense was very similar to the Ryder Gambit, 1 d4 d5
2 e4 de4 3 Nc3 Nf6 4 f3 ef3 5 Qxf3!
Both variations have double - pawn sacrifices; both had one game played; and both had
to wait decades to be rediscovered. The Ryder Gambit, 1898 - 1931; Zilbermints Gambit
in the Euwe, 1968 - 1993.
Deutsche Schachzeitung, 8/1901:
Dr. Ryder - NN, Leipzig, 1898
1 d4 d5 2 e4 de4 3 Nc3 Nf6 4 f3 ef3 5 Qxf3 Qxd4 6 Be3 Qg4 7 Qf2 Qb4 8 000 Ng4 9
Nd5 Qa5 10 Bb5+ c6 11 Bb6 Na6 12 Qc5 Qxb6 13 Bxa6 e5 14 Qxb6 axb6 15 Nc7+
Ke7 16 Nxa8 Nf2 17 Nxb6 Bg4 18 Be2 Nxh1 19 Bxg4 Nf2 20 Rd7+, 1- 0.
During the 1980s and early 1990s, interest in the 8 00 Nxd4 line re-awakened.
Attempts were made to reintroduce the line into tournament play. The main question
was: What should White play after 7 Bd3 Nc6 8 00 Nxd4 ?
What is Whites best chance to get a crushing attack for two pawns? Keep in mind that
while the game Fechner-Schneider, 1 BDGW, 1968, was known, no one really bothered
to analyze 9 Kh1!.
It must be noted that the early pre -1993 experiments focused on other 9th moves:
9 Nxd4 and 9 Ne5. Later, in 1997, a third move was discovered - 9 Bf4.
Had it been played correctly in its inaugural game, 9 Bf4 could have given White good
chances.
GAMES:
X. Richard - Jurgen Sparka
Aachen, Germany
Hochschule Championship
Rd. 7
November 1982
1 d4 d5 2 e4 de4 3 Nc3 Nf6 4 f3 ef3 5 Nxf3 e6 6 Bg5 Be7 7 Bd3 Nc6 8 00 Nxd4 9
Nxd4?! This move is speculative, as Black gets to recapture with check.
Although Black has an extra tempo to consolidate his position, the Queen is somewhat
exposed. 9...Qxd4 10 Kh1 Qe5 In the game Peter Grott - F. Binger, September 2003,
Germany, Muensterland Verbandclasse, Black played the more conservative 10...Bd7.
The game continued 11 Qe2 Qg4! 12 Qd2 Bc6 13 Rf2 Rd8 14 Raf1 00 15 Bf4 Bd6
16 Bxd6 Rxd6 17 b4 a6 18 Rf4 Qg5 19 h3 Nh5 20 Kh2 Nxf4 21 Rxf4 f5 22 Qf2 Bxg2
14
23 Be4 Bxe4 24 Nxe4 Qe7 25 Nd6 Qd6 26 Kg2 Rf6 27 Rd4 Qf6 28 Kh2 Rf8 29 c4
Qb6 30 c5 Qc6 31 a4 Qa4 32 Qd2
Qc6 33 Rd7 e5 34 Re7 e4 35 Qf4 Qf6 36 Rd7 Qd2+ 37 Rd2 Qc3 38 Rf2 Re8
39 Qc7 Qe5+ 40 Qxe5 Rxe5 0 -1 11 Bf6? Perhaps this Bishop capture is not a good
idea. gf6 12 Qf3 c6 13 Rae1 Qc7 14 b4 Bd7 15 b5 000 16 Rb1 f5 17 Rb3 Bd6 18
Rfb1 b6 19 bxc6 Bxc6 20 Ba6+ Kb8 21 Qh3 Rhg8 22 Bf1 Bc5 23 a4 Rd2 24 Nb5
Rdxg2 25 Rf3 Bxf3 0-1
In 1986 - 1988, Rev. Timothy Sawyer, a strong master, played two games with 7 Bd3
Nc6 8 00. However, in both games, his opponents played (after 6 Bg5 ) 6...Bb4. They
also declined to capture the d4 - pawn immediately.
Sawyer - Anonymous
Fort Washington, Pennsylvania, USA
1986
PRE - ZILBERMINTS GAMBIT DELAYED
1 d4 d5 2 e4 de4 3 Nc3 Nf6 4 f3 ef3 5 Nxf3 e6 6 Bg5 Bb4 7 Bd3 Nc6 8 00 Rev.
Sawyer decides to take a chance and play the gambit line. 8...00 9 Ne4 Nxd4 In the
first edition of Blackmar-Diemer Gambit Keybook (1992), Rev. Sawyer gives 9...Be7
10 Nxf6 gxf6 12 Kh1 Qd5 13 Ne5!? as a way of declining the double gambit. The text
move, 9...Nxd4, is a form of the Zilbermints Gambit Delayed. 10 Nxf6+ gf6 11 Bh6
Re8 12 c3 Nxf3+ 13 Qxf3 Bc5+ 14 Kh1 Kg8 15 Bxh7+ Kxh7 16 Bxf8 Rxf8 17
Qh5+ Kg8 18 Qg4+ Kh8 19 Rf3 1- 0
The next game featured the Declined version of the gambit.
PRE-ZILBERMINTS GAMBIT DECLINED
Sawyer - Black
Horsham, Pennsylvania
1988
(Moves 1-7 as in previous game) 8 00 Bxc3? It is not a good idea to trade the
Bishop. White gets a strong d4 - pawn, and the two-Bishop advantage. 9 bxc3 00
10 Qe1 The thematic Queen maneuver. Rb8 11 Qh4 b5 12 Bxf6 Qxf6 13 Qxh7 mate,
1- 0.
And finally, the game that connected the experiments of the 1980s to the 1990s.
It also served as a prototype for the 8 00 Nxd4 9 Kh1 variation. Though it was published
in Scottish and American chess magazines, I was unaware of it. Only recently did I
come across this game, played by two German players in a correspondence
tournament. Originally, the game was published in Scottish CC Association publication
#36. Tom V. Purser then published this game in his magazine, Blackmar-Diemer Gambit
World #48. November/December 1991.
15
I reproduce much of his comments and analyses for the game here, with due credit.
Pursers comments are in italics.
PRE-ZILBERMINTS GAMBIT DELAYED
B. Geisler G. Heidemann
16
13 Raf1 Bf6 14 Bxf6, 1-0, Sawyer - guest, ICC, 1997. 11 Bxf5 ef5 12 Rad1 Qe8 13
Ne5?? Be6?? Oops! Both players missed 13...Bc5+! winning the Ne5 and the game for
Black. 14 Rf3 Rd8 15 Rh3 Rd1 16 Nd1 Qd8 17 Ne3 Bc5 18 Bf6 Qd1+
19 Kf2 Qd2+ 20 Kf1 Qc1+ 21 Ke2 Qe3 22 Rxe3 Bxe3 23 Kxe3 gf6 24 Qf6 Re8
25 Kf4 Bd5 26 Kg5 Re6 27 Qxf7+ Kh8 28 Qf8 mate, 1- 0
The next game was played just a few weeks before I invented my gambit. I had an easy
win, but did not see the winning move. I believe that this game played a critical part in
inventing the Zilbermints Gambit.
PRE-ZILBERMINTS GAMBIT DELAYED
Zilbermints - Della Selva
United States Amateur Team East
February 14, 1993
(Moves 1-10 identical to Zilbermints - Gaspard) 10...Nxf3? 11 Rxf3 h6?
12 Bxh6 e5 13 Bg5? This is incorrect. The winning move is 13 Bxg7! which wins in all
variations. 13...Qd4+ Forcing a Queen trade. 14 Qxd4 exd4 15 Nb5 c5
16 Nc7 Rb8
17 Re1 Bd8 18 Bxf6 Bxc7 19 Be7 Re8 20 Bb5 Bg4 21 Ra3? Rxe7 22 Rxe7 Bd6
23 Re8+ Rxe8 24 Bxe6 a6 The game score in Blackmar-Diemer Gambit Keybook II
(1999) stops here, with +=, 0 -1. Given is the continuation. Blacks two Bishops are
very powerful. Perhaps with accurate play they could be neutralized. Eleven years
earlier, I was not that good. Nowadays (2004) I can beat International Masters, but this
was 1993... 25 h3 Bc1 26 c4 Be2 27 Ba4 Bxc4 28 Bb3 Bb5 29 Ba4 Be2 30 Kf2
d3 31 Rc3 Be5 32 Rc1 Bxb2 33 Rb1 Bd4+ 34 Ke1 b5 35 Bd1 Bc3+ 36 Kf2
Bxd1 37 Rxd1 c4 38 Ke3 Kf8 39 h4 Ke7 40 g4 f6... Eventually 0-1
While I was busy analyzing the variations after 8 00 Nxd4 9 Kh1! another two games
were played. In the first game, White tried getting into form of the Gambit Delayed; in
the second White could have won early on.
Harper - Dowling
Blackmar - Diemer Gambit Thematic
Correspondence, 1993
5 Nxf3 e6 6 Bg5 Be7 7 Bd3 Nc6 8 a3 Intended to prevent the Nb4 maneuver.
Usually there are no double-gambits herebut watch what happens. 8...h6
9
Bd2 Nxd4 What did I say earlier? There we go! 10 Bf4?! Better is 10 00! transposing
to Zilbermints Gambit-like lines. 10...c5! This move can be extremely complicated even
in regular ZG lines! Here Black might have an edge. 11 00 Bd7 12 Ne5? Another
mistake. Best was 12 Nxd4!? 12...Bc6 13 Qe1 a6 14 Qg3 g5 15 Rae1 Nh5 16 Qg4
Nxf4 17 Rxf4 gf4 18 Qg7 Rf8 19 Bg6 Nf3+ 20 gf3 Qd4+
21 Kf1 000 22 Bxf7 Bh4 23 Bxe6+ Kb8 24 Re2 Bxf3, 0-1
17
The following game makes me wonder: If White had a Queen, why on Earth did he play
so sloppily?
Wedge - Hoffman
USA 1993
5 Nxf3 e6 6 Bg5 Be7 7 Bd3 Nc6 8 00 Nxd4 9 Ne5 This move was more often seen in
the early 1990s than other. Williams - Wolfe, Spartanburg, SC, Open, 1991, was already
well-known by this time. In that game, Black played 9...h6, chasing away the Bg5. Here
the game takes on a different turn. 9...a6 10 Qe1 Bd7
11 Qh4 Nf5 12 Bxf5 gf5 13 Rad1 Bd6 14 Rae1? A mistake. Best was 14 Bxf6! gf6
(14...Qxf6 15 Qxf6 gf6 16 Nd7 Kd7 17 Rf6! +=) 15 Nxd7 Qxd7 (15...Kxd7 16 Rxf5! ++-)
16 Qxf6! ++- with winning chances (or at least a draw) in all variations. 14...Be6 15 Nd5
Bxe5 16 Nxf6+ Bxf6 17 Rd8 Bxd8 18 Bxd8 Rxd8 19 Qh5 00
20 Rd1 g6 21 Qf3 c6 22 Rxd8 Rxd8 23 Qe2 Rd4 24 b3 b5 25 c3 Re4 26 Qd2 Bd5
27 h3 a5 28 c4 bc4 29 bc4 Rc4 30 Qxa5 Rc1+ 31 Kf2 Rxa2 32 Ke3 Rxa2 33
Qd8+ Kg7 34 g4 Ra3+ 35 Kf4 h6 36 gf5 Rf3+ 37 Ke5 Rxf5 38 Kd6
Bg2 39 Kc7 c5 40 h4 h5 41 Kb6 Bf1 42 Ka5 Rf6 43 Ka4 Bc4 44 Ka3?? Rf2! 01
And finally, my first game with the Zilbermints Gambit Accepted:
Zilbermints - Kopiecki, Edward
First Blackmar-Diemer Gambit Discussion Match (1 BDM)
Marshall Chess Club, New York City
Game/5 minutes
4 April 1993
1 d4 d5 2 e4 de4 3 Nc3 Nf6 4 f3 ef3 5 Nxf3 e6 6 Bg5 Be7 7 Bd3 Nc6 8 00 Nxd4
9 Kh1 c5 This was a new move at the time. Luckily, I had spent considerable time
analyzing it the previous month. 10 Bxf6 Bxf6 11 Ne4 b6? 12 Nd4 Bd4 13 Qf3!
00 14 Nf6+ Qf6 15 Qa8 I win a Rook and the rest is just technique. 15...Qh6?!
16 Qf3 Bb2 17 Rab1 Be5 18 h3 Bd7 19 Rbe1 f6? 20 Rxe5! Bc6 21 Qc6 fxe5
22 Rf8 Kf8 23 Qd7+ Kf6 24 Qd7+ Kf6 25 Qd8+ Kf7 26 Be2! Qc1 27 Qd1 Qxd1+
28 Bxd1 Kf6 29 Kg1 e4 30 Kf2 Ke5 31 Ke3 c4 32 c3 b5 33 Bc2 a5
34 a3 g6 35 Be4 b4 36 cb ab 37 ab c3 38 Bc2 Kd5 39 Kd3, 1- 0
So, we have traveled from the beginnings of the Euwe Defense and the 6 Bg5 Be7
(and 6...Bb4) 7 Bd3 Nc6 line in the early 1950s to 1968. After that, we saw the
gradual development of the 8 00 Nxd4 line in the between 1982 and 1993.
I will write Chapter 2 by the next issue. Hope you liked this one!
Questions? You can e-mail me at [email protected]
18
****************************************************************************************************
****
Games added by D. Rozzoni: a few BDG played in 2003 Both players elo > 2.200
Abbasifar,H (2284) Safarli,E (2232) [D00]
Friendship Cup AZEIRI Baku AZE (9), 06.04.2003
1.d4 Nf6 2.Nc3 d5 3.e4 dxe4 4.f3 exf3 5.Nxf3 Bf5 6.Bc4 e6 7.0-0 Nbd7 8.d5 Bc5+ 9.Kh1 0-0 10.dxe6
Bxe6 11.Bxe6 fxe6 12.Qe2 Qe7 13.Bg5 Rae8 14.Rae1 Bb4 15.Nd4 Bxc3 16.bxc3 e5 17.Nf5 Qe6 18.c4
Nc5 19.Bc1 Nce4 20.Qd3 Rd8 21.Qh3 Kh8 22.Qh4 Nd6 23.Ne3 Rf7 24.Bb2 Rdf8 25.h3 Nd7 26.Rxf7 Qxf7
-
19
20
21
1
2
3
Hiarcs 8
Fritz 8
Shredder 7
1
**
01
0
2
10
**
01
3
1
10
**
2.5/4
2.0/4
1.5/4
22
23
Il rientro: Si rientra nella variante 1.d4 f5 2.Nc3 d5 e4 dal gambetto Blackmar Diemer: 1.d4 d5
2.e4 dxe4 3.Nc3 f5 . Come accennato si pu scegliere anche lordine di mosse: 1.Nc3 f5 2.d4.
Naturalmente dopo 1.d4 f5 2.Nc3 d5 e4 e la spinta in f3 del bianco al momento opportuno, si rientra nel
Gambetto Staunton.
Le partite :
23.Txe7+ Rb6 24.Txb7+ Ra5 25.Txb4 Rxb4 26.Db7+ Db6 27.Dxa8 Rb5+] 21.De5+
[21.Af4+ Rd7 22.Cf6+ Rc8 23.Cxe8 Dxe8 24.Txe7 Dxe7 25.Dxe7+] 21...Rd7 22.Axe7
Db6?? [22...Dxe7 23.Dxf5+ Rc7 24.Txe7+ Txe7+] 23.Cf6++ [23.De6+ Rc7 24.Ad6+
Rd8 25.Dxe8#] 23...Rc8 24.Cxe8 [24.Dxf5+ Rc7 25.Dd7+ Rb8 26.Ad6+ Cc7 27.Txe8#]
24...Cb4 [24...c5 25.Dxf5+ Rb8 26.Dd7 Dh6+ 27.Te3 b6 28.Ad6+ Dxd6 29.Cxd6 cxd4
30.Te8#] 25.De6+ [25.De6+ Rb8 26.Ad6+ Dc7 27.Axc7#] 1-0
Gonzalez de la Nava,A (2365) Cenal Gutierrez,R (2250) [A80]
ch Linares ESP (5), 1998
1.d4 f5 2.Cc3 d6 3.e4 g6 4.exf5 Axf5 5.Ad3 Dd7 6.Cf3 Ag7 7.0-0 Cf6 8.Te1 0-0 9.Axf5
Dxf5 [9...gxf5!? 10.Cg5 e5] 10.Txe7 Cc6 [10...Ca6!?+] 11.Te2 [11.Txc7!? Cb4
12.Txb7 Cxc2 13.Tb1+] 11...Cd5 12.Cxd5 Dxd5 13.c3 Ce5 14.Cd2 Cg4 15.Cf1 c5
16.h3 Cxf2 17.Txf2 Txf2 18.Rxf2 Tf8+ 19.Rg1 cxd4 20.Ae3 Txf1+ 21.Rxf1 Df7+?
[21...Dc4+ 22.De2 Dxe2+ 23.Rxe2 dxe3 24.Rxe3 Rf7+] 22.Af2 dxc3 23.bxc3 Axc3
24.Tc1 [24.Tc1 Ae5 25.Db3+] 1-0
27
Toyota M, vs Gifford, G.
XABCDEFGHY
8rsnlwqkvl-tr(
7zpp+-+p+p'
6-+-zp-+psn&
5+-+Pzp-+-%
4-+L+-+-+$
3+-+-+Q+-#
2PzPP+-zPPzP"
1tRNvL-mK-sNR!
xabcdefghy
After 7. . e5
8.g3 f5 9.h4 Ng4 10.Bg5 Qa5+ 11.c3 Bg7
12.b3?? Perhaps b3 was played to save
some time on the clock? However, White
apparently suffers from the illusion that the
c3 pawn is not an issue since both his
Queen and Knight protect it. 12.h5 would
equalize, according to Fritz. 12...e4
XABCDEFGHY
8rsnl+k+-tr(
7zpp+-+-vlp'
6-+-zp-+p+&
5wq-+P+pvL-%
4-+L+p+nzP$
3+PzP-+QzP-#
2P+-+-zP-+"
1tRN+-mK-sNR!
xabcdefghy
After 12.. . e4
13. Qf4?? [13.Qe2 Fritz] 13...Bxc3+-+
14.Nxc3 Qxc3+ 15.Ke2 Qxa1 16.Qxd6
Qb2+ 17.Kf1 Qxf2# 0-1
Fritz shows the following line for 17. Kd1:
[17.Kd1 Qb1+ 18.Kd2 e3+ 19.fxe3 Qxa2+
20.Kc3 Qa1+ 21.Kc2-+]
XABCDEFGHY
8rsnlwq-trk+(
7+-+-+nvlp'
6-+pzppzpp+&
5zpp+-+-+-%
4-+-zPP+-+$
3zPL+-vLN+-#
2-zPPwQNzPPzP"
1tR-+-+RmK-!
xabcdefghy
After 11. . O-O
30
XABCDEFGHY
8-snq+r+-mk(
7+-+-trnvlp'
6-+-+-zpp+&
5zpp+-+l+-%
4-+-zP-+-sN$
3zPLzP-vL-+-#
2-zP-wQ-zPPzP"
1+-+RtR-mK-!
xabcdefghy
After 22. c3 ??
Fritz now states that White is ruining his
position; and that after 22. Nxf5 White can
hope to live 22...Qxf5 23.Qxa5] 22...Nd6
23.Bh6?? Rxe1+ [Here Fritz suggests a
better move order based on the same
principles 23...Bxh6 24.f4 Bxf4 25.Qf2-+]
But this is a game with 15 minute time
control and I was happy with my plan.
24.Rxe1 Rxe1+ 25.Qxe1 Bxh6 26.Qe7 Ne8
XABCDEFGHY
8-snq+n+-mk(
7+-+-wQ-+p'
6-+-+-zppvl&
5zpp+-+l+-%
4-+-zP-+-sN$
3zPLzP-+-+-#
2-zP-+-zPPzP"
1+-+-+-mK-!
xabcdefghy
After 26. .. Ne8
XABCDEFGHY
8-snq+-+-mk(
7+-sn-+-vlp'
6-+-+-wQ-+&
5zpp+-+p+-%
4-+-zP-+-+$
3zPLzP-+-+-#
2-zP-+-zPPzP"
1+-+-+-mK-!
xabcdefghy
Final Position, White Resigns
**************************************************
31
of the italian Chess Review Scacco including some issues of the years 1990, 1992,
1994 (including the Fischer-Spassky 1992 match). If interested pls. contact me at
[email protected]
**************************************************************************************************************
*****
Our chessfriend Erik Jensen has done a great job preparing the attached e-books. As he has
done this work starting from the games, we wold like that paople who submit their articles and
would like our support to put together an e-book/journal out of their work they should follow the
following simple rules:
1. Proper title
2. Sections of the article should be clearly layed out.
3. All the games for the article should be provided with annotations included if there are any. We
don't mind if they are in text format, but do prefer that they could be sent to me in pgn format. We
can add the annotations later.
4. We would like the information sent to us to be checked for errors, ie- spelling, grammar, etc.
These are the basic things we need. Thanks everybody for your support and mostly thanks Erik
for his willingness to put together these e-books.
Some recent UCO Games:
[Event "Thematic 10'+5 sec per move played on D. Rozzoni own pc AMD Athlon
2000+ Ram 256 - Hash Tab 44Mb "]
[Date "2004.04.18"]
[White "Fritz 8, (No MMX)"]
[Black "Shredder, 7."]
1. e4 Nc6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 e5 4. dxe5 d4 5. Nd5 Nge7 {the game starts after this move} 6.
Bg5 Qd7 7. Bc4 Nxe5 8. Qxd4 N7c6 9. Qc3 Nxc4 10. Qxc4 Bd6 11. Bf4 O-O 12. O-O-O
Qg4 13. Bxd6 cxd6 14. g3 Be6 15. f3 Qg5+ 16. f4 Qh5 17. Qb5 Bg4 18. Rd3 Rfe8 19.
Qxb7 Rac8 20. h3 a5 21. a3 Be6 22.Qb5 Qg6 23. Nf3 Bd7 24. Qb7 Rcd8 25. Qc7 f6 26.
Nd2 Rf8 27. Rd1 Qh5 28. Nc4 Qxh3 29. Nxd6 Ra8 30. Rb3 Nd8 31. Nb6 Bg4 32. Nxa8
Ne6 33. Qc4 Bxd1 34. Nf5 Bg4 35. Qxe6+ Kh8 36. Nb6 Qf1+ 37. Kd2 Qd1+ 38. Kc3
Rd8 39. Rb5 Qf3+ 40. Kc4 Qe2+ 41. Kc5 Bxf5 42. Qxf5 Qxc2+ 43. Nc4 Qf2+ 44. Kc6
Qd4 45. Qe6 h6 46. Nd6 Rg8 47. e5 fxe5 48. Nf7+ Kh7 49. Qf5+ g6 50. Ng5+ hxg5 51.
Rb7+ Rg7 52. Rxg7+ Kxg7 53.Qxe5+ 1-0
North,R (2234) - Welling,G (2361) [A10]
Western Canadian Open Richmond CAN (2), 10.07.2004
1.c4 g5 2.d4 Bg7 3.Nc3 h6 4.g3 c5 5.d5 Bxc3+ 6.bxc3 d6 7.h4 g4 8.e4 Qa5 9.Bd2 Nf6
10.Bd3 Nbd7 11.f4 gxf3 12.Nxf3 Ng4 13.Qc2 Nde5 14.Nxe5 Nxe5 15.0-0 Bh3 16.Rf2
Rg8 17.Bf4 Ng4 18.Rh2 Nxh2 19.Kxh2 Bd7 20.Bxh6 0-0-0 21.Bf4 f6 22.Rb1 Rh8
23.Qb3 Qc7 24.Qa3 Kb8 25.Qb3 Rdg8 26.Bf1 Bc8 27.Bh3 Bxh3 28.Kxh3 b6 29.Qc2
Rh7 30.Rh1 Qc8+ 31.Kh2 Qg4 32.Qf2 Rgh8 0-1
Welling,G (2361) - Haukenfrers,D [A00]
Western Canadian Open Richmond CAN (3), 11.07.2004
1.b4 g5 2.Bb2 Nf6 3.c4 c5 4.b5 a6 5.a4 axb5 6.axb5 Rxa1 7.Bxa1 Bg7 8.Nc3 0-0 9.e3 e6
10.Nge2 d5 11.Ng3 d4 12.Na4 b6 13.Bd3 e5 14.0-0 Re8 15.Bf5 Nbd7 16.d3 Bb7 17.e4
Nf8 18.Bb2 Ng6 19.Bc1 Nf4 20.Ne2 Qc7 21.g3 Kh8 22.gxf4 exf4 23.f3 Rg8 24.Kh1 Bf8
25.Rg1 Bd6 26.Qf1 Rg7 27.h4 h6 28.hxg5 hxg5 29.Qh3+ Kg8 30.Kg2 g4 31.fxg4 Be5
32.Rh1 Kf8 33.Kf3 Bc8 34.g5 Rxg5 35.Qh6+ Rg7 36.Bxf4 Bxf5 37.Qxf6 Bg4+ 38.Kf2
Bxf6 39.Bxc7 Bxe2 40.Kxe2 Rg2+ 41.Kf1 Ra2 42.Bd6+ Kg7 43.Rg1+ Kh6 44.Nxb6
Bh4 45.Rh1 Ra1+ 46.Kg2 Ra2+ 47.Kf3 Rf2+ 48.Kg4 Rf6 49.Rxh4+ Kg6 50.Bf4 1-0
33
34