Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 17 views

    Married Women's Property Act, 1882: D. Venkata Krishna (2015031

    Uploaded by

    praveen
    This document provides an abstract for a case study on the 1952 case Best vs Samuel Fox & Company. The case involved a married woman seeking damages for loss of consortium from her husband's negligent injury by a third party. The judges who heard the case are named. The abstract explains that the case study will discuss the facts of the case, relevant issues, reasoning regarding negligence law, the Married Women's Property Act of 1882, and cite precedent cases to conclude how the decision relates to the concept of negligence. The full case analysis with descriptions and additional findings will be included in the project.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Married Women's Property Act, 1882: D. Venkata Krishna (2015031

    Uploaded by

    praveen
    17 views1 page
    This document provides an abstract for a case study on the 1952 case Best vs Samuel Fox & Company. The case involved a married woman seeking damages for loss of consortium from her husband's negligent injury by a third party. The judges who heard the case are named. The abstract explains that the case study will discuss the facts of the case, relevant issues, reasoning regarding negligence law, the Married Women's Property Act of 1882, and cite precedent cases to conclude how the decision relates to the concept of negligence. The full case analysis with descriptions and additional findings will be included in the project.

    Original Description:

    xx

    Original Title

    LT_2015_031_(ABSTRACT)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides an abstract for a case study on the 1952 case Best vs Samuel Fox & Company. The case involved a married woman seeking damages for loss of consortium from her husband's negligent injury by a third party. The judges who heard the case are named. The abstract explains that the case study will discuss the facts of the case, relevant issues, reasoning regarding negligence law, the Married Women's Property Act of 1882, and cite precedent cases to conclude how the decision relates to the concept of negligence. The full case analysis with descriptions and additional findings will be included in the project.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    17 views1 page

    Married Women's Property Act, 1882: D. Venkata Krishna (2015031

    Uploaded by

    praveen
    This document provides an abstract for a case study on the 1952 case Best vs Samuel Fox & Company. The case involved a married woman seeking damages for loss of consortium from her husband's negligent injury by a third party. The judges who heard the case are named. The abstract explains that the case study will discuss the facts of the case, relevant issues, reasoning regarding negligence law, the Married Women's Property Act of 1882, and cite precedent cases to conclude how the decision relates to the concept of negligence. The full case analysis with descriptions and additional findings will be included in the project.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    SUBJECT: Legal Theory

    CASE STUDY: Best vs Samuel Fox & Company, 1952


    Citation of the above case is [1952] A.C. 716
    ABSTRACT:
    In this project, the researcher wants to do case study on the case law on Best vs Samuel Fox
    & Company, 1952. In this case, Judges involved are Lord Porter, Lord Goddard, Lord Oaksey,
    Lord Morton of Henryton and Lord Reid, of APPEAL from the Court of Appeal. The facts of the
    case stated by Lord Goddard and the Judgment passed by Lord Porter, Lord Goddard, Lord
    Oaksey, Lord Morton of Henryton and Lord Reid.
    Firstly, the researcher starts with the statement of facts in brief like how a married
    woman whose husband has been injured by a negligent act or omission has no right of action
    against the negligent person in respect of loss or impairment of consortium consequential on the
    injury. After the researcher points outs the issues in the above case law and gives the reasoning
    in legally how this particular case is related to the concept of negligence.
    Moreover, he mainly explains the reasons how it is settled law that a husband can bring
    an action per quod consortium amisit in respect of any tort by a third person resulting in injury
    to his wife and thereby depriving him of that consortium will be mentioned in the project.
    In middle of this case study researcher also takes part to point out Involvement of the Married
    Women's Property Act, 1882 will be explained in the project. Researcher according to our
    university research guide will do all the citation methods and conduct of research. Finally
    researcher wants to conclude the case after solving the point of issues involved by using the
    decision held in the present case and another related particular decided cases on the concept of
    negligence.
    The detailed description of this case analysis with relevant and precedent cases will be
    mentioned in this project, any other findings will be added to the final project with suggestions
    and recommendations

    By, D. Venkata Krishna (2015031), Sec. A , 4th semester.

    You might also like